Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-91 Ft Collier Indus Pk (Revised) - Stonewall - Backfile (2)
FORT COLLIER GROUP PARTNERSHIP agrees to reserve a 508 way for ingress/egress and easements for required utilities risnt-o=_ 89 on tax map 54 (Lockhart) based on the following onditi ns:�t 1. Location determined by FCGP 2. Lot 89 owner or assigns will be responsible for design and construction costs relating to said right-of-way and utilities. 3. Granting of said right-of-way will be contingent upon rezoning of Lot 89 to M-1 Industrial category. 4. Upon granting of said right-of-way, the owners of Lot 89 will pay 1/5th of the design, acquisition and construction costs of the road and utilities from Fort Collier property line to Route 11 (proposed Park Center Drive entrance). 5. In order for this agreement to be valid, owners of Lot 89 must agree to grant necessary utility and drainage easements for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. 6. At the time of granting of right-of-way, Lot 89 owners agree to place on record covenants substantially in accordance with Fort Collier covenants for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. Said covenants applying to Lot 89. 7. Said right-of-way will be limited to use of Lot 89 only and restricted for industrial traffic only. The right-of-way will end in a cul-de-sac in lot 89 and will only serve lot 89. rczs«�, f," COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 January 25, 1999 JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984 5600 FAX(540)984-5607 Mr. Ralph Beeman Ref: Fort Collier Industrial Park (Lot 32 Plat) C/O Greenway, Inc. Route 1320 (West Brooke Road) 151 Windy Hill Lane Frederick County Winchester, VA 22602 A VDOT review of the referenced subdivision plat dated January 12, 1999 has been completed. The plat appears to be satisfactory and is approved by this letter. Enclosed please find the signed plats. Once available, please provide a copy of the signed recordation plat for our records. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely G✓'t�t� Barry J. Sweitze Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer RECEIVED JAN 2 6 1999 DEPT, OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 October 2, 1998 To Whom It May Concern: This is to certify that the parcel of land in the Fort Collier Industrial Park identified by Property Identification Number (PIN) 54-A-361, also known as Lot 42, which has the address of 265 West Brooke Road, is the location of a Southeastern Container Corporation facility. This same land is zoned M1 (Light Industrial). The manufacturing process being conducted there by Southeastern Container Corporation is a permitted use in the M1 Zoning District. contact me with any additional questions. Eric R. Lawrence, AICP, CZA Zoning Administrator 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 BURR P. HARRISON 1904-1973 WILLIAM A.JOHNSTON H. K.BENHAM = BILLY 1.TISINGER IAN R.D.WILLIAMS CHARLES S.MCCANDLISH BRUCE E. DOWNING TRAVIS JOSEPH TISINGER HARRISON 8 JOHNSTON ATTORNEYS AT LAW POST OFFICE BOX 809 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 September 30, 1998 STREET ADDRESS: 21 S.LOUDOUN STREET WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA 22601 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 540 667-1266 FAX NO. 540-G67-1312 Mr. Eric Lawrence, Zoning Administrator Frederick County By Hand Dear Mr. Lawrence: i represent Ft. Collier Group, L.C., which owns Lot 42, located at 265 West Brooke Road, the location of the Southeastern Container manufacturing facility. Ft. Collier is refinancing its loan on that property, to cover recent construction. The lender requires a zoning letter. I enclose a copy of the letter we received from Wayne Miller the last time Ft. Collier refinanced. I have lined out the second lot, Number 36G, because Lot 42 has been expanded to include that parcel. I will be grateful if you will provide such a letter and call my office to let me know when we can pick it up. Thank you. CSMcC/akg Enclosure Very truly yours, AV, C� Charles S. McCandlish OeT 19% mac. P P ftD'DrV[1 PMETG 5EP 29 198 09:05RM MCILVAIN Ih 703 536 4307 W"29,•�-1"11 15,42 7�*oi95a P.522/S Februa y 10. 2095 10 VUUM it $nosy Coumm COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of rlanub4 =d Dew SMM -M652 FAX 7o31679-M2 This -is to oerdfy that tho parcel of lsud fu the Fort Collier Indus=ial Park Idendffied by I� PIN 054-At36L also known as Lot 4Z, which has the address of 265 Vilest Brooke Road, Is the 1OC"on of 80uthe2smm Cornainer Corp, facility. dUllA l District (MI). ma land where this faki g conducted there by Sou ed is zoned Light In theastern Container Corp. is an allOwcdc manufs�cturittg prevess being use in the MI mo afng district. - -�� r1s W. Wayne Zoning mirifstratnr 107 North &nt'$Wwt Wiache6tar, VA 22601 F.D. Box 6M Winchester, VA 226W Wntim ' 931xv+�00 660V s9COc06E010 ic260 as/61/60 • . LAW OFFICES KUYKENDALL, JOHNSTON, MCKEE & BUTLER, P.L.C. 112 SOUTH CAMERON STREET P. O. DRAWER 2097 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604-1297 (540)662-3486 Facsimile (540)722-3787 E-Mail: kjmb@shentel.net J. SLOAN KUYKENDALL(1906-1995) PETER K. McKEE (1934-196 ) BENJAMIN M.BUTLER STEPHEN G. BUTLER GEORGE W. JOHNSTON, III Mr. Eric Lawrence September 30, 1998 Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: White Hall Subdivision My File No.: 10647 Dear Eric: J. SLOAN KUYKENDALL, III EDWIN B. YOST OF COUNSEL: JOHN F. ANDERSON I am enclosing herewith the copy of the subdivision plat which was placed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, for the White Hall Subdivision. Very truly yours, enjamin M. Butler BMB/jmw Enclosure COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 February 27, 1998 Greenway Engineering Attn: Mark D. Smith, P.E., L.S. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Mark: Frederick County administratively approved a supplement to the referenced plan on February 24, 1998. This supplement revises various design features associated with the previous master development plan which was approved by Frederick County on November 22, 1991. These design features include the relocation of a 50 foot access easement to the Arcadia tract, a revision to the zoning district buffer adjacent to the Third Battle and Battleview Subdivisions, the provision of a common shared buffer and screening easement adjacent to the Arcadia tract, and the delineation of the total undeveloped acreage within this industrial park. I have provided you with approved copies of this plan for distribution, as well- as signatures on a sepia to allow for additional copies of this plan to be produced. Please ensure that approved copies are provided to the owner and other interested parties. Frederick County will maintain the approved copies of this supplement in the project file that was created for the previously approved master development plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt r Deputy Director cc: James L. McIlvaine, Jr., Fort Collier Group U:\EVAN\COMMON\REVIEWS\FrCOLIER.APR 'q. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • GREENWAY ENGII 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 1971 TRANSMITTAL TO: -T�" ' of LArvriiwCl ATT. a.,,( \f l -t A-r—r :=1 IREMARKS: ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review 6 Date 1 L 13 r 19 -7 FROM: ; h�n� "9 t,-1 GREENWA Y ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Va. 22602 Phone 540-662-4185 Fax Phone 540-722-9528 ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment L�rnM�.r-4TS �►— .�/ I S£1� �O►Z �y2� Ccj���£�Z 1 r4-i -rA L a; 1 R��. Q�VE�oQM a Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 • • April 14, 1997 Greenway Engineering Attn: Mark D. Smith, P.E., L.S. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Mark: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 I have had an opportunity to review the above referenced plan received by our department on April 4, 1997. The following items need to be incorporated onto this plan for final approval: 1) Please provide the telephone number for the owner/developer. 2) Please include the date with your signature on the P.E. Seal for the final plans. 3) Please provide the dates of the previous approvals for this MDP within the revision block. 4) Please include a signature line and date line for approval by the County Administrator. 5) Please provide a location map for this industrial park. 6) Please provide a line that depicts the perimeter boundary of the industrial park which has an increased width from that of the line that depicts the property boundaries. Please include this line in the legend. 7) Please provide a metes and bounds description for all properties within the industrial park. 8) Please provide the property identification number, ownership, use, zoning, and deed book and page number for all properties within the industrial park. 9) Please provide the property identification number, ownership, use, and zoning for all adjoining properties. 10) Please label the portions of the buffer areas to reflect the buffer sections A -A and B-B. 11) Please revise the buffer narratives to read 67% evergreen in lieu of 50% evergreen. 12) Please provide the location and size of the water, sewer and gas lines which adjoin or are within the industrial park. 13) Please revise the 100' Joint Screening Easement to read 100' Common Shared Buffer and Screening Easement and provide the deed book and page number (DB 864, PG 823). 14) Please provide the name for the 60' drainage easement (Redbud Run). 15) Please provide the route number for Imboden Drive (RTE. 1327). 16) Please provide a symbol for the dot hatch pattern and place it adjacent to the Total Undeveloped Area statement. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 Smith Letter Page -2- April 14, 1997 Please find enclosed a red -lined copy of the master development plan for you use. Please provide our department with six copies of the final master development plan which incorporates the comments in this letter. Once this has been received, I will forward approved plans to all appropriate parties. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Lai Evan A. Wyatt Deputy Director EAW Enclosure Ll 0 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Required Information Checklist MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN The following information must be included on the master development plan. If the submitted master development plan is incomplete or is missing- information, it will not be reviewed and will be returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Yes No 1. Name of proposed development. O2 Name, address, and telephone number of owner. 