HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-97 Shenandoah Mobile Co Hunting Ridge Site - Tower Site - Backfile�4
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, Planner II
SUBJECT: Pending Commercial Telecommunication Tower CUP Applications
DATE: March 5, 1998
As the Board is aware, Shenandoah Mobile Company has five Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
applications pending at this time. Since the applications were tabled on January 28, 1998, staff has
met with the applicant, researched in greater detail current information pertaining to the many
telecommunication tower siting issues, and contacted additional localities and organizations regarding
their regulations and experiences. The information obtained during this process has been summarized
to address many of the issues raised by the Board during your January 28 meeting, and to aide the
Board in evaluating the pending CUP applications.
The five pending CUP applications are: CUP#020-97, Bowling Green Ridge Site; CUP#021-97,
Little Timber Ridge Site; CUP#022-97, Hunting Ridge Site; CUP#023-97, Sherando Site; and
CUP#024-97, Parkins Mill Site.
Issues:
1) Location of Parkins Mill Tower.
In order to mitigate the visual impact of the tower at this site, the applicant is willing to relocate the
proposed tower to a point approximately 400' east of the location initially requested. This new
location is partially inside a wooded area and less visible to the neighboring properties. This location
necessitates the granting of a waiver to the setback requirements by the Board.
107 North Kent Street - Winchester. Virginia 22601-5000
,,
1
Towers Update Memo
Page 2
March 5, 1998
2) Access to Parkins Mill Tower.
In a letter to Mr. Kris Tierney dated February 6, 1998, the applicant states "Shentel will make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the road will not deteriorate because of our use. Typically, we
(Shentel) first ensure that it is strong enough to support the construction effort. Then, following
construction, we regrade it as part of our procedure to turn the site over for routine operations. " The
Board may wish to evaluate if this commitment on the part of the applicant mitigates any impact
Shentel's use of the road may have upon the condition of the road.
3) Form of Guarantee.
"The commercial telecommunications facility shall be removed by the applicant or landowner within
one year of the abandonment of operation."
It is stars judgement that the above condition satisfactorily covers the intent of the requirement to
guarantee the removal of the tower upon abandonment. A Conditional Use Permit, by its very nature,
is specific to a piece of property. The property owner is required to be a party to the CUP application
and is, therefore, secondarily responsible for the removal of the tower in the event that Shentel, or
any other service provider, should cease to exist. The determination that the ultimate liability for
removal of the tower falls with the landowner has been consistently endorsed by other jurisdictions
within the State. In addition, staff was unable to find another jurisdiction in the State that required
a monetary guarantee for removal of a tower. Time periods for the removal of a tower upon
abandonment ranged from 90 days to 24 months.
4) Site Security.
The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires that commercial telecommunication facilities are
enclosed to prevent access by persons other than employees of the service provider.
S) Taxation.
The Frederick County Commissioner of the Revenue taxes the commercial telecommunication
facilities in the following way: The land on which the facility is located, and the tower and accessory
structures, are taxed as real estate; the antennas and any other fixtures placed upon the tower are
taxed as personnel property.
r
Towers Update Memo
Page 3
March 5, 1998
Scope of Local Control under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Upon review of the available information, staff maintains the view that while local governments
cannot "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting" cellular service, they do have the ability to evaluate
a request to provide cellular service to determine if residential properties, land use patterns, scenic
areas and properties of significant historic value are negatively impacted. It is clear that any perceived
impact should be significant and quantifiable for the jurisdiction to deny a facility at a particular site.
Equally as clear is that any such denial should not have the effect of prohibiting the service within a
given area. The numerous legal articles provided along with this memo highlight both this and, in the
case of a denial, the need to provide this decision in writing supported by "substantial evidence
contained in a written record."
Additional information is attached to this memo for the Board's review. This includes correspondence
from Mr. Leonard Greisz of Shenandoah Mobile Company under Attachment 1, and a particularly
helpful fact sheet under Attachment 2, Fact Sheet #2, which provides answers to frequently
answered questions. Specifically, questions three, four, five, seven, 10, 12 and 13 in the fact sheet
reinforce answers previously given to the Board.
Fact Sheet #1 under Attachment 3 summarizes Section 704, Facilities Siting, of the 1996
Telecommunications Act. This section outlines the limits of the authority that state and local
governments have over the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless facilities.
Under Attachment 4 are the previously mentioned articles from recent Land Use Law Reports. The
Virginia Beach case highlights the importance of following the procedural requirements established
by the FCC, avoiding discrimination among providers, and supporting any decision with substantial
evidence. It is apparent through the different cases that many of the issues concerning the siting of
facilities, and the limits in which jurisdiction may use their authority, are being determined in the
courts on a case -by -case basis. At this time, there are no distinct limits to guide jurisdictions. The
Iimits are still being defined. Jurisdictions must, therefore, use solid judgement when evaluating
applications for these facilities.
Please contact me if you have any further questions regarding the pending applications.
MTR/cc
Attachments
A
PC REVIEW: 01/07/98
BOS REVIEW: 01/28/98
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #022-97
SHENANDOAH MOBILE CO.
Commercial Telecommunications Facility
Hunting Ridge Site
LOCATION: This property is located on Turtle Meadow Drive approximately 0.5 miles past the
intersection with Route 616.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 51-A-67
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use:
Residential
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use:
Residential, agricultural, and vacant
PROPOSED USE: 350-foot Commercial Telecommunications Facility
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objection to conditional use permit for this
property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand
in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT minimum commercial
standards.
Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide
Building Code and Section 312, Use Group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of the BOCA
National Building Code/1996. Please submit Virginia A/E sealed plans at the time of permit
application.
Fire Marshal: Post temporary street address signage during construction.
Health Department: The Frederick County Health Department has no objection to the
proposed facilities.
Shenandoah Mobile Co., CUP #022-97
Hunting Ridge Site
Page 2
January 21, 1998
Winchester Regional Airport: See attached letter from Douglas P. Strand, Executive
Director, dated December 16, 1997.
PlanninLy and Zoning:
Ordinance Background: Frederick County adopted an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance in April 1997 that allows commercial telecommunication facilities with an
approved Conditional Use Permit. This amendment specified that telecommunication
facility CUPs could be approved provided that residential properties, land use patterns,
scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are not negatively impacted.
Additional performance standards are also applicable to the CUP review.
Ordinance Conformance: The proposed facility will be constructed on property located
of Turtle Drive which is west of Route 616, on the Guthridge property. The Zoning
Ordinance requires that towers of 350 feet in height (as is proposed) be placed a minimum
of 365 feet from adjoining residential or vacant properties, and 375 feet from any road right-
of-way. The proposed tower location will comply with the setback requirements for the
proposed telecommunication facility.
The applicant has provided a map depicting the site selection search area. Eight comparable
FCC license holders operating within this search area have been identified; none have
constructed telecommunication facilities and begun providing services. In the interest of
protecting the county's viewshed, it is encouraged that all telecommunication facilities are
constructed in a manner that is conducive for co -locating with other comparable service
providers. CUP's should not be granted until attempts to co -locate have been exhausted.
The applicant has identified other comparable FCC license holders in the area that will be
seeking telecommunication facilities in the near future and, without allowing for co -location,
the County may encounter a significant increase in telecommunication facilities in the
viewshed. As there are no comparable facilities in existence within the search area, it is
acceptable that this facility could be permitted with the understanding that other comparable
service providers be allowed to co -locate on the tower.
In order to alleviate the future abandonment of telecommunication facilities, the ordinance
requires that procedures for guaranteeing the removal of such towers be established during
the CUP process. The applicant has researched possible methods to guarantee the facility's
removal. The applicant proposes that the County not require a monetary guarantee, but
accept Shentel's (Shenandoah Mobile Company) business practice as a guarantee. The
applicant, Shentel, states "It is our accepted and understood business practice to remove any
tower that no longer serves a purpose." The Zoning Ordinance requires that a guarantee be
provided for removal of facilities; therefore, this needs to be resolved prior to this
Shenandoah Mobile Co., CUP #022-97
Hunting Ridge Site
Page 3
January 21, 1998
application's review before the Board of Supervisors.
The structure will be a 350-foot, three -sided, self-supporting galvanized steel tower initially
equipped for operation of a personal communication system. The tower will be provided
with a dual lighting system which provides red lights for nighttime and medium intensity
flashing white lights for daytime and twilight use. The Zoning Ordinance requires that these
lights be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. At
this time, the proposed accessory structures are not visible from adjoining properties, roads
or other rights -of -way. Therefore, landscaping and screening of any accessory structures will
not be required.
Request for Construction -Type Waiver: Monopole -type construction is required for all
new telecommunication towers. The Planning Commission may allow lattice -type
construction for towers located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites.
An identified Rural Landmark, 34-913, the Paul A. Sweeney Barn, is in the vicinity of this
site. However, it is staff's belief that the impact to this site is limited. This site would
potentially qualify for the lattice -type tower.
The applicant proposes to construct a self-supporting lattice -type tower, requiring the
Planning Commission's approval. The applicant has stated that the height of the tower, in
addition to their interest in constructing a tower that is readily modifiable for subleasing,
would be best accomplished with a lattice -type structure. It is the applicant's contention
that the height of the proposed. tower would make a monopole -type construction cost -
prohibitive.
Staff Recommendation for January 7, 1998: Staff recommends approval with the following
conditions:
1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for co -locating comparable communication service
providers, at reasonable rates.
3. An acceptable guarantee is established with the County for the removal of the tower
within one year of tower abandonment.
4. A minor site plan is approved by the County.
Shenandoah Mobile Co., CUP 4022-97
Hunting Ridge Site
Page 4
January 21, 1998
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 01/07/98: Two members of the public
came forward to speak concerning the proposed tower. The first, an adjoining property owner being
represented by his nephew, had concerns about aesthetics, the effect on property values, and access
across his uncle's property to the proposed tower site. The other individual, an area property owner,
had questions on the applicant's attempts to co -locate on existing towers, water tanks, power
transmission sites, etc.
Commission members discussed the aesthetics issue of allowing the construction of a lattice -type
tower. It was stated that monopole construction would be less visually obtrusive on the landscape.
However, other Commissioners noted that more service providers could be accommodated on a
lattice -type pole. These members of the Commission preferred to see a single lattice -type tower
rather than several monopole -type towers on the landscape.
