Loading...
PC_06-19-02_Meeting_MinutesMEETING MINUTES OF THE • FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on June 19, 2002. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman /Stonewall District; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Cordell Watt, Back Creek District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; William C. Rosenberry, Shawnee District: Pat GochenOnr, Red Bud District; Marie F. Straub, Red Bud District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; Gene E. Fisher, Citizen at Large; Robert Sager, Board of Supervisors' Liaison, and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; and Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison. STAFF PRESENT: Eric R. Lawrence, Interim Planning Director; Abbe Kennedy, Senior Planner; Jeremy F. Camp, Planner Il; Rebecca A. Ragsdale, Planner 1; and Carol Huff, Clerk. . CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEETING MINUTES - MAY 15, 2002 Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the minutes of May 15, 2002 were unanimously approved as presented. COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) - 06/10/02 Chairman DeHaven reported that the CPPS continued discussions on entrance corridors in general. 11 Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 883 -2- • Sanitation Authority (SA) - 06/18/02 Mtg. Commissioner Fisher reported thatthe SA elected officers forthe year and Mr. Anderson was elected chairman. Commissioner Fisher also reported that the rainfall deficit is now below 15'; he said the south quarry is up approximately 30' since October and the north quarry is holding. He said the SA is considering acquiring the services of Dr. Burbey, a faculty member from Virginia Tech, who will evaluate their hydrological evaluation methods. The SA also approved the 2002 -2003 budget. Winchester Planning Commission (WPC) - 06/18/02 Mtg. Comm issioner Ours reported thatthe WPC approvedasite plan foran office buildingon West Jubal Early Drive, a medium density residential area with a planned shopping center overlay, and the WPC amended an ordinance pertaining to the definition of pharmaceutical centers within the City. Commissioner Ours reported thatthe WPC also passed a favorable recommendation forthe preliminary subdivision approval ofeighttownhouse lots at 909 North Loudoun. He recalled for the Commission that in this evening' sPlanning Commission agenda, the Commission will be considering the County portion of that same development. • INTRODUCTION OF ROBERT M. SAGER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' LIAISON Chairman DeHaven recognized the newly appointed Board of Supervisors' Liaison, Mr. Robert M. Sager, and welcomed him to the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning Application 406 -02 of Rex Dalrymple, submitted by Valley Mill, L.L.C., to rezone 3.18 acres from RP (Residential Performance) to B2 (Business General) District. This property is located along Valley Mill Road (Rt. 659) at Berryville Pike (Rt. 7), and is identified with P.LN.s 54F -1 -9, 54F -1 -9A, 54F -A -30, 54F -3 -A, and 54F -3 -AI in the Red Bud Magisterial District. Action - Tabled for 60 Days Ms. Abbe Kennedy, Senior Planner, read the background information and review agency comments. Planner Kennedy stated thatthe 3.18 -acre site is comprised of five parcels zoned RP (Residential Performance), it is within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA), and existing B2 tracts adjoin the property on the east and west. She stated that the site was also adjacentto I -81, Exit 315, and is consistent with the Idealized Interchange Development Pattern included within the County's Comprehensive Policy Plan. • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 884 3- Planner Kennedy noted that the applicant does not address the impact on the adjoining residential properties, nor the visual impact to the public as they exit the interstate and enter the community of Frederick County. She also noted that the Rezoning Concept Plan, submitted with the application, is not a proffered document and, therefore, should only be utilized for illustrative purposes. There was a brief discussion on the amount projected by the County's Capital Facilities Impact Model to compensate fire and rescue services. Commissioner Thomas commented that the applicant's impact analysis statement was based on fast food /convenience store uses, while no analysis was based on a service station use. Commissioner Thomas inquired why that was not considered, as he believed it wou Id be the worst -case scenario from a traffic standpoint. Commissioner Thomas also inquired aboutthe distance of possible fuel tanks or sewer lines from water wells and whether the distance figures designated by the applicant were based on EPA regulations. Commissioner Fisher inquired about VDOT's minimum distance requirement from Rt. 659; he said VDOT's review comments indicated 300', however, the plan shows 225'. Staff noted that conversations with VDOT indicated that VDOT was confident this could be worked out with the applicant. Mr. Stephen L. Pettler. Jr., an attorney with the firm Harrison & Johnston, was present to represent the applicant, Valley Mill, L.L.C. With regard to the County's Capital Facilities Impact Model's projected impacts, Mr. Pettler said that a zero impact was realized after all the credits were taken. tie said the applicant offered an amount to offset costs to the volunteer organization which was comparable to what other commercial developments recently rezoned had offered. Mr. Pettler stated thatthe plan is conceptual because the user is still speculative, however, they've attempted to portray the worst -case scenario on the plans and factored gas pumps into the plan. Mr. Pettler gave some background information on the adjoining nine lots of the Morris property subdivision, which is subjectto