Loading...
PC_08-07-75_Meeting_Minutesi MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board of Supervisors Room, August 7, 1975 PRESENT: Keith Williams, Chairman; Elmer Venskoske; Manuel DeHaven; James Golladay; C. Langdon Gordon; Richard Madigan; Frank Brumback; R. Wesley Williams; J. 0. Renalds, III; J. William Riley,III; and H. Ronald Berg, CALL TO ORDER In the absence of the Chairman, the Vice- Chairman called the Meeting to Order and announced that the first order of bus- 0 iness was the approval of the Minutes of July 3, 1975. MINUTES - APPROVED Upon motion made by Frank Brumback, seconded by Manuel DeHaven and approved unanimously, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby move to dispense with the reading of the Minutes of July 3, 1975, LAND USE PLAN The Vice - Chairman stated that the next order of business was to set a date for Public Hearing on the proposed Land Use Plan. • Mr, Ronald Berg read the changes made in the proposed Plan to the Members. Mr. Robert T. Mitchell appeared before the Commission on -2- F the behalf of several land owners west of Route 37 in Frederick County. He stated that the land owners were very concerned with the proposed designation in that area of the county as a solely agricultural area. Mr. Mitchell presented a petition which sets forth a number of the reasons why the land owners do not wish to have their land strictly designated as agricultural. He added that also included to the petition were two letters, one from J. Kenneth Robinson and the other from Ray Robinson, Jr. He further stated that he would like to have copies of the peti- tion and letters made available to the Commission Members. (Pe- tition and Letters attached) Mr. Mitchell went on to state that he would like the Commission to consider the agricultural desig- nation of this area prior to the adoption of the Land Use Plan. Mr, Ronald Berg read the petition to the Members. • Mr, Golladay stated that the Commission should have another Work Session on the proposed Plan. Upon made by James Golladay, seconded by Richard Madigan and unanimously approved, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby move to hold another Work Session on the proposed Land Use::Plan. Mr. Madigan stated that a copy of the Potter Study should be made available at the next meeting which sets forth the drain- age areas. SITE PLANS 1. Perry Engineering Company, Inc. - To construct a 27' x 51' pole barn for storage, located on the north side of Route 50 East. Recommended Approval Mr. Ronald Berg showed the exact location of the site to -3- the Members. He stated that all zoning requirements may be met. • Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Bruin- back and passed unanimously by roll call vote, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby recommend approval of this Site Plan. 2. Solenberger Hardware - To construct a 70' x 100' building located on the north side of Route 7. Recommended Approval Mr. Ronald Berg showed the exact location of the property to the Commission. He stated that the Highway Department had made numerous suggested changes to the Plat, including additional parking spaces for the employees and a wider entrance. Mr. Solenberger appeared before the Commission and stated that the orginal plan was to move everything out to the site, • but added that only the warehouse was going to be located on the property. He stated that he would like to locate the building on the western part of the property so that additional buildings may be added on the remainder of the five (5) acres if needed. Mr. Golladay asked if additional parking spaces could be added. Mr. Solenberger stated that he would add the additional spaces required. Upon motion made by Manuel DeHaven, seconded by Frank Bruin- back and approved unanimously by roll call vote, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby recommend to approve this 70' x 100' building located on the north side of Route 7, • SUBDIVISIONS 1. Leon Zeiger, Section 6 - To contain ten (10) lots with septic tanks and wells, The Health Department and High 1 _ -4- way Department approved the subdivision, Recommended Approval • Mr. Berg showed the exact location of the proposed subdiv- ision to the Members, Mr. Berg read the following telegram to the Members from Mr. David Zeiger: "Per your letter of June 24, I am pleased to report the following; Topographic characteristics of this property both from an engineering and sanitation standpoint preclude any alternative design. Care ful and thorough engineering studies conclude that the submitted design is the only proper way to pro- vide adequate drainfields for the lots in question. And the Health Department has concurred that this design satisfies their requirements. Cordially and Sincerely, /-s/ David L. Zeiger'! - Mr. Berg stated that the lots meet all zoning and frontage regulations. • Mr. Gordon asked how many lots had been approved up to date. Mr. Zeiger stated that there have been 15 lots approved. Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Langdon Gordon and approved unanimously, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby recommend approval. PUBLIC HEARINGS AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPT- ED NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 1144.297 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF J, L. BOWMAN AND F. L, GLAIZE, III, FRONTING 920.57 FEET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROUTE 277 (BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 1.45 MILES EAST OF INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 636) AND BOUNDED BY THE FREDERICK COUNTY - CLARKE COUNTY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 6000 FEET, MORE OR LESS, (BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY .53 MILES SOUTH OF ROUTE 277); IN OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT; FROM AGRICULTURAL, GENERAL (A -2) TO RESIDENTIAL RECREATIONAL COMMUNITY (R -5), • Recommended Approval Mr, Madigan stated that there will probably be some legal questions that will need to be answered by the Planning Commis- -5- sion's attorney, therefore the following motion was made: • Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Elmer Venskoske and approved unanimously, including the Chairman, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby send for our attorney and have him present during this meeting. Mr. Berg stated that the office was notified this morning that the Commission's attorney would not be present. Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by James Goll- aday and unanimously approved, including the Chairman, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby move that the Commission in- form the Board of Supervisors of our request for a county attorney and ask them to make provisions to furnish us with an attorney at all of our meetings, especially our Public Hearings. Mr. Berg read the application of James L. Bowman and Fred L. Glaize, III to the Members, • Mr. Billy J. Tisinger appeared before the Commission repre- senting Mr. J. L. Bowman and Mr. M. L. Glaize,III in their re- quest for rezoning from Agricultural, General (A -2) to Residential Recreational Community (R -5). Mr. Tisinger stated that a Master Plan for the development has been drawn. The frontage is approximately 900 feet on Route 277 between Stephens City and Double Tollgate and approximately 6000 feet on Route 522 in Clarke County. He also stated that there are 1196 acres with approximately 1144 acres in Frederick County and approximately 50 -60 acres in Clarke County. He further stated that this appears to be the first application to the new Zoning Ordinance with someone attempting to rezone from Agricul- tural to R -5 (Residential - Recreational Community). Mr. Tisinger added that a requirement of this Section is that a master plan be presented to the Commission for a recommendation; then sent on to -6- the Board of Supervisors for approval or disapproval, Mr, Tis- inger stated that, if approved, that developers will appear be- fore the Planning Commission with preliminary plans to show how the Master Plan can be implemented, He said that the Master Plan is thensent to the Board of Supervisors for final approval. Mr. Tisinger stated that a dam is presently being construct- ed that will provide approximately 135 acres of lake, He further stated that, as required, 35% of the entire area will be set a- side for recreational or open space, Mr, Tisinger stated that some 350 acres, if approved, would be set aside for recreational or open -land areas. Mr. Tisinger stated that it is contemplated that the area will be served by a central water and sewer system to be located on the property. He said that something may be worked out with the Frederick County Sanitation Authority if the development it- self and the neighboring area would justify the extension of water and sewer lines. Mr. Tisinger stated that the developers do not anticipate this becoming a permanent home residence area; but rather, that it be attractive for those who want a second home. Mr. Tisinger further stated that forty (40) acres will be set aside initially for townhouses and multi - family dewllings (2 areas of 20 acres each). He said the developers will change their plans should these townhouses not be attractive or compat- ible, He further-stated that there are two six (6) -acre village centers planned. He added that the developers intend to preserve the environment within their application. • Mr. Tisinger stated that the dam is approximately 70% com- plete and the developers hope it will be finished in 1 to 1 -1/2 years. He added that there will be about 7 -1/2 miles of shore / / -7- frontage on the lake. Richard Madigan asked of the possibility of condominiums. L Mr. Tisinger replied that this possibility has not yet been discussed, Mr. Madigan asked for a description of the village centers, Mr, Tisinger replied that they will contain supporting -type services; such as shops and small grocery stores, Mr. Madigan asked the number of individual lots planned. Mr, Tisinger replied that there will be approximately 1500 to 1800 lots including the townhouses, The Chairman asked about the "area impact" anticipated with this project and the amount of time before completion. Mr. Fred Glaize, III stated that it would be many years be- 0 fore total completion. He also stated that it is too large an area to submit final plans at this time for the entire tract - -it will be developed in portions, Mr. Richard Madigan asked for a Master Plan in relation to impact. He also asked for a Master Plan in relation to antici- pated County services required and anticipated County profit po- tential (taxes less services equalling profit potential) per year, Mr. Richard Madigan asked about the restrictive covenants. Mr. Tisinger stated that the only way to provide proper pro- tection for the people in the subdivision is to put restrictive covenants in the deed. James Bowman stated that the plan to put in a sewage system • to serve the entire area would include approximately 2000 acres (everything south of Route 277). He further stated they intend to ask the Sanitation Authority to build a sewage plant after guaranteed feasibility is proven. He added that the proven feas- ibility would have to include adjoining landowners. Mr. Bowman r�s i 11:M also said that the same procedure would be used for water lines that would be laid down