The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-83 Ronnie Ward - Glen Mont Village - Backfile (2)�F- 4)dAw-, Ab ?zo-� -* COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development 703;665-56561 FAX 703 / 667-0370 August 21, 1989 Mr. Ron Ward P.O. Box 2071 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Ward: This letter is to confirm the Frederick County Planning Commission's action at their meeting of August 2, 1989: Approval of the Subdivision Plat of Glenmont Village, Section VII, 7.147 acres, for 21 single—family cluster lots. This property is located on the south side of Route 657 (Senseny Road), 1.6 miles east of intersection of Route 656, in the Shawnee Magisterial District. The change has been noted to allow 21 single—family cluster lots instead of 48 multiplex housing units as originally indicated on the master development plan. If you have any questions regarding your subdivision, please do not hesitate to call this office. Sincerely, Kris C. Tierney Planning Deputy Director KCT/dkg cc: Greenway Engineering 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 .COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 February 28, 1984 Mr. Ronnie Ward P.O. Box 2071 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Ward: This letter is to confirm the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' action at their meeting of February 22, 1984: Approval of Final Master Development Plan #001-83 of Ronnie Ward/ Glen Mont Village for the construction of approximately 135 single- family detached cluster units and 48 multiplex units on 71.02 acres located on Senseny Road, .85 miles west of Opequon Creek, in the Shawnee Magisterial District. If you have any questions regarding your Final Master Development Plan, please do not hesitate to call me. Soincerel , o n T. P. Horne Director JTPH/rsa 9 Court Souare - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 I • 0 APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA DATE: APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT/AGENT: BGW Inc.* Ronnie Ward ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 2071 Winchester, Virginia 22601 PHONE: 662-3484 The following checklist serves solely to aid the staff, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors in reviewing your application. Please complete this checklist and submit it with your proposal. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Location of property: Southern side of Senseny Road (St. Pt. 657) approxi- mately .85 miles West of Marke oun y. p Tax Ma 65 A_2 33-4 1 2. Propertytax ma and identification number:, P 7-R-Q- 0 . Previous zon - 3. Property zoning and present use: Present Performance zoning 4. Adjoining property zoning and present use: Agricultural and (R-3) Performance zoning . 5. Proposed uses: Approximate l3 s'n le family cluster and approximately 24 . units PL 6. Magisterial District: Sha e PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS 1. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? original 2. Is the Master Development Plan to be waived? yes no X 3. Is the scale shown on Master Development Plan? yesX no 4. What is the total area of property? +/- 71.024 Acres 5. Is the north arrow shown on Master Development Plan? yesX no 6. Is boundary survey certified? yes X no 7. Is topography shown? yes X no 8. What is the contour interval? 9. What is the development's name? *BGW Inc. is a Virginia Corporation owned by: Frank H . Brumback f William Gilliam William R. Ward, Jr. 2 Foot Glenmont Village (May be changed) Page 2 1 ,r r PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTENTS 1. Are all land uses clearly shown (housing types)? yesX no 2. Are all environmental requirements shown? yesX no- - Floodplains ...................... See - Lakes and ponds ................... Preliminary - Wetlands ........................ Plan - Natural stormwater retention acres - Steep Stops (6-15) .... (15-25) ......... 25.or more,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Woodlands ................................... 3. Is open space shown? Total Percent I Amount in I acres disturbed open space 14. 11 n 17.39 3.38 197 15.0 8. 19 yes X no- - What is total amount of open space? +/- 27.32 Acres - What percent is the open space of the total property? App. 7.5 % 4. Are recreational facilities required? 5. What housing types are proposed? Single Family Cluster , Multi-p lex 6. Are bonus regulations being proposed? What are they?: - Recreational facilities (15%) - Woodlands (150) - Landscaping (15%) - Solar access (10%) - Solar construction (15%) - Pedestrian/bike path (10%) - Pedestrian/bike path connector.