PC_10-01-86_Meeting_MinutesMINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room in the Old Frederick County
Court House, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia, on October 1, 1986.
PRESENT: Frank H. Brumback, Chairman; James W. Golladay, Jr.,
Vice - Chairman; George L. Romine; Marjorie H. Copenhaver; Kenneth
Y. Stiles; A. Lynn Myers; Carl M. McDonald; S. Blaine Wilson;
Manuel C. DeHaven; Robert W. Watkins, Secretary; Stephen M.
Gyurisin, Advisory.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brumback called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
The first order of business was the approval of the minutes of
September 17, 1986. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr.
Golladay, the minutes of September 17, 1986 were unanimously approved as
presented.
BIMONTHLY REPORT
Mr. Watkins stated that he had received a request for an
administrative review and approval on an amended site plan for the
Solenberger property (Apple Tractor) for a storage shed. Chairman Brumback
instructed the staff to proceed with that administrative review.
The staff and Commission next discussed pending BZA applications.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Transportation Committee
Mr. Golladay stated that the Transportation Committee will be
meeting on October 9, 1986 at 7:00 p.m., with public hearings starting at
7:15 p.m.
2289
-2-
Rural Ordinance Subcommittee
Col. Myers reported that the Rural Ordinance Subcommittee met on
September 29, 1986 and the staff proposed an alternative plan for rural
subdivisions which would have three types of minor subdivisions and all
remaining subdivisions would be considered by the Board of Supervisors.
Col. Myers said that after an informal vote, the Subcommittee decided to
stay with the original plan, making revisions where necessary. He said
that the Subcommittee would like to present this plan to the whole Planning
Commission and then have a joint worksession with the Planning Commission
and the Board of Supervisors.
Water Line to White Post Correctional Unit
Mr. Golladay said that the County has been approached about running
a water line to the White Post Correctional Unit. He said that officials
from the correctional unit, members of the Clark County Board of
Supervisors, Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Frederick County
Sanitation Authority, and himself, representing the Planning Commission,
met to discuss this project. It was decided to have the Clarke County and
Frederick County Sanitation Authority Directors meet with the consulting
engineers to come up with a proposal.
Amendments to the Residential Performance District
Mr. Stiles, speaking on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, said
that the amendments to the RP District were a matter of urgency and
requested that draft amendments be presented to the Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors as soon as possible.
SITE PLANS
Site Plan 11028 -86 of Shockey Company Building for a 16,156 square foot,
two -story office addition in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Watkins said that the applicant is proposing to add an addition
to the existing building. He said that they are substantially reorganizing
and improving their parking areas as a part of this site plan and have
shown more than sufficient parking spaces for the amount of square footage
proposed.
David McClure, Architect with Howard Shockey & Sons, was present to
answer questions. Mr. McClure stated that they have outgrown the existing
building.
2290
— 3 —
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Stiles,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
approve Site Plan #028 -86 of Shockey Company Building for a 16,156 square
foot, two —story office addition on Route 11 North in the Stonewall
Magisterial District.
The vote on this site plan was as follows:
YES: Mrs. Copenhaver and Messrs. McDonald, Myers, Stiles, Brumback,
Wilson, DeHaven, Romine
ABSTAIN: Mr. Golladay
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Rezoning Request #015 -86 of WORCO to rezone 7.606 acres from M -2
(Industrial General) to B -3 (Industrial Transition).
Action Approved
Mr. Benjamin M. Butler, attorney representing WORCO, introduced
himself and Mr. J: Randolph Larrick, the attorney representing J & P
Properties, the seller of the property. Mr. Butler said that this business
will cater more to the professional builder rather than the consumer and
they will carry such items as insulation, drywall, lumber, etc. Mr. Butler
said that they were granted an Industrial Development Bond to expand the
building on the rear of the property to 8,000 square feet.
Mr. Stiles asked if the applicant planned to hook —up to water and
sewer when it was made available to the area, and Mr. Butler replied yes,
that they did plan to.
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr. Romine,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
unanimously approve Rezoning Application x/015 -86 of WORCO to rezone 7.606
acres, located on the east side of US 522 South in the Shawnee Magisterial
District, from M -2 (Industrial General) to B -3 (Business Transition) for
retail and wholesale building supplies sales.
Rezoning Request #016 -86 of James C. Shelly, Jr. to rezone 16 lots (50' X
130' X 150') from A -2 (Agricultural General) to B -2 (Business General) for
the retail sales of truck caps and related items in the Opequon Magisterial
District.
Action — Denied
Mr. Watkins said that this property is in the old Ridgeway Heights
2291
- 4 -
Subdivision and has a pattern of extremely small lots which were subdivided
prior to subdivision control. He said that the rezoning would constitute
an inappropriate spot zoning because it singled out an individual property
for rezoning without considering other similar nonconforming uses. The
staff was also concerned about the residences in the area. It was noted
that the outdoor storage of truck tops could not be legally expanded to the
Homa property, although the use of the Jo -Lynn building would constitute a
legal nonconforming use.
Mr. Watkins next read a letter from Mr. Robin A. Frans who was
opposed to the rezoning.
