Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Channing Drive Twin Lakes Overlook - Backfile
� ({yam� 1 V .jam RR ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I /8"=l'-0" SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=20'-0' fxokk oj THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT & IS NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHOLE ON ANY OTHER. PROJECT WITHOUT HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION & IS TO BE RETURNED UPON HIS REQUEST. Twin ku 1--y Pliunlic In - l snt,, — AW A1l SHEET TITLE ISSUE DATE D SITE PLAN 10.03.P ROJECTT NO. G INC. & ELEV. 05022 1600 PRINCE ST. SUITE 114 ©A D G, 1 n c. (�' � 2"P) � 0�_ LAWSON AND SILEK, P.L.C. THOMAS MOORE LAWSON • TLAWSON(l)LSPLC.COM 120 EXETER DRIVE, SUITE 200 POST OFFICE BOX 2740 WINCHESTER, VA 22604 TELEPHONE: (540) 665-0050 FACSIMILE: (540) 722-4051 February 16, 2007 Ed Strawsnyder, Director Frederick County Department of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Twin Lakes Overlook Our File No. 600.001 HAND DELIVERY Dear Ed: Enclosed please find an architectural drawing, budget and a quote from a construction company to build the community center at the Twin Lakes Overlook development. As you will recall, when we last spoke, you had some questions about the total cost to build the center and requested some back-up information regarding the same. After you have reviewed the enclosed, you should be able to verify the cost and be able to provide confirmation of the same to the Frederick County Planning Department. Thank you for your continued assistance and cooperation. As always, should you have any questions or require any additional information, please give me a call. Very truly yours, qknm -more &X,� Thomas Moore Lawson TML:cmh Enclosures cc: Toll Brothers, Inc. FRONT ROYAL ADDRESS: POST OFFICE BOX 602, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA 22630, TELEPHONE: (540) 635-9415, FACSIMILE: (540) 635-9421, E-MAIL: SILEKJ(3a LYNXCONNECT.COM FAIRFAX ADDRESS: 10805 MAIN STREET, SUITE 200, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030, TELEPHONE: (703) 352-2615, FACSIMILE: (703) 3524190, E-MAIL: THOMASO.LAWSON@VERIZON.NET August 31, 2006 Thomas Moore Lawson, Esq. Lawson and Silek, P.L.C. P.O. Box 2740 Winchester, VA 22604 RE: Twin Lakes Overlook Community Center Dear Mr. Lawson: This letter is in response to the illustration submitted by Toll Brothers to build a 30 x 30 square foot picnic gazebo to meet the requirement for the Twin Lakes Overlook community center. This gazebo is to be built in lieu of remodeling the existing dwelling as a community center as required by Master Development Plan (MDP # 05-04). This proposed gazebo would the meet the intent of community center requirement, due to its location on the lake and natural surroundings. The County Engineer has reviewed the information provided, and the illustration submitted for this proposed gazebo, and his belief is that the gazebo can built at a cost of $90,000. (See attached County Engineer review and illustration) Therefore, the proposed gazebo appears to be about $178,600 less than the $268,000 community center requirement as noted in the letter addressed to you dated October 29, 2004, from Kris C. Tierney, Assistant County Administrator. This letter gave the breakdown of the required cost amounts for recreational facilities. The $178,600 could be used to upgrade this community center site by adding parking areas, electrical service, restrooms, or other non -proffered recreational amities. If a 10' wide asphalt bike path was installed circling the lake, such an improvement could provide access to the gazebo and be considered as part of the community center requirement. Please call me at (540) 665-5651, if you have any questions on this proposed project. Sincerely, Mark R. Cheran Zoning Administrator MRC/bad Attachments cc: Ed Strawsnyder, Public Works Director Kris Tierney, Assistant County Administrator Eric Lawrence, Planning & Zoning Director 040006449 THIS DEED OF DEDICATION is made this 3 day of December, e%3., by and between ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO., a California corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"); and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as the "County"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property (the "Property") as shown on Plat of Mark D. Smith, L.S. dated October 17, 2002, entitled "Right of Way Dedication of 3.8835 Acres of the Land of Arcadia Development Co., Future Channing Drive, Red Bud Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia" and prepared by Greenway Engineering of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors, which Plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Property is situate in the County of Frederick, Virginia; Owner having acquired the Property by deed recorded as Instrument No. 020004815 among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, it is the desire and intent of Owner to dedicate, grant and convey to the County, for public use, the streets and thoroughfares in accordance with this Deed of Dedication and the Plat; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner does hereby grant, dedicate, and convey to the County, in fee simple, the 3.8835 acres for public street purposes as shown on the Plat. This dedication is made in accordance with the statutes made and provided therefore. This Deed of Dedication is made in accordance with the statutes made and provided in such cases including but not limited to Section 15.2-2240 et seq. and including Section 15.2-2264 et seq. of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended; with the approval of the proper authorities of the County of Frederick, Virginia, as shown by the signatures affixed to the Plat, and is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the Owner, the owner and proprietor of the land depicted on the Plat, as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has caused this Deed of Dedication to be signed by its duly authorized representative. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: (SEAL) Name: " U Sri A R( A DI A D VET OPMENT CO A Califcrnia Corporation By: Eli Reinhard Its: President STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK, to -wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid do hereby certify that John R. Riley, Jr., County Administrator for Frederick County, Virginia, whose name is signed to the foregoing, personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this 13' j� i 1 ;7T C �91VAsion expires: ii-30 —Dq day of April, 2003. Klaa L�7� Not Pu c STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF to -wit: C.a.J I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, whose commission expires on the day of , do hereby certify that as Chairman ofthe Board of Supervisors for Frederick County, Virginia, whose name is signed to the foregoing, personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my juisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this day of Notary Public STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF r4-& CI (L(r— , to -wit: 2003. I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, whose commission expires on the ^ 3 day of 191p v- A OCQ ? do hereby certify that ELI REE\11 R , as President of ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO., whose name is signed to the foregoing, personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this day of __'Y(tVW 61' LA , 200/_ q a no V,' '� GINAGOMEZ Notary Public Commission # 135306000.4a Z Notary Public - Cslifomia i Z Santa Clara County My Comm. E)ires Apr23.2006 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION. OF 3.8835 ACRES OF THE LAND OF •47- ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. CHA NNING DRI VE RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2002 VICINITY MAP 1" = 2000' 69 Fib' 6 Volley Mill Roo °pd wee ,eo s,o ,ew sae m, o� ca sm Q° cg 0 sae OWNER'S CERTIFICATE. - THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING DEDICATION, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO., AS APPEARS ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF YE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY DA fE D COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Louduu ',,„./ii7a••• C '''� ••• -£ -/ COUNTY OF n TO WIT. .r�`Ot �ZW THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME U THIS 4'-'- DAY 0 20cy, BY 1 ad- 'o, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: It 30- axx(o 'l.rl,^tip Ya' -` N SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE.- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED IN THIS RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS A PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. BY DEED DATED MARCH 21, 2002 AND RECORDED AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA, AS INSTRUMENT #020004185. MARK D. SMITH L.S. TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION T.M. 55—((A))-181 94.3622 ACRES ZONE: RP USE.- VACANT APPROVALS. c 0 S Fre k :9,, $ubdivision Administrator Date T D — � -03 G, ederick Co. Sanitation Authority Date 6 MARK D. SMITH 9 Va. Dept. of ronsportation Dote No.002009 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 WINDY HILL LANE Engineers WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FAX: (540) 722-9528 F 2185R SHEET 1 OF 5 Founded in, 1971 www.greenwayeng.com INSET MAP (NOT TO SCALE) WEST RESIDUE 41.1308 AC. 3.8835 AC. OF RIGHT OF WAY i DEDICATION EAST RESIDUE \ I 49.3480 AC. -T RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION OF 3.8961 ACRES OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. CHA NNING DRI VE RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA _SCALE: N/A I DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2002 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 WINDY HILL LANE Engineers WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FAX: (540) 722-9528 Founded in 1971 www.greenwayeng.com V V MARK D, YMITH NII ffo''.002009 lq 4V►(?U p4 2160A SHT 2 of 5 ....�.�. .......... � . �..�,.. � . ;1 MATCH LINE SHEET 4 3.8835 ACRES HEREBY c- �d :.•' DEDICATED TO THE 1.'•':'.' N :.: • I COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA o �: • : ' :: •' :: v I N FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES V:...'...'.. ��.�°., Wiz' �• 'I z r--l*,1 EAST RESIDUE 49.3480 AC. a EASEMENT LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L6 S 12' 19 53" W 227.30' L7 S 78'19'f0" E 31.70' S 7636'06" E 22.06' WEST RESIDUE \ ' : 0S 73'08'50" E 25.24' 41.1308 AC. f ' ' ' •' "� L 10 S 14'43'35" W 23.54' �' :: ' : •� Z n L 11 N 16' 14 37" E 38.49' 1-�k L12 N 78'19'10" W 15.60' LEGEND: !\L 13 N 51'0525" W 28.28' U = 5/8 IRON ROD SET h ' : • .' : , ^ L 14 N 06'25 25 ' W 79.33 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) . • . a ; I I ' �. L 15 N 04'49 37 E 382.78 . = POINT a L 16 N 09'3830" W 192.04' L 17 N 22'32'19" W 108.63' L24 S 11'24'12" E 121.88' � L25 S 03'34'00" E 128.22' C/L 20' SAN. SEWER L26 S 08'2926" W 227.35' EASEMENT 3 L27 S 10'00' 11 " W 244.28' L28 S 07'0949 " E 100.38' N 16'25'15" E 38.48' \ CIL 20' SAN. SEW. EASEMENT N 01'55 20" E 137.30' \ TM 55—((A))-206 L YNNEHAVEN, L. C. DB 843, PG 415 ZONE.- RP, USE. VACANT (L 12) 12.0 10.3 FOR CURVE DATA SEE SHEET 5 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L2 S 78'19'10" E 16.59' L3 S 11'40'50" W 56.00' L4 N 6437'31 " W 84.28' L5 N 78' 19' 10" W 16.59' L6 N 11 *40'50" E 56.00, L7 S 78'19'10" E 89.88' L8 S 78'19'10" E 89.88' L9 S 78'19'10" E 179.75' 100 0 100 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) " WALNUT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION OF 3.8835 ACRES OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. CHA NNING DRI VE RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA ;SCALE: 1:100 1 DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2002 GREENWAY ENGINEERING / 151 WINDY HILL LANE t\ Engineers WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FAX: (540) 722-9528 Founded in 1971 www.greenwayeng.com V vv\ MARK D. SMITH No.002009 �►� 160A SHT 3 w .j 100 0 100 x w hw GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 3.8835 ACRES HEREBY -9� DEDICATED TO THE 9� COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA '�i•f]►C1_ non nr rnr rn G`TDCCT D/ /DD/1C�C LINE BEARING 0/STANCE L 1 $ 32'07'33" W 6.59' FOR CURVE DATA SEE SHEET 5 EASEMENT LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 51'15'14" E 72.55' L2 N 25'57'14" E 39.39' L3 S 13'56'00" E 187.90' L4 N 31'4759" E 60.17' LS N 48' 1325" E 44.60' L 18 N 31'47'11 " W 112.38' L 19 N 10'58'42" W 42.23' L20 N 44'4525" E 119.81 ' L21 S 4525'03" E 72.48' L22 S 42'04'16" E 61.30' L23 2'58'00" E 40.11' L29 1'2228" E 116.89' S 0 S 5 �T .IRF �19 "�`•`' a�`s` STORM DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT rn EAST RESIDUE • .: • ,� 49.3480 AC. � ••� • � ' • \�J SLOPE MAINTENANCE ' •1� •' � � •' •�' �.-�'� EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION OF 3.8835 ACRES OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. CHA NNING DRI VE RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDER/CK COUNTY, V/RGIN/A [SCALE: 1:100 DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2002 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 WINDY HILL LANE Engineers WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FAX: (540) 722-9528 Founded in 1971 www.greenwayeng.com OF MARK D. SMITH No.002oos SHT 4 CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE C 1 825.00' 39Z 75' 393.91 ' S 3l '21 '04" E 273724" C2 825.00' 322.05' 320.01 ' S 06'2 1'22" E 22'21 '59" C3 825.00' 32.04' 32.04' S 05'56'23" W 02'1331 " C4 785.00' 17.20' 17.20' N 05'27' 17" E 01 ' 15'20 " C5 1 41.00' 59.50' 54.4 1' N 36'4447" W 83'0848" C6 41.00' 69.31 ' 61.35' N 53' 15'13" E 96'51 ' 12" C7 785.00' 306.44 304.50' N 0621'22" W 22*21'59" C8 785.00' 521.10' 311.58' N 36'33'23" W 38'02'02" C9 617.72' 63.26' 63.24' S 59'20'40" E 05'52'05" C 10 2600.47' 164.68' 164.65' S 543427" E 03'37'42 " C 11 1962.9 1' 216.82' 216.71 ' S 5555 28" E 06' 1944 " C 12 915.43 15.04' 15.04' N 57'51 '43" W 00'5629" C 13 275.00' 131.36' 130.11 ' N 71 '04'33" W 27'22'07" C 14 35.00' 70.07' 58.94' S 37'53' 15 " W 114'42' 18" C 15 865.00' 29.07' 29.07' S 18'30'08 " E 01 '5532 " C16 865.00' 337.67' 335.53' S 06'21'22" E 22*21'59" C 17 41.00' 59.50' S4.41 ' S 36'4447" E 83'0848" C 18 41.00' 69.31 ' Cl. 34' S 53' 15' 13" W 96'51 ' 12" C 19 865.00' 46.81 ' 46.80' S 06'2238" W 03'06'02 " C20 617.72' 1 157. 16' 1 156.74' S 69'34'01 " E 14'34 J8" r r rr r r r rr . rr r MERIDIAN OF PLAT r (DB 843, PG 417) i rr r r rr r r rr r 1 Q' I , ��4jo / �y�� WEsf RESIDUE 6 EX. 25' FREDERICK- ' r 4 1. 