Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-97 Westminster Canterbury - Gainesboro - Backfile (2)
STAFF MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST (Note: The application does not need to be complete to be accepted.) Submission Package Comment sheets from the following agencies along with an marked copies of the plan: vshVDOT City of Winchester V Sanitation Authority Inspections Dept. Fire Marshal Health Department Parks & Recreation L County Engineer _ l One copy of the master development plan application 25 copies of the plan on a single sheet One reproducible copy of the plan (if required) A 35 mm slide of the plan TRACKING Date IQ -9"-7 Application received 0' 717 Fee Paid (amount: 0, oo ) It- 1 q -W Preliminary MDP heard by Planning Commission -Action taken: e-. la- [0-97 Preliminary MDP heard by Board of Supervisors - Action taken: e d Letter to applicant regarding action and revisions (if required) Final MDP submitted with review agency, PC and BOS comments addressed Final MDP signed by County Administrator and Planning Director (send two copies to applicant) IZ-12-q7 Administratively approved; letter sent to applicant K.IWPCMMCIC_C WTRACKING MDP Rev II!96 �Z -lS- q 7 CASH .. - ��'(1►�•! .. RECEIPT i - • • ��t �.,1_� � /,1 Il � 1 tali'. � `� � ACCOUNT HOW PAID U, ) "19 COUNTY Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 December 15, 2004 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Revised Master Development for Westminster Canterbury Dear Evan: I am in receipt of the revised Master Development Plan for Westminster Canterbury. This revised MDP provides for two revised parking areas and the addition of a service road. I would offer the following comments for your consideration. Total Density. The total density on the approved MDP in 1997 was 4.98 and the total number of units allowed within the Frederick County portion of the site was 246 (acreage was 49.35). The revised MDP shows a density of 5.5 with a total of 257 units allowed within Frederick County (acreage 48.27). The density on the revised plan cannot exceed the 4.98 units per acre density shown on the 1997 plan without review by the Board of Supervisors. Please explain the discrepancies between the acreages as this will effect the total number of units allowed on the site. Also, please provide the density breakdown that was shown on the previous MDP's. 2. Phase V. The revised MDP has a Phase V included; the MDPs from 1997 and 2001 do not. Please clarify why this has been added. 3. Open Space. Please show the amount of open space for this development. In order to continue the review of this Master Development Plan, you will need to submit a complete MDP application, a signed and notarized Special Limited Power of Attorney Form, comments from the Frederick County Department of Public Works, and review fee, to this department. The fee for this project will be $1566.50 (a $1,500 base fee and $66.50 for the disturbed area). Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County 4th Floor Department of Public Works 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5643 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach three (3) copies of the MDP with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Applicant's Contact Address: Westminster Canterbury Phone Number: 540-665-0156 300 Westminster -Canterbury Drive Winchester, VA 22603 Greenway En ing eering Attn.: Evan A. Wvatt. AICP 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Name of development and/or description of the request: Phone Number: 540-662-4185 MDP Revision for Westminster Canterbury Location of property: Straddling the City of Winchester and Frederick County line accessed via Westminster -Canterbury Drive (Route 1518). Department of Public Works Comments: Date received 121111 vy Review Number: 1 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed __". ) OS Date approved i & 1 Df Revision required n JAN - 6 20 ! Signature and Date III PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 'd,,. k PC REVIEW DATE: 11-19-97 BOS REVIEW DATE: 12-10-97 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #007-97 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY LOCATION: The property is located on Westminster Canterbury Drive (Route 1318) off of Front Royal Pike (Route 522 North). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 53-A-63A, 53-A-63B, 53-A-52B, and 53-4-3-J PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance); Present use: Residential and Assisted Living/Health Care Facility. ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: 10 North - Zoned: RP IUse: Residential South - Zoned: LR (Low Residential) Use: Residential / Vacant East - Zoned: RP Use: Vacant West - Zoned: RP Use: Residential PROPOSED US Residential/Assisted Living Facility ,,,� � 6 p a1. \/ OvT REVIEW EVALUATIONS: yrp„,,*DttL Kt ��t.G c�lj (ill C_Q_rt•,-A LA-.1 Virginia Dent. of Transportation: See attached letter from Bob Childress dated October 24, 1997. Sanitation Authority: Water and sewer are available. Inspections Dept.: Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 308, and 310, Use groups I (Institutional) and R (Residential) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Will comment further at the time of the site plan review. C. Westminster Canterbury MDP 9007-97 Page 2 November 10, 1997 Fire Marshal: The Site Plan for this project must be submitted to the Winchester Fire and Rescue Dept., as well as Frederick County, as the City is the primary service provider of Fire and Rescue services. 2. Fire Lane access and hydrant locations will be reviewed at the time of Site Plan submittal. 3. Burning of land clearing debris requires a permit from the Fire Marshal's Office. Burning of building construction debris is not permitted. 4. During construction, access to all structures, hydrants, and Siamese locations must be maintained at all times. Staging of construction materials, trailers, vehicles and other equipment within 20' of a fire hydrant is prohibited. Temporary street address signs must be posted when construction begins. V Countv Engineer: Stormwater management has been indicated for future development. Detailed design will be required at the time of the site plan submission. The proposed master 10 development plan dated 10/22/97 is approved by the Public Works Department as submitted. City of Winchester Planning: While the western expansion brings development closer to existing City residences, it does so outside the City's PUD District, and this requires no rezoning approval in the City. Layout seems to minimize impact on existing emergency access drive. Minor associated revisions to eliminate west serve road and expand maintenance garage in City can be handled as a City site plan application. Planning and Zoning: Project History The Board of Supervisors rezoned the property on which the Westminster -Canterbury facility is located on August 24. 1983 (Rez. 4005-83 ). The ensuing development of the property was prior to the County's current MDP requirements. Subsequent cottage/duplex development on the property in 1991 and 1994 necessitated the approval of Master Plans 9005-91 and 9008-94, and the rezoning of 2.9 acres of B2 zoned land to RP (Rez. 9005-91). Project Scope Westminster -Canterbury is proposing a two-phase development. Initially, they plan to develop a forty-eight (48) unit assisted -living residential facility. In the future, they plan to develop eighteen (18) cottage/duplex units. Both phases are wholly within Frederick County. Westminster Canterbury MDP 4007-97 Page 3 November 10, 1997 0-r � Bealv��u vw1 ck 0-000017 The assisted living residential facility is an extension of their current facility in which there are two hundred (200) existing units with an additional one hundred ninety two (192) previously approved, yet undeveloped, units. Of the existing units)eighty-five (85) are in the City and one hundred fifteen (115) are in the County. With regards to the undeveloped units, one hundred twenty-one (121) are in the City and seventy-one (71) are in the County. It should be noted that the existing health care facility will lose 32 units when this facility is added. This results in a gain of 16 units. The cottage/duplex development is in addition to the twenty-six (26) cottages that exist on the property. Access to the cottage development is to be provided through private driveways that connect the existing Westminster -Canterbury Drive. Issues Staffs review of this :VIDP has highlighted no sig?uficart concerns. The gross density of the project, at 4.9 units per acre, is below the maximum permitted gross density for this development which is 5.5 units per acre. Twenty-three (23) acres of open space, which is 46 percent of the development, have been provided. This surpasses the minimum open space requirement which is 30 percent. Furthermore, `he acreage of disturbed environmental features is significantly lower than the amount of disturbance permitted. Se,,c_� _ The or issues shouYd be considered by the Planning Commission.., tee, 1) Transportation. CO-Vt o � �—t Al,v-w e-kJ 0-k� -3 The proposed private driveways th t provide access to the future cottage developments should be aligned to form a cross intersection These driveways should also intersect Westminster -Canterbury Drive at approximately right angles. In addition, a note to the effect of "Private driveway providing access to the future cottages will not/never connect with Old Fort Road" should be added to the AMP 2) Buffer and Screening. 0� C o G - � 6 4 The applicant is correctly showing a one -hundred-( 10 foot perimeter single family separation buffer adjacent to all abutting single family residences However, this residential separation buffer is not required adjacent to the Tudor Square and the Canterbury Square developments, and may be removed from the vMP Also, the category zoning district buffer shown adjacent to the Hiett and Weber should be removed. These properties have split RPB2 zoning with the B2 portion fronting along Route 522. The detail of all buffers is to be determined at the site plan stage- 0 Westminster Canterbury MDP 4007-97 Page 4 November 10, 1997 3) Recreational Units. �v A VJ �-'�` `�'�nc�-� f ` cc LAAA low — The applicant is showing a proposed T14rapy Pool. Additional detail should be provided on the MDP regarding this pool in addition to the recreational units that currently exist at this facility to determine that the recreational unit requirement is being met. It would appear from visiting this property that this is being accomplished. 0 4) Environmental Features. OW�GE �- �`�^'" J kr � earm& rvxc4jo� The location of the environm tal features, in addition to the area that is to be disturbed, should be shown on the MDP. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 11-19-97 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Westminster -Canterbury Master Development Plan. The overall concept of this Master Development Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff asks the Planning Commission to ensure that all review agency comments are adequately addressed prior to final approval • of this plan. O\AGENDASCJNI.MFN-rs%wS %INSTR.SIDN 0 n • 10.24.1997 13:05 Post -It" brand tax 1. Mr.Mar kS 4 a 'A.,* smltta! memo 7671 i • or cage, . C0MMI0NW zj,Uj'H of VIRGINIA P.aI OEPARTMEN7 OF TRANSPCRTATION OAVIO R. GFHR EOINBUAG RESIDENCY COMM13SIONER 14031 OLO VALLEY PIKE P 0 BOX 278 JERAY A. COPP ECINFILIRG. VA 22824-0278 aESiGENT EW;.%eeR TELE (3,00I774 5600 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMINIEN'TS �Ax(540)"A-S CT WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY OctO ber 24, 1997 We have no overall objections to this property's master development plan. All external streets shown are private and cannot be considered eligible for addition to our Secondary Maintenance System until they meet our Subdivision Street Des; Standards and Frederick County Ordinance Requirements. gn The existing entrance serving the propel' at the end of Route 1318 is adequate for the Proposed imrnovements However, we are concerned with potential impacts at the Route 1318 and 522 North intersection, Existing and proposed traffic imparts at this intersection may necessitate improvements, i.e. turn Iane expansion and sigtalization. The developer should be required to participate in the costs of any improvements. Detailed traffic generation data existing uses along Route 1318, incIudirg existing and proposed uses on this site, counts on Route 3Z2, and anticipated splits at the Route 1318 and 522 intersection should be provided at the site plan stage to determine if the aforementioned improvements will be necessary. This plan should be revised to identify Westminster -Canterbury Drive as Route 1318 Signed: RBC/ rf xc: Mr. S. A. Meinikoff (w j copy of plan) WE KEE? VIRGINIA MOVING 6:'� Iz, -, - � " g �'. ': � L, /' '/ , Robert B. Childress, Trans .Engineer V • 0 0 Frederick County, Virginia - Master Development Plan application Package APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Development Use Only. Date application received 10-24-17 Complete. Date ofacceptance. /0-�?7-Q7 Incomplete. Date ofreturn. Application # oa- 7 1. Project Title : W l r✓cl�1STEF=iN T� ��C�c.! 1-'( 2. Owner's Name: WESrMiwST-cFz, GAt TEF-13(-LIm-r ATT'. MICHAeL PEASLG -1/ (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) 3. Applicant: G'-1C-CC N W A `l E NC-t N C L t24 N G Address: I S ! Phone Number: /S4+ — .` - 14-� -i. Design Company: GCN1.N,� (=NC-�NEEHNL 1 C'�GN 4�NLCF' 15 Address: Phone Number: Contact Name: ►� ��+=- ^ 5N? , Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package • APPLICATION cont'd MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5. Location of Property: I,�i ES Th,�i NsTCt= G,4 �; TC�c.i2`( pP-te - _� F- GF N✓P.TH 6. Total Acreage: , 3 �.� �, 3 maces, REv i5� 7. Property Information: _ a) Property Identification Number (PIN): S &3A b) Current Zoning: (Zp c) Present Use: P-C-St DCN TA L- d) Proposed Uses: RES t DC—N T A L- e) Adjoining Property Information: Property Identification Numbers Property Uses North J . P Su-fx,- pz�, C) 0 South r(A-)1 (3 F 15N41TH AG tc. East '3=- ( - 4 6,eC-- L,D F. SMtTH West oUOFj,-4=TSLAf p,p f) Magisterial District: 8. Is this an original or amended [aster Development Plan" Ori�.zinal ! Amended _ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: V V Date: A_—t-6.1 Page 12 0 . WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' TM#53-((A))-63A TAX MAP# OWNER 131-6-E-5 Davis, James A and Janet C. 504 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-6 Resident 508 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-9 Wood, Herbet A. Jr., et ux 520 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-11A Gibbs, Paula H. 528 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-12 McLoughlin, Dennis J. 532 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-13 Rogers. Charles P. et ux 536 Marion St. Winchester. Va. 22601 131-6-E-14 Von Payr, Hans et ux 540 Marion St. Winchester. Va. 22601 131-6-E-15 Willis, William D. et ux 606 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-C-12 Baker, William H. et ux 545 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-C-13 Boppe, M. Lee et us 601 Old FortRoad Winchester, Va. 22601 • 132-1-4 Lawrence, Edward C. & Ann B. 469 Fairmont Ave. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-D-14 Jones, Robert, Mark & Jo Allen 540 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-D-15 Glaize Development, Inc. 131-6-D-16 302 N. Cameron St. 131-6-D-17 Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-14 Moore, Thomas G. & Sally C. 605 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-15 Carey, Dennis L. & Diane F. 609 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-16 Lloyd, Thomas D. et ux 613 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-17 Keith, Kimberly D. & Isaac A. IV 617 Old Fort Road Winchester. Va. 22601 111-1-4 Hack Land Trust 111-1-5 974 East Macedonia Church Rd. Stephens City, Va. 22655 111-3-E-16 Pota, Anthony 610 Old Fort Road Winchester. Va. 22601 132-1-4 Smith, Gerald F. 53-q-63 P.O. Box 3588 Winchester, Va. 22604 53-A-60 Lewis, John P. & David P. Box 3300 Winchester, Va. 22601 • 53-A-61 Hiett, Russell D. & Ann B. 53-A-61A 930 Autumn View Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-53 Weber, Katherine P. 8301 Robey Avenue Annandale, Va. 22003 53-A-7 Luttrell, Marlene R. 204 Margaret Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-A-4 Fishel, Linda Sue 107 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A--2-A-5 Peacemaker, Wayne J. 1243 North Frederick Pike Winchester, Va. 22603 . 53A-2-A-6 Campbell, Benjamin E. 111 Redwood Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53-A-2-A-7 McDaniel. Evelyn J. & Loring 113 Redwood Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-B-2 Moomaw. Preston E.. Jr. 53A-2-B-6A 321 Cedar Grove Road 53A-2-B-7 Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-B-2A Jenkins, James W. 53A-2-B-3 108 Redwood Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-B-3A Simmons, Chester W. 112 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-4 Fogle, Richard Harold 117 Oak Side Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-B-5 Simmons, Paul E., Sr. • 115 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-5A Phillips, Wendall H. 53A-2-B-6 113 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-C-5 Storm, William E. & Hilda M. 110 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-6 Jenkins, Charles L. Jr. 1333 Ambrose Drive Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-C-7 Catlett, Kenneth J. 53-A-2-C-8 c/o Satoko Catlett 114 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-13 Drummond, Tereas S. c/o Teresa Jackson • 111 Hickory Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-14 Foreman, Roger L. & Darlene L. 113 Hickory Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-C-14A Clay, Mildred Helen 53A-2-C-15 115 Hickory Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-C-16 Fahnestock, Elton R. 53A-2-C-17 117 Hickory Lane 53A-2-C-16 Winchester. Va. 22603 53A-2-D-5 Bean, Betty Lou Reeves 53A-2-D-6 112 Hickory Lane 53A-2-D-7 Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-D-8 Place, Thomas J. 53A-2-D-9 116 Hickory Lane Winchester. Va. 22603 • 53B-4-1 Schelble, Carol 123 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-2 North Frederick Realty 53B-4-7 P.O. Drawer 2097 53B-4-10 Winchester, Va. 22603 53 B-4-11 53B-4-12 53B-4-14 53B-4-16 53B-4-18 53B-4-20A 53-B-4-3 Toan, Douglas R. & Michael L. Bryan P.O. Box 2800 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-4 Toan, Douglas R. 360-2 McGhee Rd. • Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-5 Beverley, Marshall J. Jr. and Sharon W. 109 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-6 Kelsey, Joseph & Roberta 107 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-8 Butler, Benjamin M. & Ann R. P.O. Box 2097 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-9 Butler, Stephen G. P.O. Box 2097 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-13 Bryan, Michael L. 53B-4-15 12 Rouss Avenue 53B-4-17 Winchester, Va. 22601 0 0 . 53B-4-19 Sewell, Zona Gail is c/o Gail S. Unger 120 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-20 Pugh, G. Schott & Lori P. 122 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53D-1-(1 through 42) Tudor Square Subdivision Section One Deed Book 642, Page 122 - 126 53D-2-(65 through 87 and Tudor Square Subdivision 92 through 96) Section Two Deed Book 676, Page 782 • 11 I MICHAEL L. BRYAN H. EDMUNDS COLEMAN, III BRYAN & COLEMAN, P.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12 ROU9B AVENUE WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 TELEPHONE: (540)665-4366 FAX: (540)665-4380 MmuNa ADDRESS: P. O. Box 2800 November 19, 1997 WINCHESTER. VA 22604 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention: Chuck DeHaven, Chairman RE: Master Development Plan Number 00797 Westminister Canterbury Dear Chuck, I would like to express my full support the for the proposed Master Development Plan filed by Westminster Canterbury before the Planning Commission. I do not in any way find objectionable the proposed assisted living facility or additional cottages. Both individually and through partnerships, I have an interest in substantial real estate holdings in both Canterbury Square Subdivision and Tudor Square Subdivision and would certainly not support any proposal which would negatively impact these adjacent properties. However, having fully reviewed the proposed plans, I think that Westminister Canterbury's proposal is both reasonable and a welcome addition to the community. Thank you for your consideration. MLB/pmn c:\Letters\DeHaven 11-19-97 53A - 2- C- 8- CATLETT, KENNETH J. SATOKOCATLETT 114 0 R WINCHESTER,-", 53A • 2- C--Ir CATWf, KENNETH J. Ct SATOKO CATLETT 114 OAK DR WINCHESTER, VA 53A - 2- C- 13- DRUMMOND, TERESA S CIO TERESA S JACKSON 111 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA "'l-Z 22603.3558 22603.3558 22603.4217 53A - 2- C- 14- FOREMAN, ROGER L & DARLENE L 113 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A - 2- C- 14-A CLAY, MILDRED HELEN CIO RUSSELL CLAY 219 W MONMOUTH ST WINCHESTER, VA 22601-4010 53A - 2- C- 15- CLAY, MILDRED HELEN CIO RUSSELL CLAY W MONMOUTH ST INVA 22 40 0 5 A - 2- C. 15- CLAY, MILDRED HELEN CIO RUSSELL CLAY 219 W MONMOUTH ST WINCHESTER, VA 22601 4010 53A - 2- C- 8 CATLETT, KENNETH J. CIO SATOKO CATLETT 114 OAK DR A A WINCHESTER VA 22603-3558 53A - 2 CATLETT, KENN J. CIO SATOKO CATLETT \ 114 OAK DR \� WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3558 53A - 2- C- 13- DRUMMOND, TERESA S CIO TERESA S JACKSON 111 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- C- 14- FOREMAN, ROGER L & DARLENE L 113 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A - 2- C- 14-A CLAY, MILDRED HELEN CIO RUSSELL CLAY 219 W MONMOUTH ST WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4010 53A - 2- C- 15- CLAY, MILDRED HELEN M-RUSSELL CLAY 219 IN'M-011 O U T H ST WINCHESTER; kA 22601-4010 5 3 A C• 15- Y, MILDRED HELEN CIO RUSSELL CLAY 219 W MONMOUTH ST WINCHESTER, VA 22601-4010 53A - 2- C- 16- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4217 53A - 2- C- 17- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 1 HICKORY LN WI HESTER, VA. 22603-4217 XHICKORYLN 17- CK, ELT R. R VA. 22603.42 7 16- CK, ELT"0,N R. RY LNER, VA. 22603-4217 53A - 2- C- 16- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4217 53A - 2- D- 5- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A - 2- D- 6- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN / WINCHESTER.,V/1 22603.4217 53A - 2- D- BEAN, BETTY LOL 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 53A - 2- C- 16- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA. 53A - 2- C- 17- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN `,WINCHESTER, VA. 53A 2- C- 17- FAHNES OCK,ELTON . 