HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10 Comments & CorrespondenceM FILE
COUNTY of FRE ORK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665 -5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
May 25, 2010
Mr. Dennie Dunlap
Triad Engineering
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
RE: Approval of Site Plan #06 -10; Carrier Facility
Property Identification Numbers (PINs): 54-A-9bA & 36B
Dear Dennie:
The above - referenced site plan was approved on May 25, 2010 for the construction of additional parking.
All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan,
including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with four (4)
copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s).
Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy
must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is
complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to
contaclxe if yqu have any questions or concerns.
D,dna M. Johnston,
Zoning Inspector
Attachments
DMJ /bad
cc: Jane Anderson, Real Estate
Charles S. Dehaven, Stonewall District Supervisor
Gary Oates and Stan Crockett, Stonewall District Planning Commissioners
Commissioner of Revenue
Meritage Fort Collier, LLC, 101 Main Street 4345, Norfolk, VA 23510
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
TRANSMITTALOETTER
Civil Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering
Environmental Services • Land Surveying
Construction Testing & Monitoring • Drilling
Water & Wastewater • Landscape Architecture
0
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 226
(540) 667 -9300
(540) 667-2260 facsi
www.triadeng.com
To: Department of Planning and Development Date: 20 May 2010
107 North Kent Street Re: Carrier Facility Site Plan
Winchester, VA 22601 Project No.: 07 -10 -0039
Attn: Dana Johnston
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
MAY 202010
COPIES
DATED
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
2
03 -29 -10
C -1 to C -6
Carrier Facility Site Plan (revised 05- 19 -10)
1
05 -20 -10
Comment Reply Letter
1
Site Plan Comments from Engineering, Inspections, & Fire Marshal
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
® For Approval
❑ As Requested
❑ Other
❑ For Your Use
❑ For Review and Comment
COPY TO:
SIGNED: �!
Dennie D. Dunlap III
If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
"HAD
TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC.
May 20, 2010
0 0
MDIPAIVAIWV
� o o o � o � o o > � � � P � > � � � o TRIAD Listens, Designs & Delivers
Dana M. Johnston, CZO
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202
Winchester. VA 22601 -5000
RE: Carrier Facility ( #06 -10), Site Plan Review
Dear Mr. Johnston:
The following represents Triad Engineering, Inc. responses to your comments, dated
April 21, 2010, concerning the Carrier Facility Site Plan. Review comments are shown in
bold italics. We are responding on a point -by -point basis to correlate with your
comments.
1. Off -site Improvements. Site Plan cannot be approved until all off -site
improvements have been implemented. The Owner is currently processing bids
for the off -site improvements on Fort Collier Road, and is aware of the stipulation that
this off -site work must be completed. The intent is to award the contract for the
building /parking improvements and these off -site improvements to the same general
contractor, and construction will occur simultaneously in the most efficient manner.
Therefore, the Owner needs to have site plan approval prior to initiation of site work.
2. General Site Plan Notes. Correct rear setback from 75 feet to 25 feet. Also, the
number of parking spaces provided is 26 (new) and 2 HC (new) totals of 28.
Lastly, annotate number of existing parking spaces lost, it appears that seven
spaces were lost. The General Notes have been revised to reflect the comments
(see notes #7 & #9, sheet C -02).
3. Site Plan. Annotate proposed sidewalk and width. Where is the location of
the two new loading spaces as noted on your general notes? The proposed
sidewalk and width have been properly annotated and the loading spaces identified
as existing loading spaces (see sheet C -04).
Please find the attached revised Site Plan for your review. If everything is satisfactory,
we will provide additional copies for final signatures. If you have any questions, please
don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
Dennie
Dennie D. Dunlap III, P.E.
Civil'Engineering Services Manager
��
TRANSKY ITT A��� ETTER
Winchester, VA
TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC.
(540) 667-9300.
(540)667^226Ofacsimile
mmvw.triaden5.cnm
Civil Engineering "Gootochnicu|Engineering
.
