Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-07 Traffic Impact AnalysisA Traffic Impact Analysis of the Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Easy Living Associates 112 South Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: I Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. Lmdsccpe Architects. P� 3F0300,4.264.3671 t Avenuei 54 Martinsburg, West Virgininia a 25401 T 304.264.2711 May 11, 2006 0 OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Easy Living Associates Commercial Property located along the west side of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike), north of the intersection of Route 11 /Old Charles Town Road (Route 671), in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project is comprised of 45,000 square feet of retail, 35,000 square feet of office, 35,000 square feet of self - service storage, a 16 pump gas station (with convenience store) and a 5,000 square foot -fast food restaurant. Access will be provided along Route 11 via two site - driveways: 1) Primary - to be located north of the existing Easy Living Mobile Home Park Site- Driveway, 2) Secondary - to be located along the existing Easy Living Mobile Home Park Site - Driveway. The proposed development will be built - out over a single transportation phase by the year 2008. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate ' the location of the proposed Easy Living Associates Commercial Property with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology � The traffic impacts accompanying the Easy Living Associates Commercial Property ' were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of impact, I • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Easy Living Associates Commercial Property, • Distribution and assignment of the Easy Living Associates Commercial Property development - generated trips onto the completed roadway network, • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway capacity software, HCS -2000, for existing and future conditions. P � A7rp eTmpaet dnalvsis of'the Gast/ Lii�in�Assacia Commercial Property Project Number: 14367-1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 1 No , � . . MY, 'Z® . «x 3 Z ���� S ITEy ;�\ z « - .� R =. y � ^ + Figure Vicinity Map - Easy Living Associates Commercial Property P HR , « s� r r m , c , , Pr mNumber: 14367-1-0 May » m, Page I [1 U H U 11 U P U P L H U H EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR +A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 11 /Old Charles Town Road and Route 11 /Easy Living Mobile Home Park Site - Driveway. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 9.4% based on the published Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data. I Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM /PM peak hour trafifi I c volumes at key locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour HCS -2000 levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. I P A Traffic Impact Analysis of Me EasV Lioim Associates Commercial Properly Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 3 No Scale AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 0 u Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions P A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 4 1 r No Scale Denotes two -way left turn lane * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 1 Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P H A A Traffic /umacl AuaR;sis o(the Easy Living Associates Commercial Properly Project Number. 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 5 I 11 1 U 1 2008 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Based upon the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average daily traffic data (between years 2001 and 2004) for Route I 1 (Martinsburg Pike) within the vicinity of the site, a growth rate of 3.2% was calculated. PHR +A, however, applied a conservative annual growth rate of four percent (4 %) per year to the existing traffic volumes along Route 11 and Old Charles Town Road (shown in Figure 2) to obtain 2008 base conditions. Additionally, PHR +A included specific future developments located within the vicinity of the proposed site. Using the 7` Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (1TE) Trip Generation Report PHR +A has provided Tables la and lb to summarize the 2008 "other developments" trip generation. Figure 4 shows the 2008 background ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2008 build - out lane geometry and levels of service. HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of this report. Table 1 a Background Development: Adams Commercial Trin Generation Summary R Code Land lice Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak (lour Out Total ADT 150 - Warehousing 120,000 SF 78 17 95 19 1 57 75 792 151 Sclf -Score Storage 140,000 SF 12 9 21 18 17 35 334 710 ot7me 120,000 SF 191 26 217 36 177 213 1,535 812 auildine Lumber Store 25,000 SF 44 21 65 59 67 