PC_12-07-88_Meeting_MinutesMEETING MINUTES
of the
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room in the Old Frederick County
Court House, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia, on December 7, 1988.
PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: Frank H. Brumback, Chairman;
James W. Golladay, Jr., Vice - Chairman; S. Blaine Wilson;
Manuel C. DeHaven; Beverly Sherwood; Carl M. McDonald;
Kenneth Y. Stiles; Marjorie H. Copenhaver; and George L. Romine.
Also present were: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary; Kris C. Tierney,
Advisory; and A. Bray Cockerill, Advisory
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brumback called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
The first order of business was the consideration of the minutes of
November 16, 1988. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr.
DeHaven, the minutes of November 16, 1988 were unanimously approved as
presented.
BIMONTHLY REPORT
The Commission and staff discussed pending applications.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Economic Development Commission
Mr. Romine said that economic development continues to be very busy
and some bright prospects are into the final stages for locating in
Frederick County.
Capital Improvements Plan Subcom
Mr. Romine reported that the Capital Improvements Plan Subcommittee
had their initial meeting and rearranged some of the items on the plan.
The next meeting will be held in January.
2793
- 2 -
Transportation Committee
Mr. Golladay reported that the Transporation Committee held a public
hearing on the Six -Year Major Road Improvement Projects on December 5,
1988. He also reported that the Transportation Committee received a
request from Mr. Jerry Shields and Mr. David Eller of the College Park
Subdivision to abandon a portion of a stub street in the College Park
Subdivision. The committee recommended that the County abandon the stub
street and begin the process for Mr. Shields and Mr. Eller to purchase the
property.
Holiday Meeting Schedule
Chairman Brumback announced the cancellation of the Planning
Commission's meeting of January 4, 1989, due to the Christmas and New Years
holiday.
PRESENTATION TO THE CRANWELL COMMISSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Mr. Stiles announced to the Commission that John Riley, the County
Administrator, and himself were scheduled to go to Richmond on December 8,
1988 to testify before the Cranwell Commission, a study committee of the
General Assembly, that is considering allowing counties to deal with
off -site improvements on proposed developments. Mr. Stiles said that he
intended to testify that Frederick County believes it needs additional
leeway as far as dealing with off -site improvements, particularly as it
applies to roads. Mr. Stiles said that, for example, when a rezoning comes
before the Planning Commission, the only review the Transportation
Department has done is to determine whether or not there is an acceptable
entrance and suitable site distance. He said that they do not address the
question of whether or not the roads that will carry the traffic from the
development are adequate. Mr. Stiles felt that the county was at the point
where it needed the leeway to address this issue locally. Mr. Stiles said
that once the County determines the location of roads, through the
Transportation Plan, it needs to have the authority to prohibit building
where the road is planned.
Mr. Stiles also announced that Mr. Smalley, the Highway Commissioner
from the Staunton District, Mr. Riley, and himself would be meeting with
Commissioner Raymond Pethtel of the Transportation Department and Vivian
Watts, the Secretary for Transportation and Public Safety, to address the
Board of Supervisors' offer to the Transportation Department to front money
for the design and engineering of Route 37 and to push for the immediate
initiation of work on Route 37, particularly the sections from Kernstown to
Route 522 and the intersection with Route 11 North. Mr. Stiles noted that
the other item to be addressed was the Board's willingness to advance money
for the secondary program for design, engineering, and right -of -way
2799
- 3 -
acquisition for secondary roads on a revolving basis in order to try and
speed up some of the projects.
(Mr. Stiles left the meeting at this point.)
Plat Vacation and Subdivision of Frederick Plaza (formerly Frederick Mall)
for a shopping center in the Gainesboro Magisterial District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Harry Benham III, attorney, was present on behalf of the owners,
James T. Anderson, William Johnston, and himself. Mr. Benham said that
there are five lots in this tract of land and the owners would like to
rearrange the lots to better utilize the property.
Mrs. Sherwood asked if the 30 foot utility easement was also the
roadway. Mr. Benham replied that the utility easement would pass through
the middle of the roadway. He said that the utilities are already in place
and a partial road exists. Mr. Benham added that the present road width
varies from approximately 50 feet down to 40 feet.
Upon motion made by Mrs. Sherwood and seconded by Mr. McDonald,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
unanimously approve the Plat Vacation and Subdivision of Frederick Plaza
(formerly Frederick Mall) for a shopping center on 15.8 acres, zoned B -2,
and located on the south side of Route 522, east of Route 37, in the
Gainesboro Magisterial District.
