PC_10-01-75_Meeting_Minutes• MINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board of Supervisors Room, October 1, 1975
PRESENT: Keith Williams, Chairman; C. Langdon Gordon;
Richard Madigan; Frank Brumback;
Manuel DeHaven; H. Ronald Berg;
J. William Riley, III; J. 0. Renalds, III
ABSENT: James Golladay, Sr.
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the Meeting to Order and announced that the
first order of business is the approval of the Minutes of August 20,.
September 4 and September 17, 1975.
• MINUTES - APPROVED
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Brumback
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby move to dispense with the reading
of the Minutes of August 20, September 4 and September 17, 1975.
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Brumback
I
and approved unanimously,
I
BE IV RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick,IVirginia does hereby approve the Minutes of August 20,
September 4 and September 17, 1975 with the Chairman to present a
draft of spelling and typing corrections.
[l
�C�
(PC 10/01/75) P.2
A -95 Review '
VIRGINIA SEASONAL MIGRANT FARMWORKERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
(Tabled from September - 1-975 Meeting)
Recommended Approval
Ronald Berg stated that he has the application from the State for
the amount of $822,000.
Mr. Berg read the following narrative from Mr. R. Edward Duncan,
LFPDC, Communication of September 15, 1975:
"The Commonwealth of Virginia is predominately an agricultural State.
fourteen (14) of the twenty -two (22) planning districts, thirty -six (36)
counties employ migrant and /or seasonal farmworkers as their labor force.
Presently, the State provides limited services to this specific portior
of the population through such agencies as: VEC, Health Department,
Manpower, etc.
The Commonwealth of Virginia feels that services provided to the gen-
eral population should also be extended to migrants and seasonal farm -.
workers. The most effective way to implement this effort is through
the entire participation of the State in overall administration, coor-
dination, planning, program delivery and maintaining of present services
and maximum utilization of State resources.
The State is.convinced that the above objective could best be achieved
through inter - agency coordination and development of service delivery
mechanisms, involving State, local and private agency resources. We
propose to gear our project to service seasonal farmworkers with a mecha-
nism for incorporating the migrants into the program and services when-
ever residing in the State.
Based on our statistical analysis of where the greatest number of
seasonal farmworkers and migrants are located, we have designated the
following counties as basic areas of concentration:"
Mr. Berg continued that in Planning District 7 to be in the program
are Shenandoah, Frederick, Clark and Warren. He stated that it is for-
overall administration, coordination planning, program delivery, etc.
Mr. Berg then read the list of support services from above (from
page 4):
"Specific programs related to Manpower services shall include:
1. On the job training
2. Vocational Education Training
® 3. Classroom Training
\ `\ `�
(PC 10/01/75) P.3
For each of the above the following services will be provided:
i• 1. Outreach 2. Orientation 3. Counseling
4. Job development, placement, referral and follow-up
5. Transportation
The supportive services shall include:
1. Health & Dental Services -- increasing the assesibility to preventive
and primary care. Particular emphasis shall be placed on the young.
Programs dealing with the problems of alcoholism will also be developed.
2. Education----------------- Adult education referral and counseling.
Preschool and day care for children through Title 1, Secondary & Elemen-
tary Education Act.
3. Welfare------------ - - - - -- -Food stamp certification and all other
eligible programs.
4. Emergency Assistance - - - - -- Provide the capacity at the local level to
respond to crisis situations.
5. Legal Aid Services-- - - - - -- Funding of the established project in the
target areas to enhance the services in solving farmworkers legal situa -_
tion.
6. Family Assistance--- - - - - -- Counseling, relocation assistance, resi-
dential support."
The Chairman expressed his concern that, after twenty (20) years,
the State of Virginia is planning to extend to the Migrant Workers the
• privileges of Citizenship -- it appears we are in a prime target area.
Richard Madigan stated that this is funded Federally and adminis-
tered by local agencies.
Upon motion made by Manuel DlHaven, seconded by Elmer Venskoske,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval of the A -95 Review
for the Virginia Seasonal Migrant Farmworkers Assistance Program.
