The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-07 Comments1 Patrick R. Sowers From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [ Rhonda .Funkhouser @VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [ Lloyd.Ingram @VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:00 PM To: Patrick Sowers Cc: Ronald A. Mislowsky; Eric Lawrence; Ingram, Lloyd Subject: Shenandoah /Oak Ridge Development - Route 522, Frederick County The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a measurable impact on Routes 522, 636 and 277. These route are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Shenandoah /Oak Ridge Development Rezoning Application dated January 3, 2007 (revised April 19, 2007) addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off - site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the cpportunity to comment. Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Edinburg Residency - Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 Phone #(540) 984 -5611 Fax #(540) 984 -5607 f rt � R 2 1dz V �F 1 M1 _ �4 i n'- x Control number RZ07 -0002 Project Name Shenandoah- Oak Ridge Property Address 117 E. Piccadilly St. Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RA Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Date received 1/19/2007 City Winchester Tax ID Number 85- A -273D n Date reviewed Date Revised 1/24/2007 Applicant Patton Harris Rust & Associates State Zip Applicant Phone VA 22601 540- 667 -2139 Fire District Rescue District 11 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway /Aisleway Width Not Identified Election District Opequon Residential Sprinkler System Yes Fire Lane Required No Special Hazards No Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature J i Yes J. Neal Title • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665.5643 FAX: 540/678 -0682 April 23, 2007 Mr. Patrick R. Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates, p.c. 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Shenandoah - Oak Ridge Rezoning Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Sowers: We received your responses to our April 19, 2007, review comments related to the subject rezoning_ We take exception to your conclusion that the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area policies are not relevant to the subject property. Consequently, we will defer any further reviews until the comprehensive plan is amended to include the subject property. Sincerely, W��n� Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. �/ , Director of Public Works � HES /rls cc: Planning and Development file C:\Program Files \WordPerfect Office X3\ Rhonda\ TEMPCONINIENTS\Shenandoa- oakridgerezcom.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 0 Rezoning Comments Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Frederick County Department of Inspections Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665 -5650 Applicant's Name: Mailing Address: Location of Property: Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections Co. Administration Bldg., 4 Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o Patrick Sowers 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 1 Phone: (540) 667.2139 The Property is located West and adjacent to the existing/developing Shenandoah Age Restricted Community South of Route 277 and West of Route 522. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: R5 Acreage: 52.6 Department of Inspections Comments: {/ z,1�5 1/�ZN X Yze I Inspections Signature &Date: Notice to Dept. o nspections — Please Return is Form to he Applicant RECEIVED JAN 1 d 2007 60 Gov, l ,. 03/28/2007 10:12 1 Mail to: Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P,O. Box 1977 Winchester,.VA 22604 (540) 868 -1061 540811061 Frederick County Sanitation Authority I FGSA PAGE 02 Hand d— ei= tv— e< S. Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority ,A€tr3:. 315 Tasker Road 774s Stegiit:nsCity. VA Applicant's Name;_ att )heels Rust & AssogjAics . , Phone: 15401 667 2139 oio raa S& Sums _ Mailing Address: 117 E. PipLWill Stree S ' Winchester VA '22601 Location of Property: The Pro is located West and adjacent to the existin / t g elouing Shenandoah A ae Restncted Co un t So th e€ aut 27Z Wcst Ro a 322. Current Zoning: K Zoning Requested- R5 Acreage: 52.6 zinitalloo Authority Cotnmetus:__. 77te statements fnthe section sewage conveyance and water supplyrrasorrect. However, the h Autho"ryes'"ontrs„^t w Lr, fiWdocs trot allotssewnge service to be provided outside the - Shenandoah Development without the approval of Oxbridge Development. Such approv has not areaasa tcs�utsr t Too Ktur ace ea. Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: ngIneer -it for 2/2/07 Notice to Sanitation Authority nPlea 12etura I�as =kor n to Appllenz t / 14 • 0 Rezoning Comments Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Frederick - Winchester Service Authority __./ Mail to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 722 -3579 Hand deliver to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 0�`I 1 9 ICJ/ 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The Property is located West and adjacent to the existing/developing Shenandoah Age Restricted Community South of Route 277 and West of Route 522. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: R5 Acreage: 52.6 Fred -Win hester- Service Authority's Comments: wrwnw wer 0AWhed. FWSA Signature &Date: � 61 Notice to Fred -Wine Se ice Authority — Please Return This Form to the Applicant IN Frederick- Winchester Service Authority Post ice Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Office. 