3� Name, address, and telephone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and telephone number of designer. 5. Signed certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. '' 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listin- of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional zoning approval. Rezoning file number should be cited. "Approved 8. A space labeled by the Director of Planning and Development" for the approval signature and date of approval. A space labeled "Approved by the County Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. / �L 10. Magisterial District. 11. Sheet size less than 42 inches. Pace 13 • • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package General information Yes No T C). Location map (scale 1:2000) 2. Scale of the MDP is not to exceed 1:100. 3. North Arrow. 4O Legend describing all symbols. l jDW FOIL PitoP, b&#jND* y SO Surveyed boundaries of all lots anepNam' arcels. 6. Acreage of all parcels included in the NfDP. 7. Topography contour lines at acceptable intervals. 8. A schedule of phases, boundary of phases, and order of development. Use, zoning, and property owner of all adjoining properties. 9 . 10. Location of proposed uses (location, boundaries, arrangement). 0Location and treatment of historic structures and sites. CME 12. History of all land divisions in relation to this tract. FOIT 13. Acreage, Location and boundaries of environmental features: floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, steep slopes, woodlands. 14. Amount and percentage of disturbed and protected land in common open space. Pat-'e 14 r: • CIA Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Residential Development Information Yes No i 1. Location and dimension of Residential Separation Buffers. 2. Acreage in common open space, in housing type, in road rights -of -way, and for the entire development (by Phase). 3. Location and boundaries of housing types. Residential Performance (RP) dimensional requirements should be indicated. 4. Number of dwelling units (by type, phase, and in total). 5. Location and configuration of required recreational facilities. Statement of required and type of facilities to be provided. Infrastructure information Yes No �0 Location of adjoining streets and utilities. 2. Location, arrangements, and right-of-way widths of roads / and property access. 3. Location and arrangement of street entrances, driveways, and parking areas. 4. Location of entrances to the development from public streets. 5. Type of road design (rural or urban). 6. Use of inter -parcel connectors. Page 15 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package 7. Traffic impact analysis. To be submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation. Location of sewer and water mains with statements concerning the connection with and availability of facilities. 9. Location and arrangement of electric and gas utilities. Other Design Wormation Yes/ No _!L O Location of Zoning District and Road Efficiency buffers, and examples specifying the screening to be provided. 2. Plan for stormwater management. Location of stormwater facilities. 3. Acreage of each type of environmental protection land. (Amount and percentage of disturbed and protected land in common open space.) Shown in a table format. 4. Amount, boundaries, and location of common open space. (Indicate the percentage of the entire site to be placed in common open space.) 5. Location of environmental protected areas to be included in common open space. Paqre 16 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package County Health Degnrtment information Yes No 1. Statements and locations pertaining to sewer and water availability. 2. Statements and locations concerning any existing pre- or post -water treatment facilities. 3. Statements and location of any planned private treatment facilities. Pa(Te 17 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development . 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: . Robert W. Watkins, Director of Planning FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner H RE: Fort Collier Master Development Plan DATE: ' February 2,.1996 It has been brought to our attention that plans are underway to expand development on the Regional Jail property (P.I.N. 54-A-92B) and to construct a new Lease Building on the adjoining property to the northeast (P.I.N. 54-A-36A). Concerns have been expressed regarding the buffer requirements between these properties and the adjoining Arcadia property. Concerns have also been. expressed regarding the uncertainty of the requirement for a 50-foot road right-of-way to the Lockhart property (P.I.N. 54-A-89). The information in this memorandum provides an opinion of what is required. Subsequent pages provide a map of the described area, a history of actions regarding the above referenced master development plan, and information regarding potential remedies. The original master development plan for Fort Collier was approved provided that appropriate buffers were provided and that a stub road was provided to the adjoining Lockhart property (P.I.N.. 54-A- 89). Section 165-37 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a "C Category Buffer" to separate the properties zoned M-1, Light Industrial (P.I.N.s 54-A-36A and 54-A-92B) from the property zoned MH-1 (P.I.N. 54-A-91). Under this requirement, the minimum side. and rear building setback line is increased from 25 feet to 100 feet. This requirement also calls for the establishment of a six-foot high berm with appropriate landscaping. A revised master plan for Fort Collier Industrial Park was approved which eliminated the Park Center Drive/Brooke Road connection to accommodate the Hershey Pasta development. A 50-foot future street was provided along the boundary line between P.I.N.s 54-A-36A and 54-A-92B which provides a future connection to the Arcadia property (P.I.N. 54-A-91). A note is provided on the plan as well which states that the owners will provide a 50-foot right -of --way to the Lockhart property undeuthe terms of an agreement which requires the Lockharts to pay for the design and construction of the right-of-way, as well as to rezone P.I.N. 54-A-89 to M-1, Light Industrial. Under this agreement, it appears that the owner must provide the 50-foot future street until the Lockharts indicate that they will not be a party to the proposed agreement. Therefore, all structures that are proposed to be constructed on properties that adjoin this right-of-way must be setback a minimum of 75 feet from the right-of-way. This includes properties identified as P.I.N. 54-A-36A and 54-A- 92B. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 Page -2- Watkins Memo February 2, 1996 Under the requirements of the approved master development plan for the Fort Collier Industrial Park, it is my opinion that the required building setbacks for P.I.N.s 54-A-36A and 54-A-92B are as follows: P.I.N. 54-A-36A (proposed Lease Building properky) Front Setback: 75 feet from Brooke Road. Side Setbacks: 25 feet from Hershey Pasta property. 75 feet from Future 50-foot Street (or 125 feet from Regional Jail property). Rear Setback: 100 feet from Arcadia property including the requirements for a Full Screen as defined by Section 165-37 of the Zoning Ordinance. P.I.N. 54-A-92B (Regional Jail property) Front Setbacks: 75 feet from Fort Collier Road. 75 feet from Brooke Road. Side Setback: 100 feet from Arcadia property and 75 feet from Future 50-foot Street. Rear Setback: 25 feet from adjoining M-1, Light Industrial property. I will be glad to meet with you to discuss these requirements further. Please advise me as to how you would like to proceed with this issue. E 0 w 73A 6 pts. a 36J "aswy PASTA 3 6 A �004 p t S. gQaAaA 91 92B QEGIoM*L- JAIL- 8]A II�00� I-oc.KN44T' 89 89C ..W� / 0 PROJECT HISTORY 4/18/90 The Planning Commission (PC) approved a master development plan (MDP) for Fort Collier with conditions. Two significant conditions regarded the provision of appropriate buffers and a stub road to the Lockhart tract. The stub road would not be extended to provide access into Arcadia Mobile Home Park. 5/9/90 The Board of Supervisors (BOS) approved the MDP with conditions as recommended by the PC. 6/8/90 MDP received administrative approval. The plan provided a note that stated a 50- foot right-of-way would be provided to the Lockhart tract under the provisions of the accompanying letter; however, a location was not indicated. The same holds true for the required buffers. 10/2/91 The PC approved revisions to the Fort Collier MDP to eliminate the Park Center Drive/Brooke Road connection to accommodate the Hershey Pasta proposal. 10/9/91 The BOS approved the revisions as recommended by the PC. 11/22/91 The revised MDP received administrative approval. The revised plan provided the location of the 50-foot right-of-way and the location of the required buffers. The note stating that the 50-foot right-of-way would be provided to the Lockhart tract under the provisions of the accompanying letter remained on this plan. NOTE: The location of the proposed 50-foot right-of-way was to the Arcadia Mobile Home tract and not to the Lockhart tract. The approved MDP did not account for the location of the required buffer on the Regional Jail property; however, the narrative describes the need for the buffer. 7/l/92 Information was presented to the PC and the Lockharts regarding the elimination of the 50-foot right-of-way based on the needs of Hershey Pasta. Staff advised the PC and the Lockharts that the original conditions for access still applied. 1-1 • Required Buffers: POTENTIAL REMEDIES 1) Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): a) The Regional Jail tract could petition for a reduction in the required buffer distance to accommodate the proposed development of the new pods. A case may be made that it meets the test of "Practical Difficulty" based on the existing site conditions and the need for the expansion. Any requested for a reduction in distance should propose a "beefed up" berm and landscaping area. b) The industrial site could make a similar appeal for a reduction based on the same argument. A similar approach for the "beefed up" berm and landscaping should be proposed. The BZA approach could resolve this issue by March 19, 1996. 2) Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance: a) An amendment could be written that is specific to the Regional Jail property and all adjoining properties that are zoned industrial. This could be done with or without review by the DRRS. The Board of Supervisors would need to be aware of this approach, because it is doubtful that this type of amendment would be recommended favorably by the Planning Commission. This approach may also reflect poorly on Frederick County in the news media. This amendment approach could be accomplished by March 13, 1996 provided that the BOS permitted a public hearing following the PC meeting of March 6, 1996. b) An amendment could be written that takes a comprehensive look at buffer and screening requirements as a whole and attempts to incorporate ideas that have been suggested such as shared easements between adjoining properties, proportional requirements, specific landscaping requirements and the ability to reduce current buffer distances. This approach would involve the DRRS and the private sector. This approach would require two to three meetings at the DRRS level prior to public meeting. This amendment approach could be accomplished by late April 1996 to early May 1996. • POTENTIAL REMEDIES Required 50-foot right-of-way: 1) Revised Master Development Plan: a) The Fort Collier Group could propose a revision to the MDP that relocated the proposed 50-foot right-of-way south of the Regional Jail property. This would still only provide access to the Arcadia Mobile Home property and would increase the costs associated with this improvement to both the Fort Collier Group and the Lockharts. b) The Fort Collier Group could propose a revision to the MDP that eliminated all access to the Arcadia tract and the Lockhart tract. This proposal would need to involve the Lockharts and require the BOS to make a difficult decision. These approaches could be accomplished by March 27, 1996 depending upon the design firm and cooperation by the Lockharts. 2) Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance: An amendment could be written that permits the Regional Jail property and all adjoining properties that are zoned industrial to have a reduced building setback from road right-of-ways. Once again, this approach will probably not receive a favorable recommendation from the PC and will create a difficult decision on the part of the BOS. This amendment approach could be accomplished by March 13, 1996 provided that the BOS permitted a public hearing following the PC meeting of March 6,1996. 3) Property acquisition: The Fort Collier Group could acquire the vacant Arcadia tract and the Lockhart tract, and work with the County to revise the master development plan to provide for access to these tracts for future development. 9-1 Mr. Tierney said that plaques would be awarded to any structure/site which the Board designated as locally significant. He said that if the program is put into place by the Board, the HRAB would like to run a design contest to determine the appearance of the plaques. Mr. Tierney added that several years ago, over $10,000 was given to the County under the condition that the money be used to fund a plaque program; therefore, if a program is started, there should be no cost to the County. Concerns were raised on the liability of allowing public access to historically - designated properties. Mr. Tierney said that the property owner is under no obligation make his property available to the public. Another question concerned whether a well-meaning citizen could volunteer someone else's property. Mr. Tierney said that the application would be considered only at the owner's consent. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Marker, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the Historic Resources Advisory Board's amendment to the County Code to establish a locally significant Historic Property Recognition Program. PC. Mn. ACCESS TO LOCKHART PROPERTY FROM FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK 711 19Z Mr. Tierney presented a letter from Dellitt Lockhart requesting that the access extending from Brooke Road in Fort Collier Industrial Park to the east and connecting with the Arcadiaproperty,currentl shown a a "future 0' r i Mr. Tierney v s 5 road," be dedicated. e e gave the Y � � Y g following background information: When the Fort Collier MDP first received a recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission in April of 1990, the Planning Commission specified that there should be access provided to the Lockhart property. A statement providing for the proposed future access was placed on the approved MDP, but not dedicated. A letter of agreement was provided which stated the conditions under which the right-of-way would be granted. One of these conditions was that the dedication would take place when the Lockhart property was rezoned M-1. The reasoning was that this would prevent through residential traffic should the Lockhart property be developed residentially. When the Fort Collier MDP was amended, eliminating portions of Brooke Road and Center Drive to accommodate the Hershey development, the future access was shifted south, adjacent to the property line of the Regional Jail. This location does not provide direct access to the Lockhart property. As it is presently located, the access point is on the Arcadia property. The Lockharts are concerned that if the future road is not dedicated, it might again 3524 4 be relocated or eliminated all together. The rational for not dedicating the right-of-way in its present location is the same as it was previously. This would open up Fort Collier to additional residential traffic from the Arcadia Mobile Home Park. Mr. Tierney said the staff has explained to the Lockharts that the conditions originally placed on the MDP are still valid. No action was required of the Planning Commission on this matter. APPOINTMENTS TO THE STEPHENS CITY STUDY COMMITTEE As a result of the June 29 meeting between the Stephens City Town Council and the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Chairman Golladay appointed Roger Thomas, Marjorie Copenhaver, and John Marker as county members of a Stephens City Area Study Committee to study the business corridor on Route 11 North. He said that the function of the Committee would be to formulate a proposal to study development plans that are submitted along the business corridor and to deal with the various problems associated with each proposal between Stephens City and Frederick County. APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE Mrs. Sherwood said that discussion took place at the last Board meeting on the problems that may have been created with some of the direction the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee was taking. Mrs. Sherwood suggested that two non -voting citizen members be added to the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee --one from Middletown and one from Stephens City --so that information could be shared and the ongoing communication problem might be resolved. It was the consensus of the Commission that this was a good proposal. PUBLIC HEARINGS Conditional Use Permit #007-92 of John E. Merrill for an off -premise sign. This property is identified with PIN #600000A000075A and is located in the Reynolds Store area, on the west side of Route 522 North, in the Gainesboro District. Action - Approved Staff noted that the applicants are requesting an off -premise business sign to advertise their business, the Log Cabin Campground. The applicants are proposing to place the sign on property owned by the Reynolds Store Volunteer Fire Company. Staff recommendations were for approval with conditions. 3525 F9 LJ i _ �nr 11 DELL ITT J. LOCKHART ff1 D Q 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 JUNE 29,1992 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 22601 I AM WITHDRAWING MY REQUEST FOR THE DEDICATION OF THE ACCESS INDICATED ON THE FORT COLLIER PLANS AS "FUTURE 50' ROAD". SINCE SUBMITTING MY REQUEST FOR DEDICATION,THE INFOR- MATION SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSION AS A MEMORANDUM FOR THE JULY 1,1992 MEETING HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ME. MOST OF THIS INFORMATION IS NEW TO ME AND WILL REQUIRE SOME TIME TO STUDY. SINCERE Y, - - ---- DELLIT J. LOCKHART ,e Zo DELLITT J. LOCKHART 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 MAY 16 , 1992 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 22601 BACK IN 1990,THE COMMISSION HELD A MEETING AT WHICH THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK WAS APPROVED. AT THAT TIME,THE ACCESS FOR THE -PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY DELLITT LOCKHART WAS DISCUSSED AND THE COMMISSION AGREED THAT SUCH ACCESS WOULD HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT WITH THE SALFr OF PROPERTY BY FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HERSEY COMPANY THAT THIS ACCESS, WHICH WAS NEVER DEDICATED,HAS BEEN MOVED NEXT TO THE JAIL PROPERTY AND THEREBY ELIMINATING DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY EXCEPT THROUGH OVER A THOUSAND FEET OF ARCADIA MOBILE PARK WHICH IS OWNED BY OTHERS ** , IN LINE WITH THE COMMISSION'S POLICY OF NOT LAND -LOCKING PROPERTY,WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE ACCESS NOW SHOWN ON THE FORT COLLIER MASTER PLANS BE DEDICATED AT ONCE TO PREVENT ADDITIONAL CHANGES. SINGER.FLY, DELLITT J. LOCKHART CC: JAMES W. GOLLIDAY, JR. MANUEL DeHAVEN JOHN H. LIGHT • Ll FORT COLLIER GROUP PARTNERSHIP agrees to reserve a 50' right-of- way for ingress/egress and easements for required utilities for Lot 89 on tax map 54 (Lockhart) based on the following conditions: I. Location determined by FCGP 2. Lot 89 owner or assigns will be responsible for design and construction costs relating to said right-of-way and utilities. 3. Granting of said right-of-way will be contingent upon rezoning of Lot 89 to M-1 Industrial category. 4.. Upon granting of said right-of-way, the owners of Lot 89 will pay 1/5th of the design, acquisition and construction costs of the road and utilities from Fort Collier property line to Route 11 (proposed Park Center Drive entrance). 5. In order for this agreement to be valid, owners of Lot,89 must agree to grant necessary utility and drainage easements for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. 6. At the time of granting of right-of-way, Lot 89 owners `agree to place on record covenants substantially in accordance with Fort Collier covenants for the benefit of Fort Collier "Industrial Park. Said covenants applying to Lot 89. 7. ":Said right-of-way will be limited to use of Lot 89 only .and restricted for industrial traffic only. The right-of-way will end in a cul-de-sac in lot 89 and will only serve lot 89. FORT COLLIER GROUP PARTNERSHIP agrees to reserve a 50' right-of- way for ingress/egress and easements for required utilities for Lot 89 on tax map 54 (Lockhart) based on the following conditions: 1. Location determined by FCGP 2. Lot 89 owner or assigns will be responsible for design and construction costs relating to said right-of-way and utilities. 