The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-93 Village at Sherando - Backfiley .75' NM.IN^7+4.00 / ¢ R-25' �. P \ jt RIM= '46 28J y r. INV.IN�738.98( 2 / INV.Oq=738.78 MH #7 J J 12 M-744.0 IN-740. 0 J.3 / ! •¢ / J 5 / ,~ 76 a 1-10"TEE a .t 2-10"G.V.&BOX / ; 9 1-107xTRED. s' R 5' 1-8"G.V.&BOX r a c ) 1-8" 11.25' EL �. V, E s �. ems::} .. A l,� .. `_ •, f -- 00 'C C. FLUMK 00 J� 2C ca 27 22 123 o Str. 12 DI-3C ' PE=DI338 TOP EL=747 _.4 =75.5TYOP= � C VEL. q .N=742.75 INV.OUT=743.40 �2.50INV.OUT=7 ill RIM-7 7 20 . 'INiI 0 —737 86. s 3 \ — 0" TE \\ — 0"G. h BC `\ \ Zl—lCrTEE 3-1o"G.V-tAox i 29 i 30 31 32 1-22.5 : EL. 3 I ` UTILITY �,_ REWD Uc5� u � r �.` 'r'1 s�� y�S_ y��o� V COUNTY of FREDERICK Parks and Recreation Department James M. Doran, Director 540/665-5678 - FAX: 540/665-9687 MEMORANDUM TO: Evan K. Wyatt FROM: James M. Doran �% SUBJ: Bicycle/Pedest an Travelway DATE: December 28, 1995 Please advise me as to what the developer of the Village at Sherando is obligated to provide as it relates to the completion of the bicycle/pedestrian travelway through this subdivision. During the agency review phase of this project, I recommended that concessions be given the developer in the areas of open space set aside and tot lot construction if the developer would agree to complete a bicycle/pedestrian travelway which would extend from Georgetown Court to the Frederick County. Park property line. I also suggested that the planned pedestrian travelway be redesigned to conform with a comprehensive bicycle/pedestrian plan for the entire development designed to provide controlled access to Sherando Park and Sherando High School. Evan, while working together on the bicycle/pedestrian travelway ISTEA grant application, I was of the understanding that the Planning Commission supported these staff recommendations and that the developer, in exchange for open space and tot lot concessions, would be obligated to make the recommended design changes. We are currently in the final phase of the design of this travelway and the financial responsibility of the developer must be determined as soon as possible. I am looking to your office for guidance in this matter. I appreciate your assistance with this issue and, if you should have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call. JMD/sm 107 N. Kent Street P.O. Box 790 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 P/C review date: 03/18/92 BOS review date: 04/08/92 REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN VILLAGE AT SHERANDO (Formerly Evans/Snyder MDP) #002-92 Revising 6.65 acres of 55.4293 LOCATION: North and adjacent to State Route 277, east of Stephens City and 1750 ± east of State Route 641. Approximately 1.75 miles east of I-81 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 860000A0001020 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business, General), and RP (Residential Performance) - land use - vacant, residential PROPOSED USES: Residential and Commercial' REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objections to the revised master development plan for this property. However, since several different pavement sections for the proposed 60' right-of-way (Golladay Drive) have been previously approved during site plan review we suggest the one shown be corrected or removed. Before making any final comments this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculation, and traffic flow data for review. Before any work is started on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Sanitation Authority: Approved Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building code and Section 309 Use Group R, Residential use of the BOCA National Building Code, 1990. Fire Marshal: See attached comments, dated February 19, 1992, Page 2 Revised MDP Village At Sherando from Douglas A. Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal. County Engineer: Verify that the gravity sewer line paralleling the steep slope area will adequately tie into pre existing 15" sanitary sewer without conflicting with the improved Wrights Run Channel. No other comments at this time. Parks & Recreation: See attached comments, dated February 20, 1992, from Jim Doran, Director of Parks & Recreation. Planning and Zoning: The revised Master Development Plan submitted would amend the approved Master Development Plan of 11/15/90 to include patio homes. This amendment will modify what was originally 17 single family cluster lots to 32 patio home lots. Modifications in this area, as well as the single family cluster area will increase the overall units in the proposed development from 164 to 183, or 4.4 units per acre. The applicant has shown additional pedestrian walkways throughout the proposed development. One of the three required recreational units in the townhouse area is not shown on the revised Master Development Plan. A temporary patio home sales model with customer parking and signage has been permitted in the B-2 (Business General) Zoning District. An affidavit for temporary commercial uses has been provided by the applicant. This states that the temporary patio home will be removed from the property by November 1, 1992. The modification from 17 single family cluster lots to 32 patio homes has increased the length of the northern cul-de- sac from 270 feet to approximately 600 feet. The primary concern of staff regards required open space. Section 5-4-1 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum percentage of the gross area of any proposed development to be designated as common open space. This development contains 51% townhouse lots, 31% single family cluster lots, and 18% patio home lots; therefore, the minimum open space requirement is 30%. The total gross area of the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District is 38.65 acres, which would require 11.60 acres of open space. The applicant is providing 9.73 acres of open space. Minor project summary information on the revised Master Development Plan, such as total acreage, original Master Development Plan approval date, and total open space required by RP use needs to be modified on the revised plan. Page 3 Revised MDP Village At Sherando STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 03/18/92 P/C MTG.: Approval, provided that all review agency comments are addressed, the issue regarding required open space is resolved, and the plan is modified to incorporate the project summary information. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS OF 03/18/92: Unanimously approved, provided the following comments are addressed: (Golladay abstained) 1. Address staff and agency comments. 2. Put walkways on both sides of the connection on Warrior Road to Route 277 and add a walkway on one side of the temporary connection of Warrior Road to Route 277. t February 20, 1992 Parks and Recreation Department Comments Master Development Plan - The Village at Sherando This Master Development Plan provides for approximately 25% open space while being required 30% open space. 1 would recommend that credit be given for the 5% open space that is lacking if the developer is agreeable to completing a bicycle/pedestrian travelway which would extend from Georgetown Court to the Frederick County Park property line. I would also suggest that the planned pedestrian travelway be redesigned to conform with a comprehensive bicycle/pedestrian plan for the entire development. If such a travelway could be created, which would provide controlled access to Sherando Park and Sherando High School, I would also recommend that only one tot lot be required for this development. Please note that detailed specifications for all recreational units will be required during the site plan review stage of this project. AA Village at Sherando Subdivision #002-93