DISCUSSION ON FREDERICK PLAZA SITE PLAN
Mr. Watkins informally presented the Frederick Plaza site plan which
consisted of a shopping center anchored by a Food Lion grocery store, a
Rite Aid drug store, and some other smaller buildings. Mr. Watkins pointed
out the parking, entrances, detention areas, etc. He noted that the staff
is currently receiving comments from the various reviewing agencies.
Chairman Brumback asked that this plan be formally presented to the
Commission after all the comments have been received from the reviewing
agencies.
Final Subdivision Plat of Kimerly Henry for two lots, zoned B -2, for
business uses, located on Baker Lane in the Stonewall District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Michael Bryan, attorney for Kimerly Henry, was present to
:11
- 4 -
answer questions. Mr. Bryan said that this request is a continuation of
subdivisions that Mr. Henry has been doing in this area.
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Romine,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
unanimously approve the Final Subdivision Plat of Kimerly Henry for two
lots (Lot 32 and Lot 33) for business uses. This property is located on
Baker Lane in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Rezoning Request #018 -88 of Nicholas Smart, et al. to rezone 3.96 acres
(Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) from RP (Residential Performance) to B -2
(Business General) and located on Route 50 East in the Shawnee District.
Action - Tabled for 60 Days
Mr. Nicholas Smart came forward to represent himself and the
following property owners /applicants: Jerry and Helen Kirk, Thurston and
Thelma Collins, Charles Luttrell Estate, and Nicholas and Kathy Smart. Mr.
Smart said that sewer and water were in place and he felt that the property
was a natural entrance to the town.
The Planning Commission was concerned about the possibility of
having six driveways onto Route 50, if the properties were sold separately.
Mr. Smart said that all the properties are currently for sale and it was
their hope that one buyer would purchase all the properties and make an
attractive entrance to Winchester.
The question was raised on whether or not the Planning Commission
had the right to turn down site plans on the basis that too many entrances
would create a safety hazard.
Mr. Lawrence R. Ambrogi, the Commonwealth's Attorney, said that in a
previous court case, the judge ruled that entrances were a Transportation
Department matter and the Board did not have the authority to deny an
application based on a Transportation Department matter.
Chairman Brumback called for anyone from the audience who wanted to
speak on this rezoning and the following people came forward:
Mr. Robin Doss, adjoining property owner at 1155 Princeton Drive,
came forward to speak in opposition to the rezoning. He said that there
were a lot of traffic problems at College Park now and he felt any business
zoning at this location would add to the problem. Mr. Doss said that
across the street from Purdue Drive and Route 50, the Church of Christ is
being completely surrounded by residential development. Mr. Doss felt that
opening this property up for general retail would create a conflict of
uses. Mr. Doss was also concerned that the business zoning would devalue
2801
- 5 -
his property. He was also concerned about blowing trash and lights.
Mr. Leonard Newcome, resident of College Park, was present on behalf
of the College Park Property Owners Association. Mr. Newcome said that
Route 50 figures into many of the problems that are presently occurring in
the College Park area. He said that the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) has been widening and grading Route 50, however, the
problem is that VDOT has not allowed ample turning distances for
automobiles heading west on Route 50 to make a right hand turn into any of
the lots in question or any other businesses in that area. Mr. Newcome
said that it was difficult to get out of College Park now with any ease and
if these lots were approved for commercial use, it would make the situation
much worse. Mr. Newcome asked the Commission to hold off any rezoning in
this area until VDOT has finished their work on Route 50. Mr. Newcome also
felt it would be appropriate for future developers in that area to put in
curb and gutter and sidewalk for pedestrian safety.
Mr. DeHaven felt that if the property remained zoned as RP, it would
be possible for a property owner to put three houses on one of the lots.
Mr. DeHaven felt the business use would be more appropriate than
residential use at this location.
Other commissioners agreed that this was potential business
property; however, until the entrance question was resolved, they were
hesitant to approve a rezoning. It was mentioned that this one application
was submitted by four different owners of six different lots. The question
was also raised on whether or not VDOT realized this rezoning request was
for six separate lots when they submitted their comments.
Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mrs. Copenhaver,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
unanimously agree to table Rezoning Request X6018 -88 of Nicholas Smart, et
al. for 60 days in order for the staff to receive some clarification from
VDOT on future entrances to serve the lots in question.
Rezoning Request #019 -88 of Willis White to rezone 2.0498 acres from B -1
(Business Limited) to B -3 (Industrial Transition) for mini -self storage
buildings in the Opequon District.
Action - Denied
Mr. Willis White said that it was his intention to serve the
Stephens City area which was in need of self- storage facilities.