3. Granting of said right-of-way will be contingent upon rezoning of Lot 89 to M-1 Industrial category. 4. Upon granting of said right-of-way, the owners of Lot 89 will pay 1/5th of the design, acquisition and construction costs of the road and utilities from Fort Collier property line to Route it (proposed Park Center Drive entrance). 5. In order for this agreement to be valid, owners of Lot 89 must agree to grant necessary utility and drainage easements for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. 6. At the time of granting of right-of-way, Lot 89 owners agree to place on record covenants substantially in accordance with Fort Collier covenants for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. Said covenants applying to Lot 89. 7. Said right-of-way will be limited to use of Lot 89 only and restricted for industrial traffic only. The right-of-way will end in a cul-de-sac in lot 89 and will only serve lot 89. 369 E Dos Mrs. ioI9 191 number 009-91 was approved as set forth by the Planning Commission. The vote was as follows: Kenneth Y. Stiles - Aye, Robert M. Rhodes - Aye, Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye, Dudley H. Rinker - Aye, Roger L. Crosen - Aye, and W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye. REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK - STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED Mr. Robert W. Watkins presented this request for a revised master development plan. The Planning Commission, in their meeting of October 2, 1991, unanimously approved this plan. Mr. Whit Wagner, with Beery, Rio, & Associates, and partners with James and Don McIlvaine, presented to the board a layout of the revised plan. The master plan is being revised to show the elimination of the intersection of Brooke Road and Park Center Drive since the Hershey Pasta Group property on the south and Park Center drive will terminate at the Hershey property on the west. This will give access to the Hershey property from two directions and will have minimal impact on the development of the remainder of the industrial park. Mr. Wagner also stated that he would like to recognize John Riley, Economic Development Commission Director June Wilmot, and the county staff for all their cooperation and assistance on this project and thanked them for a job well done. He also went on to say that Hershey selected Freder- ick County for its new plant because of the confidence they had in the Frederick County staff and the way things were handled to get the job done. Chairman Stiles returned the compliment to Mr. Wagner and the McIlvaines stating that real professionalism was shown by them on this project. Their willingness and support to help bring this company to Frederick County was greatly appreciated by the board and this was a real plus to the taxpayers of Frederick County. He also thanked them for all their work with the new jail and Kraft and stated that 370 • • the Fort Collier Industrial Park was a business park to be proud of. Supervisor Crosen also agreed with the Chairman's remarks and added that sometimes the Frederick County employees are taken for granted and are not always thanked for the jobs they do. Supervisor Smith echoed the remarks and added that what Frederick County has accomplished in the last two years is (more than most localities have done in the last 15 years. Mr. Riley stated for the record that the design of the Clarke -Frederick -Winchester Regional Jail would be honored with an architectural award in Richmond on Saturday, October 12, 1991. Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded Iby Dudley H. Rinker, and passed unanimously, the revised (master development plan for the Fort Collier Industrial Park (was approved. YOUTH DEVELOPMMT CENTER SITE PLAN Mr. Watkins addressed the board and stated no action was required at this time regarding the site plan for the Youth Development Center. The plans were provided for the boards information and the Planning Commission had reviewed same at their regular meeting of October 2, 1991, and the commission had directed the planning and development depart- ment to administratively approve this plan when all require- ments have been met. COMMITTEE REPORTS PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION The Parks and Recreation Commission met on September 17, 1991. Members present were: Carmen Rio, Robert Roper, James Robinson, Carole Ambrogi, and Dudley Rinker. The following action was taken: 1. Mr. Roper moved to accept the 1992-93 CIP program, seconded by Mr. Robinson, carried unanimously (4-0). 4 PG M. Revised Master Development Plan #004-91 for Fort Collier Industrial Park and the Subdivision Application of a 73.350 acre parcel for the Hershey Pasta Group plant facility ,to,? in the Stonewall District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller introduced Mr. Edward G. Buchan, the project manager and engineer for Hershey Foods, and Mr. Steve Holzinger, the Hershey staff counsel. Mr. Miller said that the master plan for Fort Collier is being revised to show the elimination of the intersection of Brooke Road and Park Center Drive. He said that this is required since the Hershey Pasta Group property will eliminate the need for this intersection. He said that Brooke Road will terminate at the Hershey property on the south and Park Center Drive will terminate at the Hershey property on the west. Mr. Miller said that this will give access to the Hershey property from two directions and will have minimal impact on the development of the remainder of the industrial park. Mr. Miller reported that the subdivision is for a 73.350 acre parcel to establish the tract where the Hershey Pasta Group will be building their facilities. He said that the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the subdivision ordinance and will be in conformance with the proposed revised master development plan. Mr. Whitney Wagner, one of the owners of the Fort Collier Industrial Park, said that the first phase of the facility is a 180,000 square foot plant. The warehouse, to store the pasta, will be 350,000 square feet. The third phase will be a 15,000 square foot mill. Mr. Wagner pointed out the existing and proposed rail locations. Mr. Shenk had questions on wastewater handling at the site. Mr. Ed Buchan, Hershey Food's Project Manager, felt that, based on their other plants, the affluent will not be a problem with the existing sewer; however, they are looking at the situation. Mr. Stiles commented that the Service Authority currently has agreements with the City and the County Sanitation Authority, pursuant to Federal regulations and the Clean Water Act, that before sewage can be accepted for the sewage treatment plant from industrial users, it will be pre-treated, if necessary, so that it is essentially household waste. Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Revised Master Development Plan #004-91 of Fort Collier Industrial Park, located north of Winchester and south of I-81, and the Subdivision Application of the Hershey Property for the Hershey Pasta Group facilities. This property is identified as number 84000OA0000081 in the Stonewall District. It was also the consensus of the Commission that the staff would administratively review and approve the site plan for the Hershey facilities. 3399 0 0 Z05 .19 lqo 585 BOARD WITHDREW FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by Robert M. Rhodes and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from Executive Session. BOARD RECONVENED INTO REGULAR SESSION Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed unanimously, the Board recon- vened into Regular Session. Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed unanimously, that nothing was discussed other than what was noted in the request for an Executive Session. The meeting was adjourned until 7:15 P.M., at which time Planning Commission public hearings were heard. P.M.. The Board of Supervisors reconvened there meeting at 7:15 PRESENT: Kenneth Y. Stiles, Chairman; Robert M. Rhodes, Vice Chairman; Dudley H. Rinker; Roger L. Crosen; W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and Charles W. Orndoff:, Sr. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The invocation was delivered by the Reverend `I'lzomas M. Berlin of the Brucetown/Welltown United Methodist Church. PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK - APPROVED Mr. Watkins, Planning and Development Director, presented this request and stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval. with conditions. Mr. Whit Wagnor., one of the owners, appeared before the 130111'd on btflltl.lf; Of U119 rc.h,l�rcawt;. There was no public input. Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded by Dudley H. Rinker and passed unanimously, the preliminary master development plan of Port Collier Industrial Park wasapproved. • • PL i1T(o Preliminary Industrial 4 �18 Iq0 located in 5 Master Development Plan #001-90 of Fort Collier Park for M-1 uses on 313.14± acres, zoned M-1, and the Stonewall Industrial Park. Action - Approved Mr. James McIlvaine and Mr. Whitt Wagner were present to represent this preliminary master development plan. Mr. Wagner said that they have been working on an outlet road to the northern end of Route 11 so that industrial traffic could be routed to the northern end of the park and onto I-81, instead of routing traffic on the southern end of Route 11 or Baker Lane. He said that they have also been working with the Frederick County Administrator and the Jail Board in an attempt to upgrade the water pressure and water flows in the area. A discussion followed regarding the realignment of Fort Collier Road at the southeastern entrance of the park to eliminate a curve and allow a straight entrance into and through the park. Staff felt that the Fort Collier Road would serve as a major collector road for the area and should be designed properly. The applicants were concerned because they had just completed realignment of high-pressure gas lines in the area. Mr. William Lockhart, owner of the adjoining parcel #81, said that he has access to Baker Lane through the Arcadia Mobile Home Park. Mr. Lockhart said that he would appreciate access at the eastern part of the Fort Collier site. The staff noted that they would not recommend the approval of any master plan that would cutoff the possibility of an undeveloped parcel's access to a state -maintained road. It was noted that the normal procedure would be to stub the road out to the undeveloped parcel and end it at the property line. Upon motion made by Mrs. Sherwood and seconded by Mr. McDonald, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Preliminary Master Development Plan #001-90 of Fort Collier Industrial Park with the following conditions provided before Final Master Plan approval: 1. Information on stormwater management be provided as well as an explanation of how the design requirements of the ordinance regarding floodplains will be met. 2. Appropriate buffers are to be provided. 