restrictive covenants prohibiting commercial uses. Mr. Pettler said that eight of those lot owners have signed agreements waiving the enforcement of covenants against Valley Mill, L.L.C. and the remaining lot owner has listed his property for sale. He said that some VDOT details will still need to be worked out, but they are site review and master development plan details. Mr. Pettler pointed out that the subject property is surrounded on three sides by B2 uses. He believed the transportation improvements proposed will result in bettervehicle stackingalong Valley Mill Road and the proposed leveling and landscaping would visually improve the entranceway into the County from 1 -81. Comm issionerOurs inquired ifthe three existing structures would be vacated and Mr. Pettler rep I i ed that contracts for purchase ofthe structures are conti ngent upon the rezon i ng. RegardingMr.Pettler's statement that the proposed landscaping goes over and above what is required under Frederick County Code, Commissioner Ours believed the wording was nebulous and he requested the applicant submit detailed plan of the proposed buffer. Mr. Hank Sterenberg, P.E., with the engineering firm of Chester Engineers, addressed the comment from Commissioner Fisher regarding VDOT's minimum distance requirement from Rt. 659. He stated that 300' was recommended in VDOT's letter, however, during subsequent discussions with VDOT, they concurred that the proposed location was preferred for their site distance requirements. Mr. Sterenberg felt confident that all of the issues detailed in VDOT's letter can be addressed to VDOT's satisfaction. Mr. • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 885 4- Sterenberg next addressed the comments raised by Commissioner Thomas. He said that six gas pumps are planned, which will allow 12 fueling positions, and all fuel tanks will meet and/or exceed EPA standards. He stated that State Health regulations require a I00'setback from all wells, which they will meet; however, ifthey cannot, they will close the well. Commissioner Thomas requested that all existing water wells and the proposed tank locations be identified on the master development plan. Commissioner also requested to see more detaiIson the transportation flow planning, including signage for traffiiccontrol. Mr. Sterenberg described the deceleration lane extend ing off Rt. 7 onto the frontage road. Also discussed was lighting and the direction and handling of storm water runoff. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments and the following persons came forward to speak: Mr. Kirk Marsh, property owner to the west, was opposed to the rezoning because he bel ievcd it would create an eyesore for the residents to the west ofthe site. He pointed out that no buffers have been designated forthe west side and lie had issues with lighting and visual impacts. Mr. Marsh also had concerns regarding traffic impacts. He said the existing service road was not sufficient to handle existing traffic and the the area was already terribly congested due to the Dowell J. Howard Vocational School. Mr. Bob Gantz, owner of the 220 Seafood restaurant, was concerned about the traffic congestion and possible well contamination. He believed the applicant should proffer a traffic light and provide a better overall traffic flow plan. Mrs. Cathy Gantz said she was concerned about the impact the proposed commercial area would have on her rental properties in the immediate vicinity. She also was opposed to the rezoning because of the noise and visual impacts it would have on her home. She described the existing traffic congestion and was concerned about even greater traffic impacts. Ms. Shelly Harold was opposed to the rezoning because of traffic and visual impacts. Commissioners were disappointed that V DOT representatives were not presentto discuss the transportation issues. They believed that B2 Zoning for this parcel was appropriate, however, there were transportation problems and safety issues that needed to be addressed. Commissioners informed the applicants that the issues raised must be addressed and they would be more comfortable approving the rezoning if the issues were detailed in a proffer statement. The Commission wanted the applicant to supply detailed information on transportation flow, the signage for traffic control, detailed protection of water wells, information on stormwater management, and detailed information on design standards, landscaping, and lighting. They also believed the applicant should proffer out undesirable B2 uses and address the residents' concerns regarding traffic congestion. Members of the Commission agreed that this was the opportunity to guarantee mitigation of the impacts. Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Ours, • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 886 -5- • BELT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously agree to table Rezoning Application 406 -02 of Rex Dalrymple, submitted by Valley Mill, L.L.C., to rezone 3.18 acres from RP (Residential Performance) to B2 (Business General) District for 60 days to give the applicant the opportunity to provide additional detailed information concerning transportation flow, the signage for traffic control, detailed protection of water wells, information on stormwater management, and detailed information on design standards, landscaping, and lighting. They also believed the applicant should agree to eliminate some of the undesirable B2 uses and address the residents' concerns regarding traffic congestion. Conditional Use Permit #09-02 of Frog Eye Fiber Emporium, submitted by Mary S. Groundwater, for a Cottage Occupation for Instructional Classes and Retail Sales. The property is located at 347 Schoolmarm Lane and is identified with P.I.N.s 62 -A -22 and 62 -A -21A in the Back Creek District. Action - Recommended Approval Planner Rebecca Ragsdale stated