The above motion was approved by the following roll call vote:
Chairman, Mr. Gordon, Mr. DeHaven -- AYE;
Mr. Brumback, Mr. Madigan --- - - - - -- NAY.
EVALUATION OF THE TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS
WHICH HAVE SERVED RESIDENTS OF SHALOM ET BENEDICTUS, INC.
Withdrawn
•
7�J .
(PC 10/01/75) P. 4
LAND USE PLAN
• Drafting Change
Commercial Property
Recommended Approval
Ronald Berg stated that in regard to commercial property on Route
7 he had a request from Mr. Cole to extend commerical area to include
his personal property as at the present time commercial property area
ends just at his door with his property extending beyond that point .
several hundred feet. He said that zoning maps go to the Run.
Mr. Berg stated that changing the commercial area designated would
include two (2) additional residences.
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Langdon Gordon
and approved unanimously,
® BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval of extending the
Commercial Area of the zoning maps to include the property in its
entirety of Mr. Dennis T. Cole; as owned at the time of this hearing.
LAND USE PLAN
Drafting Change
Balance of Opequon Watershed West of Route 37
Postponed
The Chairman stated that he expected this subject to be mentioned
this evening.
The Chairman stated that this area represents about ten (10) square
miles that the Commission has called agricultural land; which the resi-
dents would like essentially to have rezoned as residential. He refer-
red to the presentations by Mr. Dischinger and Mr. Payne at the meetings
® of August 20 and September 17, 1975.
1
(PC 10/01/75) P. 5•
The Chairman stated that apparently they felt that unless it is
• designated as residential in the Land Use Plan that they cannot develop
it, but he didn't think that is the intention of the Land Use Plan.
He said that it is possible the land will eventually be developed into
very high - priced subdivisions.
The Chairman further stated that the residents feel that they would
rather have it decided now rather than have to go through the entire
procedure for each parcel of land even though it is basically highly
productive agricultural land that is profitable to a number of fairly
large corporations at the present time.
Richard Madigan stated that he would like to see this whole area,
in about five (5) to ten (10) years become realized as not just neces-
sarily residential, but business as well. He said he felt that it would
be much better than just getting part of it rezoned to whatever an
individual thinks it should be in order to make money. He said that
he does not mean annexation.
Manuel DeHaven suggested classifying everything that drains into
the
Opequon
or the land
west of
Route
37.
He also suggested a cut -off
at
Kernstown
and letting
Middle
Road
be the
dividing line.
The Chairman stated that the Opequon Watershed is difficult to
define that it was used quite loosely in their arguments.
Manuel DeHaven stated that anything west of Route 608 does not
drain into the Opequon; conceding that everything east of there does.
} Ronald Berg stated that he does not have the Potter Study maps
and that the LFPDC Water Quality Control Study does define service area,
not watershed.
0p0
(PC 10/01/75) P. 6
•
J. 0. Renalds, III showed the Commission the above - mentioned maps.
Ronald Berg stated that the Regional Water Quality Management Plan
was adopted by the Commission several years ago.
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Brumback
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby postpone further discussion of the
Land Use Plan until the scheduled evening Joint Public Hearing.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED
NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO AMEND SECTION 10 -1 -22 TO READ:
10 -1 -22: OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND LIGHT MACHINERY SALES
AND SERVICE, UNDER COVER.
Recommended Approval
• The Chairman stated that this is to clarify the vague section in
i
B -2 zoning of "machinery sales and service ".
The Commission discussed the fact that "light" is vague as well
as "under cover" in relation to weight, height, size, horse power, etc.
Lawrence Ambrogi suggested defining what it.will be used for and
that it might be practical to describe it by use such as household or
garden to keep it from including things like road grading equipment or
excavating equipment or restrict it to machinery for individuals rather
than contractors. He said it might be shorter to state an exclusion or
state what is permitted even though that might be more lengthy -- the
idea is to keep it from being vague.
is Richard Madigan suggested Mr. Ambrogi make a list.