3. Comments of review agencies and the county engineer be addressed and the information listed in the staff comments be 3093 • • 2 provided and/or shown on the plan. 4. A stub road to the Lockhart property be extended to the property line, which would not be extended into the Arcadia development. --------------------- Preliminary Master Development Plan #003-90 of Frederick County Townhouses/Silver Communities, Inc., for townhouses on 22 acres, zoned RP, and located on Route 645, off of Route 522 South, in the Shawnee District. Action - Approved Mr. Wilson abstained from discussion and vote due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Richard Tremblay was present to represent Silver Communities of Fredericksburg, Virginia, the owner/applicant. Also present was Mr. Frank Carson, project engineer with Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates. Mr. Tremblay said that the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has expressed concern that this site will be subject to increasing levels of aircraft noise and flyover nuisance as the airport grows. Mr. Tremblay said -that they have agreed to incorporate a disclosure in all of their sales contracts, deeds and covenants that this community is in close proximity to the airport. He said that their sales brochures will include a map which will clearly show proximity of the airport. Chairman Golladay called for citizen comments and the following persons came forward: Ms. Lorraine Rogers, resident on Bufflick Road, requested that the screening used to buffer adjoining properties be a solid wooden fence. Ms. Kay Pearce, a business owner on Bufflick Road, also requested that a solid wooden fence be used to screen adjoining properties. Ms. Pearce said that some of the adjoining properties are businesses with outside storage and she was concerned about safety for children and screening of outside storage. Linette Spicer, resident on Bufflick Road, said that she and several of her neighbors did not receive notification of the public meeting. After consulting with the applicant, it was determined that neither Mrs. Spicer's property or her neighbors' property adjoined the property in question. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Marker, 3094 r :r 3 Mr. Tierney said that plaques would be awarded to any structure/site which the Board. designated as locally significant. He said that if the program is put into place by the Board, the HRAB would like to run a design contest to determine the appearance of the plaques. Mr. Tierney added that several years ago, over $10,000 was given to the County under the condition that the money be used to fund a plaque program; therefore, if a program is started, there should be no cost to the County. Concerns were raised on the liability of allowing public access to historically - designated properties. Mr. Tierney said that the property owner is under no obligation make his property available to the public. Another question concerned whether a well-meaning citizen could volunteer someone else's property. Mr. Tierney said that the application would be considered only at the owner's consent. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Marker, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the Historic Resources Advisory Board's amendment to the County Code to establish a locally significant Historic Property Recognition Program. PC r IT4. ACCESS TO LOCKHART PROPERTY FROM FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK -711 192 Mr. Tierney presented a letter from Dellitt Lockhart requesting that the access extending from Brooke Road in Fort Collier Industrial Park to the east and connecting with the Arcadia property, currently shown as a "future 50' road," be dedicated. Mr. Tierney gave the following background information: When the Fort Collier MDP first received a recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission in April of 1990, the Planning Commission specified that there should be access provided to the Lockhart property. A statement providing for the proposed future access was placed on the approved MDP, but not dedicated. A letter of agreement was provided which stated the conditions under which the right-of-way would be granted. One of these conditions was that the dedication would take place when the Lockhart property was rezoned M-1. The reasoning was that this would prevent through residential traffic should the Lockhart property be developed residentially. When the Fort Collier MDP was amended, eliminating portions of Brooke Road and Center Drive to accommodate the Hershey development, the future access was shifted south, adjacent to the property line of the Regional Jail. This location does not provide direct access to the Lockhart property. As it is presently located, the access point is on the Arcadia property. The Lockharts are concerned that if the future road is not dedicated, it might again 4 be relocated or eliminated all together. The rational for not dedicating the right-of-way in its present location is the same as it was previously. This would open up Fort Collier to additional residential traffic from the Arcadia Mobile Home Park. Mr. Tierney said the staff has explained to the Lockharts that the conditions originally placed on the MDP are still valid. No action was required of the Planning Commission on this matter. APPOINTMENTS TO THE STEPHENS CITY STUDY COMMITTEE As a result of the June 29 meeting between the Stephens City Town Council and the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Chairman Golladay appointed Roger Thomas, Marjorie Copenhaver, and John Marker as county members of a Stephens City Area Study Committee to study the business corridor on Route 11 North. He said that the function of the Committee would be to formulate a proposal to study development plans that are submitted along the business corridor and to deal with the various problems associated with each proposal between Stephens City and Frederick County. APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN B OMMITTEE Mrs. Sherwood said that discussion took place at the last Board meeting on the problems that may have been created with some of the direction the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee was taking. Mrs. Sherwood suggested that two non -voting citizen members be added to the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee --one from Middletown and one from Stephens City --so that information could be shared and the ongoing communication problem might be resolved. It was the consensus of the Commission that this was a good proposal. PUBLIC HEARINGS Conditional Use Permit #007-92 of John E. Merrill for an off -premise sign. This property is identified with PIN #60000OA000075A and is located in the Reynolds Store area, on the west side of Route 522 North, in the Gainesboro District. Action - Approved Staff noted that the applicants are requesting an off -premise business sign to advertise their business, the Log Cabin Campground. The applicants are proposing to place the sign on property owned by the Reynolds Store Volunteer Fire Company. Staff recommendations were for approval with conditions. 3525 0 0 , DELLITT J. LOCKHART 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 JUNE 29,1992 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 22601 I AM WITHDRAWING MY REQUEST FOR THE DEDICATION OF THE ACCESS INDICATED ON THE FORT COLLIER PLANS AS "FUTURE 50' ROAD". SINCE SUBMITTING MY REQUEST FOR DEDICATION,THE INFOR- MATION SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSION AS A MEMORANDUM FOR THE JULY 1,1992 MEETING HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ME. MOST OF THIS INFORMATION IS NEW TO ME AND WILL REQUIRE SOME TIME TO STUDY. SINCERE Y, DELL IT J. LOCKHART� ii2 DELLITT J. LOCKHART 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 MAY 16 , 1992 FREDERIi_K COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 2'2601 BACK IN 1990,THE COMMISSION HELD A MEETING AT WHICH THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK WAS APPROVED. AT THAT TIME,THE ACCESS FOR THE PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY DELLITT LOCKHART WAS .DISCUSSED AND THE COMMISSION AGREED THAT SUCH ACCESS WOULD HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT WITH THE SALE OF PROPERTY BY FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HERSEY COMPANY THAT THIS ACCESS, WHICH WAS NEVER DEDICATED,HAS BEEN MOVED NEXT TO THE JAIL PROPERTY AND THEREBY ELIMINATING DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY EXCEPT THROUGH OVER A THOUSAND FEET OF ARCADIA MOBILE PARK WHICH IS OWNED BY OTHER'S IN LINE WITH THE COMMISSION'S POLICY OF NOT LAND -LOCKING PROPERTY,WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE ACCESS NOW SHOWN ON THE FORT COLLIER MASTER PLANS BE DEDICATED AT ONCE TO PREVENT ADDITIONAL CHANGES. SINCERELY, DELLITT J. LOCKHART CC: JAMES W. GOLLIDAY, JR. MANUEL DeHAVEN JOHN H. LIGHT • 0 FORT COLLIER GROUP PARTNERSHIP agrees to reserve a 50' right-of- way for ingress/egress and easements for required utilities for Lot 89 on tax map 54 (Lockhart) based on the following conditions: 1. Location determined by FCGP 2. Lot 89 owner or assigns will be responsible for design and construction costs relating to said right-of-way and utilities. 3. Granting of said right-of-way will be contingent upon rezoning of Lot 89 to M-1 Industrial category. 4. Upon granting of said right-of-way, the owners of Lot 89 will pay 1/5th of the design, acquisition and construction costs of the road and utilities from Fort Collier property line to Route 11 (proposed Park Center Drive entrance). 5. In order for this agreement to be valid, owners of Lot 89 must agree to grant necessary utility and drainage easements for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. 6. At the time of granting of right-of-way, Lot 89 owners agree to place on record covenants substantially in accordance with Fort Collier covenants for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. Said covenants applying to Lot Z9. 