By a majority vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Hunting Ridge Site
with conditions as recommended by staff and with a waiver of the monopole requirement, allowing
for the construction of a 350' lattice -type tower. The vote on this application was:
YES (TO APPROVE): Thomas, Romine, Marker, Light, Morris, Copenhaver
NO: Stone, Ours, DeHaven
(Mr. Wilson was absent from the meeting.)
0:4IGENDASICOMM ENTSViN7NGRDG.0 UP
WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT
491 AIRPORT ROAD
OF 71t WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602
e. _ (703) 662-2422
December 16, 1997
Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager
Shenandoah Mobile Company
Post Office Box 280
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit Comments
Installation of Commercial Telecommunications Facilities
TWR167 - Smith Property
TWR78 - Guthridge Property
TWR79 - Anderson Property
TWR84 - Poole Property
TWR180 - Ritter Property
Dear Mr. Greisz:
Based on review of the above referenced projects by our engineering firm, the Winchester
Regional Airport Authority does not anticipate that the above towers will penetrate FAR Part 77
Surfaces that will impact operations at Winchester Regional Airport.
Final comment on these request will be contingent on receiving favorable responses from the
Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of Aviation on the FAA Form
7460-1 submittals. I would like to request that a copy of each response from FAA be forwarded
to this office as soon as you receive it.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office (540)
662-5786.
I appreciate your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
0�
Douglas P. Strand
Executive Director
/6 4
3 15 2
N
3 4
e
s9 �s
so
5 6
�hP
1
5 7
,
G
B
w E y�e
g 8
a1`oh �h6P
-
s 7¢
72 �Q
q
7
156
6 15 see 13
3 PW 16E s
157
3 PI&
16C .z
16D 13
15
1661
�.= 16E 16F
Q
3
7s c
22 �6 17 �
150
Oig e
Whitacre
151
A
c'¢
23
24
L
2
$.
;� 9
84 10
Jvr�ceny a
�
P°� ,,g'q
11
♦
?S°
121
8
- Propsed ,Tower
'
o
E
1
turtle Yeodor Drive
n
°pd°.
- Connelly
<e
o.
O
D
�9
Guthridge -
Dub yl t0 ii5
ydnor
11
71.5 ? i; E
a'S
s °
2s -
olme c
9
�
77,4
-.
z?P.t
2
6`
o
6a lk �;
70 �
5
6
G 71B
6q
-
71F
71C
7�1 A 71 D _
�wOo° Lo°e
31
F
E'?r•, 646
y t09A
1 B 64E
71G
�
e 1 7
34A
1A da 64A 64D
�Se
3
°
32
64C ^� 77
3
y •
33 9
Al
a
58C
58D
t
12
h
'I�� c - 7
��•
24.
13
f pls-
g
22 23
am Lao
20 �1 15
�
14
O
J z
�0•
7 1[
CUP #022-97
PIN: 51-A-67
Shenandoah Mobile Co.
All parcels in
this area
Hunting Ridge Site
are zoned RA
(Rural Area)
TWRC078
Hunting Ridge
Submittal Deadline /Z -/ ? - a y
P/C Meeting - 7- q _=
BOS Meeting j- z- 87-?W
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I I FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA C /'(C P# 0 z2`4 7
1. Amnlicant (The applicant if the owner x other)
NAME: Shenandoah Mobile Company
ADDRESS: Post Office Box 280 - 212 Piccadilly Street, Edinburg, VA 22824
TELEPHONE (540) 984-3003 Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager
2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of
the property:
Thomas C. Guthridge and Nina Miceli Guthridge, husband and wife
3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and
include the route number of your road or street)
At intersection of Rts. 50 and 37, proceed west on Route 50 approximately 2.8 miles
to intersection with Route 608, go west on Rt. 608 approximately 0.3 miles to
its intersection with Route 616. Go west on Rt. 616 approximate y 1.1 ml es
to Turtle Meadow Drive, proceed 0,5 miles on Turtle Meadow Drive to tower site.
4. The property has a road frontage of 1 ,161 .74 feet and a
depth of ±2,000 feet and consists of 108.908 acres.
(Please be exact)
5.
W.
The property is owned by Thomas C. and Nina M. Guthridge
evidenced by deed from John G. Kaknis, et ux,
in deed book no.
823
(previous owner)
as
recorded
on paqe 1456 , as recorded in the
records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court,
Frederick.
County of
14-Digit Property Identification No. 51-A-67
Magisterial District Back Creek Magisterial District
Current Zoning Rural Area
7. Adjoining Property:
USE
North Agrir^.a1-tea i
East Agricultural/Vacant
South Vacant/Residential
West Residential
(Lincoln Estates)
ZONING ` T
RA
RA
37
TWRC078
8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept
before completing)
9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be
constructed: A 350' self supporting steel tower and a 8' x 10'
concrete equipment pad
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or
corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, rear and
in front of (also across street from) the property where
requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if
necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this
application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14-DIGIT NUMBER.)
NAME
Daniel E. Whitacre
Address
519 Turtle Meadow Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
Property
IDIO
_
51-A-9
Paul A. Sweeney, Trustee
5'Z18 5e/voir Drive
8ethesd4 , rn0, z,08140
ne: 30�- zz9- i93
Address
Property IDS
51-A-116
James H. Connelly
Address
1034 McDonald Road
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDS
51-A-31
Donald R. Ricketts
Address
2437-36 Berryville Pike
Winchester, VA 22603
Property
IDS
51-A-27
John Michael Saul
Address
13813 Town Farm Road
nf �)
Property
IDT
Edward B. Pigeon
Address
170 White Pine Lane
Property
IDF
51-A-29
TWRC078
NAME
Joseph L.
Greathouse
Address
339 Heartwood Drive
Winchester VA 22602
Property
ID#
51-A-66
William B.
& Dana M.
Address
338 Heartwood Drive
Winchester VA 22602
Ebeling
Property
ID,O
51-A-66A
Address
314 Heartwood Drive
Thomas C.
Guthridge
Property
IDS
51-A-66B
Mark E. &
Cathy A. Snyder
Address
230 Lightwood Court
Winchester, VA 22602
Property
ID#
51-23-12
James H. &
Ruth A. Holmes
Address
181 Lightwood Court
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDm
51-23-13
Address
181 Lightwood Court
James H. &
Ruth A. Holmes
-
Winchester, VA 22602
Property
IDS
Address
1356 North Hayfield Road
Sylvester
D. Speelman
Property
IDS
51-A-17
Marguerite
E. Bernard
Address
307 Bear Run Road
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDm
51-A-18
Floyd L. &
Kay C. Ritter
Address
141 Bridgeport Lane
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDS
51-1-1 A
Address
917 Quail Run Lane
Jay & Nellie
M. Batt, III
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDm
51-1-2A
Address
204 Wardensville Grade
Davis S. &
Betty S.
Winchester VA 22602
Property
IDS
51-1-3
Bauserman
Randall K.
Riley
Address
1247 Gray Spring Avenue
Bunker Hill, WV 25413
Property
IDS
51-1-4
241 Greenwood Drive
Cody D. & Beverly L. Kerns Winchester, VA 22602�,*11
TWRC078
12. Additional comments, if any:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application
and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to
allow the use described in this application. I understand that the
sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed
at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the
first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after
the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a
Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick
County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and
Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed
use will be conducted.
Signature of Applicant
Signature of Owner u
Owners' Mailing Address
Owners' Telephone No.
MOBILE COMPANY
Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager
314 Heartwood Drive Winchester VA 22601
(540) 877-1306
Shenandoah Mobile Company - (540) 984-3003
TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:
USE CODE:
RENEWAL DATE:
TOI`ER HEIGHT = 350'
G•V.SO•II Aa5261 7
_r
i11+2
A 760143
FNt PS
AO.'O119
I
9N,26
AP00773
I
I Pt/90
A / j02t7,'
Ilm 26
A S•0660
AROOU,7
I
I �.V29
1910031
1:.V12
A 79C'O61
I /
I SIII D
A75U079
I_
V,:Ol
1 c�rr. fSMrr
^d IO161
K7 [: I ZaV
_I -
Arl' f: /
( I ) CFf7O CAP R ATE
(1) AF7f- S DEACON PLATE
(6) 5/0" X 2» BOLL ASSY
(P/N: 7/00316A)
FLAS/f L(ML R60,'SrROVE
Lirwita; KIT
V0690 NORIZ. BRACE
ASSY AT 300'
- SLOPE CHANGE
V&903A HOl7TZ. BRACE
ASSY AT 290'
CILSIbN WINf) LUAU PLh J1N5//t:/A-L..''l_-t 1_ &1 , /U A•ft l-f
BASIC WINO LGACI (11P- RAOIAL ICE- LOAD).
r„IS T•:AFR 15 OCS:GlIrO r0 ' '"rcrr T,.c F-01.LCATr., LtlA.•" S: _
ELEVAT( i
ANTENNA
E.P.A.
(5F)
LING
(FT' I
T YP£
A'O ICE_N'!TH ICE
TWE
4i _S47 E-C_Av.i S61.IG-nlllifN.t$ N76-6- 5IL'E A.mS 53 )0rAl
6-I-APA ` 1.110 A/!IFlNAti G-E' 5IL*- ANM•i 5}_III PAL- _C•ti_rOlAl_
-66 I_OIAL_
-
_LGI i-(:,1,--
_(5I I.5/Il-
7./5
_M:
ANIElJVAS IV,3-6' 1,16: AftIS 7 1(JI!L
SU I(/1AI.
(C•1 I-!i.�R"
7�wJ
6 r"l_1155 A+JfFrdJAS N'.'S-G' SILICA/7AK %7 IL1F_.:lSO
/OTAL
W_1-!:/R"
.ou
6-PCJ95 AN,-F.NTt75 W,
3.9, S/L,E A/i.N:i �_ }7 IUTAI.-
fry OIsWS [Iao)Lbli•':u) i%� ruEa
50 tUlnf
Iio TOTAL
161_I.
_!31 / it'
I-IG/
--
I .0
G-PB.t G5 ANIf'Nr,AS W/3-6' S1LY. A,7M5- --J7 II//AI -_0
IV IAL
I _/:1"
NOTE: ANIENNA AZIMUTH 15 Sf1OIN 114 LN.617EE5
IVI THIN 'PIE [BRACKETSI
e NOTE, JNfr1AL ANFENVA LOAD (1) OAPA SR2tO
11%(1) 6- SIDE ARAIS AT 297- ELEVATION
GENERAL NOTES
1.
f7CN+N CommuNICA TION TOI:ER DESIGNS CONFORM rO E. 1. A. -7_.'7.-E LMALF_55
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED UNTI£R 701YER DESIGN LOADING. 1QIIEN CXSIGN MAY
OR MAY Nor CCNFDPIA TO LOCAL. STATE LX1 fE()<I7AL R•FOUIREMFNrS.
Z.
THE UFSIGN LOADING C1rf IFUTA INDICATED HAS BFEN PROVIOCO TO ROW.
71:E GES;IGN LOADING CRITERIA HAS OCFN ASSUMLO TO OC BASSO ON
SITE-Sr-ECIFIC DATA IN ACCOrOANCE WITH ANSI/EIA-ZZ2-E AND MUST BE
VERlf•!£D BY OTHERS PRIOR 10 INSTALLATION.
{ J.
SEE INOIVIUU,t!IJ _ .SECTION ASSEMBLY RAWINGS rL117 PART NIIMUERS AND
SECTION ASSEMBLY CETAII_S.
* 4.
rAOR l CA r 1 oN DRAWINGS, IF REFERENCE O. ARE FOR SHOP USE ONLY.
5.
S t FP BOLTS ARE PROV I Zf D ON ONE LEG ON. Y FLX7 SECTIONS 6
1 ftl701.IGH ll, AND ALL THREE LEGS FOR Fr rIC7N5 12 11 Ar,,x A;H 16 AND
ALL "IVSECrICNS.
6.
PAT_ NUI . ARE PROVIDCD FOR ALL TON£!! ANIU AN:IKJR IIIx 1.5
(ECI- DNG. A790135).
7.
THE CFO PART NGMBER IS STAMPED AT THE ooi rw u, FAL:,L VEG
OF EACH SECTION.
R.
TOtI£R OESIC.N ASSUAJES LEVEL GRADE AT TOItfR SITE.
9.
TOLERANCE ON TONER STEEL HEIGHT IS EOUAL TO F'f-US f;: fX7 MINUS I/ZZ.
10.
N'?�;K '.r!:7LL BE !N A,XffY,I&Cr IVI rH C. 1. A-;lZ?-C. 'S 1 �iJ('1UftnL
>l
STAM(IAR-^,S FOR STE_EI_ ANrCNVA TOWF_NS AND AF/e L'A.•�M "+.✓117 STRUCIURES.
- I t.
rYl ic)4ASCl7 SHALL .VERIFY 'THE INSTALLAYIiJN Jr.; If/ C0040JAMNCE
WITH LOCAL. STATE. AND FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
MARKING AND LIGHTINGw,
12.
ION£n MEMBER DESIGN ROES N'OF INCLUDE STrFSSF_S nHr TO ERECTION
S1NYE ERECTION EOJUIPAIENT AND CONDITIONS A17F t0witK)IIP/. UESIGN
ASSUMES COMPETENT AND OUALIFIEU PEr7S(-*JVEL WILL ERECT THE TONER.
13.
OFSIr,N ASSIJt/ES PO 6 DAPA TYPE ANTEM/AS ARE MW717E-0 SIA!MEIRICALLY
TO MINIMIZE TOROI.£.
/
>� 14.
ANTENNAS AND LINES LISTED IN TONER DESIGN LOADING TABLE ARE PROVIDED
BY OTHERS, INLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
15.
T1C r07IER AZIMUTH SHONN IS A RELATIVE AZIMNJTII IISF-U TO ESIAM.15H
T1F. RELATIVE POSITION OF ANTENNAS WITH RESPECT TG THE TONER FLAT
SJLN.
'\ 16.
L,SIC+.'! ASS!'Af£S 17fA/, AS A MINIAq,NI, AJAlN1L-NAN!'E AND I1119'ECl7 L'N
tr
IVll.l, ft. FLri-MAIED OVER 1W LIFE OF ,Ili S,rIAXILA7E IN AC(.ORDA.VCE
Ir1111 AN5I/E1A-ZZ7-E.
SLOPE CNAAGE 17.
11CJ:JGA:f:V DOLT ASSY'S ANU KH3121 RIAKWILLS ARE P77oVl NLB
FCJR ATIACHMr7Nr OF RCO/STROPE FLA97fAII TO BEACON PLATE.
10.
DISH MOLNrS ARE r0 BE PROVIDEO BY OTHERS.
19.
SIDE ARTJS ARE TO BE PRUVIDEO BY OrIA£RS tlhLESS OTFF.RWISE &'DIED.
20.
TOWER CIRIENIAFIOV TO BE CIEFFrMIWV BY OTHERS.
ZI.
C*C IS-RIXE WAVE61VIPE LACXWF; IS PROVIDE0 FROM 10'1 TO 300' ELEVATION.
(7-N'AVEC.UJCE LADOFRS ARF FUTL►,E)
22.
HO'N SHALL HAVE rfrC OPTION 10 REVIEW FINAL 01511 LOCATIONS.
A?/A(Llrff5 AMJ MOLBJrS 10 VErIrY IHAr ASS(ACU TOfXt.£ VALIALS,
XV LCCAl. SlAESSES ARC MIDI EXCEEDFO.
23.
r,LVA•f-LOG SAFETY DEVICE IS SLMT`PLILU FLIR )LE ENI'IRC IEirwr Or
TIE 1011ER.
�! 24.
DISH AZIMUTHS SI701IN ARE NLOMIML AZIMUTHS USED FOR OESIEN. AC/UAL
.�
A7IWRR3i TO DE DETERMINED BY OTHERS/ MUST MJr RESLA_T 1N INCREASED
•..
25.
PES:G'J LGAOS.
DESIGN ASSLTdES THAT ANTENtlU 1"RANSM1SSftw LINES AN'/ WAVF,GUIUC
LAODERS ARE EVEM_Y nlSrrlDUT£O OVJ:H 71LAF E TCMI:R FACES.
! 26.
W/G LACN)ER SECTION MAY RFOUIRErIELO CUTTIA, IO Pf.orrR LF_M.;TH
yy
AFTER ASSEMBLY. ALL FIELD CUTTING MUST BE PEPAIREU IV] rH COLO
GALV OR ZINC RICH PAINT.
r
�A%L
easE SI''REnnREACTIONS
TOTAL) COW-FESSION J50.9 KIPS
LG. TENSION 2V-r.9 KIPS�y11 • TOTAL 511EAR SB.O Y.1P5
99ns. G F r. -K rP>
OUAN. I PART NO. I DESCRIPTION L;01-.. Plo. '1
uR01.171f A; OPA (rNGE DETAIL --_--1--iA'
S,f , I I
r,Er.
OIiKO_
BOLT D=FAIL
(1�5:."-f•'_
C%{I W.;
_STEP
GnClffJUIf.G DETAIL
REF
FCUJDAj;-Y GArICC__RLF. ANCI•CP OrCI TEMPLATC INSTALLATION171or
qA
ANC#" DOLT TEMPLATE FAB_(Tir1710D A147P R DOLT ;EMPLATE FAB. IOC:IOVI isl!.
ANClAJR (; tl' r LAYourRff". f75vA7Ar1(vT LAErAILt1Tr
BOLT ASSfMDLY INSIALLAfIGrI -_ --_ -_
IS -I rll.L 1VF.-G1 F. LA(XIFF! II(X/ ASSY
I> I,xC NA VCGUI(IL= l_A/XX-It ff.l lil!/ A.. �✓
NAVt GUI(.t LA(XIr`1 Cl. IP ASSY --
N4vEGUIr•S LAOJER Cl li' AAS5Y
- -AP 1:-
!, !,III 1?, I,.
•'•,II/rl,,, ll,.',
-LA✓)IM11
6151010
IU,6
NL IIIF /!iJKD
NL."I r IS•IKD
K,/;93
Kvt;9s
I
11
-- _-
12
2
KY697
WAVEGU15&- LADDER CLIP ASS✓
C`•J frIR_
O
K( 1Z07A
WAVEGUfDE LADDER CLIP ASSY
C^�71010
N'YSOPOA
N'AVEC-UIDE LADDER CLAMP ASSY
C90,019__
I
r,LFO`1M
ETY HARNESS
C
I
r1.rPA/
_ROT+`+-LOC_SAf
TL;P POST ASSY
C741J!J
li;r_RA2
llLCr,A3
at.-mm
CABLE RESTr7AINT ASSY
_
C711,'.11
C7J L'! 1 _
C7J,F!J
Ie--
•t_"�i
o
1
CABLE RESTRAINT ASSY
OOI i17AI orACKEF ASS I'
r<VC;-LCI: SnfETY 6191.E
16, 1.1CF Af,MS n 797'1----((i:
1
1
ItL C3CX)
SAR7lA1
I
t'Bro- A
M-fiiiENi PRACE ASSY AT 2`)O'
11'AVEGJICL !._AocjER CLAM" ASSY
1
It 130"IA
I
Mt SN'}30
irwiT rm MI5 .S!5,
-I
-!)LIKE/
(X)SIRLC/ION -Li o;Ft Nli K/I"
1
OL,K25
L_104iIN_i KIT
I
CY.KFlrmst.
_L_ONVEPSICW
LIUAL LIGIIIIN, KIT f1E0/STR0UC
-i --
I(XJ;i 7ANW
!/7"-X T 11/1 1 .i W/t-pU/N.E WA L!•C It
-
--/---
KI I.I171--
JI/IX:/ 11. 1. !• -_- -__-
j�r.--
- i(tU75
10/3tklld* lr t.E 'SO' CORD
i -
-Ar•L5
OFAC ON ft A IE w
I_
CP50
CAP /`L A I F it
5/03" X 2' BC_t ASSY
6
_
2/(XJS IGA
_
OULT ASSY
�l'
Z _ -
-7_5_L7tl`Jo
3/fJ" F! / I lIClS•.iPR
%F
_-_-_
2
rBMP
FUItLR COItVERTEA' M161 , fA rE
:k
2
_
Jl7yO5AW
U_-LICLr ASSY NYWASHERS
O"
(SEE NOTE 0/5)
* (FOR MOufJrING
PoitLR coNvEmm
AT BASE OF IOtt'ER)
IONTR /\
AXI'i /
kn,�n
�
l
TOWER C0tVF16URA T ION
N. T. S.
cl-
WA
I I/A
IJ%ASC_r f e
t iirlo�
C 7 iO4ti --_
rl.'A
L'BOCZ'fiJ
350' TYPICAL SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER
TTE:
f!.-.A, Frrl. - 1741-1,11" AD- A P.. o, ♦ Ca a,AA,_n• ,q
1lrla MANHTG IS rlA- rkvT.-IrY M NIXtlI. Ir IS Nnt (-1 iJ q� /,,, //
IO ll, rEPI,IXYA-[II, Lop'" t"1 I'M' IN MIgLt LXI G' `I v IN PART WI70dVT OIX! NrIrlErl Ltv,SENr.
