Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04 Impact AnalysisFile #27951/EA W Impact Analysis Statement IMPACT STATEMENT RUTHERFORD'S FARM INDUSTRIAL PARK Stonewall District Frederick County, Virginia TM 43 -A -96, 43 -A -97, 43 -A -98, 43 -A -99, 43 -A -100 43 -A -101 43 -A -111, 155.21 Acres Contact Person: April 5, 2004 Current Owners: Rutherford, LLC Evan Wyatt, AICP Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540- 662 -4185 Greenway Engineering April 5. 2004 INTRODUCTION Basic information Location: Magisterial District: Property ID Numbers: Current Zoning: Current Use: Proposed Use: Proposed Zoning: Total rezoning area: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning RUTHERFORD'S FARM INDUSTRIAL PARK This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoning of 155.21 acres parcel owned by Rutherford, LLC. The subject site is located on a natural boundary created by Interstate 81 on the western edge of the tract. Norfolk Southern and the Winchester and Western Railroads have rail lines paralleling Route 11 North. Rutherford, LLC proposes to rezoned Tax Map parcel 43 -A- 101, consisting of 0.75 acres, from RA District to B2 District, and to reconfigure the existing zoning boundaries of the B2 District, B3 District and M1 District within the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park to create an additional 4.7 acres of B2 District, and an additional 7.9 acres of B3 District, while reducing the existing MI District acreage by 12.6 acres. A series of Zoning and Rezoning Exhibits are incorporated, which depict the existing and revised acreages, and are identified as Existing Zoning Plat Exhibit A, Rezoning Plat Exhibit B and Overlapped Rezoning Plat Exhibit C. Intersection of Interstate 81 and Route 11 Stonewall 43 -A -96, 43 -A -97, 43 -A -98, 43 -A -99, 43 -A -100 43 -A -101 43 -A -111, Ml, B3, B2 and RA Unimproved Industrial Park and Business B2 28.6 Acres B3 22.5 Acres M1 104.1 Acres 155.2 Acres Proposed build -out 1.4 million sf (Based on 9000 sf per acre) The proposed site is being developed in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Northeast Land Use Study adopted in 1996 and updated in 2000. With in the limits of the study, the property will consist of commercial and industrial development. Greenway Engineering 1. Urban Development Area elt April 5, 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning Expansion of the Urban Development Area (UDA) beyond its existing boundary is not required by this application. 2. Sewer and Water Service Area Expansion of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) beyond its existing boundary is not required by this application. A. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The subject site, tax parcels 43 -A -96, 43 -A- 97, 43 -A -98, 43 -A -99, 43 -A -100, 43 -A -101 and 43 -A -111 is located on a manmade boundary created by Interstate 81 on the western edge of the tract and Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11) to the east. Martinsburg Pike enables vehicular traffic to quickly travel to the south onto Interstate 81 at Exit #317. A Public Improvement Plan has been prepared to reflect the proffered road improvements plan that was approved during the original rezoning for the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park (Rezoning Application #07 -01). This Public Improvements Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Virginia Dept I,uent of Transportation (VDOT). The availability of rail through the north portion of the tract increases the opportunities of transporting freight in and out of the area. Flood Plains (Exhibit C) The subject site is located on the FEMA NFIP map #510063 -0105 -B. The majority of the site is located as "Zone C area outside the 100 -year flood plain. The area traversing Hiatt Run is indicated "Zone A 100 -year flood plain. Wetlands The soil types on the property are well- drained and predominantly moderately sloping terrain. The southern portion of the property contains rock out crops. However, Hiatt Run travels through the northern section of the tract, which is estimated to contain one tenth of an acre of wetland. The National Wetlands Inventory Map indicates this feature. Any disturbance of this area will be in conformance with Army Corps of Engineers and Department of Environmental Quality permitting procedures. 3 Greenway Engineering Gradual Slopes 2 -7 The site contains gradual slopes with well drained soils draining into Hiatt Run. Prime Agricultural Land Use All of the aforementioned soils do not support crops without fertilization, liming, and soil management. Portions of the property contain rock out crops however; all of the soils are suitable for agricultural use such as hay, pastures, and orchards. Soil Types The following soil types contained in this tract have been obtained from the Soil Survey of Fredrick County. published by the USDA Soil Conservation Service. The subject site is located on map sheet number 24, and contains nine soil types: 6C -Carbo Oaklet Silt Loam covers approx. 