Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-89 Wheatlands Stonewall - Backfile
.A4 �. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT l DG5-�- (Sign ure)- (Name - please print) 1 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box+2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JA. C, gQW-<_ (Signature) (Street Adress) 4 I i :Stteet Adress) (Signature) �AM a,, E, 7 (Name - please print) Sim kc_u s C'�A (Post Office`and Zip) LhTW>5i284 (Name - please print) 6o (Post Of ice and Zip) (Name --please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) - please print) (Signature) (Name Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Post - please print) (Signature) (Name Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Post - please print) (Signature) (Name Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Post (return to; Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------- 7-------------- ------------------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �E/TH (Signatur (Name - please print) c" ry CIA (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Si ature) ,q8ga 66,j.-S I - a (Street Adress) (Signature) �f4 176 (S eet Adress) l l� F - � S cJ e ( Name - please print) smP 0JS C 1 V065 5 (Post f ice and Zip) gu,sS-e tl A /?.e i a (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ( gnature) (Name - pi::"se print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) '(return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box.2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R��z P. ib&�; 2cz (S tur (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Signatu (Street Adress) ( Signa" cure) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) 1X3 c eJCi-�e�-� EfL . VA °LUD ( - (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) w c VA. as D I (Post Office. and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) 117 McIAGAN 5TkEtrr W)A/Cw srra (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) J --------- -------------------------- ---------- - ----- ------ ----- ----- -- -- - -- - -- - -- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) p (Street Adress) r 21 (Name - please pr nt) (Post Office n( p) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) Nc4 (Name - lease print) 1l�ivc,�tsTt4, 1/7}— 2 z 6Q (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) %lame - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) -(Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------- (Signature) G (Street Adress) (Sign tur (Name - please print) (Post Office an Zip) 7k -'. ly►A-�A (Name - please print) V A . Z2G�-(o (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) �n i � S ( ignature) (Street Adress (Name - please print) Sccgl,:,,s c. t:- 4 22 (Post Office and Zip) A. (Signature) (Name - please print) s 6-16 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) .(Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------- - -------------- ------------------------------------------------ - --- - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Sign u ) S-r (St eet Adress) ( Sign t (Street Adress) (o:0 E 6 6 C-\I, I YIS (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (''Rk U zz, - �� I (Name -'please print) (PC f'ice and Zip (S gnature) (Name - please print) e la �7,nr In (Street Adress) -� -- (Post Office and Zip) (Sig to ) (Name - please print) VA 5,96"�zl (Stree.e A ,ss) (Post Office and Zip) ( S atur-e`) i (Street Adress) (Name - please p int) (.Post Office and Zip) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ - --- -- PETITION.to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( Signaturfe ) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) :aL>�, -�- 1-&-7 ( ign ure) (Street Adress) (Signature) b)-, (Street Adress) (Signature) � � � 4 (,Street Adress) V (Signature) (Street Adress) t % E J? - /-1- /YAt !.l- 9 (Name - please print) -�' 4,e C �. (Post Office and Zip) Ole (Name - please print) A/Jlvek (Post Office and Zip) / (Name - please print))' e 2�2 ylel (Post Office and Zip) (game - please print) _;2 2 GJ (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please p int) (Post Office and Zip) 10 c 'U U �l- (N - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT 4%A4 -------=---------------------------- v/l�s�iY — (Signature) IjecSit (Street Adress) li�p4A � (Signature) (Street Adress) �'�C-►� Lam' -� � � �. (Signature) (Street "ress) (Street Adress) (Signature) er- (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) Madrl (Name - please print) l l IF1/ ll 25 4�,-VA 77_ (o O t (Post Office and Zip) o�.wx V lllae6� (Name - please print) (Post Off ce and Zip) (Name - please print) —`" (Post Office and Zip) /(Name - please print) LJ t CIA t, 2-Z-6 d l (Post Office and Zip) -1W,nn es XYN . V\ A e'Me g- (Name - please print) W1► C- k-,-- c Av 'A-- 014 , 02 6 a 1 (Post Office and Zip) 1 )fern d I¢fj Its' K/ (Name - please print) j� 1)2c ixP$1,X - 1/A- 2Sv/ 0FI (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2556, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to . PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------- =---------------------------------------------------------------- (-Signature ) (Name - please print) Ell= r/U� '2e�-66i (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) As. &FLE d A. J.H",!M41S (Name - please print) (Post Office and Z p) (Signature) (Name - please print) ,37-4 / /Zt (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) 14 6LI Alk�",'ex�n (Signature) (Street dress) �(Signature) (Street Adress) Ufl�w"vi . "� - T'�q ntvi A -5) (Name - please print) W/,q (Post Office and Zip) 0412c- I/ �. zoi em 0 (Name - please print) (,J Oe key �e r , Vo - a,9 (c C / (Post Office and Zip) (Name/- please/ print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l (Signa re) // (Streets Adress) (Signature) e1.Cas Lie` (Street Adress) Of (Street Adress) (Signature) p \ s C �J (Street Adress) O (Signature) la C 3� /3v�4 9er� (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) j �ti J, � (Name - please print) La-i (Post Office and Zip) 0Reo1Ann I%ne-�L-9 (Name - please print) Si �e"-,s o.4H ,ya aa�s s` _r (Post Office and Zip) (Nam - please print) / Z�S.J (Post ffice and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) J�2,cz,, o2Y>d--X (Name - please print) (.Urnc�:o e/I UG z 2-6al (Post Office and Zip) � IFS M. C�-Nlz7r��7 (Name - please print) 51r--H s c)TY, (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------- ------ ---------------------------------- (Sign re) �-18 N • L.ov ooiv +P1- 2- (Street Adress) at—" b1*1T -ft 4 n -.A- -1 - - (S nature) (Street Adress) _Plu�yvj�_ (Siggn turQe)) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adressl -' (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 2 ¢D (Street Adress) � �t—F ��l.l�i►� (Name - please print) w 1NGt E-S I E2, V,? - 9-260 ("Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) wIN4 H & S (Post Office and Zip (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) r,��.,lGiS�Lcs r6,QJ 1/�9 • �. Z �m / (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) �l +j H ,�5- rz , VA, (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Street Adress)' (Signat (St (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) L A) &A (Name - please print) �t g 2&x`� (Post Office and Zip) at r ) (Name - pleasd print) Z16 1461C (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) r ( Siignnaa�ture ) (Street Adress) ignature) aStrdbt Adress) (Signature) -(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) please print) xS�== c-� �.6�' (Post ffice and Zip) G, My\\\ tJ (Name - please print) 1 yw1W:N��r.es�ec. S�P, aQl601 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens -for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, -Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I _a::141,::Q2 '--7T,,& (Signature) 3Z 1 S• /� eet Adr (,/,g ),L4SS, (Signature) l7ownins PA% S� ep%enJ CL'14 m (Street Adress) 27,& jj"' /. (Signature) I 6" ro 7A - "(Street Adress) 121 7 �) gnature) ^� (Street Adress) A ( gnature) (Street Ad r ss) (Signature) (Street Adr ) �PhrS2 �� (Name / ame - please print) ���e ,PAPr,s- ( , k Ulq (Post Office/and Zip) I�ovss45#4L/ (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) /'�� ili) &A a'z'/' 6 3 (Post Office and Zip) %name - please print) G' ro.5-5 l/w -2 2 j— (Post Office and Zip) y�i10/�// s4101-Z4 (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please p int) 4- zz (Po ht Office and p) (return to: -Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Street Adress (Signatur 9& a •� 2 dh 0a (i i in L (Street Adress) ( ignature) G �6 3 W 1 nC (Street Ad ss) (Signature) L 1SG W41eeCAN0 DG. ''TfOPAPNs Ciry,t/TA (Street Adress) (Sig Lure) Adress) 2 Rreet (Signature) (Street Adress) _ 5 �. Z,D pa,,. (Name -'please print) (Post Office and Zip) ✓e_s-,�L /D (Name - pleas print) LtJ�'/7c . (Post Office and Zip) e e� (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) 2 2- 4 S" (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please rint) (Post Off 1pi and Zip) (Name- please�.p�rint) _601*9)v_�r;re K. (Post Office and Zip) . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — .o .. .•: __..___�_— rtw nn�n9 ------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '.1 /U Y/cki &A).S7;91J71A)o (Signature) (Name - please print) 3'/ac 0'4W &cc 'bR. S71!PR0 J S C IT)! 04 �2loSS' (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) vd.4 Z.".' (Signature) 613o e*owee,L DO, (Street Adress) ;2149.a,eD P. Co&S j a,U 2iN e (Name - please print) S7_FPAL4) s C17y, , r/,4. Z Z 5 (f (Post Office and Zip) 104 'f I r r� (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office a d Zip) 27" 4 ILC - (Sign ure) MARCEL-O 7. SABLES (Name - please pint) y$6 80ck►1dGNA11 PR. � StEP►jws c►ry STEP► ms c.►TY, ✓A 2] 6SS (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) �i �a 6� I (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) �' Zw� � r ,I�-,— �o n a '1V (f -, cg 7`ri (Signature) (Name - please print) e- �Z- (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ i17„ (Signature) �Z4lpocom plkce (Street Adress) Signature) 'Sy3 ewa�Iog ime (Street Adress) (Signature) R-7" / /'e%C l> -iE' (Street Adress) (Sign Lure) 2i' J e3 six, i S o— 2 3 (Street Adress) (Signature) 397 WGsfrr-�orela�� Dr (Street Adress) (Signatur .270 / / (Street Adress) M S C la u�,' a C.rr ( Name - S�please print) F1t,� dZ)- (Pos44fcaip) V: E''s'E7 (Name - please print) (Post Office dnd Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name = please print) (Post Office and Zip) 01 (Name - please print)"- 3 t'e r-,)?eAS C,f:�l ,V'+ 0245S (Post Office and Zip) ��,,,,,, ( Name - please print) '57 4. (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ------------------------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----- ------------------------------------------------------ (signature) T ,x Dill (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) }j,G l 73y / 212, (Street Adress) 644 t� (Signature) 971 $6 114 q4a 7'3 (Street Adress ------------------ Virginia to (Nam - pleas print) (Post Officefand Zip) Amu ���f i✓e�Er� v .� (Name - please print) �r Y "z. , 42 z ee'c ) (Post'Office and Zip) r (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) G 1=/P n b"/l2 I' �46'e L - (Name - please print) -?-.61 -3 ') (Post Office and Zip) A'4ens� (Name - please print) AVI`p')3'1(4 1.,'0"? �Viye �G heS7f2 Vr7 (Post Office and Zip) ' Z,60/ (Signature) (Name - please print) hlC 3 GQ 8x (Street Adress) (Post Glfice and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester,•VA 22601) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS.PROJECT (Signature) 1 /71 (Street Adress) (Street Adress) (Signature) /•tOe).Z-�6� (Street Adress) (Sig ature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) . �,?V,',P /1e_1L g (Name'a- please print) Z d (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (game - please print) (Post Office and Zip) L C7,4i,46R.5"Op -(Name - please print) o-•� U�- 2,2-6 .1-4 r (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) w/ 1c/1�I �r (Post Office an ip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature— (Name - `pleease print) RT 1 r3oX 3 1 l ��►Nc �e�1 �,��Y �0 a'ab I (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) S (Signature) �g� 5 „ CC-\C,55.. (Street Adress) -Z) ti (Signature) (Street Adres (Signature) . /S- � 2-era, (Street Adress) (S gnatur ) (Street Adress) I/ � (Signature) (Str t Adress) c s (Name - please print) C-�,tje-C )R • -L2 (00 % - (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please pri t) (Post Tice and Zip) A- P. EArAeof (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - pleahe print) (Post Offi a and Zip)[ f/,//, zi, , � 9 , �,l� (G (Name - please print) � (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) 7 FA PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (5lgnature) / ao, �04(� (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signatur ) (Street Adress) IN4(Signature) (Street Adress) 11A, q (Signature) l c-,Y Sic �Se� � oy e (Street Adress) (Name - please print) LIE VA 22c 21/ (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print �L�4p tiyoiiC-� VA Z262+ (Post Office and Zip) Fe Z&- IAC46:�'2 (Name - please print) 1V� CAw (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Vlease print) •a • Q dX `7UD (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) W�•AC.�� U (Post Office andtip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a r iv- i -� (Signatu ) 1 r. s (Street Adress) Po (Name - please rint) S ! Z 2- s (Post Offic6 and Zip) (S'4/atL , /4L'�, - �')' L'4" ignature) / (Name` - please print) c Gum -t 62 ' (Street Adress)(Post Office Zip) (signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) lzLreez i2. Z.�,J � 6%4 (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) TAL)Mw Lt� (Name - please print). (Post Office'and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) T2 /- rN 01/V FAt-- (N - please print) �W-z =9A2Lr CA Z-16sr' (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Signature) G rho y 3:2 (Street Adress) -CeJ (S nature) �� 33 (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) V Q . - �tx�' r (Signature) 09(-1. 7 0A,,.,L1n4 DrI'„"O' (Street Adress) (Signature) �J �a�m6�-ram (Street Adress) (Signatur ) 0'� 'S f U rwl br\- (Street Adress) (Name - plea/s�e print)-� t—v (Post Office and Zip) ",� ' Z. l�is (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) ` S 1 N OSSbrn DP , W t l\)� t- L (Post Office and Zip) 0 22 (Name - p elel ase prl.&�) (Post OPice and Zip) 10z;qp"4 --!T - C-) / 2--) (Name - please print) V�) .2, ,, (Post ©ffice and Zip) WY' c. 'qM 0- P44�� (Name - please print) Lt�v/ � , UG • z Zvi/ Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT -------------------------- '-------------------------------------------------------- (Signature)' (Name - please print) ax- (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) 0- 4 &)X'V66 (Street Adress) �'4d�:tQe (Signature) /,.j',,, G�. (Street Adress) (Signaturey ?-�aoi St�.►�RcQ RoaD (Street Adress) �� (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ff l%C,f/n � /q. loci t k (Name - please print) 6414L�-I5 G, , vt9 aa6515 (Post Office and Zip) C -A . Ann10L.D (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) . (Name - please print) u A 22.6 3 7 (Post Office and Zip) C-4- LU ►'�;t v� r (Name - please print) /i IrnA�A vim-- -12 (A )1 (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District - Delegate Alson Smith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and -your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: * Density - Current planned density of 1800 -'2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in.both Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As curr-w' nla- ned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. • Moral - We -further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( Signature) G' - LM,) -?(r l4(t `rrl or, (Street Adress) (Sig at (Street Adress) (Name - please print) nr. h t- 4 j- Yr - a--?1,,r) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester,. VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of �u�- are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands an your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: - Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. - Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. - Services - A..-—rert.ly planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. - Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development. Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ther approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. SZ��rn�ti\Ck (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post 6ffice and Zip) (Signature) ,Z (St et Adress) ,-4erysc_ 4 • (Name - please print) (Post ffice and Zip) (return to: Citizens Cor a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith We, the undersigned citizens of the are deeply concerned about the plans for the development o heat lands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: " Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Accegs - As currently planned, will create significant transport -:.:on problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned,*we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County•s unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of/a current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable.. a10A,t1,2- )L N1Ag-T—�A, L C LA eK- ( igna u e) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) N4, I j - L, 41, t " �) (Signature) �tt.L,c-s f .6 (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) The Petition will continue until we get action.... - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District - Delegate Alson Smith We, the undersigned citizens o are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: " Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. - Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been Improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County°s unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (41 J,. rM_ pc�,sr2:r159 (Signature) (Name - please print) -71v k1 U-L&,c0 6feCLE -S:T�"s)S n r!l VA (Street Adres ) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens For a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... , If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, - Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of the are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. _ We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: " Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Access AT -,--r,-ntly planned, will create significant transportation rr- '-ms -n both Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been Improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 'since it lies outside the Urban Developmerli Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands- are unacceptable: (Signature) (Name - please print) n Sr(�i,i�►C`' �°S�c°r Cl �aZLe/ (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) sst \a24 V.. (Signature) 71e.����'� (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) The Petition will continue uritil we get action.... If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith We, the undersigned citizens of the are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: " Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. ~ access - As -1-tinned, will create significant transportation problemQ ',-th Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage ana water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development.. Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current velopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable, (Signatur ) J (Name - please p t) (Post Office and' Zip) Vft, C-NI (Z t I M,a (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE An Assessment of Potential Development Impacts on the Water Quality of Wheatlands Lake prepared for Harrison and Johnston Attorneys at Law Winchester, Virginia prepared by Thomas J. Grizzard, Ph.D., P.E. Manassas, Virginia October, 1990 ITable of Contents I Intro duction duction...................................................... 1 StudyArea ........................................................ 1 Watershed Characteristics ....................................... 1 Drainage Area .......................................... 1 Current Land Use 1 Lake Characteristics ............................................ 1 Storage Volume and Pool Area .............................. 1 Water Quality Measures ............................................. 5 5 Nutrients.................................................... Phosphorus............................................. 5 Nitrogen............................................... 6 TraceMetals ............................................ 7 Chlorophyll........................................... 8 Trophic State Classification ........................................... 9 Carlson Trophic State Indices .................................... 9 Existing Water Quality .............................................. 13 SecchiDepth 13 ................................................ Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen ............................... 13 Other Water Quality Measurements ............................... 20 Hydrogen Ion Activity .................................... 20 20 Total Alkalinity ......................................... Nitrogen.............................................. 20 Phosphorus 20 21 N:P Ratio ............................................. Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent .............................. 21 Hydrogen Ion Activity............................... 21 Alkalinity ............................................. 21 Nitrogen.............................................. 21 Phosphorus............................................ 21 N:P Ratio ............................................. 21 Analysis of Pollutant Export to Wheatlands Lake .......................... 24 Streamflows................................................. 24 Existing Stream Gage Data ................................. 24 Runoff Coefficients 24 1, i Nonpoint Pollutant Export Coefficients ............................ 25 Water Qualitv Prediction Methods ................................ 25 Water Quality Projections .... .30 BMP Selection . • .....• .... •... • • . • . • . • • ........ 30 BMP Performance ....................................... 30 Current Conditions ...................................... 31 Future Conditions - No BMPs .............................. 31 Future Conditions - BMPs in Place .......................... 31 BMP Maintenance ....................................... 32 Summary and Conclusions ........................................... 35 36 References ....................................................... I i 1 1 An Assessment of Potential Deveiopment Impacts on the Water Quality of Wheatlands Lake 0 Introduction This report presents the results of a study of Wheatlands Lake, located in Frederick County, Virginia as shown in Figure 1. The report addresses the current water quality of the lake, and the likely water quality effects of a proposed plan of residential development in the tributary watershed, and adjacent to the lake. The report further assesses the likely effects in mitigating pollution export of various levels of stormwater pollution control that might be applied to the development. Study Area "r Watershed Characteristics Drainage Area. The watershed of Wheatlands Lake is situated astride Crooked Run, and is located to the southwest of the intersection of State Routes 522 and 277. The lake is approximately 10 miles south of the City of Winchester. The drainage area was determined by delineation of the boundaries on the 7.5 minute USGS Stephens City Quadrangle, dated 1986, and subsequent planimetric measurement of the area. The drainage area encompasses some 1,936 acres. Current Land Use. Currently, the drainage basin is principally undeveloped, consisting of a mixture of forested and idle land uses. There are a few small isolated areas of residential use near the basin boundaries, and a single trailer park development located in the northeast quadrant near the Route 277 - 522 intersection. The trailer park is served by a small wastewater treatment plant, which discharges to the small unnamed stream tributary to the northeastern arm of Wheatlands Lake. Lake Characteristics Wheatlands Lake was originally impounded in 1976 with the construction of the earth fill dam just west of State Route 522. The dam was renovated following transfer to the Commonwealth of Virginia Storage Volume and Pool Area. A topographic map of the original bottom contour of Wheatlands Lake was provided by Gilbert W. Clifford Associates, Inc (1990). The map was 1 1 t ■ boundaries. scaled at -1" = 3W with a contour interval of 10 feet. An area - capacity curve was developed using bottom contour areas and incremental volumes between contours. The resulting morphometric data are shown in Figure 2. As may be seen, the lake had an original storage volume of 2,400 acre-feet at a pool elevation of 616 ft., m.s.l. The pool area K 1 at that elevation was 112 acres. This, along with a 49 acre area described by the 50 foot buffer surrounding the lake, resulted in a total of 161 acres. 3 WIN ON Oman. NOW= a Wheatlands Lake Area -Capacity Curve 120 3,000 100 2, 500 N 80 2,000 a) U a i 60 1,500 E O =3 O O °- 40 1,000 > 20 Reference: 500 G. W. Clifford Assoc. Figure 2. Area -Capacity Curve for Wheatlands Lake, Frederick County, Virginia Water Quality Measures The maintenance of acceptable water quality in bodies such as Wheatlands Lake depends upon the development of a thorough understanding of the pollutant types and magnitudes likely to be introduced into the system as a result of the transition to more intense urban land uses. Experience has shown that the most ubiquitous nonpoint pollution problems in watershed - lake systems exhibiting mixes of undeveloped, agricultural, and urban land uses are those related to the export of plant nutrients. There are other potential problems associated with such systems, including the export of organic matter, trace metals (e.g. lead and zinc), and synthetic organics (e.g., pesticides and herbicides). The first category of pollutant may affect the oxygen resources of the receiving system, and the latter two categories may have toxic effects on receiving water biota, and on secondary users of the water. 2 Nutrients Phosphorus. Eutrophication is the process whereby lakes, or other slow moving waters, become enriched with nutrients, resulting in the production of autotrophic biomass, which ultimately dies, decays, and settles to the bottom. The logical conclusion of this process is when such biomass, along with material washed in from the tributary watershed, fills the lake, and transforms it into a peat bog or meadow. It should be emphasized that this is a natural process, and is the fate of all lakes, but in a completely natural system, it may require thousands of years to complete. The activities of man may accelerate the export of nutrients into lake systems, either through the introduction of wastewaters or through nonpoint pollution. This has given rise to the term cultural eutrophication, which implies an acceleration of the natural process so that enrichment takes place during periods of time on the order of decades or centuries, rather than millennia. In freshwater lake systems, the rate of the eutrophication process is most often governed by the availability of the plant nutrient phosphorus. This is because the relative scarcity of phosphorus in the earth's crust virtually assures that it will be present in most aquatic systems in smaller concentrations (relative to algal need) than any other required nutrient, including nitrogen. Most attempts to manage the rate of eutrophication of impoundments, therefore, center on the reduction of phosphorus loads to. the system, whether from point or nonpoint sources. EPA (1986), in the latest revision of Quality Criteria for Water, has noted that a consensus on phosphorus criteria for streams and lakes is evolving around values of 50 ug/L for the former where they enter lakes; 100 ug/L in upstream areas; and 25 ug/L for the latter. These criteria are based on a large body of information that suggests that the cited stream 5 values are the highest concentrations that are likely to be diluted to the 25 ug/L level in the lake body, and further, that most relatively uncontaminated lakes have surface water phosphorus concentrations between 10 and 30 ug/L (Hutchinson, 1957). The high event mean concentrations of phosphorus present in urban and rural stormwater runoff (121 to 383 ug/L as P, [EPA, 1983]) would seem to implicate these sources as having a pivotal role in determining the trophic state of reservoirs and lakes in developing watersheds. Nitrogen. The receiving water effects of nitrogen are related to its ability, in certain concentration ranges and forms, to act as a stimulant to the excessive growth of phytoplankton, cause the consumption of oxygen when being oxidized, act as a toxicant to aquatic life, and induce some human health problems when consumed. Nitrogen is a required nutrient for all forms of life in that it is essential for the formation of amino acids and proteins. This has been used as a rationale for the control of nitrogen from wastewaters and runoff entering lakes sensitive to excessive growths of algae. If sufficient quantities of the forms usable by algae (NH4-N, NO2-N, and NO3-N) are eliminated from the aquatic environment, it is clear that the growth of many algae could be controlled. Unfortunately, however, there are species of algae that have the ability to obtain their required nitrogen from the atmosphere as N2. In addition, it is known that many of these are the most undesirable forms (e.g., the blue-green algae) from the perspective of creating unsightly floating mats, causing tastes and odors, and secreting extracellular toxins. This, then, is a valid reason for refraining from removing too much nitrogen from aquatic systems sensitive to algal blooms: such actions may result in the establishment of a competitive advantage for the most undesirable algae. This, in most cases, is fortunate, because the supply of nitrogen in natural freshwater systems is rarely less than that of the other essential algal macro -nutrient (phosphorus) relative to their respective requirements for organism growth. In most systems, the inorganic nitrogen concentration needed to support significant algal growth is at the 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L as N, while the required phosphorus concentration is far below that value. Nitrogen introduced into aquatic systems in its reduced forms may result in the imposition of a demand upon the oxygen resources of the system. Ammonium (NH4 N) and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (NH4N + organic N) cause the consumption of relatively large quantities of oxygen when certain species of bacteria oxidize them to nitrite or nitrate (NO2 or NO3). In fact, 1 mg/L of reduced nitrogen may be responsible for the exertion of an oxygen demand of 4.6 mg/L. Considering that summer saturation dissolved oxygen values may be in the range of 7 to 8 mg/I, it may be seen that relatively small nitrogen concentrations have the potential to create undesirable effects. Fortunately, this is rarely a problem in relatively deep quiescent water bodies such as reservoirs, because the organisms responsible for the depletion generally attach themselves to surfaces in shallow riffle areas. 1 6 Ammonia is present in water either as a dissolved gas (NH3), or as a monovalent cation (NH4+).. The form taken is a function of the pH of the water body. At temperatures of 20 c and pH values above 8.0 (which can easily occur in an algal bloom), total ammonia concentrations in excess of 1.3 mg/L can be toxic to some freshwater fish species. Also, as the pH rises, the required concentration for toxic effects drops. In fact, at a pH of 9.0, only 0.17 mg/L ammonia is required to create an undesirable situation. The toxicity is also inversely related to temperature, so that as temperature rises, the ammonia toxicity concentration also drops. Although not a problem for Wheatlands Lake, because use for public water supply is not contemplated, excessive concentrations of nitrates may also create difficulty from the standpoint of the induction of methemoglobinemia, or the so-called blue baby disease. Fortunately, the Federal standard that has been set to guard against this problem is 10 mg/I, and it would be extremely rare for a surface water not receiving a point source discharge of nitrate to reach such a level. Trace Metals. Lead and zinc are the trace metals that have been routinely reported to be present in most urban stormwaters. Lead, of course, has been present as a result of its use as a motor fuel additive. Automobile exhausts may contain lead -bearing particulates which settle to the surface in dryfall, or are washed out of the atmosphere in precipitation events. Depending on the type of surface (pervious or impervious) upon which the particulates are deposited, the area may act as an efficient source of lead in stormwater (impervious surfaces), or a sink (pervious surfaces). In recent years, however, Federal regulations have mandated the use of unleaded motor fuels in newly manufactured automobiles. As older automobiles are retired in favor of new purchases, the demand for leaded fuels has been declining. This trend, in fact, has been observed in studies of urban stormwater in the National Capital Area (NVPDC/VPI&SU,1978; VPI&SU, 1983). As this trend continues, it is likely that lead export in urban runoff will continue to decline in future years, and that contamination from that source will not be a significant receiving water problem. Chronic toxicity concentrations for aquatic life are not well documented for lead, but data are available for some species, and depending upon water hardness, may be as low as 12 ug/L or as high as 128 ug/L. The EPA ambient water quality criterion for lead is the same as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water, 50 ug/L (EPA, 1986). Zinc is present in urban stormwaters from any number of sources, but it is likely that the principal ones are wear products from synthetic rubbers in automobile tires (zinc stearates), and leaching of the metal from galvanized metals such as the corrugated metal pipes found in stormwater conveyance systems. The leaching of zinc from the latter may be accelerated where stormwater pH is lowered by the presence of acid precipitation. As with lead, the toxicity of zinc is related to the hardness in aquatic systems. EPA (1986) criteria, however, suggest a 24 hour average of 47 ug/L to protect aquatic life. No human health criteria are currently available, but it should be noted that undesirable tastes and odors may result from zinc concentrations in excess of 5,000 ug/L (EPA, 1986). The decline of lead in urban stormwater, the high receiving water tolerances of zinc relative to the likely stormwater export, and the relatively low development densities contemplated for the Wheatlands Lake watershed would seem to argue against trace metals posing a water quality problem. Chlorophyll a. Nutrient over -enrichment in an aquatic system is generally manifested in accelerated algal production. Algal growth and cell mass production, however, is difficult to quantitatively describe. There are many species, and the assay techniques for measuring them are quite laborious and time-consuming. One characteristic of all species of algae, however, gives the analyst a flexible tool for making quantitative measurements about the level of production in a given body of water: all algae are photosynthetic, and therefore contain chlorophyll. Chlorophyll a, in fact, has become the de facto standard as a surrogate because of its direct relationship to the cell measurement of algal growth in aquatic systems, mass, and its ease of measurement. There are data relating chlorophyll a to water column transparency, hypolimnetic oxygen depletion, fish production, taste and odor episodes, blue- green algae toxicity, and production of trihalomethane precursors in public water supplies (Walker, 1985). In short, the measurement is a superior means of evaluating lake water quality in the terms of the characteristic most likely to render it unsuitable for some intended use, namely level of algal production. Much has been published about levels of chlorophyll in freshwater systems, and what they mean with respect to lake trophic state. Oligotrophic (or nutrient -poor) lakes usually have summer average chlorophyll a values of less than 6 to 7 ug/L Such lakes are generally quite unproductive, and would not be expected to harbor good game fish populations, The because of a lack of sufficient nutrient materials to support a complex food chain. the boundaries of the mesotrophic National Eutrophication Survey (1974) proposed (moderately enriched) state to be at 7 to 12 ug/L, with the eutrophic (enriched) condition lying beyond 12 ug/L. In recent years, a newer term has come into use to describe lakes heavily enriched with nutrients: hypertrophic. The lower chlorophyll a boundary for the hypertrophic state is generally taken at 20 ug/L I Trophic State Classification Reservoir water quality is a complex determinant, and is based upon more than a single objective set of measured physical, chemical, and biological variables. Even when the suite of water quality parameters is reduced to only those having significance with respect to eutrophication, the task of making a determination of the water quality condition is still difficult. EPA (1974), as a part of the National Eutrophication Survey, published some general delineations of trophic state in north -central freshwater lakes as a function of ' chlorophyll a, total phosphorus and Secchi depth measurements. Table 1 shows the classifications from that survey. The EPA classification scheme, while useful, is cumbersome in the sense that it requires the user to develop a facility with measurements that follow no easily -remembered pattern. One approach to developing an easily interpreted descriptor of water quality has been to develop an index based upon one or more of the measurements commonly used to determine trophic state, but using a normalizing technique to reduce the measurement to a simple numeric scale. Carlson Trophic State Indices A number of multi -parameter indices have been developed in recent years in attempts to arrive at a generally accepted classification system for lake water quality. One of the most widely known of these is the Carlson Trophic State Index (TSI), which is in fact, composed of three separate indices based, respectively, upon Secchi depth, total phosphorus concentration, and chlorophyll a concentration (1977). In the Carlson index system, lakes (and reservoirs) are classified on the basis of surface or epilimnetic measurements, using the following equations: I MI (CHL) - 8.23 In (CHIa) + 33.3 TSI (TP) - 14.42 In (TP) + 4.15 TSI (SD) - 60 - 14.41 la(SD) where, TSI - Trophic State Index, dimensionless In - Natural logarithm CHLa - Chlorophyll a, ug1L TP - Total phosphorus, ug/L SD - Secchi Depth, m 9 L1 P The indices in each case, give rise to a number that ranges generally from 0 to 100, although none of the of the equations has a theoretical upper boundary. Generally speaking, the lower the Carlson TSI for a given measurement, the better the water quality from the standpoint of nutrient enrichment, and the consequences thereof. Table 2 contains a narrative description of the lake conditions that are likely to be associated with a range of Carlson indices. 10 Table 1. National Eutrophication Survey Trophic State Determination (EPA, 1974) Trophic Chlorophyll a Condition Oligotrophic < 7 ug/L Mesotrophic 7 - 12 ug/L Eutrophic > 12 ug/L 11 Total Secchi Phosphorus Disk Depth < 10 ug/L > 3.7 m. 10-20ug/L 2.0-3.7m > 20 ug/L < 2.0 m. Table 2. Water Quality as Reflected by the Carlson Trophic State Index in Lakes (After Carlson, 1977) TSI < 30 Classical oligotrophy: Clear water, oxygen throughout the year in the hypolimnion, salmonid fisheries in deep lakes. TSI 30 - 40 Deeper lakes still exhibit classical oligotrophy, but some shallower lakes will become anoxic in the hypolimnion during the summer TSI 40 - 50 Water moderately clear, but increasing probability of anoxia in hypolimnion during the summer. Iron and manganese problems begin to develop during the summer. Raw water begins to have noticeable odor. THM precursors in raw water will begin to exceed 0.1 mg/I.. TSI 50 - 60 Lower boundary of classical eutrophy: decreased transparency, anoxic hypolimnia during the summer, macrophyte problems may be evident, warm -water fisheries only. Iron and manganese and taste and odor problems continue to worsen. TSI 60 - 70 Blue-green algae dominant during the summer, algal scums probable, extensive macrophyte problems possible. TSI 70 - 80 Heavy algal blooms possible throughout the summer, dense macrophyte beds, but extent limited by light penetration. Reservoir becomes hypertrophic (light limited). TSI > 80 Algal scums, summer fish kills, few macrophytes, dominance of rough fish. 12 Existing Water Quality ■ Staff of Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates made two sampling visits to Wheatlands Lake on 14 and 26 June, 1990. At that time, dissolved oxygen and temperature profile measurements were made at selected locations in the lake, and other field measurements made, including secchi depth, pH and total alkalinity. Samples were also collected for laboratory measurement of ammonium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, oxidized nitrogen, ortho phosphate phosphorus, and total phosphorus. Secchi Depth Figure 3 is a plot of the secchi depths observed on the two sampling dates at each of the five stations visited. As may be seen, the values were not observed to vary appreciably, either temporally or spatially.. In fact, a value of about 4.3 meters would be a satisfactory discriptor of the median value of all observations for the two dates. Referring back to the NES data in Table 1, it may be seen that such a value is consistent with very high water quality, indicating a lake in the oligotrophic condition with total phosphorus concentrations of less than 10 ug/L and chlorophyll a concentrations of less than 7 ug/L The Carlson TSI(SD) value based upon a secchi depth of 4.3 meters is 39. This also indicates very high water quality, but as shown in Table 2 may be consistent with a system containing sufficient organic matter to experience some deoxygenation of the bottom (hypolimnetic) waters during the summer months. Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Figure 4 shows the dissolved oxygen and temperature profile at Station 01 in Wheatlands Lake at 08:45 on the morning of 14 June, 1990. Similarly, Figures 5 - 8 show the profiles at Stations 02, 03, 04, and 05 on the morning of 26 June, 1990. Observations were begun at 09:15 and completed at 10:30 on the 26th. Examination of the plots shows clearly that the lake has a classic summer stratification, with temperature differences of from 14 to 18 degrees between the upper (epilimnion) and lower (hypolimnion) layers. During the period of the summer stratification, the temperature - induced density differential between the surface and bottom waters may be expected to limit the migration of dissolved oxygen from the well -oxygenated waters of the epilimnion (which is in contact with the atmosphere) into the hypolimnion. This is precisely what is depicted in Figures 3 - 8, with the dissolved oxygen values approaching zero in the lower depths of the lake. This is not totally unexpected, but total anoxia in mid -June does indicate a substantial quantity of degradable organic matter in the lake. 1 13 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 7 Cn 6 a� E 5 m 4 0 :E r U � U N r Secchi Depth Measurements Lake Frederick WH01 WH02 WH03 WH04 WH05 Station Number 06/14/90 M 06/26/90 Figure 3. Average Secchi Depths in Wheatlands Lake on 14 and 26 June, 1990. M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 01, 06/14/90 0 Dissolved Oxygen Figure 4.- Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 14 June, 1990 at Station 01. M M M M M M M M M M M C a) ca -10 va -1 V L (� -2( E -2r O L 4- -3( a) a) 4-- -3' .c ' Q 0 -41 in Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 02, 06/26/90 — Dissolved Oxygen C I -- emperature I i i -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 5 Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 02. Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 03, 06/26/90 0 -.4— Dissolved Oxygen -5 a� ca -10 c -15 a) -20 emperature E -25 O L -30 ai -35 a) -40 -45 -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 6. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Proriles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station us. Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 04, 06/26/90 0 Dissolved Oxygen Figure 7. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 04. M M r M M M IN M r M 0 M M 0 M M M 0 M Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 05, 06/26/90 0 a� ca -1 c� -1 a� -2 E - 0 0 - W a� L 5- a) - 0 -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C 25 30 35 40 45 Dissolved Oxygen 5 0 5 0 Temperature Figure 8. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 05. An additional feature of the D.O. profiles is the slight rise in concentration in the zone where temperature begins to decline rapidly (thermocline). Water temperatures in this near -surface zone (10 to 20 feet) are substantially lower than those at the surface, and therefore, saturation oxygen concentrations are somewhat higher. Other Water Quality Measurements Figure 9 shows an average of all water quality observations made at the surface and bottom of each sampling stations on 14 and 26 June, 1990. Data are shown on a logarithmic scale in order to cover the range of values from < 0.01 for Total P to approximately 65 for total alkalinity. Hydrogen Ion Activity. The pH values observed on the two sampling dates were slightly higher at the surface, as would be expected. The values of slightly above pH 8 would indicate some elevation due to algal activity. There are no chlorophyll data available to confirm this, but values approaching the phenolphthalein endpoint of pH 8.3 would indicate the presence of some carbonate alkalinity, which is almost a sure sign of algal activity. Total Alkalinity. The alkalinity values of 60 to 83 mg/L as CaCO3 are typical for impounded surface waters of the area, and do not appear to indicate any substantial departure that might herald increased algal activity. It should be noted, however, that these values result from only two sampling trips, and neither was conducted during the period of maximum insolation, when peak algal activity might be expected. Nitrogen. Measurements were made of ammonium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and oxidized nitrogen (Ox-N), which is the sum of nitrite and nitrate, expressed as N. By summing the values of ammonium N and Ox-N, one can obtain an estimate of the total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) concentration, which represents the quantity most likely to be available for algal metabolism. The average TIN concentration for surface stations was 0.07 mg/L as N, and for bottom stations, 0.10 mg/L as N. In general, these values are indicators of very low enrichment with respect to nitrogen, and would support the conclusion that Wheatlands Lake is in an oligotrophic condition. The TKN values, which were reported at slightly over 0.3 mg/L as N, could contribute to the available nitrogen upon some hydrolysis of decaying organic nitrogen, thereby raising the TIN value somewhat. Phosphorus. h Phosphorus measurements were also conducted on the two sampling dates. p The data reported for all stations, were below the detection limit of 0.01 mg/L, and are trepresented in Figure 9 as half that value. If an average of 0.005 mg/L Total P is present in the lake, the TSI(P) value is 27, an indicator of slightly better water quality than was predicted by the TSI(SD). A value of less than 0.01 mg/L is also indicative of oligotrophic 20 conditions base on the criteria of the National Eutrophication Survey (1974), as shown in Table 1. N:P Ratio. With an average TIN of 0.1 to 0.15 (including some TKN contribution), and assuming the TP value to be 0.005 mg/L, the N:P ratio would range frorn 20:1 to 30:1. With N:P values in excess of approximately 15:1, phosphorus limiting conditions may be assumed for the lake. That is, the low supply of phosphorus relative to the supply of nitrogen assures that algal metabolism would exhaust the former prior to the latter, and growth, therefore, would be regulated by the phosphorus supply. This is generally found to be the case for lakes in this region, and indicates that changes in water quality (with respect to the trophic state) are likely to result only from increases in the input phosphorus supply, either from point sources or nonpoint sources. Wastewater Treatment P1ant.Effluent The stabilization pond located on the unnamed tributary to the northeast arm of Wheatlands Lake was also sampled on 14 and 26 June, 1990. In general, because of the low flow rate, the discharge from the facility did not appear to affect water quality in either the rarm receiving the discharge, or in the main body of the lake above the dam. Figure 10 summarizes the results of those analyses. Hydrogen Ion Activity. The pH of the WWTP effluent was observed to remain essentially constant for the three sample observations, with values ranging from 7.5 to 7.9 standard units. There is no evidence that pH of the waters of the northeast arm has been affected by the WWTP discharge. Alkalinity. WWTP alkalinities were observed to vary from 260 to 323 mg/L as CaCO3. As with pH, there appears to be no evidence of the WWTP effluent affecting the receiving water alkalinities. Nitrogen. TKN values were observed to vary from 6.72 to 10.08 mg/L as N, with an average value of 8.4 mg/L. The total inorganic nitrogen value (NH3-N + Ox-N) averaged 4.62 mg/L as N. ' Phosphorus. Total P values averaged 0.73 mg/I., and ranged from 0.41 to 1.05 mg/L. Approximately 85 percent of the phosphorus was in the readily available form of ortho- phosphate. •P Ratio. Inspite of the fact that the TIN:TP ratio in the WWTP discharge was only 6.3:1, N. there was no apparent effect on the ratio in the main body of the lake, and as noted above, the ratios at that location stayed in the range indicating phosphorus limitation. 1 21 ��/ -; ��� :� :. ��� ;�::. :. ii� ' ;; ■� =_ .. ��/ -: �� 1� =� ��� E� --, �■� -. Analysis of Pollutant Export to Wheatlands Lake Streamflows Existing Stream Gage Data. In order to develop estimates of nonpoint pollutant export for the Wheatlands Lake Watershed under current and future land use conditions, it was first necessary to project adequate information on annual basin runoff. It was, therefore, necessary to locate a stream gaging station in a similarly undeveloped watershed in order to estimate the quantity of runoff originating annually from pervious land surfaces in the basin. The Virginia Water Control Board and the United States Geological Survey operate a continuous record stream gaging station on Mountain Run near Culpeper. The gage, numbered 01665000, is located three miles west of Culpeper on State Route 641, and drains an area of 15.9 square miles (10,176 acres). Records are available from September, 1949 to the present time, and are generally described as good for the entire 37.5 year period (USGS, 1986). The average annual streamflow for the gage was 14.26 inches per year, and this figure was used as a base to provide an estimate of the annual average runoff from the pervious fractions of the watershed. Runoff Coefficients. The discharge from impervious surfaces was estimated by assuming a runoff coefficient of 0.95, meaning that only 95 percent of the incident rainfall was converted to runoff. The remaining five (5) percent would be lost to paving infiltration, depression storage, and subsequent evaporation. At an average annual rainfall of 40 inches, an impervious surface would, therefore, generate 38 inches of direct stormwater runoff. Annual runoff from land uses exhibiting a mixture of pervious and impervious surfaces may then be calculated from the relationship which follows: Q - (q) x (A) x (1- IMP) + (R) x (0.95) x (A) where, Q - Average annual catchment runoff, inches q - Annual stream gage runoff, inches Ap - Catchmentimperviousfraction IMP - Imperviousness, fractional R - Annual rainfall, inches Ai - Catchment impervious fraction The above relationship was used to compute average annual runoff volumes for the land use categories contained in the Preliminary Master Plan prepared by Gilbert W. Clifford & 24 Associates, Inc. (1989). The proposed development plan was overlain on the drainage basin boundaries, in order to determine which segments did not lie within the Wheatlands Lake drainage basin. Additional land use type definitions were used as necessary to produce annual runoff estimates that will be of use in evaluating the effects of future land use changes on water quality. The land use classifications and areas within the physical drainage of Wheatlands Lake are shown in Table 3. INonpoint Pollutant Export Coefficients Over the past decade, a number of stormwater pollution export and control studies conducted in the National Capital Area, and particularly in the Suburbs of Northern Virginia, have resulted in the compilation of a large data base descriptive of the export of pollutants from a variety of land use types (NVPDC/VPI&SU, 1978; VPI&SU, 1981; VPI&SU, 1983). In addition, data from the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (EPA, 1983) are available to supplement urban land use pollutant export data from a number of locations in the Continental United States. The pollutant export data shown in Table 4 for total phosphorus (TP) have been derived from the calculated annual runoff rates, and median values of pollutant export rates expressed as Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs). Because r these export rates are sensitive to both the hydraulic efficiency of the basin pervious areas, and the percentage of impervious area, it may be seen that they can be altered to account Ifor specific site variations in these characteristics. IWater Quality Prediction Methods Given the types of urban development anticipated in the Wheatlands Lake watershed, the declining levels of lead in urban runoff, and the large system tolerance for zinc, it is evident that the greatest potential for water quality impacts rests in the possibility of accelerated cultural eutrophication as a consequence of over -enrichment with plant nutrients. Further, given the probability that existing nitrogen to phosphorus ratios will continue to be found in future runoff in the system, it is even more likely that any water quality threat is to come from enhanced exports of phosphorus to the system. It seems, therefore, prudent to provide a tool that can be used effectively to evaluate receiving water quality effects as a result of land use changes, and subsequent changes in phosphorus loading. Using the technique outlined in the section above, it is possible to develop annual loading estimates for phosphorus entering the lake from the tributary watersheds. This estimate may then be used with an empirical input-output model developed by Rast, Jones, and Lee (1983) to predict the mean summer chlorophyll a. The authors evaluated the phosphorus load and water body eutrophication response for over 40 lakes in the United States, which displayed a wide range of morphologic and hydrologic characteristics. The results of that 1 25 evaluation are shown in Figure 11, which shows predicted summer chlorophyll a as a function of areal phosphorus loading, mean lake depth, and hydraulic residence time. While the model does not simulate the entire suite of parameters influencing algal production in lakes, it does give a reasonable estimate of chlorophyll a levels to be expected in response to phosphorus loads, and can provide a lake mal:a6.,r v ath a tool of sufficient resolution to set goals or evaluate the effectiveness of alternative management strategies. The loading function in the model is the normalized annual, areal phosphorus loading rate, and is computed as follows: (PJ l (A) L - M l (td) (1 + tds) where, L - Annual phosphorus loading, mglm3 PL - Average annual lake phosphorus load,mg/yr A - Surface area of lake at full pool,m2 Z - Mean depth of lake at full pool, m r td - Average hydraulic retention time, years In order to use the model, the user need only compute the required annual phosphorus loading as described in the previous section, obtain the lake morphometric characteristics (available from the area -capacity curve calculations), and compute the value of L By entering L on the abscissa of Figure 11, and constructing a vertical to the line of best fit, the user may obtain the predicted chlorophyll a value by measuring the height of the ordinate. Confidence intervals at the 95 percent level may also be constructed to band the line of best fit. As an example, for an annual phosphorus loading of 50 mg/m3, the predicted chlorophyll a response is 10 ug/L with a 95 percent confidence interval of 3 ug/L to 40 ug/L 1 26 ITable 3. Land Use Proposal for Future Wheatlands Development ['I Il Land Use Description i Area, Ac. Forest and Open Land 1175 Low Density Single Family Residential 393 Trailer Park 10 Multifamily Residential 5 School 15 Recreation Complexes 12 - Commercial 9 j Roadways 46 Open water (Lake Surface) 12 Unclassified Open Land (Buffer and Green Space) 259 Total Acreage in Basin 1936 27 Table 4. Phosphorus Export Coefficients for Land Uses Included in Analysis for Wheatlands Lake Watershed. Land Use Description Impervious Fraction Annual Runoff (inches) TP Load (lb/ac/yr) Forest and Open Land 0.01 14.26 0.03 Low Density Single Family Residential 0.30 20.78 0.94 Multi -Family Residential 0.50 25.13 1•99 Trailer Park (Existing) 0.40 2296 1-24 School Site 0.40 22.96 1•04 Recreation Complexes 0.60 2730 1.24 Commercial Centers 0.75 30.57 1.38 Roadways 0.90 33.83 0•84 Open Water 1.00 40.00 0.65 Unclassified Open Land 0.05 - 5 0.49 28 ■ ■ w ■ ■■ r ■■ ■r ■r ■ 0 ■■ ■■ ■r w ■1 ■i ■ ■■ Big ■■■■■■.��■■■■ ■.i�r�%■■ ■ll OEM P-A� .________..________■-______._ IMMENIMMINEM SOME / 1 11 111 Figure 11. Empirical Input - Output Model for Chlorophyll . Estimation in Lakes. After Rast et al, 1983. Water Quality Projections The Rast, Jones, and Lee model (1983) may be used to estimate the current trophic state of Wheatlands Lake, to evaluate the effects of changing land uses within the basin, and to test the efficacy of the implementation of management practices for the reduction of nonpoint pollution transport. The nonpoint pollution export coefficient technique previously described was used to develop estimates of loadings of phosphorus to Wheatlands Lake using land use data developed from the preliminary development plant, and observations of the watershed. The phosphorus loads were used with the empirical model developed by Rast, Jones, and Lee (1983) to develop average summer chlorophyll a estimates that could be used to characterize the current trophic state of the lake. BMP Selection. A number Qf studies on BMP effectiveness have been conducted in the National Capital Area by Virginia Tech and The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG, 1983, 1987; Virginia Tech, 1988). These studies have made use of full scale prototype testing and laboratory analyses of selected BMP processes to determine their effectiveness in reducing the transport of stormwater-borne pollutants. Pollutant removal efficiency estimates for a number of BMP types have been published, including: o Wet Retention Ponds o Extended Detention Dry Ponds o Porous Paving o Infiltration Trenches o Grassed Waterways Hydrologic considerations on the Wheatlands site were consistent with the selection of extended detention ponds as appropriate BMPs for the development. The basic nonpoint pollution control design criteria have been extensively discussed for such a facility (Virginia Tech, 1987), and include: o Maxim1zing site drainage control o Providing complete storage for the 2-year storm o Providing extended detention for the 2-year storm o Providing 40 hour draw down of the NPS control pool i BMP Performance. A performance assessment of a prototype extended detention facility in Fairfax County may be used to obtain efficiency data for pollutant removal (Virginia Tech, 1987): o Total Phosphorus - 55.7 percent o Total Nitrogen - 59.8 percent 30 o Total Lead - 25.2 percent o Total Zinc - 40.3 percent Using the above efficiency estimate for phosphorus, the pollutant exports and associated reductions from extended detention BMP implementation may be calculated. These, along with the net effect on pollutant transport to Wheatlands Lake, are shown in Table 5. The phosphorus loading, annual average phosphorus concentration, and average summer chlorophyll a projections in Table 5 are summarized for six scenarios: (1) existing land use, (2) proposed land use with no BMP, and (3) through (6) proposed land use with variable coverage of the extended detention BMP. The phosphorus load and chlorophyll a data are also shown graphically for the same scenarios in Figure 12. Current Conditions. The existing condition of Wheatlands Lake with respect to phosphorus and chlorophyll a, a projected by the Rast, Jones, and Lee model is shown in Figure 12. As may be seen, the model predicts a current condition of 3.06 ug/L chlorophyll a. While the lack of chlorophyll data on the Lake make it impossible to directly compare the predicted value to current conditions, it is possible to compare the comparable phosphorus concentration. Referring back to Figure 9, it may be seen that Total P concentration in the lake were below the detection limit of 10 ug/L, and the predicted existing condition summer Total P concentration is 8.9 ug/L; which indicates satisfactory agreement. Future Conditions - No BMPs. The proposed development of the site without BMPs in place would result in an approximately six -fold increase in phosphorus export to the lake, resulting in almost a four -fold increase in summer chlorophyll a concentrations (11.8 ug/L). This would raise the lake trophic state to the high range of the moderately enriched condition shown in Table 2 (mesotrophy), in which decreases in transparency (secchi depth) would be anticipated, as would periodic episodes of increased algal growth. This condition would not appear to be an acceptable alternative for the lake, particularly given the current high water quality. Future Conditions - BMPs in Place. Should, however, the proposed development plan be undertaken with a mixture of extended detention BMPs, some substantial reductions in phosphorus export may be anticipated. Cases 1 - 4 in Table 5 show the impacts on phosphorus and chlorophyll a in the lake as a result of employing the BMPs at a rate of 100 percent coverage on all multi -family, commercial, institutional, and recreational centers; and at increasing increments of 25 percent for all single family areas and roadways. As a practical matter, Case 4 (100 percent coverage) cannot likely be achieved. It is likely, however, that BMP coverages of between 50 and 75 percent can be achieved for the single family portions of the site. These cases (2 and 3) would make it possible to keep summer chlorophyll a concentrations in the vicinity of 9 ug/L. While this is still indicative of a mesotrophic condition, it is at the lower end of the scale, and would represent an acceptable rcondition for the anticipated use of the lake as a recreation site. In fact, some moderate 1 31 enrichment of the lake with phosphorus over the levels found in the 14 and 26 June, 1990 samplings would probably have a beneficial effect on the body with respect to its ability to develop as a satisfactory fishery. BMP Maintenance. Extended detention BMP's have only been in common use for less than a decade. Because of this, and the relatively low pollutant loadings from moderate density urban uses, objective assessments of maintenance effects on performance in such applications have yet to find their way into the scientific literature. Prudence, however, would dictate the assumption that maintenance is the key to long-term satisfactory performance of such practices. As fine materials accumulate in extended detention ponds, failure to remove them from the structure will increase the risk that future large events will scour the materials (and their associated pollutant loads) from the BMP, and transport them to the Lake. In addition, such accumulations may affect the performance of the low flow release mechanism. The low release rate, for instance, depends upon very small orifices to maintain the recommended 4Q hour drawdown of the 2-year BMP pool. Should the release orifices, or the bedding material become blocked with fines from an accumulation of previous events, standing pools of water (and their subsequent hazards) may result. 32 Table 5. Projected phosphorus loads, concentrations, and resulting chlorophyll a in Wheatlands Lake under various BMP implementation scenarios. Annual TP Load (lbs.) Average TP Concentration (ug/L) Average Summer Chlorophyll a (ug/L) Development Condition BMP Coverage (Extended Detention Dry Pond) Existing Conditions None 114 8.9 3.1 Proposed Development None 678 47.7 11.8 Proposed Development Case 1 598 42.2 10.7 Proposed Development Case 2 541 38.1 9.9 Proposed Development Case 3 484 34.1 9.0 Proposed Development Case 4 427 30.1 8.2 Case 1: 25 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways; 100 percent coverage on all other developed uses. Case 2: 50 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways;. 100 percent coverage on all other developed uses. Case 3: 75 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways; 100 percent coverage on all other developed Case 4: 100 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on all developed lands. BMP efficiency for phosphorus removal is assumed to be 55.7 percent. 33 Wheatlands Lake TP Loads and Chlorophyll a with Various Controls — - 1400 14 Total P .`I Chl a 1200 12 (tS 0 -J 1000 — -10 >, L � 0 0 �- 800 8 0 - 0 AZ- U o_ 0 0 600 - - - 6 0) m Ca lz > > Q 400 _ -4 E 0 E c 200 — - 2 O Q 0 0 Exist No BMP 25% 50% 75% 100% Pct BMP's on Residential Uses Figure 12. Projected TP Loads and Chlorophyll p Values in Wheatlands Lake Under Various Scenarios. Summary and Conclusions (1) Using the supplied rater quality data, it may be concluded that Wheatlands Lake is currently oligotrophic (nutrient poor), and as a result, is likely to be sensitive to increases in phosphorus loads from the tributary drainage basin. () water 2 The quality data indicate that the Lake is currently phosphorus limited, so that any stormwater quality control technologies applied to future development should be effective in removing that nutrient. (3) By using pollutant event mean concentration data from a number of previous studies, streamflow data, and estimates of catchment imperviousness, it was possible to develop acceptable estimates of current and future condition annual phosphorus exports to the Lake. (4) The technique of using pollutant export coefficients and the empirical input/output nutrient loading model was shown to be applicable to the assessment of relative changes in lake water quality resulting from alterations in basin land use characteristics. (5) Without an aggressive program of BMP implementation, the proposed land use changes will likely result in decreased lake transparency, and increases in algal growth. (6) Using BMP performance data from studies in the National Capital Area, it was shown to be possible to use pollutant export coefficients and the empirical input/output nutrient loading model to assess the relative water quality impacts of alternative scenarios of land use alteration and BMP implementation. (7) Implementing a network of extended detention pond (or similar BMPs) on the site as it develops will lower the summer average chlorophyll a concentrations to a range consistent with the lower end of mesotrophic conditions. It is possible that the increased phosphorus supply responsible for the transition to mesotrophy will also enhance the recreational fishery potential of Wheatlands Lake. 35 References Hutchinson, G.E., A Treatise on Limnology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1957. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Water Resources Planning Board, "Final Report, Washington, D.C. Area Urban Runoff Project," MWCOG, Washington, D.C., (1983). Northern Virginia Planning District Commission and Virginia Tech, "Occoquan/Four Mile Run Nonpoint Source Correlation Study," Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C., 1978. Novotny, V. and G. Chesters, Handbook of Nonpoint Pollution, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, New York, (1981). Rast, W., R.A. Jones, and G.F. Lee, 'Predictive Capability of U.S. O.E.C.D Phosphorus Loading - Eutrophication Response Models," JWPCF, 55, 7, pp. 990 - 1001, (1983). United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Volume I - Final Report," PB-84-185552, Washington, D.C., (1983). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Quality Criteria for Water, EPA 440/5-86-001, Washington, D.C., 1986. Virginia Tech Department of Civil Engineering, "Evaluation of Management Tools in the Occoquan Watershed," Virginia State Water Control Board, Richmond, VA, (1982). Virginia Tech Department of Civil Engineering, "Final Report, Metropolitan Washington Urban Runoff Project,", Manassas, VA, (1983). Walker, W. W., "Statistical Bases for Mean Chlorophyll a Criteria", in Lake and Reservoir Management - Practical Applications, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference and International Symposium, NALMS, Merrifield, VA, 1985. i Water Pollution Control Federation. Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers. Manual of Practice Number 9 (ASCE Manual of Engineering Practice No. 37), Washington, D.C., (1969). 36 Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors Development Managers FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS WHEATLANDS, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Presented to: �o^o The Inter ate Company Prepared by: Halcyon Ltd. September, 1989 1 7 Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors Development Managers FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS WHEATLANDS, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared by Halcyon Ltd August, 1989 The following presents summary information and a fiscal impact analysis developed by Halcyon regarding the proposed Wheatlands community in Frederick and Clarke Counties, Virginia. As currently analyzed, the project will contain 1,800 residential units (1,584 single-family units and 216 townhouses), 50,000 square feet of office space, and 140,000 square feet of retail space. A range of recreational facilities, including a community center, neighborhood pool, and tennis/swim center are also planned. Total project buildout will occur over approximately 15 years. L SUMMARY Halcyon projects that the net fiscal impact of Wheatlands will be positive for several reasons. First, there will be a large number of relatively high - value housing units, with taxable values ranging from approximately $119,000 to $160,000, that will generate significant property taxes for Frederick County and its school district. Property taxes on largely undeveloped land will provide revenues to Clarke County and its school district. Secondly, Wheatlands will contain commercial and retail space that will generate property taxes and sales taxes for both Frederick County and the state of Virginia. Finally, the costs to the counties and school districts of servicing the project will not exceed projected revenues, resulting in a positive net fiscal benefit to Frederick and Clarke Counties and their school districts. The Summary Table illustrates the fiscal impact of Wheatlands at various points in the 15-year development period. In Frederick County, Wheatlands is expected to generate gross revenues of $8.0 million in year 15 (all figures are expressed in constant 1989 dollars). Costs are projected to total $5.9 million in year 15, resulting in a net fiscal benefit of over $2.1 million for the county that year. By year 15 of the project, the cumulative benefit to Frederick County should approach $20 million. Clarke County will receive an annual benefit of $536. Clarke County will bear no servicing costs, thus, total property taxes on undeveloped residential land collected by Clarke County represent ' Over the project's buildout period, Clarke total approximately $8,040. the net fiscal benefit. County property tax receipts will 1 Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors ' Development Managers 1 11 H. PROJECT PROGRAM AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS Population and Households Halcyon has projected the number of residents likely to be generated by the Wheatlands residential component. To calculate the total population Halcyon utilized household size estimates and other demographic data provided by the Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission. Halcyon estimates that each single-family unit will contain a population equal to 100 percent of the average household size, while the population of each townhouse unit is estimated at 80 percent of the average household size. Based on these assumptions, we multiplied the adjusted household size by the number of planned housing units to project a total residential population at Wheatlands of 4,405, as shown in Table 1. School -Age Children Halcyon has separately projected the number cf elementary, middle, and high school students likely to reside at Wheatlands, utilizing estimated pupil yield factors shown in the Key Assumptions. These factors were determined by applying a U.S. Census population age distribution of school -age children to the projected Frederick and Clarke County average household size to determine school children per household. These figures were then adjusted for housing unit type and were used as factors to determine the distribution and total number of school -age children at Wheatlands. We estimate that the development will generate 0.37 school -age children per townhouse unit and 0.46 school -age children per single-family unit. Although none are currently planned for the site, multi -family units will generate 0.28 school -age children per unit. As shown in Table 2, Halcyon projects that the proposed Wheatlands development, will generate a total of 729 school -age children as of year 15: 213 elementary school, 260 middle - school, and 256 high-school pupils. Employment Halcyon estimates that the commercial component of Wheatlands will ' generate a fair number of permanent jobs for Frederick County. Table 3 shows the projected number of employees in each of the development's components. Assuming one employee per 400 square feet of retail, ' tennis/swim center, and neighborhood pool space, one employee per 250 square feet of office space, and one employee per 800 square feet of 1� Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors Development Managers community center space, Halcyon estimates that 560 employees will work in Wheatlands at the project's completion. III. REVENUE PROJECTIONS Residential Property Taxes Halcyon has calculated the amount of residential property taxes likely to be collected by Frederick and Clarke Counties, as shown in Table 4. Based on assumed current average market values for the residential units ($119,000 per townhouse; $160,000 per single-family detached unit), Halcyon computed the total value of the residential component for assessment purposes. For Frederick County, utilizing an equalization ratio of 100 percent and a tax rate of $0.66 per $100 assessed value, Halcyon calculated total residential property taxes for the county of $1,842,350 in year 15. A 48-acre portion of the Wheatlands development in Clarke County will remain undeveloped, according to current plans, except for a project entrance and landscaped open space. This land will, however, generate approximately $537 in property taxes annually for Clarke County, based on its current assessed value of $67,001 and. a local tax rate of $0.80 per $100 assessed value. Commercial Property Taxes Halcyon has calculated the amount of commercial property taxes likely to be generated by the proposed Wheatlands development for Frederick County and its school district. Using the 100 percent equalization ratio and the county tax rate of $0.66 per $100 assessed value, Halcyon estimates that at buildout the Wheatlands commercial component will produce $159,614 in property taxes for Frederick County (see Table 5). Sales Taxes Wheatlands will also generate sales taxes for Virginia and Frederick County. Frederick County currently receives approximately 22.2 percent of all County sales tax revenues collected by the state. Total retail sales at 1 Wheatlands are estimated at $250 per gross square foot. Thus, the project's retail component should generate $35 million in sales annually by project completion. The state will receive 4.5 percent of total retail sales, ' or $1.575 million, in sales tax revenues each year. As Table 6 illustrates, Frederick County's share of this will be $349,965 annually. 7 Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors ' Development Managers F1 I� Other Revenues In addition to property and sales tax revenues, the residents of Wheatlands will generate other revenues, including personal property taxes, for Frederick County, as shown in Table 7. Based on the per capita operating revenues outlined in the Frederick County's fiscal year 1989 budget, other revenues were projected for Frederick County. By multiplying these per capita amounts by the cumulative population of Wheatlands in each year, Halcyon projects that the residents of Wheatlands will generate $5,676,976 in other revenues from all sources for Frederick County in year 15. School District Revenues The school districts in Clarke and Frederick Counties are funded by county revenues and by state funds through the counties. The summary table shows school district revenues, costs, and net fiscal benefit as sub- categories of overall net fiscal benefit. Based of the current proportion of county revenues received by the school district, it is projected that the Frederick County School District will receive approximately 63 percent of. the county's revenues, or $5,031,118, in year 15. The cumulative revenues for the school district are estimated at over $49 million. Clarke County School District receives approximately 64 percent of county revenues. Therefore, it is estimated that schools will receive approximately $346 of the total revenues received annually by Clarke County from Wheatlands. Over the 15-year buildout period, $5,184 is received by the school district. Because the Clarke County portion of the Wheatlands will not generate residents or pupils, no education or public service costs attributable to Wheatlands are incurred. Therefore, the total revenues equal the net fiscal benefit. IV. COST PROJECTIONS Per Unit Costs The residents and employees of Wheatlands will exert additional demand for county services such as public works, education, and social services. In Table 8, Halcyon has calculated these costs of government on a per capita and per employee basis. Since certain government services are related entirely to residential development while others are related to both residential and commercial development, certain cost categories must be distributed accordingly. 11 Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors Development Managers Halcyon has assumed that those categories that service both residential and commercial development are distributed on an 80 percent/20 percent basis, respectively, between the two; those that service only residential are allocated entirely to residential. Once allocated, the expenditures were divided by the estimated 1989 Frederick County population (39,933), and the estimated 1989 employee population (20,068) to arrive at Frederick County per unit costs. Per unit costs for Clarke County were calculated in the same way. As currently planned, the portion of Wheatlands in Clarke County will remain undeveloped and will not require government services. Thus, Clarke County will not incur additional residential or commercial unit costs related to Wheatlands. Residential Cost Projections In Table 9, Halcyon has projected the annual cost to Frederick County of providing government services to the residents of Wheatlands. To arrive at these projections, Halcyon multiplied the estimated cumulative residential population in each year by the per capita costs developed in Table 8. Annual school district costs (shown in Table 9) were calculated on a per pupil basis by dividing the 1989/90 Frederick County schools enrollment into the 1989/90 school district budget. The $5,132 per pupil education costs were then multiplied by the estimated number of students likely to reside at Wheatlands in order to arrive at the annual figures. Halcyon projects that coma services for the Wheatlands residential population will total approximately $5.9 million in year 15. Conuxiercial Cost Projections Halcyon has likewise computed the total cost to Frederick County of providing services to the commercial components and employees of Wheadands, as shown in Table 10. The projected number of employees was multiplied by the per employee costs developed in Table 8 in order to estimate the total costs to the county. Halcyon has estimated that Frederick County will ultimately incur costs of $111,667 annually at project buildout to provide county services attributable to the commercial portion of Wheatlands. ' Halcyon Ltd. Real Estate Consultants Investment Advisors ' Development Managers IV. SUMMARY OF FISCAL IMPACT Table 11 provides a summary of the revenues and costs to Frederick and Clarke Counties from the proposed Wheatlands project. Wheatlands will ultimately provide Frederick County with revenues of $78.7 million over the 15-year development period and will necessitate services costing $58.7 million for a net fiscal benefit of $20 million. Clarke County will receive total cumulative revenues of $8,040 and will incur no costs of servicing the project, for a net fiscal benefit of $8,040 over the 15-year period. This net ' fiscal benefit will provide Frederick and Clarke Counties with revenues that would otherwise have to be financed through tax-exempt municipal bond offerings, tax rate increases, or other means. In addition to having a ' cumulative positive fiscal impact, the proposed project has a positive fiscal impact every year of the development period. Wherefore, no interim county borrowing will be required for Wheatlands. ' VI. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE An analysis was conducted to determine the sensitivity of overall net fiscal impact to changes in the population of Wheatlands by adjusting the average household size. Average household size translates directly into the overall project population and school -age children population, the main generators of additional public costs. As shown in Table 12, in scenarios 2 and 3, when 1990 household size was increased by 10 percent and 20 percent, the cumulative net fiscal benefit declined slightly. In all of the scenarios, the increase in costs resulting from the larger household population was not met with an equal increase in revenues provided through property taxes --the total number of housing units remained stable, but the population grew. The result is a slightly lower net fiscal impact in each alternative scenario. M M M M M M M M M M M r M M M M M i M SUMMARY TABLE WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Development Program its. Per Acre , Adr, Residential Townhouse 216 8.0 27 Mufti -Family 0 0.0 0 Single -Family 1,584 3.4 469 Commercial Sq. Ft. FAR Acres Village Center 140,000 0.00 11 Office Center 50,000 0.00 1 Hotel 0 0.00 0 Industrial 0 0 0 Constriction Employment Total Construction Cost 234,330,000 Labor Cost (50 % of Total Cost) 117,165,000 Average Annual Construction Wage $21,112 Number of Labor Man -Years 5,550 Clarka'County Flscat Impact YearlS Year 10 Year 15 Cumulative Total Revenues $536 $536 $536 $8,040 Property Taxes $536 $536 S536 $0 Sales Tax and Other Revenues s0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) $8,040 larlcpCounta! Sdaols Ylaarb: ; :;: .Y..ear t0 Year 15 .; CumQlative> Total Revenues $346 $346 $346 $5.184 Total Costs $0 $o $0 SO Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) Frederick County Flscali Impact Years Year 10 Yeal 15 �iutfElG�BttiYB Total Revenues $3.409,170 $7,498,801 $8,028,906 $78,672,778 Property Taxes 804,137 1,834.694 2,001,965 18,001,124 Sales Tax and Other Revenues 2.605.032 5.664,107 6.026,941 59,475.926 Total Costs $2,584,143 $5.567,016 $5.946,929 $58,721.166 Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) %Fledefwkal 0 .:; Yar15;;.; Ciirrwla3hs; Total Revenues $2,136,528 $4,699,501 $5,031.718 $49,304,255 Total Casts $1,638.312 $3,494,569 $3,740,606 $36,974,428 Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) TOTAL NET FISCAL IMPACT (COST) $825.563 $1.932,322 $2,082.512 $19.959,652 The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 M KEY ASSUMPTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Program Avg. Val. Total Housing Number %d Total Per Unit Value Townhouse 216 12% $119,000 $25,704.000 Mufti -Family 0 0% $0 so Single -Family 1,584 88% $160.000 $253,440.000 Total 1.800 100% $155,080 $279.144,000 Avg. Val. Total Commercial S.F. %of Total Per S.F. Value ....: Tax Revenue Assumptions Clarke County Frederick County Tar Raters (per$100) T&KRates (per $100) Commercial Residential Commercial Residential Real Prop. 0.800 0.800 Personal Prop 4.000 4.000 Real Property 0.660 0.660 Personal Prop 4250 4250 Village Center 140,000 73.7% $120 $16,600,000 Miscellaneous . Office Center 50,000 0 26.3% 0.0% $125 $6,250,000 $0 $0 Eq. Ratios 100.00°F. 100.00% Eq. Ratios 100.00% 100.00% Hotel Industrial 0 0.0% $0 $0 Hotel Room Tax 0.00% Hotel Room Tax 0.00%s::; .. Hotel Room Rate $0.00 Hotel Occupancy 0.0M. Total 190,000 100.00% $23.050,000 Undeveloped Lard - Clarks County >Demographles ' .. :; .. Assessed Taal Acreage VaIJAcre Value Population -Frederick County 39,933 Population -Clarke County 10,833 mmerci Employment -Frederick County 20,068 Employment -Clarke County 4,317 Residential 48 $1,396 $67.001 1990 Avg.Household Sae -Frederick Co. 2.82 1990 Avg.Household Sae -Clark Co. 2.61 Ann'I Avg.Change in Household Size -0.547% Ann'I Avg.Change in Household Sae -0.551% Frederick County Schools Enrollment 7,522 Clarke County Schools Enrollment 1,600 Adjusted Gross Income $26,195 Adjusted Gross Income $30,241 Commonwealth of Virginia Age Distribution Age Distribution State Sales Tax Rate 4.50% County Share of Salsa Tax 2222% years 10-14 years 6.41 % 2,558 years 10-14 years a 5.61% 608 State Income Tax Rate 0.00% County Share of Income Ta 0.00% 15-19 years 6.78 % 2.707 15-19 years 5.02% 544 Average Deduction $0 School Children Per Dwelling Unit: %a Avg. HH Sae Elementary Middle High Total Townhouse 80% 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.37 Mufti -Family 60% 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.28 Single -Family 100% 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.46 ': gg isDevelopmentCosts I ...ik;�:Yt;::ih,+.iY,+,'::$:.,•};.:::i.+.:.::::w::':�viYY<i:Y:::} {:;: ........ Acres Building Cost Building Construction Costs Per Unit Acres Area(sf) Per Unit Infrastructure Costs (per acre) 1,584 Single Farnily Homes 0.30 469 2,200 $124,000 Excavation & Grading 44.00% $15,840 216 Townhouses 0.13 27 1,800 $92.500 Sewer & Water 14.00% $5.040 1 Community Center 6.00 6 4,000 $650,000 Storm Drains 12.00% $4,320 1 Tennis & Swim Center 4.00 4 1,200 $325,000 Paving 11.00% $3,960 1 Neighborhood Pool 2.50 3 800 $159,000 Curbs & Sidewalks 9.00% $3,240 1 Village Center 11.00 11 140,000 $16,800,1X10 Landscaping 10.00% $3,600 1 School 15.00 15 1 Office Center 1.00 1 50.000 $6,250,000 Total Per Acre 100.00% $36.000 38.92 534 150.000 Source; Frederick County; Ciarke unty; Frederick County Public a County Public Scho66; Lord Fairfax Planning DistrictCommission; 14alcyon Ltd. The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 KEY ASSUMPTIONS, continued WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Clarke County Sdredule of Budgeted Operating Expenses Sdredule of Budgeted Qoerating Revenues Executive $145,525 Real Property Tax $3,125,000 Admin. & Finance $556,625 Pers. Property Tax $1,244.386 Judicial $128,727 Other Taxes $642,500 Community Development $234,984 Penalties & Interest $65,500 Public Safety $1,124,454 Charges/Miscellaneous $641,300 Public Service $508.028 Non -Revenue Receipts $1,016.190 Public Works $278.430 State Aid $5.436,338 Public Buildings $155.865 Federal Aid $115.000 Public Health $97,271 Fees & Permits $236,750 Education $8,079,125 District $16,530 Debt Service $10,000 Capital Projects $1.187,400 Total 12,522.964 Frederick County Sdodula of Operating Expenses General Administration $4,211,363 Judicial Administration $1.744.682 Public Safety $4,780,430 Public Services $3.296,898 Health & Welfare $1,488.622 Education $33.201.890 Parks, Recreation, & Cultur $1.233,253 Community Development $1,455.820 Non -Departmental $4,519,166 School Building Program $3,864.624 School Debt $1,795.487 Total $61,592.235 Total $12,522,964 Sdredule of Operating Revenues General Operating Fund $29,870,815 Northwest Regional Jail Fun $120,392 Frederick-WinchesterLandfi $2,190,621 Div. of Court Services Fund $797,046 Shawnee -Land Sanitary Dis $320,000 School Operating Fund $18,736,131 School Cafeteria Fund $1.551,993 School Construction Fund $3,967,523 School Debt Service Fund $22.442 Regional Jail Capital Project Admin. Ren. Cap. Proj. un $1.025.000 $2,027,382 Airport Auth. Cap. Proj. Fun $533.000 Latridk Trust Fund $90 Harriet Sides Trust Fund $560 School Textbook Fund $429,240 Total $61.592,235 ctark�Courtypubfcsota Budgeted Operating Expensed Budgeted Qpwaatrp Resonuea General Support $291,850 State Funds $2,575.738 Instruction $5,774,057 Federal Funds $243.400 Transportation $430,545 Other Funds $10,000 Operations & Maintenance $714,900 State Sales Tax $8,3,000 Non -Instructional Operation $300,9D0 County Appopriation $4,222,642 Facilities $6.500 Cafeteria Reoepts $210,000 Other Uses of Funds $353,100 Special Education $72,236 Chapter 1 & 2 $127,669 Ed. for Economic Security A $3.023 Source: Frederick County; Clarke County; Frederick County Public Schools; Clarke County Public Schools; Halcyon Ltd. Total $8,074,780 $8,074.780 Frederick County Public Schools Budgeted Operating Expenses Budgeted Operating Revenuers General Support $826,955 State Aid $17,249,597 Instruction $24,002,680 Interfund Transfers $11,864.445 Transportation $1,720,265 Federal Aid $1.048.412 Operations & Maintenance $3,269,630 Other Revenue $438.122 Construction Projects $3,864,624 School Cafeteria Fund $1,881.231 Facilities $151,500 School Construction Fund $3,864,624 Debt Service $1,795,487 School Debt Service Fund $1,795,487 Attendance & Health Servic $629.546 Latridk Trust Fund $90 Other Uses $2,339,1136 Harriet Sides Trust Fund $560 School Textbook Fund $457,305 of ,5g9,873 ,599,873 The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 M M M A M M M= M M M M M= i = = M M PROJECT DEVELOPMENT WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY ........ ....................... Development Program Total 19W 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19W ..', 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003, Single Family Homes 1,584 291 291 291 171 170 185 185 Townhouses 216 50 58 56 50 Community Center 1 1 Tennis & Swim Center 1 1 _ Neighborhood Pod 1 1 Village Center (sf) 140,000 40•000 100,000 School 1 1 Office Center (sf) 50,000 50•000 Dovoloped Acreage ; ........ .............................. Single Family Homes 469 0 86 06 86 51 50 55 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 Townhouses 27 0 6 0 0 7 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Center 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennis & Swim Center 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Neighborhood Pod 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Center 11 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 School 15 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office Center 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 535 0 98 86 108 58 60 61 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; lnfrastrudure Costs Excavation &Grading $8.460,763 $1.557,780 $1,363,740 $1,714,483 $916.213 $951.126 $965,982 $991,439 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sewer & Water $2,692,061 $495,657 $433.917 $545,517 $291.522 $302.631 $307,358 $315,458 SO $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Storm Drains $2.307,481 $424.849 $371.929 $467,586 $249,876 S259,398 $263.450 $270.393 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Paving $2,115.191 $389,445 $340.935 $428,621 $229,053 $237.782 $241,496 $247,860 $0 $o $0 $0 so $0 $0 Curbs & Sidewalks $1,730.611 $318,637 $278.947 $350,690 $187.407 $194.549 $197,587 $202.794 $0 $0 $0 $0 to $0 $0 Landscaping $1,922,901 $354.041 $309,941 $389.655 $208,230 $216.165 $219.541 $225.327 $0 $0 $o so $0 $0 $0 Total $19,229.006 $3.540.408 $3.099,408 $3,896.551 $2.082,302 $2,161,651 $2,195.414 $2.253,271 $0 $0 $0 $a $0 $0 $0 iiGtan in ;.... Single Family Homes $196,416,000 $36,084.000 ........... S36,084,000 $36,084.000 $21.204,000 $21,080,000 $22,940,000 $22.W0,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Townhouses $19,980,000 $4,626,000 $0 $0 $5,365.000 $5,365.000 S4,625,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Center $650,000 $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tennis & Swim Center $325,000 SO $0 $325.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Neighborhood Pod $159,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Village Center $16,800,000 $0 $0 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 School $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Office Center $6,250,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $234,330,000 $41,359,000 $36.084,000 541,209,000 $26,569.000 $28,604.000 $27.565.000 $34,940,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 to $0 Total Development Costs $253.559.006 $44.899.408 $39,18:3,408 $45,105.551 $28.651,302 $28.765,651 $29.760.414 $37.193.271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 The Inlergate Company W heatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 M i r TABLE 1 HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Total 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19N 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Annual Housing Units Sold Townhouse 216 0 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mufti -Family Single -Family 0 1,584 0 0 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,800 0 189 189 189 lag 189 189 189 158 158 158 0 0 0 0 Cumulative Housing Units Sold Townhouse 0 31 62 93 123 154 185 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 Mufti -Family 0 0 0 158 0 317 0 475 U 634 0 792 0 950 0 1.109 0 1,267 0 1,426 0 1.584 0 1,584 0 1,584 0 1.584 0 1,564 Single -Family Total 0 189 379 568 757 946 1,136 1,325 1,483 1,642 1,800 1,a00 1,800 1,l= 1.800 Average Household Size (1) Townhouse 2.17 2.16 2.15 2.14 2.12 2.11 2.10 2.09 2.08 2.06 2.05 2.04 203 2.02 2.01 Mufti -Family 1.63 1.62 1.61 1.60 1.59 1.58 1.57 1.57 1.56 1.55 1.54 1.53 1.52 1.51 1.50 Single -Family 2.72 2.70 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.62 261 2.59 2.58 2.56 2.55 2.54 252 2.61 :�Q181({,.p�OPubdiotl :I- ':<i I>I %. <.xs;::•:::•::.;:.;;.;;.;.,. ., ............ Townhouse 433 0 67 133 198 262 326 389 451 448 446 443 441 438 438 433 Mufti -Family Single-FarnRy 0 3.971 0 0 0 428 0 850 0 1,268 0 1.682 0 2,090 0 2.494 0 2,893 0 3.287 0 3,677 0 4,063 0 4,040 0 4,017 0 3,994 0 3.971 Total 4.405 0 494 983 1.466 1,944 2416 2,B82 3,344 3.736 4,123 4,506 4.480 4 47M (1) Based on average size of Frederick and Clarke County households, multiplied by percentage of average household size as shown in Key Assumptions The Intergate Company Wheallands Fiscal Inpad Analysis 25Sep-89 ■r IM M M err M M 11=1 M M M M r■� rr r rr rr rr it TABLE 2 SCHOOL -AGE CHILDREN PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Total 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20M 2004 Cumulative Housing Units Townhouse 216 0 31 62 93 123 154 185 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 0 Mufti -Family a Single -Family 0 1,584 0 0 0 158 0 317 0 475 0 634 0 792 0 950 0 1.109 0 1,267 0 1.426 0 1,584 0 1.584 0 1.584 0 1.584 1,584 Elementary School Pupils (1) Townhouse 17 0 3 5 8 10 114 15 18 18 18 17 17 17 17 0 17 0 Mufti-Farnily 0 196 0 0 0 21 0 42 0 62 C. 83 0 103 0 123 0 142 0 162 0 181 0 200 0 199 0 198 197 196 Single -Family Total 213 0 24 47 70 93 116 138 160 180 199 218 216 215 214 213 Middle School Pupils (1) Townhouse 21 0 3 6 10 13 16 19 22 22 21 21 21 21 21 21 0 Mufti -Family Single -Family 0 239 0 0 0 26 0 51 0 76 0 101 0 126 0 150 0 174 0 198 0 221 0 245 0 243 0 242 0 241 239 Total 260 0 29 58 86 114 142 169 196 220 243 266 265 263 262 260 High School Pupils (1) Townhouse 21 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 0 21 0 Mufti -Family Single -Family 0 236 0 0 0 25 0 50 0 75 0 100 0 124 0 148 0 172 0 195 0 218 0 241 0 240 0 238 237 236 Tom 256 0 29 57 85 112 139 166 193 216 239 262 28 2 56 Total :..: .::::.. !►AdlgalfW. ..:.... ;:. d>'fi : :::•. •::•:::.::<.::.;;:: is F'4:'."3i:`•3i<C ::: ;::••:::•>:•:::.:::;;:•::•::<:::::::::.:: i:. :i :;:;> ;.:;: p:r •:i::::::::i:::;:;z:::.::;::•::•::::>;r::;::•:;::•>:•>::o-;:.i:•::•;:•:;::•::::;:.;;:::•::i::•::•;::.;<z:::::;::•::•::•:.... ' ... 'r ;:;:;:;: .;::::. :.:.:;::;:; '.•Pi:: . <:: ?: 3 i:::. ai `S ;:c:;l:::;:;: I:.:;i4< > ; :[: E:: ;:i 5:???i >:.>::•>::•:•>:•;: :`•f ;: Elementary 213 0 24 47 70 93 116 138 160 180 199 243 218 266 216 265 215 263 214 262 213 260 Middle -School 260 0 0 29 29 58 57 86 85 114 112 142 139 169 166 196 193 220 216 239 262 261 259 258 256 High -School 256 Total 729 0 81 161 241 319 397 4 616 681 46 41 7 1) Based on school district planning parameters displayed in Key Assumptions The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-69 M M Mr r r r M Mr M IM M w M = r M IWI MM 1=1 TABLE 3 EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Total 19W 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19W 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Cumulative Commercial Devek4xnent (Sq. Ft.) Community Center 4,000 0 4,000 4,000 4.000 4,000 4.000 4,000 4,000 4.000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Tennis & Swim Center 1,200 0 0 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1.200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 12W 1,200 Neighborhood Pod 800 0 0 0 0 0 800 800 80o aw Soo 800 800 800 800 800 Village Center (sf) 140.000 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 40.000 40,000 140.000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140.000 140.000 140,000 Office Center(sf) 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000 50.000 50,000 : ....:::::.:::::::.�::::...:::•:::::::::::::•:: •: ::..: ;:.:.;•:.:;:::::?> ;}';i::i::::::;>::;::i:;;;::;•::;:;:<:':::::;•:::::;;::>::>::::;::;::;:•;;>::;::::i:::S;fSiS;i::;;:::i:L:;'•::•:S>:;: Community Center (1) 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 5 3 Tennis & Swim Center (2) 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Neighborhood Pod ( Village Center (sf) (3)) 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Office Center (sf) (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 0 5 5 108 108 110 110 560 560 560 560 560 560 560 560 (1) Assumes 1 employee per 800 sq. ft. (2) Assumes 1 employee per 400 sq. ft. (3) Assumes 1 employee per 400 sq. ft. (4) Assumes 1 employee per 250 sq. tt. The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 TABLE 4 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Ccnstant 1989 Dollars) Cumulative Housing Units Townhouse 0 31 62 93 123 154 185 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 Mufti -Family 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Single -Family 0 158 317 475 63.1 792 950 1,109 1,267 1.426 1,584 1.584 1,584 1,584 1,584 Total Value (000) (1) Townhouse $0 $3.672 $7,344 $11,016 $14,688 $18,360 $22.032 $25,704 $25.704 $25,704 $25,704 $26,704 $25.704 $25,704 $25,704 Mufti -Family $0 so $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 so $0 s0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 Singl&-Family $0 $25,344 $50.688 $76,032 $101,376 $126,720 $152.064 $177,408 $202.752 $228.096 s253,440 $253.440 SMA40 $253,440 $253A40 CI arks County.:.. .. Assessed Value (000)(2) $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 Townhouse Multi -Family s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 so s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 Single -Family $0 so $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 Undeveloped Property 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 Total Taxes (4) Townhouse $0 s0 $0 s0 so $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mufti -Family $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 Single -Family $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 Undevek"d Property $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $556 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 Total $536 $536 5536 $536 Sa3fi $536 5536 $536 IX- ....... Assessed Value (000) (3) Townhouse $0 $3,672 $7,344 $11,01G $14,688 $18,360 $2Z032 $25,704 $25,704 $25,704 s25,704 $25,704 $25,704 $25,704 $25,704 Mufti -Family. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Single -Family $0 $25,344 $50,688 $76.032 $101.376 $126.720 $152,064 $177,408 $202,752 $228.096 $253.440 $253,440 $253,440 $253,"0 $253,440 Total Taxes (4) Townhouse $0 $24,235 $48.470 $72,706 $96,941 $121.176 $145.411 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 $169,646 Mufti -Family so s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 so s0 Single -Family $0 $167.270 $334,541 $501,811 $R69,082 $836.352 $1,003,622 $1,170,893 $1,338,163 $1,505,434 $1,67Z704 $1,672,704 $1,67Z704 $1,67Z704 $1,672,704 Total so $191.506 $383.011 $574.517 $766.022 $957.528 $1,149.034 $1.340,539 $1,507,810 $1,675,080 $1,84Z350 $1.84Z350 - $1,84Z350 $1,84Z350 $1,84Z350 (1) Based on average values shown in Key Assumptions. (2) Based on an equalization ratio of 100.00%. (3) Based on an equalization ratio of 100.00 (4) Based on residential property tax rates listed in Key Assumptions The Intergate Company Wheatland$ Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 TABLE 5 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAX PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) 19W 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Cumulative Convnerdal Development Community Center 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tennis & Swim Center 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Neighborhood Pod 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Village Center(sf) 0 0 0 40.000 40.000 40,000 40,000 140,000 14-0,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140.000 140.000 140.000 Office enter(sf) C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Value (1) Community Center $0 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,ODD $650,ODO $650,000 $650,ODO $650,000 $650,000 $650.000 $650.000 $650,000 Tennis & Swim Center $0 $0 $0 $325.000 $325,ODO $325,000 $325,000 $325.000 $325,ODO $325,000 $325.ODO $325,000 $325.000 $325,000 $325.000 Neighborhood Pod $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $159,000 $159,000 $159,000 $159.000 $159,000 $159,ODO $159,000 $159.000 $169,000 $159,000 Village Center $0 $0 $0 $4,80 .000 $4,800.000 $4,800,000 $4,800,000 $16,800.000 $16,800,000 $16,800.000 $16.800,000 $16,800.000 $16,800.000 $16,800,000 $16.800,000 Office Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $C $0 $6250.000 $6,250.000 $6.250.000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6.250,000 Clarke County .. Assessed Value (000)(2) Community Center s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D s0 $0 Tennis & Swim Center s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 Neighborhood Pod $0 $0 $0 s0 $C s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 s0 SO $0 Village Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so so $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 Office Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Taxes (4) Community Center $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 Tennis & Swim Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $C $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Neighborhood Pod s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 s0 $0 so $0 s0 $0 Village Center $0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Office Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Frederick County ;; _ ' .....•:. ;vrak�S:#•:�::'t�r:Sa.S:'iSntr::::.,.:...:...:,,.:..•:.�::.,,,•ra,•.,,3c,..::..ax<.....:.,•.,Sc:x•:>:r:: r:.v:..; }.::.••... i.i::.::. ::::..::.�:::: ......... r>::::::�::•:o-::o-:. {.,..:::.....:. r..f...nr3$r..v:...::5 Assessed Value (3) Community Center $0 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,ODO $650,000 $650.000 $650,000 $650.000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,OD0 Tennis & Swim Center s0 $0 $0 $325,000 $326,000 $325,ODO $325,000 $326.000 $325.000 $325,ODO $325,000 $325,000 $325.000 $325,000 $325.000 Neighborhood Pod $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $159.000 $159.000 $159,000 $159,000 $159,000 $159,000 $159,000 $159.000 $159.000 $159,000 Village Center $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 $4,800,000 s4,800,000 s4,800,000 $16.800.000 $16,800,000 $16,800,000 $16,800,000 $16,800,000 $16,800.000 $16.800.000 $16,8W,000 Office Center so $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $6.250,000 $6.250,000 $6250,000 $6,250.000 $6,250.000 $6,250,000 $6250.000 $6250,000 Total Taxes (4) Community Center $0 $4,290 $4,290 $4,290 s4,290 $4,290 $4,290 $4,290 $4.290 $4.290 $4,290 $4,290 $4,290 $42W $4290 Tennis&Swim Center $0 s0 s0 $2,145 $2.145 $2.145 $2,145 $2,145 $2,145 $2,145 $2.145 $2,145 $2,145 $2.145 $2,145 Neighborhood Pod $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $1,049 $1.049 $1,049 $1,049 $1,049 $1,049 $1,049 $1,049 $1,049 $1.049 Village Center so $0 s0 $31,680 $31,680 $31,680 $31,680 $110,880 $110,880 $110,880 $110,880 $110.880 $110.880 $110,880 $110.880 Office Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 so $41,250 $41250 $41,250 $41,250 $41,250 $41.250 $41250 $41250 Total s0 $4,290 $4,290 $36,115 $38,115 $39,164 $39,164 $159,614 $159,614 $159.614 $159,614 $169,614 $159,614 $159.614 $159.614 (1) Based on average values shown in Key Assumptions. (2) Based on equalization ratio of 100.00%. (3) Based on equalization ratio of 100.00 (4) Based on commercial property tax rates listed in Key Assumptions. Source: The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25-Sep-89 i1=1 M M err = M war r M M r M M M .r I TABLE 6 COUNTY SALES TAX REVENUE PROJECTIONS WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) 1990 1991 19W 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Cumulative Clarke'County Total Retail Sales (1) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 State Sales Tax Revenues (2) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 80 $0 $0 $0 so $0 1s0 $0 $0 County Portion of Revenue (3) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Retail Sales (1) $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000.000 $10,000.000 $35.000,000 $35.000,000 $35,000.000 $35.000,000 $35.000,000 $35,000.000 $35,000,000 $35,000.000 State Sales Tax Revenues (2) $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1.575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 County Portion of Revenue (4) $o $0 $0 $99,990 $99,990 $99.990 $99,990 $349.965 $349,965 $349,965 $349.965 $349,965 $349,965 $349,%5 $30.965 $3,199,680 (1) Estimated at $250 per square toot. (2) State Sales Tax rate is 4.5%. (3) Clarke County receives 22.29/ of sales tax revenues. (4) Frederick County receives 222% of sales tax revenues. Source: Halcyon Ltd. The Intergate Conpany Whoatlands F;soal Irpact Analysis 25--So"g m m m m m m TABLE 7 PROJECTIONS OF OTHER OPERATING REVENUES--CLARKE COUNTY WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Revenue Per Capita(1) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2D04 Cumulative Pers. Property Tax $114.87 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 Other Taxes $34.39 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 Penalties & Interest $6.05 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Charges/Miscellaneous $59.20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 Non -Revenue Receipts $93.81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 State Aid $501.83 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 so $0 s0 $0 s0 Federal Aid $10.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Foes & Permits $21.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $842.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 PROJECTIONS OF OTHER OPERATING REVENUES-FREDERICK COUNTY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Per Revenue Capita(2) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2D04 Cumulative General Operating Fund $494.52 $0 $244,418 $486,064 $724.960 $961,130 $1,194,598 $1,425,385 $1,653,616 $1,847,345 s2,038,921 $2,228,264 $2,216,624 $2,203,055 s2,190,558 $2,178,132 Northwest Regional Jail F $3.01 $0 $1,490 $2,963 $4.420 $5,860 $7,283 $8,690 $10,081 $11,262 $12,430 $13,585 $13.508 $13,431 $13,355 $13.279 Frederick -Winchester La $54.86 $0 $27,114 $53,920 $80,421 $106.620 $132,519 $158.120 $183.427 $204.929 $226,181 $247,185 $245.782 $244.388 $243,002 6241,624 Div. of Court Services Fu $19.96 $0 $9,865 $19.618 $29,261 $38,793 $48,216 $57,531 $66.739 $74.562 $82,295 $89.937 $89,427 $88,919 $88,415 $97.913 Shawnee -Land Sanitary $8.01 s0 $3.961 $7,876 $11,748 $15,575 $19.358 $23.098 $26.795 $29,935 $33,D40 $36.108 $35,903 $35.700 $35,407 $35.296 School Operating Fund $469.19 $0 $231.900 $461.170 $687,831 $911,906 $1,133,416 $1,352,384 $1,568,831 $1,752,732 $1,934,497 $2,114,142 $2,102,150 $2,090,225 SZ078.368 $2,066,678 School Cafeteria Fund $38.86 $0 $19.209 $38,201 $56,976 $75,537 $93,886 $112,024 $129.953 $145,186 $160,243 $175,123 $174,130 $173,142 $172,160 $171,183 School Construction Fun $99.35 $0 $49,107 $97,656 $145,654 $193,103 $240,010 $286,378 $332,212 $371.155 $409,645 $447.686 $445,147 $442.622 $440,111 $437.614 School Debt Service Fun $0.56 $0 $278 $552 $824 $1,092 $1,358 $1,620 $1.879 $2,099 $2,317 $2.532 $2,518 $2.504 $2,489 $2.475 Regional Jail Capital Proj $25.67 s0 $12.687 $25,229 $37,629 $49,888 $62.006 $73,985 $85.826 $95.887 $105,831 $115.659 $115.003 $114,350 $113,702 $113.057 Admin. Ran. Cap. Proj. F $50.77 $0 $25,093 $49,902 $74,428 $98,675 $122,644 $146,338 $169,759 $189.658 $209.328 $228,765 $227,467 $226,177 $224,894 $223.618 Airport Auth. Cap. Proj. F $13.35 $0 $6,597 $13,119 $19,567 $25,942 $32,243 $38,472 $44,630 $49,861 $55,032 $60,143 $59,801 $59,462 $59,125 $58,789 Latridk Trust Fund $0.00 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $8 $8 $9 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 Harriet Sides Trust Fund $0.01 $0 $7 $14 $21 $27 $34 S40 $47 $52 $58 $63 $63 $62 $62 $62 School Textbook Fund $10.75 $0 $5.313 $10,W5 $15,758 $20,892 $25.966 $30,983 $35,942 $40,155 $44,319 $48,434 $48,160 $47,887 $47,616 $47.345 Total $1,288.88 $0 $637,040 $1,266,853 $1.889,500 $2,505.042 $3.113,540 $3,715,054 $4,309,644 $4,814,828 $5,314,142 $5,807,636 $5,774,692 $5,741,934 $5,709,363 $5,676,976 $56.276.246 (1) Based on per capita revenues projected for 1989-90 Clarke County budget. (2) Based on per capita revenues projected for 1989.90 Frederick County budget. Source: Halcyon Ltd. The Intergate Conpany Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25Sep-89 M M M M M M M M1=1 M M r1=1 w1=1 r M1=1 M TABLE 8 UNIT COSTS--CLARKE COUNTY WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY Allocation (1) 1989 Per Per Expenditures Budget Residential Commercial Capita (2) Employee (3) Executive $145,526 $116,420 $29,105 $10.75 $6.74 Admin. & Finance $556,625 $445,300 $111,325 $41.11 $25.79 Judicial $128.727 $102,982 $25,745 $9.51 $5.96 Community Development $234,984 $187,987 $46,997 $17.35 $10.89 Public Safety $1.124,454 $899,563 $224.891 $83.04 $52.09 Public Service $508.028 $508.028 $0 $46.90 $0.00 Public Works $278.430 $222,744 $55,686 $20.56 $12.90 Public Buildings $155,865 $124,692 $31,173 $11.51 $7.22 Public Health $97,271 $97,271 $0 $8.98 $0.00 Education (other than school district) $4,345 $4,345 $0 $0.40 $0.00 Distract $16.530 $13,224 $3,306 $1.22 $0.77 Debt Service $10,000 $8,000 $2,000 $0.74 $0.46 Capital Projects $1,187,400 $949,920 $237,480 $87.69 $55.01 Total $4.448.184 $3,68Q476 $767,708 $339.75 $177.83 UNIT COSTS--FREDERICK COUNTY Expenditures 1969 Budget Residential Commercial Per Capita (4) For Employee (5) General Administration $4,211,363 $3,369,090 $842,273 $84.37 $41.97 Judicial Administration $1,744,682 $1,395.746 $348.936 $34.95 $17.39 Public Safety $4,780,430 $3.824.344 $956,086 $95.77 $47.64 Public Services $3,296,898 $2.637,518 $659,380 $66.05 $32.86 Health & Welfare $1,488,622 $1,488.622 $0 $37.28 $0.00 Education (other than school district) $262,128 $262.128 $0 $6.56 $0.00 Parks, Recreation, & Cultural $1,233,253 $1.233.253 $0 $30.88 $0.00 Community Development $1,455,820 $1.164,656 $291,164 $29.17 $14.51 Non -Departmental $4.519,166 $3.616.333 $903,833 $90.53 $45.04 School Building Program $0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 School Debt $0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 (1) Based on 80120 split for certain cost categories. (2) Based on 1989 Clarke County population of 10833. (3) Based on estimated 1989 Clarke County employment of 4317. (4) Based on 1989 Frederick County population of 39933. (5) Based on estimated 1989 Frederick County employment of 20068. ource: krederick Uounafke oun you LIU. The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis `�e"g M M M IM M r M M=1 M M M M M M M I• = I• TABLE 9 RESIDENTIAL COST PROJECTIONS--CLARKE COUNTY & SCHOOL. DISTRICT WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Expenditures Per Capita(1) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Executive $10.75 $0 $0 SO $0 SO $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D Adm n. B Finance $41.11 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Judicial $9.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Development $17.35 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 Public Safety $83.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Service $46.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works $20.56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Buildings $11.51 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Public Health S8.98 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Education (other than school district) $0.40 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 District $1.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service $0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Projects $87.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $339.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Education Costs (Per Pupil) $5,048.74 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 :0 $0 i0 Total Costa $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL COST PROJECTIONS--FREDERICK COUNTY & SCHOOL DISTRICT (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Per Expenditures Capita 1990 1991 1932 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20M 2001 2002 2003 2D04 General Administration Judicial Administration Public Safety Public Services Health 8 Welfare Education (other than school district) Parks, Recreation, 8 Cultural Community Development Non -Departmental School Building Program School Debt Subtotal Education Costs (Per Pupil) Taal Source: Halcyon Ltd. $84.37 $0 S41,700 S82,927 $123,684 $163,977 $203,808 $243,183 $282.104 $316.172 $347,857 $380.160 $378,004 $376,860 $373,728 $371.608 $34.95 $0, $17.275 $34.355 $51,240 $67.932 $84.434 $100,746 $116,870 $130.570 $144.110 $157A93 $156,599 $155,711 $154,828 - $153.949 $95.77 $0 $47.335 $94,132 $140,397 $186,135 $231.348 $276.043 $320,224 $357,761 $394.862 $431,530 $429,082 $426,648 $424228 $421,822 $66.05 $0 $32,645 564,920 $96,827 $128,371 $159.553 $190.377 $220,847 $246,735 $272.323 $297,612 S295,923 S294A45 $292,576 $290,916 $37.28 $0 $18,425 $36,641 $54,650 $72.463 $90.052 $107,450 $124,647 $139258 $153,700 $167.973 $167.020 $166,072 $165.130 $164.194 $6.56 SO S3,244 $6.452 $9,623 $12,758 $15,857 $18.921 $21.949 $24.522 $27,065 $29.578 $29.410 $29.243 $29.077 $28,912 $30.88 $0 $15,264 $30,355 $45,275 $60.024 $74,604 $89.017 $103.264 $115.369 $127,333 $139,157 S138,368 $137,583 6136,803 $136,027 $29.17 SO $14.415 $28,667 $42,756 $56,685 $70,454 $84,065 $97,520 $108,962 $120,250 $131,417 $130.672 $129,930 $129.193 $128,460 $90.53 $D S44,748 $88,988 $132,724 $175,962 $218.704 $260,957 $302,722 $338=8 $373,281 $407,946 $405,632 $403,331 $401.043 $398.768 S0.00 SO $o $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $475.56 $0 $235.051 $467.436 $697,176 $g24,295 $1.148.815 $1,370,758 $1,590,146 $1,776.546 $1,9W,780 $2,142.886 $Z130.711 118,624 $2.106,606 QA94,656 $5,131.60 $0 $416,628 $828,529 $1,235,744 $1.638,312 $2,036,273 $2,429.666 $2,818.531 $3.158.52A $3,494,569 $3.826,700 $3,804,992 $3.783A08 $3.761.946 $3.74Q606 $0 $651.679 $1095.965 $1,932,920 $2.56z607 $3,185.088 $3.80Q424 $4.40%677 $4.935.070 S5A55.348 S5,969,566 S5.935.703 $5.902.032 $5,868,552 65 B35.262 The Intergata CompanyWheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25Sep-89 M IM M M M M M M r r r M M M M M M TABLE 10 COMMERCIAL COST PROJECTIONS--CLARKE COUNTY WHEATLANDS THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Expenditures Per Employee 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20M 2004 Executive $6.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 co $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Adrrdn. & Finance $25.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Judicial $5.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Development $10.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Safety $52.09 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Service $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works $12.90 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Buildings $7.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Health $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Education (other than school district) $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 District $0.77 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service $0.46 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Projects $55.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i0 COMMERCIAL COST PROJECTIONS--FREDERICK COUNTY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) Per - Expendltures Employee 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2D02 2003 2004 General Administration $41.97 $0 $210 $210 $4,533 $4,533 $4,617 $4,617 $23,504 $23,504 $23,504 $23,504 $23,504 $23,504 $23,504 $23.504 Judicial Administration $17.39 $0 $87 $87 $1,878 $1,878 $1,913 $1,913 $9,737 $9,737 $9.737 $9,737 $9.737 $9,737 $9.737 $9,737 Public Safety $47.64 $0 $238 $238 $5,145 $5,145 $5.241 $5.241 $26,680 $26,680 $26,680 $28,680 $26,680 $26,680 $26,680 $26.680 Public Services $32.86 $0 $164 $164 $3,549 $3.549 $3,614 $3,614 $18,400 $18,400 $18,400 $18AW $18.400 $18,400 $18,400 $18AW Health & Welfare $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Education (other than school district) $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks, Recreation, & Cultural $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Development $14.51 $0 $73 $73 $1,567 $1,567 $1.596 $1,596 $8,125 $8,125 $8,125 $8.125 $8,125 $8,125 $8,125 $8,125 Non -Departmental $45.04 $0 $225 $225 $4,WA $4.864 $4,954 $4,954 $25.222 $25,222 $25,222 $25= $25,222 $25,222 $25,222 $25,222 School Building Program $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 School Debt $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $997 S%7 $21,535 $21,538 $21,935 $21.935 $111.667 $111.667 $111.667 $111,667 $111.867 $111,667 $111,697 $111.687 Source: Halcyon Ltd. The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact AnaFisis 25Sea89 M M M r A M M M TABLE 11 THE INTERGATE COMPANY (In Constant 1989 Dollars) M M r M M M M M M M M 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19N 2000 2D01 2002 2003 2004 Cumulative iCw" County, . .. ..>:� ':> .. ..:>:.. ..: f .. .. ... ... ....... .. .. . .. ... ... ... Revenues Property Taxes Commercial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Residential $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $8,040 Other Revenues s0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenues $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 $536 .040 Costs Commercial s0 $0 $0 $0 $C $0 $0 $� $0 s0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Residential s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $U SO $0 $0 ;0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1i0 Total Costs Not i en i IFreder' .;;:i: :. _ _ .1dc Cou -:.; ..... .. ,... .::;i s2 isi: i•:'• i:;?i'r:2 :: :?a';:"%:;:;:::::i :::::i rS:........... X :i:'i'` E:`; " .............. .......................... ... . Property Taxes Commercial $0 $4,290 $4,290 $38,115 $38.115 $39,164 $39,164 $159.614 $159,614 $159,614 $159.614 $159,614 $159.614 $159,614 $159.614 $1.440,054 Residential $0 $191.506 $383,011 $574,517 $766,022 $957,528 $1.149,034 $1,340,539 $1,507,810 $1,675,080 $1,842,350 $1,842,350 $1,842,350 $1,842,350 $1,842,350 $17.756,798 Sales Taxes $0 $0 $0 $99,990 $99,990 $99,990 $99,990 $349.965 $349,965 $349.965 $349.965 $349.965 $349,965 $349,965 $349.965 $3.199.680 Other Revenues $0 $637,040 $1,266,853 $1,889,500 $2,505,042 $3,113,540 $3,715,054 $4,309,644 $4,814,828 $5,314.142 $5,807.636 $5,774,692 $5,741,934 $5.709,363 $5,676,976 $56,276,246 Total Revenues Costs Commercial $0 $997 $997 $21.536 $21,536 $21,935 $21,935 $111,667 $111.667 $111,667 $111,667 $111.667 $111,667 $111,667 $111,667 $982,272 Residential $0 $651.679 $1,295.965 $1,932,920 $2,562,607 $3,185,088 $3,800,424 $4,408,677 $4,935,070 $5,455,348 $5,969,566 $5,935,703 $5,902,032 $5,868,552 $5,835262 $57,738,894 Total Casts . Net Fiscal e . 36 180,696 , $357.129 $W.202 $825,b63 $1.003.736 ,181,419 $1.639.954 1,/86,018 $1.932.322 2, /8,869 $2.019./88 $2.080.701 $2.081.609 $2.082.512 519,959,652. Clarke County School District _ Revenues $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 $346 S346 $346 S5,184 Costs $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Not en rCOU"•:`•:'•i`ii5?:,c iii:?2i8:i+'J<'' `:'i:: ::•::i°iii:<`5`"i` .. .. ;tMQ6tidc ....:.:.:.:::::......:.:.:::.::::.:............................. .....:.::::.....:..................................... .... ... ........ ..... ......... . Revenues s0 $521,938 $1,036,659 $1.630,751 $2,136,528 $2,638,548 $3,135.534 $3,660,325 $4,281,752 $4,699,501 $5.113,603 $5,092,956 $5.072,427 $5,052,015 $5,031,718 $49,304,255 Costs $0 $416,628 $828,529 $1,235,744 $1,638,312 $2,036,273 $2,429.666 $2.818.531 $3,158,524 $3.494,569 $3,826,700 $3.804,992 $3,783,408 $3,761,946 $3,740,606 $36.974,428 Source: Hale on Ltd. The Intergate Company Wheatlands Fiscal Impact Analysis 25Sep-89 TABLE 12 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS WH EATLAN DS THE INTERGATE COMPANY 1990 Avg. Hsehld. Size: 2.72 (1) 2.99 (2) 326 (3) 'DECL `NJNO` HO'U`3EHOLD 3`1ZE (4) .'.<' Clarke County Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) $8,040 $8,040 $8,040 Frederick County Net Fiscal Benefit (Cost) $19,951,612 $19,814,921 $19,670,189 TOTAL NET FISCAL BENEFIT (COST) $19,959,652 $19,822,961 $19,678,229 7 Notes: (1) Average household size as estimated by the Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission. (2) Reflects a 10 percent larger household size than scenario 1. (3) Reflects a 20 percent larger average household size than scenario 1. (4) Household size declines at the average rate estimated by the Lord Fairfax Planning Commission (5) Household size remains stable over the 15-year period. Source: Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission; Halcyon, Ltd. PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY V `� r �,•1G, ✓� S t' J DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE �1-j To y ® 1� An Assessment of Potential Development Impacts on the Water Quality of Wheatlands Lake prepared for Harrison and Johnston Attorneys at Law Winchester, Virginia prepared by Thomas J. Grizzard, Ph.D., P.E. Manassas, Virginia October, 1990 Table of Contents Introduction...................................................... 1 StudyArea ........................................................ Watershed Characteristics ....................................... Drainage Area .......................................... Current Land Use ........................................ Lake Characteristics ............................................ Storage Volume and Pool Area .............................. Water Quality Measures ............................................. Nutrients.................................................... Phosphorus... .......................................... Nitrogen............................................... TraceMetals ............................................ Chlorophyll ........................................... 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 6 7 8 Trophic State Classification ........................................... 9 Carlson Trophic State Indices .................................... 9 Existing Water Quality .............................................. 13 SecchiDepth ................................................ 13 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen ............................... 13 Other Water Quality Measurements ............................... 20 Hydrogen Ion Activity .................................... 20 20 Total Alkalinity ......................................... Nitrogen.............................................. 20 Phosphorus 20 ............................................ N:P Ratio ............................................. 21 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent .............................. 21 Hydrogen Ion Activity .................................... 21 21 Alkalinity ............................................. Nitrogen.............................................. 21 Phosphorus 21 ............................................ N:P Ratio ............................................. 21 Analysis of Pollutant Export to Wheatlands Lake .......................... 24 Streamflows................................................. 24 Existing Stream Gage Data ................................ 24 Runoff Coefficients ...................................... 24 i Nonpoint Pollutant Export Coefficients ............................ 25 Water Quality Prediction Methods ................................. 25 Water Quality Projections ...................................... 30 BMP Selection ......................................... 30 BMP Performance ....................................... 30 Current Conditions ...................................... 31 Future Conditions - No BMPs .............................. 31 Future Conditions - BMPs in Place .......................... 31 BMP Maintenance ................:...................... 32 Summary and Conclusions ........................................... 35 References....................................................... 36 ii An Assessment of Potential Deveiopment Impacts on the Water Quality of Wheatlands Lake Introduction This report presents the results of a study of Wheatlands Lake, located in Frederick County, Virginia as shown in Figure 1. The report addresses the current water quality of the lake, and the likely water quality effects of a proposed plan of residential development in the tributary watershed, and adjacent to the lake. The report further assesses the likely effects in mitigating pollution export of various levels of stormwater pollution control that might be applied to the development. Study Area r, Watershed Characteristics Drainage Area. The watershed of Wheatlands Lake is situated astride Crooked Run, and is located to the southwest of the intersection of State Routes 522 and 277. The lake is approximately 10 miles south of the City of Winchester. The drainage area was determined by delineation of the boundaries on the 7.5 minute USGS Stephens City Quadrangle, dated 1986, and subsequent planimetric measurement of the area. The drainage area encompasses some 1,936 acres. Current Land Use. Currently, the drainage basin is principally undeveloped, consisting of a mixture of forested and idle land uses. There are a few small isolated areas of residential use near the basin boundaries, and a single trailer park development located in the northeast quadrant near the Route 277 - 522 intersection. The trailer park is served by a small wastewater treatment plant, which discharges to the small unnamed stream tributary to the northeastern arm of Wheatlands Lake. Lake Characteristics Wheatlands Lake was originally impounded in 1976 with the construction of the earth fill dam just west of State Route 522. The dam was renovated following transfer to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Storage Volume and Pool Area. A topographic map of the original bottom contour of r Wheatlands Lake was provided by Gilbert W. Clifford Associates, Inc (1990). The map was I - boundaries. scaled at " 1" = 300' with a contour interval of 10 feet. An area - capacity curve was developed using bottom contour areas and incremental volumes between contours. The resulting morphometric data are shown in Figure 2. As may be seen, the lake had an original storage volume of 2,400 acre-feet at a pool elevation of 616 ft., m.s.l. The pool area 2 at that elevation was 112 acres. This, along with a 49 acre area described by the 50 foot buffer surrounding the lake, resulted in a total of 161 acres. 3 mWrINr, mmmmrmm,mrmm Wheatlands Lake Area -Capacity Curve 120 3,000 100 2,500 U) 80 2,000 }' Ca U ai 60 1,500 "s E o :3 0 °- 40 1,000 > 20 Reference: 500 0 0 550 560 570 560 560 660 610 620 Pool Elevation, ft., msl a G. W. Clifford Assoc. Contour Map of O6/90 Figure 2. Area -Capacity Curve for Whcatlands Lake, Frederick County, Virginia Water Quality Measures The maintenance of acceptable water quality in bodies such as Wheatlands Lake depends upon the development of a thorough understanding of the pollutant types and magnitudes likely to be introduced into the system as a result of the transition to more intense urban land uses. Experience has shown that the most ubiquitous nonpoint pollution problems in watershed - lake systems exhibiting mixes of undeveloped, agricultural, and urban land uses are those related to the export of plant nutrients. There are other potential problems associated with such systems, including the export of organic matter, trace metals (e.g. lead and zinc), and synthetic organics (e.g., pesticides and herbicides). The first category of pollutant may affect the oxygen resources of the receiving system, and the latter two categories may have toxic effects on receiving water biota, and on secondary users of the water. Nutrients Phosphorus. Eutrophication is the process whereby lakes, or other slow moving waters, become enriched with nutrients, resulting in the production of autotrophic biomass, which ultimately dies, decays, and settles to the bottom. The logical conclusion of this process is when such biomass, along with material washed in from the tributary watershed, fills the lake, and transforms it into a peat bog or meadow. It should be emphasized that this is a natural process, and is the fate of all lakes, but in a completely natural system, it may require thousands of years to complete. The activities of man may accelerate the export of I nutrients into lake systems, either through the introduction of wastewaters or through nonpoint pollution. This has given rise to the term cultural eutrophication, which implies an acceleration of the natural process so that enrichment takes place during periods of time on the order of decades or centuries, rather than millennia. I In freshwater lake systems, the rate of the eutrophication process is most often governed by the availability of the plant nutrient phosphorus. This is because the relative scarcity of phosphorus in the earth's crust virtually assures that it will be present in most aquatic systems in smaller concentrations (relative to algal need) than any other required nutrient, including nitrogen. Most attempts to manage the rate of eutrophication of impoundments, therefore, center on the reduction of phosphorus loads to the system, whether from point i or nonpoint sources. EPA (1986), in the latest revision of Quality Criteria for Water, has noted that a consensus on phosphorus criteria for streams and lakes is evolving around values of 50 ug/L for the former where they enter lakes; 100 ug/L in upstream areas; and 25 ug/L for the latter. These criteria are based on a large body of information that suggests that the cited stream 1 5 values are the highest concentrations that are likely to be diluted to the 25 ug/L level in the lake body, and further, that most relatively uncontaminated lakes have surface water phosphorus concentrations between 10 and 30 ug/L (Hutchinson, 1957). The high event mean concentrations of phosphorus present in urban and rural stormwater runoff (121 to 383 ug/L as P, [EPA, 1983]) would seem to implicate these sources as having a pivotal role in determining the trophic state of reservoirs and lakes in developing watersheds. Nitrogen. The receiving water effects of nitrogen are related to its ability, in certain concentration ranges and forms, to act as a stimulant to the excessive growth of phytoplankton, cause the consumption of oxygen when being oxidized, act as a toxicant to aquatic life, and induce some human health problems when consumed. Nitrogen is a required nutrient for all forms of life in that it is essential for the formation of amino acids and proteins. This has been used as a rationale for the control of nitrogen from wastewaters and runoff entering lakes sensitive to excessive growths of algae. If sufficient quantities of the forms usable by algae (NH4-N, NO? N, and NO3-N) are eliminated from the aquatic environment, it is clear that the growth of many algae could be controlled. Unfortunately, however, there are species of algae that have the ability to obtain their required nitrogen from the atmosphere as N,. In addition, it is known that many of these are the most undesirable forms (e.g., the blue-green algae) from the perspective of creating unsightly floating mats, causing tastes and odors, and secreting extracellular toxins. This, then, is a valid reason for refraining from removing too much nitrogen from aquatic systems sensitive to algal blooms: such actions may result in the establishment of a competitive advantage for the most undesirable algae. This, in most cases, is fortunate, because the supply of nitrogen in natural freshwater systems is rarely less than that of the other essential algal macro -nutrient (phosphorus) relative to their respective requirements for organism growth. In most systems, the inorganic nitrogen concentration needed to support significant algal growth is at the 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L as N, while the required phosphorus concentration is far below that value. i &.. t+-:5 1JLs_AL v -19 f �z� ✓ � Nitrogen introduced into aquatic systems in its reduced forms may result in the imposition :�%A_ of a demand upon the oxygen resources of the system. Ammonium (NH4 N) and Total , " Kjeldahl Nitrogen (NH4-N + organic N) cause the consumption of relatively large quantities of oxygen when certain species of bacteria oxidize them to nitrite or nitrate (NO2 or NO3). In fact, 1 mg/L of reduced nitrogen may be responsible for the exertion of an oxygen demand of 4.6 mg/L. Considering that summer saturation dissolved oxygen values may be in the range of 7 to 8 mg/L, it may be seen that relatively small nitrogen concentrations have the potential to create undesirable effects. Fortunately, this is rarely a problem in relatively deep quiescent water bodies such as reservoirs, because the organisms responsible for the depletion generally attach themselves to surfaces in shallow riffle areas. G Ammonia is present in water either as a dissolved gas (NH3), or as a monovalent cation (NH4+). The form taken is a function of the pH of the water body. At temperatures of 20 c and pH values above 8.0 (which can easily occur in an algal bloom), total ammonia concentrations in excess of 1.3 mg/L can be toxic to some freshwater fish species. Also, as the pH rises, the required concentration for toxic effects drops. In fact, at a pH of 9.0, only 0.17 mg/L ammonia is required to create an undesirable situation. The toxicity is also inversely related to temperature, so that as temperature rises, the ammonia toxicity concentration also drops. Although not a problem for Wheatlands Lake, because use for public water supply is not contemplated, excessive concentrations of nitrates may also create difficulty from the standpoint of the induction of methemoglobinemia, or the so-called blue baby disease. Fortunately, the Federal standard that has been set to guard against this problem is 10 mg/I, and it would be extremely rare for a surface water not receiving a point source discharge of nitrate to reach such a level. Trace Metals. Lead and zinc are the trace metals that have been routinely reported to be present in most urban stormwaters. Lead, of course, has been present as a result of its use as a motor fuel additive. Automobile exhausts may contain lead -bearing particulates which settle to the surface in dryfall,I or are washed out of the atmosphere in precipitation events. Depending on the type of surface (pervious or impervious) upon which the particulates are deposited, the area may act as an efficient source of lead in stormwater (impervious surfaces), or a sink (pervious surfaces). In recent years, however, Federal regulations have mandated the use of unleaded motor fuels in newly manufactured automobiles. As older automobiles are retired in favor of new purchases, the demand for leaded fuels has been declining. This trend, in fact, has been observed in studies of urban stormwater in the National Capital Area (NVPDC/VPI&SU, 1978; VPI&SU, 1983). As this trend continues, it is likely that lead export in urban runoff will continue to decline in future years, and that contamination from that source will not be a significant receiving water problem. Chronic toxicity concentrations for aquatic life are not well documented for lead, but data are available for some species, and depending upon water hardness, may be as low as 12 ug/L or as high as 128 ug/L. The EPA ambient water quality criterion for lead is the same as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water, 50 ug/L (EPA, 1986). Zinc is present in urban stormwaters from any number of sources, but it is likely that the principal ones are wear products from synthetic rubbers in automobile tires (zinc stearates), and leaching of the metal from galvanized metals such as the corrugated metal pipes found in stormwater conveyance systems. The leaching of zinc from the latter may be accelerated where stormwater pH is lowered by the presence of acid precipitation. 7 L As with lead, the toxicity of zinc is related to the hardness in aquatic systems. EPA (1986) criteria, however, suggest a 24 hour average of 47 ug/L to protect aquatic life. No human health criteria are currently available, but it should be noted that undesirable tastes and odors may result from zinc concentrations in excess of 5,000 ug/L (EPA, 1986). The decline of lead in urban stormwater, the high receiving water tolerances of zinc relative to the likely stormwater export, and the relatively low development densities contemplated for the Wheatlands Lake watershed would seem to argue against trace metals posing a water quality problem. Chlorophyll a. Nutrient over -enrichment in an aquatic system is generally manifested in accelerated algal production. Algal growth and cell mass production, however, is difficult to quantitatively describe. There are many species, and the assay techniques for measuring them are quite laborious and time-consuming. One characteristic of all species of algae, however, gives the analyst a flexible tool for making quantitative measurements about the level of production in a given body of water: all algae are photosynthetic, and therefore contain chlorophyll. Chlorophyll a, in fact, has become the de facto standard as a surrogate measurement of algal growth in aquatic systems, because of its direct relationship to the cell mass, and its ease of measurement. There are data relating chlorophyll a to water column transparency, hypolimnetic oxygen depletion, fish production, taste and odor episodes, blue- green algae toxicity, and production of trihalomethane precursors in public water supplies (Walker, 1985). In short, the measurement is a superior means of evaluating lake water quality in the terms of the characteristic most likely to render it unsuitable for some intended use, namely level of algal production. Much has been published about levels of chlorophyll in freshwater systems, and what they mean with respect to lake trophic state. Oligotrophic (or nutrient -poor) lakes usually have summer average chlorophyll a values of less than 6 to 7 ug/L. Such lakes are generally quite unproductive, and would not be expected to harbor good game fish populations, because of a lack of sufficient nutrient materials to support a complex food chain. The National Eutrophication Survey (1974) proposed the boundaries of the mesotrophic (moderately enriched) state to be at 7 to 12 ug/L, with the eutrophic (enriched) condition lying beyond 12 ug/L. In recent years, a newer term has come into use to describe lakes heavily enriched with nutrients: hypertrophic. The lower chlorophyll a boundary for the hypertrophic state is generally taken at 20 ug/L. ., ITrophic State Classification Reservoir water quality is a complex determinant, and is based upon more than a single objective set of measured physical, chemical, and biological variables. Even when the suite of water quality parameters is reduced to only those having significance with respect to eutrophication, the task of making a determination of the water quality condition is still difficult. EPA (1974), as a part of the National Eutrophication Survey, published some general delineations of trophic state in north -central freshwater lakes as a function of chlorophyll a, total phosphorus and Secchi depth measurements. Table 1 shows the classifications from that survey. The EPA classification scheme, while useful, is cumbersome in the sense that it requires the user to develop a facility with measurements that follow no easily -remembered pattern. One approach to developing an easily interpreted descriptor of water quality has been to develop an index based upon one or more of the measurements commonly used to determine trophic state, but using a normalizing technique to reduce the measurement to a simple numeric Iscale. Carlson Trophic State Indices A number of multi -parameter indices have been developed in recent years in attempts to arrive at a generally accepted classification system for lake water quality. One of the most widely known of these is the Carlson Trophic State Index (TSI), which is in fact, composed of three separate indices based, respectively, upon Secchi depth, total phosphorus concentration, and chlorophyll a concentration (1977). In the Carlson index system, lakes (and reservoirs) are classified on the basis of surface or epilimnetic measurements, using the following equations: 71 (CHL) - 8.23 In (CH1a) + 33.3 7SI (TP) - 14.42 In (TP) + 4.15 71 (SD) - 60 - 14.41 ln(SD) where, T31 - Trophic State Index, dimensionless In - Natural logarithm CHLa TP - Chlorophyll a, ug/L - Total phosphorus, ug/L SD - Secchi Depth, m I H The indices in each case, give rise to a number that ranges generally from 0 to 100, although none of the of the equations has a theoretical upper boundary. Generally speaking, the lower the Carlson TSI for a given measurement, the better the water quality from the standpoint of nutrient enrichment, and the consequences thereof. Table 2 contains a narrative description of the lake conditions that are likely to be associated with a range of Carlson indices. 10 Table 1. National Eutrophication Survey Trophic State Determination (EPA, 1974) Trophic Chlorophyll a Total Secchi Condition Phosphorus Disk Depth Oligotrophic < 7 ug/L < 10 ug/L > 3.7 m. Mesotrophic 7 - 12 ug/L 10 - 20 ug/L 2.0 - 3.7 m Eutrophic > 12 ug/L > 20 ug/L < 2.0 m. 11 Table 2. Water Quality as Reflected by the Carlson Trophic State Index in Lakes (Mier Carlson, 1977) TSI < 30 Classical oligotrophy: Clear water, oxygen throughout the year in the hypolimnion, salmonid fisheries in deep lakes. TSI 30 - 40 Deeper lakes still exhibit classical oligotrophy, but some shallower lakes will become anoxic in the hypolimnion during the summer TSI 40 - 50 Water moderately clear, but increasing probability of anoxia in hypolimnion during the summer. Iron and manganese problems begin to develop during the summer. Raw water begins to have noticeable odor. THM precursors in raw water will begin to exceed 0.1 mg/L. TSI 50 - 60 Lower boundary of classical eutrophy: decreased transparency, t anoxic hypolimnia during the summer, macrophyte problems may be evident, warm -water fisheries only. Iron and manganese and taste and odor problems continue to worsen. TSI 60 - 70 Blue-green algae dominant during the summer, algal scums probable, extensive macrophyte problems possible. TSI 70 - 80 Heavy algal blooms possible throughout the summer, dense macrophyte beds, but extent limited by light penetration. Reservoir becomes hypertrophic (light limited). TSI > 80 Algal scums, summer fish kills, few macrophytes, dominance of rough fish. 12 Existing Water Quality Staff of Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates made two sampling visits to Wheatlands Lake on 14 ar J.2 June, 1990.0.At that time, dissolved oxygen and temperature profile measurements were made at selected locations in the lake, and other field measurements made, including secchi depth, pH and total alkalinity. Samples were also collected for laboratory measurement of ammonium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, oxidized nitrogen, ortho phosphate phosphorus, and total phosphorus. Secchi Depth Figure 3 is a plot of the secchi depths observed on the two sampling dates at each of the five stations visited. As may be seen, the values were not observed to vary appreciably, either temporally or spatially.. In fact, a value of about 4.3 meters would be a satisfactory discriptor of the median value of all observations for the two dates. Referring back to the NES data in Table 1, it may be seen that such a value is consistent with very high water quality, indicating a lake in the oligotrophic condition with total phosphorus concentrations of less than 10 ug/L and chlorophyll a concentrations of less than 7 ug/L The Carlson TSI(SD) value based upon a secchi depth of 4.3 meters is 39. This also indicates very high water quality, but as shown in Table 2 may be consistent with a system containing sufficient organic matter to experience some deoxygenation of the bottom (hypolimnetic) waters during the summer months. Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Figure 4 shows the dissolved oxygen and temperature profile at Station 01 in Wheatlands Lake at 08:45 on the morning of 14 June, 1990. Similarly, Figures 5 - 8 show the profiles at Stations 02, 03, 04, and 05 on the morning of 26 June, 1990. Observations were begun at 09:15 and completed at 10:30 on the 26th. Examination of the plots shows clearly that the lake has a classic summer stratification, with temperature differences of from 14 to 18 degrees between the upper (epilimnion) and lower (hypolimnion) layers. During the period of the summer stratification, the temperature - induced density differential between the surface and bottom waters may be expected to limit the migration of dissolved oxygen from the well -oxygenated waters of the epilimnion (which is in contact with the atmosphere) into the hypolimnion. This is precisely what is depicted in Figures 3 - 8, with the dissolved oxygen values approaching zero in the lower depths of the lake. This is not totally unexpected, but total anoxia in mid -June does indicate a substantial quantity of degradable organic matter in the lake. IFS 13 m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m m MOMMMOMM Figure 3. Average Secchi Depths in Wheattands Lake on 14 and 26 June, 1990. M M M M M 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 01, 06/14/90 0 Dissolved Oxygen -5 — a� ca -10 I � -15 - (D co -20 E -25 - 0 0 +-� -30 Temperature -35 a) -40 t� -45 -- -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 4. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Meatlands Lake on 14 June, 1990 at Station 01. M r M M M M IM M M M M M M M M IM M M M 0 -5 a) � -10 t j -15 L Q] -20 E -25 0 L �- -30 (D a) 4- -C� -35 tZ W -4a - 4 E -5C Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 02, 06/26/90 Dissolved Oxygen u 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 5 Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 02. M IN M M M M M M M i M M M M M M M i IN -5 (D � -10 t j -15 aD -20 E -25 O -3C W aD 4- .c -3E GL � -4C -4'r -5( Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 03, 06/26/90 Ived Oxygen (Temperature 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 6. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 03. Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 04, 06/26/90 0 Dissolved Oxygen U � c� -1 0 - - c) -15 L a� cu -20 E 0 L. V- 4-• -30 - - Temperature (D -35 CL (D -40 — 0 -45 — -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 7. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 04. INIMINIon r���M■��w� �� ,� Wheatlands D.O. - Temperature Profiles Station 05, 06/26/90 - 0 Dissolved Oxygen -5 a� ca -10 t ) -15 a� s -20 E -25 0 L. 4- +� -30 Temperature 4— -35 ---- -40 -45 -50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D.O., mg/L or Temperature, C Figure 8. Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Profiles in Wheatlands Lake on 26 June, 1990 at Station 05. An additional feature of the D.O. profiles is the slight rise in concentration in the zone where temperature begins to decline rapidly (thermocline). Water temperatures in this near -surface zone (10 to 20 feet) are substantially lower than those at the surface, and therefore, saturation oxygen concentrations are somewhat higher. Other Water Quality Measurements Figure 9 shows an average of all water quality observations made at the surface and bottom of each sampling stations on 14 and 26 June, 1990. Data are shown on a logarithmic scale in order to cover the range of values from < 0.01 for Total P to approximately 65 for total alkalinity. Hydrogen Ion Activity. The pH values observed on the two sampling dates were slightly higher at the surface, as would be expected. The values of slightly above pH 8 would indicate some elevation due to algal activity. There are no chlorophyll data available to confirm this, but values approaching the phenolphthalein endpoint of pH 8.3 would indicate the presence of some carbonate alkalinity, which is almost a sure sign of algal activity. Total Alkalinity. The alkalinity values of 60 to 83 mg/L as CaCO3 are typical for impounded surface waters of the area, and do not appear to indicate any substantial departure that might herald increased algal activity. It should be noted, however, that these values result from only two sampling trips, and neither was conducted during the period of maximum insolation, when peak algal activity might be expected. Nitrogen. Measurements were made of ammonium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and oxidized nitrogen (Ox-N), which is the sum of nitrite and nitrate, expressed as N. By summing the values of ammonium N and Ox-N, one can obtain an estimate of the total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) concentration, which represents the quantity most likely to be available for algal metabolism. The average TIN concentration for surface stations was 0.07 mg/L as N, and for bottom stations, 0.10 mg/L as N. In general, these values are indicators of very low enrichment with respect to nitrogen, and would support the conclusion that Wheatlands Lake is in an oligotrophic condition. The TKN values, which were reported at slightly over 0.3 mg/L as N, could contribute to the available nitrogen upon some hydrolysis of decaying J organic nitrogen, thereby raising the TIN value somewhat. ►ryy��_ Phosphorus. Phosphorus measurements were also conducted on the two sampling dates. The data reported for all stations, were below the detection limit of 0.01 mg/L, and are in Figure 9 half that value. If an average of 0.005 mg/L Total P is present represented as in the lake, the TSI(P) value is 27, an indicator of slightly better water quality than was predicted by the TSI(SD). A value of less than 0.01 mg/L is also indicative of oligotrophic 20 conditions base on the criteria of the National Eutrophication Survey (1974), as shown in Table 1. N:P Ratio. With an average TIN of 0.1 to 0.15 (including soma:-Q - = ontribution), and assuming the TP value to be 0.005 mg/L, the N:P ratio would range from 20:1 to 30:1. With N:P values in excess of approximately 15:1, phosphorus limiting conditions may be assumed for the lake. That is, the low supply of phosphorus relative to the supply of nitrogen assures that algal metabolism would exhaust the former prior to the latter, and growth, therefore, would be regulated by the phosphorus supply. This is generally found to be the case for lakes in this region, and indicates that changes in water quality (with respect to the trophic state) are likely to result only from increases in the input phosphorus supply, either from point sources or nonpoint sources. Wastewater Treatment Plant.Effluent The stabilization pond located on the unnamed tributary to the northeast arm of Wheatlands Lake was also sampled on 14 and 26 June, 1990. In general, because of the low flow rate, the discharge from the facility did not appear to affect water quality in either the arm receiving the discharge, or in the main body of the lake above the dam. Figure 10 summarizes the results of those analyses. Hydrogen Ion Activity. The pH of the WWTP effluent was observed to remain essentially constant for the three sample observations, with values ranging from 7.5 to 7.9 standard ,. units. There is no evidence that pH of the waters of the northeast arm has been affected by the WWTP discharge. Alkalinity. WWTP alkalinities were observed to vary from 260 to 323 mg/L as CaCO3. As with pH, there appears to be no evidence of the WWTP effluent affecting the receiving water alkalinities. Nitrogen. TKN values were observed to vary from 6.72 to 10.08 mg/L as N, with an average value of 8.4 mg/L. The total inorganic nitrogen value (NH3-N + Ox-N) averaged 4.62 mg/L as N. Phosphorus. Total P values averaged 0.73 mg/L, and ranged from 0.41 to 1.05 mg/L. Approximately 85 percent of the phosphorus was in the readily available form of ortho- phosphate. N:P Ratio. In spite o the fact that the TIN:TP ratio in the WWTP discharge was only 6.3:1, e there was no apparent effect on the ratio in the main body of the lake, and as noted above, the ratios at that location stayed in the range indicating phosphorus limitation. 1 21 ■� ■�ME ■■ j ■�- ■\ NOR' INN Iff _Mffil� .. :S IR ■N 01El Analysis of Pollutant Export to Wheatlands Lake Streamflows Existing Stream Gage Data. In order to develop estimates of nonpoint pollutant export for the Wheatlands Lake Watershed under current and future land use conditions, it was first necessary to project adequate information on annual basin runoff. It was, therefore, necessary to locate a stream gaging station in a similarly undeveloped watershed in order to estimate the quantity of runoff originating annually from pervious land surfaces in the basin. The Virginia Water Control Board and the United States Geological Survey operate a continuous record stream gaging station on Mountain Run near Culpeper. The gage, numbered 01665000, is located three miles west of Culpeper on State Route 641, and drains an area of 15.9 square miles (10,176 acres).. Records are available from September, 1949 to the present time, and are generally described as good for the entire 37.5 year period (USGS, 1986). The average annual streamflow for the gage was 14.26 inches per year, and this figure was used as a base to provide an estimate of the annual average runoff from the pervious fractions of the watershed. Runoff Coefficients. The discharge from impervious surfaces was estimated by assuming a runoff coefficient of 0.95, meaning that only 95 percent of the incident rainfall was converted to runoff. The remaining five (5) percent would be lost to paving infiltration, depression storage, and subsequent evaporation. At an average annual rainfall of 40 inches, an impervious surface would, therefore, generate 38 inches of direct stormwater runoff. Annual runoff from land uses exhibiting a mixture of pervious and impervious surfaces may then be calculated from the relationship which follows: Q - (q) x (A) x (1-IMP) + (R) x (0.95) x (A,) where, Q - Average annual catchment runoff, inches q - Annual stream gage runoff, inches Ap - Catchmentimperviousfraction IMP - Imperviousness, fractional R - Annual rainfall, inches Ai - Catchment impervious fraction The above relationship was used to compute average annual runoff volumes for the land use categories contained in the Preliminary Master Plan prepared by Gilbert W. Clifford & 24 Associates, Inc. (1989). The proposed development plan was overlain on the drainage basin boundaries, in order to determine which segments did not lie within the Wheatlands Lake drainage basin. Additional land use type definitions were used as necessary to produce annual runoff estimates that will be of use in evaluating the effects of future land use changes on water quality. The land use classifications and areas within the physical drainage of Wheatlands Lake are shown in Table 3. Nonpoint Pollutant Export Coefficients Over the past decade, a number of stormwater pollution export and control studies conducted in the National Capital Area, and particularly in the Suburbs of Northern Virginia, have resulted in the compilation of a large data base descriptive of the export of pollutants from a variety of land use types (NVPDC/VPI&SU, 1978; VPI&SU, 1981; VPI&SU, 1983). In addition, data from the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (EPA, 1983) are available to supplement urban land use pollutant export data from a number of locations in the Continental United States. The pollutant export data shown in Table 4 for total phosphorus ('IT) have been derived from the calculated annual runoff rates, and median values of pollutant export rates expressed as Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs). Because these export rates are sensitive to both the hydraulic efficiency of the basin pervious areas, and the percentage of impervious area, it may be seen that they can be altered to account for specific site variations in these characteristics. Water Quality Prediction Methods Given the types of urban development anticipated in the Wheatlands Lake watershed, the declining levels of lead in urban runoff, and the large system tolerance for zinc, it is evident that the greatest potential for water quality impacts rests in the possibility of accelerated cultural eutrophication as a consequence of over -enrichment with plant nutrients. Further, given the probability that existing nitrogen to phosphorus ratios will continue to be found in future runoff in the system, it is even more likely that any water quality threat is to come from enhanced exports of phosphorus to the system. It seems, therefore, prudent to provide a tool that can be used effectively to evaluate receiving water quality effects as a result of land use changes, and subsequent changes in phosphorus loading. Using the technique outlined in the section above, it is possible to develop annual loading estimates for phosphorus entering the lake from the tributary watersheds. This estimate may then be used with an empirical input-output model developed by Rast, Jones, and Lee (1983) to predict the mean summer chlorophyll a. The authors evaluated the phosphorus load and water body eutrophication response for over 40 lakes in the United States, which displayed a wide range of morphologic and hydrologic characteristics. The results of that 1 25 evaluation are shown in Figure 11, which shows predicted summer chlorophyll a as a function of areal phosphorus loading, mean lake depth, and hydraulic residence time. While the model does not simulate the entire suite of parameters influencing algal production in lakes, it does give a reasonable estimate of chlorophyll a levels to be expected in response to phosphorus loads, and can provide a lake manager vnth a tool of sufficient resolution to set goals or evaluate the effectiveness of alternative management strategies. The loading function in the model is the normalized annual, areal phosphorus loading rate, and is computed as follows: (Pd l (A) L - M l (td) (1 + tds) where, L - Annual phosphorus loading, mglm3 PL - Average annual lake phosphorus load,mglyr A - Surface area of lake at full pool,m2 Z - Mean depth of lake at full pool, m td - Average hydraulic retention time, years In order to use the model, the user need only compute the required annual phosphorus loading as described in the previous section, obtain the lake morphometric characteristics (available from the area -capacity curve calculations), and compute the value of L By entering L on the abscissa of Figure 11, and constructing a vertical to the line of best fit, the user may obtain the predicted chlorophyll a value by measuring the height of the ordinate. Confidence intervals at the 95 percent level may also be constructed to band the line of best fit. As an example, for an annual phosphorus loading of 50 mg/m3, the predicted chlorophyll a response is 10 ug/L with a 95 percent confidence interval of 3 ug/L to 40 ug/L 26 Table 3. Land Use Proposal for Future Wheatlands Development Land Use Description Area, Ac. Forest and Open Land 1175 Low Density Single Family Residential 393 Trailer Park 10 Multifamily Residential 5 School 15 Recreation Complexes 12 Commercial 9 Roadways 46 Open water (Lake Surface) 12 Unclassified Open Land (Buffer and Green Space) 259 Total Acreage in Basin 1936 27 Table 4. Phosphorus Export Coefficients for Land Uses Included in Analysis for Wheatlands Lake Watershed. Land Use Description Impervious Fraction Annual Runoff (inches) Forest and Open Land 0.01 14.26 Low Density Single Family Residential 0.30 20.78 Multi -Family Residential 0.50 25.13 Trailer Park (Existing) 0.40 22.96 School Site 0.40 22.96 Recreation Complexes 0.60 2730 Commercial Centers 0.75 30.57 Roadways 0.90 33.83 Open Water 1•00 40•00 Unclassified Open Land 0.05 1535 M. TP Load (lb/ac/yr) 0.03 0.94 1.99 1.24 1.04 1.24 1.38 0.84 0.65 0.49 ■r = = w = w w = a = = a r r w it = = = WS no SO • ■�■■■■■Poll /'...-:J1011 3■111111■■■ I ��■■� 111 ■■■1111M E■■■11 II■■�■■.■■■■■��.■■■■■■■■�..