that the applicant is proposing to conduct instructional classes in spinning, weaving, knitting, and dying wool; in addition, the applicantwould like to sell products associated with this craft, including spinning wheels and fibers. She said the classes and sales activities would take place in an existing 525-square-foot studio in theapplicanfs home and there will be no employees. She added that classes and sales would generally be conducted on an appointment -only basis. Planner Ragsdale reported no disapproving review agency comments; however, the Fire Marshal has required a 14.5' vertical clearance the entire width of Schoolmarm Lane. She reported that the applicant is willingto provide the clearance as requested. Planner Ragsdale stated that the staff believes the proposed use would not adversely affect adjoining properties and it would be appropriate to approve the application for a conditional use permit. Mr. Robert Groundwater, a co -owner of Frog Eye Fiber Farm, stated that they want to expand their home -based industry to a cottage occupation level, which will allow them to place a small sign and allow incidental sales of spinning wheels and small amounts ofcommercialfiber. Mr. Groundwater explained that they sell to a "niche" market of hand- spinners and weavers; he said they dye their own wools and sell them to persons interested in fiber arts. Commissioner Morris inquired i fthe Groundwaters operated a registered farm and questioned whether the proposed use would fall under the "right -to- farm" classification, thereby eliminating the need for a conditional use permit. Mr. Groundwater replied that this was predominantly a farm -based operation, with the exception ofa few incidentals such asthe spinning wheels, notions, and other fibers. Planner Ragsdale said that since the applicant planned to sell some products not actually produced on the property, the staff believed the conditional use permit would be appropriate. There next followed some discussion on the comments received by the Health Department regarding the septic system. Chairman DeHaven said he understood the Health Department comments to mean that since they cannot locate any record ofan approved permit being issued, they may require the system to be uncovered, inspected, and confirmed that it is functional. Mr. Groundwater commented that the Health • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 887 6- Department's representative walked the septic field and stated that it did not appear to be malfunctioning. Chairman DeHaven believed that definitive comments were needed from the Health Department so that the applicant and the County knew exactly what is expected. Commissioner Unger commented about the narrow driveway and inquired ifthe GrOLlndwaters expected deliveries by large trucks. Mr. Groundwater stated that they bring in hay, usually 100 bales at once on a pick -up truck with a trailer, with no problems. Mr. Groundwater added that he spent $900 for a tree service to clear all overhanging branches and they created a circular drive. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, however, no one came forward to speak. Commission members were comfortable with the request and believed the use was appropriate for this area. Upon motion made by Commissioner Ours and seconded by Commissioner Kriz, BE IT RESOLVED, Thatthe Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit 909 -02 of Frog Eye Fiber Emporium, submitted by Mary S. Groundwater, fora Cottage Occupation for instructional classes and retail sales at 347 Schoolmarm Lane with the following conditions: All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2. Any proposed business sign shall conform to the Cottage Occupation sign requirements and Should not exceed four (4) square feet in size. 3. Any change of use or expansion of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Proposed amendments to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Rural Areas District, Section 165 -54B, Family Division Lots, and Article XXII, Definitions. The proposed amendments are intended to identify qualifying family members for family division lots and to provide a supportive definition. Action - Recommended Approval Planner Jeremy F. Camp reported that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) has recommended an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance dealing withfamilydivision lots. Planner Camp said the amendment would provide a defin ition of a "fain i ly member" that would be consistent with the Code of Virginia. Commissioner Morris inquired ifthe DRRS discussed the length oftime these properties are to be held by the immediate family member before the property could be resold. Planner Camp replied that current requirements state that transfer of property can only occur once to the same family member in their lifetime, however, there is no provision as to the length of time the property must be held. Planner Camp said 40 Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 888 7- the DRRS believed the amendment would tighten -up the procedure, eliminating some potential abuse, and overall, they believed it was a useful provision. Chairman DeHaven asked legal counsel, Mr. Jay Cook, if the definition of immediate family could be interpreted to include "in-law" relationships. Mr. Cook replied that the definitionas stated would not include "in -law" relationships. In response to Commissioner Morris' previous question, Mr. Cook stated that the Virginia Code states that the family subdivision procedures cannot be used to circumvent the County's Subdivision Ordinance. Chairman DeFlaven called for public comments, however, no one came forward to speak Commission members believed the amendment as presented was appropriate. Upon motion made by Commissioner Unger and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, Thatthe Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval ofthe proposed amendments to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Rural Areas District, Section 165 -54B, Family Division Lots, and Article XXII, Definitions. The proposed amendments are intended to identify qualifying family members for family division lots and to provide a supportive definition. • PUBLIC MEETING Subdivision #12 -02 of Kim and Marietta Walls Townhouses, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for the subdivision of a 0.79 -acre tract into six townhouse lots. This property is located at 909 North Loudoun Street and is identified with P.I.N. 54 -A -50 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval Patrick Davenport, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator, presented the background information for the Commission. Administrator Davenport stated that the master development plan requirements have been waived for this project because of the small scope of the project. He also explained that the subject property is bisected by the corporate limits of Winchester and Frederick County with six townhouse units proposed for Frederick County and eighttownhouse units proposed in Winchester. He noted that a Category A buffer is required to separate the zoning districts in the Frederick County portion of the property. Administrator Davenport requested that the Commission require the applicant to provide language in the subdivision plan and final plats for the townhouse development pertaining to the establishment and maintenance of the required 50' common shared buffer and screening easement. He also noted that staff is seeking administrative approval authority for the plan. Mr. Evan A. WyattofGreenway Engineering stated thatwhilethe property is bisected by the City/ County line, the Walls are attempting to create a "seamless" townhouse project. Mr. Wyatt said a site plan has been approved by both the Cityand the County for commercial development proposed forthe project. He noted that more than the required amount of parking has been provided; they have also provided 20' • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 889 in inimumlotfrontagesfortheinternallotsand30' lotfrontagesfortheexternallotsonthecorners. He added that once the commercial development has occurred, an interparcel access connection will provide through - movement out to Rt. 11. Mr. Wyatt stated that the buffer and screening easement will be shown on all the plats. He added that language for the buffer and screen ing easement wil I be provided to staff for the condition of approval for the subdivision design plan. Commissioner Gochenour asked the applicant for an explanation of the City's street requirements for this subdivision. Mr. Wyatt explained that the City's requirement is that if a physical lotis created, it needs to abut a public street, however, there are instances, such as with townhouses, where the lot may encroach upon a private street system. He said this is not the norm for the City and there is no ordinance prohibiting it, but it is within their ability to approve, which they did. Mr. Wyatt said that Frederick County's subdivision ordinance permits duplexes, multiplexes, townhouses, apartments, and single - family small lot subdivisions to be served by private access drives, which in essence are parking lots, provided they are more than 500' from a state - maintained road. Mr. Wyatt believed there was not a street issue for Frederick County. Commissioner Straub inquired about buffering between the proposed townhouses and the existing apartments/ townhouses. Mr. Wyatt said that no landscape buffering is proposed; it is strictly a distance buffer. Commissioner Gochenour inquired if any of the existing trees would be saved. Mr. Wyatt replied thatall the existing vegetation will be cleared for grading of the lots and parking; he pointed to an area on the map that is proposed for vegetative planting on the common side. He said there is a common shared buffer and screening easement between the units and the B2, which will be landscaped, and there will be parking lot landscaping provided in both the City and the County. Commissioner Morris inquired if City water and sewer was intended for the entire development. Mr. Wyatt replied yes. He said they had the ability to have water and sewer from the County through Star Fort, however, the issue was that the Star Fort line was only six inches. Mr. Wyatt said that this size line is not optimal for fire suppression; he said the City had an eight -inch water line and they requested service from them. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, however, no one came forward to speak. Upon motion made by Commissioner Ours and seconded by Commissioner Kriz, BE IT RESOLVED, Thatthe Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Subdivision Application # 12 -02 of Kim and Marietta Walls Townhouses, submitted by Greenway Engineering, forthe subdivision of 0.79 -acre tract into sixtownhouse lots at 909 North Loudoun Street and to grant administrative approval authority to the Planning Staff for the subdivision design plan. • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 890 -9- • DISCUSSION ITEMS DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SETBACKS ON EXISTING STRUCTURES (DWELLINGS) No Action Required Plann er Jeremy F. Camp stated that the Development Review and Regulations Subcomm ittee (DRRS) has prepared a text amendment which would clarify setbacks for existing structures in the Rural Areas District. Planner Camp reviewed the existing and proposed requirements; he explained that the intent of Section 165 -55C is to require a 50' setback from existing "dwellings" rather than existing "structures." Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, however, no one came forward to speak. No issues of concern were raised by the Commission and they believed the amendment as presented was appropriate. The Commission instructed staff to proceed with advertising for the public hearing of the amendment. DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER SETBACKS AND WAIVERS 0 No Action Required Planner Jeremy F. Camp stated that upon direction from the Planning Commission, the Development Review and Regulations Subcomm ittee (DRRS) prepared a draft text amendment to Section 165- 48.6, Commercial Telecommunication Facilities, to establish a minimum setback distance for commercial telecommunication towers when a setback waiver is requested, as well as a requirement for engineer certification when the requested setback is less than the tower height. Planner Camp said the amendments will provide clear guidelines for the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to follow when reviewing applications for a new commercial telecommunications tower. Commissioner Gochenour inquired ifthe amendment guarantees the tower w i l l fall within the property on which the tower is located, if it collapses. Planner Camp replied that the amendment would require that an engineer prepare a certification that if the tower were to collapse, it would collapse within a defined area, which would be within the setback area. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, however, no one came forward to speak. No issues of concern were raised by the Commission and they believed the amendment as presented was appropriate. The Commissioninstructedstafftoproceedwithadvertisingforthepublichearing of the amendment. • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 891 • PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION - DEPARTMENT WORK PRIORITIES Planning Director Eric R. Lawrence stated that each year, the Planning Department seeks guidance from the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission pertaining to the ranking of projects associated with the departmental work program. Director Lawrence presented a summary sheet describing work program items, identified by the staff and the Commission at their last retreat, as well as rating tables which identified long -range planning projects as well as current projects. Director Lawrence asked the Commission to provide a ranking for each identified project and return to the Planning Department by Ju ly 3, 2002. 2001 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FREDERICK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Planning Director Eric R. Lawrence presented the 2001 Annual Report for the Department of Planning and Development. Director Lawrence stated that the Annual Report is a document intended to show what the department has been work ingonandaccomp li shed during the 2001 calendaryear. Hesaidthe report includes demographic data of Frederick County, describes the types of duties and applications processed by the Planning Department, and gives a breakdown on the numbers of applications, such as master plans, rezonings, subdivisions, site plans, etc., processed. Director Lawrence proceeded to point out some of the highlights of the report. Chairman DeHaven inquired aboutthe compilation for building permits reviewed; he asked if the zoning classifications for single- family, multi - family, and mobile home could be listed in the report. Director Lawrence believed the information could be provided. Commissioner Straub asked ifthe numbers inthe school report included the mobile home desk space used at some locations. Director Lawrence replied that it did. OTHER SHERWOOD BRYANT REZONING Chairman DeHaven stated that the Planning Commission considered the Sherwood Bryant rezoning application at their previous meeting, on June I, 2001, and the application was unanimously tabled for 60 days. Chairman DeHaven said that Mr. Bryant has since stated that lie is ready for the Commission to reconsider his application before the 60 days has expired. Chairman DeHaven stated that he asked Planning Director Lawrenceto place a reconsideration ofthat rezoning in the advertisement forthe Commission's next meeting, scheduled for July 1, 2002. Chairman DeHaven asked the Commission members if they would be willing to reconsider Mr. Bryant's rezoning application at the Commission's next meeting or would the Commission rather wait the full 60 days. • Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 892 The consensus ofthe Coin mission was to go ahead and have Mr. Bryant's rezoning application reconsidered at the Commission's July 1, 2002 meeting. Upon motion made by Commissioner Fisher and seconded by Commissioner Ours, the Commission unanimously voted to reconsider Mr. Sherwood Bryant's rezoning application at the Commission's July I, 2002 meeting. "SAVE THE WATER" WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 2002 Chairman DeHaven announced that the "Save the Water" work session is scheduled to take place on July 10, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors' meeting room and everyone is encouraged to attend. CORRECTION TO MAY 1, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Commissioner Straub inquired about making a correction to the Planning Commission meetin minutes of May 1, 2002, which had already been approved by the Commission. Commissioner Straub wanted to include a question she had raised to the Sanitation Authority Director, Mr. H. Wellington Jones, and his response. Upon motion made by Commissioner Straub and seconded by Commissioner Morris, the Planning Commission unanimously agreed to amend the previously approved minutes of May 1, 2002 to include a question by Commissioner Straub and response by Sanitation Authority Director, H. Wellington Jones, regarding damage to the drainfield at Stonewall School. ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. by a unanimous vote. submitted, Eric �. Lawrence, Secretary Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of June 19, 2002 Page 893