1308 AC. WINCHESTER SERVICE r AUTHORITYEASEMENT SEWER r r � IN DB. 579 P. 790 r r r �`1' �A) r Q / 3.8835 ACRES HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES r / h rr� � r r rr rf / rr r r rr r � rr / r 'r rr / MATCH r r ^. � a/ 100 0 100 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) LINE SHEET 4 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION OF 3.8835 ACRES OF THE LAND OF ARCAD/A DEVELOPMENT CO. CHANGING DRI V RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, V/IRGINIA SCALE: 1:00 1 DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2002 1 Engineer Surveyor Founded in 1971 OP V V �v - MARK D. SMITH No.002009 GREENWAY151 YHILL LANE EN\�Zi7GINEERING'UZo� S WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SUR� g TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FAX: (640) 722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com 2160A SHT 5 of 5 tin 0 Conceptual Costs Page 1 of 2 1/19/2006 Unit Qtper Unit Total Comments EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 LF 4,600 $25.00 $115,000.00 Acre 2 $9,000.00 $18,000.00 C/Y 877 $15.00 $13,155.00 C/Y 1060 $9.50 $10,070.00 LF 800 $6.50 $5,200.00 S/Y 3300 $2.50 $8,250.00 EA 1 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 EA 1 $5,500.00 $5,500 EA 1 $7,500.00 $7,500 Subtotal $186,475.00 Unit Qt er Unit Total Comments OF 178 $23.00 $4,094 CY 64 $235.00 $15,040 SF 1.805 $14.50 $26,173 SF 540 $28.00 $15,120 LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000 EA 1 $18,000.00 $18,000 EA 8 $328.16 $2,625 EA 18 $273.92 $4,931 EA 64 $14.02 $897 LF 210 $45.00 $9,450 EA 12 $196.44 $2,357 SF 468 $28.00 $13,104 S/F 1,688 $2.50 $4,220 EA 1 $6,750.00 $6,750 EA 1 $7,500.00 $7,500 EA 1 $9,700.00 $9,700 EA 1 $22,000.00 $22,000 Structure Subtotal $186,960.90 Combined Cost per +/- 5.00 Acre Single Family Home Lot $15.00 $373,435.90 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 March 13, 2007 Thomas Moore Lawson, Esq. Lawson and Silek, P.L.C. P.O. Box 2740 Winchester, Virginia 22604 RE: Twin Lakes Overlook Dear Mr. Lawson: The County is in receipt of your letter dated February 16, 2007, in which you request confirmation regarding the construction values for the planned picnic gazebo at the Twin Lakes Overlook project. The use of the proposed lakefront picnic gazebo as the community center for the Twin Lakes Overlook project continues to meet the intent of the community center expectation (as previously noted in an August 31, 2006 letter). At issue is the determination if the required community center investment is achieved. The County has reviewed the details provided with your request, which included cost estimates, gazebo architectural drawings, and an illustrative of the gazebo. Having discussed this request with Ed Strawsynder, County Engineer, and representatives from the Building Inspections Department, we believe that the construction of the gazebo continues to satisfy the community center requirements with the following considerations: • The cost estimate sheet you have provided assigns a value of $185,000 for Path/Trails. Presuming this estimate covers an asphalt trail of at least a six foot width which circles the lake, we would concur with the cost estimate, and recreation amenity. • This gazebo should be provided with proper handicap accessibility. Preliminary discussions with the Building Inspections Department suggest that handicap accessibility to the gazebo appears to be an issue. While we recognize that the actual gazebo architectural drawings include an ADA ramp, the issue is ADA access to the gazebo. It appears this access issue may be resolved in one of two manners: 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Thomas Moore Lawson, Esq. Re: Twin Lakes Overlook March 13, 2007 Page 2 o Provide the paved trail from a road within the development (connection to Canyon Road appears logical). This trail would need to comply with ADA slope requirements. Or, o Provide a paved parking lot adjacent to the gazebo. In conclusion, once these two items are confirmed and addressed, it would appear that these proposed facilities would meet the community center requirements. Please contact me should you have questions. Since ly, Er' Lawrence, AICP P' ing Director Attachments: Lawson request letter dated February 16, 2007 cc: Toll Brothers, Inc. Public Works Department Inspections Department Zoning Administrator ERL/bad DITL Twin Lakes Overlook• ToU Brothers A D G 05022 /5-11 ff n4 47ter / -/- S-,,) , - , --- , t , �4Oild0j./IntcrBuld, Inc. Contractors Post Office Box 237 Purceliville. VA 20134 Phone 540-338-230f Fax S40-338-3015 mir, RorsebamscentrAcom December 8, 2006 Mr. Chip Patterson Ms. Pascale Roy Toll Brothers 903 Crestview Terrace Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Chip and Pascale, I am very pleased to submit to you the following revised proposal for the log pavilion building at the Twin Lakes Development in Winchester. The scope of the work did change fairly substantially with the revised drawings. The majority of the change was due to the foundation design and the added masonry. The total specifications and costs are as follows: General conditions: Appropriate full time supervision to carry out the project in a first class manner. General Liability insurance, Workmen's Compensation insurance and all rental equipment for normal working conditions are included. The general scope of the work is to provide and install a rough sawn log pavilion at your new development in Winchester. The logs will be Western Red Knotty Cedar. The construction will be per the ADG plans dated 12/13/06 pages AO-O, Al-O, A2-0, A3-0, A4-0, S1, S2, and S3. The total anticipated constructed cost for this project will be: $236,009 Since our firm began business in 1981 we have completed over 1,500 projects. We take great pride in doing quality work at a fair price. Please call with any questions or comments you may have. I look forward to working with you on your building project. Sincerely, John L. Fuog President SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOME`S THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: NIA $488,881 $488,881 Rev: srzvos T:=RPXBUD5005CF U, lm rovamems and ec s COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate, A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGETIF Enteramount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 i 701 �2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION Subtotals By Cash Flow Category Subtotals By Type C=Copt. E=Est., A=Allow Dedication Field Cond Ordinary Improvements ORD $217 500 Extraordinary Improvements OEX $14 087 Offsite Improvements OFF $0 Capital Contributions CAP $0 Fees FEE $1 785 HOA Fees and Maint. HOA $0 Recreation & Amenities REC $255 509 TOTAL $488 881 CONTRACTED SUBTOTAL $0 ESTIMATED SUBTOTAL $0 ALLOWANCE SUBTOTAL $0 DEDICATION SUBTOTAL $0 FIELD COND SUBTOTAL $700 DEDICATION COST/ LOT $0 NOT ALL TYPE ITEMS FILLED IN TOTAL C+E+A $o NOTES: 1. SUMMARY ACCOUNT (Do not enter a budget in this soot). THIS ACCOUNT SUBTOTALS ACCOUNTS WITHIN THE GROUP. ENTER BUDGET AMOUNTS IN THE ACCOUNTS BELOW THIS SUMMARY ACCOUNT BUT WITHIN THE SAME GROUP OF ACCOUNT NUMBERS. 2. BUDGET REFUNDS FOR DIRECT TBI CONNECTIONS ONLY, DO NOT BUDGET TAX REFUNDS OR USAGE REBATES, ETC. SET UP A DEPOSIT ACCT & TWO RECEIVABLE ACCOUNTS - SEE EXAMPLE BELOW. CALL LAND DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION. EXAMPLE: WATERMAIN EXTENSION - TOTAL INITIAL DEPOSIT $100,000, DIRECT CONNECTION REBATE 40 LOTS @ $1000/LOT: Budget Acct 2435 - Water Deposit = $60,000, ACCT 2445 - Water Deposit Refundable = $40,000, ACCT 2446 - Water Deposit Reimburse =-($40,000). Code Check Request to Accts. - 2435 & 2445, REFUNDS WILL BE CREDITED TO ACCT 2446. ALL CHECK REQUESTS MUST HAVE A FULL EXPLANATION OF ALL REFUNDS & REBATES. 3. IMPROVEMENT PIPEWORK REPAIRS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS (is: laterals, water boxes, etc) DUE TO DAMAGE BY HOUSE SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE CHARGED TO JOB OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION REPAIR ACCT (CC 4903) - Repair Improvement Pipework. 4. IMPROVEMENT CURB, APRON AND PUBLIC SIDEWALK REPAIRS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS DUE TO DAMAGE BY HOUSE SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE CHARGED TO JOB OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION REPAIR ACCT (CC 4904) - Repairs Curb, Apron, and Public Sidewalk. 5. BUDGET CASH BONDS BY SETTING UP A DEPOSIT ACCT & A RECEIVABLE ACCTS. EXAMPLE: CASH BOND = $100,000, BUDGET ACCT 2921 Cash Bond = $100,000, ACCT 2921 - Cash Bond Reimburse =-($100,000). 5. TOTAL FOR ALL UNALLOCATED & ALLOCATED PREP FOR DEDICATION ACCOUNTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED $1200/LOT, AVERAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SHOULD BE LESS THAN $800/LOT. This document represents proprietary information and is not to be reproduced without the expressed written approval of Toll Bros., Inc. Page 8 of 8 -- To Hide Unused Rows CTRL - X (to unhide, CTRL-U) "" This spreadshxet is protected, if changes are necessary - contact LD Dept. SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2114/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: N/A $488,881 $488,881 Rev: 922106 T9CORPtBUD5005CF Site Im ruvements Bud et.ds COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate A=Allowance E-ICT DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 + 1 702 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 20001 SITE IMPROVEMENTS see Note 1 Note: Shaded Boxes indicate 2010 SURVEY see Note 1 Summary Accts, Do Not Budget 2011 Survey -1 ORD 2012 Survey 2 ORD 225 Plot plan 2013 Survey -3 ORD 700 Stake out 2014 Survey -4 ORD 150 Final Survey Pins 2015 Pond As Builts ORD 2016 As Builts ORD 475 2017 As Builts -1 ORD 2018 Survey - Restake ORD 2021 Monuments 1 ORD 2022 Monuments 2 ORD 2025 Topo Check ORD 550 2026 Construction Certs ORD t^. 2030 SITE CONSULT & ENG See Note 1 2031 Site Consult & Eng -1 ORD 2032 Site Consult & Eng -2 ORD 2033 Site Consult & Eng -3 ORD 2034 Envir. Consultant ORD 2035 Geotechnical -1 ORD 500 Certification of pad 2036 Geotechnical -2 ORD 2037 Geotechnical -3 ORD 2039 Consultant SWPPP ORD 2040 MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISION See Note i 2041 TBI Sitework Mgt -1 ORD 2042 TBI Sitework Mgt -2 ORD 2043 TBI Sitework Mgt -3 ORD r ' 2044 Outside Mgt & Supervision ORD 2045 Outside Mgt & Supervision ORD 2048 Mgmt/Suprvsn-Retention ORD 2050 Management Prep for Ded. ORD See Note 6 2060 DEMOLITION & SITE DEBRIS See Note 1 2061 Demolition 1 OEX 12,250', Includes house & Farm 2062 Demolition -2 OEX 500 Structural inte ert report 9 Y 2063 Envir. Testing OEX 600 Asbestos 2064 Envir. Remed. OEX 487 Asbestos remediation 2065 Demolition Retention OEX VA Only 2070 CLEARING & GRUBBING See Note 1 2075 Tree Spading OEX ! 2076 Save Existing Plants OEX 2077 Tree Nursery OEX 2078 Replant Exist Plants OEX 2081 Clearing & Grubbing -1 OEX 2082 Clearing & Grubbing -2 OEX 2084 Tree Protection OEX 2085 j Clear & Grub Lots -1 OEX 2086 Clear & Grub Lots -2 OEX 2088 Select Clearing OEX 2089 Light Clear/Mow OEX 2090 Clear & Grub Fld Cond OEX Max 15% (Avg 5%)' 2092 Clear & Grub Retention OEX VA Only 2100 E & S CONTROLS / BMPs See Note 1 2101 E & S Controls -1 ORD 1,200 Protection around construction area 2102 E & S Controls -2 ORD 2103 E & S Controls -3 ORD 2104 E & S Controls -4 ORD 2110 E & S Controls -5 ORD 2111 E & S Controls -6 ORD House E&S Work '-• ' 2112 E & S Controls -7 ORD Should he Budgeted 2113 E&SControls -8 ORD to Base House -40a3 2114 Temp Stabilization ORD 2115 E & S Retention ORD VA Only 2116 Dust Control ORD 2117 BMP Removal ORD 2118 E & S Field Conditions ORD 2120 E & S Repair/Maint -1 ORD Max 4011.(AV 20'Ao)' 2121 E & S Repair/Maint -2 ORD 2125 Sed Basin / Trap 1 ORD 2126 Sed Basin / Trap 2 ORD 2127 NPDES Compliance -1 ORD 2128 Sed Basinrrrap Restore ORD 2129 STORMWATER MGMT PONDS See Note 1 2131 SWM Ponds - Excav ORD 2132 SWM Ponds - Seed ORD 2133 SWM Ponds -1 ORD 2134 SWM Ponds -2 ORD 2135 SWM Ponds -3 ORD 2136 SWM Ponds -4 ORD Page 1 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: - 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 211412007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: NIA $488,881 $488,881 Rev 9/22/06 TICORPOUD5005CF Site im mvemeMS Bud et& COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate, A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 �2 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 2137 SWM Ponds - Field Cond. ORD Max f0'Io of Basin 2140 Pond Maintenance -1 ORD 2141 Pond Maintenance -2 ORD 2142 Pond Conversion -1 ORD 2143 Pond Conversion -2 ORD a 2144 Pond Conversion -3 ORD 2146 Access Road ORD 2147 Underground Detention ORD 2148 Infiltration System -1 ORD 2149 Infiltration System -2 ORD 2150 Pond Dedication Fees ORD �a , 2151 Liner System 1 ORD... 2152 Aerators/Water Feature ORD 2153 SWM Field Conditions ORD 2154 SWM - Prep for Ded. ORD 2155 Wetland Mitigation -1 OEX 2156 Wetland Mitigation -2 OEX 2157 Wetland Mitigation - Maint. OEX 2160 ROCK, UNSUITABLE SOIL See (vote 9 2161 Rock Test/Profile -1 OEX 2162 Rock Test/Profile -2 OEX 2163 Rock Test/Profile -3 OEX 2164 Rock Ripping OEX 2166 Rock Handling OEX 21681 Rock Processing OEX 2172 Rock Blasting/Removal OEX 2173 Rock Blasting/Removal OEX 2174 RockBlast Remov- Retn OEX 2175 Unsuitable Soil Mitigation -1 OEX 2176 Unsuitable Soil Mitigation -2 OEX 2177 Soil Cement OEX 2178 Lime Stabilization OEX w , 2180 EARTHWORK Sea Note 1 2182 Road Excavation 1 ORD 6,500 "WX 2183 Road Excavation 2 ORD 2184 Road Excavation 3 ORD 2186 Grading 1 ORD 15,000 2187 Grading 2 ORD 2190 Grading 3 ORD 2191 Bulk Lot Excavation 1 ORD Use house Acct. 2192 Bulk Lot Excavation 2 ORD #4092 when tots 2193 Bulk Lot Excavation 3 ORD Are Individually 2195 Import/Export Topsoil OEX , 2196 Import / Export Fill OEX 2197 Spoil / Borrow Pits OEX 2198 Slide Remediation 1 OEX 2199 Mobilization ORD 2200 Special Excavation OEX 2201 Special Excavation -1 OEX 2202 Topsoil Strip 1 ORD 2203 Topsoil Strip 2 ORD 2204 Topsoil Return 1 ORD 2205 Topsoil Return 2 ORD 2206 Mass Earthwork 1 ORD 2207 Mass Earthwork 2 ORD 2208 Lake Excavation 1 ORD 2209 Lake Excavation 2 ORD 2210 Easement/ROW Exc. ORD 2211 Easement/ROW Exc. ORD 2212 Retaining Walls 1 OEX 2213 Retaining Walls 2 OEX 2214 Sheeting / Walls 1 OEX 2215 Sheeting / Walls 2 OEX 2220 Earthwork Field Cond. 1 ORD Max 15%(Avg 5%)' 2223 Earthwork Retention ORD VA Only 2230 SANITARY SEWER sea Note v 2232 Sanitary Sewer 1 ORD 2233 Sanitary Sewer 2 ORD 2234 Sanitary Sewer 3 ORD 2235 Sanitary Sewer 4 ORD 2236 Sewer Services 1 ORD 2237 Sewer Services 2 ORD 2238 Alternative System -1 ORD 2239 Alternative System -2 ORD 2240 Purchase Sewer Capacity FEE 2241 Capacity Reservation FEE 22421 Sewer Connection Fee FEE 2250 Sewer Plant/Community Systen OEX a 6 2251 Sewer Plant/Community Systen OEX 2252 Sewer Plant O & M OEX "° 2253 Disposal Field OEX Page 2 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2114/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: = NIA $488,881 $488,881 R. arm T:ICORPOUD5005CFSReIm vemense Lbs COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate, A=Allowance ET DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 amount to load in Phase 702 701 �Enter 2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 22541 Access Road OEX 2260 Pump/Lift Station -1 OEX 2261 Pump/Lift Station -2 OEX 2262 Pump Station O & M OEX 2263 Force Main OEX 2264 Pump and Haul OEX 2270 San. Sew Deposit Receiv, FEE See Note 2 2275 San Sew. Dep. Reimburse FEE 1115, 2279 Connect Fee Reimbursement FEE 2280 San Repairs / Maint ORD See Note 3. Max 3%' 2290 San Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note 6. Max 2%' 2300 Sanitary Field Conditions ORD Max 10%(Avg 591)- 700 Evaluation of septic and abandon 2302 Sanitary Dewater OEX 2303 Sanitary Retention ORD VA Only z . 2310 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT See Notel.,• 2312 Storm Sewer System -1 ORD '. 