HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-08 Comments.4„14 =,•..� ,.•2,
COUNTY :oa FREDERICK
Department of Public Works
540/665 -5643
FAX: 5401678 -0682
July 21, 2008
Mr. Dennie Dunlap III, P.E.
Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
RE: Revised Rezoning Application for Proposed I -81 Distribution Center, Clearbrook,
Virginia
Dear Mr. Dunlap:
We have completed, our review of the revised rezoning application for the proposed I -81
distribution center and offer the following comments:
1. Refer to B. Locations and Access:
Correct the narrative to reflect a single access point as indicated in the proffer statement
and as implied on the generalized'development plan.
2. Refer to C. Site Suitability:
a. Refer to our previous comment dated February 26, 2007, regarding the karst
terrain and the potential for sinkhole development.
b. The boundary survey shown on sheet 3 of 3 indicates the existence of power line
right -of- ways. The narrative needs to be expanded to discuss the impact of these
right -of -ways on the proposed development. Also, the boundary survey needs to
be revised to reflect the correct power company names.
c. The narrative needs to be expanded to include the description and disposition of
the existing buildings.
3. Refer to F. Site Drainage:
Refer•to our previous comment 93 in our February 26, 2007, review related to the term
"low impact type stormwater management techniques." The narrative needs to be revised
to describe this method of stormwater management. The Department of Conservation
and Recreation will require that BMP measures be implemented to address quality as
well as quantity issues related to stormwater runoff. We also recommend that
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
I -81 Distribution C r - Revised Rezoning Comments
Page 2
July 21, 2008
oil separators be utilized in the truck parking areas to augment the efficiency of the BMP
measures.
I can be reached at 722 -8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above
comments.
Sincerely,
Harvey E. Straw Jr., P.E.
Director of Public Works
HESh
cc: Planning and Development
file
JUL 2 2 2008
i
TA rsargentT [ion daUENIPCONINIENTSV -8 t D ISTCTRREVREZCO A Ldoc
HAND - DELIVERED
Michael T. Ruddy, AICP
Deputy Director
Frederick County Department of Planning &
Development
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Re: 1 -81 Distribution Center (BPG Properties, Ltd.)
Proposed Proffer Statement
Dear Mike:
I have reviewed the above - referenced proposed Proffer Statement, with a
revision date of July 3, 2008. It is my opinion that the Proffer Statement is generally
in a form to meet the requirements of tile Frederick County Zoning Ordinance wind the
Code of Virginia, subject to the following continents:
1. The third unnumbered paragraph of the Proffer Statement references
the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). It should be noted that the proffer for the
development to be in general conformance with the GDP is subject to certain
conditions, including "revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct
multiple buildings on the Property ". I would recommend that this condition be limited
to changes in the location of structures and parking on the site, so that the entrance,
buffers, setbacks, etc., shown on the GDP would still apply in the event multiple
buildings are constructed on the site.
HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE,
MAHAN MITCHELL
A PARTNER5HIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS JUL 1 8 w
I
ATTORNEYS
AT LAW
WILBUR C.
HALL (1892 -1972)
-
THOMAS V.
MONAHAN (1924 -1999)
7 d 309 EAST MARKET STREET
B EAST BOSCAWEN STREET _
SAMUEL D.
ENGLE
LEESBURG. VIRGINIA
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
O. LEI-AND MAHAN
TELEPHONE 703777T 1050
TELEPHONE 540-662 - 3200
ROBERT T.
MITCHELL, JR.
F" 540-6624304
JAMES A.
KLENKAR
PLEASE REPLY TO
E -MAIL lawyers @hallmonahan.cam
STEVEN F.
JACKSON
P. 0. BOX 848
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 -0848
July 18,
2008
HAND - DELIVERED
Michael T. Ruddy, AICP
Deputy Director
Frederick County Department of Planning &
Development
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Re: 1 -81 Distribution Center (BPG Properties, Ltd.)