= ■■■ oil 11��■■■1 1 �� ■■■111 IN 11 111 Figure 11. Empirical Input - Output Model for Chlorophyll a Estimation in Lakes. After Rast et al, 1983. Water Quality Projections The Rast, Jones, and Lee model (1983) may be used to estimate the current trophic state of Wheatlands Lake, to evaluate the effects of changing land uses within the basin, and to test the efficacy of the implementation of management practices for the reduction of nonpoint pollution transport. The nonpoint pollution export coefficient technique previously described was used to develop estimates of loadings of phosphorus to Wheatlands Lake using land use data developed from the preliminary development plant, and observations of the watershed. The phosphorus loads were used with the empirical model developed by Rast, Jones, and Lee (1983) to develop average summer chlorophyll a estimates that could be used to characterize the current trophic state of the lake. BMP Selection. A number Qf studies on BMP effectiveness have been conducted in the National Capital Area by Virginia Tech and The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG, 1983, 1987; Virginia Tech, 1988). These studies have made use of full scale prototype testing and laboratory analyses of selected BMP processes to determine their effectiveness in reducing the transport of stormwater-borne pollutants. Pollutant removal efficiency estimates for a number of BMP types have been published, including: o Wet Retention Ponds o Extended Detention Dry Ponds o Porous Paving o Infiltration Trenches o Grassed Waterways Hydrologic considerations on the Wheatlands site were consistent with the selection of extended detention ponds as appropriate BMPs for the development. The basic nonpoint pollution control design criteria have been extensively discussed for such a facility (Virginia Tech, 1987), and include: o Maximizing site drainage control o Providing complete storage for the 2-year storm o Providing extended detention for the 2-year storm o Providing 40 hour draw down of the NPS control pool BMP Performance. A performance assessment of a prototype extended detention facility P in Fairfax County may be used to obtain efficiency data for pollutant removal (Virginia Tech, 1987): o Total Phosphorus - 55.7 percent o Total Nitrogen - 59.8 percent 30 o Total Lead - 25.2 percent o Total Zinc - 40.3 percent Using the above efficiency estimate for phosphorus, the pollutant exports and associated reductions from extended detention BMP implementation may be calculated. These, along with the net effect on pollutant transport to Wheatlands Lake, are shown in Table 5. The phosphorus loading, annual average phosphorus concentration, and average summer chlorophyll a projections in Table 5 are summarized for six scenarios: (1) existing land use, (2) proposed land use with no BMP, and (3) through (6) proposed land use with variable coverage of the extended detention BMP. The phosphorus load and chlorophyll a data are also shown graphically for the same scenarios in Figure 12. Current Conditions The existing condition of Wheatlands Lake with respect to phosphorus and chlorophyll a, aprojected by the Rast, Jones, and Lee model is shown in Figure 12. As may be seen, the model predicts a current condition of 3.06 ug/L chlorophyll a. While the lack of chlorophyll data on the Lake make it impossible to directly compare the predicted value to current conditions, it is possible to compare the comparable phosphorus concentration. Referring back to Figure 9, it may be seen that Total P concentration in the lake were below the detection limit of 10 ug/L, and the predicted existing condition summer Total P concentration is 8.9 ug/" which indicates satisfactory agreement. Future Conditions - No BMPs. The proposed development of the site without BMPs in place would result in an approximately six -fold increase in phosphorus export to the lake, resulting in almost a four -fold increase in summer chlorophyll a concentrations (11.8 ug/L). This would raise the lake trophic state to the high range of the moderately enriched condition shown in Table 2 (mesotrophy), in which decreases in transparency (secchi depth) would be anticipated, as would periodic episodes of increased algal growth. This condition would not appear to be an acceptable alternative for the lake, particularly given the current high water quality. Future Conditions - BMPs in Place. Should, however, the proposed development plan be undertaken with a mixture of extended detention BMPs, some substantial reductions in phosphorus export may be anticipated. Cases 1 - 4 in Table 5 show the impacts on phosphorus and chlorophyll a in the lake as a result of employing the BMPs at a rate of 100 percent coverage on all multi -family, commercial, institutional, and recreational centers; and at increasing increments of 25 percent for all single family areas and roadways. ractical matter, Case 4 100 ercent covers a cannot lik It is likely, however, t at BMP coverages of between 50 and 75 percent can be achieved for the single family portions of the site. These cases (2 and 3) would make it possible to keep summer chlorophyll a concentrations in the vicinity of 9 ug/L. While this is still indicative of a mesotrophic condition, it is at the lower end of the scale, and would represent an acceptable condition for the anticipated use of the lake as a recreation site. In fact, some moderat� �p Wye y 31 enrichment of the lake with over the levels found in the 14 and 26 June, 1990 phosphorus samplings would probably have a beneficial effect on the body with respect to its ability to develop as a satisfactory fishery. BMP Maintenance. Extended detention BIMIP's have only been in cornmon use for less than a decade. Because of this, and the relatively low pollutant loadings from moderate density urban uses, objective assessments of maintenance effects on performance in such applications have yet to find their way into the scientific literature. Prudence, however, would dictate the assumption that maintenance is the key to long-term satisfactory ,performance of such practices. As fine materials accumulate in extended detention ponds, S failure to remove them from the structure will increase the risk that future large events will Y scour the materials (and their associated pollutant loads) from the BMP, and transport them to the Lake. In addition, such accumulations may affect the performance of the low flow release mechanism. The low release rate, for instance, depends upon very small orifices to maintain the recommended 4q hour drawdown of the 2-year BMP pool. Should the release orifices, or the bedding material become blocked with fines from an accumulation of previous events, standing pools of water (and their subsequent hazards) may result. ky-i Table 5. Projected phosphorus. loads, concentrations, and resulting chlorophyll a in Wheatlands Lake under various BMP implementation scenarios. Development Condition BMP Coverage (Extended Detention Dry Pond) Annual TP Load (lbs.) Average TP Concentration (ug/L) Average Summer Chlorophyll a (ug/L) Existing Conditions None 114 8.9 3.1 Proposed Development None 678 47.7 11.8 Proposed Development Case 1 598 42.2 10.7 Proposed Development Case 2 541 38.1 9.9 Proposed Development Case 3 484 34.1 9.0 Proposed Development Case 4 427 30.1 8.2 Case 1: 25 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways; 100 percent coverage on all other developed uses. Case 2: 50 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways; 100 percent coverage on all other developed uses. Case 3: 75 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on single family residential uses and roadways; 100 percent coverage on all other developed uses. Case 4: 100 percent Extended Detention Pond BMP coverage on all developed lands. BMP efficiency for phosphorus removal is assumed to be 55.7 percent. 33 no= m mm mmmmm m m m n m mmm m 1400 Wheatlands Lake TP Loads and Chlorophyll a with Various Controls 14 Total P 1200 J o 12 c� m o 1000 -10 - C) CI- �- 800 8 o .0 U a) 600 — - 6 m a)Ca Q 400 - 4 > Q aD =3 E c 200 2 � Q CD 0 0 Exist No BMP 25% 50% 75% 100% Pct BMP's on Residential Uses Figure 12. Projected TP Loads and Chlorophyll a Values in Wheatlands Lake Under Various Scenarios. S Summary and Conclusions (1) Using the supplied rater quali data, it may be concluded that Wheatlands Lake is currently oligotrophic (nutrient poor), and as a result, is likely to be sensitive to increases in phosphorus loads from the tributary drainage basin. (2) The water quality data indicate that the Lake is currently phosphorus limited, so that any stormwater quality control technologies applied to future development should be effective in removing that nutrient. (3) By using pollutant event mean concentration data from a number of previous studies, streamflow data, and estimates of catchment imperviousness, it was possible to develop acceptable estimates of current and future condition annual phosphorus exports to the Lake. (4) The technique of using pollutant export coefficients and the empirical input/output nutrient loading model was shown to be applicable to the assessment of relative changes in lake water quality resulting from alterations in basin land use characteristics. (5) Without an aggressive program of BMP implementation, the proposed land use changes will likely result in decreased lake transparency, and increases in algal growth. (6) Using BMP performance data from studies in the National Capital Area, it was shown to be possible to use pollutant export coefficients and the empirical input/output nutrient loading model to assess the relative water quality impacts of alternative scenarios of land use alteration and BMP implementation. (7) Implementing a network of extended detention pond (or similar BMPs) on the site as it develops will lower the summer average chlorophyll a concentrations to a range consistent with the lower end of mesotrophic conditions. It is possible that the increased phosphorus supply responsible for the transition to mesotrophy will also enhance the recreational fishery potential of Wheatlands Lake. 35 References Hutchinson, G.E., A Treatise on Limnology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1957. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Water Resources Planning Board, "Final Report, Washington, D.C. Area Urban Runoff Project," MWCOG, Washington, D.C., (1983). Northern Virginia Planning District Commission and Virginia Tech, "Occoquan/Four Mile Run Nonpoint Source Correlation Study," Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C., 1978. Novotny, V. and G. Chesters, Handbook of Nonpoint Pollution, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, New York, (1981). Rast, W., R.A. Jones, and G.F. Lee, "Predictive Capability of U.S. O.E.C.D Phosphorus Loading - Eutrophication Response Models," J fTCF, 55, 7, pp. 990 - 1001, (1983). United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Volume I - Final Report," PB-84-185552, Washington, D.C., (1983). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Quality Criteria for Water, EPA 440/5-86-001, Washington, D.C., 1986. Virginia Tech Department of Civil Engineering, Evaluation of Management Tools in the Occoquan Watershed," Virginia State Water Control Board, Richmond, VA, (1982). Virginia Tech Department of Civil Engineering, "Final Report, Metropolitan Washington Urban Runoff Project,", Manassas, VA, (1983). Walker, W. W., "Statistical Bases for Mean Chlorophyll a Criteria", in Lake and Reservoir Management - Practical Applications, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference and International Symposium, NALMS, Merrifield, VA, 1985. Water Pollution Control Federation. Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers. Manual of Practice Number 9 (ASCE Manual of Engineering Practice No. 37), Washington, D.C., (1969). 9.1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE A Traffic Impact Analysis of WHEA TLANDS A Proposed Mixed Use Development In Fredrick County, Virginia Prepared for: Bowman and Glaize October 1990 Revised March 1991 Callow Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning & Design Consultants TRAFFIC 11"ACT STUDY OF WHEATLANDS prepared for BOWMAN AND GLAIZE Glaize Development, Inc. P.O. Box 2598 Winchester, Virginia 22601 prepared by CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 12007 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite 160 Reston, Virginia 22091 (703) 476-0001 October 15, 1990 Revised March 15, 1991 Wheatlands October 15, 1990 Revised ?March 13, 1991 Figure 9: Build Scenario Level of Service and Lane Geometry with Queue Lengths LLOWASSOCIATES, INC. 12 M The following narrative describes level of service conditions that would be observed for this analysis at each critical intersection: o Route 277 and Route 636 will operate signalized at level of service `B' in the A.M. and 'C' P.M. peak hours with the existing lane geometry. o Route 277 and Route 522/340 (Double Toll Gate) will operate signalized at an acceptable level of service `B' in the morning peak and 'C' in the evening peak hour, with the modified lane geometry shown in Figure 9. o Route 277 and the Wheatlands entrance will operate signalized at a level of service `B' during both peak hours. In order to achieve this double left turn lanes will be required in the westbound direction. o Route 522 and the Wheatlands entrance will operate signalized at level of service `B' during both peak hours. - Queue and Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in Appendix B. CONCLUSION " In the year 2000, the intersections analyzed in the existing conditions were also analyzed in the No -Build Scenario. The Double Toll Gate intersection will no improvements to operate at level of service `C' or better in the peak hours. The Route 277/Route 636 will remain unsignalized and have all approaches operate at level of service `C' or better in the peak periods. For the Build Scenario, the Wheatlands development will generate 2,024 trips in the morning peak hour and 3,227 trips during the evening peak hour. The levels of service of the analyzed intersections will decrease slightly from the No -Build Scenario. The site CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 13 PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE A Traffic Impact Analysis of WHEA 7L A NDS A Proposed Mixed Use Development In Fredrick County, Virginia Prepared for: Bowman and Glaize October 1990 Revised March 1991 Callow Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning & Design Consultants TRAFFIC IWACT STUDY OF WHEATLANDS prepared for BOWMAN AND GLAIZE Glaize Development, Inc. P.O. Box 2598 Winchester, Virginia 22601 prepared by CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 12007 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite 160 Reston, Virginia 22091 (703) 476-0001 October 15, 1990 Revised March 15, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Page No. LIST OF FIGURES ................................................. iii TABLES iv LISTOF ................................................. ' INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................. 1 ' T -B ILD SCENARIO ....... ................... NO -BUILD ................... 5 ' BUILD SCENARIO ................................................ 5 ' CONCLUSION.................................................... 13 APPENDIX A - COUNT SUMMARY ................................... ' APPENDIX B - LEVEL OF SERVICE .................................. ' CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ii LIST OF FIGURES Page No. Vicinity Map 2 Existing Road Network and Peak Hour Volumes 3 Existing Level of Service and Lane Geometry 4 2000 No -Build Peak Hour Volumes 6 2000 No -Build Level of Service and Lane Geometry 7 Wheatland Trip Distribution 9 Wheatlands Development Volumes Only 10 2000 Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes 11 2000 Build Scenario Level of Service 12 and Lane Geometry ' CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. iii LIST OF TABLES Table No. Wheatlands Trip Generation 1 Page No. -N ' CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. iv ' INTRODUCTION This report documents the analysis of traffic conditions associated with the proposed Wheatland development. This development is a mixed use community proposed for Frederick County, Virginia (See Figure 1). The site, consisting of approximately 926 developable acres, is located just south of Route 277 and west of Route 522. This report is in support of an application for rezoning to include a total of 1,288 single-family dwelling units, 175 townhouse units, 228,690 square feet of retail use, and 511,830 square feet of light industrial uses within Frederick County only. This report presents the findings of an analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development. It examines the projected traffic volumes and road improvements for the build -out year of 2000. EXISTING CONDITIONS Route 277 exists as a rural two-lane highway and intersects with Route 522/340 (Double Toll Gate), and Route 636. Route 636 is a rural two-lane collector. U.S. Route 522 exists as a four -lane divided highway and U.S. Route 340 is a two-lane highway. Traffic counts were taken during July 1989 and April 1990 at these intersections. A summary of the data is included in Appendix A. Figure 2 shows the resulting peak hour volumes and 24 hour (ADT) volumes. The peak hour volumes were evaluated for level of service using the existing lane geometry (See Figure 3). The Double Toll Gate intersection operates signalized at level of service `B' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The Route 277/Route 636 intersection currently operates unsignalized at level of service `A' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in Appendix B. Level of service definitions are also provided in Appendix B for signalized and unsignalized intersections. CALLOWASSOCIATES, INC. 1 M ti ^O 1. 7j7(37 1,11watlands October 15, 1990 Revised March 13, 1991 �o o �Q N o'aI !� 60(59) flljl 164(1 (293J1q`1 r58(98)� fs3J1B m S17E� h AM(PM) [ADIJ qRR� Y` Qq Figure 2: Existing Road Network and Peak Hour Volumes U.S. Kt. Sao [5,1621 CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 3 Wheatlands Figure 3: Existing Level of Service and October 15, 1990 Lane Geometry Revised March 13, 1991 C4LLOWASSOCL4TES, INC. 4 NO -BUILD SCENARIO Background Traffic The existing peak hour and 24 hour counts were increased at a rate of 4 percent per year. This percent growth was the average growth of Virginia Department of Transportation counts conducted between 1985 and 1988 east of the site. These increased peak hour and ADT volumes represent the 2000 No -Build Scenario (See Figure 4). Level of Service Callow Associates has performed capacity analysis at the same intersection analyzed in the existing conditions assuming the same lane geometry for the No -Build Scenario. The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of the future traffic without the Wheatlands development (See Figure 5). The Route 277/Route 636 intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service without signalization. All the approaches will operate at level of service `A' in A.M. peak hour and in the P.M. peak the northbound approach will operate at level of service 'C' and the southbound approach will have a 'B' level of service. The Double Toll Gate intersection will operate signalized with the existing lane geometry at a level of service `B' in the A.M. peak hour and 'C' in the P.M. peak hour. BUILD SCENARIO Trip Generation The Wheatlands development proposes to construct approximately 1463 residential dwelling units, an elementary school, 21 acres of commercial uses, and 62 acres of light industrial uses. The traffic generated by the development was estimated by using the ITE Triq Generation Manual, 4th Edition (1987). Table 1 gives the resulting trips generated by the Wheatlands for the A.M. and P.M. peak periods. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 5 , Wheatlands Figure 4: No -Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes October 15, 1990 Revised March 13, 1991 CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 6 41 r �y A(A) 277 1P 4V J m � SIGNALIZED LOS- B(C) U.S. RL 340 10 SITE 4P AM(PM1 Wheatlands Figure 5: No -Build Scenario Level of Service October 15, 1990 and Lane Geometry Revised March 13, 1991 ' CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 7 Table 1 WHEATLANDS TRIP GENERATION Land Use A.M. IN OUT P.M. IN OUT ADT SF Detached 1,288 units Townhouse 175 units Retail 228,690 SF (0.25 FAR) Elementary School (700 Stds) Light Industrial 511,830 SF (0.25 FAR) Total 260 705 867 466 12,880 15 80 75 37 1,151 265 113 654 681 16,210 84 56 3 5 511 392 54 52 387 3,506 1,016 1,008 1,651 1,576 33,538 ' Trip Assignment The distribution of the trips generated by Wheatlands is shown in Figure 6. The overall ' trip distribution was based upon existing travel patterns, and a report prepared by Housing Data Reports, a division of Regardies, Inc. as well as through area commuter trends. For ' a more accurate trip assignment, the land use was divided into three zones and assigned to the road network separately. The school traffic has been reduced by 20 percent to account ' for trips generated within the site. The Wheatland Development traffic only is shown in Figure 7, and the site traffic plus the total background traffic discussed earlier comprises the ' Build Scenario (See Figure 8). ILevel of Service Callow Associates performed capacity analysis at the intersection discussed earlier in the ' existing condition section plus the two site access points. The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of Wheatlands build -out plus ' background traffic on the local roadways (See Figure 9). CALLOWASSOMTES, INC. E "eatlands II Figure 6: Site Trip Distribution March 15, 1991 I CALLOWASSOCIATES, INC. 10 Wheatlands Figure S: Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes October 15, 1990 Revised March 13, 1991 CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 11 Wheatlands Figure 9: Build Scenario Level of Service October 15, 1990 and Lane Geometry with Queue Revised Lengths March 13, 1991 W ASSOCIATES, INC. 12 The following narrative describes level of service conditions that would be observed for this I analysis at each critical intersection: o Route 277 and Route 636 will operate signalized at level of service `B' in the A.M. and 'C' P.M. peak hours with the existing lane geometry. o Route 277 and Route 522/340 (Double Toll Gate) will operate signalized at an acceptable level of service `B' in the morning peak and 'C' in the evening peak hour, with the modified lane geometry shown in Figure 9. o Route 277 and the Wheatlands entrance will operate signalized at a level of service `B' during both peak hours. In order to achieve this double left turn lanes will be required in the westbound direction. o Route 522 and the Wheatlands entrance will operate signalized at level of service `B' during both peak hours. Queue and Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in Appendix B. CONCLUSION In the year 2000, the intersections analyzed in the existing conditions were also analyzed in the No -Build Scenario. The Double Toll Gate intersection will no improvements to operate at level of service `C' or better in the peak hours. The Route 277/Route 636 will remain unsignalized and have all approaches operate at level of service `C' or better in the peak periods. For the Build Scenario, the Wheatlands development will generate 2,024 trips in the morning peak hour and 3,227 trips during the evening peak hour. The levels of service of the analyzed intersections will decrease slightly from the No -Build Scenario. The site CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 13 ' entrance along Route 277 will operate signalized and will require double left turn lanes in the westbound approach to operate at level of service `B' during the peak hours. The site entrance along Route 522/340 will also operate signalized will turn lanes at level of service ' 'B' during both peak hours. I CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 14 APPENDIX A COUNT SUMMARY JCLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLOW A55CCIAI I INC. ;, - r. Rrl: - .. ^i/C ,.�=c r L am„ Loot u . uu: _uv 1 ll�ly • -T C 'ram l._ UJ. .. • C7j.A •v. l'4 } •fJV- L.r • 11Fr UV }Cat ❑ a�ll:iL . . ,.. ie:_:_._ -------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------.--------- 1 CnC-,` �'�Ui r'f`._ n�-TLnliAli - i: ii jl �ncruca��pin U,'•:r ,1u -.a:; - 1. SHTHID KI.i JUV :.. .. T 1:"L �C1 r r 11 UV.r H T. .:Lit r, i•,� 0'- -_ ^.�? .__:_ .., _ r„7i!T= _... i',u.'i- r'77 L/f i•,i: ni AL I - Iis ______________________ __-____-_______-_---__ ___---__--_-________-- -____-----------____-_ I r,."JT r`T/ -Err lla. rf� P: T-.'TI-".` _CLCU .u:-� T ri.IriL _T - tir- r,.... TI `TarTX IhL _----------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - != 7 1 :: J '�A .`" :... U. _` .'- 1 it 1 77 % (%, 2.70 -L `1 1 ; 1 70 I " I 5 n , tilt ` ! ip `,'- n- 1�T -= 7t `� V_ .'- It 17? • 7Li1 7L - `-r _L I ,� 1 rn: t1c LAg I {c I: i _ i `': 4 .• :V- L= v. .._ +1 lU [ :ll' . . __ T: . 7 - / :71 U.1 LnA y VV,: I Ir, 11 i7 ,� 5c 1i11 'r' r.1= 10 1 Y a..♦♦ 4o '?!L 7S /' 1 ! 01 J: L7' -. Ric ♦_ 'v UT%; 'f � IC 1. 15` lu Gi . t'// 1._ �C . 1 110 .l. fC, Ii. 1:1 4- 1 = j! J 6 S TV ; [T:, U h4.• 1 1 L' - . L LL a._ i7 1AC, a.+J `= 1,34 U7 'Z . I 4 7^ : U _ ' t - _. ju= 5L r15v GO 1V: L YL p7 1 70 JV I a '77• Jy -i,v,_ ., y T (7t I ' I 1 I iL` 14 ' 1�4 ':,hi 1 • 1 v1 �` JJ 7 4 J r . , l 7T�1 I iL 1%!5 17 1/ .l; �' 5- iL^ :64 477 7 �4. •, �(!•: 7, %J 1qT 1 T[: J 71 J1 77 1 " I LL i'% 1 77(, 7 45 I {{ 1. 77 . 1 ! 1(' 94 `.. 117, 11. '.'0 .. 1A 1`. 7` L. T 1,fF 14 `;j _ - SO $7;' 7d=. T. 0 %lii I '' 4 L u R-' '- r " 1C 1, ii:_ i L Ac, . A t 9` iG . 17 ♦v L 7A ��/ 1 Ir (` 5 .' +a ')y t1 " 7�.! v 1t L , - —1 ! T rl� C: I 1 11 i %I to I 11 - ! 11 11 t L ,1 • L I ! 5 1 ? ( j 0 ! 1 AY C ; 1 i u (11 I) f) - V it t+ t a t 0 �j 1 !j ft I ! L _14.i 12 (} (1 I (l 1.1 0(' (• 0 \) L 0 (j \, (j �j (i l' V , (: y � ? V .! ' •:{C I 1 lj it { i 11 ; V / it fl `• ` I I i:i _r 1 iJV y V \• (% V i (' V V ;,i 01 C - ! '! 1i4,' y 11 V (1 v 0 `I ii v (' (? V ! Lj (f V % V !? V /1 \•r it 4 (1 I , t1 I 1r !74= { T 1-45 - a7 7! �: 46 is ,Z i r. _ 1 tL17, i: : ; 4L 71 wJ`J 14 ?.i `+_ nn =`• 74 !i'S 71 17D i L R 4jn T ?n? rr. -.1 , JL 1Y 57 .- -_ _r_ ^f !C 71 .1 �R U fet5 iT• t7 ,) 1{1- 1Vi i_ .. 71J7 ... if:5? f 1\: J:' 1 1770 , i770 S1 `_ -'0: 0A / 17%) c7 -- ^,0 iJ 7G 0 "Jv,0 i { ?7r.' I :lr;: 1745 ; 1.: 1 ;7VV : iJV`: ..� 5? . a70 7C a-' iJ: 1 1 5 , a. _? ._ .vim 9t ..1 00 Ui S[[ JC+ ! 7e1 i/`. [[ 10-: , r i00 I 1 f.^'� I { n,:,, 1 '?1 70 / 141 L 4U OL 4C ' ilei 1., K :V% 1 74\ , a17 i , 11lC'nT:=- .1 CJ,0.0U' 1 L 7A ' U i 7 1 .J1 ti! f7 YG 14 i51 G = 7l L•_ u.l`. rL i s±, 1. On L .ir7 ?" 7[ -i G ?7 ' ; - `♦ : :tT: A ar [ v a.. r• 1?' 1J1 S� . i ie 14V _ .-,:_. .T- ?A JV TI iL n'r L !7 .-v [� Yy% 1' .. 1 7t? L1J 71- , 1�' 40 e! /l- , I L i. {'/ l� {.. '- ._ �� JJ .7� 1� :9.1 JJ C E. !,- -� i(+� i71 1J1 R' Ja i< ?5 JJ '?{- i:.- ii L! n� r� n i1: c7 1(17 i- 1- yy '75 1 +. 07'1 1V.' .LJ Vr 1%J_„J�+ '.II CLE TURNING MO EEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC., cp�l r__ ii Jni _r.l T_ 5^, i'. r1J'U .. C`r!I TC , UU,_ '?�? �. • [::= i .� CRC .._ i13L;= • L -_!,^� a h.: vJVli i. 11D UU. ut b Inpy lu[i �� LOUnt Date ':': /89 iti.at WAS" & D R V _ --1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-------1--------- Hcur -rat-. [[TDILQIlir• U.11 Tra.#:c ; 1, nT ❑011"T' Tryz# # 1i— iL S`,JT:Hrin_J�1!lr_! -rats.' �I— T' ! !1'T:� i _.. -- �. 277 .,__ _ r. C, /?IiT-- V•:� IiVVi_ .ir- _• F, (tUTr Vl1. 1U _ c-- Sri [[I� IT[ c^-: [!n• r1VL'ir .�_ Tfl%Ai IUD„- 1. T „ ii::;C - r: ______________________ rT :nu 'i .u_ - v LLB -L :; r:-.. _ -„• a-_ TVT;! i inL ---------------------- I .F7 T�p!I L_, !!nw F, UT T -_ ,llu !: ---------------------- 'LEFT I HIRU ic 1S: IIIr. •,i4'::1 !�_:r.� _-_----_-----_-_-----_ i [ 1 T-1. C•, [._' �� 1!!w :. ♦�... 1! h .:rhL ! i • ,1' i.J n 1•C r: L'L' - .t -:t- c�:n!..:.-' --_-______-1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A.M.Peak ! \i\' / i a. •., ! lU.• �V _ter �• J/ \�� UV lUe J' JI _ i P Hour factor_ = 0.9u -C 6C° 84 ;-. ; A Peal:; ,, F c 1 1! '1 r i! it it i. A i� i1 Hour Factor; Peak_ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------ - 4A - z NA NP, N ' - Peak ; 174` 1. L734 51 ?Q 94 1,' y7 ^Q 79 //p 49 lCC e. 197 '(1!. . : ,r 1' I- Peak Hour r, pp, VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. File Name 5397 Job Number: 5397 Intersection: ROUTE 277 & ROUTE 636 Location WINCHESTER Counted by JJP Date 4-17-90 Day: TUES Input by JJP Weather AM/DRY PM/WET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------------- I TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM WEST TRAFFIC FROM EAST I I I on: ROUTE 636 on: ROUTE 636 on: ROUTE 277 on: ROUTE 277 I TOTAL I TimeI ---------------------- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------- I N,S, I Time Period I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I E & W I Period ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+----------- AM I I I AM 7:00-7:15 I 1 5 2 8 2 1 4 7 2 49 2 53 1 21 3 25 I 93 17:00-7:15 7:15-7:30 I 2 4 2 8 1 1 4 6 1 53 4 58 2 23 2 27 I 99 17:15-7:30 7:30-7:45 I 7 1 5 13 2 3 3 8 1 76 2 79 1 40 1 42 I 142 17:30-7:45 7:45-8:00 I 12 2 3 17 5 2 3 10 1 59 1 61 1 27 1 29 I 117 17:45-8:00 8:00-8:15 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 18:00-8:15 8:15-8:30 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18:15-8:30 8:30-8:45 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 18:30-8:45 8:45-9:00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 18:45-9:00 I I I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7:00-8:00 I 22 12 12 46 10 7 14 31 5 237 9 251 5 111 7 123 I 451 17:00-8:00 7:15-8:15 I 21 7 10 38 8 6 10 24 3 188 7 198 4 90 4 98 I 358 17:15-8:15 7:30-8:30 I 19 3 8 30 7 5 6 18 2 135 3 140 2 67 2 71 I 259 17:30-8:30 7:45-8:45 I 12 2 3 17 5 2 3 10 1 59 1 61 1 27 1 29 I 117 17:45-8:45 8:00-9:00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0( 0 18:00-9:00 � I I A.M. PEAK HOUR I 7:00-8:00 I 22 12 12 46 10 7 14 31 5 237 9 251 5 111 7 123 i 451 17:00-8:00 PHF = 0.68 PHF = 0.78 PHF = 0.79 PHF = 0.73 I I I I PM I I i PM 5:00-5:15 I 1 1 0 2 4 0 8 12 3 40 6 49 4 70 6 80 i 143 i 4:00-4:15 5:15-5:30 I 2 0 0 2 1 3 5 9 6 45 17 68 4 77 6 87 I 166 14:15-4:30 5:30-5:45 I 8 2 2 12 3 1 2 6 4 44 12 60 5 84 1 90 I 168 14:30-4:45 5:45-6:00 I 9 2 1 12 3 0 7 10 3 49 8 60 4 87 2 93 I 175 14:45-5:00 6:00-6:15 ( 6 1 1 8 1 2 9 12 6 44 9 59 3 69 1 73 I 152 15:00-5:15 6:15-6:30 I 4 0 3 7 2 1 6 9 4 39 11 54 4 58 3 65 I 135 ( 5:15-5:30 6:30-6:45 I 2 1 2 5 4 2 8 14 3 35 5 43 1 51 2 54 I 116 15:30-5:45 6:45-7:00 I 3 0 2 5 2 1 5 8 3 37 4 44 2 53 1 56 I 113 15:45-6:00 I I I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4:00-5:00 I 20 5 3 28 11 4 22 37 16 178 43 237 17 318 15 350 I 652 14:00-5:00 4:15-5:15 I 25 5 4 34 8 6 23 37 19 182 46 247 16 317 10 343 I 661 ( 4:15-5:15 4:30-5:30 I 27 5 7 39 9 4 24 37 17 176 40 233 16 298 7 321 I 630 14:30-5:30 4:45-5:45 I 21 4 7 32 10 5 30 45 16 167 33 216 12 265 8 285 I 578 14:45-5:45 5:00-6:00 I 15 2 8 25 9 6 28 43 16 155 29 200 10 231 7 248 I 516 15:00-6:00 I I I P.M. PEAK HOUR I I -------------------------------------------- 4:15-5:15 I 25 5 4 34 8 6 23 37 19 182 46 247 16 317 10 343 I 661 14:15-5:15 PHF = 0.71 PHF = 0.66 PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.92 APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS and LEVEL OF SERVICE The most current analysis methodologies used for evaluating the capacity of intersections were developed ' by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other members of the transportation profession. This methodology is presented in TRB Special Report Number 209, The 1985 11ij!hwav Capacity Manual (HCM). Computerized methods for conducting these analyses were developed by FHWA; and are the methods used in this report. The ' following brief explanations of the methodologies are adapted from the HCM. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS At an unsignalized intersection the major street has continuous right of way while the side street is controlled by a Stop or Yield sign. In operation, vehicles exiting the side street and crossing or turning into the main street flow must wait for "acceptable gaps" in the main street flow. The same is true of left - turning traffic from the main street that must cross the opposing flow. ' The analysis takes into account the probability of a gap in the main street traffic. The probability and number of acceptable gaps, is lower in higher volume flows. The acceptability of a gap is modified by physical factors (sight distance, turning radius, etc.) and by characteristics of the traffic flow (percentage ' trucks, buses, etc.). In the analyses in this report, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor - trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the ' intersection as a whole. The capacity of a movement is calculated (in terms of vehicles per hour - VPH) and then compared with the demand. The difference is the "reserve capacity." The level of service is then based on the amount of reserve capacity left over: Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Reserve Level. of Expected Delay Capacity Service to Minor Street Traffic > 400 vph A. Little or no delay. 300-399 vph B Short :traffic delays 2007299 vph G > Average traffic delays: 100-199 vph ` D Long traffic delays. 0- 99 vph . E _ ..... Very longtrafflcdelays. negative , F' Demandexceeds capacity; ;: extreinel lon Bela Y g Y ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The operation (and therefore the capacity) of a signalized intersection is complicated by the fact that ' the signal is allocating time between conflicting traffic movements - movements that must use the same physical space. The analysis, therefore, must not only look at the physical geometry of the intersection, but the signal timing aspects as well. ' In the analysis of signalized intersections, two terms are important: volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and; average stopped delay (seconds per vehicle). The theoretical capacity is based on the physical geometry, the available green time (often expressed as G/C), and the traffic mix (e.g. trucks use more capacity than cats). ' The average stopped delay may be calculated from the v/c ratio, cycle length, quality of progression on the arterial and available green time on each approach. Calculations of both capacity and delay are based on empirical data, therefore some situations may not fit the theoretical formulas. For example in signal systems with good progression, it is often possible to show a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (demand exceeds capacity), ' but at the same time, correctly calculate delay values in the acceptable 'C' or 'D' range. In this report all default values recommended by the HCM are used unless other specific information is available (percentage of trucks, pedestrians, etc.). Existing signal timings are observed and used whenever possible. When future signals are being evaluated, an "optimal" signal timing is calculated based on projected volumes. The level of service is based on the calculated average delay per vehicle for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Based on extensive research studies, the maximum delay acceptable by the average driver is 60 seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection. This is defined as the upper limit on the possible range of delay/level of service criteria. The following criteria describe the full range of level of service: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Stopped Delay Service per Vehicle (sec) A <_ 5:0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D - 25.1>:to 40.0 E 40.1` to 60.0 F > 60:0_ EXISTING CONDITIONS m� N� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pa�e-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, M�JOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 POPULATION. NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......'. RT 277 N� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREE�. . . . . . . RT 636 CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS N� IN�E�SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .... ... ..... _..... ..... _..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ... .... .... ..... ..... ____________.... .... .... _.... .... _______________________... ..... ..... ____ N� INTERSECTION TYPE: �-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST N� CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES N� -----------------------------------------------... ..... ---------------..... .... .... .... - EB WB NB SB N� ---- ---- ---- ---- �� LEFT 5 5 22 10 THRU 237 111 12 7 RIGHT 9 7 12 14 m� NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 LT . ` LANE USAGE LTR R '-'--------- '-- ' ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _________________________________________________________________ Page-2 m� PERCENT RlGHT TURN CUR� RADIUS (ft> ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE ..... ..... - FOR RIGHT ----..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TURNS ..... -.... .... .... ..... FOR ..... .... --------------- RIGHT TURNS N� -..... ..... .... -... .... ..... N� EASTBOUND 0.00 ..... ..... ..... --- 90 20 N WES�BOUND 0.00 90 20 N � NORTHBOUND 0.O0 90 20 N N� SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... VEHICLES ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ---- ..... .....----- % MOTORCYCLES ------------- N� -- EASTBOUND 0 0 N� W�STBOUND 0 0 0 NORT|{BOUND 0 0 V �� SOUT�BOUND 0 CRITICAL GAPS 0 0 N� ..... ... ... ---... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... --------- TABULAR ... ..... ..... --..... ..... ..... .... ... ----... VALUES ..... ------------------- ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. ..... ..... -..... ..... ..... .... ... ..... ..... ..... -- FINAL N� (Table N� -------------- 10-2) VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP _ - __________ m� MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 50 MAJOR LEFTS N� EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 N� WB 5.�0 5.00 0.00 5.00 N� MINOR THROUGHS N� NB 6'00 6'00 0.00 6'00 SB 6.O0 6.00 0.00 6.00 N� MINOR LEFTS SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 N� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ p ________ M _________ ____________ SH R SH ____________ ___ MINOF IDENTIFYING INFORMATION .... _..... .... .... _____..... _________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRE| DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTE�SECTIONS Page-� N� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� ___________________________------------------- m� ----------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................'.. 1 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . RT 636 NAME OF TiE ANALYST.................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. -- DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 3/14/91 N� TlME �THER INFORMATION...' WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS N� INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .... _..... ..... _..... ..... _..... .... ..... ... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ___________..... ..... ... ..... .... _____..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... ... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... _______ N� INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTIO�: EAST/WEST N� CONTRO� TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES N� ----------------------..... ..... ... -------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB N� ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 19 16 25 8 THRU 182 317 5 6 RIGHT 46 10 4 23 m� NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ..... _.... ... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ___________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 ~~ LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _ .... ..... _..... ..... .... ... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... .... ... .... _ .... ..... ..... ..... .... ______________ ..... ..... .... ..... _________________________ age- P� w� PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft> ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS ... ..... ..... -------- FOR ----------------- RIGHT TURNS N� N� EASTBOUND ------- -... 0.00 ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ... 90 ........ ..... .... ..... 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 C. 20 N -- NORTHDO�ND 0.00 90 20 N N� SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ______________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION ANDVEHICLES ..... ------- ------------- % MOTORCYCLES ------------- N� m� EASTBOUND ..... ..... ..... 0 0 0 N� WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND N� SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 0 0 � CRITICAL GAPS N� ... ..... -.... ..... ..... ..... ... -..... ... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ----- .... ..... .... ..... .... -..... ..... .... .... ------- ---..... ..... ..... ... ----------- ... .... -.... ..... ... ..... -..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... -- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ..... -..... -- ADJUSTMENT -.... ..... .... .... ..... .... ---- CRITICAL GAP ------------ m� MINOR RIGHTS -------------- ..... .... .... NB 5.50 5.50 d...0 0.00 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS N� EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 N� WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 N� MINOR THROUGHS N� NB 6'00 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.0O 6.00 N� MINOR LEFTS w� NB 6. 50 6. 50 0.00 6. 50 SB Cl.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 m� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... �� WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS ' CAPACITY AND _____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL-OF-SERVIWE Page-7 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p ..... .... ..... ----- M _________ SH ____________ R SH ____________ ___ 11INOR STREET NB LEFT 28 428 405 > 405 > 378 > T� THROUGH 6 503 490 > 445 490 > 408 485 >A A RIGHT 4 885 885 > 885 > 881 > A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 9 429 414 > 414 > 405 > � THROUGH 7 491 478 > 599 478 > 559 471 >A A RIGHT 25 770 770 > 770 > 745 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT WB LEFT 21 18 864 958 BA 958 864 958 343 rL 941 ^ 'nc cmo'/wow . n."==..... '. ,.. -,, NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: SIGNA| SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE. ....OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - EXISTING CONDITIONS __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 11 58 18 40 : LT 12.0 LT 12.3 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 142 164 106 38 : R 12'0 R 12'0 T 12.0 T 12'0 RT 18 60 71 2 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ PH-� EB LT X X PH-2 SIGNAL SETTINGE- PH-3 PH- NB L7 TH CYCLE 1-1 PH-2 X X LENGTH = PH-3 66.0 PH-4 TH RT X PD WB LT X RT PD SB LT X X TH X TH RT X X RT X FD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.212 0.455 7.0 B 7.0 B R 0.029 0.455 6.4 B WB LT 0.327 0.455 7.5 B 7.3 B R 0.097 0.455 6.6 B NB L 0.028 0.455 7.6 B 6.7 B T 0.076 0.455 6.6 B R 0.115 0.455 6.7 B SB L 0.073 0.455 7.7 B 7.1 B T 0.027 0.455 6.4 B R 0.003 0.455 6.4 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 7.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.221 LOS = B 19E5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIO� SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - EXISTING CONDITIONS __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 11 98 29 97 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 243 177 82 200 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 53 59 50 16 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.(-.*i RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.-j : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.6 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N No Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.O0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 2.00 N 0 0 SIGNAL 0.90 SETTINGS 0 N CYCLE 14.5 LENGTH 3 = 66.0 EB LT TH PH-1 P�-2 X X PH-3 �H-4 NB LT TH �H-1 PH-2 X X PH-3 PH-4 RT X RT PD X PD WB LT X SB IT TH X X TH RT X X RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.{ YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 010 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.350 0.455 7.6 B 7.5 B R 0.086 0.455 6.6 B WB LT 0.495 0.455 8.6 B 8.3 B R 0.095 0.455 6.6 P.- NB L 0.055 0.455 7.7 B 6.7 B T 0.059 0.455 6.5 B R 0.081 0.455 6.6 B SB L 0.168 0.455 8.1 B 7.2 B T 0.144 0.455 6.8 B R 0.026 0.455 6.4 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 7.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.331 LOS = B NO -BUILD SCENARIO 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT I1ATERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD .... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ______________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 16 86 27 59 : LT 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T� 210 243 157 56 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 22 89 105 3 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADO PKG BUSES PHF REDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%> (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 0.90 � N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ 144:1H-1 PH-2 EB LT X TPA X SIGNAL PH-3 PH-4 SETTINGS NB LT TPA RT pH-1 X X X CYC'_E LENGTH PH-2 P�-3 = 66.0 PH-4 RT X pD WB LT X. TH X RT X PD SB LT TH RT X X X PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 PD 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 ').0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.339 0.455 7.6 B 7.5 B R 0.036 0.455 6.4 B WB LT 0.518 0.455 8.8 B 8.4 B R 0.144 0.455 6.8 B NB L 0.043 0.455 7.6 B 6.8 B T 0.113 0.455 6.7 B R 0.169 0.455 6.9 B SB L 0.118 0.455 7.9 B 7.2 B T 0.040 0.455 6.5 B R 0.005 0.455 6.4 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 7.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.344 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATEE DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD .... .... ..... .... ... ..... _.... ..... ..... .... _______________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 16 145 43 144 : L- 12.0 LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 360 262 121 296 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.� RT 78 87 74 24 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12'0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(-.- : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED' BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min 1- EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0'90 0 N 14.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 74.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH RT X X TH RT X X PD WB LT X SB pD LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 25.0 25'0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 0.695 0.338 15.8 C 15.0 B R 0.169 0.338 11.1 B WB LT 0'765 0.338 17.6 C 16.5 C R 0.189 0.338 11.2 B NB L 0.222 0.203 18.8 C 16.5 C T 0.195 0.203 15.8 C R 0.268 0.203 16.2 C SB L 0.584 0.203 22.6 C 18.7 C T 0.478 0.203 17.2 C R 0.087 0.203 15.5 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 16.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.696 LOS = C N� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYINS INFORMATION m� ----..... .... ..... -.... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ... ... ..... -..... ..... --------.... .... ..... -- ..... ..... --.... ..... .... .... .... ..... ... ..... --------..... ..... ..... ... -------- AVERAGE R�NNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 -- PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST N� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . RT 636 CALLOW ASSDCIATES, INC. TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY N� INTERSECTIO� TYPE AND CONTROL ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ______..... ..... ..... _________..... ..... _..... ..... ..... _________ .... ..... _..... .... ..... .... _____________________ N� INrERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MA`0R STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST N� CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUN3: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES N� ---..... -..... ---................ ..... ..... -..... -------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ... -..... .... -..... ..... -..... ---- N� ---- ---- ---- ---- N� LEFT 7 7 33 15 THRU 351 164 18 10 ~- RIGHT 13 10 18 21 N� NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE N� EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUT�BOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GA, ______________ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 SB 5.50 5'50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 WB 5.00 5'00 0.0C 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY N� CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pagr-� N� ... .... .... ..... _... ..... ... .... .... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... _.... .... .... ..... _.... ..... ___________..... ________... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... _.... ..... ..... .... ..... .... _ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY p M SH R SH ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... _ .... ..... ______ _________ ____________ ____________ 36 441 424 > 424 > 388 > � 20 518 513 > 503 513 > 427 493 >A � 20 738 738 > 738 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION m� --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; A� PE�� w� OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMET�Y N� 1985 HC�: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-� *******************************�********* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 -- PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 N�ME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 N� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 636 CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 3/14/91 OTHER I�FORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD N� INTERSECTION TYPE AND CO�TROL ... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... ..... __.... ..... __..... .......... ..... .... ..... ..... ... ... ........ ............. ............. ........ ____________..... ..... ____... ..... ... __..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... _ N� INTERSECTI�N TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST N� CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: ST�P SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES N� --------------------------------..... .... ------..... ..... ... -------------------------- EB WB NB SG N� ---- ---- ---- ---- �� LEFT 28 24 37 12 THRU 269 469 7 9 RIGHT 68 15 6 34 m� NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ________________________________________________________ N� EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 1 �� LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-1- _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS F]R RIGHT TURNS _ ..... ..... .... __.... ..... ..... .... ..... ________________ -------------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.0o 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 Emmmonow Lb n.00 n.00 o.00 n.00 WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page--- _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LO-z- p M SH R SH _.... ..... _..... ..... _ ... ..... ..... _____ _..... ..... ..... _---- ____________ ____________ ___ ��� NB LEFT 41 277 251 > 251 > 211 > � THROUGH 8 346 331 > 284 331 > 229 324 >C G RIGHT 7 787 787 > 787 > 781 > � MINOR STREET SB LEFT 13 279 262 > 262 > 248 > C THROUG� 1 10 334 319 > 434 319 > 373 309 >B S RIGHT 37 645 645 > 645 > 607 > � MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 31 726 726 726 695 � WB LEFT 2 855 855 855 828 � [DENTIFYING INFORMATION am NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/14/91 : PM PEAK OTHER ... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD BUILD SCENARIO :,_"!: DUE ANALYSIS FOR SIGNALIZED lNTE"SECTIONS #' E H ROUTE ..... i77 r rrT[ NIA , CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE ... ,,..... _.14;91 r' `.E ITC R! D CUT r nT n�:nr _!�!'1.C1Y 1,,,,.. „��.!1 LL �-J� �!f {��EHI�M,Y;JJ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HM f'CHh HOUR' auw$ Pat HE: i!: PEAK ;-!Ur, auto r!r__ DUE: ...... Orr - Movement Vf H f_,__ E.''P. Ji_ !men Ic__:r (feet! M'_!-. e:t;.!t W.'! ttiar7.= CP.. G'L ._ T___.., (Net) __ __!I nT t 40 , li: 33 _ `(1 2 � �28 -. ���' ! nT ! EL': .�[, i 305 1 e0 �:! � T u,�6' - [!1 2 220 280 EBR 26. 1 40 0,667 20 _ 97 E ^: , 4�4 1 4G `; " .6�t 2li 2 156 +_ i_c �81T,�!1 2 r, 4v ;T L!,�L_, 2i! - � 12 _ 1 ! un , a:L 45 y�!L _ y 4!: 2 (i.LY 2. 2 117 177 BT 19 1 40 0187 20 - BI WBT 543 1 40 0.547 0 - 251 25; iYLR 0 40 - -- - 20 2 i i! H T ., 20 -0 N T -0 1 Pj'^^, _%= 1 40 0,547 ,:'l' - 129 i .._E: 441 _ .. .,61i 2. 2 174 174 S$T 0 0 40 0 20 - - -- ' 0 - 4 • 0 -- - # 20 fee: f_: car length is ccr__-.=_t'_Ye, ENTRANCE ANALYST CPLLDW ASSOCIATE-.-. DATE ..,....... _.?4 -_ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ )M PEAK HOUR eatLK priL QUE: ru r:HA HOUR ________________________________ Ento pr_L DUE. 0.912E MUVe1I elt Y^H fl ane_ CPH PC length factor (feet) ement ^F Canes -.H ----- _r ------ length ------ factor - Neat) ----- est) ------- -------- Er:E D ----- 22 �i ------ 1 ----- 40 YV ------ 5 '! 34v! ------ LL) ------ ------ iTC' AS -------- , ER ----- 'JO M ------ � i 4i1 T EMS - y�! . 2H L..+ '\ - r r LEh� ice. 187 _ 40 :U Ccr. Z7,__� - iV - _ - :� � �BR _94 i 4ii c i!,�5� 2r �tl .� T4 1.7 � 13 +JY K 0 ! 40 0 20 2 0 !vR 0 0 40 0 a. 2 i [� P ; 0 4(! i) 2f L.! 2 c 0 i r:r' ern l 1 (i i 4: 0 - �l! � 0 t - idc'f_ 185 1 40 0.586 20 2 %c N'! 30L i 40 O..b.' ::! _ 137 T --- 0 0186 20 2 TL NBT 343 2 40 0.563 20 2 76 i 76 SK 0 0 40 0 20 2 0 SK 0 0 40 _ 20 2 0 ; 0 EBT ..�` 233 � 4v 11.T 5 �'4 2) �C 2 L 789 �O P T 62t ! ^ L 4C' 0,345 Y 20 L4 ^ L 207 207 u8R 219 1 40 169 20 2 69 Sm 369 1 40 170 20 2 108 1 108 1 20 feet for ear lengthy is conservative 1985 HCN: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE'.. ....... 3/14/91 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ NEW GEOMETRY __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 122 197 96 59 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 347 386 2b2 164 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 FIT 87 89 220 102 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 28 20 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... ... ..... ..... ____________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Wb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 26.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 26.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 SS 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 _..... .... .... ..... _..... .... .... _______________________________________________________________ PH-1 PH-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-3 PH-4 CYCLE PH-1 LENGTH 2 = 63.0 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X TH X NB LT TH X X RT X PD RT PD X WB LT X X SB LT TH � X TH X FIT X RT X PD PD GREEN 15.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.163 0.683 2.7 A 10.1 B TR 0.703 0.397 12.2 B WB L 0.258 0.683 3.0 A 10.6 B TR 0.768 0.397 13.7 B NB L 0.368 0.222 16.1 C 11.8 B T 0.386 0.222 13.6 B R 0.306 0.460 7.0 B SB L 0.332 0.222 16.0 C 11.8 B T 0.242 0.222 13.0 B R 0.131 0.460 6.3 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.574 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD NEW GEOMETRY __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 163 335 148 144 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 573 485 296 475 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 179 87 255 187 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 80 60 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 26.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 26.5 3 NB 0.00 2.O0 N 0 N 14.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 14.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 P�--2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X TH RT X X X NB LT TH RT Pu X X X X PD WB LT X TH RT X X X S8 LT TH RT X X X X PD PD GREEN 7.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 4.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 __... ..... .......... ..... ..... .... ..... .... _______________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.297 0.641 5.0 A 20.1 C TR 0.948 0.513 23.4 C WB L 0.735 0.641 15.4 C 12.6 B TR 0.712 0.513 11.0 B NB L 0.514 0.282 20.3 C 18.1 C T 0.504 0.192 18.6 C R 0.455 0.282 15.4 C SB L 0.447 0.282 18.9 C 21.3 C T 0.809 0.192 23.7 C R 0.330 0.282 14.5 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.847 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSE[TIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTlON..ROUTE 277/WHEATLANDS ENTRANCE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST. ...... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD -------------------'------------------------------------------------------ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB :B SB LT 0 301 244 0 : T 12'0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 412 193 0 0 : R 12.0 L 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 RT 284 0 278 O : 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12'0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV HDJ PKG BUSES PHF pEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb v/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 WB 0.00 2.�0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 17.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 17.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = P�-2 PH-� 75.0 PH-4 PH-1 EB LT TH pH-2 X PH-3 PH-4 NB LT T; PH-1 X RT PD X RT PD X WB LT X SB LT To: To_! X RT X RT PD PD GREEN 16.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 25'0 0'0 0.0 0.( YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _.... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.771 0.333 18.1 C 12.1 B R 0.312 0.667 3.5 A WB L 0.502 0.213 20.2 C 14.4 B T 0.205 0.587 4.7 A NB L 0.537 0.333 16.3 C 11.0 B R 0.373 0.547 6.4 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.645 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -ROUTE 277/WHEATLAND5 ENTRANCE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME..........PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 456 435 0 : T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 305 543 0 0 : R 12'0 L 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 RT 424 0 441 0 : 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8'5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SE�TINGS CYC_E LENGTH PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 P�-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD WB LT X SB PD LT TH X X TH RT RT PI) PD GREEN 18.0 20.0 0.0 C.0 GREEN 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.713 0.267 19.0 C 10'8 B R 0.486 0.640 4.8 A WB L 0.676 0.240 21.3 C 14.4 B T 0.619 0.547 8.3 B NB L 0.855 0.373 25.0 C 15.3 C R 0.527 0.613 5'7 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 13.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.768 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..WHEATLANDS ENTRANCE/RDUTE 522/343 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASS[CIATES DATE .......... 3/14/9l TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 221 0 185 0 : L 12.0 L T R 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 358 233 : R 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 187 0 0 219 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(", __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG SWSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb 0 Y/N N min T 23.3 3 EB 0.00 WB 0.00 2.00 N 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N G.5 3 EB C.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 87.0 PH-1 EB LT X TH PH-2 PH-3 P�-4 NB pH-1 LT TH X X PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X X RT X PD WB LT SR RT PD LT TH RT TH RT X X PD PD GREEN 0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 30.0 0.0 0.{' YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. Y/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.470 0.345 17.4 C 12.5 B R 0.249 0.552 6.6 B NB L 0.256 0.586 6.7 B 5.9 B T 0.200 0.586 5.5 B SB T 0.221 0.345 13.1 B 8.4 B R 0.233 0.690 3.2 A __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 8.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.322 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION'.WHEATLANDS ENTRANSE/ROUTE 522/340 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... TIME .......... 3/14/91 PN PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SG LT 356 0 308 0 : L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 343 620 : R 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.{ RT 294 0 0 369 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12'0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%> Y/N Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2'00 N N 23.3 3 WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 87,f:*% PH-1 P1- 1-2 PH-3 1-1 PH-� PH-� it: .1-� EB LT TH FT PD X X NB LT TH RT PD X X X X WB LT TH RT PD SB LT TH RT PD X X GREEN 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 16.0 30.0 0.0 0.� YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.710 0.368 20.8 C 14.7 B R 0.391 0.552 7.3 B NB L 0.557 0.563 10.6 B 8.1 B T 0.199 0.563 6.0 B SB T 0.589 0.345 15.6 C 11.1 B R 0.380 0.713 3.3 A __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.629 LOS = B 19G5 Hw: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARv REPORT INTERSECTION'.RTE 277/RTE 63� AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE .......... TIME .......... 3/14/91 AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 7 18 81 15 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 TH 634 408 18 10 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12n- RT 31 10 47 21 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(-.f ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ___... ..... ..... _____________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. T?PE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 __________________________________________________________________________ PH-1 EB LT SIGNAL PH-2 PH-3 X SETTINGS PH-4 NB LT PH-1 CYCLE X LENGTH = 71.{ PIP PH-3 PH-� TH RT Ph, WB LT X X X SB TH RT P..".7; LT X X X TH RT PD X X TH RT PD X X GREEN 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 C.� YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.666 0.704 5.5 B 5.5 B WB LTR 0.454 0.704 3.7 A 3.7 A NB LTR 0.504 0.211 19.9 C 19.9 C SB LTR 0.162 0.211 17.4 C 17.4 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.628 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..RTE 277/R7E 63('� AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE .......... 3/14/91 TIME ...... ....PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB S� LT 28 59 69 12 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 TH 694 904 7 9 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RT 127 15 25 34 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 z2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF REDS RED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.B 3 WB 0.00 2. N 13.G 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 O.90 5 N 13.2 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENSTH = 70.0 P2 PH I. PH-2 X EB LT X TH X NB LT TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0'0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.843 0.786 7.9 B 7.9 B WB LTR 0.989 0.786 24.1 C 24.1 C NB LTR 0.566 0.129 24.5 C 24.5 C.- SB LTR 0.327 0.129 21.5 C 21.5 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.930 LOS = C PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE A Traffic Impact Analysis of WHEA TL A NDS A Proposed Mixed use Development In Fredrick County, Virginia Prepared for: Bowman and Glaize October 1990 Callow Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning & Design Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF FIGURES ................................................. iii LISTOF TABLES ................................................. iv INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................. 1 NO -BUILD SCENARIO ............................................. 5 BUILD SCENARIO ................................................ 5 CONCLUSION.................................................... 12 APPENDIX A - COUNT SUMMARY ................................... APPENDIX B - LEVEL OF SERVICE .................................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page No. 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Existing Road Network and Peak Hour Volumes 3 3. Existing Level of Service and Lane Geometry 4 4. 2000 No -Build Peak Hour Volumes 6 5. 2000 No -Build Level of Service and Lane Geometry 7 6. Wheatland Trip Distribution 9 7. 2000 Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes 10 8. 2000 Build Scenario Level of Service 11 and Lane Geometry C4LLOWASSOCL4TES, INC. iii LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1. Wheatlands Trip Generation Page No. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. iv ' INTRODUCTION ' This report documents the analysis of traffic conditions associated with the proposed Wheatland development. This development is a mixed use community proposed for ' Frederick County, Virginia (See Figure 1). The site, consisting of approximately 926 developable acres, is located just south of Route 277 and west of Route 522. This report is in support of an application for rezoning to include a total of 1,288 single-family dwelling units, 175 townhouse units, 228,690 square feet of retail use, and 511,830 square feet of light ' industrial uses.t( 65 ' This report presents the findings of an analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development. It examines the projected traffic volumes and road improvements for the build -out year of 2000. EXISTING CONDITIONS Route 277 exists as a rural two-lane highway and intersects with Route 522/340 (Double Toll Gate), and Route 636. Route 636 is a rural two-lane collector. U.S. Route 522 exists as a four -lane divided highway and U.S. Route 340 is a two-lane highway. Traffic counts were taken during April 1990 at these intersections. A summary of the data is included in Appendix A. Figure 2 shows the resulting peak hour volumes and 24 hour (ADT) volumes. The peak hour volumes were evaluated for level of service using the existing lane geometry (See Figure 3). The Double Toll Gate intersection operates signalized at level of service `B' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The Route 277/Route 636 intersection currently operates unsignalized at level of service `A' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in Appendix B. Level of service definitions are also provided in Appendix B for signalized and unsignalized intersections. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 Wheatlands October 15, 1990 Figure 1: Vicinity Map O t, 7��7 (7(46)9 5(7g) O Rr. 27 v1 a i i / se M (s.6Zj U.S. IZ� �\ Q INV� c?' AM(PM) (Apn . Wheatlands Figure 2: Existing Road Network and Peak October 15, 1990 11 Hour Volumes CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 3 `Q1 P UNSIGNAUZED L.OS• A(A) (414 AAA; Cj lP1P 4 Q� O /'J %p k.1 A / / �L SIGNAULDS. 8(B) 1 B,e I' Ir U.S. lI 34U I m / m S I FE \ h" •NOTE: PAVEMENT IS UNMARKED BUT 'MOTH CAN ACCOMMODATE TWO NORTHBOUND LANES AM(PM) R,pF,� * 90 CO,,� Wheatlands Figure 3: Existing Level of Service and October 15, 1990 Lane Geometry CALLOWASSOMTES, INC. 4 NO -BUILD SCENARIO Background Traffic The existing peak hour and 24 hour counts were increased at a rate of 4 percent per year. This percent growth was the average growth of Virginia Department of Transportation counts conducted between 1985 and 1988 east of the site. These increased peak hour and ADT volumes represent the 2000 No -Build Scenario (See Figure 4). Level of Service Callow Associates has performed capacity analysis at the same intersection analyzed in the existing conditions assuming the same lane geometry for the No -Build Scenario. The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of the future traffic without the Wheatlands development (See Figure 5). The Route 277/Route 636 intersection level of service will be `A' in both peak hours without signalization. The Double Toll Gate intersection will operate signalized at a level of service `D' in the P.M. peak hour. This signalized level of service is inadequate therefore the lane geometry was modified to raise the P.M. level of service. Left turn lanes were added at the eastbound and westbound approaches, with this modification the level of service will increase to `B' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. BUILD SCENARIO Trip Generation The Wheatlands development proposes to construct approxi ately 1463 residential dwelling units, 21 acres of commercial uses, and 62 acres of light industrial uses. The traffic generated by the development was estimated by using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4th Edition (1987). Table 1 gives the resulting trips generated by the Wheatlands for the A.M. and P.M. peak periods. CALLOWASSOCIATES, INC. 5 Wheatlands 11 Figure 4: No -Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes October 15, 1990 ICALLOWASSOMTES, INC. 6 A% Wheatlands October 15, 1990 Figure 5: No -Build Scenario Level of Service and Lane Geometry ICALLOWASSOCIATES, INC. 7 Table 1 WHEATLANDS TRIP GENERATION Land Use A.M. IN OUT P.M. IN OUT ADT SF Detached 1,288 units Townhouse 175 units Retail 228,690 SF Light Industrial 511,830 SF Total 260 705 867 466 12,880 15 80 75 37 1,151 265 1 113 654 681 16,210 392 54 52 387 3,506 [0732 952 1,648 1,571 33,027 Trip Assignment The distribution of the trips generated by Wheatlands is shown in Figure 6. The overall trip distribution was based upon existing travel patterns, and a report prepared by Housing Data Reports, a division of Regardies, Inc. as well as through area commuter trends. For a more accurate trip assignment, the land use was divided into three zones and assigned to the road network separately. The Wheatlands traffic plus the total background traffic discussed earlier comprises the Build Scenario (See Figure 7). Level of Service Callow Associates performed capacity analysis at the intersection discussed earlier in the existing condition section plus the two site access points. The analysis was performed for the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours for the condition of Wheatlands build -out plus background traffic on the local roadways (See Figure 8). The following narrative describes level of service conditions that would be observed for this analysis at each critical intersection: CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 8 sib 1%Vheatlands II October IS, 1990 Figure 6: Site Trip Distribution Wheatlands Figure 7: Build Scenario Peak Hour Volumes October 15, 1990 I CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 10 Wheatlands October 15, 1990 Figure 8: Build Scenario Level of Service and Lane Geometry ICALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 11 o Route 277 and Route 636 will operate unsignalized at level of service `E' in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The minor movements will experience delays because the mainline through volumes on Route 277 will take the reserve capacity of intersection. However, the signalized Wheatlands Drive intersection to the east will cause gaps in the traffic that will allow the minor movements to operate adequately. o Route 277 and Route 522/340 will operate signalized at an acceptable level of service `B' in the morning peak and 'C' in the evening peak hour, with the with the modified lane geometry used in the No -Build scenario. o Route 277 and Wheatlands Drive will operate signalized at a level of service `B' during both peak hours. o Route 522 and Wheatlands Drive will operate signalized at level of service `B' during both peak hours. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity software is included in Appendix B. CONCLUSION ' In the year 2000, the intersections analyzed in the existing conditions were also analyzed in the No -Build Scenario. The Double Toll Gate intersection will require east and westbound left turn lanes to operate at level of service `B' or better in the peak hours. The Route 277/Route 636 will remain unsignalized and operate at level of service `B' or better in the ' peak periods. For the Build Scenario, the Wheatlands development will generate 1,884 trips in the ' morning peak hour and 3,219 trips during the evening peak hour. The levels of service of the analyzed intersections will decrease slightly from the No -Build Scenario. The two site ' CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 12 ' access points along Route 277 and Route 522/340 will require turn lanes and signalization ' to operate at level of service `B' or better during the peak hours. I C4LLOWASSOCL4TES, INC. 13 APPENDIX A COUNT SUMMARY 4HICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. ;ntersection: ROUTE 522 & ROUTE 277 -ocation WINCHESTER Count Date 7/18/89 -----------+-------------------------------------- 1 Hour ; EASTBOUND Traffic WESTBOUND Time ; on: ROUE 277 on: ROUTE 2 Period---------------------- ------------ Beginning LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU R -----------+-------------------------------------- 530 20 94 24 138 28 82 545 18 1C2 21 147 34 90 600 15 101 26 142 45 101 615 ; 12 11i 23 146 55 101 b30 9 131 15 155 51 107 645 ; 10 •JJ 16 161 58 137 700 11 137 17 161 56 158 715 15 126 14 155 53 164 730 16 105 11 138 52 164 745 1 11 7.- 10 94 35 lit 800 B 43 6 62 23 64 815 3 21 5 29 11 32 830 ; a t: (' v u 0 845 ; 0 u 0 0 0 0 900 ( 0 0 0 915 i± ^ 0 0 930 ; 0 0 0 C 0 945 ; 0 ii 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 C 0 1015 ; (' U U U u 0 1030 0 0 0 0 0 1045 ; 0 0 0 C 0 1100 U 0 C 0 0 0 1145 0 0 0 0 0 0 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 1145 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 1215 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1230 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1245 0 0 U 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 1315 0 0 0 0 0 0 1030 1 0 C O U O 0 1345 1 49 7 57 21 46 1400 6 101 11 124 48 93 1415 ; 8 163 30 101 66 136 1730 10 229 44 283 91 184 1745 ; 11 2,34 51 296 94 170 1800 ; 7 219 53 119 82 150 1815 ; 6 185 40 231 78 141 1830 ; 6 146 30 181 64 131 1845 ; 6 119 26 151 60 127 1700 6 103 25 134 59 140 1915 ; 8 ':06 23z 137 61 130 1930 8 103 20 131 62 116 File Nave ERR Count by JJP Job No. 5304 Input by JJP Weather : WARM & DRY -------------------------------------------------------------+-------+--------- raffic NORTHBOUND Traffic SOUTHBOUND Traffic ; 1 Hour 7 on: ROUTE 511 on: ROUTE 522 TOTAL Time --------- ---------------------- ---------------------- N. S, Period i 1 BHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL ; E & W 'Begirninc ----------------------- ----------------- ---------------------+-------+--------- 53 163 11 177 40 228 21 16 1 38 ; 561 ; 53C 57 181 11 183 46 240 24 31 0 56 ; 624 545 65 111 16 176 49 241 32 43 2 77 671 ; 600 62 21E 18 159 49 226 35 47 1 84 674 615 59 217 17 118 51 192 34 48 2 84 648 ; 630 66 261 20 108 56 184 36 39 4 79 ; 6E5 645 58 272 17 102 68 187 38 37 2 77 ; 701 700 56 2'3 14 100 81 195 36 32 4 72 695 ; 715 47 263 17 100 76 193 38 34 5 71 611 730 2B 175 10 71 64 146 30 26 3 59 ; 474 745 19 1066 45 43 94 18 17 3 38 ; 300 B00 /1j 50 5 21 16 42 10 10 1 21 ; 142 0 Y 0 0 (• 0 0 C (� C V� 83�• C V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B45 i; 0 0 0 is 0 0 0 0; ^ 0 0 t: 0 J v 0 U U U 0 0 0 is 0 U 93 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 345 (' 0 0 (1 0 0 U 0 C; U; 1000 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0; 0; 1015 0 0 0 (. U U 0 1030; 0 (: 0 0 U i! U 0 0 0 iO4 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 1100 0 C C U U U 0 0 0 0 0; 1115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 1145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0; 1215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0; 1230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 1245 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 1315 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :J3V 11 712 7. 12 10 29 25 32 5 61 ; 226 ; ;W— 1b45 25 166 16 29 17 62 48 75 14 137 489 A4. 1-7 at 39 241 22 52 34 108 71 139 16 226 ; 776 ; 9P. 1„6 53 328 28 71 46 145 97 181 18 297 ; 1053 1730 57 321 2B 79 48 155 93 192 15 300 ; 1072 ; 1745 53 185 25 89 56 170 84 192 12 288 1022 18U0 46 265 26 86 46 160 82 160 15 257 ; 913 ; 1815 42 237 27 62 44 153 66 155 15 236 SOS 1S3f, 35 222 29 85 37 151 59 151 17 227 151 ; 1845 43 241 30 71 29 130 67 133 13 213 ; 719 ; 1900 39 230 27 64 29 120 56 123 14 193 ; 690 ; 1915 35 213 26 61 24 112 57 107 15 179 ; 635 ; 1930 ' VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLON ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection: ROUTE 522 d ROUTE 277 File Naee : ERR Count by : JJP location WINCHESTER Job No. : 5304 Input by : JJP Count Date 7/lB/89 Weather : WARM i DRY -----------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+--------- 1 Hour EASTBOUND Traffic WESTBOUND Traffic NORTHBOUND Traffic SOUTHBOUND Traffic ; Time on: ROUTE 277 on: ROUTE 277 on: ROUTE 522 on: ROUTE 522 TOTAL ; Time Period---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N,S, Period ::Beginning LEFT -HRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL E 6 W ;Beginning -----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+--------- A.M. Peak ; 700 ; 11 137 17 165 56 158 58 272 17 102 6B 181 38 37 2 77 701 ; 700 Peak Hour Factors = 0.90 0.77 0.60 0.84 0.89 MIDDAY Peak; 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0; 0 44s Peak Hour Factors = NA _ NA NA NA NA ; P.M. Peak 1745 ; 11 234 51 296 94 170 57 321 28 79 48 155 93 192 15 300 1072 174`_ Peak Hour Factors = 0.90 0.91 0.81 0.04 ; 0.93 ' VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY CALLOW ASSOCIATES, ' File Name 5397 Job Number: 5397 Intersection: ROUTE 277 & ROUTE 636 Location : WINCHESTER Counted by JJP Date : 4-17-90 Day: TOES I......JJPWeather ............------............-•----...---- AM/DRY .......WET .........-•----------......... ..... I TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM WEST TRAFFIC FROM EAST I on: ROUTE 636 on: ROUTE 636 on: ROUTE 277 on: ROUTE 277 I TOTAL I TimeI ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------•----- I N,S, I Time Period I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I E & W I Period -----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------- ' AM I I I AM 7:00-7:15 ( 1 5 2 8 2 1 4 7 2 49 2 53 1 21 3 25 I 93 + 7:00-7:1 7:15-7:30 I 2 4 2 8 1 1 4 6 1 53 4 58 2 23 2 27 I 99 ( 7:15-7:3 7:30-7:45 I 7 1 5 13 2 3 3 8 1 76 2 79 1 40 1 42 I 142 17:30-7:4 7:45-8:00 I 12 2 3 17 5 2 3 10 1 59 1 61 1 27 1 29 i 117 17:45-8:0 8:00-8:15 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:00-8:1 ' 8:15-8:30 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:15-8:3 8:30-8:45 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:30-8:4 8:45-9:00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:45-9:0 I I -----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+--------- 7:00-8:00 I 22 12 12 46 10 7 14 31 5 237 9 251 5 111 7 123 I 451 17:00-8:C 7:15-8:15 I 21 7 10 38 8 6 10 24 3 188 7 198 4 90 4 98 I 358 17:15-8:1 ' 7:30-8:30 I 19 3 8 30 7 5 6 18 2 135 3 140 2 67 2 71 ( 259 17:30-8:3 7:45-8:45 I 12 2 3 17 5 2 3 10 1 59 1 61 1 27 1 29 I 117 17:45-8:4 8:00-9:00 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:00-9:C A.M. PEAK HOUR I I ---------------------------------------------- -- 7:00-8:00 I 22 12 12 46 10 7 14 31 5 237 9 251 5 111 7 123 I 451 17:00-8:C I PHF = 0.68 PHF = 0.78 PHF = 0.79 PHF = 0.73 I I I I I ' PM I I I PM 5:00-5:15 I 1 1 0 2 4 0 8 12 3 40 6 49 4 70 6 80 I 143 14:00-4:1 5:15-5:30 I 2 0 0 2 1 3 5 9 6 45 17 68 4 77 6 87 I 166 ( 4:15-4:2 5:30-5:45 I 8 2 2 12 3 1 2 6 4 44 12 60 5 84 1 90 I 168 14:30-4:1 ' 5:45-6:00 I 9 2 1 12 3 0 7 10 3 49 8 60 4 87 2 93 I 175 14:45-5:( 6:00-6:15 I 6 1 1 8 1 2 9 12 6 44 9 59 3 69 1 73 I 152 15:00-5:1 6:15-6:30 I 4 0 3 7 2 1 6 9 4 39 11 54 4 58 3 65 I 135 15:15-5:2 ' 6:30-6:45 I 2 1 2 5 4 2 8 14 3 35 5 43 1 51 2 54 I 116 15:30-5:� 6:45-7:00 I 3 0 2 5 2 1 5 8 3 37 4 44 2 53 1 56 I 113 ( 5:45-6:( I I I -- ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+--------- 4:00-5:00 I 20 5 3 28 11 4 22 37 16 178 43 237 17 318 15 350 I 652 14:00-5:( 4:15-5:15 ( 25 5 4 34 8 6 23 37 19 182 46 247 16 317 10 343 I 661 14:15-5:' 4:30-5:30 I 27 5 7 39 9 4 24 37 17 176 40 233 16 298 7 321 I 630 14:30-5:: ' 4:45-5:45 I 21 4 7 32 10 5 30 45 16 167 33 216 12 265 8 285 I 578 14:45-5:� 5:00-6:00 I 15 2 8 25 9 6 28 43 16 155 29 200 10 231 7 248 I 516 15:00-6:( I I I ' P.M. PEAK HOUR I I 4:15-5:15 I 25 5 4 34 8 6 23 37 19 182 46 247 16 317 10 343 I 661 14:15-5:' PHF = 0.71 PHF = 0.66 PHF = 0.91 PHF - 0.92 APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS and ' LEVEL OF SERVICE The most current analysis methodologies used for evaluating ' the capacity of intersections were developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other members of the transportation profession. This methodology is presented in TRB Special Report Number 209, The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Computerized methods for ' conducting these analyses were developed by FHWA; and are the methods used in this report. The following brief explanations of the methodologies are adapted from the HCM. ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS At an unsignalized intersection the major street has continuous right of way while the side street is controlled by a Stop or Yield sign. In operation, vehicles exiting the side street and crossing or turning into the main street now must wait for "acceptable gaps" in the main street flow. The same is true of left - turning traffic from the main street that must cross the opposing flow. The analysis takes into account the probability of a gap in the main street traffic. The probability and number of acceptable gaps, is lower in higher volume flows. The acceptability of a gap is modified by physical factors (sight distance, turning radius, etc.) and by characteristics of the traffic flow (percentage trucks, buses, etc.). In the analyses in this report, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional ' information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor - trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the ' intersection as a whole. The capacity of a movement is calculated (in terms of vehicles per hour - VPH) and then compared with the demand. The difference is the "reserve capacity." The level of service is then based on the amount of reserve capacity left over: .moo Level of Service Criteria for Un;ignalized intersections Reserve Levei'of F.xpeeted Delay Capacity Servtce - to Minor Street Traffic': >_ 400_wph A Little or no delay: 300 399 vph B Short traffic delays 200 299 vph` C> Average traffic delays .aeI- r .. -._ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The operation (and therefore the capacity) of a signalized intersection is complicated by the fact that the signal is allocating time between conflicting traffic movements - movements that must use the same physical space. The analysis, therefore, must not only look at the physical geometry of the intersection, but the signal timing aspects as well. In the analysis of signalized intersections, two terms are important: volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and; average stopped delay (seconds per vehicle). The theoretical capacity is based on the physical geometry, the available green time (often expressed as G/C), and the traffic mix (e.g. trucks use more capacity than cars). The average stopped delay may be calculated from the v/c ratio, cycle length, quality of progression on the arterial and available green time on each approach. Calculations of both capacity and delay are based on empirical data, therefore some situations may not fit the theoretical formulas. For example in signal systems with good progression, it is often possible to show a v/c ratio greater than 1.0 (demand exceeds capacity), but at the same time, correctly calculate delay values in the acceptable 'C or 'D' range. In this report all default values recommended by the HCM are used unless other specific information is available (percentage of trucks, pedestrians, etc.). Existing signal timings are observed and used whenever possible. When future signals are being evaluated, an "optimal" signal timing is calculated based on projected volumes. Ile level of service is based on the calculated average delay per vehicle for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Based on extensive research studies, the maximum delay acceptable by the average driver is 60 seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection. This is defined as the upper limit on the possible range of delay/level of service criteria. The following criteria describe the full range of level of service: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections :Level of Stopped. Delay Service per Vehicle (sec) S.Q A B 5.1 to.15.0 C 15 Lxo 25.0 D 25 1 to 40.0 'E 401 to 60 0 F >6 00 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 6/26/90 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - EXISTING CONDITIONS __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 17 58 12 40 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 215 110 106 38 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 27 60 71 2 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12,0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 �B 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PI) PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.401 0.455 9.3 B 9.3 B WB LTR 0.407 0.455 9.4 B 9.4 B NB L 0.019 0.455 7.5 B 7.8 B T 0.073 0.455 7.7 B R 0.115 0.455 7.9 B SB L 0.073 0.455 7.7 _Ti 7.6 B T 0.026 0.455 7.6 B R 0.004 0.455 7.5 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 8.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.261 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 6/26/90 TIME .......