Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23-97 Shenandoah Mobile Co Sherando Site - Tower Site - BackfileCOUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/ 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, Planner II SUBJECT: Pending Commercial Telecommunication Tower CUP Applications DATE: March 5, 1998 As the Board is aware, Shenandoah Mobile Company has five Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applications pending at this time. Since the applications were tabled on January 28, 1998, staff has met with the applicant, researched in greater detail current information pertaining to the many telecommunication tower siting issues, and contacted additional localities and organizations regarding their regulations and experiences. The information obtained during this process has been summarized to address many of the issues raised by the Board during your January 28 meeting, and to aide the Board in evaluating the pending CUP applications. The five pending CUP applications are: CUP#020-97, Bowling Green Ridge Site; CUP#021-97, Little Timber Ridge Site; CUP#022-97, Hunting Ridge Site; CUP#023-97, Sherando Site; and CUP#024-97, Parkins Mill Site. Issues: 1) Location of Parkins Mill Tower. In order to mitigate the visual impact of the tower at this site, the applicant is willing to relocate the proposed tower to a point approximately 400' east of the location initially requested. This new location is partially inside a wooded area and less visible to the neighboring properties. This location necessitates the granting of a waiver to the setback requirements by the Board. 107 North lent Street - Winchester. Vir-inia 22601-5000 Towers Update Memo Page 2 March 5, 1998 2) Access to Parkins Mill Tower. In a letter to Mr. Kris Tierney dated February 6, 1998, the applicant states "Shentel will make every reasonable effort to ensure that the road will not deteriorate because of our use. Typically, we (Shentel) first ensure that it is strong enough to support the construction effort. Then, following construction, we regrade it as part of our procedure to turn the site over for routine operations. " The Board may wish to evaluate if this commitment on the part of the applicant mitigates any impact Shentel's use of the road may have upon the condition of the road. 3) Form of Guarantee. "The commercial telecommunications facility shall be removed by the applicant or landowner within one year of the abandonment of operation." It is stafi's judgement that the above condition satisfactorily covers the intent of the requirement to guarantee the removal of the tower upon abandonment. A Conditional Use Permit, by its very nature, is specific to a piece of property. The property owner is required to be a party to the CUP application and is, therefore, secondarily responsible for the removal of the tower in the event that Shentel, or any other service provider, should cease to exist. The determination that the ultimate liability for removal of the tower falls with the landowner has been consistently endorsed by other jurisdictions within the State. In addition, staff was unable to find another jurisdiction in the State that required a monetary guarantee for removal of a tower. Time periods for the removal of a tower upon abandonment ranged from 90 days to 24 months. 4) Site Security. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires that commercial telecommunication facilities are enclosed to prevent access by persons other than employees of the service provider. S) Taxation. The Frederick County Commissioner of the Revenue taxes the commercial telecommunication facilities in the following way: The land on which the facility is located, and the tower and accessory structures, are taxed as real estate; the antennas and any other fixtures placed upon the tower are taxed as personnel property. r Towers Update Memo Page 3 March 5, 1998 . Scope of Local Control under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Upon review of the available information, staff maintains the view that while local governments cannot "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting" cellular service, they do have the ability to evaluate a request to provide cellular service to determine if residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are negatively impacted. It is clear that any perceived impact should be significant and quantifiable for the jurisdiction to deny a facility at a particular site. Equally as clear is that any such denial should not have the effect of prohibiting the service within a given area. The numerous legal articles provided along with this memo highlight both this and, in the case of a denial, the need to provide this decision in writing supported by "substantial evidence contained in a written record." Additional information is attached to this memo for the Board's review. This includes correspondence from Mr. Leonard Greisz of Shenandoah Mobile Company under Attachment 1, and.a particularly helpful fact sheet under Attachment 2, Fact Sheet #2, which provides answers to frequently answered questions. Specifically, questions three, four, five, seven, 10, 12 and 13 in the fact sheet reinforce answers previously given to the Board. Fact Sheet 91 under Attachment 3 summarizes Section 704, Facilities Siting, of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. This section outlines the limits of the authority that state and local governments have over the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless facilities. Under Attachment 4 are the previously mentioned articles from recent Land Use Law Reports, The Virginia Beach case highlights the importance of following the procedural requirements established by the FCC, avoiding discrimination among providers, and supporting any decision with substantial evidence. It is apparent through the different cases that many of the issues concerning the siting of facilities, and the limits in which jurisdiction may use their authority, are being determined in the courts on a case -by -case basis. At this time, there are no distinct limits to guide jurisdictions. The limits are still being defined. Jurisdictions must, therefore, use solid judgement when evaluating applications for these facilities. Please contact me if you have any further questions regarding the pending applications. MTR/cc Attachments PC REVIEW: 01/07/98 BOS REVIEW: 01/28/98 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #023-97 SHENANDOAH MOBILE CO. Commercial Telecommunications Facility Sherando Site LOCATION: This property is located approximately 3/4 mile south of the intersection of Routes 277 and 636. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 86-A-209 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) and MH 1 (Mobile Home Park) District; Land Use: Residential, vacant, and the Sherando Park PROPOSED USE: 300-foot Commercial Telecommunications Facility REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objection to conditional use permit for this property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT minimum commercial standards. Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, Use Group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Please submit Virginia A/E sealed plans at the time of permit application. Fire Marshal: Post temporary street address signage during construction. Health Department: The Frederick County Health Department has no objection to the proposed facilities. Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #023-97 Sherando Site Page 2 January 21, 1998 Winchester Regional Airport: See attached letter from Douglas P. Strand, Executive Director, dated December 16,1997. Planning and Zoning: Ordinance Background: Frederick County adopted an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in April 1997 that allows commercial telecommunication facilities with an approved Conditional Use Permit. This amendment specified that telecommunication facility CUP's could be approved provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are not negatively impacted. Additional performance standards are also applicable to the CUP review. Ordinance Conformance: The proposed facility will be constructed on property located south of Route 277, adjacent to the Sherando Park and the Ritter Mobile Home Park. The Zoning Ordinance requires that towers of 300 feet in height (as is proposed) be placed a minimum of 365 feet from adjoining properties engaged in agricultural uses, and 315 feet from adjoining properties engaged in residential uses. The proposed tower location will comply with the setback requirements for such telecommunication facilities. The applicant has provided a map depicting the site selection search area. Eight comparable FCC license holders operating within this search area have been identified; none have constructed telecommunication facilities and begun providing services. In the interest of protecting the county's viewshed, it is encouraged that all telecommunication facilities are constructed in a manner that is conducive for co -locating with other comparable service providers. CUP's should not be granted until attempts to co -locate have been exhausted. The applicant has identified other comparable FCC license holders in the area that will be seeking telecommunication facilities in the near future and without allowing for co -location, the County may encounter a significant increase in telecommunication facilities in the viewshed. As there are no comparable facilities in existence within the search area, it is acceptable that this facility could be permitted with the understanding that other comparable service providers be allowed to co -locate on the tower. In order to alleviate the future abandonment of telecommunication facilities, the ordinance requires that procedures for guaranteeing the removal of such towers be established during the CUP process. The applicant has researched possible methods to guarantee the facility's removal. The applicant proposes that the County not require a monetary guarantee, but accept Shentel's (Shenandoah Mobile Company) business practice as a guarantee. The applicant, Shentel, states "It is our accepted and understood business practice to remove any tower that no longer serves a purpose." The Zoning Ordinance requires that a guarantee be provided for removal of facilities; therefore, this needs to be resolved prior to this Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #023-97 Sherando Site Page 3 January 21, 1998 application's review before the Board of Supervisors. The structure will be a 300-foot, three -sided, self-supporting galvanized steel tower initially equipped for operation of a personal communication system. The tower will be provided with a dual lighting system which provides red lights for nighttime and medium intensity flashing white lights for daytime and twilight use. The Zoning Ordinance requires that these lights be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. At this time, the proposed accessory structures are not visible from adjoining properties, roads or other rights -of -way. Therefore, landscaping and screening of any accessory structures will not be required. Request for Construction -Type Waiver: Monopole -type construction is required for all new telecommunication towers. The Planning Commission may allow lattice -type construction for towers located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites; this site would potentially qualify for the lattice -type tower. The applicant proposes to construct a self-supporting lattice -type tower, requiring the Planning Commission's approval. The applicant has stated that the height of the tower, in addition to their interest in constructing a tower that is readily modifiable for subleasing, would be best accomplished with a lattice -type structure. It is the applicant's contention that the height of the proposed tower would make a monopole -type construction cost - prohibitive. Staff Recommendation for JanuarX 7, 1998: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating comparable communication service providers, at reasonable rates. 3. An acceptable guarantee is established with the County for the removal of the tower within one year of tower abandonment. 4. A minor site plan is approved by the County. Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #023-97 Sherando Site Page 4 January 21, 1998 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 01/07/98: The applicant indicated that two services will initially be installed on this tower, making it a co -located site. The applicant requested a waiver of the monopole requirement in order to construct a lattice -type tower in anticipation of accommodating numerous other service providers on the tower. It was also the applicant's contention that the proposed height of the tower would make monopole construction cost -prohibitive. Two citizens came forward to speak in opposition to the tower location. Their concerns included aesthetics, the effect on property values, and a preference for a monopole tower rather than a lattice - type tower. One of the citizens felt that monopoles could be structurally engineered and built to accommodate as many users as needed. Because this area of the County was rapidly expanding, Commission members preferred monopole - type construction for aesthetic reasons. They also raised concerns about using lattice -type construction in an area so close to Sherando Park because the tower was climbable from its base. By a majority vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a 300' monopole -type tower at the Sherando Site with conditions as recommended by staff. YES (TO APPROVE): Morris, Marker, Romine, Ours, DeHaven, Copenhaver NO: Light, Thomas, Stone (Mr. Wilson was absent from the meeting.) O:\AGEN DAS\COM MENTS\SH E RAN DO.CUP .a. SERVR+c 114E rov OF V.IRC-M December 16, 1997 WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (703) 662-2422 Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager Shenandoah Mobile Company Post Office Box 280 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit Comments Installation of Commercial Telecommunications Facilities TWR167 - Smith Property TWR78 - Guthridge Property TWR79 - Anderson Property TWR84 - Poole Property TWR180 - Ritter Property Dear Mr. Greisz: Based on review of the above referenced projects by our engineering firm, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority does not anticipate that the above towers will penetrate FAR Part 77 Surfaces that will impact operations at Winchester Regional Airport. Final comment on these request will be contingent on receiving favorable responses from the Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of Aviation on the FAA Form 7460-1 submittals. I would like to request that a copy of each response from FAA be forwarded to this office as soon as you receive it. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office (540) 662-5786. I appreciate your cooperation on this matter. Sincerely, 0� Douglas P. Strand Executive Director AN 728 �0? 70 218 o, v ti 72A 0 , r •o� -- =— - •,, Chct ouneui 0� `� �00 — — Ritter 22 71A ti P 217 21 o O Double Church _ Rood Reclty 4 �fi _ P 6, 0 ro 57F 209 Walker 210 9 21A h Proposed 10 11 12 • yO0 57E O Tower c ao. -n* 211 212 1 2 4 6 8 'L O 57D Trenory 3 '~ ' 57C w 5 ; h� 215 7 �5 ,,• a 57C 213 3 214 ''. r' ✓ q � S pta s 1' 57A a 1 578 ,1U., 46 25 » 226 27 ( �� 45A 45 227 45C � o U 29 w •�•• " 32 q 45D 30 v `tb • 3 w E • 44A • � • ry0� s S 44 �• ti 228 252 CUP #023-97 PIN: 86—A-209 Shenandoah Mobile Co. Sherando Site TWRC180 Sherando Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA /Z-/Z - 9 '-7 O� i Z T 1. Applicant (The applicant if the owner x other) NAME: Shenandoah Mobile Company ADDRESS: Post Office Box 280 - 212 Piccadillv Street. Edinbura. VA 22824 TELEPHONE (540) 984-3003 - Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager =g� 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: Linwood D. Ritter and Elizabeth Ann Ritter, husband and wife. 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) At inter'qPr- ion of Ro utP 277 and 616, nror-eed Gou h on Ro uta 636 approximately 0 4 mile to a sharp left in the road Continue straight ahead on gravel road approximately 0.25 miles to tower site. 4. The property has a road frontage of 570.36 feet and a depth of 2,209.95 feet and consists of 39.074 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Linwood D. & Elizbeth A. Ritter as evidenced by deed from _ Christopher D. Deahl recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. 745 on page 532 as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14-Digit Property Identification No. 86-A-209 Magisterial District Opeguon Magisterial District Current Zoning Rural area 7. Adjoining Property: USE North park East Vacant/Residential South Vacant West Vacant/Residential ZONING �C, 'u'� EA ,''' Del, RA RA r�' TWRC180 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept before completing) commercial telecommunications facilities vP.r L 4 1111-7/q 7 300 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: A self supporting steel tower with a 10' x 22' concrete equipment pad 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, rear and in front of (also across street from) the property where requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14-DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME County of Frederick Address Post Office Box 601 Winchester VA 22604 Property IDS 86-A-143 Raymond E. Chateauneuf, Jr. Address 1063 Hudson Hollow Road Ste hens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 86-A-207 Linwood D. Ritter Address 746 Double Church Road Stephens City, VA 22655 Property IDS 86-A-208 Samuel & Ann Walker Address 2330 3rd Street Middletown VA 22645 Property IDS 86-A-210 Address 8430 Hidden Pines Road Clyde R. & Robert L. Property IDS 86-A-211 Trenary Clyde R. & Robert L. Address Fort Pier e PFLe34945d Property IDS 86-A-212 Trenary TWRC1 80 NAME Raymond E. Chateauneuf Address P. 0. Box 323 Property IDm 86-A-213 Double Churches c/o Benjamin M. Road Butler Address P. 0. Box 2097 Property ID, 86-A-57C Double Churches c/o Benjamin M. Road Butler Address P. 0. Box 2097 Winchester VA 22604 Property IDm 86-A-57F Address Property IDM Address Property IDF Address Property IDm Address Property IDS Address Property IDIO Address Property IDY Address Property IDS Address Property IDIO Address Property IDS TWRC180 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, includinc measurements to all property lines. See attached site plan. TWRC180 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. 746 Double Churches Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 (540) 869-4123 Shenandoah Mobile Company (540) 984-3003 TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: TOtTER HEIGHT = 300' TYPICAL 300' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER (1) CP50 CAP !'LATE (I) ATLS OFALON PLAIE 16) 5/0 X 2" hLA-I ASSY (P/N: 710031GA) /FLASH DEAL RED/STROBE L IOHTI(Ai K/ r V0690 HORIZ. BRACE - ASSY AT 300' - SLOPE CHANGE '!Jz A7Dol�s V0e0JA HORIZ. BRACE ASSY AT 290' F.N; d5 Ad S0249 I X 9N 126 X ArA_10273 X _I I fKIQO A 1902D5 f l r1 f JG I /\ /'19CK/17 \ I </ I.',N29 a9fOU3f > l:I 1Z A 79C'064 /\ >< A 7SU079 I I N&45#/.1- SLOPE CHANGE DaIG164 I MAY. SJ e_,�Izeo _I MIP G/ i050290 v% 0 OESJ.303 A'aN/.O C135J613 36'-5 1/1I" BASE SPREAD 10 A -DOLTS (30 TOTAL) I" OIA. X 78" LG. (.DESIGN W1N0 LOAD f Ll; ANSI/E IA-«2-E I S):?! , 70 MPH BASIC WINO LGACI (l/2" T7A01AL ICE LOAD). r11/5 rr:»rn is DES:rtirn rn Ft•rCPr rr-f rrN.LCM•1.'r) colr<, �V!�T�H ELEVATIONANJ-ENNA E.P.A. LINE (FT.) T YPE IOC TYPE 1 3+7 6.OAPA 567.IG Al,'UI.NA. %16-6' SIC£ A,AfS plo 3_1O TAL 66 TOTAL If.) 1-5/6" �l70 6-('AI•A !•I'21(1 A/IIEINAti N:6-_!�' �It!LA•1A11SIO_' A/)M- I0r.'.L50 /OTAL (6) 'e'2i 0-1`O+SG All:_E nvi15 uo _3-G' SI(ti ARtf:: _� J/ IUTAL___50 TOTAL (6) I-5/0" 20O_ 3-9' fA^ O15'ff S f 1+0 ��0 )j .7+O/_ /+J lO LIL 1+0_T_OTAL (3) /St.' (� I'H•:5!i A!Ilf_IN:Ai tv/3 6' SIY A,105 3' TUTAL JO TUTAL IGI I-5/d" f101f: AflltH':A AZIMUlff IS `:IIOWN 1/4 LM:rsREES IYI I,IIN THE (ORACKETSI 0 NOTE, /NI f1AL ANT£tXIA LOAD 141 OAPA df210 11'/(I) 6' SIJE ARMS AT 297' ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. ROHN COAMUPIICATIO,V rMER DESIGNS CONFORM TO E. 1. A. -222-E LA^ILESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED L"A-R TOWER DESIGN (LOADING. TOWER DESIGN MAY OR MAY NOT CUNFC'RM TO LOCAL. STATE (XI FFOERAL REQUIREMENTS. Z. THE IX=SIGN LOADING CRITERIA INDICATED HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ROHAI. IhE fk S1 GN LOADING CHI rERIA HAS DEr.N AS9UMf0 TO LIE BASED ON 5f1E-5PECIrIC DATA IN ACCOROANCE WITH API51/CIA-222-E AND MUST BE VEI 11 FI vo fTY OII IEi1S PTII UII 10 I N9 TAIL I. A T I IXI• 3. Sf.F INUf VIIXbtI. 'EcrILW AS!;F.MULY iy4AIV1Nti.`s FLM7 PART NUAIVERS AND 517CTION ASSEAIOLY 1"17IAII..S• * A . rAf)RI CA r I fX•/ f7!lAW I /•II S, IF HEFEHENCE U, ARE FOR S/ KIP USE ONLY. 5. '� I f-I' U(X_ T S ARC rYlUV I Df.O OTJ ONE LEG OFAd Y FOAt SECT IONS 6 fl-IHO1K41 ll, AND ALL THREE LEGS FOR SCL:rIVNS 12 TIA 00;H 16 AND A, I MIV SECT f CXv5 f. G. Af_ NU11 All PROVIOCD FOR ALL TOME!? ANU ANCIKX7 DOLTS (SEE ONG. A7501351. /. HIE LF_rs PAITT NUMBER IS STAMPED AT 71$: 0011LM1 OF EAO; LEG OF EACH SECTION. , R. TONER (AESIGN ASSUMES LEVEL GRADE AT TONER SITE. 9. ToLu Ncv (RI TUt1I5R STFEL HEIGHT /S EOHIAL TO rvus I;, (AR MINUS wz. to. KC17)( :JIALL DF IN A,-CL'!1?•1":iE WI T'H E. 1.A - ':7-E. "S l.^.x'TLK7AL S rAPN IAf7::5 FOR STE!-1. AN/EN.NA TOTTERS AM) APHCN7M SMUCIURES. It. f'"e04A I_-R SHALL VEftIF)' H.F- IN5rALLAI'IC)N P, I.l COX-:/-Of:AUNCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGUIREMENTS FOR OBSTRIJL:TICN I,IARKfM; ANTI LIG1rrING. 12. TON["R MFMtIFf? DESIGN IXIES /,'(IT fM'I_LXX: STAWSSES fXIr TO ERECTION ;IN(-- ERECTION EOUIPMENr AP.J cort J1f!(XVS Ah'F L"00JINV, IKSIGN A5t;IJMES C.OAfPETENT AND OLIAI_ IFIE0 14i,7St"IFL WILL t.'ITF_CT THE TONER. I3. OFSIGN ASSI-AfES PO d OAPA TYPE ANIEWAS AhE AJLU,'11:0 S)'AISLPRICALLY TO MINIMIZE TOROLE. 14. ANTENNAS AND LINES LISTED IN TOILER DESIGN LOADING TABLE ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS, UNLESS OIHrRW ISF_ NUICO. 15. HIE TOWER AZIMUTH 51191IN IS A IIFLArIVC AZIAMJTH 05EO TO ESlARL15h Yff.. IlELArI VE POS1TIUN OF ANIE/MAS WITH RES�ECI rO THE TONER ron OE51 C H. 16. DESIGN ASSLWES THAT, AS A MINIAIIAf, MAINIFNAM'E Af.O INSPECTION WILL RE PERrOHMED OVER THE LIFE OF ,THE :.TRUCII.RE IN ACCORDANCE W11H ANSI/EIA-222-E. 17. 21 OQL'OGA31V BOLT ASSY'S AND KH342+I RIIAWILLS ARE r`ITOVIDCO FOR ATIACHAIENr OF RLOISTMWE FLAf:194FA0 TO DEACON HATE. 10. DISH MOUNTS ARE TO OE PFOVILiEO BY OIWRS. 19. S/OE AR,'JS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS LALESS OTfF_RW1SE NOTED. 20. TOTTER ORIENIAr10N TO (E VETFRMINCD BY OR.FRS. 7.1. OtE 15-HOLE WAVEG.HVE LADDER IS PROVIDSO FROM 10'A TO 300' ELEVATION. (2-WAVEGUIGE LAOLV-- I. Afir FUTt*4E1 22. RO'N SHALL HAVE Trk CAPTION 10 REVIEW FINAL DISH LOCATION,', A7. fMUrfr, AND MOLrITS 10 VERIFY THAT ASStAk U TOCO#,£ VALL.ES, ANP LOCAL STfddSSES ARE ttOI EACEEDFO. 03. 111$91-LOC SAFETY DEVICE IS SUPPLILU FIX: 11;E ENTIRE 1EIC41T O- , - TONER. 24. RISH AZIMUTHS SIOIIN ARE NOMINAL AZIMUINS USED FOR DESIGN. ACTUAL AZIMUIh'Sj TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHCRSI A1UST hOr RESULT IN INCREASED •.. DES,&i LCADS. 25. DESIGN ASSUMES THAT ANTENTA TRANSMISSION LINES AND WAVFGUIDE LADDERS ARE EVEM.Y DISTRIOUTEO OVFH THREE TOYER FACES. 26. WIG LADDER SECTION MAY REOUIRE" FIELD CUTTING, TO PITOPCR LEPA_;rH AFTER ASSFMOLY. ALI- rIrLO CUTTING AR/ST BE REPAfREU WITH COLD GALV OR ZINC RICH PAIN(. TOPER REACTIONS LCW-PESS/ON f 350.9 KISS rE45tgi Zs1+,y Klf•s _ TOTAI VIF7.R 1 58.0 KIPS OUAN, 1 PART NO. REr. REFERENCE DRAWINGS DESCRIPTION 1 I RLBBAB Borrom eRAcXEr ASSY I RLC300 RL9fi-LOC SAFETY CAOLE A SA625P1_ 6' S1CF. ARMS a 297'A 1 V86W HORIZONTAL BRACE ASSY Ar 1 1 V6003A IY13_OR IA HORIZONTAL BRACE ASSY AT IIAVECK ICE f.AOCIER CLAW' A I !!LIE FCtR MIS J-TO' I _NISw330 LX/STIkcrICN L/C+!T NG Klr / _00KE1 MK25 L1Gfmw CLNVENSICIN KIT I + _ 1 CYKEIFFTSL 210C1i0GANW L'1UAL RED/SE I/7." X Z" BCl r ASSr W/C0 Kf1342+ HINGFILLS 22C 530075 12/3 tAEOPREt.E 'SO' CORO l APL5 BEACON PLATE I CP50 CAP PLAIE G Z$003/6A 5/0` X 2` 00_T ASSY___ * + 21000F)GA 3/d" X 1-1/.?` 110LT ASSY 3/0` FL Ar IVAu,gR :k 2 25tK:U6 IiF 2 FHAIP PUNER CONVERTER MIG. PLA * 2 1 JR90FAIV U-OcLr ASSY W/wAvins 1k (FOR hKXNTING POKER CONVERTER AT BASE OF TOYER) Qf (SEE NOTE 0l5) / TOWER AXIS / \ i�_( rYP. ) TOWER CONFIGURATION N. r. S. GNt�. HO. C%311JS 7G19114 8730571 SK73JS62 [e? I PO I C_ddU07_'O A 95261 L. I - WA A 75UI SS :501drd_10 :�01Lr1H. HI _ C»J11111I �u2 lilir. Ca7iolti C 90181p [7+/23, C 7+7+ 123- C 7+ 123. C7+ 123_1 c7A 1- •, L' 7+ 1 ?3+ CP<J!56- 069r [c1. CJtJ. _ N/A ay�on�- 095Jr7J 0//.50773 TONER SITE: _ N,.♦ .r., "0...1, f1." 7. D. ♦R.. B,A C1,A DrAAr". THIS DRAwma IS THE fYK'Pf.'Irr DF RJfI. IT 15 NOT %�J% ��/ (� n r, IN PARTS wnwur OLA9 NR/rTEN CRCNSENr�N N)ALE LA7 //---If G--i/ D.f. nlLr Y Y lll..��� YYY Y V r...,, Slrl+ 9/21: 95 3OO • SSVMW TOWER ASSEAIBL FOR CA....I1 ,1 G7 S%i''f% CMFI7ANORA1l PFCCONA! r0uu �r TWR180 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration Aeronautical Study Number u.s. Deoo,tmenr of 1rr-nsocrtotion Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing Of Your Notice Federal Aviation Administration Nature of Pro osal 2. Complete Description of Structure Tvpe B. Class C. Work Schedule Dates Please describe the proposed construction or alteration, J New Construction ❑x Permanent Beginning 2 1 % 98 A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include ❑ Alteration * ❑ Temporary (Duration months) End effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequent} not known, give frequency band and maximum ERP. B. For proposals involving overhead wire, transmission lir etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires If Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number, if available : A. Name, address, and telephone number of individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the construction or alteration. (Number, Street, City, State, and Zip Code) their supporting structures. Shenandoah Mobile Company C. For buildings, include site orientation, dimensions, and Post Office Box 459 construction materials. Edinburg, Virginia 22824 D. optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking a lighting system desired. The FAA will consider this in It ( 540 ) 98A-3003 study. Area Code Telephone Number B. Name, address and telephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above. Leonard L. Greisz c/o Shenandoah Mobile Company Exhibit 4 Post Office Box 459 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 ( 540 984-3003 Area Code Telephone Number Location Of Structure 5. Height and Elevation ilonearestfoc Coordinates (to hundred-,ls of seconds. t known) B. Nearest City or Town and State C. Nearest public or military airport, heliport, flightpark, or seaplane base A. Elevation of around above mean sea level. dtitude 0 r n Stephens City, W OKV Winchester Exhibit 1 730 39 04 05.79 g r rr on itude 0 (1). Distance to 4B (1). Dis ante from structure to nearest B. Height of structure including all point of nearest runway appurtenances and lighting above 78 I 11 I 08.64 2 miles 4.8951 rim ground or water. 300 D. Source for item 4A data. (2). Direction to 4B (2). Direction from swacture to airport C. Overall height above mean sea level h USGS Oter `uad Chart ❑ Survey ❑ specify 293 Degrees 23.187 Degrees 1,11030 Jicate the reference datum. 4E. Description of site location with respect to highways, street, airports, prominent terrain, features, Other NAD 27 ® NAD 83 ❑ Specify existing structures, etc. Please attach a U.S. Geological Survey Map (or equivalent) showing the construction site. If available, attach a copy of a documented site Survey with the surveyor's certification. phi hi f-cz 9 R I Mice is required by Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. Part 77) pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amencec (49 U.S.C. app. 1501). Persons wh owingly and willfully violate the Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received• pursuant to Secticn 901(a) of the Fece:al Aviation Act of 58, as amended (49 U.S.C. aop § 1471(a)) as well as the fine (criminal penalty) of not more than S500 for the first offense and not more than $2,000 for subsequent offenses, pursuant to Section 2(a1 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. as ar„ended (49 U.S.C. app § 1472(a)). 1EREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, free to obstruction mark and or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary. ;e Type: or Fr,rned Name and Title of Person Filing Notice S,gnalure Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager, PCS OR FAA USE ONLY �'•r Y; :* fAA will eitherreturn'this forn or issue a separate acknowledgement. he Proposal: - :� i r _ r j r Supplemental Notice of Construcill FAA Form7450 z is required any time the project is abandoned, or Does not require a notice to FAA At leazi 48 hours before the stag of constructoa Is not identified as an obstil ction under any standard of FAR Part 77 ' >':..' Within five days after the construction reaches rs greatest he,5hl_ - _ Subpart C. and would not be a hazard to air rav oatwn " ' o* +:This determination expires on unle _-. .•f�� :� y . (aj extended, revised or terminated by the ssumng office;': Is identified as an obstiuct:on under the standards of FAR; Part 77, -_ .;:,,_ (bl the construction.is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an'applicatio Subpart C, but would not be a hazard to air navigation _' , : ,for a copstrtrction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such cases the determination 1' =; r �sN, s expires onthe date prescribed bye e FCC for cbmpleton of construction,' r on the date•the FCC .deniess the application. ❑ Should be obstruction ❑ n rked ❑lighted per FAA .. Sr �._ :NOTE Request for extension of the effective period of this determination mist be pos , arxedvfdelivered to the issuing office «`•Ady,sory Circular 70,74E0-4, Chapters ' G iatleast 15days prior (o_the ezptrat on date �` ." LT ��.�? s� fir; r c r._ .__ _ �..-t : i; j.r. , .' •d .✓F1ti: N?Zl �..+.. -v:. •�'\•✓t..a ts.: r Fx'.•' Obstruciicn marking and_Iight ria are note ecessaryT ttie structurels"sublectlo the 6censrng.authonty of the FCC'a copy of this tleterminatior�i g be sV to thBT ty .lr - "7'- =a�.: �_ f 'Y:af_-.;;:!`-`.Y 7S+:S:.'-F''%i .-rt^•" ",> t`r:•tjA,:x,i a.. __ _ - .+.a+i=.. y.:1b"' �..-a •.: �,^-.:-,�;:;moo• .^t,y-, ..�;'Zc�=.'�;:;_t:�; � r• ``s'>'r•a..s. ,•i'•-t�';tt;�i_u>•;" P',r�`.'•�:F;:.a�...r.kx .` m "� -,�Y►. :�'w.: L s �J_.y ... `',.., �i-zdL.f- ` r' 'iY S7r a'� �t ��; T-h✓4`-it�.�....'�'l.��f... _'_t� z. � ��.�.^. 5; �.'_=� _ i w;! � .F ?l,. _��in r..t � v�...L.,.7-... .r.,! ..k� .- 1N,�r •. L. , ti :4f`..' �7 •'t'}•ti 'r � • {'-: -..air � . . � S � - v��� - _�,�y y s �i� • t -,� v�j';� :��e `t t �, y� Li ++ +c : •c i - t r ,„y ?}�ii?--` !. ,Y O ' I z f/ r a ` O LY ,jus. etiese c r na. s or anY,�aD 83 Coordinatesh i re tonnes yr ^ce wAh the FAA) d@Il4re 'o?L8tUngltude � +• _•—` ,ea m I Signature I Date NOTE. NOT DRAWN TO SCALE TWR180 OVERALL HEIGHT: 1,030 ft AMSL 300 ft. v i � GROUND ELEVATION: 730 ft. AMSL EXHIBIT 1 Sherando, VA VERTICAL PLAN SKETCH OF PROPOSED ANTENNA AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY MAP SHOWING PROPOSED SITE ''�:� ��`• _ ;e � �� �, •- . f � � ; ; u \'� � �; ;r=�Y;• o!-o '.'`_,%- a ('V2 SrA TWR 180 - Sherando ""-'lonis- Shenandoah Mobile Company '••"� e ; ;.�� ys;71. `• °" `' -< �-�. - ,� �:� • (1 % _ :%� Exh ib it 2 1 •� by � \-• , ����'g� )o --�I l_1\f v J. 3 Radio :•s • s :�.y 1\ -c Facilitl\ • .''�; f " y \\\\11 ���'�/ l �. �l �) nil `=' v 1 C 08 pt j�Iy• •1f '��_'�•� (,� U I �.?1C' J1'('�. 11/�l. a ry _1-:-_) �'4/'i /��" t, �d/h�'7 •f(11� •�./ ) �t� a".,� ,: � o � • ` I � ,I �/ q �I a��/%1`J;�.1,e1• /..__'`�r�"-'r .'�_, � ,� I �,_"• I T-y.�\ �../`Iv I�\ •\ 1 � / � _ ' J.��_'.� -- �•'`/ (l_'. =) �� -- r l •`-J-'*'•'-, .. _.1..�1 •,_»�_y �.��.••., % r f ; •Sh e. �_ !�% �%/• I 1, l� C 11 ` 769 •. •e O f/ 5`�� f • 4-.'��j:� ' -�_l ,�n�4 .�',SJ'. Br 75 -74 �� ••Q�':• • ate\ `�• �"•�\�J•'}pI�(1� J�ir��� •,• � .