2313 Storm Sewer System -2 ORD 2314 Storm Sewer System -3 ORD 2315 Storm Sewer System -4 ORD 2316 Storm Sewer System -5 ORD 2317 BMP Devices -1 ORD 2318 BMP Devices -2 OEX 2319 Yard Drainage OEX 2320 Culverts / Bridge -1 OEX 2321 1 Culverts / Bridge -2 OEX 2322 Culvert - Material OEX 2323 Wash Crossing OEX 2324 Ditch Stabilization OEX 2325 Sump/Leader Collec 1 ORD 2326 Sump/Leader Collec 2 ORD 2327 Driveway Culverts ORD 2328 Infiltration System ORD 2329 Bioretention ORD 2330 Storm Repairs / Maint ORD See Note 3. Max 3%' 2340 Storm Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note 6, Max 2%• 2350 Storm Field Conditions ORD Max 10% (Avg 5%)' 2353 Storm Sewer Retention ORD VA only 2358 Dewatering General ORD 2360 CURBING See Note 2362 Curbing 1 ORD 2363 Curbing 2 ORD 2364 Curbing 3 ORD 2365 Curbing 4 ORD 2367 Curb Backfill ORD 2370 Curb Depresssion Relo OEX 2380 Curb Repairs / Maint. ORD See Note 4. Max 5%- 2390 Curbing Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note &.Max 15%- 2400 Curbing Field Conditions ORD Max 5%(Avg 2%)' 24021 Curbing Retention ORD VA Only 2410 WATER See Note 1 2411 Water -1 ORD .•;•,; 2412 Water -2 ORD 2413 Water -3 ORD 2414 Water -4 ORD 2415 Water Services ORD 2416 Water Tower / Tank OEX 2417 Booster Pump OEX 2418 Fire Tank OEX -" 2419 Meter / Vault OEX 2420 Community Well / Plant OEX 2421 Well / Plant O & M OEX 250 Capping the well 2430 Water Taxes OEX See Note 2. Budget 2435 Water Deposit ORD Direct Reimb. Only 2437 Water Connection Fee FEE 250 Water analysis 2438 Water ReservationFee -1 FEE 2439 Water Usage Fee FEE 2445 Water Deposit - Refund FEE Provide Memo for...., 2446 Water Reimbursement FEE all Potential Rib. 2450 Water Repairs / Maint. ORD See We 3, Max 3%' 2460 Water Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note 6, Max 2%' 2470 Water Field Conditions ORD Max 5% (Avg 2%)' 2472 Water Retention ORD VA Only 24801 UTILITIES See Notei 2482 Electric 1 ORD See Note 2 2,500 , •. Meter service + dust to dawn lights 2483 Electric 2 ORD 2484 Electric 3 ORD 2485 Front Footage Charge -1 ORD Budget Diced 2486 Front Footage Charge -2 ORD Reimb 2487 Electric Deposit ORD only-P—ide 2488 Electric Dep - Refundable FEE Explanation for ALL 2489 Electric Dep - Reimburse FEE Refunds or Rebates Page 3 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE:— COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1295 • Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: — 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2114/200711:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: NIA $488,881 $488,881 Rev 9122106 T]CORMBUD5005CF Site Improvements Bua et.ds COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 �2 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 2490 Street Lights ORD 2491 Street Lights 1 ORD 2492 Specialty Lights ORD 2501 Telephone 1 ORD 2502 Telephone 2 ORD 2503 Telephone 3 ORD 2504 Pipeline Crossing ORD 2505 Regrade After Utilities -1 ORD 2506 Regrade After Utilities -2 ORD 2508 Telephone Dep Refundable FEE 2509 Telephone Dep Reimburse FEE 2511 Gast ORD 2512 Gas ORD 2513 Gas 3 ORD 2514 Propane -1 ORD 2515 Propane -2 ORD 2516 Gas Front Foot Charge ORD 2519 Gas - Deposit FEE See Note 2 2520 Gas Deposit - Refundable FEE 2525 Gas Dep. - Reimbursement FEE 2531 Cable / T.V. 1 ORD 2532 Cable / T.V. 2 ORD 2541 Utility Trenching 1 ORD Repairs to ; F•• 2542 Utility Trenching 2 ORD Public Utilities 2543 Utility Trenching 3 ORD for Individual Lots 2544 Conduits 1 ORD Individual House 2545 Conduits 2 ORD Acct 4902 2546 Pole Relocation OEX Repairs Improvement 2547 Pole Relocation -1 OEX Utilities 2551 Utility Backfill -1 ORD 2552 Utility Backfill -2 ORD 2560 Utilities Repairs / Maint. ORD See Note 3. Max 4%• 2570 Utilities Field Condition ORD Max 4%(Avg 2%)•' 2572 Utility - Retention ORD VA Only 2580 ROAD BED CONSTRUCTION See Note 1 2582 Regrade Subgrade 1 ORD 2583 Regrade Subgrade 2 ORD 2584 Regrade Subgrade 3 ORD 2585 Improve Subgrade 1 ORD 2586 Improve Subgrade 2 ORD 2587 Improve Subgrade 3 ORD 2591 Underdrain 1 OEX 2592 Underdrain 2 OEX 2593 Underdrain 3 OEX 2600 Curb Subase ORD 2601 Stone Subbase 1 ORD 2602 Stone Subbase 2 ORD 2603 Stone Subbase 3 ORD 2611 Base Course 1 ORD 2612 Base Course 2 ORD 2613 Base Course 3 ORD_' 2614 Binder Course 1 ORD 2615 Binder Course 2 ORD Via. 2616 Binder Course 3 ORD 2620 Asphalt Index Adjust ORD 2621 Top Course 1 ORD 2622 Top Course 2 ORD 2623 Top Course 3 ORD 2624 Pavers OEX 2625 Stamped Asphalt/Concrete OEX 2630 Striping 1 ORD 2631 Striping 2 ORD 2640 Guiderail1 ORD 2641 Guiderail2 ORD 2650 Road Repairs/Maint. ORD Max 5%(Avg 3%)• 2660 Road Prep. for Dedication ORD See Note 6.Max 10%• 2670 Road Field Conditions ORD Max 10%(Avg 5%)• 2673 Road Retention ORD VA Only 2680 SIGNALIZATION & SIGNAGE See Note i 2682 StreetlTraffic Signs 1 ORD 2683 Street/Traffic Signs 2 ORD 2684 Streetrrraffic Signs 3 ORD 2685 Decorative Signs OEx�,,:: 2686 Detour OEX%- 2687 Maint. Of Traffic OEX 2690 Traffic Lights 1 OEX if funds are placed inEscrow. 2691 Traffic Lights 2 OEX please note on check 2700 LANDSCAPE See Note 1 2702 Street Trees 1 ORD 27031 Street Trees 2 ORD 27041 Street Trees 3 ORD Page 4 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/1412007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: N/A $488,881 $488,881 Rev: 9rDJo6 T ICORPtBUD5005CF Site Im ovements Bua ebse COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 702 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION Street Trees 4 Irrigation 1 Irrigation 2 Fountains General Site Landscape General Site Landscape Entry Landscaping Fence 1 Fence 2 Wetland Plantings Landscape Buffer Areas Landscape Buffer Areas Seed/Sod Seed/Sod Entry Feature Entry Feature Perimeter Walls Perimeter Walls Privacy Walls Privacv Walls Lawn / Landscape Maint. Landscape Field Conditions Landscape Prep. for Ded MAILBOXES/DUMPSTERS Common Mailboxes 1 Common Mailboxes 2 Dumpster/Compactor Dumpster/Compactor REC & OPEN SPACE Tennis Courts Tennis Courts Courts Other Courts Other Sports Field Sports Field Tot Lots Tot Lots Piers/Docks Rec Irrigation Rec Irrigation Rec Landscape Rec Lawn Pool Pool Deck/Fence Cabana Building 1 Building 2 Club House Club House Clear / Earthwork Storm / San / Water Curb / Pave Tot Lots Tot Lots 1 Electric / Telephone Rec Sidewalks Lighting / Signage Park / Picnic Areas Rec Fum. & Equip. Gazebo/Trellis Guard House Guard House Gated Entry Gated Entry WALKSITRAILS/ APRONS Common Area Sidewalk Common Area Sidewalk Frontage Walk Crosswalks Paths/Trails Paths/Trails Backfill Sidewalks Driveway Aprons 1 Drivewav ADrons 2 Sidewalk Repairs / Maint. Sidewalk Prep. for Ded. Sidewalk Field Conditions ORD OEX OEX OEX OEX ORD ORD ORD ORD ORD OEX ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD -1 OEX -2 OEX OEX -1 OEX OEX -1 OEX ORD Max 10%(Avg 5%)• ORD ORD ORD See Note 6. Max 5%' See Note 1 ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD See Note i REC Corp. Planning to Load All Rec. Cost To Budget Phase 702 -1 REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC REC -1 REC -2 REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC -1 REC -2 REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC REC VA Only See Note r ORD ORD ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD -1 ORD ORD ORD ORD ORD See Note 4.Max ILA ORD See Note 6.Max 10•A ORD Max5%(Avg2%)• 1 * 19,500 36.009 General Landscape around Fee I & Construction $83,000 from road to lake, add'I $71,000 to wrap the trails Improvement to access easement Page 5 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE:- COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 - Pavilion` # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: - 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 211412007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: NIA $488,881 $488,881 Rev: 9=5 T:ICORPOUD5005CFSdelm ovementsBua et>ds COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEr BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract E=Estimate, A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 �2 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 28571 Sidewalk Retention ORD VA Only 2860 PERMITS I FEES Sao Note 1 2862 Permits / Fees 1 FEE 35 Demoition permit for existing structure 2863 Permits / Fees 2 FEE 1,500 Building permit 2864 Permits / Fees 3 FEE 2865 Traffic Impact Fee FEE 2866 Purchase Development Credits FEE 2867 Park Rec Fees FEE 2868 Wetland Bank Fees FEE 2869 Tree Mitigation Fees FEE 2870 INSPECTIONS See Note 1 2871 Municipal Inspections ORD 500 2872 Municipal Inspections ORD 2875 Water Inspections ORD 2880 Sewer Inspections ORD 2881 NPDES Inspections ORD 2885 Misc. Inspections -1 ORD -` 2886 Misc. Inspections -2 ORD 2890 HOMEOWNER ASSOC FEES See Note v/y,• . 2891 HOA Oper. Deficit HOA orp. Planmhg o oad 2892 HOA Reserve HOA HOA Costs to Phase 701 ' .. 2893 HOA - Miscellaneous HOA 2900 IMPROVEMENT BONDS & LC Sea Note f •, j "' 2901 LC Fees 1 ORD Contact 2902 LC Fees 2 ORD Accounting 2904 Improvement Bonds 1 ORD Department 2905 Improvement Bonds 2 ORD for 2911 Maintenance Bonds 1 ORD Current 2912 Maintenance Bonds 2 ORD Fees 2920 Cash Bond 1 FEE See Note 1.c, 2921 Cash Bond 2 FEE 2922 Cash Bond - Reimburse FEE See Note 5 2923 CDD Reimburse FEE 2950 MISC. CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION See Note t 2951 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP Note on 2952 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP Check Request 2953 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP whether any 2954 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP Portion is 2955 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP refundable. 3020 OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS See Note 1 e 3025 Off -Site Survey OFF 3026 Off -Site Survey 1 OFF 3028 Traffic Control 1 OFF 3029 Traffic Control 2 OFF 3030 Off -Site Clearing OFF 3031 Off -Site Clearing OFF 3035 Off -Site Eros & Sed OFF "•> •° 3036 Off -Site Eros & Sed OFF 3040 Off -Site Rock OFF 3041 Off -Site Rock OFF 3045 Off -Site Excavation OFF 3046 Off -Site Excavation 1 OFF 3050 Off -Site Sanitary -1 OFF 3051 Off -Site Sanitary -2 OFF 3056 Off -Site Storm Sewer 1 OFF Oa -sire 3057 Off -Site Storm Sewer 2 OFF Improvements 3060 Off -Site Curbing OFF are Required, 3061 Off -Site Curbing 1 OFF Consider 3065 Off -Site Water OFF Setting Up 3066 Off -Site Water 1 OFF a Budget 3068 Bore/Direct Drill 1 OFF 3069 Bore/Direct Drill 2 OFF 3070 Off -Site Utilities OFF Phase 3071 Off -Site Utilities OFF Designated 3072 Off -Site Pole Relocation OFF Solely 3075 Off -Site Road Const. OFF to on -site. 3076 Off -Site Paving OFF 3077 Off -Site Striping OFF 3080 Off -Site Signalization OFF 3081 Off -Site Signage OFF 3085 Off -Site Landscaping OFF 3086 Off -Site Landscaping -1 OFF 3090 Off -Site Sidewlk & Dry OFF 3091 Off -Site Sidewlk & Dry OFF;'. 3095 Off -Site Amen. & Rec. OFF 3096 Intersection Improvements OFF 3097 AccellDecel Lanes OFF 3098 Turn Lanes OFF 3100 Off -Site Engineering OFF 3105 Off -Site Inspections OFF 3110 Off -Site Fees/BondING OFF Contact Fees Page 6 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. M 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES PHIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/141200711:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: - WA $488,881 $488,881 Rev: ar=6 T:ICORP18UD5005CFSite im ac improvements es COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: AVALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate, A=Allowance ACCT DESCRIPTION F# TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 � Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 1 + 1 702 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 3112 Easement Softs OFF 3113 Easement Buy OFF 3115 Off -Site Repairs / Maint. OFF Max 2%(Avg 1%)- 3120 Off -Site Prep. for Ded. OFF See Note 6. Max 3%- 3122 Off -Site Receivables OFF 3123 Off -Site Reimbursement OFF 3125 Off -Site Field Conditions OFF Max 10%(Avg 551)- 3127 Off -site Retainage OFF VA only 3151 Misc. Cost - Receivable FEE 4; 3152 Misc. •• Reimbursement FEE 3160 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS COSTS See Note 1 3161 Field Office Setup -1 ORD 3162 Mobilization ORD 3163 Allocation of Costs ORD 3164 OPEN ACCT: OEx Division controller 3165 OPEN ACCT: OEX Can Enter custom 3166 OPEN ACCT: OEX Descdpt ons 3167 OPEN ACCT: OEX AZ Tax code 3168 Improvement Rebates ORD 3170 PREPARATION FOR DEDICATION See Note 1 3171 Prep. for Dedic. -1 ORD sae Note 6 3172 Prep for Ded Consolidated ORD 3173 Phase 999 Reserve ORD 3175 Field Cond. Consolidated ORD 3176 Repair/Maint. Consolidated ORD SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 488881 $ $ 3195 CONTINGENCY see Note 1 3196 Contingency - Ord ORD Typ. 5% of Budget 3197 Contingency - Extra Ord ORD 701 702 TOTALS PHASE> 0 $ 488,881 $ $ Improvement Cost / Lot Calculated Below OVERALL TOTAL $ 488,881 1 = # OF LOTS $488,881 LAST LAND / PROJECT PROF. Prof. Date This section must be filled out before Vice President Signs. Total Common Improv. Cost per Lot (Land Dev.) 0 Weighted Avg. Common Improv. Cost (Proforma)' Avg Improv. Cost THIS Product (Land Dev.) $0 Avg Improv. Cost THIS Product (Proforma)" ' From "Summary Per Lot" Worksheet "From "Lot Cost" worksheet for subject product type IS THIS PHASE ADDED TO AN EXISTING JOB? l'E$ ANC; APPROVALS: Budgets will not be loaded without all approvals. LD SIGNATURES BELOW ARE FOR SITE ONLY- NOT PH 7011702 This form is used by the Project Manager to Project Manager I Data LD Manager I Date submit an original Budget on a new Project or Phase to the Corp. Planning Department. Vice President I Date LD Dept Head I Date Page 7 of 8 LAWSON AND SILEK, P.L.C. THOMAS MOORE LAWSON • TLAWSON(F%LSPLC.COM 120 EXETER DRIVE, SUITE 200 POST OFFICE BOX 2740 WINCHESTER, VA 22604 TELEPHONE: (540) 665-0050 FACSIMILE: (540) 722-4051 February 16, 2007 Ed Strawsnyder, Director Frederick County Department of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Twin Lakes Overlook Our File No. 600.001 VIA HAND DELIVERY Dear Ed: Enclosed please find an architectural drawing, budget and a quote from a construction company to build the community center at the Twin Lakes Overlook development. As you will recall, when we last spoke, you had some questions about the total cost to build the center and requested some back-up information regarding the same. After you have reviewed the enclosed, you should be able to verify the cost and be able to provide confirmation of the same to the Frederick County Planning Department. Thank you for your continued assistance and cooperation. As always, should you have any questions or require any additional information, please give me a call. Very truly yours, qkpw z0anm/ ow� Thomas Moore Lawson TML:cmh Enclosures cc: Toll Brothers, Inc. FRONT ROYAL ADDRESS: POST OFFICE BOX 602, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA 22630, TELEPHONE: (540) 635-9415, FACSIMILE: (540) 635-9421, E-MAIL: SILEKJ@LYNXCONNECT.COM FAIRFAX ADDRESS: 10805 MAIN STREET, SUITE 200, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030, TELEPHONE: (703) 352-2615, FACSIMILE: (703) 352-4190, E-MAIL: THOMASO.LAWSON@VERIZON.NET Twin Lakes Overlook• Toll Brothers A D GZ�'�. osou ."tgo,t Uog/InterBuild, Inc. ers . Contractors Post Office Box 237 Purcellville. VA 20134 Phone 340-338-2306 Fax 540-338-3013 v Tv-Horsebarnscentral.coin December 8, 2006 Mr. Chip Patterson Ms. Pascale Roy Toll Brothers 903 Crestview Terrace Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Chip and Pascale, I am very pleased to submit to you the following revised proposal for the log pavilion building at the Twin Lakes Development in Winchester. The scope of the work did change fairly substantially with the revised drawings. The majority of the change was due to the foundation design and the added masonry. The total specifications and costs are as follows: General conditions: Appropriate full time supervision to carry out the project in a first class manner. General Liability insurance, Workmen's Compensation insurance and all rental equipment for normal working conditions are included. The general scope of the work is to provide and install a rough sawn log pavilion at your new development in Winchester. The logs will be Western Red Knotty Cedar. The construction will be per the ADG plans dated 12/13/06 pages AO-O, Al-O, A2-0, A3-0, A4-0, S1, S2, and S3. The total anticipated constructed cost for this project will be: $236,009 Since our firm began business in 1981 we have completed over 1,500 projects. We take great pride in doing quality work at a fair price. Please call with any questions or comments you may have. I look forward to working with you on your building project. Sincerely, John L. Fuog President • "" To Hide Unused Rows CTRL - X (to onhide, CTRL-U) "" This spreadsheet is protected, if changes are necessary - contact LD Dept. SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1296 -'Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy # HOMES THIS PHASE: � 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: = _NW_NW7 $488,887 $488,887 Rev: 9t2v08 TACORMBUo5005CrSaeim re�emsntsBea etas COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 +702 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 20001 SITE IMPROVEMENTS See (vote 1 ='t Note: Shaded Boxes indicate 2010 SURVEY See More f..:, , Summary Accts, Do Not Budget 2011 Survey -1 ORD 2012 Survey -2 ORD 225 ' Plot plan 2013 Survey -3 ORD 700 '`: Stake out 2014 Survey -4 ORD 150 : Final Survey Pins 2015 Pond As Builts ORD ;;%%�• ?' 