The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-06 Senseny Village Residential - Redbud - Backfile (2)r MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRACKING SHEET (Note: The application does not need to be complete to be accepted but will not be scheduled for the PC or BOS until all items have been received.) Submission Package Comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: -VDOT Fire Marshal Sanitation Authority Inspections Dept. Health Department County Engineer City of Winchester GIS (Mapping) J Parks & Recreation i' Winchester Regional Airport One copy of the master development plan application. --' Appropriate number of blueprint plans, colored maps, etc. to cover the PC and BOS meetings. / Submission Fee TRACIENG Date -��70 Application received 00 c)- (o Fee Paid (amount: d Preliminary MDP heard by Planning Commission - Action taken: 4 di j O Preliminary MDP heard by Board of Supervisors - Action taken: 44P T Letter to applicant regarding Board action and revisions (if required). Final MDP submitted with review agency, PC and BOS comments addressed. Final MDP signed by County Administrator and Planning Director (send two copies to applicant). Administratively approved; letter sent to applicant. LIWC, , NOTES: DATE: File opened. Reference Manual updated/number assigned. D-base updated. List of adjoiners given to staff member for verification. One black & white location map requested from Mapping & Graphics. Four sets of labels requested from Data Processing. -X. 0to File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary. CLOSE OUT FILE: Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant (*Note: Be sure Joe Wilder in Public works and Jane Anderson in Real Estate receive a copy of the administrative approval letter. Jane wants a copy of the final action letter even if the application was denied or withdrawn.) L 0 File stamped "approved"/"denied" or "withdrawn." �J, i 0 Reference Manual updated. AI d(p D-base updated. 11 al 0 agile given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary. File in file drawer. U CuoKCommon\T—kmg sheets\TRACKING. MDP Rem 01111/03 0 m 0 ro co a 0 0 RECEIVED FROM `— taarYtvi ADDRESS i�2ri ❑FOR RENT iJ FOR 1 A CASH ACCOUNT CO AMT. PAID 3 ./ CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER l� BY 'Y U �1 DOLLARS $ '1 0 "A ' DEC 1 5 2006 Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 COUNTY of FREDERICK December 14, 2006 Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 RE: Site Plan Comments - Senseny Road/Rossum Lane Public Improvements Plan Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Tweedie: Upon review of the revised site plan dated October 12, 2006, all of our previous comments have been addressed. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject site plan. Please be advised that it will be necessary to provide an executed copy of the temporary grading easement with the land disturbance permit application submittal. Sincerely, r Joe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/rls cc: Planning and Development file CAProgram Files\WordPerfect Office X3\Rhonda\TEMPCOMMENTS\SENSENYRDROSSUMLNREVSPCOM.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 A 1 DIP COUN f Q IWK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 May 26, 2006 Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Preliminary Review Comments for Senseny Village Property Identification Number (PINS): 65-A-49B & 65-A-55 Dear Mr. Tweedie: I have reviewed the preliminary master development plan for the proposed development referred to as Senseny Village. After reviewing the MPD, we find a number of issues that require attention prior to the formal submission of this project for review by the Planning Commission. 1. Generalized Development Plan Conformance. The MDP is not in conformance with the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) that was proffered with the rezoning. While the proffers do state that the internal road system can be modified, the MDP varies significantly. The MPD depicts a very different road network, removal/relocation of open space and the shifting of housing areas and types. It would be appropriate to seek the approval of a revised GDP prior to MDP approval so that the two documents are in conformance with each other. The two processes (GDP revision and MPD) can be done concurrent with each other. 2. Lot Numbers. On the coversheet under "allowable overall project gross density", the total maximum units allowed is listed at 406 and the "proffered SF (detached) allowed per rezoning" is listed at 285. The total allowed units allowed by the rezoning is 285; revise the total number and provide a breakdown for SF detached and SF attached (townhouses). 3. Phasing. On the coversheet and sheets 4 and 5, the phasing needs to match what was depicted in the proffers from the rezoning. While the proffers do state that units not built within a certain phase can be carried forward, the table needs to match the phasing listed in the proffers. A note can be provided under the table that states that structures not built within a particular phase can be carried forward. 4. Tabulations. On the coversheet, it states that the open space and landscaping tabulations are on sheet 2. It appears that the minimum open space tabulation is shown on the 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Re: Senseny Village MDP May 26, 2006 Page 2 coversheet, but there are no actual open space calculations, landscaping tabulations or details in the MPD. Provide the calculations and details in the MPD and revise the coversheet to show on which page they can be found. 5. Recreational Units. On the coversheet, provide a tabulation for the required recreational units, as well as what is being provided. 6. Overall Plan. Provide one sheet (without topography) that shows the entire development, similar to the GDP. 7. Density. On the coversheet, the maximum density is provided; provide the actual density of the project. 8. Road Detail. The road detail shown on sheets 4 and 5 needs to depict five foot sidewalks and a list of the roads that will use this detail needs to be provided (Rossum, Thornton, etc). A road detail for the private townhouse lots needs to be provided as well. 9. Private Roads. There is a statement on the coversheet that "all roads/streets will be built for acceptance into VDOT secondary systems of highways" and there are statements under the project tabulations on the coversheet and sheets 4 and 5 that state (*no private roads). It appears that the roads within the townhouse developments will be private roads. 10. Senseny Road Improvements. Provide a detail in the MPD that shows the Senseny Road improvements. 11. Riparian Buffers. Show the required riparian buffers for the intermittent streams on the MPD. 12. Environmental Features. On sheet 3 under the environmental features table, the Phase IV shows .16 acres of wetlands being disturbed but the Phase IV existing acreage shows no wetlands. 13. Buffers. Internal separation buffers are required between townhouses and single family dwelling lots; the minimum buffer is a 100' full screen. Show the required buffer on the MDP along with a buffer detail. 14. Waivers. On sheet 5, some of the private streets are labeled as "exceeding 500'. Townhouses can only be located more than 500' from the private road if the Planning Commission grants a waiver, and private roads cannot exceed 800'. 15. Interparcel Connections. A connection from Lehigh Drive to the adjacent parcel should be provided with this development. 16. Notes. On the coversheet under general notes, provide a statement that public water and sewer is being provided and is available from the Sanitation Authority. In an effort to more efficiently process plans as well as accommodate an increasing number of applications which require review by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, applications need be in a "final stage" with all agency comments addressed prior to placement on agendas for public meetings. This MPD will not be scheduled for the Planning Commission until you have addressed Plani ing Department comments as well as all other outstanding agency Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Re: Senseny Village MDP May 26, 2006 Page 3 issues. Once you have achieved approvals from the reviewing agencies we will welcome the formal submission and place the project on the Plamling Commission agenda for review. Approval comments are still required from the following agencies: Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Virginia Department of Transportation. As submitted, this application is incomplete and your application fee in the amount of $9,379.00 is being returned to you, as well as the copies of the plans you submitted for the public meeting. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding • this letter. Also, for future reference, please direct all correspondence regarding Master Development Plans to my attention. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP/bad Attachments cc: Denver Quinnelly, 22A Ricketts Drive, Winchester, VA 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 September 6, 2006 FAX: 540/678-0682 Mr. Brett Kelly Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Site Plan Comments - Senseny Road/Rossum Lane Public Improvements Plan Frederick County, Virginia Dear Brett: Upon review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: 1. Provide appropriate notes regarding trenching practices in accordance with 4VAC50-30-40, subsection 16. 2. Provide a note requiring cleaning of any sediment on public or private roads. 3. Provide a note requiring all temporary controls be removed within 30-days once no longer required; trapped sediment must be removed and stabilized. 4. Provide a copy of the temporary grading easement. 5. Provide the Responsible Land Disturber signature block on the plans. We will reserve our approval until receipt of the above revisions. Please highlight on the revised plans the changes listed above. Sincerely, oe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/rls cc: Planning and Development file C:\Program Files\WordPerfect Office X3\Rhonda\TEMPCOMMENTS\SENSENYRDROSSUMLNSPCOM.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Fuca., COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 November 21, 2006 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #12-06 FOR SENSENY VILLAGE Final Master Development Plan Approval Property Identification Number (PIN): 65-A-49B and 65-A-55 Dear Evan: Frederick County administratively approved the above -referenced final master development plan on November 17, 2006. The master development plan is approved for the potential development of 285 residential units (112 Single Family Homes and 173 Townhomes) on 73.79 acres within the Red Bud Magisterial District. The property which would comprise this development is located on the south side of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). The Frederick County Board of Supervisors granted staff administrative approval authority on November 8, 2006. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance have been addressed in the plan. Please note that approval of a subdivision design plan is required prior to the subdivision or development of this parcel. I am providing you with ten (10) copies of the approved final master development plan. Please ensure that these plans are distributed accordingly. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP/bad cc: Philip A. Lemieux, Red Bud Magisterial District Supervisor Gregory S. Kerr and Christopher Mohn, Red Bud Magisterial District Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Patrick Barker, EDC Joe Wilder, Public Works Commissioner of Revenue Denver Quinnelly, 22A Ricketts Drive, Winchester, VA 22601 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 0 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #12-06 SENSENY VILLAGE Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: October 26, 2006 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, Planner II This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 10/18/06 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 11/08/06 Pending LOCATION: The property is located on the south side of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 65-A-49B and 65-A-55 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) PRESENT USE: Residential and Unimproved North: RP (Residential Performance) South: RA (Rural Areas) East: RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) West: RP (Residential, Performance) Use: Residential Use: Residential/ Unimproved Use: Residential Vacant Use: Residential PROPOSED USES: 285 residential units (112 Single Family Homes and 173 Townhomes) on 73.79 acres at a density of 3.86 units per acre. • • MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 26, 2006 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: Please see attached email from VDOT dated May 15, 2006 to Greenway Engineering and attached email from Greenway Engineering to VDOT dated September 25, 2006 Frederick County Fire Marshal: Water supply for firefighting must meet Frederick County Code 90-4, and be in place prior to construction materials arriving. Plan approval recommended. Frederick County Public Works: Your letter dated July 11, 2006 and the accompanying revised MDP have adequately addressed our May 9, 2006 review comments. Therefore, we grant our approval of the Senseny Village MDP. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Engineer to verify/design project to have sufficient water pressure and volume. Engineer to verify/design project to have sufficient downstream sewer capacity (to FWSA trunk main). Frederick County Inspections Department: Demolition permit required prior to removing any structures. Please include 100 year FEMA Flood Plain Elevations if lots are located within. No additional comments at this time. Will comment when the subdivision plan is submitted showing lots. GIS Department: The following road names have been approved and registered into the Frederick County System: Thornton Drive, Lehigh Drive, Lacross Court, Tye Court and Rivanna. And Menasha Court. Foster Drive is denied as a duplicated name and must be renamed. Royce Drive has been approved and entered. Winchester Regional Airport: We have reviewed the proposed Master Development Plan for Senseny Village and it appears that this plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. However, this proposed site does lie within airspace of the Winchester Regional Airport and residents in that area may experience noise from over flights of aircraft arriving to and departing from the Winchester Regional Airport. Potential homeowners should be forewarned about the proximity of this site to the Winchester Airport. Department of Parks and Recreation: The proposed 22.137 acres of open space appears to meet County requirements. Staff recommends bicycle trails, providing circulation within the development and connections to Senseny Road and adjacent developments be included in the plan. The proposed monetary proffer of $1,166 for Parks and Recreation appears to be appropriate to help offset the impact this development will have on the services provided by this department. 9 0 MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 26, 2006 Page 3 Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. B) Location The property is located on the south side of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). C) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephenson Quadrangle) identifies both parcels as being zoned A-2 Agricultural. In 1981 Frederick County approved a request (RZ001-81) to rezone the parent tract of 65-A-49B, 65-A-49, from A-2 (Agricultural General) to R-3 (Residential General). Subsequently, the residential zoning classifications were consolidated into the RP (Residential Performance) zoning district. The County's A-1 and A-2 agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject properties and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA (Rural Areas) District. The Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #04-05 on August 24, 2005 which rezoned parcel 65-A-55 to the RP District with proffers and revised the proffers associated with parcel 65-A-49B. D) Intended Use 285 residential units (112 Single Family Homes and 173 Townhomes) on 73.79 acres at a density of 3.86 units per acre. E) Site Suitability & Project Scope Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use Compatibility: 0 0 MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 26, 2006 Page 4 The parcels comprising this rezoning application are located within the County's Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Urban Development Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. In addition, the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use map designates the general area in which the Senseny Village property is located for residential land uses. Transportation: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for this application projects that the development of 285 residential units (145 single family detached and 140 single family attached residential units) would generate 2,668 vehicle trips per day. The report was developed with access to the project being provided along Senseny Road via Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle. The TIA concludes that the traffic impacts associated with the Senseny Village application are acceptable and manageable. The intersections of Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle along Senseny Road will maintain levels of service of C or better during the build out conditions. Proffers: Generalized Development Plan The applicant provided a Generalized Development Plan with Rezoning #04-05 for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of street systems, residential land use areas, and open space areas within the Senseny Village development. Staff Note: This GDP is being modified with Rezoning #13-06. The revised layout is being reflected with this MDP. The revision provides a different road layout, a revised townhouse layout and additional open space between this development and Glenmont Village. Residential Use Restriction The applicant has proffered to limit the total number of residential units to 285 dwelling units. The applicant has committed to a phased introduction of the residential units over a four year time frame with seventy units within the first three years and 75 units in the fourth year. A no disturbance easement that is ten feet in width shall be provided along the rear property line of all single family detached residential lots that abut Glenmont Village and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue to preserve woodlands on 65-A-55. A 50 foot no disturbance easement shall be provided on 65-A-49B adjacent to Glenmont Village Section 6, which shall remain undisturbed between the state street serving the townhouse lots and the existing residential lots within Glenmont Village section 6. Transportation $5,000 per single family detached unit and $3,000 per single family attached townhouse unit for improvements to the Senseny Road corridor and/or a proposed north -south MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 26, 2006 Page 5 connector between Senseny Road and Berryville Pike; right turn lanes on Senseny Road at the Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Drive intersections; improvements to Rossum Lane to VDOT standards; and the dedication of right-of-way for the future Route 37 Eastern Bypass. The applicant proffered to design and construct Rossum Lane (Route 736) to meet VDOT minimum geometric and pavement design standards sufficient to allow for two-way travel and on -street parking, and to include curb/gutter, street lights and storm sewer, within the existing Rossum Lane right-of-way. Staff Note: As indicated in Rezoning #13-06, the existing right-of-way for Rossum Lane is only 37feet in width, which was contrary to VDOT and County Staffs belief during Rezoning #04-05. The applicant is proposing to construct the Rossum Lane improvements within the existing right-of-way. The improvements will include curb and gutter, two driving lanes and a sidewalk along the western side of Rossum Lane. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development $10,000 for each single family detached unit and $8,000 for each single family attached townhouse. Waiver: The townhouse portion of Senseny Village located at the southern portion of the development contains some units which will be located more than 500' from a state maintained road but not more than 800'; therefore the applicant needs a waiver of § 144- 24C(2)b of the Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance. The Planning Commission at their October 18, 2006 meeting recommended approval of this waiver. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF 10/18/06 MEETING: Staff noted that two actions will be required for this MDP—one for the waiver of Section 144- 24C(2)b of the Subdivision Ordinance for the Rossum Lane improvements and one for the MDP itself. The applicant offered to pictorially show the areas for traffic chokers on the MDP and to include a narrative stating any and all chokers will be constructed, provided VDOT grants approval. The applicant also offered to include an additional narrative on the MDP committing to the open space and tree -save areas and the delineation of those areas on the site prior to land -disturbing activity. One resident of Glenmont Village spoke in favor of all County agencies working together when reviewing development projects. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the waiver of Section 144- 24(C)B of the Subdivision Ordinance to allow for the proposed Rossum Lane improvements. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the MDP with the inclusion of a narrative and pictorial indicating the areas for traffic chokers as directed by VDOT and a MDP #12-06, Senseny Villa October 26, 2006 Page 6 narrative committing to the open space/tree-save areas and the delineation of those areas on the site prior to land -disturbing activity. (Note: Commissioners Unger, Watt, Manuel, and Mohn were absent from the meeting.) STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 11/8/06 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The preliminary master development plan for Senseny Village depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. The preliminary master development plan is also in accordance with the revised proffers of the rezoning (REZ #13-06) and has addressed all of staffs' concerns. All of the issues brought forth by the Board of Supervisors should be appropriately addressed by the applicant. Please note this MPD is in conformance with the rezoning application being heard on the same night as this MDP; if the rezoning for Senseny Village is not approved, the MDP should also not be authorized for administrative approval. Two recommendations are required for this MPD, one for the waiver request and the other for the MPD. The applicant is seeking approval of a waiver request and approval authorization of the Preliminary master development plan by the Board of Supervisors. The Board's authorization will grant staff with administrative approval authority for the rinal master development plan. Farm Letter: PS 10 0 Page 1 of 2 Jeremy Tweedie From: Ingram, Lloyd[Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:52 AM To: Jeremy Tweedie Cc: 'mruddy@co.frederick.va.us; Ingram, Lloyd; Baluch, Stephen Subject: Senseny Village Ref: Senseny Village Route 657, Frederick County Your revised Master Development Plan (MDP) dated February, 2006 for the referenced project has been reviewed by VDOT. The changes to the master plan do not substantially affect the conclusions of our prior review of the MDP for this development dated February 8, 2005. This letter reaffirms that VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Senseny Village Rezoning Application dated November 22, 2004 with latest revisions to the proffers dated August 25, 2005, address transportation concerns associated with this project, subject to the following comments: 1. The Master Development Plan for this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 657 (Senseny Road), the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Before making any final comments, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. 2. Approval is also contingent on VDOT and Frederick County's approval of the proffered Senseny Road Public Improvement Plans. 