7. Said right-of-way will be limited to use of Lot 89 only and restricted for industrial traffic only. The right-of-way will end in a cul-de-sac in lot 89 and will only serve lot 89. "It number 009-91 was approved as set forth by.the Planning Commission. The vote was as follows: Kenneth Y. Stiles - Aye, Robert M. Rhodes - Aye, Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye, Dudley H. Rinker - Aye, Roger L. Crosen - Aye, and W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye. �5 Mom. REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL 11 PARK - STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT --APPROVED ldh 191 Mr. Robert W. Watkins presented this request for a revised master development plan. The Planning Commission, in their meeting of October 2, 1991, unanimously approved this plan. Mr. Whit Wagner, with Beery, Rio, & Associates, and partners with James and Don McIlvaine, presented to the board a layout of the revised plan. The master plan is being revised to show the elimination of the intersection of Brooke Road and Park Center Drive since the Hershey Pasta Group property on the south and Park Center drive will terminate at the Hershey property on the west. This will give access to the Hershey property from two directions and will have minimal impact on the development of the remainder of the industrial park. Mr. Wagner also stated that he would like to recognize John Riley, Economic Development Commission Director June Wilmot, and the county staff for,all their cooperation and assistance on this project and thanked them for a job well done. He also went on to say that Hershey selected Freder- ick County for its new plant because of the confidence they had in the Frederick County staff and the way things were handled to get the job done. Chairman Stiles returned the compliment to Mr. Wagner and the McIlvaines stating that real professionalism was IIshown by them on this project. Their willingness and support to help bring this company to Frederick County was greatly appreciated by the board and this was a real plus to the taxpayers of Frederick County. He also thanked them for all their work with the new jail and Kraft and stated that the Fort Collier Industrial Park was a business park to be proud of. Supervisor Crosen also agreed with the Chairman's remarks and added that sometimes the Frederick County employees are taken for granted and are not always thanked for the jobs they do. Supervisor Smith echoed the remarks and added that what Frederick County has accomplished in the last two years is (more than most localities have done in the last 15 years. Mr. Riley stated for the record that the design of the Clarke -Frederick -Winchester Regional Jail would be honored (with an architectural award in Richmond on Saturday., October 12, 1991. Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded Iby Dudley H. Rinker, and passed unanimously, the revised master development plan for the Fort Collier Industrial Park Iwas approved. YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SITE PLa►N Mr. Watkins addressed the board and stated no action was required at this time regarding the site plan for the Youth Development Center. The plans were provided for the boards information and the Planning Commission had reviewed same at their regular meeting of October 2, 1991, and the commission had directed the planning and development depart- ment to administratively approve this plan when all require- ments have been met. COMMITTEE REPORTS PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION The Parks and Recreation Commission met on September 17, 1991. Members present were: Carmen Rio, Robert Roper, James Robinson, Carole Ambrogi, and Dudley Rinker. The following action was taken: 1. Mr. Roper moved to accept the 1992-93 CIP program, seconded by Mr. Robinson, carried unanimously (4-0). 0 n 4 PG M%. Revised Master Development Plan #004-91 for Fort Collier Industrial Park and the Subdivision Application of a 73.350 acre parcel for the Hershey Pasta Group plant facility ,to,.,41 in the Stonewall District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller introduced Mr. Edward G. Buchan, the project manager and engineer for Hershey Foods, and Mr. Steve Holzinger, the Hershey staff counsel. Mr. Miller said that the master plan for Fort Collier is being revised to show the elimination of the intersection of Brooke Road and Park Center Drive. He said that this is required since the Hershey Pasta Group property will eliminate the need for this intersection. He said that Brooke Road will terminate at the Hershey property on the south and Park Center Drive will terminate at the Hershey property on the west. Mr. Miller said that this will give access to the Hershey property from two directions and will have minimal impact on the development of the remainder of the industrial park. Mr. Miller reported that the subdivision is for a 73.350 acre parcel to establish the tract where the Hershey Pasta Group will be building their facilities. He said that the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the subdivision ordinance and will be in conformance with the proposed revised master development plan. Mr. Whitney Wagner, one of the owners of the Fort Collier Industrial Park, said that the first phase of the facility is a 180,000. square foot plant. The warehouse, to store the pasta, will be 350,000 square feet. The third phase will be a 15,000 square foot mill. Mr. Wagner pointed out the existing and proposed rail locations. Mr. Shenk had questions on wastewater handling at the site. Mr. Ed Buchan, Hershey Food's Project Manager, felt that, based on their other plants, the affluent will not be a problem with the existing sewer; however, they are looking at the situation. Mr. Stiles commented that the Service Authority currently has agreements with the City and the County Sanitation Authority, pursuant to Federal regulations and the Clean Water Act, that before sewage can be accepted for the sewage treatment plant from industrial users, it will be pre-treated, if necessary, , so that it is essentially household waste. Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Revised Master Development Plan #004-91 of Fort Collier Industrial Park, located north of Winchester and south of I-81, and the Subdivision Application of the Hershey Property for the Hershey Pasta Group facilities. This property is identified as number 840000A0000081 in the Stonewall District. It was also the consensus of the Commission that the staff would administratively review and approve the site plan for the Hershey facilities. 3399 • � -605 5Iq Iqo e1H J BOARD WITHDREW FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by Robert M. Rhodes and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from Executive Session. BOARD RECONVENED INTO REGULAR SESSION Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed unanimously, the Board recon- vened into Regular Session. Upon motion made by Roger L. Crosen, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed unanimously, that nothing was discussed other than what was noted in the request for an Executive Session. The meeting was adjourned until 7:15 P.M., at which time Planning Commission public hearings were heard. P.M.. The Board of Supervisors reconvened there meeting at 7:15 PRESENT: Kenneth Y. Stiles, Chatr.man; 11ob(--.-rt- M. Rhodes, Vice Chairman; Dudley H. Rinker; Roger L. Crosen; W. Harrington Smith, Jr. and Charles W. OrndoCf, Sr. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The invocation was delivered by the Reverend Thomas M. Berlin of the Brucetown/Welltown United Methodist Church. PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FOR1' COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK - APPROVED Mr. Watkins, Planning and Development Director, presented this request and stated that the Planning Commission recommended nPl)rovtAl. with c011di,tton:3. Mr. Whit Wagnor, one of the owners, appeared before the il�r►rd un holi tl,f; of i:hls roquont.:. There was no public input. Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded by Dudley H. Rinker and passed unanimously, the preliminary master i. development plan of Port Collier industrial Park was approved. • W PG P1r6, preliminary Master Development Plan #001-90 of Fort Collier Industrial Park for M-1 uses on 313.14± acres, zoned M-1, and 4 �1 qO located ' in-- the Stonewall Industrial Park. Action - Approved Mr. James McIlvaine and Mr. Whitt Wagner were present to represent this preliminary master development plan. Mr. Wagner said that they have been working on an outlet road to the northern end of Route 11 so that industrial traffic could be routed to the northern end of the park and onto I-81, instead of routing traffic on the southern end of Route 11 or Baker Lane. He said that they have also been working with the Frederick County Administrator and the Jail Board in an attempt to upgrade the water pressure and water flows in the area. A discussion followed regarding the realignment of Fort Collier Road at the southeastern entrance of the park to eliminate a curve and allow a straight entrance into and through the park. Staff felt that the Fort Collier Road would serve as a major collector road for the area and should be designed properly. The applicants. were concerned because they had just completed ..realignment of high-pressure gas lines in the area. Mr. William Lockhart, owner of the adjoining parcel #81, said that he has access to Baker Lane through the Arcadia Mobile Home Park. Mr. Lockhart said that he would appreciate access at the eastern part of the Fort Collier site. The staff noted that they would not recommend the approval of any master plan that would cutoff the possibility of an undeveloped parcel's access to a state -maintained road. It was noted that the normal procedure would be to stub the road out to the undeveloped parcel and end it at the property line. Upon motion made by Mrs. Sherwood and seconded by Mr. McDonald, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Preliminary Master Development Plan #001-90 of Fort Collier Industrial Park with the following conditions provided before Final Master Plan approval: 1. Information on stormwater management be provided as well as an explanation of how the design requirements of the ordinance regarding floodplains will be met. 2. Appropriate buffers are to be provided. 