Proposed Proffer Statement
Dear Mike:
I have reviewed the above - referenced proposed Proffer Statement, with a
revision date of July 3, 2008. It is my opinion that the Proffer Statement is generally
in a form to meet the requirements of tile Frederick County Zoning Ordinance wind the
Code of Virginia, subject to the following continents:
1. The third unnumbered paragraph of the Proffer Statement references
the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). It should be noted that the proffer for the
development to be in general conformance with the GDP is subject to certain
conditions, including "revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct
multiple buildings on the Property ". I would recommend that this condition be limited
to changes in the location of structures and parking on the site, so that the entrance,
buffers, setbacks, etc., shown on the GDP would still apply in the event multiple
buildings are constructed on the site.
HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL
Michael "r. Ruddy, AICP
July 18, 2008
Page 2
2. Proffer 2 proffers out certain otherwise permitted uses on the
Property. Staff should review the proffered -out uses to determine if all of the uses
appropriate to be proffered out are included, taking into consideration the Applicant's
possible intended uses of the Property. It also should be noted that in Proffers 2. 1,
and 2.3 all uses in the related SIC category have been proffered out, while in the
remaining proffered -out uses all of the associated uses in the related SIC category
have not been proffered out.
3. In Proffer 3. 1, 1 would recommend changing the word "provide" to
"construct ". Further, it is noted that the entrance improvements proffered are those
"consistent with Virginia DepartmentofTransportation (VDOT) requirements ". This
language has been substituted for the previous draft of the Proffer Statement which
specifically provided for a ri turn deceleration lane. Staff should determine
whether the revised language is preferable.
4. In Proffer 3.2, regarding the entrance to the property, it is not clear to
me from the Proffers (it may be clear to staff) what would be in place upon the
construction of the Flltllre Entrance. Is the plan to have this Property and the
adjoining property to the north served off of a right -of -way on the Applicant's
property, and that it will be the responsibility of that adjoining property owner to
CnnStl "llCt the entrance.9 If this is the anthC!pated plate, It Would seem to ine that the
platters of the buffers along the north property line, as shown on the GDP, will need
to be addressed with respect to an entrance and access easement being located at the
north end of the property.
5. Proffer 3.3 references as i gnal izati oil agreement, but does not indicate
the location for the signal.
6. In Proffer 3.4, in the second sentence I would recommend the
Applicant substituting the words "the first" for the words "any final ".
0
0
HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL
Michael T. Ruddy, AICP
July 18, 2008
Page 3
7. In Proffer 3.5, concerning the 8350,000.00 cash proffer, it should be
noted that the proffer will not be paid until the first Certificate of Occupancy is issued
on the Property. Proffers are customarily paid at the time of the issuance of the first
building pea-mit (as,is the proffer for fire and rescue in Proffer 4).
S. In Proffer 4, concerning the proffer for fire and rescue, I would
suggest the Applicant use the words "for fire and rescue purposes" in place of the
words "to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County ".
9. With respect to Proffer 5, concerning site landscaping, staff should
determine whether the proposed landscaping meets the goals for landscaping in the
Route 1 I corridor.
10. In Proffer 5.2, concerning planting of street trees on the west side o1'
the Property adjoining the Interstate 81 right -of -way, staff should determine whether
the proposed spacing of the street trees is adequate.
It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to
whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific
property, whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my Understanding that
that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission.
If there are any questions concerning the foregoing comments, please contact
me.
ery y yours,
R"Mitch
RTM /glh
WALSH COLUCCI
LUBELEY EMRICH
& WALSH PC
Michael J. Coughlin
(703) 680 -4664 Ext.113
mcoughlin@pw,thelaiidlawyers.com
Fax: (703) 680-2161
June 19, 2008
Eric Lawrence
Fred. Co. Dept. Of Planning & Development
North Building, 2 °a Floor
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia
Re: Agency Comments on the BPG Properties, Ltd. Rezoning Application
Dear Eric:
Below you will find a chartthat reflects the agencies we submitted our application materials to,
their comments, and the Applicant's response.
COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Fire Marshal:
'thank you.
Recommend A roval
Frederick County Public Schools:
Acknowledged.
We offer no comments.
Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Will provide
Acknowledged.
sewer & water to this site.
Frederick— Winchester Health Department:
It is the Applicant's understanding that
No objection under following conditions.
these regulatory requirements are
applicable to the project irrespective of the
1. All buildings on site are to be served by the public water
as approved by the Frederick County
Proffer Statement, and so these conditions
and sewer system
have not been drafted into the Proffer
sanitation authority.
