PC_03-01-89_Meeting_MinutesMEETINGIMINUTES
COUNTY PLANNING
Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Courthouse
in Winchester, Virginia on March 1, 1989.
PRESENT: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; Beverly Sherwood,
Vice Chairman; Manuel C. DeHaven, Stonewall District; S.
Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Carl M. McDonald, Gainesboro
District; Douglas Rinker, Citizen at Large; Marjorie H.
Copenhaver, Citizen at Large; John Marker, Back Creek
District.
ABSENT: George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Kenneth Y.
Stiles, Board Liaison
Planning Staff Present: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary and Kris
C. Tierney
CALL TO ORDER
p.m.
Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00
1.11 W 61 awn - t h
The Commission and staff reviewed pending
applications.
SUBDIVISIONS
Final Subdivision Plat for the Regional Jail Site for one lot,
zoned M -1, in the Fort Collier Industrial Park in the
Stonewall District.
Action - Approved
John R. Riley, Jr., Chairman of the Regional Jail
Board, was present to answer questions.
Wilson,
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve the Final Subdivision Plat for
the Regional Jail Site for one 20.00 acre lot, zoned M -1, in
2850
- _2 -
the Fort Collier Industrial Park, located on the corner of
Brooke Road and Fort Collier Road, in the Stonewall District.
Final Subdivision Plat of Carlisle Estates, Section 1, for 96
townhouse units on 24.76 acres, zoned RP, in the Shawnee
District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Bruce Edens of Greenway Engineering and Surveying
Company prepared the final subdivision plats.
Chairman Golladay called for anyone in the audience
who wished to speak regarding this subdivision.
Ms. Martha Wolf asked if the developers were required
to provide open space, to pay for water and sewer, and to
contribute to the schools, etc. The staff and commission
explained the procedures that the developer had to follow.
Mr. Wilson had positive comments about the open space
in this development. He felt that the open space was useable
for recreational purposes, even though it was designated as
flood plain.
McDonald,
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby approve the final subdivision plat of Carlisle
Estates, Section 1, for 96 townhouse units on 24.76 acres,
zoned RP, located at the intersection of Routes 659 and 656 in
the Shawnee District.
The vote on this subdivision was.:
YES (TO APPROVE Marker, Copenhaver, McDonald, Sherwood,
Golladay, DeHaven, Wilson
NO: Rinker
Carlisle Estates, Sections II, III, and IV, for 267 single -
family lots on 123.9 acres, zoned RP, in the Shawnee District.
Action - Approved
Mr. H. Bruce Edens of Greenway Engineering and
Surveying prepared the final subdivision plats.
McDonald,
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr.
2851
- 3 -
BE IT RESOLVED, That
does hereby approve
Estates, Sections II,
on 123.9 acres, zoned
Routes 659 and 656 in
the Frederick County Planning Commission
the final subdivision plat of Carlisle
III, and IV, for 267 single - family lots
RP, and located at the intersection of
the Shawnee District.
The vote on this subdivision was:
YES (TO APPROVE): Marker, Copenhaver,
Golladay, DeHaven, Wilson
NO: Rinker
McDonald, Sherwood,
Final Subdivision Plat of Fredericktowne Estates, Sections I
and II, for single family lots on 9.6 acres, zoned RP, in the
Opequon District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Watkins noted that the open space is shown on the
plat as an "open space easement" as opposed to land that is
actually dedicated. Mr. Watkins said that the staff has no
objection if the deed of dedication is drawn correctly and
specifies that: 1) the land is permanently preserved in an
undeveloped state; and 2) the land is open to access by the
residents of the development.
Mr. Charles Maddox of G. W. Clifford & Associates,
said that the master plan for this subdivision was approved
under the old 15,000 square foot minimum regulation. Mr.
Maddox explained that Fredericktowne currently has a property
owners association. He explained that if they establish open
space as fee simple ownership, requiring them to establish
another property owners association, it would create a second,
new organizational structure at Fredericktowne. Mr. Maddox
said that this would not be responsive to their intentions for
this development.
A discussion followed on the issue of putting Surry
Drive into service as soon as possible, before the majority of
Fredericktowne was constructed. It was felt that the sequence
of construction needed to be addressed. Mr. Maddox said that
he would address that issue the next time he came before the
Commission.
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr.
McDonald,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve the final subdivision plat of
Fredericktowne Estates, Section 1 (24 lots) and Section 2 (31
2852
- 4 -
lots) , on 9.6 acres, located adjacent and to the east of the
Fredericktowne Subdivision, in the Opequon District.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Rezoning Application #001 -89 of Parkfield Associates to rezone
5.4465 acres from RP (Residential Perfo to B -2
(Business General) in the Gainesboro District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Watkins said that this rezoning involves the
Winchester T.V. Cable site on Route 522 and the expansion of
an existing B -2 area. He noted that there is about 300 feet
of existing B -2 zoning on Route 522 and for some historical
reason, does not include the cable company. Mr. Watkins said
that this rezoning will move the B -2 line back somewhere
between 150-250' feet to include the cable company and be
parallel to Route 522.
Mr. George Johnston, on behalf of Parkfield
Associates, was present to answer questions.