3. Comments of review agencies and the county engineer be addressed and the information listed in the staff comments be 3093 2 provided and/or shown on the plan. 4. A stub road to the Lockhart property be extended to the property line, which would not be extended into the Arcadia development. --------------------- Preliminary Master Development Plan #003-90 of Frederick County Townhouses/Silver Communities, Inc., for townhouses on 22 acres, zoned RP, and located on Route 645, off of Route 522 South, in the Shawnee District. Action - Approved Mr. Wilson abstained from discussion and vote due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Richard Tremblay was present to represent Silver Communities of Fredericksburg, Virginia, the owner/applicant. Also present was Mr. Frank Carson, project engineer with Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates. Mr. Tremblay said that the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has expressed concern that this site will be. subject to increasing levels of aircraft noise and flyover nuisance as the airport grows. Mr. Tremblay said that they have agreed to incorporate a disclosure in all of their sales contracts, deeds and covenants that this community is in close proximity to the airport. He said that their sales brochures will include a map which will clearly show proximity of the airport. Chairman Golladay called for citizen comments and the following persons came forward: Ms. Lorraine Rogers, resident on Bufflick Road, requested that the screening used to buffer adjoining properties be a solid wooden fence. Ms. Kay Pearce, a business owner on Bufflick Road, also requested that a solid wooden fence be used to screen adjoining properties. Ms. Pearce said that some of the adjoining properties are businesses with outside storage and she was concerned about safety for children and screening of outside storage. Linette Spicer, resident on Bufflick Road, said that she and several of her neighbors did not receive notification of .the public meeting. After consulting with the applicant, it was determined that neither Mrs. Spicer's property or her neighbors' property adjoined the property in question. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Marker, 3094 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 November 26, 1991 Mr. Bruce Edens, President Greenway Engineering, Inc. 1104 Baker Lane Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Bruce: - This letter is to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of October 9, 1991. The revised master development plan #004-91 _of Fort Collier Industrial Park was approved showing the elimination of the intersection of Brooke road and Park Center Drive. This property is located north of Winchester and south of Interstate 81 in the Stonewall District and is identified as GPIN 840000A0000081. Final administrative. approval was granted on November 22, 1991. Enclosed is a copy of the signed master development plan for your records. Do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kris C. Tierney, AICP Deputy Director KCT/slk enclosure cc: James L. McIlvaine, Sr THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • 0 }REV I S E� 1AA2rS9- DEV F-WP-tAE rr PL4N Poer Coc.uea- -XMD"TP-141, PARK -- APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: 1 C I Application # TV UsT E-,-' OWNERS NAME: AME7S r^ M! ) LVA I M F S2, 1A FS (,� MS 11 V O E (Please list the names of all owners, principals, or majority stockholders.) APPLICANT/AGENT: Address: UQ4 &A ICE2. LA i MC46SrE2.6 Q A - Phone Number (p (D 2 -- 4 (12) �S DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: Co P-F z & In Address: SAME A.S t' Q'wle Phone Number Contact Name Vi-f )`rH r3022 - 5 - PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided or is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the preliminary master development plan. All required items must be provided on the PMDP. Background Information: 1. Development's name: hd21 P.FNzK 2. Location of property: jmrx, E"3eopicE Ro. 9021 eou_IFa PAA 3. Total area of property: 3(3.14 f AcCzr-.S 4. Property ID # (14 Digit) 5¢p0 - AQ .- Q0QQ- BOA* 5. Property zoning and present use tA-( A- 1 enmmrmaela- 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: t!( ( A-( dOMMic1�C14L 7. Proposed Uses: Co M M 69cl A L- 8. Magisterial District: STodt1EU9ALl� 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original Amended 8 General Information: 1. Have the following items been included? North arrow Yes ✓ No Scale Yes v No Legend Yes No Boundary Survey Yes�L No Total Area Yes� No Topography Yes_L No Project Title Yes ) No Preparation and Revision Date YesJ No Applicant's Signed Yes No Consent Statement 2. Number of phases proposed? 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes No 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes ,% No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes ✓ 'No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown?/ Yes J No 8. Describe the following environmental features: Total Area (Acres) Floodplains 25 AC, Lakes and ponds 0 Natural retention areas p Steep slopes (15 0 or more) 035 Ac- Woodlands 9 % Disturbed Acres in 0 by development Open Space M'. 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout Yes ✓ No Entrances Yes No Parking areas Yes No_� Utilities (mains) Yes No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes ✓ No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes No Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What numbers and types of housing are proposed? 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes No Acreage in each housing type Yes No Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes No Total acreage Yes No Number of dwellings of each type Yes No 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 10 i 0 P/C Review - 10/02/91 BOS Review - 10/09/91 REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #004-91 FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATION: Fort Collier Industrial Park, north of Winchester and south of I-81 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NO: 84000OA0000081 ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned M-1 (Light Industrial) - present use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned M-1 (Light Industrial), MH-1 (Mobile Home), RA (Rural Areas), land use - vacant, mobile home park, railroad and Interstate 81 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: County Engineer: I have no comments at this time. I understand that the cul-de-sac at the end of Park Center may be relocated to the east. This issue plus the proposed box culvert will be reviewed at the time of the site plan submittal. Planning & Zoning: The master plan is being revised to show the elimination of the intersection of Brooke Road and Park Center Drive. This is required since the Hershey Pasta Group property will eliminate the need for this intersection. Brooke Road will terminate at the Hershey property on the south and Park Center drive will terminate at the Hershey property on the west. This will give access to the Hershey property from two directions and will have minimal impact on the development of the remainder of the industrial park. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 10102/91 MTG: Approval. Page -2- Fort Collier Indus. Pk. Revised MDP PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION OF 10102191: Approved unanimously. (Absent: G. Romine, J. Marker and C. McDonald) DELLITT J. LOCKHART 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 JUNE 29,1992 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 22601 I AM WITHDRAWING MY REQUEST FOR THE DEDICATION OF THE ACCESS INDICATED ON THE FORT COLLIER PLANS AS "FUTURE 50' ROAD". SINCE SUBMITTING MY REQUEST FOR DEDICATION,THE INFOR- MATION SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSION AS A MEMORANDUM FOR THE JULY 1,1992 MEETING HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO ME. MOST OF THIS INFORMATION IS NEW TO ME AND WILL REQUIRE SOME TIME TO STUDY. SINCERE Y, DELLIT J. LOCKHARTl DELLITT J. LOCKHART 1426 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER,VA. 22601 MAY 16 , 1992 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO BOX #601 WINCHESTER, VA. 422601 1"? BACK IN 1990,THE COMMISSION HELD A MEETING AT WHICH THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK WAS APPROVED. AT THAT TIME,THE ACCESS FOR THE PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY DELLITT LOCKHART WAS DISCUSSED AND THE COMMISSION AGREED THAT SUCH ACCESS WOULD HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT WITH THE SALFt OF PROPERTY BY FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HERSEY COMPANY THAT THIS ACCESS, WHICH WAS NEVER DEDICATED,HAS BEEN MOVED NEXT TO THE JAIL PROPERTY AND THEREBY ELIMINATING DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY EXCEPT THROUGH OVER A THOUSAND FEET OF ARCADIA MOBILE PARK WHICH IS OWNED BY OTHERS: IN LINE WITH THE COMMISSION'S POLICY OF NOT LAND -LOCKING PROPERTY,WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE ACCESS NOW SHOWN ON THE FORT COLLIER MASTER PLANS: BE DEDICATED AT ONCE TO PREVENT ADDITIONAL CHANGES. SINCERELY, DELLITT J. LOCKHART CC. :TAMES W. GOLLIDAY, JR. MANUEL DeHAVEN JOHN H. LIGHT V3 FORT COLLIER GROUP PARTNERSHIP agrees to reserve a 50' right-of- way for ingress/egress and easements for required utilities for Lot 89 on tax map 54 (Lockhart) based on the following conditions: 1. Location determined by FCGP 2. Lot 89 owner or assigns will be responsible for design and construction costs relating to said right-of-way and utilities. 3. Granting of said right-of-way will. be contingent upon rezoning of Lot 89 to M-1 Industrial category. 4. Upon granting of said right-of-way, the owners of Lot 89 will pay 1/5th of the design, acquisition and construction costs of the road and utilities from Fort Collier property line to Route 11 (proposed Park Center Drive entrance). 5. In order for this agreement to be valid, owners of Lot 89 must agree to grant necessary utility and drainage easements for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. 6. At the time of granting of right-of-way, Lot 89 owners agree to place on record covenants substantially in accordance with Fort Collier covenants for the benefit of Fort Collier Industrial Park. Said covenants applying to Lot 89. 7. Said right-of-way will be limited to use of Lot 89 only and restricted for industrial traffic only. The right-of-way will end in a cul-de-sac in lot 89 and will only serve lot 89. �e�i 5•eD l'V� �C©v� 1 9 cl I I /J 1• y' .`~r�jy~M J i� ." :_ 'f _ 'w.r\'• cif 'ul ry = 1 C Mal- 411 Al LCA BcDar 1 J ~ i ♦%' 4Wl ' l A jjj f c:. S A, 12�KIn7E4 :OT Z 0 + OT Z/S S �E436 r ICJ w✓ f +- GW =NOw+1 w *N3x 1v V- e t �_•'\�� I� 5/►� t. t s a Pelf Ef ,J. c3c ZDA7 J• i%'J -� , �: r `\ ,. - f-? % tJi �. o� x Y . � � .i{ r .. 3��\._ �- J � i f� r��..;:' rs, �, � :: � _ /�' •w.isie e/xk � . � � � ti s'!a'��.J'tA .wires tw.� •�-'" yr, ! l .., •,. + , ' ` 1' � . .' �. tTe�'"'o o is %is'ze�e t- L3Z8 Y. a 7771 �. 