Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-05 Stonewall Plaza Commercial - Stonewall - Backfile (2)MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRACKING SHEET (Note: The application does not need to be complete to be accepted but will not be scheduled for the PC or BOS until all items have been received.) Submission Package Comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: VDOT Fire Marshal Sanitation Authority Inspections Dept. Health Department One copy of the master development plan application. County Engineer City of Winchester GIS (Mapping) Parks & Recreation Winchester Regional Airport Appropriate number of blueprint plans, colored maps, etc. to cover the PC and BOS meetings. Submission Fee TRACKING Date Application received US— Fee Paid (amount: $ 4111O0 ) i:s Preliminary MDP heard by Planning Commission - Action taken: APPROVrr, Preliminary MDP heard by Board of Supervisors - Action taken: APPTrMr�,® p Letter to applicant regarding Board action and revisions (if required). �i 95 Final MDP submitted with review agency, PC and BOS comments addressed. l� CAS` Final MDP signed by County Administrator and Planning Director (send two copies to applicant). Z et-' Administratively approved; letter sent to applicant. NOTES: DATE: File opened. Reference Manual updated/number assigned. D-base updated. List of adjoiners given to staff member for verification. `% 410 S One black & white location map requested from Mapping & Graphics. *d�— Four sets of labels requested from Data Processing. File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary. CLOSE OUT FILE: l 1"40 Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant (*Note: Be sure Joe Wilder in Public works and Jane Anderson in Real Estate receive a copy of the administrative approval letter. Jane wants a copy of the final action letter even if the application was denied or withdrawn.) File stamped "approved"/"denied" or "withdrawn." a; -Reference Manual updated. � an Al D-base updated. 0 - i e given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary. j File in file drawer. U \Carol\Common\Tracking sheen\TRACKING. MDP Rev 01/21/03 L� DATEn—LIJ-5 \ No. 127327 0 RECEIVED FROM`y� 1 ✓ ►�" 4 ,�l> �+�y V �` lhigi, O 00 1 � ____DOLLARS FOR FOR ACCOUNT PAYMENT BAL. DUE )- 6 CASH FROM TO CHECK 1930 OMONEY BY 2a ORDER --- 1182 A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Miller & Smith 8401 Greensboro Drive Suite 300 McLean, VA 22102 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc End neers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401 + HT 304.264.2711 _A F 304.264.3671 May 26, 2005 OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Stonewall Plaza development located northeast of the Route 522 (Northwestern Pike)/Route 37 interchange in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project is comprised of a 4,000 square foot fast food restaurant, a 3,000 square foot fast food restaurant, 238,600 square feet of office development, a gas station with 16 pumps, a 4,500 square foot bank, a 69,000 square foot supermarket and 47,325 square feet of retail development. Primary access is to be provided via a site -driveway located along Route 522 (Northwestern Pike) opposite of ' Westminster Canterbury Drive. The proposed development will be built -out in a single transportation phase by the year 2007. Figure I is provided to illustrate the location of Stonewall Plaza with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Stonewall Plaza development were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Assessment of background traffic including growth rates and other planned projects in the area of impact, • Calculation of trip generation for the Stonewall Plaza development, • Distribution and assignment of the Stonewall Plaza development generated trips onto the completed study area road network, • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the newest version of the highway capacity software, HCS-2000, for existing and future conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) obtained AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 522 (Northwestern Pike)/Apple Pie Ridge Road, Route 522/Route 37 NB/SB ramps, Route 522/Fox Drive, Route 522/Plaza Circle and Route 522/Westminster Canterbury Drive. PHR+A established the ADT (Average Daily Traffic) along each of the study area roadway links using a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 8% as determined from published 2003 VDOT traffic count data. Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of ' service. All traffic count data and HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. ' A Tra is Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza P Project Number: 13304-1-0 ' May 26, 2005 H Page 1 No Scale I � J, >r 1Vain 41 �. Yy� zd t Golds Hill re6a®bbinRd� wi�r`tre ��✓' ,� } ,7,b t ,t�s$ sq `tf Jessica; w y s E ods Ln raHoR o,.&c ac �b ,`«N,�rC� ientavbai Ds v� ry`�G a r' SITE, .. �•ry r�;�� t" "' ',� dun �ti a Lne •, a r' perq•� �y het` tio-�`� j) r .... A' O�, / `y rdliWest i91ic Ii a•nT c k�' q� ^�J'`Q 50 Alf snit 'c /i S 3 •t l ice/ e6 At n11B W S1 r •;� ER �L1li. I �.. Figure 1 PH R+A Vicinity Map - Stonewall Plaza A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 2 I No Scale -I- AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 R+APage 3 PH No Scale / �G1 22 �4 Signalized Intersection Intersection aDenotes stop sign control nDenotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) A*Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 PPMay 26, 2005 H Page 4 2007 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Based on VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average daily traffic data (between years 1995 and 2003) for Route 522 (Northwestern Pike) within the vicinity of the site, a growth rate of less than one percent (1%) was calculated. PHR+A, however, utilized an annual rate of four percent (4%) per year through year 2007 to represent worst -case conditions. Based upon the 7th Edition of ITE's Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Table 1 to summarize the 2007 "other developments" trip generation. . Figure 4 shows the 2007 background ADT and AWPM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 5 shows the respective 2007 background lane geometry and AWPM peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. Table 1 2007 "Other Developments" Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Star Fort* 210 Single -Family Detached 70 units 15 44 58 50 28 78 700 Total 15 44 58 50 28 78 700 Regents Crescent 210 Single -Family Detached 28 units 7 22 29 22 12 34 280 230 Townhouse/Condo 42 units 4 21 26 20 10 30 365 Total 12 43 55 42 22 64 645 Note: The Star Fort development is approved for 144 single-family detached residential units, however, 74 units were already occupied when the traffic counts were conducted. A Traffic Impact Anal sy is of Stoiaewall Plaza P Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 H Page 5 No Scale bC Em bgLryry b 02 J Nester N c '� Apple Pie Ridge 1 Road �l 1� 97(40) (6p)S gg Off -Ramp r� 9(89 (7j0)89 j1 33(82) 3) C8y�3�► A) 922 ^� �y4 i 522 y m�� A **.883(16Z1 Q q ( 13)1142�; 37 (2g) )670 � p4 C14-1 r g7j(9 SITE �q (668j�z9(jo \ \ (236)I63� �ro � O�fga�4 0` i q N v � �h�63 Au N~I9�(989) o. a: 3 j 37 522 `� u (7gp 877= d3� > U AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) Trips nT TP+n Daily Figure 4 2007 Background Traffic Conditions AA Tracmslmpact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza PH ProjectNumber: 13304-1-0 May 26,2005 Page 6 No Scale Signalized Intersection Signalized �uggesteo Intersection Improvement" LOS=B(Q NB - 1 Left SB -RI Right V� g�C) 522 � e / Signalized Intersection LOS=C(D) U Signalized [ntersectio❑ LOS=B(B) "Suggested Improvement" Signalizalion e 04 �t Ar i L irk 8B9 m v SITE 37�� o� Unsignalized Intersection Denotes stop sign control Denotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement Figure 5 2007 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PHR1� A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 7 TRIP GENERATION PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 2 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Stonewall Plaza development. Table 2 Stonewall Plaza Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour In Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 710 Office 238,600 331 45 376 59 287 346 2,606 820 Retail 47,325 SF 61 39 100 183 199 382 4,176 850 Supermarket 69,000 SF 197 126 323 ' 355 341 696 6,011 912 Drive-in Bank 4,500 SF 31 24 56 103 103 206 1,077 934 Fast Food w/ DT 4,000 SF 108 104 212 72 67 139 1,984 934 Fast Food w/ DT 3,000 SF 81 78 159 54 50 104 1,488 944 Gas Station 16 pumps 90 90 180 111 111 222 2,697 Total 900 507 1,406 937 1,157 2,094 20,040 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway ' network surrounding the Stonewall Plaza development. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Stonewall Plaza trips (Table 2) throughout the. study area. Figure 7 shows the respective development - generated ADT and AMIPM peak hour trip assignments. 2007 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Stonewall Plaza assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2007 background ' traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2007 build -out conditions. Figure S shows the 2007 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes key locations throughout the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2007 build -out lane geometry and AN"M peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 8 No Scale -I- Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26 R+A ,2 Pagee 9 PH 9 No Scale -I- AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) Figure 7 Development -Generated Trip Assignments A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1 0 PBMay 26, 2005 HPage 10 No Scale AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) Figure 8 2007 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 11 No Scale Signalized Intersection Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvement" LOS=C(D) NB - 1 Left SB - I Right 522 .OPW* (OM )% 4� Signalized Intersection LOS=C(E) Signalized In LOS=C(B) "Suggested Improvement" Signalization e Vr U Unsignalized \ Intersection 6 rk 3 Jrs 1 Denotes Free -Flow Lane Denotes stop sign control Denotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement Figure 9 2007 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PHRn A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 12 CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the Stonewall Plaza development are acceptable and manageable. Based upon HCS-2000 results, each of the study area intersections, assuming "suggested improvements", will operate with levels of service "C" or better during 2007 build -out conditions (except at Route 522/Fox Drive that will maintain levels of service "D" during the PM peak hour). Aside from the improvements required at the proposed Stonewall Plaza site -driveway, the following "suggested improvements" will be necessary during 2007 background and 2007 build -out conditions. 1. The intersection of Route 522/Route 37 northbound ramps would require two (2) additional left -turn lanes along the northbound off -ramp. 2. The intersection of Route 522/Route 37 southbound ramps would require two (2) additional left -turn lanes along the southbound off -ramp. 3. The intersection of Route 522/Fox Drive would require an additional left -turn lane along northbound Fox Drive and an additional right -turn lane along southbound Fox Drive. 4. The intersection of Route 522 /Plaza Circle requires traffic signalization. 5. The intersection of Route 522 [Westminster Canterbury Drive/proposed site - driveway would require traffic signalization, two (2) left -turn lanes along eastbound Route 522, a right -turn lane along westbound Route 52 as well as a fourth leg southbound that will include a left -turn lane, a thru-left lane and a right -turn lane. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza P Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 HPage 13 APPENDIX HCS-2000 Worksheets INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS and LEVEL OF SERVICE ' The most current analysis methodologies used for evaluating the capacity of intersections were developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other members of the transportation profession. This methodology is represented in TRB Special Report Number 209, The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Computerized methods for conducting these analyses were developed by FHWA; and are the methods used in this report. The following brief explanations of the methodologies are adapted from the HCM. ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - TWSC At an unsignalized two-way stop -controlled (TWSC) intersection, the major street has ' continuous right of way while the side street is controlled by a stop sign or yield sign. In operation, vehicles exiting the side street and crossing or turning into the main street flow must wait for "acceptable gaps" in the main street flow. The same is true of left -turning traffic from the main street that must cross the opposing flow. The analysis takes into account the probability of a gap in the main street traffic. The probability and number of acceptable gaps is lower in higher volume flows. The acceptability of a gap is modified by physical factors (sight distance, turning radius, etc.) and by characteristics of the traffic flow (percentage trucks, buses, etc.). In the analysis in these reports, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks ' (single unit and tractor -trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for TWSC intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the intersection as a whole. The total delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a ' vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line; this time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last -in -queue position to the first -in - queue position. Level of Service Criteria for TWSC Intersections'' ' Average Total Delay Level of Service seclveh 1 A <_10 B >10 and <_15 C >15 and <_25 D >25 and <_35 E >35 and <_50 F >50 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - AWSC At an unsignalized all -way stop -controlled (AWSC) intersection, all directions are controlled by a stop sign. Operation of AWSC intersections requires that every vehicle stop at the intersection before proceeding. Since each driver is required to stop, the judgment as to whether to proceed into the intersection is a function of the traffic conditions on the other (opposing and conflicting) approaches. Therefore, a driver proceeds only after determining that there are no vehicles currently in the intersection and that it is safe to proceed. The analysis takes into account the problem of determining, under capacity conditions for a given approach, the factors that influence the rate at which vehicles can depart successfully from the STOP line. Traffic at other approaches, which increases potential conflict, translates directly into longer driver decision times and saturation headways. The saturation headways are also influenced by characteristics of the traffic flow (slow accelerating vehicles, left turns, etc.). In the analysis in this reports, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor -trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for AWSC intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the intersection as a whole. The total delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line; this time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last -in -queue position to the first -in - queue position. C D E F of Service Criteria for AWSC Intersections verage Total Delay >15 and <_25 >25 and <_35 >35 and <_50 >50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The operation (and therefore the capacity) of a signalized intersection is complicated by the fact ' that the signal is allocating time between conflicting traffic movements - movements that must use the same physical space. The analysis, therefore, must not only look at the physical geometry of the intersection, but the signal timing aspects as well. In the analysis of signalized intersections, two terms are important: volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and; average stopped delay (seconds per vehicle). The theoretical capacity is based on the physical geometry, the available green time (often expressed as G/C), and the traffic mix (e.g. trucks use more capacity than cars). The average stopped delay may be calculated from the v/c ratio, cycle length, quality of progression on the arterial and available green time on each approach. In this report all the default values recommended by the HCM are used unless other specific information is available (percentage of trucks, pedestrians, etc.). Existing signal timings are observed and used whenever possible. When future signals are being evaluated, an "optional" signal timing is calculated based on projected volumes. The level of service is based on the calculated average delay per vehicle for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Based on extensive research studies, the maximum delay acceptable by the average driver is sixty seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection. This is defined as the upper limit on the possible range of delay/level of service criteria. The following criteria describe the full range of level of service: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Stopped Delay Level of Service perVehicle (sec) A <_10.0 B >10.0 and <_20.0 C >20.0 and <_35.0 D >35.0 and <_55.0 E >55.0 and <_80.0 F >80.