HomeMy WebLinkAboutFrederick Mall 3 Lots Gainesboro - Backfile (2)s
l
Reyartm2itt of J11anning anb Pg6claymeal
H. RONALD BERG 9 COMM SgUARH
PLANNING DiRscroq REVIEW and COiNMENT EVALUATION - WI.NCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22501.
J. WILLIAM RILEY. Ili (To Items 1, 2, 3)
20T11N6 CODS ADMINI9TRATQR
I / Frederick County Sanitation Authority ATTN wPii;atea Dees
2 /X/ VA. Department of Highways and. Transportation, ATTN Mr. King
' T
3// ATTN
4 / / REZONING / / SITE PLAN / / CONDITIONAL USE PERMT / SUBDIVISION
5 / / ENCLOSURES Final plat - Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERs C. D. Hylton
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia 22620
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above-c-hecked offices)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 .....advised by copy of this form thy._ above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive , Gainesboro Magisterial District
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots,- 1.962 acres
13 Your REVIEW CO'-2IENTs would be appreciated no later than as soon as possible 19
14 BY H. Ronald Berg DATE July 15, 1977
-------------------------------------------------------------
15 For your REVIEW COK4ENTS:
Central water and sewer facilities are not directly available to these
lots. Facilities are in the vicinity, however, extensions must be made in order
to serve these lots. The expense of these extensions will not be borne
the Authority.
16 For your SIGNATURE
DATE July 21, 1977
RECEIVED j U L 2 1 1977
Wxe��xic�
�E��tx#min# u� �I�nnin� �n� �Efik'�II�SZTCE2I#
H. RONALD BERG 9 COURT SQUARE
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVIEW and COM14EiNT EVALUATION WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601
J. WILLIAM RILEY, III (To Items 1, 2, 3)
ZONING CODE ADMINISTRATOR
1 / Frederick County Sanitation Authority ATTN Wallington Janes
2 /X/ VA. Department of Highways and Transportation, ATTN Mr. King
3 / /
4 / / REZONING
5 / / ENCLOSURES
, ATTN
/ / SITE PLAN / / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /X / SUBDIVISION
Final plat - Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERs C. D. Hylton
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia 22620
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above -checked office(s)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 .....advised by copy of this form that above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive , Gainesboro Magisterial District
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots - 1.962 acres
---- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 Your REVIE14 COMMENTs would be appreciated no later than as soon as possible , 19
14 BY H. Ronald Berg DATE July 15, 1977
15 For - your REVIEW COMMENTS:
Satisfactory except for ,providing additinnAl rigor of wAy Along VOX DV4g4
(Route 739) for .futwm widdning of the road as required by the Frederick County
subdivision ordinance.
16 For your SIGNATURE-ZfL_'., DATE /�
RECEIVED J v L 2 2 1977
Ar.ebuir Ltlllt p
Pryartmen# of 1ha nning anb aj efrdopurn#
H. RONALD BERG P. O. Box 601
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVIEW and COMMENT EVALUATION 9 COURT SQUARE
DOROTHEA L. STEFEN WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - (TO Items 1, 2, 3)
1 )0 Frederick County Dept. of Public Works , ATTN Thomas_Ma,cci bin
/ Z Dept. of Planning & Development , ATTN Dorothea L. Stefen
2 " VA. Department of Highways and Transportation, ATTN Reginald C_ King
3 /XX/ Frederick County Sanitation Authority
4 / / REZONING / / SITE PLAN
5 /X/ ENCLOSURES Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERs C. D. Hylton
, ATTN Wellington Jones
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBDIVISION
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia (667-1266) (21 So. Loudoun Street)
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above -checked office(s)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 .....advised by copy of this form that above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots ---1 0.813 Ac.; 2 - 0.647 Ac.;
------------------------ -------- ---------- -----------------
13 Your REVIEW COMMENTs would be appreciated no later than
14 BY H. Ronald Berg
3 - 0.662 Ac.
---------------------------------------
as soon as possible , 19
DATE February 10, 1978
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 For your REVIEW COMMENTS:
Mr. S. Roger Koontz, Chairman of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, has
requested a relocation of Route 739, (Fox Drive and Apple Pie Ridge Road), The
Location and Design Division in our Central Office in Richmond has made a study of
several possible locations. It appears the most feasible location and the one be
considered at this time is in the area of this proposed development. Until such time
as the final location is determined, or the project abandoned, we cannot approve this
lat.
1$ For your SIGNATURE �e
3/669-4532
DATE Feb. 15, 1978
x.e��erit� Cruixxtt�r
eyartmznt of Phanning am ebe-loyment
H. RONALD BERG P. 0. Sax Sol
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVIEW and COMMENT EVALUATION 9 COURT SQUARE.
DoRorl _zA L. STEFEN WINCHESTER. VIR-GINIA 22601
ZONJN. AoMMISTRATOR - (To Items 1, 2, 3).
1)& Frederick County Dept. of Public Works ATTN Thomas M ccl,h in
Dept. of Planning & Development , ATTN Dorothea L. Stefen
2 /X VA. Department of Highways and Transportation, ATTN _ Reginald S_ King
3 Frederick County Sanitation Authority , ATTN Well ngtga Jones a
4 / / REZONING / / SITE PLAN / / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT %y/ SUBDIVISION
5 i X/ ENCLOSURES Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERs C. D. Hylton
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia (667-1266) (21 So. Loudoun Street)
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above -checked office(s)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 . ...advised by copy of this form that above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots ---1 - 0.813 Ac.; 2 - 0.647 Ac.; 3 - 0.662 Ac.
13 Your REVIEW COMMENTS would be appreciated no later than as soon as possible > 19
r
14 BY H. Ronald Berg DATE February 10, 1978
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 For your REVIEW COMMENTS:
Central
water and sewer facilities are
at
the Golden Glow Restranant and extensions want be
made to
serve these lots. The expense
of
these extensions will not be borne by the Authority.
con R. K. Benham, III.
16 For your SIGNATURE elm FK
7031662-4532
RECEIVED FEB 13 1,73
�z.ebtrich (gauutV
Jli
veyartment of h-1lt1ting allb P- 6daynTent
H. RONALD BERG P. 0. BOX 601
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVIEW and COMME14T EVALUATION 9 COURT SQUARE
❑OROTH: EA L. STEPZN WINCHESTER. VIRvINIA 22601
ZONIN, ADMINISTRATOR (TO Items 1, 2, 3)
1 Frederick County Dept. of Public Works , ATTN Thomas_Marrubb;n I%
/MZ Dept. of Planning & Development , ATTN Dorothea L. Stefen
2 " VA. Department of Highways and Transportation, ATTN Reginald r- King
3 )& Frederick County Sanitation Authority , ATTN Wellington Jones
4 / / REZONING / / SITE PLAN / / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT %% SUBDIVISION
5 /x/ ENCLOSURES Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERS C. D. Hylton
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia (667-1266) (21 So. Loudoun Street)
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above -checked office(s)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 .....advised by copy of this form that above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots ---1 0.813 Ac.; 2 - 0.647 Ac.; 3 - 0.662 Ac.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
13 Your REVIEW COMMENTs would be appreciated no later than as soon as possible 19
14 BY H. Ronald Berg DATE February 10, 1978
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..
15 For your REVIEW COMMENTS:
16 For your SIGNATURE _ DATE
703/662-4532
,�rEb-erick &uutp
Pryar#mrn# of Planning a rrl P— 6doplund
H. RONALD BERG P. 0. Box 6ol
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVIEW and COMMENT EVALUATION 9 COURT SQUARE
DOROTS'ZA L. STEFSN - WINCHESTER. VIR.GINIA 22601
ZONINI, AOMMISTRATOR (TO Items 1, 2y 3)
1 h& Frederick County Dept. of Public Works ATTN
/W Dept. of Planning & Development , ATTN Dorothea L. Stefen
2 " VA. Department of Highways and Transportation, ATTN Reginald C. King
3)& Frederick County Sanitation Authority
4 / / REZONING / / SITE PLAN
5 /X/ ENCLOSURES Frederick Mall Subdivision
6 PROPERTY OWNERs C. D. Hylton
, ATTN Wellington ,Jones
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT X/ SUBDIVISION
7 Representative(s) Harry Benham, III, Boyce, Virginia. (667-1266) (21 So. Loudoun Street)
8 .....advised by copy of this form of responsibility to contact above -checked office(s)
concerning this application as soon as possible.
9 .....advised by copy of this form that above -described office(s) have been requested
to submit a review comment.
10 PROPERTY LOCATION Route 522 North & Fox Drive
11 PROPOSED USE
12 TOTAL ACREAGE 3 lots ---1 0.813 Ac.; 2 - 0.647 Ac.; 3 - 0.662 Ac.
---- ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
13 Your REVIEW COMMENTs would be appreciated no later than as soon as possible 19
14 BY H. Ronald Berg
-----------------------------
15 For your REVIEW COMMENTS:
DATE February 10, 1978
-------------------------
16 For your SIGNATURE L J,
703/6°��_1-4532
DATE Z
l�l
FINAL PLAT
Frederick Mal Subdivision
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - 100' June 11, 1977
5T RT. n 57
APPROVED BY:
FREDER I CK COUNTY
Board of Superviso
Planning Commissioj
(reco-mmended)
Subdivision Administ
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highway
Frederick County Sanitation Aut
Owner's Certificate
/ [OC'AT/Oh MAP
SCALE, 1'_ 2000'
Date/� ? d'
Date
D at e
Date 2 Z 3-- )X
)ate 4/ .
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the plf t is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated August 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Gook 302 at page 444
Sheet n 1 of 2
H. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
v _ ...
0.063 Ac. ,
�;• R/RIVE /� '- " .�'- �/
FAX Dot— 5�"�
f 183�8 5� � �o
i p�
E 63 8 t0
/ o9a45
N 12 p.00 0
0
`O scope.
g to 15' O M
h � Iti 1
2 Q
3 � I
0 0.647 Ac. \
e �
O 4 1
O ti e O
M
QO
Z 045�3
12000 W N 09 d l
r ti
S09o45 30 /
0.8/3 Ac.
3 �,W
M ^ i O
31632 ►��
_ 0" yll co
9045 3 a/ w a•ea CI)5�
50 so yj,de 257 9
_
30
N09o45 O
�o
3 0.662 Ac. h
h
O
� 06 i
250-
09045 30 N
[��
S
Lots 1 and
of --ay t ti
Lots 1 and
Lot 2 shal
3 shai 1 have 50' w•i.e .right-of-w•a)
i,CJtG 5'2.
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
J
over ".ter ea for ;:icjht-
FINAL PL A r
FiREDERICK VIAL L SUBDIVISION
Go/nesboro Mogister/o/ District
Frederick County, Virginio
Sco/e : l'= /00' June //, 1977
Pre-por&d by
GREEMWYAY ENGiP✓EERING S S✓RVE—E YING
CO., /A'C.
P. 0. BOX 666
W/NCHES7cR, WRG/N/A
Revised ✓on_ 6, /97S
Shalt 2 of,?
}
F INAL PLAT
Frederick -call Subdivision
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - 100' June 11, 1977
sr. R T. n j )F
LO: Ar,04 NAP
4L Q b / SCALE. 1 `_ 2000'
APPROVED BY:
FREDER I CK COUNTY
Board of Supery i so 6 Date -z -L
Planning Commission / c.--*% Date 3'—?3
(recommended)
Subdivision Administrat M
- Date 3----,31- 9 7. 1
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highways Date Z- Z�-7
Frederick County Sanitation Auth s ty Date 4/1?_AS
Owner's Certificate
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the plat is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated Auoust 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
Sheet n` I of 2
H. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
tA� -
C,LT:i Cl.
fr:-rc,fel ro f,tu,r .,or, V V. ,,,
0.063 Ac.
DRIVE
Fo"(
6
lod
NO
12 0.
Q)I
15
0.647 Ac.
, ft)I
311.67
V)
0 4 5��3
N 09
00 453
0. 8/3 Ac.
A Jo
o A
6 A
to 1- 6-30 -,)
ti 1c;
30 w. A'ec (r)
5
50 .9 045 90,vlode 25-7-9,
FIE
o45130
009
cy At)
0.662 Ac,
- rk
06
05.0
[�so45 -
�O9 0-7
LUtS I anci
of -..ay "' tc)
Lots I and
Lot 2 shall
b ;i
shai I have 50 " wide .right -of -wad over "Area for ;' i pht-
!:(;U4-C
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have So' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL A 7'
f-REDERICKMIALL SUBDIVISION
Golne-sboro Mcglsferldl DistrIef
Frederlck County, Virginia
Sco/e:/,= /00, dune //, 19 77
Prepo,-&d by
GREEMWAY ENGhftb1=-R1A!GI9 SURVEYING
Co., INC.
P. 0. &QW 666
WINCHE-SM-R, P7RGINIA
revised lor. 6, 1978
sh&ef 2 of p
FINAL FLAT
Frederick Mall, Subd i v i t i on
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - 100' June II, 1977
Sr ar. "!r
APPROVED BY:
FREDER I CK COUNTY
Board of Supervisors
Planning Commission
(recommended)
Subdivision Administrator
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highways
Owner's Certificate
LOCAr/Oh MAP
SCALE. I._2000'
Date
D ate
.Date
Date
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the plat is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated Auoust 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
H. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
4L"
Sheet n` I of 2
pr fat"r 0, L,,V
0.063 Ac.
P/W VIC
9 45 3p^rE
JqP1
6.
6
3. 100
od
T 0
e Scope.
2
6 - 0.647Ac.
Q,
- fn
311.61
o45 1 30
0ti
0 09 j '045
50
0. 813 Ac.
'it 4j
ih 6
-k
32
Ito 316-
0
Mir
9 RI 5
50, 45 3 A'to
BG y0e 2 5 -7.9
FIE
09
045130
cb
h)
C\;
0.662 Ac.
Olco
06
(b
,45
so9 0 30
-; 0
L(--tS I any
of -,.ay"' to
Lots I and
Lot 2 shal
3 shal I have 30' wide ri ght-of -wa) over "Arca for 1";ipht-
1:vu-be 520
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL A r
FREOSRICK MIAL L SUB01VISION
Golnesboro Moglsferlal D.,sfrlct
Frederick County, VirgInia
Sco/e: / 0 = /00, dune //, 1977
Prepo;-&d by
GREEMWAY E1VGiAVE;SR1A'GB SURPEYING
Co., INC.
P. 0. Bt2,Y 666
WINCHE'SrER, L*7RGIAIIA
Revised aor. 6, 1978
Sh"f 2 OfF
50.00,
A=46.36'
This plat was prepared without the benefit of
a title report and does not therefore necessarily
indicate all encumbrances on the property.
4. This survey is subject to all Easement and
Rights of Ways of record, whether shown
or not shown.
The property delineated on this plat is shown
on Frederick County, Virginia Tax Assessment
Map No. 53 - ((4)), Parcels G, H and I.
WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY DRIV
E
cc
Lot "J1t Cd
�I
3
cl�I
�o
M
ti
�
z
L
--J — — —
10' Utility
Easement
NOTES
(Formerly Frederick Mall Drive)
60' R/W
N 16 ° 02' 56" E - 318.31' A=199_8
-� T- -- --
5' Utility Easement
LOT G-1
3.879 ACRES
20, Utility Easement_
S 180 32:45" W - 560.00' — —
Darlington Subdivision
1. The property shown on this plat is same property
conveyed to Walter L. Pugh and Marjorie K. Pugh,
his wife, Lot "I" from Georgie E. Smith and JameE
M Stewart, Jr., Trustees for the Landye Trust, by
a deed dated April 28, 1987 and recorded in
D.B.645, Pg.804 and Lot "G" conveyed by Carlin
L. Smith and Georgie E. Smith by a deed dated
April 28, 1987 and recorded in D.B.645, Pg.807
and Lot "H" conveyed by H. K. Benham, III,
Trustee of Frederick Mall Land Trust by a deed
dated April 28, 1987 and recorded in D.B.645,
Pg.809.
2. Lots G, H, and I are being combined to form
one Lot containing 3.879 Acres.
At57' 47"
R=50.00'
A=46.36'
T=25.00'
C-44 72'
SU ION APPROVE ROVE
IVISlO A RDa
0618-'- 7
86N 29° 37' 00" EA=92.50A ,-
R=781.50391.58' W
PLAT SHOWING
�o �V,
Elliott Ritchie. Jr
V LICENSE No
_1318
I,gND SUM��4
C.B.=N 10° 30' 58" W A PROPERTY LINE ADJUST-MENT�-._,
OF ORIGINAL LOTS G, H be I�
Frederick Mall Subdivision
�g4° 18, „
0
GAINESBORO DISTRICT
``REIiICH
A=199.82'
C4 NTY VIRGINIA,
—:_ �_.__
T=100.01'
SCALE:1"=100' JUNE 26, 1987
C=199.72'
RITCHIE SURVEYS
C.B.=N120 53,4911 E STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA
June 26, 1987
METES AND BOUNDS
LOT G-1
FREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION
GAINESBORO DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
LOT G - 1: Beginning at an iron pipe, a corner with Lot "J", in the east right of way
line of Westminster Canterbury Drive; thence running with the said east right of way
of Westminster Canterbury Drive along the arc of a curve to the left whose radius is
50.00 feet (and whose chord is N 100 30' 50" W, 44.72 feet) an arc distance of 46.36
feet; thence N 161 02' 56" E, 318.31 feet to an iron pipe; thence along an arc of a
curve to the left whose radius is 1,815.97 feet ( and whose chord is N 121 53, 49" E,
199.72 feet) an arc distance of 199.82 feet to an iron pipe, a corner with Lot "F" in
the east right of way line of said Westminster Canterbury Drive; thence leaving said
east line of Westminster Canterbury Drive and running with the line of Lot "F"
S 74° 15' 26" E, 325.37 feet to an iron pipe in the line of Darlington Subdivison;
thence running with the line of Darlington Subdivision S 181 32' 45" W, 560.00 feet
to an iron pipe, a corner with the aforementioned Lot "J"; thence running with the
line of Lot "J" N 730 56' 57" W, 269.99 feet to the beginning and containing 3.879
acres of land.
Elliott Ritchie, Jr.
Certified Land Surveyor #1318
Ritchie Surveys
RITCHIE SURVEYS
STEPHENS CITY, VA_ 22655
Dedicated to future widening of Fox Drive
0.063 AC.
R1W
FOX
6 jt�,Jod
085 0 lod
0 M
r00 0 'Lilesr15' Q$
2
00.647Ac.
O
N
� i � I o 31 16��
o JOE
00
4
0 09 5 >500
9010 �111
I C 090 0
46 50 -
0. 8/5 AC.
316.39
for
045 eG
_o A25
.509 Wide 1.96
90
JOE
045130
009
0.662 AC. N
0.06
low
50
�/9045
Lots I and
of -way" to
Lots I and
Lot 2 shal
k
rt
3 shal I have 50' wide right -of -Way over "Area for Right-
i*,'oute 522.
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL A r
FREDERICK 44AL L SUB91 VISION
601nomomwo mopowm/ zwftfcf
Fmdwyc* Comf . X, virflom,
Scale x /00, dum //j, 1977
pmpamd br
6REENWAY EAWMEMWOR WRVIrWAV
Co., ma
P a say see
WNCHESMR, 107MM/A
Revised ✓/M. 4 1970
Sft*t 2 Of 2
Ded,coted to future widening of Fox OrIve
0.063 Ac.
FAX
63-
000 0(tol I lod
60 9 - - Scale.
.
Q11
Q11
lb
0.647Ac.
of
4z) 00
045 f Q) K
0 09 Z;
30 V.
LSC090 0. 815 Ac.
Z))
316.3 MI
IN O
011W yy %
for
Qe Area 95
X.- 80 951.
o4 301f
1
09
rNn 00
O. 62
0.
06
509 0
Lots I and 3 shal I have 50' wide right-of-way over "Area for Right-
of-4ay"-to route 522.
Lots I and 3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
Lot 2 shall have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522. -
FINAL P1. AT
FREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION
saln"b"
Avdwyc*
5cV/* /00 , dam 11j, 1977
PAWOMe by
6REENWAY AWMAMMMA S&WWWNG
Co... ma
P. 0. am see
WYNCHESrAW, W&WIA
Revised ✓Am. 6, 1970
&W10, 2 of 2
Dedicored to future widening of Fox Drive
0.063 AC.
RAWQ E _�
30 �r'v
,
g' S�
'30 rE 63.85 N h 00 , i00
/ Np2p 0o gc�je I
i
15' I I
2 Q
O 0.647 Ac. e
h
3 h M 3 N W
M
31161'
of 1
� O
tic o
Z oa5 3 O l n
ZO ��a5 3p
W N 09 ti 1 ti
`- S p9
a &/3 Ac.
,3 W
o
�10 316.32
�i�o
� O
p" W w �o
oa5 3 Area
so.
for R/ , h
Sp9 w�° a 2g%95
r�
046150
a5 30 E ,W
N09- M
- 3
3 a662 Ac. b
O co -
o�21 0.06
0 '�W
= p9oa5�30
S
h
K
rk
J
.w
Lots I and 3 shall have 50' wide right-of-way over "Area for Right -
of -Way" to i.oute 522.
Lots I and 3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.'
Lot 2 shall have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL AT
FREDERZ K MALL SUBDIVISION
G01homb" A/o"t~ ,priA 0
AhdOr^t* COv WYJI wrfkw
Sea/B /'= /ODD' ✓NM //, /977
AAoasnrd by
6REENWAY EAWNfirAW6 A SURVLrYM
CO., /Nt~
PO. BIGiX 6B6
WINCKEMW, ITV/A
Revis" Jan. 6y 197d
i dylNl
I
Dedicated to future widening of Fox Drive
0.063 AC.
30 F?1W IV15 --- ---- - -
FOX
-5 j0d
12 00
Ad r019E 63 g5 ^ ,� 1
(%0: 15'
0.647Ac.
3 h M 3 ti W i
61
0 04650 rz
-0yV, N
10009
so 0 g5o
a 813 AC.
Fir)
,
316.3 in 1
V
oil
w
45
F?l
S09 0 Pea 251
for
96
80
I I
0 4 5130
009�
a662 AC.
,Q)
0.06
11W
09 046
Lots I and
of -Way" to
Lots I and
Lot 2 &hall
3 shall have 50' wide -right-of-way over "Area for Right-
lZoute 522.
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive*
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL AT
FREDERICK MALL SUED/ VISION
"Ifteebwo MOV/Stomw p8mof
.19VOW~ COOWY, WOW
Seam: /00 , Am 197?
PAVOrOd br
69EFAWAY EAWA*WRIM A WRVEWM
Co... /,VC
P. 0. am Soo
WNCH" MR.. OW& WIA
Revised /m. 4 1-978 Al,
c
FINAL PLAT
Frederick Mall, Subdivision
Gainesboro Distrigk, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - IQ, June 11, 1977
APPROVED BY:
FREDERICK COUNTY
Board of Supervisors
Planning Commission
(recommended)
Subdivision Administrat
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highways_
Owner's Certificate
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: I a_ $000'
0
Date
'Date
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the p1jt is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated August 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk'sxOffice in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
�I�r�i CO., INC. H. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
P. P B ��yi,ALTH OOr
>
54.17-3 (al,965
Sheet # 1 of 2 � 54 11.3 (b)162
fit. V
�FA LAND �`���
Fox
Genjsel of Fox prim
widM�n9
f� 15 four
d Died to
Qe
� is
�
�
Vyi
v
o
�Q
W
�
W
k
3
�
O
a
o
y
200-
'
0
i
9°0
a g/•61 3
of
Formerly
B
N�'" tXgley
0it
09o130
_ Z
3 Ages
ki
Ca
600 6
FINAL PLAT
FREDERICK MALL SURD/V/S/
Go/nesboro Moy/sterw aUsM/ct
FI *dWNck County, V/rp/nio
Sco%: /"= /wo ✓ww //, /977
Plsporsd by
GREENWAY ENG/NEER/NG S WRVEY/NG
CO., Ove.
R. O. stw 666 `
W/NCHESMR, McIN/A
Sheet 2 of 2
ri
FINAL PLAT
Frederick Mall Subdivision
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - 100' June II, 1977
APPROVED BY:
FREDERICK COUNTY
Board of Supervisors
Planning Commission
(recommended)
Subdivision Administ
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highway
Owner's Certificate
LOCAT/ON MAP
SCALE. 1 "= 2000'
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the pleat is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
LS.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated August 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
6iCL�4Lr`
5 r .....E r . 911a'
-9%;&� e Y-Ce--A
. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
RL+II 0F'
I
>
54 17.3 (b)162
�f(I 1.AN1) S�
ti.
DRIVE
FOX M3d'E r+
N 090 00
� -
120
orrf, erlY
F
Q W N°W or
ckleY
M - B
c 250.0000W
�o 0.46
' 50� E N
2 IN O9
' 509
0 45
61.81' 3 Acres
0.
53 s W
h � Z,a,e
o a5 30 W STRIP 9" E
S 0 R�Ep I 6po1 6gp
�
i , RESE 251•9E, 32
80
V W O90 45
N �
rz
I
3 Acres
v o ►. 0.66
�b
M Z O9 � 30
S
FINAL PL A T
FREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION,
Golnesboro Moylster/al DIstrIct
Freder/ck County, wrolnio
Sco/e: /"= /00' ✓une //, /977
Prepared by
GREENWAY ENGINEERING B .SZ'/RVEYING
Co., INC.
R. 0. sew 666
W/NCHESMR, V1'RMN/A
Shut 2 Of
t
f
f
1RRISON 6 JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA
Ilk0 51A Fr�C_ 5
uw��.
THIS DEED, made this '% o� day of Z" 1978,
between C. D. Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, of the one
part, hereinafter called the Grantors, and H. K. Benham, III,
Trustee of Frederick Mall Land Trust pursuant to Trust Agreement
dated 1.
7
, 1977, a Memorandum of which is
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick
County, Virginia in Deed Book �j< , as Instrument No.
of the other part, hereinafter called the Grantee.
WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid and other valuable
consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the
Grantors do grant and convey, with General Warranty and with
English Covenants of Title, unto the Grantee, in fee simple,
together with all rights, rights of way, privileges and appurten-
ances thereto belonging, all of that certain tract of land con-
taining 38 Acres, more or less, fronting on the South side of
Route 522 and on the East side of Fox Drive, situated in Gainesbo
Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia, and being
all of the property conveyed to the male Grantor herein by
Robert G. Buckley, et al, by deed dated August 24, 1964 and of
record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 302, at Page
444, LESS, a lot conveyed to Page -Brooke Land Trust and a lot to
be conveyed to Delmar Bayliss Realty Company, plats of which
lots are attached hereto, designated as Lots 1 and 2.
This conveyance is made subject to all legally enforceable
restrictive covenants and easements of record affecting the
aforesaid realty.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
LS�/ .G------ —(SEAL)
C. D. HtZton
is
BOCK rr.EE 6
J'-,"t / -(SEAL)
Irene V. Hylton
STATE OF w ,
OF -7„�,i1�, To -wit
I, ��„ ��^ti , a Notary Public of and
for the - //and aforesaid, do certify that C. D.
Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, whose names are signed to
the foregoing writing, bearing date on the day of
,eq'n,�r,L, , 1977, have acknowledged the same before me in
my State and aforesaid.
of
Given under my hand this 7-t4 day of ���s 1977
My commission expires /ieol7 9
I was commissioned notary as Sandra Mae B=:aay
Notary Public
i
i
j{
R
f
{
f
I
HARRISON 6 JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA
- 2 -
BecK 5A PAGE 7
FINAL PLAT
Frederick Mall Subdivision
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" — 100' June 11, 1977
LOCAT/OM NAP
SCALE: / ", Z000'
APPROVED BY;
FREDER-ICK COUNTY
Board of Supervisors Date
Planning Commission Date
(recommended)
Subdivision Administrator Date
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highways Date
Owner's Certificate
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the plat is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land -in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated August 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
"s Co., INC.
1 U. BOA U
�Va.
Sheet # 1 of 2
A4(-ex ��
Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
EAL'TH 0
N. [or
NS
U
CE ZTiI ,'ATE No. �►
54.17.3 (a)965
54-17-3 (b)162 �4
�£� LAND -
80t
b
r Dedicolsd /o fufure vA*nmg of Fox Drive
0.063 Ac.
so R/w VE
FOX DRI "5r
b '
9a 5 30 rE 63'8 h dt�� , Ip0
N
N�Zp pp b o scoje i
%
2 Q
0 0.647 Ac. Q ^ I
00
M
i�
2' y 04
5 36
o° 1
12 �5130
�� W N p9 �E
ti
SO9° /
0.8/3 Ac.
,3 W
o
Oleo 316.32 M� a
Ili 00
" M/ %
09045� oil
a ea
so
' h
S ' wQ° .9-6
.
o45,3p E ,W
009� M C
3 0.662 Ac. h
M �
O 'o
250'06
0 '
kT�
Z Sp9v45 30
Lots I and
of -'►'day" to
Lots I and
Lot 2 shall
gook 511 PACE
h
k
rk
J
3 sha) I have 50' wide .right-of-way over "Area for Right-
i;oute 522.
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
r
FINAL PL A T
FREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION
Go/nesboro Moy/ster/o/ QUstr/cf
Freder/ck County, M91flio
sea/e /". /00' ✓WW //, /977
GREENWAY ENGINEERING A SURVEYING
CO., INC
R. O. BOX 666
W/NCHESTER, VIRMN/A
Revised ✓on. 6, /978
JiR�INiA FREDL-RICX COUNTY, SCT.
This instrument riling was produced to me on the
- �� day of U 19_, at
and with certificate of ac nowl-edgment thereto annexed was
admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58-54.1 of
$ and 98-54 have been paid, if assessable,.
W'
Clerk.
S/reet 2 Of
HARRISON & JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
THIS DEED OF DEDICATION OF FLAT, made this 1st day of
I
October, 1977, by C. D. Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, of
I
the one part, hereinafter called the Grantors, and the County of
i
Frederick, of the other part, hereinafter called the Grantee.
WHEREAS, the male Grantor is the sole owner of the herein- !
after described property; and,
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to subdivide said property and
to dedicate for public use the Eastern portion of Fox Drive as !
shown on the attached plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DEED OF DEDICATION OF PLAT, WITNESSETH:!
For valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby subdivide the
following described property as shown on the plat of Greenway
Engineering and Surveying Co., Inc., attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof. The platted land consists of three
(3) lots containing .813 Acres, .662 Acres and .647 Acres,
respectively, lying South of U. S. Route 522 and East of Fox
Drive in Gainesboro Magisterial District of Frederick County,
Virginia; and being a portion of the property conveyed to the
male Grantor herein by deed dated August 24, 1964 and recorded
in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick
County, Virginia in Deed Book 302, at Page 444.
The Grantors dedicate to the Grantee that portion of the
real estate described on the attached plat as set aside for
Fox Drive, being approximately 15.96 feet wide and 183.35 feet
long.
The platting and dedication of the above described property
is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of
the Grantors.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
fl Cr „�¢. --�- (SEAL)
C . D . Hyltigh
HARRISON & JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
(SEAL)
Irene W Hylton
STATE OF VIRGINIA,
OF `.�.��C�a,.t-, To -wit :
01
a Notary Public of and
CY
for the State and aforesaid, do certify that C. D.
Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, whose navies are signed to
the foregoing writing, bearing date on the 1st day of October,
1977, have acknowledged the same before me in my State and
aforesaid.
G ven under my hand this j day of /") 1078
My commission expires % y ,
.I was co"sionwd notary as Sandfra Mae Nnay
i-t"
Notary Public
- 2 -
fr�:[
THIS DEED, made this ,A- day of 1978,
between C. D. Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, of the one
part, hereinafter called the Grantors, and H. K. Benham, III,
Trustee of Frederick Mall Land Trust pursuant to Trust Agreement
dated October 1, 1977, a Memorandum of which is recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia
in Deed Book !I 1 $, as Instrument No. (off, and Delmar Bayliss
trading as Delmar Bayliss Realty Company, of the other part,
hereinafter called the Grantees.
WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid and other valuable
consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the
Grantors do grant and convey, with General Warranty and with
English Covenants of Title, unto the Grantees, in fee simple,
together with all rights, rights of way, privileges and appurten
ances thereto belonging, all of that certain lot of land con-
taining 0.647 Acres, more or less, fronting on the East side of
Fox Drive situated in Gainesboro Magisterial District of Frederi
County, Virginia more particularly described by plat and survey
of Greenway Engineering & Surveying Company attached hereto and
by this reference made a part hereof; and being a portion of the
property conveyed to the male Grantor herein by Robert G. Buckley.,
et al, by deed dated August 24, 1964 and of record in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 302, at Page 444.
This conveyance is made subject to all legally enforceable
restrictive covenants and easements of record affecting the
aforesaid realty.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
IARRISON 6 JOHNSTON �• I.�.��.�
(SEAL)
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA C . D . Hy +� l on
RRISON S JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER, YIRSINIA
311,C`, .511 2
r
(SEAL)
Irene V. Hy1forty
STATE OF
OF �?� ;.,.� c v'�-c-t. �,�,. To -wit:
a Notary Public of and
C'o �..✓ T
for the aforesaid, do certify that C. D.
Hylton and Irene V. Hylton, his wife, whose names are signed to
the foregoing writing, bearing date on the _-7-e4_ day of
1978, have acknowledged the same before me in
my State and aforesaid.
Given under my hand this day of 1974
My commission expires 4/-1
I was commission�_d notary as S=dra Mae.DPay I
Notary Pub--'
- 2 -
W
0
FPE T 3
Frederick Mall Subdivision
Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia
Scale I" - 100' June II, 1977
APPROVED BY:
FREDERICK-COUNTY
LOCA7/ON MAP
SCALE. /"rZOOO'
Board of Supervisors Date
Planning Commission Date
(recommended)
Subdivision Administrator Date
VIRGINIA Dept. of Highways Date
Owner's Certificate
The above and foregoing subdivision of C. D. Hylton Land
as appears in the plat is with the free consent and in accordance
with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees,
if any.
Surveyor's Certificate
I hereby certify that the land in this subdivision is a portion
of the land conveyed to C. D. Hylton by deed dated August 24, 1964
and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed
Book 302 at page 444
Sheet # 1 of 2
Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
��v�ALTN �fiG
lio. >
54 17-J We 65
54-17.3 (b)152
�£U LAND-
1
BOCK Jj_i r"�.�E 4 C
Oeo cored to future widening of Fox Drive
0.063 Ac.
50 Riw IvE
FOX "."85�
9aa5 30 E 63 8 h Ndt j'' ; 1p0
00 �o
`ode,
-- N 120S
O ►i
2 Q
0 0.647 Ac. 3
Q
3 �o M 3 ti W i
M
M
311.6-1
CV
04530E ol�
12 0.00 W N 09
0 '
5 p9° 3 /
r-k - ,
0. 8/3 Ac. `�j
,3
I co 3
IN h O
"
45
W �o
30 a
eo� wide 257,9
E p9;a
N5�30
h) 0
o�
,3 h
3 0.662 Ac. h
) � 50p6 ,
Cb
e 904 '6 30 W
50
Lots I and
of -`&" ay" to
Lots 1 and
Lot 2 sha l
CY
h
J
3 shal I have 50' wide .right-of-way over "Area for Right-
i,'oute 522.
3 shall have 30' wide right-of-way to Fox Drive.
have 50' wide right-of-way to Route 522.
FINAL PL A T
IFREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION
Goinesboro Moy/ster/o/ DIstr/ct
FredeNck County, Wrp/nio
Scole: Pe= /00' June //, /977
P"Pored by
GREFFNWAY ENG/MEER/NG S SVRVEY/NG
CO., INC.
P. O. Box 666
W/NCHESMR, KRG/N/A
Revised Ian. 4 1978
;/iRCINLA FREt7L.RICIZ COUIRTY, SCT.
This instrument riting was produced to me on the
day of Z-41— Cz , at/C� = A
and with certificate f a nowledgme t thereto annexed
admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58-d4.1 of was
and 58-54 have been paid, if assessable,.
Clerk.
SAwt P Of
Forrest D. Miller, P. S.
•ENIOR ABSOCIATt
ALAN hL V00BHi+.ES 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Transportation and Urban Planning Consultants
Westgate Research Park 703/893-4310
Mclean, Virginia 22101 Cable: AMVOR—McLean
C. Richard Keller
Vice President
Traffic Operations
Pro Alan
M. Voorhees & Associates, Inc.
Transportation, Environmental and
Urban Planning Consultants
7798 Old Springhouse Road 703/893-4310
McLean, Virginia 22101 Cable :AMVOR, McLean
r
March 9, 1978
Mr. H. Ronald Berg
Planning Director
Frederick County
9 Court Square
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Re: Frederick Mall Subdivision
Dear Ron:
ROUSS CITY HALL
22601
Since the Frederick Mall Subdivision does not involve the platting of
streets, its approval does not fall under the jurisdiction of the City.
RTN:bpm
lewwl
Reed T. Nester
Director of Planning
" T4e'kkyvle (gapital"
HARRISON & JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
TELEPHONE February 8, 1978
AREA CODE 703
667-1266
Dear Ron:
Attached hereto please find
final plat of Frederick Mall property
on interestion of Route 522 and Fox
Drive. I do not believe a copy has
been sent to you for final approval
of the Planning Commission. I am
having a similar copy signed by the
owner, C. D. Hylton and his wife.
If you need any thing further or
have any questions, please give me a
call on Thursday morning.
H. K. Benham, IIT+��,:
�re�erir� �uun#p
Department of Ifanning aub pefulopmen#
H. RONALD BERG
PLANNING DIRECTOR P. O. BOX 601
DOROTHEA L. STEFEN 9 COURT SQUARE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601
March 2, 1978
Reed T. Nester
Planning Director
Rouss City Hall
Room 210
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Dear Reed:
The three lot subdivision for Frederick Mall has been approved by
the Frederick County Planning Commission. The three lots have also
been approved by the required agencies. Your contact person, should
you need any additional information,is Harry K. Benham, III, Harrison
and Johnston, Attorneys at Law, P. 0. Box 809, Winchester, Virginia,
22601.
Let me know as soon as this is approved.
Sincerely yours,
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA
7
H. Ronald Berg
Planning Director
HRB:btr
703/662-4532
a: -i F01 A L;::,Ln t:7 L R.. Rm'" 'A. JR:,
�^, fi i,"70- _:i G>`+G1.y cCRING.
�y � � �:l t7` ��'qST T ,L,(g �-[-
_ ., c. 4 t:.:.t L1f c :7 - 1�_ 4✓ a. 1 3 p i.� ` .✓4 i Il .d. +t o .i. Y - �iS�.
_.' V _ AL L.4n t .;•:K 4:. '�°'}+ " MANAGEMcNr
�r o<,txcna! DEPM..R"Tt4 N Qi HIGH'! :=AY$ & TPA'wS:'Ci�2TAi EC}I�t
ram.
Edinburg, Virginia 22824uc?kC Gs ut�FY
February 23, 1978 x 1
9L
Mr. harry K. Benham, III
21 South Loudoun Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Dear Mr. Benham:
I am writing you with regard to the plat you have submitted for the
property along Fox Drive near Route 522.
As you are aware, the Chairman of the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors, Mr. Roger Koontz, has been very interested in relocating
the connection of Route 739 into Route 522. Should this relocation
be approved by the Board of Supervisors, the best alignment for the
road comes right through your property. I am approving this plat
because we have no firm commitment from the Board and no definite
plans for Route 739 and I cannot tell you not to build. However,,
please be aware of this upcoming decision from the Board and the
Highway Department.
Ver truly yours, r%n
//f
,Tbhn W. Chiles, Jr.
Resident Engineer
JWCjr/raf
Cy: Mr. W. F. McCormick
Mr. R . C . King
Mr. S..Roger Koontz
11r. J. C. Renalds
All Board Members
c
— .=R1G.x'S L:EE;—!%ES
Y
s
,ay
? .R
'1-e� --7T
/ -
-�, ~_ / /
� ' . - _ '_ _= ~_ '`�~^�~~ ' ~,
��
/' � r ,��
/
��
�?<�
- _ . ^+~-~ -"
'
F-
lp
;z 5 0
`en Mtcne� o' fat Or .
o ,vidgadllwd to
Mtn9
Sdi
L 9 45
i
h
v
or Fer
e W NOW �UCRI y
Jq
o i
y 00
o log
_�00� 0 45# 30
N
09 o �,
S09elm
°
Q�res
2 9oA5 30 STR
r
' 50 6EQ 9�r 16
g0 RSERY2�1
U 09045
a a
�, 230•
d
o,$g'30 W
5 09
FAVAL RL A i'
F1(?FDS1?1Cr', III IALL SUBDIVISION
Caineataro Magistarla D $,wct
Fr L ric3r Gcu&y, Virginia
Scots = t"= f GG ` ,iun8 t t, 1377
-parr 22:
a r. a.�ra ��s e.i w•�a .w�.a ..�rrrf ♦s fs. rl AllAflr-•Vea lt+
— rr
SUBDIVISION
Frederick Mall Subdivision -- two lots fronting Route 522 North and one
lot fronting Fox Drive. Approved by the Sanitation Authority for
central water and sewer and the Highway Department for entrances.
Staff Comment:
All technical requirements have been met, and the division complies
with the Land Use Plan. The same issue arrises here as addressed with
Allen, how many entrances should there be on a congested _highway? The
proposal could generate five (5) entrances on Route 522 or it could generate
one (1), now would be a good time to find out.
^' � ! �
►, � f
�i
a
r-
11
4:
LOT SIZE
NO. ACRES
1 0.66
2 0.65
3 ' 0.65
4 0.65
5 0.65
Now or Formerly a
Buckley
S 60°-14'-30" E
311.67
n �
63.85 c
NOTE:
THIS PROPERTY, 1
IS NOT IN A FLOOD o
N
HAZARD_ AREA lu
_N
TOTAL ACREAGE
1Nec
39.26
Z
Excluding Buckley Parcel) IRON
N ,
I�
N 630-58' E
59.90
S 61 49)
S
S9 0 `30, 11 85.13
32.69
92.38
S 520-52-45" E
_ 150.00
0 j
O Z r NO
>O O o ti ) ,o
O N3
6
CO
;SO O
rn
r4, �
`3
0-58'-45" W
88.2
IRON
o/ w
IRON
N 150-24' -30" W �
120.84 IRON
N 10°-10 W t
218.86
IRON
17.30 Acres
F
Parcel to be Rezoned
for Multi —Family Use
R-6
10.83 Acres
N 15°-46 W �� 265•�'S
134.53
POST
'N 13°-34-30" W ti Parcel to be Rezoned
269.69 for Single —Family Use
POST R-3
7.88 Acres a
N 1 °-50'-15" 1 n�
216.36 � �
IRON N 764$=q2
4$ 451, �•
Now or Formerly
Miller POST
JOHN W. '4cNAIR,`1R.,//x
CERTIFICATE No. >
650
C.� LAND SVoe
S 620-17'-30" E
200.20
S 550-23' E
223.22
3 To �rNc
R
;� Now or Formerly.
w Unger
S 710-28' E
IRON 188.96
IRON
'
1117
t�
DARLINGTON
SUBDIVISION
/'�v
Plat Showing
Proposed Rezoning of a
19
Portion of the Property of
PAGE - BROOKE LAND TRUST
Gainesboro Magisterial District.
Frederick County, Virginia
SCALE: 1" = 300' JANUARY 13, 1977
REVISED: APRIL 6, 1977
John McNair and Associates
Consulting Engineers
Waynesboro, Virginia
7 5
s�
0&, 0,., 'Y 9 -3 W 4,,,,
Rj" VL�
5
lv,
6-Q-" "- or-12- J4
I
t
. 1
A +5
� � .i, � � eg. ;.r.,a pea sV+c� ; "'•. '1:�"'t !� w .pe� "•,� i�p `� R ' � Tj° � ^,.a+� '�� �r r� ,g+ /i® Oy
o, i to !..- i f e«•,,� , i 1.
r, q r.:a e �... t '�! s � r... .t . "`'i+a+.•r :ir x�x ie+. r<a cJ„ � .wa 4y:a �3i F:a�y~ � :r, ��- Mn ws--�� Ali?
A
n ry e b r, ra ITW" 'r . i rxY`+ a0.1
1 0 , • F , '`�j P
•zf-`.
tW eLa
By Ohio Section, ITE
As multi -family developments and
high intensity commercial land use
continues to grow rapidly, it is vital
that criteria be available to gauge their
impact on traffic.
The process of establishing such
criteria began in Ohio more than a
year ago, using as a guide the Trip
Generation Sold), of Selected Coin-
mercial and Residential Development,
published by the Tnstitute's Illinois
section in June, 1969.
Two basic traffic engineering terms,
trip and generation, defined in that
report were adopted.
The term trip refers to a single,
one-way vehicular movement having
either an origin or destination within
the study area or site.
The term generation refers to the
total number of trips crossing a count-
ing station .,ithin a given time period.
These trips can have either an origin
or destination in the study area or
site. Trip generation is expressed as
a rate, i.e., trips per unit of building
area, trips per dwelling unit, trips per
motel room.
'rho gross floor area of an estahlish-
menf expressed in 1.000's of square
feet, is the best characteristic for iden-
tifying a commercial development and
it provides a base for use in the trip
generation rate.
.Additional terms are peak hour of
operation and peak street hour. The
peak (tour of operation is the hour of
the day when the high^st combined
in and out traffic movement is ob-
served at the site studied. The peak
street hoar is the hour during the day,
usually the evening rush hour, when
the highest traffic movements occur
on streets adjacent to the develop-
ment studied.
Study procedures
In Columbus, week day 24 hour
non -directional mechanical traffic
counts were made at each site. Sites
selected had driveways long enough
to get 90 degree cros.;ings of the road
tubes to eliminate double counting.
In Mansfield, this double -counting
was eliminated by basing the machine
counts on manual peak hour counts:.
in addition, Mansfield made 24 hour
ma: nine counts on two successive
week days.
Springfield did not coilect 24 hour
data. Its trip generation rates were
obtained from peak hour manual
counts.
Manual peak hour counts were not
made in Columbus except for single-
family and multi -family residential
cases where car occupancy and in vs..
out. volumes were obtained. In other
cases, machine counts were used to
determine peak hour trips.
In Columbus and Mansfield, resi-
dential sites were selected to eliminate
through trips and occupant' counts
were inrludcd for the 7-9 a.m. and
3-6 p.m. periods. Apartment vacancy
rates were less than five per cent and
no adjustment was made for this in
developing trip generation factors per
dwelling unit.
TABLE 1
Contributin'- to this report were ------
Williarn C. Habig. coordinator, ,Wid-
Ohio Regional Planning Commission, No. of samples No. of uses Ave. somples/use
Gerald Wilcox and David A. Younger, - -- ------_._.--___--- --_--
Columbus Dirision. Ttaf i. F_n;dneer_ Columbus 26 5 5
ing and Parking: Walter .Src:esnvY, Spi infield 6 6 1
oR3 `1 P (G( lark�Ctnrtr :Sj,�trt; id�Cn ,rpQrin-,.w r y
3.Ve . raUSP,Jr"ttt:1J11 tfV �i u' d 'it' .�'� .. Si-tC .'Sf1efU: �l S r �''� x �► `1 �flr «fie 1 >► Q (� Q Cr N R4 `' .
Wood G. hlclnr� r. Id was approvea by Total 43 22
,tt. `•1 1 i)iti0 S'ttf>>Dr l%7. ji -< /'.S ill l��Ct ttt,tici', ,r r i`'a 4�� 4.. �� i 1, l ` . 1t t
J � ,r
28 N TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 0 MARCH, 1974
TABLE ? f ,
f Land use
Sample size
Peak site hour V. UV� Doily `
god -estourc:
IF*
73 tr; (t //,0.: r.ft. ,FA= M{jOn 561 trip, fl,)CC sq._;►, CFA
5 t-down restaurants
8'
33 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA 6-1 at4Axw, 237 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Discount stores
7'
6.7 trips/1,000 sq ft. GFA 1-%?M 69 trips/1,000 sq ft. GFA
Community shopping center 1
4.2 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA �,tq n.a.
Regional shopping center
1
1.5 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA 20 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Food store
1
16.6 trips/1000 sq ft. GFA n.a.
Auto supply store
1
10.0 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA 137 trips/1,000 sq ft. GFA
Motel
1
0.6 trips/room Q� 9 trips/room
Hospital
1
1.0 trips/bed 9 trips/bed
Suburban office
1
2.5 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA 17 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Service stations
2'
622 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA 43 trips/1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Single-family
6
.
0.91 trips/du 1-vw 4-1PYk10.5 trips/du
Multi -family
6
0.85 trips/du 1, pia►-.5-0't18.1 trips/du
24 hour data not available from one city.
2 GFA=Gross Floor Area of building.
Data from three cities
All three cities provided data on
developed site acreage and gross floor
area of commercial buildings. Mans-
field collected the number of entrances
and exits, employment, number of
parking spaces and car occupancy for
each site.
Springfield collected the number of
parking spaces, employment and oper-
ating hours for each site in addition
to the two basic variables obtained by
Columbus.
With proper site selection, studies
of this type can be done by mechan-
ical counters without the need for ex-
TABLE 3 Fast-food restaurants
pensive manual counts. This assumes
that a machine count crew normally is
operated in the field by the agency
collecting data.
Traffic generation studies of com-
mercial and residential development
conducted in Columbus, Springfield
and '11\4ansfield, Ohio provided 43
samples illustrating 12 different land
uses, shown in Table 1.
Table 2 summarizes average vehicle
generation factors during the site peak
hour and on a daily basis.
Peak periods of generation for
restaurants, discount stores and shop-
ping centers differ from the normal
evening peak hours on streets serving
such developments. Average peak
hour traffic generation rates per dwell-
ing unit were more than 20 per cent
higher for single family than multi-
family units in the evening peak.