2. All wells are to be abandoned according to the Private
Statement.
Well Regulations.
3. All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic
hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel.
4. Permits are to be obtained from the health department for
any proposal for a motel, hotel, or restaurant.
5. All designs submitted should provide for protection of
the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due
to the proposed future construction.
Also attached 12/14/06 comments.
PHONE 7o3 680 4664 1 FAX 703 680 6067 1 Www.rnELaNUI,Awvr,RS . cona
4310 PRINCE WILLIAM PARKWAY, surrE 300 1 PRINCE WILLIAM, VA 22192
ARLINGTON OFFICE 7 47 1 L0000UN OFFICE 703 737 3633
ATTORNEYS AT LAN'
•
gional Airport:
Acknowledged.
nts received. No objection previously.
Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept.:
Fnewc ornments
Acknowledged.
ents received.
s: As long as the design as the standard fire
co.
Fredericksburg — Winchester Service Authority:
Acknowledged. Capacity numbers were
previously and are included in
No comments but also attached 12/21/06 comments
regarding water and sewer capacity numbers.
provided
the Applicant's Impact Statement.
Historic Resources Advisory Board, c/o Eric Laurence:
• Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the
HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a
• This comment was previously
Preliminary Information Form (PIC) from the
addressed as follows: BPG
Department of Historic Resources (HR) form the
contracted ECS Mid - Atlantic to
Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the
complete and submit a PIF to the
property proposed to be rezoned. The PIT will
Department of historic Resources.
determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can
A copy of the report dated May 1,
received state recognition for its historical value.
20076 was sent directly to HRAB
and DHR.
• The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be
placed along the frontage of the property so that the
viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across
• The Applicant has addressed this
Rt. 11) would not be negatively impacted by the
comment in Proffer 5.
placement of a 739,000 sq. ft. Industrial structure.
Frederick County
Proffer 3.4 addresses this comment and
Department of Parks & Recreation:
has been modified to require the Applicant
to dedicate an easement to the County for
Recommend proffer statement include a 10' trail on an
to the trail — should meet
public purposes in the location of the trail.
adequate easement which construct
VDOT & ASHTO guidelines.
Robert T. Mitchell, County Attorney:
No comments received on the Proffer Statement.
. Dept. of Planning & Development, Mi7N�
suggest that no further revision to
ffer 5 is necessary and that the
: While this is consistent with that prevof
w1l be ab n Crease width
at
, I would suggest you insert the word
"a
rwide
t landscape area, its disc ethos
beyond 10' during the site plan process
m" in the first sentence before ten (
t the proffers as drafted.
dscape strip" to enable the landscapin g
spread out within the minimum 25' area between te
With respect to landscaping along the
R.O.W and the parking lot.
Property's I -81 frontage, the Applicant has
not had sufficient time to evaluate this
I would also suggest you consider providing some form
request but will offer a response as soon as
of landscaping along the properties frontage with
p ossible.
0 0
Interstate 81 in an effort to improve the appearance
along this corridor and help break up the mass of such
a large facility and potential trailer parking area. This
should in no way be as intensive as that which you
have proffered along Route 11, but some consideration
should be warranted.
Frederick County Department of Public Works:
No comments received and unable to locate continents from
previous submittal.
Matthew B. Smith, Staff Engineer
Acknowledged.
Edinburg Residency
Virginia Department of Transportation:
The documentation within the application to rezone this
property appears to have a significant measurable impact on
Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been
considered as access to the property referenced.
VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers
offered in the BPG Properties /1 -81 Distribution Center
Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addresses
transportation concerns associated with this request. We
have the following comments:
• The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance
with Branson Springs Road in the future will have a
positive impact on the overall traffic movement on
Route 11.
• These proffers provide for the necessary
entrance /turn lane improvements at the initial
entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at
the time of site plan review.
• While the Department recognizes that there are
traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route I 1 and
Rest Church Road intersection and Route 1 I and
Brucetown /Hopewell Road intersection, it appears
the best solution is to accept a monetary
contribution from the applicant. This would allow
Frederick County and VDOT to make future
decisions on the appropriate use of these funds.
