Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04 Traffic Impact AnalysisFile 112795J /EAW Traffic Impact Analysis Study RUTHERFORD, LLC REZONING PROPOSAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STUDY Stonewall Magisterial District Frederick County, Virginia Current Owners: RUTHERFORD, LLC Contact Person: Founded in 1601 Engineers Surveyors March 17, 2004 Evan Wyatt, AICP #0135028 Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540- 662 -4185 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone 540- 662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www. green wayeng.co rn •g NI Summary Rutherford's Farm Rezoning Proposal Traffic Impact Analysis Study March 17, 2004 Greenway Engineering and Rutherford LLC met with VDOT representatives and Frederick County Planning Department staff on February 26, 2004 to discuss a proposal to rezone a 0.75 -acre parcel to B -2 District and to reapportion the current zoning boundaries for the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park to change 12.6 acres of M1 District land to create 7.9 acres of B3 District land and 4.7 acres of B2 District land. The purpose of this meeting was to determine if the increased traffic associated with the addition of 13.4 acres of commercial land use was significant enough to warrant a new traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the rezoning application. The consensus of the group was that no traffic impact analysis would be required for a rezoning application that only accounted for the 0.75 -acre parcel; however, VDOT and Frederick County Planning would need to review additional information pertaining to the 13.4 acres of new commercial land use to determine the severity of the traffic impacts. It was agreed that VDOT would review the October 26, 2001 TIA that was prepared for the original rezoning application to determine the approach agreed to for the analysis and that Greenway Engineering would prepare floor -to -area (FAR) land use data to determine a reasonable FAR calculation for this additional commercial acreage. Greenway Engineering was contacted by VDOT on March 11, 2004 and was advised that the approach agreed to for the TIA could not be determined as the VDOT traffic engineer responsible for the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park rezoning had retired. Therefore, the base line data for the rezoning assumes a maximum of 1,400,000 square feet of structural development to occur throughout a 154.4 -acre site, in which 116.7 acres are zoned M -1, Light Industrial District, 23.2 acres are zoned B -2, General Business District and 14.5 acres are zoned B -3, Industrial Transition District. The TIA utilized information from the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual (ITE) 6 Edition and determined that the 1,400,000 square feet of commercial and industrial land use would produce 9,744 ADT. A transportation proffer was approved, which provided for significant improvements to Martinsburg Pike including additional travel lanes and turn lanes to serve the 154.40acre site. A Public Improvements Plan (PIP) was engineered by Greenway Engineering that was consistent with the proffered transportation improvements. This PIP was approved by VDOT on February 17, 2004. File #2795) /HAW Traffic Analysis Study Recognizing that the 9.744 ADT reflects the 1,400,000 square feet of commercial and industrial land use, it is important to determine the additional commercial square footage that could be expected to develop on the 13.4 acres of new commercial land area. In determining the probable land use patterns for this site, it would be reasonable to assume higher end traffic generators, which would include shopping centers on the additional B -2 District land area and offices on the additional B -3 District land area. Greenway Engineering reviewed existing land uses within Frederick County and the City of Winchester that meet the criteria for shopping center and office traffic generations. These land uses account for medium size and large offices, shopping centers with ancillary retail stores, big box retail and an indoor sports complex. These land uses represent a reasonable sampling of higher traffic generators that could occur within the commercially zoned portions of the project site. Greenway Engineering developed a table that is included with this study that provides for the FAR associated with the described land uses. The acreage and structural square footages were confirmed by the Frederick County Real Estates Office and the City of Winchester Assessor's Office in telephone conversations with Greenway Engineering. The results of this analysis demonstrate an average FAR of 0.192; therefore, this study assumes a development pattern that will yield a FAR of 0.2 for the 13.4 acres of new commercial development. The addition of 13.4 acres of commercially zoned land on the subject site can be further broken down to reflect the actual change associated with each zoning district. The change associated wit the rezoning proposal results in the following: 5.44 acres of additional B -2 District land area 7.95 acres of additional B -3 District land area Reduction of 12.58 acres of M -1 District land area An exhibit depicting the new zoning boundary limits is attached with this report. This exhibit was prepared by Greenway Engineering in February 2004. Greenway Engineering obtained traffic generation projections for the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 7 Edition that is the current document utilized by VDOT. The following land use codes and ADT was obtained from this document: ITE 130 Industrial Park ITE 710 General Office Building ITE 820 Shopping Center 6.96 ADT /1000 square