3. On sheet 1 include the Trip Generation Summary, Table 2, from the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this site. Identify by date and title the TIA report as the source for the traffic analysis. 4. On sheet 4, concerning the Standard Typical Section for Residential Streets we offer the following comments: a. The 5-foot wide grass strip behind face of curb with a 4-foot wide sidewalk (should be a minimum of 5-foot sidewalk) provides sufficient space to accommodate the latest revisions to the VDOT standard CG-9D for Standard Entrance Gutter as revised 2/06 (see attached copy). b. Per the VDOT "Subdivision Street Design Guide", Table 1 on page B-7, the Category III requirements can be used up to projected traffic volume of 1500 average daily traffic (ADT). Note however that the minimum stopping and intersection sight distance for this category have been changed to 155 feet and 280 feet respectively. c. Based on the projected trip generation for this site, it may be necessary to include a Category IV for ADT up to 2000 using the requirements from Table 1 for the range of 1501 - 2000 ADT. d. With respect to pavement structure requirements for Categories II and III, note that VDOT Staunton District Materials Sections suggests a guideline of 8" aggregate base, 3" base asphalt, and 1.5" surface asphalt for pavements for both categories. FSi1 Vlmo; Form Letter: PS Page 2 of 2 k 5. On sheet 5, in reference to item C.)2. of the proffer statement, the use of standard 12-foot wide turning lanes exclusive of gutter pan for Route 657 (Senseny Road) at Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle is recommended, if existing ROW is sufficient. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact.me at 540-984-5611 or Mr. Stephen Baluch of our Winchester Office at 540-535-1823. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT N Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) Attachments: Table 2, Trip Generation Summary from TIA Report VDOT Standard CG-913 Table 1, page B-7, from VDOT 'Subdivision Street Design Guide' 5/15/2006 Senseny Village - Rossum I 1ne • Page 1 of 1 Candice Perkins From: Jeremy Tweedie Otweedie@greenwayeng.com] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:58 PM To: Candice Perkins (E-mail) Cc: Mark D. Smith; David Jordan (Dave) (E-mail); Brett Kelly; David Jordan (Dave) (E-mail 2) Subject: RE: Senseny Village - VDOT approval Candice, Please find below the approval from VDOT concerning the Rossum Ln Public Improvements Plan. This will satisfy all agencies for the formal submission for today's deadline. As discussed the following will be submitted tomorrow morning: 1. Power of attorney for the Rezoning (GDP Proffer Modification) 2. Signed Rezoning Application 3. 44 copies of the GDP 11X17 4. 44 Copies of the MDP plan set As always, thank you for your assistance in moving this project forward. ----Original Message ----- From: Ingram, Lloyd[mailto:Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:10 PM To: 'Candice Perkins' Cc: Copp, Jerry; Alexander, Scott; Mark D. Smith Subject: Senseny Village - Rossum Lane Candice, After reviewing the various issues concerning the typical roadway section with various VDOT and County officials, it appears that VDOT will support a 36' curb to curb roadway with parking on one side. There will be no sidewalk required by VDOT. The actual curb to curb measurement may be reduced to 35' to allow for maintenance on the backside of the curb. If you have any questions, please contact me. Regards, Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540)984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) 9/26/2006 APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Departmei7t of Dc1-1lopmcnt Use, vniy. Date application rcceivecl� Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return 1. Project Title: Senseny Village 2. Owner's Name Quinnelly Group, LLC J U N 2 g 200h i !lpplicatiopi # r`' w, 22A Ricketts Drive Winchester, VA 22601 (Please list name of all owners or parties in interest) 3. Applicant: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number: 540-662-4185 4. Design Greenway Engineering Company: Address: Same Phone Number: Same Contact Name: Jeremy Tweedie, Project Manager 5. Location of Property Rossum Lane (Route 736) off of Senseny Road (Route 657) 6. Total 73.79 acres Acreage: 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number (PIN): b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: Property Identification Numbers North South See attached list East West f) Magisterial District: 65-A-49B and 65-A-55 RP -Residential Performance Vacant Single-family detached cluster . Townhouses Property Uses Red Bud S. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? .Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master. development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: Date:-2C9 r� co ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION PIN Owner Deed Book and Page or Instrument number Zone Use A 65B-7-10 Randy L Ruble 020016145 RP Residence B 65d-1-1. Connie B. Linaweaver 606/444 RP lResidence C 65D-2-4 Swa ler H II and Brenda S Koonce 866/220 RP Residence D 65D-2-5 Bettie G Brumback c/oBetty Kisner 770/1278 RP Residence E 65D-2-6 Bettie G Brumback c/oBettie G Brumback 770/1278 RP Residence F 65D-2-7 Elw nne Godlove 020009910 RP Residence G 65D-2-8 IMaureen E. Smith 040011444 IRP Residence H 65D-2-9 Duane A & Priscilla McDonald 020014474 IRP Residence I/J 65D-2-10A Glenmont Villa e Association 614/802 RP Green Space K L 65D-3-4-53 65D-3-4-54 More , Mic ea Joseph AG McDonald Pro ernes, LC 000005484 RP RP Residence Residence M 65D-3-4-59A Glenmont Village Association 614/802 RP Green Space N 65D-4-5-71 Valley View Associates, LLC 1010017503 RP Residence 0 P 65D-5-6.76 65D-5-6-77 c ee, ichard Vaugin Ramon & Wilson Drucker FH. •, 050018497 RP IRP Residence Residence Q 65D-5-6-78 Yolanda Funes 050012670 IRP Residence R 65D-5-6-79 Maria R &Yon A Cruz Santos 040025966 RP Residence S T 65D-5-6-80 65D-5-6-81 Vaga Hector I Perez n. M y Mary Janeczek 853/1382 RP RP lResidence Residence U 65D-5-6-82 Calvin R Jr & Michelle Hunt 852/591 RP Residence V 65D-5-6-83 Donald E Nesselrodt 7221716 RP Residence W , 65D-5-6-84 Dawn L White 010013827 RP Residence X 65D-5-6-85 Kim V & Carolyn S Ross 724/18 IRP Residence . Y 65D-5-6-86 James J & Rebecca L Fitzgibbon 723/338 RP Residence Z 65D-5-6-87 William Roy 050021488 RP Residence AA 65D-5-6-88 Daniel & Monica O'Hara 1030011096 RP Residence BB 65D-5-6-89 Gary Linden Adams & Juanita Spielman 725/724 RP Residence CC 65-A-50 Maurice M Atkins 582/756 RP Residence DID 65-A-54 Randy Lee & Mary F Ruble 03000577 RP Residence EE 65-A-56 Winifred D & Jerry U d ke 040005558 RP, Residence FF 65-A-57 Genevieve M Cline B105/636 IRP Residence GG 65-A-60 Daniel & Jenifer Lafond 040012117 RP Residence HH 65-A-62 Donald L. & Delores V. Roles 878/1398 RP Residence II 65-A-63 Robert D: & Fletcher H. Smith 1030014240 RP lResidence JJ 65-A-70 Paul R. Puffinbur er 404/335 RP lResidence KK ' 65-A-66 Feathers, Vicky Lynn & Richard A 957/979 RP lResidence LL 65-A-65 Mar in L. & AI son M. Swaner 850/838 RP Residence MM 65-A-71 Hesham F. & Khalifa N.S. Attia 030016515 RP Residence NN 65-A-68A Lewis F. Franklin, JR. 682/791 RP Residence 00 65-B-6-38 Maurice M. Atkins 582/756 RP Residence 65-A-72 EFG Investments, LLC 955/724 IRA Unimproved 65-A-186B Ronald F & Melanie J Werdebau h 000006836 RA Residence 65-A-186J I lGloria C Corbin 818/1831 IRA 1 lResidence 65-A-190 1 JWilmer R & Donna N Davis 757/923 1 jUnimproved Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Planning office, County of Frederick, Virginia,107-Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Denver Ouinnelly, manager/member of Ouinnelly Group, LLC (Phone) (540) 662-4164 (Address) 22A Ricketts.Drive Winchester, VA 22601 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 050002909 on Page and is described as Parcel: 65 Lot: 49B Block: A Section: Parcel: 65 Lot: 55 Block: A Section: _ do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineering Subdivision: Senseny Village Subdivision: Sensenv Village (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described Property, including: ❑ Rezoning (Including proffers) ❑ Conditional Use Permits ® Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site Plan My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shalt In witness Signature(s) one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or ,n,A modified. (our) hand and seal this day o&q_, 200 ( , w State of Virgi 'a, C ty/County of Frederick, To -wit: I, hfl c It , a Notary Public in a or the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has ,N0rr� wledged the samePre a in the jurisdiction aforesaid this 6-day of �[, 200_ �.` '(1NA �i My Commission Expiresgun--(-Q : Z` O 4 Notary PublicCA OF• .V • Y knw ,... . •,��OTARY pv%`�.� ig II WEST R/W TYPICAL SECTION WITH UTILITIES ROSSUM LANE IMPROVEMENTS 15 1 2' EX. R/W 31' 30' PROP. PAVEMENT 2(o' WIDTH 5' 0 z rc W W z rs z W " m m q m cQ t U 3 �� IW z �� C � �q I W aLom ccU .0 to —E,45T R/W a 10' cs� LXiI H U W Z � � A Z 0 J ?z w 04 wU � 0 � U U 1-4 w W co) :z)W 0 ma Z cr w� �U a w� CL Oz DATE: OCT. 2, 2006 SCALE: NTS DESIGNED BY: BSK JOB NO. 3924 SHEET 2 OF 3 A WEST R/W TYPICAL SECTION WITH UTILITIES ROSSUM LANE IMPROVEMENTS 2' /W 31' 30' PROP. PAVEMENT 26' WIDTH i 1(oi 3' 0.1 5'1 MIN, 2' 1 1m I' J BEAST RNJ 10' 0 z — W W z 3 z W " m m a' it m N co U z W W -a 0 w� 4 E- U W z z Q Q O dz v W � a 0 O U ul D� co) w 0 �a z w� �U x wQ fY -� Oz C DATE: OCT. 2, 2008 SCALE: NTS DESIGNED BY: BSK JOB NO. 3924 SHEET 2 OF 3 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #12-06 SENSENY VILLAGE Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: October 3, 2006 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, Planner II This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 10/18/06 Pending Board of Supervisors: 11/08/06 Pending LOCATION: The property is located on the south side of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 65-A-49B and 65-A-55 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) PRESENT USE: Residential and Unimproved North: RP (Residential Performance) South: RA (Rural Areas) East: RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential Use: Residential/ Unimproved Use: Residential Vacant Use: Residential PROPOSED USES: 285 residential units (112 Single Family Homes and 173 Townhomes) on 73.79 acres at a density of 3.86 units per acre. 0 is MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 3, 2006 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: Please see attached email from VDOT dated May 15, 2006 to Greenway Engineering and attached email from Greenway Engineering to VDOT dated September 25, 2006 Frederick County Fire Marshal: Water supply for firefighting must meet Frederick County Code 90-4, and be in place prior to construction materials arriving. Plan approval recommended. Frederick County Public Works: Your letter dated July 11, 2006 and the accompanying revised MDP have adequately addressed our May 9, 2006 review comments. Therefore, we grant our approval of the Senseny Village MDP. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Engineer to verify/design project to have sufficient water pressure and volume. Engineer to verify/design project to have sufficient downstream sewer capacity (to FWSA trunk, main). Frederick County Inspections Department: Demolition permit required prior to removing any structures. Please include 100 year FEMA Flood Plain Elevations if lots are located within. No additional comments at this time. Will comment when the subdivision plan is submitted showing lots. GIS Department: The following road names have been approved and registered into the Frederick County System: Thornton Drive, Lehigh Drive, Lacross Court, Tye Court and Rivanna. And Menasha Court. Foster Drive is denied as a duplicated name and must be renamed. Royce Drive has been approved and entered. Winchester Regional Airport: We have reviewed the proposed Master Development Plan for Senseny Village and it appears that this plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. However, this proposed site does lie within airspace of the Winchester Regional Airport and residents in that area may experience noise from over flights of aircraft arriving to and departing from the Winchester Regional Airport. Potential homeowners should be forewarned about the proximity of this site to the Winchester Airport. Department of Parks and Recreation: The proposed 22.137 acres of open space appears to meet County requirements. Staff recommends bicycle trails, providing circulation within the development and connections to Senseny Road and adjacent developments be included in the plan. The proposed monetary proffer of $1,166 for Parks and Recreation appears to be appropriate to help offset the impact this development will have on the services provided by this department. MDP #12-06, Senseny Village• October 3, 2006 Page 3 Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. B) Location The property is located on the south side of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). C) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephenson Quadrangle) identifies both parcels as being zoned A-2 Agricultural. In 1981 Frederick County approved a request (RZ001-81) to rezone the parent tract of 65-A-49B, 65-A-49, from A-2 (Agricultural General) to R-3 (Residential General). Subsequently, the residential zoning classifications were consolidated into the RP (Residential Performance) zoning district. The County's A-1 and A-2 agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject properties and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA (Rural Areas) District. The Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #04-05 on August 24, 2005 which rezoned parcel 65-A-55 to the RP District with proffers and revised the proffers associated with parcel 65-A-49B. D) Intended Use 285 residential units (112 Single Family Homes and 173 Townhomes) on 73.79 acres at a density of 3.86 units per acre. E) Site Suitability & Project Scope Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use Compatibility: MDP #12-06, Senseny Villa e October 3, 2006 Page 4 The parcels comprising this rezoning application are located within the County's Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Urban Development Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. In addition, the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use map designates the general area in which the Senseny Village property is located for residential land uses. Transportation: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for this application projects that the development of 285 residential units (145 single family detached and 140 single family attached residential units) would generate 2,668 vehicle trips per day. The report was developed with access to the project being provided along Senseny Road via Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle. The TIA concludes that the traffic impacts associated with the Senseny Village application are acceptable and manageable. The intersections of Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle along Senseny Road will maintain levels of service of C or better during the build out conditions. Proffers: Generalized Development Plan The applicant provided a Generalized Development Plan with Rezoning #04-04 for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of street systems, residential land use areas, and open space areas within the Senseny Village development. Staff Note: This GDP is being modified with Rezoning #13-06. The revised layout is being reflected with this MDP. The revision provides a different road layout, a revised townhouse layout and additional open space between this development and Glenmont Village. Residential Use Restriction The applicant has proffered to limit the total number of residential units to 285 dwelling units. The applicant has committed to a phased introduction of the residential units over a four year time frame with seventy units within the first three years and 75 units in the fourth year. A no disturbance easement that is ten feet in width shall be provided along the rear property line of all single family detached residential lots that abut Glenmont Village and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue to preserve woodlands on 65-A-55. A 50 foot no disturbance easement shall be provided on 65-A-49B adjacent to Glenmont Village Section 6, which shall remain undisturbed between the state street serving the townhouse lots and the existing residential lots within Glenmont Village section 6. Transportation $5,000 per single family detached unit and $3,000 per single family attached townhouse unit for improvements to the Senseny Road corridor and/or a proposed north -south MDP #12-06, Senseny Village October 3, 2006 Page 5 connector between Senseny Road and Berryville Pike; right turn lanes on Senseny Road at the Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Drive intersections; improvements to Rossum Lane to VDOT standards; and the dedication of right-of-way for the future Route 37 Eastern Bypass. The applicant proffered to design and construct Rossum Lane (Route 736) to meet VDOT minimum geometric and pavement design standards sufficient to allow for two-way travel and on -street parking, and to include curb/gutter, street lights and storm sewer, within the existing Rossum Lane right-of-way. Staff Note: As indicated in Rezoning #13-06, the existing right-of-way for Rossum Lane is only 37feet in width, which was contrary to VDOT and County Staffs belief (luring Rezoning #04-05. The applicant is proposing to construct the Rossum Lane improvements within the existing right-of-way. The improvements will include curb and gutter, two driving lanes and a sidewalk along the western side of Rossum Lane. Please note that the road improvements depicted on sheet 7 of the MDP are not accurate, a revised road plan has been included in your agenda. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development $10,000 for each single family detached unit and $8,000 for each single family attached townhouse. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 10/18/06 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The preliminary master development plan for Senseny Village depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. The preliminary master development plan is also in accordance with the revised proffers of the rezoning (REZ #13-06) and has addressed all of staffs concerns. All of the issues brought forth by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Please note this MPD is in conformance with the rezoning application being heard on the same night as this MDP, if the rezoning for Senseny Village is not recommended for approval then the MDP should also not be recommended for approval to the Board of Supervisors. Following the Planning Commission discussion, it would be appropriate to forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding this MDP conformance with County codes and review agency comments. All issues and concerns raised by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. 9 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540)984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 2275 Northwestern Pike Winchester, VA 22603 (540)-53 5-1828 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach three (3) copies of the MDP with the sheet. AppIicant's Name Address Phone Number Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln. (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Senseny Rd. Corridor Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal V Floor Attn: Fire Marshal 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-6350 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name Address Phone Number Greenway En ineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln. (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Senseny Rd. Corridor Fire Marshal's C s--2_,�, Frederick County Fire Marshal use only , y t"i}A,2M1'*'F:., Date reviewed 9:.7e 4 Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Dateapprove Revision required Signature and Date RECEIVED FEB 2 4 20M /M Control number MDP06-0005 Project Name Senseny Village Address 151 Windy Hill Ln. Type Application Master Development Plan Current Zoning RP Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Date received 2/24/2006 City Winchester Tax ID Number 65-A-A9B Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Date reviewed 2/28/2006 Applicant Greenway Engineering State Zip VA 22602 Fire District 18 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Not Identified Access Comments Emergency access shall be maintained during all phases of construction. Date Revised Applicant Phone 540-662-4185 Rescue District 18 Election District Red Bud Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Additional Comments Water supply for firefighting must meet Frederick County code 90-4. and be in place prior to construction materials arriving. Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signat _...-..... . ._-....... ...... Yes J. Bauserman h Title Rl - - --- ------ - - 1t"MRICK-COUNT n LJ LJ Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Senseny Village MDP Dear Jeremy: July 11, 2006 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: S40/678-0682 Your letter dated July 11, 2006 and the accompanying revised MDP have adequately addressed our May 9, 2006 review comments. Therefore, we grant our approval of the Senseny Village MDP. HES/clw cc: file Sincerely, Harvey E. -awsnyder, Jr. P.E. Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 ti _ COUNTY of FREDERICK 5 Mr. Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Senseny Village Master Development Plan (MDP) Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Tweedie: Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 We have completed our review of the Senseny Village MDP and offer the following comments: Sheet 3 of 6: Re-evaluate steep slope areas. It appears that several additional areas within the proposed development could qualify as steep slopes. 2. Sheet 4 of 6: It appears that only one stormwater management facility is shown on the proposed master development plan. Indicate if this facility will be designed to serve the entire development area including Phase IV shown on Sheet 5 of 8. Also, the proposed location of the stormwater management facility is shown relatively close to the property line shared with EFG Investments. An offsite easement will most probably be required if a point source discharge is created at this location. 3. Sheet 4 of 6: An offsite cul-de-sac and a traffic calming area are shown at the south end of Lehigh Drive. Explain why a traffic calming area is required at the end of a road. Also, provide a copy of the legal agreement with the adjacent property owner which allows the construction of the off -site cul-de-sac. 4. Sheet 4 of 6: The construction of the stormwater management pond will obviously impact a portion of the annotated wetlands area. Indicate if the amount of disturbance has been included in the environmental feature tabulation shown on Sheet 3 of 6. This same line of reasoning should also be applied to the construction of Foster Drive and Lehigh Drive over existing wetlands. 5. Sheet 5 of 6: During the subdivision design, consideration shall be given to accommodating the discharge flows from the small pond shown on the EFG Investments' property. 6. Sheet 5 of 6: Indicate if the proposed spanned arch will be extended to negate any impact on the proposed pump station. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Senseny Village MDP Comments Page 2 May 9, 2006 I can be reached at 722-8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, G� Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Planning and Development file CAProgram Files\WordPerfect Office II\Rhonda\TEMPCOMMENTS\SENSENYVILLAGEMDPCOM.wpd 0 0 Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department 4th Floor Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Inspections Department with their review. Please attach one (1) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln. (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Senseny Rd. Corridor Frederick County Inspections Department's Comments: /A.. /V,,-, n',n'.,� hV0f2f,_,Ir)0^ nr!c1n -/^ ✓11VUtwin /ccuJed P,(:Lk in 6 %fe a7),4/ cc"W-enj-�S_ tli -71A S P—. bl;ll � al-" /I"l etl / �o„� e,� 5c -,6 ,6- /5 /v77 pkv3 Frederick County Inspections use only Date reviewed Review Number 1 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Date approved Revision required Sicnature and Date II APR 0 5 2006 39 apt Fax from 0 to Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick. County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick. County Sanitation Authority 31.5 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Stephens City, Virginia P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1.061 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Sanitation Auth.onty with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name Address Phone Number Greenway EngineennQ 151. Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 Name of development and/or description of the request: SensenyVillage Location of property: South of Rossurn Ln. Rte 736and Twinbrook. Cir. Rte 867 of the Senseny Rd. Corridor Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: 1 st review — approved as noted -- 2 items 1) Engineer to verify/ design proiect to have sufficient water pressure IBC volume. 2) Engineer to verify/design project to have sufficient downstream sewer capacity ( to FWSA. trunk k main). �- r JUL 2 4 2006 iY �.T Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 315 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Stephens City, Virginia P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1061 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Sanitation Authority with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the M )P with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address Phone Number Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Name of development and/or description of the request: Sensenv Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln. (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Sensenv Rd. Corridor Frederick County Sanitation Authority use only Date reviewed Review Number l 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Date approved Revision required Signature and Date 33 211 Request for Master Development Plan Comments Department of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of GIS, Attn: GIS Manager Department of GIS 107 North Kent Street 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5614 (540) 665-5614 The GIS Department will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County Street Name System. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will prevent duplicate street names from being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name: Address Phone Number Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Route 867) of the Senseny Road Corridor GIS Dept. Comments: kls> i GP— --r-) rz4B-F— J 4-jpp"JEo �vl F-N i'Ek'-F� i ry tY� t-N E �f'� c ^ E21�k Caeill /20� /y�4rrJ� 44 GIS OFFICE USE ONLY: Date reviewed Date revision received Incomplete Incomplete _ Date reviewed Date approved Signature and Date Date approved o3-zio4- Revision required MAR 2 2 2000 39a� Request for Master Development Plan Comments Department of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of GIS, Attn: GIS Manager Department of GIS 107 North Kent Street 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5614 (540) 665-5614 The GIS Department will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County Street Name System. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will prevent duplicate street names from being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name Address Phone Number Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Route 867) of the Senseny Road Corridor GIS Dept. Comments: �el�taiNG i2�Ao Nr�mEs �L,trrf k3EE��o� ,lJ�t� R EI.� STF/ A /N T1f � �/2E6F Ga(c G9 K/ �' ifs �l TNe/�► Myl h Ae /,f1n,0 4?1y~19 IiAD 1r)JWAS464 CT- y AYW%7- GIS OFFICE USE ONLY. Date resietw�d D.Z- v Date revision received Date approved _� p Incomplete- Incomplete Date reviewed oz-27-00 Date;approved evision required Signature and Date� Oz ZxoG FFR 2. 9 7000 0 0 Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County 107 N. Kent Street Department of Parks and Recreation 2nd Floor 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5678 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address 151 Windv Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Senseny Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln. (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Senseny Rd. Corridor Department of Parks and Recreation's Comments: The proposed 22.137 acres of open space appears to meet county requirements. Staff recommends bicycle trails, providing circulation within the development and connections o Senseny Road and adjacent developments, be included in the plan. The proposed monetary proffer of $1,166 for Parks and Recreation appears to be appropriate to help offset the impact this development will have on the services provided y t is department. De aztizwnt of Perks anti Recitation use 0_Ufrl n1 Date revie«°ed" Review NUMber 1 2 3 4 5 (please circ,le,one i' Date rev iuwed Dat approved' _ Revision: qutre_ rt 4, Si'nature'aiid Date MAR 2 4 2006 w • Request for Master Development Plan Comments Winchester Regional Airport Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 Hand deliver to: 491 Airport Road (Route 645, off of Route 522 South) (540) 662-2422 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address Phone Number Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Sensenv Village Location of property: South of Rossum Ln (Rte 736) and Twinbrook Cir. (Rte 867) of the Sensenv Rd. Corridor Winchester Regional Airport Comments: WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT SERVING THE TOP OF VIRGINIA / March 24, 2006 Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Re: Master Development Plan Senseny Village Red Bud Magisterial District Dear Mr. Tweedie: We have reviewed the proposed Master Development Plan for Senseny Village and it appears that this plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. However, this proposed site does lie within airspace of the Winchester Regional Airport and residents in that area may experience noise from over flights of aircraft operating in and out of the Winchester Regional Airport. Potential homeowners should be forewarned about the proximity of this site to the Winchester Airport. We appreciate the opportunity to review these plans and your cooperation in ensuring the continuing operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, po--\W" S. R. Manuel Executive Director 1i MAR 2 7 2006 Greenway Engineering `i November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 Senseny Village Rezoning March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 SENSENY VILLAGE PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ# 04-05 Rural Areas (RA) and Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) with Conditions PROPERTIES: 73.79-acres +/- Tax Parcels 65-((A))-49B and 65-((A))-55 RECORD OWNERS: Hazel C. Lambert Taylor Grace, LLC APPLICANT: Taylor Grace, LLC PROJECT NAME: Senseny Village ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: November 22, 2004 REVISION DATE: August 10, 2005 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 et. seq. of the Code of Virginia, (1950, as amended), (the "Code") and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "Ordinance") with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicants hereby proffer that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # 04-05 for the rezoning of 49.70-acresf from the Rural Areas (RA) District to Residential Performance (RP) District, and for the rezoning of 24.09-acres± currently zoned Residential Performance (RP) District to proffered Residential Performance (RP) District, development of the subject property conformity with the terms and conditions set forth her in, exept toltheextent that aat such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no binding effect whatsoever. Upon approval of such rezoning, these proffers shall be binding upon the applicants and their successors and assigns. The subject property, identified as Senseny Village, and more particularly described as the lands owned by Hazel C. Lambert, (the "Owner of the first parcel") being all of Tax Pile H3924/GAW Greenway Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 Senseny Village Rezoning January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 Map Parcel 65-((A))-55 and further described by Will Book 115 at page 1563, and the lands owned by Taylor Grace, LLC, (the "Owner of the second parcel") being all of Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-49B and further described by Instrument 4050002909. A.) Residential Land Use The Applicants hereby proffer to limit the total number of residential units to Z8 dwelling units on the combined subject properties of Tax Map Parcels 65-((A))-49B and 65-((A))-55. 2. The Applicants hereby proffer to prohibit the development of garden apartments, as defined in Section 165-65L of the Zoning Ordinance on Tax Map Parcels 65-((A))-49B and 65-((A))-55. ` The Applicants hereby proffer to develop the residential dwelling units in accordance with the following annualized phasing plan. This annualized phasing plan shall begin in the calendar year in which the Senseny Village Master Development Plan is approved by Frederick County. All dwelling units not developed within` the specified year shall be carried forward to the ensuing calendar years: YEAR TOTAL BUILDING PERMITS 1 70 2 70 3 70 4 75 TOTAL 285 B.) Generalized Development Plan and Master Development Plan 1. The Applicants hereby proffer to submit a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of street systems, residential land use areas and open space areas within the Senseny Village Community. The final engineering documents for Senseny Village will be in substantial conformance with the proffered GDP; however, it is recognized that modifications to the final internal road alignment on Tax Map Parcels 65-((A))-49B and 65-((A))-55 may occur due to site development constraints such as wetlands or steep slopes without the need to modify the proffered GDP. However, in no event will a modified internal road alignment encroach within File 93924/EAW • Greemvay Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 Senseny Village Rezoning January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005, August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 the 50-foot no disturbance easement adjacent to Glenmont Village Section 6 on Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-49B as described in Section B3 of this proffer statement except for existing dedicated street and utility connections. The final engineering documents will ensure that the Senseny Village Community provides for a street extension /connection to Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Glen -ridge Drive (Route 865), an internal street system that connects to both of the extended streets, and an inter -parcel connection to Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-72. 2. The Generalized Development Plan (GDP) has been designed to provide for single-family detached residential lots to adjoin the Glenmont Village Subdivision and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue on Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A))-55. Furthermore, the GDP has been designed to provide for open space adjacent to Glenmont Village — Section 6 on Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-49B. 3. A no disturbance easement that is 10-feet in width shall be provided along the rear property line of all single-family detached residential lots that abut Glemnont Village and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue for the purpose of preserving existing woodlands on Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-55. Furthermore, a 50-foot no disturbance easement shall be provided on Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-49B adjacent to Glenmont Village — Section 6, which shall remain undisturbed between the state street serving the townhouse lots and the existing residential lots within Glenmont Village — Section 6, except for existing dedicated street and utility connections. 