Route 277, • The Chairman asked if these facilities were to be public or private. Mr. Bowman stated that these facilities were anticipated to be public, Richard Madigan stated that he would like to have a Flow Process Chart as soon as possible to use as a tentative schedule of development plans, Mr. Tisinger stated that he would be glad to supply this information of the "concept ". (These are not either prelimin- ary or final plans.) Langdon Gordon asked the number of lots planned per block, etc. Mr, Tisinger replied that the answer will be incorporated • in the Flow Process Chart, OPPOSITION Virgil Bates stated his opinion that there should be an amendment to the application for rezoning of approximately 6000 feet of frontage in Clarke County. Mr. Bates asked if the sewage leakage from Sandy's Trailer Park would contaminate the proposed lake and what would happen to Sandy's lagoon. Roy Williams (Health Department) stated that he was not aware of the contamination problem. Mr, Bates asked what would happen to the dam if this appli- cation is disapproved or sewage plant is not approved. He stated • that Mr. Brad Chewning of State Water Control Board (as of 1:15 PM today) had stated that there are no State standards for dam struc- tural specifications and no governing body with the authority of \ �I • approval, Charles H. Shockley asked about water pollution resulting. James Giles (sp) stated that the dam has stopped the flow of water to the stream that is his water source. James Bowman stated that there is no water anywhere- -the stream is dried up, Mason Larwood asked what effect the projects would have on Route 636 and adjacent roads, James Bowman stated that there would be two (2) entrances: Route 277 entrance and Route 522 entrance, He added that Route 636 is a temporary construction entrance, Virgil Bates stated that "concepts" are extremely dangerous • in his opinion without everything being detailed for decision makers. He added that the market is declining from second home projects. Mr. Bates questioned the theory that security need not be provided from outside the complex. He stated that the Sheriff's Department of Clarke County spends 2/3 of its time in Greenway (sp) District which lies along the Warren County border where Shenandoah Farms, Shenandoah Shores, Shenandoah River of Lake River Estates are located. He said that these communities have a great problem with vandalism and burglary. He further stated that it was his feeling that the surrounding landowners experienced increased vulnerability to these crimes without the private security force of the complex for protection, He said that Shenandoah Farms no longer has its own security force because of the expense. He asked if there would be a "binding" for 100 years, for example. • He also said that a never - ending entity (or comparable) providing for security may be necessary as well as an explanation of how to L� -10- J finance the security force, He also said that the exceptions would be bankruptcy and sqecific arrangements with the property • owners within the subdivision, Bill Tisinger stated that the .land could be developed in five (5) -acre tracts and not have to go through this problem, Richard Madigan stated that they can develop the land in large tracts without asking for approval and feels that it is best to achieve the best possible method of development. Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by James W. Golladay, and unanimously approved, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby recommend to the Board of Supervisors the approval of the master plan for Wheatland Re- creational Subdivision R -5 with these stipulations: That they provide information to the Planning Commission a flow process chart projecting the development stages of pop- ulation impact tax revenues and cost of services, sectional development, plans on sewer and water, roads and other amenities within the subdivision, • SHACKELFORD REZONING AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPT- ED NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 12.692 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF S. L. SHACKELFORD ESTATE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 642, APPROX- IMATELY SIX- TENTHS (6/10) MILES SOUTH OF KERNSTOWN INTERCHANGE 79; IN BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL'DISTRICT; FROM RESIDENTIAL, LIMITED (R -2) TO BUSINESS, GENERAL (B -2). Recommended Denial H. Ronald Berg stated that he had been on the site and that no sign was posted. Mr. Richard Madigan stated that he would not participate in any way with this application for rezoning. The Chairman asked if a sign was posted on the property. • Herbert Shackelford appeared before the Commission stating that it was posted on Wednesday, July 16th. He further stated check was that the application was made on Friday, July 11th; I � 1 J -11- presented to Mr. Riley on July 14th; Tuesday, July 15th he called IS to varify date to post sign. Mr. Shackelford also stated that he was out of town from July 25 through July 28. He said that Tuesday morning the sign had been removed and he put it back up. He further stated that he was not certain how long it had been removed, The Chairman asked Mr. Shackelford why he reapplied for B -2. Mr. Shackelford stated that he thinks it should be changed from M -1 because that category was wrong for industrial. He also said that he had talked with Danac ( Danac Real Estate Investment Corporation, new owners of Lakeside Estate) and that Danac did not object to B -2. He added that the building would be 3200 square square feet instead of 3200, He also stated that it would be used for farm machinery sales and services, is Mr, Shackelford mentioned