-, '• '.jli•� :/! , l y � I r • � ''' �l .J )[,ll..) C_ _ � I •,"+.. ' �' r L - e per 9'e��; `--�±.766 I ^ \ I`1� :e, '� I,- 1 e+'�OCC: M) _ /jf.lf.•V _ CO// ,�„iir�1 t1 \ ,, 1 : n 1• •� ', �, �>f, ,�i= /�!Jj + }\�` _ U /•�;jarV� , i, 0. p•°'J l/ Oice✓ '; -.. :`` O t J\.�. \ �JJ lilt' `J\ a% .`'�� op°Se`.: r ��!`1-'i, `%��j - r() -il• � � �� .G •r � •� •.r � ��.1 �\ L • -- t ' . I _ ..� c r ../.� `--• °\ ..Y•,/ Oq• •- 'i'if .-/'�.- i -1 1'`�• � S�w-3Jt ;'1:G /'��rr^/ JJ \ �lJ, 0 1•�° \•1 .. '�V .� �`I. Il � �' � 1 // ,`n � 1J c I, �i1 N/ J�.i ..� �:\' >�+ �i �i� ` o 0 1 , :�' C•J �j \ 1 . � � , • �,•• -. `� ' � a \ !` C• - �' �..,.irjl�11,' Ii ; r a /• ,y�(O :/��: r:\:i.(•� Q /%'• ).'b \�. i ��•� f. 4 �'��`,Sl -�\ r�J,•�JI+ ` �� �f,J� .Frie�dahip- "•'.�� d ^- 'L% . s,, i� „ ,� I \... ; � lt; � J� %1 /�'�1 /S / • C.I T..., i.'ilr rw" ... r ,; �r �\ �• xr' / / `' a��-,fB, ..1 / �'•, rf..,_ .r�• 4J..� �-/ f�•' �lil\ ) .�� r i"• i� I a .\� ?\;.�'�:• ) % -r"'� j l'71`' �. • (� i�-' .;.�, airne �r/ • � �' ' `-_ � � � f•' 1 •- - 1 J �r'~���� 1 1� ��Ji'`+� � `SIC, , _ ln� ��d l 1, `` + ^ !I<�4` �°a �`7G0J •J �fJ �I'� r� ! l 1 �� ' `r^�J�(i �JLi Ij, 5 v� .i,_',1�,1 �w;:' '),' / �• / 1� l., (,,�-:::. •�rl., ,7 �y�•ro r �,- %�, •/,fie 1 ; \ I - 1p' i� �1 / • v'�t f 'y 635 _.:. _ �,{•,.: — - `� ,,, �+ _ ,l , J % /`�` �. G+.•`, y� � ^�I`� J (. ,i � '. ��%r�P •';il - � f.'">G, ,,:. ^ .m�;.i Via) (. -30 4aa �.. rip " � '�J ^s �� Y.J � � / � , 1. �'1 � U- ���® �� ii f \: "i•s:. i a / � , 1t1/ / )1 � ., )1.� J /r'%' ��% � � /r i1 • � Y I I I f f �\•��\�,-,•� , Z1-iL' l i - �' r�t: l �,%11i 1 -/u 11 ��1+ � ,-�/. =j���\ ! V • ��1 \ 1 y•/ `.'11� il°/� 'Q .-' � e. "���,1�'0 - `' (Lr} L� \-- _) O� _.- �� r -\ ° i J (� 1, )�( r.�% ;' )�_ „Jy �' l i �1 7 ��` irj :\• 'I{`\� \ 1!'l� \t"``� 11`'1jr�� 1'�,` t"•' SCALE 1:24000 1 1 MILE ;i i r \,'.= - . ---�+ .� • { 0 �/ ,)r / \ O.s1,; loco 0 1000 2000 3000 40co 5000 6000 7000 FEET =`Ld� I , 1` ,,�✓ , \-T '- z: 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET 1, ` �\ �•) �'� NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 y� `'�"-` ^• °• - � 7i� ''1.�� l) - N) ,�� ,r�'pl/�Lrrc �� .�r �/_, ���!11 f\ �\`v -- ' '`` �iIr11 �' c•n. v,'!1' -l/" •.::.d3� 'f ! I ^a�� {-!7ncyc:i `'q7 :.,:G.ST±irrir;� Y / Frosr6ur 1 LJ�/439";,i �.t.. r�8 6., l..7", 109.8ytiG���.. �r'273o JV- -r _ /{..^'��.="x 9s \ \ c_ —'\ M uc MAP SHOWING PROPOSED SITE T'WR1 SO - Sherando- Very ' �`. Q 2 3jf �1 Shenandoah Mobile Company I2/97 I ( 237,: �' - ;,. '• ' Exhibit ' .8t7 F,�! sfib js: C/NI;w if 69%; f Hedgesv e• 00 Ctti o svrll NOTAMs�[Direct ' T< ' �KkiE \� J., EIGEE r y e dfai i qr Clas itf lira _ �� f o �.% d^ : ► 2 23P :254 COurfSC.r 165. �- _ • 1'Spr�g218� � ^� ��0 + fEASLVIE �(PY') 1 'z!>'. •�°' _" `9 44'; 2615 y ; /E"'. ?172`�, .. a -t Ri 7.. 1771 ifR762.VRt i 9�.y 1810 19 - Romney 756 ,/ (2 •1H.PHERDI(b1R8 r FtN56 rG O.Tt q Bake GT_124.3; (ii:..` . ::'' c lnwcod iosak:, ss_ -t 70'72z9sv .. 267 /i r / S OUNTAINs,�25 , IMBER RIC'T"'. i.• 122.11^ 7o jp� '6t 285 Co (iir•' Y �_`•e'^ 7l2.t ..n.;r \ • �, •}1AR�1 d LIRG %Ob s'A ar.: w9e '' '(( 'v' ✓I / /112.ICCill_P>R8 l\ coon / 29sl i.. J� u u:ra %� .. R n l� 5EL Y 1. � r V'166r_ Om HaIoN c.r.. \ \. LvESBURCI—� y, ■ E st c _f�•' s: 08%`:•� = 1 ` i / A"`1000 L7_`• r To s9 i( INS 1 �' ;• r i72o_ 6 nes5ord. . p '. �s'arq nor:: 11817 �-` pr Gt�S:.r j9n F 'Op". `� (30d) l050+`r s7y.'Sumr�ii L� 1a09M Y, . !t/!, - , r w •.)• � '•` ,/` IF "'"v _ •i\ % r v 1 Pomi � KPQ lyL /Z 30; ./-A1't.�6� 1• '- �!.' i - Y33-�:- /':\ / '� 1 HIG��YI'c :: \ Ly / 1Vl 't`•, 0 12ap. •a -./1! �#• HE5TER�..r J"r„_Q14 o _ •s?f i,:+, s ,NIr7�CH r• t 91'� A0 A s _2� •r•' � 2 s" :wUS-3 12a.P5 I /.1(275) _.i i. 'L 55 72 ./ i��`, .� Ber ,>l goif l <^ _ 1 I� ` f� z ! 97 1736yyy. _.a �r _ ' I �iCC� Gq—�y� HC s l4i bi _ . /�' (3 r`� 3f.. r +ra T r� a Il. • r :'..;e.r luemol z rEld 4 �= : ' Jz, rc!e :vi Posed Locat)on =-- -� �' —% 1 PAst o:' ';gip 100 '.3304' �+'30 ,i' 'v3 . :�'• 20 t in �.1> : City'•. j ('`ice \.. Millwo� .yc arJ .�n�Jj 11,st•~:i Hl� : Tt'Pvti J y .•arer� , 390.,y.• 3t�w�^`� 80� 19 0 fJ Strasovrg ' 'V , C }! r god of 1810. 41y`l-�' ( d\t�• =Ursa 3266' / 7 rc •',' roo J�oQ c;.-.F _, ( 1 r MAA -,... ti. ••- cddi t•.w.^± rvt' r` T�r� r t` � it r3P3�i •sue '' 99t� 23d .. �t: .j : jr j (PvI *_• Cityt:��/ = ?y I •+i. �, �Y$ ;7_ ) G , ':JJJJ___ '�4:.iI. R3•r•j��; • e.-^ ` r_ all, - 'i:. - 'v-�' •ve� 7X V. Wcodslock j/ jsa`,�.ypRF:..w1'.IFRR) Ro' - -.a'' t%y lIt',ctortown '' S 3219.Columb `_" 2388 a ( i 4 ®�� 'P.Y.j it'd` ''a' +CS a'e._.. tr.h� F r\'nRI_ BRY o 1370) • . igl�.e rJ '`y CE/( tj (370) 302-ZiBEND .� .n gyp¢ LI Qc`.: fi" _ A` (31'7 $ tP203 22 t22.S UC 1 �: GOG� 2t r'; �' , xl ,1 la 3 Ch Ot; ,..�(• �! r /.i UC 1 �ge!!coursa - - ��/ s�� .:pt`•1("� 1 to 1810� �. Edinbu +1.2? KSiRM t p-y��y lEE5ai1RGi-nail\��� • ' 1251 :R �375, AcU. (/9 1' 1 - r. sve u' j 291 1 e `tr- ��y'.' � �M�occ/nie o,ae //j ``r �J�O�N.\•Gs 5.�7r=r1: �i:}a�� "� ``ls; r._.sshee,r� O..!�•.. "aA AO � f R 01- i 3Es28 V?gsvn. Li/%� /".• i f ar 7Oc ki ey• Ilex d ' �_ '! tom; Fhnr Hill G '� J ` (21'y . Jackson r1 �,. Y I ] c„ U 1J/ lD RD pAl'IS (P�rl i �. -+`.: ."2803. 'J'.. '�� /1 .4, '+t . '2o G�' 2t•C:` r o� 1 FOx`a •PES 'R `tip R"+lo�z _ 2 ®%O Xl�;2310 _!� H02t'L 31�r22r G. 12 �. �• \^^� w rC' ::\ r' \ �(nr �: berville �'- -- �,^-yao- /t.:.^.c.�ir_•.. �+OFrtiT..ly.alvER.• , __._. _ , rr:l"dz -�2 UlQ 7O ao -- - 'o as �•'' Cee ( ^® 21 Mid �/�w°° •P � - SIO Y�� /°rs!Ys' i• _ � D'.` •i` ! tt t CULPER 1 (�!216 ^ Y�252 CJo;.4 Ir.. ��3.�^-� n\` CIOr O Unvil TWR180 - Sherando, VA Shenandoah Mobile Company Item 2.A (FAA Form 7460-1): Exhibit 4 The structure will be a 300 foot three -sided self-supporting hot -dipped galvanized steel tower initially equipped for operation of a personal communications services system operating in the frequency band of 1850-1865 or 1930-1945 at a max ERP of 200 watts and the in frequency band of 825 - 845 or 865 - 895 at a max ERP of 100 watts. See Exhibit 1 for pertinent structure and topographic measurements. Item 2.D (FAA Form 7460-1: We would prefer to use a dual lighting system with red lights for night time and medium intensity flashing white lights for day time and twilight use. :- f HENTEL SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS P.O. Box 459 - Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0459 - (540) 984-4141 December 16, 1997 Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, Planner I Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Ruddy: Please find attached additional information which Shenandoah Mobile Company is submitting in support of the five conditional use permit applications recently filed by Shenandoah Mobile Company and pending with Frederick County. Listed below by site number are descriptions of the type of installation we propose to install at each location: (1) TWR078 Hunting Ridge (Self Supporting Lattice -type) — We propose to build a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons: A. This site is outside the Urban Development Zone; B. A comparatively large structure is necessary; C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; and D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive. (2) TWR079 Little Timber Ridge (Monopole) — A monopole will be used at this location due to the relatively small size of the required structure. (3) TWR084 Bowling Green Ridge (Monopole) -- A monopole will be used at this location due to the relatively small size of the required structure. (4) TWR167 Parkins Mills (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site because: A. This site is outside the UDZ; B. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; SHENANDOAH TELEPHONE COMPANY - SHENTEL SERVICE COMPANY - SHENANDOAH CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY SHENANDOAH LONG DISTANCE COMPANY SHENANDOAH VALLEY LEASING COMPANY SHENANDOAH MCSILE COMPANY SHENANDOAH NETWCRK COMPANY WE MUST SERVE WELL TO PROSPER - WE MUST PROSPER TO SERVE WELL Mr. Michael T. Ruddy December 16, 1997 Page 2 C. The proposed design is consistent with another structure viewable from the same area; and D. Monopoles of this size are not cost advantageous. L/ (5) TWR180 Sherando (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons: A. This site is outside the UDZ; B. A comparatively large structure is necessary; C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; and D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive. We appreciate your continued assistance and cooperation as we proceed through the conditional use permit process. Sincerely yours, Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager (PCS) Shenandoah Mobile Company LLG/lsh Enclosures ATTACHMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNCATIONS FACILITIES Submitted by Shenandoah Mobile Company Tower No. TWR180 Sherando Property Owned by Linwood D. Ritter & Elizabeth Ann Ritter In accordance with Frederick County Zoning Ordinance Section 165.48.6, Subsections A (1) through A (4), the following information is attached: (1) Attachment 1 — A topographic map depicting the search area. (2) Attachment 2 — Identification of other service providers or commercial telecommunications facilities within the proposed service area. (3) Attachment 3 — Compliance with ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. (4) Attachment 4 - Statement of procedure for tower and equipment removal_ ATrACHMENT Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR180 Conditional Use Application 753 120,��; —7-70— io ATTACHMENT 2 Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR180 Conditional Use Application SHENTEL IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS AND COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The comparable FCC license holders operating in the search area of the prospective site are... Cellular A -- Cellular One B -- Shenandoah Cellular PCs A -- American Personal Communications (Sprint Spectrum) B -- AT&T Wireless PCS C -- CFW Communications (Virginia PCS Alliance) D & E -- Shenandoah Mobile Company F -- Devon Mobile Communications There are no commercial telecommunications facilities within the search area of the prospective site. ATTACHMENT 4'� Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR180 Conditional Use Application COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL COMMUNCIATIONS COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED ANSI/IEEE STANDARDS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD LEVELS AND RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION As set forth in 0E7 13ullefin 65, Edition 97-01, August 1997, entitled Evc1hlating Compliance with I '('C Guidelines for Hunan Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, states on Page 14: "Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular telephone, PCS, and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) operations warrant a somewhat different approach for evaluation. While there is no evidence that typical installations in these services cause ground -level exposure in excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers has been a topic of ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it necessary to ensure that there is no likelihood of excessive exposure from these antennas. Although we believe there is no need to require routine evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the ground, out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted installations be evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters above ground and the total power of all channels being used is over 1000 watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for broadband PCS. These height and power combinations were chosen as thresholds recognizing that a theoretically `worst case' site could use many channels and several thousand watts of power. At such power levels a height of 10 meters above ground is not an unreasonable distance for which an evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher than 10 meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated that ground -level power densities are typically hundreds to thousands times below the new MPE limits." (Emphasis added.) (A copy of excerpt from OET Bulletin 65 is being submitted with this package.) The antenna installation planned under this Conditional Use Permit will be at a height in excess of twenty (20) meters. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01 Aubust 1997 OET BULLETIN 65 Edition 97-01 August 1997 A UTHORS Robert F. Cleveland, Jr. David M. Svtvar Jerry L. Ulcek Standards Development Branch Allocations and Standards Division Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission' Washington, D.C. 20554 The first edition of this bulletin was issued as OST Bulletin No. 65 in October 1985. This is a revised version of that original bulletin. NOTE: Mention of commercial products does not constitute endorsement by the Federal Communications Commission or by the authors. 2.1091 and 2.1093 (for portable and mobile devices). This requirement applies to some, but not necessarily all, transmitters, facilities or operations that are authorized under the following parts of our rules: 5, 15, 21 (Subpart K), 22 (Subpart E), 22 (Subpart H), 24, 25, 26, 27, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I; and L), 80 (ship earth stations), 90 (paging operations and Specialized Mobile Radio), 97 and 101 (Subpart L). Within a specific service category, conditions are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A to determine which transmitters will be subject to routine evaluation. These conditions are generally based on one or more of the following variables: (1) operating power, (2) location, (3) height above ground of the antenna and characteristics of the antenna or mode of transmission. In the case of Part 15 devices, only devices that transmit on millimeter wave frequencies and unlicensed Personal Communications Service (PCS) devices are covered, as noted in rule parts 2.1091 and 2.1093 (see section on mobile and portable devices of Appendix A). Transmitters and facilities not included in the specified categories are excluded from routine evaluation for RF exposure. We believe that such transmitting facilities generally pose little or no risk for causing exposures in excess of the guidelines. However, as noted above, in exceptional cases the Commission may, on its own merit or as the result of a petition, require environmental evaluation of transmitters or facilities even though they are otherwise excluded from routine evaluation. Also, at multiple -transmitter sites applications for non -excluded transmitters should consider significant contributions of other co -located transmitters (see discussion of multiple -transmitter evaluation in Section 2). If a transmitter operates using relatively high power, and there is a possibility that workers or the public could have access to the transmitter site, such as at a rooftop site, then routine evaluation is justified. In Table 2 of Appendix A, an attempt was made to identify situations in the various services where such conditions could prevail. In general, at rooftop transmitting sites evaluation will be required if power levels are above the values indicated in Table 2 of Appendix A. These power levels were chosen based on generally "worst -case" assumptions where the most stringent uncontrolled/general population NIPE limit might be exceeded within several meters of transmitting antennas at these power levels. In the case of paging antennas, the likelihood that duty factors, although high, would not normally be expected to be 100% was also considered. Of course, if procedures are in place at a site to limit accessibility or otherwise control exposure so that the safety guidelines are met, then the site is in compliance and no further environmental processing is necessary under our rules. Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular telephone, PCS, and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) operations warrant a somewhat different approach for evaluation. While there is no evidence that typical installations in these services cause ground - level exposures in excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers has been a topic of ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it necessary to ensure that there is no likelihood of excessive exposures from these antennas. Although we believe there is no need to require routine evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the ground, out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted installations be evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters above ground and the total power of all channels being used is over 1000 watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for 14 broadband PCS.13 These height and power combinations were chosen as thresholds recognizing that a theoretically "worst case" site could use many channels and several thousand watts of power. At such power levels a height of 10 meters above ground is not an unreasonable distance for which an evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher than 10 meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated that ground -level power densities are typically hundreds to thousands of times below the new MPE limits. In view of the expected proliferation of these towers in the future and possible use of multiple channels and power levels at these installations, and to ensure that tower installations are properly evaluated when appropriate, we have instituted these new requirements for this limited category of tower -mounted antennas in these services. For consistency we have instituted similar requirements for several other services that could use relatively high power levels with antennas mounted on towers lower than 10 meters above ground. Paging systems operated under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90 of our rules previously have been categorically exempted from routine RF evaluation requirements. However, the potential exists that the new, more restrictive limits may be exceeded in accessible areas by relatively high-powered paging transmitters with rooftop antennas.14 These transmitters may operate with high duty factors in densely populated urban environments. The record and our own data indicate the need for ensuring appropriate evaluation of such facilities, especially at multiple transmitter sites. Accordingly, paging stations authorized under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90 are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure if an antenna is located on a rooftop and if its ERP exceeds 1000 watts. Mobile and Portable Devices As noted in Appendix A, mobile and portable transmitting devices that operate in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, the Personal Communications Services (PCS), the General Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communication Service, the Satellite Communications services, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and Specialized Mobile Radio Service authorized, respectively, under Part 22 (Subpart H), Part 24, Part 25, Part 26, Part 27, Part 80, and Part 90 of the FCC's Rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. Unlicensed PCS, NII and millimeter wave devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. All other mobile, portable, and unlicensed transmitting devices are normally categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure (see Section 2 and Appendix A for further details). 13 For broadband PCS, 2000 W is used as a threshold, instead of 1000 W, since at these operating frequencies the exposure criteria are less restrictive by about a factor of two. 14 For example, under Part 90, paging operations in the 929-930 MHz band may operate with power levels as high as 3500 W ERP. 15 ATTACHMENT Y4 Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR180 Conditional Use Application SHENTEL REMOVAL OF ABANDONED COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The Conditional Use Permit application process (ordinance) in Frederick County for Commercial Telecommunications Facilities requires that the applicant provide "information delineating procedures for guaranteeing the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility within one year of abandonment of operation." Having worked with the Planning Commission in the development of the ordinance it is our understanding that the intent of this section (§ 165-48.6. A. (4)) is threefold, (i) "not" to burden the applicant with a requirement to post a bond, (ii) not to leave the landowner "holding the bag" with an abandoned site, unless, or course, that was the agreement with the landowner, and (iii) to ensure the tower itself is removed, not necessarily the foundation. In the spirit of complying with this requirement, Shentel considered several possibilities, including the purchase of a removal bond, entering into an irrevocable letter of credit to ensure removal, and the establishment of a self -funded sinking fund. Each possibility was rejected either because of cost, or because it restricted the use of critical working capital. Shentel is a locally established, successfully operating telecommunications company that has been doing business in the Shenandoah Valley continuously since 1902. It is our accepted and understood business practice to remove any tower that no longer serves a purpose. Shentel stands behind that practice. Most recently Shentel decommissioned a cable TV tower in Shenandoah County and arranged to remove it along with our equipment. The landowner, however, asked us to leave the tower in place so he could use it for amateur radio purposes. We readily complied with his request, removing all of our equipment and cabling from the structure and the surrounding grounds, turning the site over to the landowner as requested. All of our site lease agreements contain a provision allowing us to remove our communications tower and all related equipment upon the termination of the rental period. � ER PIIDPNEX, FOMM c C MY. M (MM-90AW FROM a OF RnERSTAFE et wo AWE in Al EMT 307. PROCEED EAST ON ROUTE 277 APPROOMIELY 13 WILES TO KtUtgrroN ROUTE m AID ROUTE 636. PROCEED SOUTH ON RTARE 676 AFPAOXbKH1Y CIA MISS TO A 94W LEFT N THE XAa CONTINUE SM0420 AHEAD ON GAVEL ROAD FOR APPQ:IMWUT 0.15 MILES TO TOWER SITE. 1. THE LEASE AREA AND PCCTSS AND UTRJFES COMMENT ARE L=U ON PROPEM CURRENTLY DESIGNAED As FREDMM CDJTY TAX PARCELS ea-A-20e R e6-44-2011 AND CtRRENILT OWNED BT DOOM KM AND RZABETN AA, MYTEX 2. SrrE PLAN ARK PREPARED WIN THE B04TF OF A TIRE REPORT PREPARED BY 9T AN t CDDWL PLC RE/ 324M 1 THIS PROPUM 6 SAFLT TO ALL RE5OaCTta4 EASOdD(, OR MOTS OF WAY OF RECORD PRIOR M THE DATE OF THS RAC. 4. TEE UNADJUSTED RATD Or PRECSION FOR THIS SIRNLY OCEEMS 1:10000. 1 aroxcR6 A[ BASED ON Lac t cs SIATOM VD14c S Div. - 7e1-35', WOOD 29 L EIDCH WRIT 5 A RMLRDVO SPICE IN A 12' PIE MY . 73126. 7. OaSTWO PROPERTY CO NU16 APPROWN7C1T -'U74 ACRES B ZONING OUk CUFS09 ZONWI. RURAL AREA RA PROPOSED USL SELF-SUPPORTING CONIAMCATON S 10NOT WIN MEDUNI M:DdTY WHITE DRY LIGHT AND RED NIGHT UGT (F REORXEO RY THE TAN PROPOSED )OwCR HE7G4U: 30T REDL.WLD SETEMC s FRONT - =Y FROM ROAD ANW-OF-WAY SOIL - 3W REAR - m' L MiCt: UNOW O. RITTER AND ELRABETH AM RITTER 746 DOUBLE 04AOI ROAD ROCHESTER. VA 22M5 10. APwraMF: SEowOW MOBILE CO~ 124 SOUTH WAIN STREET P.O. SEX 4% EDN6LIRC N R 22624-0439 (540) 964-4141 It. PNSWFR OOMPmft: POTOMAC ED60N PON" CO~ PA BOA MOD WWOESTER WR 2m (BUD) 654-3317 IZ TELEWONE COl~ SELL ATLANTIC 2960 K. FALVEY PAIR DRNE FALLS O4AOL 14 2704E (54Oi 254-SM IS flG STE DOES NOT LE WHIR A HLUA OfSOM7ED 100 TEAR FLOOD 701E K NAD 27 uuES PEAR PROPOSED TO" LATITUDE XO4*M42- LONr111AE 7BR1'o9 * 11 APPK L TO" BASE EEv. - 729D FT. A, IL T45 RRF�TS THE SURVEY Or THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA NO Accra EASE IDM TH S SLIMY WAS CONDUCTED BT A&COWNN R ASSOCMTEs ON 25 AUL 1997 AND 000 NOT REPRESENT A COMPLETE SOLAi1ARY SURVEY OF THE RITTER PiOPERTT. 17. INaH ROOS CET AT ALL CORNER5 OF LEASE AREA L,LESS OTHE]VINSE NOTED. avers ayTnAm M LEASE AREA NO EAS CM AS APPEAR ON THIS PLAY. ARE in THE FREE Ca®T AND N ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UDFRSICND OWNERS PROPRIETORS OR TRUSTEES ouE_ DATE: wuRrs cuffvrA, =39M D To wT: l . A NOTARY PUBLIC N AND FOR THE STATE AO COUNTY AFaESAO 00 HEREBY cor" T1HAI 00= O. KTTM WHOSE WANE 6 SUED TO THE FDRECO/NC WRIrn4 ffANIC DATE OF . 