Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-04 ApplicationAugust 13, 2004 Mr. Evan Wyatt 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: REZONING #09 -04, DAVID AND LINDA HICKS Dear Evan: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of August 12, 2004. The above referenced application was approved to rezone .85 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to the B2 (Business General) District. The subject property is located west and adjacent to North Frederick Pike (Route 522 N) and north and adjacent to Burnt Church Road (Route 678), and is identified with Property Identification Number 42 -A -81, in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. The proffer that was approved as a part of this rezoning application is unique to this property and is binding regardless of ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, MRC/bhd Mark R. Cheran Interim Zoning Administrator cc: iDSvid and Linda Hicks, 260 Redland Road, Cross Junction, VA 22625 --Cary W. Dove, Board of Supervisors, Gainesboro District orge J. Kriz ands E. Triplett, Gainesboro District Planning Commissioners /Pane nderson, Real Estate ommissioner of Revenue 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 RECOPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540 /665 -6395 REZONING APPLICATION #09 -04 DAVID A. AND LINDA W. HICKS Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing Prepared: July 13, 2004 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Planner 1 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. As this application proceeds through the legislative review process, the method(s) of resolution for each issue proposed by the applicant(s) and/or recommended by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors will be stated in the text of this report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 07/07/04 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 08/11/04 Pending- /Wig °d PROPOSAL: To rezone .85 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (Business General) District. LOCATION: The property is located in the northwestern quadrant at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522 N) and Burnt Church Road (Route 678). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 42 -A -81 PROPERTY ZONING PRESENT USE: RA (Rural Areas) District, Residential and Country Store ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING PRESENT USE: NORTH: RA (Rural Areas), Residential SOUTH: RA (Rural Areas), Residential Commercial EAST: RA (Rural Areas), Vacant WEST: RA (Rural Areas), Residential PROPOSED USE: Office Use REZ #09 -04, David A. and Linda W. Hicks Page 2 July 13, 2004 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT): The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 678, Burnt Church Road, and Route 522, North Frederick Pike. These routes are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Old Massey Store Rezoning Application dated February 13, 2004 address transportation concerns associated with this request. The required dimensions of the right turn lane taper and deceleration dimensions on Route 522 South Bound can be taken care of at the site plan review. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. County Attorney: Monetary proffer to a specific fire company should be made by applicant directly to the company. Otherwise O.K. Fire Marshal: I do not find any specific obstacles to affect fire department response. Emergency vehicle access will be identified during the site plan process. Plan approval recommended. County Engineer/Public Works: Stormwater management will be evaluated in detail at the time of the site plan design submittal. We have no additional comments at this time. Frederick- Winchester Health Department: Health Department has no objection to request. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not impact historic resources. The Rural Landmarks Survey and the Comprehensive Policy Plan do not identify any battlefields or significant historic structures either on or adjacent to the subject properties. The subject parcel currently contains the Janney- Davis Massey House #34 -538) and the Albin Cash Grocery #34 -539). It is the intent of the owner to remove these structures from the property and then construct a two -story office building that is approximately 10,000 square feet in size. Although these structures on the subject parcel are not potentially significant on their own, it was determined through the site visit that the Albin Rural Community Center is potentially eligible as an historic district as a whole collection. The HRAB recognizes that these buildings are contributing structures to the potential Albin historic district. If this property is developed for commercial use, the HRAB suggests the following be considered to mitigate impacts on historic resources: Existing Structures: The existing buildings on the site should be incorporated into the development proposal instead of demolishing them to build a new commercial building. The use of the existing buildings would help preserve the integrity of the community, so that the area would have a better chance of becoming an historic district in the future. Building Layout: Given the size of the existing structures and all the other structures in the community, a building that is 10,000 square feet in size will be out of place in this community; a smaller structure REZ #09 -04, David A. and Linda W. Hicks Page 3 July 13, 2004 would be more appropriate. Height of Buildings: The applicant has proffered a building height of 30 feet; however, this will be higher than the surrounding structures. The 'ARAB suggests the applicant consider a building height that is more compatible with surrounding land uses, such as 25 feet instead of 30. Winchester Regional Airport: No comment on this proposed rezoning. Planning Zoning Site History: The original Frederick County zoning map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) identifies the subject parcel as being zoned A -2 (Agricultural General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re- mapping of the subject properties and all other A -1 and A -2 zoned land to the RA District Site Suitability: The subject property does not contain any environmental features or constraints that would either hinder or preclude site development. In particular, the site does not include any areas of steep slopes, flood plain, or wetlands /hydrologic soils. The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County. Virginia indicates that the soils comprising the subject parcel fall under the Frederick Poplimento Loams soil association. This soil type is delineate as prime farmland. Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Albin area is identified as a Rural Community Center. The Rural Community Center polices of Comprehensive Policy Plan recommend the establishment of additional commercial uses in and around the Albin Rural Community Center. Several parcels of land in the Albin Rural Community Center are currently zoned commercial with a variety of uses. These types of uses include a fruit market, agricultural equipment and sales, self- service storage, country store, and landscaping business. The proposed use would complement the types of commercial land uses that have been developed in the Albin Rural Community Center. Furthermore, the applicants are proffering building design to ensure compatibility with the surrounding community.(Comprehensive Policy Plan Pg. 6 -45) This proposed rezoning is, therefore, consistent with the Land Use Policy of the Rural Community Centers. Potential Impacts: Transportation: The proposed rezoning has been proffered for a maximum of 8,000 square feet of office use on an 0.85 acre parcel. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6 Edition, provides traffic data for office land uses. General Office Buildings are projected to generate an average of 11.01 vehicle trips per day (VPD) per 1,000 square feet of floor area during weekdays. Therefore, traffic generation for the 0.85 acre site is anticipated to produce 89 VPD. REZ #09 -04. David A. and Linda W. Hicks Page 4 July 13, 2004 The 2002 VDOT Daily Volume Jurisdiction Report 34 identi ties traffic volume on North Frederick Pike (Rt.522) between Rt. 37 and Cedar Grove Road (Rt. 654) as18,000 VPD. The same report identifies volume on the entire segment of Burnt Church Road (Rt. 678) as 90 VPD. This proposed rezoning is projected to increase the current traffic counts on this segment of North Frederick Pike by 0.5% on week days. Traffic is not projected to use Burnt Church Road (Rt. 678) other than for immediate access to North Frederick Pike (Rt. 522). Impacts on Burnt Church Road (Rt. 678) are minimal given the limited segment involved. Historic Resources: The Frederick County Landmarks Survey Report identifies six structures located within the area of this proposed rezoning, with one structure located on this site (Janney- Davis Massey House). There are no core battlefield sites identified on this parcel. (The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered this rezoning at its April 21, 2004, meeting and offered comments located on page two (2) of this staff report) Water Sewer: This 0.85 acre parcel is located outside the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the development of a private water source and private health system will be provided for this proposed use and will be approved by the Virginia Department of Health. The Virginia Department of Health Sewage Handling Disposal Regulations identi Pies a sewage flow range for office use of 15 -35 gallons per person. Assuming 20 full -time occupants within the 8,000 square foot building, a projected health system capable of supporting an average daily flow of between 300 -700 gpd would be required. This is the maximum daily flow produced by two four bedroom homes. The applicant has approval for a Puraflo Treatment System that has been engineered to allow the drainfield to be located under the parking area. The existing well located on this parcel will be protected from parking and maneuvering by an adequate barrier. Proffer Statement Dated February 13, 2004 Site Access: The subject site has 170 feet of frontage along North Frederick Pike (Rt. 522) and 400 feet along Burnt Church Road (Rt. 678). The site has a large access area as a result of the widening of North Frederick Pike, which relocated the major arterial road to the east of the former road bed. The applicant has proffered to eliminate this large access area and prohibit access onto North Frederick Pike. Access to this site will occur through the development of a single commercial entrance on Burnt Church Road. Land Use Restrictions: The applicants have proffered to limit the land uses for this 0.85 acre parcel to the following: Land Use SIC General Business Use Finance, Insurance Real Estate Offices Legal Services 81 Engineering, Architectural Surveying Services 871 Accounting, Auditing Bookkeeping Services 872 Management and Public Relations Services 874 REZ #09 -04. David A. and Linda W. Hicks Page 5 July 13, 2004 Structural Development: The applicants have proffered to limit development on this site to a maximum of 8.000 square feet of structural area, and limit the structural height to thirty -five (35) feet from the first floor to the apex of the roof. The structure will utilize similar construction materials on all building walls, including brick and vinyl, and the roof will be standing seam metal or single dimensional construction. The structure will be in substantial conformance with the perspective rendering entitled "Hicks Construction prepared by Design Concepts and dated June 1, 2004. Business Signs: The applicants have proffered to limit the number of freestanding business signs to one (1) on the 0.85 acre parcel. The free standing business sign is proffered to be of monument style construction and will not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. Staff would note that a maximum sign size has not been proffered. Therefore, a maximum size of face of 100 feet would be permitted. Outdoor Storage: The applicants hereby proffer to prohibit outdoor storage on the 0.85 acre parcel. Monetary Contribution for Fire and Rescue Services: The applicant hereby proffers to provide a cash payment of $200.00 to mitigate impacts to the Fire and Rescue Services. The applicants will provide the cash payment to the Treasurer of Frederick County. Virginia at the time of building permit issuance for the 0.85 acre parcel. This contribution is well below contributions generally offered for similar non- residential uses. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 07/07/04 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The subject application is a request to rezone an 0.85 acre parcel from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General) to accommodate general office land uses. The 0.85 acre parcel is located in the Albin Rural Community Center, as identified in the 2003 Comprehensive Policy Plan for Frederick County Virginia. and conforms with applicable Rural Community Centers policies. There were no significant issues raised by any of the reviewing agencies regarding this proposed rezoning, except those potential impacts identified above, including: signs, fire and rescue services, and health systems. The applicant should address all potential impacts. Following the required public hearing, it is requested that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding this application. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY ACTION FOR THE 07 /07/04 MEETING: The applicant pointed out that not all of the rural community centers identified in the Comprehensive Policy Plan call for commercial land use; however, the Albin Rural Community Center is one that does. The applicant believed the rezoning request was appropriate because it was not out of scale with the commercial and light industrial uses already established in the immediate vicinity. The applicant also noted that the proposed structure was architecturally designed to be in keeping with the existing architecture of the Albin area. REZ #09 -04. David A. and Linda W. Hicks Page 6 July 13, 2004 A Commissioner, who is also a member of the Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB), believed that pristine rural areas in Frederick County, such as the Albin Rural Community Center, should be preserved and possibly viewed as potential historic districts. Recognizing that the two structures intended to be removed from the property were not historically significant on their own, HRAB members believed the Albin Rural Community Center could potentially be eligible as an historic district if viewed as a whole collection. Other Commission members pointed out that the limited number of uses for the property listed within the applicant's proffer statement was significant in considering this property for rezoning. They did not believe any of the uses listed would be offensive to the surrounding area. Many of the Commissioners agreed that the use was appropriate for this community and the structure was aesthetically appealing. There were no citizen comments. By a majority vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning with the proffers submitted by the applicant, as follows: YES (TO APPROVE): Straub, Unger, Morris, DeHaven, Thomas, Kriz, Fisher, Triplett, Rosenberry NO: Gochenour (Commissioners Watt, Light, and Ours were absent from the meeting.) W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr. Secretary of Natural Resources Dear Candice: Sincerely yours, Administrative Svcs. 10 Courthouse Avenue Petersburg, VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863 -1685 Fax: (804) 862-6196 David Edwards COMM INWEALTH VIRGINIA Petersburg Office 19-B Bolingbrook Street Petersburg, VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863 -1620 Fax: (804) 863 -1627 Candice E. Mills County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 July 21, 2004 Portsmouth Office 612 Court Street, 3'd Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (757) 396 -6709 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221 This is to confirm our previous conversation that the village of Albin appears to be eligible for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places. You will recall that Maral Kalbian, you, and 1 visited Albin in March 2004 and concluded that it was a well preserved turnpike town with historic buildings ranging in date from the late 19 century to the 1950s. Represented were buildings exhibiting the Late Victorian, Craftsman, Colonial Revival, and vernacular styles of architecture. The Department of Historic Resources encourages Frederick County to consider the eligibility of this historic district when making or recommending decisions that affect its overall preservation. Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Director Tel: (804) 367-2323 Fax: (804) 367 -2391 TDD: (804) 367 -2386 www.dhr.state.va.us Roanoke Office Winchester Office 1030 Penmar Avenue, SE 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Roanoke, VA 24013 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 857 -7585 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (540) 857 -7588 Fax: (540) 722 -7535 REZ #09 -04 David Linda Hicks (PIN: 42 A 81) Greenway Engineering Preliminary Matters January 27, 2004 Old Massey Store Rezoning Revised July 8, 2004 OLD MASSEY STORE REZONING Tax Parcel 42- ((A)) -81 Gainesboro Magisterial District Pursuant to Section 15.2 -2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application O9 for the rezoning of 0.85 acres from the RA, Rural Areas District to establish 0.85 acres of B2, Business General District, development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this applicant and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The subject property, more particularly described as the lands owned by David A. Hicks and Linda W. Hicks being all of Tax Map Parcel 42- ((A)) -81, and further described by Deed Instrument 030024908 recorded in the Frederick County Clerk of the Court Office on October 29, 2003. The applicant hereby proffers the following: A.) Land Use Restrictions The applicants hereby proffer to limit the land uses for the 0.85 -acre parcel to the following: Land Use SIC General Business Offices Finance, Insurance Real Estate Offices Legal Services 81 Engineering, Architectural and Surveying Services 871 Accounting, Auditing and Bookkeeping Services 872 Management and Public Relations Services 874 File #3865/EAW 1 Greenway Engineering January 27, 2004 Revised July 8, 2004 B.) Site Access The applicants hereby proffer to prohibit any connection to North Frederick Pike (Route 522 North) and to limit access on Burnt Church Road (Route 678) to one commercial entrance. C.) Structural Development 1. The applicants hereby proffer to limit the development on the 0.85 -acre parcel to a maximum of 8,000 square feet of structural area. 2. The applicants hereby proffer to limit the structural height to thirty-five (35) feet from the first floor to the apex of the roof. 3. The applicants hereby proffer to utilize similar construction materials on all building walls including brick, vinyl or dryvit, and that the roof will be standing seam metal or dimensional single construction. 