Loading...
PC_06-16-82_Meeting_MinutesMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, June 16, 1982 PRESENT: Frank Brumback, Chairman; James M. Golladay, Vice - Chairman; Carl M. McDonald; M. Domenic Palumbo; Kenneth Stiles; A. L. Myers; Manual DeHaven; W. French Kirk ABSENT: George L. Romine CALL TO ORDER Chairman Brumback called the meeting to order. The first order of business, consideration of the minutes of June 2, 1982. Mr. Myers noted that on page five, line seven, should read "...what the owner /operator of the particular store..." There being no further corrections, Mr. Myers moved for approval. This was seconded by Mr. Kirk and passed unanimously. Mr. Horne next presented a preliminary plan for subdivision development in the Opequon Magisterial District submitted to the staff by Mr. Fred Glaize, III and Mr. James Bowman. Mr. Horne stated that the presentation does not require action by the Planning Commission; however, before the owners go to the time and expense of drawing road profiles and final site plans, they wished to have the Planning Commission review the design for any problems. Mr. Horne explained that this will be a very large subdivision with areas designated for parks. The subdivision does reflect new subdivision road standards with 50' right of way roads except for the central road which is a 60' right of way. Mr. Horne noted that the property is located on Route 647 on the Mobile property. Mr. Horne further stated that both the Department of Planning and the Department of Parks and Recreation have been working with the developers on the overall design. Mr. Glaize, part owner, and Mr. Bruce Edens, representative for the developer, were present to answer any questions. Mr. Stiles asked for the total acreage designated for park area and Mr. Edens replied that there would be 6.6 acres. Mr. Golladay asked who would own and maintain the park area. Mr. Horne stated that in lieu of the recreational impact fee, the land would be dedicated to the County. Mr. Horne commented 1568 -2- that a detailed set of conditions would go into the Deed of Dedication of the subdivision as to what the character (slopes, grades) of the land will be when the County does take over. He further commented that the parks will be minimum maintenance. Some of the members of the Commission were very concerned with regards to County maintenance of the park areas. Mr. Edens stated that the parks could be drawn in Section One of the plans as an option and the Commission could then decide later whether they preferred money or land for the impact fee. There next ensued a discussion on the water runoff and drainage for the subdivision. BIMONTHLY Mr. Gyurisin explained the variance applications reviewed at the June 15, 1982, Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. Discussion of Rural Land Policies Mr. Horne stated that the Comprehensive Plan Update Subcommittee has approved the rural land policies as presented, based on a set of underlying understandings as to the ultimate details of this type of land regulation system. Mr. Stiles felt that two statements should be included in the agricultural preservation section of the rural land policies; one dealing with the protection of property owner's rights and another stating that agricultural land preservation should be voluntary and on the part of the landowner. Mr. Stiles further stated that he agreed with the underlying understandings listed in the memorandum, but the majority of people at the public meetings disapproved of more restrictions. 1569 -3- After much discussion, the majority of the Commission felt that the agricultural preservation section needed to be reworked and made less restrictive. Chairman Brumback next turned the Rural Land Use Policies back to the Subcommittee without the Commission's endorsement until the agricultural section could be reworked. Discussion of Urban and Suburban Land Policies Mr. Horne stated that the Comprehensive Plan Update Subcommittee has approved the urban and suburban land policies as presented. There next ensued a discussion on whether a broad statement of intent should be added to the policies stating how the County envisions its urban and suburban development for the future. The Commission concluded that all of the policy statements combined sufficiently outlined the County's philosophy on future development. Mr. Palumbo then moved for endorsement of the policies as presented. This was seconded by Mr. Kirk and passed unanimously.* BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby endorse the Comprehensive Plan Policies for Urban and Suburban areas presented by the Comprehensive Plan Update Sub- committee. Discussion of Comprehensive Plan Schedule Mr. Horne stated that he will have a package of infor- mation, in fairly complete form, ready in August to submit to the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Horne added that it will contain the outline of the text and the actual chapters for the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Horne next reviewed each individual chapter in order to bring the * Mr. Stiles was not present for this vote. 1570 -4- Commission members up to date on what has been completed and what yet needs to be done. Adjournm Mr. Gollady next moved for adjournment. This was seconded by Mr. DeHaven and passed unanimously. ** ** Mr. Palumbo and Mr. Stiles were not present for this vote. Respectfully submitted, F ank Brumbac'k , Chairman Q nc:/2aoA� Q o n T. P. Horne, Secretary 1571