107 North Kent Street County Office Complex Winchester, Virginia 22601 1 -540- 722 -3579 February 2, 2007 Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Sowers: SUBJECT: COMMENT LETTER - SHENANDOAH —OAK RIDGE PROPERTY The comment I have relates to the Sewer Conveyance and Water Supply section of the application. In that section, there is discussion about the Crooked Run Wastewater Treatment Plant and its design and permit limits, which are accurate. However, it does mention that, "Should future needs dictate an expansion of the treatment plant, it is possible for the plant to be permitted to treat up to 600,000 gallons of water per day." This is only partially true because, exceeding the 500,000 gallon per day threshold, will make this a significant discharge facility; and, if I am correct in my interpretation of the Bay Regulations, it would require that the treatment facility acquire nutrient tradeoffs or offsets to exceed its present permitted amount of 250,000. This would be something that would have to be considered in an expansion and the acquiring of the nutrient allocations, which could, in fact, limit the size of expansion or if any expansion could occur without additional cost beyond infrastructure. L y, Je se W. Moffett Executive - Director Frederick - Winchester Service Authority JWM:ncg Enclosures °MalntaJning and Promoting I& VwQaas of fAe dootockmily fArokpA 8nvirootmantad SiewardSRJp" 0 Rezoning Comments Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Frederick— Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick - Winchester Health Dept. Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 722 -3480 Hand deliver to: 10 Frederick - Winchester Health Dept• Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent St., Suite 201 1 A a 2UO2 Winchester, VA 22601 g YOB - - --- (540) 722 -3480 Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The Property is located West and adiacent to the existing/developing Shenandoah Age Restricted Community South of Route 277 and West of Route 522. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: R5 Acreage: 52.6 Frederick — Winchester Health Department's Comments: h e health department recommends that the applicant obtain approval from the permitting authority for the Crooked Run Wastewater Treatment Plant for the total projected wastewater flow including the currently approved 2,130 units and the 160 units proposed for approval. Note hat '. � ffetj tj y a f 250,000 g allatis per day whieh, based efi the applieffrit's estimated wastewater flow per unit, is already exceeded. Health Signature & Date: / Z' 7 / / 0 Notice to Health Department — Please Rety n This Form to the Applicant RECEIVED JAN 1 a 2007 FREDERICK COUNTY MUCWORK &MVECNONS 15 0 Coordinator of Construction and Facilities Use .vents M A E- Frederick County Public Schools Visit us at www.frederi&112.va.us February 2, 2007 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Sowers: RE: Shenandoah -Oak Ridge Property e -mail: kapocsis@frederick.k This letter is in response to your request for comments regarding the Shenandoah -Oak Ridge property-. Based on the information provided, which states that this will be an age- restricted project, it will have no impact on the school division as far as student population; however, a concern for the increase of traffic, which will impact the transportation of students to and from school twice a day, does exist. Respectfully yours, Stephen M. Kapocsi Coordinator of Construction and Facilities Use SMK:dkr cc: Patricia Taylor, Superintendent of Schools Al Omdorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Charles Puglisi, Director of Transportation 540 - 662 -3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604 -2546 FAX 540 -662 -3890 Rezoning Comments Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation I'—) Mail to: Frederick County Dept. of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665 -5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Co. Administration Bldg., 2 " Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The Property is located West and adjacent to the existing/developing Shenandoah Age Restricted Community South of Route 277 and West of Route 522. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: R5 Acreage: 52.6 Dept. of Parks & Recreation Comments: Plan appears to offer a monetary proffer adequate to offset the impact this development will have on the services provided by the County Parks and Recreatio Department. Parks Signature &Date: /2� ` J• Z �� Notice to Dept. o arks & Recreation — Please Return This Fo m to the Applicant U 12 Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Rezoning Comments Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Winchester Regional Airport Applicant's Name: Mailing Address Location of Property: 0 Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o Patrick Sowers 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone: (540) 667.2139 The Property is located West and adjacent to the existing/developing Shenandoah Age Restricted Community South of Route 277 and West of Route 522. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: R5 Acreage: 52.6 Winchester Regional Airport's Comments wee a�a�,d \eV\ Winchester Regional Airport Signature & Dat ! Y a cs Notice to Winchester Regional Airport — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 16 • WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD SERVING THE toA of wA�iNin WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 ai...__.. t (540) 662 -2422 February 9, 2007 Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: R,22o4ling Cc m m e nt Shenandoah — Oak Ridge Property Opequon Magisterial District Dear Mr. Sowers: The above referenced rezoning request has been reviewed and it appears that it should not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's Part 77 surfaces. However, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircraft within that area. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, s- - D Manuel Executive Director 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK April 30, 2007 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Shenandoah -Oak Ridge Property; PIN # 85- A -273D Dear Mr. Sowers: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a fom7al review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does identify a core battlefield within this area. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincere � C Lauren E. Kremp� _.-:..:___- Zoning Inspector LEK/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. FAX 640662 -4304 NAMES A. KLENKAR E-MAIL lawyers@hellmonahan.com STEVEN F. JACKSON May 29, 2007 DENNIS J. MCLOUGHLIN, JR. Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 P.4AY 3 0 2007 PLEASE REPLY TO: P. O. Box 848 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 -0848 Re: Shenandoah - Oak Ridge (Oak Ridge Properties, Inc.) Proffer Statement Dear Susan: I have reviewed the above - referenced Proffer Statement, with the revised date of April 19, 2007. It is my opinion that the Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. It is noted that the Proffer Statement references a Generalized Development Plan, a copy of which is attached to the Proffer Statement. It would appear that the Generalized Development Plan only addresses the entrance issue, and is not a development plan in any other respect. It is noted that the Generalized Development Plan does not indicate a general location of roads on the site, nor does it indicate the general location of the attached and detached dwellings, the location of common areas, or the location of any other amenities. 2. It is noted that Proffer No. 1 (Land Use) contains a proffer (Proffer 1.1) which limits single - family dwelling units to 160. However, it is noted that there is no limit on the number of the single- family dwelling units which may be attached. HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS /ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILBUR C. HALL (1892 - 1972) E 307 EAST MARKET STREET 9 EAST BOSCAW EN STREET THOMAS V. MONAHAN (1924 - 1999) LEESBURG, VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA SAMUEL D. ENGLE O. LEI-AND MAHAN TELEPHONE 703-777 1050 TELEPHONE 540-662 3200 ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. FAX 640662 -4304 NAMES A. KLENKAR E-MAIL lawyers@hellmonahan.com STEVEN F. JACKSON May 29, 2007 DENNIS J. MCLOUGHLIN, JR. Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 P.4AY 3 0 2007 PLEASE REPLY TO: P. O. Box 848 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 -0848 Re: Shenandoah - Oak Ridge (Oak Ridge Properties, Inc.) Proffer Statement Dear Susan: I have reviewed the above - referenced Proffer Statement, with the revised date of April 19, 2007. It is my opinion that the Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. It is noted that the Proffer Statement references a Generalized Development Plan, a copy of which is attached to the Proffer Statement. It would appear that the Generalized Development Plan only addresses the entrance issue, and is not a development plan in any other respect. It is noted that the Generalized Development Plan does not indicate a general location of roads on the site, nor does it indicate the general location of the attached and detached dwellings, the location of common areas, or the location of any other amenities. 2. It is noted that Proffer No. 1 (Land Use) contains a proffer (Proffer 1.1) which limits single - family dwelling units to 160. However, it is noted that there is no limit on the number of the single- family dwelling units which may be attached. • HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL Susan K. Eddy May 29, 2007 Page 2 Therefore, under this Proffer Statement, all 160 single - family dwelling units could be single - family, attached dwelling units. 3. With respect to Proffer 9.1, which provides for a minimum of two - road access to Rachel Carlson Drive, it should be noted that the property which is the subject of the rezoning does not front on Rachel Carlson Drive. In addition, the strip of land located between Rachel Carlson Drive and the subject property is under different entity ownership than the subject property. There is no information in the proffers as to how access will be obtained, and whether the access will be by private road or public road. 4. In Proffer 9.4, I would recommend that the proffered contributions be for "design and/or construction of transportation improvements ... ". 5. As a clerical matter, it is noted that in the cover sheet of this Proffer Statement the owner is identified as "Oakridge Properties, Inc. The proper corporate name for the owner is "Oak Ridge Properties, Inc. ". The signature block at the end of the Proffer Statement has the correct corporate name. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, or whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. If there are any questions concerning the foregoing comments, please contact me. Very truly yours, Robert_ T. Mitchell, Jr. RTM/ks 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK May 18, 2007 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Proposed Rezoning of the Shenandoah -Oak Ridge Property Dear Patrick: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Shenandoah - Oak Ridge Property. This application seeks to rezone 52.6 acres of land from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the R5 (Residential Recreational Community) District. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. I. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The site is not within the limits of any small area land use plans. The Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan identifies the site as a rural area. The Comprehensive Plan specifically calls for the preservation of rural areas. The plan does not identify the site for residential use. The proposed rezoning for residential use is contrary to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. 2. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The site is outside of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Services Area (SWSA). The Comprehensive Policy Plan confines urban development, such as this proposal, to the UDA. The proposed development is outside of the UDA and is therefore not in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The applicant should first seek to have the site brought into the UDA through a Comprehensive Policy Plan amendment request. The assertions in the applicant's impact statement that "the UDA and SWSA were established as the intended boundary for residential development by the service area of the Opequon and Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Plants" and "the SWSA/UDA concept does not apply to this rezoning application" have no foundation. These assertions are never stated or even implied in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. 3. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The policies in the Community Services and Facilities Chapter of the Comprehensive Policy Plan reiterate the policies in the 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 4 Winchester, Virginia 226015000 0 0 Page 2 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Shenandoah -Oak Ridge May 18, 2007 Land Use Chapter. "The intention is that additional extensions of sewer and water services will reflect the boundaries of the Urban Development Area. The extension of mains into areas not included in sewer and water service areas described by the facilities plan will require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. In this way, the County will maintain an orderly process of development." (8 -14) 4. Legal Agreement. The legal agreement between the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick - Winchester Service Authority and Dogwood Development Group LLC provided with this preliminary application, is of interest, but is not relevant for this proposed rezoning. Through the agreement, the three parties established a procedure for designing, constructing and financing a water distribution system, a sewer collection system and a wastewater treatment plant to serve Shenandoah and what has been called in the agreement the Crooked Run Sewer Service Area. The site of this proposed rezoning is not in the Shenandoah Development, nor is it in the Crooked Run Sewer Service Area. Expansion of the Crooked Run Sewer Service Area would be a policy decision of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors. Section 1 b of the agreement permits the developer to expand the wastewater system to provide treatment capacity to complete development of Shenandoah as currently planned and approved and as the same may be enlarged and expanded in the future. This in no way guarantees approval by the Board of Supervisors for any expansion of Shenandoah. 5. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Comprehensive Plan calls for Level of Service (LOS) Category C or better on roads impacted by new development. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) indicates that Level of Service C will not be maintained at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Routes 277) and Hudson Hollow Road (Route 636) and Fairfax Pike and Front Royal Pike (Route 522). While it may be true that background traffic alone warrants these transportation improvements, the County should riot be rezoning property that will exacerbate failing situations. It is worth noting that much of the background traffic is from the Shenandoah Development. This was rezoned in 1975 (Rezoning #173: Wheatlands) and no transportation proffers are associated with that rezoning. 6. R5 Residential Recreational Community District. The purpose of the R5 District is to protect and preserve natural and historic resources and features and protect and enhance the natural scenic value of the area to be developed. This application in no way addresses these key factors. 7. RS Residential Recreational Community District. The Zoning Ordinance ( §165 -75) requires the submission of a master development with every rezoning Page 3 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Shenandoah -Oak Ridge May 18, 2007 request to the R5 District. Please provide the Master Development Plan for preliminary review. 8. Traffic Impact Analysis. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was based on 160 single family attached units. It should be based on 160 single family detached units, as only the cap of 160 units is proffered. Since the housing type is not limited, the housing type with the largest traffic generation should be modeled. The TIA appears to show incorrect existing traffic on Hudson Hollow Road (Route 636). The figure is too high; please verify. In addition, the background traffic should include Cedar Meadows on White Oak Road. 9. Proffer Statement — The applicant has proffered a monetary contribution of $1,000 per single family attached unit and $2,000 per single family detached unit for transportation improvements. The total contribution may be as little as $160,000. This is not enough to install one traffic signal. Given the improvements needed as per page 17 of the TIA, the monetary contribution will do little to affect the failing levels of service in this area and further fail to adequately mitigate the impact of this development. 10. Proffer Statement — A minimum of two entrances are proffered on Rachel Carson Drive. In the interest of good access management, a maximum of two entrances would be more acceptable, and these should be lined up with existing intersections on Rachel Carson Drive. 11. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Historic Resources Advisory Board Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation. Frederick County School Department, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick- -- Winchester Health Department, Stephens City Fire and Rescue Companies and the Frederick - Winchester Service Authority. The proposed proffer statement has been forwarded by staff to the Frederick County Attorney. Once attorney comments are received by the Planning Department, they will be forwarded to your office. Attorney comments are required for acceptance of the rezoning application. 12. Other. This application is missing a number of items — A plat, a list of adjoiners, a copy of the deed verifying current ownership and a statement that taxes have been paid. All of these must be included for the application to be accepted by the Planning Department. 0 0 Page 4 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Shenandoah -Oak Ridge May 18, 2007 13. Fees. The fee for this application includes a $3,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre, and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. This is based on fees as of January 27, 2005. Fees may change. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, aLau_ / Z� &&� Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner SKE/bad cc: Oxbridge Development, LC, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Suite 550, Rockville, MD, 20852 Oak Ridge Properties, Inc., P.O. Box 885, Winchester, VA 22604 0 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK May 30, 2007 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Proposed Rezoning of the Shenandoah -Oak Ridge Property Dear Patrick: Attached you will find review comments from the County Attorney's office concerning the proposed proffer statement for the rezoning of the Shenandoah -Oak Ridge Property. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, _-Qy C u� Susan K. Eddy, AICP Principal Planner SKE /bad Attachment 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000