that there is a 60 foot right of way between his property and eight (8) acres belonging to Mr. Gene Radford. Opposition Ms. Barbara Ratcliff (resident of Lakeside Estate) appeared before the Commission and presented a petition signed by approx- imately 90% of the residents, as well as Mr, Williams, Project Manager of Danac, She stated that their objection is not to B -2 zoning, but to this business. The Chairman read the petition (the essence of objections and not the names). I -12- PETITION from residents of Lakeside Estates and Immediate Vicinity to Frederick County Board of Supervisors and dated August 1, 1975: We, the undersigned taxpayers and property owners residing in the immediate vicinity of the site in question, feel the pro- posed farm implement company is entirely out of character with our community. We suggest that this sort of business should not be placed on the site in question nor should the business be considered for B -1 zoning for the following reasons: 1 1. As evidenced by the following signatures and the many representative residents attending recent meetings on this matter, the business is not residentially desirable. 2. A business of---this sort requires heavy _ trucking of construction and farm equipment w iEc�B- zoned we as resi- dents will not allow. 3. The business proposed will entertain nuisances far greater than that presented by the "incidental light and noise of congregation of people and passenger vehicles" as B -2 zoning permits. 4. A farm implement company will gain nothing by being located close to a residential area as many other businesses would. 5. The residents will have very little if any need in the services of the proposed business, thereby rendering the bus - iness useless as far as an improvement from the residential community standpoint. • We understand and agree that businesses are inevitable on and around the site in question, but feel businesses with more resi- dential desirability, usage, and purpose would be more cor- rect to consider for this site so closely situated to our homes. We are most open to compromise and discussion involving consid- eration of reasonable site usage, Finally, we feel that approval of this request by Mr, S. Herbert Shackleford for the construction of a farm implement company would be unreasonable, partial, and of questionable foundation. • 127 I -13- Mr, Berg showed the exact location of the property to the • Members. The Chairman read the Statement of Intent from the B -2 zon- ing district, Ms, Vera Ritenour stated that Route 642 is the only access onto Lakeside Estates and added that the industrial and farm equipment would be an "eyesore ". She also atated that this would cause land depreciation, Ms. Ann Vermillion stated that 4 -5 years ago Herb Shackelford stated that the land should not be B -2 and that he owned Lake- side Estates at the time of his petition to the Board. Gordon Langdon states that this is not compatible with the neighborhood. BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend denial of this • application to the Board of Supervisors, The above motion was approved as follows: Mr. Golladay, NAY; Mr. Brumback and Mr. Madigan, ABSTAINING; Mr, Gordon, Mr. DeHaven , and Mr. Venskoske, AYE, BEST FLEET CONTRACTORS, INC. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPT- ED NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 0.413 ACRES, MORE OF LESS, OF BEST FLEET CONTRACTORS, INC. LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 11 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 706; IN BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT; FROM BUSINESS, GENERAL (B -2) TO INDUSTRIAL, LIMITED (M -1), Withdrawn Mr. Berg read the application, Mr, Gordon wanted to know what the zoning was. Someone answered that the zoning is Business on north, Business on south and Residential on west. Mr, DeHaven asked what the frontage is. Mr, Berg stated that it is 62' and added that they would -14- not be building anything on the property, • ,David Sisler, the Secretary /Treasurer of the Corporation appeared before the Commission stating that he received 'a letter on June 23 from Mr, Riley asking the Corporation to rezone to Industrial Limited (M -1) from B -2, He further stated that the business is that ofcommercial and industrial remodeling and main- tenance with a subsidiary company that does light paving for driveways, etc, He said that they also maintain heavy equipment storage. He added that they employ 22 people with a payroll last year of $171,000. He continued that they are operating now on a low volume due to economic pressures at this time. The Secretary / Treasuser stated that they will cooperate in any way whatever and that he didn't know if rezoning was required. He said that they wanted to do whatever necessary to stay in • business such as beautifying grounds, etc. The Secretary /Treasurer of Best Fleet continued that equip- ment had been on the premises since January, 1975 (business in operation since December, 1974 and property purchased January or February, 1974). A citizen stated that the equipment was being left on the property. Mr. Gordon stated that he needs to know if this is good, sound zoning. The Secretary /Treasurer of Best Fleet Contractors, Inc. asked that the application be withdrawn, Richard Madigan stated that the business could maintain their office, but that they will have to move out the equipment. • Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Frank Brum- back and passed unanimously, C BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County / • J -15- • of Frederick, Virginia does hereby move to return half of the zoning fee, Upon motion made by Richard Madigan, seconded by Elmer Ven- skoske and unanimously approved, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia does hereby move that we refund the other half of this application fee, V. V. CUTSHAW AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 3,53 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF V..