4. A no disturbance easement shall be established within the open space areas that are associated with the natural drainageways to protect the integrity of the waterways and the upland slope areas. The only activity that may occur within this no disturbance easement will include utility installation and a single road crossing to provide access to the southern portion of Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-49B. 5. A Preliminary Master Development Plan will be submitted for the portion of the subject property that is located on Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A))-49B to demonstrate how this portion of the subject property would be developed. Board of Supervisor approval of this Preliminary Master Development Plan concept does not bind the Board of Supervisors to any action on this rezoning application. Additionally, Board of Supervisor approval of this Preliminary Master Development File #3924/EAW 3 Greenway Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 Senseny Village Rezoning January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 Plan concept does not eliminate the requirement for a Master Development Plan for the entire 73.79-acres +/- subject site. C.) Transportation The applicants hereby proffer monetary contributions that are to be utilized for improvements to the Senseny Road (Route 657) corridor and/or a proposed north -south connector between Senseny Road and Berryville Pike (U.S. Route 7). The contributions, in the amount of $5,000 per single-family detached unit and $3,000 per townhouse unit, total a potential maximum of $1.145 million dollars. The applicants authorize the use of these contributions unconditionally by Frederick County for transportation improvements to these roadways. This monetary contribution shall be provided to Frederick County at the time of building permit issuance for each dwelling unit. 2. The applicants hereby proffer to design and construct right turn lanes (and tapers) of eleven -foot width, and to include curb/gutter, on Senseny Road at the Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867) intersections, within the existing Senseny Road right-of- way. The construction of these improvements shall occur prior to the issuance of the first building permit, but will not restrict site grading and infrastructure installation on the subject properties. 3. The applicants hereby proffer to design and construct improvements to Rossum Lane (Route 736), to meet VDOT minimum geometric and pavement design standards sufficient to allow for two-way travel and on -street parking, and to include curb/gutter, street lights and storm sewer, within the existing Rossum Lane right-of-way. Furthermore, traffic calming measures will be considered during the design of the Rossum Lane improvement project. The construction of these improvements shall occur prior to the issuance of the first building permit, but will not restrict site grading and infrastructure installation on the subject properties. 4. The applicants hereby proffer to design the internal street system to provide two means of access to Senseny Road via both Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867) for all residential lots. Traffic calming measures will be considered during the design of the internal street system connections to Rossum Lane, Glenridge Drive, and Tax Map Parcel 65-((A))-72 if desired by VDOT. The applicants hereby proffer to provide for a right-of-way dedication for the future Route 37 Eastern Bypass in conformity with the File H3924/EAW 4 Greenway Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 Senscny Village Rezoning January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 Alternative C alignment depicted on the Frederick County Route 37 Corridor Study Functional Alignment dated October 1992, as identified on the proffered GDP. This right-of-way dedication shall be provided to Frederick County at no cost within 90 days after receiving written request from Frederick County that the right-of-way is needed. D.) Monetary Contributions The applicants hereby proffer monetary contributions in the amount of $10,000.00 for each detached single-family dwelling unit, and $8,000.00 for each townhouse dwelling unit, to mitigate impacts to capital facilities as identified in the Frederick County Capital Facilities Fiscal Impact Model — Output Module prepared by the Frederick County Planning Department on November 19, 2004. This monetary contribution shall be provided to Frederick County at the time of building permit issuance for each dwelling unit. E.) Community Trash Collection The Applicants hereby proffer to provide commercial trash pickup and waste removal service to all residential land uses within the Senseny Village community. The commercial trash pickup and waste removal service shall be established by deed covenant and shall be assigned to the Senseny Village Homeowners Association ("HOA") or sub -association at such time as identified in the legal documents setting forth the guidelines for the Senseny Village HOA or sub -association. The commercial trash pickup and waste removal service shall remain in effect and be the responsibility of the Senseny Village HOA or sub -association until such a time that this service is provided by Frederick County or other municipal providers. F. Monetary Contribution to Establish Homeowners' Association Fund The Applicants hereby proffer to establish a start-up fund for the Senseny Village Homeowner's Association (SVHOA) that will include an initial lump suin payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicants and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Senseny Village community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the SVHOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the SVHOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the applicants to the SVHOA. The start-up funds for the SVIIOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. File k3924/EAW 5 Greenway Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004� Senseny Village Rezoning January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 - August 25, 2005 G.) Signatures The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the assigns and successors in the interest of the Applicants who constitute the owners of the Property. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered foregoing conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: 9-2-a6 Date Denver Quinnelly, Conunonwealth of Virginia, City/County of To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z'c'�'day of 2005 by LkjAI/U,'2- u.� otary Public My Commission Expires /U. 3 File #3924/EAW 6 W ,I Grecmvay Engineering G.) Signatures November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005; August 10, 2005 August 25, 2005 Senseny Village Rezoning The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the assigns and successors in the interest of the Applicants who constitute the owners of the Property. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered foregoing conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: By /" 7 a-S azel C. Lambert Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of 1' (,l n t To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day o t) 20D C7- by *Notary Publ c My. Commission Expires Olu a- M, q File I13924/EAW 40 0 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 1971 June 26, 2006 Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Eric Lawrence, Director of Planning Re: Senseny Village Master Development Plan Waiver Request Dear Mr. Lawrence: On behalf of our client, Quinnelly Group LLC, and the Senseny Village project, Greenway Engineering is respectfully requesting a waiver associated with the length of private drives within the Phases II, III, & IV of this development. The private road system that extends from the public right-of-way along Leheigh Drive throughout Phases II, III, & IV of the development as delineated on the MDP has been designed to enhance and provide a traffic circulation loop. In accordance to Frederick County Zoning Ordinance Code Section 144-24.C(2)(b). As stated: (b) When such lots do not abut public streets, they shall abut private roads, parking lots or access easements. The length and extent of private roads, driveways and parking aisles providing access to lots shall be minimized, and public streets shall be provided in larger subdivisions when substantial distances are involved. Individual lots shall be more than 500 feet from a state -maintained road, as measured from the public street along the access route. The Planning Commission may allow lots to be located as much as 800 feet from a state -maintained road in cases where enhanced circulation is provided with a driveway loop. The length of the private roads as shown on the MDP measured from the public right-of-way along Nassau Drive ranged from less than 500' to a maximum of 1600' (loop condition). Therefore, wo-t respectfully request your support and approval for this waiver to the Planning Commission to grant us the 800' maximum length (1600' loop condition) allowed per approval of this request. Thank you for your time and consideration with this matter. Should you have any question please call at your earliest convenience. Please forward this application to the Planning Commission at the next available meeting. Sincerely, Greenway Engineering Jeremy Tweedie CC: Dave Jordan, Project Development Manager — Morlyn LLC Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 File #3924 JNT www.greenwayeng.com R 6 Founded in 1971 0 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 June 26, 2006 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601-5000 Attn: Candice E. Perkins Re: Senseny Village — Master Development Plan Dear Ms. Perkins, Oreenway Engineering is in receipt of comments, dated May 26, 2006; and we of e pleased te. offer the following responses: Comment 1: Generalized Development Plan Conformance. The MDP is not in conformance with the , Generalized Development Plan (GDP) that was proffered with the rezoning. Whiie the proffers do state that the internal road system can be modified, the MDP varies significantly. The MPD depicts a very different road network, removal/relocation of open space and the shifting of housing areas and types. It would be appropriate to.seek the approval of a revised GDP prior to MDP approval so that the tow documents are in conformance with each other. The two processes (GDP revision and MDP) can be done concurrent with each other. Response: As discussed please find attached the New GDP with the adjusted road network matching our MDP. Also attached he the rezoning application for the GDP amendment process. Comment 2: Lot Numbers. On the coversheet under "allowable overall project gross density", the total maximum units allowed is listed at 406 and the "proffered SF (detached) allowed per rezoning" is listed at 285. The total allowed units allowed by the rezoning is 285; revise the total number and provide a breakdown for SF detached and SF attached (townhouses). Response: Revised as requested to reflect just the proffered density. See sheet l Comment 3: Phasing. On the coversheet and sheets 4 and 5, the phasing needs to match what was depicted in the proffers from the rezoning. While the proffers do state that units not built within a certain phase can be carried forward, the table needs to match the phasing listed in the proffers. A note can be provided under the table that states that structures not built within a particular phase can be carried forward. Response: Phasing has been revised to reflect proffered phasing, in addition a note has been provided to ensure units not built within a certain phases will be carried over to the next phase and so on. See sheet 1 Comment 4: Tabulations. On the coversheet, it states that the open space and landscaping tabulations are on sheet 2. It appears that the minimum open space tabulation is shown on the coversheet, but there are no actual open space calculations, landscaping tabulations or details in the MPD. Provide the calculations and details in the MPD and revise the coversheet to show on which page they can be found. Response: Open space tabulation is provided on sheet 1. Breakdown of open space per phase is in provided in the "Overall Project