2016 As Builts ORD 475 z s 2017 As Builts -1 ORDMIZ,, , 2018 Survey - Restake ORD r > 2021 Monuments 1 ORD 2022 Monuments 2 ORD:� - 2025 Topo Check ORD 550 2026 Construction Carts ORD �2�030 SITE CONSULT & ENG see More f 2031 Site Consult & Eng -1 ORD ` ,;. 2032 Site Consult & Eng -2 ORD 2033 Site Consult & Eng -3 ORD 2034 Envir. Consultant ORD 2035 Geotechnical -1 ORD 500 - g Certification of pad 2036 Geotechnical -2 ORD, 2037 Geotechnical -3 ORD 2039 Consultant SWPPP ORD 2040 MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISION See Note i 2041 TBI Sitework Mgt -1 ORDz 2042 TBI Sitework Mgt -2 ORD 2043 TBI Sitework Mgt -3 ORD 2044 Outside Mgt & Supervision ORD 2045 Outside Mgt & Supervision ORD 2048 Mgmt/Suprvsn-Retention ORD 2050 Management Prep for Ded. ORD See Notes 2060 DEMOLITION & SITE DEBRIS See Note f � s:± 2061 Demolition -1 OEX 12,250 Includes house & Farm 2062 Demolition -2 OEX 500 „; tructural integerty report 2063 Envir. Testing OEX 600 %: Asbestos 2064 Envir. Remed. OEX 487 ` Asbestos remediation 2065 Demolition Retention OEX VA Only ✓,,,;'�', 2070 CLEARING &GRUBBING See Note f s 2075 Tree Spading OEx, , 2076 Save Existing Plants OEX 2077 Tree Nursery OEX f 2078 Replant Exist Plants OEX ... 2081 Clearing & Grubbing -1 OEX 2082 Clearing & Grubbing -2 OEX y , 2084 Tree Protection OEX �. 2085 Clear & Grub Lots -1 OEX 2086 Clear & Grub Lots -2 OEX 2088 Select Clearing OEX 2089 Light Clear/Mow OEX 7 2090 Clear & Grub Fld Cond OEX Mex 15%(Avg 591), 2092 Clear & Grub Retention OEX VA Onlye 2100 E & S CONTROLS I BMPs See Note 1 2101 E & S Controls -1 ORD 1,200 ;il _ Protection around construction area 2102 E & S Controls -2 ORD 2103 E & S Controls -3 ORD 2104 E & S Controls -4 ORD 2110 E & S Controls -5 ORD �? j 2111 E & S Controls -6 ORD House E&S Work 2112 E & S Controls -7 ORD Should be Budgeted4 2113 E & S Controls -8 ORD to Base House -40B3 � � � „q y` �•. 2114 Temp Stabilization ORD� 2115 E & S Retention ORD VAOWy 2116 Dust Control ORD 2117 BMP Removal ORD 2118 E & S Field Conditions ORD 2120 E & S Re air/Maint p -1 ORD Mex 40%(Avg 20%)' 2121 E & S Repair/Maint -2 ORD 2125 Sed Basin / Trap 1 ORD , 2126 Sed Basin ! Trap 2 ORD 2127 NPDES Compliance -1 ORD 2128 Sed BasiNTrap Restore ORD 2129 STORMWATER MGMT PONDS See Note f 2131 SWM Ponds - Excav ORD .•" °_ `' 2132 SWM Ponds - Seed ORD ' 2133 SWM Ponds -1 ORD 21341 SWM Ponds -2 ORD y 21351 SWM Ponds -3 ORD, 21361 SWM Ponds -4 ORD Page 1 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROD. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #'HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2114/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: + NIA. $488,881 $488,881 Ree srzaoe T:%CORPXBUD5005CF SOIm—ememeeua eaes COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #vALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 F702 I COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 2137 SWM Ponds - Field Cond. ORD Max 10%efeasin 2140 Pond Maintenance -1 ORD •` 2141 Pond Maintenance -2 ORD ^ 2142 Pond Conversion -1 ORD 2143 Pond Conversion -2 ORD , 2144 Pond Conversion 3 ORD ;w. 2146 Access Road ORD 2147 Underground Detention ORD 2148 Infiltration System -1 ORD 2149 Infiltration System -2 ORD c eg 2150 Pond Dedication Fees ORD1,4 2151 Liner System 1 ORD .. 2152 Aerators/Water Feature ORD 2153 SWM Field Conditions ORD 2154 SWM - Prep for Ded. ORD z 2155 Wetland Mitigation -1 OEX a -.. 2156 Wetland Mitigation -2 OEX as ' 2157 Wetland Mitigation - Maint. OEX 2160 ROCK, UNSUITABLE SOIL see Note f 7;" , •:; y, 2161 Rock Test/Profile -1 OEX 2162 Rock Test/Profile -2 OEX , 2163 Rock Test/Profile -3 OEX ,.y. 2164 Rock Ripping OEX 2166 Rock Handling OEX 2168 Rock Processing OEX 2172 Rock Blasting/Removal OEX 2173 Rock Blasting/Removal OEX ="" - 2174 RockBiast Remov- Retn OEX 2175 Unsuitable Soil Mitigation -1 OExli ;� 2176 Unsuitable Soil Mitigation -2 OEX ., . 2177 Soil Cement OEX 2178 Lime Stabilization OEX77 2180 EARTHWORK See Ntef ti 2182 Road Excavation 1 ORD 6,500 V 2183 Road Excavation 2 ORD sg t 2184 Road Excavation 3 ORD s, 2186 Grading 1 ORD 15,000z 777 2187 Grading 2 ORD 2190 Grading 3 ORD ILL,F 2191 Bulk Lot Excavation 1 ORD Use house Acd. 21921 Bulk Lot Excavation 2 ORD #4092 when LetsSM 2193 Bulk Lot Excavation 3 ORD Are Individually 2195 Import/Export Topsoil OEX 2196 Import/Export Fill OEX 2197 Spoil / Borrow Pits OEX "" •. 2198 Slide Remediation 1 OEXMai 2199 Mobilization ORD' 2200 Special Excavation OEX < 2201 Special Excavation -1 OEX ' = L, 2202 Topsoil Strip 1 ORD 2203 Topsoil Strip 2 ORD 2204 Topsoil Return 1 ORD „r 2205 Topsoil Return 2 ORD 2206 Mass Earthwork 1 ORD 2207 Mass Earthwork 2 ORD C 2208 Lake Excavation 1 ORD 191 Z •'. 2209 Lake Excavation 2 ORD;. 2210 Easement/ROW Exc. ORD 2211 Easement/ROW Exc. ORD ., e 2212 Retaining Walls 1 OEx 2213 Retaining Walls 2 OEX 2214 Sheeting / Walls 1 OEX 2215 Sheeting / Walls 2 OEX 2220 Earthwork Field Cond. 1 ORD Max 15%(Avg 5%)• " 2223 Earthwork Retention ORD VAOmy 2230 SANITARY SEWER see Motet ; 22321 Sanitary Sewer 1 ORD 2233 Sanitary Sewer 2 ORD' 2234 Sanitary Sewer 3 ORD 2235 Sanitary Sewer 4 ORD:;'. �b 2236 Sewer Services 1 ORD 2237 Sewer Services 2 ORDN < 2238 Alternative System -1 ORD 1 i 2239 Alternative System -2 ORD 2240 Purchase Sewer Capacity FEE 2241 Capacity Reservation FEE 2242 Sewer Connection Fee FEE 2250 Sewer Plant/Community Systerr OEX 2251 Sewer Plant/Community Systen OEX r 2252 Sewer Plant O & M OEX 22531 Disposal Field OEX Page 2 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: ,a COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. tF: 1295 - Pavilion ;> # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #-HOMES THIS PHASE: - 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: '. 'NIA $4$8,881 $488,881 Rev: MV06 T:ICORPIBUD5005CF Sfte Improvements Bud etxis COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Cont.ct E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 T2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 22541 Access Road OEX 22601 Pump/Lift Station -1 OEX 2261 Pump/Lift Station -2 OEX - 2262 Pump Station O & M OEX a 2263 Force Main OEX ¢ Z 2264 Pump and Haul OEX 2270 San. Sew Deposit Receiv FEE See Note 2 2275 San Sew. Dep. Reimburse FEE x£ 2279 Connect Fee Reimbursement FEE 2280 San Repairs / Maint ORD See Note 3. Max 3%'� 2290 San Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note 6. Max 2%'', r 2300 Sanitary Field Conditions ORD Max 10% (Avg 5%)' 700,±',,- Evaluation of septic and abandon 2302 Sanitary Dewater OEX 2303 Sanitary Retention ORD VA Only STORMWATER MANAGEMENT See Note 1 Storm Sewer System -1 ORD Storm Sewer System -2 ORD Storm Sewer System -3 ORD Storm Sewer System -4 ORD Storm Sewer System -5 ORD BMP Devices -1 ORD BMP Devices -2 OEX Yard Drainage OEX Culverts / Bridge -1 OEX Culverts / Bridge -2 OEX Culvert - Material OEX Wash Crossing OEX Ditch Stabilization OEX Sump/Leader Collec 1 ORD Sump/Leader Collec 2 ORD Driveway Culverts ORD Infiltration System ORD Bioretention ORD Storm Repairs / Maint ORD See Note 3. Max 3%' Storm Prep. for Ded. ORD See Note 6, Max 2%• Storm Field Conditions ORD Max 10%(Aug 5%)' Storm Sewer Retention Dewaterino General ORD ORD VA Only CURBING Curbing 1 Curbing 2 Curbing 3 Curbing 4 Curb Backfill Curb Depresssion Relo Curb Repairs / Maint. Curbing Prep. for Ded. Curbing Field Conditions Curbing Retention WATER Water Water Water Water Water Services Water Tower / Tank Booster Pump Fire Tank Meter / Vault Community Well / Plant Well / Plant O & M Water Taxes Water Deposit Water Connection Fee Water ReservationFee Water Usage Fee Water Deposit - Refund Water Reimbursement Water Repairs / Maint. Water Prep. for Ded. Water Field Conditions Water Retention UTILITIES Electric 1 Electric 2 Electric 3 Front Footage Charge Front Footage Charge Electric Deposit Electric Dep - Refundable Electric Dep - Reimburse Sea Not. 1 ORD ORD ORD ORD ORD OEX ORD See Note 4. Max 5%' ORD See Note &Max 15%' ORD Max 5%(Avg 2%)' ORD VA Only See Note 1 -1 ORD -2 ORD -3 ORD -4 ORD ORD OEX OEX OEX OEX OEX OEX OEX See Note 2. Budget ORD Dired Reimb. Only FEE 1 FEE FEE FEE Provide Memo for FEE all Potential Reimb. ORD See Note 3, Max 3%• ORD See Note 6, Max 2%- ORD Max 5%(Avg 2%)' ORD VA Only See Note 1 ORD See Note 2 ORD ORD -1 ORD Budget Dired -2 ORD Rib ORD Only -Provide FEE Explanation for ALL FEE Refunds or Rebates 250 250 the well Meter service + dust to dawn Page 3 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 -. Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: = NIA $488,881 $488,881 R- 9rzv0s T9CORP10UD5005CF Sfte Im rovemeras Butl etAs COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract E=Estimate, A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 IFIF-- 701 �2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 2490 Street Lights ORD ft 2491 Street Lights 1 ofeo 2492 Specially Lights ORD 2501 Telephone 1 ORD;z* s 2502 Telephone 2 ORD 2503 Telephone 3 ORD� ; 2504 Pipeline Crossing ORD ,£ 2505 Regrade After Utilities -1 ORD j 2506 Regrade After Utilities -2 ORD 2508 Telephone Dep Refundable FEE • , ,' 2509 Telephone Dep Reimburse FEE 2511 Gast ORD 2512 Gas 2 ORD- 2513 Gas 3 ORD 2514 Propane -1 ORD 2515 Propane -2 ORD 2516 Gas Front Foot Charge ORD 2519 Gas - Deposit FEE Sea Note z j 2520 Gas Deposit - Refundable FEE` 2525 Gas Dep. - Reimbursement FEE A 2531 Cable / T.V. 1 ORD 2532 Cable / T.V. 2 ORD 2541 Utility Trenching 1 ORD Repaint to 2542 Utility Trenching 2 ORD Public utilities 2543 Utility Trenching 3 ORD for Individual Lots 2544 Conduits 1 ORD Individual House^ 2545 Conduits 2 ORD Acd 4902 .ti 6 2546 Pole Relocation OEX Repairs Improvement r 2547 Pole Relocation -1 OEX ufirties 2551 Utility Backfill 1 oRD,;, j ,• ',. 11 2552 Utility Backfill -2 ORD I 2560 Utilities Repairs / Maint. ORD sea Note 3. Max 4% 2570 Utilities Field Condition ORD Max 4%(Avg 2%)' 2572 Utility - Retention ORD VA Only -; 2580 ROAD BED CONSTRUCTION see Note f 2582 Regrade Subgrade 1 ORD t •': . "' 2583 Regrade Subgrade 2 ORD 2584 Regrade Subgrade 3 ORD 2585 Improve Subgrade 1 ORD 2586 Improve Subgrade 2 ORD 2587 Improve Subgrade 3 ORD 2591 Underdrain 1 OEX;; •', „ ,y 2592 Underdrain 2 OEX !. 2593 Underdrain 3 OEX r 2600 Curb Subase ORD r 2601 Stone Subbase 1 ORD 2602 Stone Subbase 2 ORD 2603 Stone Subbase 3 ORD p 2611 Base Course 1 ORD i - 2612 Base Course 2 ORD 2613 Base Course 3 ORD 2614 Binder Course 1 ORD ,i T 2615 Binder Course 2 ORD ," •• -` 2616 Binder Course 3 ORD r . 2620 Asphalt Index Adjust ORD 2621 Top Course 1 ORD 2622 Top Course 2 ORD � 2623 Top Course 3 ORD ,, 2624 Pavers OEX 2625 Stamped Asphalt/Concrete OEX gm 2630 Striping 1 ORD .<. 2631 Striping 2 ORD 2640 Guiderail1 ORD 2641 Guiderail2 orto 2650 Road Repairs / Maint. ORD Max 5%(Avg 3%)• 2660 Road Prep. for Dedication ORD See Note 6.Max 10%• 2670 Road Field Conditions ORD Max 10% (Avg 57.)f 2673 Road Retention ORD VA Only 2680 SIGNALIZATION & SIGNAGE Sea Note t 2682 Street/Traffic Signs 1 ORD 2683 StreettTraffic Signs 2 ORD 2684 Street/Traffic Signs 3 ORD 2685 Decorative Signs OEX 2686 Detour OEX 'M 2687 Maint. Of Traffic OEX �a„I 2690 Traffic Lights 1 OEX lf hinds are placed inEscrow. 2691 Traffic Lights 2 OEX please note on check 2700 LANDSCAPE See Note 2702 SVeetTrees 1 ORD 2703 Street Trees 2 ORD 2704 Street Trees 3 ORD Page 4 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 -,Pavilion = # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #'HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/1412007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: $488,881 $488,881 Rer. WON T:XCORMBUD5005CF Site Im ve omerds Bud etds COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract E=Estimate A=Allowance E.CT DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 j 702 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION Street Trees 4 Hardscape Irrigation 1 Irrigation 2 Fountains General Site Landscape General Site Landscape Entry Landscaping Fence1 Fence 2 Wetland Plantings Landscape Buffer Areas Landscape Buffer Areas Seed/Sod Seed/Sod Entry Feature Entry Feature Perimeter Walls Perimeter Walls Privacy Walls Privacy Walls Landscape Repairs/Maint Lawn / Landscape Maint. Landscape Field Conditions Landscape Prep. for Ded MAILBOXES/DUMPSTERS Common Mailboxes 1 Common Mailboxes 2 Dumpster/Compactor Dumpster/Compactor REC & OPEN SPACE Tennis Courts Tennis Courts Courts Other Courts Other Sports Field Sports Field Tot Lots Tot Lots Piers/Docks Rec Irrigation Rec Irrigation Rec Landscape Rec Lawn Pool Pool Deck/Fence Cabana Building 1 Building 2 Club House Club House Clear / Earthwork Storm I San / Water Curb / Pave Tot Lots Tot Lots 1 Electric / Telephone Rec Sidewalks Lighting / Signage Park / Picnic Areas Rec Fum. & Equip. Gazebo/Trellis Guard House Guard House Gated Entry Gated Entry WALKS/TRAILS/ APRONS Common Area Sidewalk Common Area Sidewalk Frontage Walk Crosswalks Paths/Trails Paths/Trails Backfill Sidewalks Driveway Aprons 1 Driveway Aprons 2 Sidewalk Repairs / Maint. Sidewalk Prep. for Ded. Sidewalk Field Conditions ORD OEX OEX OEX OEX ORD ORD ORD ORD ORD OEX ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD -1 OEX -2 OEX OEX -1 OEX OEX -1 OEX ORD Max 10%(Avg 5%)' ORD ORD ORD See Note 6. Max 5%' See Note 1 ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD See Note 1 REC Corp. Planning to Load All Rec. Cost To Budget Phase 702 -1 REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC REC -1 REC -2 REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC -1 REC -2 REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC -1 REC -2 REC -1 REC -2 REC REC VA Only See Note i ORD ORD ORD ORD -1 ORD -2 ORD -1 ORD ORD ORD ORD ORD See Note 4.Max 10%• ORD I See Note 6.Max 10%. ORD I Max 5% (Avg 2%)' 1 500 around Design Fee Material & Construction $83,000 from road to lake, add'] $71,000 to wrap the trails ImDrovement to access easement Page 5 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: = 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #,HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: NIA ;` $488,881 $488,881 Rev: 9rzvoe TSCDRP16UD5Bo5CF Sne Improvements Bud etAs COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 �2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION 28571 Sidewalk Retention ORD VA Only 2860 PERMITS I FEES see Note f 2862 Permits / Fees 1 FEE 35 Demoition permit for existing structure 2863 Permits / Fees 2 FEE 1,500 Building permit 2864 Permits / Fees 3 FEE 2865 Traffic Impact Fee FEE 2866 Purchase Development Credits FEE 2867 Park Rec Fees FEE 2868 Wetland Bank Fees FEE 2869 Tree Mitigation Fees FEE �- 2870 INSPECTIONS See Note t " 2871 Municipal Inspections ORD 500 2872 Municipal Inspections ORD ,; 2875 Water Inspections ORD 2880 Sewer Inspections ORD ;:'.