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - EXISTING CONDITIONS __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 7 98 45 97 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 153 274 82 200 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.3 RT 33 59 50 24 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ kDJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE <%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-1- EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.302 0.455 8.7 B 8.7 B WB LTR 0.713 0.455 13.5 B 13.5 B NB L 0.086 0.455 7.8 B 7.7 B T 0.056 0.455 7,7 B R 0.081 0.455 7.7 B SB L 0.168 0.455 8.1 B 8.0 B T 0.137 0.455 8.0 B R 0.048 0.455 7.6 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.440 LOS = B 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 636 NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/26/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ____________________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ LEFT 5 5 22 10 THRU 237 111 12 7 RIGHT 9 7 12 14 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB _______ _______ ------- LANES 1 1 2 LANE USAGE L + TR SB 1 LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page - PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _______ 0.00 __________ 90 ________________ 20 _________________ N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ____________________________________________________________________ EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS _____________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ _____________ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL Gr*- ______________ ________ ___________ ___________ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.0� MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 BB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND ____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LO _______ p ________ M _________ SH ____________ R SH ____________ -- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 24 567 554 554 530 THROUGH 13 647 643 > 643 > 630 > RIGHT 13 849 849 > 732 849 > 705 835 >A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 11 564 548 > 548 > 537 > THROUGH 8 647 642 > 714 642 > 680 634 >A RIGHT 15 980 980 > 980 > 964 > MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 6 997 997 997 992 WB LEFT 6 941 941 941 936 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 636 NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/26/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIG,; CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ___________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 19 16 25 8 THRU 182 317 5 6 RIGHT 46 10 4 23 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB _______ _______ LANES 1 1 2 LANE USAGE L + TR SB 1 LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page--4 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _________________ EASTBOUND _______ __________ 0.00 90 ________________ 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION ^ AND RV'S _____________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES -------------- EASTBOUND ___________ 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT ______________ ________ ___________ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.nV WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 MINOR LEFTS FINA- CRITICAL GAF ____________ 5.50 5.50 5.00 5.0C 6.00 6.00 NB 6.50 6.50 u.00 b^n» SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-: POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LO' p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREEl NB LEFT 28 428 405 405 378 1 THROUGH 6 503 490 > 490 > 485 > / RIGHT 4 885 885 > 612 885 > 602 881 >A / MINOR STREET SB LEFT 9 429 414 > 414 > 405 > / THROUGH 7 491 478 > 599 478 > 559 471 >A / RIGHT 25 770 770 > 770 > 745 > / MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 21 864 864 864 843 ' WB LEFT 18 958 958 958 941 ' IDENTIFYING INFORMAl NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 1990 - EXISTING CONDITIONS !Z[i i1 i 1f 1��� �1►` 1 9 [�� 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SnMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 6/26/90 TIME .......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD Uw1 &c6rltJro __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 25 86 18 59 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 318 163 157 56 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 40 B9 105 3 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 P1 1-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.593 0.455 11.2 B 11.2 B WB LTR 0.684 0.455 13.3 B 13.3 B NB L 0.029 0.455 7.6 B 7.9 B T 0.108 0.455 7.8 B R 0.169 0.455 8.1 B SB L 0.118 0.455 7.9 B 7.7 B T 0.038 0.455 7.6 B __________________________________________________________________________ R 0.006 0.455 7.5 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.427 LOS = B 1985 HCMe SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -DOUBLE TOLL_ GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 6/26/90 TIME .......... FM PEAK COMMENT ....... 4. HEATI....ANDS -- 2000 0 - NO BUILD W1 ExtSTlN6 "OfAf,77ty -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES . GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB . EFi WB ND SD LT 10 145 67 144 . LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L_ 12 . (_) TH 226 404.: 121 296 a 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12. _? RT 49 B7 74 _rc_ . 12.0 12.0 T 1.2.0 T 12. _ c_? t ? 12.0 12.0 IRt 12.0 R 12 . (:? 12.0 12.0 12.0 1.2.C.t -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJU :: i MEN , FACTORS GRADE: HV A D3 PKG BUSES P It._ PEDS PED . BUT. ARR. TYPE r:',) ' n) Y/N Nfn Nb Y/N min l r, r+ pit: 2.00 h 0 -? 0.90 0 N 31.8 AB 0.00 2.:00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 {; 0.90 0 Ind 13.8 - L -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _: I GNA` SET..I.. , !.,:,4 CYCLE LENGTH : H =;=r a _ PH-! PH-2 'H-.? PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH--T PH-4 EB LT x NB _T x TH TV! Y RT RT .. PD PD TH ±H x RT x RT :x PD PD GREEN 20.0 40.0 ,_? a 0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0,C) YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 oar. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- L..EV L OF SERVICE LANE [RP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB R... c_ 0.238 { r=q 35.1 T 0.211 0.179 22.4 C BD L., 0.688 0.179 30a2 D 2:6a0 D T 0.517 0.179 24.3 C R 0.185 0.179 22.3 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTE:RCECTIiON: Delay = 29.9 ( _-.err/ eh ) V/C.: = 0.876 L_OS =- I_'., SUM11ish:Y t-'Lt-'UK 1 �?K*�?KiKikikik?K��***�*�**iK?k*****?�ik7K*****�k*?K*�*ik#?K**********iK***?K*�K*?K*�********* 1 INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE. .... OTHER ANAE_YS'1......,CALLOW ASSOCIATES 1 DATE .......... 6/26/9(--) TIME .......... AM PEAK. COMMENT. ,:..... WIHE:ATLANDS -- 2-C )i?) - NO BUILD W/ NEW GEOMETRY 1 VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SD EB WB NB SB 1 LT `5 86 18 59 L 1., .(=) L 12.0 L L 2.0 TH T18 16 1�J 7b lR 1.(? TE;: 1.i) 1 1.() T 1 .ci !T 4(_) 89 105 T 1?.(=) T 12.E 1 ADJUS MEN] FACTORS 7F:r`4DE: E-1V AD,_T F'k::G f:�USES F'E;F F'EDS E='ED. BUT. ARR. T'Y'c'r,_' r /N hJm Na Y N mi.n T r.".�' O„O(? .._..t)O N r) ft i)oUf't it 'G N 1.., 1 ._... --_--- -- ----- - -" (_"YULE LENf3: ! H _. 6 ;' _'t T i i X R'T :Y F'T Y I- L F l �., 1_.' ..�. 1 Y . , p- 1 L LT x j.. i._ k: T H X x 1 PET) .t i_RE_E_!'': i.(_'.i_% _ ri,f_t rj,!7 (-•+ it GF-EjE1 7(j,(1 rt.r) ra_O i;eii 1 it ,i) ,(l (j it r'1 ri `Ir EL L ij W ( LE JKEl- OF SERV I— CE LANE GR!" , t' / C !::'C Df=E_AY LOS A.F'E=' . DELAY AF'F' . LDS r CjeOy,1 B 1 TR :.: =i.4?c; y- a_ L. P. T r, . 11 i> . 4:- 5 ED . 8 B. 1 �, C).4:';7 8,9 R _)�1 4.2 n 5 r 4. -= E !`., r_1'?«, !•__! Ii!� v _ _ IF1 �4 _ I __-...._ _ 1Yv l _ -- \!`v C111 - - i �. (i. L ._ i SUMMARY REPOR'F ' aKaKaK>�akakaKaKakak*aK*ak*akak*aKaKak*aKaKak**aK*aKaKakakaKaKaK*aKakakaKaKaKaKaKaKaKaKaKaKakaKaK>k*akaK*aKaKaK>KaKaKaKaKak*aK*ak*akaK INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ' ANALYST..... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE. ...6/6/9C) '? TIMI=".......... PM PEAk:: ' C_—:OMME:N•T . , ... , . WHEATLANDS NO BUILD W/ NEW GEOMETRY VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB I .T. 1Cj 145 6�7 144 a L 1`� .ia L 1=.�a L 1 .O L - 1�.i. 1H _" 6 4Ci6 1?1 L`�6 . 'rR 1`2.Cj TF: 12.(-) 1 1�.Ca T 127, E�;T 4�' Et7 -74 _�6 1�:'.. =a ',ci 1.� T 12.Ca T _ 1� RR Ci C? Cj Ci .1.'�,�=a i�'.ii R i'Y„C) R i 4 1 Ca 1 ,Ca -----------... ' AD* US TMENT FACTORS GF:ADE= 1 IV AJ,:I f'F::L I_ji USES F'! i= E-'EL'�S F'ED , 1 UT' . ARR. T ' Y%N C.Im Nb YiN min T (.:1.-; jat)(t tit_? C) t1 C).9) (j N ?i o ,v h o- {"t,(`{t �! _ �,r)tt ra it i C) C? ) _ . �_]NIA'i_ CSC t NLD i �� _ f L. LENGTH NL L T Y : R"'x r.' ..!.. E. D WB x A SB LT z R R_r r t_�F':EEP, 1:`,r) +r`,or_? C?,r) Ci,'._a L;^:E.- j °. :_i, 7. LF*`>jEL OF S E R V C_E L.ANt_ C1F:F'. ':!C Ca! DELAY L)J AE='F'. DELAY AF'F'. L= L C :) : _._ r,") is 4 . A . 8 = TR „ o i, :, :�_, o ._ S,r, B 13. 4 C R Ca, l`;' Cj, '55 N� ER- �FL; T i C!!'a e Delay' �y 1:_ . ` �c :! I �J:! r i 1 s;. .:, LOS B ' 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _______________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1 AREA POPULATION...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'..... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 636 NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6/26/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEO� INTERSECTION _______________________________________________________________ TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ______________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 7 7 33 15 THRU 351 164 18 10 RIGHT 13 10 18 21 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ______________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SE, _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 1 1 2 1 LANE USAGE L + TR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page_ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _________________ EASTBOUND _______ 0.00 __________ 90 ________________ 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES --------------- EASTBOUND ___________ _____________ 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT ______________ ________ ___________ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 t-�..0o o.00 WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 MINOR LEFTS FINAL CRITICAL GA ------------ 5.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.yo SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.5O IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page- ____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LO p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 36 441 424 424 388 THROUGH 20 518 513 > 513 > 493 > RIGHT 20 738 738 > 605 738 > 566 718 >A ` MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 436 415 > 415 > 399 > � THROUGH 11 517 512 > 587 512 > 536 501 >A RIGHT 23 923 923 > 923 > 899 > MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 8 989 989 989 981 WB LEFT 8 829 829 829 822 � [DENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS-2000-NO BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY 1935 HCM: UNSIGNAL.IZED INTERSECTIONS Page — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. Tc i PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 NfyM}"_ OF (}-,I:: EAST/WEST STREET . „ ....... . RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... RT 636 NAME OF THE ANALYST , ... , ... CALLOW OW ASSOCIATES, INC.. DATE OF I.. I...I I=. ANALYSIS t. m i?l ; Cj (1 % yy 1 , ; w .. TIME .. .. _ _.... ., ANALYZED PERIOD !NTERSECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE AND CONTROL I TER ECT I ON TYPE: 4—LEG M !-'1 t: O r • STREET .:' I I"C _. C!_: N e _. A ..: T % W i_ S CONTROL r:..!_ Y"E=i_ I•d_!F:THB!_!;_;I`•aL-. STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- 269 469 i NUMBER R OF LANES AI'ti'D LANE USAGE -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB iB SB LANES 1 1 2 1. LANE USAGE L + TR t .TR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-. PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ --------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GA! ______________ ________ ___________ ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 V.Vo WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 Mimi 6.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/26/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - NO BUILD CAPACITY AND L..EVEL..--i7±=—SERVICC'E Page — POT E N — ACTUAL FLOW— T I AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pc Fah) c (pcph) c pcph; c (pcph ) ` = c — v LE p ih SH R SH ----- MINOR STREET 2 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 13 _ 262 > 248 RIGHT 645 5 645 > 607 MAJOR STREET t;? _:_ !`a ! _ G- ';` I N L"; 1 !':; r- ,..., tom: M r! ! .: !_J t , -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET d < < . , , RT 27'.'' NAME_ OF THEE NORTH/SOUTH STREET •Ei_T n . .. o R DATE D TIME OF THE ANALYSIS .Q :: a 2 PM :-.ter OTHER TE INFORMATION :. :. 4==1_ A tiS —2000 - NO BUILD BUILD SCENARIO 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..WHEATLANDS DRIVE/ROUTE 277 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 251 227 0 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 412 193 is C) R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 RT 258 0 245 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Q) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.O0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 62.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 25.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.637 0.403 12.6 B 8.6 B R 0.261 0.726 2.2 A WB L 0.033 0.581 4.2 A 4.4 A T 0.207 0.581 4.7 A NB L 0.516 0.323 13.8 B 11.2 B R 0. 398 0.452 452 8. 8 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 8.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.490 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..WHEATLANDS DRIVE/ROUTE 277 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... PM PEAK: COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 454 443 0 : T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 305 54.E 0 to : R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12. o RT 423 0 438 0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (y) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 71 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0, 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 64.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT TH X X TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 25.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.609 0.313 15.6 C 8.5 B R 0.441 0.703 3.3 A WB L 0.503 0.516 8.7 B 9.3 B T 0.657 0.516 9.8 B NB L 0.8.32 0.391 20.2 C 14.2 B R 0.588 0.547 8.2 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 10.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.732 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..WHEATLANDS DRIVE/ROUTE 522/340 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 221 0 177 0 : L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 336 238 . R 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 182 0 0 219 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 84.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.454 0.357 16.2 C 12.5 B R 0.249 0.536 8.0 B NB L 0.028 0.571 6.0 B 6.3 B T 0.183 0.571 6.6 B SB T 0.208 0.357 14.3 B 15.2 C R 0.450 0.357 16.1 C --------------------------------------------------------------=----------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.287 LOS = 8 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..WHEATLANDS DRIVE/ROUTE 522/340 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 356 0 308 0 . L 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 367 590 : R 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 29.3 0 0 369 . 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 23.3 .3+ NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 a 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 84.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH TH X X RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.731 0.357 21.3 C 15.7 C R 0.401 0.536 8.9 B NB L 0.210 0.571 6.7 B 6.7 B T 0.200 0.571 6.6 B SB T 0.515 0.357 16.5 C 18.7 C R 0.758 0.357 22.3 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.528 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 120 197 74 59 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 441 285 262 164 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 96 89 220 86 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 28 20 . 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) K) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 to N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 _ NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 .3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 87.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 32.0 .32.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 1.277 0.369 WB LTR 1.120 0.368 95.2 F 95.2 F NB L 0.429 0.161 26.0 D 19.7 C T 0.508 0.161 26.0 D R 0.267 0.529 8.6 B SB L 0.6.34 0.161 34.0 D 22.7 C T 0.318 0.161 24.6 C R 0.092 0.529 7.7 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.141 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EH WB NH SB LT 156 335 171 144 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 438 627 296 475 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 149 87 255 199 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 80 60 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------- 7-------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 > i � N 29.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 92.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 20.0 40.0 0.0 0:o GREEN 4.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 2.467 0.217 WB LTR 1.720 0.435 NB L 0.297 0.250 21.6 C 19.9 C T 0.531 0.174 27.0 D R 0.211 0.609 6.2 B SB L 0.078 0.250 20.1 C 28.8 D T 0.851 0.174 35.7 D R 0.260 0.391 14.5 B --------------------------------------------------------------------•------ INTERSECTION: Delay = * (sec/veh) V/C = 1.612 LOS = * 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... AM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ NEW GEOMETRY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 120 197 74 59 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 441 285 262 164 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 96 89 220 86 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 28 20 . 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Q) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 31 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 63.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 15.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.021 0.683 2.4 A 17.8 C TR 0.867 0.397 21.3 C WB L 0.021 0.693 2.4 A 9.1 B TR 0.609 0.397 12.6 B NB L 0.276 0.222 15.6 C 13.1 B T 0.368 0.222 15.9 C R 0.306 0.460 8.2 B SB L 0.332 0.222 16.0 C 13.6 B T 0.230 0.222 15.3 C R 0.105 0.460 7.3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 13.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.543 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..DOUBLE TOLL GATE/ AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... CALLOW ASSOCIATES DATE .......... 10/12/90 TIME.......... PM PEAK COMMENT ....... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD NEW GEOMETRY ----------------------------------------------------------------=--------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EH WB NB SB LT 156 3.35 171 144 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 438 627 296 475 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 149 87 255 199 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 80 60 : 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 29.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 84.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 12.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 4.0 16.0 0.0 0.o YELLOW .3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------- LEVEL 7-------------------------------- OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.033. 0.655 3.9 A 15.1 C TR 0.799 0.476 18.1 C WB L 0.05.3 0.655 3.9 A 22.4 C TR 0.952 0.476 31.0 D NB L 0.169 0.274 17.7 C 20.1 C T 0.484 0.190 23.5 C R 0.385 0.333 16.5 C SB L 0.071 0.274 17.2 C 24.1 C T 0.777 o.190 28.5 D R 0.305 0.33.3 15.9 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.6737 LOS = C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 6.16 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 10/12/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR'STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- LEFT 7 18 ---- 81 ---- 15 THRU 609 392 18 10 RIGHT 31 10 47 21 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND i > 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS -------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES (Table 10-2) -------------- ------------------------------------- ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 o. oo 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 WB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 10/12/90 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 89 205 191 > 191 > 102 > D THROUGH 20 253 247 > 250 247 > 89 227 >E C RIGHT 52 539 539 > 539 > 487 > A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 192 168 > 168 > 151 ::> D THROUGH 11 250 244 > 287 244 > 236 233 ::>C C RIGHT 23 703 703 > 703 680 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 8 793 793 793 786 A WB LEFT 20 604 604 604 584 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 10/12/90 ; AM PEA[-.',* OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... RT 636 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd /yy) ...... 10/ 12/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2(.100 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- LEFT 28 ---- ---- ---- 59 59 12 THRU 693 902 7 9 RIGHT 127 15 25 34 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 2 1 LANE USAGE L + TR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS Qt) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR ----------------- RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND ----------- ------------- i > 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 U CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT ----------- CRITICAL GAP ------------ -------------- MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0. 00 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 0. 00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 WB 5. ICU 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.O0 6.00 0.00 6.00 SB 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6. 5s � 6.50 ) 0. 00 6. 50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 10/12/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 65 95 74 74 9 E THROUGH 8 115 101 > 101 > 93 > E RIGHT 28 453 453 > 257 453 > 221 426 >C A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 13 95 77 > 77 > 64 > E THROUGH 10 115 101 > 163 101 > 103 91 >D E RIGHT 37 373 373 > 373 > 336 > B MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 31 439 439 439 408 A WB LEFT 65 490 490 490 425 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... RT 277 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... RT 636 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS....' 10/12/90 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... WHEATLANDS - 2000 - BUILD W/ EXISTING GEOMETRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for WHEATLANDS , 0 I" I I�w�� 00 oW� 0° CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation Planning & Design Consultants TRAFFIC A1PACT STUDY FOR WHEATLANDS prepared for THE INTERGATE COMPANY, INC. 480 Spring Park Place Suite 1500 Herndon, Virginia 22070 prepared by CALLOW ASSOCIATES, INC. 12007 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite 160 Reston, Virginia 22091 October 16, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF FIGURES ............................................. iii INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 EXISTING 'TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................ 3 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................. 7 TRIP GENERATION ...................................... TRIP DISTRIBUTION ..................................... 7 TRIP ASSIGNMENT ....................................... 7 TRAFFIC IMPAM....................................... 7 CONCLUSIONS............................................... 12 APPENDIX................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page No. 1. Site Location 2 2. Existing Peak Hour Volumes - A.M. 4 3. Existing Peak Hour Volumes - P.M. 5 4. Existing Level of Service and Lane Geometry 6 5. Trip Generation Table 8 6. Trip Distribution 9 7. Future Peak Hour Volumes - A.M. 10 8. Future Peak Hour - Volumes - P.M. 11 9. Future Level of Service and Lane Geometry 13 iii INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Wheatlands Traffic Study is to quantify the traffic improvements of the proposed Wheatlands development on existing and planned area roadways. The Wheatlands development is a proposed community located in Frederick County, Virginia. The Wheatlands development is just southeast of Winchester and east of Stephens City. It is located on the southwest comer of the Double Toll Gate (Route 522/340 and Route 277) as shown on Figure 1. Wheatlands will have 1,538 single family homes, 258 townhouses, 140,000 square feet of ' retail, 50,000 square feet of office. The lake itself will create minimal trips in the peak hours at the projected buildout year. ' The traffic impacts of Wheatlands performed by Callow Associates on surrounding roadways are measured through the following sequence of activities. 1. Establishing the existing base condition traffic volumes through field count ' surveys. ' 2. Forecasting future traffic volumes by adding the expected traffic volumes associated with the Wheatlands development. 3. Analyzing the future conditions with standard capacity analysis methods and ' recommending mitigation measures to accommodate Wheatlands traffic. ' The commuter hours in the morning and evening peak generate the greatest volume of traffic from a residential community and volume to capacity measures are evaluated on an hourly basis. Further, the highest hourly traffic flows on the two arterials serving the ' site are the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak commuter hours. Therefore all other times 1 N wQ,crEsrEx 17 5221 [ 50 522 7 !-, CALLOW I Figure 1. Site Location ASSOCIATES INC. 17 7 50 W ' would have less impact. ADT's (Average Daily Traffic) is the total driveway trips coming in and going out in an average weekday per household. For instance, the A.M. commuter ' out trip and the P.M. commuter in trip accounts for only two ADT trips. Many ADT trips would be confined to the site such as shopping trips to on -site retail, visits to the ' doctors in one of the offices etc. Further, other ADT trips would be more oriented toward the local areas such as Winchester. Thus, the A.M. and P.M. peak hours are the two worst cases for measuring the traffic impact of Wheatlands. The purpose of this report is to document these analytical steps and present conclusions and recommendations. ' EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDMONS Traffic counts were taken during July 1989 at Routes 522/340 and Route 277 (Double ' Toll Gate). Existing traffic operations were then analyzed based upon existing traffic control devices and roadway geometrics. The result of this analysis provided level of service (LOS) for the intersection. (Briefly, level of service ranges from `A' free flow condition to `F' forced flow condition. The Appendix contains a detailed description of the levels taken from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Callow Associates then performed capacity analyses at one intersection for the A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. This intersection is: o Route 522/340 and Route 277 (Double Toll Gate). Route 522 /340 and Route 277 operate at a level of service `B' during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours - signalized. Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual software is included in the Appendix. Existing volumes are shown on Figures 2 and 3. The level of service and lane geometry are shown on Figure 4. 3 N CALLOW Figure 2. F.ldsting Peak Hour Volumes - A.M. ASSOCIATES INC. Ln L—� CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. Figure 3. Mdsting Peak Hour Volumes - P.M. U CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. Figure 4. Fidsting Level of Service and Lane Geometry ' FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION The number of trips produced by and attracted to the Wheatlands site was established using ITE (4th Edition) Trip Generation rates, Code 210 for single family homes, Code 230 for townhomes, Code 820 for retail, and Code 710 for office. Figure 5 shows the trip generation table. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The trips generated by the development were distributed onto the local road network so that the traffic impacts could be determined. The overall trip distribution was based upon a report prepared by Housing Data Reports, a division of Regardies, Inc. as well as P existing travel patterns and through area commuter trends. Figure 6 shows the trip distribution for the Wheatlands development. TRIP ASSIGNMENT tThe generated trips and other background traffic were then assigned to the already existing and future road network. Figures 7 and 8 show the total volumes on the network for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. TRAFFIC Il WACTS Callow Associates then analyzed traffic operations for future conditions, based upon the growth in traffic with the Wheatlands development traffic added, traffic control devices and roadway geometrics. Callow Associates performed capacity analyses at four intersections for A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. These intersections were: o Route 522/340 and Route 277 (Double Toll Gate) 7 co va 15% WQYCHEWE,R 35%/ 522 17 7 L - CALLOW I Figure 6. Trip Distribution ASSOCIATES INC. n 7 So n 522 131 .� 203 ///��� �( 127 277 9 les �-►- I � fir s9 �21921 m S�� z oe z W 522 N 0 O N. ENTRAN E 67so � S. ENTRA 273 000;0 17.2 � C L--� CALLOW Figure 7. Future Peak Dour Volumes - A.M. ASSOCIATES INC. r r 17= 27 ►P. � W S7 9 \.277 2% .._► ,,► uT ,mil 1� 340 se4 Tie � 1 �� 79 ` V Z t oL Z W 522 N P N. ENTRAN E 5. 's It 65 N S. ENTRA M� �t U N CALLOW Figure 8. Future Peak Hour - Volumes -P.M. ASSOCIATES INC. ' o Route 277 and Entrance 1 o Route 522 and North Entrance ' o Route 522 and South Entrance ' Route 522/340 and Route 277 will operate at level of service V during the A.M. and P.M. peak hour - signalized. Route 277 and Entrance 1 operate at a level of service V in both the A.M. and P.M. peaks - signalized. Route 522 and the South Entrance will operate at level of service V in the A.M. and P.M. peaks - signalized. Route 522 and the ' North Entrance will operate at an acceptable level of service in the A.M. and P.M. peaks - unsignalized. When an unsignalized intersection is near a signalized one, (in this case 'I there are signalized intersections on either side) the signalized intersections will control the flow of traffic through the unsignalized intersection (the 1985 Highway Capacity 'I Manual Software assumes traffic flows arrive in a random manner). The signalized 'I intersections at the Double Toll Gate intersection and at the south entrance should be synchronized in order that the timing of the traffic signals determine when the platoons of 'I cars go through the unsignalized intersection. This in effect makes the unsignalized intersection a "signalized" intersection. The traffic volumes were adjusted to accommodate 'I for this platooning effect. 'I Capacity analysis output from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Software is included in the Appendix. The level of service and lane geometry results from this analysis are shown 'I on Figure 9. The following narrative describes the location analyzed for the future condition. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the Wheatlands development will have no significant effect on the existing road network with the lane configurations as in Figure 9. The total future traffic analyzed will operate at acceptable conditions. 12 r w rl U CALLOW ASSOCIATES INC. 522 Signalized Signalized L.O.B. = B(H) B(B) L.O.s. = B(B) A (A)pu - B (B) R 340 (B) B JI (B)B z z 522 A(A 11 � Unsignalized N. ENTRAN (B)C (A) A (A)A A (A) S. ENTRA III %ff Signalized (B) B0100 (B) A L.O. S. = B (B) Figure 9. Future Level of Service and Lane Geometry APPENDIX 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..ROUT E*277�AND$ROUTE$340*ROUTE�522*340*(DOUBLETOLL) AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ... .... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE...... .... 10/4/65 PM PEAK HOUR TIME.......... COMMENT....... EXISTING ----g--- ___________________ _________ GEOMETRY VOLUMES E WP NB SP EP WP NB 28 SP 93 : LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 LT 11 94 79 192 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TH 234 170 15 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0kT 51 57 48 O 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 U 12.0 12.0 1�.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ---- --------------- ------ - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE Y/N Nm Nb Y�ND' min 31.8 3 EP 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 0.9 0 O 0 N N 31.8 3 WH 0.00 2.00 N U U 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N U 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N ------------- ---------------____ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT X EP LT TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD Sg LT X WP LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 O. 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 LOW0.0 U.0 0.0 YELLOW ----------0-0------- ------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C P 8.3 $ EP LTR 0.463 0.455 8.3 E . P WH LTR 0.607 0.455 9.9 P 6.7 8 NP L 0.053 0.455 7.6 T 0.054 0.455 6.5 P R 0.077 0.455 6.6 P 7,1 P SP L 0.160 0.455 8.1 P T 0.132 0.455 6.7 P R 0.024 0.455 6.4 P --- ___ _____ INTERSECTION: Delay = 8.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.383 LOS = P 1985 HCMt SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..ROUTE 277 AND ROUTE 340/ROUTE 522/340 (DOUBLETOLL) AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE.......... 10/4/65 TIME.......... AM PEAK HOUR COMMENT....... EXISTING ------------------ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB 17 SB . 38 : LTR EB 12.0 LTR WB 12.0 NB L 12.0 L SB 12.0 LT 11 56 TH 137 158 102 37 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 17 58 68 2 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 0 0 0 0: 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR • 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK:G RUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M (/) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 NS 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 ------- N 13.8 - ---- 3---- -------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 t> PD 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. EB LTR 0.255 0.455 7.2 B 7.2 BLOS B WB LTR 0.442 0.455 8.2 B 8.2 B NB L 0.027 0.455 7.6 B 6.7 T 0.070 0.455 6.6 B R 0.110 0.455 6.7 B SB L 0.068 0.455 7.7 B 7.0 B T 0.025 0.455 6.4 B R 0.003 0.455 6.4 B ------------------------ INTERSECTION: Delay- 7.4 (sec/veh) V/C _ 0.276 LOS B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ' SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..ROUTE 277/ENTRANCE 1 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE .......... 10/9/89 TIME.......... AM PEAK HOUR COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE - --------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NE SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 131 109 4 : T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 165 176 0 0 : R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RT 59 0 176 i) : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.() ' RR 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (.) M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB O.Oc► 2.00 N 0 i),90 0 N 11.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.9C> f_) N 11.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 0. oO 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 56.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH ' RT X RT X PD PD WS LT X SB LT TH X TH ' RT RT PD PD GREEN 35.0 c.) . 0 (-) . o 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 ' YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW-----3-0- 0.0 0.0 � 0.0 --------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.165 o.625 2.8 A 2.8 A R 0.069 0.625 2.7 A WB L 0.189 0.625 3.4 A T 0.176 0.625 2.9 A NB L 0.299 0.268 12.5 B 12.1 B R 0.487 0,268 11 .8 B ' - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.278 LOS = B ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ' INTERSECTION..ROUTE 277/ENTRANCE 1 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE .......... 10/9/89 TIME.......... PM PEAK HOUR COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE ------- -------------------------------------------- ' VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 279 120 0 : T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 296 183 0 0 : R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 12•0 ' RT 164 0 199 0 : 12.o 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 1� 0 12.0 12 0 12.0 -----------------------------------,-------------------------------------` ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3 WB i>. C >cj 2.00 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 11.3 3 ' NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 0. C>C> 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 ------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 56.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH ' RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT ' TH X TH RT RT PD PD ' GREEN 35.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.C> YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE ' LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.295 0.625 3.2 A 3.1 A R 0.192 0.625 2.9 A WB L 0.567 0.625 5.7 B 4.6 A T 0.183 0.625 2.9 A NB L 0.329 0.268 12.7 B 12.5 B ' R 0.545 0.268 12.4 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.561 LOS = B 1985 HCMt SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..ROUTE 277 AND ROUTE 340/ROUTE 522/340 (DOUBLETOLL) AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE.......:..10/9/89 TIME....... ..AM PEAK; HOUR COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 104 127 40 38 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 ' TH 218 203 306 137 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12. i > T 12.0 RT 21 58 205 64 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV A D J PK'G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 Q.90 i► N 31.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 31.8 3 ' NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD ' GREEN 30.0 0.0 i > . i > 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.235 0.455 8.4 8 7.8 B ' TR 0.332 0.455 7.6 B WB L 0.275 0.455 8.6 B 8.0 B TR 0.370 0.455 7.7 B NB L 0.075 0.455 7.7 B 7.3 B ' T 0.210 0.455 7.0 B R 0.331 0.455 7.6 B SB L 0.106 0.455 7.6 B 6.8 B T 0.094 0.455 6.6 B R 0.103 0.455 6.7 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 7.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.351 LOS = B ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT '********#***********#**************4**FtOUTE�5*2*340*(DOUBLETOLL)**#****** INTERSECTION -ROUTE 277 AND ROUTE AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. RO5SON DATE .......... 10/9/89 PM PEAK HOUR TIME.......... COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE ------------- ------------ GEOMETRY ' VOLUMES WB NB SB EB WB NB SS 93 : L 12.0 L 12.0 -,12.0 L 12.0 L LT 127 292 �46 : TR 12.0 TR 471 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 TH 318 275 281 6 RT 78 57 186 161 12.t> 12.0 T 12.0 T R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 7 0: 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 1• .0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PK:G BUSES PHF Y/N min T ( % ) (( % ) Y/N Nm Nb 0 c_� 9C 0N 31 .8 3 EB t� . C �t> . c:�0 N C> . O O 0.90 0 N 31.8 WB 0. 00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 N 19.8 3 NB 0.00 2.Oo N 0 0 0.90 t0 N 19.8 3 SB 0.C:C> 2.0 N ------------------ --------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS _ CYCLE LENGTH - 69.C) PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT TH X x TH X RT X RT X PD PD SB X X LT X WB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT PD PD ' 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 5.0 25.0 C>.0 0.0 GREEN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.t> YELLOW 3.0 ----------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY LOBS APP12.6LAY APP.BLOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C 0.051 0.478 7.3 EB L TR 0.702 0.362 14.2 B B WB L 0.051 0.478 7.3 B 10.0 TR 0.586 0.362 12.4 B 8.1 B NB L 0.165 0.435 9.0 B T 0.201 0.435 7.8 B R 0.314 0.435 8.3 B 8.5 B SB L 0.259 0.435 9.5 B T 0.338 0.435 8.4 B ' R 0.272 0.435 8.1 B ------------------ ___------------------- - INTERSECTION: Delay 9.7 (sec/veh) V/C - 0.446 LOS B 1995 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SOUTH ENTRANCE/ROUTE 522 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE .......... 10/9/89 TIME.......... AM PEAK; HOUR COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE ------- --------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 273 0 72 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH C 0 233 202 : R 12.0 12.0 T 12.o T 12.0 RT 122 C) 0 96 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PK;G BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (7.) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 i0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 3 WB C>,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 3 NS 0. i )C ) 2.00 N O 0 0.90 O N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N O O 0.90 O N 11.3 3 -------------------------------- ----------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH - 66.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH X RT RT X PD PD GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0. YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APR. DELAY APP. LOS ED L 0.441 0.455 9.6 B 8.8 B R 0.197 0.455 7.0 B NB L O.i51 0.455 8.0 B 7•i B T 0.160 0.455 6.8 B SB T 0.139 0.455 6.8 B 6.8 B R 0.155 0.455 6.8 B ----------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 7.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.300 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ########################################################################## INTERSECTION..SOUTH ENTRANCE/ROUTE 522 ' AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE .......... 10/9/89 TIME.......... PM PEAK HOUR COMMENT....... TOTAL FUTURE ------------- ------------------------------------ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 280 0 218 0 : L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH c? 239 329 R 12.0 12.0 c? T 12.0 T 12.0 ' RT 130 0 0 332 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 o 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.�? 12.0 12.0 12.0 1�. n 12 0 0 12._ 12 t � ---------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( / ) (7.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2. 00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 25.8 3 NB o.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 O N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 3 ---------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 66.0 ' PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH TH X ' RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT ' TH TH X RT RT X PD PD ' GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 ! • c ------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE ' LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.452 0.455 9.7 B 8.9 B R 0.210 0.455 7.0 B ' NB L 0.768 0.455 18.9 C 12.6 B T 0.164 0.455 6.9 B SB T 0.226 0.455 7.1 B 8.0 B ' R 0.536 0.455 8.9 B ------------------------------- ___________ INTERSECTION: Delay 9.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.610 LOS = B 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROUTE 522 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 10/9/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. AM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAP ADJUST INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 67 -- 22 0 THRU 0 -- 211 109 RIGHT 88 -- 0 39 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 -- 2 2 ADJUSTMENT ----------------------------------------------- FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT ------------ TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 N WESTBOUND ----- --- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION -------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND ----------- ------------- 0 0 0 WESTBOUND --- NORTHBOUND i) 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 o 0 CRITICAL GAPS ----------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE -------- ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS Fs 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROUTE 522 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 10/9/89 ; AM PEAK. HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAP ADJUST 5.70 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------ ------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c p (pcph) c M (pcph) c SH (pcph) c R = c SH- v LOS ------------------------------------ -- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 74 476 468 468 395 B RIGHT 97 937 937 937 840 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 24 906 906 906 881 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROUTE 522 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 10/9/89 ; AM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAP ADJUST Page-2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----------------------------- -------------- ------------------------ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - ---------- -------- EASTBOUND c_� . pi � 90 20 N WESTBOUND ----- - NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 9� � 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------- -------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES -------- - EASTBOUND WESTBOUND --- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS ------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table10-2)VALUE ADJUSTMENTCRITICALGAP - - - - -- - MINOR RIGHTS FR 5.40 5.9C> i � . 00 5.9(_) MAJOR LEFTS 5.7i� 0.CCU NB 5.70 5.70 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------- ------------ ---------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROUTE 522 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... jo/9/89 ; PM PEAK: HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAP ADJUST 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... ROUTE 522 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. MARCUS A. ROSSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 10/9/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAP ADJUST INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SEA LEFT 50 -- 56 0 THRU 0 -- 183 306 >6 RIGHT 65 -- 0 64 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 -- 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ------------- Page-3 ----------------- POTEN- ACTUAL RESERVE FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c M (pcph) c SH (pcph) c = c - v LOS R SH - MINOR STREET 55 EP LEFT RIGHT 72 337 829 •319 829 319 264 C 829 758 A MAJOR STREET NEB LEFT 62 695 695 695 633 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------- ---------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ROUTE 522 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... lo/9/89 ; F'M PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION.... TOTAL FUTURE GAF' ADJUST 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE PRELIMINARY DAM STUDY (Hec I Analysis) of WHEATLANDS WHEATLANDS LAKE FREDERICK DAM SCALE: 1 "=10T r- n c POND. LI r i r,, urn: 5 . 15 S/N: 129S160128 EXECU I f.,: "I 1.5--1991 17:' s: 03 ****tom» 5U1t;1APY OF- ROUTING CDfiPUTATIONS --*•.•{w.--. � . D: \WHEATLAN\WNEE Tl .PNO fill Itudr.•o3r-aph— D:\WXEATLAN\WHEAT HYI] \WXEATLAN\IOUT . HYD Elevation - 616.00 Ft 41 * * ** SummaFg oC PL-,�i, Outflow and Peak Elevatior: « � • — Fnsa , Inflow - 97193 . 00 crs Peak Dut_`inw - 10524.80 eFs Peak Elevation - 62'7.55 Ft **'*"'* Sr-rmma!`g of Approximate peek. Storage '***** Initial Stor-age - 0.00 ac-f-t Deal• St:Orage From 1706.80 ae--Ft ^ I Uta1 Strsrage in Pond - 170B . BO ac-E't r1:r; l; i r:c� : I of 1 C�i.i h yrir arlraJ�?� truncated on left lice . rrirrg: tllf-low hUdrriguaph truncated on right side. T 4_i - .A T '- = - 11H1 T r - T-:�:j.1r-i `,WXE:A'fLF-)N\WHEATl PND \WHEATL,.qN`,,UJHEAT lqyn Hydrog-raph; WHEAT LAN',CUT 1 A I L L' i C3 LIJ - CES La c) i i - 627.9s Ft Page U E X E E LJ T E- TJ H J3 ii-Ooo i�OOO 18000 21000 24LJ 000 e"20".; 27193.0 Fs X Hyl) 24.8 nFs c Amax I05 . - C-1 - -I E X F C UTL L� 0'a, - i'/ - 19 9 1 CH: 31; i3 fjl`:_K ! 1: WHEAT , 14YL) ; WHEAL FND U11JEN PUND LIAIA L L L,,,, 1 1 (3 N 1 OUTFLOW 1 STORAGE ---------- Uo 1 E31 Es I . 6 1527.445: UU BSS7.5 I 55e. GLi7 6; LIO i ss,39. 1589.DGq: IGS2,u-jj1 1062G.2 I (S . 3'./1 1 LLjU .'f0 ii'193.G 17SO.273i -------------------------- G29; INTEP11F-aIATE PUlil ;,'IL CC)I-JPUTf;-" I Ljtj�� .L 4 E!S/t I i2'j t- C Ors) ------------ I t.-- I i 377192.6 1 :3&� 38q771.3 J, 392377.6 . i �-: . . i : 400009le i UL J 4IS361.8 i i L123079.9 Time incL-amerit �t) - 0,100 lirs. s,%N', -1l2s-r�IE01178 FX E'C_. U 0 0 t 31 : Ili I PNALY-SIS, FOR POST 2E1 )ELOPE13 CUI,,1l3ll ifl!;` 160' BROAD LREASTED OGEE WEIR + 6 4. 40 XYdc09raPh: D:\WHEATLAN\WHE.AT .1it-i Table File: D:\IUHEATLAN\WHEATI lN111TIAL CONDIT IONS----- -,"ic)r,, - 616.00 rt Ijui 0 . 00 c f, 0.00 ac-Ft li'l,JE.r\j PUNU IJAI I A 1 oi'ltl ION: OUTFLOW STORAGE C) 0 (),COO: E, I H32 l'3li 7 :'0 i Pl17 .5 R9 9 518 .360 S913 I)o /,HLf 0 7 i I0 H 5 1 E) I r? I - "1 6 1 0 7 h 2 F3 4 C 5i BB9 G i S 15()3 21"', F 13 S 203 i )_0 104 3 FjSS: i i. () /13 OSE G 3 3P_ F� 1 1 102 SED: 3 G . "3 0 1 132 iuo, j I Uo 9 F) G C., C) ":,E! 1 _�Co: 261 Yie: 13 '312 : b9 i 9 .7 l'ALii2 637 G U 1 3 -89 4 I i b IS A39 /7 1 B 3SH; FINE) I NTERI !E-D I ATE Lr-'Dr1PUTA-1 ------------------------- I C r-- F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- C.0 i lLisoss 6 I52S!4 5 1 LJ 169203 3 17607e. 3 162BS7. b 196319,2 i 22L1376 . 5 23i3ss.4 238'f 19. 0 245179.5 �?52SGLi. S 2S967B.G 273987.5 2B I le2. S EeBqo2. 3 29S651 , Ll '3 cei 3OPS27.9 310231 . q 317s6E. 3 324918. c -3 d 339716 147157,2 3sqs2s,3 35211e.6 L, s , 1 cs R_/m 1- P-q- 15 1 R_ F, C, F, 9 19 91 - 08 i : LiA PutiLi D W H E PT L A N\ W I i L 0 T1 FNL) IME-lut.) L aoh 0 W H E r) T L A H L HY13 DutS I L:t, 4: ;juraph: D ',WHLF` I-LAN'\DUT HYD i NFL,; - ROUTING - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crjmpui,priuw!,� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- TIM, - - - - - - - - - 0 2S/t + 0 CE 5 F � 'tjo .00 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'jo 0 1 . 00 3031 . 0 3031.0 3021 . 0 3 . 00 33,111f 0 GLlos . 0 1 (SLIO� . 0; 11 . ou T/ 1" 10" 12 2 . 0 10122 0: Li 166 111288 142aB. 0 1 Lf. 22 0 190101.0 19010 0: _LJ I fS(_ .. u o .0 S27F3 0 242eo 1 0 2q2ea 0; ()o 6982.0 3 la70. 0 31270. 0: U, UL,:'. lJo. UU; E383LI Li 1104 . 0: 'D Go; 53"; so, 0 537S0. 0: 736e3.0 ! J,J .00 JG1f34. 0 7 110 11 -7 . 0! DO V37964 - 0 L-."1633 . s i 16BOB I , 0: ib G 00; �J 103. 0 23L�351 .:3 P-LiCSIG. S: 22-3f.) J lu 0 0 DO I '/'Isli . 9 311e9Li.3; 50UU, 69L20s,0 js,:Aiu. 9 3709S9. y: 7Bcl i I I CO! Lf Li i? I tA . 5:026 . s 43749S, 5 1 11 Ln , 3;,," 44 3 _3 _� 9 Li ',i24741 S 44E3390. S: 11 B ]L �3. k 12 JC) U. 00; 2F3:3H,* 193 . 3 1128 Z) F 1.'i2so. 0 '110070. 7 LZ) 1-:yj 33 'JI 1._3 00: G 1 1 I-J , .0 i U"i e 2 3. 3 4242S2. 6! 10 Lz:T; 1i H. 0 0: 1 1 PF3n. r) JLI;iLisi .4 3 1 10 0 �'� 13. 00: I O1U2 Jussol L104633. q: S!z i; 1 J, fjll. tl 1 .'0 00! 9 3 C-1 Lt 0 2716911 . 6 35Li955, 3 1 S10121 . U': J 2:j ID 00! 86GES. 0 3691175 . E3 365S77.6: 64; I on: b 11 7 . 0 DG0392,S 376S96.8; 8 p 00: 7 6'13 . 0 352E63. Lt :96e025.S: i Ll . j: L.j (Ij '7216 . 0 345307.8 35ee'79 . Ll 2u`j b JS 7 00: RF36 I . L, -33E3336, 0 352168 , 6: GHIL �.�!2; i i 14, .00 3317SE.9 344902. 0 G-L) b 00: C, 33802, , 9; 62'J! (3011 . 0 '19632.3 331E-36.2: �2 19 CO 978'� . 01 31 lio 70 1 6 32S417 . 3 00 SSS9.0 301B803. 8 319629,6; `-:01 1 L U L 31 Lt. 0 1 13:3 77 . 0 303840.3 5: Li co 5240 C) 2!3SI88 .21 309080.3: 4 5 00: 5 1. LOA . 0 r94815.0 3011291 . 3; 7 i'JU, J'I 9. Oo I t` 1_; 290G92'a 2SS'780.0; LJL,!_� L i 15 J 00 c LUBB 1:l 8 2955li I . 8 ; Lf36J 11-7Ss 0 Jc) 46GA 0 s 755 8 297839.e! Lie! ; 1 15 l4570 0 - - - - - - - - 1 27GS34.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2BL4326 .8 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 289E . - - - - - -- - - - - - .38 - - - - - - - - FE)ND-L .i uii: 5, 15 S/N: 1255160128 E X E L: U 11,-1.) _" 1 1 7 - I S 9 1 0 a : 3 1 : I 13 P cl "j C. 'I Flot)d ; ["; D;\WHEATLAN\WXEAT1 PNO InFluw iitjJL_' UYL'aph: D _. \ u) H E A T L n N \ WH E 01 IXYD D: ',WHEATLAN\OUr HYD I N F1, I j F, I i ROUTING COMPUTATIONS T 11 !1-. iFLDW ---------------------------------------------------------- 11.4,12 25,,t - 0 RS/t 4. 0 0 LI T I, L U Ali s . () 0 ------------------ Li Lf/7 ----------- 2734BB.7 281011 .4! 37Ui j:-, 5 L, LJ6. oc 4381 270602.6 277669.7! :3 6:3 j . 00: 4283 - 0 2678SG.4 3 i 'IS . UUL L) u E3 0 01 4166.0 1 aG5239.3 1 272042.4; 3'iU1 ;2--J�0. GO 40ss.0 262739.6 26932B,3; '3 SB 6, j'., 1 . 00: 39s1.0 8SC343.S 2ES730.6: 3 1 :.J.J, 6 .00 3B97, 0 258046-8 1 284240.S! 301ju. u C, .t3U2'00; 3606.0 '__)55B111i , 5 R6185ii.B: 300'-), i:' lu. :30" :337C)o 3.71S.0 253'726.8 1 2SSS63-S1 2SiH A -3. .'1 16. "Ji ()c: 3630. U 2SIE586's 2S-73SS,G: 2 EJ:Y., 2J - L' b 1 3 ESS227 .5 ; 27 5' ij U 2 . b0 1 16 . Ll '��Jo 00; :Ili-7827 . 2 2S3186.3: 26';Ij . j IG 16 S I . 0 0 i 31111 . 0 2'1GO22. 3 1 2S123B.2: 2 G 0 16 u (11 fJ cc); 33S4.0 244297.3 2493715.3; 2S3'1,'-1cj .' _jLJ. 00: 329Y.0 247SS4.3; 2 Lij 17 0 L; 306. 00: J240. 0 Llf 1056. 6 2i5885'5: 2413 1 . 00 1 31 SY. u 6: 2.35L . "j, P 3. 30 17' 00: 3166.0 23Q110 '7 242711 .0 : 230C. 1_1 00: 313S.0 23674S,B 1 24 12LiS. 7: 22Lj �j 1 `_:_':3 22 0 0 3104 . 0 219E jr-'s. 00: 30,13.0 234221.6 1 J 14 17 . 6 I'l . uc): :3043. 0 2330q5.0 I 23?264.51 2 1 U U . iu. 00: 3012. 0 E2j1920 6 1 236OS7.01 E? 0 LN f:3 i L2 J IU3.00: i=9e31 . 0 23094S i G: 2 0 LIU go: 2950.3 1 IrJUU i-,.: L D 01 LJ I 'i . 0 228825. 4 1 232733.9: c2'i U ji 00; PUB3.0 227B68,2 1 231708.1i: 1 t3LO U 226935 .5 23C709.2; WHi H 1 U -3:. iHS 226025.8 229734, 5: 18 j AL�u. 00; 2, 0 13- .4 226'762.8: 1922, JT/'. Ou: 271S.0 2E4266.9 227B52 Li: I. '7 9- J L_' L' 9 H j_�G. 00: 1 223419.11 226941.9. i'.17 '__' i LIE 00! 2E31.0 222566.5 1 226050-1! 173.1 ;)2.E3C) I Hi; "..1 26 00; 2589.0 E,:: 17 6 7 , S 225175.5: 1'/0 U 22-i314 . 8! 1 00! L G S 0 2LOIGE3. /7 223467. 1 i 16'1 J 2 L!Iiju. 0 6626. S 221819. 6: 1}9(, 3u, Li . 0 _PR1020.b1 L 0 0 21, .8 220236 G 1 jbL,�Lj IP 0r) C32;_, 0 =16424 . E 1 21s466'81 I S 14 012 2286.0 21S71S.7m 218710.2: 1'i'J, 9 IL S u ID) i L? 2 IS 0 _215016.q 217965.S! 14 57 19 H U J�3H. 00 22 1 Lf, 0 I Li 3 F .3 217230.4: 1`3'. > f- 0' 0H (M: P178-0 : 21364 Lf . 8 : PISSCLJ 3: _ L4 1_, JLJ�21j ;��- 2D S3 2 0 (110 P14E.0 ------------------------------------------- 212970.8 21S786-6: I Li 0':' 9 1 H 1 T t'S. - POND-i-, 5.15 5,04; 120S,001,28 E- x FC� PbwC S Pond f- 0;\WHEATLAN\wXEnii .FIND 1 -nF 1 C) U.1 D i \WHEATI-ANI.,WHEAT Hyn Outf-lcj;,,, !;,i-:! oomph. f):\WHEATLA!',d1',,0LjT , HY13 i N, p H RGUTINS MIPUTATIONS 11 1--UW 11-+1F 1 2s/t - 0 i 2s/t + 0 1 i 0 r.j 1.: f cf-S - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 20 --313 . 0 0: - P-1,1810 - - - - - - - - - - - 212315 I _7 - - - - - - - - 21S022.9; I JUL �i�j ; Uliu. 001 1 210S.0 211688.S 1 214Lf20. 71 1:3EU.i-i a 2 C's , -3 C "'Y12. 00: 2091 . 0 211066.5 1 213773.S: I 34 11 , 'I; 2 0 , J5. DO: 2076, 0 10 -50 9 '1 2-1 3164 - S: 1:3 2 -, . L p Q )�0. DO: 206G.0 2099SS.9 1 212S75.11 130D I L IiI2 20. 13. 00; 2053.0 20542412 i 212008.91 12uI2,ji I P() , L. DO: 1 2029 . c 206311.2 1 211463.2: lc H, - i 0. 00! L0216. 0 1 20aL41 210937. E2: 12bu, L-,. 3 a 00: 1 PC i 0 207937.S 210429.8; 1 E211 L� J ...--2. 00: 20o1 C 20 7 47 S . 5 i 209939.91 12:31 Li 00; 198-7,0 L:0702E.5 1 2091152.5: 1,2 1 U :3 Li 1 !3'7 Li C) LIOGSS2.2 1 209000. .9; 1E!011 . 3 P:,k B. 00: ISGE1.0 2061 *71 If 1 2085511 1 2 1 119i ..i 4 - 0 2OS762.9 i 206120.41 117B. 30 PI 00: 193S.0 20536S.0 1 207897,9: 11 6L .1 e-oLf978 20728'7.0: 11 � I i . L, 2 . -'a P't , 00 1,910.0 E302. 2 E, I . i i(�t 0 1 1 1 B 0 1 E04236.1 1 206499, 2; 11 j i . LZ 5 IAH, W: 1. RF3'3 . 0 203878.0 1 206119 ii�lc. D 14 GO 1 B701. 0 PO:9529.6 1 20S7'ie.o: iloS, _2 L L, 3 2p, 203172.E 1 20S3639. G 1 109u. if 3;. 3, 010: a04966.2; I OHL , j -P.00: 0 i?02385. 9 20'iS39.2! 1 07:i . i jr. 2 o 3;3. 00: )7,01 20196E,3 20L1090. 9: 10 L L, 9 0 LO1S22,5 1 203621,3: 10T.� r2 LE! 3 00 1 1 1F;OB.n 201OSB.7 203130.S; 00: 1 1561 .0 FaoS7G.0 1 202619 .-/,: I sji, 00: 1 1,-; 1 S, 0 200075 . 3 1 202091.0; l 0 3 f.. co; ViGB 0 isssss.7 20151.iLi .3; 0()f ":!39 00; I3502".1 i ROOSBO,7; S.3',7[1 u 0 QO: 1 i.:3,i 0 1 L3SL480. 4 1 200402 . I t,;: CH 0 1,328 a 1 197919,E i 199soe, Li 1 S, I, I 3. 1') 00! 1261 0 iS734q.6 1 199200.i2; 9" 0 -". A I P.715. 0 19675H2O ISBS79.6: ijl,Lj. 00 i iiAR n 191;153. 3 11917SL4s. 0; 00: 1955Lia . Li 1 197300.3; B.," )L . 9 9192S , i0 3. 00! 1 1 10 9 9. 0 1 i 94290. 8 i 1E3597LJ Lf BLI `5 9 1 00: 100E, . 0 11 19 -364,1 , 11 155292'.8: 95 1';A, 00: 1 909 . 0 1 1!32315. 2 19389S. B; 1H I,.; 56E.0 66 P 9 30!.. 31 N-), 00 E31 S. 0 1 SOSSLi 7t ' 1 BE PLI .'i()(? ou: 7[�D, C . 24 Alo 00: 723.0 165555'5 1 190981.6: 7 A. I HE? 2,-' . 6 67E.0 1 ------------------------------------------------------ 186843.0 190E31.5; SSLi , 22 1 621 7 9 S-lS S/N: 12bS180128 EXECUTED: 01i -.17-1991 oe:31:43 Page E; Pond Fliu. 0: \WHEAT LAN " WHEnTl PNII Inflow liticit,ugi-aph: IJ;\WMFATLAN\WHEAT Hyr) nutr,u, )i. 'HYD I Nf**l ()L; !I, .'! ';)APH TF(lc fJFLOW �2'i .3013, 00 211 0C 2 L30. Go: 2 CO: 0. 00: 2!3 iub . 00 2 S Au,; I i.,)J. 00 213. 1 i (_I:_. ." - 0, 00 2 00! 2 F) H 11*1. 00: 2E). LIUL. L1:3. CO: ROUTING CONPUTRIMNS I + 2s/t + 0 Liu I I i I ulli i c F s (Cfs) c 6 El Li 0 ----------- 18HIL is IB 189472. 0: G i1 ,7387 .2 i 188702.0: SA') . 0 1 BsGqli 6 18,7923 e: b 3 Ii89 187133 9: 62C. J._i PiJ 0 i ss 133. 3 i 188336. 0; GO! .60 39Q 0 1.6436S.0 I 18SS2S. 3: 0 L I 3Li8. 0 1847 1 Li Q: Li I 303.0 -1 8 j? a () L5.3 I B3891 6: 1 ij 0 1 82013. 1 103061 3; 209.0 181210.3 lE32222.1; S L. 163.0 18039613 1E31373 , 3: Li f I 117, 0 17 3S S iBcsis. 3: LIBL� . Lj"..) '70. C) I 7/87Lf7. 4 179647. S: 41J.06 I , Ll 9 POND S. 15 S/N; 1295 MGM EXECUILD: 04 08AIM3 SUMnARY UF RUUIINU COMPUIPTIONS P()l!": i I ' L" - 0:\WHERTLRN\WHEATI AND 1"Etaw Hydvogvaph: 0:\WHERTLAN\WHEAT Hyll OuL!!ww HWWOgraph; 01WHEATLAWOUT HYD Mai _."V Pund W.A, Llevation - G16.00 Ft ***** Summacy uF Peak OuLFlow and Peak Elevation 446** Pea" Inc low 1881S.00 CES Peak OwtCluw 11967.SU cFs Peal,, Elmvatlon 6E8.61 Ft **,** Summwy W Ppptoximate Peak Storage ****+ WiLlai Storage 0.00 ac-FL Peak Storage From StLom - I814.72 an -FL ---------------- TDLLi Storage in Pond - 1914.72 an -Ft 1"Flaw hydcoguaph truncated on IsFt side. !;Lflg; InFlow hydrograph truncated on right side. iJeus.icri: S.IS S/Nl; 129516012S P.IWH u : u. : 0-\WXEATLAN\WHEPTI ydrogr-aph: r.l. \UJHL-ATLAN'..CJUT !!I!,Iuw - 39816.00 c6s 1,;utClow - 11967,58 cFs I 'L-Vation - 628.81 Ft PND HYID HYD EXECUTED: oli i I. 119sl 00: 31: Lf3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE PRELIMINARY DAM STUDY (Hec I Analysis) of WHEATLANDS WHEATLANDS LAKE FREDERICK DAM SCALE: 1 "=100'- PCND-r_' S.1S S/N: 12SS160128 EXECU (i h nq.1s.1991 17 : 46: 03 Hayti I * `"+ ". •"" * `*•" ** SUMARY OF ROUTING COnPUTAT IONS ***A ...... 4 • _ _ PW W D: WHRATLAN\>.1J;-iEATl PND iiJ;lroSraph: 0: \l. HEATLAN\UINEAT HYD Ii;_dr"Ouaph : 0: \U. HEATLAN\OUT AM St.,:,, ! l "u Pond W.S. ElevatiQn - 616.00 Ft `* * ** piummar Oc Pe y a;; Dutf low and ?ea}; Elevation « • • •' Peak Inflow - 27193.00 cfs Peal: Out`'low - 10S2S .60 cfs Peal: Eievaticn - 627 . SS f t ***** Si..,mmar � Of A � pProximate peak Storage ***M* I n i t: i al Stousge - 0.00 ac -L t Deal,. SLOT age F'r om Storm 1708.80 ac-Ft TuLai `^`cvrage in pond - ^1708 80 ac-FL �,�r , cr: 1 „tow r,ydr r�gc'a},h truncated on right side. - _. 12.1 12 . t.2 12.,t IR.9 13,0 3.1 3 13.3 13. 13.B 1 f �71 I I oil PND jilrugr-apll, WHEATLAN\ WHEAT HYD )-(Ydr-09-,'aPh; \WHEOTLAN \DUT HYD 27193.00 uFt� CES F t Page zj EXELLITEU: t -'� l .03 ! 'L :- !- :- t- : -,, u SOOG 9000 1S000 16000 21000 24000 2"70 401 Mt X x x x x H T, D Cnax 27157,0 LFS ',LJXEP;TI-PN',C)UT HYD 10524 B CFS EYfLUT o'l - I I Els I ob: 31;,ij I LJH EAT , HYLI ; WHErlil FIND Flaye L, E.IULIIIJ PUND D)lr) Fi ON! OUTFLOW 1 STORAGE C:: f, s "I (mc--Ft) .I,uo E31 ES i .6 ---------- IS27, .445: '.Uo E35S7.5 155e.G471 6 2 0 i BUESS. 1S99. L36Li S3G',,, 162i.3981 S,/Gl j I GsiE, U.J3: U0 I C)�00. 9 i 11SE34 . 5911 1 00 1 CLS213. 2 1ll16.371 UC'L] -'fU 1 1 I'IS3. G 17/80.2721 ts.UU oc -------------------------- ?23ep-,G 18,11-i . G29; INTER[lEDIPTE IRUtJl iflL CCMPUTATIUIJ�� 2s/t - - - - - - - - - - - - i 377192,8 1 Jul-, 3Bq771 , 3 J liul-;. J- 41S361.8 '-f23073. 9 4308a6.1 i 'Pi L'i 438597. 9 LiLisLico 1,7 Time I -,ici:,amerlt -1 t ) - 0, 100 hrs. F CIN D -.. P S. IS S/N; 129r I- Eq 0 3 1,11L,c i FIN P!'J'ALY311S FUR POST DEVELOPED CON13114 1(1!;` 160' SPOAD LREAS';TED CGEE WEIR • + 4" 0 + + HYCIC-OgraPh: .0 WXEATLr)N\WHEAT HYI] liti Table File: D: WHEA'LAN\ WHEAT I FIND -L c) ri m s16.00 Ft 0.00 0.00 ac-Ft GIUE.r1j POND IJAIIA ION: OUTFLOW STORPSE C) 0 0.000; 1'3,f ;0 P'i7 S i i F-39 S3 S 18 7H4 0 7 H5 I I E) I f? I - "1 6 F3 Lf 0 9"3 1 C) H96 2 Fs Do-(; �2 Li 6',y (-j !i j 7 L� i 0 ,"G 332F; 1102 . S is C lu c !HO: 3HP.R.L i! �314 '-)1 "7 C 2"1 i GP 1 0 3 8 G L4 I IiPS, :39y INTER!!EDJLAIE i,:Ui: C-UNPUTAT 1 UNIJ 2S/t to ------------ ------- 0.0 162S1Li . S 17607E3.3 82B97. 1697LiS I 196519 . c? 20:3519. 217/396.3 t it 2E?Li37B. 5 231385 1 Lf 23BLI 19. 0 ELISLi79. S 252SG4.S 259678.G i C2 U L 266BI9. 5 273SR7, 5 2E3112.2 s 28eL402. ---1 302327.5 31 OF31 .Li 317SEE. 3 329918.2 J Li 3�S? 16.-/7 3 Li 7 -1 S 7 , 2 362118.E L3 15- R- M , 1 eq7 1 F_, -;' ;`a Ft F-YFCu-''... i . -1991 UB.:3i .'iA Putici 1 v; `•,WHEOTLAN\WHLF1T'1 FNU InE-lui.,, C: \WHEATLANI \WHEA'1' HY3 Out(',' :;:. !.,:'; :juraph: 9: '..WHEf;ILAN`•.OUT HYt7 I NFL «; :..:.. . .: 'Flf'!{ ROUTING CCJMPUTA T 1 UN:� T I i! .-" L DU li-12 2`)'I t - ❑ 1 2Si t + 0 L)U'1 ! i; .,, (Cf s �cFs:� (cFs 11 i30 . 00 : ---------- ---- -- ,------------; 0 .0 ----------;----- 0.01 - U. J": - 1. l f `1 .1t.1 . Go: 3031.0 3031.0 3031 . 0 ; ( . r.; ; (] . CS _C'•. 3 . 00 : 33;" 1 . 0 S'i0S . 0 I (7i05 .0 : ". ;ii. 'U 11.3'_.. !!'i.00; 3:'1.:'.0 10122.0 10122,0: G....., ..�� `i 166 . 0 ! 1 `i286 .0 I 1`..3010.0 l i -1 53'7E3 . 0 11 .:'i_:;._ C`t . OO ; 6982.0 31270 . 0 31270 . U ; U .:.)(: : +O . UU ; 111 104 . 0 4 1 104 . 0: 11 .`1(:•. :'-)6.Oo 1La]]ELL3''iCCb.0 S379U.0 S377SO.0 G.:_:; 00 . ; 1 JC�J� .0 3663.0 / 36Bi , 0: U . I F . •, .;'j; .00 Jf3'f:3Li.O i!O11'; .0 11011-1- .0 S7J6'1 '0 0*7 G 3 3 . S ; 168081 . 0 , L''-'.' .. '! 16 00 i .i ..ti 1E3.3 U i 2AIS35i . - I 2l-t081S G. S; ?L3:' -i. .... ..J "U ! 00 , f3 �i 3 . 0 :_30-:'S'f . 9 31 169`f . 3 ; 50C 1 1 1 i' . _ f; . UO 69LOS . O 35A1U . ` 37OSS9 . 9 : 7Hc'4i! UJ 00 'i.'E]�;'l . (� :.3`=332S6. `i 1316`3 . 9 . :JUI. L:. E;H 1 r_' 00 . ; `t`ti"t'3 . (7 i 1 02G .5 '337�L``J . 5 ; 1 iL:jL; .'i !a , i':', 1 r . E3(;. 1I P. 00 , '3 5Li , 0 ±247�}i . 6 ; 46 '13e0 .'1i , 11LA19 . 12 . 1�c: 1` 11- . 00 ; E5 3H' . O LiI, 451 12£3 . 3.0"(; )E3.00: L'l 1'-)A.0 `i c`f i48. E. '1`iS38E.3, l iB.-'.1. :_.i C ]. % 280 .0 1119070 .. 4'-!2026. S: 11'Y • :I J; i.3, l>'.00; 1'{f��i 3.O If115`f9.E 433719.. :110J,-,.'U- -�. U 1 _ !fic) .00 ; lr_'f�'f`3 . U 1U3c23.3 4Fg2258.6 : 10L.:'..3. 1 ., ".1F3 . 00 , 1 ] r f37 . i] 3fJ1iqS_ .L4Li 1Lf503. 3; 10UL"" , 13.'::; t{t1,t.00: 7U1U2.0 :38S6U1.3 404E33.4: 9alL:..t.! 1 3 ........ U . 00 : H3C-)`I '0 376911 . 6 39g955 . 3 : 9UU1 . U', _.__ 2:3 00 ; 866G _ 0 3E847 3 . e 38SS7-7 .6 ; S5` t! ] :i • !+i ; . 00 ; H11 ; . 0 D G 0 3 9 2 . S 376S96 . 8 ; 81 UL' 352ES3 . Li 368pGpc75p 7GE{1 • tLl :li )��'i 00 : , 721E 0 3 SS30 .- . 8 , 35SE1 / 9 .'i i / i2U 00 : RF3e31 . U 336336.0 352168 . F3 Li91�_ . 1: 331 L; . e 34`f902 . 0: 6� 1_i:. `.jb 00 ; 336Uc'. . 9 ; 6L2`3 i i �� . (iU ; (3011.0 -,I632 . W 331S36 . 2 ' SJ`.) 19 ..:,:.:. 1 '16 . 00 ; S78' . C 31'i0)7 0 . 6 32Si1 7 . 3 56. ,i . DO: 555J . G y0S-B03 . E+ 319623.E , UO , 53.'7 . 0 303a40 . ; 31'-f 160 . 8 ; 51 MG . 00 : :��'�t0 . n �i391B8 . 3 303080 . 3 , 4� 00 . 5 !.0:y . (7 9'f81c . 0 30a2S:. 3 , f.:3E✓ . '.: . 2139'780 , 0: '-! L,_ L `iH'i'3 . C UL- .... 2855'•f, . 8 ; _ `136J . J[;, 0 L' 2Ej3di. , e 291569.H '11`3i ,'i. _ .. ] c ii it)E . UU : If6G-3 . C 79=:1S6 . e 287939 , 8 : `i0'i 15 .'iui [32 . UO I `iS70 . 0 2?=5?4 . 28f132E .8 ; 389E . - C�; `! .38 FDND5, 15 S/N: 1255160128 EXECU-1 1 7- 1991 08: 31:'13 FICT)d i D; \.1UJXEATLAN\WHEPTi PNO lnfluw 0 W H E A T L- A N \ WHE- OT HYD out f, I (;,.. D:*,WHEATLAN\0Ur .)qyr) ..''LLSE OC! 00 00: JL20 00.! 1 00: I co: I C, U, JU2, 00 ; I b . jull' : . .3 3 7 . 00! 1B .'I Ut.. 6. UO: lo' cc; G 00; ':-3Li 00: ;-)OE. 00; ! Oki i I(X) i 00: I / 3 U:- -ADO 00 17 t f:i.*.: j, i'l 00 17 L,13, Ili . UU: T11H. 00: UO: 10. 1 00: I U LE) 0 0 Auu. 00 00; I ,C) ao F 0 0 0 ROUTING COMPUTATIONS FS/t + 0 OU'l I- LUG CES ------------ Lf Lf 77 0 2 7 3 If 8 8 .7 ----------- 281011 - Lf r19 1 q391 0 270602.6 277669. 7 i2B3 0 1 26-7eS8. 4 27488S.6; 3'-,Pi L) Li 166 2720112 . Lf 31 10 1 110e3. 0 262739.6 1 26932B.3: 3 58 3991 .0 260343. S 268730.61 31 U .3 3897 , 0 258046 - a 264240.5; 3oub. U 3609.0 E-)SsBlili 1 5 RG 1 E354 - 8: 300'-) 1:2 3719.0 2S372G. 6 1 2S9563.S; 291 H - 3630. U Edsissg .5 2S-73SF) 6: 2 U J'. :354 1 2L1S718. 3 2SS227 S; L 3qG9. 0 2'i7827 . 2 1 2S3186 . 3; 26.- U - '31111 .0 246022.3 2S1236. 2 : 2GO 24S376 3; 2SjJ,'..- :3 2 9'/ . 0 Eq26LI5 . S 247S91-f 3 ! 2 Li 'i 3240,0 cIfI058. 6 2459B5S: 2 Ll :31 0 �?3SSiS. 0 24LI25s 6 ., 3. 30 U 316b, 0 ":3 E3 I 10 .7 2Lf271 I . 0 1 2300 3135 - 0 2367iS, 8 2111 2Li 5 7: 22Li '22 :3104 . 0 2 35Lf55 .5 239653 E3: 2 1 9 L-' 3013.0 234221 G 1 1 Li 3()Li3. C 233045.0 23/12BLI . 6: 2 I'U_1 J. i 1 3c12.c 2j!920 - 6 23605*7.01 E' 0 b H - r) 7 290 L 0 LJOBis'i 23Li901 6: 2 C- c2 U U11 2s 1 19 . 0 229BPS.4 2 3 27 3 3. L3: 19 PUB3.0 Z227B6e. 2 1 231708,11; lt3�0, 12 s) 2qL4J . 0 226935.5 23070S.2; 10iii :i - L /`39. U 2LD6025 .8 22973LI . 5 � 1 LE-: 21. 1- U D 1 s 13 Li - 2EE3762.B: 18 2715.0 2H-1 4 E? 5 6 . 9 22785E , Li 223419.1 226SLf1.9: 1: --J 2631 .0 222565.5 B 0 213L' 13 221767 , E2 225175 . S ' 1 U 221-i3 14 8: 1 L '� 0 13 0 �L01166. -j 223Li67 1 1 L)'I J C) L!130. 0 c2 1962[3. S E21819.6: I 5IJLN 3 U Li . 0 7 8? E3 6 1 ;EE210eo L'31. 9. 0 2 17 iliLi 6 22:10E36,6; 1 c 3 2 2 EA F-- I S 7 1 S ;-:118710.2; Pi:.; i. 2 9 225O. 0 2ISOI6. S, Li 2'? ILi 0 b L3 P17B 0 21364Li .6 1 21ES0LJ -1: 1 Lj c H c� -3 : F. I Li F 0 2 12:970. 8 2IS766 G: ],LiO c 131 POND-c' );.r.-y 1 (-)t�: 5. 15 S'N: 01`c E:Y,E-cuTi :t l -1991 08: 31 : `1;3 1-3b'jC Pond I- : ... 0. \WHEATLAN\'wHEATI PNO inn low t ytl? ::roc aph: D. \WHEATI_AN`IWHEAT hYD Outf lug„ c3g7aph: n: '.a1HEATLA(J',C)UT HYD i l 1.iJl.: , ....: • ,, ,I?f1i'H ROUT I NB CMIPUTAT I ONS I il:. d't I._ow 1 1+ 12 25/t - 0 i 2S/t + 0 OUIi 1.1 LL L ♦.IL ON I • Cht :.3 ,._t'�) ; .c�'s., CcPs) CCi=S? � �:ci .. -- _ , ' __. 00: -- -- 211f3.0 ---'-----------' 21231S.7 --- 21S09B.e; 13Es1 20. i.'t:t. 011`3 . UO ; 210S.0 1 21168E3 . S ; 214Li20 . 7 ; 13E;(_; . _• _ U'12 . 00 ; c.'091 . 01 2110BE . S ; 213779 . S ; 1:.''tt_ .'[_. U•-= • '`[ C U .';; :.; )36 . 00 : 20'i 8 . 0 ?10505 , 1 ; 213164 . S ; 1:32 • . u is - . `i`i PO . `.i(;�:: U30 . Do: 206G.0 20SSSS . J ; 212S75 . 1 : 130D . �'. _-- • `:c 20. Eit:;: J1';:3 . 00 ; 20S3.0 209424.2 ; 212008 . 9 ; 12UL . s . :-J,.:,_' PO . '(;c . ', 1G . 00 ; ; 2039. 0 a06511.2 2111f63 . 2 ; J; •. 10 . 00 ; E U2Ei . 0 20841 5 . 9 ; 210937. L ; 12L> )t)'i . UU ; aO `i . 0 20:%937 . 5 2101i29 , 8 ; 12'i'� ' 1 All !"i", . UU I CUU1 . U 207`375 . 5 ; 20BS36 . S 1 123_ :3L iJA 01 01Sf3:•' . 0 20?02Ei . 5 ; 209462 .5 ; if i'i . f)0 1 197-1 .0 206592 . 2 ; 209000 . 9 ; 1E�U'i _3 r c'..i ..it).. ) 18 . On: 19G_ . 0 20G1"' 1 . Lf ; 20855'i .2 1 11`31 . -J .On ; 1949. 0 : 2OS762 . 9 1 208120 . 4 ; 117E3 . ".. 30 ; QU; i9'35.0 205365.0 20769I,9; 11G'•'ti H . 00 , ') 204978 . O 207287.01 11` . P l ..... J. r' , 00 ; 1.9 10 . U PIN 5-02 . 2 206888 , 0 ; 1 i'f 1`1`3 . 00 ; ; ; 89:-' . n 2U'i236 . 1 ; 205'1SJ . 2 ; 11 ! _ _-_ • �`a r� l 0( 1:1H . 00 ; I.Hp.'-3 . 0 203878 . 0 ; 208119. 1 ; 0 ; ^U3S28 . 6 ; 20S74E3 . U ; 1 10D D. 22 . l i;;: I1.31.3 . 00 . F34 i . n 203i 7? . i= ZOS3f� 3 , 6 '. 1 OL)u c'c' iit00; ; ,'DLi . 0 20279C • 2 I 204966 .2 , 10HE i - i fi(12 .00 ; i '•"i . . 0 902389.9 204S35 .2 ; 10"Zi . is i u Pp. `1O: ti 3:J . 00 ; 1 :?O 1 . n 201966 , 3 ; 204090. 9 ; 10U_L :it00; ; 16`Y).7 (�01S22.S I 20:3S21,3; 10'.`.,. ! 00 ; ; 1 (;OB _ n 201OS8 . 7 203130 . 5 ; 1 UD3;, . �3 ' S 00 ; ; 15(31 .0 Pr)OS7E . O 202619 . 7 ; i0r..' iji . -" rr • f +1 ' : i (:� . 00 ; t !11 S . n 200076,3 ; 202091 . 0 ; 1 UU" . _ 3 r'2..`: co: i `icL . 0 i3`355S . 7 _ _ :139.00 . i ��% 1 _ n 18SOc7.1 20OS80 . 7 ; i . ; i;: E:. UO ; ;3"6 . 0 I. i3e }80 . 4 , 2001102 . 1 , S(;t .i t3 132a.C) 197919.2 113 . 00 ; 126) -0 1 ✓ 3 fit . 6 199200 . 2 ; 9;2 .3 . f li:.:)G ; 1 r�.7 C) i ��67543 . L) 196S79 . 6 ; UU . I i t1F . n 1 `3E155 . 3 1979Lt6 . 0: U, i 13. 00: ! 1't i . ^ 195S46 • `i 1 C':.. OG , ; ] O``". . U 1 d`i9ES . 1 1 s66`f3 . �t Li I;:?. I :3 . UU , ) U4 0 1 9Li290 . B 15S974 . i55292.3; H,'.. !i;ii . i)G , 135`.. ,) i 5289G . S 19`t55S . Li I`.A.OU• 5011.0 - - L 193895. U, i'.i., U _ c. !9.011); c56E.0 1 iE 1 .6 1y31Ei .c i H 3 ... (' i`.ii�.OU, ; 825.0 190 ; 554 1gCfSG.6; 7',f UU ; 7E `3 . 0 1 1_3025B . 8 ; 1S 1723 . 3i= 6`4 `DGP A9O. OU ; 7i?3 . 0 1 bS556 . 5 ; 190981 . B ; 7,1 2`1 . ( 3,G .00' 67H.0 iB68`t3 .0 ; 180231 S. 15 S/N: 129SISO128 Page E; EXECUTED: O,i 17-1991 09:31:,13 Pond F i r` : InFlolil Hlj(j[,ucj[-aph-, F) U t F 1 L) 1'' ) i L 1, ( i r ;)g. r a P)') I Ni"I (AL, )PAPH I ( I L J! LOW .,)U, 00; CIO, 233. cc 1 (". 00; 2 ub. 00! 2 � 3 0,i 00 0 0 0 U3. 00: 25. 117. 00: L1:3. 00; I]: \WHEATL.AN\lLJHE:s:)Tl . PNE) IJ:\WHEnTLAN\WHEAT HYD 0: \WHF-A-I'LAN\,OLJI- -HYD ------------------------------------------- ROUTING CCr*IPUTr)!* IONS I It IE? 2.13 t - 0 2sl t + 0 OU ill Lljt-: (CFS) G 29 0 ----------- 18 9'-17 2. 0: 13 E3:j C) 188702 . B; s3c). 0 Lf E39 Q L 1 BY 133 1 9: 62C JL� 0 1 Bi5 133. 3 396 0 18S529. 3: 349. 0 lG3sB9.6 I ali7l Lf Q: 303.0 1 E3 E? E3 0 L :3 I E-33061 3; Los. 0 1B1210.3 le2222 . I 163,0 160396.3 1B1373 . 3: Lj J' 0 1755i. 1eoSI5. 3: Lf L u . 1 7B717. 4 I 1796Li7 . S: Li -D 0 POND - S . 15 S/N; I S I E, () I f'-3 6 EXECU I'ED: i,'i 1 1991 06: 3 t 'C3 * * 4 A . - . + I I * - 1* -&+ +.o + OF ROUTI Nb COf IPUTAT I ONS *** * +'N + - 4' - - ' - � - - - - D:,,W,4EA'rLnN\WKEATI FND p h: D: \WHEATLON\WXFAT HYD 0 LA t.' L' Lj Ll U OU r P- p) I : D-\WXEATLANJ\CUT HYD Sty !'ut id lwi,'; , Elevation GIG.00 Ft c-,Ljnlmau L� Ljf, Peal. ULitl- low and peaj,: E lt2va t i cirl ITIF low 3881-6.00 CES Peak Uutf'low IISFz7.SEA cFs Fleai, Elevation sps'si Ft ****, summa-fu of qpptoX,.Lme-te Peak stol:-agp- ***** I T I I L I a i S t- Ci F a g E 0.00 aF- -F L Paai: ;tor age From Stor-m IR-14 . 72 ac:-FL iutai Stor-age lvi Pond ----------------- IEKLi . 72 Ft a.t, t I I I lu I tlL- ULO ! ly C-1 F-Og FL2pll truncated 0 F) I eF t S -L Cl E en right Side'. S . IS 129SIG0122 [1--LjH U N \WHEA Ti MYLIL,ograph! JJ LJH I --" r-) r L r) N \ W H E T Hgdrogt-aph: FJ; '\WHL'.OTLr)N,,,CJuT i {.low - 38816.00 c6m 1!(-;trlc2w - 11967.56 cFs I ;L.-vaticn - 628.61 Ft PND HYD HYID EXECUTED� 01i !, 1 �Sl 0 E3: -3 1 : Li 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S COPY DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS OF WHEATLANDS DAM LAKE FREDERICK FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MAY 13, 1991 PREPARED BY: gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. p. o. box 781 p. o. box 2104 Fredericksburg, Virginia 22404-0781 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 898-2115 (703) 667-2139 L gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. INCORPORATED 1972 Engineers Land Planners Surveyors Water Quality Analyses Corporate Office: 150C Olde Greenwich Drive • P. O. Box 781 Fredericksburg, VA 22401 • (703) 898-2115 Winchester Office: 200 N. Cameron Street • P. O. Box 2104 • Winchester, VA 22601 • (703) 667-2139 14 May 1991 Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, CLP Department of Game and Inland Fisheries 4010 W. Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23230 RE: "Wheatlands" - Lake Frederick Frederick County, Virginia Dear Sir: Attached is our report of assessment of hydrologic impacts on the dam due to the Wheatlands development. Specifically we have estimated the predevelopment and postdevelopment inflow hydrograph for the probable maximum flood (PMF) and routed this storm through the existing emergency spillway, establishing water levels behind the structure. You will note that this development does not cause overtopping of the embankment. The flood height increases 0.15 feet during the postdeveloped conditions. The remaining portions of Appendices "A", "B" and "C" will be handcarried to you on Wednesday, 15 May. Please advise if we can be of further assistance in this matter. 1 �l Very truly yours, gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. David J. Sau ers, E., Project Engineer BOARD OF DIRECTORS Thomas J. O'Toole, P. E. Charles E. Maddox, Jr. P. E. Earl R. Sutherland, P. E. P. Duane Brown, C. L. S. William L. Wright, Laboratory Director HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS FOR WHEATLANDS DAM - LAKE FREDERICK Introduction Predeveloped Condition Postdeveloped Condition Methodology of Analysis - Summary of Computer Model Results Appendix "A" Stage/Storage/Discharge Data Inflow Hydrograph Data Appendix "B" Computer Printout of Predeveloped Conditions Appendix "C" Computer Printout of Postdeveloped Conditions INTRODUCTION The purpose of this analysis is to determine the impact of the Wheatlands ' development within the watershed of Lake Frederick in Frederick County, Virginia. (Refer to Exhibit 1). The impact is based on the probable maximum flood (PMF) caused by the rainfall event equal to the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) for this area. The PMP is the maximum precipitation expected due to the most severe meteorological events which can occur in the watershed. This criteria is required tfor a Class I Reliability Dam as outlined in publication Virginia Dam Safety_ IRegulations dated 1990. This report is being prepared at the request of the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, the current owner of this structure. LIMITS OF WATERSHED ir �� �\��/ q, ~•; \.� � � // `ram /,, 73 Jam' .f\� "��,\ • J 8M no r Ouble 9ut l\`� _. �� /l�-.)� _' ^1 �' `� - ', it \ .. �' �., - �.— • 1 ` r-: a, y//Sawa DENOTES PROJECT 340 r AREA c3 1` Y zz LAKE FREDERICK °` :' \i� >> i ?��o, ; y �I b DAM LOCATION �n�.",�lef �' / o".�f� , �_ti� ,.'� �� ��\ � � �i��/ n I�1 i in/���, �• 1 � /�/ � l✓%,1 it SCALE: Y =2000' STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA WHEATLANDS DAM WATERSHED DELINEATION EXHIBIT 1 1 - 1 PREDEVELOPED CONDITIONS The original dam was constructed in 1975 in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. The dam consists of an earth filled structure with a principal spillway consisting of a 72 inch drop inlet structure which discharges into a 60 inch corregated metal riser. The principal spillway is set at an elevation of 616 which is the normal pool elevation of the lake. The emergency spillway consists of an earth wier approximately 175 feet long at the base. This wier is set at an elevation of 620.8. (Refer to Exhibit 2). The original principal spillway was damaged in March of 1978 due to an ice thaw condition which destroyed the upper portion of the drop inlet. Since this damage occured, the dam has been modified under the direction of Law Engineering. These modifications included repairs to the principal spillway structure and an increase in the elevation of the dam from an approximate elevation of 626 to 629. The increase in the dam height was to enable the lake to pass the PMF (probable maximum flood) caused by the PMP (probable maximum precipitation) without overtopping. These modifications are outlined in the Law Engineering Report dated April 25, 1980. The watershed for this facility is primarily undeveloped at this time. For the purpose of preparing this report, existing topographic conditions are based on aerial surveys supplemented by field survey to determine critical elevations and dimensions. .= WHEATLANDS DAM EARTHFILL DAM AND EMERGENCY SPILLWAY SCALE: 1" = 100' EXHIBIT 2 POSTDEVELOPED CONDITIONS It is proposed that approximately forty percent of the watershed be developed into low density housing development. This development will include the construction of numerous detention ponds for best management practices. Due to the size of these ponds in relation to the overall drainage shed, they are not considered in the routing of the storm thru the lake. METHODOLOGY OF ANALYSIS The hydraulic analysis for this facility was prepared utilizing the HEC -1 "Flood Hydrograph" computer program developed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center and the "POND - 2 Detention Pond Design & Analysis" computer program developed by Haestead Methods. Inflow hydrographs were developed utilizing the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) dimensionless hydrograph as outlined in the SCS "National Engineering Handbook Section 4" NEH-4 and a 28 inch - 6 hour PMP based on U.S. Weather Bureau, NOAA data. The values utilized for development of the dimensionless hydrograph are listed below. These values along with the SCS curve numbers for predeveloped and postdeveloped conditions were entered into the HEC -1 program for generation of the design hydrographs. These hydrographs were then imported into the POND - 2 computer program to perform the routing analysis. The routing analysis is based on a level pool reservoir routing equation or a mass balance equation based on inflow minus outflow over a period of time equals a change in storage. This method is consistent with that utilized in the HEC -1 program. The stage storage relationship for the lake is based on aerial topography. The contours were measured by planimeter to determine the level pool area at various elevations. These elevations are in turn translated into cumulative storage by the POND - 2 computer program. Storage below elevation 616 is considered inactive and therefore is not reflected in the cumulative value listed in the computer Ianalysis. The principal spillway is not considered in this analysis due the possibility of clogging during the PMF and also due to its insignificant capacity as to the flows expected during the PMF. Based on aerial topography which has been field verified, the emergency spillway is set at an elevation of 620.8. The computer analysis does not recognize flows exiting the lake until they reach this elevation. The emergency spillway is modeled by a series of five vertical rectangular wiers. These wiers are modeled in heights of two foot increments. The first being a wier active between elevations 620.8 and 622 with an average width of 175 feet. This wier becomes inactive at elevation 622 at which point the second wier becomes active. This wier has a bottom elevation of 620.8 to a high elevation of 624 with an average width of 188. The remaining wiers are modeled in a similar fashion until an elevation of 630 is reached. A summary of the input data for development of the Stage/Storage/Discharge rating table and the Inflow Hydrographs are include in Appendix "A" of this report. The computer model printout for the pre and post developed conditions are included in Appendices "B" and "C" respectively. SUMMARY OF COMPUTER MODEL RESULTS IThe following pages summarize the results of the hydrograph routing thru Lake Frederick. In review of these results it is determined that the postdeveloped ' (PMF) does not cause the lake water level to overtop the earth dam. For comparison purposes similar data taken from the PHASE I INSPECTION REPORT dated OCTOBER 1980 is included. Please note that the PHASE I INSPECTION REPORT data is based on the original dam design prior to modifications made in response to the Law Engineering Report. HYDROLOGIC ANAYLSIS OF WHEATLANDS DAM - LAKE FREDERICK RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Predeveloped Postdeveloped Increase PMF PMF Peak flow c.f.s. Inflow 17815.82 18308.62 492.8 Outflow 11659.27 12311.03 651.76 Maximum elevation ft. msl 627.87 628.02 0.15 Non -overflow section (el 628.9 ) Depth of flow, ft *** *** Duration, hrs *** *** Velocity, fps *** *** Tailwater elevation ft. msl. 559 *** HYDROLOGIC ANAYLSIS OF WHEATLANDS DAM - LAKE FREDERICK RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE Taken from PHASE I INSPECTION REPORT dated OCTOBER 1980 Normal PMF Flow Peak flow c.f.s. Inflow 3 17464 Outflow 3 11611 Maximum elevation ft. msl 616.00 626.75 Non -overflow section (el 628.9 ) Depth of flow, ft *** 0.75 Duration, hrs *** 2 Velocity, fps *** 4.1 Tailwater elevation ft. msl. 559.00 *** APPENDIX A STAGE / STORAGE / DISCHARGE DATA INFLOW HYDROGRAPH DATA STAGE / STORAGE / DISCHARGE DATA • _.r'� _".�a�.,S_ Cale. I Elevation Planimeter Area A!TP,E+sgrCA_-A2; Jclume :%c_ume Sum Cft_,, CSq.i t._ -------------.-_--_---,_-_------__----------------------- _ _ cc S03 u� c .,... . �.. c . �k� SE .30 S03.ES 139.ciS.S_3 J .J .J . 0II i13 . w4 i3 3j Incre,mer,tal �__ _ _- - - _- ''_ _-� .'.e'Ched Volume - 1. u. . '� "Areal T Area.E T sq r .. . LG'^'G where: EL1 , ice_ an" uc:,er elm rat ��r:s or the - _-- - Areal fRreaE = Areas computed P CiJ. yr ELI, -La. _-esp@ y lyUclumc = T_nc: e e to volume -et:1 en -E-i and Lam= -In; utiet Structure File: WFEAT2 '.STR POND-2 Uersion: 5.15 S M : I295160128 Date Execc.:ted: T .ime-.:ecuted: *'��l�•-�*��'��+ile�?0!�'�'if'its-*'ja*�-._s_�.:a.:._...s�...:A.�i:S.$�!:54-1#e$.����. :.4'##.3:##:��-h d.. �. -¢-;y T;,UC.uFs 0131 5 A WIEF - _ ACCOUNT rN INCs As- ?N CROSS SECTICN AS TC-"lCDEASEr. ***"* COiiPOSITE OUTFi.CW SUMMARY -*4'* Elevation CFt) 6IA. 6.Oo 62C.6C 621.00 621.25 62i.50 621.75 622.00 622.Es 622.50 622: 75 623.00 623. 623.50 ' 623 .75 62Lt . CO 62u.25 BE"- so 62LL.75 625.00 1 625.25 625.50 625. . 526.00 626.25 626.50 626..- 62-== B E 7 6c7. _ LCB . iJ 625 622.-7J 52a.00 6c 6cS."S 0 CCFS) 0.0 C . `t7.0 156 . Li 307.2 Lf as. 8 7uO.5 983.3 12u7.9 1532 . 0- 1838.1 2157 .? 2u9S.0 28u8.7 3 3 -3 % . 6 3735._ u1u7.7 Li573 .9 5013.7 5u8E.5 5532.1 6'i_0.0 l`_.Li n V t i • v 62ul l . 1 87S7.0 9 _.3 1_�BI.0 iC=6iJ I2�02.� 1355u.6 ,uSaa.O i bCJ7r . V • n Contributing Structures ------------------------ 1 I 1 2 2 c 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 `I u i Lf u 1 4 ALL: i u S 5 5 5 -► y 4- .s- + .3 .¢ .«. -K }#+ .., ....a -e- -a 4� + 41 f= + -�F s- ,Y- 4. 4- OROss -710N AS T *^*-.4'f!*+-*i*+-1l64-*4.