The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLake Centre 24 Lots Shawnee District - Backfile (2)t ar1511ll. * STAFF SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST * As application is not complete if the following are not included: SUBMISSION PACKAGE Comments sheets m the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan; VDOT +✓ Sanitation A Inrons Dept. Fhal One copy of the subdivision application 15 copies of the plan on a single sheet One reproducible copy of the pl r uired) A 35mm. slide of the plan TRACKING Date ✓ City of Winchester ✓ Health Department ✓ Parks & Recreation Road Naming Coordinator ✓ County Engineer ✓ So � i �- Vim-+�✓ ,.5' s 9l Application received ,5 Fee Paid (amount $ O ) Subdivision heard by Planning Commission. Action taken le - Subdivision heard by Board of Supervisors. Action taken" Final plat submitted with review agency signatures and; deed of dedication bond estimate $ Plat signed by Planning Director Plat signed by Subdivision Administrator House numbering assigned Info added to annual report disk awe* 4ft cr X-4 04-Y fo LAP Ift RECEIPT AMOUNT DUt $ - -/ 40,5-,coo AMOUNT PAID $ q C/o .5 - � BALANCE DUE XID BY 0 CASH a4"CHIECK 1:1 OTHER kNNING AND DEVELOPMENT WINCHLzilLK, VMUMIA z,;::boi OgN x1mm"Immil 1,0111 t DATE J -4 RECEIVED FROM - ADDRESS THE SUM OF FOR BY DAY TIMERS RE -ORDER No. 3221 — Printed in USA I .0 .1% w a COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 May 5, 1994 David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Dave: The purpose of this letter is to request written notification of your intent to officially withdraw the subdivision application for Lake Centre Townhouses which our office has in the pending status. This request has been prompted by the submission of a revised subdivision application for this property which we understand is now under different ownership. If you have any questions regarding this request just give us a call. Since ly, W. Way a Miller Zoning dministrator WWM/slk 9 North l_oudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 PC Review - 6/19/91 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LAKE CENTRE 23 Townhouses on 4.1613 Acres LOCATION: At the southeast corner and intersection of State Route 642 and Chinkapin Drive in Lakeside Estates MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NO: Tax map 75B, Parcel 1F ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R-P (Residential Performance), present use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned R-P (Residential Performance) present use - residential and vacant REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Va. Department of Transportation: See attached letter dated April 8, 1991. Inspections Department: This request for subdivision approval shall comply to Use Group "R", Residential, Section 309.0, of the BOCA National Building Code 111990" Fire Marshal: See attached comments. Sanitation Authority: First review - 9 items - correct and resubmit. County Engineer: See attached letter dated April 15, 1991. Health Department: No objection as long as facility serviced by central water and sewer as planned. Parks & Recreation: The swing set needs to be relocated so that a 33' x 46' protective area can be provided. This department recommends that an energy absorbing surface be � " 5 c (�/J-o // C(Q 7 'v b / included within all playground equipment protective areas. All other open space and recreational requirements appear to have been met. Lord Fairfax Soil & Water Conservation Dist.: See attached letter dated April 17, 1991. 1) Need to show details and specification number for sediment trap. 2) Show sequence of construction. 3) Should consider placing a temporary silt trap at point "A" drainage. "C" factors appear to be adequate for on -the -ground cover conditions. Planning & Zoning: This subdivision plat is basically in conformance with the approved Master Development Plan. The review agency comment sheets for the subdivision were the same as those for the site plan. There are several comments of significance which will be addressed during the site plan review. At this time there are no identified problems that cannot be resolved or any that would preclude approval of this subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 6119191 PIC MTG: Approval with the stipulation that all outstanding review agency comments will be adequately addressed prior to site plan approval. LAKE CENTER SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Shawnee Magisterial District County of Frederick, Virginia Prepared for David B. Holiday P.O. Box 2"S Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 May1991 by gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. FREDERICKSBURG - WINCHESTER APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST SUBDIVISION FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA Date:March 21,1991 Application #: Fee Paid Applicant/Agent: G.W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Phone: (703) 667-2139 Owners name: David B. Holliday P.O. BOX 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 Phone: (703) 667-2120 Please list names of all owners, principals, and/or majority stockholders: DAVID B. HOLLIDAY Contact person: Darren Foltz Phone: (703) 667-2139 Name of Subdivision: LAKE CENT Number of Lots: 24 Total Acreage: 4.1613 Acres Property Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) (Give State Rt.#, distance and direction from intersection) Magisterial District: SHAWNEE Tax ID Number (21 digit): Commissioner has no number! Property zoning and present use: RP (Vacant) Adjoining property zoning and use: RP (Vacant & Townhouses) Has a master Development Plan been submitted for this project? Yes X No If yes, has the final MDP been approved by the Board of Supervisors? Yes X No What was the MDP title? LAKE CENTRE Does the plat contain any changes from the approved MDP? Yes No X If yes, specify what changes. Minimum Lot Size (smallest lot): 2,000 sf Number and types of housing units in this development: Number Types Townhouses CO 'Y OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA \ FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 032291270 Date Received 032291 Date Reviewed 042291 Applicant Name G. W. Clifford & Assoc. Address 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name Lake Centre Phone No. 703-667-2139 Type of Application Subdivision/Site Plan Current Zoning 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 11 Election District Shawnee Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System Emergency Vehicle Access; RECOMMENDATIONS Residential Sprinkler System X Other RP X Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required;, Yes X No Comments: Painted curbing and fire lane signage required at all hydrants. Roadwav/Aislewav Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes X No Comments: All access to the Tot Lot is between parked vehicle travel areas creating a dangerous situation for uq across �� children. 