Before development, this office will require a complete set
of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage
features, and traffic Flow data from the I.T.F. Trip
Generation Manual Seventh Edition for review. VDOT
reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs,
9 0
including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and
off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work
performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered
under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office
and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage.
Thank you for allowin us the opportunity to comment.
John Bishop, Deputy Director — Transportation:
Acknowledged.
Regarding the Transportation Impact Analysis:
With regard to the extension of Branson
Spring Road, the Applicant requires
It appears to me that your updated TIA addresses my
additional information before determining
previous concerns regarding background traffic.
the impact of a right -of -way reservation or
dedication for this extension.
Regarding the Application and Proffers:
The Applicant is open to discussing this
item further, but is concerned that there
While it continues to I nc my position that the ideal entrance
will be considerable right -of -way
for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it
necessary to accommodate an extension of
appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your
Branson Spring over 1 -81
proffers.
While, it is generally the preference of staff that physical
improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers,
the right of way issues in this situation and the fact that the
greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client
make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case.
I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in
process right now that calls for the extension of Branson
Spring Rd across the northern portion of your Client's
property. I would ask that your client consider making
accommodations for this future roadway.
Thank you for your review of these matters.
Best regards,
WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH &
WALSH, P.C.
Michael J. Coughlin
i
BPG Properties/1 -81 Distribution Centel - VDOT Comments to Rezoning Page 1 of 1
Coughlin, Michael J.
From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [ Rhonda .Funkhouser @VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E.
[ Matthew .Smith @vdot,virginia.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:10 AM
To: Coughlin, Michael J.; jknott @bpgltd.com
Cc: Copp, Jerry; Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Hoffman, Gregory; Bishop, John A.
Subject: BPG Properties /1 -81 Distribution Center - VDOT Comments to Rezoning
The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant
measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered
as access to the property referenced.
VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties /I -81
Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addresses transportation
concerns associated with this request. We have the following comments:
• The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the
future will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11.
• These proffers provide for the necessary entrance /turn lane improvements at the initial
entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review.
I
• While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the
Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and ,Brucetown /Hopewell
Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from
the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make future decisions on
the appropriate use of these funds.
Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing
entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Tri Generat
Manual Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way
needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway
improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be
covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an
inspection fee and surety bond coverage.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment.
Matthew B. Smith, P.E.
Residency Staff Engineer
VDOT - Edinburg Residency
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, VA 22824
Phone 4 (540) 984 -5615
Fax 4 (540) 984 -5607
6/19/2008
•
Coughlin, Michael J.
From: John Bishop [Jbishop @co.frederick.va.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:24 AM
To: Coughlin, Michael J.
Cc: 'Mike Ruddy'; 'Eric Lawrence'; 'John Bishop'
Subject: BPG County Transportation Comment
Mr. Coughlin,
E
Page 1 of 1
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this rezoning application. I have the following comments
to offer.
Regarding the Transportation Impact Analysis:
It appears to me that your updated TIA addresses my previous concerns regarding background traffic.
Regarding the Application and Proffers:
While it continues to me my position that the ideal entrance for this site would align with Branson Spring
Road, it appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your proffers.
While it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to
cash proffers, the right of way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on
property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case.
I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the
extension of Branson Spring Rd across the northern portion of your Client's property. I would ask that
your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway.
Thank You;
John A. Bishop, AICP
Deputy Director - Transportation
Frederick County Planning & Development
107 North Kent St, Suite 202
Winchester, VA 22601
Ph: 540- 665 -5651
F: 540- 665 -6395
jbishop@co.frederick.va.us
6/19/2008
From:LIFESAFE 0 00 !008 09:20 #121 P.001/001
Project Name
1 -81 Distribution Center
Address City State
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William VA
Applicant
BPG Properties, Ltd.
Type Application Tax ID Number Fire District
Rezoning 33- A- 110,33 -A -10 13
Current Zoning
RA R eCOI7 mendaiionS
Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System
No No
Other recommendation
i... _._
i
Hydrant Location
Not Identified
Not Identified
C
Roadway /Aisleway Width
Not Identified
@@
s r K1
YIStGSNSA', -�
Control number
Date received
Date reviewed Date Revised
8200 -0006
5130/2008
612/2008 1
Project Name
1 -81 Distribution Center
Address City State
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William VA
Applicant
BPG Properties, Ltd.
