HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-90 Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Company - Stonewall - Backfile (2)COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5650
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST FAX 703/667-0370
The application is not complete if the following are not present
1. Two sets of comment sheets from the following agencies
along with any marked copies of the plan;
VDOT City of Winchester
Q-V Co. San. Auth. ( v Co. Hlth. Dept.
6 9 Inspections Dept. Parks & Rec.
8-�3 Fire Marshall Airport Authority
80 2. 2 copies of the MDP application
3. 25 copies of the plan on a single sheet
4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required)
- . 5. a 35mm. slide of the plan
* One copy of the application and comment sheets, three
copies of the plan and the marked plans from the review
agencies should be enclosed in a package which will be
forwarded to the County Engineer.
TRACKING
t
DATE
�: 90 Application Received
B-ID -q0 MDP information forwarded to Consulting Engineer
Review/Invoice received from Engineer
0 .a Fee Paid (amount $ 1500-OD (base (2o.161od. ��o QCr2
,lQ MDP heard by Planning Commission
MDP heard by Board of Supervisors
F 1141al Final MDP submitted with review agency, Planning
A Commission, and Board of Supervisors comments addressed;
deed of dedication bond estimate
Final plat information forwarded to Engineer
Review received from Engineer
Final Fee paid and MDP approved.
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
RECEIPT
022949
AMOUNT DUE
$-�. / 0 7 �y
BALANCE DUE
PAID BY
,❑ CASH
� )( CHECK
❑� OTHER
017761
FREDERICK COUNTY DEPT. Of WANING AND DE'ALUPMEN4
P.O. BOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE
WlINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 • (703) 665-5651
D ATE
RECEIVED FROM
--- _ AN "ly,
FOR
DAY TIMERS RF-ORDER No. 3221 — Printed in USA
COUNTY of FREDERICK.
Mt.:Jackson, Virginia 22824
Dear. . Mr . Rea,:
This letter. is to notify you that on January 4,.1991 the Final
Master Development':Plan #008-90 for. Valley Fertilizer was
administratively approved. Enclosed are two copies of the signed
plans for your.files.
If you.have.any questions regarding the approval of this plan, do
not hesitate to call this office.
Kris i ney
Deputy Director
KCT/slk
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
i
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/66575651
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FAX 703/667-0370
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5651
Letter of Transmittal
TO: Donahue & Associates
ATTN: Paul A. Bernard, P.E.
FROM: Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director
DATE: August 9, 1990
GENTLEMEN:
We are sending you the attached:
Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Company
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
for your use as requested
X for review and comment
COMMENTS:
signed:
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
RECEIVED J U c 0 2 1990
COUNTY of FREDERICK
IDepartment of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703/667-0370
Frederick County Fire Marshal
P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-6350
The Frederick County Fire Marshal is located at 21 Court Square in
Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co. Inc.
P. o. Box 816 Mt. Jackson, VA 22842 (703)662-8280
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Location:
Nnrth side of State Route #837, in the Stonewall
lei ctri ci- of Fredrick Co un y, Virginia
Fire Marshal Comments:
Fire Marshal Signature & Date C. T-
(NOTICE TO FIRE MARSHAL _ PLEASR RETURN THIS FORD TO APPLICANT.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach two copies of your plans and/or application form.
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick -Winchester Health Department
ATTN: Herbert L. Sluder, Sanitation Engineer
P.O. Box 2056, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 667-9747
The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the
intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you
prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number: �L°1
Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co, Inc.
P.O. Box 816 Mt. Jackson, VA 22842 (703)662-8280
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Valley Industrial Park
Location:
North side of Sate Route # 837, in the Stonewall District of
Fredrick County, Virginia
Health Department Comments:
.3
PLc&j_ I — #PPIWE�) -Fv2 600 �j� �� (8'�Ctiv, ��reS pwvtp
Irvini ) Fia 36D
Health Signature and Date:
(NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - PLEAS
lv-1 Z-9
/71
RE URN THI FORM TO APPLICANT.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
16
djl 4,e� D2 t3Y�oS
61
fz) `i •e lam - .,al
0
C5
4�l�
41M
aE�Deuj" IDiO
Frederick County Inspections Department
ATTN: Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director
P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5651
The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court
Square in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review
form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Valley Fertilizpr & Chemical C'n_ Tnrr
P.O. Box : • Mt. Jackson, VA 22R421 .. :1
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Valley Industrial Park
Location:
North side of State Route 4837, in the gtnnPwill ni ctrir•t
Ins
c.
off Fredrick County. Viriginia
Department Comments:
-a_ 0C
Inspect. Signature & Date
(NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS -
<)
ItEASE RETURN THIS FOM4 TO
Ali
%—/.7-90
LICANT.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
19
0
6
REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS
Virginia Department of Transportation
ATTN: William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer
P.O. Box 278, Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278
(703) 984-4133
The local office of the Transportation Department is located at
1550 Commerce Street, if you prefer to hand deliver this review
form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Vallev Fertilizer & Chemical Co. Inc.
P .0. Box 816 Mt. Jackson, VA 22842 (703)662-8280
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Valley Industrial Park
Location:
North side of State Route # 837 , in the Stonewall District
of Fredrick County, Virginia
Transportation Department Comments:
No overall objection to master plan for this pry e-Ly. However, the existing
substandard entrance will need to be upgraded to minimum commercial standards
and a 50' spacing re uirement met between the entrance and subdivision entrance.
Before making any tinal comments this office will require a complete set o
site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the ITE Trip Generation
Manual 4th Edition torreview. Be ore starting work on the State s right-of-way the
developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to
cover saki worK.
VDOT Signature and Date: � -� /j `o
(NOTICE TO VDOT - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE APPLICA
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach THREE copies of your plans and/or application form.
18
r-CSA
1990
7-Y � r
-�'ST FORR DEVELOPMENT &IWEf
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
ATTN: Wellington Jones, Engineer/Director
P.O. Box 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5690
The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second
floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you
prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Valley Fertilzier & Chemical Co Inc.
Box 816 Mt. Jackson,!(703)662-8280
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Valley Industrial Park
Location:
Noth side of State Route # 837 in the Stonewall District
of Fredrick County, Virginia
Sanitation Authority Comments:
4/0 (rO Ott .t1,E•yTS . 4/0 NF w C- o 4Y S TA yr-,''io V s *0 w�
,JUST .44YOv7' 0,,9� LOTS.
Sanitation Signature & Date: (/G p
(NOTICE TO SANITATION - PLE44aLr RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICA '.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form.
Sri
15 t! tr----- -
0
P/C review date 10/03/90
BOS review date 10/24/90
PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #008-90
VALLEY FERTILIZER & CHEMICAL CO.