A discussion followed on the zoning history of this
parcel. The Commissioners were trying to determine the zoning
of the property when the cable company went in and how the
property eventually came to be rezoned to RP.
Mr. Howard Lewis, part owner of the property, said
that approximately eight years ago, they constructed a small
equipment building and two or three dishes. He did not
remember the zoning at the time. He said they later came back
with a site plan for the office. Mr. Lewis said that the line
between the agriculture zoning and the B -2 zoning was not
defined and he did not recall how it came to be rezoned to RP.
Mr. Lewis said that when they sell the cable company, they
would like the entire parcel to be zoned the same.
Chairman Golladay called for anyone from the audience
who wished to speak regarding this rezoning.
Ms. Martha Wolf was concerned that this rezoning
might set a precedent for strip development along Route 522.
Upon motion made by Mr. McDonald and seconded by Mrs.
Copenhaver,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve rezoning #001 -89 of Parkfield
Associates to rezone 5.4465 acres from RP (Residential
Performance) to B -2 (Business General) for the cable
television business and other uses allowed in the B -2 Zone.
This property is located on Route 522 North, approximately
2853
- 5 -
1,000 feet north of the Winchester Corporate limits in the
Gainesboro District.
Conditional Use Permit $013 -88 of Cheryl L. Anderson for an
off - premise sign in the Stonewall District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Tierney noted that the proposed location for the
sign is within the state's right -of -way.
Mrs. Cheryl Anderson, the applicant, said that the
sign would be located 40' from the side of Route 11 and 25'
from the side of Route 836. She added that the proposed
location would be 15' east of Potomac Edison Company's power
poles and right -of -way. Mrs. Anderson said that she has
applied for a permit from the Virginia Department of
Transportation to put the sign in the state's right -of -way.
The Commission and staff discussed whether or not an
off - premise sign needed business zoning. It was noted that
county regulations allow off - premise signs in all zones;
however, state regulations prohibit off - premise signs along
some primary roads without the proper zoning. The staff noted
that secondary roads and some others do not require commercial
zoning according to state regulations.
No one else was present to speak in. favor or
opposition to this conditional use permit.
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr.
Wilson,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve conditional use permit #013 -88
of Cheryl L. Anderson for an off - premise sign to be located on
the southeast corner of the intersection of Routes 11 and 836
in the Stonewall District, with the following conditions:
1. This will be a one -year permit to be reviewed and renewed
annually by the staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board
of Supervisors.
2. If the use, occupancy, or ownership of the property
changes, this conditional use permit shall expire and a new
conditional use permit will be required.
3. All necessary local and state permits need to be obtained.
Conditional Use Permit $001 -89 of Charles and Nancy Thompson
for a Cottage Occupation for garden supplies and rentals,
2854
- 6 -
preparation and sale of baked goods, crafts and gifts shop,
and water hauling in the Gainesboro District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Tierney said that the Thompsons received a
conditional use permit for a cottage occupation /garden
supplies and rental in 1982. Since then, the use has expanded
and the Thompsons have applied for a revised permit. Mr.
Tierney said that the staff has received some complaints
regarding Mr. Thompson's business. He noted that the original
cottage occupation was for garden supplies and rentals and
soon after that, a water hauling business was added and
administratively approved. Mr. Tierney said that the
Thompsons want to include baked goods, crafts and gifts to
their cottage occupation.
Mr. Charles Thompson said that he operates a
greenhouse, from which he sells potted plants, he sells
childrens clothing, he manufactures and sells lawn furniture,
and he has a 40 -acre orchard. Mr. Thompson said that he has
one full -time employee and one person under contract as a
salesman for the lawn furniture. He added that the complaints
received by.the staff were about his business expanding too
quickly.
Chairman Golladay called for anyone who wished to
speak regarding this conditional use permit and the following
people came forward:
Mr. David Peek, an adjoining property owner, said
that Mr. Thompson's activities were not in keeping with the
residential area. Mr. Peek said that Mr. Thompson's business
has expanded over the years to the point where it resembles a
junk shop. Mr. Peek felt that Mr. Thompson's business was
reducing the value of his property. He was concerned about
lights being on throughout the night and he did not like to
see the lawn ornaments, ceramic pots, and lawn furniture
displayed on the front lawn. Mr. Peek said that there are
about five different businesses taking place on the property
and he felt these activities could not be considered as a home
occupation any longer.
Mr. George Sempeles inquired if Mr. Thompson had
received a permit from the Health Department to sell the baked
goods.
Mrs. Ann Grogg, resident in the area, said that she
did not object to Mr. Thompson continuing his activities under
a conditional use permit, but she did not want to see the
property rezoned to business.
Chairman Golladay asked Mr. Thompson if all
activities were taking place inside of a building. Mr.
Thompson said that the lawn furniture manufacturing takes
2855
- 7 -
place in a building at the rear of the property, the crafts
shop takes place in the garage, and the bakery is in his
residence. Mr. Thompson said that lawn furniture and
ornaments are displayed on his front lawn for sale.
After some discussion, the Commission felt that Mr.