0Y||/ '�A/ /5k]n Hydrant Locations; Adequate Inadequate x Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified X Additional Comments:1> Frederick County Chapter 10 requires two (2) hydrants within 300' of each structure when more than five dwelling units. The single hydrant shown is inadequate 2) Access for ambulance crews is also between parked cars which can compromise patient care, recommend handicap access islands at the center of each building to facilitate access. 3) Access for fire dept. apparatus must be maintained at all times during construction. 4> Post temporary street signs during construction for identification of property. Review Time .50 hr Fire Marshal COMM®NWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER I (703) 984-4133 I RESIDENT ENGINEER April 8, 1991 Mr. Tom Price, Project Manager Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. Lake Centre Townhouse Development 200 North Cameron Street Routes 642 & 1070 Post Office Box 2104 Frederick County Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Tom: As requested we have reviewed the above referenced project's site plans dated January, 1991. Our recommendations may found on the attached plans marked in red and as follows: 1. The entrance width should be increased to a minis m 36' from face to face of curb and radii increased to 151. This would remain consistent with other commercial entrances which have recently been approved within the Lakeside Development. 2. A 1700" C.M.P.A. with standard ES-3 end sections will be required under the entrance and the roadside ditches regraded to provide positive drainage. 3. A drainage easement will be required along Routes 642 and 1070 as noted. Also, as we have recently discussed any existing easements are to be clearly shown on the site plan. 4. A half typical section of the entrance improvements is to be incorporated into the plan. 5. Existing sight distance, reference and speed limit are to be added to the plan as noted. Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for further review. Should any changes be deemed necessary please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. hman, Trans. Resident Engr. �G MAY By: Robert B. Childress, Hwy. Permits & Subd. r. 19� RBC/rf Enclosure r xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond, Mr. R. W. Watkins TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY � ,� c,� �i r� • �� LVI YVrIUL r I—Ilr�r h-IJ, 11240 Waples Mill Road + ENGINEERS Suite 100 ARCHITPCTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030 SCIENTIST5 703.WS.3566 Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, Sox 601 Winchwster, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Lake Centre Townhouse Plan Plan and Site Visit Project Manager Senior Engineer, Admin. Assist. 910/-,3061-60 2.0 hrs 4.0 hrs 0.5 hrs @33.25 @33.25 @14.50 Total Direct Total. Indirect TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE D p Phone Fax* Fax N r.lic AT-ei Date: Please Reference: Protect No. Invoice No. Client No. Apt. 15, 1991 17555.130 9102341 07534 66.50 133.00 7.25 207.00 310.50 $ 517.50 � I-LN Note: ,_. Pink Copy To: Loa/Dept — Accountant: ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS April 15, 1991 Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Frederick. County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA. 22601 Re: Lake Centre Townhouse Plan 17555.130 Dear Ed, Following our site visit and previous discussions, I have reviewed the above referenced townhouse plan. In general, this plan conforms to the Master Development Plan submitted in 1989. Based on my review I have the following comments: A. ACCESS 1. The traffic generation for this project was estimated by the Designer which is consistent with ITE studies. The predicted vehicle trips of 135 VTD for this development will not be a major increase to the traffic loadings on Chinkapin Drive, however, Route 642 has been feeling the strain of growth. The developer has indicated a dedication for improvement to Route 642 which I assume is consistent with VDOT's proposed improvements. 2. I concur with your assessment of the need for a reinforced dumpster pad and landing. Turn around will be an effort that will require backing up in the parking area. 3. Providing access to the future day care facility is a good idea. Access should be restricted to this location to minimize impact to traffic flow on Chinkapin. B. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. The dumpster is located in an area where concentrated surface drainage is discharged to the rear yards of lot 15. If it ri 15 r,. ■ 11240 Mples Mill Road, Suite 100, Fairfax, Krgima 22030 ■ 703.36 3566 � 13A,,8319, � (` Prnruci on _,,.; recic(ed prprr: were acceptable to County Planning, relocating the dumpster to a "pull -in pad" in the open space behind Lot 1 could resolve this problem as well as the problem of maneuvering in the parking area. 2. Spot elevations are needed to adequately plan and construct the curb and gutter and grade the site. This includes spot elevations at building corners, entrances, curb returns, changes in grade for curb and gutter, high points, and in some cases in flow lines of swales. 3. Invert elevations should be provided for drainage culverts. In particular, the existing 15 inch CMP under Chinkapin Drive and culvert #2. The inverts for culvert 2 are provided in the calculations, but not in profile or the grading plans. 4. Based on my assessment, there will only be 2 tenths of a foot between the crown of the culvert #2 and the invert of the sewer, not including pipe materials. Some special grading may be needed here. 5. I assume that all of the units are on crawl space based on the floor elevations indicated. Based on drainage and groundwater problems that have been showing up lately, soil and groundwater investigations would be advisable for foundation design. Basements in this area would not appear advisable. 