+=**-M i*-**-#-4_.L+--*b--i-#-1-s KA4-Y441 fi41-J' I--*O4-+b-k_*-* Outlet Structure File: D:\WHEATLAN'-IWHEAT2 ETR Flanimeter Ircut File: D: `.uJHEAiLA"v`•a1HEAT .L:OL Rating Table Output File: D: .aHEATLAiv';wHEATZ .FND N ir, Elev. Lft. = 621 i1a.. E:'I Cf }_ - E 3 3 0 1.1r . i.L r. - Atui'L tonal pi^-vaticT?s _i te _'l': Iuued in -able: 3* -* * :* -* # + + iE # K + + # 616.0 620.3 tiYSTE' i L.OT I U I TY St7 L---- ---------- 11.o . --- Q '_"able W Table WE I R-UR 5 ------ ------- -> 5 WEIRIR-1�1= -> U 3 -> 3 Z lic.= D R l -> 1 Outflow rat=. taLle summarg was storeu in _ _ D: \i:JH A.TL^nPd\W',^;`.A 2 . R',!D t =t v, . is l 1=.� �, � �, C t-,. ;..t L' :: .� i 1.r . w } : FOND-2 Uersior}. S.1S S `N. IES513C.12a Data Execute": Time;;acute 4k-CIF++41#0#+M#-i-+F-d++.d•♦--�--{-a.a-.1 a-,K+Y—+-+-'K #-fr +F -1e ?y-,i. -d: .¢ '+!'ie'�F CIF* #4, CRCSEE E-E-E 10-1JN AS ; i{ R` E'UA T I0rq I S i rtiCRF'3SD . >>» >> Structure No. S <<<<<< (Input Data) WEIR-UR Weir - Uertical Rectangular El elev.(Ft)? 62a E2 eiev.(Ft)? 630 Weir coerficient? 3 Weir elev.,CFt)? 6EC.a Length (Ft)? 213 Ccntracted./Suppressed (C;'S)? C Outlet Structure rile: ahEAT2 STR POND-2 Uer sicn: 5. iS S/N: 1295160128 Date E>:ecuted: Time Ex7ecuted: URE "1E. C i=" ACCOUNT AN I NCREaSE IN COr'C:ZS IS »»» Structure No. 'i ««« (input Data) WEIR-UR weir - Uerticai Rectangular - El aiev . (Ft )? 626 EE eiev. Ft)? 62d weir cceFFicient? 3 heir eiev . !: Ft: ? 620, .8 Length Pt)? 203 Contracted,/Suppressed CC/S: ? C 3utie - S ti uC. z �3'i P POND-Z r — liLe r; ec� �a;i: ,_me E' ;ecuted: h- ,ie dIF S: f'Ul4,u:' LE L'.�..� �.. '� w 1 �.. •f� 1 L' , , .Tu nl..�r..uu•.'i 1 new _ :�L.REAS�.. CFCCS _�'Crl AS il�S _._ Ti';CPCr^.SCC. ��3k•*•+ct:+lF#xir-iFq-y+.r:#�+�+l�MF�+i��*++Y�:ka1f�I:��*;K.rat+k�#�+F��:�#�:;►..«•y,r.�.:*�K »»>> structure Nc. 3 ««<< �Irput Data) WEIR-UR Weir - Vertical Rectangular - El elegy.:. k:i t)? o?`i -_ coeti'iclent? 3 + - _�- �_ acted,'Sur,�ressed CC,'S)? C File: ..HEAT2 S1R _=mcz-.7ve * .t e. ti > J- +- i- -o- .i s - v.. s _t ... -- d- ♦ .� :.: 't. a; il- b -R 1 # ,a- A- Al -{.- �► �.. '1! i! # i� � JF ♦ + 4 � x ei- * de 'II�--" -!- a b s I. �--++h�-c.:..-��a-+#++-a++-x.->�-+-p:�k+ass+-►+K+K+Y--#-++.. �r#,s :: a-a#+F.-�+K-4 -t ++�i�-w--1►#'F ,►al. i#+K� >>> >>> Structure i`:ic_:. 2 <C <f <4 input IJ L J WEIR-UR I heir - .:ate tal RectamauIar El elev. t)? 622 E2 elegy. - . _'? 6r4 Weir cnef�icient? 3 Weir ele,.;.CEt'? 62u.8 L.emg'Lh C 71-- )? lea Ccntraetez;.'Suppressed C.C/S C ,.,++++ UPE -KXb}a4*++w+**--+►**_*a-+#-0--W a j --i-b+-0-s-+-*-.--•-- -*+ A.+1-M1T-01w p♦+1*w'Ar- _. _** } 1 i i i } Structure No. 1 input Lata) wE i R-UR Weir - Uertica! Rectangular El elev.,-Ft"? ^,8 . EC eiev. `.ft)? LjC' wain cce�r iciest? 3 6c0.8 Length � t)? 1.75 Contracted/SuppLzssed 1 `_ems St r. u c a 1 In r;ili- ��L JiL�•� _.� �.-.�V=���1JhJl�uC- E :ecu ::et �e acute 1 ;IF#+4; l 1 1 +4}:*'.**4#+4: *4-A-i-4, :{>+?E +4-i 1 Outflow Rating Tahle For Structure #5 ' WEIR-UR Weir - Uertical Rectangular ***+* INLET CCNTRDI. ASSUMED 1 ElevationCF _t 0 CCES Cou (31E.00 -mptat_cn 0.0 E < --Messages ___ In:.-.E1.= 620.8 620.30 0.0 E < E1=626 ' 621.00 0.0 E < E1=628 621.25 0.0 E < E1=628 621.S0 0.0 T < E1=628 1 621.75 0.0 E < E 1=628 62E.00 0.0 E < E1-628 622.25 C.0 E < E 1 = 8 E 3 622.50 0.0 E < ti=628 1 6C-- ":) 0.0 E < E.'1=628 623.00 0.0 E < E1=628 1 623.25 6E3.50 0.0 0.0 E E < < E1=628 =1=62t3 623.75 0.0 E < E1=628 62`i . 00 0.0 E < E 1=628 1 62Lt.25 0.0 E < E_=628 6EL.50 0.0 E < E1=628 62Li.75 0.0 E < E1=628 625.00 0.0 E < E1=6?8 1 625.25 0.0 E < E1=628 62575.S)0 0.0 E < E1=628 625.75 G.0 E < E1=5E8 ' 620S.00 G.0 E < Ei=626 626.25 0.0 E < E1-626 526.50 0.0 E < E1=6c8 626.75 0.0 E < E1=o2S ' 627.00 0.0 E < Ei=628 627.25 0.- E < E1=625 627.50 0.0 E < `. 1=628 ' 62 "'S C . 0 E < E1=E 2-3 Outlet S*l.rt.ic'-File: � �i_ii'C POND-2 Versicn: 7, 5 S/N: 1295160123 Date Executed: Time E::ecuted: »»> Cf:;Tli•; ED frc;r previous gage ««< 3u-`'I-w Dating Table for Structure #5 WEI,,-VR Weir - Verticai Rectangular *4'�* TNLET CONTRCL ASSUP1ED 'i#� Elevation Cft) Ccfs> Computation Nessages --------------------- ------------------------ 629.00 1u66S.t H =6.2CC 629 .25 15571 . °f H =6 . Lf50 629.50 16263.7 H =6.700 629.7S 169e5.7 H =6.950 63C.00 0.0 E = ar > E2=630 C = 3 L Cft) = 213 H Cft� = Tamale elev. - Invert elev. C 620.6 ft .I Q (Cfs) = C CL-.2H) 'H-**l.S) -- Contracted Weir 1 Outlet Structure File: :iHE'AT2 .S R PCNO-2 Version: 5.15 S.N: 1ES51SC128 Date Executed: Time Executed: i+Yr+h--iK�#}##.l#1#+.�##dlf�#w#++K###t{<-.:Y:##-.iEi:►-31:ylc+K�aK31E��-ilF#a4#�X-iF*+K##'IEa1u STRUCTURE =EiS A WIER TAK! ._ _ 3 ACCOUNT AN INCREASE 1N CR`S5 SE. T I CN ^5 THE ION I S INCREASED. Outflow Rating Table For Structure #`i WEIR. -OR Weir - Uertical Rectangular ** INLET CONTROL ASSUMED Awe** Elevation act) 0 CCESD Computation Nessages -------------- 616.00 ------- 0.0 ------------------------ E < Inv.E1.= 620.8 620.63 0.3 E. < E1=626 621.00 0.0 E < E1=626 62i.25 0.0 E < E1=626 621.50 0.0 E < E1=626 621.75 0.0 E < E1=626 622.00 0.0 E < E1=626 622.ES 0.0 E < E1=626 622.50 C . C E < E1=6c6 622.75 C.0 E. < E1=626 623.CO C.0 E < E1=626 623.25 0.0 E < E1=626 623.50 0.0 E < E1=626 623.75 0.0 E < E1=626 621.00 0.0 E < E1=626 62q . R5 C.0 E < E1=626 621.50 C.0 E < E1=6ES 621.75 0.0 E < E1=626 625.00 0.0 E < E1 62S 62S.25 0.0 F < E1=626 62S.SC C.0 E < E1=825 E2 5 .7S 0.0 F < %1=626 E26.00 71S .1 H =5.2 62E.25 7705.8 H =S.`f5 62E . 50 9241.1 H =5 . 526.75 87E7.0 H -5.55 627.00 9344.3 H =6.2 627.25 S912.6 H =6.45 627.50 10451.3 H =6.7 627.7S _ _ CE 1 . 8 H =6 . 95 628.00 0.0 E = or > E2=626 BMW CA _ = or s _ 2=62r; ? S^ 0,0 E 626.75 0.0 E = or > E2=628 Outle . =eruct=ire "' ' HT2 =a 5TF ��e: wL. FOND-2 Uersion: 5.15 S,'N: _E551r,,-01za Date E.;ecu4, Time Executed: » »> C"-NTINUED From previous page « «< Outrlow Rating Table For Structurs #lt WEIR-UR weir - Vertical Rec;.anclular * * INLET CONTROL ASSUMED *#-*** Elevation _ft) -------------- 0 ECES) ------- Computation ------------------------ fiessages 629.00 0.0 E = or > E2=628 629.25 0.0 E = or > E2=628 629.50 0.0 E = or > E2=628 629.75 O.0 E = or > E2=628 63C.00 0.0 E = or > E2=628 C = 3 L (Ft) = 203 H (Et), = Table elev. - invert elev. C 620.8 Et 0 (cfs) = C * CL-.2H) CH`1.5) -- Contracted Weir Outlet Structure 'File: WHEAT2 STR POND-2 Uersicn: 5.15 S' 12951601c8 Date Executed: Tire Executed: :< •- +x- #: * # * A 4 W- +k +► + -*, * -4 !L + -4- 41 4. -* 4; + - -#L * * AE A + 4: -* -* + 4- -A6 - +io- +1. # S = U" i f1OD---.j W . c P. Tai:I "iC _'� T .^. ±COL'�1I A�1 "" -- AS T _. CROSS SEET : O'': A E i_-= .� _ Or:! T S T NC REASED . -i*-.-Yx 4b 4*44--*--*4.#-*+-*-44-./F �► 4,A4 AE A A ds; :-4 A1.J..;A-*-*. :AA,A A A.bj.AAA#A;iF +A A iA A##ie Outflow Rating Table For Structure #3 WEIR-UR Weir - Vertical Rectangular **+** INLET CONTROL ASSUMED '� * Elevation (Ft) -------------- C (cFs) Ccmputation Messages 616.00 ------- 0.0 ------------------------ E < InS.;.El.= 620.8 620.HO 0.0 E < E1=62LL 621.00 0.0 E < E'_=o2u 621.25 0.0 E < E1=62LL 621 . SO 0.0 E < E1=S-=*i E21.75 C.0 E < E1=62LL 62E.:0 0.0 E < LEI =62LL 622.25 0.0 E < Ei=62`f 622.50 0.0 E < E1=n2LL 622.' S 0.0 E < E1=62q 623.C^u O.0 E < E1=62LL 623.25 0.0 E < E1=62LL 623.50 0.0 E < E1=62', 623.75 0.0 E < Ei=62LL 62LL.00 3337.E H =3.2 62LL.25 373S.S H =3.LL5 62LL . SC LL1LL7 . ' H =3 .7 62LL.75 ':S73.9 H =3.95 625.00 501j. H =LL.a 625 .25 5LL6c . 5 H =Li . `t5 625.50 5932.1 H 7 625.75 GLL10.0 H =4.35 626.00 0.0 E = or > =2=6C6 626.25 0.0 E = or > E2=6EG 626.550 C J E = or > 026.75 E = or > E2=5,-6 627.00 0.0 E _ or > E2=GEE -S27.25 0.0 E = or > E2=626 =/ .75 5 C.0 > E2=-=f7 623.00 G.0 E = cr > a _ E E E� P GEB ..'5 0.0 � = or > E==626 ' Outlet Structure File: wiiEAT2 STY ' FLOND-2 Uersion: 5.15 Si.N: 12S5160128 Date Executed:Time _ ecutad: ' »»> 1_CN!TT".UED from previous page ««< DUtElOW Rating Tn ;le Fo_ Structure #3 ' o I., weir - Uert_cal Rectangular **:*-** INLET CONTROL ASSUMED * ** *+ ' Elevation (ft) -------------- C tcfs) Computation Messages 629.00 ------- ------------------------ 0.0 E = or > E2=626 ' 629.25 0.0 E = or > E2=626 629.50 C.0 E' = or > E2=626 629.5 0.0 E = or > E2=626 E30.00 C.0 E = or > E2=526 C = 3 L C t` = 19S H CF4- _ Table 0 (cfs) C '" elev. - Inver elev. C 620.8 Ft CL-.2H) * C'r'*1.5) Contracted heir Outlet Structure L 4la: '. HE-4c T2 _T2 FOND-2 Uersion: 5.15 Da E:<ecut d : S"N: 12�S16O12-a T 4 Me E_eCuta-? : STFUCTUIR "- CE c q ' `i GR K I i C I iJTO ACCOLP�T A": : `lC R, aSc i 3 �: u:�E t .L;:.i;:. CROSS SEE 1 T 1 ON AS THE r L_.:AT I ON I S I NCR ASED . ye t.k k#Yt## W;***, 4,4. !! # Fw##Jt K#> ac :4Fb is +►GIs :4*-'* wd iE r.-4-,d4 �4*i; CutFlow Rating Table For Structure #2 WEIR-UR Weir - Uertical Rectangular '++*+ INLET CONTROL ASSUMED +++** Elevation (Ft) -------------- O EcF I ------- Computation Messages 616.00 0.0 ------------------------ E < Inv E1.= BE .6 ' 620.80 621.00 C.0 C.0 E E < E1=622 < E1=822 621.25 0.0 E < E1=622 621.50 0.0 E < E1=622 ' E21.75 C.0 E < E1=622 622.00 7uC.5 H =1.= 622 . -P _ 9B3 .3 H =1 . Lt5 622.50 9 H =1.7 ' 622.75 1532.E H =1.95 623.00 1830.1 H =_.2 1 623.2S 623.50 2157.2 2`i95.0 H H =2.'i5 =2.7 623.7S 2BLiB.7 H =2.95 62u.00 0.0 E = or > E2=62'f ' 624� . 2S 0.0 E = or > E2=62't 624.SO 0.0 E = or > E2=62q 62Lt . 75 0.0 E = or > E2=62't 625.00 0.0 E = or > E2=62LI ' 625.25 0.0 E = or > E2=62`t 62S.50 0.0 E = or > E2=62ui 625.75 0.0 E or > E2 't 626.00 C.0 E =62 = or > E2=624 626.25 0.0 Eor > E2-62Lf 626.50 0.0 E = or > E2=52Lf 626.75 0.0 E = or > E2=62't ' 627.00 C.0 E _ or > T= 6cu ._ 627.25 0.0 E = or > E2=62`t 627.50 0.0 E or > E2=6p" ' 62 �5 0.0 E - or > E2=624 626.00 0.0 E = or > E2=32 6-- . 25 1' . 0 or. >=.==6=`t 62P . 50 0 .C�� > EE=Sc U SE8 . i 3 li . 0 � or > 7r-�24 Outlet Structure ;ile: wHE;T2 STR POND-2 Version: S.15 S 29Si60128 Date Executed: Time E:;ecutect: »»> C3iJTI 'JUED from previous page ««< Outflc.0 Rating -'able for Structure #2 .HEIR-VR weir - Vertical rectangular ilvL 77 .T CQNTMIL ASSLIf1E #+ # Elevation CFt:, 0 (CES) Ccmputation Messages -------------- ------- ------------------------ 629.00 0.0 E = or > E2=6Eq 629.25 0.0 E = or > E2=62Lf 629.SO 0.0 = or > E2=62'f 629.75 C.0 E = or > E2=E2't 630.00 0.0 E = or > C = 3 L = IS6 H lftD = TZbie eiev. - inVert e'_-V. i. SCv.e it (CES) = C rL-.2H? * CH-1.S) -- Contracted heir ' 0ut1zt Str"ctura 7 i I a : 'iiEATEE STR ' 'I CN-M-? Version: 5 _5 5'.-'N. IESSIE-3128 Date ExecLlt-ad: T imTe E:.:ac_ted: #`W d1E*4F 4-�+++lF+T 4-4 4: V:. -4-ii,+--tww++++-,K. ,.,:+ha-K-k,*+#++A.*A*-W-W +4++-*-4�-k+4-4, 16 AC _ _ .. _. 'VLV�.� T r'!Z) 1�._ ..••'1 hlr T n,v Tf1 /h (... r-, rl /hhi T (��� .1 �,i l.i I: _ - Cri U IN A"J T �:4.`. LA.i I.. _.." 5 SZE . ICI i AS _7 HE...- -C. _ i NC� JF++-+-k #.#3 4* 4r. 44 4-4�4, -►±k k -4, 414#41 -k-4, # ' Outflow Rating Viable For Structure #1 WEIR-VR Weir - Vzrtycal Rectangular *+**+ INLET CCNTRCL ASSi INED ++-**. ' Eievat-on Cz t:, -------------- 0 :cfs Computation 'essagas 618.00 ------- G.0 ------------------------ E < T7V 1.= 620.8 621.0C u- H =.2 E21 .25 i5n . Li H = .'i5 62i.50 307.2 H =. E21 .75 '8S . 6 H . 95 622.00 0.0 _ E or > E2=62E 622.25 0.0 - = or > E_="=2 622.50 0.0 E = or > E2=S22 ' 622.75 C.0 E = or > E2=c22 623.00 0.0 E - or > E2=622 623.25 0.0 E = or > E2=622 ' 623.50 C.0 E = or > E2=622 623.75 0.0 E = or > E2=622 62.00 0.0 E = or > E2=622 ' 62'i . 25 C.0 E = or > E2=622 62u.50 0.0 E = or > E2=622 62't.75 0.0 E = or > E2=622 625Z.00 0.0 E = or > E2=62LE' ' 62S.25 0.0 E = or > E2=622 625.50 0.0 E = or > E2=622 62S.75 0.0 E = or > E2=622 ' 626.00 0.0 E = or > E2=622 626.25 0.0 E = or > E2=622 626.50 0.0 E - or > E2=322 626.7S C.0 E = or > E2=622 ' 627.00 0.0 E = or > E2-GE2 E27.2S C.0 E = or > E2=622 627:5u O.0 E = or > E2=OC- 0.0 E or > E:2=622 6c9. 0 0.0 E = or > E2=622 c28 . 25 C , 0 = or > ' 6 C.0 E cc > E=-622 =3 .. 5 C.0 _ E or > E2=6?? 0Utlet :DtrLlCtUre ; e: �iic:AT2 $TR POINC-2 version: 5.15 S/iJ: 1295160128 Date Executed: Time E:_acuted: »»> CCi!-Irlr .UE2 E'rc;m previous page ««< Outflow Ratin.; Table Lor Structure #1 a;EiR-v WeJL7 - vertical Eectangular i'J . `�', ET =NTROL ASSU"ES Elevation ft� C %- Z .) Computation NessageS --------------------- ------------------------ 625.00 0.0 E = or > E2=622 629.25 0.0 E = or > E2=622 62S.50 0.0 E = or > E2=622 62S.:5 0.0 E = or > E2=622 630.00 C.0 E = or > E2=622 C = 3 L Cft) = 175 H Cft) = Table elev. - Invert eiay. 620.3 Ft Q �cFs = C _T 214'1CCntraCtECi Weir INFLOW HYDROGRAPH DATA HYDROLOGIC ANAYLSIS OF WHEATLANDS DAM - LAKE FREDERICK DESIGN SCS CURVE NUMBERS PREDEVELOPED CONDITION SUBAREA A B C D E TOTAL AREA (ACRES) 716 675 297 166 173 2027 CN 74 72 76 74 73 CN x AREA 52984 48600 22572 12284 12629 149069 WEIGHTED CN= 73.54 POSTDEVELOPED CONDITION SUBAREA AREA (ACRES) CN CN x AREA A 716 81 57996 B 675 72 48600 C 297 85 25245 D 166 80 13280 E 173 74 12802 TOTAL 2027 157923 WEIGHTED CN= 77.91 Refer to Exhibit 3 for delineation of subdrainage areas. v L70- 4�' -0 AREA L (277) 720 ouble 7j 1 ; AREAS sub! J AREA 14 E : Y te AREA A"wd A 'FY 6 AREAS AM LOCATION EBB LAKE FREDERICK neeh .0 (l�� ..w� . "=/lj�- �\ \� �� ,'�i�� _ /�:.'��� \ _1' �(.t`, 1T a� SCALE: Y =2000' STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA WHEATLANDS DAM WATERSHED DELINEATION WATERSHED SUBAREAS EXHIBIT 3 APPENDIX B COMPUTER PRINTOUT OF PREDEVELOPED CONDITION + 7 77 T 71� 1 i T, 1 e v at- 0 n c a c a 0 C C r-� 7 ------------------------------ LL -------------------------- - - - - - --- - - ---------- ------------- kj 13 j 71 i 17; 7C 1 71:z� r) 77 :DU 15 C 0 ■ - - -- - -- - - ---- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'Fi, F CIL-1. T E 211 D T T Tw� Lz —E ------------------------------- --------------------- EED cz=— E 2 E 7 5� -------------------------------- -1 -7 1-iI_Zvl LI Z' 1 T - -i%j - - - - - - - - ---- - - - -- - - - " - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - Z7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - 2 -7 kj E -7. 3M C7 :D Li E3 f 5 S- E LI L-, I �S 4-7 'u E 5 6 17 5 LD er --I tD u Lz C, C, .00 r 1 Lj C2 ZD 15 15- S 3 3 E ES ;D u- , D E 3E ES tz. - at. j ZZ .... U - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- - - - - - 13 E X E. C' U T E.P. D c 0 Cl L ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- 'i I __ ____I_ 3 _.____J_'___ -- - - - - - - - - i ----------- t --------- --------- 17 E -7 M L4 G 3 E E 17 6 3; 17 6 =.• D :2 CZ I CD E3 1, 7 9 E 5 E 57-- -CZ a E. B 001 0- ' "9,E 5 r '7 � 18 31 '-E 1 :3S '4 7D C:2 E f:EIi i ;;7 i 3, B Li 5 E 13 E 1 E E 5 E: S: 5 CE 1 E 033 7' BE G 3, E E7 li 3 9 L- 0 E E S 55 3 E =5 0 i IS E 5'� 5- 0 B '7-S6 i 3 Li I E 7 E i i _7 E- k0l. 5 0 i P E F 7 a S--7 03 3 Ol =6 .3C E. 0;--- ---i =± i --D ,7 1 C) -3 1 i Li n- 33 PCE3 E S .22 3 -)EaO - 463= E'1 1 -7 -E 6 57 1� i S'i.JC�. , ._.. �, r �...�s - , ^_J....=r r, -2 ter` E3 I __.J �i� JC joLj,2: F-7 :D C'.T- 1: B 2 S - ED C:., n ZZ L; 2 -- 0 E E EO E E 5 f--Z q 5 3 -7L 20 I. E'-! 2 0 3E37; c U �D 20 S -BE r-N LD E, 2'! 2 E I I E, Z, CD '• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I . . T j ------ --- --- r - - - - - - - - - 'It 2 E E 3 2 31 E E-1 3 ----------------- I I ------------------------------------------------------- Fes'"_ I ;NJI 5 rE n T T `7 T I ------------- E33- C-;=: L4 IU :D :3 --------------------------- --------------------------- Z- -k 4 -4- 4 ri Lj ri r YD Stai tin" F—D r, t,11 av a 107., Feai, COU"E"OW E71---J Pea', E I e v a T-, r-Fs 4- 4. 4, C: 7- l3o:�-Oximas Pea! Ll 0 t I n J t i a 5 t C 0 a F t .o - a --------------- r-1 FINI-D-EE UE=7--s 7 -ji zz Cn 0 C) C, - - - - - - - - - - - - - E 7 x E - - 1- x ,1C.�=-i,., 13. 05- 13. =L.L i x 14 41 Li OLD i -7 '7 tC E33-: 7 T S'l F i I APPENDIX C COMPUTER PRINTOUT OF POSTDEVELOPMENT CONDITION 4 -4, + 4, 4, L4,_ Lk- 4. --km -7 s v a, ri I ES 0 101 f:, IL t F I C. w g7 L L. T - - - - - - - - - - T C' LJ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - zz --------------------------- 7:� E E E E ED Lj q E 15 6 E 35 C 0 I:z :D Z7, 5- 0- C� E S 0:3 Lj E 3 1 5 I C - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- '7 7� 7 r7: 7� D 571 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - fO 0 14E c i a =F- E:� E 3 ------------------------------- 1 0 - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - ------------------ --------- E Vim. _ ___ ._ _.� _ T t7 T T r - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 ES 15 C 12 :3 sD I CD 1 E --i E E P ;7� IS E 5 7np 12 E 153 G Ll -I E 7 r-I E 3- E, 2 T—i LL Li q -7 S 1 5 0 Ol G S a i I 0 .0 15 C 1 Li Li E C-- iq --40 14 0 -5 L4 1 LL 1 Ll cm .00 E. 0 'i 80 E, G cm E E 3 Ez 0 14 1 :D r, 15- I E E CO E C: -2 5 '7 -7 6,- -Z :7 — — — — — ---- — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — ---------------I------------ — — — — — — — — — 3:3 — — — — — — — — — — Cl N Tj - 2 e r- s i Oil : 5; 1 S-, N, Fond 7ila: P- P. I nFICLij u d 00 a c'n T - - - - - - - T7 - - T IE T N - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - --- i - - - - - - - - - �T 71 F - - - - - -- - - J 'F+ - - --- r- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - I El 7 E3 U:mcm rz- E SIE 3C.Su ED ..5,9 � --') -.'� ET 11 7- 3 i L_j E EE; 6 E 0 i E i a i LSD-' G E3 3 C.D P 7 L, 4m 0 'C 1: E3 BE E U L4 L-3 )s EC p :z 0,- 1 , T -'-L: 'il •� 1 I 7 EE3 _. •--:D 74 '- , - *`= E3;:: ... • U „J .~., S4 E- E 0 30 7 ES:E Li c c 2- 2 U -- 5 o C E� E 7 r-i it ,• --- • _. -. v ------------------ - _ -. ... -. - -------------------------------------------------------- tJ • � - - �- � -..� 1 or, CW Ea L-h Z: 7 Z7 U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - %,T, r --I I I - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ . .. . . . . . . . s c ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - r,� n E5 8 1 C-5 E3 '7 M I E. I L4`4 0 23. 0'4 q 6.7 L4 ;E 3 ------------------------------------------------------- r. WHIE T E' 'DND Clut-Fllouz, --co T S t t rl c i t id W "On = Big 0.10- E 5 Lj Peal: --z7t ------------ -- co Lam- t- F Z:- -7 Lj I I I I J r1 C � J ! - . r O �.;vU •`:. .^..� JiJ O'� �5 :i v� OVI: :�. _��+,.J :.`vas �i_ _ - - - - - - - --1 = -- IE .!-L-7-! --- x x 1P.7 ;x I is 13 . Eq-- 1. t3.Lf 4- x x. A. x �3.%u 13 . B7- x x x Lf x LL r - i -'` Ll . X 1 1 41 41, 4i lt- yuu hiiVC 11UL d►['Cauy aabl.Vu, not sign more than once. �� -------------------------------------------------------- - T O: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith --------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: • Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. • Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently pl-iiv- we lave grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. • Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake witch has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further 9�orovals or tj( �.t development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 7- ------ -------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------ (Signatures ((Street Adress) r-1-2 ntcq��z — ( ignature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) 0^0 -n,,. / (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) ?I 7- ni (Street dress) (Signature)c �—� JLc:�4 c (Street Adress) (return to: Citizen for a Quality � (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - p ease print) UeL rhed} La y (Post Office and Zip) � Inc r� rj,-( () .2 c; n (Name - please print) G a rd N14 � , -)- -? _ (Post Office and Zip) � Q SO rr 0 f-0 ls� E (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) Gi (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office a d Zip) Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) 9 --------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------ (Signature) ----------------------------------- (Name please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) �WW (Signature) (Street Adress) .(Signature) (Street Adress) (sIgnature), (Street Adress) 01-f- )1 6")l "vn (Naide - please print) .(Post Office and Zip) (Name please print) Lf" C (Post Otfice and Zip) (Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name please print) (post office and Zip)- Mlend(j &Acl J(Name - 4lease print) vb - (Po &e office and Zip) ------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Street Adress) (Sign ture) (Street Adress) (Sign turel ( Street Adress) � - �'Od (Signature) (Street'Adress) n Jf L / / /` O — ;- "(Name - please print) LLj r A C 4 e S r J G A c- 6 C) k (Post Office and Zip) (Name - plea a print) (Post Office and Zip) W (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) J 11 (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please prin (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) ear �UPrS'1 (Signature) (Name - please print) �a60) 0 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) C" y43� u}-4-e 0uk-t Dr. Sk h � Ct y i 5.J (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 25589 Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------- `f- (.Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 3 ? & x R7 y (Street Adress) ae&z6i�� (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) Par r-iS/ /Y?ar?in .(Name - please print) u/;, _t 6 + e r Ja(10) (Post Office and Zip) (Name'- please print) wt H c1.2S 4x_ (Post Office and Zip) N eW via r" )(Name - please print) Sf✓1\�AyP�t/5 (Post Offi a an Zip) (Name.- please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) W ! f� CNE'S`T f/14 02-42(, D l (Post Office and Zip) ------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) 50 &\1 (Signature) (Name - please print) ti3 3 C loss Jv �. 25 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature (Name - please print) (Street Adress) .(Post Office and Zip) Lauri ,l�o (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) e ( gnature) �✓ � � se -.coal e _ 1J•- (Street Adress) (Street Adress) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - pleas? print) (Post Office and Zip) P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) -------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT e --------------------------------------------------------- Ekvc (Signature) (Name - p ease print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) LAX)!�'p �� _ (Signature) (Name - please tint) ��► as � � �sa� Me�aG,�l�c�oK T�� ��P (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Name - please print) L �5i ct.o rr a � as0� Q. p 0 1 e n� (Street Adre s) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) • � •-- � 3 Boxd'�,QS1-� r NC�F STE_t��lA• ,. (Street Adress) 0%)1W l (Post Office and Zip) . i I. ------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------- ------------------- (Signa ure) AA (Street d ess) (Signature) (Street Adress) (/ (Signature) (Stre6t Adress) :k (Signature) 2 � (Name - pleas tint) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) L/rT (Post`Office and Zip) e� (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) -er,?4 r rkn (Name - please print) Box 25;58, Winchester, VA 22601) (return to:' Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 ------------------------------------------ PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT -------------------------------------------------- -- r.:.-C n (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signa re) (Street Adress) (Signa re) � u �� 33a19 orr,�l (Street Adress) Q Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) �1 (Nam - pleas print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) gT tl gcA 3-3o X w, nc+ly VW -2? (Post Office and Zip) , �V, (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) - �eRrrnt �� �M 0 0 (Si nature) (Name -` lease print) .(Street. Ad s) (Post.Officeland Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) goy Gay►-b Ala (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) .- _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------- 17 (Signature) L, 2:9 k (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (SignatureT +P 66.1, 375 (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) kr.5 u€. oy- sD.PI,uoK (Name - please print) u.. '1 4 o (Post Office and Zip) rn e- L fiti2 r (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) �ofifi-1�� s (Name - please print) w v\cL%es+rr 2 Z Go ( (Post Office and Zip) d fti • PETITION to elected officials of`,and Frederick County,Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ,N Hfor TWHEATLANDS PROJECT (Name - please print) (Signature) / (Street Adress) (Post OfficO and Zip) (Name - plea a print) gnature) , t r C 7�� (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) -.. 1 A, ANG ELL AP- e2 - '' (Signature) (Name - please print) Sri ay (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) " (Signature) (Name - please print) - 2 Adress)•(Post Office and ��,r)(Street Poner a -. pint Nam please print) <, (Signature) :.. R+ Rm( z93 — (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Name..- please print) �., `t. (p Office and Zip) (Street Adress) Citizens for a'Quality do miunity, P O Box 25�8, Winchester, VA 22601) (return to: ; C! . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE VHEATLANDS PROJECT C (Signature). U 7- (Street Adress) (Signature (Street Adress) . (Signature) AV =Z4--��57 (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) n in (Name - ple se print) (Post Yffice and Zip r/:*�s 414, 7/a;�,�.r�,J (Name - please print) (Street Adress) -- -- (Post.Office and Zip) (Signature) .._ (Name - please print) A"' ( trees Adress) (Post Office and Zip) R(return to Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Vinchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y (Signature) (Name - please print) A4 t 13ox 109 �✓h tPosf (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) ,L Chc r I (Signature) (Name - please print) LtLl s-u WoldanC4 Dr. Sf� ✓� h e rt �-�;� a 1 G .57s (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) C,L AAA GlLC\ O�--\\L C--,It (Street-Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) O ( Signature ) 7- Z (Street—Adress) Post r5 i Zip) (Name - please print) (P st Office'and Zip) F wwd El e4r_h _r . -Tr- (Name - please print) ,IVh;-FP Pest .2Z6 63 (Post Office and Zip) (>eAy3(>i-�- _ (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) 663 (Post Office and Zip) Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT -------------------------------------------------- '1 i /1(Signature) (Name - please print) L C-, ( , (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) 0 (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) Signature) YR (Street Adress) (Signature). (Street Adress) (Sign Lure) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) ti r-n (Post Office and Zip) l P rr� �2rn C , (Name - please print) (Posft Office and Zip)( �Co 5 t) Le A (Name - please print) (post Off ice and Zip) (Name - please print) 26:O / (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Po t Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) 2 Our 63 ,1 (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) F - ,I (Street Adress) (Signature) 8QX 5'n C'�V_ (Street Adress .(srgroature) (Street Adress) . CT -- (Signature) J ff 5 (Street Adress) (Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) ('Name please print) vlk (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) 111', r " (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) I 244 (Post Office and Zip) (NamCa please print) (Post Office and Zip) r -t- No r ro u-j --(Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT -------------------------------------------------- Zen 1�aZ�� (Signature) (Street Adress) << z (Signature) ax (Street Adress) ct/%iG%G'1 ;/ . ) /e r (Name - please print) 2% Z2-j�,2-S (Post Office and Zip) _'t)r i C� �ti�, � r c �� (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) lid 4-.hL411_1 V 6G (Si nature) - Name - please print) Cx 53Y? lNin[` �i..& . zZ�ci H- - (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) Ri c , Greel'AwA1 (Signature) (Name - please print) n f �A V;(,+-4 1)1-, Wi'Achesder V'q- a a v/ (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) 77X -(Name - please print) t. 1-1cs,3/ - ly� 17d r. l- , c (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) ",• / (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) - - - --- - - -- - - - - --- -- - - - - - -- --------- --- ----- -- - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------=------------------------------------------------------------------- m ��'h/YI (Signature) (Street Adress ( igna re) (Street Adress) '(Signature) x 17�k (Street Adress) '(Signature) treet Adress) E>o n n -P— bL�-A-S - (Name - please print) i+. ����•._, a .. (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) -> S I -�' //-(-- - r /- (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) / ,(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) desA [Alm eet A e s) (Post Office and.Zip) ignature (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) . --- - --- ----- - - -- ---- ---- -- - ---------- - ----- --- -- --- - -- --- -- - -- - - - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 040 MI. (Signature) %i moo? fox f (Street Adress) (Signature) a � e L (Stree dress) (Signature) (Street Adress) Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (.Street Adress) (Si nature) (S reet Adress) (return to: (Name - please print) en50 r) a L&_-3 to (Post Office and Zip) zkcrt)q 1,64 vez - (Name - please print) (post Of ice and Zip) fo- �F�t- (Name - please print) Z<4_�T_ Z z Co J (Post Office and Zip) please print) (Post 'Office and Zip) (Name - please int) . (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) A c)X�56 (Post Office and Zip) Citizens for a Quality Community,.P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) r ------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 .L (Street C\ L ... 6 . �i I ��ur1v R N(' rKe rson _ please print) 226 5 5 (Post Office and Zip) nck- (Name - please print) r C�Lo6s ) (Post Office and Zip) o q� f4i,l� /�as'k S-i-�,•c��r� (Signatur (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Officeyand Zip) (Signature) .,(Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) I -fa Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ------------------------...------'--------------------------------�-{' PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUK ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- g (Sttreet Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Oefice'and Zip) �Q ,4 Luf,otpLIPQ (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) C4Name - please print) L17(Street Adress) (posttoffice and Zip) (Signature) lease print) r�hts-�'f V��'?Z��L (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Prr�a �Ip ' (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ame - please print) 114 2�C (Post orrice and Zip) - s ---�----------- ---------- PETITION to elected officials of and --- -------------- - - - - - - - - - - for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------- 0 AvivA (Signatu e) nic i�� (Name - please print) f l Ale, t� &1 1 S34c1 ��.'�' 1�iir��i�sf�,� I/�} Z21Py 7 (Scree re (Post Office and Zip) �dln PI-, yr e A S 19,2 �.. (Signature) - (Name please print) C 3 (Street Adress) (Post office and Zip) `" (Name - please print) (Signature) Z -z G o � (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) f_- . . 000, (Name - please print) (Signatures Zip) (Post Office and (Street Adress) ;-. (Name -please print) '(Signature) Ir (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) r ---- (Name - ease print) iK� i��,c4i�Sf-elf (�i�r �z6al r (Post Office and Zip) i (Street Adress) r P 0 Box 255S,• Winchester, VA 22601) a Quality Community, -(return-to: Citizens -for (Signature r. (Street Adr. s) �C ILG l! ? 4 r �� (Name - please 'print) h �in�f�v cLr Il �3 W (Post Office and Zip) (Si atur (N a -please rnt) AL 3 Cs�; .(Street Adress) (Post O fice nd Zip) o� }� f� 0 r, 4 (Signature) I� ~. (Street Adress ) , rrn l a (Yt :_(Signature) (Street Adress)' , (.Signature ) (Street Adress) ( gn ture) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) PNjYI t Name - please print) u o Nr a�(P*) 7 (Post Office and Zip) (Name.-) please print) re (Post Office and Zip) JA) rin �V_ vz `(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) fi Vinchester. VA 22601) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P O.Box 2558. i .. / �Siznate) (Name- please print) y 4 �..2� (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) rDCd i I A ►'nbCY-t (Signature) (Name - please print) (3-A -fWIt4hb Il CA YC� C�� �c V 22ny) — (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress)' (Post Office and Zip) (Si nature) ame - please print) ..� 3 a - - - iU ►�nl' �n 1� i 4 (Street Adreaa) (post OffiCI ' and Zip) a y {� � (Signature) (Name -please print) �i .. (Post/Office and 21p) . - ( Street Adreaa) t. Citizens fora Quality.Community,.P 0 Box 2558, yinchester, VA 226®1) (return to: *- x J e - t r. " ______ -------------------------------------------- --------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) �T y 4)5-Y 3 (Street Adress) J ✓, I'7 (Signature) (S t Adress) /( Signature ) (Street Adress) ( gnature) (Street Adress) ( ignat re) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) w�N o }f'r S-7'a // �: �� 0 / (Post Office and Zip) i (Name - please print) 7 (Post Office and Zip) ((Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) C.A?- A .(Name - please print) NU C 0voe) Z Z v Z Z (Post Office and Zip) . (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) T 7 Y- (Street Adress) j (Signature) (Street Adress) 0,CSignature) Aljn� jZ4ZF 1# J&d=a Ya-- - (Street A4iiesfs) A (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) �1 � -7i A �- -4 A -Ail. (Name - please print) U(-k -2- (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) 6z T S C4 ta /P-- /(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) M N Ic (Name please print) 6.2 (post office and Zip) (Name - please print) (post office and Zip) ter, VA 22601) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winches .(Signature) Name - print) please '= (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Name please print) - (Signature) (lost Office and Zip) (Street Adress) (Name - please print). (Signature) (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) - print) (Name please pri ) - , (Signature) . (Post Office and Zip) ' (Street Adress) (Name please print) m (Signature) .' (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) •>' lit Citizec�s for a'Qua Y Community. P.O -Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ;. (return for i "r _ ------------------- U f PETITION to eleeted.officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to '` •' PLACE.A MORATORIUM ON THE VHEATLANDS PROJECT --------------------------------------------------- �1 /,/•��,�s fir, c- �c- l Jcz.� e_ r� (Signature) (Name -please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) Cl) x l��t ��1; etc �.E> s �' r ,�� ✓-1 �? �c�_I (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) i`�., l mr' ( Name - please print) (Signature) ILI (Post" Office and Zip) (Street•Adresa) (Signature) (Name - please hint) , (Street Adress). (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip). (return to: Citizens for a Quality Comunity, P O Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) bm ,yt_' �elected officials oP and Por Frederick County, Virginia to -- ,,. PETITION to PLACE A MORATORIUM'ON THE VHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------ ----------- -------------------------- ----�----- -------------------_ 2 AQ ( Si n ture) (Name - please print)) � •- �'-Fj'-f (y-r-PP►� -F-ie �� � (Street Adress) (post Office and Zip) (Signature) ,rD %�//d; P jai �•J (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (post 6ffice and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress). (return .r-o: s (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 3 y 1 (Street Adress) (Street Adress). ( Name - please \print) (post Office and Zip) fete- v Ford (Name - please print) v�- 2 2- <oD (post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (post Office and Zip) (Name --please print) - (Signature) (Foal Office and Zip) s (Street Adress) r (Nam - please print) .,t (Signature) 0.ai y y t n (Post Office and Zip) (Street Adress) • Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) (return (r to: Citizens for a"Quality i PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- - (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) Co r (Name-�yplease print) Ti III I' (Post Office and Zip) _, (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post -Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office'and Zip) (Signature) .: (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) ------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name.- please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (S gnature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) :,(Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------=---------------------- ------------------------------------------------- 'Si tu.�) r (Name - please print) i (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) _ : - please print) (Name (Street Adress) ._ Office and Zip) =: (,Post - (Signature) - please print) (Name (Street Adress) -- --•- and Zip) (Post.Office - (Signature) ---- _ - please print) = .(Name (Street Adress) Office and Zip) -�. (Post (Signature) - please print) (Name (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens fora Quality•Coamunity, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) y -r , �e y �.Rt d Y��kusL �,np ���r'"t r � �� -= � rr-�r:f ��.*:"�"'�yr `.�`"�-.4i�`'�'f```.���' L"` �� a`k .i i q s•r �,.c--�c�'3 ��r�'+�'�'�` '� ". .!` -- •�`.{ +� •S•: '[F w: � - to ... sza.. �. , ;...�i.+-�,..._�,„-, y,.,;.rrv.j-.." 0:'3+.v.�.�4e ]• z..:. ... _ i �— .1,•_w � 2.... -� i Al _ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------� PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) (Name - please print) 3 Y2- Sliermvi �L� AL .,22 4 61 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) Office and Zip) (Post CO (Signature) - please print) (Name Office and Zip) (Street Adress) - (:Post - (Signature) - please print) (Name ..:.. (Street Adress) - -'-_ _ . _.............._. _ (Post Office and Zip) ( Signature) - please print) :_ :..:, ..:..:;r :. ' .:..: . ( Name (Street Adress) Office and Zip) -- _ (Post (Signature) please print) _ (Name- (Street Adress) Office and Zip) (Post - :(return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) M PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the d'evelooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) k (Addr ss) (Signature Address / Signature) Address Address A14111 L�� 1%11101r11e1s 6?`%-i (Name - Please PrintT. ��cff�s�YQ, u�- `Z Z60 Post Office and Zip) ), 4 ue% (Name - Please Print) ZZ("c) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Ple se Print Post Office ,and/. Zip ef 1� r - (Name - Please Print) 5 (> Post Office and Zip over GL4.. Signature WIA-)at{-cSriF-?-,VA ZZ6d Name -.Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print (Address) Signature 2 �- Signature 8o-�, 6 8 Address (Si natury . ddress Signature 112A�� Address Sign re Address Sign turte (Address) Post Office and Zip 'tare e t W. Name Please Print ZZ�o Post Office and Zip ��N Sold Name - Please Print �Z looi Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Zto o ( Post Office and Zip -0 Name - Please Print Post Office and ip n��a Name - Please Pr' t Post Office and Zip tit) A-4 o /V Name- Please Print ,2!z G 0 I - Post Office and Zip G, 0 (Z. Name -'Please Print --z- -z.c�o 1 __TPost Office and Zip ,-7 �_ v e- ek e -vi-- Name m Please Print (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and deeply concerned about the plans for the development willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let of development in our community. Winchester, Virginia, are of Wheatlands, and the apparent the developer determine the scope We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both -Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signa ire) Address Q (Signature) Address (Signature) s� goy J_33 Address Signature o�c �Ey�7 Address ( gnature) Address NANCy R. To wlyse V (Name - Please Print) C . VA Z Z (Post Office and Zip) 3 AnEfi k . GOWe?s ( ame - Please Print) Post Office and Zip fill S, Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip i'eMe'fsc -A )I e,dei Name - Please Print ,�_> Z C0 o Post Office and.Zip CooP& Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over e Signatu Name - Please Print lS'r &,,K, a/Q Y 570T ,00%. (.Adddress ) 222, 22! 3: LG/ Signature ICl/ IR Z moo/ Addr ss) Signature Address Signature (Address) � U /((Signature (Address ture Vt) e5j, !on ZLf Address dw� Signature 13 6 .K 3 Co /` 2 Address 14, C 7-� (Signature �► G n Address ignkfure ' (Address') �• Signature (Address) Post Office and Zip o lYgl Name - Please Print Post Of ice a d Zip f l� l Name - Please Print 'Z'Z. O J Post Office and Zip A' R in E (Name - Please Print Post OfficeandZip I:. L Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip ' J _v- V Z Name - Please Print 2z 6oi Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print ZZ�ooi Post Office and Zip �2 Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip L U� /z Name Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Racros (Post Office and Zip) The Petition will continue until we get action.... /y3' - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District - Delegate Alson Smith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of r ` erick,iantynia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. • Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. -Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been Improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development. Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. FuMappro is of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. cc tw � L� �Yl rlL ��`�� �.�1� �j Signature) (Name - ase print) C� rnaC: l Va ZuoST- (S reet Adress) (Post Offic nd Zip) tziLreeL Aaress) (Name - please print) v ( ost Office and p) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so. But please do not sign more than once. ------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District - Delegate Alson Smith -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, the undersigned citizens of Fresc.trgirua#-are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: " Density Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. " Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been Improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ' -�:�.r <'/,/ L�(_ t/1 l l!/f `C �f 1 `C C l �� __ L� f F'iC-iL (Signature) � (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) The Petition will continue until we get action.... - If you have not already signed, now is your opportunity to do so not sign more than once. --------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: - Frederick County, Virginia Board of Supervisors Kenneth Stiles Chairman Roger Crosen, Supervisor - Gainesboro District Charles Orndoff, Sr. Supervisor - Stonewall District Dudley Rinker Supervisor - Opequon District Robbie Rhodes Supervisor - Back Creek District Harrington Smith Supervisor - Shawnee District Delegate Alson Smith ------------------------- But please do We, the undersigned citizens o are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. " Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. " Services - As e,..,,ently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. " Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availabilty of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. - Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - We also have grave concerns about the County•s unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development (Signature) 401 (Name - please print) �o. �X 94.E V6¢ (Street Adress) - __ (Post OfPice and Zip) (Sig ure) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Officd and Zipf plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `'� Q„-� • � Kos e vN 1= �2 ale (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Signature) ,/ ' lD�-I I`�ern Oir"cle (Street Adress) (] (( Signature') % L Ll (�G?rltr a a--l- ' (Street Adress) (Signature) C t f ,, \,'P7 (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) henS Ce- b�- 2L4SS (Post OPfice and Zip) LDS 6 6 1' t'V f f h�l� (, ( Name - )please print) (Post Office alid Zip) r1 FLA n K -- (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature (Street Adress) (Signature) 1/�j_ ��.�� c ,7,t� : , r(�"t. (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) < �►�1 IC<', I �'l�c�UY1�C� (Name - please print) (Post Office andZip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Signature) (Street Adress) ignature) go,(- ba.r c"_ G Y' e e (-&— (Name - please print) J ✓� �-3 L .�S_ (Post Office a6d tip) please print) 67 7 TJ 6Jj'/A Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signa re) rx?- b 8 '�-/ u)dv d Cf. (Street Adress) Signature) 4'ox,4� (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) fir'c(n h -0 . (aM Lr �'-Tr , —(Name - please print) (.j\" C-�j4e-�- d46 0 1 (Post Office and Zip) Z112 �L/Q)rsdh (Name - pleas6 print) aa6s's- f� Post Office and Zlp) A� N e please print) (Post Office and Zip) �l r e.-14 /f., r—1 (Name - please print) (Post OfficeCId Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ' � s ------------------------------------------------------------------------ — —------- — — PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :t. ,fir:�%z.� signature) J 1`7t� r �al (Street Adress) r (Signature) QC� T (Street ress) i t_ (Signature)' v (Street Adress) (Signatury/Je), •/` /J (Street Adress) v (Signature) /U �. ooc2 /6A (Street Adress) (Signature)/ (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) S4"L -" ct' tiJ P zz b', s (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ff (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) 4rr"��1$- Ar /3d-k ;Z-1e--4 Az/ A/r 17,71Go / (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------- m -------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 75s>c� (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name lease print) e v, (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) V'/j (Post Office and Zip) 71,011 Ad(( rb (Name - please print) (Post Office',and Zip) (St'gnat e) (Name pteii Ae print) 513 \5,krf\me-r- Lpkz UA (Street.Adress) (post Oft'ice and Zip) o. (Signature) (Street Adress) 3 0 P (-" r" � 0 n " o (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( Signature) --e�- ( Name please %print) 1 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) 3y 12oK y//i (Street Adress) b L G L Y /(; '�/ (Name - please print) V\/ / IV cH C-S i /_ i� , I/rl 2 2 G 0 / (Post Office and Zip) . � . S () �-i / 10. e Z y'4/ /-v (Signature) (Name - please print) c)/? S TC/9Pi (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) C_ j (Signature) (Street Adress) -TZ (Signature) lk, (Street Adress) on (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office',and Zip) (Name = please print) s z C, z2�ss (Po t Office and/Zip) .Shcz�on A �5',lox g (Name - please print) C nM Va . ?Lcy (P st Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) -------------------------------------------------------------7--------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) 7- (Street Adress) (Signature)' (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) r -- C (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) - - r� (Signature) Z� �-L �--- �p L/ (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) 7. (Post Office and"Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office=and Zip) . US i C. (Name - please print) (Post Office,and Zip) (Name - please print) e ste cyA�� t (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Sign ture) LV 4 --<� - (Street Adress) (Signa ure) k- , (Str et Adress) (Signature) ( Street Adres s ) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 560 ( PiCir=�idcI Ryi (St eet Adress) (Signature) s ss 1 D R, (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) 1 i kll �j '. 0,i� �� (Name -1 please 'prrint ) ZL T— (Post Office and Zip) -' (Name please print) � � ,,roc •`n= ��--'_,�, �_�'� ` z �>�/ (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office' and Zip) ( Name - nplease + /print) 154DW' Pi h.i VC- ZZG)S— (Post Office and Zip) W� (Name - plea a print) ` (Post Office and' Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- j. "signature) 1 Go ) 4cc� (Street Adress) (Signature) Vie* <" (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) �j j, , J (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) c1 c r'. � -,n 1r1 (Signature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) 110e-k-1C.1,17 1 . -4. AA (Signature) (Name - please print) /�?5y" (Street Adress) (Signature) 12 CA u rcA 9, (Street Adress) (Signature) g6 ;< (�-o (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) Lock 36'v C-L �y l(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) 2a�(i "Oa/'e r (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -- --- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 / ui I 1 U= L,� r� (S#nature ) (Street Adr s) (Signature) (Street dress) (Signature) t (Name p1lease print) (Post Office and Zip) rr(Name - please print) (Post Offic&J6nd Zip) (Name - please print) mod, e: (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) 1C, 9 (Signature) / (Street Adress) �l- Al (Signatu (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) .0A`f (Name - please print) Ltd j y c. ( )6� - _? K-'O (Post Office`,,and Zip) n15e -f7 e i, (Name - please print) 7T112�49n� (Post Office and Zip) (Name - .please /print ) . A�L� (/ct: (Post Of9f6d and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) PETITION to elected officials of and PLACE A MORATORIUM ON TF (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) e ri 0 L,/ t C-0, u r 7- L (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress)l ---------------- 7 ----------------------- for Frederick County, Virginia to E WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------- A-� T- ((Name - please print) (Post Office affid'Zip)' !V, (Name please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name please print) -7 (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) / (Post Office',and Zip) '(Signature) (Name - please print) `,fStreetJAdress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) 10 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) --------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Street Adress) (Street Adress) i Q., .� (Signature); .III C� Oak� � 0, (Street Adress) ,j (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) aot",C c C' (Name -'please print) L.N,D nC \! a 7_al C (Post Office and Zip) ,u (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) Signaturel (N e - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Officel,and Zip) ignature nn - (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress)( (Name - plFe/ase print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name -`please print) _y �= PAY` G 1�Is ��\1 (Post Offi a and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT �- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I , r.l• Lill"�Icik &( `J (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) +v v/� _q(Post Office and Zip) �, � ✓ ^�����' �e�s� ��"i.—� G{/2Gf r �.�T/2 �.' ,! / I G, iV (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) 450 '3 o P-) - (Street Adress) (Signature) 1 an)4-0 - (Street Adress) 'S SOSOA j � C`'t, (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) ' (Post Office�,a'nd Zip) (Name - please print) _S2 kkf r,.-) G-+ I, Va , -? 0 (0 S (Post OffIce and Zip) (Signature) ` A; ( Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) --------- ------------------------------------------ - -- ------------- ---- --- - -- - --- - PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Signature) %4 cccc0.,,^ack ave (Street Adress) c) (S gnature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) Al-ri. . J. - Signature) 4-f-, (Street Adress) (S/Idnature (Street Adress) (Signature) Street Adress) aeb etso Y\ (Name - please print) 1 -5 (Post Office and Zip) AQ �-4 U } a Po- kt I L,- ci vG (Name - please print) �Yl1�ci�llie �0 ccj n 22 6 �� (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) r2)'�j,i zze, (Post Office and Zip) So Act `(Name - please print) S /i eA)'S 61 (Post Offic6 and Zip) (Name -- lease- pr t) (Post Office and Zip u> ALT- (Name - please print) DO; �14 (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) --- ------ -- - ---------------------------------- ----- -- - - ----- ----- --- --- -- - - -- - - - -- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Signature),V(Name —please print) L� �r C) A4 nV ( ci (Street Adress) C(Signature) l 7&-41. (Street Adress) (Signature (Street Adress) J ( gnat (Street Adress) Adress) 5Tf5:Plus cs 7Y I---)- (. SLL! (Post Office and Zip) AAoLry J RKc i;�e_ rki5 (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - pleas print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name —please print) (Post Office and Zip) 1Lyn Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ( nature) Nam - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: -Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------- . (Signature) 2L2�,- ' &-1 Z1:21 'P S (Name - please print) P.11 (bEIZ�1 C (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) A&-- (*Jgnatur- (Street Adress) /�� �., (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Stre& Adress) PADnd� A ( G (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name -.please-print) s M- (Post ffice and Zip) �SI•fc�2a2Y /�l �SN�72 (Name - please print) F (Post Office and Zip) P,jL4-"4 � &ddir— - - --- —Beveglu d-e (Signature) ( e - please print) +. a4, 7f% - Se e nj�-� (Street Adress) 3&0 L &-4� / (Signature) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) �.S n ,,, eaL� P re -- (Name - please print) Po S7 - � 2 6?J (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature) rnv� Q�. 41 �1-13 (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) 16 alell, hAlyl? Ida (Signature) ,6.1 73a (Street Adress) (Street Adress) (Signature) C-tP R.v- t . 2A4'v--'r- C-1- (Street Adress) (Signature) ( Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) nnf_ �Occl"SOry (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) o 4& zv-/ / '57� "/ (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) ���ercc �v � ►-, so r. (Name - please print) (Post Offike and Zip) 44 c_,- .4 Je 7 (Name - please print) CtJ,-5 c i+-L, (Post Off ce and Zip) cU ex — (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Sox 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- n (Signature) 4/3&Z 1-kwe y 8-,eeX 011C� (Street Adress) '1w,& -- j!= 2� - (Signature) (Street Adr s) (Signature) (Street dress) 6 rS— Josee' A, GCJism ci 't (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - pleas rint) (Post Office an Zip)6 S- 1 o4ame - please print (Post Offi a and Zip) (Name - please pint) _ 3 (jPost Office and Zi ) Ci:iGCJ "cLL,I (Signature) (Name - please print) ZPr7OA � (Street AdresAi iL (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Tess) (Name - please print (Poit Office and Z ) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) --------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of PLACE A MORATORIUM ao ( ignatur (Street Ado'ess) (Signature) and for Frederick County, Virginia to ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT /4,�TH,tx Y sAlkO =/' (Name - pleas6 print) (Post Office and Zip) a, c r c )° P r 11 & e ?%) (Same - please print) -� C32.x41,04—,;Z 21.4 :3 (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - please print) s2��i4,;J E `1 ��JL e j�: L_ �� (Street Adress) '(Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Post Offidt and Zip) 4/7� (Name - please print) VA (Post Office and Zip) / I I �c b v) n (f , �� (Nam -.please print) , (Post Office and Zip) (return to: -Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA-22601) --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ba4_24v 2 tl Signature) 50�1t (Street Adress) � J-1 Signs ure) ga% (Street Adress) (Signature) t/ Ya �� C (Street Adress) (S ature) 0. 2Dx /-f c/N 60 (Street Adress) -4 �a, - A, �Q (Sign ure) (Street Adress) y1. e &X=A (S g ture (Street Adress) (Nam - please print) T7 (Post Office and Zip)' L1-�- (Name - please Iprint) V CL� (Post Officd and Zip) �0 6 (Name - please print) ei-A IS (Post Office and Zip) /P ,-, Z�- -i� aj i'i'1 q `7 ' ( Name '- please print) (Post Office and Zip) a F -Jud (Name - pleav6 print) �S s C_I l to _y a a (a S� (Post Otfice and Zip) (N e - please p int) 4/ c l , l � (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2556, Winchester, VA 22601) ---------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT --------------------------------------------------------------- (Signa ure) A elv- //.V- (Street Adress) "-� 6 1-9 (- � 0 - (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) Lina 5 I (Street dress) /a r (Street Adress) (Sign Lure) (Street Adress) ------------------ Virginia to y� 1-9z-J4 4 '(Name - ple a print) e�- , )A'..6,5 (Post Office and Zip) �m M Q, K7 LQ -4 (Name - please print) (Post Off a and Zip) 1 "A M� v en� (Name - please print) ISL. 1-1 &-/, (/a , a-�(Os� (Po ,sVOffice and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post 4ffice and Zip) /--S-/ e (Name - please pri t) (Post Offic.4 and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) (Street Adress) (S nature) (Street Adress) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) of N-D� T .y.m yj (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) `a k , -�p �u `(Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) -14 (Name please print) (Pofit Office anj Zip) Coot% (Signaatture) (Name - please print) (Street Adress) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) ( Street Adress (Signatu e) ZO041 (Street Adress) 7 (Signature) d07-o CJes'f S-� (Street Adress) (S1 nat re) (Street Adress) (Signature) A (Street Adress) (Name - please print) &�"j lXI C ) O �- Z (- Y' - (Post Office and Zip) (Name please pr t) '� (Post Office and Zip) 1a Tic 6L/ J" /J (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) p - D� RA7'v'p�- Y-�-) (Name - please print) 2 2 6� � N � (Post Offi a and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) I�IR Y V. o. - 'Otj Z'o (Name - please print) (Po t Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITION to elected officials of and for Frederick County, Virginia to PLACE A MORATORIUM ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Signature) --br', U e (Street Adress) (Signature) 1 Busk (Name - please print) (Post Office/and Zip) karen 7-bvrn'e- (Name - please print) 191 ice/ W I Val o7o�t2 � l (Street Adre s) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Street Adress) gnature) -� (Street Adress) /�&" 0 (Signature) (Street Adress) (Signature) (Street Adress) arr' - (Name - please print) 0 vLc�-es �� r" �b+ zz- G a l (Post Office 4nd Zip) V L'k- b 4 6e !7 /2r "�' (N e - please print) (Post Office and Zip) 4h, 0,/" "'�' - (Name - please print) (Post Offiete and Zip) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (return to: Citizens for a Quality Community, P 0 Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601) PETITION We, the ,indersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are.. -acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plannssJ for W�hhea/tllands are unacceptable. Signature) (Name Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip) i�All (Signature) Address (Signature) Address FLOPEroa G, KANiNSIC( (Signature) S H i;-Y�_& r7, Name - Please Print) Post Office a d Zi (Name -"Please -Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post /Office and.Zip / (Name - Please Print) A)l A 0_1:� - V4 . D / Post Office and Zip over JZ'�Sig�nat ��� Address Si nature (Address) Sig re (Address) Signature �+�-� Su f�cRfaFz Ay (Address) / f (5igmture) (Address) nature Address Signature 0- (Address) Signature o� 5 L a sQ� .�1 /0 Address Signature �y Address Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip / ev Name - Please Print; W6X' L22 1011 IV Post Office and Zip ) - (game - Please Pr' Post Office and Zip) V.) I W-i AM b l� cot Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - ease Print Post Office and Zip) liz )Z- ) I- L 1- 0 1+1 Name - Please Print) �.3 1 t.� c. - Z Z G a, (Post Office and Zip) Name- Please Print ,5p-,qss-8. pLFa-525,,-f U446.;, AG, --- Post Office an Zip Ae/l,nda Name - Please Print Post Office and lip)/ N �vEzr, Name - Please Print) Z//,rtir w� At (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of thei officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is Unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. . "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's.unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. F ther approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature)-) Address (Signatur ) 25 S-e. t Address Signature z (Address, (Signaturd)� ` CD ; t)a. cly;g, � 1 Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) h eR hA W -�A( , y t ul a. - (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name'-' Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print a'hv A� 7Z,6v ) (Post Office and. Zip) rr ✓N�'N ( i� �•'i E Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip over _ 'Q'•'<•vs +.k "'% 4:% A rt fsF`v i,.. .£.- f� ir, i � t 1i..__ Y�, t,h _ � t 2, `J .c3 2: "Tl.. c. c`..� _ i F� '_ 1 S g nature Address \ \ a Signature aag __;) LL,w,m-,k A0A_ (Ad ess) (Sign 'ure) 1 (Addres Signature '7 (A dress) to etii`, �,, - Signature) Z 04 v Pre, ce s- . 1 d:wth,. da (Address) ignat re T 3 � (Address) Signature Address 010-j A Signature Address Signature ss v (Signature) �/01 7�awhee (Address) G i6 El , F F, Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip _Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) � (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip n �X Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) 4,—f d Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 2- 'n Be, Y_2��a a-1 Name- Please Print i�&O/ Post Office and Zio c• Name. --Please Print Post Office and Z p S . r i C�&_M Name - Please Print r (Post Office and Zip) 1�, P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The.200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined inin the Comprehensive Plan. her approv-41 s off th rrent development plans for Wheatl t . � (Signa re) k 6 N i d ti Address (Signature) � Address a ignature) Address) a&4., Z-,4'1 M C Signature O to Address (Signature) - Address Is are unaccootabl?. �r�-� r Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please.Print U/ 11t(A aex 2 (,/a Post Office and Zip '(Name - Please Print I-t'�-h7d� , Z/z' ?—(", u Post Office and Zip (5ss;& Z- S(AadP_ r 1;o Name - Please Print) &J e-4 Q S4P-Ar. U0 . Post Office and Zip over Y Signature o z v Z A dres Signature A dress) - kz, Signature Ad ess) Sign ture Address) Name - Please Print /I, c�" 61�-. Post Office and Zip :.� 7 — Name - Please Print -� V,=,- --,, zoo Post Office and Zip) Lrr1 d� i3• �)%E�z�(So•� Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip -� 7 �c�6 Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Name - Please Print) D � CAddress)— Post Office and Z'p (Signature) Name - Please Print) C(/6 I , Mo. N16--I (Signature) (Address ) � Signature Address Y9 1;_ Signatur Address Signature (Address) Post Office and Zip) ?� r2V;-(I)C- Mo z - - � - Name - Please Pri t) Lb) �.. U -� Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip / �r/� 6-LL/ate Name - Please Print s1-rf#eA4 d /Ty ; 1 — (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. CN4� C__ 64-)1 (Signature) g,P5 44wU� Address (Signature) 4,-, (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) _;Cidress Post Office and Zip �/, cl-ARF (Signature) (Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature _ Name - Please Print). ss (Signature) Address �4_-�N •/a, ?2�� Post/Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) LIi,G�s�� Post Office and Zip over N L2,i Signature Address (Signature) s-r 4T (Address) Signature Address (Signature) 3o i 7 f'1-4- ,7- W L= , 2v Address H tAcx, /�i✓. _wL Signature Address Signature Vddressf Signature �/i Address Signature (Address) kL- H t✓r42s 45--cee.,e-s&,eWx . Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip rFt4 L-pA E-. L,9/ f12 Name -`Please Print T Post Office and Zip ?444 ieiA 14- V *ter Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office // and Zip (Name - Please Print) 2—L6 c% Post Office and Zip 2C_=e IF L/g Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- P ease Print Post Office. and Zip 6-a 1 �' (Name,' --Please Print l Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) 1S PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the evelopment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints. placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( 1gnaturP) '(Address) (Signature) o +"ss c� (Address) ('Signature o/ 4/1 dress Signature (Address) w M (Signaturfl Address 16/� % 1—� /-%iv (Name - Please Print) Post Office andZip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip /f ( me - Please P int Post Offi e and Zip) Name -'Please Print _ yn - i90c-- . aa/'oi Post Office and Zip . R (Name'- Please Print l W , T I,—' ' ' Post Office and Zip over YZ4�z�Z5��L Signat re L/a`f SvPeRieRt ST, (Address) Signature aq S - (Address) Signature � /,,::;; � -Z - kzz 14 (Address) �i vzs-�C),/-,// Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip )96,1T2,cC �otE� Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) tj 4 M C,-- J�a / l--- �1 4yF . Name - Pleas Print) -A A , Ca Post Office and Zip ZC*. - U � 0./- - .. -:N-Ar- I< -rig y C, r I Sig ature Name - Plea a Print 3033 CLQRr- 1^t M fr wChP_,�kr Address) (Post Office and Zip) L4.0 ho 0.0 iv r e Z o �""� e t S Signature Name P Please Print) ddres gnature Ln Add Signat e L,�j #432 Address (Address) Post Office and Zip uJ"5 Name - Please Print AIC-l•�zsfe-5-- vn moo 1 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Via nee- Pleas Print Post Office and io C �G/ Name -"Please Print Post Office and Zip TA Poettre;,* Name - Please Print) • lJ 4� (Post Office an Zip) S PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the -current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. i?/V- /Vieev�I Signature) (Name - Please Print) 2a3 /3EFchc-r1>>' 1/ Z 2�v1 (Address) Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name-- Please Print) F (Address) ' CU � (Sign` t�u� (Address) ignature Address (Signature) - Address \ Post Office and Zip lrv//_nX .P ,4 z9-z a C-,OA (Name - Please Print Z Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip .; � S 1��4__ c_�� N,Ome - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature ) Address _Qd Signature (Address) (Signature) Address n A��O_z Signat e ( ddress). (Signature) 4� "y ' �-�_ Address / -10K Signature (Address) Signature Add ess her Signature ress Signature Address �^ ature I Namd - Please Print &)_G��s - Post Office and Zip J o[ C E /, Pl/ill (Name'- Please Print /���l�ejffP. LAP, . �•�Go/ (Post Office acid Zip) ,30h.1$ t"Y7, 73gyro w le7 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) o Post Office and T p /U Caz;�/ Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name'-'- Please Print /Il 1 C, ��� r, Y� Z Post Office andZip) Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) I) i /' h e y 4e Y,,� . (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. .it- C 0 � (Signature) (Address) j Signature/' Address c (Signature) b _v r c=LL�a D . Address (Signature) 3 6-1 U'sS Cu. caOP_� Addre s (S gr'ature) Z_4 �/ xi 2 4 5 ,l / --� 4 (Address) (Name - Please Print) r� Post Office and Zip) X (Name - Please Print) e' 15ecZ Post Office and Zip W4M J' 76 Qa1,V (Name - Please.Print) �.2.66 (Post Office acid Zip) L v (S03 Name - Please Print 2-a-7 - .9 LA_.3fCZ-< C Post Offce and. Zip r � Name - Pleise Print) 1 _7',�-4 Ap A Post Office"and Zip over Signature a Eat A4t-0 &),I,J Sy A dr ss) (Signature) ya98h�ceaF7 A6 (Address) o . S i g n a 44 (Address) AhOLAA�f �, Pot U�4PA--, (Signature) 94 ZZ-�o (Address/) Signa ure) 1 ssell roff Address Signature PI Address r Signature Address (Si gnatur Ad dress Signature yz-L( (Addy s) MaRlkgAIN l cRnJ-D2V P /��Name - Please Print) w-IA&La&, 22�-(o 0 Post Office and Zi Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print CiIIAIC. o22do/ Post Office and Zip Name - Please Prin u,h eke st2Y a a Gal (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 0'o, p I S-, -D a Atr (Name-- Please Print) f 14. Russeflo-?- Rd. Post Office and Zip) 'Name - Please Print) (Post fice and Zip C7/ go Name- Please Pr nt Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip /qra ' P W 1- I a- C Y e- (Name - Please Print) t J � ]a C - V,4z 1 (Post Office and Zip) 1 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of t1'e current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. . i (Signature) Addres ) (Signature) Ad e s (Signature) uTC-c S �� Address) Signature 2 z �Aqdress) �, At Signature) pt- do ON 0-7 Address (Name -'Please Print) Al/e_5 Post Office and ip j (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip S, p �- Name - P ease Print UA , Post Office anb Zip) Name - Please Print ) "4-4 e,,14r. - Z '?-_Gai Post Office and. Zip ,11eu Y. IxI ram. (Name J Please Print) Post Office and Zip over V#MIA I �► • iems,. �� r3w ress Signature) (Address C: Signature S�//cz S i Z) ' 7 /z (Address) Signature (Address) gnature Addr ss j Signat e 6 U Address _ja ll-e�e .� e- Signature ®l41442 err Address Signature 9 6 ? 9 o� Gl'- � 7zu. C4; (Address" Signature Address c Ursignature) (Address) (Name - Please Print �nc�cS , ZZGo1 (Post Office anddJ Zip) Name - P1 Iase Print Post Office and Zip ZK'uhI(� C- AA001VI Name - Please Print) e H e S7t VA 6a-j o Post Office an/d' /Zip _ i N ,U / e GCS Name - Please Print I I )tiL �e,/6,/ (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) W : , , A ,..g � l,- V a- ; l�n� Post Office and Z'p J/�� Name - Please Print r / i ltlG Lt /L Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip // (Name- Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print Post Office and .Zip) Name - Please Print M. w V� _T 2 L Goo (Post .Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick.County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of.thelcurrent development plans for Wheatlands are -unacceptable. 77P', -If, "14JI l� (Sig-n`aiure) 70 Address (Signature) Add _ess Signature) z L C_-- Address (cSignature) Address (Signature) (Address)� (Name - Please 'Print) AU7,4 ' Post Office and Zip) ( ame Please Print)✓ Post Office and Zi Name - Please.Print) 41 Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print), Post Office and Zip over Signature 3a. IF-, P'�cC_. •Addre s) (Signature Md -Oess A--"' 6t') Signature 703 (Address) Signature �d A dress ✓� Signature Address � Signature 1AV Address Signature --P, �T"'/ dddrocc Signature 'iv (Name - Please Print �,�,• j ,�/ �_ 1 it ?i ; r t' - Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print ;•� Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) - Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) -- Post Office - and Zip Name - Please Print .— _ V/ln1<-l1 Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print tj D i5 /\/, /� /`' 1 .S i . Post Office and Zip !: /i ivy " j (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print �- (Address) (Post Office and Zip) We, the undersigned citizens of deeply concerned about the plans willingness of the officials of of development in our community. PETITION Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals f the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 7'Y 7 Address (Signatur Address (Si ature) 5 i -n-rf ✓ S t- 0r 't Address , (Si nature) � 0 � Address �__,U a4k'- / (Signature) '(Address)„liLL v�'L Jac(,. - (Name - Please Print) �K�� f�� Ala. aa-•� 6 Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip . over Signature -f-s5x 34 Addres �21��� ,,�L�j - Signature (Address) Signature (Address) _ �y- (Signature) d r )" (Signa re Address Si ature 6cx 27�� Address Signature 27 Addre s Signa re gnature Address Signa re (Address) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Ullw6 tt-E S R. V, - Z� 6 U t (Post Office and 'Zip) _,1` _ •� Name - Please Print Wi EST—f Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and deeply concerned about the plans for the development willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED the following issues are resolved: j.L. Winchester, Virginia,-.ar?,, of Wheatl ands, and` -the" apparent the developer` eter:ijine the scope ON THE WHEATLANDS�PROJECT until "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the "Access -As currently planned, will create significant is unacceptable. dam are acceptable. transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral" - -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ret� r approvals of e curren development lans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. � 1 o N i4 D o S c A) ignaa e) Name - Please Print) 0 4 Address Post Office and Zip) i. 00- MRW (Address) Signature Address (Signature) �Par1 M , Mar*w5od (Name - Pl ease Pri nt,)r W V ct Post Office and Z p (Name - Please .Print) LW �_ A a Post Office a d Zip Name - Please Print ,Post Office and Zip). Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip over Signature Address Signature (Address) Signature).- u>E �k a'i Signature (Address) (Signature) Address Signature Address Signature /moo S7v42 r Address Signature /d�Cl v0Z,70, 4vkt/I.4�4, Address Y � � Signature 3, 6X / Address C&.'C-x R--� g4'4� - Signature) ,?/�C'/',-, f3/'/6�'-, (Name - Please Print /,// iv a4a &n r V,,q- ;2 26 d 1 (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip - Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip �a �r F P13t/L Name - Please Print wl.�c VA- Post Office and Zip) qV< 6 6. bEAi4A,.r Name - Please Print ZZGo/ (Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -"Please Print V,5f- 22 r, 0 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) -P E T I T I 0 N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia,.are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. - "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthe approvals of the current development plans for Whe/atlla�nds are unacceptable. ignature) (Name - Please Print) C::� Address � (Signature ate( 5 1c2c,� Rc" (Address) (Signatur ZZZZ G e.CMI-J Ftta L b 2b. Addres LA _ Z2� � Sig to Address Y�,V� (Signature) ,52FrA( 12,�, Address Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) a+' w Post Office and Zip (Name.- Please -Print) w -44 L--5 -T- c-d— " V �- ZZL It, Post Office and Zip) N e A 1a se P ' nt, .4�v Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Address Sign u e 2f �kl33, w _ (Address) (Signature (Address) ar-, �— 0 4 Signature S -1LL'i (Addre ) Signature ress gnature WIMMAWRAWMAM Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Gc Name - P ase Print 0 -k V, Gk-e�s4L-cr �P, . ZZG o l (Post Office and Zip) / / /��/,/, /� - � / `L-� 'v Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Po tt/ Office and Zip) R Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 1.Z4V A ke- Name- Please Print Post OffA ce and -Zip) Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature (Address) —7Namb Please Print V7 %w ' , �' 4� (Post Office and Zip) 2va B PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for -the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthe approva of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. LLtSS�4 \on��L�oJ ( gnatI _(Name - Please Print) tHaaress) 2� 3 60X (Signature vU ` Address (Signature) 22Co O ( Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip ULd t dLA_V� Name - Please Print ost Office hand. Zip AWXL5X �. Name - Please Print) 2�Mffic�Post Zip over ISign`ature) (Ad res QQ(Signature) l7e,4 o/��o,�C�'r Address (Signature) z474 o(d ForeS+ Girth (Address) Signature 6y 3 3ace� v h n Address Signature _ Address (Signature). n1 L , 3 o LI Name - Please Print 2/ Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) / Name - Please Print) tv,hc4sl`� �60/ (Post Office and Zip MG•r QrGf � • �� c �r��o Nam - Please Print W i n c, („ems et,- , VA z z 6 0 Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Address) Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness'of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 -.2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth r approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable G/1 �X . CKI4R� F i0tGL Signature) (Name - Please Print) .331/S .Jo in s A0JKl lucNEs r�,2 VA- Addres///s) Post Office and Zip) �,/({�\/� (Signature) (Name - Please Print.) Uq z6o 1 Address Post Office and Zip Name - Please _Print) Signa re ' - Address Signature Address 4�� �9,0_z� (Signature) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) Address `'4` Post Office and Zip over Name - Please Print vh- 1 Post Office dnd Zip Name - Please Print U y ,;;7-3 Add ess) Post Office and Zip) r (Signature) Name - Please Print Address (Post Office and Zip lc% . Signature 92, 3 43 &Y-,, -2 33 lj --(Address) - -(Address) T (Signature) Ad re(ss C Ln Signature -2 o ids Fo-,-r5 Address Signature Address Signature Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please PrMt) Post Office and Zip 2 i L-a� C. CC Ee (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name -DEE Please Print) U) i Aj G C+(- r s 7SIL A �1C o Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and'Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in part.i.cular streams and groundwater. . "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signa re)- `nAddressl' / (Signature) 16 ,Q-1 Address (Signature) Address _. Signature Address ��rxd nie�Q.1 (Signature) 18 Add ess anci r (Name - Please Print) w l es V ai-(o/ Post Office andtip) ufAiz.t� �- �i DrL� (Name - Please Print) i A.C/f�.lAk - U/& Z-Z6 U Post Office and Zi _? �[ -L Name /- Please -Pri n ) �/•`/! Ut.-ems 1� l� � U Post Office a d Zip Name - Please Print G,/" ^v en -A -I _ �2_ �?-6 Post Office and Zip :D gd o a M �FAA� AND Name - Please Print lea. a Z 4.o ) Post Office and Zip over G�/!x QiYI Signature 0 2- a Address (�2 Sign ur (Address) (Sig atature) Ad ss Signature 2 7/S- Old FieSi C,l Address O Sign ure Address Signature Address SWhature 115z (Address) Si to 2 (Address) Z-Z(ao 1 She'rul meF5raRlpNoe Name - Please Print (Q- a d Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip •97 S'n/A PD Name - Please Print (Post Office a d Zip) Name - Please Print Vi 41 f<EST�•�°, !/jl ao2lo lJ� Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Xa,0—L1 IAI*S Name Please Print 22d-01 Post Office and Zip �i Name - Please Print LJO►NClesTe2 . ro, aa601 (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns'as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlan s are unaccceotahle. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office - and. Zip) _T b Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Si ature Address Si ature 1 � � RUMV4 Address Signature Address) Qk" S anature Address AM*w?, lm'71" offl, F. Ars v - o aaressIL2 U ignatui Zl� (lam D l a } o , C) c® Address (Signature) (Address) .T Name - Please Print 1�111,414�c-7>�- 2--L-4 0 � (Pos ffice and Zip) Name - Please Print &C' dsfo' (Post Office and ip) a 0� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi Name - Please Print I.r.��Q��RI (Post Offices and Zip) 7a h I[. I6-Me Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office an ip) V� Name - Plea a Print) VAR Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) -Nam - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as ydefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further a pr 1 of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) /3 ax (Address) I, S�,b, 44 SigaA lj� nature) U Address (Signature) Address Signatr6re A�2. y, 1-3oX'1219y (Address) f d� ignature) Address (Name - Please Print) S7—pp 4xe C — Post Office and p) 010,g011,0,_ <- bt .11 (Name = Please Print) UJ;��h����� Post Office and Zip (Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip rA Name - P ease, Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature 035"4 S-1bnf-JorwIc 2� .Address r 4�r 193 Address �O3 gi n ICY l !/ (Address) e4 le2& V� (Signature) Address _ ,2, 30 7 c�pi gn Am, , V,4. a,7rvc)/ C�P_� gn ature) Address Signature Ad ..ss gnature Name - Please Print i noes-�e�- as L d Post Office and ZipF Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip zoaQnn 'kl vye - Name - Pleale Print Post Office and Zip 4/ 7, 42 (Name'- Please Print '(Post Office and Zip)- Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip l Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Address) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned,density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has -been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current_development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Name - Please Print) �— ess (Signature) Address Signature Post Offi andZip) 5���5 ✓C "— 5Z, —,,— (Name - Please Print) '(PostOfficeand Zip) / (Name - Please .Print) Post Office and Zip /Vo Name - Please Print) W 1'..s LI/t a--> t o / Post Office and.Zip 73-0 6�i V (Name - Please Print) ZZ 6© . Post Office and Zip over Ar (Signature) 3C , Address) Signature (Address (c r--� C—) c a /-YA �7�((Signature) I t-t 3 B010 _aW (Address) y� o , Signature) 4f � / 2 �a (AddresW (Signature) r2D (Address) Signature Dr: 1,61;Neleele r Address Name - Please Print VA- ILLO Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and / �Na�me� p- Please Print Post Office and Zip w.'//.44M /F.. 0 Vis (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) e)3,^yAkj 4L 0,!20.,.nA0^ Name//L Please Print) V,+ Z ZOO' Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) , /_ rh J G (Name - lease Print Post Office and Zip s- Signature Name- Pl se Print Address Post Office and Z' Z=4ztle e A) 25_-Le-4,- Signature Address (Signature �3 N ��re,e��ield C� A) gr/4 Name - Please Print Gf�iN 22�0/ Post Office and Zip r 'LOU RU165 Name j Please Print ti� � r c In es��` Sabo I (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral- -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address e�)� G� (4ddr„ss / /-7 'gnature) Address Ce,:) S i g n a t u e Address (Signature) (Address) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please .Print) Post/ Office and Zip C h o le4 0,5 C v 1Z T ~-- Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature) Address Signature —� (Ad ress) 1N'4'r'4) OA j��d -) (Signature) 2lvC� ! 'VD1Ieri Ct (Address) Signature. (Address) d� (� ig` ature) , 37S0-C1, -jd eME/LL ,D ddress e (Si_gnatu / 1 (AddressY- 5 (Si gna u e Addres ) Sig to .d Address ,(Signature -yyo/ Address re If (Signature) �t. 3 Avax /aV 3 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip ,gIo, Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) z%/VDA )-/c/jolo (Name - Please Print) witg sk_r Z26 o � Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - PTease Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please print 'N"'-yy� 'r/ Post OffXce and Zip) Name - Please Print C4/ M VIC ff 9S'7 4 V'/�-- z— (Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print ZZ6 s3 (Poft Office and Zi L- / A./ GC eR A' . Art (Name - Please Print) Z.Z-d rs` P t.Office an Zip elv xt lox Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined inin the Comprehensive Plan. Further prov is of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. .011 (Signature) Address Y./ Signature .3 Q OV 3&-o '^> � . Ad s (Signature) (Address) (Signature) 2 Address Signature) Address s� f (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip �. r �a y (Name - Please Print) ZZCo (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over, K lou X. wL Signature Name - Please Print 2 3 [3op / �, Address Signature (AddJrreess) O Signature �73 dra4iez& (Address) Signature (Address) (Signature "JZ3 333 b.) Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature 47` 4d x &/.