126 1,024 860 %%1mieale Market 150,000 SF 41 34 75 14 17 I 32 1,010 50,000 SF 64 Total Tripsl 366 107 473 1 146 ,334 481 4695 Table 1 b Background Development: Stephenson Village (Phase 2) Trio Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AD1 Peak Hour Out Total In 1'M Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single - Family Detached 858 units 153 458 610 477 268 745 8,580 220 Apartment 240 units 20 103 123 100 49 149 1,573 230 Townhouse /Condo 390 units 26 125 150 127 62 189 3,393 251 Elderly Housing - Detach 531 units 49 86 135 112 63 175 2,124 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 144 units 6 4 10 8 6 14 501 820 Retail 50,000 SF 64 41 106 191 207 397 4,365 Total Trips 317 816 1 133 1 014 655 1 20.536 Total Internal 26 26 53 99 99 199 2,183 Total Pass -by 10 6 16 29 31 60 655 Total "New Trips" 281 784 1,065 886 525 1,411 17,699 P � d Traffic lmnacr Hno(vsis ofthe Easy Living dssocia Commer cial 367 -1-0 RA Project Number: 14367 -I -0 May 11, 2006 Page 6 i No Scale 11 ti i � 8 �w p �1 Q 6) �9 3��� I Old Charlesp ° N'n Ro 11 AM Peak Hour nr (PM Peak Hour) TD +n Figure 4 2008 Background Traffic Conditions p � A Tra/Jic /mpac( Anah�sis o(!he F.'asv Living Associn Commercial Property Project Number 14367 -I -0 May 11, 2006 Page 7 [] Ir No Scale ;a q cI y 41 r (cJU signalized I "suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS =6(B) signalization WR - I Right Figure 5 �� I nsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersectwn Denotes two -way left turn lane * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 2008 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P R+A A Traffic hnpact Analysis of the Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 8 11 I U U TRIP GENERATION Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (1TE) Tri Generation Report PHR +A has prepared Table 2 to summarize the trip generation for the proposed Easy Living Associates Commercial Property development. Table 2 Proposed Development: Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Out Hour Total In I'M Peak (lour Out Total ADT 151 Self -Sen ice Storage 35,000 SF 3 2 5 4 i 4 8 82 710 Office 35,000 SF 71 10 81 20 98 118 594 820 Retail 45,000 SF 59 38 97 177 192 370 4,041 934 Fac Food w/ DT 5,000 SF 135 130 266 90 83 173 2,481 945 Gs Station w/ Mart 16 pumps 80 80 161 107 i 107 214 2,604 Total 349 260 610 399 484 883 1 9,803 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns, for the roadway network surrounding the proposed site. PHR +A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Easy Living Associates Commercial Property trips (Table 2) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 7 shows the development - generated AM /PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments. 2008 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS H H 1 The Easy Living Associates Commercial Property assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2008 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2008 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2008 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 9 shows the respective 2008 build -out lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. P ] rPA A Traffic Impact Analvsis of the East Liviap Associaler Commercial Proyeriv Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 9 I 1 1 H u u 11 p � A TrufOe lumnet Ai�nlvsis o(dre Eusv Livin¢Associa co u 1 367-1 0 RA Project Nmnber: 14367 -I -0 May 11, 2006 Page 10 No Scale eti ^l e %..12 AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 7 Development- Generated Trip Assignments P �.1. l r4 TrJli nc /nrpnc( Analysis of the Easv Living �Issoci Co mm ercial 367 -1-0 1 1l Pro Number: 14367 -I -0 May 11, 2006 Page I I r No Scale 1 N. AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 8 2008 Build -out Traffic Conditions P RA A Tragic Impact Analysis o0he Fan 7 iyin¢ Associates Commercial Properly Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 12 t I No Scale Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements I,OS =n(C) Signalization wn - I Right n^ C(C 00 11 Figure 9 )q Unsignafized Intersection Unsignalized� a Intersection P Unsienalized Intersection r (p)+ e6 7 - Y *O - f Intersection 2j� LOS =n(C) Denotes two -way left turn lane * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 2008 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P H A A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Easy Li vino Associates Comomercial Property Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 13 U U H n CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the build -out of the proposed Easy Livin Associates Commercial Property development are acceptable and manageable. All the study area intersections, except the intersection of Route 11 /Old Charles Town Road, will maintain satisfactory levels of service "C" or better during 2008 build -out conditions. The intersection of Route 11 /Charles Town Road will