6. With the fill proposed in the future day care center, it would appear to be preferable to redirect the- channel (SCC 14) to the west as opposed to the middle of the building lot. This would be a more direct route from the existing culvert to the storm channel (SCC) #7. 7. The "C" factors used for drainage areas B,C,E1,E2,E3,H, and N are questionable. We are finding that for this area, undeveloped surfaces show a runoff coefficient more like a 0.4 or 0.45. In estimating flow rates for determining stormwater management storage and release rates, I agree that a low C factor of 0.2 should be used for the on - site predeveloped condition which will yield a factor of safety in the storage estimate and allowable discharge rates. However, the off - site flow should be estimated using planned land use runoff rates, for the "pre" and "Post" conditions. 8. In my comments for the Master Development Plan, it was suggested that they check the adequacy of the existing pond for stormwater management. This means that adequate storage and discharge controls will need to be designed as a part of this plan. These plans do not indicate this was done. I would like to add that since those comments in 1989, new provisions or requirements for water quality have been developed on a State level. Frederick County is now in the process of adopting those. This lake will help in the water uality treatment. However, it will do so at the expense of its wa }�, --- lakes purpose is for more than a stormwater manag c' this needs to be taken into consideration. If not n the lake may 91 V � be determined to be adequate to address water quality with the provision of adequate discharge controls. Development such as this speed up the eutrophication process of surface water impoundments through increased nutrient loadings. 9. The flood stage of the pond needs to be established, and shown on the plans. C. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION 1. The E & S narrative is not provided with the plan identifying the sequence of events, temporary stabilization, installation of temporary measures, removal of measures, and permanent stabilization. The proper implementation of the E & S plan will be important to the existing lake. 2. For the inlet protection to C-2, both straw bales and silt fencing may be required, or a perforated riser pipe with stone backfill could be considered. The drainage area is not in excess of 2 acres, but the flow is far in excess of 1 cfs. 3. Sod should be considered for SCC 5, 6, 7, and 8 as well as being provided for SCC 14 as indicated on the plan. 4. The other provided measures appear adequate. The above comments should be considered and addressed before I can recommend approval. If you have any questions or responses, please let me know. ff , & ASSOCIATE , IN.Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/j la cc: Ron Mislowski, Gilbert Clifford & Associates R/F/A16 e�y /y! COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRGINIA LORD FAIRFAX SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2045-B Valley Avenue Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662-3312 April 17, 1991 G. W. Clifford & Associates 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 ATTN: Tom Price Dear Mr. Price: Enclosed please find our response to the Request for Site Plan Comment sheet. On April 12, 1991, Frank Sherwood, District Director representing Frederick County, and I examined the site near Lake Centre. The Soil and Water Conservation District feel the three items we have commented on are very important, especially Item #2, a sequence of construction. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Sincerely, ti James A. Hepner, Sr. Conservation Specialist Lord Fairfax SWCD CC. David Weiss, Chm., E & S Control Committee, LFSWCD John Penney, Director, Frederick Co., LFSWCD Frank Sherwood, Director, Frederick Co., E & S Committee Member, LFSWCD D Ca Q I Y ; 5 I01) i G. W. CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 North Cameron Street P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 703-667-2139 Fax: 703-665-0493 MEMORANDUM To: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator Frederick County Planning and Development From: Darren Foltz Re: Erosion and Sediment Control Study Lake Centre Date: 18 March 1991 2Mv-� t I MAY 15 Project Description - The purpose of this project is the construction of four townhouse buildings consisting of twenty-three units and grading for a future daycare facility. The site consisting of approximately 4.2 acres is located at the intersection of Chinkapin Drive and State Route 642 in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia. In addition to the buildings, an access road, utilities, storm sewer and parking areas will be constructed with almost the entire site being disturbed during construction. Existing Site Conditions - The proposed site is an area of rolling hills formerly in agricultural production. Most of the site is covered with a sparse natural growth of weeds and grasses. The site slopes from north to south towards an existing 10 acre lake with existing slopes ranging from approximately 4% to 7%. A pre development C factor of .20 was used. Adjacent Property - The easterly and southerly adjoining properties are vacant areas formerly in agricultural production. The entire Lakeside Development lies to the east and north of the site. Soils - The site is in the Weikert-Berks-Blairton Soil Association. The area is characterized by gently sloping to steep, poorly drained soils that have a medium textured subsoil, formed in material weathered from shale. For purposes of design runoff conditions, antecedent moisture condition II (normal consideration for the mid -Atlantic region) is assumed. Soils are of the Blairton (3B) Series. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission, therefore SCS Soil group "C" is adopted. A copy of the soils map is enclosed as attachment #1. Stormwater Management - The rational method was used to determine peak flows to storm structures and these values were used to size all storm piping. The design meets VDOT standards. All piping will carry the ten year storm. The ditches were designed for two year velocity and ten year depth. In almost all cases velocities less than 3 fps are realized for the two year storm. In the singular case where the velocities fall between 3 and 5 fps, EC-2 is required. The remaining ditches will receive standard grass seeding. Two points were analyzed for post development discharge; A and B as shown on the drainage map. The post development flow to these two points has been evaluated for the 2 and 10 year pre and post development storms. The goal of the design is to meet or exceed the control requirements of pre two -post two and pre ten post ten as required by the County ordinance. The entire site drains to the east and the existing pond, which lies just off site. The site is divided into thirteen drainage areas which are delineated on the drainage map. There are basically two regions of drainage. The first drains to Point A and includes a few acres of open space. The second, which drains to Point B, and includes some offsite drainage from the west, encompasses most of the development. As the pre development area "A" is much larger than the post development drainage area, the post development two and ten year storm flows are less than that realized in pre development. The post development flows to Point B are larger than those in pre development. The ditches will be constructed from the discharge point at the southeast end of the development to the existing pond to carry the ten year flows without degradation. These channels are adequate for all post development storm flows. A capacity analysis of the existing pond was completed for the two and ten year storms. The pond covers approximately 8 acres. It has an emergency spillway set at the 728.8 elevation. The normal pond water elevation, for purposes of the study, was 724.7. The watershed which drains to the pond is 62 acres. This area extends to the west, across Rte. 642, to just east of I-81. A C factor of .25 and time of concentration of 15 minutes was used for the pre development flows. The pre development peak two year flow to the pond was estimated at 53 cfs, the ten year flow is 71 cfs. Hydrograph routings of each of these storms through the pond are attached. The c factor for the 62 acre area was weighted to account for the increased runoff to points A and B and thence to the pond in post development. The weighted c value is .29. As the longest time of concentration governs; 15 minutes was used in post development also. The peak post development two year storm flow is 60 cfs. The ten year peak flow is 82 cfs. The peak post development storm routing for the two and ten year storms are attached. For the two year storm, the increase storage volume required by the development is 8385 cu.ft. The corresponding change in pond elevation is 724.86 to 724.88 or .02 ft. The ten year storm increase volume is 11,364 cu.ft. The resulting change in elevation is 724.91 to 724.94 or .03 ft. In both cases, the pond has much more capacity than what is required by this proposal. Sediment and Erosion Control - In order to ensure the quality of runoff does not decrease during construction, we have provided for silt fencing, straw bale barriers, rock fill check dams, a sediment trap and a construction entrance to minimize erosion. Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetation and structural erosion and sediment control practices will be constructed and maintained according to the most current minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. The erosion control measures are specified on the plans. Maintenance - All soil erosion control structures shall be checked weekly by the contractor during this construction period and after construction is completed until grass cover is established. Sediment retained by these structures shall be continuously removed and placed in an area of the site specified, damage to soil erosion control structures shall immediately be repaired when identified by the contractor. The contractor shall cooperate with all agents of the County, the Engineer and others who may identify needed facilities or work in order to protect the environment within the subject of this report. ''`4 and • t' �#� �• ^,�6,'��if�L�? A f+f�'� i f� f ':.` �y�,�,: q•yf "'�� y ':'., r '# � � i,,.' 1. + x. �.6' ^$5 t :�/ � F 'gym„ � � „� � •.r ♦� r v�,' ,.Fhrf "Y �.j :Jtr .�� ur wwrty,,,�.r.+:"•''� �' � - '. _� k• ,�\ �^ ./. Au Al.- ' At Al r. \ 'f f < • fro" r , Y rt � � s•.i� ��< °.•,9��'1. �� , , � ?�."_ ��'*Q V 1� •' _ , a r F - 5 .S ' p '.*.fie xi n. f "•a - 1 J�^ � ,�` , �F{�f�1�•r •�� ti ,P��'-� .:'—sue'" � �� I '' woo 1- +F•a�`d �::c•'�` `r. ;5. ..x+l. `r,,r"x `. •,,;Z' ., I ^�' /t. ! � r �a• J'' a .. '^Yv1 aka _ e r.» eS �`•• .. ,x....,►"�•. rur : 'tom �� "" i e 4Kta.. Cr >.. {�.... IK ' � l� •ry,'�7j/�? �` ,�i,r"< � ^' b'"'�:�^ �._. t�•„`,l °'� ,s�'.""�„t^r.9.i`44"' �-�.,9� w�'',�^F^• .I'i�.a rl '�r �,' - _ �," ,,� 4i t r• i J�•+ "2 _;�.✓a'ti �qp,..:. •ti'�^A z. - � n•� .' A� r� •'a+�jr '�� t t • r/ e ear i • .a. -it °�G� J ., �» " w � ``t �j T " ,�,,:+_�. � ;� �+� •'�� `- sir .s �'�a+ `,s � � �T � `.�t' � ?4 � �P j�� r _1 • t ,k } • ^� , � if i • � � ,� ", ,, t,•�•.i.Y, a ly'i`"'' 1 `"` • p a ��,e4 . 3 ,`f�'� Y' r .�{ ` n ' �i ' •,s,,, t Cl ` 4` J • �, io r �'..�� y ?fit,. �„jr '*'�1,.-61A :di�C'. � � `t• '��,.:i � � •� �+`'Y �`,�F ` ,ram _s�`.a.+� _,�---•'Z+.sa�2 _ - �� 1 _ .': � _.'.4 IfKafifwG�w'jTTTy �* r •f�ii31.�� `•JC' pj��'• � NAjs L•. �' "Y r� j�y I t s ��r ,� ° • ar' °! •a{ as 4 } , •"- �i� • '`�` f � � i� '+ '• r 'd -�. Y��- � e✓g. ^=<F'" + �.� ttr +��,,i a�-mil y '. +�•�#� 1� ti r�Y � ":� �� . � �,ifY� � .. �y `+++��"'�,.�' 4 • � �' , ; •a^,Phliii *16 r• ' � t 2�. .. ,. l`3 -�.'� q} '�S•r�''.�a,�^�' T.=..3 T ^s�,�n �, i n ��z,. •:R.a ,-. . . t "i X.5 INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS Installation of an erosion and sediment control plan will be discussed in seven distinct steps, primarily from the standpoint of the job superintendent. The steps are: 1. study of the plan and site to organize implementation 2. pre -construction conference between the job superintendent and inspector 3. site preparation 4. inspection and maintenance 5. grading and utilities installation 6. building construction 7. permanent stabilization Study of the plan and site The job superintendent must be thoroughly familiar with both the erosion and sediment control plan and the construction site. He should note all of the critical areas indicated on the plan and then actually identify their location and extent on the ground. These should include stream channels and associated flood plain areas, drainageways and outlets into streams, points where land -disturbing activities are adjacent to or must cross streams and drainageways, steep slopes and highly erodible soils, and runoff entering the site from adjacent areas. He should note what practices are specified to protect these areas. Also, he should be aware of critical areas not specifically treated in the plan. He should discuss these with the inspector at the pre -construction conference. Next, he should determine the locations of all control measures and determine their "fit" on the land. He should note any needed adjustments and plan to discuss these at the pre -construction conference. He should check the schedule for the installation of erosion and sediment control practices, the schedule for all earth -disturbing activities, and the relationship between the sequence and timing of practice installation and the earth -disturbing activities. The timing and sequence of installation are important elements of an erosion and sediment control plan. The site must be ready for rain before the earth -disturbing activities are started. For this reason, certain practices must be in place and ready to provide protection before both areas are exposed. The staging of major earth -disturbing activities in order to limit the size of bare area exposed at any time is another important element of the plan which should be noted. Barriers may be required to keep traffic within the delineated areas, or at least out of the critical areas. If needed, they should be installed before opening. the site to general construction traffic. Required sediment trapping practices should be installed. (Note that compacting, seeding, and mulching are required to stabilize these practices.) Next, waterways -..and outlets should be installed, with the vegetation or lining material; call for in the plan. The work force should be instructed about the location of critical areas and sediment control practices and the need to protect these areas from damage. Inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures Maintenance differs from the other erosion and sediment control activities; It must begin as soon as the first practice is installed and must continue through; tall the succeeding activities until the permanent erosion control measures are established and functioning. : The features of a maintenance program are described in the narrative part of the plan. All structural measures should be checked at the close of each work day and, particularly, at the end of the work week. Also, they should be checked before -and after each rainstorm. Diversion berms should -be--checked to see that they have not been breached by equipment. The condition of level spreader areas, waterways, and other outlets should also be checked. Traffic should be moving within the established access routes. Channels should be checked for sediment deposits or other impeding material. Repairs should be made promptly when damages are discovered. When repairing waterways or other channels, the new lining material should be at least as erosion resistant as the original material. Vegetative practices and vegetative cover on structural practices require maintenance fertilizer and, perhaps, mowing. All sediment traps should be cleaned out after each storm. Sediment basins should be cleaned out when the deposited material reaches the level designated in the plan or standards and specifications. Grading and utility construction The fifth major step is the grading and utility installation. If stockpiling of fill or topsoil is planned, a pre -selected, relatively safe stockpile area should :be used. To minimize erosion, the slopes of the stockpile should be flattened at the end of each working period. The stockpile should be mulched and seeded as soon as it is completed. The pre -construction conference The next step is a pre -construction conference and site review with the erosion and sediment control inspector. The site review will help both parties in meeting their responsibilities. - It should be called for by the job superintendent and should be help on the construction site. All aspects of the plan should be discussed to ensure that the job superintendent and the inspector are in agreement in interpreting the plan, scheduling, procedures, and practices which are to be used. They should agree particularly on the critical problem areas and on the perimeter practices specified to prevent damage to adjacent properties. The location of all measures should be carefully considered. If study of the plan indicates that adjustments in location are needed, these should be discussed with the inspector. The inspector may authorize minor adjustments, such as moving a diversion from a property line to a grading limit; or shifting an outlet to match a natural depression in the land. Major adjustments may require formal revision of the plan and should be approved by -the plan -approving authority. The sequence of installation of practices and land -disturbing activities should also be discussed. The guidelines for erosion and sediment control ---planning require that debris basins and --other -appropriate erosion and sediment control measures be installed prior to, or as a first phase of, land grading. Other appropriate measures include construction entrances, diversion dikes, interceptor dikes, perimeter dikes, gravel outlet structures, lever spreaders, waterways or outlets, and grade stabilization structures. The inspector must be firm about establishment of these practices before grading begins. The State minimum "General Criteria" should be checked to be sure that they will be satisfied during construction. Authorized variances should be noted, and it should be determined if any additional conservation measures or 'variances are needed. Remember that variances to the "General Criteria" must be documented. Site preparation One of the first steps in preparing the site is to lay out all traffic circulation routes and storage areas. Route locations should