Zoned M2 (Industrial General)
20.181 Acres
LOCATION: On the north side of State Route 837
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
ADJACENT LAND USE & ZONING: M-1 (Light Industrial), and RA (Rural
Areas) zoning, land use - storage and pasture
PROPOSED USE & IMPROVEMENTS: General M-2 uses
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
VA. Dept. of Transportation - No overall objection to the
master plan for this property. However, the existing
substandard entrance will need to be upgraded to minimum
commercial standards and a 50' spacing requirement met between
the entrance and subdivision entrance. Before making any
final comments this office will require a complete set of site
plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the
ITE Trip Generation Manual 4th Edition for review. Before
starting work on the State's right-of-way the developer will
need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate
permits to cover said work.
Sanitation Authority - No comments. No new construction
shown, just layout of lots.
Fire Marshal - See attached comments
Inspections Department - This request for master development
plan approval shall comply to USE GROUP of the BOCA National
Building Code," 1987". The use group will be determined at
the time of plans review.
Health Department - Three lots approved for on -site sewage
disposal:
Ll
Page 2
PMDP Valley Fertilizer
Parcel 1 - approved for 600 gal/day (equiv. to 4-BR) requires
PUMP
Parcel 3 - approved for 300 gal/day (equiv. to 2-BR) requires
pump
Parcel 4 - approved for 300 gal/day (equiv. to 2-BR) gravity
Planning & Zoning - The preliminary MDP, proposing the
creation of four lots out of the existing 20-acre M1 parcel,
is appropriate for this zone. The parcel fronts on State
Route 837 and the PMDP shows a State maintained entrance road
to be constructed to serve the newly created lots.
The plan needs to indicate a method of stormwater management.
Stormwater could be dealt with on each lot individually at the
time of site plan approval or for the entire site at
subdivision. It appears that the eastern portion of the site
could be utilized for a stormwater detention/retention area.
The plan.also needs to indicate a method for supplying water
to each of the proposed lots. This proposal will need to be
approved by the Sanitation Authority.
Any right-of-way needed for future expansion of Route 837
should be dedicated at subdivision along with any easements
required for railroad spurs, stormwater or water lines.
An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required
prior to any site plan approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1013190: Approval, with all review agency
comments and above requirements being meet prior to final approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS OF 10103190: Unanimous
approval with Mr. Wilson and Chairman Golladay abstaining.
i
0
APPLICATION
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Frederick County
Virginia
Date: June 6, 1990 Application #;C,^� _Cif
OWNERS NAME: Vallev Fertilizer & Chemical Co. Inc.
(Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest)
APPLICANT/AGENT:
P. O. 816
Address: Mt. Jackson
Virginia 22842
Daytime Phone Number 703-662-8280
DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co., Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 816
Mt. Jackson, VA 22842
Phone Number 703-477-3121
Contact Name William H. Rea
�1300.°° Free
8D� -Zq / 61 M, @ 'ND/01.)
/off. 0 .{giaI
PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CHECKLIST
The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in
insuring that all required information is provided or is available
to allow review by the County.
This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with
the preliminary master development plan. All required items must
be provided on the PMDP.
Background Information:
1. Development's name: Valley Industrial Park
2. Location of property:North side of State Route #837
3. Total area of property:
20.181 Acres
4. Tax ID # (21 Digit) 44000A000000000000060
5. Property zoning and present use M-2 Large Truck Parts Sales -
6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: M-1 Industry, R-A
Storage, & R-A Pasture
7. Proposed Uses: To Sell 3 of 4 Lots for general M-2 use
8. Magisterial District: Stonewall
9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan?
Original x Amended
8
�1 AUG
General Information:
1. Have the following items been included?
North arrow
Yes
x
No
Scale
Yes
x
No
Legend
Yes
x
No
Boundary Survey
Yes
x
No
Total Area
Yes
x
No
Topography
Yes
x
No
Project Title
Yes
x
No
Preparation and Revision Date
Yes
x
No
Applicant's Signed
Yes
x
No
Consent Statement
2. Number of phases proposed? one
3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan?
Yes x No
4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated?
Yes x No
5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project
and all public roads within 2,000 feet.
Yes x No
6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes x No
7. Are environmental features clearly shown?
Yes x No
8. Describe the following environmental features:
Total Area
(Acres)
Floodplains 0
Lakes and ponds 0
Natural retention
areas 0
Steep slopes
(15% or more) 0
Woodlands 0
% Disturbed Acres in
by development Open Space
0
CJ
9. Are the following shown on the master development plan?
Street layout Yes x No
Entrances Yes No
Parking areas Yes No x
Utilities (mains) Yes No x
10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided?
Yes Now_
11. Have all historical structures been identified?
Yes x No
12. Are signature lines for the Director of Planning and the County
Administrator provided on the plan?
Yes No x
Residential Uses
If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP,
(Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following
items should be completed.
1. What numbers and types of housing are proposed?
2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each
phase:
Open space acreage Yes No
Acreage in each housing type Yes No
Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes No
Total acreage Yes No
Number of dwellings of each type Yes No
3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open
space?
10
%1 i
i
Jii
0
•
4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes No
5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed?_
6. Are separation buffers required? Yes No
7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes No
8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required?
Yes No
9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by
the plan with profiles or examples? Yes No
10. Are any of the following bonus improvements proposed to be
used?
Recreational Facilities Yes No
Energy Conservation Yes No
Pedestrian or Bikeway System Yes No
Underground Utilities Yes No
Street Design Yes No
11. How many bonus factors have been earned?
12. How will the bonus factors be used?
11
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the
public hearing.. For the purposes of thus application, adjoining
property is any property abutting the requested property on the
side or rear or any property directly across a road from the
requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the fol-
lowing information on each adjoining property including the
21-digit tax parcel identification number which maybe obtained
from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue.
Name
Address and Property Identification
1
Address:
Rt. 8, Box 655
Winchester, VA 22601
Allen L. Shirley.
Property
ID.>44000A000000000000080
2
Address:.
Rt . - 2 , Box 1 8 6
'
Stephenspn, VA 22656
Donald H. Shirley
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000070
3
Address:
Rt. 8, Box 655
Winchester, VA 22601
C. Edward Shirley, ETAC
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000050
4
Address:
P.O. Box 3275
Winchester-, VA 22601
Zuckerman Co., Inc.
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000+120
5
Address:
P.O. Box 2037
Winchester, VA 22601
C&S Steel Fabrication
Inc
Property
TD: 4400.OA000000000000120
6
Address:
P.O. Box 3231
Winchester, VA' 22601
Buckley Lages, Inc.
Property
ID: 43000A000000000000830
7
Address:
Property
ID:
8
Address:
Property
ID:.
9
Address:
Property
ID:
10
Address:
Property
ID:
�. s ;
COUNTY of FREDERICK
IDepartment of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
October 10, 1990
TO THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S)
The Application of: VALLEY FERTILIZER
PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: General uses allowed in
the M-2 (Industrial -General) district. This property, consisting
of 20.181, is located on the north side of State Route 837 in the
Stonewall Magisterial District.
This preliminary master development plan will be considered by the
Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of October
24, 1990 at 7:15 p.m., in the board room of the old Frederick
County Courthouse, Winchester, Virginia.
Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may
attend this meeting.
Sincerely,
Kris C. Tierney
Deputy Director
KCT/slk
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
This is to certify that the attached correspondence wan mailed to the following"'on.
October 10, 1990fr*he Department of Planning and Oelopment, Frederick
County, Virginia:
�811.1 \ Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co. ,Inc. l
R1..E;:y , ALL -EN N L.P.O. Box 816
VA.. Mount Jackson, Virginia 22842
`
st••l.t.1'iL...::.Y , I)t:)1�irlt...I) .i••1 « -- - - -
.. r
� ::11 I:I:FiI..•lii:Y, tr , E.-I)WA RX){)& i')L}L>'.:N L.t)t)t){)t);:"o
RY . i:y X."4(3x 6:15::1;
- - o saes>t)ry00<)t>t3e)«t)t)t)t)()
X-M.)x 32715
j W:1:NC:1•'1(:Na'Y'i:i:F2, VA. 224
I\,C&S Steel Fabrication, Inc.
P.O. Box 2037
Wi-ncheser, Virginia 22601
-- ---t--
id:I:P*li:a••ii:;i's'T'l�:F't, '+lri.,
. i I
Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Director
Frederick County Dept. of Planning'
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
I, Debi D: 'Siaimley'a Notary Public in and for the " state and
county aforesaid, do hereby certify that Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Director,
for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the
foregoing, dated Oct'ober'10,_'1990' has "personally appeared before me and,:
acknowledged the same in my state and county foresaid.
Given under my hand this loth day of October 1990
My commission expires on September 30, 1993
COUNTY of FREDERICK
IDepartment of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
September 19, 1990
TO THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S)
The Application of: VALLEY FERTILIZER
PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR: General uses allowed in
the M-2 (Industrial -General) district. This property, consisting
of 20.181, is located on the north side of State Route 837 in the
Stonewall Magisterial District.
This preliminary master development plan will be considered by the
Frederick County Planning Commission at their meeting of October
3, 1990 at 7:30 p.m., in the board room of the old Frederick County
Courthouse, Winchester, Virginia.
Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may
attend this meeting.
Sincerely,
Kris C. Tierne
Deputy Director
KCT/slk
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
This is to certify that .the attached correspondence: was mailed to the following on
September 19, 199(fr he Department of Planning and Oelopment, Frederick
County, Virginia: __ _--___.--- -------------___-- ---_ —.
Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co., Inc. 1
I
P.O. Box 816 i
Winchester, VA, 22601
- - - -- - --R4•�L}{>4)r•'1{J4)t){?C347S5{)4){}L�4)4)£i
bia:i'wi...EE:Y, Dfli ir•'ai...a !••I.,
}E::1f}WAi'iI} 'f� r,l.:. 1:.Cis! L. h
W:I:N(:;I••1lEE: i*,fi:::i°�, VA.,
I
C & S Steel Fabrication, Inc.
P.O. Box 2037 J
Winchester, Va. 22601
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Ysi.J(:3lLi...E:y l...r GE ,83 :i:NC— r
F, 0 x+(:)x lh.Z31-
W:i:N(:1'IAEE:8*T'1:.TP , Val �
Kr s C. T' rn y. D puty Dir
Frederic nt ept, of� ning
I, Debi D. SwImley , a Notary Public in and for the state and
county aforesaid, do hereby certify that Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Director,
for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the
foregoing, dated September 19, 1990 , has personally appeared before me and
acknowledged the same in my state and county foresaid.
Given under my hand this 19th day of September J, 1990 .
My commission expires on September 30, 1993
NOTARY PUBLIC
IBC
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the
public hearing.. For the purposes of this application, adjoining
property is any property abutting the requested property on the
side or rear or any property directly across a road from the
requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the fol-
lowing information on each adjoining property including the
21-digit tax parcel identification number which may be obtained
from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue.
Name
Address
and Property Identification
1
Address:
Rt. 8, Box 655
Winchester, VA 22601
Allen L. Shirley
Property
ID:.44000A000000000000080
2
Address:
Rt. 2, Box 186
'
Stephenson, VA 22656
Donald H. Shirley
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000070
3
Address:
Rt. 8, Box 655
Winchester, VA 22601
C. Edward Shirley, ETAC
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000050
4
Address:
P.O. Box 3275
Zuckerman Co., Inc.
Property
Winchester, VA 22601
ID: 44000A000000000000120
5
Address:
P.O. Box 2037
Winchester, VA 22601
C&S Steel Fabrication
Inc
Property
ID: 44000A000000000000120
6
Address:
P.O. Box 3231
Winchester, VA 22601
Buckley Lages, Inc.
Property
ID: 43000A000000000000830
7
Address:
Property
ID:
8
Address:
Property
ID:.
9
Address:
Property
ID:
10
Address:
Property
ID:
14
MA."114 ITRMAN CO. a I Nt:",.
327`5
i**koon, 0000000000do
C' C).., INN, n-
VA.
VA.
22601.—
ZUC,KE-:-'RM(NN C.M., INC-*-
VA.
5�
March 21, 1991
Donohue
11240 Waples Mill Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
SHENANDOAH
ENGINEERING
LTD • 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
P.O. Box 462 703745974958 Fax 45972957
Attention: Mr. Paul Bernard, P.E.
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Paul,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are three copies of the
revised preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County
near Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision, plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
Sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
C �
rav-'i-d. ushrnan, P.E., -"''----
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham III, Esq., w./encl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL EN(.'INEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
1
5�
March 21, 1991
SHENANDOAH
ENGINEERING
LTD 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
P.O. Box 618
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Attention:Mr. Wellington Jones, P.E.
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Wendy,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are two copies of the
revised preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County
near Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
Sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
n
rely, L. ushman, P.E.,
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham III, Esq., w./encl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
1
5�
March 21, 1991
SHENANDOAH
ENGINEERING
LTD • 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
1 P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957
Frederick County Fire Marshall
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Va 22601
Attention: Mr. Douglas A. Kiracofe
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Mr. Kiracofe,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are two copies of the
revised preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County
near Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been -reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
Sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
2incerely„
vid L. Bushman, P.E., '---
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham III, Esq., w./encl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
1
SHENANDOAH
ENGINEERING
LT'D • 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957
March 21, 1991
Frederick County Health Department
P.O. Box 2056
Winchester, Va 22601
Attention:Mr. Herb Sluder
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Herb,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are a copy of the revised
preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County near
Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
eerely,
David L. Bushman, P.E.,
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham I1I, Esq., w./encl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
0
SHENANDOAH
ENGINEERING
LT'D • , 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957
March 21, 1991
Frederick County Inspections Department
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Va 22601
Attention:Mr. Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Mr. Coffelt,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are a copy of the revised
preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County near
Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
M
12-e75�__
David L. Bushman, P.E.,
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham III, Esq., w.lencl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
•
SHENANDOAH
MOM ENGINEERING
N�JW LTD. 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664
P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957
March 21, 1991
Virginia Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 278
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
Attention: Mr. Bob Childress
Re: Valley Industrial Park
Dear Bob,
Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are four sets of the revised
preliminary subdivision plan for the Valley Industrial Park located in Frederick County near
Stephenson. I have also enclosed the Frederick County comment sheet for your use.
This subdivision has already been reviewed and approved by your Department and has
received approval from the Planning Commission. The approved design showed 4 lots in the sub-
division with a new State maintained road providing access to lot 4. The plan also showed an 8"
water main along the new road providing water service to lot 4.
This revised subdivision plan shows 2 lots instead of the previous 4. Both lots are now pro-
vided with frontage on Route 837 and so the new State maintained road will not be necessary
along with the new 8" water main. Access and water will be provided from the existing Route 837
and the existing 8" watermain on the north side of the road. The stormwater detention ponds are
still shown on the plan as previously approved, however, the future owner/developer of lot 1 may
submit a revised stormwater management plan when they begin to develop lot 1. It will not be nec-
essary to construct these ponds until improvements are proposed to lot 1. As before all the struc-
tures shown on lot 2 are existing and no modifications or improvements are proposed to this lot. I
have also included a revised E & S plan which provides more information regarding the subdivi-
sion.
I hope that you are able give this project a speedy review since it has already received the
scrutiny of your Department. However, if you should have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to call.
incerely,
David L. Bushman, P.E.,
Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd.
enclosures
cc: Mr. Orville Smoot, Valley Fertilizer, Mt. Jackson, w/encl.
Mr. Harry T. Benham III, Esq., w./encl.
Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Planning Dept., w./encl.
file
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
1
rI
v oa-
VALLEY FEET. MOP
COMMONWEALTH of V1RQjJNJA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. 0. BOX 278
RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN
COMMISSIONER ( 703 ) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER
December 4, 1990
Mr. David L. Bushman, P.E. Ref: Valley Industrial Park TAfl P
C/O Shenandoah Engineering Ltd. Route 837
131 South Main Street Frederick County
P. 0. Box 462
Woodstock, Virginia 22664
Dear Dave:
Upon review of the above referenced development's site plan dated
November, 1990 please find our comments on the attached plans marked in red
and as follows:
1. The fill shoulder is to be increased to 6' in width.
2. A drainage easement should be provided between the cul-de-sac right-of-way
and detention pond #2 as noted. A maintenance/liability agreement between
VDOT and Frederick County will be required to cover responsibility of
detention pond #2 prior to the street being accepted into the State
Secondary Road System. Please ensure the developer understands this
requirement fully.
3. A fence will be required along the eastern right-of-way line as noted to
control entry into the access road from the existing gravel parking lot.
4. A standard VDOT stop sign will be required at the location noted.
5. A half typical section of the entrance improvements to Lot #2 will be
required. Also, the asphalt entrance taper is to be increased to 36' as
noted.
Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for final approval. Should any
changes be deemed necessary please design them to meet or exceed the above
recommendations.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
J. A. Copp, Trans. Ass't. Res. Engr.
6�0 '_C/� /� � � la
By: R. B. Childress, Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Sr.
RBC / rf
Attachments
xc: Mr. J. C. Heatwole, Mr. F. E. Wymer, Mr. R. W. Watkins --
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
a
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
AND
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
PLAN
FRLDERICK COUNTY
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK
NovEMBER,1990
REv.1, MARCH 21,1991
SHENANDOAIi
ENGINEERING
L;ID.
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL
131 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WOODSTOCK, VIRGINIA 22664
703-459-4958
Ll
NAIMATIVE
Project Description
The purpose of this project is to construct an industrial park consisting of 2 lots. The total
area of the tract of land is 20.181 acres. It is located in the Frederick County on the north side of
Route 837 on the east side of the W & M Railroad. The property is zoned M-2 Industry.
Existing Site Conditions
The property is presently improved by a block and metal building that houses a truck
parts business. The structure was formerly a fertilizer plant. The site is topographically gently
rolling in nature. The vegetation cover consist of grasses ,weeds, and mixed trees at its perimeter.
The site is well drained by two swales that begin at the southwest and run to the northeast. There
are no sinkholes located on this site.
Adjacent Property
The property is bounded on the west side by the W & M Railroad. To the north is agri-
cultural land. To the east is residential and agricultural land. To the south is State Route 837 with
Industrial land beyond.
Soils
There is only one soil category on this site. It is 14B - Frederick - Poplimento loams, 2 to
7 percent slopes. Typically the surface layer of this Frederick soil is dark brown loam about 7"
thick. The subsoil extends to a depth of 60" or more. It is yellowish red silty clay to a depth of
12". Below that, it is yellowish red and yellowish brown, mottled clay and yellowish red and
yellowish brown silty clay.
Typically, the surface layer of this Poplimento soil is dark yellowish brown loam about 5
inches thick. The subsoil extends to a depth of 50". In the upper part it is strong brown clay loam
to a depth of about 9". In the next part it is yellowish red and strong brown, mottled clay to a
depth of 39". In the lower part it is yellowish red and strong brown silty clay loam. The substra-
tum is mostly strong brown silty clay loam to a depth of 60" or more.
Critical Erosion Areas
The erosion hazard is moderate for these soils. However, due to the flat slopes and good
management practices, the erosion hazard should be minimized.
Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
There are no land disturbing activities planned for this subdivision until a time when site
development commences on lot 1. At that time an E & S plan for that site plan should be devel-
oped and would include the necessary control measures.
Stormwater Management
Calculation of runoff before and after development indicates the need for detention
facilities when lot 1 is developed. Two detention ponds are shown on the drawings near the
northeast and northwest corners of the property. The ponds have been sized for the 100 yr. storm
Page 2
and will not allow the discharge rate from the project to exceed the 2 yr. pre -development flow.
The construction of these detention ponds will not be required until a time when site develop-
ment activity begins on either lot 1 or 2.
Runoff Calculations
The rational method was used for computing the pre and post development runoff charac-
teristics. The runoff can be grouped into 2 distinct drainage areas. The first which is designated
as DA 1 on the site plan has a drainage area of 17.90 acres. The pre-existing C for this area is
0.39 and based on 75 % of the area at C=0.25 and the remaining 25 % at C=0.80. The second
drainage area DA-2 is 14.55 acres and has a pre -development C of 0.55. This is based on 54 % of
the are at C=0.80 and 46% at C=0.25. The post development drainage areas are the same as the
pre -development. The post development C for both drainage areas is 0.80. Calculations for the
detention ponds are included with this report.
Pre -development
Drainage Area Area Tc
1 17.90 acres 25 min.
2 14.55 acres 25 min.
Post -development
Drainage Areas Area Tc
1 17.90 acres 25 min.
2 14.55 acres 25 min.
Page 3
C Pre Dev. Runoff
0.39 16.75 cfs
0..55 19.21 cfs
Totals 35.96 cfs
C Post Dev. Runoff
0.80 34.37 cfs
0.80 27.94 cfs
Totals 62.31 cfs
Difference 26.35 cfs
0
CALCULATIONS
SOILS INFORMATION
Page 4
PRE
-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREAS
EX.-DA
Acres
C
tc
i(2)
i(10)
Q(2)cfs
Q(10)cfs
1
17.90
0.39
25
2.40
3.00
16.75
20.94
2
14.55
0.55
25
2.40
3.00-
19.21
24.01
POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE
AREAS
DA
Acres
C
tc
i(2)
i(10)
Q(2)cfs
Q(10)cfs
1
17.90
0.80
25
2.40
3.00
34.37
42.96
2
14.55
0.80
25
2.40
3.00
27.94
34.92
Difference: 26.34
P
POND #1 DESIGN
FOR
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK
FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA
11 /4/90
GENERAL
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY PROCEDURE IS TO DESIGN A STORM WATER DETENTION POND
WHICH WILL STORE THE PEAK OF A DESIGN STORM TO THE EXTENT ADEQUATE TO ALLOW
THE CONTROLLED RELEASE OF FLOW NO GREATER THAN THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO
DEVELOPEMENT.
DATA
PROJECT : VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK
COUNTY
FREDERICK
STATE
VA
ACREAGE
17.90
Tc
25.00
SCS CURVE:
N/A
C wgt-pre :
0.39
C wgt-post :
0.80
i 2
2.40
i 10
3.00
1 100
3.40
12-60min
1.30
110-60mih:
1.90
i100-60min:
2.80
Pond bottom
900.00 (also structure
invert)
PREDICT PRE/POST-DEVELOPEMENT
PEAK
FLOW
Q=CiA in CFS
difference
02-pre=
16.75
Q2-post=
34.37
17.61
Q10-pre=
20.94
010- post=
42.96
22.02
Q100-pre=
23.74
0100- post=
48.69
24.95
PREDICT INFLOW
HYDROGRAPH
time(min)
% of total 12-inches
110 -inches
1100-inches
0-10
8.00
0.104
0.152
0.224
10-20
9.00
0.117
0.171
0.252
20-30
11.00
0.143
0.209
0.308
30-40
49.00
0.637
0.931
1.372
40-50
15.00
0.195
0.285
0.42
50-60
8.00
0.104
0.152
0.224
totals
100.00
1.3
1.9
2.8
0
PREDICT INFLOW EQUATION
Q avg=(A)(43560)(C)(1/12)/(10min)(60sec)
86.6361
HYDROGI VALUES
in cfs
TIME
Qavg-2
Qavg-10
Qavg-100
0-10
9.01
13.17
19.41
10-20
10.14
14.81
21.83
20-30
12.39
18.11
26.68
30-40
55.19
80.66
118.86
40-50
16.89
24.69
36.39
50-60
9.01
13.17
19.41
60-70
2.79
4.07
6.00
PREDICT STAGE STORAGE RELATIONSHIP
accum
elevation
area
volume volume
900
0
0
8000
901
16000
8000
17072
S= 6.28615E-05
902
18144
25072
38560
904
20416
63632
TOTAL 63632
ASSUME OUTFLOW DEVICE
PIPE
0 in CFS
hgt above cntr
elev
10
12
15
18
21
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
1
2.92
4.21
6.57
9.47
12.89
2
2
4.13
5.95
9.30
13.39
18.22
3
3
5.06
7.29
11.39
16.40
22.32
4
4
5.84
8.42
13.15
18.93
25.77
5
5
6.53
9.41
14.70
21.17
28.81
PERFORM FLOOD ROUTING
-2 YEAR STORM & PIPE DISCHARGE
--- dla=
21
Average
Inflow
Trial
Average
Outflow
Volume
Cumul
ELEVATION
Time
Inflow
Volume
Elevation
Outflow
Volume
Difference
Volume
Begin el=
900.00
0-10
9.01
5406.09
900.15
4.99
2994.38
2411.70
2411.70
900.15
10-20
10.14
6081.85
900.28
6.82
4091.11
1990.74
4402.44
900.28
20-30
12.39
7433.37
900.42
8.35
5010.56
2422.81
6825.25
900.43
30-40
55.19
33112.28
901.86
17.57
10544.31
22567.97
29393.22
901.85
40-50
16.89
10136.41
901.83
17.43
10458.93
-322.52
29070.70
901.83
50-60
9.01
5406.09
901.56
16.09
9656.60
-4250.51
24820.19
901.56
50-60
1.50
900.00
901.10
13.51
8108.83
-7208.83
17611.36
901.11
PERFORM FLOOD ROUTING
-100 YEAR STORM & PIPE
DISCHARGE ---- dia=
21
Average
Inflow
Trial
Average
Outflow
Volu►ne
Cumul
ELEVATION
Time
Inflow
Volume
Elevation
Outflow
Volume
Difference
Volume
Begin el=
900.00
Length of Overflow
Weir =
40
Overflow Weir Elv. =
902
0-10
19.41
11643.88
900.41
8.25
4950.55
6693.33
6693.33
900.42
10-20
21.83
13099.36
900.80
11.53
6915.23
6184.13
12877.46
900.81
20-30
26.68
16010.33
901.26
14.46
8678.55
7331.78
20209.24
901.27
30-40
118.86
71318.76
902.60
83.37
50022.78
21295.98
41505.22
902.61
40-50
36.39
21832.27
902.32
44.01
26404.03
-4571.76
36933,46
902.32
50-60
19.41
11643.88
902.12
24.36
14616.31
-2972.43
33961.03
902.13
0
POND #2 DESIGN
FOR
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK
FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA
11 /4/90
GENERAL
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY PROCEDURE IS TO DESIGN A STORM WATER DETENTION POND
WHICH WILL STORE THE PEAK OF A DESIGN STORM TO THE EXTENT ADEQUATE TO ALLOW
THE CONTROLLED RELEASE OF FLOW NO GREATER THAN THAT WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO
DEVELOPEMENT.
DATA
PROJECT : VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK POND #2
COUNTY
FREDERICK
STATE
VA
ACREAGE
14.55
Tc
25.00
SCS CURVE:
N/A
C wgt-pre :
0.55
C wgt-post :
0.80
i 2
2.40
i 10
3.00
i 100
3.40
12-60min
1.30
110-60min:
1.90
i100-60min:
2.80
Pond bottom
903.00 (also structure
invert)
PREDICT PRE/POST-DEVELOPEMENT
PEAK
FLOW
Q=CiA in CFS
difference
02-pre=
19.21
Q2-post=
27.94
8.73
010-pre=
24.01
Q10- post=
34.92
10.91
Q100-pre=
27.21
Q100- post=
39.58
12.37
PREDICT INFLOW HYDROGRAPH
time(min)
% of total 12-inches
110 -inches
1100-inches
0-10
8.00
0.104
0.152
0.224
10-20
9.00
0.117
0.171
0.252
20-30
11.00
0.143
0.209
0.308
30-40
49.00
0.637
0.931
1.372
40-50
15.00
0.195
0.285
0.42
50-60
8.00
0.104
0.152
0.224
totals 100.00 1.3 1.9 2.8
PREDICT INFLOW EQUATION
Q avg=(A)(43560)(C)(1/12)/(10min)(60sec)
70.422 1
HYDROGI VALUES
in cfs
TIME
Qavg-2
Qavg-10
Qavg-100
0-10
7.32
10.70
15.77
10-20
8.24
12.04
17.75
20-30
10.07
14.72
21.69
30-40
44.86
65.56
96.62
40-50
13.73
20.07
29.58
50-60
7.32
10.70
15.77
60-70
2.79
4.07
6.00
PREDICT STAGE STORAGE RELATIONSHIP
accum
elevation
area
volume volume
903
0
0
6240
904
12480
6240
27360 S= 8.92857E-05
906
14880
33600
TOTAL 33600
M
LA
ASSUME OUTFLOW DEVICE
PIPE
Q in CFS
hgt above cntr
elev
10 12
15
18
21
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
1
2.92
4.21
6.57
9.47
12.89
2
2
4.13
5.95
9.30
13.39
18.22
3
3
5.06
7.29
11.39
16.40
22.32
4
4
5.84
8.42
13.15
18.93
25.77
5
5
6.53
9.41
14.70
21.17
28.81
PERFORM FLOOD ROUTING
-2 YEAR STORM & PIPE DISCHARGE
--- dia=
21
Average
Inflow
Trial
Average
Outflow
Volume
Cumul
ELEVATION
Time
Inflow
Volume
Elevation
Outflow
Volume
Difference
Volume
Begin el=
903.00
0-10
7.32
4394.33
903.13
4.65
2787.62
1606.71
1606.71
903.14
10-20
8.24
4943.62
.903.25
6.44
3865.73
1077.89
2684.61
903.24
20-30
10.07
6042.21
903.36
7.73
4638.88
1403.33
4087.93
903.36
30-40
44.86
26915.29
904.83
17.43
10458.93
16456.36
20544.29
904.83
40-50
13.73
8239.37
904.68
16.70
10021.12
-1781.75
18762.54
904.68
50-60
7.32
4394.33
904.29
14.64
8781.26
-4386.92
14375.62
904.28
50-60
1.50
900.00
903.76
11.23
6740.13
-5840.13
8535.48
903.76
PERFORM FLOOD ROUTING
-100 YEAR STORM & PIPE
DISCHARGE ---- dia=
21
Average
Inflow
Trial
Average
Outflow
Volume
Cumul
ELEVATION
Time
Inflow
Volume
Elevation
Outflow
Volume
Difference
Volume
Begin el=
903.00
Length of Overflow
Weir =
50
Overflow Weir Elv. =
905
0-10
15.77
9464.72
903.40
8.15
4889.81
4574.91
4574.91
903.41
10-20
17.75
10647.81
903.76
11.23
6740.13
3907.67
8482.58
903.76
20-30
21.69
13013.99
904.17
13.94
8362.86
4651.13
13133.71
904.17
30-40
96.62
57971.39
905.46
72.73
43640.15
14331.24
27464.94
905.45
40-50
29.58
17746.34
905.20
34.17
20502.22
-2755.88
24709.06
905.21
50-60
15.77
9464.72
905.03
19.23
11540.51
-2075.79
22633.28
905.02
n�
-� • : ,: �; � car �: i , a11 f'
14
•,,�' rt `, � i 11 :�;�� . " �!
var
1 Kroll
lik
a �`'F / 1 � a'•
.� t, rE / t 7r r ff. � �,1J5 �l r �f -L 1r •• t �' f 1 1,J.t ,
"/_y
,Y r b : �}�` yam! +r�. r!i •,®� v t 16 .�' ✓.i _,` fit, F{
PROM
{
i .��/a ,} £"� x"r �M}��� j � 3 • .r (,ra' 7' � ;. "�;, d�� + � ��''�/� .i . •� �'. s
'�+�#�"+tx. req/,�' y ! ,�,�i`,�w�tF�J}I* ,ti. 7' `�'r •r � �« i✓- / •.l. It CIE 1� i r. 3
Z.. `ff`[,�w'e. ' if�. �;.�i'� ,.rA ,�1kh�f,,;r€;,� o f.'•,". .{� f � ����`•'�_ .�. ./ ' ?'
�+�,�,. ,. i 3 l' t �� J '� `'-'i�/� ' ( ' y: • i%jam ' �.. ''�sl,�' ��.� ,'� i_ ,:
•a "`"���.���,� irI �;• �, �Pt fit. �' ^'''- 1 �r �r��•� "�.•.<I`.\I•. w.
- � { ff Jl V `�� � ��� l ,i e- .41+.. � �,•i. .\�V •v,�t� LI�� ,,�i'"`'rIS �\ ,. 1� •'' ;:4
.:ice I'!� � ,��< � •I � i %t"'� �� .. �`� .' 0 .� !�', f✓� �..t ..� •1 r •}L
r 'r I.• iil.���-�.ir. �'f�'4 � Y'' �74 � C?w:Ft �-, ill �, �/9J��i.' i'+t,'• ���i.�I �1` ' .. - - "�- +�i4
PI
�� I.v � -/'i i/` ` /•`i✓'.- � ! I n. rl {. J�' 'w:, ? L }J �� rt tr*�
a a �t, a ���,/ o -��� _e`.i�_ � � s-��r,�tyy3::y s 3!', -rY � • ;
Y.r.r�Dl,�� ''tFm'4 "�' 1i �," .;• `� i ',, "� -'` r.k:•� t \�;� '•o'•
iris
�� f`{ ��� i ��rr r � { 1 r,�.•s _7\. �.��fs� ��,y��l it � r�L. •i r"
�yI J�Fc r-1jt.�
�• • 1
JIF' ^r
t � -;a r •� • S - 1 a f l" �� ��r p
ICU
� r � '7 i . ' tx r .� .,X i�� �� �,�, J,, ' �{'� i; 7 +, '✓� � : r � r � , Fes''`.:
l-
./ i�,f y3`fN1 �1 • �'j' �p +� !'*o ? �f J/j� •1 ✓ � `I,-! rj
24
0
Soil Survey
shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is moderate. The root
zone extends to a depth of 60 inches or more, but is
restricted below a depth of 25 inches by siltstone .
fragments. Natural fertility is medium, and organic matter
content is moderate. The surface layer commonly is
moderately acid or strongly acid, except where the soil
has been limed. The subsoil is strongly acid or
moderately acid.