•c.1.. !ATE Or u.1. Trrl.,
I
350' SSVIIW TOWER ASSEMBLY
CIr.cM.Ir ' roll
.4i1 1._Z✓!..- SPENANCOAII PLKSONAL COMA.
AO/•• Ca., , //I �";- 7G = 1-i Lrr.. FRI, :/ BOO %PA! L.+A.rlrr , C�i!)) rI �I J
�1 I Aeronautical Study Number
T4vR078 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration
US Cercrtment of Tronsooncticn Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing Of Your Notice
Federal Aviation Administration
Nature of Proposal
2. Complete Description of Structure
Type
B. Class
C. Work Schedule Dates
Please describe the proposed construction or alteration.
New Construction
❑ Permanent
X
g 2 / 1 / 98
Beginning
A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include
u Alteration *
Temporary (Duration months)
End
effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequency
If Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number, if available
not known, give frequency band and maximum ERP.
B. For proposals involving overhead wire, transmission lin
A. Name, address, and telephone number of individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the
etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires
construction or alteration. (Number, Street, City, State, and Zip Code)
their supporting structures.
Shenandoah Mobile Company
C. For buildings, include site orientation, dimensions, and
Post Office Box 459
construction materials.
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
D. Optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking a
( 540 I 984-3003
lighting system desired. The FAA will consider this in tf
Area Code Telephone Number
study.
3. Name, address and telephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above.
Leonard L. Greisz c/o Shenandoah Mobile Corapany
Post Office Box 459
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
f 540 ) 984-3003
Area Code
Telephone Number
. Location Of Structure
Coordinates f to hundredths or seconds,
if known)
atitude 0
39 1 11 1 38.78
ongitude 0 1
78 16 145.20
D. Source for item 4A data.
— USGS 7.5' Other
'uad Chart ❑ Survey ❑ Specify
::cafe the re=_rence datum.
ther
NAD 27 ® NAD 83 ❑ Specify
B. Nearest City or Town
rr and State
Winchester, VA
„ (1). Distance to 48
6 Miles
(2). Direction to 4B
92 Degrees
C. Nearest public or military airport,
heliport, flightpark, or seaplane base
)KV Winchester Regior
I1). Distance from structure to nearest
point of nearest runway
6.987 NM
(2). Direction from structure to airport
1155.86 Degrees
Exhibit 4
5. Height and Elevation Ito nearest too
A. Elevation of ground above mean
sea level.
Exhibit 1
936
B. Height of structure including all
appurtenances and lighting above
ground or ureter.
350
C. Overall height above mean sea level
1,286
4E. Description of site location with respect to highways, street, airports, prominent terrain, features,
existing structures, etc. Please attach a U.S. Geological Survey Map for equivalent) showing the construction
site. If available, attach a copy of a documented site survey with the surveyor's certification.
::ice is rec.ired by Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.A. Part 77) pursuant to Sec:icn 1101 of:he Federal AviaCon Act of 1958, as amended U.S.C. app. 15011. Persons wh
owingiy anc'•viilfully violate the Notice recuirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of S1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Sec::on 9011a) of the Federal Aviation Act of
58, as amended (49 U.S.C. app § 1471(2)) as well as the fine (criminal penalty) of not more than S500 for the 5rst offense and not more than S2.000 for subsecuent offenses. pursuant to Section
?ia) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. as amended (49 U.S.C. app g 1472(a)).
HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition,
;ree to obstruction mark and or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary.
Typed or Panted Name and Titie of Person Filing Notice I S'_nature
Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager, PCS
OR FAA USE ONLY''' = ='FAA will either return this form or issue a separate acknow/edoement.
-.
,-ie Proposal:_:: ` ` r + �1 Supplemental Notice of Construction, FAA Form 74EO-2, is requred any time the prc;act s abandoned, or
Does not require a noticeo FAA } ` � , . Ai least 48 hours before the startof consWciao
Is not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAA Part 77 u l ❑ Within five days after the consLtidSon reaches, Is gre=test height`
Subpart C, and would not be a hazard to air
nawg Uon .
,• _ Ttus determination expires on unle'
Is ideal ed as anobs ruc.on under the standards of FAR -part 77 (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issus;ng cffice; t . : ` r•
- (b) Ne consuuct on s subject to the licensing aulhony of he Federal Commun cat ors Commission (FCC) and an applicatio
Subpart C, but would not be a hazard to air navigation _ y M ;-..for a consirtrclion permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such cases the determination
expires ort. the date prescribed by the FCC for camp!et on of construction, or on the dale the FCC denies the application.
Should be obsJuchonE] marked ❑ lighted per FAA-1_� ., z NOTE Request for extens onto( the etfectivepenod of th's determination must be'posJharxed or delivered to Cie issuing office
Advisory Cirpular 70R'c9 t Chapters at leasst�Sda s nor to the e'j iiatlon date �i ~� T.r:
^,G-f' t.=.1+.�-. ,- z2'- �' t�:?nY p rr•�p �.. 7- t c r,Y.�-.M •f. i.5!�, .'.�s ,Ms•s � 4
Obsw oil marking and lighting are not necessary., ::. V ,� ., tLfheaSVucCure ts�su�ject to ttiercens - authority of the FCC'copy of this detenninaGon w�jtDe sen(o that tagp�ty } '
. r..�. - t��.. _ - i
-;arks .-'<� ti .z w r___t �. �..
ti ��„t^ >. „.' ,_• F• y r5y :y�? 'rr u� S -'° 3 fi.-L.
. �.'t'•' Y:.-.�� L.
";-tit .y .ta+` ' ^' '' •� `,a'" ...., •fie,
uJ - .Ili s lti �. rsl .�r a �, w y a > h' jk
fv,:i Y.�rL... �T.�! . r '�•.. �'% .,�' �t� lr ?.��.< ,.+ M 'K. 4. s t_. (r r:i' s�D
- ,, a` '•1._ �vri Ci..el 1'<r�v {t-_.. �r< ,,a � r � � i`.. •~'r a� t .Ja i � �• ... `•'7� +.�
i � y�i�1,� �$� •+uf;a *f>f'YyzYj,xe. ir. Jam~ y r "!- �� �� � <,;
' r � ,:. �,., • i l ' �`•r.f �i d r SI � .� w � �� fa c..fif�-. .l, - 't'. �'•, .( ��•r `�'•��' [�� ,.red
_ .r L. l T' � + a _ �� ..,.X 1•,. •. > t C : � � '�i'. , ^! � t Y .. % J � �,•�t +► ..� >'r` ,f- ; -a.� 7 ..+ � ✓`.
r F+ u 3 �f�: Jjn'rt.r+.C->,:- Y. - # < •� t.. 2.. ^ t v r r.t
_ 1�9;'�'�i'-'1"":�-C.,�.Y '�j .-iw, iV_frr'l,.r rs •.S �.4:}ems... ' n. �:.,�y W`ft:,7%kt��'iwJ
±J� s o'}: �.c• fir- .y.. - �J 7' i Tom- >• .y •.
••.iUse-Cie i••- ...•.?•t�r.•a•..- -i r�: ,•c ` >y- _ t5'-`:t'-` r v - _ - wr!
I D se coorcmile'S form �- r«0
i 83 COOfdInBtES escondencewrhtheFAA) }L2tItUdBI''., "�'� t' ^'"'X `Lon
future corn c = . F r a.
e•• n I S,gnature I Dare
NOTE: NO ► DRAWN TL ,3CALE
TWR78
OVERALL HEIGHT: 1286 ft. AMSL
GROUND ELEVATION: 936 ft. AMSL
EXHIBIT 1
Hunting Ridge, VA
VERTICAL PLAN SKETCH OF PROPOSED ANTENNA AND
SUPPORT STRUCTURE
SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY
/ I/'I/ rl , l % ' •I ( ' `, i' ,hsa s 1•I� 8, 1•r �'a.
.6+.\\mt•\
1 MAP. SHOWING PROPOSED SITE
yF Exhibit 2 ' 1:
TWR078 - Hunting Ridge ,; ,1;i;
l Shenandoah Mobile Company 12/97
r _ i, aEmi M4
/ . •� ��ilU : I "� \�� •,� l� . / _
(\ 400 ! /' a
" � 1 � � n. - °p it �`'-/_..-.�� �:\ - `•/ (I� `1� 1•\_ _' 1 u � 1'/l/i �,�/�,^\•����p`�. .`/;r+l l (,l l
— i � _. •// .\—� -- �_ •� r�' � t ( 1/" / III i-.1.�.�• y9\ .�ri is
� // -is--�Cr `, :, `,� \1, :.rYi p _'i j'� � %! '11�j • �• (\ at',
., -_ 4� .. / �=- ,I,c ��;� ;)� I k ,:✓//', �,., � , '''--ail; :�C�l
r�mnnt•.%• 78 /• r u
7L w- �/ G.^' L•' ice.. � �, � J. '
46
„s �♦ 1 1 (�' \ r -jr �� ����:, { 6,J;%•.��_1• r �.. li(( �,� ,.p'v:•.`ii' '{ \. ?9r
' mA I , °�~\ aa�a�,,� '' 1(` 1., •.:. �• I f l'((�, ., %- p ,�:.'i !%!./. ✓)'• .. . �� r �; (� ��. 7 4'�
e `�8o6 ,m.J `,,~.l �e .(�'..� .:. �' JC�•b.: !f /•/_.�, _ ..i// r��J'' /, T; l ��.i' ,\�;'��`�,�h°O
�% , -_ 't r J :( ,i �'• %O `'•+ /' 'i�-.i4 :�'% i' g;�'; r:.l r��.J' � � 1 � l ,'�,. .t:�' �� �<
gab
Tv
/ �r ) �ll_ !'' ;I' ��_,,` O _.•'. I' � i rr o, 1� �(li ��1 �' � l:' � ; �` .�i� i, .\\
a/0�n+�' pa !lr i 9G9 , p 1 j 1 r
i� c lie .. . ;i ; - _ �% .° /,, �� •,',f. ' .i I �, nk-� }; / - i,.,, /
,L�,ir l -%
Q4 •`rr ! 1 - �f" %% I! d u ..X 05J. • • a," _ R�` W •',- ```..• \��
_ r /,/ /�`� � �� r� I q��"fp / p I. ._�,�•• ,I ' .90° - (\ i 9c. •�j .�- /
A. "•'' 'h�\' 1i ' — •.� �.a \ . \I _
901
1 • IC4 i. 4 as % I) C' \ • .] ea 02 ` /�
,' 9°3- ••�.•,��`\I, r � ii' / Iv,
I./ , ��\�. .// 9aM- ^.(.� ,. �•
JI
_ ,/ �;0 -N � Ij 1• ' r � � � � j 0;.•i• '\emu ,\� !'' I%:!i
' `` , �a �Cl ) •/,. Or ��� •`\ 'v a r' I � '!,'/ . i{ :'f' ' \�q,�a �'rl�• �' 1,'/�:7. .