�"'•• 2881 NPDES Inspections ORD ': w 2885 Misc. inspections -1 ORD 2886 Misc. Inspections -2 ORD 2890 HOMEOWNER ASSOC FEES Sea Note 2891 HOA Oper. Deficit HOA Ccap. Planning to Load - _ „ 2892 HOA Reserve HOA ag HOA Costs to Phase 701 2893 HOA - Miscellaneous HOA 2900 IMPROVEMENT BONDS & LC See Note f 5^° ENV 2901 LC Fees 1 ORD Contact : r 2902 LC Fees 2 ORD Accounting 2904 Improvement Bonds 1 ORD Depanment 2905 Improvement Bonds 2 ORD for 2911 Maintenance Bonds 1 ORD Current s 2912 Maintenance Bonds 2 ORD Fees ' 2920 Cash Bond 1 FEE See Note t 2921 Cash Bond 2 FEE 2922 Cash Bond - Reimburse FEE See Note 5 . 2923 CDD Reimburse FEE 2950 MISC. CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION See Note t 2951 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP Note on 2952 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP Check Request 2953 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP whether any 2954 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP portion is 2955 Misc. Capital Contrib. CAP refundable. 3020 OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS Sea Note rIN* ? 3025 Off -Site Survey OFF 3026 Off -Site Survey 1 OFF 3028 Traffic Control 1 OFF 3029 Traffic Control 2 OFF 3030 Off -Site Clearing OFF 3031 Off -Site Clearing OFF ? ` 3035 Off -Site Eros & Sed OFFwz, s 3036 Off -Site Eros & Sed OFF 3040 Off -Site Rock OFF 3041 Off -Site Rock OFF ' 3045 Off -Site Excavation OFF 3046 Off -Site Excavation 1 OFF 3050 Off -Site Sanitary -1 OFF M�,;. 3051 Off -Site Sanitary -2 OFF a 3056 Off -Site Storm Sewer 1 OFF Dt/site 3057 Off -Site Storm Sewer 2 OFF Improvements 3060 Off -Site Curbing OFF are Required, ,. 7, 'R = r 3061 Off -Site Curbing 1 OFF Consider 3065 Off -Site Water OFF Selling up " s 3066 Off -Site Water 1 OFF a Budget ' 3068 Bore/Direct Drill 1 OFFN 3069 Bore/Direct Drill 2 OFF 3070 Off -Site Utilities OFF Phase 3071 Off -Site Utilities OFF Designated } 3072 Off -Site Pole Relocation OFF Sdet y 3075 Oft Site Road Const. OFF to on -sire. q k; 3076 Off -Site Paving OFF s 3077 Off -Site Striping OFF�z 3080 Off -Site Signalization OFF 3081 Off -Site Signage OFF 3085 Off -Site Landscaping OFF , 3086 Off -Site Landscaping -1 OFF `- 3090 Off -Site Sidewlk & Dry OFF 3091 Off -Site Sidewlk &Dry OFFa, 3095 Off -Site Amen. & Rec. OFF 3096 Intersection Improvements OFF 3097 Accel/Decel Lanes OFF 3098 Turn Lanes OFF 3100 Off -Site Engineering OFF , 3105 Off -Site Inspections OFF 3110 Off -Site Fees/BondING OFF Doted Acting r Fees f Page 6 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET / CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 - Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy If HOMES THIS PHASE: - 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2/14/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: '^', WA = $488,881 $488,881 Rev: 972*6 T:1CORMBUD5005CF Site Improvements Bud ecds COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET C=Contract, E=Estimate A=Allowance ACCT # DESCRIPTION TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 F 11 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 701 +702 1 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION Easement Softs OFF Easement Buy OFF Off -Site Repairs / Maint. OFF Max 2%(Avg 151)' Off -Site Prep. for Ded. OFF See Note 6. Max 3%' Off -Site Receivables OFF Off -Site Reimbursement OFF Off -Site Field Conditions OFF Max 10%(Avg 5%)' Off -site Retainage OFF VA Only Misc. Cost - Receivable FEE Misc. - Reimbursement FEE OTHER MISCELLANEOUS COSTS See Note 1 Field Office Setup -1 ORD Mobilization ORD Allocation of Costs ORD OPEN ACCT: OEX Division Controller Can Enter Custom Descriptions OPEN ACCT: OEX OPEN ACCT: OEX OPEN ACCT: OEX AZ Tax code Improvement Rebates ORD PREPARATION FOR DEDICATION Prep. for Dedic. -1 ORD Sea Note 1 See Note 6 Prep for Ded Consolidated ORD Phase 999 Reserve ORD Field Cond. Consolidated ORD Repair/Maint. Consolidated ORD SUBTOTALIMPROVEMENTS CONTINGENCY see Note 1 Contingency - Ord ORD Typ. 5% of Budget Contingency - Extra Ord ORD 881 1 1$ - 1$ 701 702 TOTALS PHASE> 0 $ 488,881 $ $ Improvement Cost / Lot Calculated Below OVERALL TOTAL $ 488,881 1 1 1 1 = # OF LOTS 1 $488,881 LAST LAND I PROJECT PROF. 'Prof. Date This section must be Fled out Total Common Improv. Cost per Lot Land Dev. 0.< before Vice President Signs. Weighted Avg. Common Improv. Cost Profovna)' 0 Avg Improv. Cost ILLIS Product (Land Dev.) 0 Avg Improv. Cost THIS Product Proforma)" 0 _ From "Summary Per Lot" Worksheel "From "Lot Cost" worksheel for subject product type IS THIS PHASE ADDED TO AN EXISTING JOB? ''�& APPROVALS: Budgets will not be loaded without all approvals. LD SIGNATURES BELOW ARE FOR SITE ONLY- NOT PH 7011702 This form is used by the Project Manager to submit an original Budget on anew Project Project Manager I Date LD Manager / Date or Phase to the Corp. Planning Department. Vice President / Date LD Dept Head / Date Page 7 of 8 SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET I CASH FLOW PHASE: COMMUNITY NAME / DESCRIPTION Twin Lakes Overlook PROJ. #: 1295 • Pavilion # HOMES IN COMMUNITY: 149 PREP. BY: Pascale Roy #HOMES THIS PHASE: 1 Phase Total Ph.Cost Per Lot DATE: 2114/2007 11:57 FEET OF INTERIOR ROAD: = NIA— $488,881 $488,881 Rev: erzzro5 T ICORMUD5005CF Sfte Im rovemems Bua etrd: COST PER FOOT INTERIOR ROAD: #VALUEI BASIS FOR BUDGET trac C=Cont E=Estimate A=Allowance E11CT TYPE INSTRUCTIONS BUDGET Enter amount to load in Phase 701 Enter amount to load in Phase 702 �DESCRIPTION 701 2 COMMENTS, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION Subtotals By Cash Flow Catenory Ordinary Improvements ORD $217 500 Extraordinary Improvements OEX $14 087 Offsite Improvements OFF $0 Capital Contributions CAP $0 Fees FEE ;1 785 HOA Fees and Maint. HOA $0 Recreation & Amenities REC $255 609 TOTAL $488 881 Subtotals By Type C=Coot. E=Est., A=Allow Dedication Field Cond CONTRACTED SUBTOTAL $0 ESTIMATED SUBTOTAL $0 ALLOWANCE SUBTOTAL $0 DEDICATION SUBTOTAL $0 FIELD COND SUBTOTAL $700 DEDICATION COST/ LOT $0 NOT ALL TYPE ITEMS FILLED IN TOTAL C+E+A 1 $0 NOTES: 1. SUMMARY ACCOUNT (Do not enter a budget in this sect). THIS ACCOUNT SUBTOTALS ACCOUNTS WITHIN THE GROUP. ENTER BUDGET AMOUNTS IN THE ACCOUNTS BELOW THIS SUMMARY ACCOUNT BUT WITHIN THE SAME GROUP OF ACCOUNT NUMBERS. 2. BUDGET REFUNDS FOR DIRECT TBI CONNECTIONS ONLY, DO NOT BUDGET TAX REFUNDS OR USAGE REBATES, ETC. SET UP A DEPOSIT ACCT & TWO RECEIVABLE ACCOUNTS - SEE EXAMPLE BELOW. CALL LAND DEVELOPMENT - DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION. EXAMPLE: WATERMAIN EXTENSION - TOTAL INITIAL DEPOSIT $100,000, DIRECT CONNECTION REBATE 40 LOTS Q $1000/LOT: Budget Acct 2435 - Water Deposit = $60,000, ACCT 2445 - Water Deposit Refundable = $40,000, ACCT 2446 - Water Deposit Reimburse =-($40,000). Code Check Request to Accts. - 2435 & 2445, REFUNDS WILL BE CREDITED TO ACCT 2446. ALL CHECK REQUESTS MUST HAVE A FULL EXPLANATION OF ALL REFUNDS & REBATES. 3. IMPROVEMENT PIPEWORK REPAIRS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS (ie: laterals, water boxes, etc) DUE TO DAMAGE BY HOUSE SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE CHARGED TO JOB OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION REPAIR ACCT (CC 4903) - Repair Improvement Pipework. 4. IMPROVEMENT CURB, APRON AND PUBLIC SIDEWALK REPAIRS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS DUE TO DAMAGE BY HOUSE SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE CHARGED TO JOB OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION REPAIR ACCT (CC 4904) - Repairs Curb, Apron, and Public Sidewalk. 5. BUDGET CASH BONDS BY SETTING UP A DEPOSIT ACCT & A RECEIVABLE ACCTS. EXAMPLE: CASH BOND = $100,000, BUDGET ACCT 2921 Cash Bond = $100,000, ACCT 2921 - Cash Bond Reimburse =-($100,000). 6. TOTAL FOR ALL UNALLOCATED & ALLOCATED PREP FOR DEDICATION ACCOUNTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED $1200/LOT, AVERAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SHOULD BE LESS THAN $800/LOT. This document represents proprietary information and is not to be reproduced without the expressed written approval of Toll Bros., Inc. Page 8 of 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i A Traffic Impact Analysis of TWIN LAKES A Proposed Residential Development In Fredrick County, Virginia Prepared for: Loggia Development Corporation Callow Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning & Design Consultants F t 1 1 1 1 i 1 I i 1 FINAL TRAFFIC HvIPACT ANALYSIS FOR TWIN LAKES prepared for LOGGIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1700 Diagonal Road Suite 200 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 prepared by CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 12007 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite 160 Reston, Virginia 22091 March 6, 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF FIGURES ............................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................. iv INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................... 2 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ................................... 5 EXISTING ZONING SCENARIO ................................... 8 Trip Generation ........................................... 8 Trip Distribution .......................................... 8 Trip Assignment .......................................... 8 Traffic Impacts ........................................... 11 PROPOSED ZONING SCENARIO ................................. 13 Trip Generation ........................................... 13 Trip Distribution .......................................... 14 Trip Assignment .......................................... 14 Traffic Impacts ........................................... 14 CONCLUSIONS ................................................ 17 APPENDIX ..................................................... ii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1. Site Map 2. Existing Conditions 3. Background 1997 Conditions 4. Trip Distribution 5. Build 1997 Volumes - Existing Zoning 6. Level of Service & Lane Geometry - Existing Zoning 7. Build 1997 Volumes - Proposed Zoning 8. Level of Service & Lane Geometry - Proposed Zoning iii Paige No. 3 4 7 9 10 12 15 16 LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1. Twin Lakes Trip Generation - Existing Zoning 2. Twin Lakes Trip Generation - Proposed Zoning iv Page No. 0 13 INTRODUCTION The Twin Lakes development is located on approximately 400 acres in Frederick County, Virginia. The site is located south of Route 7 in the eastern part of the county. The site is adjacent to Senseny Road to the south and Openquon Creek to the east. The Twin Lakes development plan calls for rezoning of the site to allow for increased residential dwelling units, an elementary school site and small commercial retail site. ' The analysis of traffic impacts, performed by Callow Associates, utilizes projections of traffic volumes for the year 1997. The traffic impacts of the development on the ' surrounding roadways are measured through the following sequence of activities. 1. Establishing the existing base condition traffic volumes through field count 1 surveys. 2. Forecasting future traffic volumes by applying growth factors to the base conditions and adding the expected traffic volumes associated with the Twin Lakes development, under the existing and proposed zoning. 3. Analyzing the future conditions with standard capacity analysis methods and recommending mitigation measures, if any, to accommodate Twin Lakes ' development traffic. The purpose of this report is to document these analytical steps and to present conclusions tand recommendations. it it 1 1 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is currently isolated from any major collector roadway. Route 7 is located approximately 1,400 feet to the north. Route 657 (Senseny Road) is adjacent to the southern portion of the site. Route 7 is the major east -west link between the Winchester area and Leesburg. Route 7 also provides direct access to I-81. Route 657 is currently a local collector serving as a parallel route for the local area between Route 7 and Route 50 in the eastern part of the county. The existing road network is also shown on Figure 1. Peak hour traffic counts were taken during February 1990 at the following locations: o Route 657 (Senseny Road) and Morning Glory Drive (Road C) o Route 7, east of Route 659 These traffic volumes for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours reflecting existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. Peak hour as well as ADT volumes are shown. ADT was produced from counts conducted by VDOT for Route 7 and Frederick County for Sensemy Road. The appendix contains the traffic count summary sheets for the existing conditions. Traffic operations for existing conditions at the intersection of Route 657 and Morning Glory Drive were analyzed, based upon existing counts, traffic control devices and roadway geometries. The result of this analysis provided level of service (LOS). Briefly, level of services ranges from 'A' - free flow condition to 'F' - forced flow conditions. The appendix contains detailed descriptions of these levels taken from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity analysis was performed at the intersection for A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. Figure 2 also shows the lane geometry and level of service results for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 3 I [i LEGEND: Route 7 -- - Site - Road River AM(PM) - Peak Hour Volumes (XXXX) - ADT + `�•�� I`♦ 1 I 1 � 1 / . 1 1 1 1 ♦• 1 0� 1 00� 1 I�� 1 % . / / 1 I A(A) 1 CL o ' 1 (A)A Unsignalized ., `` 13(10) 32(57) Senseny Road (3,813) (4)12 RTE,. 