The study developed data on two
basic types of land use The first set of
tables, (2 through 6), shows commer-
cial developments including fast food
restaurants, sit down restaurants, dis-
count stores, community shopping
centers, regional shopping center, food
stores, auto supply stores, motels, hos-
pitals, suburban office buildings and
service stations.
24 hour data
Peak hour data
Site
— _
—
Columbus
area
Building
Trips
Trips
site
(developed
area
Volume
1000
Trips
Peak
Volume
1000
Trips
ADT's
number
acres)
(sq. ft.)
(2-way)
sq. ft.
acre
hour
(2-way)
sq. ft.
acre
(thousands)'
1
0.63
2800
2322
828
3670
12-1 PM
336
120
534
Site 1
30-35
2
0.67
2250
1322
589
1990
12-1 PM
211
94
318
Site 2
15-16
3
0.66
3240
1640
506
2410
1 1-12 AM
218
68
329
Site 3
20-25
4
1.17
3072
1278
417
1100
12-1 PM
143
47
122
Site 4
25-30
5
0.87
3072
1154
376
1331
12-1 PM
165
54
191
Site 5
20-25
Average 0.80 2b87
:t�6 Springfield
1543 543 2100 12-1 PM 215 77 299
Burger Chef
0.66 2424 n.a.
n.a.
n.a. 12-1-PM 150 62 227
=7 Mansfield
McDonald's
0.88 1666 1183
713
1485 11:30-12:30 129 77 161
AVE. OF TOTALS
0.79 2646 1484
571
1998 1 2-1 PM 193 75 269
(n=6)
(n --- 6)
(n-=6)
' (access of service road, ADT is wainlirle)
(major street -access off service rood), 4000 (miner street)
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 2 MARCH, 1974 a 29
Sit-down restaurants
,.:,
24 Hour data
Site
------
---
"`� Columbus area
Building
Trips
site (developed
c:rea
Volume
1000
Trips
number acres)
(sq. ft.)
(2-way)
sq. ft.
acre
---1 --- 0.95 --
3721 ---205
i
- -551
-2170
2 1.49
3900
1910
490
1278
3 0.53
3000
583
193
1100
4 0.43
2500
573
219
1325
5 0.55
2900
514
178
929
6 1.99
11466
1091
96
550
Average 0.99 -
- 4581
1120 -
- 288 ---
1225
y-7 Springfield
-----
-------
-----
Perkins 0.48
3200
n.a.
n.a,
n.a.
8 Mansfield
Perkins 0.70
4507
564
125
806
AVE. OF TOTALS 0.89
4399
1041
265
1 165
' (major street), 6-8000 (minor street) (All access off service road)
(site within 500 ft. of 25-30 ADT street)
(access off service road, ADT is main
line)
TABLE 5 Discount stores
Peak
hour
8-9 AM
12-1 PM
11-12 AM
8-9 AM
12-1 PM
7-8 PM
Varies
12-1 PM
1 1 :30-12:30
Varies
-Peak hour data
Trips
Volume 1000
(2-way) sq. ft.
236 63.5
200 51.3
95 31.6
60 24.0
115 20.7
135 10.0
140 33.5
240 75.0
66 14.6
143 36.3
Trips
acre
ADT's
(thousands)'
250
Site 1
25-30
134
Site 2
5-6
180
Site 3
10-15
139
Site 4
20-25
108
Site 5
15-20
53
Site 6
35-40
144
-------
500
94
182
24 Hour data
Peak hour data
Building
-
Columbus
area
Trips
Peak
Trips
site
Site
(1000
Volume
1000
Trips
hour
Volume
1000
Trips
ADT's
number
area
sq. ft.)
(2-way)
sq. ft.
acre
(P.M.)
(2-way)
sq. ft.
acre
(thousands)
1
9.20
73.4
6368
87.3
692
7-8
571
7.80
62.2
Site 1
10-15
2
11.00
90.0
6313
70.2
574
8-9
594
6.59
54.0
Site 2
20-25
3
12.22
117.8
8252
70.1
675
7-8
854
7.25
69.6
Site 3
20-25
4
13.50
123.3
7872
63.7
583
7-8
818
6.62
60.5
Site 4
30-35
5
8.21
86.0
3587
41.7
436
7-8
381
4.43
46.4
Site 5
15-20
Average
10.83
98.0
6478
66.6
592
7-8
643
6.57
58.5
-�� 6 Springfield
Welles
12.63
66.3
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
7-8
498
7.51
39.4
#-`7 Mansfield
Five Cousins
4.00
32.0
2424
75.8
606
1:30-2:30
208
6.50
52.0
AVE. OF TOTALS 10.1 1
84.1
5803
68.1
594
Varies
561
6.67
54.9
TABLE 6 Miscellaneous uses
Site
Building
_._ 24 Hour data
Peak hour data
area
area
Trips
Trips
•
(developed
(1000
Volume 1000 Trips
Peak
Volume
1000
Trips
City Land use
acres)
sq. ft. l
(2-way) sq. ft. acre
hour
(2-way)
sq ft.
acre
Springfield Community
57.39
180.0
n.o. - -
7-8 PM
758
4.21
13.2
shopping
center
Mansfield Regular
61.33
690.8
13,824 20.0 225
2-3 PM
1041
1.51
17.0
shopping
center
Springfield
Food store
4.22
21.6
n.a.
-
-
5-6 PM
358
16.57
84.8
Mansfield
Auto supply
0.50
2.4
328
136.7
656
1 1-1 2 AM
24
10.00
48.0
Mansfield
Motel
105 units
29.2
923
31.6
9'
4-5 PM
68
2.33
0.6'
Mansfield
Hospital
105 beds
12.3
943
76.7
9•
3-4 PM
•104
8.46
1.0'
Mansfield
Suburban office
10.50
82.0
1,422
17.3
135
4.5 PM
201
2.45
19.0
Ma field
% vice :t.•'or
0.60
1.3
809
6.22.3
1348
6-7 AM
60
46.15
100.0
Springfield
Service storion
6.17
. . 3
n.u.
-
-
S-6 %M
52
40.00
192e'
' 'ratios are p-r brad
30 M TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ® MARCH, 1974
„nercial developments
Fast-food restaurants
Columbus site selection was baud
on the availability of driveways long
enough to direct the cars strai'-lht
across the road tubes to prevent dou-
.ble actuations (Table 3). Even so,
there are small errors in the counts
due to double actuations. Because of
the need to use long driveways, the
sites selected were relatively new and
located on major arterials.
These data are not available for
Mansfield or Springfield.
In all cases, the peak hour trips
occurred at noon. Peak hour trips per
thousand square feet of floor area
(gross) ranged from 54 to 12_0 vph
with an average of 73 vph. Street
volumes and location in the urban
areas seemed unimportant. Both the
highest and the lowest trip generators
were located on the same street, less
than a mile apart.
Sit down restaurants
As was the case for fast food
restaurants, the main consideration in
Columbus site selection for sit down
restaurants, (Table 4), was driveway
configuration. All locations studied
were constructed recently and repre-
sent a new trend in sit down restau-
rants. The high trip generation rates
indicate a high turnover. The variation
in trip rates points up the difficulty of
grouping sites within this general land
use category. Commercial competition
is intense and stage of development of
the market area seems to be a major
factor.
TABLE 7 Single family developments
Discount stores
Columbus discount stores studied.
(Table 5). lead to he older than the
fast food or ,it down restaurants sur-
veyed. The\- also tended to he located
farther into the city than the fast food
or sit dov. n restaurants.
Miscellaneous users
.COILImbus concentrated on obtain-
ing five or six samples for each of five
land uses while Mansfield and Spring-
field obtained one sample for each of
I 1 and six sites respectively.
Table 6 shows results for eight land
uses outside the basic set. While they
have no statistical validity, they indi-
cate the scale of trip generation for
such uses and provide guidance for
further study.
Single family developments
As shown in Table 7, six residential
subdivisions with home prices from
$15,000 to $60.000 were surveyed.
Only trips into and out of the subdi-
vision were counted. In most cases.
there were no through trips and where
through trips were possible, they were
minimal. Occupancy counts and in vs.
out volumes were taken only during
the peak hours of 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.
and from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. on week-
days.
Table 7A shows the split between
in and out traffic during the subdivi-
sions morning and evening peak
hours. Although counts were not taken
to determine the peak hour for adja-
cent streets, observations indicated the
street peak hour generally coincided
with the subdivision peak.