maintain unacceptable levels of service "F" during 2008 background and build -out conditions, suggesting minimal impact of the proposed development. Traffic signalization and one westbound right turn lane would be required at this intersection to achieve acceptable levels of service "C or better. The following describes the suggested roadway configuration required for the study area intersections: • Route 11 /Old Charles Town Road: In order to achieve acceptable levels of service, this intersection will require traffic signalization along with a westbound right -turn lane during 2008 build -out conditions. H • Route 11 /Site Driveway #1: In order to achieve acceptable levels of service, this intersection will require traffic signalization along with a northbound left -turn lane and separate eastbound left /right -turn lane during 2008 build -out conditions. Route 11 /Site Driveway #2: This unsignalized intersection will require a shared eastbound thru/right, a shared westbound left/thru and a shared southbound left right turn lane during 2008 build -out conditions. P \_l i A Traffic Impact Analysis ofthe F.asy Living Associates Commercial Properh Project Number: 14367 -1 -0 May 11, 2006 Page 14 Rights Reserved HC.S1000 Version Copyright (0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +q 3/2/2006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction Analysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2006 Existing Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Pro ert East/West Street: Old Charles Town Rd North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 116 0 33 229 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 123 0 35 243 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 38 0 74 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 0 78 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length., and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 35 118 C (m) (vph) 1464 1404 c 0.02 0.08 95% queue length 0.07 0.27 Control Delay 7.5 9.9 LOS A A pproach Delay 9.9 pproach LOS A Rights Reserved HC.S1000 Version Copyright (0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d 5/11/2006 Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4. Id 5/11/2006 Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2006 Existing Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Old Charles Town Rd North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 267 36 42 122 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 284 38 44 129 0 Percent Heavy Vehides 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R I L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 25 0 77 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 0 81 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehides 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 C onfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 44 107 C (m) (vph) 1238 997 c 0.04 0.11 95% queue length 0.11 0.36 Control Delay 8.0 10.6 LOS A B A pproach Delay 10.6 A pproach LOS B Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4. Id 5/11/2006 Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id U Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4.Id 5/11/2006 Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 3/2/2006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction Analysis Year Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park 2006 Existing Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Property East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 9 181 0 0 241 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 192 0 0 256 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 4 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 8 0 21 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 8 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 9 30 C (m) (vph) 1306 729 lc 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 Control Delay 7.8 10.2 LOS A B pproach Delay 10.2 pproach LOS B Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4.Id 5/11/2006 Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d U [1 P Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Vernon 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst gency /Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 PM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park 2006 Existing Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R V olume 37 307 0 .0 149 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 326 0 0 158 8 Percent Heavy Vehides 2 4 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 1 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 0 0 0 13 0 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 13 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehldes 4 0 4 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 39 28 C (m) (vph) 1412 686 lc 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.09 0.13 Control Delay 7.6 10.5 LOS A B A pproach Delay 10.5 