Type Application Tax ID Number Fire District
Rezoning 33- A- 110,33 -A -10 13
Current Zoning
RA R eCOI7 mendaiionS
Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System
No No
Other recommendation
Emergency Vehicle Access Comments
Access Comments
Additional Comments
Zip Applicant Phone
22192 703- 6804664
Rescue District
13
Election District
Stonewall
Residential Sprinklerlsystem
No
Fire Lane Required
No
Special Hazards
No
Plan Approval Recommended n ^ A A
Title
Reviewed By Signature e�x, , � {, , 11j (/
Yes J. Neal ` �/ s ` � ^ , Y' I 11
i... _._
Emergency Vehicle Access
Hydrant Location
Not Identified
Not Identified
Siamese Location
Roadway /Aisleway Width
Not Identified
Not Identified
Emergency Vehicle Access Comments
Access Comments
Additional Comments
Zip Applicant Phone
22192 703- 6804664
Rescue District
13
Election District
Stonewall
Residential Sprinklerlsystem
No
Fire Lane Required
No
Special Hazards
No
Plan Approval Recommended n ^ A A
Title
Reviewed By Signature e�x, , � {, , 11j (/
Yes J. Neal ` �/ s ` � ^ , Y' I 11
Rezoning Commenti. 0
Fire and Rescue Company
Comments on rezonings will be needed from the fire and rescue company serving the location in
question. Please fill in the attached comment sheet with the name of the fire and rescue squad
serving the location and obtain the comment from that squad. A list of the County Fire and
Rescue Company follows the comment sheet.
Fire and Rescue Company
Name of Tire & Rescue Compa Address & Phone
Company 13 - Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept 1256 Brucetown I
Clearbrook, VA 22624
(540) 722 -2073
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575 -2352
Mailing Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 inter section
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martin Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M -1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770 + /-
�LI'k and �BSCUe COmpally'S Com rr '> e + }4`"`7`� ,9 vrr .,, ".f
,�3 z✓ l7 x' a '"'� r� .�" yrrn a ^" z s ° e m 4 '�,atf �„r'�b 2 t t
A M- y5' 4 q a
4 '
4 � � 1 ✓ s. rl�, r x �. +s' v �` f .. m�' t, � �, s h � +� i " y ,.
N 'FIT6 SQL Rescne
g :
i1U..1. 16 ... c Asa. kluSC Uu C.iiliitiafiy - Y - W;iSe KeLprn inLS 11 brm to tre Applicant
31
Rezoning Comments
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Sanitation Authority Frederick County
Sanitation Authority
Attn: Engineer Attn: Engineer
P.O. Box 1877 315 Tasker Road
Winchester, Virginia 22604 Stephens City, Virginia
(540) 868 -1061
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680 -4664
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22192
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsbi
Current zonine: RA Zonine reauested: B -3 Ind. and Transition
Pike).
Acrearle 59.0770 + /-
;;'s h`x ,! i x :i a<, n�ai r,, 3i W 1 },��
4�1�1i3" G ry 4 iR T
i �} 11'st`.ri`N!',:.,
i::lpt
x' rr' a n3 •; ^k ''ta p inn It 'i� xt+'i b- a n maw k i.3 4 'a' a
LL 4 gHl�V /D� t
9t v x "
ta�
Jill
16 f s �_r ., •,� �:.,> t. 4!� `.._ - _.? �. fT' �.rt�.� � ,: r = a e c
�,.SdnitdYlOn AUtllOrlty SlgnatUre Date ry"Ew -'` ds� - � { + 30� t QBrr� �. a
i
Notice to Sanitation Authority Please Return This Form to the Applicant
25
0 0
Rezoning Comments
Frederick - Winchester Service Authority
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Fred -Winc Service Authority Fred -Winc Service Authority
Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director Attn: Jesse W. Moffett
P.O. Box 43 107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22604 Winchester, Virginia
(540) 722 -3579
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680 -4664
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22192
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Marti Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:B Ind. and Tran sitionAcreage: 59.077 + /-
Notice to Fred -Wine Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant
32
0
Rezoning Comments
Frederick - Winchester Service Authority
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Fred -Wine Service Authority Fred -Wine Service Authority
Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director Attn: Jesse W. Moffett
P.O. Box 43 107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22604 Winchester, Virginia
(540) 722 -3579
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575 -2436
Mailing Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 inter section
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Marti Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M -1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770 + /-
Notice to Fred -Wine Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant
32
Rezoning Comments
Frederick - Winchester Health Department
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Frederick - Winchester Health Department Frederick- Winchester Health Department
Attn: Sanitation Engineer Attn: Sanitation Engineer
107 North Kent Street 4!, 107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601 Suite 201
(540) 722 -3480 Winchester, Virginia
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway. Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22912
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Marti Pike).