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Description A Level of Service A describes operations with very low delay, up to 10 sec per vehicle. This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Level of Service B describes operations with delay greater than 10 and up to 20 sec per vehicle. This level generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Level Of Service C describes operations with delay greater than 20 and up to 35 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass though the intersection without stopping. D Level of Service D describes operations with delay greater than 35 and up to 55 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, longer cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Level of Service E describes operations with delay greater than 55 and up to 80 sec per vehicle. This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Level of Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 80 sec per vehicle. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. HCS2000'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 141 1235 614 340 374 61 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 +1_07 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 45.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 148 1300 646 358 394 64 Lane group capacity, c 333 1739 1739 792 1337 616 v/c ratio, X 0.44 0.75 0.37 0.45 0.29 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.39 Uniform delay, d1 14.5 18.0 13.8 14.5 19.0 17.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.30 0.11 0.11 0.11 1 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.9 1.8 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 15.4 19.8 14.0 14.9 19.1 17.6 Lane group LOS B B B B B B Approach delay 19.3 14.3 18.9 Approach LOS B B B Intersection delay 175 X = 0.55 Intersection LOS B HCS200drM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 40 902 1640 258 217 39 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 01 0 1 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 45.0 G= G= G= 25.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 42 949 1726 272 228 41 Lane group capacity, c 83 1739 2125 967 955 440 v/c ratio, X 0.51 0.55 0.81 0.28 j 0.24 0.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, d1 15.1 15.5 13.5 8.2 25.1 24.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.15 1 0.35 0.11 1 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 5.0 0.4 2.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 20.0 15.8 16.0 8.4 25.3 24.2 Lane group LOS C B B A C C Approach delay 16.0 15.0 25.1 Approach LOS B B C Intersection delay 16.1 X = 0.63 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000?' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 90 638 142 115 372 33 262 26 199 13 8 45 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 95 672 149 121 392 35 512 69 Lane group capacity, c 416 1410 704 269 1410 704 621 675 v/c ratio, X 0.23 0.48 0.21 0.45 0.28 0.05 0.82 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 10.44 10.44 0.44 Uniform delay, di 15.5 17.6 15.3 17.4 15.8 14.2 21.9 14.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.2 1 1.2 0.1 0.0 8.9 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 15.7 17.9 15.5 18.6 16.0 14.2 30.8 14.6 Lane group LOS B B B B B B C B Approach delay 17.3 16.4 30.8 14.6 Approach LOS B B C B Intersection delay 20.3 X = 0.65 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 125 545 210 94 832 26 424 21 138 28 25 131 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm. Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 13.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 33.0 G= G= G= G= 25.0 G= 22.0 G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 771 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 132 574 221 99 876 27 613 193 Lane group capacity, c 124 1163 1108 240 1163 580 688 354 v/c ratio, X 1.06 0.49 0.20 0.41 0.75 0.05 0.89 0.55 Total green ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.70 0.37 0.37 10.37 0.52 0.24 Uniform delay, di 28.5 22.0 4.7 21.3 24.9 18.4 19.2 29.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.41 0.15 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 99.2 0.3 0.1 1 1.2 2.8 0.0 13.8 1.8 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 127.7 22.4 4.8 22.4 27.8 18.4 33.1 31.4 Lane group LOS F C A C C 9 C C Approach delay 33.2 27.0 33.1 31.4 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 30.8 X = 0.93 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 45 777 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 47 817 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 Median type RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 Configuration L T Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 16 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 16 2 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 Configuration I LT Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L Volume, v (vph) 47 30 Capacity, cm (vph) 1004 787 /c ratio 0.05 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.15 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 9.8 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS -- -- Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Drive Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Period (hrs): 0.25 Undivided Southbound ..Southbound 26.2 15.8 D C Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Drive Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Winchester Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Year Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 53 582 76 73 767 36 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 55 612 80 76 807 37 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 _ 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R ,Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 115 12 64 67 4 70 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 121 12 1 67 70 4 1 73 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration I LT I R LT I I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 55 76 133 67 74 73 Capacity, cm (vph) 788 899 90 690 73 596 /c ratio 0.07 0.08 1.48 0.10 1.01 0.12 Queue length (951/o) 0.22 0.28 10.24 0.32 5.33 0.42 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.9 9.4 347.8 10.8 207.4 11.9 LOS A A F 8 F B -Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 234.9 110.3 Approach LOS -- -- F F Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 1013 596 90 777 72 177 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB1 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 44.0 IY= G= G= G= IY= IY= G= 36.0 G= G= G= 5 1Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1066 627 95 818 262 Lane group capacity, c 1551 774 157 1551 664 v/c ratio, X 0.69 0.81 0.61 0.53 10.39 Total green ratio, g/C 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.40 Uniform delay, d1 17.7 19.5 16.7 15.8 19.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.26 0.35 0.19 0.13 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 1.3 6.5 6.5 0.3 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 19.0 26.0 23.2 16.2 19.6 Lane group LOS B C C B B Approach delay 21.6 16.9 19.6 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 19.9 Xc = 0.62 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 663 456 237 1437 273 461 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 1 13.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 698 480 249 1513 772 Lane group capacity, c 1410 704 258 1410 744 v/c ratio, X 0.50 0.68 0.97 1.07 1.04 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 Uniform delay, di 17.8 19.9 24.3 25.0 25.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Delay calibration, k 10.11 0.25 0.47 0.50 0.50 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.3 2.7 46.3 46.2 43.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 18.1 22.6 70.6 71.2 68.1 Lane group LOS 8 C E E E Approach delay 19.9 71.1 68.1 Approach LOS g E E Intersection delay 54.3 XC = 1.06 Intersection LOS D I' HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 319 766 547 132 320 134 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 45.0 G= G= G= G='35.0 IY= G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 336 806 576 139 478 Lane group capacity, c 369 1587 1774 709 672 v/c ratio, X 0.91 0.51 0.32 0.20 0.71 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 10.50 0.39 Uniform delay, d1 20.7 15.1 13.4 12.5 23.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.43 0.12 0.11 0.11 -d 0.27 1 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 26.0 0.3 6.1 0.1 3.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 46.6 15.4 13.5 12.6 26.8 Lane group LOS D B B B C Approach delay 24.6 13.4 26.8 Approach LOS C B C Intersection delay 21.6 Xc = 0.82 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 327 609 1184 203 490 271 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 35.0 G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 344 641 1246 214, 801 Lane group capacity, c 181 1410 1379 551 764 v/c ratio, X 1.90 0.45 0.90 0.39 1.05 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.39 10.39 0.44 Uniform delay, d1 23.2 17.4 25.9 19.8 25.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 10.11 0.42 0.11 0.50 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 425.2 0.2 8.7 0.5 1 46.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 448.4 17.6 34.6 20.3 71.0 Lane group LOS F B C C E Approach delay 168.1 32.5 71.0 Approach LOS F C E Intersection delay 83.1 X = 1.89 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 ,Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Westminster Drive urisdiction Winchester nal sis Year Existing Conditions i Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Westminster Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 775 25 17 520 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 815 26 17 547 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 5 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 46 0 21 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 48 0 22 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 5 2 5 5 5 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue L ncith, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 17 70 Capacity, cm (vph) 790 248 /c ratio 0.02 0.28 Queue length (95%) 0.07 1.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 25.1 LOS A D Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.1 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc hooroach LOS -- I -- I D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc ITWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: East-West 'Lanes ' 'Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 0 670 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 705 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 5 Median type RT Channelized? 0 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street NorthbouM Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 28 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 29 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 5 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L Volume, v (vph) 29 Capacity, cm (vph) 855 /c ratio 0.03 ' Queue length (95%) 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 LOS A Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- Intersection Route 522 & Westminster Drive Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year Existing Conditions South Street: Wes Period (hrs): 0.25 Westbound Southbound Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 12 1 jAooroach LOS I -- I -- I C HCS2000'rM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 159 1392 699 382 421 69 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp t 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 45.0 G= IY= G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= 1Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 167 1465 736 402 443 73 Lane group capacity, c 291 1739 1739 792 1337 616 v/c ratio, X 0.57 0.84 0.42 0.51 0.33 0.12 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.39 Uniform delay, di 15.8 19.4 14.3 15.1 19.3 17.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.17 0.38 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, 612 2.8 4.0 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 18.5 23.4 14.4 15.6 19.4 17.7 Lane group LOS B C B B B B Approach delay 22.9 14.9 19.2 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 19.5 Xc = 0.62 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 45 1024 1850 290 244 44 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 45.0 G= G= IY= G= 25.0 IY=-5 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 47 1078 1947 305 257 46 Lane group capacity, c 83 1739 2125 967 955 440 v/c ratio, X 0.57 0.62 0.92 0.32 0.27 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, d1 15.7 16.3 15.5 8.4 25.4 24.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.16 0.20 0.43 0.11 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 8.8 0.7 6.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 24.5 17.0 22.3 8.6 25.5 24.3 Lane group LOS C B C A C C Approach delay 17.3 20.4 25.3 Approach LOS B C C Intersection delay 19.9 X = 0.71 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 101 733 160 129 471 37 295 29 224 15 9 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 ro 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= G= G= G= 24.0 G= 20.0 G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 106 772 168 136 496 39 578 79 Lane group capacity, c 310 1269 633 188 1269 633 736 321 v/c ratio, X 0.34 0.61 0.27 0.72 0.39 0.06 0.79 0.25 Total green ratio, g/C 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 10.40 0.49 10.22 Uniform delay, d1 18.8 21.4 118.1 22.8 19.2 16.6 19.1 28.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.33 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.7 1 0.9 0.2 12.9 0.2 0.0 1 5.6 1 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 19.4 22.3 18.3 35.7 19.4 16.7 24.7 29.2 Lane group LOS B C B D B B C C Approach delay 21.3 22.5 24.7 29.2 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 22.8 X = 0.73 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 141 668 236 106 966 29 477 24 155 31 28 147 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 20.0 G= 25.0 G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 1Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 95.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 148 703 248 112 1017 31 690 217 Lane group capacity, c 121 1336 667 232 1336 667 582 373 v/c ratio, X 1.22 0.53 0.37 0.48 0.76 0.05 1.19 0.58 Total green ratio, g/C 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 10.47 0.26 Uniform delay, di 27.5 20.5 18.9 20.0 23.4 16.2 25.0 30.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.31 10.11 0.50 1 0.1:7:: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pe Incremental delay, d2 153.7 0.4 0.4 1 1.6 2.6 0.0 100.0 2.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 181.2 20.8 19.2 21.6 26.1 16.3 125.0 32.8 Lane group LOS F C 8 C C 8 F C Approach delay 42.1 25.4 125.0 32.8 Approach LOS D C F C Intersection delay 53.4 X = 1.25 Intersection LOS D IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume, V (vph) 101 733 160 129 471 37 295 29 224 15 9 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G. 3.2 3.2 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 42.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 28.0 G= G= 5 Y= Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 106 772 168 136 496 39 311 267 25 54 Lane group capacity, c 379 1481 739 246 1481 739 550 682 471 492 v/c ratio, X 0.28 0.52 0.23 0.55 0.33 0.05 0.57 0.39 0.05 0.11 Total green ratio, g/C 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.42 0.42 0.31 0.31 Uniform delay, di 14.7 16.9 14.3 17.3 15.2 13.1 19.8 18.0 21.7 22.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust &.Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.11 1 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.4 0.3 0.2 2.7 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 15.1 17.2 14.5 20.0 15.3 13.2 21.2 18.4 21.8 22.2 Lane group LOS B B B B B B C 8 I C C Approach delay 16.6 16.1 19.9 22.1 Approach LOS B B B C Intersection delay 174 X = 0.53 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume, V (vph) 141 668 236 106 966 29 477 24 155 31 28 147 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 13.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 18.0 G= 22.0 G= G= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 148 703 248 112 1017 31 502 188 62 155 Lane group capacity, c 140 1410 1108 256 1410 704 606 720 363 387 v/c ratio, X 1.06 0.50 0.22 0.44 0.72 0.04 0.83 0.26 0.17 0.40 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.70 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.24 0.24 Uniform delay, di 25.0 17.8 4.8 17.2 20.4 14.2 22.3 15.7 126.8 128.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.37 0.11 1 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 92.1 0.3 0.1 1.2 1.8 0.0 9.4 0.2 0.2 0.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 117.1 18.1 4.9 18.4 22.3 14.2 31.7 15.9 270 29.2 Lane group LOS F B A B C B C I B C C Approach delay 28.5 21.7 27.4 28.6 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 25.8 X� = 0.92 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Drive Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Winchester Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 51 890 .31 33 599 57 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 936 32 34 630 60 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 18 2 19 7 1 20 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 2 1 20 7 1 21 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration LT I I R LT R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 53 34 20 20 8 21 Capacity, cm (vph) 900 707 83 542 102 681 /c ratio 0.06 0.05 0.24 0.04 0.08 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.19 s 0.15 0.86 0.11 0.25 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 10.3 61.6 11.9 43.3 10.5 OS A B F B E B [Approachdelay (s/veh) -- -- 36.8 19.5 pproach LOS -- -- E C Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Winchester 2007 Backai Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 60 710 85 82 893 40 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 63 747 89 86 940 42 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 129 13 72 75 4 79 Peak -hour factor, P H F 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 135 13 1 75 78 4 83 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration LT R LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 63 86 148 75 82 83 Capacity, cm (vph) 699 794 54 623 41 540 /c ratio 0.09 0.11 2.74 0.12 2.00 0.15 Queue length (950%) 0.30 0.36 15.36 0.41 8.67 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 10.1 948.7 11.6 677.9 12.9 LOS B B F B F B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 633.6 343.4 pproach LOS -- -- F F Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R LT R LT R Volume, V (vph) 51 890 31 33 599 57 18 2 19 7 0 20 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM , Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 45.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 54 937 33 35 631 60 21 20 7 21 Lane group capacity, c 341 1587 792 209 1587 792 622 616 648 616 v/c ratio, X 0.16 0.59 0.04 0.17 0.40 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 10.50 10.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 Uniform delay, d1 12.2 16.0 11.5 12.3 14.0 11.7 17.0 17.0 16.9 17.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 1 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 12.4 16.6 11.5 12.7 14.2 11.7 17.1 17.0 16.9 17.1 Lane group LOS B B B B B B B B I B B Approach delay 16.2 13.9 17.0 17.0 Approach LOS B B B 8 Intersection delay 15.3 Xc = 0.35 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R LT R LT R Volume, V (vph) 60 710 85 82 893 40 129 13 72 75 4 79 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 1 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 50.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 IY= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 63 747 89 86 940 42 150 76 83 83 Lane group capacity, c 252 1763 879 334 1763 879 427 528 409 528 v/c ratio, X 0.25 0.42 0.10 0.26 0.53 0.05 0.35 0.14 0.20 0.16 Total green ratio, g/C 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Uniform delay, d1 10.3 11.6 9.4 10.4 12.6 9.1 22.7 21.0 21.5 21.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.11 1 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 10.8 11.8 9.5 10.8 12.9 9.2 23.2 21.1 21.7 21.2 Lane group LOS B B A B B A C C C C Approach delay 11.5 12.6 22.5 21.5 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection delay 18.8 Xc = 0.47 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 359 877 624 192 360 151 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pod / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, Ng 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 13.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 20.0 G= 25.0 G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 378 923 657 202 538 Lane group capacity, c 476 1587 985 394 672 v/c ratio, X 0.79 0.58 0.67 0.51 0.80 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.39 Uniform delay, di 20.1 15.9 28.8 27.4 124.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.34 0.17 0.24 0.12 0.34 Incremental delay, d2 9.0 0.5 1.7 1.1 6.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 29.2 16.4 30.5 28.5 31.3 Lane group LOS C B C C C Approach delay 20.1 30.1 31.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 25.5 X = 0.85 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000T"DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 368 740 1337 253 551 305 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing I EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 35.0 G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= ly= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 387 779 1407 266 901 Lane group. capacity, c 181 1410 1379 551 764 v/c ratio, X 2.14 0.55 1.02 0.48 1.18 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.39 0.39 0.44 Uniform delay, d1 23.2 18.4 27.5 20.7 25.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 Patton Harris Rust& Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.15 0.50 0.11 1 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 530.2 0.5 29.5 0.7 94.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 553.4 18.9 57.0 21.4 119.0 Lane group LOS F 8 E C F Approach delay 196.3 51.3 119.0 Approach LOS F D F Intersection delay 112.8 X = 2.18 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB . SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 359 1877 624 192 360 151 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 13.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 IY= G= 40.0 G= G= I G= 25.0 G= G= I G= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 378 923 657 202 379 159 Lane group capacity, c 530 1939 1576 630 955 440 v/c ratio, X 0.71 0.48 0.42 0.32 0.40 0.36 Total green ratio, g/C 0.61 0.61 0.44 0.44 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, di 10.2 19.6 1 17.0 16.2 26.4 26.1 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k , 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 4.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 14.7 9.8 17.2 16.5 26.7 26.6 Lane group LOS B A B B C C Approach delay 11.2 17.1 26.6 Approach LOS B B C Intersection delay 16.2 X = 0.55 Intersection LOS B IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20007V DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 368 740 1337 253 551 305 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 13.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 18.0 G= 38.0 G= G= I G= 24.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 387 779 1407 266 580 321 Lane group capacity, c 437 1974 1498 598 917 422 v/c ratio, X 0.89 0.39 0.94 0.44 0.63 0.76 Total green ratio, g/C 0.62 0.62 0.42 10.42 0.27 0.27 Uniform delay, d1 25.4 8.5 24.9 18.5 29.1 30.4 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.41 0.11 0.45 0.11 0.21 0.31 Incremental delay, d2 19.1 0.1 11.8 0.5 1.4 7.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 44.5 8.6 36.7 19.0 30.5 38.3 Lane group LOS D A D 9 C D Approach delay 20.6 33.9 33.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 29.6 X = 0.96 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved I 11 Version 4.1e IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester 2007 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 1142 670 101 883 94 199 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 44.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 36.0 G= G= G= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1202 765 106 929 1 308 Delay calibration, k 0.32 0.43 0.43 0.19 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 2.5 14.9 55.0 0.6 0.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 21.5 36.1 76.1 17.3 20.4 Lane group LOS C D E B C Approach delay 26.9 23.3 20.4 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 25.1 X = 0.71 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20007' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 755 513 267 1621 353 519 % Heavy vehicles, %HV , 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 795 540 281 1706 918 Lane group capacity, c 1410 704 218 1410 746 v/c ratio, X 0.56 0.77 1.29 1.21 1.23 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 Uniform delay, di 18.5 21.1 25.0 25.0 25.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.16 0.32 0.50 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 5.1 160.0 101.3 115.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 19.1 126.2 185.0 1126.3 1 140.3 Lane group LOS 8 C F I F F Approach delay 21.9 134.6 140.3 Approach LOS C F F Intersection delay 100.4 X = 1.26 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20007' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 1142 670 101 883 94 199 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 60 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 50.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1202 705 106 929 99 146 Lane group capacity, c 1763 879 162 1763 1146 528 v/c ratio, X 0.68 0.80 0.65 0.53 0.09 0.28 Total green ratio, g/C 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33 Uniform delay, di 14.3 16.0 14.0 12.6 20.6 122.0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.25 0.35 0.23 0.13 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 1.1 5.4 9.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 15.4 21.4 23.1 12.9 20.6 22.3 Lane group LOS B C C B C C Approach delay 17.6 13.9 21.6 Approach LOS g I B C Intersection delay 16.7 1 X = 0.60 Intersection LOS B I HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved n Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000Tm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 755 513 267 1621 353 519 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 150 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 IY= G= 35.0 G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 795 540 281 1706 372 388 Lane group capacity, c 1234 616 429 1763 1146 528 v/c ratio, X 0.64 0.88 0.66 0.97 0.32 0.73 Total green ratio, g/C 0.39 0.39 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33 Uniform delay, di 22.4 125.5 13.3 19.2 22.4 26.5 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.22 0.40 0.23 0.47 0.11 0.29 Incremental delay, d2 1.2 13.5 3.6 14.5 0.2 5.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 23.6 39.0 16.8 33.7 22.6 31.8 Lane group LOS C D 8 C C C Approach delay 29.8 31.4 27.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 30.1 X, = 0.88 Intersection LOS C I HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 11 Version 4.1 e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Westminster Drive Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Westminster Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 888 28 19 637 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 934 29 20 670 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 5 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 52 0 24 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 54 0 1 25 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 5 2 5 5 5 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 20 79 Capacity, cm (vph) 711 191 /c ratio 0.03 0.41 Queue length (95%) 0.09 1.87 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 36.5 LOS B E Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 36.5 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc jApproach LOS I -- I -- , I E HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 11312005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Westminster Drive urisdiction Winchester nal sis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Westminster Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 809 48 31 984 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 851 50 32 1035 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 5 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 31 0 25 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 32 0 26 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 5 2 5 5 5 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LR Control DeIaV, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 32 58 Capacity, cm (vph) 750 186 /c ratio 0.04 0.31 Queue length (95%) 0.13 1.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.0 32.9 LOS B D Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 32.9 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Approach LOS -- -- D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000ru DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & West Minster Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 888 28 19 637 52 24 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 50.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 935 29 20 671 80 Lane group capacity, c 1763 879 253 1763 575 v/c ratio, X 0.53 0.03 0.08 0.38 0.14 Total green ratio, g/C 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.33 Uniform delay, di 12.6 19.1 9.3 11.3 21.0 1.000 1.000 1.000 T D00 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 12.9 9.1 9.4 11.4 21.1 Lane group LOS B A A B C Approach delay 12.8 11.4 21.1 Approach LOS B B C Intersection delay 12.6 XC = 0.38 Intersection LOS B IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 111412005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & West Minster Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 809 48 31 984 31 25 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 50.0 G= IY= G= G= IY= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 852 51 33 1036 59 Lane group capacity, c 1763 879 287 1763 568 v/c ratio, X 0.48 0.06 0.11 0.59 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.33 Uniform delay, di 12.2 9.2 9.5 13.2 20.7 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 12.4 9.2 9.7 13.7 20.8 Lane group LOS 8 A A 8 C Approach delay 12.2 13.6 20.8 Approach LOS g 8 C Intersection delay 13.2 X, = 0.41 Intersection LOS 8 1 HCS2000FM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved it Version 4.1 e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000T.. DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 159 1482 750 382 421 69 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 45.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 167 1560 789 402 443 73 Lane group capacity, c 268 1739 1739 792 1337 616 v/c ratio, X 0.62 0.90 0.45 0.51 0.33 0.12 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.39 Uniform delay, d1 16.3 20.4 14.6 15.1 19.3 17.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.21 0.42 1 0.11 0.12 1 10.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 4.5 6.6 0.2 0.5 1 0.1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 20.8 27.0 14.7 15.6 19.4 17.7 Lane group LOS C C B 8 B B Approach delay 26.4 15.0 19.2 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 21.4 Xc = 0.65 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000"" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Apple Ridge Road Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 45 1117 1965 290 244 44 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 4 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 - 0.95 0.95 1 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 =08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 45.0 IY= G= G= G= 25.0 G= G.= G= Y= 0 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 47 1176 2068 305 257 46 Lane group capacity, c 83 1739 2125 967 955 440 v/c ratio, X 0.57 0.68 0.97 0.32 0.27 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, d1 15.7 17.0 16.8 8.4 25.4 24.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.16 0.25 10.48 0.11 0.11 1 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 8.8 1.1 13.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 24.5 18.1 30.6 8.6 25.5 24.3 Lane group LOS C B C A C C Approach delay 18.3 27.7 25.3 Approach LOS B C C Intersection delay 24.6 X = 0.75 Intersection LOS C ' HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes,, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 101 1318 160 129 800 37 295 29 224 15 9 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 17 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 4.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 36.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 106 1387 168 136 842 39 507 61 Lane group capacity, c 236 1410 704 162 1551 774 554 594 v/c ratio, X 0.45 0.98 0.24 0.84 0.54 0.05 0.92 0.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.49 10.49 10.40 0.40 Uniform delay, di 17.4 24.7 15.5 19.9 16.0 12.1 25.6 16.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.49 0.11 0.37 0.14 0.11 0.43 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates,. pc Incremental delay, d2 1.4 20.1 0.2 30.6 0.4 0.0 1 20.0 1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 18.7 44.8 15.7 50.5 16.4 12.1 45.5 17.0 Lane group LOS B D B D B B D B Approach delay 40.2 20.8 45.5 17.0 Approach LOS D C D B Intersection delay 34.5 X = 1.02 Intersection LOS C HCS2000 M Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 141 1277 236 106 1718 29 477 24 155 31 28 147 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 49 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, Ng 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 46.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 21.0 G= 13.0 G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 148 1344 248 112 1808 31 636 165 Lane group capacity, c 83 1622 1266 95 1622 809 530 191 v/c ratio, X 1.78 0.83 0.20 1.18 1.11 0.04 1.20 0.86 Total green ratio, g/C 0.51 0.51 0.80 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.38 0.14 Uniform delay, di 22.0 18.7 2.1 22.0 22.0 11.0 28.0 37.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.37 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 1 0.50 1 1 0.39 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 1 Incremental delay, d2 396.3 3.7 0.1 148.3 60.8 0.0 1 107.1 1 31.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 418.3 22.4 2.2 170.3 82.8 11.0 135.1 68.8 Lane group LOS F C A F F B F E Approach delay 53.2 86.6 135.1 68.8 Approach LOS D F F E Intersection delay 79.9 X = 1.60 Intersection LOS E HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000m DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 1- 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume, V (vph) 101 1318 160 129 800 37 295 29 224 15 9 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A I A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 44.0 G= G= G= G= 16.0 G= 10.0 G= G= Y= 5, 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 106 1387 168 136 842 39 311 267 25 2 Lane group capacity, c 292 1745 1286 111 1745 871 447 525 165 198 v/c ratio, X 0.36 0.79 0.13 1.23 0.48 0.04 0.70 0.51 0.15 0.01 Total green ratio, g/C 0.55 0.55 0.81 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.32 0.32 0.13 0.13 Uniform delay, di 10.1 14.4 1.6 18.0 11.0 8.3 22.3 21.8 31.2 30.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.34 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.12 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.8 2.6 0.0 158.0 0.2 0.0 4.7 0.8 0.4 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 10.9 17.0 1.6 176.0 11.2 8.3 27.0 22.7 31.6 30.7 Lane group LOS B B A F B A C C C C Approach delay 15.1 33.2 25.0 31.6 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection delay 22.6 Xc = 1.07 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 1 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Fox Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume, V (vph) 141 1277 236 106 1718 29 477 24 155 31 28 147 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 43.5 G= G= G= IY= G= 18.5 G= 8.0 G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 148 1344 248 112 1808 31 502 188 62 103 Lane group capacity, c 93 1725 1326 119 1725 861 502 537 137 158 v/c ratio, X 1.59 0.78 0.19 0.94 1.05 0.04 1.00 0.35 0.45 0.65 Total green ratio, g/C 0.54 0.54 0.84 0.54 0.54 10.54 0.33 10.33 1.0.10 0.10 Uniform delay, di 18.3 14.4 1.3 17.1 18.3 8.5 25.3 20.2 33.9 34.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.33 0.11 0.45 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.23 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pe I Incremental delay, d2 310.7 2.4 0.1 64.2 35.5 0.0 40.2 0.4 1 2.4 9.2 Initial queue delay, 613 Control delay 329.0 16.8 1.3 81.2 53.8 8.5 65.5 20.6 36.3 43.9 Lane group LOS F 9 A F D A E C D D Approach delay 41.2 54.6 53.3 41.0 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection delay 48.8 X = 1.37 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e . , Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000Tm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LR Volume, V (vph) 359 1327 751 395 360 286 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 14 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 47.0 G= G= G= G= 33.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 378 1397 791 416 680 Lane group capacity, c 286 1657 1657 827 625 v/c ratio, X 1.32 0.84 0.48 0.50 1.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.37 Uniform delay, d1 21.5 18.4 13.7 13.9 28.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.38 1 0.11 0.11 1 0.50 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 167.1 4.2 0.2 0.5 1 62.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 188.6 22.5 13.9 14.4 90.8 Lane group LOS F C B B F Approach delay 57.9 14.1 90.8 Approach LOS E B F Intersection delay 49.6 X = 1.23 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000T" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB Agency or Co. PHR+A ramps Date Performed 511012005 Area Type All other areas Time Period PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB LT TH RT LT I TH I RT LT I TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 Lane group L Volume, V (vph) 36 % Heavy vehicles, %HV Peak -hour factor, PHF 0. Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) Start-up lost time, I, 2. Extension of effective green, e 2. Arrival type, AT Unit extension, UE 3. Filtering/metering, 1 1. Initial unmet demand, Qb 0. Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes Lane width 12 Parking / Grade / Parking Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB G Min. time for pedestrians, G Phasing EB Only EW Perm Timing . G= 5.0 G= 35.0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Lane Group Capacity, Control DelaV, Adjusted flow rate, v Lane group capacity, c v/c ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C Uniform delay, d1 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 387 11272 181 1410 2.14 0.90 0.44 0.44 23.2 23.2 1.000 1.000 0.50 0.42 ' M-- ' M® INE--©INE© •• --M•. •. • I1E--=M■ •• ••• -- ••• ••• ■ • •• -- •• •• ■ ---ENE • =--=M■ �©©m©© •�SEEM and LOS Determination EB WB TH RT LT TH RT 1712 754 1379 551 1.24 1.37 0.39 10.39 27.5 27.5 1.000 1.000 0.50 0.50 ,T 445 2 0.95 A go M _MM_■ M---■ M©©_© 0 f- 3.2 06 07 G= G= Y= Y= Cycle Lenqth, C = 90.0 h: 1048 757 1.38 0.44 25.0 1.000 0.50 3.2 08 G= Y= M Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 530.2 8.4 115.0 177.1 1 181.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 553.4 3 1. 6 142.5 204.6 206.2 Lane group LOS F C F F F Approach delay 153.3 161.5 206.2 Approach LOS F F F Intersection delay 167.9 X� = 2.28 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e � I � I � I � I IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20007" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 359 1327 751 395 360 286 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 14 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 14.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 26.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 378 1397 791 416 379 301 Lane group capacity, c 458 1904 1410 704 993 457 v/c ratio, X 0.83 0.73 0.56 0.59 0.38 0.66 Total green ratio, g/C 0.60 0.60 0.44 0.44 0.29 0.29 Uniform delay, d1 12.1 12.9 18.5 18.8 25.6 28.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.36 0.29 0.16 0.18 0.11 0.23 Incremental delay, d2 11.8 1.5 0.5 1.3 0.2 3.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 23.8 14.4 19.0 20.2 25.8 31.6 Lane group LOS C B B C C C Approach delay 16.4 19.4 28.4 Approach LOS B B C Intersection delay 19.6 Xc = 0.71 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 NB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 368 1208 1626 716 551 445 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 225 0 100 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 11.5 G= 39.5 G= G= G= 19.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 387 1272 1712 517 580 363 Lane group capacity, c 347 2023 1751 700 816 376 v/c ratio, X 1.12 0.63 0.98 0.74 0.71 0.97 Total green ratio, g/C 0.64 0.64 0.49 0.49 0.24 0.24 Uniform delay, di 24.4 8.8 19.8 16.1 28.0 30.2 Progression factor, PF 11,000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.21 0.48 0.30 0.27 0.47 Incremental delay, d2 83.2 0.6 16.5 4.2 2.9 37.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 107.5 9.4 30.9 67.4 Lane group LOS F A ED C C E Approach delay 32.3 32.6 45.0 Approach LOS C C D Intersection delay 34.9 Xc = 1.23 Intersection LOS C HCS200OTM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 1232 670 177 933 1 454 199 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 220 0 0 67 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 13.2 13.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1297 474 186 982 617 Lane group capacity, c 1410 11 704 83 1410 773 v/c ratio, X 0.92 0.67 2.24 0.70 0.80 Total green ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 10.44 Uniform delay, d1 23.5 19.8 25.0 20.1 21.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.44 0.25 0.50 0.26 0.34 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 10.0 2.5 595.2 1.5 5.9 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 33.5 22.4 620.2 21.6 27.4 Lane group LOS C C F C C Approach delay 30.5 117.0 27.4 Approach LOS C F C Intersection delay 58.4 X = 1.52 Intersection LOS E HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000m DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane group T R L T LR Volume, V (vph) 849 513 440 1737 728 519 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 170 0 0 170 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 G= 20.0 G= G= G= 45.0 G= G= G= 77 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 894 361 463 1828 1133 Lane group capacity, c 705 352 378 1234 862 v/c ratio, X 1.27 1.03 1.22 1.48 1.31 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 0.22 0.39 0.39 0.50 Uniform delay, di 35.0 35.0 23.4 27.5 22.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 131.7 54.7 122.6 221.0 149.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 166.7 89.7 146.0 248.5 172.2 Lane group LOS F F F F F Approach delay 144.5 227.8 172.2 Approach LOS F F F Intersection delay 192.0 X = 1.43 Intersection LOS F IHCS2000TM' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e it II Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20W DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 1232 670 177 933 454 199 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 201 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 10 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 62.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 92.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1297 494 186 982 478 209 Lane group capacity, c 2138 1067 211 2138 747 344 v/c ratio, X 0.61 0.46 0.88 0.46 0.64 0.61 Total green ratio, g/C 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.22 0.22 Uniform delay, di 8.3 7.1 12.0 7.1 32.7 32.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.19 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.22 0.19 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.3 32.2 0.2 1.9 3.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 8.8 7.4 44.3 7.2 34.6 35.5 Lane group LOS A A D A C D Approach delay 8.4 13.1 34.9 Approach LOS A B C Intersection delay 14.9 Xc = 0.82 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Rt 37 SB ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 849 513 440 1737 728 519 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 14 2 2 14 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 153 0 0 1159 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 22.0 G= 31.5 IY= G= G= IY= G= 26.5 G= G= G= Y= 0 5 Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 894 379 463 1828 766 379 Lane group capacity, c 1111 554 516 1886 1012 466 v/c ratio, X 0.80 0.68 0.90 . 0.97 0.76 0.81 Total green ratio, g/C 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.29 0.29 Uniform delay, d1 26.5 25.0 23.5 17.5 28.8 29.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Delay calibration, k 0.35 0.25 0.42 0.48 0.31 0.35 Incremental delay, d2 4.4 3.5 18.3 14.2 3.3 10.6 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 30.9 128.5 41.8 131.6 1 32.2 40.0 Lane group LOS C C D I C C D Approach delay 30.2 33.7 34.8 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 33.0 X = 0.92 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information A Intersection AJurisdiction nalvsis Year Analyst PHR+ Agency/Co. PHR+ Date Performed 511012005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour ite 522 & Plaza Circle chester 7 Buildout Conditions Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 60 1272 85 82 1587 40 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 63 1338 89 86 1670 42 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 129 13 72 75 4 79 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 135 13 1 75 78 4 1 83 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 10 1 1 Configuration LT R I LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 63 86 148 75 82 83 Capacity, cm (vph) 367 473 3 400 0 311 /c ratio 0.17 0.18 49.33 0.19 0.27 Queue length (95%) 0.61 0.66 20.79 0.68 1.05 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.8 14.3 24118 16.1 20.7 LOS C B F C F C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 16012 Approach LOS -- -- F Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Drive Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Winchester Date Performed 511012005 Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions nalysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 51 1430 31 33 903 57 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 53 1505 32 34 950 60 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R U stream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 18 2 19 7 1 20 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 2 1 20 7 1 21 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration I LT R LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 53 34 20 20 8 21 Capacity, cm (vph) 682 429 22 353 31 536 /c ratio 0.08 0.08 0.91 0.06 0.26 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.25 0.26 2.62 0.18 0.81 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 14.1 407.7 15.8 157.5 12.0 LOS B B F C F B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 211.8 52.1 Approach LOS -- -- F F Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Drive Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project Description Stonewall Plaza East/West Street: Route 522 North/South Street: Plaza Circle Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 60 1272 85 82 1587 40 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 63 1338 89 86 1670 42 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 129 13 72 75 4 79 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 135 13 1 75 78 4 83 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration LT r R LT R Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 63 86 148 75 82 83 Capacity, cm (vph) 367 473 3 400 0 311 /c ratio 0.17 0.18 49.33 0.19 0.27 Queue length (95%) 0.61 0.66 20.79 0.68 1.05 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.8 14.3 24118 16.1 20.7 LOS C B F C F C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 16012 Approach LOS -- -- F Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000'n' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 51912005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Build -out Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R LT R LT R Volume, V (vph) 51 1475 31 33 928 57 18 2 19 7 0 20 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 48.0 G= G= G= G= 32.0 G= G= IY= G= IY= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 54 1553 33 35 977 60 21 20 7 21 Lane group capacity, c 220 1692 844 83 1692 844 566 563 590 563 v/c ratio, X 0.25 0.92 0.04 0.42 0.58 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 Total green ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Uniform delay, di 11.3 19.2 10.0 12.6 14.2 10.2 18.9 18.9 18.8 18.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.44 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 1 Incremental delay, d2 0.6 8.4 0.0 3.4 1 0.5 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 11.9 27.6 10.0 16.1 14.7 10.2 19.0 19.0 18.8 19.0 Lane group LOS B C B B B B B B B B Approach delay 26.8 14.5 19.0 18.9 Approach LOS C B B B Intersection delay 21.8 X = 0.57 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS20007' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 51912005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Plaza Circle Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R LT R LT R Volume, V (vph) 60 1319 85 82 1645 40 129 13 72 75 4 79 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 54.9 G= G= G= G= 25.1 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 63 1388 89 86 1732 42 150 76 83 83 Lane group capacity, c 83 1936 966 145 1936 966 357 441 336 441 v/c ratio, X 0.76 0.72 0.09 0.59 0.89 0.04 0.42 0.17 0.25 0.19 Total green ratio, g/C 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Uniform delay, di 12.7 12.2 7.3 10.7 15.1 7.0 26.5 24.6 25.1 124.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.31 0.28 0.11 0.18 10.42 10.11 1 10.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 32.7 1 1.3 0.0 6.4 5.9 0.0 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 45.5 13.5 7.3 17.1 20.9 7.0 27.3 24.8 25.5 24.9 Lane group LOS D B A B C A C C C C Approach delay 14.4 20.4 26.5 25.2 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection delay 18.6 X = 0.75 Intersection LOS B HCS2000''M Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000m DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Site Driveway Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T R L T R LTR L R Volume, V (vph) 585 888 28 19 637 315 1 52 1 24 177 329 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 19.5 IY= G= 32.0 G= G= IY= G= 5.0 IY= G= 13.5 G= G= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 616 935 29 20 671 332 81 186 346 Lane group capacity, c 745 1128 800 384 1128 739 259 191 1583 v/c ratio, X 0.83 0.83 0.04 0.05 0.59 0.45 0.31 0.97 0.22 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 0.36 0.51 0.22 0.36 0.47 0.15 0.06 1.00 Uniform delay, di 33.6 26.5 11.2 27.9 23.7 16.2 34.1 42.4 0.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 Delay calibration, k 0.36 0.37 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.48 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc I Incremental delay, d2 7.7 5.3 0.0 0.1 1 0.9 0.4 1 0.7 1 57.3 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 41.3 31.8 11.2 28.0 24.6 16.6 34.8 99.8 0.1 Lane group LOS D C B C C B C F A Approach delay 35.1 22.1 34.8 34.9 Approach LOS D C C C Intersection delay 30.9 X = 0.74 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 511012005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Site Driveway Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Stonewall Plaza Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Lane group L T R L T R LTR L R Volume, V (vph) 609 809 48 31 984 325 31 1 25 405 752 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 14 2 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 14 0 0 0 7 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left I Thru & RT 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 22.0 1 G= 35.0' G= G= IY= G= 12.5 G= 5.5 G= G= IY= Y= 5 IY= 5 Y= IY= 5 Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 95.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 641 852 36 33 1036 342 53 426 792 Lane group capacity, c 796 1169 675 410 1169 875 100 452 1583 v/c ratio, X 0.81 0.73 0.05 0.08 0.89 0.39 0.53 0.94 0.50 Total green ratio, g/C 6.23 0.37 10.43 0.23 0.37 10.55 0.06 0.13 1 1.00 Uniform delay, d1 34.5 25.9 16.0 28.6 28.1 12.1 43.5 40.9 0.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 Delay calibration, k 0.35 0.29 0.11 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.13 0.46 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pe Incremental delay, d2 6.1 2.3 0.0 0.1 8.5 0.3 5.3 28.3 0.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 40.6 28.2 16.0 28.7 36.6 12.4 48.8 69.2 0.3 Lane group LOS D C B C D B D E A Approach delay 33.1 30.6 48.8 24.4 Approach LOS C C D C Intersection delay 29.9 X = 0.85 Intersection LOS C IHCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e IPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Traffic Counts Intersection: E-W: IROUTE 522 Weather Dry File Name N-S: IWESTERMINSTER CANTER BURY Count By JJP Input By JJP Location Winchester,VA Count Date ######## 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: WESTERMINSTER CAI SB: 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 196 2 198 1 94 0 95 7 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 302 7:00 7:15 0 199 4 203 3 107 0 110 14 0 4 18 0 0 0 0 331 7:15 7:30 0 210 7 217 4 105 0 109 12 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 342 7:30 7:45 0 196 6 202 5 114 0 119 9 0 6 15 0 0 0 0 336 7:45 8:00 0 182 8 190 5 100 0 105 11 0 7 18 0 0 0 0 313 8:00 8:15 0 157 7 164 2 94 0 96 7 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 271 8:15 8:30 0 152 4 156 4 90 0 94 5 0 6 11 0 0 0 0 261 8:30 8:45 0 161 6 167 5 85 0 90 8 0 5 13 0 0 0 0 270 8:45 A.M. Total r770 1453 44 1497 29 789 0 818 73 0 38 ill 0 0 0 0 2426 A.M. Total 16:00 0 155 7 162 8 176 0 184 9 0 5 14 0 0 0 0 360 16:00 16:15 0 166 4 170 5 184 0 189 5 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 369 16:15 16:30 0 168 8 176 3 197 0 200 6 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 398 16:30 16:45 0 175 11 186 7 215 0 222 7 0 4 11 0. 0 0 0 419 16:45 17:00 0 177 14 191 10 229 0 239 9 0 7 16 0 0 0 0 446 17:00 17:15 0 150 10 160 8 207 0 215 6 0 5 11 0 0 0 0 386 17:15 17:30 0 135 9 144 10 190 0 200 8 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 355 17:30 17:45 0 122 11 133 11 165 0 176 4 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 317 17:45 P.M. Total 0 1248 74 1322 62 1563 0 1625 54 0 39 93 0 0 0 0 3040 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: WESTERMINSTER C SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 801 19 820 13 420 0 433 42 0 16 58 0 0 0 0 1311 7:00 7:15 0 787 25 812 17 426 0 443 46 0 21 67 0 0 0 0 .1322 7:15 7:30 0 745 28 773 16 413 0 429 39 0 21 60 0 0 0 0 1262 7:30 7:45 0 687 25 712 16 398 0 414 32 0 23 55 0 0 0 0 1181 7:45 8:00 0 652 25 677 16 369 0 385 31 0 22 53 0 0 0 0 1115 8:00 16:00 0 664 30 694 23 772 0 795 27 0 20 47 0 0 0 0 1536 16:00 16:15 0 686 37 723 25 125 0 850 27 0 22 49 0 0 0 0 1622 16:15 16:30 0 670 43 713 28 848 0 876 28 0 22 50 0 0 0 0 1639 16:30 16:45 0 637 44 681 35 841 0 876 30 0 19 49 0 0 0 0 1606 16:45 17:00 0 584 44 628 39 791 0 830 27 0 19 46 0 0 0 0 1504 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: WESTERMINSTER CAI SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:15 0 787 25 812 17 426 0 443 46 0 21 67 0 0 0 0 1322 7:15 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.97 A.M. Peak 16:30 0 670 43 713 28 848 0 876 28 0 22 50 0 0 0 0 1639 16:30 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.92 PHF = 0.78 PHF = 0.92 P.M. Peak Intersection: E-W: ROUTE 522 Weather DRY File Name N-S: PLAZA CIRCLE Count By JJP Input By JJP Location Winchester,VA Count Date 12/2/2004 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: PLAZA CIRCLE SB: EXETER DR 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 14 189 3 206 8 90 10 108 5 0 2 7 2 0 1 3 324 7:00 7:15 12 201 4 217 6 ill 12 129 3 0 4 7 1 0 4 5 358 7:15 7:30 17 195 8 220 11 127 11 149 4 1 3 8 0 0 3 3 380 7:30 7:45 12 192 10 214 7 107 18 132 3 0 5 8 4 0 5 9 363 7:45 8:00 14 189 6 209 5 100 10 115 6 1 5 12 1 0 6 7 343 8:00 8:15 12 177 8 197 10 92 6 108 8 2 6 16 3 1 7 11 332 8:15 8:30 10 156 5 171 9 86 6 101 11 1 8 20 3 0 5 8 300 8:30 8:45 11 149 10 170 11 86 9 106 14 1 7 22 4 1 8 13 311 8:45 A.M. Total 102 1448 54 1604 T 67 799 82 948 54 6 40 100 18 2 39 59 2711 A.M. Total 16:00 10 135 15 160 16 174 7 197 26 3 14 43 16 0 4 20 420 16:00 16:15 8 152 19 179 14 179 6 199 20 1 16 37 20 1 7 28 443 16:15 16:30 11 166 17 194 18 194 10 222 24 4 21 49 15 1 16 32 497 16:30 16:45 16 167 24 207 24 199 8 231 33 2 16 51 14 0 15 29 518 16:45 17:00 12 168 21 201 22 216 7 245 31 3 24 58 17 1 19 37 541 17:00 17:15 14 141 24 179 27 197 11 235 27 3 27 57 21 2 20 43 514 17:15 17:30 12 121 28 161 34 160 9 203 30 0 21 51 15 0 17 32 447 17:30 17:45 8 116 21 145 29 138 7 174 26 2 22 50 12 0 10 22 391 17:45 P.M. Total 91 1166 169 1426 184 1457 65 1706 217 18 161 396 130 5 108 243 3771 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: PLAZA CIRCLE SB: EXETER DR 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 55 777 25 857 32 435 51 518 15 1 14 30 7 0 13 20 1425 7:00 7:15 55 777 28 860 29 445 51 525 16 2 17 35 6 0 18 24 1444 7:15 7:30 55 753 32 840 33 426 45 504 21 4 19 44 8 1 21 30 1418 7:30 7:45 48 714 29 791 31 385 40 456 28 4 24 56 11 1 23 35 1338 7:45 8:00 47 671 29 747 35 364 31 430 39 5 26 70 11 2 26 39 1286 8:00 16:00 45 620 75 740 72 746 31 849 103 10 67 180 65 2 42 109 1878 16:00 16:15 47 653 81 781 78 788 31 897 108 10 77 195 66 3 57 126 1999 16:15 16:30 53 642 86 781 91 806 36 933 115 12 88 215 67 4 70 141 2070 16:30 16:45 54 597 97 748 107 772 35 914 121 8 88 217 67 3 71 141 2020 16:45 17:00 46 546 94 686 112 711 34 857 114 8 94 216 65 3 66 134 1893 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: PLAZA CIRCLE SB: EXETER DR 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:15 55 777 28 860 29 445 51 525 16 2 17 35 6 0 18 24 1444 7:15 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.98 PHF = 0.88 PHF = 0.73 PHF = 0.67 0.95 A.M. Peak 16:30 53 642 86 781 91 806 36 933 115 12 88 215 67 4 70 141 2070 16:30 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.95 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.82 1 0.96 P.M. Peak Intersection: E-W: IROUTE 522 Weather DRY File Name N-S: IFOX DR Count By jjjP Input By JJP Location Winchester,VA Count Date 12n12004 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: FOX DR SB: EXXON 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 11 118 32 161 22 90 4 116 34 7 33 74 5 1 8 14 365 7:00 7:15 16 142 31 189 36 107 11 154 60 5 41 106 1 0 12 13 462 7:15 7:30 12 151 34 197 26 96 7 129 59 7 44 110 4 4 16 24 460 7:30 7:45 14 124 21 159 24 88 9 121 50 8 46 104 5 1 11 17 401 7:45 8:00 18 127 16 161 29 81 6 116 48 6 36 90 3 3 6 12 379 8:00 8:15 19 124 24 167 23 83 4 110 46 8 37 91 2 2 9 13 381 8:15 8:30 15 116 14 145 21 81 6 108 42 5 29 76 4 2 9 15 344 8:30 8:45 1 16 121 15 152 22 96 7 125 37 7 31 75 1 2 4 11 17 369 8:45 A.M. Total 121 1023 187 1331 203 722 54 979 376 53 297 726 26 17 82 125 3161 A.M. Total 16:00 25 137 44 206 21 168 7 196 80 8 25 113 8 7 22 37 552 16:00 16:15 24 129 46 199 20 179 11 210 84 11 24 119 5 5 20 30 558 16:15 16:30 29 135 52 216 23 188 6 217 91 6 21 118 7 3 26 36 587 16:30 16:45 39 141 61 241 20 197 8 225 90 7 26 123 8 7 21 36 625 16:45 17:00 42 151 66 259 27 210 7 244 101 4 27 132 6 11 24 41 676 17:00 17:15 35 138 51 224 24 187 5 216 88 4 24 116 7 4 20 31 587 17:15 17:30 26 122 42 190 20 154 6 180 80 4 27 111 4 8 16 28 509 17:30 17:45 21 104 43 168 16 120 6 142 62 3 23 88 6 6 18 30 428 17:45 P.M. Total 241 1057 405 1703 171 1403 56 1630 676 47 197 920 51 51 167 269 4522 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: FOX DR SB: EXXON 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 53 535 118 706 108 381 31 520 203 27 164 394 15 6 47 68 1688 7:00 7:15 60 544 102 706 115 372 33 520 217 26 167 410 13 8 45 66 1702 7:15 7:30 63 526 95 684 102 348 26 476 203 29 163 395 14 10 42 66 1621 7:30 7:45 66 491 75 632 97 333 25 455 186 27 148 361 14 8 35 57 1505 7:45 8:00 68 488 69 625 95 341 23 459 173 26 133 332 11 11 35 57 1473 8:00 16:00 117 542 203 862 84 732 32 848 345 32 96 473 28 22 89 139 2322 16:00 16:15 134 556 225 915 90 774 32 896 366 28 98 492 26 26 91 143 2446 16:15 16:30 145 565 230 940 94 782 26 902 370 21 98 489 28 25 91 144 2475 16:30 16:45 142 552 220 914 91 748 26 865 359 19 104 482 25 30 81 136 2397 16:45 17:00 124 515 202 841 87 671 24 782 331 15 101 447 23 29 78 130 2200 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: FOX DR SB: EXXON 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:15 60 544 102 706 115 372 33 520 217 26 167 410 13 8 45 66 1702F.M7:1A.M. Peak PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.84 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.69 0.92 16:30 145 565 230 940 94 782 26 902 370 21 98 489 28 25 91 144 2475 PHF = 0.91 PHF =0.92 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.88 0.92 Intersection: E-W: ROUTE 522 Weather DRY File Name N-S: IROUTE 37 RAMP Count By I JJP Input Bypip Location Winchester,VA Count Date 12/8/2004 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: ROUTE 37 RAMP SB: 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 80 190 0 270 0 80 30 110 42 0 24 66 0 0 0 0 446 7:00 7:15 82 207 0 289 0 ill 34 145 68 0 37 105 0 0 0 0 539 7:15 7:30 101 210 0 311 0 114 38 152 71 0 40 ill 0 0 0 0 574 7:30 7:45 96 190 0 286 0 92 30 122 39 0 33 72 0 0 0 0 480 7:45 8:00 80 174 0 254 0 76 31 107 37 0 29 66 0 0 0 0 427 8:00 8:15 76 150 0 226 0 64 22 86 34 0 37 71 0 0 0 0 383 8:15 8:30 54 137 0 191 0 70 26 96 38 0 40 78 0 0 0 0 365 8:30 8:45 11 41 129 0 170 1 0 66 24 90 1 31 0 36 67 0 0 0 0 327 8:45 A.M. Total 610 1387 0 1997 0 673 235 908 360 0 276 636 0 0 0 0 3541 A.M. Total 16:00 77 134 0 211 0 240 44 284 121 0 52 173 0 0 0 0 668 16:00 16:15 82 137 0 219 0 244 50 294 119 0 60 179 0 0 0 0 692 16:15 16:30 84 141 0 225 0 262 52 314 117 0 65 182 0 0 0 0 721 16:30 16:45 90 150 0 240 0 270 57 327 129 0 71 200 0 0 0 0 767 16:45 17:00 86 148 0 234 0 265 64 329 130 0 70 200 0 0 0 0 763 17:00 17:15 81 156 0 237 0 254 60 314 114 0 65 179 0 0 0 0 730 17:15 17:30 70 133 0 203 0 245 51 296 90 0 51 141 0 0 0 0 640 17:30 17:45 50 121 0 171 0 231 40 271 76 0 42 118 0 0 0 0 560 17:45 P.M. Total 620 1120 0 1740 0 2011 418 2429 896 0 476 1372 0 0 0 0 5541 P.M. Total I Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: ROUTE 37 RAMP SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 359 797 0 1156 0 397 132 529 220 0 134 354 0 0 0 0 2039 7:00 7:15 359 781 0 1140 0 393 133 526 215 0 139 354 0 0 0 0 2020 7:15 7:30 353 724 0 1077 0 346 121 467 181 0 139 320 0 0 0 0 1864 7:30 7:45 306 651 0 957 0 302 109 411 148 0 139 287 0 0 0 0 1655 7:45 9:00 251 590 0 841 0 276 103 379 140 0 142 282 0 0 0 0 1502 8:00 16:00 333 562 0 895 0 1016 203 1219 486 0 248 734 0 0 0 0 2848 16:00 16:15 342 576 0 918 0 1041 223 1264 495 0 266 761 0 0 0 0 2943 16:15 16:30 341 595 0 936 0 1051 233 1284 490 0 271 761 0 0 0 0 2981 16:30 16:45 327 587 0 914 0 1034 232 1266 463 0 257 720 0 0 0 0 2900 16:45 17:00 287 558 0 845 0 995 215 1210 410 0 228 638 0 0 0 0 2693 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: ROUTE 37 RAMP SB: Period N,S, Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W pPe0a 7:00 359 797 0 1156 0 397 132 529 220 0 134 354 0 0 0 0 2039 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.87 PHF = 0.80 PHF = 0.89 16:30 341 595 0 936 0 1051 233 1284 490 0 271 761 0 0 0 0 2981 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.98 PHF = 0.98 PHF = 0.95 PHF = 0.97 Intersection: E-W: IROUTE 522 Weather RAIN File Name N-S: IROUTE 37 RAMP Count By JJP Input By JJP Location lWinchester,VA Count Date 12/9/2004 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: ROUTE 37 RAMP 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 254 139 393 16 151 0 167 0 0 0 0 14 0 36 50 610 7:00 7:15 0 269 166 435 21 284 0 305 0 0 0 0 18 0 50 68 808 7:15 7:30 0 258 178 436 27 271 0 298 0 0 0 0 17 0 57 74 808 7:30 7:45 0 262 163 425 33 171 0 204 0 0 0 0 23 0 34 57 686 7:45 8:00 0 219 129 348 34 124 0 158 0 0 0 0 16 0 25 41 547 8:00 8:15 0 190 96 286 26 116 0 142 0 0 0 0 14 0 22 36 464 8:15 8:30 0 176 88 264 20 101 0 121 0 0 0 0 17 0 16 33 418 8:30 8:45 0 141 72 213 21 92 0 113 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 40 366 8:45 A.M. Total 0 1769 1031 2800 198 1310 0 1508 0 0 0 0 139 0 260 399 4707 A.M. Total 16:00 0 140 84 224 51 300 0 351 0 0 0 0 46 0 96 142 717 16:00 16:15 0 139 96 235 66 321 0 387 0 0 0 0 49 0 100 149 771 16:15 16:30 0 148 112 260 69 373 0 442 0 0 0 0 55 0 120 175 877 16:30 16:45 0 146 127 273 72 381 0 453 0 0 0 0 57 0 127 184 910 16:45 17:00 0 130 121 251 70 362 0 432 0 0 0 0 59 0 114 173 856 17:00 17:15 0 119 107 226 44 342 0 386 0 0 0 0 44 0 101 145 757 17:15 17:30 0 100 89 189 31 299 0 330 0 0 0 0 37 0 76 113 632 17:30 17:45 0 96 70 166 30 268 0 298 0 0 0 0 35 0 64 99 563 17:45 P.M. Total F 0 1018 806 1824 433 2646 0 3079 0 0 0 0 382 0 798 1180 6083 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: ROUTE 37 RAMP 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 1043 646 1689 97 877 0 974 0 0 0 0 72 0 177 249 2912 7:00 7:15 0 1008 636 1644 115 850 0 965 0 0 0 0 74 0 166 240 2849 7:15 7:30 0 929 566 1495 120 682 0 802 0 0 0 0 70 0 138 208 2505 7:30 7:45 0 847 476 1323 113 512 0 625 0 0 0 0 70 0 97 167 2115 7:45 8:00 0 726 385 1111 101 433 0 534 0 0 0 0 67 0 83 150 1795 8:00 16:00 0 573 419 992 258 1375 0 1633 0 0 0 0 207 0 443 650 3275 16:00 16:15 0 563 456 1019 277 1437 0 1714 0 0 0 0 220 0 461 681 3414 16:15 16:30 0 543 467 1010 255 1458 0 1713 0 0 0 0 215 0 462 677 3400 16:30 16:45 0 495 444 939 217 1384 0 1601 0 0 0 0 197 0 418 615 3155 16:45 17:00 0 445 387 832 175 1271 0 1446 0 0 0 0 175 0 355 530 2808 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: ROUTE 37 RAMP 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 1043 646 1689 97 877 0 974 0 0 0 0 72 0 177 249 2912 7:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.97 PHF = 0.80 PHF = PHF = 0.84 0.90 A.M. Peak 16:15 0 563 456 1019 277 1437 0 1714 0 0 0 0 220 0 461 681 3414 16:15 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.95 PHF = PHF = 0.93 0.94 P.M. Peak Il Intersection: E-W: ROUTE 522 Weather RAIN File Name N-S: JAPPLE PIE RIDGE RD Count By JJP Input By JJP Location lWincliester,VA Count Date 12/1/2004 15 Minute EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: APPLE PIE RIDGE RD 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 36 291 0 327 0 129 66 195 0 0 0 0 76 0 14 90 612 7:00 7:15 54 308 0 362 0 145 148 293 0 0 0 0 114 0 18 132 787 7:15 7:30 41 296 0 337 0 137 82 219 0 0 0 0 84 0 21 105 661 7:30 7:45 10 281 0 291 0 122 44 166 0 0 0 0 70 0 8 78 535 7:45 8:00 11 264 0 275 0 109 35 144 0 0 0 0. 46 0 7 53 472 8:00 8:15 8 238 0 246 0 102 26 128 0 0 0 0 41 0 4 45 419 8:15 8:30 11 221 0 232 0 90 24 114 0 0 0 0 49 0 7 56 402 8:30 8:45 11 207 0 218 0 88 21 109 0 0 0 0 40 0 6 46 373 8:45 A.M. Total 182 2106 0 2288 0 922 446 1368 0 0 0 0 520 0 85 605 4261 A.M. Total 16:00 10 236 0 246 0 340 48 388 0 0 0 0 40 0 14 54 688 16:00 16:15 11 244 0 255 0 380 44 424 0 0 0 0 47 0 10 57 736 16:15 16:30 10 257 0 267 0 389 58 447 0 0 0 0 55 0 11 66 780 16:30 16:45 12 249 0 261 0 430 60 490 0 0 0 0 54 0 11 65 816 16:45 17:00 7 255 0 262 0 441 68 509 0 0 0 0 61 0 7 68 839 17:00 17:15 4 221 0 225 0 400 52 452 0 0 0 0 50 0 8 58 735 17:15 17:30 11 199 0 210 0 376 37 413 0 0 0 0 41 0 6 47 670 17:30 17:45 12 168 0 180 0 340 31 371 0 0 0 0 37 0 8 45 596 17:45 P.M. Total 77 1829 0 1906 0 3096 398 3494 0 0 0 0 385 0 75 460 5860 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: APPLE PIE RIDGE RD 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 141 1176 0 1317 0 533 340 873 0 0 0 0 344 0 61 405 2595 7:00 7:15 116 1149 0 1265 0 513 309 822 0 0 0 0 314 0 54 368 2455 7:15 7:30 70 1079 0 1149 0 470 187 657 0 0 0 0 241 0 40 281 2087 7:30 7:45 40 1004 0 1044 0 423 129 552 0 0 0 0 206 0 26 232 1828 7:45 8:00 41 930 0 971 0 389 106 495 0 0 0 0 176 0 24 200 1666 8:00 16:00 43 986 0 1029 0 1539 210 1749 0 0 0 0 196 0 46 242 3020 16:00 16:15 40 1005 0 1045 0 1640 230 1870 0 0 0 0 217 0 39 256 3171 16:15 16:30 33 982 0 1015 0 1660 238 1898 0 0 0 0 220 0 37 257 3170 16:30 16:45 34 924 0 958 0 1647 217 1864 0 0 0 0 206 0 32 238 3060 16:45 17:00 34 843 0 877 0 1557 188 1745 0 0 0 0 189 0 29 218 2840 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 522 WB: ROUTE 522 NB: SB: APPLE PIE RIDGE RD 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 141 1176 0 1317 0 533 340 873 0 0 0 0 344 0 61 405 2595 7:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.74 PHF = PHF = 0.77 0.82 A.M. Peak 16:15 40 1005 0 1045 0 1640 230 1870 0 0 0 0 217 0 39 256 3171 16:15 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.98 PHF = 0.92 PHF = PHF = 0.94 0.94 P.M. Peak r1 a 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 December 20, 2005 Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-05 FOR STONEWALL PLAZA Final Master Development Plan Approval Dear Jeremy: Frederick County administratively approved the above -referenced final master development plan on December 19, 2005. The master development plan is approved for the potential development of 21.91 acres in the B2 (Business General) Zoning District within the Stonewall Magisterial District. This site is approved for commercial land uses as depicted on the plan. The property which would comprise this development is located in the Sunnyside area along North Frederick Pike (Route 522) adjacent to the exiting Darville Subdivision and Trex Center. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors granted staff administrative approval authority on August 24, 2005. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance have been addressed in the plan. Please note that approval of a site plan is required prior to the subdivision or development of this parcel. I am providing you with three (3) copies of the approved final master development plan. Please ensure that these plans are distributed accordingly. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ary4u Candice E. Perkins, Planner II CEP/bad cc: MPN Realty, Inc., 303 S. Loudoun St., Winchester, VA 22601 Lynda J. Tyler, Stonewall District Supervisor John H. Light, Stonewall District Planning Commissioner Jane Anderson, Real Estate Patrick Barker, EDC 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r GREENWaYINGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 I Founded in 1971 August 16, 2005 Dear Neighbors: t U r 1 9 2005 Greenway Engineering has prepared a Master Development Plan for the commercial property immediately west of the Darville Subdivision. The commercial development on this property will include a shopping center with accessory retail services and offices. This Master Development Plan was presented to the Frederick County Planning Commission on August 3, 2005 and is scheduled to be presented to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors on August 24, 2005. During the presentation of the Master Development Plan to the Planning Commission, Greenway Engineering proposed to provide pedestrian access that would connect this shopping center to the Darville Subdivision on Clark-ville Drive. Several residents from the Darville Subdivision addressed the Planning Commission regarding this matter and also spoke to me after the meeting. Some residents were opposed to a pedestrian connection to the shopping center, while others felt that it would be appropriate. In order to determine how to address this issue, I would like to have a meeting with interested residents that live along Clark-ville Drive and the project site to discuss the proposal for pedestrian access, as well as any other aspect of the project. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on Tuesday, August 24, 2005 at the Greenway Engineering office beginning at 7:00 PM. I would also be glad to meet with you prior to this date if you are unable to attend on August 24th . You may contact me or Jeremy Tweedie at 662-4185 to make arrangements for an individual meeting. Sincerely, Evan Watt, AICP Greenway Engineering Cc: Aric ynda Tyler, Stonewall District Supervisor Lawrence, Planning Director Jeremy Tweedie, Project Engineer Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 File #4090/EAW www.greenwaveng.com • 0 c0 Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 August 25, 2005 Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-05 FOR STONEWALL PLAZA Dear Jeremy: The Frederick County Board of Supervisors approved the above referenced Preliminary Master Development Plan on August 24, 2005. Your firm will need to submit a Final Master Development Plan for this project which addresses all review agency comments, as well as all comments of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Our department will provide your firm with administratively approved copies of this plan once these issues have been addressed. If you have any questions regarding the approval of this master plan or requirements needed for submission of your Final Master Development Plan, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, (��' P. (A LO- Candice E. Perkins, Planner II CEP/bad cc: MPN Realty, Inc., 303 S. Loudoun St., Winchester, VA 22601 Lynda J. Tyler, Stonewall District Supervisor John H. Light, Stonewall District Planning Commissioner Jane Anderson, Real Estate em: Charles S. DeHaven Jr., Stonewall District Planning Commissioner 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-05 STONEWALL PLAZA Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: August 15, 2005 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins — Planner II This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/03/05 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 08/24/05 Pending A"ROVM LOCATION: The site of the proposed development is located along the Route 522 North Corridor adjacent to existing commercial, residential land uses and interstate uses. This property is located next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision, in the Sunnyside area of the County. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 42-A-198H PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: B2 (Business, General) Use: Unimproved ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North Zoned: N/A Use: Route 37 South Zoned: B2 (Business General) East Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) B2 (Business General) Use: CommercialNacant Use: Single Family Residential Hotel West Zoned: B2 (Business General) Use: Commercial MDP #10-05, StonewalTPlaza August 15, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSED USE: Shopping Center and Retail Services REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. B) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester, VA Quadrangle) depicts the zoning for the subject parcel as B2 (Business General) District, and therefore does not contain proffers. C) Intended Use Shopping Center and Retail Services D) Site Suitability & Project Scope Land Use Compatibility: The site of the proposed development is located along the North Frederick Pike (Route 522) Corridor adjacent to existing commercial, residential and interstate land uses. This property is located next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision. Comprehensive Policy Plan: The subject property is located entirely within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). In accordance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan, "business and industrial areas need to be served by public sewer and water". The subject property comprising this Master Development Plan is also within the study limits of the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan and is located in an area intended to remain business. (Comprehensive Policy Plan, page 6-8) Therefore, the proposed commercial use is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Environment: The subject property does not contain any areas of steep slopes or floodplain. MDP #10-05, StonewalTPlaza August 15, 2005 Page 3 Transportation: Access to the site is proposed via one commercial entrance located on North Frederick Pike (Route 522) which is a major arterial road. As required for all major arterial roads with a speed limit over 35mph, a minimum entrance separation of 200' is required for all new entrances [Section 165-29.A (4)] which this site does meet. No new public roads are planned for this property as this site will be served by a private road that will circulate through the site. The new entrance to the commercial site is located across from Westminster Canterbury Drive which currently is an unsignalized crossover that functions with a level (C)D. This proposed development will be installing a new traffic signal at the intersection of Westminster Canterbury Drive and the entrance to Stonewall Plaza as well as dual left turn lanes into the site improving this intersection to a level of service (C)C. Buffers and Screening: This site is bordered by the Darville Subdivision to the east. The Master Development Plan depicts the required category B full screen buffer. This buffer includes a 6' opaque board on board fence along with three trees per 10 linear feet (1/3 being deciduous). The current buffer detail provided on the MDP is incorrect and needs to be revised to show three trees per 10 linear feet not one entire tree and to half trees. Access to the Adjoining Subdivision: The Master Development Plan depicts access to the adjacent Darville Subdivision. At this time it is unclear whether this will be a trail/sidewalk for pedestrian access only or a road connection for the residents to access the commercial development. The applicant is planning to hold a meeting with the community to hear their opinions on what type of access point they want to have. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 08/03/05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The preliminary master development plan for Stonewall Plaza depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. At this time only minor revisions to the MDP are needed and can be addressed prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting. Any issues brought forth by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF THE 08/03/05 MEETING: Mr. Wyatt of Greenway Engineering reviewed the transportation improvements recommended in the traffic study that were needed to maintain a Level of Service "C." Mr. Wyatt said the developer was committed to the installation of a traffic signal, which aligns with Westminster - Canterbury Drive, to be fully funded and constructed by the developer and will be operational MDP #10-05, StonewaalPlaza August 15, 2005 Page 4 before the first Certificate of Occupancy is issued; widening of the existing median cross -over; construction of a second left -turn lane on Rt. 522 with expansion of the existing left -turn lane; the provision of a continuous right -turn lane for access into the site; and a right -turn lane out of the project, tying into Exeter Drive. Mr. Wyatt also described two opportunities for inter -parcel connections; the first was a vehicular connection between the proposed shopping center and the existing office complex and the second was a pedestrian walkway from the adjoining Darville subdivision via Clarke -Ville Road. Four residents of the Darville subdivision came forward to express concerns. The residents were concerned about the amount of traffic and the speed of traffic on Route 522 and the problems they experience accessing Rt. 522. They objected to the proposed development's loop road being so close to their properties. Also raised was the issue of who would be responsible for the continued maintenance of the fence "and trees within the buffer area and the intrusion of commercial lighting and noise impacts. Three of the residents were opposed to any vehicular or pedestrian access from their development into the commercial area because of the potential for outsiders coming into their neighborhood. Storm water run-off was also mentioned as a problem. Commission members suggested the applicant might possibly assist with the on -going drainage problems in this area when they construct the storm water management facilities. Another commissioner suggested the construction of a visually -appealing structure, instead of the typical shopping center. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the master development plan for Stonewall Plaza with the transportation improvements described by the applicant. (Note: Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.) STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 08/24/05 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The preliminary master development plan for Stonewall Plaza depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. At this time only minor revisions to the MDP are needed and can be addressed prior staff granting administrative approval. All of the issues identified by the Board of Supervisors should be appropriately addressed by the applicant. The Planning Commission recommended that administrative approval be authorized on August 3, 2005. D B 8 MCLAUGHLIN WILLIAMS WILLIAMS 42 12 1 42 a, MARSHALL MILLS POPE 8 198A A 198A 1 42 12 1 1 j4 28 42 14 2 28 198 42 A 198 1981 198M TC.V. 42 A 198M Oz SogC Q v 188E 198H MPN REALTY C Q 9a! 42 A 198H 1 � .o g O 0 m N `� 3a ✓F 70 s3q 1�7NS ✓ 104 53gWOOD 32105 115 a 120 0� $31 Z/G, 0o 1p1 70), 113\Vtlliams'Cir' 7019 5 A 1 D 01 a `�' ✓ 6 �Os 18 5 CR/M 53q 1 D 4 Q 29 ' a 4 5 AENAVEN o 19 y ti ^h 0 3 a 3 53AUrLER 1 10 2 a O Q h `"� D 2 20 YER 9 53q No 1 A o��' 3 �M o�ti h v 1 2 9 yyQ tiQ n ti 45 n, 8 53q OUGH 1A 8 ' 46 �y ISAA C C - 1956 ) 1 �� 53A 1 A S7 14E rURI, 1qC ti0 s3 HESH7RF A 0 8 53 �Q ?) a 196 4?FA 196 6 1 WARD 6 O~��b 195C ?� '`a ��` __ 5 53q 1 q 5 p\�p P SERNIGRS A yys v2 \ 52 \\.... 2 =� 4 S3�O1N/DER A 195A KRA O0,3 5D p 19 42 185 v rs 3 58 3 G N D 3 � PATEL 4 14 3 K/Pps 1 �, 50 10D yoQ 195D --Foxrid 1 2 a BENHAM 1 53A A 1 53 A 1A 2 3 17 sl a U U . e gLn----4 a 1 s-"114 O` 8 3 M A 53D 3 3 D 3 B rCHER 1 8 BAILEY 53 A 42A _ 7 �s 53q 14 2 79 52 r � Q 80q Go 43 BENHAM >, 4 53D 3 4 O y z BENHAM c F� s3q FRFRS yQ' h $4 d o 80 41 SBENHAM cy 5 v `'n 7 53D 3 5 m' A C A 4q J Q Z' 1 56 Q e \; �1 o ¢ 4 3 a SNYDER 44 - __� g� Q �° 0 ` 15 m 57 c,y.,e 8 3 1 p1 88 n 53 A 44 0 s3q NGFR 7 U D 84 45 SUNNYSIDE PROPERTIES 4 6 52E 53 �� '` `� m 0 p N o �' 100 31 A 52E Q Q D �� 85 98 173 Map Features M D P # 10 - 05 /,/Bridges Stonewall Plaza B�PIiwEon /\/ B"dg. s CD Parcels Laks.POnds 0V Dams Agricultural a Foraatral Districts „�- steams /\/ R—mng Walls . Dcuble Church (4 2 - A -19 8 H ) Road Centerlines N Buildings .Refuge Church . Tanks N ® South Frederick ^� W E 0 250 500 1,000 �.. Trails S Feet 195A 1 e D / 1956 196 $44RR/S 96 R A v r KRAFOD A 195D E5 .9 'Ti 42 195 195D 1'r c idl;�_l.0 6 BAILEY 4° 53 A 42A 43 BENHAM 4t 53D 3 BENH 7 53D 3 o a 3 a SNYDER 4 n 44 51 A 44 45I N' SUNNYSIDE m� In PO 12 A 191 6 3 1 2 1 BENHAM 1 SBF�Nq,y O` 53D 3 D 1 ,o 4� BENHAM 4 53D 3 4 5 rp A C 3`` Q y3q NGFR 7 E 4 s 3 1 Map Features ^/ Bridges O B Applicaton ^/ Cu,_rt Parcels Lakes/Ponds Dams Agricultural & Forestral Districts Streams /N/ Retaining Walls - Double Church Buildings Road Centerlines - R<luge Church N - Tanks A► South Frederick /V �.. Trails W E S MCLAUG12iHLIN WILLIAMS WILLIAMS MARSHALL MILLS 42 ._ 1 198A 42 A 198A 1 42 12 1 1 F�� 28 42 142 28 " s3 ✓�� 70✓ S 104 SJAWOOD loS m 115 o M 3 M 120 Qr'Oa10 ✓77NB � tt_, � < a x M ��F 91 5 _ q 'PO 191 37 07 113 TARNES 53 'oe A 1D ,�tia 1� 6 I �iD h C 53A1D 4 4 29 ga 5 DEN o 19 ip y ^^ J 3 BUTLER T 53q 1D h Jam^ �0 �� 1 D ? 20 9 53q DYER f �� �, Q 1 p 8 OUGH h ti 53q fA 8 4s 1td'6, Lt/e. 1 S 53IA IASI 14E 1QC ti0 Jq FSH//�,F 6 T44 �e A 47 ;? 53gTURK 1A 6 d> a 1 5 WARD 53 A A 1 7s �o oQ 75 2 1 4 5 5 DSNIDER 13 1 A 4 ,h _ PATEL 14 3 53 K/P!S A 11 50 Q 53A A l 1 A J 2 11 ; 5/ SBUTCHER A 1 70 c. �k, ^ry 7 e A 2 19 0 Q 80A r hh y�Q 134 q �1 15 � v 57 88 83 1p1 D MDP#10-05 Stonewall Plaza (42-A-198H ) 250 500 1,000 Feet [i �. • � ' T }, # � � _ b MCLAUGNLIN WILLUIMS WILLIAMS � 42 111 8 198A 42 A 198A t 42 t 2 t 1 y�g� /, - ' '_ i �. 198• ' POPE i - 42 ..A 198 .. - � � it 53gw32 /1. cIDN '08 \Villia - 37 37 J' °i 113 °i JdLa- 1984M 2 A I- �• 798M CRI a` al SA4 DENAVEN 4 Q a� 13 h yoi � wry , 52 37 Qv 15sL 9 of 188H M42PNREAL•� 53q 1D 3 F 3 tU tea'' a.."'. o` o m D? 20 8 �NoypRo Afgg 4g a a '+ice - � < ` � 2 ' e NouG Q. � •.`. � r 8 c_ 195E � ♦-.. 6 53gT BRA ?� �`' 196 ?FERRi A 19IF O` Q G w 8 'A •. P a9..:.. RV1GE5 � v9�J 9 •- ,�' � 52 7 Z � 4 STRDSH/DE ?J 'E 195AL. AFp0�5�95U KR 41 A 195D 195' r a N$L S3D 'VG PATEL 1d 3 PPS �a0 . 53A A /qJ ?lO` J ' Y Foxridge Ln c � BAILEY 6 BENHAM 1 geENHq H 33D 3 3 JD 3 1 -► v , � 2A BUTCHER * � 53q 1q 1 v i BENNAM SUNNYS3IPRSDER ` , . -Q 52 I =- m5 D Map Features M D P # 10 - 05 /%/Bridges Cu ^� lver6 O Parcels Stonewall Plaza B�PIicaEon LakeslPOnds ^V Dams A arleulNral 8 Forastral Distrlcts steams /V Rebinirg."s Road Centerlines D-WeCh-h N (42 - A -198H ) Buildags - RefChurch uge - Tanks N South Frederick N E 0 W* 250 500 \i Trails S Feet i[lifll� \h JUL 1 2 2005 APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Development Use Only. Date application received ��� Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return Application # fp 1. Project Title: Stonewall Plaza 2. Owner's Name MPN Realty, Inc., VA Corp. 303 South Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22601 (Please list name of all owners or parties in interest) 3. Applicant: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number: 662-4185 4. Design Greenway Engineering Company: Address: Same Phone Number: Same Contact Name: Jeremy Tweedie or Niki Adhikusuma, PE 5. Location of Property Route 522 North, Sunnyside 6. Total 21.91 acres Acreage: 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number (PIN) : b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: North South East West Property Identification Numbers See attached list f) Magisterial District: 42-((A))-198H . B2 Vacant 132-Commercial Property Uses Stonewall 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: Date: -7 t� �' • STONEWALL PLAZA Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Use South 53D-3-2 B2-Commercial 53D-3-1 B2-Commercial 53-4-2-D B2-Commercial 53A-A-5 B2-Commercial 53A-2-D-C B2-Commercial West 42-A-198G B2-Commercial 42-A-198M B2-Commercial East 53A-3-2-102 RP -Residential 53A-3-2-101 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-6 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-4 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-3 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-2 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-1 RP -Residential 53A-4-3-6 RP -Residential 53A-A-1 B2-Commercial North 42-A-198 RA -Residential Route 37 File #4090/JT/dlm Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Planning office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) MPN Realty Inc. VA Corp -Bruce A. Griffin, Managing Member (Phone) (540) 667-2424 (Address) 303 South Loudoun Street, Winchester, VA 22602 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Deed Book Instrument No. 904 on Page 927 and is described as Parcel: 42 Lot: 198H Block: A Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineering (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorne)4in-fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described Property, including: ❑ Rezoning (Including proffers) ❑ Conditional Use Permits ® Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site Plan ❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year modified. In witness thereof, ave heret Signature(s) State of the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or hand and seal this 11th day of Jam, 2005 City CoiTV,bfFrederick, To -wit: I, Donna L. Meliso , a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before ,me and acknowledged the same before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this l lth day of Jam, 2005. My Commission Expires: February 29, 200�y Notary Public Ll J U L 2 2005 i No Scale / A:�e a �tl ~fro Signalized Intersection / Signalized Intersection LOS=C(D), Unsignalized \e�Intersection Denotes stop sign control aDenotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement Figure 5 2007 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Project Number: 13304-1-0 May 26, 2005 Page 7 Stonewall Plaza TIA 1 • Subject: Stonewall Plaza TIA From: "Ingram, Lloyd"<L1oyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:04:57 -0400 To: "'cperkins@co.frederick.va.us` <cperkins@co.frederick.va.us> CC: "Ingram, Lloyd"<L1oyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov> Candice, Please note the engineer has not addressed the offsite issues as indicated on Page 13, attached, of the TIA. <<SCN_20050822125604_001. pdf>> Thanks, N Lloyd Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540)984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) SCN_20050822125604_001.pdfFC_____.._ ntent-Type: application/octet-stream ntent-Encoding: base64 - ------ - __------- 1 RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review 0 Subject: RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review From: "Ingram, Lloyd"<Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:28:42 -0400 To: 'Mki Adhikusuma' <niki@greenwayeng.com> CC: Evan Wyatt <ewyatt@greenwayeng.com>, cperkins@co.frederick.va.us, "Copp, Jerry" <Jerry.Copp@VDOT.Virginia.gov>, Jeremy Tweedie <jtweedie@greenwayeng.com>, "Edward A. Murphy P. E. (E-mail)" <emurphy@rdsDC.com>, "John Callow P.E. (E-mail)" <john.callow@phra.com>, "Bruce Griffin (E-mail)" <brucegriffin@adamsnelson.com>, "Mark D. Smith" <msmith@greenwayeng.com> Niki, You are correct in your assumption that the off site improvements mentioned were those listed in the TIA, submitted with this project, provided by PHR&A. Other than the improvements associated with your entrance, there wasn't any mention of how or when your client was going to address the remaining recommended improvements. The County will probably raise this question at tomorrow night's Board meeting. I know that the comments were somewhat lengthy but when the MDP and Site plan are submitted so close together the final comments try to cover both submittals. If you have any questions, please contact me. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540)984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) -----Original Message ----- From: Niki Adhikusuma [mailto:niki(a),greenwayeng.comI Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:29 PM To: Ingram, Lloyd Cc: Evan Wyatt; cperkins@co.frederick.va.us; Copp, Jerry; Jeremy Tweedie; Edward A. Murphy P. E. (E-mail); John Callow P.E. (E-mail); Bruce Griffin (E-mail); Mark D. Smith Subject: RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review Lloyd, Thank you for the email, I am responding to some of your comments below as follow: -----Original Message ----- From: Ingram, Lloyd [mai Ito: Lloyd. Ingram(a,VDOT.Virginia.gov1 Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 3:00 PM To: Niki Adhikusuma Cc: Evan Wyatt; Candice Perkins (cperkins@co.frederick.va.us); Ingram, Lloyd; Copp, Jerry 1 of 5 8/24/2005 4:10 PM RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review 0 , Subject: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review I have reviewed the information contained in your submittal dated July 11, 2005 for the subject project. * The site plan did not include any of the offsite improvements as noted in the submitted TIA for the subject property. [Niki Adhikusuma] We have included the dual left turn Lanes and a right turn lane improvement along Route 522 for entrance to the project including the traffic signalization. You must be referring to other improvements that was indicated. in the TIA conclusion for 2007 build -out condition. The following comments were provided by the Staunton District Review Staff: The information provided by the consultant is not sufficient to complete the review of the drainage portion of the plans. These plans should be finalized and final computations provided. I will be happy to review a complete and documented drainage design. Until then, my comments below regarding drainage are only interim comments based on these incomplete plans. [Niki Adhikusuma] Frederick county Public Works indicated there is a drainage problem that occurred at Strowbridge Residence. We met with Public Works last week and have a session to discuss this drainage problem. Frederick County Public Works has requested us to analyze the existing SWM system surrounding the area and to provide a resolution where Stonewall Project will not add or increase this existing drainage problem rather than simply discharging post develop condition less then pre develop condition. Analyzing this request is requiring additional time and field verification, however we are in process modeling this study and the result will be forthcoming in the next few days. We will assure the result will meet the objective of Frederick County Public Works and VDOT standard requirement. A. Roadway 1. Right turn slip lane ramp onto Route 522 West a. This turn lane should be revised. There should only be one simple curve, not 2 compound curves. The radius of the curve should be designed to allow trucks to negotiate the ramp without running over the curb. The width of the ramp should be wide enough to accommodate the truck turning maneuver without creating what could be a 2 lane exit as presently designed. Maximum pavement width should be no more than around 16 to 18 feet, not the 35 feet shown on the plans. [Niki Adhikusuma] The design as submitted has been discussed with VDOT on several occasions, however we will look into this matter and will offer a better solution. b. The curb encircling the triangle island between the right turn lane and left turn lane should be CG-7 to match the C&G along Route 522. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply C. The interior of this island should be concrete. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will provide concrete within the existing VDOT Right of way and will discuss the other portion with the owner. 2 of 5 8/24/2005 4:10 PM RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review 0 • 2. **There should be a roadway typical section showing pavement, medians, C&G, utility strip, sidewalk, cut and fill slopes, etc.** [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply There should be a profile of the entrance road that extends across the intersection to show grades at the entrance road and across Route 522. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply 4. There should be a typical section at all locations along Route 522 where the roadway will be widened. The section should extend to the centerline of the existing roadway and extend to the R/W line. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply B. Drainage 1. Additional information needed for review. a. Provide a complete drainage map showing all drainage areas contributing to the proposed and existing VDOT drainage structures along Route 522. [Niki Adhikusuma] See response above b. Provide a complete hydrological/hydraulic analysis of the discharge channel into which the system discharges. Provide all necessary calculations to demonstrate the discharge channel's adequacy. Check velocities and provide linings as required. [Niki Adhikusuma] See response above C. Provide necessary hydrological/hydraulic drainage description and calculations of the existing drainage system and pipe, the proposed drainage system and pipes, and the final proposed stormwater system. If any existing drainage structures are inadequate, they must be upgraded as required. [Niki Adhikusuma] See response above d. Provide all hydrological/hydraulic calculations regarding any proposed stormwater detention basin. Provide all construction details on the plans. Sheet 14, titled "SWM Calculations" is blank. [Niki Adhikusuma] See response above 2. Provide easements for the stormwater pipes along Route 522 off the R/W. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply 3. Provide construction details of the drainage structures (i.e. Structure 20) where 2 pipes are transitioned to one pipe. [Niki Adhikusuma] will comply 4. It is not clear on the plans what design storm was used to size the pipes along Route 522. A 25-year storm should be used for this primary route. [Niki Adhikusuma] See response above 3 of 5 8/24/2005 4:10 PM RE: Stonewall Plaza Site Plan Review 0 • 5. The inlet calculations show numerous inlet where spread exceeds 8 feet. Spread should be limited to less then 8 feet using the 10 year design storm. [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply. We acknowledge some of the inlets exceeding the 8 feet spread, however these inlets are within the private parking and travel way. 6. For the storm sewer calculations, show and explain where the "Additional Flow" figures come from and are derived. [Niki Adhikusuma] We will convert computation to VDOT standard format spread sheet. 7. At the intersection of the entrance road and Route 522, how will the drainage be handled around the island and the roadways? There is no profile showing Route 522. [Niki Adhikusuma] Drainage runoff shall be pick up by inlet structure 16, 17, 18, and 19 as shown on the plan. ** This proposal intends to utilize an existing Route 522 crossover located at the Westminster Canterbury Drive intersection, by placing the development proposed site driveway on the north side of Route 522, and opposite the Westminster Canterbury intersection. The median through this section of Route 522 is a result of the construction of 2 full lane width pavement parallel to an existing 2 lane width facility, graded independently of the grade of the at the time existing facility, thus creating an independently graded median. We can anticipate grade separation, between the inside edges of the left turn lanes, to be a height that will yield a greater than 5% grade on the crossover. Although the normal median width is forty (40) feet, dual east bound left turn lanes and single west bound left turn lane will decrease the distance between inside pavement edges of left turn lanes to four (4) feet. The desirable grade on a crossover is between 0.5% and 5%. [0.5 feet in 100 feet to 5 feet in 100 feet]. [Niki Adhikusuma] We met the crossover slope requirement, the maximum propose crossover slope is 4.44%. To achieves this will required capping the existing Route 522 West Bound Lanes. With regard of separation, we will revise the plan accordingly. It is especially important at locations such as businesses generating large vehicular traffic that crossover grades fall in the category of less than 5%. Likewise a desirable maximum algebraic difference of a crossover crown line is 4 or 5 - but may be as high an 8 percent at the locations where there are few school buses and low speeds. Additionally, sight distance must be checked for values shown in table for "sight distance along major road at intersections with minor road and crossover and commercial entrances". Any deviation from these values is to be brought to the attention of the State Location and Design Engineer. The grade on this crossover is to be applied from the inside edge of pavement of the left turn lane to the inside edge of pavement of the opposing left turn lane. [Niki Adhikusuma] Agreed and we met this crossover slope requirement. Therefore, the feasible solution to the crossover grade and sight distance requirement is to raise the vertical alignment [grade] of the Route 522 westbound lane to more closely conform to the vertical alignment [grade] of the Route 522 eastbound lane through this intersection location. Accordingly, disturbed portions of existing commercial entrances, if any, will be replaced in "kind", and is to be constructed in accordance with VDOT specifications and VDOT approved plans. ** [Niki Adhikusuma] Will comply. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike 4 of 5 8/24/2005 4:10 PM 0 A Traffic Impact .Analysis of Stonewall Plaza Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Miller & Smith 8401 Greensboro Drive Suite 300 McLean, VA 221a2 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Lcndscape Architects. 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 Martinsburg Virginia West g is 25401 e T 304.264,2711 F 304.264.3671 May 26, 2005 CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the Stonewall Plaza development are acceptable and manageable. Based upon HCS-2000 results, each of the study area intersections, assuming "suggested improvements", will operate with Ievels of service "C" or better during 2007 build -out conditions (except at Route 522/Fox Dnve that will maintain levels of service "D" during the PM peak hour). Aside from the improvements required at the proposed Stonewall Plaza site -driveway, the following "suggested improvements" will be necessary during 2007 background and 2007 build -out conditions. I. The intersection of Route 522/Route 37 northbound ramps would require two (2) additional left -turn lanes along the northbound off -ramp. 2. The intersection of Route 522/Route 37 southbound ramps would require two (2) additional Ieft-turn lanes along the southbound off -ramp. �r I The intersection of Route 522/Fox Drive would require an additional left -turn lane along northbound Fox Drive and an additional right -turn lane along southbound Fox Drive. r" 4. The intersection of Route 522 /Plaza Circle requires traffic slgnalization. 5. The intersection of Route 522 /Westminster Canterbury Drive/proposed site - driveway would require traffic signahzation% two (2) left -turn lanes along eastbound Route 522; a right -turn lane along westbound Route 52 as well as a fourth leg southbound that will include a left -turn lane, a thru-left lane and a right -turn lane. A_ Traffic Impact Analysts of Stonewall Plaza PAProject Number: 13304-1-0 HMay 26, 2005 Page 13 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 L_ T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Stonewall Plaza MDP 4090 Date 8-18-05 To: FC Planning Jeremy Tweedie Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Ed Murphy Fax: 540-722-9528 Realty Development Services AUG 1 8 2005 Ty ,T Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ® Urgent ❑ For Your Review ® As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: • 0 Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments a Control number Date received SP05-0045R 8/2/2005 Project Name Stonewall Plaza Address City 151 Windy Hill Ln. Winchester Type Application Tax ID Number SP Revised 42-A-198H Current Zoning Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Date Revised 8/8/2005 8/8/2005 Applicant Greenway Engineering State Zip Applicant Phone VA 22602 540-662-4185 Fire District Rescue District 15 15 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Requirements Election District Residential Sprinkler System Yes Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location Fire Lane Required Adequate Adequate Yes Siamese Location Roadway/Aisleway Width Special Hazards Adequate Adequate No Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Fire lane markings and signage required at all fire hydrants,fire department connections and emergency access points to the structure. Access Comments Additional Comments Plans approved as submitted. Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signal Yes Jay Bauserman 0 0 Request for Street Name Comments Site Plan Review Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Attn: Marcus Lemasters, Mapping and Graphics Manager 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5651 C0(07-5(014 The Mapping & Graphics manager will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County street name system. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will prevent duplicate street names form being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Stonewall Plazaay Request for Addresses Location of property: Route 522 North Frederick Pike, Sunnyside area Adjacent to existing Trex Office Complex. Mapping and Graphics Manager Comments: FC GIS will not accept any road name into the system that duplicates the first word of any road name currently in the system. Cross is such a conflict. Therefore, Cross Stone Place is DENIED for use in the FC Road Name System and anew name must be submitted for review. A current list of FC road names maybe found on the GIS Department page of the Frederick County web site. Communication Center Supervisors Comments: • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Attn: Fire Marshal 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-6350 Hand deliver to: 107 North Kent Street First Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-6350 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Stonewall Plaza Commercial Development Location of property: Route 522 North Frederick Pike, Sunnyside area Adjacent to existing Trex Office Complex Fire Marshal's Comments: MDP #09-05, Stonewall Plaza July 13, 2005 Page 4 --- - __ d . �a Supervisors. Following the Planninge Coom�m-issi n discussion, it would be appropriate to forward a recommendation to ithe Board of Supervisors regarding this MDP conformance with County codes and review agency comments. All issues and concerns raised by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF THE 08/03/05 MEETING: Mr. Wyatt of Greenway Engineering reviewed the transportation improvements recommended in the traffic study that were needed to maintain a Level of Service "C." Mr. Wyatt said the developer was committed to the installation of a traffic signal, which aligns with Westminster -Canterbury Drive, to be fully funded and constructed by the developer and will be operational before the first Certificate of Occupancy is issued; widening of the existing median cross -over; construction of a second left -turn lane on Rt. 522 with expansion of the existing left -turn lane; the provision of a continuous right -turn lane for access into the site; and a right -turn lane out of the project, tying into Exeter Drive. Mr. Wyatt also described two opportunities for inter -parcel connections; the first was a vehicular connection between the proposed shopping center and the existing office complex and the second was a pedestrian walkway from the adjoining Darville subdivision via Clarke -Ville Road. Four residents of the Darville subdivision came forward to express concerns. The residents were concerned about the amount of traffic and the speed of traffic on Route 522 and the problems they experience accessing Rt. 522. They objected to the proposed development's loop road being so close to their properties. Also raised was the issue of who would be responsible for the continued maintenance of the fence and trees within the buffer area and the intrusion of commercial lighting and noise impacts. Three of the residents were opposed to any vehicular or pedestrian access from their development into the commercial area because of the potential for outsiders coming into their neighborhood. Storm water run- off was also mentioned as a problem. Commission members suggested the applicant might possibly assist with the on -going drainage problems in this area when they construct the storm water management facilities. Another commissioner suggested the construction of a visually -appealing structure, instead of the typical shopping center. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the master development plan for Stonewall Plaza with the transportation improvements described by the applicant. (Note: Commissioner Light was absent from the meeting.) MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #09-05 STONEWALL PLAZA Staff Report for the Planning Commission Public Meeting Prepared: July 13, 2005 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins — Planner II This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also he useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/03/05 Pending Board of Supervisors: 08/24/05 Pending LOCATION: The site of the proposed development is located along the Route 522 North Corridor adjacent to existing commercial, residential land uses and interstate uses. This property is located next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision, in the Sunnyside area of the County. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall -1 PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 42-A-198H PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: B2 (Business, General) Use: Unimproved ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North Zoned: N/A Use: Route 37 South Zoned: B2 (Business General) East Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) B2 (Business General) Use: ComercialNacant Use: Single Family Residential Hotel West Zoned: B2 (Business General) Use: Commercial MDP #09-05, StonewalTPlaza July 13, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSED USE: Shopping Center and Retail Services REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. B) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester, VA Quadrangle) depicts the zoning for the subject parcel as B2 (Business General) District, and therefore does not contain proffers. C) Intended Use Shopping Center and Retail Services D) Site Suitability & Project Scope Land Use Compatibility: The site of the proposed development is located along the North Frederick Pike (Route 522) Corridor adjacent to existing commercial, residential and interstate land uses. This property is located next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision. Comprehensive Policy Plan: The subject property is located entirely within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). In accordance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan, "business and industrial areas need to be served by public sewer and water". The subject property comprising this Master Development Plan is also within the study limits of the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan and is located in an area intended to remain business. (Comprehensive Policy Plan, page 6-8) Therefore, the proposed commercial use is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Environment: The subject property does not contain any areas of steep slopes or floodplain. Transportation: Access to the site is proposed via one commercial entrance located on North Frederick Pike (Route 522) which is a major arterial road. As required for all major arterial roads MDP #09-05, Stonewall Plaza July 13, 2005 Page 3 with a speed limit over 35mph, a minimum entrance separation of 200' is required for all new entrances [Section 165-29.A (4)] which this site does meet. No new public roads are planned for this property as this site will be served by a private road that will circulate through the site. The new entrance to the commercial site is located across from Westminster Canterbury Drive which currently is an unsignalized crossover that functions with a level (C)D. This proposed development will be installing a new traffic signal at the intersection of Westminster Canterbury Drive and the entrance to Stonewall Plaza as well as dual left turn lanes into the site improving this intersection to a level of service (C)C. Buffers and Screening: This site is bordered by the Darville Subdivision to the east. The Master Development Plan depicts the required category B full screen buffer. This buffer includes a six foot opaque board -on -board fence along with three trees per ten linear feet (1/3 being deciduous). The current buffer detail provided on the MDP is incorrect and needs to be revised to show three trees per ten linear feet, not one entire tree and to half trees. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 08/03/05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The preliminary master development plan for Stonewall Plaza depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. At this time only minor revisions to the MDP are needed and can be addressed prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting. Any issues brought forth by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Following the Planning Commission discussion, it would be appropriate to forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding this MDP conformance with County codes and review agency comments. All issues and concerns raised by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. • • GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founed in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 d T R A N S M I T T Project Name: Stonewall Plaza -Master Development Plan ile No: 4090 Date July 13, 2005 To: FC Planning From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ❑ For Your Review ® As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Candice, Per your request, attached are an additional 19 copies of the Master Development Plan. Sorry for not submitting enough copies yesterday! As always, thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: • • It\ GREENWAY ENGINEERING %47 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Stonewall Plaza -Master Development Plan J U L 1 2 2005 File No: 4090 Date July 11, 2005 To: FC Planning From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm Attn: Eric Lawrence GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other ❑ Urbent ® For Your Review Message: ® Courier ❑ As You Requested Eric, Attached is the following for the above project: -Master Development Plan application -Application fee check for $4,191.00 -1 copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis -Signed Special Limited Power of Attorney form -25 copies of the Master Development Plan ❑ Pick Up ® Please Comment Thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions or need for additonal copies or information. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: 11 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING August 10, 2005 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-05 OF STONEWALL PLAZA On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This meeting is to consider Master Development Plan #10-05 for Stonewall Plaza, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for Shopping Center and Retail Service Uses. The property is located along the Route 522 Corridor, next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision, and is identified with Property Identification Number 42-A-198H in the Stonewall Magisterial District. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the Planning Department's Web Page at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, -/� yt(a6vll Candice E. Perkins Plam-ier II CEP/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • This is to certify tlt th attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: _ 53A - 2- D• C- 42 . A- - 198-H HASSINGER, ROBERT E MPN REALTY, INC 1361 N FREDERICK PIKE 1205 CAROLINE ST WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8693 WINCHESTER, VA 22601.2903�✓ _ � 42 A 198•G Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E., L.S. - - -------- Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602�QV\ 530 -3- - 2- TSENG, CHEN & CHRISTINA 236 HORIZON WAY MARTINSBURG, WV 25401.1018 53D - 3- - 1- BENHAM, H K III TRUSTEE FREDERICK MALL LAND TR PO BOX 368 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.0368 53 -4- 2- D- UPPER CRUST, LLC 112A BRUCE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4213 53A - A- - 5- UNGER, VERNON B & FRANCES 5179 BARLEY DR STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655.2606 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK LAWSON, THOMAS MOORE 250 WIDENER DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3147 42 - A- - 198-M TC.V., LLC 720 S BRADDOCK ST WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4053 53A - 3- 2- 102- JENKINS, CHARLES L JR 1333 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.8610 53A - 3.2.101- DARLINGTON, J P 1543 MILLWOOD PIKE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602.4328 C andice E. Perkins, Planner II Frederick County Planning Dept. 1, , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do (ejeby certify that Cand ce E. Perkins, Planner II for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated 9 U lo ,has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the ame in my State an County aforesaid. Given under my hand this /��- day ofe)-5 My commission expires on c - s / NOTARY PU LIC f v 53A - 1 - D- 6- STARNES, FLOYD W & DOROTH• 1325 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.8610 53A - 1- D- 4- CRIM, NANCY A 1317 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8610 53A - 1- D- 3- DEHAVEN, LEE ROY SR 1313 AMBROSE OR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8610 53A - 1- D- 2- BUTLER, VICTORIA & BEVER, RICHARD D 1309 AMBROSE OR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.8610 53A - 1- D- 1- KRAMER, DOUGLAS G & SHERELLA A 1305 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8610 53A - 4- 3- 6- CUNNINGHAM, CHARLES R III & ANN L 1129 CLARKVILLE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603-4207 53A - A- - 1- PATEL, GIRISH T. & NITILA G. 2 TRIPLE CROWN CT GAITHERSBURG, MO. 20878-3745 42 - A- - 198- POPE, MARY ELLEN 161 GLENTAWBER DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4327 S �On9EW� PZ4200 4�4 V7'V STONEWALL PLAZA Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Use • To:BARBARA-DATA PR FROM:Bev - PlanningoCE55ING Please print Dept, I sets of labels by 'rHANKS!! ✓ South 53D-3-2 B2-Commercial 53D-3-1 B2-Commercial 53-4-2-D B2-Commercial 53A-A-5 B2-Commercial 53A-2-D-C B2-Commercial West 42-A-198G B2-Commercial 42-A-198M B2-Commercial East 53A-3-2-102 ✓ RP -Residential 53A-3-2-101 ✓ RP -Residential 53A-1-D-6 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-4 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-3 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-2 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-1 RP -Residential 53A-4-3-6 RP -Residential 53A-A-1 B2-Commercial North 42-A-198 RA -Residential ` Route 37 File #4090/JT/dlm h 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING July 20, 2005 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-05 OF STONEWALL PLAZA On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This meeting is to consider Master Development Plan #10-05 for Stonewall Plaza, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for Shopping Center and Retail Service Uses. The property is located along the Route 522 Corridor, next to the existing Trex Center and Darville Subdivision, and is identified with Property Identification Number 42-A-198H in the Stonewall Magisterial District. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the P-lanning Department's Web Page at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sinc(,! erely, y 4 w b, ,, Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 he attached correspondence was mailed to the following on This is to certify thaX5' from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 53A • 2- D• C- 42 - A- -198-H HASSINGER, 1306ERT E MPN REALTY, INC 1361 N FREDERV K PIKE 1205 CAROLINE ST WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8693 ' WINCHESTER, VA 22601.2903 42 -A- -198-G LAWSON, THOMAS MOORE Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E., L.S. ("- - 250 WIDENER DR Greenway Engineering WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3147 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 �`P{1�% , I 53A - 3. ' JENKINS, CHA CHARLES L JR 53D - 3- - 2- 1333 AMBROSE OR TSENG, CHEN & CHRISTINA WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.8610 236 HORIZON WAY 53A - 3- 2. 101- MARTINSBURG, WV 25401.1018 DARLINGTON, J P 1543 MILLWOOD PIKE 53D - 3- - 1- WINCHESTER, VA. 22602.4328 BENHAM, H K III TRUSTEE I MALL LAND TR 53A - 1- D. 6- PO BOX PO BOX368 STARNES, FLOYD W & DOROTHY J WINCHESTER, VA 22604.0368 1325 AMBROSE OR 53 - 4- 2- D• WINCHESTER, IPA. 22603.8610 UPPER CRUST, LLC 112A BRUCE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4213 53A • A• • 5- r UNGER, VERNON B & FRANCES 5179 BARLEY DR Candice E. Perkins, Planner II STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655.2606 Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do he6fby certify that Candi E. Perkins, Planner II for the Department qf Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated ®.� , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of My commission expires on C�)' 00 -1- NOTARY BLIC 53A -1- D- 4- CRIM, NANCY A • 1317 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8610 53A - 1- D- 3- DEHAVEN, LEE ROY SR 1313 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603-8610 53A - 1- D- 2- BUTLER, VICTORIA & BEVER, RICHARD D 1309 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA. 22603-B610 53A -1- D- 1- KRAMER, DOUGLAS G & SHERELLA A 1305 AMBROSE DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.8610 53A - 4.3 ;- CUNNINGHAM, CHARLES R III & ANN L 1129 CLARKV)ILE DR WINCHESTER A 22603-4207 53A - A- - 1- PATEL, GIRISH T. & NITILA G. 2 TRIPLE CROWN CT 20878 3745 GAITHERSBURG, MD. 42 - A- -198- POPE, MARY ELLEN 161 GLENTAWBER DR 22603 4327 WINCHESTER,VA STONEWALL PLAZA Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Use J_.. , /7 T'O: SAPSARA _ �_( FROMDATA PROCESSING :Bev - Planning D Please print ept, `7 sets of labels by rHANKSII 1/ South 53D-3-2 B2-Commercial 53D-3-1 B2-Commercial 53-4-2-D B2-Commercial 53A-A-5 B2-Commercial 53A-2-D-C B2-Commercial West 42-A-198G B2-Commercial 42-A-198M B2-Commercial East 53A-3-2-102 RP -Residential 53A-3-2-101 ✓r RP -Residential 53A-1-D-6 '/ RP -Residential 53A-1-D-4 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-3 RP -Residential 53A-1-D-2 i R.P-Residential 53A-1-D4 RP -Residential 53A-4-3-6 RP -Residential 53A-A-1 B2-Commercial -3N-i-oA 5 V'P North 42-A-198 RA -Residential Route 37 File #4090/JT/dlm N DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDE_RICK COUNTY, V ERGINNIA W E 7\ GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS��'CO) WORKIREQUE5T S DATE RECEIVED: REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: REQUESTING AGENT: Department Agency, or Company: - Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Write additional i ,30 FAX: p y� q-z -A -1gSW DIGITAL: PAPER. FAX: E-MAIL: SIZES: COLOR: BLACK/WHITE: NUNIBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UP/DELIVERY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYN ENT: HOURS REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NO.# Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5651) H '. s s 0 46 J U L 1 1 ?0P," Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice ----r— Bernie Mark Susan (!t Mike Kevin John COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time):