657 (78)55 N CALLOW Figure 2. Disting Conditions ASSOCIATES INC. 1 The following is a summary of the existing capacity analysis results: The intersection of Route 657 and Morning Glory Drive is currently unsignalized. The intersection operates at level of service 'A' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The relatively light traffic on Route 657 is due to the rural nature of the area. ' BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Due to the fact that the build -out date for the Twin Lakes development is not far into the ' future, the local road network will mainly remain unchanged from the existing network. The Frederick County six -year road improvement plan calls for improvements of Route 657 from the Winchester city line to Clark County. The county is also proposing an eastern bypass loop (Route 37) through this area of the county. There is no specific time frame or corridor established for this roadway and it was not assumed for this study. Route 37 is proposed as a four lane divided roadway, connecting the existing Route 37 at ' I-81 north and south of the city of Winchester. ' Access for the Twin Lakes development is being proposed via three intersections. The first access roadway would be proposed from the site northward to Route 7. A proposed iat -grade intersection is proposed at Route 7. It is not known at this time however, how this roadway will function at the time Route 37 is built. The second and third access points are located at the south end of the property. Access is being proposed directly onto Route 657 (Senseny Road), one from the Twin Lakes development and the other through ' inter -parcel access from the AppleRidge development. The AppleRidge development is ' located adjacent to the Twin Lakes development to the east. The existing counts were increased at a rate of 6.0 percent per year. This percent growth was established from Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) counts conducted between 1986 and 1988 along Route 7 in the vicinity of the site. These background volumes represent conditions in 1997, without the development of the Twin Lakes site. 5 ' Figure 3 shows the expected background traffic, for study year 1997, on the access locations as shown in the existing conditions analysis. Peak hour and ADT volumes are shown. Capacity analysis was performed at the intersection for A.M. and P.M. peak hour ' conditions. Figure 3 also shows the lane geometry and level of service results for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. 11 The following is a summary of the background only capacity analysis results: The intersection of Route 657 and Morning Glory Drive would operate at level of service 'A' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, unsignalized. C7 1 i �J 11 1 LEGEND: Route 7 (23 044 - Site Road y` River AM(PM) - peak Hour Volumes 1 1 � 1 � I 1 , I � I ` 1 � 1 r: � 1 P I 1 0 1 A(A) 1i Unsignalized vN 20(15) 48(86) Senseny Road �N CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. (5,720) (6)18.�%� RTE.657 (117)83 Figure 3. Background 1997 Conditions 11 EXISTING ZONING SCENARIO Trip Generation According to the existing zoning, the Twin Lakes development is permitted to construct up to 80 residential dwelling units. The traffic generated by the development was estimated by using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition (1987). Table 1 gives the resulting trips generated by the Twin Lakes development for the A.M. and P.M. peak periods, under the existing zoning. Table 1 TWIN LAKES TRIP GENERATION (Existing Zoning) Peak Hour Vehicle Trips A.M. P.M. Land Use Amount In Out In Out ADT Single Family Detached 80 DU 18 48 56 33 800 Trip Distribution The distribution of trips from the Twin Lakes property is shown on Figure 4. The percentages are based upon a logical split, considering the existing pattern of traffic flow and the regional highway system. Specifically, a greater percentage of traffic will be destined to Route 7 verses the access points onto Route 657. Trip Assignment ' The existing zoning generated traffic from the Twin Lakes development was then assigned to the proposed road network along with the total background traffic discussed earlier. This assignment has been conducted as a base comparison of the existing land use to the proposed land use. Therefore the proposed road network has been assumed for this ' scenario. This total, comprises the Existing Zoning scenario assignment, as shown on ' Figure 5. Peak hour as well as ADT are shown. 8 1 1 1 l r-- LEGEND: Rc�utc 7 24% -- - Site 3� Road - River '• oft oft y%l 1 , 1 / . 1 , 1 , ♦I 1� k X r ♦� 'I on t" I Mw � � 1 / M �U / a Senseny Road 0 RTE.657 - 22 % I8 % �N\ CALLOW Figure 4. Trip Distribution ASSOCIATES INC. 1.1 n �I I LEGEND : Route 7 Sitc (23,236) Ar" S700240 (686)1,093 6(20) ' ) Road (13)4 T (23,332) River AM(PM) - Peak Hour Volumes � N (XXXX) - ADT 1 o - Development Only +,1 1 � 1 � ° 1 / ,.00 %�• I aft 00 I �♦ s - 1 I , I 1 v / 1 0 j A 0 1 U cn 0 1 cl 0 v �i+" vi(_ Y 00 � �-- (5,896) ��--67(]Ol) 5 (0) Senseny Road (10)3.>1 (5,816) (8)19..•'1 (5,864) RTE.657 (126)101 (120)87 --� N Figure 5. Build 1997 Volumes - Existing Zoning CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. -1 10 1 LF� Traffic Impacts Callow Associates performed capacity analysis the three site access locations as follows: o Route 7 and Road A o Route 657 and Road C o Route 657 and Road D The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of existing zoning plus background traffic for the year 1997. The resulting level of service and lane geometry are shown on Figure 6. I The following narrative describes level of service conditions that would be observed for this analysis and assuming the lane geometry shown in Figure 6 at each intersection The lane geometry reflects minimum lane requirements for acceptable conditions. o Route 7 and Road A will operate at level of service `D'or better in both the A.M. P.M. peak hours, unsignlaized. Level ' of service `D' is unacceptable, according to VDOT standards for Frederick County. It is however acceptable according to the Federal Transportation Research Board's 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). o Route 657 and Road C will operate at level of service `A' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, unsignalized. o Route 657 and Road D will operate at level of service `A' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, unsignalized. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in the Appendix. 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 LEGEND: Route7 _ C(A) _— - Site (A)A �— - Road River AM(PM) - Level of Service i 1 •� I 1 � 1 I • 1 NOTE: All Intersections Unsignalized 1 r 1 I. 1 I �• I 1 _---"� Road P I �♦ 1. 1 IJ I I r I• I vo � b ; � �o Q 1 1 .. Q Y Y A(A)_. Y y v A(A) (A)A 4 (A)A 4 CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. Senseny Road R7 Figure 6. Level of Service & Lane Geometry - Existing Zoning 12 Ll I 1 j 1 1 1 PROPOSED ZONING SCENARIO Trip Generation The Twin Lakes development is proposing to construct 690 single family dwelling units, 427 townhouse dwelling units and 35,000 square feet of retail uses. The traffic generated by the development was estimated by using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition (1987). Table 2 gives the resulting trips generated by the Twin Lakes development for the A.M. and P.M. peak periods, under the proposed zoning. Table 2 TWIN LAKES TRIP GENERATION (Proposed Zoning) Peak Hour Vehicle Trips A.M. P.M. .Land Use Amount In Out In Out ADT SF DETACHED 201 DU 41 111 132 78 2,010 SF DETACHED 78 DU 17 47 54 32 780 TOWNHOUSE 215 DU 16 82 80 39 1,226 SF DETACHED 53 DU 12 33 38 22 530 SF DETACHED 53 DU 12 33 38 22 530 SF DETACHED 123 DU 26 71 83 49 1,230 SF DETACHED 28 DU 7 18 21 12 280 SF DETACHED 52 DU 12 32 37 22 520 SF DETACHED 58 DU 13 36 41 24 580 TOWNHOUSE 89 DU 8 41 38 19 584 SF DETACHED 44 DU 10 28 32 19 440 TOWNHOUSE 55 DU 5 28 25 13 390 TOWNHOUSE 68 DU 6 33 30 15 466 RETAIL 35,000 SF 65 28 177 184 3,755 TOTAL 252 622 826 549 13,322 13 1 Trip Distribution The distribution of trips from the Twin Lakes property is shown on Figure 4, in the existing zoning section. The same assumptions for the proposed zoning trip distribution r was assumed as for the existing zoning traffic flow. Refer to the previous section on trip distribution in the Existing Zoning section of the report. Trip Assignment The proposed zoning generated traffic from the Twin Lakes development was then assigned to the road network along with the total background traffic discussed earlier. Access to the water treatment plant has been assumed to occur along the development access road to Route 7. Minimal peak hour traffic from the plant has been included in the peak hour traffic assignment. This total, comprises the 'Proposed Zoning" scenario assignment, as shown on Figure 7. Peak hour volumes as well as ADT are shown. Traffic Impacts Callow Associates performed capacity analysis the three site access locations as follows: o Route 7 and Road A o Route 657 and Road C o Route 657 and Road D The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of proposed zoning plus background traffic for the year 1997. The resulting level of service and lane geometry are shown on Figure 8. The lane geometry reflects minimum lane requirements for acceptable conditions. The following narrative describes level of service conditions that would be observed for this analysis and assuming the lane geometry shown in Figure 8 at each intersection: 1 14 u P n L G [7 I.R(;F'ND : Route MM - Site � - Road River AM(PM) - Peak Hour Volumes (2G 1 °8) (686)1,093 (200)68 (XXXX) - ADT 1 ♦ o —*.57o(t 240 ■� 91(297) ) I1� (27 v M a Development Only ; 1 1 � 1 I. 1 1 0 j 1 �l I \I � / / 1 � 0 1 1 r I M 1 P 1 J Q 1 0 / o U lea N� ) (8�. 40(81) (8,651) Y � �_.90(121)253) JL/ \ --*--73(168) Senseny Road (149)45 �,.�/ (7,585) (39)28 (8,118) RTE. 657 (156)111 (172)145 �-�— CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. Figure 7. Build 1997 Volumes - Proposed Zoning 15 IJ it I C 1 LE'sGEND : 1�01jle 7 Signalized A -- - Site �'�' (B) - Road (�)B r River a] AM(PM) - Level of Service , , , , , , , 1 1 I 1 ,I. 1 / 1 / I I' 1 -------------- % '1 T1 tv 0 Y �t A(A) % �A(A) (A)A 4 (A)A 4 LN, CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. 8*4_____00 Senseny Road RTE. 657 Figure 8. Level of Service & Lane Geometry - Proposed Zoning 16 o Route 7 and Road A will operate at level of service `B' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, signalized. o Route 657 and Road C will operate at level of service `A' for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, unsignalized. o Route 657 and Road D will operate at level of service `B' or better for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, unsignalized. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in the Appendix. CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the Twin Lakes development are manageable. The Twin Lakes development would not adversely effect traffic in the study area. The three development access intersections would all operate at acceptable levels of service for the proposed zoning scenario with the following improvements. The intersection of Route 7 and Road A will require signalization with turn lanes. The intersection of Route 657 and Road C and the intersection of Route 657 and Road D will require only access design improvements. With these improvements the total future traffic flow analyzed, including that generated by Twin Lakes development, would operate at acceptable conditions. 17 �J 1 fl 1 E APPENDIX 11 INTFRSFCTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS and LEVEL OF SERVICE The most current analysis methodologies used for evaluating the capacity of intersections were developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other members of the transportation profession. This methodology is presented in TRB Special Report Number 209, The t985 Hi�hway Capacity Manual (HCM). Computerized methods for conducting these analyses were developed by FHWA; and are the methods used in this report. The following brief explanations of the methodologies are adapted from the HCM. UNSIGNALIZI D INTFRSFCTIONS At an unsignalized intersection the major street has continuous right of way while the side street is controlled by a Stop or Yield sign. In operation, vehicles exiting the side street and crossing or turning into the main street flow must wait for "acceptable gaps" in the main street flow. The same is true of left - turning traffic from the main street that must cross the opposing flow. The analysis takes into account the probability of a gap in the main street traffic. The probability and number of acceptable gaps, is lower in higher volume flows. The acceptability of a gap is modified by physical factors (sight distance, turning radius, etc.) and by characteristics of the traffic flow (percentage 1 trucks, buses, etc.). In the analyses in this report, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional 1 information, was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor - trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the 1 intersection as a whole. The capacity of a movement is calculated (in terms of vehicles per hour - VPH) and then compared with the demand. The difference is the "reserve capacity." The level of service is then based on the amount of reserve capacity left over: 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The operation (and therefore the capacity) of a signalized intersection is complicated by the fact that the ' signal is allocating time between conflicting traffic movements - movements that must use the same physical space. Theanalysis, therefore, must not only took at the physical geometry of the intersection, but the signal timing aspects as well. jIn the analysis of signalized intersections, two terms are important: volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and; average stopped delay (seconds per vehicle). The theoretical capacity is based on the physical geometry, the available green time (often expressed as G/C), and the traffic mix (e.g. trucks use more capacity than cars). The average stopped delay may be calculated from the v/c ratio, cycle length, quality of progression on the arterial and available green time on each approach. Calculations of both capacity and delay are based on empirical data, therefore some situations may not fit the theoretical formulas. For example in signal systems ' with good progression, it is often possible to show a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (demand exceeds capacity), but at the same time, correctly calculate delay values in the acceptable 'C' or 'D' range. In this report all default values recommended by the HCM are used unless other specific information is ' available (percentage of trucks, pedestrians, etc.). Existing signal timings are observed and used whenever possible. When future signals are being evaluated, an "optimal" signal timing is calculated based on projected volumes. ' The level of service is based on the calculated average delay per vehicle for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Based on extensive research studies, the maximum delay acceptable by the average 1 driver is 60 seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection. This is defined as the upper limit on the possible range of delay/level of service criteria. The following criteria describe the full range of level of service: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level. of Stopped Delay Service per Vehicle (sect A B 5.1 to 15.0 ' C 15 1 to 25.0 25 1 to 40,0 D ' E 40.1 to 60.0 - F u LJ n u [11 C� I LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Description A Level of Service A describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 5.0 sec per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Level of Service B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 sec per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Level of Service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Level of Service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Level of Service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This level is the theoretical maximum capacity of the intersection. F Level of Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Intersection: RME 657 1 MORNK GLORY DR location : YINLFE5IER Cou^ted or PF Date : 2-13-90 Day: TUES Inout by ::r Weather : DRY -------------------------••-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-------4----------- I TRr==iC "rr; ' : TRAffiC ROC NO'r.' 