13 of site 7C -Carbo Oaklet Rock Out Crop covers approx. 15 of site 14B- Fredrick Poplimento Loams covers approx. 25 of site 16B- Fredrick Poplimento Loams, very rocky 2 -7 percent slopes, covers approx. 4 of site 16C- Fredrick Poplimento Loams, very rocky 7 -15 percent slopes, covers approx. 13% of site 17C- Fredrick Poplimento Rock Out Crop, covers approx. 9 of site 32B- Oaklet Silt Loam, covers approx. 16 of site 5B -Carbo Silt Loam, covers approx. 4 of site 34- Pagebrook Silt Loam 1% of site B. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjoining property zoning and present use: North: Zoned M2 (General Industrial) District South: Zoned RP (Residential Performance) District RA (Rural Area) District East: Zoned RP (Residential Performance) District RA (Rural Area) District West: Zoned B -2 (Business, General) District B -3 (Industrial Transition) District M -1 (Light Industrial) District April 5 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning 4 Greenway Engineering C. TRANSPORTATION 1. Traffic April 5, 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning The traffic impact for the Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park was determined during the rezoning process associated with Rezoning Application #07 -01. The applicant proffered a significant number of on -site and off -site transportation improvements, which were approved by the Board of Supervisors. Subsequent to the approval of the proffered transportation improvements, a Public Improvements Plan was prepared by Greenway Engineering to design the required improvements to Martinsburg Pike. The Public Improvements Plan has been through the review process and has been approved by VDOT. Greenway Engineering met with representatives from VDOT and Frederick County Planning on February 26, 2004 to discuss the proposal to rezone the 0.75 -acre parcel and reconfigure existing zoning boundary lines, resulting in the creation of an additional 5.4 acres of B2 District, and additional 7.9 acres of B3 District, and the elimination of 12.6 acres of MI District. The purpose of this meeting was to determine if the increased traffic associated with the addition of 13.4 acres of commercial land use was significant enough to warrant a new traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the rezoning application. The consensus of the group was that no traffic impact analysis would be required for a rezoning application that only accounted for the 0.75 -acre parcel; however, VDOT and Frederick County Planning would need to review additional information pertaining to the 13.4 acres of new commercial land use to determine the severity of the traffic impacts. Greenway Engineering prepared a traffic impact analysis study, dated March 17, 2004, which included projected FAR calculations for the increased commercial zoning, and average daily traffic volumes for general office and shopping center land uses based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual 7` Edition. The results of this analysis project an increase of the average daily traffic volumes by 2,368 trips. This analysis was submitted to VDOT and the Frederick County Planning Department for review. Greenway Engineering received confirmation from the Frederick County Planning Department and VDOT that the projected increase in traffic volume associated with the proposed zoning boundary modification was acceptable. Therefore, the on -site and off -site improvements to Martinsburg Pike associated with the approved Public Improvements Plan are anticipated to accommodate the projected impacts associated with this rezoning proposal. D. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The subject site is within the northeastern portion of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The maximum design usage for the subject site is determined by comparing the current discharge of sewage within the developed acreage of Fort Collier Industrial Park 5 Greenway Engineering E. WATER SUPPLY and Stonewall Industrial Park. Based on discharge patterns, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 500 gallons /day per acre quantity is reasonable to consider for the sewer impact analysis for this commercial and industrial site. The proposed zoning will add 77,600 gpd to the public sewage conveyance system and the Opequon Waste Water Treatment plant, which currently has a treatment capacity of 8.4 mgd.. Q =500 gallons /day /acre Q =500 gpd x 155.2 acres Q= 77,600 gpd April 5. 