PC_02-15-06_Meeting_MinutesMEETING MINUTES
• OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on February 15, 2006.
PRESENT: June M. Wilmot, Chairman/Shawnee District; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon
District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro
District; Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; Gregory S. Kerr, Red Bud District; Cordell Watt, Back Creek
District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Gary R Oates, Stonewall District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee
District; H. Paige Manuel, Member -At- Large; Philip A. Lemieux, Board of Supervisors Liaison; and Lawrence
R. Ambrogi, Legal Counsel.
ABSENT: John H. Light, Stonewall District; David Shore, City of Winchester Liaison.
STAFF PRESENT: Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision
Administrator; Susan Eddy, Senior Planner; Candice Perkins, Planner II; Kevin Henry, Planning Technician; and
Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk.
• CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Wilmot called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the minutes
of the December 21, 2005 Planning Commission meeting were unanimously approved as presented.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) — 02/13/06 Mtg.
Commissioner Kriz reported that the CPPS discussed what will be happening in the future
regarding the Urban Development Area (UDA) Study; he said public meetings will be scheduled in May.
Commissioner Kriz also reported that a meeting will be held on March 7, 2006 with the engineers, planners,
developers, and so forth to ascertain whether the Study is on target and to receive input.
•
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1683
Minutes of February 15, 2006
-2-
• Economic Development Commission (EDC) — 02/03/06 Mtg.
Commissioner Thomas reported that the EDC discussed strategy for businesses and development
in the area; they also discussed and received a report on Frederick County/ Winchester economic measures.
Commissioner Thomas said that Winchester and Frederick County has one of the lowest unemployment rates in
the State of Virginia; he commented that this was good news; however, it means the labor market is very tight.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Wilmot called for citizen comments on any item that was not already on the
Commission's agenda for this evening and Mrs. Rhoda Kriz came forward with the following report:
Winchester- Frederick County Unification Project
Mrs. Rhoda Kriz, Chairman of the Public Opinion/Public Input Subcommittee of the
Winchester- Frederick County Unification Discussion, stated that Frederick County and Winchester have entered
into discussions regarding the possible unification of certain governmental services. She said the first phase of
the project includes five departments —the Planning & Zoning Department, Social Services, the Department of
Parks & Recreation, Public Schools, and the Department of Fire & Rescue. Mrs. Kriz emphasizedthe importance
of public participation throughout the project and she announced four public meetings where information will be
• presented. She said the meetings will be held over a two -week period in March with each meeting on a different
week night and at a different location to accommodate citizens' schedules. Those meetings were scheduled as
follows:
Monday, March 13, Sherando High School, at 7:00 p.m.
Wednesday, March 15, War Memorial Building, Jim Barnett Park, at 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, March 21, Millbrook High School, at 7:00 p.m.
Thursday, March 23, James Wood High School, at 7:00 p.m.
Mrs. Kriz next spoke about the Committee of 100 —a non- meeting committee made up of
volunteer citizens representing a cross - section of the Winchester- Frederick County population. She said the
discussion group would like as many people as are interested to have an opportunity to participate directly in the
project. Mrs. Kriz said that in order to have a thorough and consistent review of all of the proposals, each
member of the Committee of 100 will be asked to review the unification proposals and to submit comments at
various times throughout the project. She said the subcommittees would like to conduct this as much as
possible by way of Email; she said the comments will be collated and presented to the appropriate subcommittees.
Mrs. Kriz added that the individual responses and comments will remain anonymous; she said information and a
sign -up form are on the website at www.winchester- frederick.com.
•
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1684
Minutes of February 15, 2006
— 3 —
PUBLIC HEARING
Rezoning #17 -05 of Russell - Glendobbin, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC to rezone
67.73 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District for 130 single - family
homes, and to request a waiver of the preservation lot restrictions established with the Glendobbin Ridge
Rural Preservation Subdivision. The properties are located south and adjacent to Glendobbin Road (Rt.
673), approximately 3,250 feet west of the intersection of Glendobbin Road and Payne Road (Rt. 663).