Notice to Health Department - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
26
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: ( 703 ) 680 -4664
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: B -3 Ind. and Tra nsitioxreage: 59.0770 + /-
Lord F'atfax Environmental I305 District
107 N. Kent St.
Ay,
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(540) 722 -3480 FAX (540) 722 -3479
Counties of.. Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah, Warren, and City of Winchester
To: Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22912
From: Doug Dailey, Environmental Health Specialist Senior) / /7—
Date: June 11, 2008
Subject: B -3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33 -A -110 and 33 -A -109
The health department has no objection under the following conditions:
1) All buildings on site are to be served by the public water and sewer system as approved
by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority.
2) All wells are to be abandoned according the Private Well Regulations
3) All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling
with sand or gravel.
4) Permits are to be obtained from the health department for any proposal for a motel, hotel,
or restaurant.
5) All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any
contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction.
0 0
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665 -5651
rAX: 540/665 -6395
June 2, 2008
Triad Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Dennie D. Dunlap, V.E.
PO Box 2397.
Winchester, VA 22604
RE: Request for Confirmation of Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments
1 -81 Distribution Center; i4NS' 4 33 -A -109, 110
Dear Mr. Dunlap:
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered the above referenced
rezoning proposal during their meeting on January 16, 2007. The HRAB reviewed information
associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia Department of
Historic Resources, as well as information provided by the applicant. At that time, the HRAB felt that
the proffers associated with historic preservation and recognition was adequate, but made two
recommendations which included:
• Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must
Fill out a Preliminary Information Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic
Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, which is locaied on the property
proposed to be rezoned. The PIF will determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can
receive state recognition for its historical value.
• The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the
property so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Rt. 1 1) would
not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 sq. ft. industrial structure.
These comments, which were issued to the applicant in a letter dated January 24, 2007, remain
valid. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
apps
Amber Powers
Planning Technician
ALP /bad
cc: Charles S. DeHaven, Stonewall Supervisor
Rhoda Kriz, HRAB Chairman
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
0 0 - � j)-6 . c-tv\4�y
Rezoning Comments
Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Frederick County
Department of Parks & Recreation Department of Parks & Recreation
107 North Kent Street County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor
Winchester, Virginia 22601 107 North Kent Street
(540) 665 -5678 Winchester, Virginia
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd.
Telephone: (703) 680 -4664
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22192
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 1.1 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
i
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: -3 Industrial /Tra nisitioAcreage: 59.0770 + /-
:r � � i z Kd�ii„,wm� F r..h �. k.,+Pf .stn >5- P a"
partmen -
DC ,oTParks eCre 1
)�at011�(^'OIIIInCI1tS y g ,' ,�,y ° ( � '' ,. '^ `*fit N ryR4a }} c �' i 3�
os ..,
Thex De�artmentlwould recommendthe proffer sEatement�
i
1 '�tH.�}Sft4 + W� b 1,
tR t ti" e 8 x i n $ Y
include ai10 trail an' adequate easement which3to constructthe" "trail The
x� e�-me i a
9f.
yi { �. z f2
t o < s n '"' &5E- x m� r� F a ,? '>,e r r #?m34 k
akvya , 7 dtki. 35w rv` t.,i
lw T V i 'i' i f �'fi k „x t S U'+"'T 4 ¢& C �
�`
Notice to Department of Parks & Recreation - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
23
0 0
Rezoning Comments
Superintendent of Frederick County Public Schools
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Public Schools Frederick County Public Schools
Attn: Superintendent Attn: Superintendent
P.O. Box 3508 School Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia 22604 1415 Amherst Street
(540) 662 -3888 Winchester, Virginia
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd.