77 .. /2CAD/A MOB/ 6D0 t ♦ . ,, `' ,A zoNED 14MES L. Me IL P41,VE, 5R. GRO33 A,C6A r 3/J./W!44.CEB �• CORRIDOR RIO66 0AR 7v671t4AS' r/ fIQ WAC9LAM05 O ALRES M o • 511OG'6Y R6AL7Y C4 R-A ` ` 0 -144t66 L Afr A WAIF, JR, TRUSTEE 44k'Cg A,(/o ~P-4 • O ALR65 Z° ,Apa7r> e o_. f-v - . G90 •m7rr: 511/ rr 600 WETLA.!/OS w O ACRC5 ornrm ,+a�eEi fo ruwvw• eo Fr xcfrr_cr_»ar 629/ LE65BUR6�.G/KE f xar ecaeq r cep+ ro waa7 st xv xcn, n+ NATURAL STORM WATE P QETENT/OA/ ' O AGQES Mrnrma.uo.�eamurwrxvecceweN,,.rcr•-no F-eIL4 C.VUOr'N.I�i.PI-IAA/o ?�nen 0 9 oo / �R iaM[ ®••r - :. � % • ��f�cK ` -� � sir• k r aaa � ��sr� i j'r� _ c�♦Q• t.,..ray"�i?O Q.iEO BA?OQaCE 40 -�0� �' ' r Goo -'\ \ S ♦ '. r .�'. ••�.�`�� �+ +l'� 1 l -` dE,W�i— P�-,•ram ! _.. - _ �t - r� T�. ��a4,_ � ,y _ .� _ f'X 6R033 AREA 3/d. /4'A40E3 :. � \\ WaoOLdAJ03 � O AGREs �- \ L4 �E:s ,.IA/o A3avOs = o ACRES . v0,.Am MpB1L qD�A \ WETG4A/OS O ALRES N4T!/RAL STORM WATER AFMAIPIlA/' O.4"" O'RECTOR 0,- P(.QA/A//N6 /, FLOODOCd/A/ ' ".00 sfGRES 4uv OEVEGOVMEVT • I �` � _ AAtOUA/T D/STURBEo � G1 aS0 AGRES - t'N+ • E 37'02MW47-CR AUA/46EA•1EA/7' TO BE (ROgO RIW OA14Y) COdN7Y /A//S RA Q 400A'ESSED 4Y r/AAE Or S/TE PCdA/ �1 PA?EG4Qd7'/0A/. ` STEEP 54OOE3 /s '* oR MORE ' 0 T6 .4"CS AMOI/A/r OmMRS40 ' O A6RE5 M. D. P. S i rr LONER M—/ f \ GEG EA/D ' "W: FiN4L ludsTEAz DEv_ ownt'xs acaeE' ro vuaKtH a m r-r a�T-cam-wr Fav nc�xzs � ., acm row,v'rwc etei?fa°GL�n�ct- wrrn raavr o� ac�srwr f7LAN 31� ONWEALT'H of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER November 18, 1992 Mr. W. H. Jones, P.E., Engr.-Director Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority P. O. Box 618 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Jones: WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(703)984-4133 FAX (703)984-9761 Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park Frederick County I am writing in response to your letter of November 5, 1992 concerning the need to release by quitclaim deed a portion of your existing sanitary sewer easements which fall within the West Brooke Road right-of-way. State Code requires the governing body, in this case Frederick County, to guarantee a clear and unencumbered right-of-way when requesting the addition of a subdivision street into the Secondary Maintenance System. I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the code sections and our Subdivision Street Requirements Manual which pertain to this matter. Without quitclaiming those portions of the easements through deed, West Brooke Road unfortunately will not be eligible for addition into the State's System. Should you have any questions concerning the above or would like to discuss the matter, please let us know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer QrLLA, &-omi'v By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/r Enclosures xc: Mr. Robert L. Moore Mr. Connie L. Kurtz Mr. Steve A. MelniKoff Mr. John Riley Mr. Robert W. Watkins Mr. Don McIlvaine TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY COMMONWEALTH Of 'VIRGINIA RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Mr. Don McIlvaine Suite 600, 6231 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA 22044 Dear Don: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 November 3, 1992 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (703) 984-4133 FAX (703) 984-9761 Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park Route 1322 Frederick County We have recently noticed the installation of construction entrances on both Park Centre Drive and West Brooke Road in the referenced project. We certainly understand the need for these entrances. However, you should be aware after they have served their purpose they will need to be removed and the right-of-way restored. Since the streets have yet to be added to the State's Secondary Road System, as developer we look to you to satisfy the above requirements. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer Qvb�¢ra. CA:lJ A.AoG— By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf xc: Mr. Robert W. Watkins Mr. Donnie O. Wilkins -5W ' TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY �hl wy)( i 1 , RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Mr. Don McIlvaine Suite 600 6231 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA 22044 Dear Don: COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 October 13, 1992 l� WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE1703►984-4133 FAX (703)984-9761 Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park Route 1322 Frederick County We have received your package of quitclaim permit applications for the addition of certain streets in the referenced development. Upon reviewing the letter from Adelphia Cable Communications and the permit application from C & P Telephone Company appear to be in order. However, there are several discrepancies/problems with the following permit applications: Shenandoah Gas Company - The applications appear to be in order however the plans do not include any profiles or typical sections of road crossings. Furthermore, our records indicate a 3" gas line crossing within an easement at approximate Station 11 +00, West Brooke Road. If this is the case, a permit and deed of quitclaim will need to be submitted to cover the facility and easement. Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority - The application and plans appear acceptable. However, a deed of quitclaim will be required to cover the sanitary sewer facilities and easements which crosses the West Brooke Road right-of- way at approximate Stations 21 + 17.65 and 31 +74.53. Potomac Edison Company - The permit application is acceptable. However, two (2) quitclaim deeds were submitted; one (1) transmission and one (1) distribution, with one (1) set of plans. The plans will need to indicate which facilities are transmission and which are distribution. I would also like to add if the transmission facilities "step down" to provide service to the development, then the facilities cannot be considered transmission under our current policy. As discussed by phone this morning I am returning the various applications and plans to the individual utilities for corrections. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. RBC/rf xc: Mr. R. W. Watkins Ms. Kim Hickerson Mr. John Whitacre Ms. Sharon Michaels Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer Q0hAM, 0LVW,4J By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY APR 1 519912 COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjI IA _ w_ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 %/ _ WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER April 13, 1992 RESIDENT ENGINEER 1 Mr. H. Bruce Edens Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park C/O Greenway, Inc. Route 1322 1104 Baker Lane Frederick County Winchester, VA 22061 Dear Bruce: As requested we have reviewed the revised entrance design of the West Brooke Road connection with Route 1322. The proposal appears satisfactory as submittal with the exception standard ES-1 flared end sections or mitered ends will be required on the proposed 15" R.C.P. culvert. Please advise the developer of our approval. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer 6i�� /S. 60. J,4.-- By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Specialist Sr. RBC/rf xc: Mr. T. L. Jackson Mr. D. W. Hawkins Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. H. E. Strawsnyder Mr. Don McIlvaine Mr. Kevin Firebaugh COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjI IA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER April 13, 1992 Mr. Kevin Firebaugh Ref: C/O Perry Engineering Company Route 6, Box 152-B Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Kevin: 6L& WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ft. Collier Industrial Park Route 1322 Frederick County Enclosed you will find your copy of the approved Land Use Permit #855-01779 to cover the reconstruction of the West Brooke Road connection to Route 1322 in the referenced project. Please ensure a copy the approved permit assembly is provided to your field personnel so any misunderstandings can be avoided during construction. As you are aware a condition of our site plan approval for this project was the full salary and expenses of a State assigned Inspector would be reimbursed while the project is underway. Any charges to the project will be billed monthly on an account receivable basis. For your information the account receivable number is 0245 8406. This office will require 48 hours notice for any inspections. Should you have any questions concerning the contents of the permit or during construction, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Specialist Sr. RBC/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond APR I 19T Mr. D. W. Hawkins (w/ copy of permit & plans) Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. Don McIlvaine COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER January 17, 1992 RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(703)984-4133 FAX (703)984-9761 Mr. Keith H. Burr Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park C/O Greenway, Inc. Route 1322 1104 Baker Lane Frederick County Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Keith: Enclosed you will find the signed subdivision plat of 5.737 acres on Brooke Road in the referenced development. This section of Brooke Road is not currently in the State's Secondary Road System. However, all entrance design and drainage features must meet State requirements if the street is to be eligible for acceptance. The owner should be made aware the 50' frontage on Brooke Road may prohibit the construction of a commercial entrance to the property whenever it is developed. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman T ns. Resident Engineer kt Cl j� ') By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Sr. RBC/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Robert W. Watkins I'I�,�Fe c PrCUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Btuldlnb REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS 703/665-5650 COUNTY ENGINEER Vic, SEP 3 1.. Applicant's name, address and phone number: GREENWAY INC. /104 MAKER LA[NC W/NCNESTER VIRGINIA 662-4186 Name of development and/or description of the request: 1�EV(SED DLVELoPMP-�ttr Palo Pp2t' Co (-L ► CO- TN Q0-,T2J P.{ T>A 1Z<- Location: 1 MC(2-rN r)C (�1r Nc t�-�S' e c-"IH 09= S-8( t T2,2. Consulting Engineers Comments: Consulting Engineer signature & Date:\IVC (NOTICE TO ENGINEER - PLEASE RETURN TH S E y 191 TO APPLICANT. ) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach three copies of your plans. M