4. The applicants hereby proffer to develop the structure in substantial conformance with the perspective rendering entitled "Hick's Construction prepared by Design Concepts and dated June 1, 2004. D.) Business Signs Old Massey Store Rezoning The applicants hereby proffer to limit the number of freestanding business signs to one sign on the 0.85 -acre parcel. The freestanding business signs is proffered to be of monument style construction and will not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. E.) Outdoor Storage The applicants hereby proffer to prohibit outdoor storage on the 0.85 -acre parcel. F.) Monetary Contribution for Fire and Rescue Services The applicants hereby proffer to provide a cash payment of $1,000.00 to mitigate impacts to Fire and Rescue Services. The applicants will provide the cash payment to Treasurer of Frederick County, Virginia at the time of building permit issuance for the 0.85 -acre parcel. G.) Signatures The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the applicant and owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. File #3865 /EAW 2 Greenway Engineering Respectfully Submitted: By: Commonwealth of Virginia, Cit Coun pf E {ievicLi January 27, 2004 Revised July 8, 2004 David A. Hicks D.te }J dirt By: (13— Linda W. Hicks ate The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this2 of J() 7 20a—by ID/id A- -Nick. Linda- 'WA-44c, My Commission Expires bt22orj 2q, File #3865/EAW To Wit: Old Massey Store Rezoning fnvid,A.l- -4icLs Notary Public 3 AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: July 7, 2004 Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: August 11, 2004 APPROVED DENIED WHEREAS, Rezoning #09 04 of David A. and Linda W. Hicks, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone .85 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the B2 (Business General) District. The subject property is located in the northwestern quadrant at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522 N) and Burnt Church Road (Route 678), and is identified by Property Identification Number 42 -A81 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on July 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held apublic hearing on this rezoning on August 11, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change .85 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the B2 (Business General) District, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRes 1113 -04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING 1109 -04 OF DAVID A. AND LINDA W. HICKS This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 11 day of August, 2004 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Barbara E. Van Osten Gina A. Forrester Gary Dove W. Harrington Smith, Jr. Bill M. Ewing Lynda J. Tyler PDRes. 13 -04 A COPY ATTEST John R. Riley, Jr. Frederick County Administrator To be completed by Planning Staff Zoning Amendment Number 4-0 PC Hearing Date 7 REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: Greenway Engineering Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 2. Property Owner (if different from above) Name: David A. Hicks Linda W. Hicks Telephone: (540) 662 -7516 Address: 260 Redland Road Cross Junction. VA 22625 3. Contact person if other than above Name: Evan Wyatt Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map Plat Deed to Property Verification of taxes paid Fee Amount Paid w9a• 6-0 Date Receive oy BOS`Hearing Date n� Agency Comments Fees Impact Analysis Statement Proffer Statement PARCEL Ill NUMBER USE ZONING 42- ((A)) -84 Residential RA District 42- ((A)) -83 Residential RA District 42- ((A)) -82 Commercial RA District 42- ((A)) -80 Residential RA District 42- ((A)) -79 Unimproved RA District 42- ((A)) -72 Residential RA District 42- ((A)) -62 Orchard RA District David A. Hicks Linda W. Hicks 7. Adjoining Property: 5. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: 6. A) Current Use of the Property: B) Proposed Use of the Property: Residential Office 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact located based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route number): The 0.85 -acre site is located in the northwestern quadrant at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522 North) and Burnt Church Road (Route 678) Acres Current Zoning Zoning Requested 0.85 RA District B2 District Total Acre ige to be rezoned Information to be Submitted for Canital Facilities Impact Model In order for the Planning Staff to use its capital facilities impact model, it is necessary for the applicant to provide information concerning the specifics of the proposed use. Otherwise, the planning staff will use the maximum possible density or intensity scenario for the proposed Zoning District as described on Page 9 of the application package. 9. Parcel Identification /Location: Parcel Identification Number Single Family homes: Non Residential Lots: Office: Retail: Restaurant: 8.000 sq.ft. Districts Magisterial: Gainesboro High School: James Wood Fire Service: Round Hill Middle School: James Wood Rescue Service: Round Hill Elementary School: Apple Pie Ridge 10. Zoning Change: List the acreage included in each new zoning category being requested. 11. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Number of Units Proposed Townhome: Multi- Family Mobile Horne: FIotel Rooms: Square Footage of Proposed Uses Service Station: Manufacturing: Warehouse: Other 12. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. 1 (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right -of -way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the bet of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): Owner (s): Date: