Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
21-97 Shenandoah Mobile Co Little Timber Ridge - Tower Site - Backfile
,) r COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/ 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, Planner II /� SUBJECT: Pending Commercial Telecommunication Tower CUP Applications DATE: March 5, 1998 As the Board is aware, Shenandoah Mobile Company has five Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applications pending at this time. Since the applications were tabled on January 28, 1998, staff has met with the applicant, researched in greater detail current information pertaining to the many telecommunication tower siting issues, and contacted additional localities and organizations regarding their regulations and experiences. The information obtained during this process has been summarized to address many of the issues raised by the Board during your January 28 meeting, and to aide the Board in evaluating the pending CUP applications. The five pending CUP applications are: CUP9020-97, Bowling Green Ridge Site; CUP#021-97, Little Timber Ridge Site; CUP#022-97, Hunting Ridge Site; CUP4023-97, Sherando Site; and CUP#024-97, Parkins Mill Site. Issues: 1) Location of Parkins Mitt Tower. In order to mitigate the visual impact of the tower at this site, .the applicant is willing to relocate the proposed tower to a point approximately 400' east of the location initially requested. This new location is partially inside a wooded area and less visible to the neighboring properties. This location necessitates the granting of a waiver to the setback requirements by the Board. 107 North bent Street - Winchester. Virginia 22601-5000 ;1 4 Towers Update Memo Page 2 March 5, 1998 2) Access to Parkins Mill Tower. In a letter to Mr. Kris Tierney dated February 6, 1998, the applicant states "Shentel will make every reasonable effort to ensure that the road will not deteriorate because of our use. Typically, we (Shentel) first ensure that it is strong enough to support the construction effort. Then, following construction, we regrade it as part of our procedure to turn the site over for routine operations. " The Board may wish to evaluate if this commitment on the part of the applicant mitigates any impact Shentel's use of the road may have upon the condition of the road. 3) Form of Guarantee - "The commercial telecommunications facility shall be removed by the applicant or landowner within one year of the abandonment of operation." It is stafi's judgement that the above condition satisfactorily covers the intent of the requirement to guarantee the removal of the tower upon abandonment. A Conditional Use Permit, by its very nature, is specific to a piece of property. The property owner is required to be a party to the CUP application and is, therefore, secondarily responsible for the removal of the tower in the event that Shentel, or any other service provider, should cease to exist. The determination that the ultimate liability for removal of the tower falls with the landowner has been consistently endorsed by other jurisdictions within the State. In addition, staff was unable to find another jurisdiction in the State that required a monetary guarantee for removal of a tower. Time periods for the removal of a tower upon abandonment ranged from 90 days to 24 months. 4) Site Security. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires that commercial telecommunication facilities are enclosed to prevent access by persons other than employees of the service provider. S) Taxation. The Frederick County Commissioner of the Revenue taxes the commercial telecommunication facilities in the following way: The land on which the facility is located, and the tower and accessory structures, are taxed as real estate; the antennas and any other fixtures placed upon the tower are taxed as personnel property. A I Towers Update Memo Page 3 March 5, 1998 Scope of Local Control under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Upon review of the available information, staff maintains the view that while local governments cannot "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting" cellular service, they do have the ability to evaluate a request to provide cellular service to determine if residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are negatively impacted. It is clear that any perceived impact should be significant and quantifiable for the jurisdiction to deny a facility at a particular site. Equally as clear is that any such denial should not have the effect of prohibiting the service within a given area. The numerous legal articles provided along with this memo highlight both this and, in the case of a denial, the need to provide this decision in writing supported by "substantial evidence contained in a written record." Additional information is attached to this memo for the Board's review. This includes correspondence from Mr. Leonard Greisz of Shenandoah Mobile Company under Attachment 1, and a particularly helpful fact sheet under .Attachment 2, Fact Sheet #2, which provides answers to frequently answered questions. Specifically, questions three, four, five, seven, 10, 12 and 13 in the fact sheet reinforce answers previously given to the Board. Fact Sheet #1 under Attachment 3 summarizes Section 704, Facilities Siting, of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. This section outlines the