The properties are further identified by P.I.N.s 43 -A -15B and 43 -A -16 in the Stonewall Magisterial
District.
Action — Tabled for 60 Days to April 5, 2006
Senior Planner Susan K. Eddy presented a letter from PHR &A requesting a postponement of the
Russell - Glendobbin Rezoning Application #17 -05 and a copy of an email clarifying that the requested
postponement is for 60 days.
Commissioner Thomas asked Ms. Eddy about the appropriateness of a summary presentation or
whether public comments should be allowed, since there were so many citizens in the audience who were
interested in this rezoning application. Ms. Eddy said she could provide a brief summary; however, she did not
want to mislead any of the citizens who wished to speak because this would not be the required legal public
hearing for the rezoning. Ms. Eddy read aloud the letter from PHR &A which stated that work is progressing on a
revised proffer statement and a revised generalized development plan (GDP).
Chairman Wilmot asked for a show of hands of the number of citizens who were present and
interested in this specific rezoning; approximately 30 people raised their hands. Chairman Wihnot apologized to
• those present and advised them of the situation. She stated that there will be a number of opportunities for the
public to participate in the process; however, she stressed the importance of everyone viewing the correct
application.
Conunissioner Morris said it was apparent there are reasons why so many citizens were present
at the meeting and he advised the applicant to consider holding a community meeting so that everyone is aware of
the concerns.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Ours,
BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously accept the
request of the applicant for the postponement of Rezoning Application 417-05 of Russell - Glendobbin for a 60-
day period and that the application be heard on April 5, 2006.
(Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting; Commissioner Watt was absent for this item.)
\I
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1685
Minutes of February 15, 2006
-4-
2006 -2007 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Frederick County. The CIP is a prioritized list of capital
projects, requested by various County departments and agencies, and is reviewed for conformance with
the Comprehensive Policy Plan and for potential allocation in the ensuing five -year period. The CIP is
created as an informational document to assist in the development of the County's annual budget. In
addition, the CIP is an advisory document; projects are not necessarily funded because of their inclusion
in the CIP.
Action — Recommended Approval
Planning Technician, Kevin T. Henry presented Frederick County's 2006 -2007 Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP) which consisted of 46 capital projects, nine of which were new capital projects. He
reported that of the nine new projects, two are from the County Administration and seven are from the public
schools system. Mr. Henry said the seven projects from the public schools system include three new elementary
schools, school renovations, and land acquisition for I I facilities; the two projects from County Administration
include the Gore refuse site expansion and the relocation of the Clearbrook fire station.
Mr. Henry continued, stating that as requested by the Planning Commission at their discussion of
the CIP on December 7, 2005, the School Board and the Planning Department worked together to formulate a
revised map showing school locations using "bubble" locations for potential new school sites.
Mr. Henry reported that the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) endorsed
the draft 2006 -2007 CIP at their meeting of November 14, 2005. He reported that at the January 25, 2006 Board
of Supervisors meeting, the Board clarified that the CIP is strictly an advisory document and is not intended for
requesting funding allocation.
• Commissioner Ours appreciated the work of the School Administration and the Planning Staff to
formulate the revised Potential New School Locations map, which he thought was much easier to understand and
more clearly shows where the School Board is headed with their future construction plans.
Chairman Wilmot called for citizen comments, however, no one came forward to speak.
Commission members believed the projects proposed within the CIP were in conformance with
the Comprehensive Policy Plan.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Ours,
BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend the
approval of the 2006 -2007 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Frederick County to the Board of Supervisors, as
presented.
(Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting; Commissioner Watt was absent for this item.)
(Commissioner Watt arrived at this point in the meeting.)
•
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1686
Minutes of February 15, 2006
-5-
PUBLIC MEETING
Consideration of an entrance - spacing waiver request, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates on
behalf of Eastern Automotive Group, which would allow a new commercial entrance to be placed less than
150 feet from an existing entrance. An entrance- spacing waiver is permitted under Article IV, Section
165- 29B(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. This property is identified by P.I.N.75A- 6 -B-41B
and is located within the Back Creek Magisterial District.
Action — Approved
Planner Candice Perkins reported that the Eastern Automotive Group property is located on
Valley Pike, across from Kemstown Commons, and the site is zoned B2 (Business General). Ms. Perkins said the
approval of the requested waiver will allow this property to develop with an automotive sales facility with a full
commercial entrance onto Valley Pike and will align with the Kemstown Commons entrance, which will be
signalized. She explained that the required entrance spacing for this site is 150 feet from any existing entrance;
the proposed entrance is shown to be located 90 feet off of the adjacent Capital Meats entrance. Therefore, the
applicant would need a waiver of approximately 60 feet. Ms. Perkins stated that the staff is recommending that
the Planning Commission consider inter - parcel connection opportunities between the Eastern Automotive Group
site and the Capital Meats site, because the Route 11 improvements associated with the Kemstown Commons
development would reduce the Capital Meats entrance to a right -in, right -out only.
Commissioner Morris asked Ms. Perkins how the other properties to the rear, such as Vance,
LLC, were accessed and if they could also benefit from an inter - parcel connector. Ms. Perkins replied that the
other properties are accessed via a median crossover. She added that Capital Meats is the only parcel that could
• benefit from an inter - parcel connector.
Mr. Ronald Mislowsky with Patton Harris Rust & Associates, Inc. (PHR&A) stated that last
year, an Outback Steak House was approved for this site; however, Outback Steak House has since moved across
the street. Mr. Mislowsky said the site plan that was approved is still valid as far as the building, parking
arrangements, and entrances. He said that Eastern Automotive Group approached PHR &A about submitting a
revised site plan. He said the only right -of -way issue that was changed from the original site plan approval was
the relocation of the entrance to align with the Kemstown Commons entrance, for safety reasons.
The Planning Commission had numerous questions for Mr. Mislowsky about the alignment of
the applicant's proposed entrance with Kemstowm Commons' future signalized entrance, as well as the timing of
installation of the traffic signal for Kemstown Commons and the opening of the Eastern Automotive Group site.
There were also questions regarding the entrance for the adjoining Capital Meats site. Mr. Mislowsky stated that
the new entrance shown is lined up with Kemstown's signalized intersection and VDOT is satisfied that the
revised LOS calculations are acceptable with the four -way movement intersection, instead of the three -way
movement. Mr. Mislowsky said that if Eastern Automotive Group opens before work is completed on the other
side of the street, then Eastern Automotive Group will be limited to a right -in, right -out because of the median
strip; he said the only way for Eastern Automotive Group to get a full access is if Kemstown Commons completes
the Route I 1 improvements and installs the traffic signal. Mr. Mislowsky said VDOT had indicated the light
would not be installed until traffic warranted the installation. In addition, he said VDOT had also stated that
Eastern Automotive Group would be required to enter into a signalization agreement; Mr. Mislowsky noted,
however, that the approved MDP indicated that Kemstown Commons would be responsible for the traffic signal.
Chairman Wilmot called for public comment, however, no one came forward to speak.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1687
Minutes of Febniary 15, 2006
Upon motion made by Conunissioner Unger and seconded by Commissioner Kriz,
BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Frederick County Planning Conunission does hereby unanimously approve an
entrance- spacing waiver request, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates on behalf of Eastern Automotive
Group, which would allow a new commercial entrance to be placed less than 150 feet from an existing entrance
on Valley Pike (Route 11).
(Note: Commissioner Manuel abstained from voting; Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.)
Rezoning Application #12 -05 for the Villages at Artrip, submitted by Dewberry, to rezone 169.924 acres
from RA (Rural Areas) District to R4 (Residential Planned Community) District for the proposed mixed -
use development of 793 residential units and retail, restaurant, and office uses. The property is located
one mile west of I -81, three quarters mile north of Tasker Road (Rt. 649), 150 feet north of Fair Lawn
Court (Rt.1176), and west of Canter Estates, Section V. This property is further identified by P.I.N. 75-
A-99A in the Shawnee Magisterial District. (The public hearing for this application was previously held
on December 21, 2005; action was deferred for 60 days.)