pproach LOS B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Vernon 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 [l U 11 H U n Rights Reserved HCS2000T1 Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All (tights Reserved Version 4.Id Version 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +q 31212006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2008 Background Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Property EasUWest Street: Old Charles Town Rd North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 319 149 147 304 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 339 158 156 323 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 456 0 398 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 485 0 423 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v(vph) 156 908 C (m) (vph) 1067 466 c 0.15 1.95 95% queue length 0.51 60.85 Control Delay 9.0 454.9 LOS A F pproach Delay 454.9 pproach LOS F Rights Reserved HCS2000T1 Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All (tights Reserved Version 4.Id Version 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 U R H Rights Reserved HCS2000T'V' Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1d 1 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2008 Background Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Old Charles Town Rd North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 366 509 396 309 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 389 541 421 328 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 305 0 284 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 324 0 302 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v(vph) 421 626 C (m) (vph) 736 181 c 0.57 3.46 95% queue length 3.67 59.57 Control Delay 16.2 1159 LOS C F pproach Delay 1159 pproach LOS I F Rights Reserved HCS2000T'V' Copyright C 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1d 1 5/11/2006 1 r v 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 31212006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Background Analysis Year Conditions Con Easy Living Associates Project ID Commercial Property - Suggested Imp. Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L R T R L T Volume, V (vph) 456 398 319 149 147 304 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 7 2 2 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing I WB Only 1 02 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 30.0 JG= G= G= G= 8.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 6 IY= Y= 1Y= IY= 0 Y= 6 1Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 485 423 339 159 156 323 Lane group capacity, c 625 819 731 1322 452 898 v/c ratio, X 0.78 0.52 0.46 0.12 0.35 0.36 Total green ratio, g/C 0.35 0.52 0.41 0.84 0.51 0.51 Uniform delay, d. 24.5 1 113.5 18.2 1.3 12.3 12.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 5/11/2006 Delay calibration, k 0.33 1 0.12 1 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d 6.1 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.2 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 30.6 14.1 18.6 1.3 12.8 12.9 Lane group LOS C B B A B B Approach delay 22.9 13.1 12.9 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 17.8 X = 0.70 Intersection LOS B 11CS2000Tst Copyright m 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Versi or. 4.1e 1 5/11/2006 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 31212006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Analysis Year 2008 Background Conditions Easy Living Associates Project ID Commercial Property - Suggested Imp. Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L R T R L T Volume, V (vph) 305 284 366 509 396 309 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 7 2 2 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking I Grade / Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N Parking maneuvers, N tON Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G. 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 1 02 03 04 SB Only I NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 24.0 1 G= G= I G= G= 15.0 1 G= 34.0 G= 1 Y= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= IY= IY= 0 IY= 6 IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 324 302 389 541 421 329 Lane group capacity, c 500 838 710 1192 544 1024 v/c ratio, X 0.65 0.36 0.55 0.45 0.77 0.32 Total green ratio, g/C 0.28 0.53 0.40 0.75 0.58 0.58 Uniform delay, d I j 26.8 1 111.6 j 19.6 3.9 12.0 1 9.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 5/11/2006 Delay calibration, k 0.23 1 0.11 1 0.15 0.11 0.32 0.11 Incremental delay, d 2.