'RAFfIC FROM6E:' `RNfFIC FRS?! EP:T ! ' on: on: M--ORNi4G GLORY on: ROUTE 657 on: ROUTE 651 1 TOTAL I ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ I MIS, ! Time Pe,.oa LEiT THR-: RiGnT T27AL Lc=T Th;J R:':'w' T`LFT TAR: R'Gm' TOTAL LEFT THRU KIGHT TOTAL I E & Y : Period ------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- AM I I I AM 6:38-6:45 ; 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 8 12 8 12 8 6 1 7 1 21 1 6:38-6:45 6:45-17:881 a 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 2 13 8 15 8 7 2 91 2816:45-7:88 7:00-7:15 ! 8 8 8 8 1 8 3 4 3 14 8 17 8 8 4 12 1 33 1 7:88-7:15 7:15-7:38 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 4 12 8 16 8 18 3 13 1 31 1 7:15-7:38 '7:38-7:451 8 8 8 6 8 8 2 2 3 16 8 13 8 6 4 181 3117:38-7:45 7:45-8:881 8 8 8 8 1 8 4 5 2 13 8 15 8 8 2 101 3817:45-8:88 8:02-8:15 I @ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 12 6 12 8 7 8 7! ;9 18:08-8:15 3:IS-8:3a 1 8 8 8 8 a. 0 4 4 1 9 8 18 8 8 4 12 1 26 1 8:15-8:38 ----------- +---------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-------+---------- 6:38-7:3@ ; 2 a @ 8 1 8 141 12 9 cii a 66 8 31 18 41 1 113 i 6:38-7:38 5:45-7:451 6 8 6 a 1 8 11 12 12 55 6 67 8 31 13 441 123 1 6:45-7:45 7:6i-2:66 6 a 'r, 2 a Is 5` e% @ 32 13 45 ! 1K 1 7:82-8:8Q 7::5-6::5 I 0 8 8 8 1 8 8 9 9 53 8 62 8 31 9 48 1 111 ! 7:15-8:15 6 8 8 0 1 0 10 11 6 59 6 56 8 29 18 39 I 186 1 7:38-8:36 ! I A.C. PEAK `+OUR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7:88- m i 8 8 8 8 2 8 11 13 12 55 8 67 8 32 13 45 1 125 1 7:88-6:80 I c -F = NA N7 = 8.65 PHF = 0.88 FHF -- 8.87 1 1 F'h i I I Pp. 4:38-4:451 8 8 8 8 8 a 2 2 8 16 8 16 8 12 2 141 3214:38-4:45 1 4:45-5:8a 1 8 8 8 8 i 8 s 4 1 19 8 28 8 15 1 16 1 48 1 4:45-5:82 S:aB-S:IS 1 @ 8 a 8 8 8 4 4 2 21 8 23 8 16 3 19 1 46 ! 5:88-5:15 5:15-5:3a i 8 8 8 8 8 @ a a 1 22 a 23 @ 14 4 18 ! Al 1 5::5-5:38 1 5:3e-5:45 8 8 8 8 1 8 1 2 8 14 8 14 8 11 1 12 i 28 1 5:38--5:45 !:45-6:6e ; 8 8 @ 8 8 8 2 2 8 16 a '= 8 12 1 13 ! 31 1 5:45-6:88 o:PB-a:i51 8 8 8 8 8 @ 1 i 1 18 8 19 8 18 2 12 : 3216:88-6:15 G:♦J-v:J@ : 8 6 8 B 8 2 1 1 Q 14 8 :4 8 8 1 9 1 24 ! 6:15-6:38 I 4:38-5:3-1 i 8 8 8 8 1 8 9 18 4 78 8 82 8 57 10 67 1 153 1 40-5:38 4:45-5:451 6 8 8 8 2 8 8 18 4 76 6 88 8 56 9 651 15514:45-5:45 5:88-6:881 8 8 8 8 1 8 7 S 3 73 8 76 6 53 9 621 14615:88-6:88 5:15-6:151 8 8 8 8 1 8 4 5 2 78 6 72 6 47 8 551 132 1 5:15-6:15 5:31-6:311 8 8 8 8 1 8 5 6 1 62 8 63 8 41 5 461 11515:38-6:30 1 1 1 P.". PEAK HOUR I I 1 4:38-5:38 1 8 8 8 8 1 8 9 18 4 78 8 82 8 57 18 67 1 159 1 4:38-5:38 FHF = NA PHF = 8.63 P14 = 0.89 PHF = 8.88 IYEEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT MINT - SUMMARY CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ' File Nave : 5378 Job Number: 5378 I-tersectiv: rcute 7 d 659 Location : WINCHESTER Taunted 5y JJP b 11T Date : 2-13-98 Day: ' Input by JJP Weather DRY ---------+--------------- --- ---------- - _+-------+---------_ i TRAFFIC FROM SGJTH TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM WEST TRAFFIC FROM EAST I 1 on: ROUTE 659 on: on: ROUTE 7 on: RATE 7 1 TOTAL I Tice 1 1 HIS, I Time Period 1 LEFT THRU R:GHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I E 10 1 Period AM I I I AM 608-6:451 2 6 3 5 1 8 8 8 8 138 2 132 2 39 8 411 178 1 6:38-6:455 6:45 7:18 1 2 6 4 6 8 8 8 8 1 152 2 154 2 53 8 55 1 215 1 6:45-7:N 1 7:88-7:151 1 8 3 4 8 1 1 8 8 145 1 146 1 48 8 491 199 1 7:86-7:15 7:15-7:381 2 6 13 15 8 6 8 6 8 176 4 181 1 81 8 821 277 1 7:15-7:38 7:38-7:45I 2 8 3 5 8 8 8 8 8 181 3 184 2 31 8 1631 25217:38-7:45 h45-8:88 1 4 8 5 9 8 8 1 8 8 184 2 186 2 IK 8 187 '. 382 1 7:45-6:88 ' 8:88-8:151 1 8 3 4 8 8 8 8 8 162 2 164 8 67 6 871 25518:8E-8:15 8:15-8:381 1 8 5 6 8 8 8 1 6 119 8 119 2 87 8 891 214 1 8:15-8:38 6:38-7:38 I 7 1 23 38 8 8 8 8 1 683 9 612 6 221 8 227 1 869 1 6:38 7:38 6:45-1:451 7 8 23 38 8 1 8 8 8 654 16 664 6 283 6 2891 983 1 6:45-7:45 7:68-8:81 i 9 8 24 33 8 8 8 8 1 686 18 696 6 335 8 341 1 1979 1 7:88-6:88 7:15-8:151 9 8 24 33 8 8 8 8 8 783 11 714 5 374 8 3791 1126 1 7: IF8: 15 7:384:381 8 1 16 24 8 1 8 1 8 646 7 6N 6 3N 8 3861 1863 1 7:3e-6:36 A.M. PEAK HOUR 7:15-8:151 9 8 24 33 8 1 8 8 1 783 11 714 5 374 8 3791 112617:15-8:15 PHF = 1.55 PI PIF I F = HA 8.96 PHF = 8.89 1 1 i PM i t I i I PM ' 4:38-4:451 2 8 2 4 6 8 8 8 8 91 2 93 3 153 8 1561 253 1 4:38-4:45 4:45-5:881 3 8 2 5 8 8 8 8 8 N 1 88 6 148 8 1461 231 1 4:45-5:86 S:88-5:151 1 8 8 1 8 / 8 1 8 149 7 I56 1 286 1 2171 36415:88-5:15 ' 5:15 �:38 1 4 8 3 7 8 1 1 8 6 123 5 126 9 22E 8 231 1 366 1 5:15-5:38 5:38-5:45 1 1 8 4 5- 8 8 8 8 8 162 2 184 6 298 8 286 1 315 1 5:38-5:45 5:4%:N 1 3 6 2 5 8 1 8 8 8 73 2 75 5 176 8 181 1 261 1 5:45-6:88 6:88-6:151 1 8 2 3 8 8 1 1 6 79 8 79 7 153 8 1681 24216:88-6:15 6:15-6:38 ! 2 8 2 4 8 8 1 8 8 81 2 83 5 144 8 149 1 236 1 6:1%:38 4:36-5:381 18 6 7 17 8 8 8 8 8 443 14 457 19 721 1 7481 121414:38-5:36 4:45-5:451 9 8 9 18 8 1 8 8 8 454 14 468 22 768 8 7981 1276 1 4:45-5:45 5:88-6:881 9 8 9 18 8 8 8 8 8 447 16 463 21 N4 8 8251 138615:88-6:N ' 5:1%:151 9 8 it 28 8 1 8 1 8 377 9 386 27 751 8 7781 1184 1 5:15-6:15 508-608 1 7 8 18 17 8 1 6 8 6 335 6 341 23 673 8 6% 1 I 1854 1 5:38-6:38 1 ' I P.M. M_-�__------- ---- _-_ 5:88-6:N 1 9 8 9 18 1 1 8 1 8 447 16 463 21 984 8 0 1 13M 1 5:88-6:N ' PHF z 8.64 PHF NA PHF = 8.74 PNF z 8.89 ' •r t I C Vr• k T Cc'1: VEk.:._E r:c�; � �;;E E+ ,�,• - !: VPCN S: .� ' t T CA�.GW ASSCC:A:ES. INC. 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1185 HCM: UNSIGNyALIZED IyyNTERLSECTIONS page-1 •r •r � i m .3: a• :�. �a :r .r q.:r :i.. .i• r •r h � �r m m q.:r �+ .�.:�a :r :r .r m .T .T :.a :�..�.:T .ya j a', :� :..:� :�..7a :� ;p. ip. :�, :p. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... i AREA POPULATION....... ............. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Morning Glory Drive NAME OF THE ANALYST... ............... mjh DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/14/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am peak: hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 12 0 -- 2 + THRU 55 32 -- 0 RIGHT 0 13 -- 11 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 -- i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________________ Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ EASTBOUND 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT ___________ CRITICAL GAP ____________ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 8.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _________________________ ___________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STR ET...... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Morning Glory Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/14/90 ; am peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ----------------------------------------------------------------- FOTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT C 815 BOB RIGHT 12 998 998 MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 13 1000 1000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION BOB . 9b_ > 949 998 . 100t z NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Morning Glory Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/14/90 ; am peaty: hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 --Z- 8;, > A .>A 986 > A-. 987 A. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ` IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERA8E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Morning Glory Drive NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. mjh DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/14/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. pm peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 ' INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ________________ EB LEFT 4 THRU 78 RIGHT 0 NUMBER OF LANES _______________ BB 1 _______________________________________________ WB NB SB ____ 0 ____ -- ____ 1 57 -- 0 10 -- 9 ____________________ WB NB SB 1 ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-'.' PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT ___________ CRITICAL GAP ____________ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS MINOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Morning Glory Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/14/90 ; pm peak hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 5.00 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE page-:�_* POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) r_ = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 776 774 > 774 969 > 958 RIGHT 10 997 997 > 997 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 4 1000 1000 1000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Route 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... Morning Glory Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/14/90 ; pm peak•. hour OTHER INFORMATION.... existing 1990 £.. 996 ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 7 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD A NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -----•---------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------- EB WB NB SR LEFT 8 6 12 -- THRU 1093 570 0 -- RIGHT 4 18 17 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 1 -- 0� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _________________________________________________________________ Page-2 N� PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' N� _______ __________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N N� SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- - VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ 0� % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES N� ----------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 w� NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRITICAL GAPS ~� _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP N� -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ N� MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 N� MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 N� MINOR LEFTS U� =� , NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 7 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD A N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING �� CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SEIRVICE ----------------------------------------- POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) -------—P--------M------ — is40BUI&Ii =[Ar Fa ----------------------c-- SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcph) c = c — v LOS —SHR SH ------- ------------ --- NB LEFT 13 75 74 > 74 . > 152 120 RIGHT 19 592 592 > 592 MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 7 294 294 294 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 7 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD A DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — EXISTING ZONING 61 E >D 574 A 297 C 19485 UNyy SyIGNy AyLIZED IyNTERSECTIIOyNSy Page-1 yHCM: yy yWW y y l y,�yy yy y y y..yy yy b yy `yy yy yy yy.�.yy :�' ;'n T sr %ry :iC !� AY .n T '� %!� iF ,� � � "f 1� .� ?� � ;iC %n M T ^�..�. �' :X id: T � T ?• �'K :�C %P !T m T T T T M %P � %P * T T T � %K h %t• M �* T %1r fi 'P T r 'A ;� r .y.:� ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 0 ' PEAK HOUR FACTOR i ..................... ' AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 7 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD A NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK. OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- ' INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST ' CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SS 1 LEFT 8 20 8 THRU 666 1240 0 -- RIGHT 13 18 12 -- __- ' NUMBER OF LANES ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB --------------------- SB LANES 2 2 1 ------- -- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS ( f 't ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' --0.00 90 ----------90 --- EASTBOUND --------20 -------- -------N--------- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- - VEHICLE COMPOSITION -------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- i) 0 --------- 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND C) �.� 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRITICAL GAPS ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE-- ------ ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------- ----------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 7 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD A ' DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 PM PEAK: OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --Fade__ ------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 9 75 7•=� > 7' 64 E 159 137 ;>D R I (BHT 13 745 745 745 > 7 2 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 22 491 491 491 469 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 7 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD A DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; FM PEAK: OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM : UNS I GNAL I ZED _I NTERSECT I ONS Page-1 *•*?X:X;�% X?Xm X%X�C" X d� X K n%X*�K %X:� X K%X:K%+:k�:� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD D NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — EXISTING ZONING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 3 18 -- 4 THRU 101 67 -- 0 RIGHT 74 1 -- 9 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EH WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES i 1 -- 1 ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT ________________ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ` _________________ EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- _-- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT ___________ CRITICAL GAP ____________ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -CIF -SERVICE --_----Fag` - POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 4 749 747 RIGHT 10 997 997 MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 3 1000 1000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 747 904 889 `• 997 1000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 74•3 > A :> A 987 > A 997 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM : UNS I GNAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS Page—! *:9t�K��r.X�>K�K:k:'k�K%rr���>uK:%•r�%XX k�:�:i�.,��X#�K�7K%K`k*�%;c%kl'� ��".