�� 1
(PC 10/01/75) P. 7
Richard Madigan asked if a 12 HP riding lawn mower would be consi-
dered garden equipment.
Frank Brumback stated his opinion that under commercial application
it would be considered machinery, but under personal application it
.would be considered private.
Langdon Gordon stated that he felt the Commission was splitting
hairs. He said that he thought the intent was to protect unsightly
situations. He said that he thought "under cover" was not objectionable.
The Chairman stated that he could not find a definition for "under
cover ". He asked if it meant under roof or totally enclosed.
Richard Madigan suggested "office equipment and light tools" insteac
• of machinery.
Lawrence Ambrogi stated that machinery is far too broad a term and
that anything which functions mechanically could be a machine.
The Chairman suggested "office equipment and machinery excluding
those items included in Section 12 -1 -12 as amended ". He asked the
audience for comments, but there was no response.
Richard Madigan suggested amending Section 10 -1 -22 to read:
"Office equipment and lawn and garden machinery sales and service under
cover excluding those items listed under Section 12- 1 -12."
VOTE POSTPONED PENDING DECISION UPON SECTION 12 -1 -12 TO ALLOW
FOR A PROPER RECOMMENDATION.
U
A
Iq
(PC 10/01/75) P. 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS
• AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE.FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED.
NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO AMEND SECTION 12 -1 -12 TO READ:
12 -1 -12: CONTRACTORS' EQUIPMENT STORAGE YARDS OR PLANTS,
OR RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT COMMONLY USED BY CONTRAC-
TORS, TO INCLUDE FARM AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
SALES AND SERVICE.
Recommended Approval
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Elmer Venskoske
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval of the amendment
of the Frederick County.Zoning Ordinance Section 12 -1 -12 as written.
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Langdon Gordon
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
® Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval of the amendment
of the Frederick,County Zoning Ordinance Section 10 -1 -22 as follows:
10 -1 -22: OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND LIGHT MACHINERY SALES AND
SERVICE UNDER COVER EXCLUDING THOSE ITEMS LISTED
UNDER SECTION 12 -1 -12.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED
NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 27 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF DANIEL E.
WILLMORE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE 694, APPROXIMATELY
TWO- TENTHS (2/10) MILES EAST OF INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 522; IN
GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT; FROM AGRICULTURAL, LIMITED (A -1)
TO RESIDENTIAL, LIMITED (R -2).
Tabled
Ronald Berg showed the Commission the property location on the map.
The Chairman read to the Commission the following memorandum from
Ronald Berg of September 30, 1975:
• "On Tuesday, September 30, 1975 Mr. Daniel Willmore contacted Planning
and Development and requested that his rezoning application be postponed
from the meeting of October 1, 1975 to the meeting of November 5, 1975.
The Health Department has not been able to review his tract of land
and he would Like to have their evaluation before the Commission con-
iders his rezoning." '� (�
(PC 10/01/75) P. 9
OPPOSITION
Mr. John W. Boyd appeared before the Commission and asked if he
would have to appear again for the postponed date of November 5.
Richard Madigan stated that it was not necessary for the opposition
to appear again on that date.
Mr. Boyd continued with his view of opposition by stating that he
lived in that area and represents about eighty (80) other people.
Mr. Boyd handed the Commission a petition for their review.
Mr. Boyd stated that he didn't feel good agricultural land should
be used for a development since there already is land close to the City
that already has a Residential zone that already has service facilities,
etc. He said that if a more populated area 'begins outside of this area
• more..public services will have to be provided for which the established
citizens will have to pay more taxes. He further stated that this
volume of people would change the area from a rural community to an
urban development and these people had moved away from a city purposely
to avoid urban living.
Mr. Boyd stated that, if this happens, at some future time these
people would be forced to change their lifestyles due to the require-
ments brought about by a new development (livestock, orchard spraying,
etc.). He said that, with the Summit already on this end of the County,
they don't need anymore development to cause problems in growth and
planning. He mentioned the possibility of the development failing thus
causing the County to carry the burden and he thought the County could
• not afford such a disaster.
a D 1+.