Most areas of this soil are used as woodland. Some
areas are used as orchards and for pasture and hay. A
few areas are used for cultivated crops.
The soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops. Crops
respond well to lime and fertilizers. Using conservation
tillage, growing cover crops, including grasses and
legumes in the cropping system, and crop residue
management help to maintain the organic matter content
and soil tilth, to reduce crusting, to increase water
infiltration, to reduce runoff, and to control erosion.
This soil is moderately well suited to hay and pasture.
Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and
legumes and preventing overgrazing are,major pasture
management concerns. Overgrazing causes surface
compaction and increases runoff and erosion. Using
stocking rates within carrying capacity, using deferred
grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to maintain a good
stand of grasses and legumes, to reduce runoff, and to
control erosion. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of
the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the
amount of available nutrients in the soil.
Potential productivity for trees on this soil is
moderately high on the north aspect and moderate on
the south aspect. Slope is a moderate limitation to use
of logging equipment. The rate of seedling mortality is
slight on the north aspect and moderate on the south
aspect. The soil is well suited to use as orchards.
Depth to bedrock, potential frost action, slope, and
small stones in the soil are the main limitations to use of
this soil for community development.
This soil is in capability subcla�!Ve
13E— ra store annery silt loam, 25 tco 35
percent slopes: This so� oif is very tf ep-, eeR and very
sip;6—hd well drained. It is on uplands, mainly`stdb
slopes, in the valley. Areas of this soil commonly are
long and winding and irregularly oval. They are about
500 to 4,500 feet long. They range from 3 to about 100
acres.
Typically, the surface layer is dark brown and dark
yellowish brown channery silt loam about 8 inches thick.
The subsoil extends to a depth of about 40 inches. It is
yellowish brown channery and very channery silty clay
loam to a depth of 15 inches. Below that, it is strong
brown channery and very channery silty clay. The
substratum is strong brown clay to a depth of 60 inches
or more.
Included with this soil in mapping are areas, generally
less than 3 acres each, of Frederick and Poplimento
soils along slope breaks near the edge of this map unit.
Also included are areas of soils that have slopes of more
than 35 percent. These included soils make up about 15
percent of the map unit. Also included are areas of soils
that are moderately deep and shallow to rippable
siltstone bedrock. These included soils make up about
15 percent of the map unit. Also included in some map
units are scattered areas of rock outcrops.
Permeability in this Frankstown soil is moderate, and
the available water; capacity is moderate. Surface runoff
is rapid. The erosion hazard is severe. The surface layer
is friable and easily tilled when moist, but breaks up into
clods if the soil is tilled when too wet or too dry. The
shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is moderate. The root
zone extends to a depth of 60 inches or more, but is
restricted below 25 inches by siltstone fragments.
Natural fertility is medium, and organic matter content is
moderate. The surface layer commonly is moderately
acid or strongly acid, except where the soil has been
limed.- The subsoil is strongly acid or moderately acid.
Nearly all areas of this soil are used as woodland.
This soil is not suited to cultivated crops because the
slopes are too steep.
This soil is poorly suited to hay and pasture.
Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and
legumes and preventing overgrazing are major pasture
management concerns. Overgrazing causes surface
compaction and increases runoff and erosion. Using
stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred grazing,
using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to
maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes, to
reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is needed
to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is
required to increase the amount of available nutrients in
the soil.
Potential productivity for trees on this soil is
moderately high on the north aspect and moderate on
the south aspect. In some areas slope is a moderate
limitation to use of logging equipment. The rate of
seedling mortality is slight on the north aspect and
moderate on the south aspect.
Slope is the main limitation to use of this soil for,
community development.
This soil is in capability subclass Vle.
--,so. 14B—Frederick-Poplimento loams, 2 to 7 percent
slopes. This map unit consists of very deep, gently
sloping, well drained soils on narrow to broad, convex
valley sides. A typical area of this map unit is about 45
percent Frederick soil, 40 percent Poplimento soil, and
15 percent other soils. Areas of this map unit commonly
are irregularly shaped or long and narrow. They are
about 300 to 5,000 feet long, and range from 3 to more
than 100 acres. The Frederick and Poplimento soils are
intermingled so closely that it was not practical to map
them separately.
rl
Frederick County, Virginia
Typically, the surface layer of the Frederick soil is dark
brown loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil extends to
a depth of 60 inches or more. It is yellowish red silty clay
loam to a depth of about 12 inches. Below that, it is
yellowish red and yellowish brown, mottled clay and
yellowish red and yellowish brown silty clay.
Typically, the surface layer of the Poplimento soil is
dark yellowish brown loam about 5 inches thick. The
subsoil extends to a depth of 50 inches. In the upper
part it is strong brown clay loam to a depth of about 9
inches. In the next part it is yellowish red and strong
brown, mottled clay to a depth of 39 inches. In the lower
part it is yellowish red and strong brown silty clay loam.
The substratum is mostly strong brown silty clay loam to
a depth of 60 inches or more.
Included with these soils in mapping are small areas,
generally less than 3 acres each, of Oaklet, Swimley,
and Timberville soils. Oaklet and Swimley soils are
scattered throughout the map unit. Timberville soils are
in depressions and along drainageways. These included
soils make up about 15 percent of the map unit. Also
included in some map units are areas of severely eroded
soils. In some map units rock outcrops cover as much as
1 percent of the surface.
Permeability is moderate in the Frederick soil and
moderately slow in the Poplimento soil. The available
water capacity is moderate in both soils. Surface runoff
•
25
is medium. The erosion hazard is moderate. The surface
layer is friable and easily tilled. The shrink -swell potential
in the subsoil is high. The root zone extends to a depth
of more than 60 inches. Natural fertility is medium, and
organic matter content is low. The soils commonly are
moderately acid or strongly acid throughout.
Most areas of these soils are used for cultivated
crops, pasture, and hay (fig. 3). Some areas are in urban
use, and a few areas are used as woodland.