(15%) 7. Are buffers required? - from single family dwellings - from roads 8. Are screens proposed? - from single family dwellings - from roads 9. Are active or inactive buffers proposed? Active X 10. Are all buffers and screens shown on the Master Development Plan? 11. Are the following items shown? General street layout Parking areas - will be shown on final plat Entrances - Utilities - will be shown on final plat yes no X yes_ noX yes_ noX yes_ noT- yes noX- yes_ no7- yes_ noX yes_ noX yes noX yes X no yes X no yes no — yes X no yes X no yes no— Inactive — yes X no yes X no_ yes no_ yeses no yes no_ 1 IV P&ge 3 11. Are proposed sections or phases of development shown? yesX no 12. Is the open space shown for each section or' phase? yesX no 13. What is the amount of open space in each section or phase? See the attached plat, r GENERAL CHECKLIST 1. Is open space proposed to be decreased for bonus? yes no X 2. What is the amount of decrease? 3. Are any lots proposed to be averaged? yes X no 4. Have parking spaces per unit proposed (by bedrooms) been checked? Will be shown on final plat, yes no X PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION/CHECKLIST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH 10 COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Noted Changes or Corrections to the Master Development Plan: APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE / COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA DATE: APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT/AGENT: BGW Inc.* Ronnie Ward ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 2071 Winchester, Virginia 22601 PHONE: 662-3484 The following checklist serves solely to aid the staff, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors in reviewing your application. Please complete this checklist and submit it with your proposal. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Location of property: Southern side of Senseny Road (St. Rt. 657) approxi- mately .85 miles West of Clarke otin y. p Tax Ma 65 A l-2- -4- 2. Propertytax ma and identification number., P 6-7- -q- 0 Previous zon - 3. Property zoning and present use: Present Performance zoning 4. Adjoining property zoning and present use: Agricultural and (R-3) Performance zoning 5. Proposed uses: Approximate 1y,13� single family cluster and approximately 24 uniLs ot Mu t tI-plex. 6. Magisterial District: Shawnee PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS 1. Is this an original or amended Master Development' Plan? original 2. Is the Master Development Plan to be waived? yes no X 3. Is the scale shown on Master Development Plan? yes X no 4. What is the total area of property? +/- 71.024 Acres 5. Is the north arrow shown on Master Development Plan? yesX no 6. Is boundary survey certified? yes X no 7. Is topography shown?. yes X no 8. What is the contour interval? 2 Foot 9. What is the development's name? Glenmont Village (May be changed) *BGW Inc, is a Virginia Corporation owned by: Frank H. Brumback William Gilliam William R. Ward, Jr. Page 2 •F PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTENTS 1. Are all land uses clearly shown (housing types)? 2. Are all environmental requirements shown? - Floodplains ............ ... ... See - Lakes and ponds .................. Preliminary - Wetlands ........................ Plan - Natural stormwater retention acres - Steep SLopBS (.8-15) .............. . (15 — .25) ......... 25 . or more ............. . . . Woodlands ............................. . 3. Is open space shown? yesX no_ yesX no Total acres Percent disturbed Amount in open spac 0 0 0 3.14 0.. 14.91 n 7. 3.35 15.0 S. 9 19 yes X no- - What is total amount of open space? +/- 27.32 Acres - What percent is the open space of the total property? App. .5 % 4. Are recreational facilities required? 5. What housing types are proposed? Single Family Cluster , Multi-plex 6. Are bonus regulations being proposed? What are they?: - Recreational facilities (15%) - Woodlands (15%) - Landscaping (15%) - Solar access (10%) - Solar construction (15%) - Pedestrian/bike path (10%) - Pedestrian/bike path connector (15%) 7. Are buffers required? - from single family dwellings - from roads 8. Are screens proposed? - from single family dwellings - from roads 9. Are active or inactive buffers proposed? Active X 10. Are all buffers and screens shown on the Master Development Plan? 11. Are the following items shown? - General street layout - Parking areas - will be shown on final plat - Entrances - Utilities - will be shown on final plat yes no X yes noX yes noX yes noX— yes noX— yes_ now yes_ noX yes_ noX yes noX yes X no yes X no yes j( no yes X no_ yes X no yes no Inactive yes X no yes X no yes no_ yes-T no yes_ no Page 3 11. Are proposed sections or phases of development shown? yes X no 12. Is the open space shown for each section or phase? yes X no 13. What is the.amount of open space in each section or phase? See the attached plat. . GENERAL CHECKLIST 1. Is open space proposed to be decreased for bonus? 2. What is the amount of decrease? 3. Are any lots proposed to be averaged? 