Action — Recommended Approval
Deputy Planning Director, Michael T. Ruddy reported that the applicants have continued to make
• modifications to this rezoning application to address many of the concerns that were previously expressed by
members of the Planning Commission. Mr. Ruddy said the most significant change continues to revolve around
the dedicated area that has been proffered as a school site; the applicant has modified the location by moving it
slightly to the east and has enlarged the area from 15 acres to approximately 18 acres. He said the applicant has
continued to work with the County School System to ensure this site was suitable for their needs.
Mr. Ruddy stated that the applicant has also revised the phasing program by reinstituting a three -
phased approach: Phase I shall not exceed 325 residential units, Phase II shall not exceed an additional 275
residential units for a total of 600 units (with the inclusion of 20,000 square feet of proffered commercial space),
and Phase III shall not exceed an additional 193 units for a total of 793 units. He added that the development
phasing program continues to provide the basis for the transportation program which has been modified to be
consistent with the revised phasing.
Mr. Ruddy next presented the Commission with. copies of correspondence that was sent to the
Planning Staff from Mr. David Worthington regarding environmental questions and concerns.
Commissioner Kriz requested that Mr. Ruddy provide a summary of the applicant's monetary
proffers in relation to the County's Capital httpact Model. Mr. Ruddy explained that this application was being
reviewed under the original Capital Facilities Impact Model which generated a total of $5 -6,000 per unit capital
impact. He said that after this application was submitted, the County adopted anew development impact model,
which more thoroughly addresses the impacts associated with community facilities. Under the new model, a
single - family detached residential component generates approximately $23,000 impact to facilities, with about
$18,000 of that amount for schools. The new Capital Facilities Impact Model was adopted by the Board of
Supervisors in December 2005; however, the Artrip rezoning application was submitted prior to the County
. adopting the new model and by policy of the Board of Supervisors, the original capital model was applied to this
project.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1688
Minutes of February 15, 2006
-7-
Commissioner Thomas asked for the estimated value of the applicant's proposed improvements,
both on -site and off -site, including the donation of the school site and bridge construction. This question was
deferred to the applicant.
Mr. John H. Foote of Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Terpak, PC, representing the Villages
at Artrip rezoning application, stated that the original application and proffers were dated and filed with the
Planning Department in June of 2004. Mr. Foote commented that this property is located within the County's
Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the Urban Development Area (UDA). He said the transportation
improvements proposed have been recognized as a crucial link in the County's long -term transportation plan for
this area, particularly with respect to Warrior Drive. Mr. Foote said the applicant cannot commit to building
Warrior Drive through Crosspointe, but they are committed to working with Mr. Glaize in an attempt to create a
community development authority. Mr. Foote stated that the Tower Companies will provide a four -lane, divided
Warrior Drive from the top of the property to the bottom and to Wakeland Manor. He noted that there is also a
reverse mechanism for constructing the road from the opposite direction, should Warrior Drive come from the
north first. Mr. Foote said the school site issue has been resolved and the public schools are satisfied with the
site; the school site layout should have little to no environmental impact to the Opequon. Mr. Foote said the other
issue that has been raised is with respect to the traffic; he said the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)
performed indicates the traffic for this project can be accommodated and not have adverse impact on the
intersections that are critical to the County. In particular, at the future intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior
Drive, sufficient right -of -way exists at the intersection to construct the full improvements that would be required
to maintain a Level of Service (LOS) "C," once the connection is made. He added that a proffer has been included
in the package noting that these improvements will be accomplished by the applicant.
Referring to Commissioner Thomas' question on the value of improvements and contributions,
• Mr. Foote estimated the school site's value to be between $2'/: and 3'/: million dollars, based on the fact that the
property is within the UDA, as well as the fact they removed 71 potential units out of this area to accommodate
the school site. Mr. Foote said that approximately $1' /z million in cash has also been proffered. He said that if
the project was ran at die fiscal impact model of $5,000 per unit, which is the maximum amount they are subject
to under the old model, the result would be about a $4 million cash contribution to the County. Regarding the
transportation improvements, Mr. Foote said he estimated the value of only the two outside lanes instead of all
four lanes, since the applicant was only required to build two; he estimated the cost to construct these two lanes
through the property at $2 million. Mr. Foote then estimated the minimum cost for the bridge at $3 million, but
he cut that amount in half. He stated that the total infrastructure package and school site package totaled
approximately $6 million. Mr. Foote calculated that amount to result in a proffer commitment to the community
of approximately $7,500 per unit, which was over the amount the County would have expected under its Fiscal
Impact Model.