be chosen so as to pose the least treat to the critical areas which have been identified. Well vegetated areas should be damaged as little as possible. Soil stockpiles should be located a safe distance from waterways and streams. Disturbed areas which can be brought to final grade at this stage during a satisfactory season for seeding should be seeded, sodded, or otherwise stabilized with the permanent material and techniques indicated in the plan. If they cannot be seeded, they should be stabilized with anchored mulch. Areas which are to' remain at rough grade for more than 30=days before permanent stabilisation should be mulched and seeded to temporary cover immediately following rough grading. Utilities such as storm sewers, sanitary sewers, electrical conduits, water mains, and gas mains, and gas mains are usually installed at this time. To minimize the amount of area disturbed, the work should be organized and the trenches sized to take several utilities in one trench. The installation should be carefully coordinated to reduce the time that the trenches must stay open. Excavated materials should be placed on the side of the trench away from streams and drainageways. If sediment -laden water must be pumped from utility trenches, it should be conveyed safely to a sediment trap or basin. Trenches should be filled, compacted, mulched, and seeded to temporary or permanent vegetation within seven days. As soon as the storm sewers are installed, inlet sediment traps should be installed to prevent sediment from entering the system. If called for, storm drain outlet protection should be installed. Building construction The sixth major step or stage is building construction. Two major hazards are common during this step. Additional equipment and work force bring added risks to areas which should be protected. Efforts to control traffic must be increased during this period. All types of traffic should be made to stay on the established travel routes. The second major hazard is from the excavated material. This phase usually results in high volumes of soil for disposal and stockpiling. Stockpiles should be located where they will not wash into drainageways or onto previously stabilized areas. The slopes on these areas should be flattened, and they should be protected by anchored mulch and a temporary seeding. Excavations should be backfilled as soon as possible, an appropriate surface protection should be provided. Permanent stabilization The seventh and last step is permanent stabilization. As mentioned earlier, this need not and should not be delayed until the entire development is completed. A significant reduction in erosion damage repair costs and regrading costs can be made if smaller areas are stabilized with permanent vegetation as soon as they are ready, unless the season is unsuitable for seeding. If unsuitable, then all areas should be mulched. Most sediment basins, dikes, sediment traps, and, other control structures are to be removed, regraded, mulched, and seeded before leaving the site. However, the inspector should be consulted before removing them. They should not be removed until the surrounding area is stabilized and they are no longer needed. In some cases, sediment basins, diversions,_ and, waterways are to remain as part of the permanent runoff management system. In such cases, sediment basins should be cleaned out and seeded to suitable permanent vegetation. Diversions and waterways should be checked, repaired if needed, and left in. good. condition. The inspector will check on the final condition of measures which are to be retained. :-; i , When final grading is completed, all bare areas. should be stabilized with permanent vegetation within seven days. The standards and specifications for permanent vegetative practices in the State Handbook give information on various materials and methods for permanent stabilization. X.6 INSPECTION OR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The inspector will need to coordinate his work with the activities previously described for the job superintendent. He will need to study the plan ahead of time, participate in the pre -construction conference, and explain plan requirements if an explanation is needed. He should note the construction schedule and plan his own schedule accordingly. He will inspect the site frequently through each stage, but should particularly check to see that all structural measures called for are installed during site preparation. A careful inspection is called for at the end of each stage in phased developments. Utility construction may be particularly damaging to control practices. Repairs should be made immediately. The inspector should develop and use a standard inspection form to assure a proper record of each inspection. Careful documentation of inspections is especially important if enforcement actions become necessary. The inspection form should provide space to identify the project, its location, permit number, and date. Space should be provided to record the phase at time of inspection, and whether all practices called for at that phase have been installed. Space should also be provided to indicate if structural practices meet design requirements and to indicate the condition of all practices. The beginning of grading, utility construction, and other planned items should be noted and dated. If the plan is not being followed, the inspector should record what action is being taken to correct it. (The Commission has developed an inspection log form as part of the Field Manual.) The inspector will find it helpful to use a standard checklist when performing inspections. The Commission has developed such a checklist as part of th'e Field; Manual (pp. A-11 and A-12). Most of the items on that checklist refer to,a specific General Criterion. The items from the checklist are listed below: 1. Are all structural practices called for on the plan installed in the proper location-_ and in accordance with State minimum specifications: 2. Are there any denuded areas which require temporary or permanent stabilization? (GC-1) 3. Do any seeded areas require maintenance fertilization, seeding or mulching? (GC-2) 4. Is there ,any evidence that sediment is leaving the site and damaging adjacent property? (GC-3) 5. Are perimeter sediment trapping measures in place and earthen structures