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 6.9 0.2 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 29.7 11.9 20.5 4.2 18.9 9.5 Lane group LOS C 8 C A 8 A Approach delay 21.1 11.0 14,8 Approach LOS C g g Intersection delay 15.0 X = 0.73 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000 Copyright 02000 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Verson 4.1e 1 5/11/2006 n n U n U n k u 1 1 H Copynght O 2003 University of Florida, All Itights Rescrvcd Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY HC52000 General Information Verson 4.1d Site Information 5/11/2006 Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park 2008 Background Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 9 708 0 0 430 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate. HFR 9 753 0 0 457 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 4 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 0 0 0 8 0 21 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 8 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length,, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 9 30 C (m) (vph) 1101 492 lc 0.01 0.06 95% queue length 0.02 0.19 Control Delay 8.3 12.8 LOS A B [Approach Delay 12.8 pproach LOS B Copynght O 2003 University of Florida, All Itights Rescrvcd Version 4.Id Rights Reserved HC52000 Verson 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copynght O 2003 University of Florida, All Itights Rescrvcd Version 4.Id H U 1 U 11 H U n h n [1 I Rights Reserved NCS2000 Version 4.1 d Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 3/2/2006 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park 2008 Background Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Pro ert East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South J Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 37 614 0 0 690 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 653 0 0 734 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 4 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 0 0 0 13 0 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 13 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehices 4 0 4 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 39 28 C (m) (vph) 865 335 V/c 0.05 0.08 95% queue length 0.14 0 -27 Control Delay 9.4 16.7 LOS A C pproach Delay 16.7 pproach LOS C Rights Reserved NCS2000 Version 4.1 d Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 5/11/2006 Rights Reserved HCV 000 s" Version 4.Id Copyright Q 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Versior.4.1d 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Property East/West Street: Old Charles Town Rd North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 504 149 178 442 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 536 158 189 470 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 456 0 440 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 485 0 468 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 189 953 C (m) (vph) 901 338 c 0.21 2.82 95% queue length 0.79 81.27 Control Delay 10.1 850.6 LOS B F pproach Delay 850.6 pproach LOS F Rights Reserved HCV 000 s" Version 4.Id Copyright Q 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Versior.4.1d 5/11/2006 I Rights Reserved HCS2000 Vernon 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copyright C) 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY T General Information L T Site Information Volume Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 3/2/2006 PM Peak Hour 509 Intersection J urisdiction Analysis Year Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert 0.94 East West Street: Old Charles Town Rd 0.94 North /South Street: Rt 11 0.94 Intersection Orientation: North -South 0 I Study Period hrs): 0.25 541 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 602 0 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rights Reserved HCS2000 Vernon 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copyright C) 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id L T R L T R Volume 0 578 509 454 566 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 614 541 482 602 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 2 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 305 0 332 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 324 0 353 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 482 677 C (m) (vph) 605 64 lc 0.80 10.58 95% queue length 7.80 79.81 Control Delay 30.2 4433 LOS D F pproach Delay 4433 pproach LOS F Rights Reserved HCS2000 Vernon 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copyright C) 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 1 1 1 1 HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 31212006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Analysis Year 2008 Build -out Conditions Easy Living Associates Project ID Commercial Property - Suggested Imp. Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L R T R L T Volume, V (vph) 456 440 504 149 178 442 % Heavy vehicles. %HV 2 2 7 2 2 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A I A Start -up lost time. I. 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking I Grade 1 Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N r Par king maneuvers, N t j E N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3,2 3.2 Phasing I WB Only 1 02 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 30.0 JG= G= JG= I G= 8.