Commissioner Kriz asked if there was a calculation on how many units would be constructed per
year and Mr. Foote replied no. Mr. Foote said they have committed to build Warrior Drive from across
Wakeland, to the round- about, and up Parkins Mill, so the school can be accessed before the first residential
building permit has been issued. He said the cost to accomplish this is substantial; therefore, they can not limit
themselves on the number of units constructed within a year because it would be impossible for them to finance
their own infrastructure costs.
Commissioner Morris asked for clarification on where the ten -foot recreational trail enters and
leaves the property. Mr. Richard Burmingham, a designer with Dewberry, Planning Consultants and Engineers,
pointed out the trail layout through the development for the Commission. Conmiissioner Morris also inquired if
the applicant was contributing to the traffic signalization at the intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive or
if it was being funded by the commercial development. Mr. Foote replied that the commercial development is
funding its portion.
Frederick County Planning Conunission Page 1689
Minutes of February 15, 2006
Commissioner Thomas wanted to be sure the County did not end up with a "bedroom
community" with this proposed development. He said the applicant's proffer indicates he will have 20,000
square feet of commercial floor space available to be leased, with access and utilities, not later than the 600'
building permit. Mr. Thomas believed the wording on this statement was a little vague and needed to be more
specific.
Mr. Foote explained the intent of the proffer is that the 601' building permit can not be issued if
the square footage amount has not been satisfied. Commissioner Thomas argued that under the proposed
wording, the applicant could construct 600 units and stop there, and not build one square foot of commercial
space. Mr. Foote replied that the applicant could commit to initiating the site planning for the commercial
property by a specific number of building permits before the designated 600 number. He suggested that the
Commission stipulate their recommendation of approval to the Board on the condition that the proffers are
amended to require the site planning to begin by the 300"' residential unit.
Commissioner Unger thought the majority of Commission members believed this was a nice-
looking project, but there were a few things he still questioned. For example, he said that Warrior Drive is
basically a road to nowhere; he said it was a beautiful road, but it stops at Crosspointe and he did not see how this
could benefit Frederick County, especially since Crosspointe may not develop for five, six, or eight years from
now. In addition, he couldn'tjustify the applicant's quoted value of the school property and he did not think the
development had good access.
Commissioner Kriz asked Mr. Foote if this project would have been proposed if the rezoning
application was required to come in under the new Capital Facilities Model. Mr. Foote said the cost per lot would
have been too high and would have made the lots competitively disadvantaged against all other development lots
available in the County. He said they would be looking at an exceptionally high cost per lot, probably as much as
• $40,000.
Chairman Wilmot called for public comment and the following person came forward to speak:
Mr. David Worthington said he had been given the opportunity to walk over the site with the
developer and was appreciative of the environmental protections proposed for the woodlands, the ponds, and the
wetlands areas. He was concerned, however, that the area designated for playing fields, behind the proposed
school, would be difficult to grade because it was completely wooded and contained a number of ravines. His
second concern was for the protection of the Opequon stream, located below the area designated for playing
fields. Because of the amount of grading work that needed to be done in this area, and the location of stormwater
management ponds, he was concerned about the nutrient and sediment load that could conceivably be added to the
Opequon. He said the Opequon is already considered to be a polluted stream and guidelines must be maintained
to meet the Chesapeake Bay requirements.
There being no other person wishing to speak, Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment
portion of the meeting.