117 HICKOR WINCHESTE , 53A C- 16 FAH STOCK, ELTON R. 1 HICKORY LN INCHESTER, VA. 22603.4217 2260 -4217 22603.4217 22603-4217 53A - 2- C- 16- FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4217 53A - 2- D- 5- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A • 2• D- 6- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 2603.4217 53 - - 6- S EAN,BETTY REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 22 217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603 4217 53A - 2- D- 7- I 53A - 2- D- 7- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES /\3A EAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 12 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 INCHESTER, VA 22603-4217, 53A 2- D- 7- 3A - 2- D- 7- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES EAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 12 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 INCHESTER, VA 226 -4217 53A - 2- D- 5 - 2- D- 5- BEAN, BETTY LOU REE ES BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 112 HICKORY LN INCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A ' 2- D. 5- 53A -2- BEAN, 5 ETT LOU REEVES BEAN, BE YLOU EVES 112 HI 0 LN 112 HICKO LN WINCHE R, VA 22603-4217 WINCHESTE V 22603-4217 53A - 2- D- 6- 53A - 2- D- - BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES BEAN, BET LOU R VES 112 HICKORY LN 112 HICK RY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 WINCH STER, VA 22603 4217 t • 2- D- 6- �53A 2- D- 6- N, BETTY LOU REEVES BE , BETTY LOU REEVES /112 HICKORY LN \ 2 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A - 2- D- 7- 53A - 2- D- 7- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A -2-D- 7- 53A - 2- D- 7- BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 112 HICKORY LN 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- D- 8- 53A - 2- D- 8- PLACE, THOMAS J PLACE, THOMAS J 116 HICKORY LN 116 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- D- 9- - WINCHESTER, VA 22603=4217 53B -4- - 1- SCHELBLE, CAROL 123 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 53B - 4- - 2- NORTH FREDERICK REALTY CIO FAIRFAX HALL PROPERTIES PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-1297 53B -4- - 3- TOAN, DOUGLAS R & MICHAEL L BRYAN PO BOX 2B00 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-2000 53B - 4- - 4- TOAN, DOUGLAS R. 360-2 MCGHEE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4631 5 4- T0 UGLAS R. 360-2 MCGHEE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4631 53A - 2- D- 9- PLACE, THOMAS J 116 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53A - 2- 0- 9- PLACE, THOMAS J 116 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4217 53B -4- - 1- SCHELBLE, CAROL 123 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4231 53B - 4- - 2- NORTH FREDERICK REALTY CIO FAIRFAX HALL PROPERTIES PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1297 53B -4- - 3- TOAN, DOUGLAS R & MICHAEL L BRYAN PO BOX 2800 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-2000 / 53B -4- - 4- TOAN, DOUGLAS R. 360.2 MCGHEE RD WINCHESTER, V 22603-4631 5 4- DAN, UGLAS R. 360-2 MCGHEE RD __ WINCHESTER, VA 2,2603.4631 i I I I I I I I I ' 53 B - 4- - 5- 53B -4- - 5- BEVERLEY, MARSHALL J JR I BEVERLEY, MARSHALL J JR & SHARON W & SHARON W 109 RUGBY PL 109 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 I I I I I I 53B - 4- - 6- 53B -4- - 6- KELSEY,JOSEPH & ROBERTA KELSEY,JOSEPH & ROBERTA 107 RUGBY PL 107 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 i I WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 I I I 53B -4- - 8- 53B -4- - 8- BUTLER, BENJAMIN M & ANN R BUTLER, BENJAMIN M & ANN R PO BOX 2097 I PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER,VA 22604.1297 I WINCHESTER,VA 22604-1297 I I I I I 53B - 4- - 9- 53B - 4- - 9- BUTLER,STEPHEN G BUTLER, STEPHEN G PO BOX 2097 PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1297 WINCHESTER,VA 22604.1297 �I I I I I I 53B -4- - 13- 53B -4- - 13- BRYAN, MICHAEL L BRYAN, MICHAEL L 12 ROUSS AVE 12 ROUSS AVE WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4730 WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4738 I _ I .I i I' 53B -4- - 19- SEWELL, ZONA GAIL CIO GAIL SEWELL UNGER 120 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 53B - 4- - 20- PUGH, G. SCOTT & LORI P. 122 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4231 53D - 1• - 1- RICHLAND INVESTMENTS CIO RICHARD V. REEDY 103 SHARON DR WINCHESTER, VA i1JU - L- - VJ- MCCOY, KAREN K. CIO KAREN K DODSON 212 TUDOR DR WINCHESTER, VA. l 53A - 2- A- 4- FISHEL, LINDA SUE 107 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22602.6644 22603-4244 22603.4230 53B - 4- - 19- SEWELL, ZONA GAIL CIO GAIL SEWELL UNGER 120 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 53B -4- - 20- PUGH, G. SCOTT & LORI P. 122 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4231 53D - 1- - 1- RICHLAND INVESTMENTS C►O RICHARD V. REEDY 103 SHARON DR WINCHESTER, VA 22602.6644 MCCOY, KAREN K. CIO KAREN K DODSON 212 TUDOR DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4244 53A - 2- A- 4- FISHEL, LINDA SUE 107 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4230 53A - 2- B- 5-A 53A - 2- B- 5-A PHILLIPS, WENDALL H PHILLIPS, WENDALL H 113 OAK SIDE LN 113 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4224 WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4224 53A - 2- B- 6- 53A - 2- B- 6- PHILLIPS, WENDALL H / PHILLIPS, WENDALL H 113 OAK SIDE LN 113 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA226 4 WINCHESTER,,Vk 22603-4224 53A - 2- B- 6- 2- B- 6- PHILLIPS, WENDALL H PHILLIPS, WENDALL H 113 OAK SIDE LN 113 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4224 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4224 53A - 2- C- 5- 53A - 2- C• 5- STORM, WILLIAM E. & HILDA M. STORM, WILLIAM E. & HILDA M. 110 OAK SIDE LN 110 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4224 WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4224 53A - 2- C- 6- 53A - 2- C- 6- JENKINS, CHARLES L. JR. JENKINS, CHARLES L. JR. 1333 AMBROSE DR 1333 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-8610 WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-8610 53A - 2- C- 7- 53A - 2- C- 7- CATLETT, KENNETH J. CATLETT, KENNETH J. CIO SATOKO CATLETT CIO SATOKO CATLETT 114 OAK SIDE LANE 114 OAK SIDE LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3558 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3558 53D-2-94A 53D-2-94A Tudor Square Homeowner's Assoc. Tudor Square Homeowner's Assoc. P.O. Box 336 P.O. Box 336 Winchester, VA�22604 Winchester, VA 22604 Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 53 - A- - 63-A WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY 300 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4216 53 - A- - 63- SMITH, GERALD F PO BOX 3588 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604.2586 53 - A- - 60- LEWIS, JOHN P. & DAVID P. PO BOX 3300 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604.2500 53 -A- - 61- HIETT, RUSSELL 0 & ANN B 1B1 AUTUMN VIEW LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603 53 -A- - 61-A HIETT, RUSSELL KEVIN \ 181 AUTUMN VIEW LAN WINCHESTER, VA 22603 5 - A- IETT, RUSSELCKEVIN 181 AUTUMN VIEW LARD WINCHESTER, VA 2,2603 / 53 - A- - 63-A WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY 300 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4216 53 - A- - 63- SMITH, GERALD F PO BOX 3588 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604-2586 53 - A- - 60- LEWIS, JOHN P. & DAVID P. PO BOX 3300 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604.2500 53 -A- - 61- HIETT, RUSSELL 0 & ANN B 181 AUTUMN VIEW LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603 53 -A- - 61-A HIETT, RUSSELL KEVIN 181 AUTUMN VIEW LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603 A- 61- HIETT, RUSSELL KEV1Rl- 181 AUTUMN VIEW LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603 I rr 53 - A- - 53- WEBER, KATHERINE P. 8301 ROBEY AVE ANNANDALE, VA. 22003-1369 53 - A- - 53- WEBER, KATHERINE P. 8301 ROBEY AVE ANNANDALE, VA. 22003-1369 53 - A- - 7- 53 - A- - 7- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4261 WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4261 53 A- - 2- 53 - A- - 2- FRUIT HILL ORCHARD, INk6l C Q C.�II O !1 e S FRUIT HILL ORCH RD, INC. PO BOX 2368 (��e %l' PO BOX 2368 WINCHESTER, VA 68 WINCHESTER A 22604-1568 53 - A- - 2- 53 - A- - 2- FRUIT HILL ORCHARD, IN FRUIT HI L RCHARD, INC. PO BOX 2368 PO BOX 23 WINCHESTER, VA 604-1568 WINCHES E VA 22604-1568 53 - A- - 4- 53 - A- -X SMITH, ALSON H. & MAR R TTE SMITH, A. & MARGARETTE 248 W REDOUBT LN 248 W RLN WINCHESTER, VA3-4258 WINCHE22603.425E 53 - A. - 4- SMITH, ALSON H. & MAR R TE 248 W REDOUBT LN WINCHESTER, VA 2 3-4258 53 - A- - 5- SOLENBERGER,CHARLES BLE PO BOX 2368 WINCHESTER, VA 228 53 - A- - 5- SOLENBERGER, CHARLES ROBE T PO BOX 2368 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-1 8 53 A• 4- SMITH, A SO H. & MARGARETTE 248 W RE U T LN WINCHESTE VA 22603-4258 53 SOLE E GER,CHARLESROBERT PO BOX 2 WINCHE TER, A 22604 1568 53 - A- - SOLE ER ER, CHARLES ROBERT PO BOX 23 WINCHEST R, V 22604-1568 53A - 2- A- 5- PEACEMAKER, WAYNE J. 1243 N FREDERICK PIKE WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4213 53A - 2- A- 6- CAMPBELL, BENJAMIN E. 111 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA. 53A - 2- A- 5- PEACEMAKER, WAYNE J. 1243 N FREDERICK PIKE WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4213 53A - 2- A- 6- CAMPBELL, BENJAMIN E. 111 REDWOOD LN 22603-4230 WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4230 53A - 2- A- 7- MCDANIEL, EVELYN J. & LORING 113 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4230 53A - 2- A- 7- MCDANIEL, EVELYN J. & LORING 113 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4230 53 - A- - 6- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER, VA 53 - A- - 6- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER. VA 53 - A- - 7- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER, VA 53 - A- - 7- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER, VA 53A - 2- B- 2- MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603 61 r 22603-42 1 22603.4261 22603-42 1 53 - A- - 6- LU TRELL, MARLENE R 0 MARGARET LN CHESTER, VA 22603.4261 53 6- L 4CE LL, MARLENE R 20GARETLN WIST 22603.4261 53 A. - 7- LUT ILL, MARLENE R 204 M RGA ET LN WINC ESTER, VA 22603-4261 53 - A- 7 LUNREL , MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LIU WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4261 53A - 2- B- 2- MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD 22603.3110 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3110 53A - 2- B- 6-A MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3 0 ` --- 531 2 B 6A OMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHEST-U, VA i 53A - 2- B- Jl- MOOMAW, PRESTON 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603-3110 53A - 2- B- 6-A MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603-3110 53A - 2- B- 6-A klOOMAW, PRESTON,fJR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTW,VA 22603-3110 53A • B- 7- MO AW, PRESTON E JR 1 CEDAR GROVE RD 03-3110 WINCHESTER, VA 53A - 2- B- 7- MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER,VA 226( 110 53A - 2- B- 7- MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603-3110 53A - 2- B- 2-A 53A - 2- B- 2-A JENKINS, JAMES W. JENKINS, JAMES W. 10B REDWOOD LN 108 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.422E WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.422E 53A - 2- B- 3- 53A - 2- B- 3 /' JENKINS, JAMES W. / JENKINS, JAMES W. 108 REDWOOD LN 108 REDWOOD LN CHESTER, VA. 22603 4228 WINCHESTER, U : ' 22603-4228 53A B 3- 2 J INS, JAMES W. JENKINS, JAMES \\� (08 REDWOOD LN 108 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603- B WINCHESTER, VA. 22603 4228 -.._ 53A - 2- B- 3-A 53A - 2- B- 3-A SIMMONS, CHESTER W SIMMONS, CHESTER W 112 REDWOOD LN 112 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.422E WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4228 53A - 2- B- 4- FOGLE, RICHARD HAROLD 117 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4224 53A - 2- B- 4- FOGLE, RICHARD HAROLD 117 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4224 53A - 2- B- 5- SIMMONS, PAUL E SR 112 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 53A - 2- B- 5- SIMMONS, PAUL E SR 112 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4228 22603-4228 ►as't-eR &4 rir SUPLy jNr*a.NA-nO4 September 15, 1997 Planning Commissioners: Please find attached: 1) a copy of the August 19, 1997 minutes for your review and approval; 2) a copy of the minutes from the original Westminster Canterbury request, and; 3) correspondence from residents of Westminster Canterbury. 4 t PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES The Winchester Planning Commission held its regular meeting on Tuesday. August 19, 1997 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Rouss City Hall, 15 North Cameron Street, Winchester, Virginia. PRESENT: Planning Conunissioners: Brown, Chandler, Bayliss, DiBenedetto, DeBergh, Ex Officio & Staff Youmans, Lloyd, Coates, Daley, Griffin Frederick County Liaison: Absent ABSENT: Downing, Cunsolo VISITORS: Ron Mislowsky, Phyliss Baker, John Schroth, Richard Pifer and see attached list Chainnan Bayliss called the meeting to order. The minutes of the July 15, 1997 meeting were unanimously tabled until the next meeting. CORRESPONDENCE A revised agenda included Item 3A Meadow Branch Subdivision which was removed from Public Hearings and placed under Item 5B New Business for preliminary discussion. Because the public hearing letter was not issued to 'the applicant from the City Planning Department in time, the City Attorney advised that they not conduct the public hearing, Item 4A Miller Mitsubishi and item 5A Waffle House, Crown Gas/Convenience and Hirschberg Office were requests for administrative approval. The addendum packet included revised recommendations for SP-97-40; a letter dated August 7, 1997 from John Metcalf requesting to table SP-97-42; updated recommendations for RZ-97-06, minutes from meetings in 1983 and letters from some of the adjacent property owners regarding RZ-97-06: and correspondence dated August 15, 1997 from Mr. Lloyd pertaining to side yards. CITIZEN COMMENTS Tammy Pehowski stated that she had public discussion on the SP-97-42 and pictures.for the Commissioners review. REPORT OF FREDERICK COUNTY LIAISON None PUBLIC HEARINGS SP-97-40 - Request of Greenway Engineering for site plan approval of a 10,980 square foot retail, office and storage building at 2154 Papermill Road (Section 272, Double Circle 1, Lot A) zoned Highway Commercial, B-2 District. The request includes an exception to the driveway spacing standards. /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19. 1997 Page - 2 ACTION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Mr. Youmans reviewed the request to build a multi -tenant building on a vacant parcel opposite of Weems Lane at the intersection of Papermill Road and S. Loudoun Street. It would contain retail and storage space for relocation of Instant Replay Sports in addition to other office and storage space. The development would contain 6,500 square feet of retail space, 3.000 square feet of office space and 1480 square feet of storage as submitted. A total of 44 parking spaces are included. Since the width of the site is such that no location offers at least 175 feet of spacing from existing driveways to the north and south, and since the adjacent property owners are unwilling to share existing or new driveways, the applicant is also asking for an exception to the spacing standards. Mr. Youmans stated that the applicant has fulfilled the requirements to seek in writing shared access (either using an existing driveway or agreeing to close one of the existing curb cuts) from the adjacent property owners. The owner to the north sent a written rejection of shared access. The owner to the south allowed the 30 day response time to expire, effectively refusing shared access. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. opposition or about the request. Chairman Bayliss closed the public hearing. Mr. DeBergh asked about the setback from the center of the road, if the applicant was planning for future widening of the road'? Mr. Youmans stated at the north end of the site, where the need is most critical, he is providing 5 1/2 foot of additional green space, presumably that will disappear when the City and the State widen that intersection. Chairman Bayliss commented that the developer wants to have interparcel connection to the north and south. He has also agreed to offer some of his land for parking, but the adjacent owner is just not willing to have a permanent easement across his property. Chairman Bayliss stated that lie has been on record and remain on record that Weems Lane should be extended over this site to Pleasant Valley Road. Mr. Chandler, seconded by Mr. DiBenedetto, moved to approve SP-97-40 with an exception to the driveway spacing standards to allow one driveway cut aligned with the existing signalized intersection and with the landscape strips along the public street frontage as shown since the future riglit-of-way boundary is unknown in this location subject to the following: (1) continuous curbing along the rear parking area. (2) public sidewalk with any necessary pedestrian easements along the street frontage: (3) developer responsibility for connecting into the existing traffic signal per Public Works Director: and, (4) staff review and approval of the final site plan. The motion passed unanimously. SP-97-41 - Request of Greenway Engineering for site plan approval of a 10.408 square foot retail, office and storage building and change of use from auto sales/service to retail, office and storage at 3031 Valley Avenue (Section 329, Double Circle 2, Lot 1) zoned Highway Commercial, B-2 District. ACTION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Mr. Youmans reviewed the request for approval of a business center consisting of 17,000 square foot of retail, 9.513 square foot of office and 2.000 square foot of storage use. The project entails the adaptive reuse of the 18.105 square foot former auto sales/service facility at the corner of Valley Avenue and Battle Park Drive and constriction of a new 10,408 square foot one-story building along the south side of the 2.7 acre site. A total of 120 parking spaces and 2 loading spaces are proposed. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor, opposition or about the request. /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19. 1997 Page - 3 Chairman Bayliss closed the public hearing. Mr. DeBergh asked if the Commissioners action would be contingent upon Board of Zoning Appeals approval? Mr. Youmans replied yes. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. Brown moved to approve SP-97-41 contingent upon the Board of Zoning Appeals approval and subject to staff review and approval of outstanding site plan issues. The motion passed unanimously. SP-97-42 - Request of John & Sharon Metcalf for site plan approval to convert a single family residence into a two-family residence at 212 N. Kent Street (Section 174, Double Circle 1, Block J. Lot 26) zoned Residential Business, RB-I District. ACTION: PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED AND REQUEST TABLED UNTIL SEPTEMBER MEETING Mr. Youmans reviewed the request to convert a two-story residence at the corner of N. Kent Street and E. Fairfax Lane into a two-family unit. Four off-street parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the site. Mr. Youmans noted correspondence from the applicant to table the request until next month. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. Chairman Bayliss asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in opposition or about the request. Tammy Pehowski, a resident at 351 National Avenuie spoke in reference to the request. Ms. Pehowski presented pictures of the property. She expressed concerns about property maintenance, traffic and parking. Mr. Chandler, seconded by Mr. DiBenedetto moved to continue the public hearing until next month. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. Brown moved to table SP-97-42 until the September meeting. The motion passed unanimously. RZ-97-06 - Request of Greenway Engineering for revision and reapproval of the Westminster -Canterbury Development Plan per Section 13-4-5 of the Zoning Ordinance to amend the contingencies of the original approval as they pertain to building location, height and setback and related provisions to permit an Adult Care Residence addition at 300 Canterbury Drive (Section 131, Double Circle 1, lot 1) zoned Low Density Residential, LR District with Planned Unit Development, PUD overlay. ACTION: TABLED Mr. Youmans reviewed the request to constrict a three-story, 14,863 square foot addition to the west side of the existing continuous care facility which physically straddles the City/County line. The addition will house 48 new units of "assisted living" per the latest plans. However, many existing semi -private nursing home rooms will be converted into private rooms. This results in a net increase of 8 additional rooms ("units") in the City and 8 in the Country. Approximately 40% of the new addition is situated within the City limits and the structure would come as close as 110 feet of an existing residential lot along the east side of Old Fort Road in the City. Mr. Youmans stated that the request requires a revision to the PUD zoning approved in 1983 because it proposes development contrary to the contingencies approved by City Council as part of the ordinance adopting the PUD /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19. 