(PC 10/01/75) P. 10
Mr. Boyd stated that Mr. Willmore knew the land was zoned Agricul-
tural when he bought the farm -- he has owned the land for less than a
year; why does he see a need for rezoning?
Mr. Boyd stated that all adjoining land owners have signed a peti -:__
tion asking that this development not take place; plus 80 -odd residents
within a- (3)- to four (4) -mile radius have signed the same petition
equaBing a definite majority are expressing their desire to be met by
those elected to represent them in office; which they urge to oppose
rezoning twenty -seven (27) acres of land owned by Mr. Willmore.
The Commission discussed with Mr. Boyd the location of the request.
George Whitacre spoke from the audience to the Commission stating
that he was an adjoining landowner and had signed the petition.
Mr. Boyd stated that they are aware that, according to Agricultural
zoning, Mr. Willmore can build in five (5) -acre lots; but that they are
really opposed to a low -rent section with houses jammed together.
Mr. Frank Whitacre, another adjoining property owner spoke to the
Commission stating that he doesn't object to the five (5) -acre lots but
to putting twenty -five (25) houses or so there with three (3) bedrooms
each which will probably be occupied by younger people who will have
families of young children to populate the school (possibly overcrowding
Mr. Ambrogi stated that once the Commission began approving this
type of thing; they may have to continue doing so, leading to more than
is one (1) development.
X05
(PC 10/01/75) P. 11
Mr. Frank Whitacre stated that the school he had mentioned has an
enrollment of two - hundred - seventy -five (275) students equalling a little
less than thirty (30) students per classroom; and that they had moved
a trailer in two (2) years ago.
Mrs. Beth Boyd stated, from the audience, that she thought the
proposed LUP is not in agreement with the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Larry Brannon, from the audience, stated that he is an adjoin-
ing landowner in opposition to the proposed rezoning because of the
possible necessary changing the rural lifestyle.
Mr. Boyd stated his opinion that he would hate to see this tabled
again if the delegation appears at the November 5th meeting.
• NO VOTE - MR. WILLMORE'S REZONING APPLICATION TABLED FOR THE
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 1975.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED
NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 3.2160 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF SHENANDOAH
VALLEY BANK AND THOMAS C. BAKER, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE
652 AND ROUTE 816; IN BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT; FROM INDUS-
TRIAL, GENERAL (M -2) TO INDUSTRIAL, LIMITED (M -1).
Recommended Approval
Mr. Thomas C. Baker appeared before the Commission.
Ronald Berg showed the Commission the location on the map.
Mr. Thomas Baker stated that he owns the center parcel of three (3)
parcels with the other two (2) parcels (on left and right of Mr. Baker)
being owned on the Deed by Shenandoah Valley National Bank as the Estate
® of Mr. Charles Baker (Thomas Baker's father) and he (Thomas Baker) has
an option to buy these two (2) parcels. He further stated that SVNB
is joining him (Thomas Baker) in rezoning request for their mutual
interest.I
(PC 10/01/75) P. 12
Mr. Richard Madigan ABSTAINED from further participation in this
• rezoning request.
Mr. Thomas Baker stated that his plan is preliminary and that he
plans to start building two (2) storage warehouses with cubicles inside,
loading dock, etc. depending upon the needs of rental prospects. He
said that when he will construct on the left will depend upon a customer
feasibility study and what comes up in the future. He further stated
that he plans to use the house for an office relating to the storage, or
possibly some light assembly -type work (M -1 zoning).
Mr. Baker stated that the two (2) parcels of land upon which he has
an option is now zoned M -2 (located on Route 652) and to the left of his
property is zoned R -3 and M -2.
• Upon motion made by Frank Brumback, seconded by Elmer Venskoske and
approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED„ That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval of the rezoning
request by Thomas C. Baker and Shenandoah Valley Bank from Industrial,
General (M -2) to Industrial, Limited (M -2).