Tabulation" table also on sheet 1. Landscaping note has been provided for the required landscaping which will be provided by either or a combination of the following options: Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com Fi]e#397�1/JTle:1f 9 • Street tree landscaping and or ornamental landscaping which shall comply with the requirements of section 165.36b of the frederick county zoning ordinance. See sheet 1 Comment 5: Recreational Units. On the coversheet, provide a tabulation for the required recreational units, as well as what is being provided. Response: Recreational units tabulation provided. See sheet 1 Comment 6: Overall Plan. Provide one sheet (without topography) that shows the entire development, similar to the GDP. Response: As discussed a GDP amendment will be processed concurrently with the MDP application. Comment 7. Density. On the coversheet, the maximum density is provided, provide the actual density of the project. Response: Actual "Overall Project Gross Density" has been revised as requested. See sheet 1 Comment 8: Road Detail. The road detail shown on sheets 4 and 5 needs to depict five foot sidewalks and a list of the roads that will use this detail needs to be provided (Rossum, Thornton, etc). A road detail for the private townhouse lots needs to be provided as well. Response: Typical private road detail has been provided as requested. See sheet 4 & 5. The county minimum for sidewalk per section 144-18.0 is 4'. VDOT minimum per SSR Subdivision Street Requirement is 3'. The cross section shown with this MDP are in conformance with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and VDOT minimum standards. Comment 9: Private Roads. There is a statement on the coversheet that "all roads/streets will be built for acceptance into VDOT secondary systems of highways: and there are statements under the project tabulations on the coversheet and sheets 4 and 5 that state (*no private roads). It appears that the roads within the townhouse developments will be private roads. Response: Roads within the townhouse area will be private and maintained by the HOA all other roads will be within the VDOT public right of way. Note the "no private roads" statement was just for Phase 1, indicating there are no private roads within that portion for the overall project tabulation breakdown. See revised notes and tabulation sheet 1. Comment 10: Senseny Road Improvements. Provide a detail in the MPD that shows the Senseny Road improvements. Response: Please refer to sheet 7 for a detail delineating the proffered improvements for Senseny Road. Comment 11: Riparian Buffers. Show the required riparian buffers for the intermittent streams on the MPD. Response: Please refer to attached "Zoning Determination for Riparian Buffers (Natural Waterways)" dated November 12, 2003. A solid blue line on USGS maps represents a Natural Waterway. Comment 12: Environmental Features. On sheet 3 under the environmental features table, the Phase IV shows .16 acres of wetlands being disturbed but the Phase IV existing acreage shows no wetlands. Response: The Environmental Features tabulations on sheet 3 have been revised to reflect existing acreages and actual disturbed acreages.. File#3924/JT/adf 0 • Comment 13: Buffers. Internal separation buffers are required between townhouse and single-family dwelling lots; the minimum buffer is a 100' full screen. Show the required buffer on the MDP along with a buffer detail. Response: Frederick County Zoning ordinance section 165.37.C.3.states "Interior residential screening - This buffer shall be designated as a continuous landscape easement that will be placed between single family detached traditional and cluster dwelling units and other housing types. The easement shall be at least 10' in depth and contain a double row of evergreen trees. This Easement has be provide and shown on sheet 4. On sheet 5 of your markup, in Phase IV, a residential separation buffer was called out between Phase IV and the Melanie/Corbin parcels. Currently the Zoning ordinance does not require a zoning district buffer between these two uses unless the adjacent land being developed is 133, M1 or M2. Section 165-37.D.4. Comment 14: Waivers. On sheet 5, some of the private streets are labeled as "exceeding 500'. Townhouses can only be located more than 500' from the private road if the Planning Commission grants a waiver, and private roads cannot exceed 800'. Response: The private road network was designed to provide enhanced circulation to allow for free flow traffic movement. The maximum length with loop connection is 1600'. Please refer to attach Waiver request. Comment 1 S: Interparcel Connections. A connection from Lehigh Drive to the adjacent parcel should be provided with this development. Response: Interparcel connection was proffered during the rezoning and is provided from the west side of Lehigh Drive. See sheet 4. Comment 16: Notes. On the coversheet under general notes, provide a statement that public water and sewer is being provided and is available from the Sanitation Authority. Response: Statement provided as requested. See sheet I Please find attached the revised Master Development Plan, requested agency approvals shall be forthcoming. Also attached. is a fee check in the amount of $9,377.00 for your use and review. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns and as always, we thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, Jeremy Tweedie Greenway Engineering Cc: Denver Quinnelly- Quinnelly Group LLC Dave Jordan- Morlyn LLC File#3924/JT/adf COUNTI' of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 November 12, 2003 Mr. Mark D. Smith, PE, LS Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Zoning Determination for Riparian Buffer (NL atural Waterrways) Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated October 28, 2003, to the Zoning Administrator requesting a zoning determination of natural waterways. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance defines Natural Waterways - Creeks, streams, runs or other annual or perennial waterways identified on United States Geological Survey, Commonwealth of Virginia, orFrederick County Map. These natural waterways are represented by a solid blue line on the any of these named maps. You may have the right to appeal this determination within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of the Code of Virginia. This decision shall be final and unappealable, if it is not appealed within thirty (30) days. Should you choose to appeal, the appeal must be filed with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) in accordance with Article )OU, Section 165-155A(1), of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. This provision requires the submission of an application form, a written statement setting forth the decision being appealed, the date of decision, the grounds for the appeal, how the appellant is an aggrieved party, any other information you may want to submit, and a $250.00 filing fee. Once the appeal application is accepted, it will be scheduled for public hearing and decision before the BZA. Please contact me regarding any questions you may have at (540) 665-5651. Sincerely, Mark R. Che — Planner I MRC/bah U/mark/Greenway Engl. WPD 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 § 165-156 ZONING § 165-156 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE — An area provided within a residential recreational community for its residents to store recreational vehicles such as boats, campers, RV's and travel trailers. [Added 8-9-20001 RELATED RESIDENTIAL LAND USE — A dwelling, structure or facility that has a specific affiliation with or whose residents receive a direct benefit from hospitals, medical centers, medical offices, clinics, and schools of medicine. [Added 9-12-20011 RESORT— A facility for transient guests where the primary attraction is recreational features or activities. RESTAURANT — A facility in which food and drinks are prepared, served and consumed. RETAIL PETROLEUM PUMP CANOPY— A roof -like structure designed to cover a retail petroleum pump island. RETAIL USES — Establishments engaged in selling goods or merchandise to the general public for personal or household consumption and rendering services incidental to the sale of such goods. "Retail uses" shall not include coal, wood and lumber yards. REZONE —To change the zoning district classification of a particular lot, parcel or area. RIGHT-OF-WAY — Land dedicated or reserved for or occupied by a road, railroad, utility or other similar use. RIPARIAN BUFFER — An area of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation that permits inundation by water and is at least 35 feet in width, measured outward from both sides of a natural waterway beginning along the slope of the ground from the channel scar line. A riparian buffer is managed to maintain the integrity of stream channels and reduce the effect of upland sources of pollution by trapping, filtering, and converting sediments, nutrients, and other chemicals. [Added 4-23-20031 ROAD — A street dedicated to or owned by Frederick County or the Virginia. Department of Transportation; also, existing privately owned 16705 6 - 10 - 2ooa GREENWAY AINEERING • f 151 Windy Hill lane t Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 1971 October 28, 2003 Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Patrick Davenport Re: Riparian Buffer (Natural Waterway) Dear Mr. Davenport: /*/IECOPy Attached is our application fee of $50 for a zoning interpretation to clarify the definition of: "Natural Waterway". We are requesting this in order to give clear direction to the Greenway Engineering staff on current and future projects As we discussed by phone today, your direction for determination was a t fiJ9gt �J old b%t4. For the record, please forward us a formal interpretation so that we may keep that on file. Thank you for your assistance. Please contact me with any questions or need for additional information. Sincerely, Greenway Engineering ti Mark D. Smith, PE, LS President Enclosure Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 MDS/dlm www,greenwayeng.com COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 November 12, 2003 Mr. Mark D. Smith, PE, LS Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Zoning Determination for Riparian Buffer (Natural Waterways) Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated October 28, 2003, to the Zoning Administrator requesting a zoning determination of natural waterways. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance defines Natural Waterways - Creeks, streams, runs or other annual or perennial waterways identified on United States Geological Survey, Commonwealth of Virginia, or Frederick County Map. These natural waterways are represented by a solid blue line on the any of these named maps. You may have the right to appeal this determination within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of the Code of Virginia. This decision shall be final and unappealable, if it is not appealed within thirty (30) days. Should you choose to appeal, the appeal must be filed with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) in accordance with Article =, Section 165-155A(1), of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. This provision requires the submission of an application form, a written statement setting forth the decision being appealed, the date of decision, the grounds for the appeal, how the appellant is an aggrieved party, any other information you may want to submit, and a $250.00 filing fee. Once the appeal application is accepted, it will be scheduled for public hearing and decision before the BZA. Please contact me regarding any questions you may have at (540) 665-5651. Sincerely, Mark R. Che — Planner I MRC/bah U.'/mark/Green way Engl. WPD r7y' 7r-,. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 § 165-156 ZONING § 165-156 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE — An areaprovided within a residential recreational community for its residents to store recreational vehicles such as boats, campers, RV's and travel trailers. [Added 5-9-20001 RELATED RESIDENTIAL LAND USE -- A dwelling, structure or facility that has a specific affiliation with or whose residents receive a direct benefit from hospitals, medical centers, medical offices; clinics, and schools of medicine. [Added 9-12-20011 RESORT— A facility for transient guests where the primary attraction is recreational features or activities. RESTAURANT— A facility in which food and drinks are prepared, served and consumed. RETAIL PETROLEUM PUMP CANOPY— A roof -like structure designed to cover a retail petroleum pump island. RETAIL USES — Establishments engaged in selling goods or merchandise to the general public for personal or household consumption and rendering services incidental to the sale of such goods. "Retail uses" shall not include coal, wood and lumber yards. REZONE —To change the zoning district classification of a particular lot, parcel or area. RIGHT-OF-WAY— Land dedicated or reserved for or occupied by a road, railroad, utility or other similar use. RIPARIAN BUFFER -- An area of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation that permits inundation by water and is at least 35 feet in width, measured outward from both sides of a natural waterway beginning along the slope of the ground from the channel scar line. A riparian buffer is managed to maintain the integrity of stream channels and reduce the effect of upland sources -of pollution by trapping, filtering, and converting sediments, nutrients, and other chemicals. [Added 4-23-20031 ROAD -- A street dedicated to or owned by Frederick County or the Virginia. Department of Transportation; also, existing privately owned 16705 6 -10 - 2003 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 S E P 2 6 2006 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Senseny Village -Rezoning File No: _3924 Date: September 26, 2006 To: FC Planning Attn: Candice Perkins Copied Delivery: r— Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 IF Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Urgent Q For Your Review F As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message Candice, Attached is the following for the above project: -Rezoning application / -Signed/notarized Special Limited Power of Attorney / -44 11 x 17 color copies of the Generalized Development Plan A (5o aN�ed 44 copies of the Master Development Plan As always, thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions or need for additional information. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: 0 • GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 SEP 2 6 2006 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Senseny Village -Rezoning File No: 3924 Date: September 26, 2006 To: FC Planning Attn: Candice Perkins Copied Delivery: r Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 P1 Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Urgent Q For Your Review IF As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message Candice, Attache the folio g for the abo project: -Rez mg appl' ion Z�l ed/not zed Special mited Power of Attorney " 7" color co ' s of the Generalized Development Plan M60 akacIled 44 copies of the Master Development Plan As always, thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions or need for additional information. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: 0 • /!:N GREENWAY ENGINEERING %47 151 Windy Hill Lane (rounded in i q; i Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANS MIT TAL Project Name: Senseny Village File No: 3924 Date 8-7-06 To: FC Planning Jeremy Tweedie Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied 540-722-9528 AUG 7 2006 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Please find attached the following: I. 1 copy of the site area from the Stephenson USGS Quad Map 11. Zoning Determination for Riparian Buffer As discussed the USGS map shows only on intermittent stream on site and which I've highlighted in pink. The intermittent area is not an annual or perennial stream. Should you have any questions please call. Upon your review please let me know if this satisfies the final comment from the Planning Department for Senseny Village MDP Thank you for assistance Jeremy Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: r GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village MDP File No: 4090 Date 8-2-06 To: FC Planning Jeremy Tweedie Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied 540-722-9528 AUG 2 2006 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Candice, Please find attached the following Approval from FCSA Should you have any questions or need additional information please call. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: Fax from : 5408681061 • FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY P.O. ]Box 1877 Winchester. VA 22604-g377 pF. Wc111rtgtnn H. Jones, ROBERT P. NIOWERY. C.P.A.. Chairman Engineer -Director Ph. - (_so) t1-1061 FYz - (540) %8-1429 TE COPIERIFAX T_RANSMITT L PAGE DATE: UG D TRANSNUTTAL TIME: PLEASE DELIVER TFIIS AGE S IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: COMPAti'Y: CITY, STATE: TELECOPMR. #: REFERENCE: TOTAL NLJMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: _ IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (540) 868-1,061. MESSAGE: FROM: WATER AT YOUR SERVICE TELEPHONE; (540) 868-IQ61 FAX NUMBER: 540 86 1429 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane J U N 2 g 2006 Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Senseny Village - Senseny Road File No: 3924 Date: Wed, Jun 28, 2006 To: Frederick County Planning 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attn: Candice Perkines Copied File Delivery: r- Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other From: Jeremy Tweedie/adf GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 F Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Urgent 0 For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message Candice, Please find attached: 1 set of the revised MDP per your comments Application review fee in the amount of $9379.00 Comment response letter Master Deveolpment Plan App Waiver request for private streets Zoning Determination for Reparian Buffers Rezoning App for revised GDP 2 copies of the revised GDP Should you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you for your assistance. Jeremy Tweedie Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: GREENWAY ENGINEERING Ma I 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 L- Founded in 1971 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village -Master Development Plan File No: 3924 Date May 15, 2006 To: FC Planning From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm Attn: Mike Ruddy GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review Message: ® Courier ® As You Requested Mike, Attached is the following for the above project: -Master Development Plan application -Application fee check for $9,379.00 -Signed/notarized Special Limited Power of Attorney form -Planning comment response form -44 copies of the Master Development Plan Thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: ❑ Pick Up ❑ Please Comment • • /:N GREENWAY ENGINEERING %47 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village -Master Development Plan File No: 3924 Date April 5, 2006 To: FC Planning From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm Attn: Mike Ruddy GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Dave Jordan-Morlyn, LLC Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Mike, Attached is the following for your cursory preliminary review: -3 copies of the Master Development Plan As always, thank you for your assistance. Contact us with any questions or concerns. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: Please Print Name: /t\ GREENWAY ENGINEERING %47 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village -Master Development Plan File No: 3924 Date April 5, 2006 To: FC Planning From: Jeremy Tweedie/dlm Attn: `Mike Ruddy GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Dave Jordan-Morlyn, LLC Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Mike, Attached is the following for your cursory preliminary review: -3 copies of the Master Development Plan As always, thank you for your assistance. Contact us with any questions or concerns. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: Please Print Name: Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice r V - h Bernie Mark Susan Eric Mike Kevin John Lauren COMMENTS: VN'C" Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): �Q U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd W DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION S)(ftt IS FREDERIgK COUNTY, VIRGWIA w S E REQUESTING AGENT: Department, Agency, or Company:_ Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS WORK REQUEST DATE RECEIVED: /0,/ TED COMPLETION DATE: /0 1":4 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Write additional information on back of request) COL- ok mfl�'S /3 -0(- C�- "P k- l'�-o, SFN actu y V I LL-46-C DIGITAL: SIZES: COLOR: PAPER: FAX: E-MAIL: BLACKJWHITE: NUMBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UP/DELIVERY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYMENT: HOURS REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NO.# Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5651) ra• L gingSta u• i \\ 656 ( It n co ;h l 650 50 � • ..Y,q` V- �,— 'Gieenwood' _• fieighis- 623 ,I - - - _ it � �� I� -, _ - ��\ � � •�'� � � '� �J l �� go 655 Li Tw 71 o rl , r r,rS ra O` '0 i Outs 644 63 7 l - ;r Old Salem Ohm VA • ) J •�� \`/tom f ) 5 ' - ! i• 6/3 ` _1� 1 F - �� `� �, y 9 A.tti j arpers Valley ` j ✓/ V J J TO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING FROM : BEV - PI nning Dept. Pleas print sets of I �� THANKS�� THANKSI ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMA I ivIv Owner Deed Book and Page or Instrument number 7PIN Zone Use A 65B-7-10 Rand L Ruble 020016145 RP Residence B 65d-1-1. Connie:B.'Linaweaver 606/444 RP Residence C 65D-2-4 Swa ler H II and Brenda S Koonce 866/220 RP Residence D 65D-2-5 Bettie G Brumback c/oBe Kisner 770/1278 RP Residence E' 65D-2-6 Bettie G Brumback c/oBettie G Brumback 770/1278 RP Residence— F 65D-2-7 EI nne Godlove 020009910 RP Residence— G 65D-2-8 Maureen E. Smith 04001.1444 RP Residence H 65D-2-9 Duane A & Priscilla McDonald 020014474 RP Residence /J 65D-2-10A Glenmont Village Association 614/802 RP Green Space K 65D-3-4-53 Morel,Micheal, Josephf RP Residence L 65D-3.4-54 RG McDonald Properties, LC 000005484 RP Residence M 65D-3-4-59A Glenmont Village Association 614/802 RP Green Space N - 65D-4-5-71 Valle View Associates, LLC 010017503 RP Residence 0 65Q-5-6-76 c ee, is ar augin RP Residence P 65D-5-6-77 Ramon & Wilson Drucker 050018497 RP Residence O 65D-5.6-78 Yolanda Funes 050012670 RP Residence R 65D-5-6-79 Maria R & Yon A Cruz Santos 040025966 RP Residence S 65D-5-6-80 a enzue a, ector Perez RP Residence. T 65D-5.6-81 Ma Janeczek 853/1382 RP Residence U 65D-5-6-82 Calvin R Jr & Michelle Hunt 852/591. RP Residence V, 65D-5-6-83 Donald E Nesselrodt 7221716 RP Residence W ; 65D-5-6-84 Dawn L White 010013827 RP Residence. X. 65D-5-6-85 Kim V & Carol S Ross 724118 RP Residence Y: 65D-5-6-86 James J & Rebecca L Fitzgibbon 723/338 RP Residence Z 65D-5-6-87 William Roy050021488 RP Residence AA 65D-5-6-88 Daniel & Monica O'Hara 030011096 RP Residence BB 65D-5-6-89 GaryLinden Adams & Juanita Spielman 7251724 RP Residence CC 65-A-50 Maurice M Atkins 5821756 RP Residence DD 65-A-54 Rand Lee & Ma F Ruble 03000577 RP Residence EE 65-A-56 Winifred D & JerryU d ke 040005558 RP. Residence FF_ 65-A-57 Genevieve M Cline. B105/636 RP Residence GG 65-A-60 Daniel & Jenifer Lafond1040012117 RP Residence HH- 65-A-62 Donald L & Delores V. Roles 878/1398 RP Residence It: 65-A-63 Robert D: & Fletcher H. Smith 030014240 RP Residence JJ. 65-A-70 Paul R. Puff inbur er 404/335 RP Residence KK • 65-A-66 Feathers, Vick Lynn & Richard A 957/979 RP Residence LL' 65-A-65 Marvin L. & AI son M. Swaner 850/838 RP Residence MM 65-A-71 Hesham F.. & Khalif N.S. Attia 030016515 RP Residence NN 65-A-68A Lewis F. Franklin, JR. 682/791 RP Residence 00 65-B-6-38 Maurice M. Atkins 582/756 RP. Residence 65-A-72 EFG Investments, LLC 955/724 RA Unimproved 65-A-1868 Ronald F & Melanie J Werdebau h 000006836 RA Residence . 65-A-186J Gloria C Corbin 818/1831 RA Residence ✓ 65-A-190 Wilmer R & Donna N Davis 757/923 RA Unimproved