1997 Page - 4 rezoning. These contingencies require that development of Westminster -Canterbury follow the approved Development Plan with respect to Building Height, Location and Buffering among other factors. Mr. Youmans noted correspondence dated August 15. 1997 from Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Lloyd. August 17. 1997 from Mr. & Mrs. Robert Vakiener and August 18, 1997 from Issac A. Keith IV, pertaining to the request. Mr. Youmans gave an overview of the original 1983 rezoning and noted copies of the minutes from City Council at that time. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. Chairman Bayliss asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request. Mark Smith of Greenway Engineering spoke in reference to the request. Mr. Smith stated that he has walked the property several times and talked with a few of the neighbors about the proposal. He noted that Terry Stone, Architect of Design Concept was present to explain the operations Terry Stone, Project Architect spoke in reference to the request explaining the operations from the displayed exhibits. Mr. Stone stated that the addition is three -stories and the reasoning for that is to keep the footprint smaller and to keep quarters shorter. Mr. Smith gave a brief overview of the buffer issue (shown from the exhibit). Chairman Bayliss asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in opposition. Tom Lloyd, a resident of 613 Old Fort Road spoke in opposition. Mr. Lloyd expressed concerns about: (1) the height of the building: (2) screening; (3) property values Mr. Lloyd stated that he and his wife sent a letter to Mr. Bayliss and the members of the Planning Commission expressing their concerns. He ask that the Commission take into consideration and make part of the record the contents of his letter and also correspondence received from two other property owners. Tom Anthon, a resident of 610 Old Fort Road spoke in opposition expressing concerns about inadequate buffer zone. Jan Rogers, a resident of 536 Marion Street spoke in opposition expressing concerns about lighting, noise and traffic. Hans VonPayr, a resident of 540 Marion Street spoke in opposition. Mr. Payr expressed concerns about lighting, noise and traffic. Nancy Campbell asked if the access road would come onto Redwood Lane'? Chairman Bayliss replied no, they are not proposing any development that far north or northeast on the property. Russell O. Hiett, a County resident expressed concern about the �%ater. Chairman Bayliss suggested that lie check with the Frederick County Planning Commission because there has been some grading and site plan changes. Diane Sinclair, a resident of 1213 Caroline Street spoke in reference to the request. Ms. Sinclair expressed concerns about the noise and how the proposal might dramatica I IN. affect the property values in that area. Chairman Bayliss closed the public hearing. /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19. 1997 Page - 5 Mr. Brown asked Mr. Stone if they had considered moving more eastward? Mr. Stone replied yes, and explained from the exhibit. Chairman Bayliss noted the approved motion from the minutes of the May 24. 1983 Planning Commission meeting. He specifically highlighted some of the reasons for approval (1) even though this project would result in an increase population density, it is well planned to provide visual continuity with the area and to protect property values in the area, and; (3) this project will not be associated with any additional expansion in this area once approved. Chairman Bayliss stated they should be very sensitive to the original agreement and the concerns of the neighbors. Mr. Chandler commented that he lived in that neighborhood and he believes that Westminster Canterbury should live up to the promises made. Mr. Brown stated that he was not convinced that they exhausted all alternatives Mr. DiBenedetto stated that he understood that Westminster Canterbury needs have changed, but what has not been addressed by the residents is what has changed as far as neighborhoods. Has the neighborhoods' need for a buffer changed since 1983?.... The answer to that is no. He added kitchens, apartments and buildings could be moved and replaced a lot easier than trees and that they should seek other alternatives. Mr. DeBergh asked what setbacks are required for other neighborhoods if this was an office building? Mr. Youmans answered assuming the land is already zoned it would be 50 feet on the rear. Mr. DeBergh commented that the whole idea of a PUD is that you can do what you want as long as you get approval and that the existing setbacks and requirements can be waived with the PUD as long as you get approval. I am a firm believer that in 1983 we said 250 feet was what we needed, but at the same time the building is in the middle of the City and development has taken place slowly. He believe that it is ludicrous that people living in the City would think that they are going to be protected from the sounds, sites and activities of living in the City. He stated he would like to see the Commission somehow protect the Old Fort neighborhood and not prohibit and inhibit Westminster Canterbury from trying to expand. Chairman Bayliss stated he would welcome a motion to table and not deny at this point. He stated that it would not be an official public hearing, but any new designs or changes would be open for discussion and the residents will have the opportunity to review and comment on them Mr. Daley asked if the public would be notified? Chairman Bayliss notified the public at the meeting stating that if the request is tabled, the next scheduled meeting would be the third Tuesday of September, but they would not receive another public notice. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. DeBergh moved to table the request until the September meeting. Mr. DeBergh asked if they were willing to come back to the Commission in 30 days or go to City Council and be voted on? Mr. Stone answered he would appreciate the request being tabled rather than denied, but would like more specific guidance. He asked which pieces are most objectionable? Mr. Stone stated that the road has always been the worst to mitigate, he strongly feels that the building location is not overly detrimental. He stated that he was not sure if the building was detrimental because of its height or location, but he would be willing to discuss and shift accordingly. Mr. Stone stated that he was surprised to hear from the majority of the Commission that they will not allow adding to the side of the building, will not allow changes to any asphalt, etc. Mr. Youmans, in response to Mr: Stone's comments asked if there was any feedback for them regarding the height of a stricture versus the location of a structure , the structure versus the roadway. the roadway as a service drive versus the roadway as an emergency access. He asked for guidance as .to what's the most critical issue. Chairman Bayliss stated from what he has heard, certainly setbacks are important, maintaining the tall trees both pines and deciduous that the present building footprint would do away with. He stated that the pictures that were /09/ l 5/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19, 1997 Page - 6 shown, if you build as proposed, most of that screening will go away and then you will have to build some berms and try to grow it up over time and it is just too close. The motion passed on a vote of 4-1 with Mr. Brown voting in opposition. RZ-97-07 - An Ordinance to amend the Winchester Zoning Map to rezone portions of 3013 Saratoga Drive and 617 Kernstown Court (formerly Springdale Court) from Medium Density Residential, MR District to Low Density Residential, LR District and to rezone portions of 3017. 3018. 3021, 3022 and 3025 Saratoga Drive from Low Density Residential, LR District to Medium Density Residential, MR District (Section 329, Double Circle 4, Block A. Lots 7, 8, 9: 17. 18. 68 and 73) The rezoning eliminates multiple zoning designations for lots platted slightly incongruous with existing zoning district boundaries. The Comprehensive Plan calls for low density residential use. ACTION: FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL Mr. Youmans reviewed the request stating that it is of a "housekeeping" nature in that it cleans up inconsistencies between the Council adopted zoning boundaries for LR and MR zoned land which subsequently became platted lots in the Battle Park Estates Subdivision. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor, opposition or about the request. Chairman Bayliss closed the public hearing. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. Chandler moved to forward the request to City Council recommending approval because it represents good planning practice and is consistent with the intent of the previous rezoning and subdivision approval. The motion passed unanimously. TA-97-09 - An Ordinance amending the Winchester Zoning Ordinance to provide for health, fitness, and martial arts studios. ACTION: FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow physical fitness and martial arts businesses in the Residential Business, RB-1, Highway Commercial, B-2, Central, B-1 and Commercial Industrial, CM-1 Districts. Chairman Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor, opposition or about the request. Chairman Bayliss closed the public hearing. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. Brown moved to forward the amendment to City Council recommending approval because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and represents good planing practice. The motion passed unanimously. TA-97-10 - An Ordinance amending the Winchester Zoning Ordinance to provide for temporary storage units as currently provided for temporary office and sales units and to adjust the fee structure for such units. ACTION: FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19. 1997 Page - 7 Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request stating that the request is a privately sponsored amendment to provide for temporary permits for storage trailers. Mr. Llov_ d noted that Chuck Richards, Manager of Wal-Mart was present, but had to leave the meeting because of another engagement. If the Commission had any questions that Mr. Lloyd could not answer, Mr. Richards asked that they table the request until the September meeting. Chainnan Bayliss opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. opposition, or about the request. Chainnan Bayliss closed the public hearing. Mr. DiBenedetto asked if there were any permit fees less than $10.00. $7.50 or $5.00? Mr. Lloyd replied no. Mr. Daley noted correspondence dated July 8, 1997. Mr. DiBenedetto, seconded by Mr. Chandler moved to forward the amendment to City Council recommending approval because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and represents good plamiing practice and that 23-8-10 shall continue to read $25.00 per unit. The motion passed on a vote of 4-1 with Mr. DeBergh voting in opposition. Mr. DeBergh commented that the Commission should consider tabling because Mr. Richards might want to withdraw his request Mr. Youmans reminded the Commissioners that this tent amendment would go to City Council and Mr. Richards will have a chance to speak at that time. OLD BUSINESS A. Miller Mitsubishi SP-97-31 The Conmiissioners reviewed the request which now calls for removal of pavement along the north side of the building and authorized it for administrative approval. NEW BUSINESS A. Administrative Approvals: Waffle House Restaurant 1803 S. Pleasant Valley Road SP-97-38 Crown Gas/Convenience 1873 Valley Avenue SP-97-43 Hirschberg Office Amherst Street The Commissioners reviewed the above site plans and authorized them for administrative approval. B. SD-97-01. - Request of Abrams Creek Development Associates for preliminary subdivision approval of an 89 lot subdivision known as Meadow Branch South. Phase I -Single Family at 1950 and 1951 Harvest Drive (Section 230, Double Circle 4, Lots 4 and 7) zoned High Density . Residential, HR with Planned Unit Development, PUD overlay. /09/ 15/97 Planning Commission Minutes - August 19, 1997 Page - 8 Mr. Youmans noted that this was a discussion item , not a public hearing. Mr. Youmans reviewed the request for preliminary subdivision approval by the Commission for a major subdivision containing the following: 85 single-family lots ranging in size from approximately 6,000 square foot to 12,000 square foot, two open space parcels (one approximately 1 1._500 square foot and one over 27,600 square foot) one 10.8 acre lot designated for up to 180 future apartment units. and, one large remaining parcel ("Lot 5C") of unspecified acreage comprising the fixture single-family area behind the lots proposed along the western frontage of Harvest Drive. The acreage's and number of lots could change depending upon Commission and Council actions. Ron Mislowsky spoke in reference to the request stating there were two critical issues (1)access to Virginia Apple Storage. and, (2) setbacks. Chairnian Bayliss asked why the need for a 10 foot setback'? Mr. Mislowsky stated that it provides flexibility to the building. With no further business to discuss, the meeting was adioumcd. /09/ 15/97 v('o CU m . S ch azyv, . J dun. iw5 Planning Commission W05T/"1IA)S7_5P_- Minutes % ril 20, 19 t-fE�4i���tJ� Page 4 wires i= F[7E i�eiC� eO, Chairman Brumback turned the meeting back over to City Planning Commission Chairman Casey. The Commission discussed this request at length. Mr. Nester said that the Planning Commission could recommend to City Council that the request be approved as proposed, recommend to City Council that the request be denied, or table the rezoning and instruct the applicant to make changes to the development plan, and vote on a recommendation at a later meeting. Mr. Crawford stated that they could determine the feasibility of changing build- ing locations within 30 days. Mr. Crawford said he felt it would be possi- bility to move the project 50 feet to the east it. may be Possible to move it 75 feet to t_he eas t bL_ �t that moving it 100 feet to the east would be questionable. Mrs. Speakman moved to recommend to City Council that the project be approved, contingent upon it being moved at least 50 feet to the east. The motion was discussed, no second was made, and the motion was withdrawn by Mrs. Speakman. On motion by Mrs. Speakman, seconded by Dr. Laidlaw, action on this request was tabled_, and it was recommended that'the applicant inve3tigate moving this ,project as far east as possible, and that this be resubmitted to the Planning Commission at its May 24, 1983 meeting. With no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submi ted, sfd Reed T. Nester, Secretary City Planning Commission ,2z-9-7'D(, Planning Commission "May 24, 1983> A)7-6 Minutes , Page 2 Mr. George Romine, President of Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester, intro- duced the architect for the project, Ronald Crawford, to review the changes that had been made. Mr. Crawford stated that he had addressed four.basic concerns: The added traffic to Old Fort Road; concern about the preservation of the current "undeveloped" look of the land in question; increasing the distances of thg project from the existing residential area; and a concern over the height of the buildings. Mr. Craw ord stated that the cul-de-sac at t e en of Old Fort Road was not intended to be an access into the pro- ject, and that a gate would be erected and locked, with keys held by emergency services personnel. He said the health building had been moved from 195 feet away from the existing residential area to 5 feet away, and that the 5-story buildings had been moved from 250 feet away to 370-feet away. He went on to say that the bui dings had been placed so than the-tailest buildings are at the lowest elevation on the site, and that no buildings will be more than 1-story above the street level of Old Fort Road. Mr. Crawford said that the existing wooded areas will be reserved intact as much as possible, and that the neighborhood will be very unaware of the existence of this 2roject. He went on to say that he a tried to keep the living and parking areas for the residence on the side opposite from the neighbors. r. raw or also showed the Commission photos of other TWestminster Canterbury projects. On a question by Mrs. Speakman, Mr. Crawford said that the parking demand generated by this project would be much lower than any other type of resi- dential development. Mr. Nester reviewed changes that might be necessary in the final_&i.te`nlan stage, and stated that the cover letter with the re- vised plans said that the building locations could vary 15 to 20 feet. Mr. Nester advised the Commission that changes —such as t is would be consi- dered minor changes and could be approved by the Commission in the final site plan stage. Dr. Laidlaw reiterated concerns ofthe Commission which he said were visual impact, possible expansion of the project, the topo- graphy, and its effect on property values. Responding to -Dr. Laidlaw's question about property values, Gardner Van Scoyoc reviewed the Richmond Westminster/Canterbury project. He said that he had talked to the City Assessor for the northside in Richmond, and that the assessor said he noted no increase or decrease in property values attributable to the project. Mr. Van Scoyoc said that .the project in this area was an 8-story building and that there.were 384 units, and a 133-bed health care facility. Robert L. Rouse, also a consultant to Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester, reviewed the Lynchburg project. He said that he had called the past president of the Board of Realtors in Lynchburg and that she said there was no negative assess- ment because of the project, although she could not determine if there was any positive increase in value because of the project. He went on to say that'the City Assessor confirmed that there was no negative assessment on surrounding properties because of this project. Chairman Casey stated that he felt the petition and letters submitted ade- quately represented the feelings of the residents in the area, but asked' for a show of hands of those opposed to and in favor of this proposal. Mr. Nester stated that he counted approximately 55 persons opposed to this project, and approximately 24 persons in favor of the project. Planning Commission May 24, 1983 Minutes Page 3 There was extensive discussion of this request by the Commission. On ques- tion by Mrs. Burkholder, Mr. Nester stated that their was. no way the Commis- sion could, at this time, preclude any future high density zoning in the area. Mr. Nester stated that a request fora zoning change could be sub.- mitted to the Commission at any time, whether or not this request was ap- proved, and that each.request would have to be evaluated on its merits by Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Nester said the City could not legally approve this request and say that it would not approve any other zoning changes, in the area. On question by Mrs. Burkholder; Mr. Nester compared this proposal with potential development as single-family resi- dential. On question by Dr. Laidlaw, Mr. Nester stated that if the project area was developed as single-family residential there would probably be con- nections to existing streets in the adjoining subdivision, such as Old Fort Road or Caroline Street. On question'by Mr. Duane, Mr. Nester stated that there is an abundance of vacant land in the City zoned RS-1 Single -Family requiring 10,000 square foot lots, but that there is for practical purposes almost no land left in the*most dense single-family catagory, R�,-3, which requires 6,000 square foot lots. Mr. Duane observed that he felt that this would mean that the .pressure would be on the'Planning Commission to make low cost housing facilities available in the City,.because we are running out of suitably =ned land. Mr. Duane expressed concern about the possibility of this zoning change setting a precedent for other zoning changes in this area. Mr. Nester reviewed the alternative actions that could be taken by the Com- mission on this request. On motion by Dr. Laidlaw, seconded by Mr. Shokes, the Commission recommended to,City Council, by a vote of five in favor with Mr. Duane and Mr. Scheder votin in opposition, that Rezon ng case with the modifications of thQ_iuout_presented today by the applicant, be approved for the following reasons: - — 1. 'Even though this project would result in an increase popula- tion density, it is well planned to provide visual continuity with the area and toprotectproperty values in the area; 2. It appears that this project will impede future traffic flow through the area rather than enhance traffic flow;; 3. This project will not be associated with an additional ex--- pansion in is area once approved: and 4. We should not isolate a segment of our population from the rest of us as they grow older and perhaps a little less physi- cally attractive, and hide them and their needs from the'rest of the community. 61 TX 6Ov1110e, v i �.S 9— /— 03 .:••� h�tister, England and their local contemporaries, adding that the home team was at the time he departed. The English visitors are renewing friendships ,gun earlier this year when a group of City high school students traveled to our City. accordance with Mrs. Burkholder's suggestion, the agenda was again suspended .,low an immediate vote on Case #83-04 - the request of WESTMINSTER/CANTERBURY/ ,••.,.iESTER to amend the Zoning Ordinance text and Zoning Map to permit construc- of a life care facility east of Old Fort Road at the City Line. ;rsuant to a motion unanimously adopted July 14, 1983 following Council Public .earing on the Westminster/Canterbury request, the opinion of experienced outside _,.,.;sel as to whether or not approval of this case would constitute spot zoning �3 set a precedent for further rezonings had been obtained, with copies forwarded aach Councilor. ;,7RIANCE COMMITTEE conjunction with the Westminster/Canterbury request, Chairman Minor presented following ordinances on third reading, by title: (A) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA. (B) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 13, "PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS" SECTIONS 13-1-3 AND 13-1-5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA. Minor then moved for adoption of these ordinances for the following reasons: 1. This project would provide housing to accommodate the increasing age of the population, as pointed out in the 1982 Comprehensive Plan. y. The main entrance to the site would be from Route 522, with the en- trance from Old Fort Road only being used by emergency vehicles, and therefore the traffic generated would not adversely affect the single- family areas in the City. 3. It appears that this project will impede future traffic flow through the area, rather than enhance traffic flow. 4. The proposed buildings would be set back and screened from adjacent residential areas. 5. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the use of the Planned Unit Develop- ment concept. 1,. Fifty percent of the project area in the City would be utilized as open space. %. Even though this project would result in an increased population density, it is well planned to provide visual continuity with the area and to protect property values in the area. The proposed density of 14 units per acre is justified because of the amount of open space provided; the clustering of the residential buildings away from the adjacent subdivision, and because the antici- pated population density of 1.25 persons per dwelling unit is signif- icantly lower than the City average of 2.4 persons per unit. ited 3• This project will not be assocawi t-h a S -�a ditiQ xflans� on in this area once a proved. �3• We should not isolate a segment of our population from the rest of us as they grow older and perhaps a little less physicall attractive, and hide them and their needs from the rest of the community. r_zll:ilor Johnson advised that, as he is a member of the Westminster/Canterbury yarn, he had neither participated in related discussion nor would vote on this a�a• Im PI RECEIVED SEP 0 9 i997 Hugh R ✓we s I11 COUVrDrlm, Winx/iesten 10 22603-4209 540-665-5747 hbjones�visua//ink, com September05,1997 Mr Harry S. Smith, President Winchester City Council 106 N.Washington Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Shenandoah Vallev Westminstet-Canterbury Application for wilding Additions Dear Mr. Smith, I am a resident of Shenandoah Vallev Westminster-Canterbun; (SV -%&'C retirement community residing in a cottage located on the Frederick County portion of the facility property. 1 am, of course, quite interested in the future of this community and its ability to provide and improve upon benefits consistent with its mission. As is well known, a major objective of the referenced proposed changes is to provide private room facilities in the Health Care portion of SVW(-, This is an objective which has overwhelming approval of the current residents of SVWC, Many of these residents are also residents of the City of Winchester while many are re-,ents of the county. The availability of private rooms at SVWC is a matter which has become progressively more important as experience has been gained in caring for bed patients. Winchester Medical Center is an excellant example of the effectiveness of the availability of private rooms in medical facilities. The need for such moms becomes especially important for long-term use in facilities such as SVWC. The desire and need for improvement of services for any organization is a natural result of the unceasing societal demand for progress and the need to meet competitive pressures. This is unquestionably true regarding the ability of SVWC to keep in step with the rapidly advancing state-of-the-art of caring for the elderly. SVWC has become a highly respected organization within the Winchester community. It would be in the best interests of this community as a whole to encourage continued development of this respect through effective utilization of improved facilities, Winchester should be second to none in the excellance of facilities available for accomodation of the Senior Citizen. It is my recommendation that the SVWC application be allowed to go forward, unless absolutely compelling reasons to the contrary can be shown. Should such reasons exist, negotiation and mediation should be employed rather than denial of the request. Thank you for your attention. 'Very truly yours, 1 B Hu$� ones cc R.Wiliam Bayless, III, Chm., Winchester Planning Commission D Michael Peasley, President/CEO/ Administrator, SVAC RECEIVED S E P 0 9 1997 September 5, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: I was surprised and disappointed when I learned that so many citizens are objecting to the proposed Assisted Living building project at Westminster - Canterbury. Since both sides should be heard in such discussions, please bear with me in explaining why I feel we need this building. My sister, who has Alzheimer's, is living in a recently built assisted living addition to Sunnyside Retirement Community in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Before being moved from her private room to this level of living, her days were passed in sitting in her room, going to meals and then to bed. Now her days revolve around recreational activities with others who have cognitive impairment; no memory of things experienced minutes ago. These residents have trained special attendants who are with them twenty-four hours a day. It is amazing to see the change. They are now engaged in social contacts with others and seem happier and contented. There are residents at Westminster - Canterbury who need this special attention. The above is only one component of the whole need for a new addition. SVWC is an asset to the community in many ways. It provides employment, purchasing goods and services, etc. I was a Winchester resident before moving into Westminster -Canterbury and still pay city taxes on property owned by me. The above hasn't addressed the issue of being a problem to our neighbors. With more planning, I believe that some solutions can be found to make this building unobjectionable to them. Sincerely, (Mrs. L.B.) Lelia Sirbaugh RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 4, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: As a five year resident of Westminster Canterbury and a registered voter in the City of Winchester, I strongly urge your favorable consideration of Westminster Canterbury's proposal. The unique "continuing care" offered by this facility is in great demand as witnessed by a long waiting list. The Westminster -Canterbury proposal provides for a limited expansion and some upgrading of care facilities. Having spent six weeks in the care unit during the summer of 1996, I can attest to the need for private rooms. As a former house owner, I am aware of area resident's concern about maintaining property value. The Westminster -Canterbury plans go to some length to meet their concerns about increased expansion toward their property with things that they may consider nuisance factors. All things considered, I believe that approval of the Westminster Canterbury proposal will enhance the "quality of life" here without any negative affect on other area residents. Sincerely, Riner C. Payne Apt. 108 300 Westminster Canterbury Dr. Winchester, VA 22603 0 September 4, 1997 Mr. R. William Bayliss, Planning Commission C/o Wheat First Butcher P. O. Box 18 Winchester, Va. 22604 Dear Bill, III, Chairman Singer RECEIVED 3 L.r- D 0 q 14q7 On your agenda for September is the request of Westminster Canterbury to add to the Health Wing of their facility. We are aware of the opposition that has been raised against the approval of this request. However, I would like to present the need from the propective of the 48 residents of the City who reside in the apartments and are tax payers to the City. The concept of life care communities is growing throughout the nation and is now coming to Winchester more each day. The growing number of senior citizens requires this sort of solution. Such a community provides care throughout the final years of these citizens including normal independent living, a period when they need some assistance and the stage where skilled care is required. This request for additional space is not to attract additional residents, but rather to provide private, single occupancy for those in Health Care. Many of the residents of Westminster Canterbury have served the City well in the past in the field of education, the Handley Library and in youth and senior activities. There are those that still offer volunteer service throughout the area. We would appreciate your considering our needs as well as'those of the opposition and help all parties come to a mutually agreeable solution. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Marvin E. Gore, Jr. 300 Westminster Canterbury Dr. #109 Winchester, Va. 22603 RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 5, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III Chairman, Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 RE: Westminster -Canterbury Assisted Living Building Project Dear Mr. Bayliss: As a resident of Westminster -Canterbury since its opening in January, 1987, we wish to express our support for the projected Assisted Living building addition. It seems to us imperative that any social project keep abreast of all changes in its area of concentration. For example, in the first ten years, much progress has been made in the care and treatment of Alzheimer patients. More and more elderly persons are being stricken with this tragic affliction, and require specialized care. Such treatment cannot be provided efficiently if the patients must be co -mingled with victims of other diseases - as is the case where there are not enough private rooms to handle the requirement. This fact was recognized, for instance, when Winchester Medical Center was built. Its plans included private rooms for all patients. Westminster -Canterbury, unfortunately, did not then have the financial resources to do that, but is now in a position to make a substantial step forward along those lines. It must take that step if it is to remain competitive with other similar facilities. Westminster -Canterbury has been, we sincerely believe, a good citizen of this community over the past ten years. For example, it has made its facilities available to many charitable and business groups; it has provided employment to several hundred employees; it has purchased thousands of dollars worth of goods and services from other businesses in the city. In order to continue its activities, it needs your help — help that will benefit not only ourselves, but all residents of the community who may some day find themselves in need of the service we render, and do that in the best possible way. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, Mr. William E. Je r Mrs. Lois M. Jetter Mr.R. William Bayliss, Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher P.O. Box 13 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: III, Chairman Singer RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 Winchester, VA 22603 September 3, 1997 Mrs. Hubert and I, residents of Shenandoah Valley Westminster Canterbury (SVWC), are writing in support of the proposed addition to the Assisted Care wing of SVWC. The need for a facility such as ours should be obvious to everyone- - a need that increases as our population ages. The outstanding range of services provided by SVWC is unmatched in our area now and in the foreseeable future. It is now time for SVWC to expand in order to help provide the increasing demand. SVWC is an asset to Winchester and surrounding area. It provides employment, it brings people into local businesses, and it makes a direct.payment to the city and to the county, in lieu of taxes. Those who object to the building plans appear to fear an increase of noise and light from the new roadway. It is not feasible to make any drastic change to the proposed building itself, for it must be an extension the heath care wing. And a roadway must run on the western side of the building for emergency services. But it appears that the proposed berm, planting, and shielded street lights will solve the noise and light problems. Routing all traffic onto the roadway east of SVWC isn't practical. Safety considerations alone rule that out. There are many intersections with the'road on that side of the building. On balance it would appear that the enhanced value of an expanded SVWC to the community greatly outweighs the not -so -reasonable objections. After a decade the need for an expanded SVWC has arrived. I urge you and the Commissioners to approve the amended plans. Yours truly �D ter F. �btt oroth G. RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 4, 1997 Mr. William Bayliss, Chairman Planning. Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Bill: Lynn and I have been residents of Winchester for close to forty years, living the last three here at Westminster -Canterbury. We have enjoyed living in Winchester and especially the last three years in Westminster -Canterbury where we have met some very interesting people who have a lot to offer to the Winchester community. We both feel that the complex of Westminster -Canterbury has a lot to offer to the city. We cannot understand how a handful of people living adjacent to Westminster -Canterbury can object to the addition being planned. It is not an expansion of the Independence Living complex but is an addition to the Health Care complex. The addition will not increase the population of Westminster - Canterbury, but will add additional facilities to the Health Care section, an area where we will all end up at some future date. We do not feel that our facility has in any way decreased the value of our neighbors,'but has in fact enhanced the area. Your assistance in getting the approval of our plans will be very 4, much appreciated. Sincerely, Lynn and Fred Young RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 4, 1997 Mr. R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: I am not sure you will remember me, but I remember you and your lovely wife Pam very well. My wife Hester and I had the pleasure of your company several times for dinner at the Takes Inn, along with the Robertson family. Those were wonderful times and I hope to see you there again soon. During one of those get-togethers, we had an interesting chat about Westminster Canterbury. Your positive attitude towards this great facility helped persuade me to become a resident. Hester and I have resided here for nearly two years now. We are very happy with SVWC and feel Winchester is fortunate to have such a facility. Our children have been relieved of the responsibility of making arrangements for us as we become less able to take care of ourselves. I am writing to solicit your support for our proposed expansion of our health wing. The proposal would bring us into a more favorable competitive position with other planned and existing facilities. The thought that I can personally look forward to a private room in the Health Care wing when I need it is very comforting. Thank you for any support you can give us and thank you for helping direct my thoughts towards Westminster Canterbury as a place to retire for it is wonderful here. The residents are very supportive of each other and the staff are extremely cordial and courteous. I talked to Irma Robertson this morning and she informed me that Vicki is organizing dinner at Tokes Inn. Hope we can all get together there. They are nice folks. Sincerely, Willy Sullivan P.S. While the Robertson's call me Willy, I am known as Larry here at Westminster Canterbury. c: Harry S. Smith, President Winchester City Council RECEIVED Oro 0 q M7 Mr. R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer P. O. Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: Shenandoah Valley Westminster Canterbury 107 Cottage Drive Winchester, Virginia 22603 September 3, 1997 During our five years of residency, Mrs. Butler and I have come to appreciate the unique opportunities that Westminster -Canterbury provides not only to those who live here but to the larger community as well. We hope that the City Council will be mindful of these contributions when considering our Administration's request for permission to build an Assisted Living apart- ment addition to our facility. Westminster -Canterbury is an open life -care community -- no gates, no fence. Our neighbors are free to walk the grounds, with or without baby carriages and strollers. We were struck by this friendly, good -neighborly policy, in contrast to those life=care facilities that are enclaves sealed off from the adjoining areas. The city bus system has a route through our grounds. Outside organi- zations avail themselves of our meeting rooms. There are ongoing ties here with a number of churches and schools in the city. Visitors are made to feel welcome when they call on friends and relatives in the Assisted Living building or just to look around. Our neighbors on Old Fort Road enjoy using our meadow for their annual Fourth of July outings. These relationships have created a connectedness between Westminster -Canterbury and numerous individuals and organizations that, we feel, has made Westminster -Canterbury a model of which the City of Winchester, itself a model, can be proud. The need for additional Assisted Living space, both for aging present residents and for outside applicants, is pressing. With private rooms exclusively at the Winchester Medical Center, the norm for accomodations at new health-care centers is following that pattern. The proposed acgition to our present Assisted Living apartment building would incorporate this concession to privacy for those requiring assistance in their daily life. The residents of Westminster -Canterbury who are still in the status of Independent Living have expressed overwhelming support for this concept as they consider their own future needs. Mrs. Butler and I thank you for giving due weight to these and other factors that will help to strengthen Westminster -Canterbury's role in the life of the City of Winchester. Respectfully, 4� B_ �yr-� Scot and Joan Butler A //�� RECEIVED SEP 0 9 M7 'AlEs. ClAn nn ' va mEn CJ \ QiCE 4011 4anAzy c14VEnuF �7,�/ l�"V inc&eiftt, Thginia 22601 -4�- -f- GL'�•'GGGG�e'iLC, Fid / �u �.t �Ji� t LC �/ 2�c� -�G/� RECEIVED Srp p 9 1997 ROGERS MURRAY FRED, JR. 300 WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY DRIVE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22603 September 4, 1997 Mr. R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer P. O. Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: I have been a resident of both the City of Winchester and Westminster -Canterbury for over six years. Westminster -Canterbury provides a continuum of care for its residents, from independent living to nursing home services and.is one of the primary reasons I moved here. There is a great need for Assisted Living at Westminster -Canterbury. Assisted living provides dignity and privacy for those people needing assistance with the activities of daily living. It also provides a way for residents to maintain independence even if they require some assistance. Private rooms are also a great concern to us residents. When we are needing increasing assistance, we do not want to have to share these moments with a roommate. So an important part of this project is the upgrade to all -private rooms, which we consider a necessity. The only logical location for Westminster -Canterbury's assisted living building is next to the existing health center. This provides the opportunity to share resources and staffing and provides the continuity of care necessary to maintain quality health care. The service road location on the west -side of the property is likewise essential. The eastern loop road has seven intersections that create grave safety concerns for our residents. Residential parking is also located on the eastern loop road which causes additional safety concerns when residents are coming and going. Westminster -Canterbury's has been a great asset to the community. Westminster - Canterbury contributes to City's tax base by making payments in lieu of real estate taxes; they employ 130+ full-time individuals and many high school children. They purchase goods and services from the community. The residents are active members of the community and contribute by their involvement in local schools and churches, Shenandoah University Handley Regional Library, Winchester Medical Center, and Blue Ridge Hospice, etc. In summary, I request that you support Westminster -Canterbury's request to build 'the Assisted Living addition on its property as proposed. Sincerely, AW_4� "`�'� Mr. Rogers Fred, Jr. R�CSVED S-? 0 9 t 97 September 4, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer P. O. Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: My wife and I have been residents of Westminster -Canterbury and the City of Winchester for over six years. We moved to Westminster -Canterbury because of its ability to provide a full spectrum of services, from Independent Living to Assisted Living and Nursing Home Care. We believe strongly that Westminster -Canterbury's has been an asset to the community by its contribution to the tax base for payments in lieu of real estate taxes; employment of 130+ full-time individuals; and the purchase of goods and services from the community. In addition,, Westminster -Canterbury's Fellowship Fund (largely supported by existing residents) has provided over $170,000 in financial assistance to individuals who would otherwise be unable to afford to live at here. Also it is important to note that we residents remain active, contributing members of the community by our civic involvement in local churches, Handley Regional Library, Winchester Medical Center, Blue Ridge Hospice, Shenandoah University, Shenandoah Area Agency on Aging to name few. The need for the assisted living at Westminster -Canterbury is three -fold. One, we need to provide assisted living in a social, apartment -like setting, rather than the medical model we are currently using, This will promote the resident's independence as well as protect their dignity. Secondly, in order for Westminster -Canterbury to remain a viable business enterprise, it must keep pace with the competition and they are providing apartment style assisted living. Finally, we must upgrade to all -private rooms, much as Winchester Medical Center did in the late 1980's. The building needs to be situated on the west side of the property adjacent to the nursing home to provide the necessary access to nursing staff, therapy and other services. Please support Westminster -Canterbury's proposal to build the Assisted Living addition. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer, Mr. and Mrs. Rogers Fred, Sr. RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 4, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer P. O. Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: I am a resident of Westminster Canterbury and fully support the very much needed Assisted Living apartment building addition. Therefore, I am writing to request your approval of this project. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lucy Gaunt RECEIVE SEP 0 9 1,997 Charles H. Coffin September 5, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: In the past ten years, there have been major changes in the design, construction, and care required for the care of the 160 residents of Westminster Canterbury. The average age of these 160 residents grows steadily older and each year a high percentage have cancer or Alzheimers. As a result, we 160 residents urgently need the expanded health facility which has been proposed. As is the case with Winchester Medical Center - where every room is a private room - so does Westminster Canterbury need private rooms, and in order to provide efficient care the new building needs to be located next to the existing nursing home. We also believe that the new building, which meets the urgent needs of 160 residents will have very little or no affect on the five or six property owners on Old v V ort Road. Sincerely,,. Charles A. Coffin Box 108 • Cottage Drive • Westminster Canterbury • Winchester, Virginia 22603 703 • 665-5727 RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 f September 5, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III Chairman, Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: On behalf of Mrs. Sutton and myself, I am writing this letter with the hope that the Planning Commission will approve the extension of our health care facilities as presented. We moved to Westminster -Canterbury in December 1992 from New York's mid -Hudson River valley. We looked at a number of communities such as this from Western Massachusetts to Chapel Hill, NC and states in between. It was the best we encountered. We liked it for a number of reasons. Not only is it a caring community, well run, clean, architecturally attractive with thoughtful and attentive staff but also we were impressed by the City of Winchester, its businesses, its houses and friendly people. It is our understanding that the new road, west of the proposed Assisted Living addition, is causing concern. With a high berm, attractively landscaped and good-sized conifers and deciduous trees well placed, we are sure obtusive noise would be held to a minimum and traffic well hidden. A road on the eastern side of the apartment .complex would be a safety hazard to elderly residents. It would be dangerous. We know that you will give just and sober thought to the proposed extension. We need it and urge your approval. c: Harry S. Smith, President Winchester City Council Sincerely, Allard Sutton RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 September 5, 1997 R. William Bayliss, III Chairman, Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: As a "Life Care Retirement Community", Shenandoah Valley Westminster - Canterbury is a unique asset to Winchester and the surrounding area; however, after a decade of success, if SVWC is to maintain its high standards and remain competitive, planned change is essential. We, who as four-year "independent living" residents of SVWC, already support Friends of Handley Library, Winchester -Frederick County Historical Society, Belle Grove, and United Way, wish to state our support for the SVWC expansion plans which are to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. We urge both bodies to give their support. By so doing, the Commission and Council will enable SVWC to provide care for more "assisted living" residents and will increase the number of private rooms in the nursing home section. For the effect of the plans to be realized, the planned -for integrity of the new building must be preserved, including the service road on its west side. Sincerely, �j Edwin A. Cubby O' Claridele R. Cubby RECEIVED S E P 0 9 1997 September 4, 1997 Mr. R. William Bayliss, III, Chairman Planning Commission c/o Wheat First Butcher Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: I am not sure you will remember me, but I remember you and your lovely wife Pam very well. My wife Hester and I had the pleasure of your company several times for dinner at the Takes Inn, along with the Robertson family. Those were wonderful times and I hope to see you there again soon. During one of those get-togethers, we had an interesting chat about Westminster Canterbury. Your positive attitude towards this great facility helped persuade me to become a resident. Hester and I have resided here for nearly two years now. We are very happy with SVWC and feel Winchester is fortunate to have such a facility. Our children have been relieved of the responsibility of making arrangements for us as we become less able to take care of ourselves. I am writing to solicit your support for our proposed expansion of our health wing. The proposal would bring us into a more favorable competitive position with other planned and existing facilities. The thought that I can personally look forward to a private room in the Health Care wing when I need it is very comforting. Thank you for any support you can give us and thank you for helping direct my thoughts towards Westminster Canterbury as a place to retire for it is wonderful here. The residents are very supportive of each other and the staff are extremely cordial and courteous. I talked to Irma Robertson this morning and she informed me that Vicki is organizing dinner at Tokes Inn. Hope we can all get together there. They are nice folks. Sincerely, Willy Sullivan P.S. While the Robertson's call me Willy, I am known as Larry here at Westminster Canterbury. c: Harry S. Smith, President Winchester City Council RECEIVED SE' 0 9 1997 Mrs. Martin E. Resovsky 300 Westminster -Canterbury Drive Apt. 521 J'� _ c S/ 19 7 Winchester, VA 22603 Vie 2 2 v ,�,.� a.�- Y1-tom., , •�7'u-F�,, J• �� �z.,,,c �rc.�-•..�- � ,Zc.n.� &ate .�:w.h,...q�-+� Tom, n " LaLU VIIJ2 0-�, ( , 300 ' citm(nif£R-Cant£-dwrU -'LE.RECTIVED SEa 9 1 7 o¢paitm£nt 417 (R�nck£it£t, (Vityinia 22603 Cl-a, cam- 5 v W G — �aC�•�-� , � � "''_`►� cam.-�d•-�- _ C� �irna.�•� Fll d-`-� v w116.1 • '�= r V RECEIVED S F P 0 9 1997 300 'dffestminster-Canterbury Drive, Winchester, Va. 22603 Apt. 101 Sept. 4, 1997 Mr. William Bayliss, III, Chairman, Planning Commission, Dear Sir: We are writing in regard to the permit for ail additional building to Lhe Health Care Section ofWestminster-Canterbury. We were residents of Wfiiittier Estate for twenty years before moving to Westminster- Canteroury. We feel that a facility such as Westminster-Canteroury is a great addition and asset to the City of hinchester, and to the neignborhood, and has in no way reduced the property value of the nearby residential section in any way, but if anything, it is a good addition to this end of the city of Winchester. *e will appreciate your support in our new building project. Sincerely yours, IN Snort' VlArd L� Frances Ward RECEIVED SEP 9 9 1997 September 4, 1997 Mr. R. William Bayliss, III Chairman, Winchester Planning Commission c/o Wheat, First, Butcher, Singer PO Box 18 Winchester, VA 22604 Dear Mr. Bayliss: As a resident of the City of Winchester for more than 85 years, five of which have been as a resident of Westminster Canterbury, I respectfully and strongly urge that the Planning Commission approve the application of Westminster -Canterbury for an addition to their Assisted Living building. This addition will provide the residents with privacy and dignity of a private room and improved access by the nursing staff, and will also provide for additional residents as the need arises. The new road must be on the west side of the building as there are a number of intersections on the road on the east side and also resident parking on that side. Westminster Canterbury has been a good neighbor and an asset to the City of Winchester, contributing to the tax base in lieu of real estate taxes over $44,000 since 1992, and also provides employment to a large staff, and buys a large amount of goods and services. Many of our residents have been citizens of Winchester for a number of years and many residents are actively involved in civic activities in the City. Very truly yours, elf, /� a� Y ohn L. Kater cc: Mr. Harry S. Smith President, Winchester City Council RECEIVED SEP 111997 TARRY T. & BEYERLY L. SUTLER 520 OLD FORT ROAD WLNCHESTER, VLRGrNLA 22601 09/05/97 Mr. R.W. Bayliss,III Chairman, Winchester Pl"ng Commission 15 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Bayliss, As residents of Old Fort Road, we are writing to you concerning the proposed addition and the relocation of the access road at Westminster -Canterbury. Under the current proposal, it is our understanding that the new access road will be approximately 40' from the Old Fort Road cul-de-sac and only 47' from the Anthon property. What has changed since 1983 that would allow the setbacks that were established in the 1983 approval to protect the subdivision to be reduced or eliminated ? Actually, with the development of more lots within the subdivision, "the original buffers set in 1983 are more important to be adhered to now than before. The most important thing that we can point out is that Westminster -Canterbury is a 24 hour facility. That means that service vehicles and employee shift change vehicles will be using this access road at all hours of the day and night, not just from 8 to 5. The increased noise and light from the service trucks and employee vehicles on the access road could not be buffered enough to eliminate their. negative impact on the subdivision. The access road could be established on the east side of the existing building, which would allow access to the rear of Westminster -Canterbury and eliminate the negative impact of the currently proposed road on the surrounding neighborhood. We ask that the Commission and the City Council not reduce the separation between the existing buildings and the property line without carefully weighing the impact on the adjoining neighborhood. We thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerel . arry and ev r y ut r COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 December 12, 1997 Mr. Mark Smith Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: Approval of Westminster Canterbury Master Development Plan (#007-97) Dear Mark: The Westminster Canterbury Master Development Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 1997 with the condition that all review agency comments are adequately addressed. All comments have been adequately addressed. Therefore, the plan was administratively approved on December 12, 1997. The proposed Westminster Canterbury Village development is located on Westminster Canterbury Drive, Route 1318, off of North Frederick Pike, Route 522 North, and is identified by Property Identification 'Numbers 53-A-63A, 53-A-63B, 53-A-52B, and 53-4-3-J in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. This is a two-phase residential development. Initially, a forty-eight (48) unit assisted -living residential facility is to be developed. In the future, eighteen (18) cottage/duplex units are planned. Both phases are wholly within Frederick County. The gross density of the entire project is 4.9 units per acre and twenty-three (23) acres of open space, or 46 percent of the development, has been maintained. As a condition of the Master Development Plan approval, the consolidation of the lots contained within this development must occur. Also, please be aware that a site plan will have to be submitted to this department, and subsequently approved, before development of the assisted -living care residential facility can commence. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the approval of this Final Master Development Plan. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner Il MTR\cc cc: Richard C. Shickle, Gainesboro District Supervisor T. Roy Jennings, Frederick County Real Estate Joe C. Wilder, Engineering Technician Michael Peasley, Westminster Canterbury 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 PC REVIEW DATE: 11-19-97 BOS REVIEW DATE: 12-10-97 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #007-97 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY LOCATION: The property is located on Westminster Canterbury Drive (Route 1318) off of Front Royal Pike (Route 522 North). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 53-A-63A, 53-A-63B, 53-A-52B, and 53-4-3-J PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance); Present use: Residential and Assisted Living/Health Care Facility. ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North - Zoned: RP Use: Residential South - Zoned: LR (Low Residential) Use: Residential / Vacant East - Zoned: RP Use: Vacant West - Zoned: RP Use: Residential PROPOSED USE: Residential/Assisted Living Facility REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from Bob Childress dated October 24, 1997. Sanitation Authority: Water and sewer are available. Inspections Dept.: Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 308, and 310, Use groups I (Institutional) and R (Residential) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Will comment further at the time of the site plan review. Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 2 December 3, 1997 Fire Marshal: The Site Plan for this project must be submitted to the Winchester Fire and Rescue Dept., as well as Frederick County, as the City is the primary service provider of Fire and Rescue services. 2. Fire Lane access and hydrant locations will be reviewed at the time of Site Plan submittal. Burning of land clearing debris requires a permit from the Fire Marshal's Office. Burning of building construction debris is not permitted. 4. During construction, access to all structures, hydrants, and Siamese locations must be maintained at all times. Staging of construction materials, trailers, vehicles and other equipment within 20' of a fire hydrant is prohibited. 5. Temporary street address signs must be posted when construction begins. County Engineer: Stormwater management has been indicated for future development. Detailed design will be required at the time of the site plan submission. The proposed master development plan dated 10/22/97 is approved by the Public Works Department as submitted. City of Winchester Planning: While the western expansion brings development closer to existing City residences, it does so outside the City's PUD District, and this requires no rezoning approval in the City. Layout seems to minimize impact on existing emergency access drive. Minor associated revisions to eliminate west serve road and expand maintenance garage in City can be handled as a City site plan application. Planning and Zoning: Project History The Board of Supervisors rezoned the property on which the Westminster -Canterbury facility is located on August 24, 1983 (Rez. #005-83). The ensuing development of the property was prior to the County's current MDP requirements. Subsequent cottage/duplex development on the property in 1991 and 1994 necessitated the approval of Master Plans #005-91 and #008-94, and the rezoning of 2.9 acres of B2 zoned land to RP (Rez. #005-91). Project Scope Westminster -Canterbury is proposing a two-phase development. Initially, they plan to develop a forty-eight (48) unit assisted -living residential facility. In the future, they plan to develop eighteen (18) cottage/duplex units. Both phases are wholly within Frederick County. • Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 3 December 3, 1997 The assisted living residential facility is an extension of their current facility in which there are two hundred (200) existing units with an additional one hundred ninety two (192) previously approved, yet undeveloped, units. Of the existing units eighty-five (85) are in the City and one hundred fifteen (115) are in the County. With regards to the undeveloped units, one hundred twenty-one (121) are in the City and seventy-one (71) are in the County. It should be noted that the existing health care facility will lose 32 units when this facility is added. This results in a gain of 16 units. The cottage/duplex development is in addition to the twenty-six (26) cottages that exist on the property. Access to the cottage development is to be provided through private driveways that connect the existing Westminster:Canterbury Drive. Issues Stafrs review of this MDP has highlighted no significant concerns. The gross density of the project, at 4.9 units per acre, is below the maximum permitted gross density for this development which is 5.5 units per acre. Twenty-three (23) acres of open space, which is 46 percent.of the development, have been provided. This surpasses the minimum open space requirement which is 30 percent. Furthermore, the acreage of disturbed environmental features is significantly lower than the amount of disturbance permitted. The following relatively minor issues should be considered by the Planning Commission. 1) Transportation. The proposed private driveways that provide access to the future cottage developments should be aligned to form a cross intersection. These driveways should also intersect Westminster -Canterbury Drive at approximately right angles. In addition, a note to the effect of "Private driveway providing access to the future cottages will not/never connect with Old Fort Road" should be added to the MDP. 2) Buffer and Screening. The applicant is correctly showing a one-hundred-(100) foot perimeter single family separation buffer adjacent to all abutting single family residences. However, this residential separation buffer is not required adjacent to the Tudor Square and the Canterbury Square developments, and may be removed from the MDP. Also, the "A" category zoning district buffer shown adjacent to the Hiett and Weber should be removed. These properties have split RPB2 zoning with the B2 portion fronting along Route 522. The detail of all buffers is to be determined at the site plan stage. Westminster Canterbury MDP 4007-97 Page 4 December 3, 1997 3) Recreational Units. The applicant is showing a proposed Therapy Pool. Additional detail should be provided on the MDP regarding this pool in addition to the recreational units that currently exist at this facility to determine that the recreational unit requirement is being met. It would appear from visiting this property that this is being accomplished. 4) Environmental Features. The location of the environmental features, in addition to the area that is to be disturbed, should be shown on the MDP. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 11-19-97 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Westminster -Canterbury Master Development Plan. The overall concept of this Master Development Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff asks the Planning Commission to ensure that all review agency comments are adequately addressed prior to final approval of this plan. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 11/19/97 MEETING: A representative for the Board of Directors of the Tudor Square Homeowners Association spoke in 'favor of the proposed master plan. The Commission also received a letter of support from an individual who had real estate interest in both the Tudor Square and Canterbury Square subdivisions. There were two area residents and one adjoining property owner who expressed concerns with the proposal: A resident at 931 Autumn View Lane was concerned about stormwater run-off, due to her low-lying property and the increasing development that has been occurring in the Sunnyside area. A resident at 613 Old Fort Road asked the Commission to protect existing woodlands, especially in the area where the proposed building projects to the west, because those woodlands mitigated the impact of the existing and proposed three-story buildings from his residence and residences to the north, along Old Fort Road. Another area resident voiced his concern that the proposed new, three- story building cut into a distance buffer that was agreed to between the applicant and the City of Winchester when Westminster -Canterbury was originally constructed. The Planning Commission had concerns about the drainage situation in this area. It was stated that when the patio homes were built in Tudor Square, a stormwater management facility was installed but it did not work efficiently and, as a result, some residents in the area below experienced excessive Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 5 December 3, 1997 amounts of water. Commissioners stressed to the applicant the need to be sensitive to the water run- off issue at the site planning stage and to not create more of a problem than already exists. Commission members felt the overall concept of the master plan was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.. They unanimously recommended approval, as long as all the review agency comments were met. (Mr. Romine and Mr. Stone abstained from voting.) O:\AGENDAS\COMMENTS\W STMNSTR.M DP 10.24.1997 1�5 P.01 Post -It" brand fax_IW5Mittal memo 76711 x of page. ► Z Mr. sr►�Srn� , From �. Co. Dept. Phone N Fax B Fix 1' COMMONWEAI,,'M of VIRGI NIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVIQ R. GEHR 90INBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 JERMY A. COPP EDlNt1L)RG, Vq 2282�-a278 AESIDENT ENGINEER TEL9(5,10)004,$600 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS FAX (540)9R4.SW7 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY October 24,1997 We have no overall objections to this property's master development plan. All external streets shown are private and cannot be considered eligible for addition to our Secondary Maintenance System until they meet our Subdivision Street Design Standards and Frederick County Ordinance Requirements. The existing entrance serving the property at the end of Route 1318 is adequate for the proposed improvements. However, we are concerned with potential impacts at, the Route 1318 and 522 North intersection. Existing and proposed traffic impacts at this intersection may necessitate improvements, i.e. turn lane expansion and sigmlization. The developer should be required to participate in the costs of any improvements. Detailed traffic generation data including existing and proposed uses on this site, existing uses along Route 1318, counts on Route 922, and anticipated splits at the Route 1318 and 522 intersection should be provided at the site plan stage to determine if the aforementioned improvements will be necessary. This plan should be revised to identify. Westminster -Canterbury Drive as Route 1318 Signed: RBC/rf Robert B. Childress, Trans. Engineer xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff (w/ copy of plan) WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 130 .S- iz -10- q 7 Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package 2. APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Development Use Only. Date application received Complete. Date of acceptance. Incomplete. Date of return. 10-g24-g7 Application # My-dj /o �27-R7 Project Title : Wt--Tiu10sTF-F- lAN TCE-PkJ Iz-( Owner's Name: WESTKIINSTEIz CAn1TEF2-13C1f2-( ATT: MICHAEL PEAS -LEY 3. Applicant: Address: Phone Number: 4. Design Company: Address: Phone Number: Contact Name: (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) Cr-eEN WA`( E NG1NC0P4A G 151 WINDY HIL-L, LANE W1WC—HESTEfZ , VA. ZZ(r,VZ 61ZEEN WA',( Q46W EEf2-t NG I VE5tC-,-,,NJ CoN Gf✓ p T5 MAP-K- 0 . 5M (-rH Page 11 Frederick County, Virginia - Master Development Plan Application Package APPLICATION cont'd MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5. Location of Property: kloGSTIAt i--,7Cf2 G�it.7 LG'r UP`r Z r1r 64- ITC- � f•i 1� TH 6. Total Acreage: 4`(&� S J Acaz pEv ism 7. Property Information: r a) Property Identification Number (PIN): S A)) b) Current Zoning: �P c) Present Use: P-G-sl CAE✓ NT 1 A (_ d) Proposed Uses: IZCS iDC-N T(A 1.-- e) Adjoining Property Information: Property Identification Numbers Property Uses North J -5L-40 South -,SMITH A(S9t6 East (f-EP-,aLp i^. SMITH West ©1-0F&--,12=1SUDID. 12G-Sf©. f) Magisterial District: GA NESpaz�)I'-<::) 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original V Amended I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. I Signature: V v Date: ��2 ► ! l7, �GI rl Page 12 TAX MAP# WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' TM#53-((A))-63A OWNER 131-6-E-5 Davis, James A and Janet C. 504 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-6 Resident 508 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-9 Wood, Herbet A. Jr., et ux 520 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-11A Gibbs, Paula H. 528 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-12 McLoughlin, Dennis J. 532 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-13 Rogers, Charles P. et ux 536 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-14 Von Payr, Hans et ux 540 Marion St. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-E-15 Willis, William D. et ux 606 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-C-12 Baker, William H. et ux 545 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-C-13 Boppe, M. Lee et ux 601 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 0 132-1-4 Lawrence, Edward C. & Ann B. 469 Fairmont Ave. Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-D-14 Jones, Robert, Mark & Jo Allen 540 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 131-6-D-15 Glaize Development, Inc. 131-6-D-16 302 N. Cameron St. 131-6-D-17 Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-14 Moore, Thomas G. & Sally C. 605 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-15 Carey, Dennis L. & Diane F. 609 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-16 Lloyd, Thomas D. et ux 613 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-3-C-17 Keith, Kimberly D. & Isaac A. IV 617 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 111-1-4 Hack Land Trust 111-1-5 974 East Macedonia Church Rd. Stephens City, Va. 22655 111-3-E-16 Pota, Anthony 610 Old Fort Road Winchester, Va. 22601 132-1-4 Smith, Gerald F. 53-A-63 P.O. Box 3588 Winchester, Va. 22604 53-A-60 Lewis, John P. & David P. Box 3300 Winchester, Va. 22601 53-A-61 Hiett, Russell D. & Ann B. 53-A-61A 930 Autumn View Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-53 Weber, Katherine P. 8301 Robey Avenue Annandale, Va. 22003 53-A-7 Luttrell, Marlene R. 204 Margaret Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-A-4 Fishel, Linda Sue 107 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A--2-A-5 Peacemaker, Wayne J. 1243 North Frederick Pike Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-A-6 Campbell, Benjamin E. 111 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-A-7 McDaniel, Evelyn J. & Loring 113 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-2 Moomaw, Preston E., Jr. 53A-2-B-6A 321 Cedar Grove Road 53A-2-B-7 Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-2A Jenkins, James W. 53A-2-B-3 108 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-3A Simmons, Chester W. 112 Redwood Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-4 Fogle, Richard Harold 117 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 40 53A-2-B-5 Simmons, Paul E., Sr. 115 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-B-5A Phillips, Wendall H. 53A-2-B-6 113 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-C-5 Storm, William E. & Hilda M. 110 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-6 Jenkins, Charles L. Jr. 1333 Ambrose Drive Winchester, Va. 22603 53-A-2-C-7 Catlett, Kenneth J. 53-A-2-C-8 c/o Satoko Catlett 114 Oak Side Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-13 Drummond, Tereas S. c/o Teresa Jackson 111 Hickory Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-14 Foreman, Roger L. & Darlene L. 113 Hickory Lane Winchester, Va. 22603' 53A-2-C-14A Clay, Mildred Helen 53A-2-C-15 115 Hickory Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-C-16 Fahnestock, Elton R. 53A-2-C-17 117 Hickory Lane 53A-2-C-16 Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-D-5 Bean, Betty Lou Reeves 53A-2-D-6 112 Hickory Lane 53A-2-D-7 Winchester, Va. 22603 53A-2-D-8 Place, Thomas J. 53A-2-D-9 116 Hickory Lane Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-1 Schelble, Carol 123 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-2 North Frederick Realty 53B-4-7 P.O. Drawer 2097 53B-4-10 Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-11 53B-4-12 53B-4-14 53B-4-16 53B-4-18 53B-4-20A 53-B-4-3 Toan, Douglas R. & Michael L. Bryan P.O. Box 2800 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-4 Toan, Douglas R. 360-2 McGhee Rd. Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-5 Beverley, Marshall J. Jr. and Sharon W. 109 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-6 Kelsey, Joseph & Roberta 107 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-8 Butler, Benjamin M. & Ann R. P.O. Box 2097 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-9 Butler, Stephen G. P.O. Box 2097 Winchester, Va. 22604 53B-4-13 Bryan, Michael L. 53B-4-15 12 Rouss Avenue 53B-4-17 Winchester, Va. 22601 16 53B-4-19 Sewell, Zona Gail c/o Gail S. Unger 120 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53B-4-20 Pugh, G. Schott & Lori P. 122 Rugby Place Winchester, Va. 22603 53D-1-(1 through 42) 53D-2-(65 through 87 and 92 through 96) Tudor Square Subdivision Section One Deed Book 642, Page 122 - 126 Tudor Square Subdivision Section Two Deed Book 676, Page 782 �1 BRYAN & COLEMAN, P.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12 ROUSs AVENUE WINCHE6TER, VIRGINIA 22601 TELEPHONE: (540)665-4366 FAX:(540)665-4380 MICHAEL L. BRYAN MAILING ADDRESS: H. EDMUND6 COLEMAN, III P. O. Box 2800 November 19, 1997 WINCHE6TER. VA 22604 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention: Chuck DeHaven, Chairman RE: Master Development Plan Number 00797 Westminister Canterbury Dear Chuck, I would like to express my full support the for the proposed Master Development Plan filed by Westminster Canterbury before the Planning Commission. I do not in any way find objectionable the proposed assisted living facility or additional cottages. Both individually and through partnerships, I have an interest in substantial real estate holdings in both Canterbury Square Subdivision and Tudor Square Subdivision and would certainly not support any proposal which would negatively impact these adjacent properties. However, having fully reviewed the proposed plans, I think that Westminister Canterbury's proposal is both reasonable and a welcome addition to the community. Thank you for your consideration. MLB/pmn c:\Letters\DeHaven 11-19-97 • •FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 November 18, 1997 Mr. Mark Smith Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: Preliminary Review of Westminster -Canterbury Master Development Plan 9007-97 Dear Mark: I have had the opportunity to review the above referenced Master Development Plan received by our office on October 24, 1997. The following are comments that need to be addressed during the revision of this Master Development Plan: 1) Please show the surveyed boundaries and description of all lots and parcels contained within the Master Development Plan. As you are aware, the lots contained within this MDP should be consolidated in conjunction with approval of this plan. 2) On the location map, please show the state route numbers of Westminster -Canterbury Drive and Fox Drive. This should also be reflected on the plan. 3) Please revise the adjoining property information for parcels 53-A-53 and the adjoining Hiett properties. Both parcels are zoned RP adjacent to the Westminster -Canterbury. They do, however, also contain B2 zoning adjacent to Route 522. In addition, please provide the P.I.N.'s for all adjoining parcels located in the County. 4) Please clarify the phasing schedule on the MDP. In particular, as it relates to originally approved additions to the existing complex and the future cottage development. All future improvements resulting from the ultimate development of the proposed MDP should be identified. Particular attention should be paid to the road circulation and parking layout. 5) Please show the location and boundaries of the woodlands and steep slopes located on the property. In addition, the areas in which disturbance of these environmental features will occur should be identified. The symbols used to identify these features should be included in the legend. 6) Please show the open space calculations as a percentage of the development in addition to the acreage figures. 7) Please revise the description and location of the required buffers and screening. You have correctly shown a one hundred (100) foot perimeter single family separation buffer adjacent to all abutting single family 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 0 Westminster -Canterbury MDP Review Page 2 November 19, 1997 residences. However, this residential separation buffer is not required adjacent to the Tudor Square and the Canterbury Square developments, and may be removed from the MDP. Also, the "A" category zoning district buffer shown adjacent to the Hiett and Weber may be removed. These properties have split RPB2 zoning with the B2 portion fronting along Route 522. The detail of all buffers is to be determined at the site plan stage. 8) Please provide the Residential Performance (RP) dimensional requirements for the cottage/ duplex development. 9) Please provide additional detail regarding the proposed therapy pool in addition to the recreational units that currently exist at this facility. This is necessary to determine that the recreational unit requirement is being met. 10) Please revise the unit breakdown table provided. It would appear that several of the figures provided are incorrect. The correct number of total units is critical to calculating the gross density of the project. The apparent gross density of the project, at 4.9 units per acre, would be below the maximum permitted gross density for this development which is 5.5 units per acre. 11) Please consider realigning the proposed private driveways that provide access to the future cottage developments. These driveways should form a cross intersection and should also intersect Westminster - Canterbury Drive at approximately right angles. In addition, a note to the effect of "Private driveway providing access to the future cottages will not/never connect with Old Fort Road" should be added to the MDP. Based upon the existing terrain, it may be advisable to eliminate the eastern driveway connection. 12) Please show the location of the environmental features on the plan and in the legend. In addition, the area that is to be disturbed should be identified. It initially appears as though the acreage of disturbed environmental features is significantly lower than the amount of disturbance permitted. 13) Please include the percentage calculations for the open space in the table provided. 14) . Please show on the Master Development Plan information pertaining to sewer and water availability. In addition, please show any existing or proposed easements associated with sanitary sewer lines and other utilities. The Master Development Plan needs to be revised to reflect the above comments in addition to the comments of the other reviewing agencies. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner II MTR\cc �JEsrM(N,5r15R clt"redu.rzY 1imq7 Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Required Information Checklist MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN The following information must be included on the master development plan. If the submitted master development plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and will be returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Yes No ✓ 1. ✓ 2. ✓ 3. ✓ 4. 5. 6. ✓ 7. 8. 91 10 11 Name of proposed development. Name, address, and telephone number of owner. Name, address, and telephone number of developer. Name, address, and telephone number of designer. Signed certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional zoning approval. Rezoning file number should be cited. A space labeled "Approved by the Director of Planning and Development" for the approval signature and date of approval. A space labeled "Approved by the County Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. Magisterial District. Sheet size less than 42 inches. Paue 13 • • Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package General Information Yes No to Location map (scale 1:2000). 2. Scale of the MDP is not to exceed 1:100. ✓ 3. North Arrow. 40 Legend describing all symbols. Waool lo-nd-:� A a � 5 Surveyed boundaries of all lots and arc sc b 6. Acreage of all parcels included in the MDP. ✓ 7. Topography contour lines at acceptable intervals. Z ' QA schedule of phases, boundary of phases, and order of development. 0r A�U�K~�� Prova t �+•b�✓t , �.�Gc.�. o CdV14I�tJ'A�t,�y�. 9. Use, zoning, and property owner of all adjoining 10 W/ 11. carn� vi.iil,o�tetic� 2 3. properties. Location of proposed uses (location, boundaries, arrangement). Location and treatment of historic structures and sites. History of all land divisions in relation to this tract. Acrei�e, Location and boundaries of environmental features: floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, s eep s opes, woo an s. Amount and per ntage of disturbed and protected land in common ope4[ space. Ak,tII.J � 0. 0./jPat,2_ /i Paoz 14 Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Residential Development Information Yes No Jju,gYA� k_ j Avxw Grp � CM) 64 �o.0 U I Ivy is ho c 1. Location and dimension of Residential Separation Buffers. 2. Acreage in common open ace, in housing type, in road rights -of -way, and for the entire development (by Phase). 3. Location and boundaries of housing types. Residential Performance (RP) dimensional requirements should be indicated. 4. Number of dwelling units (by type, phase, and in total). Location and configuration of required recreational facilities. Statement of required and type of facilities to be provided. Infrastructure Information Yes No 4. Location of adjoining streets and utilities. Location, arrangements, and right-of-way widths of roads and property access. %4,L PLO.*,. we Location and arrangement of street entrances, driveways, and parking areas. %L *A.,, I-e- Location of entrances to the development from public streets. 5. Type of road design (rural or urban). Prw&A,4, 6. Use of inter -parcel connectors. 7. Traffic impact analysis. To be submitted to the Virginia Page 15 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Department of Transportation. 8. Location of sewer and water mains with statements concerning the connection with and availability of facilities. 9. Location and arrangement of electric and gas utilities. Other Design Information Yes No Ijj-r (&[#L_f,t "eAoa JCL4 �. Location of Zoning District and Road Efficiency buffers, �./ and examples specifying the screening to be provided. 2. Plan for stormwater management. Location of stormwater facilities. QAcreage of each type of environmental protection land. (Amount and percentage of disturbed and protected land in P16-tommon open space.) Shown ni a table format. 4. Amount, boundaries, and location of common open space. (Indicate the percentage of the entire site to be placed in common open space.) 5. Location of environmental protected areas to be included in common open space. Paue 16 Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package County Health Department Information Yes No CL-1) Statements and locations pertaining to sewer and water / availability. 2. Statements and locations concerning any existing pre - or post -water treatment facilities. 3. Statements and location of any planned private treatment facilities. Page 17 PC REVIEW DATE: 11-19-97 BOS REVIEW DATE: 12-10-97 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #007-97 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY LOCATION: The property is located on Westminster Canterbury Drive (Route 1318) off of Front Royal Pike (Route 522 North). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 53-A-63A, 53-A-63B, 53-A-52B, and 53-4-3-J PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance); Present use: Residential and Assisted Living/Health Care Facility. ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North - Zoned: RP Use: Residential South - Zoned: LR (Low Residential) Use: Residential / Vacant East - Zoned: RP Use: Vacant West - Zoned: RP Use: Residential PROPOSED USE: Residential/Assisted Living Facility REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from Bob Childress dated October 24, 1997. Sanitation Authority: Water and sewer are available. Inspections Dept.: Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 308, and 310, Use groups I (Institutional) and R (Residential) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Will comment further at the time of the site plan review. 0 0 Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 2 November 10, 1997 Fire Marshal: The Site Plan for this project must be submitted to the Winchester Fire and Rescue Dept., as well as Frederick County, as the City is the primary service provider of Fire and Rescue services. 2. Fire Lane access and hydrant locations will be reviewed at the time of Site Plan submittal. Burning of land clearing debris requires a permit from the Fire Marshal's Office. Burning of building construction debris is not permitted. 4. During construction, access to all structures, hydrants, and Siamese locations must be maintained at all times. Staging of construction materials, trailers, vehicles and other equipment within 20' of a fire hydrant is prohibited. 5. Temporary street address signs must be posted when construction begins. County Engineer: Stormwater management has been indicated for future development. Detailed design will be required at the time of the site plan submission. The proposed master development plan dated 10/22/97 is approved by the Public Works Department as submitted. City of Winchester Planning: While the western expansion brings development closer to existing City residences, it does so outside the City's PUD District, and this requires no rezoning approval in the City. Layout seems to minimize impact on existing emergency access drive. Minor associated revisions to eliminate west serve road and expand maintenance garage in City can be handled as a City site plan application. Planning and Zoning: Project History The Board of Supervisors rezoned the property on which the Westminster -Canterbury facility is located on August 24, 1983 (Rez. #005-83). The ensuing development of the property was prior to the County's current MDP requirements. Subsequent cottage/duplex development on the property in 1991 and 1994 necessitated the approval of Master Plans #005-91 and #008-94, and the rezoning of 2.9 acres of B2 zoned land to RP (Rez. #005-91). Project Scope Westminster -Canterbury is proposing a two-phase development. Initially, they plan to develop a forty-eight (48) unit assisted -living residential facility. In the future, they plan to develop eighteen (18) cottage/duplex units. Both phases are wholly within Frederick County. 0 Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 3 November 10, 1997 The assisted living residential facility is an extension of their current facility in which there are two hundred (200) existing units with an additional one hundred ninety two (192) previously approved, yet undeveloped, units. Of the existing units eighty-five (85) are in the City and one hundred fifteen (115) are in the County. With regards to the undeveloped units, one hundred twenty-one (121) are in the City and seventy-one (71) are in the County. It should be noted that the existing health care facility will lose 32 units when this facility is added. This results in a gain of 16 units. The cottage/duplex development is in addition to the twenty-six (26) cottages that exist on the property. Access to the cottage development is to be provided through private driveways that connect the existing Westminster -Canterbury Drive. Issues StafFs review of this MDP has highlighted no significant concerns. The gross density of the project, at 4.9 units per acre, is below the maximum permitted gross density for this development which is 5.5 units per acre. Twenty-three (23) acres of open space, which is 46 percent of the development, have been provided. This surpasses the minimum open space requirement which is 30 percent. Furthermore, the acreage of disturbed environmental features is significantly lower than the amount of disturbance permitted. The following relatively minor issues should be considered by the Planning Commission. 1) Transportation. The proposed private driveways that provide access to the future cottage developments should be aligned to form a cross intersection. These driveways should also intersect Westminster -Canterbury Drive at approximately right angles. In addition, a note to the effect of "Private driveway providing access to the fixture cottages will not/never connect with Old Fort Road" should be added to the MDP. 2) Buffer and Screening. The applicant is correctly showing a one-hundred-(100) foot perimeter single family separation buffer adjacent to all abutting single family residences. However, this residential separation buffer is not required adjacent to the Tudor Square and the Canterbury Square developments, and may be removed from the MDP. Also, the "A" category zoning district buffer shown adjacent to the Hiett and Weber should be removed. These properties have split RP/132 zoning with the B2 portion fronting along Route 522. The detail of all buffers is to be determined at the site plan stage. 0 Westminster Canterbury MDP #007-97 Page 4 November 10, 1997 3) Recreational Units. The applicant is showing a proposed Therapy Pool. Additional detail should be provided on the MDP regarding this pool in addition to the recreational units that currently exist at this facility to determine that the recreational unit requirement is being met. It would appear from visiting this property that this is being accomplished. 4) Environmental Features. The location of the environmental features, in addition to the area that is to be disturbed, should be shown on the MDP. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 11-19-97 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Westminster -Canterbury Master Development Plan. The overall concept of this Master Development Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff asks the Planning Commission to ensure that all review agency comments are adequately addressed prior to final approval of this plan. O:\AGENDAS\COMMENTS\W STMNSTR. MDP FROM EDINBURG RESIDENCY 10.24.1997 13* F,02 Frederick Courrty,yirginia Master Develo ment Plan App4cjLtjoWilie Request for Master Development Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: .. , i✓;..'. �- Hand deliver to: Yugiinia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Transportation - �-w;- Attn' Resident Engineer 1550 Commerce Street P.O. Box 278 Winchester, VA Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 722-3460 (540) 984-5600 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach bm (3) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: of development a� wor acArtption oghe request: V Virginia Department of Transportation's Conunents: See attaghetj T c m r n dated 7 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 315 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Stephens City, Virginia P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1061 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Sanitation Authority with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: 6-7 �Li lz rl `tilh�H l-cni ��� �,Z i N c, Address: Phone Number: C s ao ) c, (- z - 4(b , Name of development and/or description of the request: CA-N r;;- ,ZgvIzy Location of property W k STM � r 5T�2 C A),-! r*-#L I3 vI; .y Dim o (=v (Zovi-W- SZL tl oJz-rH Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: Page 22 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Bequest for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department 4th Floor Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Inspections Department with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the MDP with this sheet. Applicant's Name: GM"J�,y E,,j&j,r kE2t^' c, Address: l sVJ ii -a y Htau E �n (� tkc w rz- S7Fc )L Phone Number: Name of development and/or description of the request: kIi-STM IN STEAL_ CA n?TJL6VrL y Location of property: V\,(4-sT t-%W sTTZ-1Z LAB..-rC-,z 13 L,R-ti )> Z. ort= F-O V77— SZZ N Z-R-Tw Frederick County Inspections Department's Comments: Buildings shall cottDly with the Virginia'Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 308,and 310 Use groups I (Institutional) and R (Residential) of the BOCA Nat-ioral BLl di nq C'rxlP-/1 qqh Will further comment at the time of site plan review. Frederick County Inspections Department use only Date received Review Number: © 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed _ Date approved /�'� Revision required /1l/i4 Page 23 sue._ IU/Z4" U7 1U., JU QSJU OTT 4yJ)u rKGU l.0 kiKt W UU: COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control NolvWP97-0006 Date Received 10/22/97 Date Reviewed 10/24/97 Applicant Gmenway Engineering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winches- , Virginia 22602 Project Name Westmi=er Ca=bury Phone No.540-662-4185 Type of ApphcadonMastcr Development Plan Current Zoning RP 1st Due Fire Co. 5 Ist Due Rescue Co. 3 Election DistrictStonewall Tax I.D. No. 53-A-63A RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System Residential Sprinkier SystemXX Automatic Fire Alarm SystanKX Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Inadequate Not IdentiffedXX Fire Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Will be addressed on Site Plan or Construction Dravagp Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate Inadequate Not IdentifiedXX Special Hazards Noted Yes No XX Comments Hydrant Locations Adequate Inadequate Not IdentiSedXX Siamese Location Adequate Inadequate Not Identified XX Additional Comments Attached? Yes XX No Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No Signature [ �T— Title i.%�, �fic-s.� 1U/24/107 1U:JU a54U 676 47JV rKGU tlu r1Kt UUJ Additional Comments- 1 . The Site Plan for this project must be submitted to the Winchester Fire and R,cscue Dept as well as Frederick County, as the City is the primaryservice provider of Fire and Rescue services. Fire Lane access, and hydrant tccations will be reviewed at the time of Site Plan submittal. 3. Buming of land clearing debris requires a permit from the Fire Marshal's Office. Burning of building construction debris is not pemli=l. 4. During construction, access to all sm=tures, hydrants, and Siam= locations, must be maintained at all times. Staging of construction materials, trailers, vehicles and other equipment within 20' of a fire hydrant is prohibited S. Temporary street address signs roust be posted when construction begins. 10/24/2019 16:31 5407223618 CITY C)r WINO,-cST6 PwSc 02 Y Froder:ick CouatY VlWnta Master D4veloornent Plan ADaiieatloa Psckate Hunest for Mutar Develnipm nt Plan Qmments City of Winchester Bydtoo Ned deliv�e: Winchester Planning Department 15 N. Cameron Street Ann: Planning Director Rouss City Hall IS N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-181 S Please fill out the information as a CUMttly as possible in order to assist the agency with then review. Please attach 9M(1) copy of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant'sNamc: 61**_"VxAq C^44jNE£ii.1r✓,�j Address: 1 V t -%l d"jW n-i t �. l I► N E A z�z Phone Number: C o r.,1— 410 S" Name of development and/or description of the request: �iESTMw STtcR G w7sE ASvR� Location of property. W &W M"'' sv t C.ANrtcR Qyttti �tZ e F F Ro.rr� S22 f•[d►RTi City of wMcw step an only Date rweived % �% 9 7 Due reviewed 9% Sigosaue aad Due tia�h�62��f9,8���/, �� OCT �g91 REGEV E� I+�tAG DEP. Of L opo Nt c pND OV Kevww Number: Qsw &Waved A 3 4 3 (plaza circle on*) P Revision required Page 29 7 RECEIVED OCT 2 2 '997 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package DevelopmentRequest for Master ,00� Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County 4th Floor Department of Public Works 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5643 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach three (3) copies of the MDP with this sheet. Applicant's Name: 6q �--7r4 V 1 N E t 2 %ti e�j Address: 1 ' VQ r> ,4 ►+ � L- L- LAPJ C-- W c (-f- h z7-e, ,j Phone Number: Cs�o> �c� L- 4 ► E Name of development and/or description of the request: WE srr^�N St—rc 2 ��irr�rzi�✓rzy Location of property: W E P-1 %N si- ut - CtkNTi2%S"R_-I D2 ar=r Noizrrt Department of Public Works use only Date received Review Number: 0 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed tZagrn Date approved Revision required gqSignature and Date I U Page 24 L� n 1_J Frederick County, Virginia - Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County 4th Floor Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach tw (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: z - 4t e, Zs Name of development and/or description of the request: CA+—�U'Zy Location of property: WE-s�-KkN CA,,JrfAz(3vrzy pR. w+ 12uOrk- Szi �4.,Mr4 Department of Planning and Development's Comments: Department of Planning and Development use only Date received Date reviewed Signature and Date Review Number. 1 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date approved Revision required Page 21 Frederick County, Virginia - Master Development Plan Application Package Adjoining Property Owners MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. x NAME ADDRESS / PROPERTY NUMBER Name Address Property # Page 18 • i GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 1971 TRANSMITTAL TO: a . Go . 'P",4&w c i,/vA'r ATT: wvA,-r REMARKS: ❑ Urgent X❑ For your review Date 01l319-7 FROM: Ma�K sMrH GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Va. 22602 Phone 540-662-4185 Fax Phone 540-722-9528 ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment ��g19 202'�2�, © W a ow �' a,Q� A-10 Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 PI J' MCAOI JAI Jr PUSL !C M55 I NG2 November 7, 1997 TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: APPLICATION OF WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #007-97 On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public meeting to be held on November 19, 1997, at 7:00 p.m., in the board room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This meeting is to consider the application of Greenway Engineering for Westminster Canterbury Master Development Plan. This plan is to develop a 48-unit assisted living facility and 18 cottages in two phases. This property consists of 46.35 acres, located on Westminster -Canterbury Drive, off of Route 522 North, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 53-A-63A, 53-A-63B, 53-A-52B, and 53-4-3-J in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Any interested parry may attend this meeting. A copy of the application is available for review at the Handley Library, or the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, VA. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner II MTR/cc 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 --+ This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on fl n , M; : from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 53 - A- - 60- LEWIS, JOHN P. & DAVID P. 53D-2-94A Tudor Square Homeowner's Assoc. P.O. Box 336 Winchester, VA 22604 Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 53 - A- - 63-A WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY 300 WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4216 53 - A- - 63- SMITH, GERALD F PO BOX 3588 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604-2586 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK PO BOX 3300 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604-2500 53 -A- - 61- -A-- HIETT, RUSSELL 0 & ANN B 181 AUTUMN VIEW LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22603 53 - A- - 53. WEBER, KATHERINE P. 8301 ROBEY AVE ANNANDALE, VA. 22003-1369 53 . A. - 7- LUTTRELL, MARLENE R 204 MARGARET LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4261 Michael T. Rudd , Planner II Frederick County Planning Department GohflAdeA 0h I, I ^inn �[c� i I , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Michael T. Ruddy, Planner II for thq Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated 1 I.1 -9 _j , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this _JAh day of IAA rnou- , 19 ` ] . My commission expires on ` t ` 1 Ha-U NOTARY PUBLIC 53A - 2- A- 5- PEACEMAKER, WAY N J. 1243 N FREDERICK PIKE WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4213 I 53A - 2- A- 6- CAMPBELL, BENJAMIN E. 111 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER,VA. 22603.4230 53A - 2- A- 7- MCDANIEL, EVELYN J. & LORING 113 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4230 53A - 2- B- 2- MOOMAW, PRESTON E JR 321 CEDAR GROVE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3110 53A 2- C- 6. WINS, CHARLES L. JR. 1333 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.8610 554 • Z-& 7 Kenneth J. Catlett c/o Satoko Catlett 114 Oak Side Lane i58 Winchester, VA 22603-3558 53A - 2- C- 13- DRUMMOND, TERESA S CIO TERESA S JACKSON 111 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- C- 14- FOREMAN, ROGER L & DARLENE L 113 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- C- 14-A 53A - 2- B- 2-A CLAY, MILDRED HELEN JENKINS, JAMES W. CIO RUSSELL CLAY 219 W MONMOUTH ST 10B REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22601 4010 WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4228 53A 2- B- 3•A 53A - 2- C- 16- SIMMONS, CHESTER W FAHNESTOCK, ELTON R. 117 HICKORY LN 112 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4217 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4220 53A . 2- 4 53A - 2• D- 5- FOGLE, RICHARD HAROLD BEAN, BETTY LOU REEVES 117 OAK SIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603 4224 112 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53A - 2- S- 5- 53A • 2- D- 8- SIMMONS, PAUL E SR PLACE, THOMAS J 112 REDWOOD LN 116 HICKORY LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4228 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4217 53B -4• • 1- 53A - 2 6 5•A SCHELBLE, CAROL PHILLIPS, WENDALL H 113 OAK SIDE LN 123 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA i 22603.4224 WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4231 53A 2• C- 5-NORTH -- 53B -4- - 2- STORM, WILLIAM E. & HILDA M. FREDERICK REALTY 110 OAK SIDE LN CIO FAIRFAX HALL PROPERTIES WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.4224 PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1297 —`,I z 53B -4- - 3- . TOAN, DOUGLAS R & MICHAEL L BRYAN PO BOX 2800 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-2000 53B - 4- - 5- BEVERLEY, MARSHALL J JR & SHARON W 109 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4231 53B - 4- - 6- KELSEY,JOSEPH & ROBERTA 107 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4231 53B - 4- - B- BUTLER, BENJAMIN M & ANN R PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-1297 53B - 4- - 9- BUTLER, STEPHEN G PO BOX 2097 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1297 53B -4- - 13- BRYAN, MICHAEL L 12 ROUSS AVE WINCHESTER, VA 22601-473B 53B -4- - 19- SEWELL, ZONA GAIL CIO GAIL SEWELL UNGER 120 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4231 53B - 4- - 20- PUGH, G. SCOTT & LORI P. 122 RUGBY PL WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4231 53D - 1- - 1- RICHLAND INVESTMENTS CIO RICHARD V. REEDY 103 SHARON DR WINCHESTER, VA 22602.6644 53D - 2- - 65- MCCOY, KAREN K. CIO KAREN K DODSON 212 TUDOR DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-4244 5*2- A- 4- FISHEL, LINDA SUE 107 REDWOOD LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4230 �jf57017/AJLs - 3�, I► I _ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Li ' nr' IA r, 34 ,A 1 so 4 cp 4 411p a d 2 a CFFICIAt RECEIPT H FREDERICK '::IRLi1IT COURT 0 DEED PECEIPT DrTE: 'J5; 25; f3 TI?;E: 07:24: t � s CASHIER: RPH PEG: Wy17 TYPE- 46fCtRf8tS1J0564 RECEIPT: can ; r c•a I?dSTS;UFENF J,�S DC G PAYMENT'v :;ucJJ7,� • 96000 54 ROCK: 905 AGE: ;, �FUtt PA MENT GRANTOR: WESTMINSTER-CANTERPURY OF WINCHESTER IN�1. RECORdEd_05iJP'96 AT 0f:47 E J�;APiTEE: CO. OF FREDEFIC, �f. N iO J: C ,+ m T ',isD ADDRESS : 300 RESTMI''STEBU Y D ® RECEIVED sGF r ►S F ERA, -IF R, kINCNES9F ='A. E?: l3 kES Mlla.'E:. t;TER9t'RY 0 rnr r n fir.. ,:a CHECK�B.r Jr E 3 DEED. 05fE.,.S ;ESCpI°TI '"! DEED OF CCJP S5 {C' IDATION-64 DICT N ��ONSIDERATiiJN: .00 ASTIR-i4At• CODE DESCRIPTION e J 1 DEEDS PAld CODE DESCRIPTION MA.: PAID 10-A TECHNOLOGY FUND FEE =4.0{1 145 )SLF J•00 1 f.1 TENDERED 8 0, AMOUNT PAID: J4.0ir DC-18 (9/97) CHANGE AMT 00 i CtERI: OF COURT: REBECCA P. HOGAN ' I COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA I DO-18 (11/96) 0 BK288 PG1200 BK905PG1016 I� THIS DEED OF CONSOLIDATION made and dated this cad s+ day of May, 1998, by and between WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC., a Virginia corporation, hereinafter "Owner", the COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA, hereinafter "County"), and the CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA, hereinafter "City". RECITALS: 1. The Owner is vested with title to those certain five lots or parcels of land situate partly in the City and the County, containing in the aggregate 65.1117 acres (16.8370 acres situate in the City and 48.2747 acres situate in the County), as more particularly set forth on that certain Final Plat for Lot Consolidation of the Lands of Westminster - Canterbury of Winchester, Inc. drawn by Mark D. Smith, L.S., dated April 16, 1998 (the "Plat"), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 2. It is the intention of the Owner to consolidate or merge Parcel 1, Parcel 2, Parcel 3, Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 into a single parcel or tract of land as more particularly described on the Plat. 3. The County and City have agreed to this consolidation of lands as set forth herein as evidenced on the Plat. NOW, THEREFORE WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid by each of the parties hereto unto the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and other consideration deemed adequate at law, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 6K288 PG1201 full. 8K905PG1011 A. The Recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if set out in B. The Owner, with the express consent of the County and the City, hereby consolidates and mergers Parcel 1, Parcel 2, Parcel 3, Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 as shown on the Plat into one tract of land situate partly in Gainesboro Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia (48.2747 acres) and the City of Winchester, Virginia (16.8370 acres), containing in the aggregate 65.1117 acres, as more particularly set forth on the Plat. C. The consolidation of the parcels of land as set forth herein is with the express consent of the County and City, as evidenced by the execution of the Plat by the respective parties. WITNESS these signatures and seals: WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE, CITY/COUNTY of n ¢ , to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowaedged before me, a Notary Public in for the aforesaid State and Jurisdiction, this 01 � day of , 1998 by M as _p�cs of WE TMINSTER - CNNTEAWURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. My Commission expires: -7 A f 1_10 - NOTAkY PUBLIC MLB/pmn -2�. t� J cADeeds\Westminster dov - ,-I it18 FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CON OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINC 0 If R 23 1998 GAINESBORO DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY AND CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA APRIL 16, 1998 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC., AS APPEARS ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLATS, IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDER- SIGNED rNERS, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY. '60M IQNWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY / eTOUNTY OF THE,:FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE odF 1,�� 19LiiBY U MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TO WIT: WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS -= ' DAY NOTARY PUBLIC f I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED IN THIS CONSOLIDATION IS ALL OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. IN FIVE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL ONE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 25, 1985 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 312 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 333, LESS A PORTION CONVEYED TO FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA BY DEED DATED JULY 8, 1985 OF RECORD IN SAID CLERK'S OFFICE OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 324 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 345. PARCEL TWO ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 25, 1985 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 318 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 339. PARCEL THREE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED APRIL 30, 1984 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 575 AT PAGE 498. PARCEL FOUR ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 8, 1987 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 654 AT PAGE 97. PARCEL FIVE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED APRIL 30, 1987 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 221 AT PAGE 569. — M0.00- APPROVj FREDERIC CITY 0 . tc) MARK D. SMITH, L.S. it Q l 3 ° 9 OUN SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR DATE -IESTE SUBDIVISI N ADMINISTRATOR D E Q M", ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 MARK D. SMITH No.002009 s� 1 OK 788 PG 1 7n-i BK905PG1019 m �TF 5uNNY�sI C7E ,A S W a W 00 LA 7-5 � . !. �4- ` .P m 4'. sTaoTHFas M d Qki f P ~ v. s gti'NT `` `A N w�r.�HEsTE�- s T- ' Y 2 0 -b- a VIGT`i MAP �Q SCALE: I"= Zooms' m U PARENT TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION FREDERICK COUNTY CITY OF WINCHESTER PARCEL ONE 53—((A))-63A PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 26.3317 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONE: LR(PUD) USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL TWO 53—((A))-63B PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 14.7392 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: VACANT ZONE: LR USE: VACANT PARCEL THREE 53—((4))—(3)—J N/A 2.9360 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL FOUR 53—((A))-52B N/A 16.6516 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL FIVE N/A PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 4.4533 ACRES ZONE: LR USE: VACANT FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF _ T WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MARK D. SMITH No.002009 �( 1 ��iyD04' SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE#7 WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 4oS`U12 kSurveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 SHEET 2 OF 6 BK905PG1020 J.P. DARLINGTON'S SUBDIVISION 9 DB 218 PG 553 ,p ZONE: RP USE: RESID, 6 14 6 0 5 15 O L5 Z Il IIRS— 15' BRL 6� J N nG = L3 18 I r---- �pt t4� b SIRS 15' BRLJIR$ ( 0 100' BUFFER M1 PARCEL N FOUR O d 1 FORMER LOT LINE _ 0 HEREBY VACATED 1mo I l Q IR5 15V Ow - IRS TURN -AROUND E5MT. DB 6,42 P3 101 TURN-ARowD Ek. \ \ DB ASEMENT m1 1 C07-r \ PARCEL cp THREE FOA A1� \ , 01 IRF�� W.W. HACK Et AL �36 DB. -18m PG. 103 f�- DB. 253 PG. 533 \'SPARCEL ZONE= RP USE: RESID. IR1= \ ONE NOTE MATCH TO SHEET 5 OF 6 SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA. FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION � OF THE LANDS OF T WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MARK D. SMITH SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 No.002009 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE '9 WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 S Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 SHEET 3 OF 6 BK288 PG1205 IN, LL 0 w 0 00 Q J.P. DARLINCsTON'S SUBDIVISION DB218PG553 ZONE: RP USE: REaID. "ll 5 6 i L7 Bo wG 102 NOTE SEE SWEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA, W. J. PEACEMAKER DB. 320 PG. 335 ZONE: RP USE: REBID. 4 J'RT BNAIL FD. I IN POST IRS n —— —I I I o 100' BIFFER I I y m W mI IL � PARCEL �nl A RK WIETT FOUR J & DB. 812 Frs. 1683 W_ I I K. P. WEBER m .. ZONE: RP DB. 324 PG. 188 to USE: REBID. ZONE: RP USE: REBID. N IRS I c>> DpS IN IRS� / STONE FENCE C /< CONSOLIDATED / TAX PARCEL 53-((A))-(o3A (COUNTY) (CITY) �/ 165.111-1 ACRES (TOTAL) // N FORMER LOT LINES_ HEREBY VACATED I PARCEL ui PASTWO L ( MATCH TO SHEET 5 OF 6 FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE Surveyors WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 Qom/ A " � ry z� 3 �42U'�I .Jtn t 40 DNS N STONE FENCE MARK D. SMITH No.002009 SHEET 4 OF 6 BK905PG 1 022 I Will HACK, ET AL ! D5. ISO PCs. 103 \ !D5. 253 PCs. 533 ZONE: RP USE: RESID. Iw � I �lk"00 , -,, FLU ORT ROAD - 6m' R/U1 I IRSC� I OLD y \P4 15 O 3 W v �\2 L32 CIO 10� ik� \ L28—� I� PARCEL `'' L27 �/' fRF � ONE 0 0 Ca EX. gLpG. \\p, \1 BLDG. EX• IRS !f 9 20'SEWER ESM't. I IIRF DB 183 PCs 255 O L22 ii� O G. L21 EX. i EX gLD 11� I BLDG. <<'0 20' GAS ESM't. I 11� D5WPG134 I I � J' FORMER LOT LINES D LL_ HEREBY VACATED 0 (ZONE BOUNDARY TO REMAIN) �Im N t L38 ZOZONE: NAIL FDLR(PUD) `39� ' LU _ GERALD F. SMITH . N 7700 E. 'I cn D5. 246 PG. 1714 IN POST LR E /� O ZONE: LR co PARCEL ' OI Ci PARCI=L o FIVE two U IRS � AI Q IRS N IRF L 1600 L 15 /IRF :Z r NAIL FD. L14 '?I.' IN P05T NAIL PC). GERALD F. SMITH IN POST I DO. 246 PG. 1174 ZONE: LR I NOTE SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA. I FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF T v WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MARK D. SMITH SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 DATE. APRIL 16, 1998 No.002009 GREENWAY ENGINEERING I �4 Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SUR Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 SHEET 5 OF 6 BK 288 PG 1 207 BOUNDARY LINE DATA NUM5ER DIRECTION DISTANCE L1 S i5'56'31" E 210-00' L2 N 16'33'18" E 312.97' L3 S 60'26'19" E 212.20' L4 N 29'33'41" E 150Z0' L5 S 60'26'19" E 400Z0' L6 N 29'33'41" E 15.00' Li S 59'36'20" E 225.00' L8 S 29'04'59" W 104.26' L9 S 11'14'41" E 514.43' L10 N 46'24'26" E 151BO, LIl S 49'01'34" E 222.50' L12 S 44'36'25" W 1237.56' L13 N 46'02'04" W 3239' L14 S 40'40'18" W 194.42' L15 S 35'32'20" W 140B-l' Lib S 33'05'41" W 223.11' LIl S 04'31'25" W 132.89' L18 N 52'22'09" W 35637' L19 N 44'51'0-1" W 161.6i' L20 S 61'23'50" W 139.25' L21 N 14'44'44" W 3634' L22 N 19'52'52" W 25.00' L23 N 19'5210" W 128.59' L24 N 21,13,121, W 12932' L25 N 18'43'57" W 92B5' 1_26 N 20'21'31" W 120.00' L21 N 15'36'22" W 5004' L28 N 09'42'20" W 9.98' L29 N 09'36108" W 58.10' L30 N 11,30,30" W 133B9' L31 N 14'12'21" W 10531, L32 N 24'29'53" E 21.96' L33 N 14'12'21" W g4Bro' L34 N 04'40'51" W 185.99' L35 N 0418'll" W 241bi' 1_36 S l8'41'30" E 30634' L37 N 01'20'55" E 485.18' 8K905PG1023 ZONING E30UNDARY DATA NUM5ER DIRECTION DISTANCE L38 N 36'04'55" E I 684.85' L39 N 10'5-1'59" E I786'i AREA TABULATION PARCEL ONE 263317 ACRES PARCEL TWO 141392 ACRES PARCEL THREE 2.9360 ACRES PARCEL FOUR 16b516 ACRES PARCEL FIVE = 4.4533 ACRES TOTAL AREA a 65.1117 ACRES AREA WITHIN CITY OF WINCHESTER = 16B3'10 ACRES AREA WITHIN FREDERICK COUNTY = 482-14-1 ACRES NOTE$ IRON REBAR FOUND 1. IRF 2. IRS IRON REBAR SET 3. CMF = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND 4. DNS DRILL HOLE SET 5. BRL BUILDINCs RESTRICTION LINE 6. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED CU'IRVE DATA NUMBER DELTA RADIUS ARC TAW- ENt CHORD Cl 41'24'33" 40�00' 28.91' 15.12' N 45'12'10" E - 2828' C2 221'24'11" 40.00' 154b7' N 44'41'42" W - 1423' C3 '11'I1'07" 50.00' 6l.44' 39.98' N 52'42'21" E - 62.45' FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, MRGINIA SCALE: N/A I DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 QREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE 9 WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 MARK D. SMITH No.002009 SHEET 6 OF 6 BK 488 PG1208 BK90-bPG102 VIRGINIA, CITY OF WINCHMITER, BCT. This i nt k" of writing was to m � e �lp day of , was and with certi i of acknowledgement thereto annexed % j i ted to record. Tax imposed by See. 58.1-802 of $ ,and 5 -801 have bnpai if assessable. Deputy Clerk UIRGINIA: FREDERICK COUNTY, SCT. Thi Instrument If riting wasrloduced me on the LzaL day of at and with certificate o owledgment thereto annexed was admitted to rec d. Tax imposed by Sec. t8.1-802 of $_la, and 5a.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. 4-ems " � `'"✓ I Clerk 1 - COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA L' IA .� S o no N Z G OFFICIAL RECEIPT :. <= FREDERIr _!RCJIT CJ�RT DEED PECElPT a' € CASHIER RPHcy PEG: 4l.I7y4? vv ACCC•UT: ^59;;LRyD:?��t'�b4 RECEIPT: 4E;Oc3o?,�3 DC o INSTIRVENT GRANTOR: OR: WESTX 9E< :)0`h �E: PWIENT: F!'L: P4,; y YOU.,: n5 P PAGE" It1l6. rpncD -o IST F- P'IF '' RECJ.,�._4:: CA,MTER_i1RY T o. P.1 6,.4" ; iT _, ,-c fitEE::C. �, WINCHESTER ;►dE L,�i, FREDEFIC! EI: H iOL. N ' 9 CO `.ND 0DRES3 RECEI',ED GF 300 �ELTMI"-Tc J `-' + PCT: -' aJr R-GAF E Dl. y j UESTM��I c:_-� RL•iP, R, kNNESTE?. M. 2L,03 �_ S'E:. . p CHECn CANTEHE�4Y rF _ JVJ n,lT � SEE'• �:.8.::.,. L� E ?. �. i5i ,i�b cctDtoT � JESCR.: I.2.4 'JEER OF S ' TDAT O!N�,- A nieT �DI1JVL iUf.1J1( � U1J, :r3;2SIDERATPH J Ci DE DESCRIPTIO?' " AS, A." : A. "A= 3 0 1 KEDC PAID CODE rESCRI'PTIOt 24.0" 145 anrn 1 " TECH'lOiLfiY SLF FUND FEE 3.00 I.00 TENDERED 2a.fY:, AMOlyNT 'PAID: ?8.'i4 DC- 18(%97) CHaNBE A'1T 00 C►-ERt: OF C90RT: REBECCA P. HOSAN COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DC-18 (1 1/96) BK288 pG1200 QK905PG 10 16 THIS DEED OF CONSOLIDATION made and dated this d day of May, 1998, by and between WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC., a Virginia corporation, hereinafter "Owner", the COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA, hereinafter "County"), and the CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA, hereinafter "City". RECITALS: 1. The Owner is vested with title to those certain five lots or parcels of land situate partly in the City and the County, containing in the aggregate 65.1117 acres (16.8370 acres situate in the City and 48.2747 acres situate in the County), as more particularly set forth on that certain Final Plat for Lot Consolidation of the Lands of Westminster - Canterbury of Winchester, Inc. drawn by Mark D. Smith, L.S., dated April 16, 1998 (the "Plat"), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 2. It is the intention of the Owner to consolidate or merge Parcel 1, Parcel 2, Parcel 3, Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 into a single parcel or tract of land as more particularly described on the Plat. 3. The County and City have agreed to this consolidation of lands as set forth herein as evidenced on the Plat. NOW, THEREFORE WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid by each of the parties hereto unto the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and other consideration deemed adequate at law, the parties do hereby agree as follows: BK288PG1201 full. BK905PG1011 A. The Recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if set out in B. The Owner, with the express consent of the County and the City, hereby consolidates and mergers Parcel 1, Parcel 2, Parcel 3, Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 as shown on the Plat into one tract of land situate partly in Gainesboro Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia (48.2747 acres) and the City of Winchester, Virginia (16.8370 acres), containing in the aggregate 65.1117 acres, as more particularly set forth on the Plat. C. The consolidation of the parcels of land as set forth herein is with the express consent of the County and City, as evidenced by the execution of the Plat by the respective parties. WITNESS these signatures and seals: WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE, CITY/COUNTY of � , to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowVedged before me, a Notary Public in for the foresaid State and Jurisdiction, this o? I • day of , 1998 by M d)0_e as Pees of WE TMINSTER - CANTE URY OF WINCHESTER, INC. My Commission expires: -7 i_T/;• NOTA Y PUBLIC MLB/pmn .2 :. �' k s cADeeds\Westminster dov ' 18 111P-- FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CNSOUIb 10f fR 23 1998 OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINC GAINESBORO DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY AND CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA APRIL 16, 1998 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER — CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC., AS APPEARS ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLATS, IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDER— SIGNED Q1 NERS, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY. �OI�Qv1ONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY .� �QUNTY OF Co THE; FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE 96F 19y�BY_� E MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TO WIT: WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ' DAY NOTARY PUBLIC I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED IN THIS CONSOLIDATION IS ALL OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. IN FIVE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL ONE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 25, 1985 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 312 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 333, LESS A PORTION CONVEYED TO FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA BY DEED DATED JULY 8, 1985 OF RECORD IN SAID CLERK'S OFFICE OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 324 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 345. PARCEL TWO ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 25, 1985 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (i) FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 318 AND (ii) CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 194 AT PAGE 339. PARCEL THREE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED APRIL 30, 1984 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 575 AT PAGE 498. PARCEL FOUR ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED JUNE 8, 1987 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 654 AT PAGE 97. PARCEL FIVE ACQUIRED BY DEED DATED APRIL 30, 1987 OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER IN DEED BOOK 221 AT PAGE 569. — FREDERICK OUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF WIN HESTE -SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR — — I w ) L L<:�:: MARK D. SMITH, L.S. 4�30 �98 DATE 4DE ral7\ QR*-C WAY e4GINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE k4007 WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 MARK D. SMITH � No.002009 SHEET I OF 6 HZddNGI .�j rn (` Q Uj �C w c/TY�> Q �4L' Q. U 4. BK905PG1019 s RTF, s 5�-JNtJY�I DE 'a W 00 rn n ti m M f \ aoTNEas W I NGHE STE r? ST vlclNlT�( 5�A LE : I " = Zoe U l/ SITE PARENT TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION FREDERICK COUNTY PARCEL ONE 53—((A))-63A 26.3317 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL TWO 53—((A))-63B 14.7392 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: VACANT PARCEL THREE 53-((4))-(3)-J 2.9360 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL FOUR 53-((A))-52B 16.6516 ACRES ZONE: RP USE: RESIDENTIAL PARCEL FIVE N/A 4.4533 ACRES 4_0 4- CITY OF WINCHESTER PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 ZONE: LR(PUD) USE: RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 ZONE: LR USE: VACANT N/A N/A PORTION OF 131—((1))— —1 ZONE: LR USE: VACANT FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: AS SHOWN I DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 QREENWAY ENQINEERIM Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FouncWd in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 MARK D. SMITH >' No.002009 SHEET 2 OF 6 BK905PG 1 020 JP. DARLINGTON'8 BUBDIVI810N 9 DB 218 F G 553 ,n ZONE: RP USE= RESID. 6 14Uj 6 � 5 15 c J 16 8 4 L5 11 IIR3— 15' BRL L3 18 I r---- h SIRS 15' BRI.�IRS A10m ESUF1^�R TUBA -A .OLl E6M7.ivy DB642FIG 101 PARCEL FOUR FORMER LOT LINE HEREBY VACATED I--35' BRL EASEMENT \ \ DB , 01 1 C07-rAccs �' PARCEL �O� �4 ram\ � tHREE �Ol WJ;). HACK Et AL DB. -18m PG. 103 DB. 253 PG. 533 ZONES RP USE: REBID PARCEL ONE NOTE MATCH TO SHEET 5 OF 6 SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA. FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: APRIL 18, 1998 QREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 FoundQd to 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 Uj MARK D. SMITH � No.002oos SHEET 3 OF 6 BK 2 R R P(; 1 9 A S T J.P. DAIRLIN63TON'8 8UBD I V 181 ON DB216FG553 ZONE: RP USE: REBID. 6 2 -► $ 0 6 5 3 Q C.I -I L7 4 J I- -jF"BRT--j — I I R8 n I &g05PG102 NOTE SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA. W. J. PEACEMAKER DB. 320 FiG. 335 ZONE: RP USE: REBID. NAIL FD, IN POST 100' BUFFER I I d) rn PARCEL I=MR I mI m Y R1C NIETT $J DB. 812 F G. 1683 tY I I < P. WEBER Q m ZONE: RP I DB. 324 FG. 188 OC Q USE: RE81D. ZONE: RP USE: REBID. N IRS I I _ c>> DNS IN ►� / n / STONE FENCE Lg CONSOLIDATED / TAX PARCEL (COUNTY) / \ 131-((1))--1 (CITY) 165.111-i ACRES (TOTAL) FORMER LOT UNES_� HEREBY VACATED PARCEL PA ONE � TWO MATCH TO SHEET 5 OF 6 FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CRY OF WINCHESTER AND GAIN ESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 DATE: APRIL 18 1998 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE :07 WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 `- DH8 N STONE FENCE MARK D. SMITH No.002009 .S - SHEET 4 OF 6 BK905PG 1 022 I W.W. HACK, ET AL I DB. 180 PG. 103 \ IDB. 253 PCs. 533 ZONE: RP U8E: RE81D. lk <\ 1Rs 1 'J� OLD FORT ROAD I Cl cv \ 16 �\g\ 15 \\L2 L32 i -\�0 �0� Tk^ L2B--\ IRF PARCEL L27 IRF ONE 0 (a3 �IRF IRF IV EX. SLOG. BLDG. EX• tip`IV IRS 9 20'5EUER E5M'T. IV IRF DB 153 PG 255 O L22 �21 0 X. i EX. gLOG. BLDG. 20' GAS E5M'T. I� DB 193 PG 134 I FORMER LOT LINES 0j % J HEREBY VACATED -( It Z (ZONE BOUNDARY TO REMAIN) N •10 ZONE: 70 NAIL PD. L38`3g CsER.4LD F. 8MITH Z DB. 246 PG. 17�1d IN POST ONE. LR z ZONE= LR ao PARCEL ZI FIVE NI PAS L IRS 70. L16 L15 0 /�, Ifs z AIL PD.C14 IN P08T NAIL FD. 1� a 8� GERALD F. 5MITH IN P05T ' DB. 246 PG. 1-174 ZONE: LR NOTE 5EE SHEET 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE DATA, I FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC, CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 1''oundvd in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 ,& v 9 ��_/ '�' U MARK D. SMITH No.002009 SHEET 5 OF 6 z BK288PG1207 BOUNDARY LINE DATA NUMBER DIRECTION DISTANCE LI S 15'56'31" E 210.00' L2 N 16'33'18" E 312.91' L3 S 60'26'19" E 21220' L4 N 29'33'41" E 150100' L5 S 60'26'19" E 400.00' L6 N 29'33'41" E 15z0' LS S 59'36'20" E 225.00' L8 S 29'04'59" W 10426' L9 S 11'14'41" E 514.43' LIO N 46'24'26" E 151BO, 1_11 S 49'01'34" E 222BO' L12 S 44'36'25" W 123156' L13 N 46'02'04" W 3239' L14 S 40'40'18" W 19,4.42' L15 S 35'32'20" W 14081' LI6 S 33'05'41" W 223.11' L11 S 04'31'25" W 132.89' L18 N 52'22'09" W 35631' L19 N 44'51'01" W 161b1' L20 S 81'23'50" W 13925' L21 N 14'44'44" W 3834' L22 N 19'52'52" W 25.00' L23 N 19'52'I0" W 128Be' L24 N 21'13'12" W 12932' L25 N 18'43'51" W 92B5' L26 N 20'21'31" W 120.00' L21 N 15'36'22" W 50.04' L28 N 09'42'20" W 9.98' L29 N 09'36108" W 58.10' L30 N 11 *30,301, W 13359' L31 N 14'1271" W 10531' L32 N 24'29'53" E 21.96' L33 N 14'12'27" W 9456' L34 N 04'40'51" W 185.99' L35 N 04'18'11" W 241161' L36 S 18'41'30" E 30834' L31 N 01'20'55" E 485.18' 6K905PG 1023 ZONING BOUNDARY DATA NUM5ER DIRECTION DISTANCE L38 N 36'04'55" E 684.85' L39 N 10'51'59" E 112611 ,4RE,4 TABULATION PARCEL ONE 263311 ACRES PARCEL TWO ■ 14.1392 ACRES PARCEL THREE ■ 2.9360 ACRES PARCEL FOUR ■ Ibb516 ACRES PARCEL FIVE ■ 4.4533 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 65.1111 ACRES AREA WITHIN CITY OF WINCHESTER = 168310 ACRES AREA WITHIN FREDERICK COUNTY = 482141 ACRES NOTES 1% " IRON REBAR FOUND 1. NIP _ 2. IRS 1%" IRON REBAR SET 3. CMF = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND 4. DHS = DRILL HOLE SET 5. BRL ■ BUILDINCs RESTRICTION LINE 6. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED r CURVE DATA, NUMBER DELTA RADIUS ARC TAWSENt CHORD Cl 41'24'33" 40.00' 28.91' 15.12, N 4501210" E - 2828' C2 221'24'11" 40.00' 154.51' _ N 44'41'42" W - 14.83' C3 11*11,01" 50.00' 61.44' 39.98' N 52'42'21" E - 62.45' FINAL PLAT FOR LOT CONSOLIDATION OF THE LANDS OF WESTMINSTER—CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: N/A I DATE: APRIL 16, 1998 GREENWAY ENGINEERING Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 Surveyors TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185 Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528 DARK D. SMITH No.002009 SHEET 6 OF 6 BK 488 PG1208 BK905PG102 VIRGINIA, CITY OF WINCHUSITER, 6CT. This ins nt of wonting wM day of , at and with certi t of acknowledgement thereto annexed -,r• t ted to record. Tax irNposed by See. 58.1-802 of � ,and 5 -801 have pai if assessable. Deputy Clerk V:RGINIA: FREDERICK COUNTY, SCT 2LThi Instrument f s iting was fr�oduced me on them day of 197_Q, at and with certificate 0046, owledgment thereto annexed was admitted to rec d. Tax Imposed by Sec. §8.1-802 of $ Al&--, and 58.1-801 have �� been paid, if assessable ����� � ��y��t�1�'—�-✓, Clerk COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 5 � \ N Ill0,91 va 53A - 2- C- 7- CATLETT, KENNETH J. CIO SATOKO CATLETT 114 0AK a* S, pE L191JE WINCHESTER, VA 22603-3558 U.S. POST:S.. n Yi 01, H METER 51 [ % NIXIE a037 1 za 11i13/97 RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD •-- - --• crr.>;ysrt=