These soils are well suited to cultivated crops. Crops
respond well to lime and fertilizer. Using conservation
tillage, growing cover crops, including grasses and
legumes in the.cropping system, and crop residue
management help to maintain the organic matter content
in the surface layer and soil tilth, to reduce crusting, to
increase water infiltration, and to control erosion.
These soils are well suited to hay and pasture.
Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and
legumes and preventing overgrazing are the main
pasture management concerns. Overgrazing causes
surface compaction and increases runoff and erosion.
Using stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred
grazing, using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing
help to maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes,
to reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is
needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing
Figure 3.—Alfalfa in an area of Frederick-Poplimento loams, 2 to 7 percent slopes; corn in an area of Timberville silt loam, 2 to 7 percent
slopes, In a depression; and an apple orchard in an area of Oaklet silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, in background.
IV—
�
9 )/ ( \ •\`/,��'/• o�?l/� Jlx�-•yam." ''� ��r. llt�; �
�1.,�•ru ` r tom• " _..�_ /-^.�C-�•..%j�C � //% <� \✓� / � _
`!`Art � �.>� � ; � ;� (, , ,�`>>>� ...��.i ., c�� �, ��• <-'r! t /��` ,�
i• � � �V ���` � � r /ii �' %Ir � �/tom
�7, , \• o;
�1 a' 1 \ �IlilllilR.\ ` '.�'. � r, u� u_ 'V/ `%�.- / �\�' � � �-� .'/l� �'"1��/ `Y f ,'!�i1 /i� q•'
, � \ �,r, / = '�°,��,� :y ` '"ors:. n--� .o � ) ,� ,o. \ �• �>,,, o i �-•��.,Cz_� j
�, ��- ��\ \ ..� vt �f\ m .•li2—'— a$ �`_\.. •_.fa � •�I.o-. mob• �•%. ` �p ti�o����J+T� n _` �_' \ � ` '.J. ^ /.
r\• / `'v) Z� �S` �� n i .- /j •�f ��- o `(90 z"k sat �• \ ' �� _i r ,
LU
Oil
LAJ
Li
%
ZZ
+'._^.4 frM1`ti - _ -�. � ~-��bb�� _ /'lx 1.\EJ , .~,I \�. l �_-_... _ � l/',••�•4„,t0
"l
�I ��� \ti� •^k za-
0
0
Li._._ '
f p�
2
1 V
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
October 31, 1990
Attn: Mr. William H. Rea
Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Co., Inc.
P.O: Box 816
Mt. Jackson, Virginia 22842
Dear Mr. Rea
This letter is to confirm action taken by the Frederick County
Board of Supervisors at their meeting of October 24, 1990.
Preliminary Master Development Plan for Valley Fertilizer was
approved for general M-2 (General Industrial) uses. This property.
is located on the north side of State Route 837 in the Stonewall
Magisterial'District and is identified as parcel 6 on tax map 44.
The final master development should be submitted to this office as
soon as possible with attention to the following items:
1. Address stormwater management on the final master
development plan.
2. Include on the plan a statement certifying that any areas
contaminated with fertilizer residue will be identified.
If you have any questions regarding the approval of this master
development plan, or the items needing to be addressed, do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Kris C. Tierney
Deputy Director
KCT/slk
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
•
11240 Waples Mill Road
ENGINEERS Suite 100
ARCHITECTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030
SCIENTISTS 703.385.3566
Kris Tierney, Deputy Director
Frederick County Planning Department
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601
Your Authorization: Signed Agreement
Valley Industrial Park
MDP
Toan/Nolan Project
Project Manager
Engineer
Admin. Assist
13.0 hrs
8.0 hrs
0.5 hrs
Total Direct
Total Indirect
@ 33.25
@ 33.25
@ 14.50
TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE
Date: Sept. 5, 1990
Please Reference:
Project No. 17555.106
Invoice No. 9007361
Client No. 07534
33.25
266.00
7.25
306.50
459.75
$ 766.25
SEP 7
Copy -to ftviance,
glllgo g*
August 30, 1990
Mr. Kris Tierney
Deputy Director
Frederick County Planning Department
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601
Re: Valley Fertilizer & Chemical Company, Inc
Master Development Plan
ENGINEERS 17555.106
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
Dear Kris,
We have completed our review of the referenced plan and
have the following comments and/or recommendations.
ACCESS ISSUES
We assume the proposed road will be dedicated right-of-
way (R/W).. Otherwise the proposed road to access
parcel 3 and parcel 4 will require an easement. An
easement will also be required for the rail spur
accessing parcel 2. A rail crossing will also be needed
for parcel 4.
TRAFFIC ISSUES
Traffic projections will be required prior to final
plan approval. Roadway geometry and typical section
information is not provided. We will need this for
both the proposed road and Rt 837. The existing R/W
for Rt 837 appears to be 50 feet. Some R/W didication
may be necessaruy for future improvements along the
frontage lots.
DRAINAGE ISSUES
The plan does not address a stormwater management
concept. Either stormwater management will be required
for the overall development or individual parcels as
site plans are prepared.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
E & S requirements will have to be included in the
final design.
`: �' —FF F � -1, 7— - Psi-,
SEP - 7
■ 11240 Waples Mill Road
Tairfax, Virginia 22030
703.385.3566
Telefax 703.385.8319 _.�
Recommend these issues be addressed prior to final
approval. Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Z&a
OHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC
ENGINEERS Paul A. Bernard, P.E.
ARCHITECTS Project Manager
SCIENTISTS
PAB/j la
cc: Morris and Newman, Professional Land Surveyors
SEP - 7 1;990 ��
TY OF FREDERICK, VIRGIN401
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS
Control No. 070290176
Date Received
070290 Date Reviewed 070590
Applicant Name
Valley
Fertilizer &
Chemical Co., Inc.
Address
P. O.
Box 816
Mt Jackson, Virginia
— ------------
22842
Project Name
Vallev
Industrial Park
Phone No. 703-662-8280
Type of Application Master Development Current Zoning M-1
1st Due Fire Co. 13 1st Due Rescue Co. 13
Election District Stonewall
RECOMMENDATIONS
Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System
Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other
Emergency Vehicle Access;
Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified
Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No
Comments: Will address on site plan.
Roadwav/Aislewav Widths:
Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified
Special Hazards Noted; Yes No X
'����`��
Comments:
- Continued -
L_-
0
Hydrant Locations;
Adequate Inadequate Not Identified X
Siamese Connection Location;
Approved Not Approved
Not Identified X
Additional Comments: Consideration should be given to available water
flow for fire fighting purposes, if these lots are to have sprinklered
buildings. Hydrant locations will be reviewed on individual site plans
as received.
Impact on fire/rescue resources will depend on occupancy classification.
Provide access for emergency equipment during construction.
Review Time .25 hr
Fire Marshal