SUBDIVISION
South View Subdivision - Preliminary Plat
Recommended Denial
Ronald Berg stated that he was not sure whether the changes that
have been made will meet the Commission's previous thoughts or not. He
said that the entire subdivision is off of Route 522 South at Joe's
Ocean Cove.
® Mr. Berg stated that Section I is already "in" and on central
water system.
- _1
(PC 10/01/75) P. 13
Mr. Berg stated that the proposal is to add these lots to the rear
• and extend the central water system. , He said that Lot 18 that had
previously been rejected by the Health Department is now approved.
He said that Lots 11, 12 and 13 will not meet Health code requirements.
Mr. Berg stated that the owner had asked that Lots 11, 12 and 13
be "held" until central water and sewer comes through; which was rejected
by the Commission. Mr. Berg further stated that the developer now pro-
poses taking three (3) lots and five (5) -acre piece and combining into
one (1) seven (7) -acre tract as part of the subdivision.
Mr. Berg stated that this seven (7) -acre tract which will be a part
of the subdivision will be extremely difficult to regulate because it
will be a part of the agricultural tract and a nuisance piece of property
• that we don't know for sure will be property maintained and compatible
with the other property.
Mr. Berg stated that it could be sold to an adjoining property
owner, but he didn't know what the ramifications were to have close to
four - hundred (400) feet of a road frontage within a subidivision not
being a part of that particular subdivision. He said that if water and
sewer comes through it could be developed but he wasn't certain it would
be compatible.
Mr. Berg continued that another problem with this tract is the
enormous forty (40) foot drainage easement about which he is now
corresponding with the Highway Department to see if they will accept
for maintenance -- the drainage easement cuts into all four (4) lots.
(PC. 10/01/75) P. 14
Mr. Berg stated that the issue he's presenting is - - :if this ..
• seven (7) -acre tract were withheld from the'subdivision who will be
responsible for maintenance?
Manuel DeHaven stated that possibly they could extend the other
lots to include this property or it might be better maintained if sold
separately.,
The Chairman stated that it is some sort of significant impact by
having ownership and in limbo otherwise.
Manuel DeHaven stated that the Health Department might be agreeable
to the absorption of these lots by the subdivision.
Ronald Berg stated that he understood that the three (3) lots are
IS totally unacceptable by the Health Department.
Langdon Gordon suggested that they could be thinking about the
proposed Kernstown sewer line.
The Commission discussed the proposal's location in relation to the
Land Use map.
Richard Madigan stated that he considered the preliminary plat as
being "bad ".
Manuel DeHaven stated that he thought the seven (7) -acre tract would
be better as one (1) lot within the subdivision that would at least be
an open area for the nighbors' children
Ronald Berg suggested that the Deed of Dedication include a stipu-
lation re square footage of housing to be compatible with existing homes.
- 0 Q I
f
(PC 10/01/75) P. 15
The Chairman stated that they could alter the subdivision plat if
they had some way to subdivide at a later date (would not have to be
rezoned).
Langdon Gordon suggested that no one would buy it if it won't perk.
Frank Brumback stated his opinion that the project needs more
thought, study and work.
Manuel DeHaven stated that he questioned what can be accomplished
with it -- is it a good play area ?, -- is it property structures? --
I.
and it is not a good concept in its present form.
Langdon Gordon suggested the Commission offer suggestions to
South View Development Corporation to let them know their reasoning
• so they (South View) can re- design the plat.
The Chairman stated that Ronald Berg can get the reasons from the
Minutes and relate them to the developers.
Manuel DeHaven suggested changing lots around to take up entire
tract that would equal three and one -half (3- 1 /2) -.or three (3)- acre
tracts that might allow them a couple extra lots. He suggested men-
tioning to developers that the..Commission is not turning them down flat,
but that they re- arrange the lot lines.
Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Brumback
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend denial of the Preliminary
Plat in its present form.