19 _ HAS PERSONALLY APPEAED BEIDRE WE APO ACDCOLEOOES THE SAME MRN UNDER MY HAND APO SEX ON THIS —an Or . 19 — mmART PUBLIC K L73HRRSSAN WOES NOURYs CERTIFICATE, To 111: L A NOTARY PUBLIC N AND FOR THE STALE NO COUNTY AORESAIO CO HEREBY CERTFT THAT E12ABETH AM RITTER. WH X[ NHAAE 6 SCNED TO THE FOEOOWIC W■TNG SEIVbG DUE Or It- HAS POWON LY APPEARED BEFORE WE AND ACK NOPLEDOES THE SAE OKM LIDER WY NANO AO SAL ON THIS _CAT OF . 19— mouRY PUBLIC Wr axamssom DriES WRIBO\C11 971111. 1110 1 RBC/ELP DOUBLE CIMACIES ROAD DEALTT PARTWO& v LED I-C D.B. e64 PC B7 TAX PMCTL 86-A-SX ZONED: FA Rom: ROO FOUND ON UE 0 I&Dr ROBERT C. TR£NNARY AND CLYDE R_ TRENART D.B. 508 PG. 867 TAX PARCEL 56-A-211.212 ZONED RA USE: VACANT DE9CNER ANDERSONI i ASSOOATES 7722 AWN STREET MODETMK VA 22645 (540) 869-2501 DOUBLE oWAOES ROAD REALTY PARTNOMW LOT I-F Da e64 PR: el OLX FMRCFL e6-A-57F ZONM RA USE RESIDOIC t PYROO T PROPOSED LEASE AREA - "M SO. FT. a112 ACRES / SOIL / DELTA . / L - 9425 / 00 - e425� ROD rDUq 325 %y 1 TO" RAILROAD sPNE N 112, PURE. - OAK A7 I coRIER I 4 > ■ iSO' I � — �r ■ — POE FOUND �' /Nr1Ea 00 EIRESS FASEIEM MOTE. THE FOLLOWING EASDI MS WERE U9ED N THE TIRE RiPOAl PREPARED BY BIRANI At CMEWAK PLC ME 132451 I. ELAHE7 EASD Ofl TO acswEAxa/Porwmc Ta ,40NE CO~ OF vAaM FOR TE>B+oE SLRBACE. DAL 312 m 564 2. NOFMCM AWICI M POWER CCAP%NY EASEMENTS FOR GUY AND POLE ANQDRS ADIC *STEPIO4 CITY ROAD" Put DA lei PG 65 AM m 17e PG 421L EASEMENTS 00 NOT AFFEOr SUBJECT ERAS AREA, 1 NORTHERN VIRcsu POWER COPAYT EASEIERT FOR ELEC C SERVICE TO GARAGE: DA 206 PC 11 EAMID17 DOES NOT AFFECT SBIC LEASE AREA 4_ ITT wOU POWER COMPANY E,4M ENT FOR ACAa1TINL DE.CTRC SO NICE; DA 254 Pr: 654. EAM ENT DOES IOf AFFECT SUBJECT LEASE AREA, 5. NORTHERN wow POWER COl~ EASDOa FOR ELECTRIC SEAva TO P1ANNIC SHED; DA 210 PC 252. EASE" DOES NOT AFFECT SAW LEASE AREA, c NDRTEW VIROPM PON" CO~ EASDiDIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVa TO OELLPIQ AND DAIRY PFAUX 48 20 PG M EASFFFETa DOES NOT AFFECT SECT LEASE AREA 1. NOVWRN TA107w POWER COMPANY EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC SMRACE TO TENANT HOUSE: QA 24e PG 261. EASEMNT DOES NOT NTECT SUBJECT LEASE AREA COUNTY OF FR EDERCK DA 440 M 421 TAX PARCEL N-A-IU zomm RA RAC• PAW u N0.A«�rtr DA 719 P4 446 SEE PLAT IN DA 7% M 1948 TAX PMCEL M-A-208 POWER ZONED B-1 USG WXRLEYQ&LE MDNE PARK BELL ATtANRC-YIC N. NC M.EL RD,o POLE %EAmR3Nr FOR BL IED MILES / SEE D.B. BY PG 114 TELL rnw PAO WTN TELL TELL N SrO1'5r E EASESEM FOR WELL FOR PIONEER TRAILER I SEE DA 719 PG 456 _. WELL / _------------------------i 8 _-_------------------------------------------ T s au'" acT� �"EDNN M ,ERN° e DA 745 PG s32 I r TAX PNrQ1 RR-A-209 Ir ZONED M IN LTA: MCANT 20' W`C EASEMENT TO, I GA 780 1N C!?PAMY`I Oa Teo P.C.v.c 1177 �' 1 1 I¢[ 1 s 3rOr10- ■ — 1Z1995' FOUND SAMUEL WAFER No ANNNE ALSTIE SkJaR DA 745 PG 0712 TAX PARCEL 41"410 ZONED RA USE. 1WCAT/REMEWTNL ROO ram POST FOLIO 40' WIT OF W KY SEE DA 339 PC 207 27ar APPRoaH4AtaT CIA TELL MILES To RTE 277 6 PED. POWER POLE WIYWNO L CHATEAUNEF .R DA 313 PC 503 TAX PACEL 06-A-207 ZONED, RA AGRICULTURAL rROrM RA \ .. 200 304 DATE : 11 NOV 97 REVISNONES: PROPERTY �Jr LVv:AT� AY'Ki1J 9 GlSY'1L. V9J 1 RF5.11 A EflQ�f90OF19 F SCAB : AS SEOWnN 19 NOV97 A I-VR1ION Vr RII TER 1�� AND sun+yoFs �°r,iibp1O'VA DEAD: TO BE LEASED BY ASSOCIATES Inc. TR9� TN CHEC Eo: � SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY (TWR180—SHERANDO) ��� COUNTY. VIRGINU 1 SET 2 COUNTY OF FREDERICK 0.8. 440 Pr. 421 TAX PARCEL 56-A-143 ZONEOc RA USE: PARK AGO FOUND UIM000 D. RETTER AND 1'.2CIOO' NUMBER DIRECTION DWANCE EULABETH ANN BITTER Lt N 32'Dt'S7" E 70A0• DB PARCEL P8 t642 a TAX PARCEL 66-A-20D L2 S 57'S6 03 E 70A0' � ZONED RA FROMrTFBYCION OF 9aUMLtrt III AM BORE 2n AT EIIT 307. PROCEED EAST ON u S 3Z•O1 s IF 7000 / USE: VAGARY go= 2n MPFCmMATELT 13 NLES M MTEASECT41 III 2n NO ROUTE LX L4 N 5rW 0.3 In)0.DO CgD Wim In NOSOLIM R)A RIUIE 636 APPRO ARTELY 0.4 MI.FS TO A SLEFT THE In 03'O5 32 51.72 1 CONTMUECO TIM E STRKM NEAO OI OMIfl ROAD FOR MPROUK7FIT am MILES L6 N 57'56'03- IN K2 J / I 325' 14 / l pp RRTE EuzM"08E�no.ANN k,TTERO rrrmt vo1c� t 14 ' DA 719 PG 446 1. MKPROPOSD LUSH AREA NO ACCESS NO VIILM Eks" ME LOCIM ON .M SEE PLAT R L -A PO. 1646 PfgPERTT Q1RIE)ITLT OESOWED AS FREDUttDL COONTY 1AI PARCELS N-A-2M A I TAX PARCEL 66-A-i06 ZONED B-1 K-A_209 AND Di6Lf.NILT Orm EFE7N BT LIA•000 RITTER AND EUZANN RITTER X 2 SITE PEAK .AS PREPARED YRN THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BP W" 4i t C9LEWK PAL FLED n4M 1 116 PROPIXTY 6 SAAZ TO AL RM7RICTOR6 EASEMDITS. OR ROTA OF UV GSM E _ OFRECORD PIDI 70 M 0UE or THIS Rtt AI. BENCHMARK I POWER ,L THE UNrDASU RUO OF PREQ90N FOR T S 9R1ET DCEETS 1:1000a PROPOSED AREA 16' O RIVE ROAD SPIKE POLE 1 CEIR O16 ARE RASED ON t6C A GS STATION VERO6' DlV. - 76135'. NOWD 29 GA / BRRET 12' PINE L 9DCR NU6L 6 A Am -ROAD In SPICE A 12' PRE My - 731ii 11 EE£V. . 731.26' R- 7. Da5T9C PR>PLRTr C WLpa6 MPRIMMY1TELT 39D74 AGES. L ZONING DATk ,a u Ci1R1ENT ZOANIQ SLOW AIiA RA I Y• PROPOSED USE: Si• hS1i90RL10emoams=ooG RER WLT QF REQJMe BF �M� 1 / ♦ a D UTLR1' BACKBOARD WAND RED mwPROPOSED COHOW: 3011 1 MO' LJ L3 I : REDIISED SET910I 1\ ,J FRONT - 323' FROM MAO Rlprt-0tRv E-, I J SIDE - 3W W COMA Sf E 6 1O O TIE NEW GRAVEL ROAD OC/R - 3W PEIiCElA4 I 2• GRAVEL / INTO E7o5TNp GRAVEL OrOa WYTN ! LORR000 TTER AND ELZAAM RITTER \ / b ` tMIc. RROAD. 746 DOUBLE CLOICIL raw - CONC- PAD WITH »6rtR'A 2265 BASKETBALL COAL Ia. APPLbN11: sown 124 SDJ k SO 45 MIDDLE CD~ FENCE \ I n• R4GRES5 A EET 10 \ OETAE AND EGRESS EASEMENT PEG. �, TEIE. (j4C �-4141i1624-01S9 11. PORfR Comm" POT7MIC E06O POWER CM~ 0 TA . � � � � — — — P.a BOR 3200 CRC. 611 5 77 V5 —�— — — — — 32.01'S7* E 366.L2.— — —- 1FA4ESTER, lw 2xa / aAORIs 60:00• \\ — — — — — — — — _ _ — _ — — — — — (600) 654-1517 ARC 1D+G'IH 94.25• �•� \ — — — — -� — �"�— — 11 TEIEPNOE CD~. BELL ATLANTIC / CRC. LENGTH 64A5 \ T— —� — sr- 2960 IL TAR1EW PARK DONE FALLS DfAAOA MR U046 / ,`'s \ \ JS r0 $ (sal 154-= li M SITE GOES NOT Li WTMa A K.= DCZKVM I00 WEAR FLOOD ROE. / 14. NAO 27 Nlllts MR PROPOSED IOROt LATTuOE PPE 39'D4'OS4Y I.OINGRDE 7Vt1D9.65' / r. ar rmrs ..o c¢r.+c • .Y•' >. sun[ .wK rnoc ro 1K nalz FOUND 11 AAPPROX.TO" BAY DEY. - 729U FT, � / loot 1ROR rn.c � uc 1L THIS PUT REPRESDRS THE SURVEY OF TE PROPOSED LEASE AREA NO ACCESS EAS13"M TIr1 R*4Cy ss6 CONDUCTED BY ANOERSo N t ASSOCIATES ON 25 AlG 1997 NO GOES ROT RFf)NESEMf A COMPLETE BOAOART SLOR9fl OF THE RrTIEx 17. am IRO05 SET Al ALL 0004M OF LEASE AREA ULESS ODIUM61 NOTED. nr% LEASE AREA NO EASEAs PPON nf5 aAT. ARE wM Ti rr Jill 0ACTORDYC9NiX DSRES OF TE IADE14EO.E6. +ROPME1RS OR TR STEES. oATE: 1 Due / fL0• III IIII NDtWf'S MTWCAIT- / / a .n.a nc rttoN r.wc ro *c ..a 4. A. •ro C r nc COLNtt OF FiEDEROL TO RL: rocs ..o atoo rr .rro nrt ,.noa NYGrfm saa. l A IOURT PLIB X In AND FOR TIC SM AND CXNTT AFDRSAD DO HfRE9T CERTFT MU UINO00 0. WITOIL IH39 AMC 6 WO TO / X FoRErat 1NNILG• KARSC Dart OF . 19_ KAS APPROVED BY THE ZONING PEE'pNLLY APPEARED BEFORE 1E NO AC OWEI)CES TE SALE G" Low Wr Mw No SEAL ON TNS—DW OF j ADMINISTRATOR NOURT P18X N MMUSSION CIPRS e ZONING ADMINISTRATOR KTI FT£I70t•CIL TO r1: rLOF A ROOMY PUBIX r AIO fAR LIE SURE MO CDLNITDATE ESADDO HEREBY CER19, nW D17AEElN Am BITER rOY NAME 6 SOO TO11E FOREDONG Mar, KARAS DATE O 11_ INS -� ��p���DESIGNER�Ltom]P06DNANtr APPEARED BEFONE LE AO 1pOQIDUiS IRE SANE ANOERSON k ASSOCIATESOAOI LAW YT INFO AD SEAL ON M —0Y O' . 1/— wot%" PUQX MIT COMIe59ONN �R6 — �T FENCE 7722 MAIN STREET 30 s o 30 60 90 4IDDLETOWN. VA 22645 (540) 869-250t SCALE t- - 30' MR1Hp\C2 971111.0923 RF3C/ELP ND 3M OOCIMENT 140. EnginMn modmi ^ � vu r ; 3 NOV 97 " 7 A PORTION OF RITTER PROPERTY t 4325-000 OPEQUON �UfERtAI. DISTRICT o�o� AND oF...eoF.. TIC DE9cNE0: TO BE BY 2 SHEET 2 R19A...IAa tw DRA.N Rec $HENANDOR4H I91061LE COIIAPMIY�TWR 180 — SHERANDO) COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1x ASSOCIATES Inc. tw c�Ec»D : ccr