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 6 IY= Y= IY= 1Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 485 468 536 159 189 470 Lane group capacity, c 625 819 731 1322 307 898 v/c ratio, X 0.78 0.57 0.73 0.12 0.62 0.52 Total green ratio, g/C 0.35 0.52 0.41 0.84 0.51 0.51 Uniform delay, d 24.5 14.0 21.1 1.3 15.0 14.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.33 0.17 0.29 0.11 0.20 0.13 5/11/2006 I n H Incremental delay, d 6.1 1.0 1 3.8 0.0 3.7 0.6 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 30.6 15.0 t249 1.3 18.7 14.7 Lane group LOS C 8 A 8 8 Approach delay 23.0 19.5 15.8 Approach LOS C 8 8 Intersection delay 19,9 X c = 0.85 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright (D 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 1 h L .J H U U 1 5/11/2006 n U 1 n 1 1 k U U [J I I HCS2000 " DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 31212006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Charles Town Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Analysis Year 2008 Build -out Conditions Easy Living Associates Project ID Commercial Property - I Suggested Imp. Volume and Timing input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Lane group L R T R L T Volume, V (vph) 305 332 578 509 454 566 % Heavy vehicles. %HV 2 2 7 2 2 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A I A A A Start -up lost time. I. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 02 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 19.0 G= G= G= G= 20.0 G= 34.0 G= G= Y= 6 IY= Y= IY= IY= 0 Y= 6 IY= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 324 353 615 541 483 602 Lane group capacity, c 396 838 710 1099 504 1128 v/c ratio, X 0.82 0.42 0.87 0.49 0.96 0.53 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 0.53 0.40 0.69 0.64 0.64 Uniform delay, d j 31.4 1 12.1 j 23.4 6.0 124.0 18.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.36 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.47 0.14 5/11/2006 H 11 H H P U Incremental delay, d 12.7 1 0.3 1 11.0 0.3 29.7 0.5 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 44.0 12.5 34.4 6.4 53.7 9.0 Lane group LOS D 8 C A D A Approach delay 27.6 21.3 28.9 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 25.6 X� = 0.97 Intersection LOS C HCS2000 Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, AI I. Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 1 5/11/2006 Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4.Id Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst gencylCo. Date Performed A nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 AM Peak Hour Intersection J urisdiction A nalysis Year Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs ): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 30 915 0 0 584 5 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 973 0 0 621 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 4 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 0 0 0 9 0 37 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 9 0 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 2 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 31 48 C (m) (vph) 956 402 c 0.03 0.12 95% queue length 0.10 0.40 Control Delay 8.9 15.2 LOS A C pproach Delay 15.2 pproach LOS C Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4.Id Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 5/11/2006 ' t 1 a Movement TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ©0. Site Information Analyst Agency /Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 31212006 PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Mobil Home Park J urisdiction A nalysis Year 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Propert East/West Street: Mobil Home Park Nort outh Street: Rt 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 2 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 ©0. L T Volume 61 849 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 903 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 1 1 Configuration L T Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Westbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 Flared Approach Y Storage 1 RT Channelized Lanes 0 0 Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L (vph) 64 C (m) (vph) 664 lc 0.10 95% queue length 0.32 Control Delay 11.0 LOS B pproach Delay pproach LOS �0 ©0. 