Environmental Services " Land Surveying
Construction Testing & Monitoring "Drilling
h
Water & Wastewater " Landscape Architecture
`
,
To: Department of Planning and Development
Date: 21 May 2010
107 N rth Kent Street
Re: Carrier Facility
Winchester, VA 22601
Project No.: 07'10'0039
Attn: Dana Johnston
YYE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
COPIES DATED NUMBER I DESCRIPTION
5 03-29-10 C- I to C-6 I Carrier Facility Site Plan (revised 05-19-10)
�TRANSMITTED-
For Approval
As Requested
F-1 Other
COPY TO:
El For Your Use
El For Review and Comment
REMARKS
SIGNED:
DonnioD. Dunlap III
If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
4`VG� 1C
0 M rucopy
O COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
® 540/665 -5651
wee, FAX: 540/665-6395
April 21, 2009
Mr. Dennie Dunlap
Triad Engineering
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #06 -10; Carrier Facility
Property Identification Number (PIN):. 3frA & 36B
Dear Dennie:
Planning Staff has reviewed the above - referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be
granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues
in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please
review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses
each concern.
Review Comments
Off -site Improvements. Site Plan cannot be approved until all off -site improvements have been
implemented.
General Site Plan Notes. Correct rear setback from 75 feet to 25 feet. Also, the number of
parking spaces provided is 26 (new) and 2 HC (new) totals of 28. Lastly, annotate number of
existing parking spaces lost; it appears that seven spaces were lost.
Site Plan. Annotate proposed sidewalk and width. Where is the location of the two new loading
spaces as noted on your general notes?
After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information
contained on the plan. I am providing you a copy of the reviewed plan for your benefit. 1 will need all
approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment
sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, the
Frederick County Depyrtment of Public Works (County Engineer), and the Frederick County Fire
Marshal. Do not hesito'e to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter.
Cana M. Johrjon, CZO
Zoning Inspector
cc: Meritage Fort Collier, LLC, 101 Main Street 9345, Norfolk, VA 23510
Attachment
DMJ /bad
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
0
TRANSMITTAL LE
VINAE
TRIAD ENGINEERING,
11 0
T.ER
APR 6 2010
20 Pir ation Drive
L Wi ch ter, VA 22602
C. 1 40) 6 7 -9300
Civil Engineering ' Geotechnical Engineering
Environmental Services' Land Surveying
Construction Testing & Monitoring ' Drilling
Water & Wastewater' Landscape Architecture
{5:, 7 -2260 facsimile
www.triadeiig.com
To: _ Department of Planning and Development Date: 4/6/2010
107 North Kent Street Re: Carrier Facility Site Plan
Winchester, VA 22601 Project No.: 07 -10 -0039
Attn: County Planner
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
COPIES
DATED
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
1
4/2/2010
1129
Site Plan Review Fee
1
4/3/2010
Site Plan Application
1
4/3/2010
Request Site Plan Comments
2
3/29/2010
C -1 -C -6
Site Plan
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED:
❑ For Approval
❑ As Requested
❑ Other
❑ For Your Use
® For Review and Comment
COPY TO:
SIGNED: A94/0 �
Mike Delaney, P.E.
If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
0
F-
rn
N
.i
e--I
0
C O O
N O O
E a
�0 o
,u U)
IL
J � F fi +-
ZR -
r 9Mi
� L0.
�11
I
kr i
rn
N
.i
e--I
0
C O O
N O O
E a
�0 o
,u U)
IL
J � F fi +-
ZR -
r 9Mi
o
1 N �N,
0
U
0
E
I4 Ow
� ♦iIN�
V
U
N
,a1i, 'e
m o
❑
.can
Ln
ttiI
mu
ti
1
-
m
Ir
Ln
O
��•i
Q O CD
' „iii ❑
min
U S
O
.e
rt7
.4..z� ❑
.
�( ❑
Ul
d
G ❑
N
U-
0. C
iff
�i
-a74
LL �
f6
(D o
hi
H o
{:
a) N
�{
W
g
0
Document Approval Form
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR
APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR
APPROVAL.
IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE
COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED.
C
Mark
Dana
Eric
Mike
John
COMMENTS:
INITIALS DATE & TIME
L(
Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): �'p 17% 1/0
U:\Pam \Common\Document Approval Form.wpd