`-Ic (Add ess �Qgnature) & fMW Address 641r_� A411tIt"& Signature /,4w gA (Address) WJ,�.O►es��- V� a,a (moo c Post Office and Zip c� Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name_- Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the devel-opment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800-,20,00 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As _currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. S* tgre s (Name - Please Print) a36.3 J4,a4-A ZA - (Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature) Name Please -Print) Address Post Office and Zip kg l - Signature Name - Please Print &x Wig. ld 2-2&0/ _ 1 Addre s Post Office and..Zip) (ISignature) Name - Please Print) Address - Post Office '"d Zip over &, 1A (Signature) Rf 3 R0It- 2 t 1-A- L-J ✓w C . �•� Zz w l (Address) 62A�� d. Signature Addresss)) Signature (Add re s) Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) - Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 5 /C�- d�� (Add J (Post Office a�d Zip) (Signature) Name - Please Print) C Addr ss Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print 33l�- , Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip i Si ature R -3 L ,• Address (Signatur47 Address Signature Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. e NA La,4_1 (Signature) Post , 01Z, �_e &k I q_3 WXA� (Address)W r Signature) Q Address (Signature) Address )<. 4W Signature e.VP3 p� Address A, Signature Address ad�el N,4NN 1. N epe-� (Name - Please Print) LJ,hcA es 4-, U4 z-;, Post Office and Zip) 1, (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please _Print Post Office and Zip K. i4,4 a 4s Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Signature f o /0 -7- t c ) Address e-, Av_,q,,z,5 (Signature) f B o Asa / Address �/ �ri� C• ��e� • Signature �� LaJi.v�v y Joz 35d ✓•q. (Address) �f Z io d .2-3%-r Address r ignature) Address A4i vi, 4�f� Signature (Address) Signature (Address) cr (Signature) 5"'r / zfl'Ll� Address Z. Signature 6nz moo/ . (k. Name - Please Print &)/ /) A e,57 P^C Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lalke which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in -the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvalsofthe ,rent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signature) Address ignat'ure) Al �y�Q*_5 �>s<-- - Address Ile r„0A r �e�s% (Name - Please Print) ihciieS ter' . 2aG61 Post Office and Zip) Johrl -. Wesf (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip �o�h Ves z� (Name - P1 se_Print) Post Office and Z p) Name - Please Print CMZTU.n .-aaba5 Post Office and. Zip Je 5 (Name - PleasePrint) ! '� c s .e ✓Ile, I ; -G 0 < Post Office and Zip over Signature Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip 'gnature Name - Please Print . ,23 /,t/t ,.t4�-1, 1,/A Z7,ce f (Add r s) (Post Office and Zip) Signature) Name - Please Print Address) ' Post Office and Zip Si nature Name -'Please Print (Post Office and Zip (P(Address) Signature Name - Please Print) 2- /Ae ddress Post Office and Zip Signature ��JZn��E4 Name - Please Print c Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print p� Addr s Post Office and Zip Signatu Name- Please Print 3//19- �tLc, Addre s Post Office and Zip Signature Name --Please Print lz�- 3 ,�3oXi27�J �,Jc A//d-�dress Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as -to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about.the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ! d. __ - (Signature) (Address) (Signature) � 0 l g 3 LL) Address Signature) - - 4-fk G�.�..►� �_ , Address Signature /00 A(f (Signature) 3 3 T G Address Name - Please ,/Print) N s U Post Office and Zip) (Name --Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please -Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over EM Signature n e. T1. o ✓ e- es A Signature (Address) ,Q (Signature) rr4 (Address) Signature (Address) (Signature) A - ss gnature 3 3 S 7 Address - n, c (Signature) 3�f Address (Signature) 0 Address e Signature %Addr (Signature) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip II , Name - Please Print &�— ¢' x C3o q 2 3 A- WMw e) 7� / Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION. We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will.create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. - "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral, -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) )/ Address ignatur ddress Signat ) (Me s Si ture d ss Si�e Address Name - Pleas.e Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (,�W Office and Zip) Name - Please.Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) / >-;?�o Post Office and Zip over - Signatur Address 60 fit; k aiA Name - Please Pri 2aL4a Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zi se � Name --Please P int (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) /Z/ 3 & A Z vv/N�C�1T Address) Post Office and Zip 17 Signature _ Name - Please Pri Addres � , (Signature) — Z-vt—, / / ® %?,o Addre Sig ure Address .(Signat e) (Address) k: gam 1-2� 3 Post Office and Z'p / Name- Please _Pr i Post Office and Zip t ,-� U S,:�),. Nam - Please Print Post Offic and Zip GU (Nam - Please Print) .(Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns_as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the.constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further p oval o the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (1c) PN H. Dvr0- nature) n� e�N Address RrP_VUI- CJG 0eS (Signature) Address 72 (Si nat re) 51 (Signature). Ci3Z,4 G,f 3 u 7 3 (Signat-Xe) Address (Name - Please Print) s Post Office and Zi//p--)jj / �// I/ �OX 32 (W1/)C/, 13ie�-Vc 2Z6J/ (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please -Print Post Offices and Zip 6 A P45WAJ/,U 4,04J Na e - Please Print <,cJov� 14 2 Z,6- 0 Post Office and. Zip sRe"9 11e .� Name - Please P int) 3_-_� SS-_ _T7,k/0s ,-� Post Office and Zip over 12, gnature Name - Please Print 1. 3 a '- Z oo —4 (Address) Signature (Ad ) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature dress ( ignatur LSS (Address) Signature Q-A3s s Address Signature Address Signature ` .� M Y Ad ress Signature l,v c !-(Es TA 2 . 2 Z� p l Post Office and Zip "Zi-'Itwal . -1 ; "a Name - Please.Print Post Office and Zip J6pro W, C�-RRk Name - Please Print` w,, Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) r#.4,ez4S Y- IIA,-,4N Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi Name - Please _Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) /� Post Office and Zip AS ? n ergo Name- Please Print Post Office and'Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip L>, U r i -e L.) • f ) -e Name - Please Print VA- 1-2&oY (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P-ETITI0N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the evelopment-of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised i_n exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently•planned, will create signi:f.icant.transportation problems in both Frederick,.' and Clarke County. "Services -As curr'er&lyVplanned, we have grave db66ts as ;o the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment,`'in particular streams and groundwater. _ v "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary"edu ational facilities. "Moral � -We further haM grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since�.it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current dev2-1 o"en plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signature) A dress (Signature) If 4-4 Address Signature &;� .3 / -W%;�. ddress L Signature) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) 0a r Post Office a d .Zip S 4 e %n � C� o /1/�4• /� Name --Please Print) (707- S-&� - ��c W_ (Add a s) 7 ,0 a"L (Sign re 3 BaX /1,�3 )� Address Signature Address Signature MI c� a e Name - Please Print 54- 6 ktj CJyz�SS" P st Office 6n8 Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and M 4-r-4- (Namer- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print w Lnc.ke-s4,-, A ZZG ° (Post Office and Zip Name -, Please l Print)�41_ LJigc�a574 h Post Office and Zip (Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 4? - It. bgy, SU I-- cAJ--A-I— VC_ J. Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name- Please Print Address Post Office and Zip) (,Sign ture Name --Please Print 4 3Y 2- Address Post Office and Zip ate%- � (?L.rrl.ci►vo.��. � � �� ! � �� / BSI U . Signature Name - Please Print (Address) Rt.3 Boic c2,6 Y--A-, -will i-25tu1 VE— (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. F14rther approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) .n Address _n We -a Signature Address �h Cyr (Signature) 20 6.x (a 9 25 A. Address (Na �e - Please Print) Post Office and Zip /51. (Name.- Please Print) Post Office and Zi ( Name - Please -Print) oi� ,o _ V% . a a (a a4 (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -._Please Print) P'st Office and Zip over r i '��igna re Name - Please Print G so AddCesg Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Q (Ald eldz� Post Office and Zip r /.//, - _ Signat# re Name - Please Print) ress 7- '(Signatur Address ignature /)9d cY%�(JA Address S' ature (Address) Signat re Post 'Office and Zip ;'h< Name —Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print). t (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 0&01 I3 f- bC., IC VAi .�I �)6y (Post Office and Zip) Dr-- / -S t/ Fi c:> C :y :_� Name- M ease Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Pl ease-iPri nt Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post.Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development.in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since i.t lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 1L-t, r BYO )ql�- �Y Address (Signature) Addr ss Signature) Address Si ure) 22 �; C'c Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over G L t-, /Signature ' Na e - Please Print / Address Post Office and Zip gna ure Name - Please Print (Address) Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print •Z- !Z 3 7 ,(Address) Signature , Addres )- (Signature) X�yd A- 44Y� Addre s Signature (Address) Signature q/1 5a Q i�; :�nr 6' to V 22Lo I Address eL CIL Signature Addres / y Signature (Address) Si nature Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -*Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of`the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptahle. In (Signature) A dress) (Signature) -Add ss �-�- 1 o o ignature) "o (- -! Z) ,r w ► .v C Address &04 Signature 4-a Address (Signature) & - � r"n Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office aa)n/d Zip) 14 (Name - Please Print) Zo Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and_Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature Address C cam. i� /y�•� vr� �:� Signature J-3& (Address) (Signature) (Address) ce,4 , //-4t/� Signature ( re s s Address -,e Signature Illkll2s (Address Signature M I dress Name - Please Print L,> Z, Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print.) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -Please Print Post Office and Zip (Signatu Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMr1EDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 hou$;es promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access " • -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. far (Signature) tl-v Address ?,Ignatur ) Ad rriss '1 p (Signature' 1 Add ss) (21gnature) a (AddresK) (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) F 1 (Name _ Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print). Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature ddresst / (Signature) f Address) Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print ( dress)' Si ture) dress 0 Signatu rol %�� .3%3 �r�ir-►�z Address Signature Address Signature P Address Signature)/a ddress gnature (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater.. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further appro is of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address. 14S! qln ature Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print .5b 7 64t. Ed, .44%ell & (Address) Post Office and Zip (Signature) Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over zz!!C�/=z ee��, ev Signature Address Signature Address) ax, 2; �. �S7ignature tj Address Signature (Address) Signature) s S-' (Ad re / Signature)Q 1 K� (Addres Sign ure Address Signature Address 11,4 a4j�. Signature o I I can. I?tj - (Address) Signature �5 tL loY ". (Address)'" tir Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name"- Please Print -Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints - placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further pprovals of he current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature). (Name - Please Print) Addressf ,, Post Office and Zip) 4Z (Signature) , (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip 11.-2 fl_456 Ouzkw ,A ci&� Signature (Name - Pleaserint) Address ^ G� Signature _ Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print lP,q 7 or/rice and [;py (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Signatu (Address) Si " ature �67 A dres c . ignature T (Address) Signature �P Address -�/ (Signature) (Address) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) �� to Name/- Please Print) �% (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Printer ) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY,DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furip er approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature) // (Address) � �p (Signatur ) (Address) r�I i b Signature) �� Addres Address k (Signature) W? - Address rd (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over , i , (Signature) SO-7 Address Si ature (Address) Signature ► . 4! �_� a Address (Signaturdj & 23 :2 (Address Signature r Address 2 Signature G (/ '� Address G . -171i Signature Address Signature 7z4,k A<, LIAX. Sow Name - Please. Print VA ZZCo o � Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -"Please Print Post Office and Zip Name m Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment,•in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave -moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. .{ (Signature) Address (Signature /4/f5 vc 0 Address Signature) 2 02 (Address) Signature Address �• ti GTiv1/r�o (Signature) Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over WOUX� ..L M�� Q.0 gQ2-165'z W,►v e. Address Al IN , Signature �`�o ��P.r�Ldo � � v✓ (Address) ignature (Address) X- Signature (Address ) - (Signature) Signature Address gnature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent. willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses -is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further, have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also -have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. MpprovaCllss�.o�f the urrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Si.gnature) Name - Please Print) r .4f R Signature Address ignature) Addres-s ^ -P� (Si nature);2 � Addre \ _ Signature) dr V„ over Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name -.Please Print Post. Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip � I � A dress Signature (Address) - (Signature) Addr s Signature Address \ Signature 3-12 ress gnazu (Address) 6Za_,A,r,zf-�� Signature (Address) z Signature t* S� Name - P1 ase Print Post Office and Zip) n A-k-q ow Qi- �►r e v A Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -"Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. . -We also have grave concerns about 4he County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Li6 169&v ignature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print) 716 A-Af4P__^--\ P ) �� Address Post Office and Zip (SigntXure) Address Si nature) + C— if uc q� Address Signature Name - Please -Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print y Post Office and.Zip Name Please Print Add ess -- Post Office and Zip over eS gnature (Addressl 1 Signature Address t &2L Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print ,-757 C� -Jr. Addr s Post Office and Zip , Signature Name - Please Print (Add ss) (Post Office and Zip) Si nature) (Name - Please Print) 7 , c A ress „ Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please.Print Addres ) Post Office and Zip) gnature Name - Please Print ice, rx �!1 Lwzt (Ad ss) Post Office and Zip •5 ' 9�VU 10/_ Name- Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print /v a i�9-3 G�wy,G�¢�-kf VQ (Address) Post Office and Zip e.✓ Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply -concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the urrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. , AZ7�� i (Signature) O i Address ( ignature d Addr�e.ss W Signature) Addres Signature (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Signature a 4, A dress Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature Signature) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print). Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print `1 Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITI`0N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatiands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are.resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. . "Schools -As currently.planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also hVa grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, sincejit lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ' . Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Signature) (Signature) Address Signature 9/ 7 S Address Signature �. Address Post Office and Zip `G Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip h over Signa re Name - Please Print Post Office' and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) Post Office and Zip) Si nat re Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip 4 CAM Signature Name - Please Print t ( ZZ2b/o' (Address)- (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Name Please Print) b s- Address E c)j Post Office and Zip Sig ature _ Name - Please Print (Address) ) Post Office and Zip) Signature Address Signature Address a Signature Address — ` (Signature) (Address) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We°also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. -�'Y" W"mr-r,� (Signature) Address (Signature) 5Z�IR, r L ) Address Signatur 0, Address Signature Address n O tt' z k gnature S 7�%oil lLa!" Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over U -i kA I P, 40 2,D LI U_. Signature Name - Please Print 6-C J+ct.1L .Address Sig ature 308 RIDG6 IZr)At� , WINCNEJTEIZ (Address) ' Signature) (Address) S gnature Z (fAdddres (Signature) - Addr ss i nature (Signature) 310 Cv-A� (Add re s _�. ignature ddress Signature 2250�Edkkz Add ss G"e Signature �O V * 1)r (Address) Z Z.lpv Post Office and Zip ,S7U^r-t Y. EuoR. Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange.for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools-As.currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further p r als f t ent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. i re) Name - Please Print) Address Signature A dress (Signature) Address J Sig ature Wl, ..4 a A.L"i Ad s `1�7a ��rr Address Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over 1% k Addres C Signature (Signat re) Di Address Signature 0.11 (Address) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. rther ap vale of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable 30 v4.,Sn iture) r4� Name - Please Print) h ��7--e r Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip a (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Sig ure Name - Please Print z Address Post Office and.Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip over LNG, (Address) rL IcZ+� (Signature) (Signat re (Ad ress) Signature In "Avt WIN_.Ji,i . IL Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester;.Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. . "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further aopfovjls ff the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (� `( ignature) Address Address Z27 0 Si nature) Address Signature T 8 19OX 44 4 YYGa / Address r Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) k i Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over i bA�� ey" ✓V . Signature Addr s Signature Address) Signature ( Wiatur , e -S . .Address Signatur Pf.V $4- d Y,d. Address ,. (Signature E-THE HE,1�77'y Name - Please Print V /1 a ,=� 6 6 � Post Office and ip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) ' Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in t a Comprehensive Plan. F rt e p oval of he urr nt d velopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptably. T FL- --/��7 Signatu _) (Name - Please Print) o c � sT�i� Address Post Office and Zip JJ1 r, I 1 gnaf ure (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip lui_ 0 (Signature)�(� (Name - Please Print) �1J1i,. Uq,� Co U A re Post Office and Zip U� Signature Name - Please Print IL dress Signature) PAX a J Cy n c, . V� Address Post Office QQand. Zi p % n c) n. /Jai /F,(/ Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Lc�. LSignature( -Name - Please Print s Address Post Office and Zip Ev r 'J , , Gt_ `-) Signature Name - Please Print OJo' <i % P� `j /t,, PQ7l�a Address Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please rint 1 43(,�, e Address) 7Z(Post Office and Zip) (Signature Name - Please Print Ad ress• Post Office and Zip (Signature) ' Address Signature lel q lU Address Signature /qT 'S, & jc 253 4,i,vcXesn4t C(A dre s) Signature R� q �o- �C I �� �G Address (Signat re Name - Please Print i Post Office and Zip S --2 s Name - Please Print Post Office an_d Zip s.ot3Er4T•-i/Zi9y s� (Name- Please Print 60� PE0, t Office and Zip) bo U Name -'Please Print Post Office rr and Zip OC Ltdm YV� e-t5 c Name - Please Print da Ch,,--) 1, I (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the develooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further apprq�a)ls of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ignature r�. e��c_r�. Name 4Please Print) (Agoire ss) Post Office and Zip) �� vV ;) (Signature) Address L " GZw / (Signature) Address (Signature ' gAlddress Y` Signature) Address (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 4�1e,vxv t� , // 4 ti?,S Post Office and Zip A4 A4 (i i A- e y (Name - Please P int ost Office and. Zip,� / ame - Please Print Post Office and Zip over f Signature ✓ Address Signature Addres ) (Signaturef- �2 (Address) 9,,� � ; T(Signature) (Address) (Signature' / Address M,W.D* Signature 5 x y Addresss) Signature (Address) Signature Address Sig ure , /G./// .Tl Name -.Please Print 1, C, (),+: Z2_�c_-.ei Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 44. Name - Please Print Post Office 4ndZip) ,y Y '64 1 d, 4 i/ Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) / C,- i 4L V Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip e rayMager s Name - Ple se Print Post Office and Zip Xdkfvi Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print f{'% Z 13 Address Post Office and Zip (SignaVp6) Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur her approvals of he Curren development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature (Name - Please Print) Address( Post Office and. Zip �(Si gnatyx`e ) Name -/Pl ease -Print) r/ Address Post Office and Zi �' F' /1! Si(ja ure) i Name - Please Print (-Address) Signature) cG wo .(Address) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Z'p h Name - Please Print) 'yllt N C Z2�e) Post Office and Zip over ignature Ws-. J;ey, (Address) Signs ure (Address) Signature (Addre ) Signature (Address) r � `V r 7, IV Si ature) //4�2? �'r L9 (Address) (Signature) Address )-, CL 1�t� a _�, _. Q 6 V"1�Cj.C�C� Si at r. ddress %1 Signature M /Q'r l/v G�zr'�• Address Signature 3 FS, J(Ad /ress Signature IP72,A,, 91�y A, VI A Ah, 0, nZ (Name - Please Print W ( il (Ae-3 +-e-Y Va Post Office and Zip 17t 6�� (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip G (Name - Please Print (Post Office andZip) / RI + - � / /(ZY}-v! / G h Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip G 3 $- 9 0 13 v` Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip ' ��boco ob�c�5o� Name• Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. ."Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have -grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of: he current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ,Al (Signature) X,�f (Address) <41- J . Z �- Signa ure i Address Si 9r�ature ) Address Signature .(Address) C Signature) (Address) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 4u . / C � ex /Ci' Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip r �7 Name - P ease Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature) .Address ' Signature i �-- (Address) r Signature �J b 0 Address Signature d igc' (Address) L ignature 34 L (Address)^ Signature Address Signature '51b, , Add ess r ke;, Signature G r' Address Signature (Address Z��i U , Signature yzv� .. (Address) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip IcId Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip, Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) U, 4 1 t I� f` Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) T c,e. C . —So Na e - Please P int) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) S Cv L L l Q-A,-Iv Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip f LH Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent_ willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density-Current.planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. S Ynature) Address Signature Q !� O Address Si nature) Address Signature Address n Z (Signature) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip N me - Ple se Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) dress (Signature) (Address) Signature Address 104>� 4- .�ft-t Signature r-Y q A64")( J` ILL c, (Address) (Signature) 5LIMflN Ofutan , W1 nc'he.4Cr (Address) `� (Signature) lf, Address Si,gnature 461- e,�2w�,, Address Signature C;or,-, r Address ignature / Address 1 a Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 04r i �D Pe--2 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip / / VJ Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Oeb,,e,Q/, Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) L 7"� .4. Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zio JEVe9J I It n B. Name --Pjkase Print � O Post Of icd a d Zip Name - Please Print 1-� G 3 [e (33 i% (Q 4 (Address) f (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access _ -As currently planned, will 'create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. • "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthey a; , ;i approval ofx1th9m rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. %f U Signat` re) Address (Signature) ✓� ��. i Address_ (Signature) ' C (Address)' Si %Ks Kure '(Address) c Signature R r7OZ - Address 'T , 4 V+C �t, �_'s Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) sS�e // — ; , Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip lame - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print iirs/z" (Post Office and Zip MY4 �- \/ L.c /<oc,,tz Name - r ease Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature /fir 3 :L Address Sign tur IL� Address Signature Address Signature La ('Address) (Signature I --� C Address Signature 1131-,poR,6,f' STA,e :e1—, -910x,467 ddr ss —� Signature Address Signature A ess S t g' no u r e Address Signature (Address) /v ELU' A/ L 881 kL (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip aS S ame - Please Print Po -): 5.,0 i/-- -� a, 3 / Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip f' Name - Please Print u�oLl (Post Office and Zip KI4 L--r am S • /4- [z L Name - Please Print 10 zzec,0I Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) UJI, M10 Name - Please Print u1 AA cul A" zz�v Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip �EdAV A Ce, M6.5 Name - Please Print (Post .Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable A I "'la �� / - �E /I A/ (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature (Name - Please Print) Bc--x429 ; Address Post Office and ii Zip Signature (Name - Please .Print 3lc Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print /kz Post Office and Zip 1 d U __ , st, ct C� , Name - Please Print Post. -Office and Zip over - . (Signature) (Address) Signature (Address) d (Sig ture) Address c9 Signature (mod i�7/) ai (Signature) n Ad ess "vture) U -I r'C&L lqv U' nn Address Signature d9IVAIA- S11dw134Ik/F. SP GFR Signature t'o v7"F-S = o vr- 3 v- .(Address) (Signature) &a , Bo X ) 6�2-Uvyw S v LL i v / J Name - Please Print lWIpC Post Office and Zip L veld YVIa r � e✓i s en Name - Please Print W CvN' e j Post Office and—Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip . Name - Please Print ka,O,Eef- A. //&- i. M r G l< (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and: -Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip M&� a Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip c R4, I'PY Name- Please Print ;), �L. 6 o I Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name— Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the k,,,Ai:ersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable D ,l 1,-�. �.Y�•�� ,�(J7-.�z�� ��'C.z� l�'��? h�-%� �y �.°. n �i��_ (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address) - Post a d Zip .° �•I�� Office I ^Ves�Y (Si tur(Name'- Please Print) �114- j Address ost' Office and Zip) Signature CID � Dr Address P,< i'. ) YIo w � (Signature) Address G? %�rCYC?rt Cl r�n H.%P Name Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print t V &aI (Post Office an Zip over (Addres.$) Sign ure t G -7 Y( " 4.7.F Y '�- (Address) Signature (Address) Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature (fame - Please Print Ly ihc�- Post Office And Zip D C�rN61 .jCrL Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for .the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools .-As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. \� (Signature) (Address) .(Signature Address). \, l � l \X Signature) Address Signature S � LA ESL lid . (Address) (Signature') Address (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) -,— (Post Office and Zip)/r -e : C1 Name - Please .Print Post ffice and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and.Zip E Name - Please Print Post Office and Zips over C Signa ure 5vac_ �l 0,v is Ad ress Signature —�- (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) Y Address) Signature L13� I L!;—:sKey leLo C,:�- Address Signature Address Signature j Address J Signatu ) (Address) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and' Zip f30I.:er 4,QyS Name - Please Print I,J A , Je Po S�) Utz ZZ� � 3 st Office and Zip) �z�� (Name - Please Print -t-�� 2- Pot Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) el L� 4 Post Office and Zip / o%,L /j /4- A/ Yn i L / zly Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 2V,_rj (Name - Please Print) ,nhc� r�s c(1- y 226 ss (Post'Oflff ice and Zip) A4 JIU /yv . r5r_k-1 Name- Please Print Post/Office and Zip �-� Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 'I Address ' Signatu,r-e" Address /� v �(Signature) , -� �n r _ Address Signature Address p/ 71 Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office -and Zip Ci_2 (-1t`,i�l ._ \ - -)l Name - Please Print Ai Post Office and.Zip (Name ='Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature) (Address) JKIC�i16;41_1 4' (Signature) - I- - / '/ 3 C" '� C�','" � ( 6 j C- _ I' (Address) Signature) (Address) (Signature) 4 (Address) /? (Signatur0l," AJ_ (Address) d d�:_ (Signature) (Address) 5 CAv\\vA\Pry (Name - Please Print) (Post" Office and Zip)\ R a t-h r "i ,-I T- ol C1 I /-I rf (Name -'Please Print-) C75- (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please PrintT L e;�Il 114 10 Post Office and Zip (Signature) (Name Please Print- 7L (Address) gnature (Address) Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Post Office and (Name- Please Print) h� Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name -TIlease Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands-, and.the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools- -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 7 5 3 CC� w, I I;, C,-t- (Address) (Signatu e) y�� y ��xf & wC-0,0 /) /? Address (Signature) I ('Address Nt� _ Signature Address ` Signature Address R C, .j m a r s. F, 1-1 U- WX C_ Z Name - Please Print) Sty P �eVnS C,-� U/r 2-2�sS Post Office and Zip) met R I ) _S 5-, . d (Name - Please Print) Z//1 ZJ— Post Office and Zip "'•�_J�� \-,{ ^• {� \ � {^'. � !_ lam,) Name - Please_Print `A_0 L-ht7i 1.{ �7 (1 % j_-. { S, ) p . -,I_._ _ t:._ Post Office and Zip �- n u. I cr_� ln,.` ���� e a Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip �l Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signatu Address Signat re (Z I a A 3 9 7 (Address) (Signature) Address Signature (Address) (Signature) 1-�:S 75 I Z;e Address Signatu e z'a 3 (Address Signature /4z vim - ��_,kz 01t Name = Please Print (Post Office and Zip) ravi ce.s 1. 7�0 in tjsad Name - Please Print) Q (G�n(:-.-S ler, l)ct - cul (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print S z r-y- .Q- Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Gt-r� (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Prin - . ,Z2 SS P st Office and ip Name - Please Print) (Posf Office and Zi ) Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name- Please Print Address Post Office and Zip C- �r� IA-1 Signature (Address) ( Si g6ature l h` `t•� � •.mil � -?u �f, - � , �� . � �J �� Name - Please Print Post 'Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Address) .J (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature)_ (Name - Please Print) '% >; x, 1117. Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Y �l 3" a9l u )oC Address Signature Address (Si "ature) / Address T,e, r2 'I n, - --, /�_ err Name - Please -Print 1 � Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print ,(Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) Ail Post Office and Zip over Signature' >r (Si-cfnature) (� C� /— � -/�- �, :L- -:� z -/- Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print (Address) -d. QL Signature ZI S�a L�qe �- r ( ignature �l�l � S3 • Address Li- SCLIz Signature (Address) Signatre Address (Signature) Address (Signature) L q3 < On-mer3e-�- (Add r-e—ss (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and'Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 2='(c5� Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Jam- c, Si gnat Mame - P1 ase Print 4 1w, V� Loses (Addre s (Post ffice and Zip) G,.?-dytyG4't-.G� PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. . We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals ojf,�the c (Signature) rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. __ - U I- - &.. �, 7 Address) Signature) Address QLOA- (Signiture)4 � k- a Address Signature Address Signature)" l Fyi Address (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zi-p ) (Name - Please Print) zt Post Office and Zip � P f C-� -.T C ►�� �J� (Name -,Please Print) Po'! t Office and Zip Name - Please Print 1/4 10 \(Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature) (Address (Signature) (Address)., (Signature) (Address), (Signature) (Address) !-A (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) 4" (Signatu'r/6) (Address) (Signature) Address) (Signature) 7 p) (Address) SJ_914t u r (Address) (Name Please PrintY (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Ple,ase Print) (Post Office and Zip (Name Please Print' (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name- Please Print) (Post Office and Zio) Z_ Name -'Please Print) E z LI sT (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED. ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (SignatureY--- Address (Signature) (Address)-_ (Signature) l Address. Signature Address (Signature) t-! Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Z:7 l,Z. / 2 , '7r fjl 't Name - Please.Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post'Office and. Zip Name - Please Print Post`Office and Zip over Signat Name - Please Print .Address Post Office and Zip \` :c:: -':at' "ram � �' � .L.•� � �...,� � G S �. �� N J - C ! _ � (1.= 1� Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Signature J r Address Signat e (Address) (Signature) l'�I. ����.4 Address Signature (Address) Signature Addres Signature /(-,Pccco Pl. s A,, e"I ve.- Address Signature God Cn0t,06N &Vo C,Ccte Add es� r (Signatu'rg (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name'- Please Print IL Post Office and Zip) ,r - / 15 . /3r y Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) ame = Please Print 1/ Post Office �a d Zip nib r1 n6 !17 /.1 � P r p'�� Name- Please Print 2 z �oss Post Office and Zio �$MfyS Name - Please Print 577,4t16"'S CaT°i Post Office and Zip \- Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip.) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment,- in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use.of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in th-6 Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature) - (Name - P1 ase Print) Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) U Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip) -WA r/4 "Signature Name - Please Print t All rI , l�fiJa GI.L c �G • aZ �1 u 0 / Address Post Office and Zip d.li. 5 ie log Signature) Name - Please Print) IC- - 41� 4�'d A dress �a Post Office and Zip over I Z ?-(,, 6 l Signature 1 Z ( )4 4( Address /`q �C (Add ress�. Signature (Address) (Signat re) (Address) ignat e (Address) (Signature) Address Signature Address ,L Signature (Address)i Name Please Print Post Office and Zip jzz d I'rA- L c-/y A e, .5 Name - Please Print) �74Ci/ Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print ,;��&6/ (Post Office and Zip) J 61, e- F)e,nc2 (Name - Please Print) aa(�OI Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) n Post Office and Zip) M at F Fa H l^(/ Name - Please Print) aa(Cj Post Office and Zip /fie 1e Fu N Ze Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Lo�ct�e-- 6-�teZ8cACC Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) -% -�, q co8 Address) (Signature) Address _ (Signature) U (Address) (Signature) / R• S! X 7<3- JVi1764 r 1�! Address &C&V_1V Z . (Signature) tj VA Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 53cli�v / ' /� e //e r Name Z Please Print Post Rffice and Z1 -4 Sn1; f�i Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Address Signature Address) :� Signature) -5-- 7�l ''- Address ignatu e 4, 5 1 Jr' . V , , (Address) (Sign ure) Ad ress , : , - . Signature Address Signature Address S 1^Tffi a t u r e) Ad ress ignature p Address` (Signature) feyk e I :5tXzs!Y/41 ef, Name - Please Print .;�1d/ Post Office and Zip) %tea.tt ia/,C, 6 Ott Name - Please Print of g & v/ (Post Office and Zip) 4Ke7h.1 (2/ere)o 8ff, (Name Please Print ° a61 Post Office and Zip Name - pease P i nt A16a (Post Office and Zip) �d1rk ��-vim (Name'- Please Print) a�bal Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) e 4, de Name - Please Print) ` L0 Post Office and Zip Oe—L LA) . '�a zqa 42SI Name- Please Print w«a'Zs; ;�. Jam_ I zz��r Post Office and Zio Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip L.F-r Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick. and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. r ignatur_ Name - Please Print) Address (Signature) Address Si ature �ee `/ 5-4 Address A A A `" n 0 `k D Signature C)OW -,I(. g (Address) Signature _-P k,3 (Address). :7- "-Z, 4. o/ (Post Office and Zip B/41J\1 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip ;ev�Ki�S Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip _D1 ► 11 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over c Siggnat w-e �/ f e, / 4:1 Address) ;r (Signature) ;t • a- l3C�L �� � (Address) (- ig ature) (A�dOrress Signature (Address) !� � C. L3 &t (Signature) (AddresFS7--) Signature fN Co Name - Please Print) iVlCO&4 &c; Z z I. v Post Office and Zip ►� r rn l Name - Please Print ZZ (.0 I /(Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) 'ZZC�O1 Post Office and Zip t-Dwbrz:I>s Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) C ). (, (,jt135TE12 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Ple se Print Ad e (Post Office and Zip) 76zer0ow-J Sign a(Name - Please Print) /, P z- Z, � 7i, � z 1A 0! � � -0/, ? - (Address) Signature Address �Z- (Signature) (Post Office and Zip CA �d�Ss Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) "PO&ERV P� Zacxsoy Name --P1 ase Print ,�16 D� u)AlLth4l,tiJ , Post Office and Zip �X&61 Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent. willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) P L � .R �LC" U0 : c.r ` (AVress) 1 (Signature) Address Signature) (Name Olease Print) t Z- Post Office and Zip) iMg0ce.— (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) C 7 �Y Address Post Office an& Zip v - Signature Name - Please Print .x, Addres 2__ 2 (Signature) (Address) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print IR 6 a! Post Office and Zip over r (Signature') Address (Signature) - (Address) (Signature) �AAd ignature (Address) (Signature) Address z Sign re Address 3 n Signature Address 66Y— Signature gmwjqp�� ii ..... ..... "I'l"",!!!!!Illllllllllllllllll1 - = (Signature) 14,-L.2 al�c� PA U N E L- Af-, ss L R Y, cl Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 0-4 Z2 L w,7lsS��/z�oT Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip ill � v�f Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip / O i/ Name - Please Print it —a Iq d e- t -r Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) /T CU i/ /V v (Post Office and Zip Name - Please pri t Post Office andJ Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 2��6o I Name- Please Print �,411v- - pla xv �c Post Offfce and Zip Name - Please Print Af a- s d Post Office and Zip . aA/Ci/ Name - Please Print (Address) S vk �-� W ; h c • V (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Futther' pprovals o the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. u , r Address 91. � Signature 3-/ fox �,?SJ (Address) (Signature) (.-t t-c, Address �- (Signature) Address • V! (Signature) Address �L-t—:: �G- I;::-- - (Name - Please Print) \V I PC. `),2 (.o o I Post Office and Zip ,ROvSQ_UCT (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip S._/(.,,__J Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - P1 se Print Post Office and Zip .01 L, LE_ / Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over 2�D &A 471 ddress) (Signature) Ad�o S-, T_/o w, '4, c , 1-1 A, (Address) Signature z/1Lfr�� �- (Ad/dress) (Signature) Addr ss ignature 5 s (Address) Signature S Address Address 1 Signature) art e J� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip zexl, o, �,, X r//X) � Ile / z Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) -D �_:- vr-_�.I Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip K:�0L.sLA Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 1<,- U-L_ S r pv Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print QkA to P YI R iv Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 1t R I PES Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) U PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about -the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth a prov .1 of e c i�,nt development plans for Wheatlanlds/are unacceeptable. (Signature (Name - Please Print) / An 0a O/ ie, J Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) A dr ss -/- Post Office and Zip ; 7/� (Signature) Name - Please -Print) Address Post Office and Zip rA v Signature Name - P1 ase Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Ykint Addres Post Office and Zip over c. Signature Address Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature (Address) (Signature) Address Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on publi"c use of a recreational lake which has -been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. gQ�o ulX�n t_ I � , u ) { Ve� C// (Signature) Address (Signature) 2gZ`� Address Si nature Address Sig ature) Address '?' C- @ U e-IY d !{. �.,�7 h i -f-i ac,lc (Name lease Print) Post Office and Zip) 4eT/, .b , R,-�/-e.R (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 4Z.o Q eer f7 -T/9,/ ,0P- (Name - Please Print) w ltvc-Rfip;� , UPS- Z2(a 01 (Post,,//Office and Zip) � l tic--W Name - Please Print WW tJC4e_9 J,,0 Y &L 1 Post Office and. Zip ;)D�;3 M Lc1+aZ_ZS (Name - Please Print ✓A- .7-Z(So Post Office and Zip over o • c�ie 5 t Signature Name J Please Print Address Post Office and Zi Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address (Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name- Please Print Address Post Office and Zip) Signature Name --Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) 7 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and deeply concerned about the plans for the development willingness. -of the officials of jurisdiction to let of development in our community. Winchester, Virginia, are of Wheatlands, and the apparent the developer determine the scope We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. r her approv s of he current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 'J71� C�t4 ( ignature) Zvi O cif 2 �-� e (Address) Z� (Signature G Address Z 42 LJI�__a , (Signature) Address Signature Le Address a �✓ �,g. S v Name - Please Print p Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print , �oJ Post Office and Zip G r,04 L , Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 06U"pr, P_ Qt'n)wxn Name - P1 ase Print ,2j�� a , VA 2Z85s- Post Office and Zip Lk (Name Please Print gee, O C /Va�- xf� (Post Office and Zip over 47M 5 RQ✓to i/ 5C VA - Address) Signature Address Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Ucv, (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to.the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral - -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have crave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signatur / 6 n x %9_�2 &Drc l),v Address) (Signature) ddre (Signature) 1A0- dress) Signature (jx 3sd� Address ignature) � 3s� Address (Name - Please Print) Post OfficeandZip) (Name - Please Print) tol Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) C/1 ,Post Office and Zip E0 29-E:X_7- a - it_ SO A/ Name - Please Print W, )C44F_4 C4 , 'Zzlog Post Office and Zip') LAJdA /9, 611166&1 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over N _ Signature )�)C,x b� LA Address Q,S.Jgnature Address) Signature Address Signature (Address) (Signature Address Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature IX 14X� F R Name -Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and.Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) 0 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We-further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of tfe current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address r Signature) 7/ (Address) Signature /Q 3 i%. �,Gt� aw 4'� Address Signature 1k.S� (Address) Signature Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Signature Name - Please Print Z% Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print (Addr'ess) Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name- Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. _(Signature) 6-3 Sox I go (Address) e, /,) "&",) (Signature) 3 a Q 80 x Address (Signature) 77- 3 &,e aka (Address) 'gnature 42--r,fix � o � g Address (Signature) 6 t4�, Address A/c) R M,,t W; L,5e,v (Name - Please Print) Cc/; AJC Fs rd,e I11A a a l a Post -Office and Zip) V;V;iA/ L- Wj'L.SeAl (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip i,i G&, 0/ L g--0X/ Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Ple se Print zuo Post Office and rlZip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Si gnaf ure 2-2,a I S--1-0099 2©VK—� (Address) Signa re (Address) (Signature) Address —44�� - (- Signature Address) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address (Signature) Lr r. i4rb ro!�,! (Name - Please Pr nt l�✓�h v�r �-2(a0 r Post Office d Zi � /�ra � ! Name Please Print (Post Off ce atnd' Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip N4 Name - P ease Print (j, ��-LxV A (Post Office and Zip) An 4-9 L. (Name - Please Print) Uj,4/ch es-4-R, V4 2 z- (Post Office �and �Zip) (Name'- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for -the development of.,Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as -defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further tpproval s of the urrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptably. ,.� ( igna ure) r 307 0k Address \-� - Aays Signature) ��-(Addre ignature) ,17,2 4'c c2 A Addre ) Signature o� -7 A S Ar47� 17 �. Addres )ta�_ P-) . (Signature) 3 A, _ Address (Name - Please Print) ) I ,N Z. Z(, v J Pos� Office And Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip G—AzsvrJ (Name - Plea'se Print Post Office a d Zip Name - Please Print V/t�► A JeS fa- r)q- 22_c", o Post Office and, Zip W,, / // <h, • & is L,:C- ,-S ( Name - Please Print) .-, �C4 £sk e, t,h A-��D Post Office And Zip over Signature . Ad ess Si ature �I AMres-s ) ASignature) Addr ss� (Signature) / �3 (Address) Signature (Address) R (SignatureOt— (Address) -- (Signature) Address Signature Address Signature) ++(Name - Please Print Lof0C,'SIL4 VA (Post Office and Zip) 0,n c� i,G r� V� Name - Ple se Print lt�yn�s Y4 Post Office and Zip). ArI , A (Name'-' Please ease Print Post Office nd Zip) �- 7,t� N me - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name' - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) ,(Post -Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems.in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Sig -nature) (Address) (Signature) Address S' to e) j/ e U f A�d\re s (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip). (Name - Please Print) ..!5�bI A47'TX AVI,-'�yV/Ncl4x s7A 2 Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) M SM2,14 ? Al 1, w/ /VAN s ram? Post Office and Zip) %V/A,PA 7014X90 Al- Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature Address Signature (Address) ` Signatiti^e Address Name - Please Print Post Office'and Zip ;/ Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Signature Name - Please Print '.� <"tom/:: /L �:..1l.'%:t�" -�•r-/ l 'L -/` - . . (Address) Post Office and Zip) Signature) Name - Please Print) Address Signature YL Address Signature; Adyres Signature Address Signature Address Signature Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip ice, �. ,� �� i M `;i i, •1,' ' � � ;� � � . Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please,. Print I- L Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth 0 approvals/ofapprovals/of the current development plans for Wheatlands arm unacceptahls. yam- �z�1 / ... i Signature) (Name - Please Print) I G ram. �L� t,;' - t` {� .c I r- , !• > '� ' t �, Address Post Office and Zip) Signature) (Name - Please Print) 7�Z 5--'�� (Address) ` i ( ignature) Address "(Signatu"re) Add s� ignature) Add ess Post"Office and Zip (Name - Please Print c, ,. - Post Office and ZipiY ��li �z Z j, / Name - Please Print VIT —Y c Gf�„tAt Post Office and Zi 6- /-) 4N �? l'� , _777- i, (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip over zzz�, (SignatVre) (A res I (Address) (SignatLfre) A� Address——T (Signature)/ /3-Y-I Zo q - Address (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Name Please Print),/ (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) 0 /, CPW 13 �. (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) 7 J ;q �) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name' - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) 4 '(Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) 044-k k E-S - E , /,3 6 Y-p Name - Please Print , 7TEM&&1SCJAJ, V A , � ;, G (Post Office and Zip) Z. , 16 \/> (Name- Please Print) S 7E-A4 E-7 Al !M (Post Office (Name - 'Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. ."Moral -We further -have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further appro is of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (0lG Address LR Signature 5_ 6,1e_-ZiEL Ad ress n - /-, azure Address y l &�- Signature Address r�eAo, 0- Signature) fiqos rv\ � S_- . Address 9vl,tin (Name - Please Print) OOSt Office and Zip) AveA.. (Name - Ple se Print) 5kc)O4 C, t z Z. (Post Office and Z 4 ,/s (Name Please Print) ,� rt X7 J1 , r /,- fr, , Zar -1,21, S I- P� t Office and Zip -ICVAivG R L /ti --- M • TFA (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip L 60" 0. D (Name - Please Print hs C;,kl VA a IVY ;r (Post Office andZip) over zw rm..2.w (Address) (Address) 2 . (Signature) �Ga �• %t �aw��✓ Address ` L. Signature (Address) (Signature) tsr � dwk wvAM_w4rj Jill Signature �1 ` r Name - P ease Print 5Ae,V 4f' � t;L/ , 1 /A Post Office and i Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) ? ` �'( �4 aa& "Sye ew5 st Office an Zip &�zQ/�2f� O':4h�n5n Name - Please Print igAh- z)s1- y1,l 3 2L & Z (Post Office and Zip) IAer-A_)_In - Please Print) L:l -e- Pc3 sf- VA �( Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - ease Print 1 Post Office and Zip Z -A/ Name- Please Print Po t Office and p) Name -Please Print S s Post Office and Zip ( Name - Please Print) T (Address) (Post Office and Zip 14 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, -we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. / (Signature) Address) cE -1-L — (Signature) Address (Signature) Address Signatur nn Address (Signature) dres J� ar� Z Z� O J (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) I, (Name - Please Print) U-)1 u (14 (_ 4 �LI vk Post Office and 1Zip 0 .y.Ll1�Git.LG ✓ Name - Please Print) Z 2 (c) Post Office and Zip) �- Name - Please Print 4,64 Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Sign ture Address Signature (Address I // Signs ure tN' 'c 1(/ S c, V- Address Signature (Address) Signature Address Signature JC kes Signatu LiL22g"I_ Address ignature Address Signature dress)WWXA�1ffA4_PA Awl F/1—AM OAW�� . (Name - Please Print) �- (Post Office and Zip) tc)i V\ C. k , 5 T�"-/ 1 /, Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) ( 1C7 ic" F Name - Please Print) jc"V. Po�t Office and Zip), /II Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) '('Name Pleas Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print VP st Offic Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip?7 i Name- PlAease Print /� 6- (Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) et ) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick.County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. F rther approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) —� (Address) ; (Signature) (Address) LJ (Signature Address 6 e It r (Signature) t Address (Signature) Address AY C (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip MANY MI "7n l .. Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip / • Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over (Signature) (Address) Si g nat u re ij (Address) (Signature) (Address) 'J(Signature) (Add'ress) (Signature) /a (Address) Signature (Address) /Z (Signature) 7 T (Address) Signa ture --L(Address) (Signature) (Address) 1x'7 j (Signature) � Z) " -f 1, (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Past Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print), (Post Office and Zip) Oil E C, < (Name- Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) �iu uwesG-/° �tF /46' PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature):. (Name - Please/Print) _ Address_ n Post Office and Zip) c ,,,�v(Syat rre) w Address (Signature) / (Name - P1 ease Print )- - � I Post Office and Zip Name - Please .Print /A - Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 3 /0_ Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) - Post Office and Zip over Si nature J) (Address) (Signature) 31 V I a xi (Address) (Signat-dre) (Address) (Silgnature) L (Address) --vSig atureY L (Address) ,J (Signature) ;-/ (Addre r� ' ��� Jy (Signature) v Address) c i S g- nature LkI ), L" t.%, LJO (Address) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) L4 A7,4, Post Office and Zip J (Name Please Print), ; T (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) AA IT (Name - Please Print) L7 N/ C- Q (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) v V J tY j , ., S I Post Office and Zip n-) - (Name- Please Print) Z) Post Office and Zip (Name -'Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved wi.th Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined inin the Comprehensive Plan. ugther appro o the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ignature) Rb" Address (Signature R-A --R " `y3 - S7-6 / l V-4 ,,/(Address)�- �07 Signatur �U "d (Ad irresss) C Signature j T7 � IZI' „ (Adke s s')-- �o i gnature Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name -,Please Print) 5Z Co.0/ Post Office and Zip Ile A L^- Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip f Name - Please Print ( Post Office and Zip.)' Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature) '(Address) CIO - A (Signature) (Addfess) A j\ (Signature) Wet �(Sig'pat ure (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) Z (Address) (Signature*) -1,,v0D 5CO-ffst- zaj,-C, (Address) V7 (SignIrre) (Addrul) MAA.) (Signatu,e (Address) (Signature) -7/ C—q 21\ S:—p A ?J --T—Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) tit if I (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip VkRls Hh-,Y1�1,1-i (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) —7Post Office an'd.Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip) e-e-y�A�o qe-,rs (Name- Please RrAnt) ZJ Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Z (Signat6 AT llpt)_- .b 0 x g C E 11;t2L ress -(Si ture) Address ,` l p'f_ Signature ,(Address) gnatu Add ess over W vA Post Office and Zip) ,P�YrV 1. M YA\ I/CK (Name - Please Print) wi IY6 �/O�;; TfZ V /,9 Post Office and Zips , l (Name - Plea.se Print) -? l' 1 z Post Office and Zip DrIA*C _SNa,44C (Name - Please Print) Lc,;WCtfEs /�7z V� l2Le r Post Office and.Zip ., .4 ti 17,e Name - Please Print y VA Post Office and Zip (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address)- Z2_12:3 (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Addres (Signature) (Address) (SignatureT— . Signature W-K= (Addqzs-�) Signature) (Address) (Signature-) (Address) (Signature) Rt-5 B t.4,C e6 rf (Address) _S' 42s(5;/) (Name - Please Print) G2-( 2 -2. 6k)// (Post Office and Zip) -3 4�� �� ox;fele-11 & Name - Please Print) Z-F- 6 0 1 1 . Post Office and Zip) KI, PP, q Name -'Please Print A �C_ 'zz-c, 0 \ (Post Office and Zip) U 'I",j & - t7 17- TName - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) V � JZ_ (,jC) \, U TName - Please Print) k/� ( � C_ - --,, -z-- (" 0 (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print..). TPost Office and Zip) 3 U C-1-< (_ F_ (Name - Please Print) k'"', (KI Of, (Z— Post x ice and Zip (Name- Please Print) (Post Office and Zip). � U R T- 15 (Name --Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name --Ple-ai& Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities,on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan.- Fu current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Name - Please Print) '�2 z 3$ W 1 ,L s o,,v 4?4.v q/ Address (Signature) ��2 3? W;Is0H `'3IVC Address Signature Address (Signature) Address Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) UJ i /Y C'1-teS Tro 1JA -;t z �, o, (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) w t •n c ti �' S� e r V �� .� L ca Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip "I - e- . S' c 7,/.,-t, t) cry Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Addre •• ,,L U Signature Address Signature Yr Zvi-, 93 (Addre�s) T,g t u re) ,- Address Signature L' Address Signatu e 35- AvDkvqL Address (Signature) (Address) �1©H/J /7/ Atia ' T� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name -'Please P int Post Office and Zip) Name -'Please Print) Post Office and Zip &"-,4 l Name - Please Prints (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip D S Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip V A 22-6 a Name- Pleas6 Print (Post Office and Zip SIA Sa n 1, MQi ri s - Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) 1�I PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the develooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. . "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constra-ints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur_ o approva of the urrent development p for Wheatlands are unacceptable. aa 1_�, Z)Val-dl� (Signature) o /.V KA lf6'If 4-V-a- (AddressY � � 1fiW,]Xa � � S' nature )71 Address Signatur psi pt •e- �- y� Address 1J gm�� W , �LI LC.• (Signature) ,41 Ll. ;V - Address a, A4/eiLgk - Please Print) me T(N �IVDA1-1,6A[?0AtS-t (Post 9 Office and Zip) e- I-I'Dck"g� "d - (Name — Please Print) �i(/r���� 4e Post Office and Zip J r�e5 c• �t��� (Name - Please.Print)) V`I_/LtCPS%�Pd i YG, Post Office and Zip) E (Name - Please Print (A )r,0e et� ;w 6 0 I Post Office and. -Zip l No e . w (Name = Please Print) &/n 0- / ,-I-- , \ I / A - Post Office and Zip over Signature (Address) gnature (Address) l Signature "So Address 144k An, Signature (Address) S.igna ure) ress Signature Address) Signatu e '72,4k. �R�7 1�d_ IV,4�m _��t '(Addy ssj -' h Signatpreq ( Add r7,s ) Signature Address (Signature (Name - Please Print) . is Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (008 ja, l %C S Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Pr t n Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) _� " V-D-77; _5 - /. ��) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip — , Name - 1 ease 'Print—) Post Office and Zip -T h P-,,o l% , . (Name - Please Print) qq 1 -Po Office and Zip ps° I E/ Name- Please Print w"wl,- Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print hlo C-z Post Office and Zip) Tah -Sc + Name - Please Print 4 .4-v Cev r• c�� ( �, C' L10 1 r C_LA�,, vc, -ne (Address) (Post Office and Zip) ;cr 16 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the avai.lability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about.the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptabl?. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip) Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address (Signature) Address �j Signature `\c_,�, Y`rl, A V-N \`.N (Ad -dress) ignature) Address Post Office and Zip Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and. Zip) 6 f q Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over -_z (Signature) (Address) (Signature), (Address) X (Signature) J (Address) LLJ_ ;q (Signature) / (Addy s-s) (Signature) Address 4 (Sign,afure) ---7-7 .(Address) ,.j 5 (Signature) (-AddreVs) �ignature (Address) (Signature)) (Address) _tJ (Signature 7(h pi L' � CrIA (Name - Please Print) 7 7) (Post Office and Zip) Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip ? kn Ill (Name -,JPlease Print) (Post Office and Zip) I- IL (Name Please Print) IVII-701-tV - (Post Office and Zi,p) &,v (Name --Please Print) (Post Office and ZipY' rI4 I/ Al --f-Name = Please Print) �2 ;7 (Post Office and Zip) (Name- Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name --Please Print) v v (Post Office and, Zip) A17 Ifame - Please PrInt (Address) (Post Office and Zip) .In PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands,.and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. 'Adcess -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. - Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signa re) Si re) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office aH Zip) A�v/LLB 1 .4 (Name - Please rint) Addre s Post Office and Zip) ignature Name Please Print /a.- (-Address-Y Signature Co �fv (Add-ressl / 4� Post Office and. Zi Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip over Signature &&&✓ (Address) Signature 1 (Sig -nature) ApeIM - W, "I I . . . I -- - i (Addr 'ss) fi,V,V,q j r Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Pot Office afid Zip LP Name - lease Print chy)� Post Office and Zip ll ,, eb0t-t.Lh (r, VY)a r-�c� W Name - Please Print (Post Office and' Zip) 5 rr (Name - Please Print) 41 a/ 7 rye- Ln 6 P L f f i c e n d Zip). W fUze5 ki', vA ai,40 W1 l 4 h N L) c�inc Proms Name - Please Print UQ icy Post Office and Zip) e lr,� S1�uia-v9`e,>Q �(a me - ,lease Print) (Post 0 fice and Zip [ma's G r ri c r� Name- Please Print (Post Office and Zio Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print NWe (Addres,$)) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION 1 '7 We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatla.nds, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we -have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) I /5 b (Address) -CSignature) (Add ess a Q I ) A--� (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Offices*and Zip q (N e - Please.Print) 6Q Re3MoU'T�4 57, Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and-Zip ) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over S-iignature K, rine t /cL Q re Addr4ss Signnatture (Address) gnature Address v Signature c c (Address) (Signature) Address Signature Address) 3 UaL Signature Address �63 40' Signature Address ignature Address Signature) (Address) Name - Please Print `44mef s &%j , (P st OfficeJ'and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) C O2v L, N y N. Go R IF AIA . Name - Please Print) Florz�-Ncc Mc.l�L l re s S7 (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) , ills 401 n e. S (Na e - Please Print) G.--) z- (Post Office andZip) e. Name = Please Print (Post/Office and Zip 1JA f'l Ma 5r-s� Name - Please Print 7.0h n M j-c C s Psi% Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name Please Print P Pam, txft4 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Pr nt rA 4e,--�I L14 la � (Post Office and Zip) F. PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature) 80X Sri Address (Signature) or Address Signature) - Address ( Signature Address (Signature) SaaS C40o U Address (Name A. Please Print) d �r— P t Off i ce and //e%w 4/, (Name - Please Print) Vn Post Office andlip) MDSES (Name - Please Print Ua • as ass Po t Office fa d ip Name - Please Print) 117.1 &1 �4 3— Post Office and. p ( ii'AJM 5i641&041) (Name - Please Print) ���� T�j°/fENs "IX)!,4 . aa�.SS- Post Office and Zip over ?�SSiog2�ture Address Signature _31 �ue-k • ham � �ha br. (Addr ) P d • 13&4 3w CLIFF 7 (mob, rd Sao-• (Address) 01 MCI, t � Signature alto SS �. \ �o � � � S�.erh ass e; �.•( (Address) Signature Sa1f� Crr�v e C�- Fo 6OY 8•4l gnature S.Z g C" 4a- J i- --;?.C) _Q, B'(. Address A Z_ :n� - n� Signature va N me Please Print Post Office and Zip Gtru 4, Lvcl Name - 7Cease Print Cl Z z 55 os Office and Z p t 7- ( Name - Please Print Post Officd and Zip (/ ,(Name Please Print ;ti/c /2-7 �- ✓ (Post fice and Zi Su W • � �-� Name - Please Print) PostOf ice and Zip 6;t Na e - Please . int �- Office and Zip (Post�, C i Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip AAI (Name-- Please Print �+ A Post Office and Zip (Name -'Please Print) P o st Office ip IN, ( Zn,�I w I( : 4v4 Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope. of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. � t� (Signature) D Address (Signature) 61 9JJQ r MO�- (Address vzol (Signature !MD AJ T Address Sig ature) !�� Address Si ature �"�.ti►lF l�►e ' S. e , - V �- Address r-4I/ /,f- 19 l�Flc_ (N e - Please Print) �f P st Office anf Zip I Name - Please Print) phle-n-n C4W Vf� 1;1Office and Zip 016avS e-,r (Name - Please Print C>2%"/ NIA_ — (Post Office and ZipY I i TCJV-'N C-1 a �e_e_v-- Name - Please Print (f t -� a) Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print "lo -) Lug , V /y 4 S s Post Office and Zi15 over -" ' (Signature) p Y 5035 Cara)l ne J� s (Address) Signa r.e r� Z4 =' U), iI (Address) -,,tF &;e-/// nature) , 5►�o N Signa.tuW Addres P Signa re , M-111—wo 1 4 . Name 4 Please Print) 5M w +-4 AUK... S n6 Cit\j, 10 �DG-6` Post Of is and p i Na - Pleas Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) ')Is PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in out, community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( ignature) t_2it V (Name - Please Pri t) 7 .Address) Post Office and Zip �° 0� ✓ " ��oc r. C `S-�-C' o S n �G e ✓' (Signature) (Name - Please Print) R-c- t r3 a A '3 I _1 11017,g,�", &V4, Addr ss a Post Office and Zip / (Signature) Address Signature w i// �J Signa tki re y UTCf (Name - Please ��Pri t Co 0 5J t �t,�s �c.tc�.?•� a�sS' (Post Office and Zip) 7 L Name - Please Print 1 e. Signature �r Address Signature v C &_L�f 3Nal Address) zu Signature (Address) Signatur J- (Address) S �G_� Signature Address (Signature �e 1, a C. ma Name - Please Print f ph Pose Office and Zip� f r Name - Please Print) S_je.j2h,'-0t7 City VC-3 (Post Office and Zip r Name - Please Print (Post Office and ZipT ^ ame - Please Print A1d1-0Y11� �_ (Post Office and Zip) 0 (Name lease Print XP st Office an Z'p Name - Please Print r _ a�S3� =2 Q\ Post, Office and Zip Name- Please Pr int ~ -/3q ost ff . nd Z' Q � � b »f ��.� yb --Please Print) Post Office and Zip sc_o Lot e r ,.— Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) • 0 Signature Name - Please Print Address P st Office and Zip Qzz=z� O-Fz (fr:;a diNas— (Signature)Name - Please Print (Address) P st Office an Zip) (`� ,�jj. (Signature) 31j� i,QO t�': . Ae s (Address) d'S114C Signature (Add re s) Signature) R.a. /30x acxo Stcp.*&N,s C. UQ . aa� ss Address ig� r ) (Address) Signature Address Signature u ?-lerT F Ad ress Signature / �o z Address ,L Re ^ , k"/) t-=- GL Name - Please Print) f(Post Office and Zip JT &CI /, Uv n O 2 Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) 3ue1 J, Fr•a uaL-. (Name - Please Print) P,0.160-� 04-f Post Office and Zip nt,t.l a2Lr.CI r(; //ct^V ame P1 ase Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) /.!", a, 416 x /6 Z . Name- Please Print .SC c (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print lPJ AtrOflfice and/ ip /D FA; IV Q Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zi gnature PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick.County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. ."Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. . "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone.the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current developmently plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Lin 4_1 r— (Signature (Name - Please Print) � I I Addr ss Z,L9.= Mn�,�_o Pjk� Signature) Po t Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) 2 -ZG Address Post Office and Zip ` / 1 r� o-Hi © G21 0-eS (SAnature) Name - Please Print 47 )-ares�- L.4,6 Dh y. _ Address G&I rULA, Signature 6-T Pores + L�k� �� ✓e Address /(Signature) -555z Q7g- Address O I L', 0C, 2 2 G 5S Po t Office and Zip 4are_n S Name - Please Print &C hens L, Vf+ a.-6ss Post Office and -Zip) vr=e�Y .,E %zjaTS Name - Please Print Y7-Zy,Env�; ' C, rY Vie- .22 e,>5— Post Office and Zip 15 over (St§nature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) C.1 (Addre, S �,, w7 h'il? U --(Sfghature) 6,- cl -Y I-- 9vi— (Address) (Signature nn v (Address) A. ,1 V (Signature)_ VA - ,I (Address) : :j (Address) I (Signatur"eY (Addressl (Signature) (Address) ej (Signature) (Address 3e"A (Name - Please Print A p-;� (Post Office and Zip) —7Name Please PrintT— (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) —TName - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) C (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip11 Name - Please print) (Post Office and Zip) 14 G, A - 6-) 2 1 CY12- (Name - Please Print) Post Office and -Zip --TName- Please- Print)' (Post Office and ZIp) ,C--- � � , Ge / L- L— / C- H (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip)/ Is (Name -.Pleas e Print) C-, (Post Office and Zip) i PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development 1plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) `7 fiYl 0C c`sc n (Address) Signature) (Address) Sig ature Addres Signature dress Signature)) 112) Address WfoJV., (Post Office and Zip) ,A. (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip % �-(Name - Please -Print) / r> rnG'i' n, ( Post Office Ond Zip)' L- (Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip V, 13 • Wj-4 i Ti' H;; IZ/N i- Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Si�p�ature) (Address), (Signature) -(Address) ,Signature) (Address) v . (Signature (Ad &res s (Sihnature) (Address) (Signature) ,(Address) Si g n a t1p r,(-- (Address) Signature A On, r i (Name - Pldase Print) (Post Office and Zip) TName Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) --- (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name -'Plea§e Print) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Prift (Post Office and Zip) 7 (Name - Pl_ase Print) zz (Post Office and Zip) L-E C (Name- Please Print) ti? (Address T (Post Office and Zio)- (Name -"Please Print) (Address) (Signature) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) �'_� ��� -- (�I :J2i � f ice• �CJi �'{� ' 1 �, PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. Thb 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 (Signature) Address (Signature) Address / I((Signature) Address Sig ture i Address . Signature (Address) Name - Please Print) ►�.J (Post Office and Zip) Name Please Print) (Post \\Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip , L. i I'.\ over v (Signature) 3a-7 Wa(keF- 5� Address Signature Addres ms Address ignature Pam_ /jo%� z�� Gr/'`'`'`' , l/ '{• (Address) Signature 5z0 a A/a IV. k- 5�- - GJ.., u (Addres� Signature Address ) Signature ss )I ISighature) Ali �V - ,;ICL,•!+)i1.1. �t---. Address Signature Address (S'ignature /A�o'I • �C (- ho !�1 Name - P ease Print IAl ; n Cx e s �� F- /� z,2-4 o / Post Office and Zip V_-C.Ltni e M, -c,1,CS- r Name - Please Print �'V ) � Post Office an Zip) ame - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) . (Name - Please Print lry G✓�- .�VC f , Z(o� (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office .and Zip) Lv a Name - Please Print c VN e k � VInr Post Office and Zip) Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print bt� t v i ('.IC -j Post Office and /Zip) Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) /00 AcAlqk�>_5 Address ' (Signature) /J Address ,0 n Aa,_d (Signature) Mdf&A) O' /lDMse-,J (Name - Please -Print) G(/lnc kV-4 , as 6 0 t Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip marnOr"e-f _De ✓ t h (Na - Please Print (Address) Post Office and Zip GEor.G 41A o,SA� Signature Name - Please Print 47 1 R ✓cST /0)p Address Signature Address lZ D Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over (Signature) es / :f-v,-' VIv e— (Address) � Signature (Address) Signat e) (Address) _ Signatu (Addy -ss) Signature Signature Address "'e f' 'L:� �- Signature &Li-� .4Za aLid A Name Pease Print Post Office and Zip "._S r�k `OAN D `-1Sd- Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) N� S Name - Please Print W (�A_ .cabal Post Office and Zip cP c4� Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) +--A I r 9-4 1 u,�►� / 13T Name - Please Print) 1z8 t'l. VIA SO VA, Post Office and Zip) ame - Pyease Print Post Officand Zi ) (Name -Pease Pri�ntt /' Post Office and Zip (Name- Pl..ase Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip r � O r Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) _�. Roo `7� - PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds.for the dam are acceptable. . "Access -As currently planned, will. create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater." "Schools =As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with.Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fu the approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) '(Name - Please Print) r� Address Signa ure) S3 Z� Address a (Signature) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 1Z&b*k E, 4u✓s4sm e_ (Name - Please Print 4.2 ri an S;- Ghes�-er (Address) Post Office and Zip) Signature Na e - Please Print (Address) Ur YV.01 i I` - 4p Signature Address - Post Office and Zip cbRmaI a, L. En Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip \ over 0, Signature Address ignature -!au w Address KAI, I , _; I . ,., ) , Sign re) ki dress Signature (Address) (Signatur Address Sinature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print W "110AZT _ V c-N - o ► (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip G� kt,(Sias .�PP-tf OS Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) view C'. �o1or,U�v (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print jog g F,) r ,q(A-i &2- • L.c, ► �n.r.�Q-s �- VA 22 & o J (Address) Post Office and Zip "'Zo Iac - ) t%- v ��A, A &To J\) �v I Signature Name --Please Print Signature o 0, )cc i'r m m-F st Office and Zip Name- Please Print (P st Office and Zip),/" ds(:n�P,C //Pi - Devnz, w-- (Name -'Please Print Post Office and Zip o M 1,4,� ► • C=- r Name - Please Print Vv I nc_bnes czr- V,2- 6,cy (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick,County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE I:eMEDIATELV` ECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Morale -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the9 County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) I (Address) Signature Address (Signature) 1 Address bcrt I�i.l Signature -Abe- (Address) Signature g sg 72 • Address (Name - Please Print) l,J:., r �e__ 1/a Post Office and Zip) C / fm L,._J, (Name'- Pl ease' Print ) ( Post Office and Zip) ip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip _6Qybar0t IM. Maw) Name - Please Print 1n��nchea ; va� a;;.6 (Post Office and Zip) G. R L e ,C q-r' /Y) [ L L R Name - Please Print g5L5 IV, BR qXX Post Office and Zip over Signature k6l)c Iq I ?.A,/ (Address)VtA�J_�l Ak_64 Signature ._� ( Ad re s ) R� (Signature) .6 ; C/,�s Address Signature Q/--/ (Addy s) (Signature) D) e- ?,� -. /,, Address 11 t;J.f G>'y )A (Si�ature) Addres Signature Address K Signature Address da61 rJ- Signature (Name - Please Print) . 's 4, ), c, Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print sko" 0M V,/-f- z 55-- st Office ang Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip ;3��ss1e UJ e)C Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Cil/// jz�, -//-s!_ tIJ4, -71� (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip „ O ZA \--T, Post Office and Zip ease Print Post Office and Zip L4e&w— (Name- Please Print) �if�NS ('I T`1 Post Office and Zip Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print %b (Address) (Post Office and Zip) r4,a4 G b� PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth pro als of the urrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. bo r �r-ice , . (Signature) (Name - Please Print Address Signatur Address �_`�.� Signature) 304 C,tr,wood C . z ; f-< t/ Address Signature Address S' nature) Address Post Office and Zip) t.t 1 i ► - -f- oLyfl ! (Name - Please Print) S-tens Cniil Post Office and Zip R Ida Name - Please Print) e as Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print v� Post Office and.Zip Dyi I ` c _kca,rob 0-N (NAme - Please Print Post Office and Zip over (Signature) C 7 ( / �teh.r � .A r�esus Signature (Address ° JI(Sigpature) Address Signature (Addy .) (Signature) a .r _ .. L,71 2C24 - +VI6 (Address) 19 Ir �.--J (Signature) , S�"q# S. s-�_rn.sPI lode (- Name - Please Print PC) Aox Ll 7 9 a2 ASS Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) An U. Ri'lAiter Name J Please Print 7 ' fih ' k d Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Pos Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) r CI Post Office and Zip _WA van1-Y LAM E-5 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip lsnnArer (Name--PleasePrint) tS4r_Dj6'a_5 LA, Post Office and Zip Name'- Please Print Post Office and Zip li Name - Please, -Print) ak/4 /Lz C' (Post Office and Zip) 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( igrra r_) Name - Plea a Print) O 0 d Address(Post Office and Zip Signa-fure) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and AL J� [- - t Q &2L/� Name - Please Pri t =6,5:5-- (Postt Office and Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over qa4 ez� - i ature r Add ss Signature :5i(-Pve,� Cvc, i nature Address Signature (Address) �0 72 al I ";I , �Iz . (Signature)- Af Address Signat " (Addrlss) Signaturp , tRaaress) / Signature A dress Sign ure }-£-/ Doeft l'ekI dx— (Address) rrec:uot-� ^ e (Name - Pletase Print 3--�Aaw_s C'1` I%4 C;L"2-� Pos Office and Zi k E ram -=- +e• e P r i JA erry8c // Post Office and Zip Please Print{ Post Office a��Y Zfp) A , as 4o Name - lease Print 57wAy_,-yj s Crrv,y.4 zZc..s ss (Post Office and Zip) 1� ENA�oTl* L, 9-(cz4 ,— Name - Please print) Post Offi a and Zip) s =t-- S CI Name - Please Print DCho ?�sl�b Ll Post Office and Zip) / �_5Lg4 ter 5 (4, �z , _ yi9 (Name - Please Pr' 77-Fac x(1,v34A--,oA-&-1 Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print fo�Ka, L - Aoswo4� Post Office and Zip). V/), w6rr Na - Please Pr' t Post Office and Zip �,0 /V, .6/V m�6 Name - Please P int ,5 z"C171" , 6 ' ty (Post Office and ip) IS PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. nature) +.. - (Signat e%jj6'4 SG o4, M t�E,DBu�t'3�oDK Address Signature (Address) Signature Q ° RE-DE-reJ0 E �2 t ►z w� Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 1-1AhI qv f5 e.9kt r,fe�^ (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip N Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip R T- Name - Please Print SC Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print SC Post Office and Zip over _ A: L�x PER 1-4 IN M ,.O►1 (Address) (Signature) Address Signature (Address). 4 � U Signature Address )1� alcli Signature L � Jci� I D Address Signature j&AL4i Addres Signature Of WIMM '-tSignature) 10 2 Ln> S4 �g (Address) -- 0 ��� Name - Please Print Post Office andZip) SH F Ly F/W /�?. •S H/ F F,L C— 7- Name - Please Print -5 7f /'o /—/ F `-1r (r/ T y 6, �t . off- oli- &_...( Post Office and Zip) XZ=? P6tl7t CzLg,IX-oi,yst Name - Please Print Post Office/and Zip (Name - Please Print 0Frcderrd-lcy� .fir• (Post Office and Zip) 1 L A. N V (Name'- Please Print) y%ram bAuL' q NCD N c ITy Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print 2 Z� Pos Office and Zip) Wei � rti 1 Name- Please Print) g2-6�� Post Office and Zip) Name m Please Print 2e-.4 (Pos,f Office and Z ll %i-t Name - PleasePrint) -q-r,-�,wWs 04 1/� VI6 ss (Post Office an4 Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the -development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness.of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater.. "Schools -As currently planned-, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signs ure) f/ (Address) .. -% i , ,�, V ,* CGMJ.P_ (-;L (Address) Signature ddress JAW - Nam(Y - Please Print) Ste/ Gl T C L S _ ti4 v� Post ffice and Zip © , s . q ,-_ mac.,, -\-e . (Name - Please Print) ,57reYP/iems e/?: '- Post Office and Zip ( Name - Please Print) (PosY Office and Zip Name - Please Print S his G aa6 s Post Office and. Zip 6 -51 Name -'Please Print �ci,/ Post 0 fice and Zip over 373 btz. ress NO (Signa ur ) tea? 3A4U ke— Address (Signature) 9 o 4ye, 6�� Address Signature tvt1z Address Signature q 9oa �=ssc-u C(Rcz-c Address AL' Al, 2�A Signature Name - Please Print ,2Z S (Post Office and ip L� AYve E. MtuT�,;r, S Name - Please Print 67'q4z,vs C,`, y t Va. 2ZG�S' (Post Office and Zip) Jkd 2aS S Name - Please Print %6� V& 91A� (Pos Office and lip) G Ialnr,* Zarc-Foa::� - Name - Please Print (Po t Office and Zi le��AIvey s ;)r 7'noc/ Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip W-IL- 1`� C 6 C- Name - Please Print A4C�f Post Office and Zip S05/11�u 606ro of LL Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 4/ Name- Please Print S�io ,re m 0114, 4r,;tg, / • as 6s� Addr ss) (Post Office an Zip Si ature Name - PleasePrint) Address DPost Office and Zip a. Signature C)(nfh;a 4 . Fischer Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent. willingnessof the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. i (Signature) soyaomn ; C- 'kavAddress (Signature) Addr (Signature) 4% Address Signature) GnAl'a M. �611114-41f- (Na e - Please Print) C to Post Office and Zip Do !, I Z 0_ (0— )� M (Name -'Please Print) (Post Office and Zip W itkta{►. Sf.4 k Name - Please _Print (:J4 12f6s Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over (Sigiiature) (Addr�6s (Signature) 7z. (-Address) ,(,Si—gna u , TE v (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (S-ignature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature)' 3 4 (Address) (Signature) A-ryi�,-:, L!