0000 00 Two Way Left Turn Lane 0 - -0 ssso �0 ©0. �0v0 t Rights Reserved HC52000 Version 4. Id 5/11/2006 Copyright (D 2003 University of Flonda, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +q Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed PHR06 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Site Drive #1 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Analysis Year 2008 Build -out Conditions Project ID Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT THI RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L R L T TR Volume, V (vph) 90 154 206 718 435 121 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 7 7 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A q A A A A Start -up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0' 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 j j 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 1 04 NB O!01 NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 19.0 G= G= G= G= 8. 51.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 96 164 219 764 592 Lane group capacity, c 374 580 478 1164 987 v/c ratio, X 0.26 0.28 0.46 0.66 0.60 Total green ratio, g/C 0.21 0.37 0.66 0.66 0.57 Uniform delay, d 29.6 20.1 8.0 9.4 12.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.19 5/11/2006 Incremental delay, d 0.4 0.3 0.7 1 1.4 1.0 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 30.0 20.4 8.7 t10 13.8 Lane group LOS C C A 8 Approach delay 23.g 10.3 13.8 Approach LOS C g g Intersection delay 13,4 X� = 0.56 Intersection LOS 8 1 HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 5/11/2006 1 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +q Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed PHR06 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt 11 & Site Drive #1 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County Analysis Year 2008 Build -out Conditions Project ID Easy Living Associates Commercial Property Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L R L T TR Volume, V (vph) 167 286 235 629 700 138 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 7 7 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0, 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 1 02 03 04 1 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 G= 19.0 JG= G= JG= I G= 8.0 G= 51.0 G JG= Timing Y= 6 IY= Y= IY= IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB I WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 178 304 250 669 892 Lane group capacity, c 374 580 359 1164 992 v/c ratio, X 0.48 0.52 0.70 0.57 0.90 Total green ratio, g/C 0.21 0.37 0.66 0.66 0.57 Uniform delay, d 31.1 22.3 10.6 8.6 17.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.13 0.26 0.17 1 0.42 5/11/2006 Incremental delay, d 1.0 0.9 5.8 0.7 11.0 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 32.1 23.2 16.4 9.3 Lane group LOS C C 8 A !t C App roach delay 26.5 11.2 28.2 Approach LOS C 8 C Intersection delay 21.0 X = 0.75 Intersection LOS C 11CS2000' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4J e 1 5/11/2006 0 C' Rights Reserved 11CS2000 Version 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copyright CO 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 312/2006 AM Peak Hour Intersection atysis Year Analysis y Site Drive #2 & Mobil Home Pk 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Property East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Site Drive #2 Intersection Orientation: North -South I Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 17 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 18 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 6 12 23 0 25 0 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 12 24 0 26 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR TR LT (vph) 18 36 26 C(m)(vph) 1623 992 847 c 0.01 0.04 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.11 0.09 Control Delay 7.2 8.8 9.4 LOS A A A pproach Delay 8.8 9.4 pproach LOS A A Rights Reserved 11CS2000 Version 4.1d 5/11/2006 Copyright CO 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Verson 4.1d Version 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 3/2/2006 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Site Drive #2 & Mobil Home Pk 2008 Build -out Conditions Project Description Easy Living Associates Commercial Property East/West Street: Mobil Home Park North /South Street: Site Drive #2 :Intersection Orientation: North -South ] Study Period (hrs): 0.25 V ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 31 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 32 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR LR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R V olume 0 45 26 0 28 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 47 27 0 29 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A pproach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR TR LT (vph) 32 74 29 C(m)(vph) 1623 893 811 c 0.02 0.08 0.04 95% queue length 0.06 0.27 0.11 Control Delay 7.3 9.4 9.6 LOS A A A A pproach Delay 9.4 9.6 pproach LOS A A 1 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Verson 4.1d Version 4.Id 1 5/11/2006 n [J p intersertmu: E -W: ROUTE 761 Weather2RY Fil eNamel N -S: ROUTE I1 Count By HP I nput By 7SP Locationj Count Date 1/23/2006 ' 15 Minute EB: WE: ROUTE 761 NB: ROUTE I l S13: ROUTE 11 15 Min. Per .d N.S, Period Begining Leo Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Lcft Thru Right Total