����-'k�k%.;t:k���%K:K�?K;�.�.:.�;#.�>kAe:�C:<>ti:�..>r IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... i AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD D NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK. OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — EXISTING ZONING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EH WB NB SB LEFT 10 128 -- 3 THRU 126 101 -- 0 RIGHT 74 4 -- 6 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------- EB WB NB ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- SB 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ N� PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' N� ^� EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 2{) N w� NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- — SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES N� N� EASTBOUND ----------- ------------- 0 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 m� NORTHBOUND --- --- --- 0� SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL N� (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 N� MAJOR LEFTS EB 5~00 5.00 0.00 5.00 B� MINOR LEFTS o� SB 8.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 N� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------- NAME OF THE _----------- ______________________________________________ EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — EXISTING ZONING ` CAPACITY ANI] LEVEL -OF -SERVICE -�=age--.' POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SEA LEFT 3 687 682 > 682 > 679 > A 862 > 852 >A RIGHT 7 992 992 > 992 > 985 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 11 999 999 999 988 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 N� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 ` N� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD C NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. HARTLAND N� DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING ' N� INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------ _---- _--- _____________________________--_______-_________ ~~ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST N� CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN N� TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- N� EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 19 128 -- 8 THRU 87 50 -- 0 RIGHT 74 21 -- 18 NUMBER OF LANES N� _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 -- ------- 1 ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT ________________ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION . AND RV'S ___________ _____________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ------------------------------------------- __________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT ___________ CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ____________ SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE r'ag�__ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SEA LEFT 9 754 744 RIGHT 20 997 997 MAJOR STREET EEC LEFT 21 1000 i000 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 744 . > 90:1 874 > 997 . 1000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... /15/90 : AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING 977 > A 979 A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* ` IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD C NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. PM PEAK . OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 8 128 -- 5 THRU 120 90 -- 0 RIGHT 74 21 -- 15 NUMBER OF LANES _______________ _______________ EB ____ WB ------- I 1 NB SB _______ _______ -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (Pt) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND i) 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES (Table 10-2) -------------- MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 MINOR LEFTS ------------------------------------- ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------- ----------- ------------ 5. 50 0.00 5. 5(-_) 5.00 0.00 5.00 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; FM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING N� CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-3 N� POTEN- FLOW- TIAL ACTUAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS w� p ------- -------- M --------- ------------ SH R SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET -- SB LEFT 6 696 692 > 692 > 687 > A > 897 > 875 >A N� |� RIGHT 17 994 994 > 994 > 978 > A MAJOR STREET N� EB LEFT 9 998 998 998 990 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� N� ---- ------- ---------- ------------- ----------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK N� v� OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - EXISTING ZONING ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM : UN S I GNAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS page-1 ?K�*:K%X�#��'X�X�%i�'X%X:X�:i��XA��k�K;x:X�X��K�%X%X�C�K n%��X����X%i�-��K�X�T%�?X:�%X:d��X�%X%X�:X•'��:��:X:��X�:;�TX>X:� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD C NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC --------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 28 128 -- 53 THRU 145 73 -- 0 RIGHT 74 40 -- 27 NUMBER OF LANES --------------- EB WB LANES i 1 NB SB -- 1 ADJUSTMENT _____________________________________________________________________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ FOR RIGHT ________________ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ` EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ___________ _____________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL SAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ________ ADJUSTMENT ___________ CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ____________ SB 5.50 ' 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6~50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CP)PAC I TY AND LEVEL-LF--SEI�V ICE Page--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 58 664 652 652 7: 8 650 RIGHT 30 995 995 > 995 . MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 31 998 998 998 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK: OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED 59V= A A 966 > A 967 A 1985 HCM : UNS I GI`dAL I ZED I NTERSECT I ONS 'page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK.HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD C NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK: OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — PROPOSED INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 39 128 -- 45 THRU 172 168 -- 0 RIGHT 74 81 -- 47 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 -- 1 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( f t ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 -------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- EASTBOUND o 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND � � 3 NORTHBOUND --� --�- -- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ------------------------------------------------------ TABULA, VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL_ GAF ' MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 ' MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.0� i 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED I e CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ ` POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 50 547 532 > 532 > 482 > A > 667 > 566 >A RIGHT 52 882 882 > 882 > 830 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 43 938 938 938 896 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD C DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION...~ TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED (l_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS page-1 %K*�c*���K?X�K*:�:'K%K�%K:�k•%X�X��:k:k:X�c��c�X�X*%X:k�AcXc*�:X����:�K:�:K:�:K�.:X�:%'K:��K;X:�F:X;',c�:X��:#%Ky'%X ��c rk:"F1� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... i AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD D NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — PROPOSED INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 128 -- 62 THRU 111 90 -- 0 RIGHT 74 25 -- 112 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------- EBNB ---— WB----- LANES 1 i -- m� ADJUSTMENT ________________________________________--___________________________ FACTORS Page-2 N� PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ' N� v� EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N m� NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ w� % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES N� EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 0 0 _____________ 0 ^� WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND # 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ - TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP N� N� -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 N� MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00. 0.00 5.00 N� MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...~ ROAD D N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE pa 9 P------------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p --------------- M --------------------- SH R SH ------------ --- ' MINOR STREET SB LEFT 68 670 650 650 582 > A FIGHT 123 992 992 > E336 992 > 644 > 869 :-A ': A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 50 998 998 998 948 A 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---- ------- ---------- -----i ----- --------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED 1 1 1985 UyNS.IGNALYYIZED INTERSECTIONS Page--' yHCM:: y W' {4 %'i�T�%n �%lk ����'r m� ����M?•��m%XT * TPm�%K*•T m+l �%T TTT'IT %n f? � T 1+%�n :� rvt�{.�`. .y. � .�.A ���:�. %�'* : .�` s%b. %h •�%�.az %LLi IDENTIFYING INFORMATION IDENTIFYING --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 ' AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROAD D NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. HARTLAND DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/15/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES — 1997 — PROPOSED INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------ ----- ---- ------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST 1 CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------- ' ---------------------- E-W-NB-- —— —— —— —— LEFT 149 128 -- 55 THRU 156 121 -- 0 RIGHT 74 83 -- 99 NUMBER OF LANES ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB --------------------- LANES ------- m� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ` N� _______ __________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 ZO N N� NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES N� ___________ _____________ EASTBOUND 0 0 _____________ 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ~� NORTHBOUND --- ' --- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ - TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP N� N� -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 N� MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 N� MINOR LEFTS ' SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 N� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~- ---------------- ------------_--------_--_---------_----_-_--_-_---___ MAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED �~ - ' CAPACITY AND ------------------------------------------------------------_ LEVEL-LF-SERVICE Page-' --------.-.--- POTEN- FLOW- TIAL ACTUAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ' p --------------- M --------------------- SH R SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 61 514 456 > 456 > 395 > B > 678 > 509 ::>A RIGHT 109 929 929 > 929 > 820 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 164 981 981 981 817 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rt 657 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROAD D DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/15/90 : PM PEAS. OTHER INFORMATION.... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED 1 ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY U�y M Myy Ayy byy Y REPORT T +� •� •iT T M � T m •'i� +T A'• fi � T T* � � T T !` T �i` � � � 'T %f+ � M � * * � T �+ • •'I !{� T * �� � l•� /P � � %A r T � i` � � T h � i� ^` .j{ � %� i ` •� .i;.:Y !�; :y :�; }4 INTERSECTION..RT 7/ROAD A AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ' ANALYST ....... DATE .......... HARTLAND 2/15/90 TIME.......... AM PEAK; COMMENT...... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED ' ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 91 153 0 T 12.0 L 12.0L 12.0 12.0 TH 1093 570 0 : 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RT 68 0 224 0 . R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 ' RR 21) 0 70 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK::G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( % ) ('/. ) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 WB 0.00 2.00 N 2.00 N is 0 0.90 0 0 0 0.90 i s N 11.3 N 1 i. 3 _ NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 c � N 25.8 _ SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 _ -------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS _ CYCLE LENGTH 69.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ' EB LT TH X NB LT TH X RT X RT X ' PD WB LT X X PD SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD ' GREEN 10.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS ARP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.784 0.435 14.6 B 14.1 B R 0.049 0.725 2.1 A WB L 0.031 0.623 3.8 A 4.4 A T 0.285 0.623 4.5 A NB L R 0.387 0.259 0.290 15.2 C 0.435 9.5 B 12.3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.503 LOS = B 1 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT I NTERSECT I ON .. RT 7/ROAD A AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... HARTLAND DATE .......... 2/15/90 ' TIME.........PM PEAK.' COMMENT....... TWIN LAKES - 1997 - PROPOSED ' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 297 136 0 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 686 1240 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 ' RT 200 0 198 0 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 60 0 60 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------i--- 12.0 ----------------------------------i--t-'--------1--t---------i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ' GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 _ WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 NB 0.00 2.00 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29- 8 = SB 0.00 2 . i_ 0 ' N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 _ 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 74.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH ' RT X RT X PD RD ' WB LT X TH X X X SB LT TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 15.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APR. LOS EB T 0.528 0.405 12.9 B 11.3 B R 0.152 0.676 3.3 A WB L 0.173 0.649 3.9 A 5.6 B T 0.596 0.649 6.0 B NB L 0.369 0.270 16.9 C 12.8 B ' B --------R --------------------- INTERSECTION: ----4 Delay ----- = ------8-7- ---------------------------------- 8.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.531 LOS = B r-. CIIANNING DRIVE TWIN LAKES OVERLOOK