(PC 10/01/75) P. 16
U
•
LAND USE PLAN
Discussion - Joseph E. Butler
The Chairman read a letter to Keith Williams, Chairman, from the
Frederick County - Winchester HOME Builders, Contractors, Developers &
Allied Businesses, Inc. of September 30, 1975 written by Mr. Joseph
E. Butler:
"On the proposed rezoning of land west of Virginia Route 37 to agricul-
tural classification we called our Board of Directors. Because of the
opposition of many persons that own land in that area our Board voted
against proposal. We therefore respectfully request at this time
action not be taken for the proposal. Thank you for the consideration
you maylgive this request."
The Chairman stated that he didn't understand what Mr. Butler was
trying to say.
also
Richard Madigan stated that he had read it about three (3) times and
t the letter was confusing because the Commission is not
anything.
Ambrogi read the letter and stated his opinion that Mr.
Butler
confusing the LUP with a rezoning -- he obviously thinks the
is considering rezoning that area from Residential to Agri-
culturz
w
LAND USE PLAN
Miscellaneous Discussion
Chairman mentioned four (4) items that he thought might be
broughtlup for discussion at the evening Join Public Hearing:
1) The petition in one -man form presented by Garland Cather representing
the people of Round Hill Community who wish to be included as one of the
Community Centers (land west of Route 37).
2) TheILFPDC Water Quality Control Board map that the Commission had
previously examined.
(PC 10/01/75) P. 17
3) Commercial property -- frontage on'arterial roads throughout the
• County;las well as opposition on minimum frontage acreage of residential
property.
4) Required sewer and water for developers on any acreage less than
five (5) per lot -- opposition by such people as Tom Glass L- it will
create 'a hardship for those who have already laid out their plats.
The Commission examined the LFPDC Water Quality Control Board map.
The Chairman stated he questions why sleeves were put under Route 37
The Chairman stated he wondered what watershed they were talking
about sewering that much land to (some of it could be picked upon the
Redbud Run, but the balance of it is all the way over to Route 622)
Ronald Berg mentioned Abrams Creek as being the discharge point
Mr. Dischinger had addressed himself to during his presentation to the
Commission.
Manuel DeHaven asked if we can't run a line through Winchester how
can Winchester run a line through Frederick County?
Frank Brumback stated that we don'-t even have a water or sewer line
laid in Frederick County.
Langdon Gordon stated that Round Hill Community is a very strong
item in re to the LUP as to whether or not it should be included as a
Community Center. He said the Commission might meet less opposition to
the LUP if it were included.
Frank Brumback asked how development surrounding that community can
be discouraged and there would be a lot more pressure to rezone residen-
® tial.
7� ,
C
(PC 10/01/75) P. 18
The Chairman stated that originally the Community Centers were set
up to be mostly outlying areas within the wide scoop of the agricultural
belt which were potentially sewerable and waterable becauselthey did
exist as most viable commercial areas. He said that Round Hill was dis-
'cussed and eliminated because it is so near the City and it would be an
additional burden on the County to finance sewer and water.
J. 0. Renalds, III stated that unless the Government cuts off all
the funds we will be provided with seventy -five percent (75 %) of the cost
of the intercepter system and no assistance for collector lines.
Richard Madigan asked if it is possible that they will run inter-,
ceptor lines through the middle of Winchester.
The Commission examined the afore - mentioned map and discussed sewer
lines, intercepter lines; location of these comparing east and west of
the City.
Frank Brumback stated his opinion that the County will be obligated
to furnish sewer and water when the Community Centers are designated.
He said that the County will have to work with the City. He also said
that the County would be better off having growth around the town so that
it can be controlled,.
Upon motion made by.Richard Madigan, seconded by Langdon Gordon
and approved unanimously,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of
Frederick, Virginia does hereby adjourn its meeting until scheduled
Joint Public Hearing of the Planning Commission and Board of Super-
visors at 7:30 P.M'. today.
THERE BEING NOTHING FURTHER TO COME BEFORE THE COMMISSION, THE
MEETING WAS ADJOURNED UNTIL 7:30 P.M. AT WHICH TIME THERE WILL BE A
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LAND USE PLAN.
,-)-\ 3
i
(PC 10/01/75) P, 19
•
•
Respectfully submitted,
H. Ronald Berg, Secretary