4. Have parking spaces per unit proposed (by bedrooms) been checked? Will be shown on final plat. yes no X yes X no yes no X PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION/CHECKLIST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH 10 COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Noted Changes or Corrections to the Master Development Plan: 0 Preliminary Master Development Plan Ronnie Ward/Glen Mont',Village Approximately 135 Single -Family Detached Cluster Units and 20 Multiplex Units LOCATION: Senseny Road, .85 miles west of Opequon Creek MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS: approximately�135 single family multiplex units, required open Develop 71.02 acres with detached, cluster units and 24 space, and state maintained roads. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: The environmental features present on this site arewoodlands, natural stormwater retention areas, and steep slopes. The western portion of the site is open grasslands and will be developed first. The eastern and southern portions are heavily wooded with a mixture of hardwoods and pines and would be developed at a later date. The southern portion falls away very steeply to a tributary of Opequon Creek in an area which acts as a natural stormwater retention area.. Housing will be centered on a series of rises or plateaus on the property and open spaces will be centered in existing natural drainage channels which drain this site and a very small area to the west. Two open areas exist in the grassland areas where the proposal will be to allow existing vegetation to remain. Maintenance will consist of periodic mowing and should not be a burden to the home owners. Additional open areas are within the heavily wooded areas and should not require maintenance by home owners. The.most significant environmental limitation on development of the housing and open areas is the steep slopes: A very high percentage of the open space areas are in steep slopes. The ordinance calls .for no more than 50% of the open space to be in steep slopes, wetlands, or lakes and ponds. It has come to the staff's attention during the review of this application that slopes of 8-15% are very useable as open space. Given that determination, the administrator would recommend that open spaces within the range of 8-15% be permitted on this site. The staff would also recommend that the Residential, Performance Article be amended to reflect the need to allow 8-15% slopes in common open space with no limitations. The existing ordinance does give the administrator the authority to.allow a greater percentage of the open space into steep slopes; and therefore, for the current proposal, the administrator would propose to use that clause. y Page 2 Preliminary MDP, Ronnie Ward December 15, 1983 This proposal includes bonus factors which are to be used for the preservation of existing woodlands significantly over and above the 80% preservation required in the ordinance. It is anticipated that approximately 19% of the woodland areas would be disturbed and therefore, the administrator would recommend that the Commission approve this particular bonus factor. The applicant also wishes to allow to apply for a 30% reduction in the required 200' buffer between the multiplex units and the single-family detached units due to the provision of partial screening. The existing heavily wooded area between these two types of housing units would be the proposed screen. The staff has determined that this wooded area does present a 50% or more opaque screen which would be eligible for the partial screening buffer reduction. The overall design of this site will meet the intent of the Residential Performance Article of the Zoning Ordinance in that all environmental requirements are being met and the open space that is included on the site will be useful and maintainable to the home owners association. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval of the Preliminary Master Development Plan. The Final Master Development Plan must be prepared in conformance with this Preliminary Master Development Plan and will be advertised for public meeting in February. Y"v 72 73 EE COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 March 17, 1995 Glenmont Village Homeowners' Assoc. P.O. Box 3266 Winchester, VA 22604 Attn: Mr. Richard E. Crane, President Dear Mr. Crane: On March 17, 1995 I visited the property of Mr. Jay Banks at 220 Glenridge Drive to evaluate a situation concerning a large dead oak tree in the common area behind his home. I am aware that you had previously dealt with this situation and your Board of Directors decided not to remove the tree as had been requested. My evaluation is that the tree is an existing hazard and should be removed. Mr. Banks has agreed to completely clean up the wood and debris from the tree if someone will just put it on the ground. I respectfully request that the Homeowners' Association deal with this by having the tree cut down. Failing that, I will have a professional fell the tree and charge the cost of doing that to the Association. This is the appropriate procedure as outlined in section 144-32 E. of the Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance. I will be available to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, W. Wayne iller Zoning Administrator be: W. Harrington Smith, Jr., Shawnee District Supervisor Mr. Jay S. Banks 107 North Kent Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 `, • 0 March 14, 1995 Mr. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator County of Frederick 107 North Kent Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Miller: J`', Q z L17 LLI Z W �J P Z d UQ W U) ^ v W a I would like your help in trying to resolve an extremely unsafe condition that exists on the Common Area directly behind my residence. There is a large 70 foot Oak tree within 10 feet of the rear property line that has been dead for two years. I have tried to work this out with the Homeowners Association but have been unsuccessful, see enclosed letter. I am not willing to assume liability for what is clearly the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. I would appreciate your assistance in clearing this matter up as quickly as possible. Please feel free to contact me at 665-2779. Sincerely, ay S. Banks 220 Glenridge Drive Winchester, VA 22602 JSB/encl 0 GLENMONT VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOC. PO BOX 3266 WINCHESTER , VIRGINIA 22604 703-667-1553 January 21, 1995 Mr. Jay Banks 220 Glenridge Dr. Winchester Virginia 22602 Dear Mr. Banks: Dead Tree in Common Area Dick Crane, President Marty Barley, Vice Pres. Butch Holliday, Secretary Chris Geraghty, Treasurer Elden Nesselrodt, Architecture/Grounds Several months ago, you showed me a dead tree in the common area behind the house you live in. The Board of Directors decided not to remove the tree. We voted instead, to offer you the tree. You may cut the tree down and keep the wood for your personal use. We ask, however, that you remove unusable debris or push it down the hill to decay naturally. Don`t hesitate to call me at the above phone number with any question or comments. Sincerely, Richard E. Crane, President APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST FOR FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA DATE: Febuuary 4, 1984 APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT/AGENT: BGW */ Ronnie Ward ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 2071 Winchester, VA PHONE: 662-3484 The following checklist serves solely to aid the staff, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors in reviewing your application. Please complete this checklist and submit it with your proposal. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1 . Location of property: Southern side of Senseny Road (State Route 657) approximately .85 miles West -oT--C1-a-r-k-e-L-ou-nTy v1rg1n1a. 2. Property tax map and identification number: #65 A 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 . 3. Property zoning and use: Performance Zoning 4. Adjoining property zoning and use: Agricultural and (R-3) Performance Zonin 5. Proposed, use:__ Approximately 135 - single family cluster 6. Magisterial District: Shawnee. 7. Preliminary Master Development Plan Application #: 8. Was Preliminary Master Development Plan approved by Planning Commission? 9. Have all comments by staff and Planning Commission been addressed for the Final Master Development Plan? FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS 1. Does this plan conform with, the Preliminary Master Development Plan? 2. Note any major changes made: NONE 3. Are adjoining uses and roads shown? 4. Are drainage easements and improvements shown? %',BGW, Inc. is a Virginia Corporation owned by: Frank H. Brumback, J. William Gilliam, William R. Ward, Jr. yes X no yes X no yes X no 1-2 Yl Um be't- 1.P. '-ypC-- yes X no yes X no f Y 4 .. 'Page 2 • 5. Have all calculations been submitted? es ✓ no - Disturbance - Open space/density - Others . 6. Is the approval block shown? y SAME N' Swf3na rD yes ✓ no W TH IOA; L,rninVAr4-s" yes v no �, yes ,,no tVI 1 5 t� p yes L,,- no FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTENTS 1. Are existing subdivisions shown? r/dr'yes no 2. Are phases and sections shown? yes ✓ no 3.. Are .all common elements shown? yes ✓ no 4. Are phases and sections economically sound? yes ✓ no FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS AND IMPROVEMENTS 1. Have site plans required for Bonus Improvements been included? tV. �) . yes no 2. Conference review by Department of Planning and Development? yes_ no` PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION/CHECKLIST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH 10 COP.IES OF THE FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Final Master Development Plan Ronnie Ward/Glen Monte Village Approximately 135 Single -Family Detached Cluster Units and 48 Multiplex Units LOCATION: Senseny Road, .85 miles west of Opequon Creek MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS: Develop 71.02 acres with approximately 135 single family detached, cluster units and 48 multiplex units, required open space, and state maintained roads. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: This Final Master Development Plan is in accord with the approved Preliminary Master Development Plan, with the exception of an increase in the number of multiplex units. The units will, however, be within the same area approved on the Preliminary MDP. The environmental features present on this site are woodlands, natural stormwater retention areas,- and steep slopes. The western portion of the site is open grasslands and will be developed first. The eastern and southern portions are.heavily wooded with a mixture of hardwoods and pines and would be developed at a later date. The southern portion falls away very steeply to a tributary of Opequon Creek in an area which acts as a natural stormwater retention area. Housing will be centered on a series of rises or plateaus on the property and open spaces will be centered in existing natural drainage channels which drain this site and a very small area to the west. Two open areas exist in the grassland areas where the proposal will be to allow existing vegetation to remain. Maintenance will consist of periodic mowing and should not be a burden to the home owners. Additional open areas are within the heavily wooded areas and should not require maintenance by home owners. The most significant environmental limitation on development of the housing and open areas is the steep slopes. A high percentage of the open space areas are in steep slopes. A smaller percentage of these spaces, however, are in excess of 15% slopes. The staff has recommended a change in the Residential Performance District Ordinance to classify only those slopes over 15% as steep slopes. Page 2 Final MDP, Ronnie Ward February 16, 1984 Below that percentage, the slopes are quite usable as open space. The existing ordinance does give the administrator the authority to allow a greater percentage of the open space into steep slopes; and therefore, for the current proposal, the administrator would propose to use that clause. The overall design of this site will meet the intent of the Residential Performance Article of the Zoning Ordinance in that all environmental requirements are being met and the open space that is included on the site will be useful and maintainable to the home owners association. (see attached plan) STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval of the Final Master Development Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval by the following vote: YES: Mrs. Copenhaver and Messrs. McDonald, Stiles, Myers, Golladay, DeHaven, Kirk, Romine ABSTAIN: Mr. Brumback 0 OiA`t `rah. }Zi� } F`,4 ;(',; �' -�� 5 .`i <�++(Yyi �'. ti".+ /rF� e 4 -:N', T 41 E y SENSEN —�-�s�- s63. Oo�E -� Z6 5 (o/°OZ'39"E S 7 /50 70 SG8°33'34"E.... _ �Qs, 3 70' A h 0 lk T M n .� �Op D,P/YE 40 r\Iti 0 � '�Zj h /0.000 .4 CRES E2 �5�1 i PAP_ O OAKMONT Q� �W V IQ � Q op M 6EOR GE SUBDIVISION APPROVED DATE SDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR Oct^ Z " SEw-V G /NE L CN CERTIFICATE 0. 54-17.3 (8)965 $ 417.E (b)162�� cANU 9 PLlJT OF ,4 PO,PT/ON OF THE LAND of 8.4 TT.4/L E 4NO 60040E Sf/Al�Yi1/EE D/STEP/lT, FWZWZEP/CX` COUNTY, VA loo'—M,4Y 7, /984 P,PEG/AZI-0 BY G,PEENli�4Y ENG/NEED?/NG ANO SZIRW Y/NG CO./NC. W/NCHESTE-P, V1,,PG/N/A s The accompanying plat represents a survey of a portion of the land conveyed to William M. Battaile by deed dated May 25, 1971 and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 376 at Page 575. The said land fronts the south side of Virginia Route 657 (Senseney.Road) about 3 miles east of the City of Winchester in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia and is bounded as follows: Beginning at a point at the intersection of Routes 736 and 657; thence with the southern boundary line of Virginia Route 657 (Senseney Road) for the 5 follwoing courses S6302610011E - 62.67' to a point; thence S610021391E - 150.70' to a point; thence S71039'04"E - 150.70' to a point; thence S6202711811E - 150.33' to a point; thence S68033'3411E - 28.45' to a point in the southern boundary line of Virginia 657 (Senseney Road) and corner to the Retained Portion; thence with the Retained Portion for the 5 following courses S4004810911E - 97.71' to a point; thence S42°33'37W - 145.00' to a point; thence S26°00'37"W - 42.06, to a point; thence S38°0512311W - 185.71' to a point; thence S6101214811W - 417.79' to a point corner to the Retained Portion and in a line of George Lambert; thence with said Lambert N7202211211W - 413.50' to a point corner to said Lambert and in the east boundary line of Virginia Route 736; thence with the east boundary line of Virginia Route 736 for the 2 following courses N30°59127"E - 766.09' to a point; thence N7304614411E - 44.03' to the beginning. Containing. . . . . . . 10.000 Acres Surveyed. . . . . . . . May 8, 1984 Ta DIP 454'�'S' �x 43 IL MCI CERTIFICATE NO. 54.17.3 (8)965 lk-14.��"LAND 1"•3 (b)162/ 7d hn tkI-rw_ Edinburg,, g,, VA 22824 984-4133 March 2, 1984 Ref . Gles unt Village Subdiv. itt. 736 - Frederick Co. Mr. Ronnie Wand Delow Bayliss Peal Estate P.O. Brno 3068 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Donnie, 1. -he right-of-way should be broken across the con-ers of each street c omection as notes?. We would prefer 50' right-of- way width for the streets; however, the 40' shown is accept- able in accordance with the Subdivision standards for cul de sac streets of fixed vehicular generation. 