Chairman Wilmot questioned the issues raised concerning economy. Chairman Wilmot believed
it was the job of the Planning Commission to determine whether this was a viable project within the
Comprehensive Policy Plan and whether it was a good project for the County. She added that in order to afford
this project, the County is going to need to look at other ways and places of generating revenue, should this
project be approved.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1690
Minutes of February 15, 2006
•
•
Commissioner Kriz spoke favorably about the project, but he could not see why the citizens of
Frederick County should have to make up the difference in impact costs between the two fiscal impact models.
Commissioner Oates also liked the project layout. He said that he was concerned, however, not
with the difference in the cost models, but with the considerable build -out and not having the road go through and
connect to the north.
Commissioner Morris commented that Warrior Drive was vital to this whole area and he was
pleased to get it constructed at least this far. He said the other positive issue is that here is a valuable school site,
precisely where it is needed and the School Board has said this is a location they can work with. Commissioner
Morris said it would have been nice to have been promised more proffered dollars, but he didn't think it was
enough to delay the project.
A motion was made by Commissioner Moms and seconded by Commissioner Mohn to approve
Rezoning Application # 12 -05 and MDP 409 -05 for the Villages at Artrip. The motion failed, however, due to the
following tie vote:
YES (TO APPROVE THE REZONING)
Manuel, Morris, Wilmot, Thomas, Ours, Mohn
NO: Unger, Watt, Oates, Kriz, Triplett, Kerr
(Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.)
A new motion was made by Commissioner Unger and seconded by Commissioner Kriz to deny
Rezoning Application 412-05 and MDP 409 -05 for the Villages at Artrip.
It was Commissioner Thomas's opinion that denying this rezoning based on a difference in
impact models was inappropriate. Commissioner Thomas said the application was submitted under a valid
proffer model and it should be considered under that model. He added that proffers are voluntary and the
applicant is voluntarily submitting proffers based on the guidelines that were in effect at the time.
Commissioner Ours agreed with Commissioner Thomas. Commissioner Ours stated that the
applicant has gone through a number of revisions and has tried diligently to address the Commission's concerns
in a forthright manner.
Chairman Wilmot called for a vote to the motion on the table. The motion was defeated, due to
the following majority vote:
YES (TO DENY THE REZONING) Unger, Watt, Oates, Kriz, Triplett
NO: Manuel, Morris, Wilmot, Thomas, Ours, Kerr, Mohn
(Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.)
Commissioner Thomas next moved to recommend approval of Rezoning Application # 12 -05
and MDP 409 -05 for the Villages at Artrip with the caveat that by the issuance of the 300' building permit, the
developer must submit a site plan and start initial planning for the 20,000 square -feet of commercial area that is
• to be completed and ready for use prior to the 600' residential permit issuance. This motion was seconded by
Commissioner Ours and was passed by a majority vote.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1691
Minutes of Fcbriary 15, 2006
-10-
BE IT RESOLVED, THAT by a majority vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
recommend approval of Rezoning Application 912-05 and MDP #09 -05 for the Villages at Artrip with the
proffers submitted by the applicant, but with the caveat that by the issuance of the 300'" building permit, the
developer must submit a site plan and start initial planning for the 20,000 square -feet of commercial area that is
to be completed and ready for use prior to the 600' residential permit issuance. This application, submitted by
Dewberry, to rezone 169.924 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to R4 (Residential Planned Community)
District is a proposal for a mixed -use development of 793 residential units and retail, restaurant, and office uses.
The vote was as follows:
YES (APPROVE REZONING W/ CAVEAT) Manuel, Moms, Wilmot, Thomas, Ours, Kerr, Mohn
NO: Unger, Watt, Oates, Kriz, Triplett
(Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.)
OTHER
Committee Appointments
• Chairman Wilmot announced two committee appointments: Commissioner Oates to the
Comprehensive Policies and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) and Mr. Al Orndorff, the Assistant Superintendent
for Administration of Frederick County Public Schools, to the CPPS as the School Board's representative on that
committee.
ADJOURNMENT
Upon motion made by Commissioner Ours and seconded by Commissioner Kriz, the Planning
Commission adjourned by a unanimous vote at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
ki,((�X
Wilmot, Chairman
R Lawrence, Secretary
•
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1692
Minutes of February 15, 2006