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning Rezoning Application #07 -01 projected an increase to the public sewage conveyance system of 77,200 gpd, which was acceptable to the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. The impacts associated with this rezoning proposal will add an additional 400 gpd to this conveyance and treatment system. The maximum design consumption for the subject site is determined by comparing the current use of water within the developed acreage of Fort Collier Industrial Park and Stonewall Industrial Park. Based on existing water consumption patterns, FCSA has determined that 1,000 gallons /day per acre quantity is reasonable to consider for the water impact analysis for this commercial and industrial site. The water source for this acreage is the Global Chemstone quarry, in which the FCSA has a new water treatment plant and a 20 -inch water transmission line through the subject site. Q =1000 gallons /day /acre Q= 1000gpd X 155.2 acres Q= 155,200 gpd Rezoning Application #07 -01 projected an increased water demand of 154,400 gpd, which was acceptable to the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. The impacts associated with this rezoning proposal will increase this demand by an additional 800gpd. F. DRAINAGE Currently the runoff from approximately 155.2 acres drains into fingers, natural streams, and drainage ditches. These conveyances flow into Hiatt Run, which flows from the northern boundary to the east and off site. 6 Greenway Engineering Existing C 0.30 (pasture) ho =4.6 in/hr (15min) A 154.4 acres Qio =213 cfs (Q CIA) G. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL April 5, 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning The following calculations estimate the proposed storm water runoff for a ten -year flow: Proposed C 0.90 (commercial) Lo= 5.5 in/hr (10 min) A 154.4 acres Qio= 764 cfs (Q CIA) Reference: VDOT Drainage Manual Development of the subject site at maximum build -out will therefore result in an increased runoff of 559 cfs. A detailed stormwater evaluation shall be included with any site plan submittals. Detention ponds and other stormwater management facilities will be built to control storm water discharge into the above referenced streams and Hiatt Run. By controlling runoff of the site, the impact of developing the subject site on Hiatt Run will be within acceptable limits. Based on historical knowledge of this area, and in consultation with the Frederick County Public Works Department, karst topography appears to be present at the western property line adjacent to Interstate 81. Prior to master development plan preparation, an analysis of the karst topography in relationship to surface drainage will be performed to protect any further degradation that could be caused by surface drainage. The impact on solid waste disposal facilities can be projected from an average annual business consumption of landfill volume figure of 5.4 cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of commercial floor area (Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 4` edition). The following figures show the increase in average annual volume based on the proffered 1,400,000 square feet of total building area on the subject site. AV 5.4 Cu. Yd. per 1,000 sq. ft. AV 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 1,400 (1,000 sq. ft.) AV 7,560 Cu Yd at build -out The Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill has a current capacity of 13,100,000 cubic yards (13.1 Million Cu. Yd.) This capacity is more than adequate to accommodate the solid waste generated from this project. Furthermore, the proffer statement provides for a recycling program to be coordinated with the County to reduce the annual volume of solid waste disposal received by the Regional Landfill. 7 Greenway Engineering April 5, 2004 Rutherford, LLC Rezoning H. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES 1. Virginia Historic Landmark Commission The Rutherford's Farm File 10082 34 -727 is sited as a Historical Landmark. However, all that remains of the house is a set of concrete steps that lead from Route 11 up to the site of the house. There is a historical marker south of the site on Route 11. Landmark records can be found on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 2. Virginia Department of Historic Resources and Archeological Sites One archeological site is noted by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. It is a raised berm allowing access to opposite side of rail lines. However, it is abandoned and no loner in use. This site does not exhibit features that suggest eligibility for National Register consideration. Records can be found on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Conclusion of Historic Resource Advisory Board (HRAB) Meeting that was held on July 17, 2001, the Historic Resource Proffer D.1, D.2, and D.3 were a result of the HRAB meeting. The Frederick County Planning Department determined that additional review by the HRAB was not necessary I. OTHER IMPACTS Rutherford, LLC has not modified the Proffer Statement that was approved as a component of Rezoning Application #07 -01, with the exception of revising acreage and zoning district totals. Therefore, the impacts associated with this rezoning proposal should be adequately mitigated. 8