Lefl Thru Right Total E & W Begining 700 0 0 0 0 9 0 11 20 0 19 0 19 3 42 0 45 84 7:00 7:15 0 0 0 0 7 0 17 24 0 22 0 22 5 44 0 49 95 7:15 7:30 0 0 0 0 II 0 14 25 0 25 0 25 4 48 0 52 102 7:30 7:45 0 0 0 0 12 0 18 30 0 30 0 30 7 53 0 60 120 7:45 8:00 1 0 0 0 14 0 21 35 0 31 0 31 6 55 0 61 127 8:00 8:15 0 n 0 0 5 0 17 22 0 29 0 29 9 63 0 72 123 8:15 830 0 0 0 0 7 0 18 25 0 26 0 26 11 58 0 69 120 8:30 8:45 0 0 0 0 8 0 21 29 0 30 0 30 8 53 0 61 120 8:45 A.M. Total 0 0 0 0 73 0 137 210 0 212 0 212 53 416 0 469 891 A.M. Total 1600 0 0 0 0 7 0 22 29 0 58 7 65 7 35 0 42 136 1600 16:15 0 0 0 0 6 0 23 29 0 62 5 67 8 34 0 42 138 16:15 16:30 0 0 0 0 6 0 21 27 0 63 6 69 9 32 0 41 137 1630 16:45 0 G 0 0 5 0 23 28 0 62 7 69 8 27 0 35 132 1645 1700 0 0 0 0 8 0 19 27 0 69 9 78 11 33 0 44 149 1700 17:15 0 0 0 0 6 0 14 20 0 73 14 87 14 30 0 44 151 17:15 ' 17:30 0 G 0 0 3 0 16 19 0 66 8 74 11 27 0 38 131 17:30 17:45 0 0 0 0 4 0 12 16 0 54 6 60 8 28 0 36 112 1745 P.M. Total 0 0 0 0 45 0 150 195 0 507 62 569 76 246 0 322 1086 P.M.Teaal 1 hour EB: WB: ROUTE 761 NB: ROUTE 11 SB: ROUTE 11 I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Lcft T -I Right Total Left Thm Right 'Total Left Thru Right Total Lett Th. Right 'Total E & W Begining 700 0 0 0 0 39 0 60 99 0 96 0 96 19 187 0 206 401 700 7:15 0 0 0 0 44 0 70 114 0 108 0 108 22 200 0 222 444 7:15 730 0 0 0 0 42 0 70 112 0 115 0 115 26 219 0 245 472 730 745 0 0 0 0 38 0 74 112 0 116 0 116 33 229 0 262 490 7:45 800 0 0 0 0 34 0 77 111 0 116 0 116 34 229 0 263 490 8:00 16:00 0 0 0 0 24 0 89 113 0 245 25 270 32 128 0 160 543 16:00 16:15 0 0 0 0 25 0 86 111 0 256 27 283 36 126 0 162 556 16:15 1630 0 0 0 0 25 0 77 102 0 267 36 303 42 122 0 164 569 1630 16:45 0 0 0 0 22 0 72 94 0 270 38 308 44 117 0 161 563 16:45 17:00 0 0 0 0 21 0 61 82 0 262 37 299 44 118 0 162 543 17:00 1 Flour EB: WB: ROUTE 761 NB: ROUTE I1 SB: ROUTE I I I Hour Period N,S, Pcriod Begin mg Left Thru Right Total Ixft Thr i Right Total Left Thru Right Total Ixft Thin Right Total E & W Bcgimng T45 0 P 0 0 38 0 74 112 0 116 0 116 33 229 0 262 490 7:45 A.M. Peak PHF = PHF = 0.80 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.91 0.96 A.M. Peak 1630 0 0 0 0 25 0 77 102 0 267 36 303 42 122 0 164 569 1630 P.M. Peak PHF = PHF = 0.91 PEE = 0.87 PHF = 0.93 0.9 P.M. Peak [J p n Intersection: E -W: Mobile Home Park Weatber DRY Fil Name N -S: ROUTE I I Count 8y HK I nput By HK Location I Count Datel 123/2006 15 Minute E,B: Mobile Home Park NB: ROUTE I1 SR: ROUTE 11 15 Min. Penod F13 N,S. Period Begining Left Thou Right Total Thru Right 'total Left Thor Right Total I-eft Thru Right Total E & W Begining t 700 1 3 4 0 3 3 0 0 7 700 7.15 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 0 4 7:15 730 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 7:30 7:45 3 8 II 0 3 3 0 0 14 745 8:00 2 5 7 0 1 1 2 2 10 800 8:15 1 5 6 0 4 4 1 1 11 8:15 8:30 2 3 5 0 1 1 0 0 6 830 8:45 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 0 6 8:45 A.M. Total 11 0 31 42 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 3 3 60 1 A.M. Total 1600 3 1 4 0 8 8 0 0 12 1600 16:15 I 2 3 0 6 6 1 1 10 16:15 16:30 1 2 2 4 0 9 9 2 2 15 16:30 1645 5 3 8 0 6 6 2 2 16 16:45 1700 3 4 7 0 10 10 3 3 20 17:00 17:15 3 6 9 0 12 12 1 1 22 17:15 1730 0 3 3 0 8 8 0 0 11 17:30 17:45 4 4 8 0 4 4 1 1 13 17:45 P.M. Total 21 0 25 46 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 63 1 0 0 10 10 119 1 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: NNIB ROUTE 761 NB: ROUTE I1 SB: ROUTE 11 1 Haur Round N,S, Period BcDning Left Tnm Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left not Right Total Left Thin Right 'Total E & W Begaung ' 700 5 0 14 19 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 27 7'.00 7:15 6 0 16 22 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 2 2 30 7'.15 730 6 0 20 26 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 3 3 37 7'.30 7:45 8 0 '_I 29 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 3 3 41 7'.45 800 6 0 17 23 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 3 3 33 8'.00 16:00 11 0 8 19 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 0 5 5 53 16:00 16:15 11 0 11 22 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 0 0 8 8 61 16:15 1630 13 0 15 28 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 0 0 8 8 73 16:30 16:45 II 0 16 27 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 36 0 0 6 6 69 16:45 17:00 10 0 17 27 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 34 1 0 0 5 5 66 17:00 1 Hour EB: WB. ROU'IE 761 NB: ROUTE 11 SB: ROUTE 11 1 Hour Period MS, Pcnod Bewmm.g Left Thru Right Total Left Th. Bight Total Ixft Thru Right I'mal Lcft Thou Right Total E& W Begnang 745 8 0 21 29 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 3 3 41 7:45 A.M. Peak PELF = 0.66 PET = PHP = 056 THE = 038 0.73 A.M. Peak 16:30 13 0 15 28 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 0 0 8 8 73 16:30 Y.M. Peak PEE = 0.78 PITT = PHE = 0.77 PHE = 0.67 0 .83 P .M. Peak