-, -r�� (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip) z Name - Please Print) P _,.,ost Office and Zip) (Name Please Print)' (Post Office and tip C { �\- (z L Q � i-I i R,' C- h IA- C' (Name Please Print) (Pos'Office and Zip) (Name Please' Print) V4 (Post Office and Zi) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) X (Post Office and Zip) (Name-,! Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Alu 4 L'i , (Name - Please Print) Post Office atfd Zip) (Name.-' Please Print) . q We [,-*,r-. VA 2-2601 (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined inin the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of th ,-current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signatpre,� ! (Address)/ (-ignature �J 5i ^Address r (Signature) n Addre L�r L- / C C 77" // C . ; t; c (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip)/ (Name - P1easo,'Print) 1 � C Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office andrip) C� L / over (SignatureY (Name = Please Print) (Address) I -Post Office and zip) (Signature) (Name'- Please Print)' _A J (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (SignAture) --TName Please Print) (Addr PAMt Office and Zip) (Signature)' _7Name -,Please PH t (Address` .,.Post Office and ZJ p J(J S ignat=-) (Name Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name Please Print) (Address) (post Office and Zip) (Signature —(Name Ple-ase Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signatdre) (Name- Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) 01 IV) (Sijnhture) (Name Please Print) (J (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name Please Print) C t (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the develooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signature) _ Address (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature Address (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name'- Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature) C (Address) (Signature) (Address) i if (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) .(Signature) (Address) (Signature) j (Address) (Sigrvature) (Address (Signiture) (Address) (Signaturej (Name Please Pf-i nt) r/ (Post Office and ZipT (Name - Please Print) T Z (Post Office and Zip) (Narde Please Print) 6, (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office" and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) V (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) -7 Name- Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print --T—Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillinnness to downzo the ,property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined inin �he Comprehensive Plan. F dr ther approvals of the current (Signature Address (Signature) Addres/s (Signature) (Address) (Signature) Add ess (Signature') � n (Address) development plans for Wheatlands are unacce'otahle. i--,Ili R (Name - Pliease rint) ' (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) (Post Officeand Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Offi%e and Zip) (Name - Please Prin ) (Post Office and Zip over -,�d�, �� �6n v Address ' y Signature! ��irlracc (signature) o;K 300v 4 (Ad dress y �-/ a—,— Sign ture yfi 1J4 zZ�.s 7 Address Signature ddress Signature P 0 3 c?7 Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name L Please Print Post Office and Zip) M cl, rig cc r i t S,> p L Name Please Print %-- tichzsr�UAZ�c Post Office andZip) Rome - Please Print G0jNC T.Uf4 (Post Office and Zip) N e - Please Print) 6 ,ko s'S ` ,- rc T/vim? ��� , • �=� (Post Office and Zip). „2a- S �. tUO l � Name - /Please Print -P Lea - Z z- L 3 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print •i✓ 6/7 (Post Office and Zip VACY /Ro&PkL Name- Please PIVI t Post Office and Zip) Zid �aw Name ease Print -rc Lf Z 2- 5 Post Offi and Zip ?dd (Name Please - Pl ease Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) iPT .Z/' e.-"- 7z l �-,/;L_ss ) 7, / Signature l/ Address Signature �t2 eoe 71,5— Address Sign ure �x 6 W Address Signature) Address Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip , 'e- z i,k/1 (Name - Please Print) (24'-s.S I,) kj C no' -VO Post Office and Zip :J7,4& _9 S 94) Name - /`Please Print rK ,-G ee— Pti . VGA 22-60 Post Office and Zip 1 11/e VAAL L L y« .5 Name - Please Print b.1,✓q _-�z6o l Post Office and Zip J0 4,lel c Na - Please Print JJ&t_' hd 9)- 1✓. WA 6,7 I Post Office and Zip over (Signature) Address Signature (Address) Signature Address CA19 I ffe Lew;s Name - Please Print Post Office and- Zip Name - Please Print Post1 Office and{ Zip) { Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip a�—fF �e zsi.�2 . A�� l.r✓yhc� ;rra,-'il / / : •G /7 fi i° WI S —ignature 'Name - Please Prirrtj (Address) Signature (Address) I. Signature i Y ` tAddr ss Signature i \C— (, Address Signature Address Signature _ �19 Arci6 Z e4r� Dr. Address Lznv , GG! D (Signature) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P/) Z2 I -I /V/4/ Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip �f Jam A a / Name - Please print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print f,>-,, 1�LC,, Ua...29 Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print _? �. -I- (Post Office and Zip) ✓�Qn �. r ra. h� l i n Name --Please Print �!'!�:'i �; J can e.� � o•� ✓ � :� � ;( 5 (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We', the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we.have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. AFuhe'r&ap,?vals ofj .. c rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. t e) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip Signature) (Name - Please Print) - Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print) � f � -73 (Addre s Signature Address ignature L/V �- (Address) (Post Office and Zip) D �fi��161e 0 (Nade - Please Print f � 14. Post Office and.Zip Name - Plea a Print Post Office a6d Zip over Signature Addr (Signature) L �! /2 / .;(Address) gn C 7K. Addres (Signatures C6 (Address) (Signature)_. d res / 6L Signature Address Signature ra 96D� S)aatture Address Signatu e N Address Signature Hc- 6 ► J3tr-/- / 9 y (Name'- Please Printj Post Office and Zip / //1 AX / 6NiS�(', n' Sle ame - Please Print Post Office and Zip) i 1 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip x/w/ "L'/C/-/ //;/, Name - Please4,C, ,Print 4 1 1> /v 1 , e's I/I d Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) l (Post Office and Zip) TC 1110e ry Name - Please Print Post Office /aa d Zip) , Ja n -.f �C Ale &j �t'n Name - Please Print�/ I/ fi o� va Post Office and' Zip Name- Please Print) - CA 0 ,5-7. J v NCTIcti V Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip L L/A 1y1 !°A -V -i jv T e C -ame - Please Print " (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of.the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MOROORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. • "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. SignatuO-iiY 2 0 Address Iff Signat ) .4ZX Ad ress (Signature) 77 Address Signature Address 0. �?x - d� !' Signature � vk' Address co, //, ,rl m J rr, �W T - (Name - Please Print )/' CA s)'Ic'f �lq 1 o / Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) 6J, ncJWs,,t_ V z Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip '' S4/ s Name - Please Print Post 0 fice and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Si nature Address v 'T,, Name - Please Print) �_ _ G`� •,�aGS lam' Post Office and Zip C e En e tQ Signature (Name - Please Print (AddressPot Office and• Zi ) ,n ail ,�✓LI � 1 �, l/l l � 1 Signature .SS S' (°, T> Nam. - Please Print (Address) Post Office and Zip 66��� --nq N y LFUIVLI7-- Signatu Name -'Please Print 69 3 Z AM 6 .iA AV f/&vs rt Vot - 2 2-6 S� (Address) (Post Office and Zip (Signature) ...%.11 F4ffl_,, JA • . _. 4461� C-41, ; - 1 R- M MSM,� 21 (Address)' /� Signature U` e,-�-loo (Address) ry ,W ! ame -Please Print) Post Office and Zip z�q,, Name - Please Print AA�z� a:t. , (-OPost Office a Zip) Name - Please P int P Office an Zip Name- Please Print (PosV Office and o IiP,,O/a s r/FQPr— Name - Pilsase Print f//Z /6cmor le ro u V, +- Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Pos Office and ZijCt PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals/'gf the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. i (Signature 4,10 1v)edfP /, ()) t Address Si nature (Address) (Signature) 7 y S - Aaµ- Dr Signature ,fk-- Z., ?�� ) �,/.* , , Addre ignature 16 .5Z4 A1,2 Address ' (Name - Please Print Po t Office an rrip (Name - /Please Print) SJ-eX (7A_1J_ �f L V d C) -7Poft Office and Zi �- SCo-E•f j sdo���NS (Name - Please Print S4o>"s61 1A Zze-SS (Post Office and ip 161%X1 Z�/,/,q N e - Pleas Print,41 CJ ce anj Zip (Name -please Print) /*- "Jgl �� 1""'e 9 S� Post Office and Zip over Signature 41'2 U/ i 1,0 xr" .6&, Address Signature O . S Etis o n 4 a Address P of op, Si a ure (Ad —dress) Signature Address f Signatur �—((Address) ^ 6 aa ignature r Address (Signature) 5-5-C1 �o UP 42� R010! ei-�p (Name - Please Print (Post— O� and Zip Rober- ,& /)4vile*,:� (Name - Please Print e 6 4 Zz Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) 6 S VA r� Post Office and Zip Y Name - Please Print VA z zG ss (Post Office and Zip) (' /,�-' 7�_rt L1 S . J _ Name - Please Print) P 0. %R,,X /V -sf - (Post Office and Zip Q Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Est Office and Zip 0? I?®vr CoC/ a 7- (Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip , CA42/o / 5 die_ Name - Please Print .5e 726JT (Address) (Post Office and Zip) 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the cdirrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 1 68 Address (Signature) (Address) (Signature) O b 7-/2 6-D &lLlnJ C�2• Address Signature S� L/ 13acKiti G Address Signature Soy 13u Kt'�3 6M Do. Address �Ann-Q, Name - Please Print) 1 s Qa�(�5� Post Office and Z' 7-112-Il,vs rc/tsT (Name - Please Print) ZzliS Post Office and Zip P Zie-,.<,T Name - Please Print SNP Ck�l, , Post Office and Zip L v E-L L/ /-) /? . G AX UE/z Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 7)av►C. G �Ni/e✓� (Name - Please Print) .$� f c 14ck S C.' Z Z 6 SS Post Office and Zip over Signature .Address j Signature P—T-'It / — P3% (Address) r Signature) (Address) 0 &= — Signature ( ddress) Signature) _;Ir(Add ss Signature Address ql�l& .0 - ;60- Signa re tv5 w.1c ess ^% (9-yo" 571Un e— Address) /1;"., 'Ile Signaturen / (Address) ease Nrin �CG3 st Office and Zip ViNQ_' N�f- //C Name - Please Print z-z c=G3 Post Office and Zip) ,e71_ 1 /,e A ,Lz)G,,� (Name - Please Print) (Post Office nd Zip Name - Please Print ss� y� oOffice and ip) �- C'1'/ic�� ��4 .7'SDh (Name ---Please- Print) P t .Office Z1p q er�h2 �.'EACCIZ Name - Please Print P st Office and Zip) /L;,rz eoRm o Name - Please Print) Post Office a d Zip VW Nam@- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip C'eGY�e /�, /,'/ CCQ d2 (N'aamme --Please Print) / y� (Post Office and Zip) - 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. r A"a/ (Signature) C . Address / -(,Si gnaature Z 7✓ �/l/DDd$ i�P �. S � � � Address (Signature) lZr ►3 A, M 14 Address (Name - Please Print '6 3 Post Office and Zip) (Name'- Please Print) ZZ( -5_� -(Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip w l lL�09AJGi o Name - Please Print CRJ C,�- Post Office and. Zip)f -1 0 %.i q 1 A S 'L A d P•c = c.�f (Name-- Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (,D- AE��- USignature) i 6• t! .1 I' LA_i� MN -A l ►'j (Address) S'g�n_yature)�/ �o h-k - l-e�) Ave_ d res r (�gnature) -7Q Ni jA f/ Ad- ess ) C. �. Ia Signature (Adamess ignature A ress i /� (Signature) T f Ad ss D (Signature) v (Address) Jo%,v Cf Pefii- 1 Name - Please Print UJ►luc�es _ l ff ZZ 601 Post Office and Zip h ,dlo4�, k� (Name - Please Print 4 I�J9 ot�S� Post Office and Zip � Z,9w2LVC� 7 ,Name - Please Print) 14 5 53 AIo D7..�'rt��ti�.r.�' Post Office and Zip q66-(,- 6 kr-T,.,4, S�-� Name -Please Print Post Office and Zip LUh-eft2 (Nade - Please Print) e ns C,7LZl as Le Ty— (Post'Office and // p G a Ad ot:2cz Name - Please PrintT J,�",j G, J Po t Office and ip) SQD6i Name - Please Print S hems C1 �a Qc Cow Post Office and Zip `,5 0 Z Name- lP1 ase Print I (Pot Office and Jie/ Name -/ Pl ease Print), / Pot Office and i i �l Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent . willingness of the .officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to th-e availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Addr s) r (Signature) 13z o Address �G �4 (Signature) Addres --- -- 'gnat 1WI Address Signature YI - ------------ ---- Address (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) a T h e �'ti e �- j`a TL (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 4,1/7 -e e-) L / e- 1A M Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print 0eff)sC ,_L{_J 2:zu� CPolst Office and Z p over S gnature 2SM T.A J AQ RZ Dk (Ad ress) tj (Signature) STE9Re'w5 sqc.os Ro Geri" Avg. v� d res 617-1 Signature (Address) �— (Signature) R4yM0Iy ,S (Name'- Please Print S,C_. Post Office and Zip V/,,enrx_4h J 5,6l /A-MRe Name - Please Print ST.D6en5 C,:& 22655 (Pot Office and Zip) --E V ELI W . A A 2 D M Ai� Ctrs Name - Please Print) kq i�- (Address) !Cz A Signature -- '-� B a a ► �1 e.. I7 a ►� 2 Address Signa ur , % 0z", i•� �(Y\ 4e P_j (Address) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office aAd Zip) /-'-/ 6 r if e- . E P 6- (Name - Please Print) axe�lP vz�,- Post Office a Z'i-p fo'6� n ¢ f0 CJ'a rR � i' d le y Name - Please Print) (Post Office dnd Zip) r Name - Please Print P st Office d ip LQWat.-JetA. Snnoo* Name- Please Print C ,Va. bSS (Post Office and Z o Name --Please Print ( st Office and ZVO) j me - P ease Print S. C� V4e7- � � (Post Office and Zip) 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM'BE IMc1EDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake -which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. -/,� 11-LOL Signatu e) qO U 1Lr110(e ee, Address gnature) Address (Signat ) Address Signature Namenn - Please Print) J�e Aenj Cc C V� ZZ S Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) STL� �s C`ir 2_. s3-- Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print_` S-�`�'�l� � —s �, �t 4UA Post Office And Zip �o/`/S Tczu Name - Please Print �0 ';F0 x 730 - sf X e4, C,'� t/ (Address) Post Office and -Zip) (Signature) Name - Please Print i 4,�'3 sue, * ,#b, / e. S ,4 iv j y Address �Ss Post Office and Zip ����t� - box over Z z s s Q p �Signature) .Address Signatu e (Address) Signature Address ) �C (Signature) (Address)- (Signature 3$ � Tc&ckSDn C)e, Address C Signature W� ZCA I oS A (Address) Signatu Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature (Address) (Name - Please Print) 44.,� tle. Z.2ax—j— Post Office and Zip Name - Plea`se Print') Vew4 cer-4 7 2 P st Office and'Zip) e Name - Please Print .ate 1. 4_j C'�� � V4 • (Post Office and Zip L_ rkr \,,(. Mt l l e,Vr Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (NameVk l�Please Print w�v s IVA 60 Post Office and Zip flu OL Nam - Please Print Post Office and Zip f Na Name - Pleaa Print 5 fie• s C Post Office and Zip d , Name- Please rint .;��/,� � JA '(PostOffice and Zip )C72E'D45')e I Ct -19�20eAJ11 "C-S (Name -'Please Print) S C - VA z- S__5' Post Office and Zip , C 1 V_ t 5 o Name - Please Print �- (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses -promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) -F ' q 'PAdEk, ,P, (Address) �> � G✓,y-T.,rI s Gl�svt , ,ct boo over U11V DIC'" -&s R 4)1_&_11 Name - Please Print Post Office andZip) �Q Name - PleasePrint) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) VA (post Office and Zip - P4-cb L &it-d � L4,1+ Nime - Please Print ,� T �, 6 ,/- 1 F /,� 2- Post Office and.Zip 0 G. l). /LL12VU, Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi'p L: ►emu ,. � : 4 61AMMB Signature (Address) ddress ignature Address Signature Address (Address) Name - Plea a Print C�4 (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) --515 i2T c. /,?© � �✓i — Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip PcL+ -Pa i n +c r Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip W4 ud,4 & (Name - Please Print) (Polst Office and Z p _sue Name - Ple se Print) Post Office and Zip J"pe L �d�ten. Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip dot, S (Nam - Please Print Pow Office and Zoy OQ V- • O Y' i e-Hs Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip S//C( , � jGe &� // Name - Please Print RG C A(J S (Post Office and Zip) J5 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. F r her approval he current development laps for Wheat° are unacceptable. 'noQ- YY1 10./ J _eA CJ',-Q-a i nature Name - Please Print) ?� .(Address) Cam. a Signature cc.�--- (Address) Signa e) Address WOC6� 4e__a� Signature o S Sr 'm %1-pr5"- 4ke_ (Address) (Signature) Address Zrx., Post Office and Zip (game Please Print) (Post Office an Zip) �o/- ���, 6c ,-ee— Name - Please Print f4,pA,9;k s Vl'q 2-Z6s s (Post Office and *Zip) 0 /?m✓ k'Ac F Name - Please Print s�reA-µr C',f, VrT Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) ,5. L/, Post Office and Zip over a-2�2�� �Z2� Signature 2?,L- 80416, 4 Address Signature 0• ISO eS6- ��- ,r/•�- ^� (Address) (Sig ature Addr Signature (Address)- z/v err r (Signature) ./7/V !A Mf t ,4,4GJ/// Name - Please Print (Pqst Office ard/ZipJ n, j �M m0 ns Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name Please Print (Post Office and Zip) 1/4A),C ,L lwl eeelS Name - Please Print) L4 Address(Post Office and Zip) Signature Name - Please Print) lL�(1,frri > 1 ff��ifNs Cj� (Address) Signature �e-� &Weyv sc Address Signature Address Signat re 5 Address Sign e Ld4fiBA-ER Die Post Office and Zip) r� �llrG�\ Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print (Yost Office an Zip) Name - P easePrint) S— -,�o.Rox 225 OqFACAL c , Post Office and Zip d Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) ),5 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral .We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. i Signatu/re) • Address (Signature) 1 17G Buc�,e1-�vc /t�4�u AP ST��P 027 C�i} Address aturel (Addre s) Signature (Add r ss .(Signature) _ Address over (Name - Please Print) 94 (Frost Office and Zip) (Name' Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name-'- Please Print SIXv4w r G 4, Z�— .22 6 sJ- (Post/Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print ews ' 64 '1206'S-s— P st Offic nd. Zip ('w raKZ. Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 4 (Tf gr ture) (Address) Signature kQt,(f A ,. (Address) I�. !T w _�. kSignaturej I Address 11 NSignaturgr U / Ad ass (Signature)A/C - Address (Sign ure) ,r?O 3 Ca j m�L,, 0c_ �UIHN-#A- V- FE/Z-� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip =-,-- Fpe--.q — n = � V, 41-1'. Name - Please Print —(Post-'Office and Zip Name - Please Print) a� s t Post Office and Zip.1 Name - Please Print (Po Office and 4i) l ©h,J w . ernoe�� Name - Please Print JCL)�Co Post OiLfice and Zip �K o r, e, r) :2 ---R I n 9�Lr Name - Please Print) �Se�hens Post Office and Zip) la±r i C i awls Name - Please Print �),, d a& ss (Postt Office and Z Name- P1 ase Print (Post'Offiand Zip) OM �}.D � Li✓J/ Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Z(QCh 4 m Name - Ple&te Print S,c, Va. zz 65� (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to.let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further p ovals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signat e) (Address) (Signature) rJ 30"1 N O t 4Jw 4_ , S% i (Address) Signature) Address Signatu Address Sign ture) 3 �f1812 LMS Cdl<< Address Q,c►-441�? r Q0t1,CA (Name - Please Print) �T•P�+E�S Cr'y. 2 2 Post Office and Zip JV,Aoi Imo, 1d e OL & n (Name - Please Print) h.ert _-, C V 0 Z a. G Svr Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Po t Office and Zip Name - lease Print (P6tt Office and. Z' 'Rociee A, 4X& l R (NarM- Please Print s @t_�7 r25lS Post Office and Zip over P 12P..i.�� w (Address) ignature) Address 0 , Signature (Address) (Signature) . l , `fix, Address Signature (Address) gnature Sy0(50>-C1 Address Si na ure M 9-Iftnb) &L90,OL —T Address A.. (Address) Name - Please Print � y Post Office and Zip E )0 1� Is&_ O,/ Q-C L r hi Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Ga E�e A R- Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip rna�,ne U, i�o (funs Name - Please Print ?-;23 (��u, Au e. ,'�iF�� -�Q�,c� (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Pos,t Office and Name - Please Print) Sf tf-�,S C,-7'V Vi-I (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print LeQrw-n5 4� c-3 (,o�55 Po Office and Zip Name- Please ostvOffice and Zip SH AR SM�zc� A� Name - Please Print ;5� k�� 3• 1/ aa66✓� Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (P st Office and Zip I PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services . -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. d - - (Signature -Address ignature Addres (Signature) 42 �r+P , Address Signature Address Signa re 70 F , AV Address TjoZ (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) LL L /-I V M/4 Al Name - Please Print) (Pod -Office d Zip iU CC( i/) - Name Please Print XL4� &t Z)a zZ6.5 ,_ Pos �trrOffice and ip VM G&4 Na e - Please Print a7a i w(nm Dn, Post Office and.Zip T�7lCxA C_. CJLA\nr Name Please Print) "Ic�s5 Post Office and Zip over . ilw%-z — - "e1. Signature 56,18 Qaj . Address o Signature (Address) Signa ure) Address 5Z4 Signature (Address) (Signature) dre Signature (Address) N .. ��r/l ....�. Signature Address a,.,_ at:i2�� Signature -Ti fer L . Name - Please Print S G V �� sS Post tffice and Zi 90�e - -/- L.J Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip &- A T T y (Name - PleasePrint) Post Office and Zip t L_5 /a, (,J / LL /y9�cS (Name - Please Print ,,c (Post Office and Zip) 2/,5 t �j lfx/tj e .47— Name - Please Print) Sf G'�pS Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) �` 1"E1a� Ct�fnar�Mi AY%6Y1 Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip :UA ,4 L i e- I T� ay i.-r-- (Name- Please Print (Post Office and Zip 1C1 a S r-ostViCle,- Name Please Print a c) e r►� c_e _s- �n e S U4C__ a5 S Address (Post Office and Zip MAR 7, Lp; Signatu a Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) IS PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. —7V6.41 P; L. i U� 4 — &Z-S' Signat U Ke (Name - Please Print / CC) c Addres Signat e) (Address) V U(_S%naturet (90 1 ,e v� Address Signature o r� A dress C- Signature v^�d 3 to d 141"11 Address (Post Office and . ip) Le ves cP (Name - Please Print) " Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) 2�e,o#eas 641, aat�ss Post Office and Zip s N e - Please Print (Po4t Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) �— Post,rOffice and Zip over � Ss S Vgnatu e Address i Signature dress) ignaiure �MWAR (Address) 1, Signature 6-t Ld . (Address) (Signatur (Address) Signature (Address) T,, Dt,�-�j. (Signature) Address Signatureb 2 6 Address A Al Si gnaturje,Y Address �yJ / /(S) n a t ur`e) 9TC1 s l/_ t r ` 8 � zo,?, L Ss ame - Please Print dll� Ile Pog Z o(9,49, e-49-W,-� ,Poost�Officee and Zip) (rl/��ts� �<,,, �v�'rLr= �s (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) 4, Name - Please Print (Post Office acid Zip) Name - Please Print ,-�/ A ,o,,td-A j c-. t Post Office and Zip T " fName - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Name- Please Print) ` (Post Office and i sTPr9z R C— Name - Please Print C5�1- , vq zZ6-� Posrt Office and'Zip 73-41 lit/ )iL4- Name - Please Print) ,p D, 6zX 28 S- ' 2-4 5�S (Address) (Post Office and Zip) 15 PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans fqr Wheatlands are unacceptable. 461 112__W19 6ZZ6*4�1 (Signature Address Signature (Address) (Signature) 041 cvbi Addres Sign to Address xv� c2y=� c - Signature (glz�,7o Q tec<ot A\):�_ Address uA (Name - Please Print 't� e S 0-, Y � (Po.stf Office and Z' l v QeC-AJ - i2 MdeGP (Name - Please Print) /4��5'� Po t Office n Zip G4%1'Ls6K) C- 24Cee' (Name - Please .Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please -Print) Post Office and.Zip Jots I` VrRJ�- (Name - Please Print) �-S 75) Post Office and Zi over M ss gnatge (Address) (Signature) 3v S. r Addr ) Signature o ,�o C)r. �, C (Address)- (Sign re) /F,f / e-,l 36 V S¢.. ✓4 (Address) Signat f d s W- Ef -.2c _ Address w Signature V,C;7_0PA Z- &C-,P*�f Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Pleash Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print)U (Post Office and Zi ) ..,4S 14 • W. WTF/ 6- Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip ?risr S. w� N e- Please Print A-O h V,1/ 6 - (� 74, . / /? post Wffice and Zip) - LI Name -*Please Print 5aI 5 -C- =C, 55 Address Post Office and Zip We,'fe� - Ay4i,:.C7- A Sc�FcaL�,c,L' Signature Name - Please Print '2z" -9 x 441�_V7�� (Address) (Post Office and Zip) IS PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. D L 7-Ti4 GI_4/ti Signatur Name - Please.Print) I�4 Address Post Office an ip) 7— (Signature) (Name - Please Print) A ress (Signature) aw (Address He/eh !Si�' e-600jAho (Address) Signatu (-Address) Post Office and Zip f �l (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please rent Post Office and.Zip ✓amp S .��ve rr � K Name - Please Print .5_4-elo L_4� C, Vy, Post Office and Zip over -//I Signature �d a/ales -14 S,, Address S i g n a t �•O. hoc �?�� ... L,&j AEpt, - (Address) — rx� A 2&� �A Signat e) '23 Atq2=aa d2�:j - �SL Address Signature n", >'P, kj-" Sign re S0�( PYX r i� r-• Addre Signature ju, p v l (4177r'17 V (Name - Please Print) S7 Post ffice and Zi Name - Please Print cL,-k-, A Post Office and Zto Name - lease Print Se. J/'�L-. 22�sS Post Office and Zip 80.rCJ, L. 3-�,A-I�r Name - Please Print l -1 1� Aa r rn ()y) 3+ - Le Post Office and Zip) --, -7—i4 C y -S:i4 w E-P, Name - Please Print) ;2-:) r, 5-5- Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 3e //a v-0 ,0_ ✓ Name - Please Print Post Office and/,Zip) -;�k y U � � b Name- Please Print Post Office -and Zip San L . p r- Name - Please Print 4 e, c4i ef!4 1 Post Office and ' p td*k -rev,- Name = Please Print) S l L,t V,4 z4 SS (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both.Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of he current development plans for W`heatlands are unacceptable. Ll )�a e l a (Signatu ) Name - Please Print) �$0 1''t)e-6Jc6ww_ 1Jc • C Address Post Office and Zip (Signs ure) (Name( - Please Print) Address Post Office an Zip Signature Na - Please Print /,�>�— � -�� —;a Address (Post and Zip) /Office Signs re Name - Please Print ��-- 2-z6s l�drW55, Post Office and. Zip o- �a�ss S gnature Name - Please Prin ) Address Post Office and Zip over `le. Izzze- (Signature) Ike (Address) Signature �I O C QLJFy �J (Address) (Signature) .91 Lnct ,` Address �- k ngn red lgro0 0Aona.,� (Address)U 'T �10 k Signature 333 ,Shcnondock Addr Signature 3 7 7 14 C.., J— (Address) (Signature) Address lea, Signature /,�� R �Iw ly y _J, - Address Sign ture . / Address C-am'�(V S. a,,, (Signature (Addres ) ZaLp21s _Z�. FL��.,z Name - Please Print) llJ ''�� i G S�yI# 2-• ZG d .r� l f.v. Post Office and Zip Lz J A J A*A-K.4j-S40,4j Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) l a /k I Z7 %4l • Name - Please Print) ,K Post Office and Zip 6-6,�w 5 VT�5w Name - lease Print 14J `/ ' Cv Post Office and Zip) Ro!,er L. L.Q1,1{ Name - Please Print) LI) 4 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print I Post Office and Z. p (�-- : '. ;1_1 P r ame - Please Print Post Office and Zip K, eEw 6 . 09, i Name- Please Print Z4476; v* Post Office and Zip 5 , C . lv (se-:zA,�_ � Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 1 L l,e!/ S, TL�u1E/LS Name - lease Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. rther a prov is o (Signature ,ZZ-6. Tress) the current development plans fgr WheatlanW dsare unacceptable. -� LAC Q �� (Name - Please Print) �u V ) IA6G 9 2,2,�661 Post Office and Zip). (Si'gndture) Add ess (Signatur IV PO4:�IVIA16,7z�V (� Address \, Signature Address 61 Si nature) l o (A dr s� �l E4� (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Uss :27 Name - Please Print)� -� i�dcSG �_ ---- Z�46l Post Office Ond Zi Name - Please Print \ Post Office and Zip J A w To �4 Ad-, I A/ Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over Cea Signature Name - Please Print �v - 0 lf'rouo!, C� �ddtess) Post Office and Zip Addre Y.12Vtl,. - n,..v -..e i g n a tCU r z/m/ (Address) Signature •.t/G (Address) l Signature Address �ignature� d ss Signature l0 VV (Address) Signatur 2 � � f'Q•c �c�Jcr v Address Ii Zr' _24�1 Signature (Address) _54'FRLA WIL_1KINS Name - Please Print 2LL .,GYuo [ Chi , V 71 l Post Office and Zip) C_h r e,s Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip e; "Al -S Name Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Y 3 a RAY 5 4;!� 7-F4R Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) C CLV-' b l' C'o t h Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print .(Post Office and Zip CLrleg �, ,-4� Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print ► Ln e 4 C V Y4 22G't5 I (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) XJ/ o7 / e- Lyo v/D A Vf n Addressi) (Signature) ?a Address Signature ;OV Of�EDUvr✓ eve ; 1 /AIC- (Addres (Signa re) a3 ri� e.,?-- (Addrks)) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Are is e., V. -7-3'G g se ti '(Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip a,ga % /m W e--s (Name Please Print C- ! f Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print A ,, Ale f1E57 r, e Post Office and. Zip w ?Q_�r%Co vvl u, (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over J,Z2� r" - (Signature)L W oh S Address 99 Si nature O� Address) Signature Address) Signature / 5/ l,J Address l • Signature 144e (Address) Signature Address S�n / re A dry s Sig/nature �% lZ �� �-z x, e- ,, G .- Addy s I Signature GLAt 2,,::5 AJ( z (Address) OQ[nn 2 EjcL(,S (Name - Please Print �tJ L%I j ,-&� . .1 zc n (Post Office and Zip) u S 6_�1y-5S Name - Please Print W i ,mc a6—sue, Vg-2,260/ Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print `N /,L D a �0-R I F � ] Ty-� Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print #ff C55S Jo1714-S Post Office and Zip, / % A i_, d S Name - P ease Print W/-_, . t r �� Post Office and Zip l=Lr'�� i� �v •if �,'�Lo i,�J ( Name -)) Please Print) riint) W l n C /7 C �•i'G �� r !/ �C Z 7- to G/ Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print /o4lv, L / t1a � Post Office and Zip) Name --PleasePrint) Post Office and Zip ,L(c( S6:AV (Ct Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further.approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. �✓ '�(Si gna�tYur- e, Address "(Signa-ture) dre s (Signature) Address Signature h (Na e - Please Print) /J1 ; /U C A e S (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip e k2Z 7, !4 1-1/2 (Name - Please.Print) Post Office dnd Zip gm / � Name - Please Print (Post Office and. Zip / WGr4_2 Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature f-- A ss Signature Address ignature) Address / Signature (A ress) Signature) �r Add ss � I'l Signature Address ,4 , Signature Address Signature (Signature) �Lp,u Mu-4 , (Address) (JName (� ---Please /_� Print) 1 jit,l o ,,? V l-� s 7z�� o4— Post Office and p 7C Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) / f Name - Please Print 'n/�-- H 4L-- S (Post Office and Zip) iX., (Name - Please Print Post Offi a and Zip) Name - Please Print �,-,0-0 W 7-11IL41., 1-7z�L0/ Post Off, a and Zip Name -/Please Print Post Office and Zip) J- tC h J-, r I, <� 2, y Name - Please Print ,? L-0 / Post Office and Zip S C. Lc Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip /+/- S ogz / �s z --Ma-me - Please P int (Post Office and Zip) le -S P ( (-- L- tit A Name - Please Print �L1NcA4stt1'L a2& el J (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the -apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) - Ad ress C(/Signature), (Address) (Signature) AMaAJl Address Signature Address Signature L W,7., Addres (Post Office and Zip) /9 (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) o,t, jj; .lea I q G o (Name - Please Print) Post Office ind Zi. Name - Pleaso Print Post Office and Zip /J A o • .- / Name - Please Print) Post Office a d Zip over Signature Ad ress xSignature .sLP /4-Sf--Wn U� i LAddress) Si �OMMPrro ature F3;A S4. (Address) Of Signature (A d ess) (Signature) t,J,�(o� Ad ess (SignaturtY • d �l � rf Address) Signature /C;l "Cs �, Address • r Signature Address Signature Address Signat re) (Address) Name - Please Print 22•bo i Post Office nd Zip all Nam - lease Print Post Office and Zip) 7) nq-4 � q N Name - Please rint zZ601 Post Office and Zip Ley /-C,oL D , ///ii o iv Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip se-4 S, S Name - Please Print 0 �4 /e � �%, S� -r nc (Post Office andZip) - v 1 1 /gib P- )da(3 t4 Name Please ri n / t) Post Gffice,Snd Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name P ease Print Post 0 ice and Zip Al Name - Please Print c (Post Office a ip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment -facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. - "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur er approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( 'gnature) Q Address (Signature) Address Signature) Addr�s yl- Signature y'd>�ress Signatu e Address (Name - Please Print) Post Offic and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Plelise .Print) ost Office and Zip) c) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office an .Zip �• �aa4 �irvn._�� Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over MA Si nat re (\ .Address ppEQve �v esT�iZ Signature tA1T Wdress gnar.,yre Address Signature ddress) Signature �f Ad ress -5-7` c- kleY -Name Please Print Post Office and Zip 7:�I� t Name - Pleask Print va- Post Office and Zip) i`421� - 2��V Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip rev 6)e�o c.J /.J J�- Name - Please Print 'fi ( Post i ce and Z�i ) Name - Please Print r,, 74 S, /,- Post Office and Zip - h obc p T 9 -eA v2 S Name - Please Print {Posst Office and Zip) W 'L Name - Please Print) Post Office nd Zip Name- Please Print Post Office a d Zip Name Please Print Post and Zip 1 oJ& Signature Name - Please Print) b l'' -S" 0 Ad 4�s (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are.acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signatur) 3a .v d a-,? ✓�� Address ign re) 2cc� S�ctwhec Q (Aof e s s) �(Si at re) G o / �J, ia1G.�fl�1 �7 A ress) Signat o %Address Sc�l Lil.i J d,,,l Sig ture � Address � q6 Al - Al IA Oyu e Z. 22-7 Name - Please Print) Post Offic d Zip Y►�1 a� � W� ram- �a bol (Name-- Please Print) ....Post Office and Zip (Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over 1 0 �zj H-, Q 5ignature Address Signature Addre (Signature) 6 C% C,,- 1 0 / _ % '(Address)/ Signature l fv'ci,5 ill / C� 1 r (Addr`e/s) (Signature) Address Signature Address h C= j4�,-j s A/- Signature �1,2',f�lc�'�4ivT>aA (Address Signature VVJ V�, Address Sig ture `� Addr ss Signature E i .M r VA- L--1 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip LE (Name - Please Print Y L�f-E- r�� ` / Post Office and Zip) \A --I'- r K - ( � Ir," M i� -� Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip � o (-, /,) 6-' /i/m; et - Name - Please Print �;!-za (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office andZip) Name - Please Print Post Office` and Zip) Ira V-N Q� �J ' .r (Name (- Please Print ( Post Office and Zip) t L,,TCL Name --Please Print) %A q L� gt-;- Cam- / A` :. (Post Office and Zip) jF (Namee - Please Print (Add ess) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature.) (Address)�1 (Signature) Address (Signature) 1-a xNv n . (Address) Signature ddress r Signatu 3 Z) v_ Address Z Z 1pv L w C� (Name - P ease Print) (Post Office and Zip) 3-A M--.S "-(: ArN (Name - Please Print) %( i' IV 11, 't e- $ T -e r V,a z Z i, (Post Office and Zip) lei o_Hop�t� V%/_r� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip '2L, TA/c: )i 72FliAL7— Name - Please Print v ) d'...S NA W.IVI c' A 1/ c Post Office and Zip Z il � S �GiGE — / Name - Please Print) 3 uy 5 r-/14 r•,lwc Ayi , Post Office and Zip � ; &v/ over S gnature A dress Signature ( 3 Md11,'vigst.Wari A br, (Address) ignature) (Address) X c,(.2r .�LWf�'�Cfir J Signature (Address) Signature) G! Ad ress Si nature /- j/�. (Address) gnature Address Signature Address S gnature —� Ad ress Signature (Address) GI Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip La,, (Name - Please Print r, Va, Z7_&611 (Post Offic6 and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) - (Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Pint) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Pam' t J Post Office and Zip) ✓ Name - Please Print t� t n o v —r, (Post Office and Zip) �1 \0 Liss Name- Please Print (Post Office �and Zip) 1TT k7 f Name - R ease Print (Post /'-Office and Zip Name - Please Print) t.c3 tf,)CAe ) le t?C 2 24�Ql (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 180houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for publicfu s for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of aj sewa and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable Signa ure) / (Address) Signature / re (Signature) Address (Signature Addt s Signatur ddVs (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip -(Name - P'Tease _Print ) !9�t2kN-,,Cl eS�ci, 0'1 C,0 J Post Office and Zip JecLriF 1 / e L.. � (J2�L�nuTC_h �. (Name - Please Print �// A, VO i r e it e 5? Ci — ,2-2 G J / Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over _41. Signature Address Signature 001 / Addres.s; T - (Signature) (Address) Signature / r N 1 rf Signature (Address) Signature �- i � e PC/ Address � m Si " (Address) G ^ (Signature o� i0 I )A :q-lnno c v-� t ��: ,�C . Ua (Address) �_TiJC/ LyLZC,• Z�_ (Signature) ( Name - Please Pri nt(Y Post Office and Zip v Name - Please Print 0 (Post %Office and llip) Jame - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Jeg;-ci C e A�� L Name --Please Print _ (Post Office and Zip) Or&CL��S`5t� ✓ Pik L,/` ,`' Name - Please Print) , Post Office and Zip C, 1 ✓ A 1 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name m Please Print) L) ;,, c 4 P,s -f.2�- k1,4 :;? z G Q I Post Office and Zip (Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print I �t-r/L rvlrl ii/ Sr w I C, (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County. and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation. problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. X:�, &112, - -t�- S1 natu -CHc ST-r)Z f Ad d� , Signature) Address o�G�� i ,�Gl•-�� (Signatur 34--I L� G� N ,�� �, C_ U.4t Address Signature /''L N j4 V E re s n� Signature) —1 �-- E l9� Address /Y) (Name - Please Print P t Office and Zip n ' (Natne - •Ple e Print) ost Office and Zip �,N,FL rr_,Fj6 DNS (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name- Please Print Post Offic nd. Zip , S - -To4 rn �0 Name - Please Pr-tht ) Post Office-aV Zip C% over gnature / (Signature) (Address) ignature) (Address) S gnature (Address)- c Z (Signature) �T- Vl ILL_ Signature 3 )� (Address) gnature (Address) Si nature Address -4 - J� Signature (Add res i nature (Address) J�k. NwI3 Name - Please Pint C 6 -n Post Office #nd Zip Name Please Print _ Post Office and Zip) Z7Z (Name - Please Print) r� Pos Office and Zip) Name - P1 ase Print Post Ofifice and Zip) fY1 • . fy-\ r.), l o,_��L (Name - Please Print) Post O,Yi ce and Zip) C ! l 6& C, D . . 4-e kv cL,r f Name - Please Print (Pot Office and Zip Name - Please Print r Post Office and Zip Nam -'Please Print Post Of ice and Zip) Tel �s ir,, UJ/ (. Name -'Please Print 2 Z Post Office and Zip Name - PYease Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently.planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signatu _) 1/0 e4: f A A �S_ 4 (Address) Signature Address ignature) 7T b C4, rJ4P_ (Addre S gnature Address (Signature) JJ4 L6 W Address i✓(�/ (Name Please Print!) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) C _T - Post Office and Zip du ^J � F /- (Name Please Print JR zZ6 Ss (Post Office and /9-c/aw f , Z,-,r _ v L- . (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) 121 �z " Post Office and Zip over F Si nature (Address) )/� Signature / s - 04 L, Z', u /U (Address) (Signature) ,/ J. Address Signature (Address) (Signature) D Inc/� tea / -7 Address Signature A'dress) Signature Addr s Signature �1rl S c3&-.)rDp Rt� 1 Address (Na_meJ - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print LIE ost Office and, Zip),, ,(( afie - P1 ase Print) (J� /" __ Y,�' 919Z61 Post Office and Zip GC17 (Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip /91AX Y X" , 1j1 /4D Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) +rJC c`5�rr � �G • ��C-w i Post Office and Zip' r Name- Please Print >�� 1, .2 Post Office and Zip) MA; ru A m ji 111'"i L 1111 N me --P ease Pri t Post Office and Zip J. �� Is��E���j Name -'Please Print 1,J r ^ c 4C s �C/F+ (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public fund's�or the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in'both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Sch-As adequate primary and se "Moral -We placed on public use of dollars. currently planned, we have concerns condary educatd-snal facilities. further have grave moral misgivings a recreational lake which has been as to the availability of about the constraints improved with Federal tax -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Address) Signature �wn�,�-� Address Signature Address Signature Address (Signature) Address (Name -.Please Print) 2'c"a/ Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) l� T V/A Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip aJ C-� 4'N J Name - Please Print) j ( r Post Office and Zi m �rebhl� /(Name - Please << Print) Post Office and Zip over Addre s O . Signature 1,7 (Address) „ 1,,E / (Signatuft) Address Signature (Address) (Signature) Address I (Sig'natTrb) Address "Signature (Address) Signature i 3 3 ,2 c) Address ure Address Signature C,CD J, - P (Address) r" r r,,- (Post Office/and Zip (Name - Please Print)' (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) v /(Post Offic and Zip — / e �,<,/s Name - Please Print =.ritic tl�? 22 Go/ (Post Office and Zip) Name -�Pl/ease Print) ( 9 6 Post Offiand Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print /I_i�sf� , -"7,;LZ�/ Post Office and Zip Name- P Print n e Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Pr nt (Post Of ice and Zip Name - Please Print) la v C C/.- A,�r4j tj (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We,request that.A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further pproval� of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print Address (Signature) J t'AeiG 0v Address Sign ture Adfdrr ss GT e /�1- 6vi�w�/ . Signature Address (Signature) f / ' 4x 26 Address Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) cis Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print T Post Office and Zip L !3 4(/2S Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) over 19 I'Signature) (Addresil gnatbre -3�'&, p-1 I p t L41, , , Address) (Si.gn-ature) dress gnature (Address)- (Signature (Address)-, (Signature) F (Address) 7j (Signature) 3 Yl (Address) (Signature) / Oddress) U (Signature) I (fkddress) &, e7. se±�, (Signature) DA/' (Address) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please PrintPost ) Al Xel- , Office and Zip) 1-1t( k (Name -.Please Print) A 5 (Post Office and Zip)' Al I C 4AP— L A N (Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (—Name - Please Print) ( /, 6d11'I41*C . Cf I --Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) 3, (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) We� 14- f_/,� f (Name-'Pl—ease Print) xv n jz, p 9 - I, J4 , 7- J � n / (Post Office and'Zip) (Name - 'Please Prinf) IZ 2_ (Post Office and Zip) kt/d/w,r 4, ��� y (Name - Please Print) Mal (Post Office and Zip PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 200.4_houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage_and _water.__treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed —on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furt a approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. l 4,Signature) Address (Signature) �) Address (Signature Address i nature _ Address Sifh ature (Address) over (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) L, , % ' - C---_ % /,�,17 0 2-2- 6 1 Post Office and Zip L �} Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Plea a Print) UJTN L-Is hp, host Office and Zip r Signatur / (Address) Signature (Address)`` 'gnature (AA dres ) A-Cx V , C�n'l—LL- Ci,-, Si gnal!ure (Address) I � (Signature) Address Signature - ,ddres s ) (Si g,n,&f ur (Address) Signature � Address Name - Please PrinIJ Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip /'V/ /9 rC V f � �'t'`' •� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip lame - Please Print) A Post Office -and Z' p ) act��r•c-„� �j: Name - Plea" Print)_ I Post Office and Zip / Name- Please Print 'IV +Nc VA Z7 60. Post Office and Zip) ^� Signature Name --Please Print) �c<4 r c Add ess Post Office and Zip 1 (Si nature) (Address) ��� c.;� �J w r-,�;•,tS-moo ,� Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on -the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities-r "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals f the current d elopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable (Signatu _ (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip (Signatur (Name - Please Print) Lp 1J t fit - V c r / (Address):" Signatt6re) Ar EX Gz'4'�L .ra Address x_ Signature (Address) { Signature Address SPost Office and Zip) C44 ? ? �, Name - Please Print - st Office and Zip Name - Please Print % n -2 1 Post Office and.Zip P fel-41-er Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature. Address C Sign�ture C c�Y dress) '--("Signature) ("Signature) (Address) Signature (Address) (Si-qnature dress) Signature C" C/t Address Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print , (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print �2,74, d/ LJ (J) Post Office and Zio) Name - Please Print b✓. �y � f1�.3- i E l f�' .2 ..2.r ter' (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) 2 (Post Office and Zip ,04 L/ Name - Please Print i Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip ame- Please Print Post Office and Zip) 4 6+ r, I " C -Name --Please Print h C � e s Post Office and Zip 2,20 In Name - Please Print A l+l AJ S /— (Address) (Post Office and Zip) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction"to let the developer determine the.scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) `(A(lress) (Signa ure Ad: pss) (Vgnd ' re) Address ignatur '/_ Address Signature !-(A dress`/ �( Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) ame - Please Print) Post Office an'd Zip ~ JIC�te&s i / ��We# (Name - P1 ase"Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print • �: c ' j /`� (Post Office and Zip over G� x {(Signature ..'L r(Address) S gnature Name - Please -Print (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print rj l G 1 kv i f1 �/' �. �b�r /,^ )E" ��� i1\ {t V A (Address) Post_ Office and Zip') SignatdH) Name - Please Print Add ess Post Off- ice nd ip x�R � r Signature Name - Please Print (Address) (Signature) �[ Address �Sig 'ature)��_,. Addres ) z� , �17Y S gnature `j C 6-MC. Address Signature (Address) (Signature) Address (Signature) (Post Office and Zip) �- (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print L.� •jr'1�'E,�� Lit � � ���� Post Office and Zip) /1; L-C Name - Vlease Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Z'p Name - Please Print L �� L. c- (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we.have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about -the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals. of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. -ice i •y. 1-i�:c_�c..��i, �� Signature M- Address Sign ture) �\ 0_ (_ � IVG��� Address Signature Address Signatu e Address Signature %S ( . Lz'ieb� S'f Address s-')_ J,-" , (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Z-0 2S M %- T 0- �A k�-= L c (Name - Please Print) w\r.,,-)G. , \� -�C\ . 2a(::, r-, (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 'u h 6 C anI M I,0 S A Name - Please Pr nt Post Office and.Zip Vi ,ICJ ; oxc 11 Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over 42' umz (Signature) Y (Address) Signature c((Address) (Signature) Address Signature i 0 (Ad dre Signature dress Sig . at re Address Signature (Aad ess Signat (Address), FAKIMA Iddress) '-1 ved r1/� lc � (Name -- Please Plri nt C/`,� _z.2,C; Post Office and Zip C� hC u I/I I `1 Name - P1 as-e Print 4 LY i. i VC Yl.tiLIYL , 26 [ � .) (Post Office andZip) (-Name - Please Print �,I )) l /�� Z z 4 sS T C- 9 I/A (P"ost Office and Zip Name Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Pl ef)se Print) (Post Office and Zip z;v5 r=.v,le �,, Name - Please Print) C;v j en C � 05 F-r- � Cr Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and and Zip) 12fcv- /� l �4t Ci Name Please Print Post Office and Zip 1 C_ l I —/Y. e All Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Signature Name -Please Print) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands,.and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have.concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Address) (Signature) s /VA/4>.;- 6,_Ck� Addres's (Signature) S�- (Address) Signature l 11 w \" -Ni o ,-k 4, (Add s s Si gn#Apre dress Z,--4(?.A _`3/ t--� .R crtil (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) // , e , 411 _ Post Office and Zip )_AJ",\ iEv-,, Name - Pleaset Print) Post Office and Z p Name - Please Print k1���. VA L ('1 (Post Office and.Zip) Name -, P_eease Pr' ) Post Office and Zip over gnature 30 Address) Signature / - (Address) Signa ure) -7 i Address (-Signature) (Address) (Signature) 7 -Z Addr gnature (Address) 11 AI Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print —5*4z eN SQL-, z �� Post Office and Zip) Jo L+r-I C-.',-' Y,- z Name - Please Print , 1/A o2a6S� Post Office and Zip) t? V I k(,- r Le v. Name - Please Print 6' (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) ost Office and Zip) ame 4jlease Print Y;--,b r-cz Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please(Print) bpc.G d 1A Post Office and Zip _ 1 i S // L Name- Please P in L Post Office and Zip) G- OIL-b LAJ �-k )56 Y Name - Please Print) W-31)� ME�;TEk- z)-(46 I Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) r (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) .� C,-(o r-r� 0. Address (Signature) r Address (Signature) Address d-' - (Signature) (a),ox 202 Address Signature) e.gr)c U-)- Address I - C I a-, �1 - 6(-61# A, (Na e - Please Print) Ir ?_- �k -t 6 dJC 1 d Post Office and Zip) C. !y (Name - Please Print) +c 3 II Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print)a (Post Office and Zip Name `- Please Print c Post Office a d. Zip Name Please Print)Ud, Sa- ,— s s-" , t most Office and Zip over &me, k/ zk� Signature Fox 4- Address S orA Signature (Address) Signature 1 Roes'gB (Address) Si ' at ree ddr ) (Signature N.?4;z \ `160�- (Address) Signature RO. 9 D - 7 Address Signature r,2 L�2 .12 betel CJ' Ad -ss Signature } Address (Signature) qU Name - Please Print P//i vl G h r� 1�, ? 7�0I Post Office and Zip Name - Please Pri' -a 0lti-6-op K UQ . Z�6, (Post Office and Zip Z41-4z (Name - Please Print) 11A 2�2¢ Post Office azif / (- / 42: Z' Name - Please Print Post Office and'Zip) s/>,<; A-,) (Name - Please Print) ,!� L PI13Rv0K A ZZ�2� (Post `Office and Z'p . �0G V� W�k- O c Name - Please Print) . 154,e n A Post Office and Zip) ,L �- , ry) D /Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip M I C,he% 4. 0061 Name- Please Print (t) wcC e 5k2� \/A ZZL01 (Post/Office and %Zio) Name - P1 ase Print ost Office and liff Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently'planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral . -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approval-s•of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Sign ure) 2-i Address /�J � ///J✓yam// � /J (Signature) (Addr s Signature) ZL� " i Address S i g n a t u Address (Signature) A dress CIA) W t, �. 4t/:-, Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) ,"/A 14 ic::�h,-J% �_ , _J Name - Please Print) b o a.— U14 , 2 'z. G -z '� (Post Office and Zip) ,4,L_t1 o Cl/_SQ (Name - Please Print) -14 -2 1 Post Office and Zip (_7 )- l o-�t: W Name - Please Print n �s4cr C;2-a6 �f Post Office and Zip ( Name - Please Print/� l/ (2 Post Office and Zip over i (Signature)(, (Address) '4 (Signature) .(Signature) (Address Signature (Address) l:U ' Signature Add ess (Signature) 1 Addre s) Signature a Address Signature Addre s (SI, / � l Address (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print /(Post Office and Zip) Na - Please Print) 4,v,4� s .2 Post Office and Zip) Name - p�pz Drin+ (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Prin m Post Office and .Zip Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print) Post Office and Zic 5 (Name - Please Rrint))l SUN Post 0 fice and Zip Name - Please Print) zz ('—� (Address) va (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned_ density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature). (Name Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Address (Signature) Address Signature J Address Signature) Address (Name - P1'ease Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print , Post Office and Zip) Name = Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name = Please Print) Post Office and Zip over e2 Si ature Name - Please Print sAM 16 d Address Post Office and Zip (Signgure 6" 146 -" , (Address). 22(Signature) (Ad Signature Jj, (Address) (/Signature) Address Signature Address Signature 9- Address) -f�atu) V,, & y2z&70,0� Signature � C i 0 t-K.P-' L41 Name - Please Print LLGAP- B P-6o"L. V A ZLG � (Post Office and Zip) -LL - SdW Name - Please Print Po t Office and Zip 9 Q t- sz ti Name -PLYease Print (Poste Office and Zip)/ ame - Please Print) %aY,%ro�� Post Office and Zip Name - Please print , t (, Itar bro 0I�-- �,2'b,� Post Office and Zip) '6 , c Teni ,- (Name - Please Print) � c Post Office and Zip Migrie- V, kiehl j'f l 4Hn—so,3 Name- Please Print C/ lcJ C- ea _ 0/ �innhesCr UH. �0�(00/ A -ss Post Office and Zip �pJ Signature Name - Please Pri Addres�j JL � z (Signs ure Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction'to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational la':e which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) Address (Signature) Address l., (Signature) t Address Signature . _ / 3 �..< Address (Signature) J /&4 13� -o Address Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Z. Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip /C `�� w Name - Please Print) a/, "�ol< z 'r' > Post Office and Zip over 1r Si pa re) Address , Signature (Address) ;J Signature Li (Address) ' Signature (Address) (Signature) Address Signature Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) - (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Add-ress Post Office and Zip) Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) S-1 CE� PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and-` Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development -of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and.secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the ��current •,development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name -/Please Print) Address (Signature) (Addre,gs) j (Signature) Address Signature Address Signature) Address (Posf Office and Zip)"" (Name - Please Print) L > Pos,t Office and Zip) (Name - Please .Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and -Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature Address Signature (Address) /�2 �- Signature Addres ignature (Address) (Address) .'gnature Lit', Address Signature N �-� (�;� roc In� ZAddress) (Signat re) (Address) (Name = Please Print Post Office and' Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office�a�n(d'Zip) "_L,b-`f P V\t Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip)i ' ! J Name - P1 se Print) \ ` Post Office and-Zip)T Name -Please print Post Office and Zip) D j l � Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) i i.r-h (Name- Pleasb Print �j Post Office and Zip) C (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) z,7,Ck,r, --5. H0[[,-.,C0Cv (Name - Please Print) / vim .e- (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur appr(o�vals f the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Sig t e) /v o /-milley, 'Dr (Address) (S gnature Ir 'Lz oD , Signatures g :2 1 Addr s (Si gna ure a:�Z 141,LV D4 (Addre (Name -`Please Print) Post Office and Zip) \ZA\\ A, �\\� K\--\ (Name - Ple se Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - 7lea a Print) 0,c Post Office and Zip DG ,'L,] 1 S, )04h ev Name -'Please Print (Post Office and. Zi'p Name - Please Print) Post Offide and Zip over :(Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Addres-s) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) -A Y' i I L", (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) 1 (Address) '(Signature) ---(Name - Please Print) (Post Office and 7-/ip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) _Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) PostOfficeand Zip)/ --(—Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Mal,k A //. > i'_t_1 �,, " (Name- Please Print) Post'Office and Zfp rle � " � z - ,,— /-- / �2 (Name - Please Print) k .; 5 / rr 2 2 C7 C, ( Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please PrintY S je I -j n "vL 6(�V.,-- 2- ;( ' (Post Office and Zip) (Address) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently.planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal. tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of rthe current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) -� Address (Signature) Addr�es's (Signature) (� Add ess j Signature Address 91 i (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) WI!IlCH%J T 2 z/, Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip I/cz- le Name - Please Print / Post' Office and Zip, Name - Please Print) Post Office and. Zip) (Name - Please Print) Po'st Office and Zip over Cl gnature t 3 ^r_�o � 5(o .Address Signature (Address) Si gnaw re .9 /1+' (Address) Signature L& r t d q F C7L (Address (Signature) 4 / -Address Signature (Address Signature Tmm L/ J. �✓a�c.(� (Name - Please Print h 664 er• Vo�_ a C Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) r41 Name - Please Print \14 z z C--s-,r (Post Office and Zip) Nam /Please Print S-7� col -97 � CL% -�,/ (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) rl 4 r C� y, CS ; 2 Name - Please Print) J' � o L► o�,. � � � rc*h �ti��lt, ��� Z Z � SJ dress Post Office and Zip Signature Name- Please Print Address Signature IS ay, /2, (Ad ress (Signature) (Address) 2G D Post Office and Zip E F0 Name --Please Print Post Office and Z p Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zi /D PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the devel.oper determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. v''��C� w(Signat ure) Address Signature Address (Signature) Address) Signature Address L Sign^ature) Address (Namd Please Print (Post-10ffice and Zip Name - Please Print) 644 (Post Office and Zip LJd4 L. OQC�,sF Name - Please.Print W IVIC,� a S I a i16 ZZGc C Post Office Iand Zip) ,r Name - Please Print 1 Post Office and. Zip L L A Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over 17 f. '47 (Signature) (Name Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Name Please Print) (Address) -(Post Office and Zfp) C (§TgnatureY (Name Please Print) (Address (Post Office'and Zip) (Signature) (Name Please Print) V CII (Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Signature) 4— (Address) (Signature) r 0 (Address) (Signature)-, (Address) (Signature) Py 44 ol (AddressY (Signature)� 14 k Address - - (Signature) j A (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please 'Print) _TJ Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print7 (Post Office and ZTp) Name - Please Print Ci4z (Post'Office and Zip) 6- ,Y� l I H (-K) -' Ln i ; // r,7 (Name'- Please Print)-i (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature)- Address (Signature) (Address) (Signature) Address Signature) Address, Signature) 1 Address) - Vn(-th Nlvri�?h-,l Name - Please Print) �QphQ►iS Post Office andZip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) pp 'A ) Post Office and Zip) ` 6�^ Name - Please Print f= / /� . A2 ost Office d. Zip -3- Name - Please Print) Pos Office and Zip)- over (Signature) / .Address:' Signature ' L (Address) l Signature) Addres Signature (Address)� (Si gnat � _) Address Signature (Address) Signatures (Address) C�, , � C-, \,� Signature DDr Address /l J (Sig —nature) Address Signature . 1�'�►� -� / 1a,, l / s-L Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi,p Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) -D � K �, U a Name - Please Print �L Postl Office and Zi 2 Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) Svh C.7`, ZZI Post Offic and Z (Name- tPl_ease Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print f � t / z�5 (P6st Office a6d Zip /1/9 ,�- v e / 0f-i �► Name -f Please Print 4�)" 4-C /' P s 7-el— va 2 .z (Address) - (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density. -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further/ approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) l )" '/�! Address (Signature) Address "✓ (Signature), r1 "z` Address Signature TT (Address) Signature) ' (Address) (�J ►� � over Name - Please Print . Post Office and Zip) / by to a✓ .c' l r'�.�..., (Name - Please Print) / �/�•�'/lam t � • {i' -�'- ,� �i" - =r-< __ P scat Offic and Zi,p _ (Name - Pleas" Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print -ter; v-/� -��) Post Office and ,Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (SignatureT (Address.F. Signature (Address) (SignatureY (Addkess) (Signature) (Addres (Signature) Wx -),q -7- S (Address) /2- ( Signature ) /3 0. /C 2 - 7L (Address) 2 Signature A Lrt Address) (Signature) (Name - ,Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) d.,f 10,t—Z-hD (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) CL-CCAJ ?-, , �V2_-C Aj 4ii 1'_T' 'z2' (Name - Please Print) I LID i - P f �_k e 62- 4A - � . o N (Post Office and Zip) �I I L L t AM f , (Name - Please Print) 7_ (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name- Please Print) (Address,? (Post Office and Zip) 7) (Signature) (Name -- Please 'Print ) c (IddZ (Signature) L--�4 I (Post Office and Zip)' 6—C R C-_ (Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools. -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. U (Signature) Address (Signature) -1 0—1 M"Li bzr r L\ n 1 (c,l F (Address) LZ- Signature) Address Signature 3 13 � L L. f-�� �✓ C mac. E Address Signature) Address (Name - Please Print).' Post Office and Zip) �� re cr,-.c._ r� (`N1ame - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Pleaie.Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip 1 Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (Signature). .(Name - Please Print) ,(Ad#ess) (Post Office and Zip) (SignatureName Please Print) ) (Address) (Signature) C/ (Address)/ ������ �� /i��=� ...ter, (Signature) (Address) J Signature) Address (Signature) (Address) Signature Okddress) (Signature) J, /A (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zto)' 14- (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) H (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name- Please Print) x 5, --TAddress. . (Post Office and Zip) Signature - (Name --Please Print) (Address) Post Office and Zip) (Signature) f (Addressf l.cl, /zII -/ --A, C` (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further -_provals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 141 Signature) Address (Signature) / Address (Signature) Address Signature dd a s' AA-11 Signature) Address e- - /-,- C,- C, /I �, /1: 7 1/ . / (Name - Please print) Post Office and Zip) i I (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please.Print). Post Office and Zip) /"<.;1 ,,I-/.� . In n C'/? // (Name - Please Print) '(Post Office and Zip (Name'- Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature) (Address) 17 (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) /17 Signature) (Address) !.(Signature) (Address) FSi'ghature) (Address) V (Signature) j7L (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Signature) (Address) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) &I (Name-,-' Please Print) z/ Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) V� jt�_C' (Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip-) (Name Please Print) Post' Office and Zip)./, (Name'- Please Pr;int) (Post Office and Zip) /Vil ( —7Name'- Please Print) L:2 (Post Office and --Zip) (Name - Please PrintT - (Post Office and Zip) (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of devel.opment in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signature) r (Address) c Signature) �.t . 1 G6 C l�4,L ( _ (Address) Signature I (Address (Stghature) .A dress 7(3H0kJ D C0 0CAJ/f/fyE-12 (Name - Please Print) :2- 7�zyffQJ S C i z 1/, vim{, 2 zG S_ "_ f Post. Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) I Post Office and Zip Name - Please -Print) Post Office and Zip `J *, Y .e_yJ L, / i .� Name - Please Print //,'.', c.(, r' e tom -, Va-. 2-"L G (-' I (Post' Office and. Zip) A�;��e Name/- Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Signature J Address �t y Signature (Address) (Signature) �0 f Address - r , -' Signature c7 (Address) ' (Signature) �•� L- Lam"-`-- •,���--.-� l�_. Addreess j Signature Address)-. (Si gnat,'Ore ) X Address �a3 ci%R %C any e iV, Jr ohe s e, / Address ignature �Cr -ao X. / S _ /6 Address (Signature) (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print 2 Z c, s—r (Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post 'Office and Zip L t� c4( S . E Name - Please Print (Post 'Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) S7�Cti%5 Post Office and Zip' Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) 61or, C. a, `J(fhY?50rL Name - Please Print / ,mot/ih c heskr, 1114 (Post Office and Zip A/iee Rtaves Name- Please Print (Post Office and Zip) �4 ✓vye_.J /4 , Name - Pleases/Print t(JA ( fie JOo s7— V2 Z ZG C3 Post Office and Zip In T ` Name - Please Print) (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approval f the c rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. • C Ng/Sro Pwm (Signature) (Name - Please. Print) II g8' UA16 YDf-T 900 Addre s LE (Signature) 2457 Signatur (Address) Signature) Address w I9/C9tt rf/e I/// 22Z 0I Post Office And Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print (Posf Office and Zip Name - Please Print) !J Post Office and Zip over Signature Address Signature - Address) Signature (Address) Signature (Address) j 1771 (Signature) Address Signature Address Signature /. 's y 9 (Address) (StgWAture Address, ignature) J IX l c1-eL CY- , S (: �, �w (Address //(Signature) ame - Please Print st Office and' Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and -Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) Name - Pl,ease Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) r r 6t .-v ?--� C G ; % e (Name - Please Print) i' Post Office and Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip 1 Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please /, Print) // % Q (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Z (Signature) res Signature -�4t o Address Sig at re) f�f 2 ri 1vx 6 7 A Address �;ignature) Ch -Z,56 Address L-,y At L (Name - Ple se Print) ? 3-G a Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Past Office and. Zip (Na - Plea e.Print) Post Office and Zip I&Se-W v'e (Name - Please Print St, � 6,�� " ✓e- 12- G %—< (Post Office and Zip) A&.A-4 u J, of -:VG, uy ey (Name - Please Print) YVmtieS�-er M tz-60 Post Office and Zip over S gnature (Addre s) / S (� I Signature / (Address) Signatu Ke) 27f / 1151--x / G F Z,ncti �i �//� (Address) Signature L_J_� AaRC4_11 NC (Address) (Signature) 0 sq- /j Address Signatur (Address) Signatur Add)res Signature Address Signature i -�2- V 7 Address IRe Signature �(n✓hc.rc. -� ✓ �Z Name - Please Print L,' \, Post Office an Zip Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) X. D. , L,:9— -, �,- (Name - PleasePrint) Post Office and Zip 1�4c W, 141C, Nam - Please Print Z2—ps5 (Post Office and Zip) s1�-b /'F /'yl .-7Lor� (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print) 2- 2- (Post Office arrd Zip) Name - Please Print (P/�st Office and/Zip Name- Please Print Post Office and Zip) l/ Name - Please Print tO /tip hj s =/Z- Post Office and Zip Name -'Please Print dress) LC-- �ti �� 7`e r 2_2- 1 (Post Office and Zip) i, f PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address (Signature) (Addr'ess Signature Address S i g n a re 1-9 (Address) (Signature) )O(bY� Address (Name - Please Print) P Offi/ce and Zip) (Name - 7e, ase Print) e Z G 3 Post Office and Zip') (Name - Please Printl `�� -Z2-c J_J 5-r- //ews c.tY Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print V1//,y6-fle-s �2 Post Office and.Zip �C',�Ct Name lease Print Post Office and Zip over Signature (Address) r Signature (Address) (Signature) / 7 ��U Cl e�ie 4J97`PY C_7L_ Address Signature (Address) `', r q rn Signature) �- Box 114- NA (Address)Q, Signature Address Signature Address Signature r-GS� 9 O t� � 2,•d �rf . / L� Address KC' Signature 5� q /, s -/ A, � (Address) (Signatur,, ''Name - Please Print) (post Office and/Zip Name - Please Print �✓/�1 e 5 T-C % l Post Office and Zip) i Name - Please Print) h 10 r)s Ci X-C,7� G--S Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print ,5 G/T/ '? Z6— (Post Office and Zip) Ke I � �l L�__ �-. • E v (Name - P1'ease Print) Post Office and Zip) /Vc,rrna 0 / ;L�i� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip �r�� ice, �• ��wt wt+eL Name- Please Print S k-,CL �. zz(. Post Office and Zip LL7 Name - Please Print L5,S_ Post Office 4ndZip.) /: h (I �g Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON.THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur her approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signat e2j4l__G� (Address) (Signature) L^ H-0v� nH (Address) a L,L (Signature) L� Address (Signature) 234 C 14- e rr r: Address (Signature) Address _y,f d � C . 8'1 Y/ • S -3 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip ,ice' o A; , v (Name - Please Print) f7C-t 1, X ZZ ro / (Post Office and Zip) ` 1_�o�,� tia— � . _c 1 _ (Name - Please Print) C- (PosA Office and Zip ic[.2Ysa�I (Naihe - Please Print —? 0 -&q ('oS S�he 5 G n Post Office and Zip ,�� � s L • /�l�ov� s Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over Si ature (Addr ss Signature J//1 G /1 CT //O7,, � O / It/; )J���,`C.sL (Address) (-Signature) (Address) Signature q3-z c-ys�( (Address) (Signature) RTl ! 24 co l (Address) L/ ,1e� Signature -IS41�4 (Add -Tess) (Signature) I go>( you Address Signature o xY Address Signature .1 Address (Signature ki\,N.- LI. Name - Please Print (PosttOOffice and Zip) NameD- Please Print) j (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip -2)fl17i SL A EVE ae24 Name - Please Print ,��ephens C(4 , A ; 2O(X7 — (Post Office aWd Zip) e4 r .-Z: e E . -?F1P4)eC. L (Name - Please Print) �2IU C lid% oS% JE, f�Qt . alto C? � Post .Office andZip) Name - Please Print S ilk nn< l ; Z'z (Pot Office andd Zip) Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip A/ k) Gr-n (Name- Please Print)I l C t r\ C� s�-e r V q loG I Post Office and Zip) 51, 0 2 /,P- �; y Name - Please Print Li 1,Y) C-A -P- C �r, V, . zz l Post Office and Zip 1� Lr- Name - Please Print) SrPa�P�C�-u, �,Iv�22�SS (Post Office and Zip) (Address) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and -water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a.recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 6(41'e-C& _�& (Signature)(/ 1 fax / Address �9� -%- (Signature) T Address ' -� • `��� is (Signature) Address Signature Address eeIle /'�c-rIe. Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) ,1fo,6,E & r 777 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Cc��s f�> � D • G�l���� . (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Cr(0n , /6yy, 2Son (Name - Please Print (PosV Office and. Zi S i3ijSt4i, e) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip over Signature Name - Please Print Address Signature (Addre s) s (Signature) /add ss)/i � ,( S�i gnat`" e) I / (Address) J (Signature) (Post Office and Zip) Name 4 Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) // (Name - Please Print) c 0 ' P ' r J/q '�) _-" (' v/ Post Office and Zip ." e G,: A 42_-r_;;w Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) l i it �t=Are (Name - Please Print) �41-1Lz Pik ,V4. Address '_ -z-`'.!� (Post Office and Zip) (Sig -nature) �D X4u-ee/ V Address) Signature 6710 '-_ Q v yP l .fir. (Address) Signature y3 L LA_r e. Dr v C Ad ss Signature (Address -)is (Signature (Name - Please Print Pot Office and Zip) 1i1air�e_ F. 2'7G/)'.s• Na1me/ - Please Print) Post Office aKd Zip // (Name -Please Print 4< ke,,, S 2 2-6 f7 Pot Office and Zito) Name.- Please Print Post Office and Zip -Ta a rn /V u e, r, Name - Please Print (Address) (Post Office and Zip) / PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools As currently planned, we have concerns as to.the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further ap ovals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Address Signalure) 73 Add ess A4", t/;wc0,�z 01 (Signature) C Address l� ^ Signature (Signature) yvGB w111K� 115-1� 41�' Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) r4rj+-y (3. y (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print 41_ (Post Office and .Zi Name - Please Print) J7e s L2-4 1,-4 zz� i7j- P6st Office and' Zip over Signature . r. A dress) Signature (Address) / Signature) / Addres ) Signature .7 (Address)- (Signature Address (Signature) (Address) I (Signature) o ve Address TnAl . Signature L_ n -/ fi Address Signature Address Signature J A4 6-I? -f) Al R. /` R W;,T-D Name - Please Print — P oS V4 . 2 2 1. Post Office and Zip %`1''/: c_ 6 ,-fir % ;/) ;/VJ . I, , Name - Please Print _. IX / 'I,? C Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip / Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Pri-nt Post Office and Zip) ll)A- C T 14 /9 146j.,f (Name - Please Print { Post Office and Zip) f / Name - Please Print C \/n . a�C Post Office and Zip (Name- Please Print J Post Office and Zip Mckh'i M ' F rC,4 f I 'L� Name -J Please Print z s. (PosfY Office and -Zip) Name - Please Print) Y 3 ,?,/ P110-17-IrIll r /24- 5/�nS 411� S5 (Address) (Post Office and Zip) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are .deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral I -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (; ignature) (_ (Address) (Signature) ddress (S nature) (Addres Signature (Name Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) �/A,v e-Z /Z/ - Ee,4 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip S - Please Print Z 7Cv SS Post Office and Zip CL'Y-l., 64,1 Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip (Signature) Name - Please Print 62 Address Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the.plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. LZ i' (Signature) -Address (Signature) Address (Signature) Address Signature Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furt er approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) b � / (Addressl : / /l ` J t j (Signature) Address. (Signature) SSA' ((Address] Signature Address Signature Address Rau/ �. ((Name - Please Prin/t)/ Post Office an Zip) 1, (Name - Please Print) Gvr�; \fa.. 'a;a6 °3r7 (Post Office tan Zip),- e C Get Z L^<_7G' (1,/-L-) / Al (Name - Please Print) (Post,ofi5ice and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and..Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create.significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. A-0-er/ Signature) Address Siciprature Address (Signature) Address Signature (Address) (Signature) Address Name - Pleas? Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) I Post Office and Zip ( ame `- P1 a se' Print) Post Office and Zip) Name --Please Print Post Office and Zip 17 Y? ,iZVa-",- / eo_& i -:�; (Name - Please Print) 1)fi- J Post Office and Zip over (D PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage,and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of -the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Pignature) Address (Signature A(Address_ / (Signature) Address Si gyra turd Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please/Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) c r Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip A "-tv Z_ L� Name - Please int Zi ' Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over 6E) PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) n (Address) (Signature) Addres S' nature) (� Addres.''s i Signature)t Address L. �nu over (Nafne - Please Print) f P(o�st Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print)' Post Office a (Name - P easePrint) VA - (Post Office and Zip -5 r- Name - Pleas- Print ! 1 Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the -environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ,knrther approvalsapprovalis of.the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ` (Signature) Address (Signature) ?f _)e x /L Address (Signature) Address Signature) c' 3 y R1-7 x 4f 1? 21 Address J(Signature) (Address) (Name - Please Print) cY,, , 7- Z - (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 1 V G,L (Name - P1 ase Print) Post Office and Zip) A Fe.w Ille r Name --Please Print (Post Office and. Zip) 4,[,s (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the level-opment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature).. (Name - Please Print r\Q 34, 1v< S"I57 (Address) (Signature) - (Address) r . Signatur Address Si"gnature Address (Signatu`re) Address Post Office and Zip ''-�• _ jam/ i �'% %r',. (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Prim PC, 3 , Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip A- U,-? G' k ---0 • _ � FA Name - Please Print) � r Gti�C�sT��Z2, GSA z� 11 Post Office and Zip) over (a PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptabl--. (Signature,) Address (Signature) A;¢d.►�e � . 14Cq Soh (Signature) Addres Signature Address Si gnAurd") t-e. y Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip -��1, c rA 1_ , _T_,A me - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name -.Please , int ost-Office And Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 9/ / s�� (Address) (Signatlure) JC Address (Signature) ,/ Address s Signature Address (Signature) , Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and'Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please.Print) Post Office and Zip -Name - Please Print Post Office and Zi (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of.Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) ;f 1 Address (Signature) c--7 f- 13)yf7 r� (Address) (Signature) Address (Signature) Address (Signature) Address '(Name'- Please Print Post Office and Zip) L- linje?i=.art_ rT' �71�751'ir!'"-j�-t1 (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) Na-me- Please -Print) 71 Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Lll" Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) 7 Post Office and Zip) over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of thecurrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Sigq ture) C 3''' _l-LI Address "I (Signture) C Address (Signature) Address Signature Address .r _. . (Signature r,e f���k J , y- ✓/,A Address (Name - Please Print) 1 Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please -Print) �l u)cC 1 �vt S� � ir' Yf C 1 Post Off/ice and Zip) jram, •% ,f�-,iN � i! �'� C,•�..� l Name - Please Print 1 , ('Post,Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density I -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned,.we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as vdefined in the Comprehensive -Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) r� i fiC �l_�,� / 4 L" �1Jc: �fc S�cic' i fit/ 7u=Ci` Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) (Address) 1 r. �1 � ; ZZ_/ L (Signature) ' Address Signature) Address (Signature) Address ' Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness.of the officials of jurisdiction to let.the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ;L (Signature) J Address (Signature) Address (Signature) ✓ 7 7 Address ~ Signature ter,, l V,,�.. Address (Name`- Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print f Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print ! Post Office and.Zip t , Name -^Please Print)` Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for.public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature) Address (Signature) Address (Signature) 7 Address J 13 ="t i LJ j } - Signature Address ,1 Signature):] Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip 4) -; � y % L: n (Name - Please.Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print)` Post.Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral • -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Si"gnature) Address -('Signatu're) Address y. (S'i gnature) Address �..- Signature) ' Address (Signature r Addresses ' (Name --Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name_:_- Please -Print) P-ost Office and Zi p (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) '(Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lace which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Al L 1 ): = (Signature �' ; / ,��+ {� ; %!,(Name tiPil.eacs2 Print+> - =- (Address) (Signature) Acid re s.-s (Signature) Address ,J.. • �. ~" jam/ Ll� Signature t, ,t Address '((Signature) Address Post Office and Zip 4 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans -for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. I'll 1.