Telephone: (703) 680 -4664
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22192
Location of property: Approximately. 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Marti Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:B Industrial /Tra nsitiotucreage: 59.0770 + / -
ad 3w 1pe >H " 4 � C
' S „nr,,«,jr �' to v ��t' �+.: Me p;t `£
r, I -i teudenYxof #P ubli ,S , 0� �Onl h elltS u G= "'i" µ{£r,mf rei C"(P" ,i sa £ ' 3 1 'r' � ' " I # ar'' { _
1 ii2 �it•`'a6m Y (7 ,, }7 F" �^^kr raft a ,� rfk t# `� -
>i u.{�vP'"*G• " ih.4v�.'F`t Y�' wai. El -3' �� `i'
Qj
x s' ° r x y£'� Mw 2 �- :e .r9„T'�'
; %A " "N r , n- > r i. i x
.'� , 'kx {'t.l)z* -fu.. l''if l`It�RaS�rc`s .e �sY>rr>E�;umr
1 r .EF � ` ' " tt "1 4 x i' �"^ '„ ^r. �. 4 4 '`'i' 3`L • F" +m sc $.,} t�.. fr e>h'^ t -
'�i. � * "�' '�-� `�xlo£i a X i t � ,� ✓ _ ��' $t"
3.2 v ets # t§., �I')x i "�f t
� Pe n�Y` e �Y3txs•"F 3 aya + - E
j
lit" 1 vpti,P` ; "w -k rtvg ttb�aC+ i2 r� h''rj 'E�
�...us">i..ui�.,:v 3, .d aa a.i.. };.. `sn? x`ati..ds
�z �'''�i' �� 7> nt �f ' l r 'i . � � ' i � ? - # . ,� � 4`i '� .�r ��. , �r „�`•t '"s2�"�.#" , rsv- pr, 3, f
Sllperintendent 84S1g �� n x. atUie ceC l } ate�j a tp 6m eu r F V� � ,� ' U` he r� #7.2� kp
x - �ot�,+..�.m ESx: _•:. a`., , � ,c<�..s,�. -r, .: -.r, i lk.: ': _l _.a -� +�' �.,zi�.r.
Notice to School Superintendent - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
24
06- 19- 08;11:44AM:
Rezoning Comments
Winchester Regional Airport
Winchester Regional Airpo:
Regional Airport
Attn: Executive Director
491 Airport Road
Winchester, Virginia 22602
(540) 662 -2422
Winchester
;5406622936 # 2/ 3
Attn: Executive Director
491 Airport Road
(Rt. 645, off of Rt 522 South)
Winchester, Virginia I
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575 -2436
Mailing Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 inter section
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martin Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M -1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770 + 1 _
Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please Return Form to Applicant
30
06�- 19- 08;11:44AM;
•
;5406622936
WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT
SEBNNG ME
TOP M MGM
December 15, 2006
491 AIRPORT ROAD
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602
(540) 662 -2422
Donnie D. Dunlap, P.E.
Triad Engineering, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2397
Winchester, Virginia 22604
Re: Rezoning Comment
i -8 Distribution Center
Stonewall Magisterial District
Dear Mr. Dunlap:
We have reviewed the proposed Rezoning application and determined that the
proposed development plan will not have an impact on operations at the
Winchester Regional Airport.
While the proposed site lies within the airport's airspace, it does fall outside of the
airport's Part 77 close in surfaces therefore special conditions will not be
requested.
Thank you for your continued cooperation and consideration in the continuing
safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport.
Sincerely,
tt 3/ 3
Serena R. Manuel
Executive Director
OB- 19 -O8: 11 aagM: :5405622936 tt 1i 3
Rezoning Comments
Winchester Regional
Mail to:
Hand deliver to:
Winchester Regional Airport
Winchester
Regional Airport
Attn: Executive Director
Attn: Executive Director
491 Airport Road
491 Airport Road
Winchester, Virginia 22602
(Rt. 645, off ofRt. 522 South)
(540) 662 -2422
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680 -4664
Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin
Walsh Colucci Lubelev Emrich & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Prince William, VA 22192
Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersec
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martin Pike).
Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please Return Form to Applicant
30
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:B -3 Ind. and Tran siticAcreage: 59.0770 + /-