/ f tea` I •{.I {' ' (jt( r : ,. Jam+
','It "I. •.;.v J '•yy aa. ,.\ `. Il\ 1'r I• ^ ��d�y/4��., .\ 1 I! •/, .}.:
SCALE 1:24000 i i
MILE 1( a'
1 0 :
3000 0 1000 2000 30,30 .000 5000 6000 )OCO F = !
_
J 1 .5 0 1 KILOMc =R
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
/ ate, 11 cf,err
ps Ale
i
v /098
Cem
• ;y Alt Pleasant j !
11 /-. � • a 1 (/ (tl'� - ,!� :%� � • •�'' .' ems. /,
0.
OR
lu
A �` ., _,.,� •...,.� --yam . _ :c;
( / V 7j ,. "a:c-o...i /•' 1. �. �.'�75
.. Frosrbur "• / ^ _::. = t. , 1 lc. s.���BtnC? �,27,30
1' o . n9?11:+SBlFr s r .. V 438"`;: .: B,26) �'' 8�. ,• u
ea
MAP SHOWING PROPOSED SITE -> G p ::•o.Y r ar r
F^
TWR078 -Hunting Ridge ` ''2377'�ring, gyp` Exhibit
Shenandoah Mobile Company 12.97 !i j) ( ) : l .s , , _ r ,
eo' E(` ;itb �.. � N,q , ?a� ►...2029 ((�:� :-< �1 ='_ ..,' ...t Nedg ra �,Q �
;Sea NOTAMs/Cliree,o' I < r
E R.�,�,^ Ir'0 EIGEEpa; {.. 1 188a z rClass lin j• 3 fQcn
�{ f" `".'•'',-_ / - 223.:� ir.�s548���-,rrt•r' - �'' ' �® ��.� ..•.. � / r265, �
;,ts° J`�.49c yQ /d.\, rtinsb
'. CA/I?W 1Py`r ro; Y ,qq.t:. I615 =r: r' o2/7Tg
( ,,a84o
':c _• 2`Y ! "�'1 ESS ':•��`r - Cj .: MI�,Ac{5
l' `e " I•/
f �1-771 /iR762•VRf� 9rt. 1810. 193'9:^„�. •EAS:7ERy:1•t«ui _..�o..� VI
.(?�SHgPNERDt((.1R8�•
): - _raA=-3NSo a,'ntg9 Baker
tiT-124,$� 0 °,''. «"000�IJVL1 nl•:'L70''12295`N `/ Pq.22.1R / o /
Cap. .t za ' n.l ., �Er• �. �T�
r :5 rt i p j.6dg'e .rr:•r; `7ti . -• : \ �� : =! Al2.1tC�h/ BRc� ( C) 9ourr
3EL � ,pO. ...L,a?Orv��.`'�'• \ _ 4r \� I LF�3UR J ,y ■
_SL: _• o8�.'- 5� _ Se Y �L ,fly::'"` t / 3 8s
INS J " `s %�Y : - / r! _ (4 v �Q t20 _6��i�.. �� / nes�or) .�S• on x
Cd fore
to 0
<
. e 01 aum m t
T•:' ' �!. - � � � � � 1409 ) -'•`�r8..ri
rX 93��d `, � ter•' �` HIG„vIE`.� sF
o (2apr -/�FSSrERI, .n Q/� r�91a
� �` •+° .' :Hoer �!' �. .� � I ► � /.\ I2J 'F76e•)-- �C / ti
-) U T. /it'd. %9. f 7•.1:
.t; �~•• sqr. anir w AWO _3 12, pr, I � � 9;� `
_ (� ■. 28ad�. ° fry' 72-7 ? L 55 12 `eA 1 } 1 Ber '
S / 4
• f u golF / /( i
/.x�•G.`.a:
1 �� ' i d`i �C_::AN!446 (3
40 2639 t .r4 7� T + n./ luemor.
:f.el� :Enos: R✓�•1 .r % f .�' r \ c� 3
• 5.. a. .. {!� •arde,tsvii '...: '•P�t. �1 1�t l irAr
'
' '3�30 r .t•� / •. :44'r 00 =v,_9ERorf RUN •'''' p� t\ a Fen/s.` 5idst , a e} 1;ft4:: � 0011
o r..OPz0120 C'rr�1 �� `o 11 1 • Mili4.cc ,..o `* 45
So r wHiv- fin-- t.
�urg 0,' /" p. t /� ....11�/
f /
a V% 1 • a. 'J I ' i i
:y�s,ar .Tr' R, - 1 89" gar T Lp 30 - 'T y—
i�a �, - o/ q
:� •� 3265� % %t;""' a""`•"-
a.308s j f./ ��T /"c i� Oho 23a0'
(_.ityY.
t
f Wo.ds}ock i rr \i a`,,4_I sty jrRRl �_r -H
32 9Co umpi c�11 t2 ( .L r23.0(�r'ri23c�8.' om ctortown 5.
7 P, into. _1, • : ,. t_ _ a c kh� - o? 951
a.�
Y_•BRYC- Fvtr.•: p/TFT�62 ® �'� !r , •rai- r - 1L•5 =. \ _
'r2o 2.'/I ' (370)/s'.\^2e Rh'�.1`R'BENn`IUL.t'�01 �.C� Ll�L".�1. ) j31.71
Ae�la.' �,(�'��-: r n _ ^; ; t11.7LCh 90ry�� r /.\ UC
127K:Pue1pv�N K•, g•' �t( .1E:5 URGI >; if h1CStncll\Cv�
e;� enfpri3�ller` ?�' t I �.
� s. :i r • +a Qy ! 2 { - f f' t E. I .t5' •.l
h oreo 10NCtS, P"r ? J- �'c.;•.:
S `O,t=.' I) ' ,1�s of �` 285 •' y i : �` s ( a 45'
Mocanie i /�: .J �c' - ^�`� _ g f, lJ.ti;.. I.••I ; Q ILA, DOt�.�.IP.
i• r t.
�•, ,�� V2 sYi2 ''/ � k k 2V Ille ::e� I ,wi4 Flmt Nrll `.
/ r .1.' rt4 bckso +. 6 y� /•�{ f✓ ' r _ ,4Q is
J.R FF _ :" (P• .r ''-:= ./ S ^•rt ( i \� `( Orlean . (300)`
s�'DAVIS ov/ .fey 28 3•'`F•,�rp c // s off..: �. .: 207. ?csincon _ !so FCx�aLP=S
R /u1 7' f r •^'_ o •�• '?'T r: lk`r' O aso O' /•.�t 2 _ 32
'., [/.T�•�_ �UR..`"CAVE R� ` , i151�1ti•� -a. l - �' �.
�■Z3t0 �9 F ?)y 1215� 1 av L . yY orrenton
'` 7 02 'L 3) 422!Sw() ilJC��"� 1 t •gam o '- r ;^ �jovr)+•' M *1
m6
erville % �, 'w Al .a fir' ✓ T85 F 31r8 e:Py1i- : , ` �4RR'NTLN J�
'� d. .,Y:aORW7Y•rrti.rrvco: •sa2 /-22
1W TsR`cc_oevr,�••• ••�a35 :I I Mid
A.
r ,� i !,( e• ..� JO �• �, _ I 9EPR`t-':: r• 826
,, `!� ; r • $^.� _ � .4��'� {y',�..r�•'' .�'��.. •4'• • I 23-{'•. �/� ��.:�.T'_ cat L:i C• ��
•J// r. /i__`�;IL, i. `:'•�I,�:\'ter^/EiC'°:r''.ja:r1 �`_ _ _p .71\61 /= �;�• 15,1,E
TWR078 - Hunting Ridge
Shenandoah Mobile Company Exhibit 4
Item 2.A (FAA Form 7460-1):
The structure will be a 350 foot three -sided self-supporting hot -dipped galvanized steel
tower initially equipped for operation of a personal communications services system operating in
the frequency band of 825 - 845 or 865 - 895 at a max ERP of 100 watts. See Exhibit 1 for
pertinent structure and topographic measurements.
Item 2.1) (FAA Form 7460-1):
We would prefer to use a dual lighting system with red lights for night time and medium
intensity flashing white lights for day time and twilight use.
. ..... WSHENTEL
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS P.O. Box 459 a Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0459 (540) 984-4141
December 16, 1997
Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, Planner I
Frederick County Planning Department
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Dear Mr. Ruddy:
of �O
o ff N
c3� RL OF Q� MEND :C_
Zl
Please find attached additional information which Shenandoah Mobile Company is
submitting in support of the five conditional use permit applications recently filed by
Shenandoah Mobile Company and pending with Frederick County.
Listed below by site number are descriptions of the type of installation we propose to
install at each location:
(1) TWR078 Hunting Ridge (Self Supporting Lattice -type) — We propose to build
a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons:
A. This site is outside the Urban Development Zone;
B. A comparatively large structure is necessary;
C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; and
D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive.
(2) TWR079 Little Timber Ride (Monopole) — A monopole will be used at this
location due to the relatively small size of the required structure.
(3) TWRO84 Bowling Green Ridge (Monopole) -- A monopole will be used at
this location due to the relatively small size of the required structure.