feet on a weekday 11.01 ADT /1000 square feet on a weekday 49.97 ADT /1000 square feet on a Saturday File ti2795J/EA W 2 Assuming the new commercial acreages and reduction of industrial acreage, the 0.20 FAR structural development potential and the ADT generations from the land uses identified in the ITE 7 Edition Manual, the following provides for a reasonable projection of new vehicle trips associated with the Rutherford, LLC rezoning proposal: Additional Commercial Acreage B -2 District Area: B -3 District Area: Total New Commercial ADT Projections: 3,130 ADT Reduced Industrial Acreage B -2 District Area: Total Reduced Industrial ADT Projections: 762 ADT Projected Traffic Impact for Rezoning Proposal 3,130 ADT 762 ADT 2,368 ADT 5.44 acres x 0.20 FAR 47,393 square feet 47,393/1000 47.39 47.39 x 49.97= 2,368 ADT 7.95 acres x 0.20 FAR 69,260 square feet 69,260/1000 69.26 69.26 x 11.01= 762 ADT 12.58 acres x 0.20 FAR= 109,596 square feet 109,596/1000 109.59 1 09.59 x 6.96 762 ADT File 142795J /FA W 3 Conclusion The proposed revision to existing zoning boundaries in the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park could potentially result in an addition of 2,368 ADT under the worst case development scenario. The Public Improvements Plan approved by VDOT provides for appropriate travel lanes and turn lanes and signalization to accommodate this scenario. The distance between the intersection at Martinsburg Pike and where the primary entrance adjoins the right in/right -out entrance road is approximately 900 feet; therefore, adequate stacking can occur to accommodate this projected increase in commercial traffic. Furthermore, the right in/right -out entrance will reduce the number of vehicle trips at the primary entrance by allowing movements to access Interstate 81, Route 37 or the City of Winchester. File 112795J /FA W 4 Rutherford's Farm Rezoning Proposal Floor -To -Area Ratio Data For Shopping Center And Office Land Use In Frederick County/Winchester March 17, 2004 Land Use Tax Map Zoning Acreage Building Sq. Ft. FAR Apple Blossom Corners 253 -1 -A -2 B2 6.6 53,515 0.18 Big Lots/Joanne Fabrics 64 -A -101 B2 4.6 47,520 0.23 Costco 64 -8 -1 B2 13.0 128,662 0.22 Corp of Engineers 64 -A -89B B2 16.8 99,060 0.14 Crider Shockey Lease 75 -A -21 B3 4.0 31,334 0.18 Crossroads Mall 64 -8 -5 B2 1.4 13,494 0.22 Delco Plaza 64 -A -4A B2 16.9 173,829 0.23 Home Depot 292 -1 -2 CM1 10.7 114,900 0.24 Jamesway Plaza 86 -A -18 B2 19.0 93,946 0.11 Kim Henry Lease 54 -A -97S B3 2.7 24,400 0.20 Lyle P. Strosnyder 75 -A -2F B3 2.0 12,670 0.15 Michael Prelip Office 75 -A -91E B3 1.2 15,875 0.30 Powell's Plumbing 64 -A -4G B3 3.0 17,250 0.13 Sportsplex 75 -A -91C B3 6.0 76,000 0.22 Sunnyside Plaza 53 -A -52E B2 9.5 48,804 0.12 Toys R Us 253 -1 -A -3 B2 6.3 31,107 0.11 Trex Office 42- A -198M B2 4.0 60,000 0.34 Valley Farm Credit 75 -A -2G B2 2.0 9,707 0.11 Wal Mart 292 -1 -1 CM1 24.9 234,306 0.21 Average FAR 0.192 File d2795J /EAW OUTPUT MODULE APPLICANT: PIN 43- A- 96,97,98,99,100,111 Net Fiscal Impact LAND USE TYPE business/industr Costs of Impact Chit INEUi MQOULE_Credits lobe Take Total Potential Adjustment For REAL EST VAL $127,780,934 Required (entered in Cur. Budget Cur. Budget Cap. Future CIP/ Tax Credits Revenue- Net Capital Net Cost Per FIRE 8 RESCUE 1 CapitaLFaolltlles col sum only) Qper_Cap Equip ExpendlQeb S Taxes— Other (Unadu t CosLBalance Facilities Impact Delling-Unit Fire and Rescue Department $730,362 $0 $0 $730,362 ERR Elementary Schools $0 Middle Schools $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ERR High Schools $0 Parks and Recreation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ERR Public Library $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ERR Sheriff's Offices $0 $40,352 $0 $0 $40,352 $40,352 $0 ERR Administration Building $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ERR Other Miscellaneous Facilities $0 $467,822 $94,139 $561,961 $561,961 $0 ERR METHODOLOGY SUBTOTAL $730,362 $508,174 $94,139 $0 $602,313 $602,313 $128,049 ERR LESS: NET FISCAL IMPACT $32,184,482 532,184,482 532,184,482 218448 ERS NET CAP. FACILITIES IMPACT 0 ERR) NOTES: Model Run Date 10/15/01 ERL INDEX: '1.0" If Cap. Equip Included: 1.0 INDEX: "1.0" if Rev -Cost Bal, "0.0" if Ratio to Co Avg: PLANNING DEPT PREFERENCES 1.0 1. Capital facilities requirements are input to the first column as calculated in the model. 2. Net Fiscal Impact NPV from operations calculations is input in row total of second column (zero if negative); included are the one -time taxes/fees for one year only at full value. 3. NPV of future oper cap equip taxes paid in third column as calculated in fiscal impacts. 4. NPV of future capital expenditure taxes paid in fourth col as calculated in fiscal impacts. 5. NPV of future taxes paid to bring current county up to standard for new facilities. as calculated for each new facility. 6. Columns three through five are added as potential credits against the calculated capital facilities requirements. These are adjusted for percent of costs covered by the revenues from the project (actual, or as ratio to avg. for all residential development). NOTE: Proffer calculations do not include include interest because they are cash payments up front. Credits do include interest if the projects are debt financed. P.I.N. 43 -A- 96,97,98,99,100,111 Rezoning: Assumes155 acres zoned B2, 83, M1 utilizing a maximum of 1,400,000 square feet Due to changing conditions associated with development in the County. the results of this Output Module may not be valid beyond a period of 90 days from the model run date. 0.0 Rev -Cost Bal 1.000 1.0 Ratio to Co Avg 1.433 THIS MODEL IS FOR REZONING #07 -01 AND IS THE ORIGINAL MODEL CREATED