The peak hour splits at the Coium-
Ms locations %Ncre 76 per cent in and
24 per cent out in the morning and
64 per cent in and 36 per cent out in
the evening. Evening peak direction
rates avcr: cd rally about 1S per cent
IJ-her than the a.m. peak direction
due to the higher peak direction split
in the morning.
There appears to be no relationship
between the cost of the house. trip
(generation or auto occupancy.
Evening hour generation rates on
the average were, 40 per cent higher
than for the morning period. This in-
dicates a much greater concentration
during the evening rush hour.
Average daily traffic counts, (ADT),
to measure trip generation character-
istics on adjacent streets for this type
of land use should be used with cau-
tion and should account for all exits
and entrances and exclude through
traffic.
Multi -family developments
Table 8 shows six multi -family de-
velopments with rentals from $125 a
month for a one bedroom apartment
to 5310 a month for a three bedroom
apartment. Sites were selected to eli-
minate through trips.
Weekday occupancy counts and in
VS. out volumes were taken only dur-
ing the 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. peak and in
the 3 p.m, to 6 p.m. peak. Vehicle
occupancy and in vs. out volumes
were not measured at all entrances
and exits at sites one and two.
In all cases the apartment vacancy
rate was no more than five per cent
so no adjustments were made for the
vacancies.
Columbus
Number of----24 Hour data
-.---
Peak hour data
---------- -- ------- ------
-- ---
-
subdivision
dwelling
Volumes Vehicle trips/du
Peak Hour
Auto Price
number
units Volumes Trips/du
(am pm) (am pill)
(am pm)
occupancy range
1
210 2391 11.39
117 208 .56 1.00
7:45- 3:45-.
$15,000
8:45 4:45
1.64 $20,000
2 279 3682 9.49 210 242 .75 .87
3 1 1 2 1604 14.35 100 101 .89 .90
4 436 3613
5 246 2250
8.36 259 335 .59 .55
9.15 152 260 .62 1.06
Average 256 2708 10.55 162 229 .68 .88
=6 Mansfield 50 482
AVd. OF XJALS !z2 s337
9.64 32 62 .64 1.24
.0.40 --I f5 --201 - .67 94
7:15- 5:00-
8:15
6:00
1.60
$50,000
7:45-
5:00-
$50,000
8:45
6:00
1.55
$60,000
7!15-
4:45-
8:15
5:45
1.48
$25,000
7:00-
4:45-
8:00
5:45
1.59
$20,000
7:15-
5:00-
8:15
6:00
1.57
Varies
7:00-
4:15-
$20,000
8:00
5:15
1.60
$25,000
of ;0- :,:''0
8:00 6:00 1.58
TRAFFIC Ev4GINEERINu V MAP CH, :97
Varies
:/ 3:
VKIVE . I N 5AM"
Table 1. Drive -In Bank Design Hour Lobby Traffic Generation. -
Size of Areas Used by Hourly One -Way Traffic
Bank Within Building Generation (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
5,000 to 20,000 Square Feet2 15 to 20 Vehicles
20,000 to 40,000 Square Feet 10 to 15 Vehicles
Over 40,000 Square Feet 5 to 10 Vehicles
1 Based on surveys of suburban drive-in banks in the Chicago metropolitan area.
2 Gross floor area.
Table 2. Drive -In Bank Design Hour Lobby Customer Parking Requirements.
Size of Areas Used by Customer Parking
Bank Within Building Requirement (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
5,000 to 20,000 Square Feet 1 2.0 to 2.5 Spaces
20,000 to 40,000 Square Feet 1.5 to 2.0 Spaces
Over 40,000 Square Feet 1.0 to 1.5 Spaces
1 Gross floor area.
Table 3. Drive -In Window Configuration Capacities.
Configuration Vehicle/Window/ Vehicles/Teller
(see Fig. 1) Hour Hour
One Teller/Window (1:1)—A 30 to 35 30 to 35
One Teller/Two Windows (1:2)—B 25 to 30 50 to 60
Two Tellers/Three Windows (2:3) -C 35 to 40 52 to 60
Table 4. Drive -In Window Storage Requirements.
Number of Acceptable Waiting Time Recommended
Windows 10 Minutes 12.5 Minutes 15 Minutes Storage
2 12 15 18 12-18
3 18 22 26 18-26
4 23 29 351 23-30
5 29 361 441 25-30
6 351 — — 25-30
7 — — — 25-30
8 — — — 25-30
1 It is, generally, not necessary to provide more than 30-vehicle storage.
Table 5. Lobby Size Versus Drive -In Window Requirements.
Number of
Lobby Size' (Square Feet) Drive-in Windows
5,000 to I0,000 2 to 3
10,000 to 20,000 3 to 4
20,000 to 30,000 4 to 5
30,000 to 40,000 6 to 8
40,000 to 50,000 8 to 10
1 Gross floor area. 50t4"e_ SGl FPS P a.. u 7iZA�-�ZC �t N1A
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/SEPTEMBER 1975 23
01�
Table 5
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
AT AtJTom6mm hE 'ftCE STATION'S
Time
(T•Xo-day Volumes)
7:00-
8:00-
11:00-
Noon- 4:00-
5:00-
6:00-
Station Location
8:00 A.M.
9:00 A.M.
Noon
1:00 P M. 5:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M.,
Sinclair Skokie, Ili.
36
50
22
36
36
46
44
" " (Saturday)
- '
-
(54)
(50)
(36)
-
-
" "
-
-
27
22
7
19
-20
Standard to22
35
23
29
25
33
-
Texaco
-
-
37
34
50
29
7
"
-
-
11
1S
20
15
16
Mobil
27
21
-
-
33
25
-
Sincl.air
16,
21
-
-
14
6
-
Bulko •'
10
14
-
-
13
13
-
Pure Oil
6•
17
-
-
31
22
-
Enco
12
8
-
-
19
11
-
Sunoco "
8
22
-
-
7
12
-
Standard Riverwoods,
Ill. 9
14
-
-
22
18
•-
Shell Springfield,
" 23
21
-
-
29
18
-
Texaco it•
to 31
34
-
-
13
9
-
Shall Rock Island,
-
16
19
-
32
-
-
DX to
8
:14
-
11
Hour Totals (weekdays)
200
281
153
139
362
276
87
Number Samples
11
13
7
5
16
14
4
Hourly Averages
18
22
22
23
23
20
22
• S � ° -ry i P
f 6k) rie"o n)
t;;m►`1
1 aD/s 5 E c j7o A)
irCl
,7UMF i 9�
i
Table 1
1974 Trip Generation Study
BRANCH BANKS - DRIVE-IN
Study No.
16
Year Studied
1974
Basic Data
G.F.A. (1000 SF)
3.3
G.L.A. (Acres)
1.1
No. of Employees
7
No. of Parking Spaces
18
No. of Drive-in Windows
2
Traffic Data
Average Weekday Traffic
644
Peak Hour
Time
1-2P
Volume
94
Percent of AWDT
14.6
Trip Ratios
Average Weekday Trips Per:
G.F.A. (1000 SF)
195.2
G.L.A. (Acre)
585.5
Employee
92.0
Parking Space
35.8
Drive-in Window
322.0
-10-
S.U.B.D.I.V.I.S.I.O.N P.L.A.T S.U.M.M.A.R.Y
/6"h i
r eview Fee Paid $J '3. O 4) Health approved
vvL,y.-eti�' Highway approved
Ag-Ve-e-dof Dedication Received Sanitation approved
I;KAll Signatures affixed to Plat,
including Owner/Developer/Subdivider
/ / Zoning approved
/i--t-ftty`or Town approved
1. Subdivision NAME
2. MAGISTERIAL District yc7�
3. DATE submitted to Administrator % / / 7 7
4. CONTACT Person & Telephone # R4 A-W 4 , "'e,
CONTACT Address tG7 yc E-
5. Owner/
C. P. lYV/re
i
6. ZONING Classification of Area
7. LOCATION 9 T- .5r 2 '?- j✓ d- E,( 19/ems /
8. Adjoining Property Uses
9. Total Acreage
10. Number of Lots
11. Street Design
12. Water and/or Sewer Availability & Source , ' `P_ 6' ".�" e�,4,41 /� 0 7d
13. Adequacy of Easements
14. Storm Drainage & Floodplain
15. Recreation Areas
page 1 of 2
SUBDIVISION PLAT SUNMRY Conti._ _.ad . . ... . .
16. Covenants and/or Deed of Dedication
17. Amount of Bond
18. Review Team Comments
a
(b)
c)
(e)
(Summary)
19. Planning Commission
20.
PAGE Two of Two
Frederick Mall Subdivision 3 lots
Gainesboro
SUBDV .