+ C f Signature) - (Name - Please Print) r Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print)v . y ( C1 I Address -� SignatureY il 3q A) S i i (Address)) Signature)) Address - r U,J a �}' (Signature) r Address 1 Post Office and Zip /\�;'n r I (_'7t (Name - Please.Printt) Post Office and Zip) Name _ Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and%Zip ' over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. - -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name-- Please Print) (Address) (Signature) Address Si ature) Address (Signature) Address Signature) Address 7 Post Office and Zip) ` (Name - Please Print) �� Post Office and Zip PC (Name - Pq ease Print Post Office and Zip) A/c. Name - P ease Print tc 3LvO�, c(-2 ( 1 Post Office and.Zip (Name - Ple'ase Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) J (Address) (Signature) Address ;(Signature) _ (Address)) Signature) Address (Signature) ;_')e ,hc> ro ) .A i I � w Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) (Address)' Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns -as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) l Address Signature Address Signature A(Address) r (Signature) Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print)[/ Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) < '7 Post Office and Zip (Name - Please.Print Vi 'V v Post Office and Zip) Name'- Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceotabls. (Siq ature) add ess (Signature)' v Address (Signature) (Address) Signature 3 G' _A J Addre s (Signature 3q 13., yki 9 Address . (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) o r. :;7 Post ffice and Zip (Name ✓ Please Print) w'.YY_�? ) l -Ev . VJ1. 1..z ccci j (Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip) P OJ ; LL s (Name - Please Print) tj,,fq r— Ke S -F&I, rz- Post Office and Zip over 6—�� l� PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. .(Signature) Address (Signature) Address L� Si griAtv"re ) Addre s Si gnature 3L[ , U;., ,f(__: _+ e Address (Signature) -3o Ucx 17,9-,4 tom. Y-r_: u1 Address (Name - Please Print) jjPost Office and Zip) (Name _'Please Print) Post/Off i ce and Zip) Name - Please _Print!) Post Office and Zip) JcC (Y1�`:ci� Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Namd - Please Print Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned.about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. /(-Signature) (Address) � Sig i ture) � /134-Y •Ad ress (Signature /l.0 ex Address Si gptuee Address (Signature) 4/v , va,,* f Acre s�� 099 � � &-q (Name - Pledse Print) (Posit Off/ice and Zip) c's C rL, r/1_2 ?,�./ - L/�� (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Dame - Please .Print) ,Gf.0 3y /3GX S-3c� (Post Office and Zip) ip) 41, Z / _- 0� .J . / N lame - Please Print HCS/ 1 /ice / f�i� C•C l Post Office and. Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness. of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. %L-'� �•vru-�. �� % �'-.'�:-•L�c �� /�: i I s7 + 3 � �///i/'%% lG�i5t-/ ��+-�S . (Signature) (Name - Please Print) ' C J `i 13 o ;c 2 %�� Gyp .-tC�•_ f%T n� G'��j�i Address Post Office and Zip) (Signat-pre (Name - Pleas} Prints _ Address most Office and Zip Signatur Addres ignature) t-i 3,1 Address (Signature) Address idle Y y T /&, r! � . (Name - Please .Print) e3y, Post Office and Zip) N►Ft, 1-,w � 13;ni>��`-�. Name - Please Print 17hL 9 L_J� Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness, of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of. the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. . l�• �`"�-� / •`_� ICJ � `'�e1 `L.'" , (Signature) Address 17 ;,r}' Sig n a t r T,,�,r�• Address (Signature) , <� \ �.> 0�1-�- Addre`ss (Signature) Address n� Signature) r�� 3 42.E 37�i/ Address 1-7 (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Na M Nam - Please Print) J Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) IPost Office and Zip) Name - Please Print (Post Office and.Zip) 12,e Cr-. AJ e , (Name - Please Print) Post Office" and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness -of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as ydefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further'approva.1s of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) lC �� 66_#,S Address (Signature) Address -7 > (Signature) "4�1— _--7, 4/ 3 �-, / s' 3 > .7 (Address) �,,J vSignature H C 31 Y Address Signature) le kam_ Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip a i 1471 Name - Please Print)' Post Office and Zip 1v rI Name - Please Print) ,e102 s < I tie _ �;� ` .� C Post Office and Zip) ` over M PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. -:�, (Signature) ' D (Address) (S"ignature) J � � (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) H- R"- 2 `1 L. /v , 4 N (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip t y/� i / �e S.L_ (Signature) Address Signature (Addr (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and/ ip JLnJ'L,� Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citiz6-ns of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness.of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as Vdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur er approval of�rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signa e) F �. VY— Address /1 2r2l L1r1114 Ll1�s�e r V t Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please Pri t) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) � 2//0"/ Name - Please Print (Post Office and Zip) over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have .grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development pl s for Whe tl ds Lareunacceptable. (Sig ture) tN5me - P ea P int) lGo� f CL Ad ess) Post Office and Zip) (Signature) (Name - Please Print) �G 4 ar�,Lc+Z L W <n.cAaa ; J , Address 7-(S ignature) (Addre Signature d Qvy -v �-/ r% / Address n (Signatur L e S Addre s over U ost Office and Zip r. '4R- . - a�ti�■rii osp-Office and. Zip me - Please Print 1) �_—fIL2L Post fice a.nd Zi '(Name - Please Print C, , (vi Post Office and Zip PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furt er approvals of the current (Signs -) development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Address (Signature) Address (Signature) 441 �. Address Si nature d do ss Signature) 1011, Address over ,Z�h ,ld .�/ Sl 4-Al2 (Name - Please P i t) Post Office and Zip) (Name - ase rint) %i �. p ,/, ,: C CIA _ (Post -Office and Zip -y (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name.- Please Print)// Post Office and.Zip >,o� l�''i iG,k H- ly;,�-L T (Name - Please Print) KTI 13allol �> �G�j� Post Office and Zip PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the d'evelooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Sig ture) Address j9 `sure Address (Signatu-,re) Address Signature Address Signature) Address do e ;!gnX P ~ Z, ah� Name - Please Print) _ - 20 tie- . v a, Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) :2=01 Le e ,qU et (Post Office and Zip Dons��,0Ae, Ic1E� ; ,- (Name- Please Print) aJ, (36X a33C (P'ost Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip r Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zipll over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We -request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print Address Post Office and Zip) -��=�T✓ h. L071, (Signature) 4C �� `� 'Z,S4S �rliµc• yM. 2Z&o (Address) � `7 Signa ure (Address) — BOX (Signafurey. Address vv11�m r,4w�vy Signature) steps� over 41- IAI 1.. (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip . Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip PETITION. We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars_ -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. lFlirther approvals f the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - Please Print) 11 -- Addre Post Office and Zip) �r (jigrLatre ( Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip ( gnatpre) Address Signature Address (signature) C i over (Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip �J PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) Name - P ease Print) Address Post Office and Zip) (Signature) Address o (Signature) 0� Address ',_� CP _01 Signature Addre (Signature Address NoLncJ -D. G-CArdFAnur (Name - lease Print) Ya Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print). Post Office and Zip over O PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness.of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater: "Schools .-As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals Qvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Ge_Rr ie I ,,,je, (Signature) 6 o\ ua Address v // an (Signature) 'k� 9/ 0&,46,e-oo? VA_ (Address)-� (Sign ure) VA /?r1 i3ox S-Ya Vh Signature Address (Signa re) rr Address (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name -/Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name Please Print) Post Office and Zip) .5, ! Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip Name - Please Print) i Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur? er appro also the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Q&i�i wt ��11, - Ale-HLJL_LEo#J (Signature) (Name -/IPlease Print) —8 13 D-X. / 3 S� U� ►� ChE �'J , �� 6 O/ ress Post Office and Zip)- (Signatu e) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip UX� 1 (Signature) ess 1 Signature) Cj UX l9 i �tQ LAd a1S0r/ Address (Signature) Address (Name - Please Print) (Post Office and Zip (Name = Please Print Post Office and_Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as rdefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fyrther approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Signature (Address).' n (Signature) /Address (Signature) ZqJ 16 A d ess A�N� V K Signature) Address -U6s6 f-.W., ?i`7 (Name - Please Print) Post 'Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip r � Name - Please .Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print r •-L _ Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over (:::7f5-) P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingnessof the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as ydefined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Ps 7—Z (Si -nature) (Name - Please Print) (Ad ress (Signature) 8� �3y as cs� Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) o j p I:- %- Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) (Po st Office and Zip) Name/- Please Print jr Address Post Office and Zip �� • � . / �A/LI_ Irt t (Name - Please Print) r; /G J-a t- t :i-o n ki j I-=, . i f-. 'j_ z.j Post Office and Zip) over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Sign ure) Add ess �-` (Signatur ) 7 Address (Signature) 1 6v y 1 36 H C�a j b (row 1 (d, (Address) Signature) /11% (Address 4� (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name -'Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please .Print) Post Office and Zip) v F) Name - Please Print Post Office and Zip (Name'- Vlease Print) Post Office and Zi.p over P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the, availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable t (Si gn turf _) (Name - Please Print) Address Post Office and Zip) Signature) (Name - Please Print) to ^ Z&kk lam, dd ess Post Office and Zip Signature) (Name,- Please Print Address KA-, Post Office and Zip Signature Address p (Signa e) Address Name - Please Print Post Office and. Zip Name - Please Print) Post. Office and Zip over 0 P E T I T I O N We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) 3It (Address) (Signature) �3 d 7 ` Address (Signature) ddress i Si t Address (Signature) Address ,4 w (Name - Please Print) (Post Office an Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please rint) Post Office nd Zip) Name Please nt) Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the develooment of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ( ignature) Address (Signature) Address (Signature) Address Signature Address (Signature) Address (Na e.- Please Print)) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Frederick County and Winchester, Virginia, are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands, and the apparent willingness of the officials of jurisdiction to let the developer determine the scope of development in our community. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: "Density -Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 houses is unacceptable. The 200-300 houses promised in exchange for public funds for the dam are acceptable. "Access -As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick and Clarke County. "Services -As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. "Schools -As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. "Moral -We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. -We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ' (Signature) (Address)r (Signature) Address (Signature) Address (Signature) (Address) (Signature) Address (Name'- Please Print) Post Office and Zip) (Name - Please Print) . Post Office and Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip) Name - Please Print Post Office and.Zip (Name - Please Print) Post Office and Zip over We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fuytb r ap ovals the � r nt �lopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. lkwgnawre) (Name - please print) 4557 Wakeland Drive Stephens City, Va. 22655 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 869-1 348 FrPr�Ari r,k 't (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) f 1 enna T 1Ri 1 1 car (Signature) (Name - please print) 4557 Wakeland Drive Stephens City, va. 22655 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) r i ---------------------------------I TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H�Smith,:Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. VA House of Delgates 1 — — — —.— 1 . We are deeply. concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 e 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and I• secondary educational facilities. I I.. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a .I recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. I We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approval�tthe r�development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. ly� . (Signature) (Name - please print) rRoss i J c re otO VA 1 cP� Address) t ost Office and Zip) ((Street �- Aiy 6 6— S' P) 0 R D (Telephone Number) (County &' Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) r� (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 / �A/N ES t�e�2 Number (Telephone ) (County &Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it; and 1 either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 ' - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah ! . College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting".. 1 is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. M 1, 1 ---------- ------------------- 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of De 1---------------------------- 1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlan your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of develo 1 We request that A MORATORIUM ICE IMMEDIATELY DECLARE 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolve 1 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 2 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acce 1 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Fr and Clarke County. 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and w 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We furtherlhave grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on pu 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehe 1 Furt approvals o the current development plans for Wh nds are unac I ig ature) ((Name - please p int) Z eCe r' (Street Address) ost Offi e and Zip) 1 S� - � �� 1 (Telephone Number) (County Voting Precin 1 Fred I 1 p ]gates .I ds and 1 ment. D ON d: 1 1 1 00 - 300 units 1 ptable. 1 1 County I " 1. 1 ater treatment 1 primary and 1 1- blic use of a 1 1., 1 ' the property 1 1� nsive Plan. ceptableffp 1 1 1 1 1. 1 (Signature) 1 1 (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sigi 1 either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O.'Boz,2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be rece 1 November 8, 1989 I 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, SI 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 P' Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at t. 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. /yl . I ® s o mi 1 (Signature) 1 1 (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sigi 1 either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O.'Boz,2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be rece 1 November 8, 1989 I 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, SI 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 P' Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at t. 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. /yl . I ® s o mi — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ------------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA,House of Delgates — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current.planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 360 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fu her approvals of the current de elopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) I Z S 1\1. 1nWAS 14, &Q, is P4 S T. • W I ►J C.!-} E--, i �r (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (Cour & Voting Precinct) 1 (I I I I I. (Signature) (Name - please print) I, (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct). P If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and I either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by I . November 8, 1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning I _ Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. ' Our strength lies in our numbers. - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved. Density - Current plahned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in;exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County. and Clarke County. Services As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. MoralWe further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approval of the current development plans for Wheatla ds are unacceptable. (Signature) (Signature) (Name - please print) A (Street Address) (Post Office and, p 62 -- (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) .(Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8-1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. - 1--------------------------------- 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, -Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1---------------------------------, 1 1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 . 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 . 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County ' 1 and Clarke County. 1 _ As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 11 Services y p' g I'• I 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I 1 I 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 I 1 Moral - ' We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. I .. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. I 1 � 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 1 ( i ature) (N� e - lease ri t) 3 ; 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voti g Preci 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) 1 ` _.:..:..,:. ._ :: •, . 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) to�, 4 q.ndkcrL MAN kA155 5 1 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: �.. r - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by ,I 1 November 8, 1989 " ,I 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. 1------------------------------� i TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 ---------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 I Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units I 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. ' �I Access - Ascurrent ly planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment ' ! facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 i •. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. I Further approvals of the yurrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) �.'. o x 3 39 e s e,- 0 c, . 221n o I L 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) %03 aa7t) Co . - he�wne-e— .'. (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) 0 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) I (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O.'Bok 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by i November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. i . This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning ` Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting . is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. /j� i I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 .I I ;1 1 1 '1 EI �1 1 I 1 1 1 �1 1 1 ---------- 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — •1 s 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 e We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 . 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 : 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable.lo ' (Signature) (Name - please print) 1 f y-•s" � .r,4.�t/E �1r/� �Ji�cs�Es �.�,�,y,4 .� l�ai 1; ... ',_ . ' • (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Street Address) (Name - please print) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1' . If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning ' Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. 1, Our strength lies in our numbers. I TO: Board of Supervisors•, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it liesoutsidethe Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. A // /,/, A Furth h urrent development plan I h tla are�cceptable. i n ure) (Name - please print) (Street Address) 1 (P st Office nd Zip) oaj (Telephone Number) (Count & Voting recinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and I. either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by I November 8, 1989 L.. . - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. I' Our strength lies in our numbers. M e, -----------------'-----------.-----'— I TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia ) Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates -- ------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved - Density Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units. promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and I. secondary educational facilities. Moral We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further ovals of e-Lur/eve nifR--ntplansfo heatlands areu 7n a e/ (Sign re) pl se print) (Street Address) cis Off ice and Zip . elephone Number) Mir6tT (County/ " / 14 Z4Z /5 I . : . . . . I C-PI as print) Vw (Street Address) OSL P 01f c ancj/zip) K 9 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precific If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium", Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development.. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved - Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke'County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. s as to the availability of adequate primary and Schools As currently planned, we have concerns secondary educational facilities. Moral We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - pleas 6 X 2� (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signatu me -please pri t) �_IeAv - VY4 y� (Street Address (Post Office and ZipF (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it,. and V either: Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. % . , Our strength lies in our numbers. MIA ---------------— --------- --- ==—=t TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia I Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates -- — — — I I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and j yourapparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. I I We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON I I THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: l I Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 . 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 I Access - Ascurrently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. I Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment —/1<x✓-_ _ _ _WK-t L_' - �,�, 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 — 1 Moral . - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. I_ / I Further approvals o he current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. / /' ' -- ---- — - - '! !<-✓ _� GUI-s-- .__ 1 (S azure) (Name - please print)---- 1. f.Z6 0 (Street Address (((P�ost Office and Zip) 7.0 3 — C. e 1 (Telephone N mber) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 & 1 (Sig/nature) (Name - lease print) I -- 1 311 �.fb �%7 • 1/ t.fi rfyn / l tea' J+? G I 1 and ' i — .— — .. (Street Ad ess) (Post Office Zip — (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) -- — — 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and l 1 either: ------ --- 1 Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by I 1 November 8, 1989 ------- 1 I 1 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah I --- — --- 1 College & Conservatory. ect the November 15, 9 Planning sionlmeetingtlE planned 1 Commission if you do not wish to peak, your attendance at this meeting 1 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. /� 1 M L--=------------------------------ We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. I Access Ascurrently planned, will create significant transportation problemsin both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services . - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property n since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. the curh�nt developmentyi and for WAeatlands are (Signature) (Name - (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) '1Ql�,- Wl- It e =S�9w�Jk (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) rya-i%6,G - (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) �Hmc (Telenhone Numher) (Cnunty k Vntinn Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College &Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Ccanmission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is criCeal. Our strength lies in our numbers. Al --------------------------- MEMO /�l✓C /N �C L.i I `� /— d1,-� ti r�� �� J i t. k\pi 1 90- D)j L`S �rJ t—t2C�jtCk u'Jt`11I >=C)AAti A5 Io i �l� [t)ateP, ;A tiffs �1 u Zoo- 500 vNt � 5 6k. T ISoo -7000 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and Your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We recluest that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON � THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density Access i - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County i and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of ie current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. -/ — Tra,rTL Mi 1 1 A r (Signature) (Name - please print) 4557 i• keland Drive Stephens City, Va. 22655 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) RFQ —i 242 Freclerir-k (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Telephone Number) (Post Office and Zip) ty & Voting Precinct) We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County, and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary.. educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furt rap rovals of the cu nt de elopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Y RC) y cG Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) -- -., T-e ►i e h a 1 -t z- (Signature) ame - please print) �0• t3�x �s4 4-e hers Ci4v VA4`ia6s5.. (Street Address) d k; ...( ost Offce anZlp) o - 9-iy1 -- -etck - ; (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Preci t) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. ------------------------------7 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates -- ---------------------- -- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent will to let the developer determine the scope of development. I . I I We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: I 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. I . Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. 1 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furtherapprovalsof the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. V1C_ror2►"t S �E�1 Day 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) R K 3 13 ox i /-/ !-f �,✓c �1� �s i�Yl, l�-9 ��60 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (TelephonZNmber), (County & Vibting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) �MO �� (Str t Address) (Post Office and ZiO 6� 1S Cce� (Telephone Number) ) (County & Voting Precinct) . If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 -or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. l This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 P' ing Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at t. ieeting is critical. Our strength lies in o>i.>Ir numbers. --------------------------------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1------=-------------------------'- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 B We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - Ascurrent ly planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals. of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. lL+ C, y 61 (Signature (Name - please print) (Street Address) e Number) (Post Office andIZip) ty & Voting / cVC)�-i�- (Signature) (Name - please print) 1 �A (Street Address) (Post 0 and Z ) 1. (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by, 1' November 8, 1989 1; - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia I Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 •. your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: i Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 1 . promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 . Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems inboth Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1' _ As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment Services Y P' g P g 1 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. i Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 'I 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 Q �G,00. to P` fit, G k I N�i 1. — (Siignature)t� (Name - please print) �,Q1 Ay iT (Streets) tPos00i'l ice and Zip) 1 Precift, 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting 4 7 .h 'Si (Signature) / (Name - please print) I .... . CAS c���n1P I (Street (Post Office and Zip) (Address) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning .. 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting ;. 1.. is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. 1 ---------------------------------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County . and Clarke County. Services 1 Schools Moral As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furth'eer approvals of/ t/hp,,c��`urrent development plans for foM Wheatland areQunacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) Rt 8 Box 6i o 4Ack*r c:Pa 6 0 ! (Street Address) (Post Office and ZiI& (Telephone Number) (County & Vo ng Precinct) �,.. LINWooD R W S1Cr A�nSo� (Signature) (Name - please print) R'r 9c soy 61C) wiNeNESr& qA. -a246j ; (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) ke — 104S s ToNFw�4« R�'Coe��Ut (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.OJBox 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by .,• November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. ` This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. ! s 1 1 1 1 I 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — . I 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 1 We request that.A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 . 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units" 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 . Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 1. r ,,(Signature) (Name - please print) 1 , `� ZS p/, C a r e -o2i-� S i ,1 i N Ci (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 I , If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1'. either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 . November 8, 1989 I' - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1, College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting'i:.,-- is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. %� 1 1------- -------------------------- 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith,'Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1--------------------------------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: )ensity - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. recess - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. ;erviees - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 . We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 . since it 'es outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 rt of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. Y (Signature (Na e - please print) (Street Address) (Post O0�lde a' i (Telephone Number) (County & oting Precinct) to e I nature) (Na e - please prin ) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) _ I. '. (Telephone Number) ( ounty & Voting Precinct) I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by �. November 8, 1989 ` - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. 'This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. I Our strength lies in our numbers. rn i i -----------------,---------------- 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 --------------------------=—� �1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 1 " 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1, � 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 Density- Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ' 1 mised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 1 1 Access currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County J_a 1 nd Clarke County. 1 1 _ As current) planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 Services y p' g 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 . 1 1 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 1 Further approvals of the currept development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 1 Ld f , ll � � 1 (Signature) (Name -please print) 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 . 1 — 70 - w- ro e ---- .0 /✓ 1 1 (Telephone Number) County & Votmg Precinct) X, ctt C l Z a 6x1 (Si,nature) (Name - please print) 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zi i (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Pr mc • 1 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and` 1 1 either: 1 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by i November 8, 1989 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 1 College & Conservatory. 1 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia + Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates ' ---------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - Ascurren . tly planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment . facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of fhe c Anent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) L UG s+- (Street Address) 0 5- (Telenhone Numb (Street Address) IV - (Name - pleas print) R-: -)_ L(o 5?� (Post Office and Zip) (County & Voting Precinct) Office and Zip) (County & Voting If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and. either: ::.;.`:. ... - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by.', November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. , Our strength lies in our numbers. — — - . TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 1--------------------------------- 1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 -.300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County - 1 and Clarke County. 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 ' Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a ' 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property . since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. he approvals of the current evelopment plans for Wheatlands are un ceptable. 1 (Signature) Name - pleaseprint) (Street Address) (flost Office and Zip) - 1 1 elep o Number) �' (County &Voting Precinct) 12 Signat re / (Name - please print) 1, 1 itJ - -- - - C:... - 1 1 (Street Address) (P st Of e and Zip) Number / I (Telephone ) (County &Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and ` 1 either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be' received by 1 November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning ' 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. /n 1 ---------------------=-----------I TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, 'Jr., ,29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlan'ds and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ' promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. ' Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County . and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 ' Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1. secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a i recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. her approvals o the current development pl s for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) �f (Name - ple_asse print) C/ VA V6!X1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zi) (Telep one umbe (County & Voting Preci t) (Signature) (Name - please print) — 0 trpe Address) (Post Office andZip) v 17 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and I ; either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 -or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah .. College & Conservatory. i This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. i — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: I ... Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units t promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of die dam are acceptable. ' Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 0 f ' Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 0 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Furter approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) D,t,t e Ol do as I (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I C1-2ez A- YZ M 1r'c-,4,1s (Signature) (Name - please print) Ct-fc' (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and I either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah ' College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. �1'� 0 , --------------------------------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia v Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 0 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 0 . We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 0. 1 . . Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units I. promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment . facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. ' We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property, since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ' Further approvals of the rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1. t �- (Signature) , (Name - please print) / Is c3 - /11-�Lz 14c�� UA (Street Address) (PostOffice and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) f� 0 (Signature) (Name - please print) , / (1A J� (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) .. J%p (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) - f If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and — either: either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Bo? �2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by. November 8, 1989 . . - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting i Ij is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Vh8inia 1 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 1------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and yourapparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 � 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 � 1 Density. - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 � 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 _ As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment I 1 Services Y P' g P g facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and; 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral. - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the•'current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. VV (Signature (Name - please print) !l LAY' 1 (Street Address) 1 (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) n (County & Voting Precinct) ,, 1 (Signature) _ (Name - please print) 1 (street Address) ' f (Post Office a Zi) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Pr inct) 1 1 1 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and • 1 1 either: 1 . 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 ' - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah ' 1 College & Conservatory. 1 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this -meeting 1 is critical. h Our strength lies in our numbers. --------------------- ----------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved:, Density Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access As currently planned, wil I create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal Lax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the cur -rent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 7- (Signature) (Name - please print) /7 X/) (Street Address) (Post Office and ZIP 6141z' 411 (Telephone Number) (County &-',Voting Precinct) (Signatu(c)' (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) ;z (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. •1"'�ti1ki. �.-t`+rOR 4..: "1�'.. ... ...,{:yq.y.v..r ... -.. .,..:e.+' t -y„. a .� ,., .a. .. .c .r- 0' R -.�17t><:. 'a'A•-1 t S.a i* �• �� - }k ' _i: 1 ,� L t 1 R. .. ATO Board of Supervisors, Frederick County; Virginia tI Hon.tAlson H Smith, Jr:, 29th Legislative Dist.! Rep VA House'of Delgates �.I I �C , Y' - 6,- i 1 .'' l i: - -, ' t �a +'' �. I c Weare deeply,concerned about the.plans foi the development of Wheatlands and . 1 p: your apparent Willinness to let the develo er.determine the scope of development. request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON r 1 THE WHEATLANDS:PROJECT until the following issues are* resolved DenSit Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 ' 30.0 units. .•' _ y promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable: 1� 1 1 Access i As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County I ; 1 and Clarke County,', 1 ' Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment . 1 facilities on the environment, in particular' streams and groundwater. = i Schools. - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities.14 :, - ; • L; 1 'Moral t* We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a -`''recreational lake h ha s been.ipdith Federal tdollars. mrovewith oars. 44 JJ.L -Y. IJ c II X11 J`,i Y11t, '' ' t. .. - ". .. •,. . 1`',a � .. We, also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the propetty 1 since it lies outside.the Urban Development Area as defined in the. Comprehensive Plan. -°-Further approvals of the current development. plans for Wheatlands aie unacceptable... 1 (Signature) " . (Name - please print) 1 3 o. 7' 1Z L) J X � Z'z 6 � (/Street Address) - (Post Office and Zip) 1 4- (Telephone Number (County & Voting Precinct) 1 1 (Signature) (Name Please pri/nt)/ 1 f J (Slr Address) (Post Office d Zip) A� 5` (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I ; 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this,out of the paper, sign it, and 1 ';,either: -Mail to: 'Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 - : I November 8, 1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 ' C. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning I ' Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish. to. speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is .critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers.— — — — — — — — J —�— -----_ -- ----- --- f'—— — — — 1 T,O. Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Vtrgtnia 1 Hon.'Alson H.,Smith 'Jr:;'29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA.House of Delgates �' 1 1 — 4' ----- 1 1 __------ i ;-------—_—_-__ — 1 1 We are deeply concerned'about the.plans for the development of Wheatland s and 1 1 your apparent willingness,to let the developer determine the scope of development, i a 1 We request that A•MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT. until the following issues are resolved-' esolved 1� r ` 1 � . - r •: ' it y i,. 1 }., i 1: .. ,• k. F -�`• I: Ir ' o-.. %..- f "' 1 1 C Density, Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 300 units � 1 Y- - P Y g promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable.: ° 1 ' ' 3 tea'. ,,.. > : _ 1 Access -'- - As currently lanned,willcreatesi nificantY P g transportation problems in both Frederick County.' i and Clarke County 1 Services. - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 3 1 secondary educational facilities. s 1' Moral - 'We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a ` 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 1 p We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property ,1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 ' 1. Further approvals_of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable 1 .1 �(Signature) Name - please print):, .. UT (Street Address) • `� (Post Office and Zip) 1 . �,W, 4,we�p :A; - •.< (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 ignature) (Name - please print) 1. 1 a (Street Address) .(Post Office and Zip) 1 1 ` 1 (Telephone Number , ' 1 -• ) .(County &Voting Precinct) � - 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 1 t: either 1 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by ` 1 ' ' 1 November 8, 1989 1 y 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. 1 1: 1 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 1 is critical.... 1 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. 1 I TO: Board of Supervisors, Fre 2gth Legislative County, Dist. VA House of Delgates I Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., I fans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 We, are deeply concerned about the p i B.; I your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. ORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 ° i 1 We request that A Mresolved;1 u THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are 1 t .using table. The 200 - 300 units 1 '4 _ Current pl'atnned der of ub00 fundo�reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Density promised in exchange P 1 lanned,willcreatesignificanttransportationproblemsinbothFrederickCounty 1 Access - As currently p 1 ' and Clarke County. rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 Services _ As currently planned, we have. g groundwater. 1 r 1 facilities on the environment, n particular streams an g 1 1 we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 1 As currently planned, 1 1 Schools secondary educational facilities. 1 1 laced on public use of a 1 1 We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints p 1 1 Moral roved with Federal tax dollars. 1 i recreational lake which has been imp pro rt y W e also have grave concerns about the Coun rea as defined m the Comprehenshve PPI a 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development A 1 1 1 current development plans or Wheatlands are unacceptable. i her a prova of the r ee 1 1 '._ 1 1 d (N -please print) 1 1 (Signature) ,7 . Off 1 r Lk L S (Post ice and Zip) 1 1 (treet Address) �, , cam, �.,� r_ i 1 (County &Voting Precinct) 1 (Telephone Number) 1 l rc /A c 1 (N e - please print) ignature) ost Office and Zip) 1 (Str t Address) 1 . (County & V ing Precis 1� 4 ,. .mot (Telephone Number) 1 sign it, and 1 1 have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, g 1 1 If you 1 1 either: Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by. 1 1 -Mail to: Citizens for Quality 1989 Community, P.O. Box 2558, 1 November 8, 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 currently planned for discussion at the Noveou ba attendance e att this meeting 15, 1 1 This project is curr y 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, y i 1 is critical. _,_,.th liPc in our numbers. i-------------------- --,------------ 1 TO.: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia " - 1 ! Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr:;• 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA' House of Delgates 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 — — — 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 1 1. ' 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1' 1 1 .1 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 ' promised in exchange. for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. ' Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1' Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment ' I facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 - We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 ' since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 1 1 Fu her approvals of the o rrent development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. r 1 � �. 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) U1 ost Office and ip) 1 (Street (P� �Address) /ADr 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 tA4 I t2265� 10 (Signature) (Name - please print) 1 1 447 0 a a,161aya - d,&� 1 (Street Address) (Post Offic and ip) 1 ) - i 1 (Telephone Number) (County & roting Precinct) 1 � 1 . If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 ' College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 ; . Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. '--.-------------- ----------- ------. 1 1, TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia !1 Hon. Alson H. Smith,'Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA,House of Delgates :I---------------------------------1 1 it I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved-.- . I 1. 1 1 i Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ' 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 1 and Clarke County. 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment ' 1 . facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 ' I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and I secondary educational facilities. � 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. F er ap vals. of the e t velopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 j(Sign ure) (Name - please p int 1 Street Address) Vyllffice and Zip 1 1 ( elephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 •I I X 1 1 (Si ature) (Na - pleas print)10/04 1 2 1 (Sieet Address) (Post Office and Zip) ho (T.Aephone Nu er) (County & Voting Precinct) ;I 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out bf the paper, sign it, and 1 1 either: 1 Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 1 November 8, 1989 1 ! - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. tl 1--- - ---------------------.-----------1;, TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia "of 1 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith; Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House Deigates '' 1 , 1 . ; 1------------------------'--------- 1 1 ,1 1 - . 1 We are deeply.concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 G { 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1: 1 1 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units . 1 k 1 ; 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 1 and Clarke County. 1 1 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 1 1," . 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 " 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 ' } 1 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. r 1 1 1 a-,n A 6aAAaA-\ fY1 PA4z4 k i.}urerJ 1 1 (gignature) (Name -please print) 1 1 . (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 1 el (County & Voting Precinct) 1 A 1 0 ('gnature) (Name - please mt) 51 �' -z 4 r (Street Address) (Post Off&iEalfid Zip) 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 1 1 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 1 either: 1 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 1 November 8, 1989 1 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 1 1. College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, V irginia l' ►;;' Hon."Aison H. Smith, -Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA House of Delgates -- 1 1 -. t ... 1 1 deeply concerned the plans for the development of Wheatland s and We are p Y 1 1 1 Y our apparent.willingness to let the developer determinethe of development. e 1 1 request that A"MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED, ON 1 1 We 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following.issues are reso 1 1 Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 1 e for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 1 Density P promised in ex P 1 1 - Ascurrentlyplanned,willcreatesignificanttransportationproblemsinbothFrederickCour 1 1 Access 1 1 and Clarke County. 1 _ As currently planned, we have. grave doubts as to s and p oundwateraci of e and water treatment ; 1 Services facilities on the environment, n particular stream 1 , 1 ed we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 1 _ As currcntly planned, 1 1 Schools 1 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 laced on public use of a 1 1 _ We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints p 1 Moral 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. i 1 We also have grave concerns about the CouArea as defined n the Comprehensy's unwillingness to downzone ive Plan.pproperty 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development 1 1 1 1%Fur a rov f the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable.PP -DI1 , 1 (Name - please print) (Si ature ZZ w 1 �V cQ V1,1 1 1 ; !e 2A O / 5 3 (Post Office and Zip) 1 (Street Address) — 9„c ee,Lc�- 1 Cvu,�e 1 1 7o 3 - 837 — Z ZCw (County & Voting Precinct) I1 1 (Telephone Number) 1 1 " (Name - please print) 1 1 (Signature) f} ZZ6 2 .¢ sG?r(53 So ce 1 1 / Z (Post Office and Zip) 1 1 (Street Address) 1. G -7' Voting Precinct) 1 (County & g 1 1 (Telephone Number) 1 1 petition, lease cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 1 If you have not already signed this pet , P 1 1 either: 1 Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 1 - Mail to: C 1 1 November 8, 1989 1 November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, 1 1 College & Conservatory. 1 1 Tanned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 This project is currently p our attendance at this meeting 1 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, y 1 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. i------------------------ ---- ----- - TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 " Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- 1. 1 1 . We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 i 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 _ As current) planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 Services Y P' g P g 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. - 1 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. . 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 F er rova',- of t e ftritdevellopment plans for. Wheatlands are unacce table. " i H (Si atur) (Name - please print) 1 (Scree Address) r ((Post Office and Zi ) C, 1 7jG9 — 9 tQ rat s c 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 (Sig ` ure) (Name - please print) 4�e Prs Ct4,tYtk•c�i(n�S-S 1 • (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) CD 9- 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: 1 - Mail -to:. Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia ' — Hon. Alson H. Smith;`Jr',29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA -House of Delgates — j1 -- 1 1 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 • 1 e 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 ;I THE WI-IEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: I 1 •I 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unaccep4able. The 200 - 300 units ' promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable, 1 Access - As currently planned, wil I create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. a i Schools - hav •' �.....y r.S Clii�i;Iiuy peniui�u, we uavo COnCCrnS dS t0 tl1C a':ui�a�..1.� Of adequate primary v secondary educational facilities. 1 "•I 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 • 1 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) Post Office and Zip) 1 C / �r (Telephone Number) . (County & Voting Precin(!t)� I (Signature) �� (Name - please print) (Street Address) Vost Office and Zip) 1 CV (Telephone Number) (County & Voting P inct) 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah ' College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. " 1 -Our strength lies in our numbers. TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia r 1 r Hon. A1son.H. Smith„ Jr:, 29th Legislative Dist. Rep.' VA, House of Delgates We are deeply;concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 :` your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development.} ou g . PP, Y 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 1 l THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1. :.. . Densit - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units y funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 • promised in exchange for public - Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. 1 1 ServiceS - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 in particular streams and groundwater. 1 1 facilities on the environment, 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to die availability of adequate primary and 1 1 ' 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 1 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 ' ' 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 Area defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development as 1 nt development plans for Wheatlands are unaccep Further approvals of the curretable. 1 1 vtAJ�rt) 1 1 (Signature) (Name - please prin 1 l/^ 1 (Street Address) (ost Office and Zip) �y�eK Q' t %7�Pct�ct" i 1 '� (-��3 e �3) ( (County & Vot ngPrecinct) 1 (Telephone Number) 1 1 1 cya C E)VJLA)CLkA 1 (Name - lease print) 1 _ (Signature) 1 1 MA _ (Post Offic and Zip) (Street Address) 1 1 - ��31 lc Uo YL 1 (Telephone Number) unty tin Precinct) 1 1 1 1 lease cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 If you have not already signed this petition, p 1 1 1 either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 ' 1 College & Conservatory. 1 1 1 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Even if do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 Commission meeting. you 1 1 is critical. 1 Oiir ctrength lies in our numbers. 1 I---------------------------------0 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates i ---------------------------------v j 9 I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and j I your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. . l � 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON I THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 . I I I 1. Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units I . promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 I Access - Ascurrently planned, will create significant transportation problernsin both FrederickCounty and Clarke County. - As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment I Services Y P' g P g I facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. I . I I Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a I. recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. I � I We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office -and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I � I �LLC �l C d/ �15 (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I � If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. I I This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. I (fur strenuth lies in our numbers. We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 " We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ' . promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. + ' Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 0 and Clarke County. " Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the sews impact of a and water treatment P g facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. - J' Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the -availability of adequate primary and f• secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 0 ; We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property �'. since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. , Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. F (Signature) (Name - please print) B Street Address > = ( ) (Post O ice and Zip) 0 4 + (Telephone Number) (County,& Voting Precinct) O (Signature) (Name - please print) 0 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 0 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 0 B If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 1 . -or come to our next meeting, Thursday,. November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah f College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. 1 • Our strength lies in our numbers. 1' m 1 1— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----------..---x—`-- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 >F Hon: Alson H. Smith, Jr.,,29th Legislative Dist. Rep' VA House of Delgates •Y. l 1 =;— - - - - - - - - - - We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 ` your apparent willingness,to let the developer determine the scope of development. I i i We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON' 1 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ' promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 .1 and Clarke County. 1 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment z l facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 = '1 secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fur he rovals of th urren evelopment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 (signature) (Name - please pnnt) 1 P S •� K-,�Jan a:k Aze S Lab L I (Street Address (Post Office and,Z') (Telephone Number) (County & Voti g Precinct) 1 � 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address). (Post Office and Zip) I 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) ; • I I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either. 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah ' College & Conservatory. 1 • it This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning ; Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting i is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. —------------------ — 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia -Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr.,l 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA'House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and i your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 ..THE WHEATLANDS. PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, wil l create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment ' facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 'We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside. the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. p ble. A i (Signature) 1 �E;02 b 1� _ (Name -please print) W rtcre- 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 �3(o41-S-I -1 `+ �tto d Bch. O 1 (Telephone Number) (County &Voting rec ct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. -------------------------'——.—._—_ .; TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 'Hon: Alson H. Smith; Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA House of Delgates ----------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. _ As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment Services Y P' g P g i I facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and I. ' secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. I . Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. I Y I ( azure) (Name - please print) AT I-(J STePIf�NSC�-7 VCZ:2 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 yEc� C_- >Cervs' CI' TV 0 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I I I I (Signature) (Name -please print) I _ I (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) I . I (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 November 9 1989, 7:30 .m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah - or come to our next Meeting,Thursday, P I . ' College & Conservatory. I This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. lino in nwir ilvilttl-torQ V— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -----j----=-----Y-0 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 1 -Hon: Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 it- -------------------------------- 1 1 i " 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 ; I 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1. ; 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 1 promisedinexchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. 1 ; 1 _ As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment I Services Y P' g P g 1 1 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater.. 1 1 1 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 1 I• . . Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1. ; 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Furte approval ,the current development plans fo Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 1t2 I I 1 ignature) ( ame - rrlease Tint) �I 1 1 y ( 80t33- % In(h�s . 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) A 1 ace 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) � � 1 I (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 1 1 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: 1 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 1 College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 ' Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 :.. is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. 1 ® . We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON - THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, wil I create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downione the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheadands`are unacceptable. A C:X s Sig ture) (Name - please print) 3 (� , �.t,� ��l o o. - 2 2- (. IS1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) f i (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) i If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and f either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8; 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah f College & Conservatory. I This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. I TO. Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA,House of Delgates -------------------- ______ We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 We request that A.MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues 'are resolved: 1 j 1 Density = Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 'promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access, - As currently planned,will create significant transportation problemsinboth FrederickCounty 1 and Clarke County. 1 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment 1 facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 I 1 I Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since }t lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ' I 1 Furth a provals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name.- please print) 1 _ 1 3 u cr rr S t✓ .o,� . .� S 1 (Street Addr s) (Post Office and Zip) CX— i� (Telephone Number) (Courhy & oting Precinct)1 /�.I:,t9 ..S _Todd ■ I (Signature) (lame -please print) 1 rc U i oss J,�v�c I (Street Addr ss) (Post Office and Zip) 1. %/� e (IN r �'c l� I C: «I t� S (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: l - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601; to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9. 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium. Shenandoah i i ('nllt'ke car t_'nn��.•� �•a�i a v. � ' This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting i is critical. t . Our strength lies in our numbers.. i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 1 TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 1 —--- ------------------------------1. 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. I . We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: i Density- - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems inboth Frederick County . and Clarke County. As currently planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment Services Y P' g P g ( .. facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. . I We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further appro als oft current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) / (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) _]o3 - 6 61- 33 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 703� G�6 — 3 3 ► (—f-ec�errc�<�i .yes Qot—o (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 P' -ing 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at t. ieeting 1 is critical. V Our strength lies in our numbers. !� v: rsoard of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgates 7:- ---------------------------------I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and--. I. your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. I I We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: •I Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units I. . promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently: planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 i recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Further approvals of the current cjevel�pment plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) I IC 33 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 cle e Numb (County & Voting Precinct) 1' Signature) (Name �-please pr)'ng � U Z 1. . G ') Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 . 1 (Telephone Number) County & Voting Precinct) 1 ; 1 If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 either: i' - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah., V 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 P' •ing l 1 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at t. ieeting 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers.— — — —n'j —� We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - Ascurrently planned, will create significant transportation problernsin both FrcdcrickCounty and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. development plans for Wheatlands are un ceptable. kaignature) (Name - please print) 2T0 2 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) (Signature) (Name -please print) r� - (Street Address) 21, (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Numb b(G6unty & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: ;.Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989. - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. __ .. - ---------- — — — — -- -- --' -, h E a TO Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virgtma=' Hon.<A1som H.--Smithjjr ,�29th Legislative Dist..Rep; VA!House of Delgaies, t' s 1 ; , '�'_ I` .. _. L) _ l I ,i a •- -t: = r 1 . .+ . ,' � ); l 4 f•. t� to ,. 4 ••. ='. ! ,.; .. { t ft 1 „ � • We. are deeply concerned:about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and :.� your apparent willingness to let•the developer determine the scope of development "" 1 1 ' .We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON t . i 1. o= THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until. the following issues are resolved 5 ,�t� �.• f ;.. � t ,p t ) � .r, _� , a 7. „i o'. J 1,�, 5 ,� M. - .7 },t _) •f a 95, � l.�ttt }F.y 7=.' b,i .'� , ' DensityCurrent planned density of•1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The'200 = 300,units .,' 1 �t k' promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable r 1 t ,f 1; , +n .. ,. .':.�.'. :' S t.fp .`. - , �2, t:�' .4 1'1 �"Ea. K•:: 7,'}".?•` .. - t ' Access As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County . 1L 1 and Clarke County 1 Services As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. , �,r F 1 �.; Schools. - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the, availability of adequate primary and 1 1 " secondary:educational facilities. t 1, t- .Moral ' "We further.have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed..on public use of a recreational lake. which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1 k since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan.: ; urther approv�ls:of thycen. d. velo to nt plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable 1' 3 (Signature) ` / (Name - please print) (Street Address) . - (Post Office and Zip): Tele hone Number , 1 ; a; ( p ) (County & Voting Precinct) CC (Signature) (Name -please print) 1.. fir sr -1 �� �h�/i �cJI �Lc. Sir (Street Address)' (Post Office and Zipa 1 ss' y (Telephone Number). ' (County &,Voting Precinc! F: If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign ;it, and 1 ., either �' . ✓' . ; ' 1 Mail to:• Citizens for Quality , P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received b Q Y Community. y 1 November 8, 1989 or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. 1 t This project is currently planned for discussion at the No 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance. at this meeting • i_s critical. Our', strength lies in our numbers. Hon. A sonf-i Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist Rep. VA House of Delgates 6 — . 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and I your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. e 1 1 We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON e THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: � I ' Density- Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 I Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County I' and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment . facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and I secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a I recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1 1 We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property . I since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. (Signature) (Name - please print) " C) DE►� / &X '35-yC ��f1�1CitF54-tr— U0 Z7�nf (Street Address) r� (Post Office d nd Zip) 70 --- � t, 33 f `wed ecl Qv-- Cv«nk I.Sl�at,)11ee_ (Te ephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) D j -�fr ; C f jC•,#tkVC1— 1-le Id e-( , j F, p B (Signature) (Name - please print) c I 9 fl 01 ester ytl Z Z L� 35ci G 1�i S¢ } (Street Address) r (Post Office and Zip) . i C 71e— octal Fy —S1 u jt)A-C (Telephone Number) (County & Voting P inct) 5>♦t`i C� If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: 1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 ' - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting . is critical. Our'strength lies in our numbers. ._ - - - - - - - - __ TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia 'Hon. A1son H. Smith; Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA Hotise'of Delga'tes — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I :I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and I . your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. I I We request that.A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON I THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: I I I Density - Current planned density of 1800 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units ! promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. I I I Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. _ As current( planned, we have rave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment I Services Y P g P g facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and f . I secondary educational facilities. .Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a � recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. I We also have grave concerns about the County unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. I I i (Signature) (Name - please print) f . yk),p R-)St- \Its c4��o� 3 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 0 elephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 0 I 1 Ii s (Signature) (Name - please print) 0 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) --------------------------------- TO: Board of Supervisors, Frederick County, Virginia Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep: VA House of Delgates --------------------------------- We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. I . Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. /h ;'no A-��Ywu , - (--7 ff) /-)'j �, fZ I :. ., (Si (Street Address) N (Name please print) I (Post Office and Zip) f aunty & Voting Precinct) wo"s 19fdRR2 (Signature) (Name - please print) �t87 SLIME et-4CFE Tr4 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip). Number (Telephone ) - (County &Voting Precinct) i If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and either: - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by November 8, 1989 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. I. TO: Board of Supervisors; Frederick County, Virginia 1 6 Hon. Alson H. Smith,'Jr., 29th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House of Delgaies --------------------------------- • 1 We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 e We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON 1 THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units 1 r promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. 1 Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County and Clarke County. 1 ; Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. U, V Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. 1 Moral - We. further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars.1.4 1 i; We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property 1; ; since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 ; Further approvals of the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. 1 G, I A O �aw /;A/ z- (Signature) (Name - please print) o U (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1 Tele one Number) (County & Voting Precinct) 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) 1 S (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) 1� 103 (Telephone Number) (County & Vdfing Precinct) 1 1 I If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and 1 , either:. ! - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to be received by . 1 November 8, 1989 1 1 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning_ 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. 1 Our strength lies in our numbers. 1 Hon. Alson H. Smith, Jr., 2 th Legislative Dist. Rep. VA House or Delgates 1 ■ ---------------------------1" . I I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and 1 1 your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 e.. We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved: 1 1�, DensityCurrent planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units., 1 - promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 and Clarke County. I - 1 1 Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment I facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. ° 1 I. 1 Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and 1 secondary educational facilities. I I - 1 Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a I ; 1 recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. 1: I We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property since it lies outside the Urban Development Area. as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Further approvals o the current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. IQP -TAME-5 W , -S- v 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) ,,BOX y214* WHITRCRe, 11g, ,2Zb 2 3— 1 (Street Address) (Post Office and Zip) fIReDEr/Gf1 "' 6l4ofspVRo /. 8, 1 (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) I 1 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) (Street Address) (Post Off ce and Zip) . A �S $0R-z (Telephone Numb ) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign it, and....,..' 1 either: - :1 - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601, to'belreceived by'. 1 November 8, 1989 1 - or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah 1 1 College & Conservatory. 1 This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1989 Planning 1 Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers. t rion. iitson n. Jmltll, Jr., /2;Ml LGgISNAL1VU "VIL. ikG1/. V!'1 11VUJG V1 ► %Aran 3 i-------------------------------- I We are deeply concerned about the plans for the development of Wheatlands and your apparent willingness to let the developer determine the scope of development. 1 e- We request that A MORATORIUM BE IMMEDIATELY DECLARED ON �. THE WHEATLANDS PROJECT until the following issues are resolved - Density - Current planned density of 1800 - 2000 housing units is unacceptable. The 200 - 300 units.. y , promised in exchange for public funds for reconstruction of the dam are acceptable. Access - As currently planned, will create significant transportation problems in both Frederick County 1 - and Clarke County. L Services - As currently planned, we have grave doubts as to the impact of sewage and water treatment ' I facilities on the environment, in particular streams and groundwater. Schools - As currently planned, we have concerns as to the availability of adequate primary and secondary educational facilities. Moral - We further have grave moral misgivings about the constraints placed on public use of a z recreational lake which has been improved with Federal tax dollars. ' We also have grave concerns about the County's unwillingness to downzone the property ' since it lies outside the Urban Development Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. ' Further approvals of he current development plans for Wheatlands are unacceptable. c( ci ,y,�' 1 (Signature) (Name - please print) - � is-ro ,3� y���IA-1 ua � .��t9 !1 � (Street Address) Q (Post Office and Zip) (Telephone Number) 1 County & v oring Precinct) (Signature) fl(Name - please print) /A; (Street Address) O (Post Office and Zip) n (Telephone Number) (County & Voting Precinct) If you have not already signed this petition, please cut this out of the paper, sign=it, and ' .: • , 1 either: ;,.. - Mail to: Citizens for Quality Community, P.O. Box 2558, Winchester, VA 22601,' to be received by November 8, 1989 ' ' ' -or come to our next meeting, Thursday, November 9, 1989, 7:30 p.m., Henkle Auditorium, Shenandoah) College & Conservatory. This project is currently planned for discussion at the November 15, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. Even if you do not wish to speak, your attendance at this meeting 1 is critical. Our strength lies in our numbers:'. L____________________e_________'���� OMM Revised MDP #006-89 WHEATLANDS ~ Submitted 11/13/90 Stonewall _