Mr. James Shelly, Jr., President of Shelly's Truck Caps, said that
he bought four acres in 1977 and operated a grocery store. He said that
the truck cap business started in 1978 and was a family owned and run
business. Mr. Shelly said that the truck cap business has continued to
grow and they need more space for storage and retail sales.
Mr. Stiles asked Mr. Shelly if he intended to use the property for
anything other than the expansion of the truck and camper tops sales and
Mr. Shelly replied that he did not. Mr. Stiles asked the staff if the
county could require screening on the Homa property if Mr. Shelly was
allowed to expand. Mr. Gyurisin said that the county does not have
regulations governing nonconforming uses as far as screening. Mr. Gyurisin
noted that screening could be required if the property was zoned into a
category that had screening requirements, for example, the B -2 and B -3
zones.
Chairman Brumback asked for the number of other nonconforming
commercial uses in this area. Mr. Stiles replied that there were five or
six.
Mr. Stiles noted that these properties were overlooked at the time
of the comprehensive rezoning when the goal was to bring zoning in line
with existing uses. He said that the Commission could take the approach
that we are recognizing existing uses and amend the comprehensive rezoning.
Mr. Stiles felt the spot zoning issue could then be avoided. He also felt
that in some circumstances, more protection could be provided to the
neighbors if the nonconforming properties were zoned commercial.
Mr. Golladay felt that all the commercial properties should be
rezoned on a comprehensive basis, rather than have piecemeal rezoning.
Col. Myers felt that Route 522 provided for a good business location
and that the existing commercial uses would be better zoned for business.
Mr. Wilson said that he also would not be in favor of piecemeal
rezoning and would rather rezone the entire area.
Upon motion made by Mr. Golladay and seconded by Col. Myers,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
deny Rezoning Application #016 -86 of James C. Shelly, Jr. to rezone 16 lots
2292
— 5 —
on Route 522 South, at Ninevah, in the Opequon Magisterial District, from
A -2 (Agricultural General) to B -2 (Business General).
The vote on this rezoning was as follows:
YES (TO DENY): Mrs. Copenhaver and Messrs. McDonald, Myers, Brumback,
Golladay, DeHaven, Wilson, Romine
NO: Mr. Stiles
Mr. Stiles said that the staff could advertise the existing
nonconforming uses for rezoning, using as a basis the written part of the
comprehensive rezoning that the County would, from time to time, rezone
areas that were overlooked during the 1980 comprehensive rezoning. Mr.
Stiles requested that the staff prepare a memorandum to the Board of
Supervisors reflecting the Planning Commission's discussion.
Rezoning Request #017 -86 of C. Douglas Adams and Fern L. Adams to rezone
6.224 acres from A -2 (Agricultural General) to M -1 (Industrial Limited).
Action — Approved
Mr. Watkins stated that this land is surrounded on three sides by
land zoned M -1 and owned by Mr. Adams. He said that this rezoning would
represent a minor addition to an existing M -1 area.
Mr. Robert Mitchell, attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Adams, stated that
this property was just recently acquired and would be added to the overall
industrial tract.
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr. Romine,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
unanimously approve Rezoning #017 -86 of C. Douglas Adams and Fern L. Adams
to rezone 6.224 acres, located on the south side of Bufflick Road in the
Shawnee Magisterial District, from A -2 (Agricultural General) to M -1
(Industrial Limited).
Conditional Use Permit #010 -86 of Charles and Faye Grady for a Kennel in
the Opequon Magisterial District.
Action — None (motion died due to a tie vote)
Mr. Charles Grady said that he has 24 dogs, consisting of cocker
spaniels and poodles, which he breeds as a hobby for better quality and
disposition. Mr. Grady said that he does not board dogs.
Mr. Watkins stated that this conditional use process began by a
neighbor complaining of barking dogs.
2293
— 6 —
Mr. Thomas Thompson, adjoining property owner, said that his home is
probably no more than 75' from the Grady's house. Mr. Thompson said that
the noise of harking dogs is a problem. Mr. Thompson said that he and his
wife have spoken with the Gradys on several occasions about the noise, but
nothing has been done.
Mr. Donald Clark, adjoining property owner, stated that the noise of
barking dogs all night long is a problem. Mr. Clark said that he has
contacted the Sheriff's Department and the Law Enforcement Committee and no
one has been able to give them relief. Mr. Clark also objected to the
odor.
There next ensued a discussion on the types of conditions that could
be placed on the kennel to reduce the noise. The staff felt it was
difficult to police conditions such as odor, hours of operation, and
whether the dogs were put inside at a certain time each day.
Mr. Golladay moved and Mr. DeHaven seconded the motion to approve
the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. This will be a one year permit to be reviewed and renewed annually by
the staff, Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors.
2. If the use, occupancy, or ownership of the property changes, this
conditional use permit shall expire and a new conditional use permit
will be required.
3. A wooden stockade fence or other solid fence providing a solid screen
must be provided around the entire kennel and run area.
4. All dogs must be secured inside an enclosed building between the hours
of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
5. The total number of dogs on the property will be limited to 24.
This motion failed due to the following tie vote:
YES: Mrs. Copenhaver and Messrs. McDonald, Golladay, DeHaven
NO: Messrs. Myers, Brumback, Wilson, Romine
(Mr. Stiles was not present for this vote.)
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Vran H. Brum�Cha� n
obert W. Watkins, Secretary
2294