- CUTSHAW, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 11 NORTH, AP- PROXIMATELY ONE- EIGHTH (1/8) MILE NORTH OF INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE, &cL; IN STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ; "FROM AGRICULTURAL, GENERAL (A -2) TO BUSINESS, GENERAL )B -2), Recommended Approval Ronald Berg read the application and showed the exact lo- cation of the property to the Members. Mr, Madigan asked Mr. Cutshaw if he had landscaped the land. Mr. Cutshaw responded that he had. Mr, Madigan asked if there would be any screening. Mr. Cutshaw stated that there would be screening and that he wanted to make it look nice. He further stated that the 3,53 acres in front would be used for a store with a mill to be behind it. Mr. Cutshaw said that he did not plan to use Route 761 for access, but rather that he would use Route 11. Mr. Berg stated that a Conditional Use Permit was issued for lumber storage, Mr, Cutshaw stated that he would like to use the building 0 for a furniture store if the rezoning is approved; otherwise, he will use it for lumber storage, He added that the initial property was purchased in 1963 with the back property purchased since. :7 Y0 A ' -16- OPPOSITION • Mr. Straight stated that he had talked with 75 of the property owners and mentioned the approximate tax appraisal value of these properties at $40,000 to $75,000 altogether. He men- tioned that he felt a furniture store to be completely out of character with the area and wanted to know what will happen if this store is a flop. He said he objected to the eventual pos- sibility of a furniture manufacturing building there also. Mr. Cutshaw stated that all the people he talked with were in of a furniture store. Mr. Straight stated that Mr. Cutshaw's sawmill adjacent to .this proposed furniture store was in conjunction with A -2 zoning, but he felt that the dry kiln in operation at the sawmill site was not. • Upon motion made by Manuel DeHaven, and seconded by Langdon Gordon, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby recommend to approve this rezoning and send it to the Board of Supervisors for move from A -2 to B -2. The above motion was approved by the following roll call vote: Mr. DeHaven, Mr. Gordon, and Mr. Venskoske, AYE; and Mr. Golladay, NAY. BOYLES AND RICHARD AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY.ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 1, 1973 TO REZONE 1.81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF CHARLES W. BOYLES AND PAUL E. RICHARD, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 739, ABOUT TWO- TENTHS (2/10) MILES NORTH OF INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 671; IN STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: FROM AGRICULTURAL, GENERAL (A -2) TO MULITFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (R -2). Recommended Approval Mr. Berg read the following letter from Mr. Blair Webber, Director of Inspections, of July 24, 1975: � v J -17_ This letter concerns the inspection I made of the White Hall school building today, This building is basically sound • and my office can approve your plan to convert to a four (4) apartment building. As I explained to you the main feature we look for is to insure that each unit is protected from the above or adjoining unit, As long as the plans comply with the Virginia Uniform State- wide Building Code and the Health Departments requirements we .. will approve your building permit application. Mr. Berg also read the following memorandum from Mr. Ronald El Berg, Secretary of the Planning Commission, of June 10, 1975 con- taining comments by Mr. H, S, Sluder, Winchester - Frederick County Health Department of July 8, 1975; Soil appears to be satisfactory for septic tahk -drain fields. This office would have no objection to rezoning for 4 apartmennts of one (1) bedroom each, Upgrading of the present sewage system might be necessary, as these records have not, as yet, been located, Richard Madigan stated that action had been withheld pending the information from Health Department and Building Inspector. Mr. Richards, Builder, appeared before the Commission and stated that he would comply with the Health Department's require- went of one (1) bedroom per apartment. He also stated that Mr. Sluder is working on locating original health permits. Upon motion by Frank Brumback, seconded by Elmer Venskoske and unanimously approved, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend approval. REGIONAL SOLID WASTE PLAN The Chairman read a letter from the Lord Fairfax Planning is District Commission by Mr. R. Edward Duncan, Director, directly jointly to Raymond Sandy and Jim Mead in regard to LFPDC Regional Solid Waste Plan; which recommended considering the Plan for adoption as soon as possible and sending that recommendation on to the Board of Supervisors The Chairman also read the Resolution of January, 1971; which had been properly reviewed and adopted by LFPDC. He stat- ed that he didn't know how the Commission could "act" on this, as we didn't have a copy of the Plan itself. Mr. Berg stated that it would not be necessary to act on the Plan. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion made by James Golladay, seconded by Langdon Gordon and unanimously approved, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby adjourn its meeting. J is th Williams, Chairman Respectfully submitted, H. Ronald Berg, Secretary 1