seeded and mulched? (GC-4) 6. Are all cut and fill slopes adequately stabilized? (GC-6) 7. Is there any evidence of increased off -site erosion since the project began? (GC-7) 8. Are all on -site drainage channels and outlets adequately stabilized? (GC-8) 9. Are all operational storm sewer inlets protected so that sediment will not enter the system? (GC-9) 10. Is there any work going on in live streams that may require stabilization or a temporary stream crossing? (GC-10) 11. Are utility trenches being backfilled, seeded and dewatered properly? (GC-11) 12. Is there any structural practices that should be removed because they are no longer needed? (GC-12) 13. Are there any structural practices that should be removed because they are no longer needed? (GC-13) 14. Do any structural practices require repair or clean -out to maintain adequate function? (GC=14) If violations of a plan or potentially hazardous situations are noted, they should be reported to the job superintendent. The inspector may be able to suggest economical ways to achieve desirable corrections. In any case, it is wise to set a reasonable deadline for accomplishing necessary corrections. Cases of non-compliance (such as commencing land disturbance without an approved plan) should be reported to the local program administrator. If enforcement action is ever necessary, it should be taken promptly and firmly. X.7 SCHEDULING AND TIMING Scheduling and timing are extremely important aspects of the erosion and sediment control efforts with superintendent and the inspector must be concerned. Certain practices must be in place before general grading begins. Utility trenches should remain open for as short a time as possible. This means close coordination of the installation of the various utilities. Immediately upon completing installations, trenches should be filled, compacted, mulched, and seeded. Temporary sediment traps should be installed to protect storm sewer inlets immediately after sewer installation. Mulching and seeding should quickly follow grading. Attention to the timing of stabilization can greatly reduce the risk of costly repairs and clean-ups. To make sure that conservation practice implementation is timely and well coordinated with construction activities, some method of work scheduling is needed. Failures can be very costly. They can often be prevented by foresight and scheduling. One method of work scheduling is the flow chart. The flow chart has good display value for the superintendent, contractor, and foremen of various crews. It should be flexible and may need to be revised as construction proceeds. For effective erosion and sediment control, construction should be scheduled to eliminate unnecessary exposure of bare soil. X. 8 FINAL WORD It is common knowledge to anyone with just limited experience with erosion and sediment control that even the best control plans sometimes result in implementation problems. Keep in mind the disparate goals of the job superintendent and the inspector: Selection of Plant Materials for The Northern Piedmont/Mountain Region PERMANENT SEEDING FOR HIGH MAINTENANCE AREAS: Spring ---March 15 - April 15 Kentucky bluegrass Red fescue .._.Tall fescue Summer ---May 1 - August 1, Tall fescue 'Bermudagrass (winter -hardy sod) Fall ---August 15 - September 15 Kentucky.bluegrass Tall fescue Winter ---see SELECTION OF PLANTS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING PERMANENT, SEEDING FOR LOWER MAINTENANCE AREAS: Spring ---March 15 - April 15 Summer ---May 1 - August 1 Fall ---August 15 - September 15 Winter ---see SELECTION OF PLANTS TEMPORARY SEEDING• Tall fescue Redtop Weeping lovegrass Reed canarygrass Red fescue Kentucky bluegrass Sericea lespedeza Crown vetch Tall fescue Weeping lovegrass Sericea lespedeza Tall fescue Redtop Red fescue Kentucky bluegrass Crown vetch Reed canarygrass FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING Spring ---March 1 - April 30 Rye Oats Italian ryegrass Korean (annual) lespedeza (may be used for 1/2 seeding rate of any of the above) Summer ---May 1 - August 14 Millet Weeping lovegrass Korean (annual) lespedeza Fall ---August 15 - November 1 Rye Italian ryegrass Crimson clover Winter ---prepare seedbed, mulch in acceptable manner, and seed at first available opportunity in spring. 1. The job superintnedent's main goal is to complete the project on time within the project budget. 2. The inspector's main goal is to see that the construction plans and regulations are followed and the public is protected from unreasonable damage 'and danger. The common thread in each of these viewpoints is the need to reach timely solutions to problems that come up. By developing a cooperative working relationship and exercising common sense, the contractor and inspector can work together to solve problems efficiently and economically. REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN: Herbert L. Sluder, Sanitation Engineer P.O. Box 2056, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 667-9747 The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester. Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) Health Department Comments: Health Signature and Date: 3-- C37 (NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - VrEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO AGENT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department ATTN: James Doran, Director P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5678 The Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department is located on the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Building, 9 Court Square, Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Accent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) Parks & Recreation Department Comments: The swing set needs to be relocated so that a 33' x 46' protective area can be provided. This department recommends that an energy absorbing surface be included within all playground equipment protective areas. All other open space and recreational requirements appear to have been met. Parks Signature and Date: 3/26/91 (NOTICE TO ARKS - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE AGENT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form_ z- REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN COMMENTS City of Winchester, Virginia ATTN: Tim Youmans, Planning Director 15 N. Cameron Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 667-1815 The City of Winchester offices are located in Rouss City Hall at 15 North Cameron Street in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC, 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Eti City of Winchester Comments: City Signature and Date:_,,--" ""Z '' (NOTICE TO CITY - PLEASE RETURN THIS TO THE AGENT.) APPL!I! NOTICE TO It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please also attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. D OMB MAY 1 51991 t� � C Y.:'i V r- REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department ATTN: Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court Squard in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & hinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) Inspections Department Comments: cJ c s f, - tS` ��• 6 .IV7 _� / 0 O 7 e� ,�`�� iU.