Mr. Golladay said that he received a call from a neighbor who did
not have a problem with the self- storage business, however, he was
concerned that if the applicant changed his mind about the use of the
property after it was rezoned, other businesses that he did object to could
be located on the property under the ordinance. Mr. Golladay said that
this neighbor was also concerned about trash and debris and also requested
2802
- 6 -
that the applicant be required to provide screening.
Mr. Watkins commented that at the public meeting held in Stephens
City, comments were made that the commercial development in this area may
be greatly affecting the problems at the interchange. Mr. Watkins noted
that self storage was one of the lowest generators of traffic. He also
noted that B -3 was a lower traffic generator than B -1 or B -2.
Mr. Harry Stimpson, property owner to the south and to the west of
the land in question came forward to speak in opposition to this rezoning
request. Mr. Stimpson said that in 1973, both he and his son purchased
about 83 acres in this area. He said that they worked very closely with
the staff and the Planning Commission and many meetings were held. He said
that after several plans had been worked on, a plan evolved for 103
single - family homes to the west, known as Ridgefield, Sections I and II.
The general agreement was that there would be a buffer zone of multi - family
land to the west of the single - family homes and this was approved by the
Board. He said that at the request of the planning staff and at
considerable expense, they constructed Stickley Drive. He said that they
have also submitted a plan for 11.7 acres of multi - family land to the south
of the present Stephens Village. Mr. Stimpson said that they have worked
very hard and closely with the staff and the Board on their plan and he
felt it was a very bad precedent to come in and rezone two acres of
industrial land right in the middle of their project. Mr. Stimpson said
that some mention has been made about having more industrial land to the
south of Stickley Drive and he was also very opposed to this, since it was
adjacent to his Stephens Village project.
The Planning Commission felt that the mini -self storage proposal was
a reasonably light business use with low traffic, however, the B -3 Zoning
was not compatible with surrounding properties at that location. There
also was some discussion of allowing this use in a B -2 Zoning District.
Upon motion made by Mr. Golladay and seconded by Mr. DeHaven,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
deny Rezoning Request #019 -88 of Willis White to rezone 2.0498 acres in
Stephens City from B -1 (Business Limited) to B -3 (Industrial Transition)
for mini -self storage buildings by the following vote:
YES (TO DENY): DeHaven, Wilson, Golladay, Brumback, Sherwood, McDonald,
Copenhaver
NO: Romine
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Preliminary Master Development Plan #014 -88 of Canterbury Square (formerly
New Dominion) for 20 patio houses on 3.879 acres, zoned RP, and located on
Westminster - Canterbury Drive in the Gainesboro District.
2803
- 7 -
Action - Approved
Mr. Bruce Edens, Engineer with Greenway Engineering & Surveying
Company, presented the plan to the Commission. It was noted that the
current owner, Walter Pugh, will be selling the property to Doug Toan,
Benjamin Butler, Stephen Butler, and Michael Bryan.
Mr. Michael Bryan presented drawings of the type of homes they plan
for this property, which he noted would be in the $175,000- $200,000 price
range.
Buffers, screening, recreational facilities, stormwater management,
and other items concerning this site were discussed. The staff recommended
approval with the following additions to the final plan:
1) A conceptual plan for stormwater management.
2) A general statement of the type of recreational facility to be provided.
3) Statements, profiles, cross - sections, or examples clearly specifying
screening.
Upon motion made by Mrs. Sherwood and seconded by Mr. McDonald,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
approve Preliminary Master Development Plan #014 -88 of Canterbury Square
(formerly New Dominion) for 20 patio houses on 3.879 acres, zoned RP. This
property is located on Westminster- Canterbury Drive, south of Route 522
North, in the Gainesboro Magisterial District.
The vote on this plan was:
YES (To Approve): Wilson, DeHaven, Golladay, Brumback, Sherwood, McDonald,
Copenhaver
ABSTAIN: Romine
DISCUSSION OF JAILS AS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE M -1 ZONING DISTRICT
Mr. Watkins said that the County Administrator's office has
requested that the Planning Commission take action to allow the regional
jail in the M -1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Watkins presented
a proposal to amend the ordinance.
Mr. Golladay made a motion to advertise this amendment for public
hearing. This motion was seconded by Mr. DeHaven and unanimously approved.
2804
- 8 -
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
The staff and Commission reviewed the current list of conditional
use permits. No action was taken at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission had no further business to discuss and
adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert
W.
Watkins,
Secretary
i/J�
%
�-
Prank
H.
B ack,
Chairman
2805