2. A 201 drainage easement is required opposite station 2 + 20 Edgewood Drive and extaoding from back of Lot No. 1 to exist- ing pond 3. The two (2) sewer manholes in the cul de sac should be moved outside of the payment. 4. Plastic soil reinforcing flat (F iuwrat) is r+eoo mended in all ditch lines and drainage easersents, for erosion control. (See Note %, . S added to plum). Base depth will be determined by a CBR tit conducted by the Virginia Department of Hi& ays toad Transportation at your expense. These tests require approximately two (2) weeks. Therefore, it is suMested you re- quest these tests prior to placing tre base st mie or after the rough grading has been completed. A pe=xtt must be applied for and amnvv+ed for the ends that enter onto the states' right-of-way before work is started on the rich -of - way. Mr. Ronnie Ward -2- Edinhxg. VA 22824 984-4U3 March 2, 1984 Enclosed you will find a copy of mirdm= requirwents and data needed for subdivision streets prior to acceptance onto the states' seowAlaxy Mum. This is your responsibility. I an returning one (1) set of plans with our caments and recc m endations marched in red. If you have anry additional questions please feel free to can me. Sincerely, W.H. Buslzmm Resident Ezrineer By: Keith I1. Walker hisPector KILT/ lw cc: Mr. Paul P. Cecchini M.E. Maddox Bruce Ede Jolts T.P. P,orne Subdivision street&y be considered eligible fc cceptance into the State Secondary System when built according to plans approved by the Department of Highways and Transportation, properly maintained since completion and rendering a public service. (Public service is generally defined as serving three (3) occupied dwellings.) The following is to be furnished to the County Subdivision Administrator at least three (3) days prior to the adoption of the resolution by the Board of Supervisiors requesting the addition. One (1) copy of plans showing: Roadway geometries Drainage.and drainage easements Date and place of recordation, Deed Book number, and page number Three (3) copies of final plat. Maintenance fee - check payable to "Treasurer of Virginia". Maintenance fee is required based on -the length of the streets being taken into the system from the date of acceptance to June-30, (the end of the fiscal year). No maintenance fee is required if the addition is effective July 1st. Less than k mile - at the rate of $300.00 per year @ $25.00 per month.. k mile to ' mile - at the rate of $600.00 per year @ $50.00 per month. Over k mile - at the rate of $1200.00 per mile per year prorated monthly. ::Bond to guarantee workmanship and materials for one year from date of acceptance. Less than mile - $3750.00 k mile to mile - $7500.00 Over k mile - at the rate of $15,000.00, per mile Signed permits covering all utilities, publicly or privately owned, to occupy or cross the right of way and quit claiming any prior rights are in hand to be processed after route numbers are assigned. Additions will be made effective only,,,on the first of the month. All data is to be in the hands of the Department of Highways and Trans- portation by the 20th of the proceeding month. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 June 30, 1983 Mr. John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator Frederick County P.O. Box 601, 9 Court Square Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Riley: As Chairman of the Frederick County Planning Commission, I am making the following disclosure as required by the 1983 Conflict of Interest Act (Code of Virginia, 1950) as amended, Section 2.1-610, and Section 2.1-613C. There is currently a petition for rezoning from BGW partnership scheduled for public hearing before the Frederick County Planning Commission on August 3, 1983. The petitioner is requesting that 71 acres, more or less, be rezoned from R-3 (Single Family Residential). to R-MH (Residential Mobile Home Park). I represent forty percent (40%) interest in this partnership. BGW partnership does have an option to purchase said 71 acres subject to the rezoning being approved by the Frederick County Planning Commission and Frederick County Board of Supervisors. It is therefore m intent to s f y publicly disclose this interest and to further state for the public record that I have relinquished the chair on the Commission for this matter and abstain from any role or discussion on this matter. It should be further noted that when this matter appeared before the Planning Commission on July 6, 1983, I did relinquish the chair and stated publicly for the record that I abstained from the discussion. I now formally request that this written disclosure be on file in your office for the next five years and be open for inspection by the public. I would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Frank Brumback, Chairman Frederick County Planning Commission FB/rsa _ 9 Court Square -. P.O, Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601