(4) TWR167 Parkins Mills (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building
a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site because:
A. This site is outside the UDZ;
B. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing;
SHENANDOAH TELEr ONE COMPANY • SHENTEL SERVICE COMPANY • SHENANDOAH CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY
SHENANDOAH LONG DISTANCE COMPANY SHENANDOAH VALLEY LEASING COMPANY
SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY SHENANDOAH NETWORK COMPANY
WE MUST SERVE WELL TO PROSPER • WE MUST PROSPER TO SERVE WELL
Mr. Michael T. Ruddy
December 16, 1997
Page 2
C. The proposed design is consistent with another structure viewable from
the same area; and
D. Monopoles of this size are not cost advantageous.
(5) TWR180 Sherando (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building a
self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons:
A. This site is outside the UDZ;
B. A comparatively large structure is necessary;
C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; and
D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive.
We appreciate your continued assistance and cooperation as we proceed through the
conditional use permit process.
Sincerely yours,
Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager (PCS)
Shenandoah Mobile Company
LLG/lsh
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ��,���S3l�
FOR
COMMERCIAL TELECO MMUNCATIONS FACILITI
Submitted by Shenandoah Mobile Company �GoFo`
Tower No. TWR078
Hunting Ridge
9Sq�Z
Property Owned by Thomas C. & Nina Miceli Guthridge
In accordance with Frederick County Zoning Ordinance Section 165.48.6, Subsections A
(1) through A (4), the following information is attached:
(1) Attachment 1 — A topographic map depicting the search area.
(2) Attachment 2 — Identification of other service providers or commercial
telecommunications facilities within the proposed service area.
(3) Attachment 3 — Compliance with ANSUIEEE standards for electromagnetic
field levels and radio frequency radiation.
(4) Attachment 4 - Statement of procedure for tower and equipment removal.
L. ) /
__ ATI'ACE�' = 1
<� - -_(% • j ` - Shenandoah Mobile Company
TWR078
/003Conditional Use Permit
z �' � . , _ 7 � . !! \\ - �.� . , ' 'yr• - i
14
� a= � - - _ �\'- _ '� - � �y ': � ., • .,=� a rr
_ rJ/ ex a i lie
Run ,
r \a` 08•-, H��4 •�a�a.., .;.'- r-` ^0_ �• _ /H•/ /H: .vim/ f '�_,/ �.
�� ✓( j, ^ I�i '%�` yL ,'o �' I � - 'a �`I 1 - /J'(f �
94
/ - =�. _ • � �• - it _ - � (� � .! .. (�i. = - - - /� /
`L l/•� Hy f.,i3�'. �/"!!".1��YY11 �5iO._J'�.. 4' � �
%OSJ :
l ^_�
I —.� _ _ , _ ` �• ' as ��/` ' �( � - \ II N ~ �•,- � - ` \
"'tilt Pleasant .�
1 JnO
ATTACHMENT 2
Shenandoah Mobile Company
TWR078
Conditional Use Application
SHENTEL
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS AND
COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
The comparable FCC license holders operating in the search area of the prospective site
are...
Cellular
A -- Cellular One
B -- Shenandoah Cellular
PCs
A -- American Personal Communications (Sprint Spectrum)
B -- AT&T Wireless PCS
C -- CFW Communications (Virginia PCS Alliance)
D & E -- Shenandoah Mobile Company
F -- Devon Mobile Communications
There are no Commercial Telecommunications Facilities within the search area of the
prospective site.
ATTACHMENT X 31
Shenandoah Mobile Company
TWR078
Conditional Use Application
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL COMMUNCIATIONS
COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED ANSUIEEE STANDARDS
FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD LEVELS AND RADIO
FREQUENCY RADIATION
As set forth in UET Bulletin 6.5, Edition 97-01, August 1997, entitled Evahiating
Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Hzmraii Exposure to Radiofrequency
Electromagnetic Fields, states on Page 14:
"Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular
telephone, PCS, and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) operations warrant
a somewhat different approach for evaluation. While there is no evidence
that typical installations in these services cause ground -level exposure in
excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers has been a topic of
ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it
necessary to ensure that there is no likelihood of excessive exposure from
these antennas. Although we believe there is no need to require routine
evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the ground,
out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted
installations be evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters
above ground and the total power of all channels being used is over 1000
watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for broadband PCS.
These height and power combinations were chosen as.thresholds
recognizing that a theoretically `worst case' site could use many channels
and several thousand watts of power. At such power levels a height of 10
meters above ground is not an unreasonable distance for which an
evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher
than 10 meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated
that ground -level power densities are typically hundreds to thousands
times below the new MPE limits." (Emphasis added.)
(A copy of excerpt from UET Bulletitr 6.5 is being submitted with this
package.)
The antenna installation planned under this Conditional Use Permit will be at a height in
excess of twenty (20) meters.
Comm
!/H
Qr �'6
'C�MMISs�s
Federal Communications Commission
Office of Engineering & Technology
Evaluating Compliance with FCC
Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
OET bulletin 65
Edition 97-01
Aucyust 1997
Evaluating Compliance with FCC
Guidelines for Human Exposure
to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
OET BULLETIN 65
Edition 97-01
August 1997
AUTHORS
AUTHORS
Robert F. Cleveland, Jr.
David M. Svh-ar
Jerry L. Ulcek
Standards Development Branch
Allocations and Standards Division
Office of Engineering and Technology
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
The first edition of this bulletin was issued as OST Bulletin No. 65 in October
1985. This is a revised version of that original bulletin.
NOTE: Mention of commercial products does not constitute endorsement by the Federal Communications
Commission or by the authors.
2.1091 and 2.1093 (for portable and mobile devices). This requirement applies to some, but not
necessarily all, transmitters, facilities or operations that are authorized under the following parts
of our rules: 5, 15, 21 (Subpart K), 22 (Subpart E), 22 (Subpart H), 24, 25, 26, 27, 73, 74
(Subparts A, G, I. and L), 80 (ship earth stations), 90 (paging operations and Specialized Mobile
Radio), 97 and 101 (Subpart L). Within a specific service category, conditions are listed in Table
2 of Appendix A to determine which transmitters will be subject to routine evaluation. These
conditions are generally based on one or more of the following variables: (1) operating power,
(2) location, (3) height above ground of the antenna and characteristics of the antenna or mode of
transmission. In the case of Part 15 devices, only devices that transmit on millimeter wave
frequencies and unlicensed Personal Communications Service (PCS) devices are covered, as
noted in rule parts 2.1091 and 2.1093 (see section on mobile and portable devices of Appendix
A).
Transmitters and facilities not included in the specified categories are excluded from
routine evaluation for RF exposure. We believe that such transmitting facilities generally pose
little or no risk for causing exposures in excess of the guidelines. However, as noted above, in
exceptional cases the Commission may, on its own merit or as the result of a petition, require
environmental evaluation of transmitters or facilities even though they are otherwise excluded
from routine evaluation. Also, at multiple -transmitter sites applications for non -excluded
transmitters should consider significant contributions of other co -located transmitters (see
discussion of multiple -transmitter evaluation in Section 2).
If a transmitter operates using relatively high power, and there is a possibility that workers
or the public could have access to the transmitter site, such as at a rooftop site, then routine
evaluation is justified. In Table 2 of Appendix A, an attempt was made to identify situations in
the various services where such conditions could prevail. In general, at rooftop transmitting sites
evaluation will be required if power levels are above the values indicated in Table 2 of Appendix
A. These power levels were chosen based on generally "worst -case" assumptions where the most
stringent uncontrolled/general population MPE limit might be exceeded within several meters of
transmitting antennas at these power levels. In the case of paging antennas, the likelihood that
duty factors, although high, would not normally be expected to be 100% was also considered. Of
course, if procedures are in place at a site to limit accessibility or otherwise control exposure so
that the safety guidelines are met, then the site is in compliance and no further environmental
processing is necessary under our rules.
Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular telephone, PCS, and
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) operations warrant a somewhat different approach for
evaluation. While there is no evidence that typical installations in these services cause ground -
level exposures in excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers has been a topic of
ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it necessary to ensure that
there is no likelihood of excessive exposures from these antennas. Although we believe there is
no need to require routine evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the
ground, out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted installations be
evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters above ground and the total power of all
channels being used is over 1000 watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for
14
broadband PCS.13 These height and power combinations were chosen as thresholds recognizing
that a. theoretically "worst case" site could use many channels and several thousand watts of
power. At such power levels a height of 10 meters above ground is not an unreasonable distance
for which an evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher than 10
meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated that ground -level power densities
are typically hundreds to thousands of times below the new MPE limits.
In view of the expected proliferation of these towers in the future and possible use of
multiple channels and power levels at these installations, and to ensure that tower installations are
properly evaluated when appropriate, we have instituted these new requirements for this limited
category of tower -mounted antennas in these services. For consistency we have instituted similar
requirements for several other services that could use relatively high power levels with antennas
mounted on towers lower than 10 meters above ground.
Paging systems operated under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90 of our rules previously
have been categorically exempted from routine RF evaluation requirements. However, the
potential exists that the new, more restrictive limits may be exceeded in accessible areas by
relatively high-powered paging transmitters with rooftop antennas." These transmitters may
operate with high duty factors in densely populated urban environments. The record and our own
data indicate the need for ensuring appropriate evaluation of such facilities, especially at multiple
transmitter sites. Accordingly, paging stations authorized under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90
are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure if an antenna is located on a
rooftop and if its ERP exceeds 1000 watts.
Mobile and Portable Devices
As noted in Appendix A, mobile and portable transmitting devices that operate in the
Cellular Radiotelephone Service, the Personal Communications Services (PCS), the General
Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communication Service, the Satellite
Communications services, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and Specialized Mobile
Radio Service authorized, respectively, under Part 22 (Subpart H), Part 24, Part 25, Part 26, Part
27, Part 80, and Part 90 of the FCC's Rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF
exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. Unlicensed PCS, NII and millimeter wave
devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment
authorization or use. All other mobile, portable, and unlicensed transmitting devices are normally
categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure (see Section 2 and
Appendix A for further details).
" For broadband PCS, 2000 W is used as a threshold, instead of 1000 W, since at these operating frequencies the
exposure criteria are less restrictive by about a factor of mvo.
1
4 For example, under Part 90, paging operations in the 929-930 Nffh band may operate Frith power levels as
high as 3500 W ERP.
15
ATTACHMENT X `i•
Shenandoah Mobile Company
TWR078
Conditional Use Application
SHENTEL
REMOVAL OF ABANDONED
COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
The Conditional Use Permit application process (ordinance) in Frederick County for
Commercial Telecommunications Facilities requires that the applicant provide
"information delineating procedures for guaranteeing the removal of the commercial
telecommunications facility within one year of abandonment of operation."