Thompson's activities could still take place under the
guidelines of the cottage occupation use.
DeHaven,
Upon motion made by Mr. McDonald and seconded by Mr.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby approve conditional use permit #001 -89 of Charles
and Nancy Thompson for a cottage occupation for garden
supplies and rentals, preparation and sale of baked goods,
crafts and gifts shop, and water hauling on property located
1/2 mile north of White Hall, on the west side of Route 739,
in the Gainesboro District, with the following conditions:
1. This is a one -year permit to be reviewed and renewed
annually by the staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board
of Supervisors.
2. If the use, occupancy, or ownership of the property
changes, this conditional use permit shall expire and a new
conditional use permit will be required.
3. Hours of operation shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
The vote on this conditional use permit was:
YES: (TO APPROVE Marker, Copenhaver, McDonald, Sherwood,
Golladay, DeHaven, Wilson
ABSTAIN Rinker
An Amendment to Allow Concrete Block Manufacturing as an
Allowed Use in the M -1 Zone
Action - Approved
Mr. Tom Gilpin was present to speak in favor of the
amendment.
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr.
Wilson,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve an amendment to Chapter 21,
Article XIV, M -1 (Light Industrial), Section 14 -2, Permitted
Uses, as follows:
285
- 8 -
14 -2 -1.1.1
The manufacture of concrete block, brick and related products.
All storage or manufacturing activities that are not located
within a fully enclosed structure shall be fully screened from
the view of surrounding properties or public right -of -ways by
an opaque fence of sufficient height or by landscaped screens
as defined by this chapter.
Adoption of the Revised 1988 -89 Comprehensive Policy Plan for
Frederick County
Action - Approved
Chairman Golladay called for anyone wishing to speak
in favor or opposition to the plan.
plan.
Mr. Steve Cote' came forward to speak in favor of the
Mr. George Sempeles was concerned about the Hackwood
mansion being included inside of the urban development area of
the comprehensive plan. Mr. Sempeles felt that the Hackwood
mansion was one of the county's most valuable assets as far as
historical importance and as a watershed and he wanted to see
this area preserved and protected.
Mr. Watkins noted that historic sites will be
included in the urban development area, however, the county
needed to develop a policy to protect those sites. He said
that the county needed to appoint a Historic Resource Advisory
Committee, now that the historic site survey is underway.
Mr. George Johnston came forward to speak on behalf
of Helen Moore. Mr. Johnston asked that Mrs. Moore's
property, consisting of 54+ acres south of Bartonsville, be
included in the urban development area of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The Planning Commission felt that since the
Comprehensive Plan is updated each year, they would consider
including this tract the next time the plan was updated.
Ms. Martha Wolf expressed her concern regarding
historic preservation and she also inquired if scenic
easements were included in the plan. Ms. Wolf was also
concerned about the rate of growth in Frederick County and
asked if this was addressed in the Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Golladay explained that the Board of
Supervisors has funded $15,000 towards a historic resources
survey. He said that the Winchester- Frederick County
2857
- 9 -
Historical Society, who is undertaking the project, has
received an $18,000 state grant for additional funding. The
Chairman noted that this study is currently being done and
when finished, the Historical Society will come to the
Planning Commission with their findings. It was also noted
that the Comprehensive Plan contained policy statements to
promote the preservation of historic sites and scenic vistas
and also promoted activities to encourage tourism.
Sherwood,
Upon motion made by Mr. McDonald and seconded by Mrs.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve the 1988 -89 Comprehensive Plan
for Frederick County.
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Master Development Plan #016 -88 of Winchester Office Park for
condominium office buildings and warehouse space for sale on
30.862 acres, zoned B -2 and B -3, in the Shawnee District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Nevill Turner, of Wiltshire Turner Ltd., was one
of the partners in the Winchester Office Center Limited
Partnership, the property owners. Mr. Turner presented the
plan to the Commission.
Mr. Tierney said that this proposal is for an office
and mixed use industrial park, consisting of 73,752 square
feet of office space and 157,200 square feet of industrial
space on 27.87 acres. He noted that an additional three plus
acres exists in three out parcels, zoned B -2.
Mr. H. Bruce Edens, of Greenway Engineering and
Surveying Company, was the engineer for this project.
Mr. Junior Triplett, an adjoining property owner,
said that he was not opposed to the development; however, he
was concerned about the entrance off Route 522. Mr. Triplett
felt that this entrance would not be safe and he felt a
turning lane should be required.
Regarding entrances, it was noted by the Chairman
that the Commission could not require any more than the
Virginia Department of Transportation required, according to
State Law. The Commission discussed the entrances and agreed
that turning lanes would help the situation. They also felt
that an internal road network would be appropriate.
McDonald,
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr.
- 10 -
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission
does hereby unanimously approve Master Development Plan #016-
88 of Winchester Office Park for condominium office buildings
and warehouse spaces for sale on 30.862 acres, zoned B -2
(Business General) and B -3 (Industrial Transition). This
property is located .7 miles south of the Route 50 /Route 522
intersection, on the east side of Route 522, in the Shawnee
District.
No other business remained to be discussed and the
meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman
Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
2859 P