�' ONat / 7y Inspect. Signature & Date: Z (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - PLEASE RETURN THI RM TO AGENT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. MAY 15 • 1 •: :� •\ �\ •UIUI \ Frederick County Sanitation Authority ATTN: Wellington Jones, Engineer/Director P.O. Box 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) Sanitation Authority Comments: 157 AEV/Ew-- 9 /T, t S - c'ORRE& AES1, 4 e4J Sanit. Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO SANITATION- SE T NOTICE M APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form. REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Lord Fairfax Soil & Water Conservation District 2045-B Valley Avenue Winchester, Va 22601 (703)662-3312 The Soil & Conservation Office is located at 2045-B Valley Ave, Winchester, Va, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: David B. Holliday P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-2120 Aaent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139 Name of development and/or decription of the request: LAKE CENTRE Location: Southeast Corner @ Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) Soil & water Conservation Comments: 1 Q- I a s �c �� w,� 4r�_ KJ 3 C Lor S C' r CW U m` t' - IV4e w f U v zr Co eanl-t-.- Signature & Date: Sp P c, 4SwCl MOTILE P EASE T7PLICANT THIS FORM TO AGE .) I E TO It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form. 2 L5@I5�V Lr D j� MAR 25 IN RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER 4, COMMONWEALTH of V1RQ1N1A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 (703) 984-4133 Fax - (703) 984-9761 August 15, 1991 Mr. Scot Marsh C/O G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street P. O. Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Scot: WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref: Lake Centre Routes 642 & 1070 Frederick County Enclosed are the signed subdivision plats of the above referenced project. If we can be of any further assistance, please let me know. RBC/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY k k 1 PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre BEVLSTCN9 lOBNO. 9148 a Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc - Engineers Land Planneri Surveyors 150-C ❑tde Greenwich Dr. 200 North Cameron St. Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 Winchester, Virginia 22601 _ LAKE CENTRE CONDOS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1„=ioo11 L— Jt�. 1994 nx.xr ar: C.A-J. �rra°cca �� C.E.M. 5C.E.M. 1 i -' i 1. 4 1 1260 PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre e Boa NO. 9148 P� 1 H nF 0 �. "DLIO JR CERnFLCATE W. _ " 7091 a r mnx+w� Gilbert w. Clifford and Associates, Inc. Engineers Land Planners Surveyors 150-C ❑ ole Greenwich Dr, 200 North Careron St. Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 Winchester, Virginia 22601 T ' i CONDOS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA .� ..�.,�.� b, .� — -- JAN. 1994 -mm BY: C.E.M. -- - - - - --_ DRAWN ar: C.A.J. Arrn°vm uy= C.E.M. s> 5 OF — — -- - - — — — — ------ -- - -- - PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre g 111-7maNs JOB NO. 9148 1- of �p L 0 G Z F. W Bwy. JP- O I C CERTIFICATE Ha 70% n WGSTU n P4� Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. Engineers Land Planners Surveyors 150-C ❑Ide Greenwich Dr. 200 North Cameron St. Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Jl CENTRE CONDOS LAKE CENTRE CONDOS FREDERICK COUI`l`ri, VLRGINIA .�.1. ; 1„ =100' 1 - __-- SAN. 1994 - - - ----- ----- ------- -- -' --- ---- -- o�� BY: C.E.M. DUV%" BY, C.A.J. ssyrr OF-- g - -- — - -. - lPP6aV2D By.- C.E.M. ' - i a �- gym-'• �- sosE Dyne aat (w %m IT IN PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre IRS JOB Jos 40. 9148 �� D»� ,R = r CERTiFlCATE NQ •- 7091 0 C. rout � . Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. Engineers Land Planncr� Surveyors 150-C U1,de Greenwich Dr. 200 North Caneron St. Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 Winchester, Virginia 22601 LAKE CENTRE CONDOS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA x ioo, i t -- ------ - --—------- DILL JAN. 1994 -- - - - Ste, 5 OF DLSICITID,�: C.E.M. DRex�: C.A-.J. 04� C.E-M. I /j ------------- �Z7 ------------- k If PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre REVISIONS ME N0. 9148 LT E{ 1 1ICJCONDOS T � -- �- - y l �P nF L LAKE C E IN'I R C 0 Iv D 0 S 1_ 100, JAN. 1994 0 Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. sHIET -- i C.E. —DDO P DLSECN£D BY: C.F.M. r CERTIFICATE R1 _ Of En inccrs Land Planners Survc ors —— — — - - - DR.1EN BY:C.A.J. g s pf=Ft �� 150-C Utde Greenwich Dr. 200 North Cameron St. trrxoc» Rr_ C.E.M. E� Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 WIncheSter, Virginia 22601 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA I � PROJECT SUMMARY Total Acreage = 3.4113 Acres Existing MDP Density = 6.74 TH's/Acre Proposed MDP Density = 9.38 Condos/Acre 'RS 7��0- 9148 1H OF LAKE CENTRE CONDOS 1��=100' - D« .TAN. 1994 Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. SEEM -- Dmcmm BY: C.E.M. — - _ C.E. WDDOK AL = 5 ----- D1L1m BY: C.A. J. Engineers 1Bnd Plenncr� Surveyors OF r�iaziixcv 6 �"^� 150-C ❑lde Greenwlch Dr. 200 North Cameron St. LPMa� C.E.M. Fredericksburg Virginia 22401 Winchester, Virginia 22601 FREDERICK COUNn, VIRGINIA Subdivisio4 24 Lots LAKE CENTRE I D O Submitted 5/15/91 Shawnee District