Having worked with the Planning Commission in the development of the ordinance it is
our understanding that the intent of this section (§ 165-48.6. A. (4)) is threefold, (i) "not"
to burden the applicant with a requirement to post a bond, (ii) not to leave the landowner
"holding the bag" with'an abandoned site, unless, or course, that was the agreement with
the landowner, and (iii) to ensure the tower itself is removed, not necessarily the
foundation.
In the spirit of complying with this requirement, Shentel considered several possibilities,
including the purchase of a removal bond, entering into an irrevocable letter of credit to
ensure removal, and the establishment of a self -funded sinking fund. Each possibility was
rejected either because of cost, or because it restricted the use of critical working capital.
Shentel is a locally established, successfully operating telecommunications company that
has been doing business in the Shenandoah Valley continuously since 1902. It is our
accepted and understood business practice to remove any tower that no longer serves a
purpose. Shentel stands behind that practice. Most recently Shentel decommissioned a
cable TV tower in Shenandoah County and arranged to remove it along with our .
equipment. The landowner, however, asked us to leave the tower in place so he could
use it for amateur radio purposes. We readily complied with his request, removing all of
our equipment and cabling from the structure and the surrounding grounds, turning the
site over to the landowner as requested.
All of our site lease agreements contain a provision allowing us to remove our
communications tower and all related equipment upon the termination of the rental
period.
�W-78)
FRDW W(IERSEC1Yl1 OF KTE%'WE 61 AND RARE 37 AT EVT 3111 PROCEED WORTH ON
ROUTE 37 APPR=AAMT SS YR£S TO kTER ccnCN ROUTE 37 AND ROUTE 50. PROCEED
HEST ON ROUTE 50 FOR APPfi7oMEAr 22 in -ES M KrERSECTION ROUTE 50 NO RDUIE
RO& PROCEED TEST ON R1x71E 606 A-PQ30AUUY 0-3 MILES TO WIERSEI:TCM ADUTE
SM AND ROUTE 61L PROCEED TEST ON ROUTE 616 APPROOMiELY 1.1 wis TO TURTLE
WE1D0l DRAM PRO® OS MIB ON 71RDF WEAOON ROAD TO TONER WE
11. TEHPROPOSED LEASE AREA NO ACCESS AND UTUTIES EASNOO ARE LOCATED ON
PROPERTY CSIRIENRY DESOOM AS FREDERICK COl1A1 IM PARCEL 51-A-67 AND
5 CU SdXTIT OINM BY THOMAS C. AND TOM h0CEU DMIROCE.
I SITE PLAN INS PREPARED WITH THE BEIEFD OF A TTRF REPORT PR0*RED BY WM
A COI EWK PLC. FEFJ 32425
1 THS PROPERTY 5 SIAELT TO ALL RESTRICTIONS. EASDAENTS OR MOM O is
OF RFLORD PRIOR 70 i1E DATE OF M RAI.
L THE U%AaASTFD RUD OF PRECISION FOR THS SURKY EXCEEDS 1:10000.
S. E1Ew=wS AREBtSED ON = STATION STEP ENS7 QV. - >0115'. WCAM 29
L BENCH WNBC 6 A ANAD�O SPLICE SET IN A Y HC]CXYY EIEVI 94='.
7. EASING PROPERTY CDNIAR6 NPPfO *kMT IOL" ACRES
L ZOIHC DUk
G IROIT ZONC. PLOW AREA IM
PROPOSED USE. SELF-SFPORENC COWN000006 TONER WITH ME" Onols"
WHITE Dtr WET AND RED NCH U017 (F REOURED BY THE FAA)
PROPOSED VvER WEAR: 350'
111COUR D SETBACKS:
FRONT - 410' FROM ROW ROR-OF-W
SOE - 330', 365'
355'
L CNER TIONG C ND HIM HCEU OAH✓OCE
445 TURTLE MEADOW ONE
MN1QES3ER IM 2m
10. AR UCIWI: 943V DOW MOBLF COF'NA'
124 SOUTH IIAM STREET
Pn BOR 4%
EDWSIJI G. M 22624-0059
r,40) 964-4141
IT. POWER CO~. AEIFUEAll POFEA COMPANY
Pb DOT 3200
1 INCH57 R N1 22604
wo 15,4-3317
12. TELQiOIE CDAFtitNr AIL ATLANIY
2960 k FAIRVIEW PAIR ORK
FALLS CKQOO] VL 22046
(SW) 954-M
11 TNS STE DOES 10 lE IRIIN A H.U.D. OESSCIAATED 100 YEAR FLOOD ZO14E.
14. IUD 271uUES FOR PROPOSED TOWER: LATITUDE 3PT 1'3d41•
IOIO7U E 7316'46.20'
11 APPRX TOWER PSE ELM. - 9MD FT
IL THS RAT RFTQESDiTS TK 95KY OF THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AID ACCESS
EASENDITS TITS SURVEY HIS CONXCTED BY AIDERSOM i ASSOC V CN 25 AUG
1997 NO DOES NOT REPRESENT A CUIPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE QJTHIDCE
PROPERI'F.
17. ROM IDOS SET AT ALL VASE AREA CMVd RS WM ODERR6E NOTED.
TIE LEASE AREA AND EASEIEMS. AS OPEN ON THIS PLA7. ARE IKIN M FREE CC160B
AND N ACCORDANCE MITI THE OC9RES OF THE UNDERSOLD OVADM PROPRIETORS OR
T%STEEi
TICUIS C. GA TRI U DU
WK LI ITAJDHRIOU mu
mm
CM"FTkXKkT NNF
E A NOARY PU9,L M AND FOR THE STATE NO MXITY
NDRESAO DD HERE" cum TAW DDIIAS C OUDWDGL WHOM WINE 6 50" TO
THE FOREMM NQITWi BEAW 017E OF 19_ HIS
P(Twvt1Y NPRENLD BEFORE WE AND AODCUL DGED THE SALE.
a" IN" W NMO AND SEA ON T1N5 _ DAY OF . 19_
NDTARr KNIX MY COMMISSION EXPRFS
N"f
L A NOTARY PLHL M AND FOR 714E STATE AND COMB
NURESAD DO 1 ERM CERTFY TlW ISO TCEU GTTTH RD0L WHOSE W AE 6 5A74ED M
THE FOEMIC IR7MG. BFANC DUE OF 19_ NOS
PowmaY APPEARED BMW M NO AODOWIFDGED THE SAIL
CAEA L DUR Mr HAO ND SM 01 R9$ _ DAY OF . 19 _
NOTARY K" MY C016SON EIPRES
78C11 971113.21111 GCP
l µTN C,
�0 4c
L'v=r C. rum;
lie 19"
44y6 slnr+ld
1
1 /
1
1
I
1
R
JAMES K CONNELLY
D.& VA PC-420
TAX PARCEL SI-A-31
�RA
A7,faL1JLTL1F7Al
E--PROPOSED LEASE AREA
\ I 4,900 SQ.FL x 0.112 AC.
PROPOSED 150' TowER
vWELL
CAP • x 10'
CELLULAR PAD
i
EDGE OF WOODS
!
THOMAS C.GURRO TtiGE
PROPOSED 25'
AND ECRESS
D.Ei 6t0 PG
TAX PARCEL 51a-A-66H
EASEMENT
ZONCO RA
LOT A8-3 Ftouss COMPANY.
i�-DOSED 12' CRAVEI
VjWRPOR&TED LAND
III ACCESS ROAD
II
I) II' TREE
i
b,>
ROAD
i.•
EX>STING SOIL
N.
4
ilDAD
S 31.11'14" 1O11LT IF
NLCb 17170' ROO TYtNIEL ROAD
FNO F1AD ExiSTwG
04CRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT S
TO STATE ROUTE 615
CEN ERLME OF ?NEW ROAD' �•
(HOOK+ VARIES FROM 10' 1D 15 .0.
D.B. 452 PG. 320 'd
TIABERWOOD VILLAGE e
LOT 12 �D
MARK A. SYDMFE O
Pr- 59a594
0.& 773 76 PG.
\
TAX PARCEL 51-23-12
ZONED RA
USE: RESIDENTIAL/VACANT P t
O
J
i)E.SA NFR
ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES
7722 ►AJN STREET
MIDDLE -TOWN. VA.. 22645
(540)-869-2501
DANIEL E. eHNTAd2E
D.A 637 PG t5
Z1 �PDARCEL 51-A-9
USE: RRAAAGttCULTURAL
\
THOMAS C. OUOIRIDGE AND
NINA MICELI GLITHRNOGE
D.B. 1456
TAX PARCEL 51-A-67 C�
USE: AGRICULTURAL -{ti
NUMBER DRECTION
LI N IS16'20" E
12 5 71'43'40" E
L3 S tSt6'20 W
LA i4 71.43 40 W E70.00
L5 S NSC 11,31^ W
57-24OS W
L7 N 7T503 W
vI
NUMBERI
DELTA
I CHORD BRC
TANCENi
RADAl15
ARC
Cl
Ja24'24^
S 76'36'17- E
21.77
6230
41,90
f 41.12
C2
20'26'31
N 67-37'21^ W
I 1603
1100.0o
31.68
J5,49
Hi
1
PAJX A SWEENEY
TRUSTEE OF THE bAUL A.
SWEENEY REVOCABLE TRUST
D.B. 660 PG 513
TAX PARCEL 51-A-116
ZONED RA
USE: ACRIMXTUPAL/VAGWT
ROD
FHD
N=
PROPERTY 6 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOVFNG:
1. NORIHERN NRGMIM POWER COMPANY EASEMENT,
POLES. AW kon. WIRES AND FlxTURES FOR RESIDENTIAL
SOZACE. D.B. ZA PG. 513
2. OIL AND GAS LEASE TO C.E. BECK D.8 525 PG 479
�►�17ar
IA
`'/�`) PYNDERSON EI9Qif1NE7 �s. M
�UQ�AND s49rm-11 Ndwou HAw, PC
A.SSOCIATESe Inc. ' � TM
SDATE CALE : AS S]40WN7
T7ESGNED:
E D � �P
1 7
A PORTION OF GUTHRIDGE PROPERTY
SHENANDOAH MOBILE LEASED MPS (TWR-78)
BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA
DOCUMENT NO.
14325-005
1 �� 2
JLIM
FROM wros¢ndI or WOMU1T 91 AND ROUTE 37 AT CUT 310. PROCEED MOIM ON
ROUTE 37 wPR01oAUELT 5-3 mkM TO KTERSOCION IONS 37 NO ROUTE 50. PROCEED
TR57 ar ROUTE 5o FDR Am QMmWaT n MILES 10 WEASECrOw ROUE 50 NO ROUTE
ROIL PROCEED VCR ON ROUTE ROTE APPRO WUY 0.3 MIRES TO NTE G=M ROVE
SM AAO ROUTE IIIL PROCEED REST ON ROUTE 616 AWROI7AUELY 1.1 MILES TO TURTLE
W-#aW DRIVE. At10,D I S MILES ON TURTLE MEADOW ROAD 10 10" MIL
I�PIOP�LEASE AREA AND ACCESS NO UTILUfiS EAS" ARE LOCKED O.
PLEA., CUTRDRY DESY,7MEED AS FRfDEHC[ COUNTY TAX PAp4a 51-A-67 AND
5 CIAFOFDT OWNED BY TTOMAS C. AND MINA MCXU OITHRIOM
2. SITE RAM RAS PRDVJU WITH THE 9CMUIT OF A TIDE REPORT PR ENRED BY BRUN
TOOLEIVAI P1.L FEE/ 32425
1 THS PROPERTY 6 SAW TD ALL IESTIDCTO4. EASOADRS OR MH S Or wQ
OF RECpiD PRIOR 10 THE DATE OF THS RAT.
L THE TAA'ELILWM NATD a PRffAON FOR DES SURVEY OSiEOS 1:10000.
1 D.EVUO6 ARE BASED ON USCS STATIONSEERE16' Ulf. - 78135. NOD 29
L BEACH MNR 6 A RAILROAD W= SET N A 9' HCNCORY EIEV. - 94 M.
7. MSINC PROPEM RRTLMI6 APPRCdwM1TLY 108 ACRES
d II?w10Oak
CUtAEMT ZCMHQ RURAL AREA IM
PROPOSED USE: SELF-ARPORTRC. COMAIUMCA1CN6 IONNER AIM 1E" NRI6TTT
VIM DART IJOE AND RED INN LAW (F WOAR D 8r THE FAA)
PROPD"..ED TOIOt HIOIT: 3w
REQUIRED SE711AM
{TOME _ 410' FXX MAD R7G6-OF_�a/
Sa - 330'. 3w
REM - 3w
9. DI.LR DOHS C. AND MNA 1ACEU OUnFmCE
W TLRRL MEADOW LANE
wpESTE1L M 226TI2
10. APPUCMIT: SADNMOOAN MOBLE COIPNAF
124 SOUTH I" STREET
Pb BO[ 459
EA6U RC. YL 226N-MS9
11. PURER CO~ ALLL7>ENY POWER CD~
Pb MIT 3200
wAA7NESTER M 2260E
i6DD) 154-3317
IL TEIL 4m C01PNN: SI.L ATLANTIC
2960 K FAIRVIEW POM ONAE
FALLS DIUMCL MR 22046
(540) 254-M
11 THIS SITE DOES NOT UE WTHIII A KU.0. DFSOWED 100 YEAR RDOO ?W-
14. WD 27 WLUES FOR PROPC= TDMEk IAITIUOE SP11'3641'
LONGITUDE 7SIC46.20'
11 APPEM TOER BASE M, - 926.0 FT.
Id THS PLAT R;PR£SEXTS THE SiM7 OF THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA NO ACCESS
EASEMENTS. I14s SURELY MRS CONDUCTED BY AN ERSO N t ASSOOATES ON 25 NRi.
1997 NO DOES NOT REPILSEIR A COMPLETE BOUNDARY SANE? Or THE DUTHEODE
PRopum.
17. ROUT NODS SET AT ALL LOSE AREA CDROM (MESS ODERISE TIMM
OrAm
THE TEASE AREA AND EASEI MS AS APPEAR ON THIS RN. NICE MYM THE FREE MGM
ARE N AQODAICZ XATN THE DES RES OF THE UDERyONm DOM PROPRIETORS OR
TRUSTEES
flows L wrlkm O
.E_
NuNDIARYS
L . A NDURY PUBLIC N NO FOR THE STATE NO COUNTY
AFORESAID DD HkBY CERTIFY MAT DgIAS C. QDHRD 1IHg4 NAME E 6 SIGNED TO
THE FDRECORD IQITAG KARDC DATE OF Ill - HAS
PERROUu1T APPCMm B601E Ni AND ADDADE.M ID THE SAME.
DAp LOW MY HMO AND SILL ON THS _ORE Or , 19-
IOW" I` 8 C K CDMIA65:lH CItPRRIS
NOTARY'S
TO lin,
L . A VOTARY PURL N AND FOR THE STATE AND COUNTY
AFORESAID 00 NEREW C OM DW mg MCELI WT1RO HOSE AMC 5 S4+ED M
THE FORT109C NNrtND, MINOD DATE OF . 19 _ "AS
PERSORNU APPEARED IIEAONE NE AID AwD.LmaD THE SAAC
GAO LARDER tw HARD AND SEAL (N THIS _DART OF . 19_
NOTARY PUBLIC ITT COMMISSION DIPRES
75M 1 971113.2115 1 CCP
---
,)SYLVESMR O. sPEELALM
SxDDY M RERUNS
9),IMM FL CONNELLT
6 3
D.B. 362 PG. 13
BEVERLY L. KERNS
D.B. 634 PC. 420
L 4
TAX PARCEL 51-A-17
MEL 480 PG 773
TAX PARCEL 51-A-31
a
ZONED RA
TAX PARCEL 51-1-5
ZONED RA
2
USL41ESIDENTIAL
ZONED
USEACRQLTURAL
PROJECT
2
PQ
pEs�nEMTwL
RtOCE
IOMEL 6100
SITE
513ERt+1ARD
D.B.
6)OONALD R RA7CETTS
PCC. 4"
PARCEL 51-A-6W
9 13
-�"
FNtOP'a= 35O' TOwFR
TAX PARCEL 51-A-18
ZONED RA
M& 5S0 PC. 617
TAX PARCEL 51-A-27
TAX
ZONED RA
USCRESIDENTIAL
ZONED RA
LASE- ESICENTM.AA CANT
HELL
3YA0 RECORDATION FOUND
� AL
11 MARK E.
THIY
O
.�,
\
U.AR PAD PROPOSED
LEASE
7%STEPHEN 1 H ALLICrAN
4,11PQ51 `A-8
MEAREA
3A. Pr-SYD50
511--223-12
j 2
TAX PARCEL
TAX PARCEL
ZONED RA
ZONED RA
ZONED
USE:RESIDEWIAL
�_
4
TKWU
t2 0.8.
BENCH AAAItX D} & 474 PC, 6),IOHN WRIAEL SAIA. 660 M 513
RAILROAD SPICE SET
bIN
TAX PARCEL 51-A-16
D.B. 764 PG. 1823
TAX PARCEL 51-A-116
RA
8' CHHAIN
FENCE w
9' 1KNCDRY
94D.05
ZONED RA
USEftESIDENTIAL
TAX PARCEL 51-A-26
ZONED RA
ZONED
USE."CANT
Fj
NUMBER
DIRECTION
DISTANCE
I
0
%
Lt
N Ia16'20" E
70.00'
L2
S 71'43 40 E
70.00
L3
S 16' 16 20 w
70A0
L4
N 71'43 40 w
MOO'
L5
s be 11.31" w
87sr
L6
N 57'24'05 w
244.92
L7
N 77-50 3 -WTT66-
NUMBER DELTA
CHORD BRG
TANCENT
RADIUS
ARC
CI 38"24'24"
S 76.36.1 r- E
21.77
62.50
t1.90
atJ2
C2 i 27?6'31
N 67321 IN
1 I&C3
100.J0
I35.66
3Sa9
e
DMIGNER
oe7722
ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES
YMN STREET
YIDDLETOWN. VA., 22645
(540)-869-2501
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
31'11'14" '
ROD T*A cRw000 VILULGE
FWD LOT MARK E. � CATHY A. SYDNOR
D.B. TM PC. 504
TAX PARCEL 51-23-12
ZONED RA
USE: RESIDENTIAL
4�1
U;E T1AL 13)DwEL E. ■ICTACRE
D.B. 537 PG. 15
-21.29 TAX PARCEL 51-A-9 -
VEFICULAR GTE TNOWAS C. GUT11160GE AND ZONED RA
No" MICELI G UTHROGE us,, lClATl�
D.8. 823 PO, 1456
TAX PARCEL 51-A-67
ZONED RA f
USE_ AORICUL'LORAL 15"
oo�
PROPOSED 12' GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
1. si .roslz A-o I TC A 4 X4'
TArra UrSilpC AtD-O M tK
n' ACCESS EASEMENT If NUYz
EXSTNG
Sok Raw
rLo�
Annp1 M R1ER RAKE Tp M w�
ID1Q YD ES1VO R MD M llmOl
rLo
SILT FENCE QFitQL
NOT TO SCALE
L SIHNII w IVAa¢ w T NOSTS
4. Arauu AND m!K M
pCw�1CD fOl
i
"'1T.1. \ tYrzl:in� (Y fMfK YO .K MOM Rppt
III
�I/� ri*a IAeac
ul
\
12' RCP
\ \
STOT�
PAUL A. SWEENEY, TRUSTEE
�\
TT6T
D_8. NO PC. 513
TAX PARCEL
51-"'116
ZONED RA
APPROVED BY THE ZONING
�T11RRE MEAMW ROAD
USE.vK'ANT
ADMINISTRATOR
\MO
�_�JA
COn4ECT TO amaxoG GRAVEL ROAD *1 \ �& \ I n / \ I DATE
\ SfTE PLAN
30 15 0 30 60 90
O.S MILES M 616
SCALE 1' - 30'
DATE : 12 Now, 97 REVISAONS: A PORTION OF VV IF7FEIWG PROPERTY 6 at"
/���y ',`^ �p��� /►� i -�%
\Q������11 Efl�f1Mf1 � W. SCALE : AS SNGMM 2D NON. 1"7 6x81.►1� CREEK 98AGIS P G.RAL DtS 1 RIC 1
AND Sur "vm �I� rL DES;NEo:
TO BE FREDERICK COUNTY ViRCiNIA Z 4EET 2
�Tf A Inc. ptorx>.F, ,ns-a,R,, n, DRAMCKECX0 �/P� SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY 78 - HUNTING RIDGE) '
a