limits of the authority that state and local governments have over the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless facilities. Under Attachment 4 are the previously mentioned articles from recent Land Use Law Reports. The Virginia Beach case highlights the importance of following the procedural requirements established by the FCC, avoiding discrimination among providers, and supporting any decision with substantial evidence. It is apparent through the different cases that many of the issues concerning the siting of facilities, and the limits in which jurisdiction may use their authority, are being determined in the courts on a case -by -case basis. At this time, there are no distinct limits to guide jurisdictions. The limits are still being defined. Jurisdictions must, therefore, use solid judgement when evaluating applications for these facilities. Please contact me if you have any further questions regarding the pending applications. MTR/cc Attachments PC REVIEW: 01/07/98 BOS REVIEW: 01/28/98 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #021-97 SHENANDOAH MOBILE CO. Commercial Telecommunications Facility Little Timber Ridge Site LOCATION: This property is located on Route 610 approximately 0.38 miles south of the intersection of Routes 50 and 610. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 27-A-8 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use: Residential, agricultural, and orchard. PROPOSED USE: 100-foot Commercial Telecommunications Facility REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objection to conditional use permit for this property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT minimum commercial standards. Inspections Department: Building and towers shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, Use Group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Note: Five-foot minimum distance to property line without fire rating requirements on structures. Please submit Virginia A/E sealed plans at the time of permit application.' `. Fire Marshal: Post temporary street address signage during construction. Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #021-97 Little Timber Ridge Site Page 2 January 21, 1998 Health Department: The Frederick County Health Department has no objection to the proposed facilities. Winchester Regional Airport: See attached letter from Douglas P. Strand, Executive Director, dated December 16, 199Z Planning and Zoning: Ordinance Background: Frederick County adopted an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in April 1997 that allows commercial telecommunication facilities with an approved Conditional Use Permit. This amendment specified that telecommunication facility CUP's could be approved provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are not negatively impacted. Additional performance standards are also applicable to the CUP review. Ordinance Conformance: The proposed facility will be constructed on property located to the east of Route 610, adjacent to the electrical substation owned by the Potomac Edison Company. The Zoning Ordinance requires that towers of 100 feet in height (as is proposed) be placed a minimum of 125 feet from any road right-of-way, and 115-feet from adjoining properties used for purposes other than agriculture or orchard. The applicant has proposed two alternative tower locations on this site. Option 2 complies with the setback requirements for a tower of the size proposed. Option 1, the applicants preferred option, locates the tower directly adjacent to the adjoining Potomac Edison Company property. As per Section 165-48.6(B)1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission may reduce the required setback distance if it can be demonstrated that the location is of equal or lesser impact. When considering the use of the adjacent property, an electrical substation, it is staff s opinion that the location of the tower in Option 1 would be a more desirable location than that in Option 1 where it would be located more towards the center of an open field. The applicant has provided a map depicting the site selection search area. Eight comparable FCC license holders operating within this search area have been identified; none have constructed telecommunication facilities and begun providing services. In the interest of protecting the county's viewshed, it is encouraged that all telecommunication facilities be constructed in a manner that are conducive for co -locating with other comparable service providers. CUP's should not be granted until attempts to co -locate have been exhausted. The applicant has identified other comparable FCC license holders in the area that will be seeking telecommunication facilities in the near future and, without allowing for co -location, the County may encounter a significant increase in telecommunication facilities in the Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #021-97 Little Timber Ridge Site Page 3 January 21, 1998 viewshed. As there are no comparable facilities in existence within the search area, it is acceptable that this facility could be permitted with the understanding that other comparable service providers be allowed to co -locate on the tower. In order to alleviate the future abandonment of telecommunication facilities, the ordinance requires that procedures for guaranteeing the removal of such towers be established during the CUP process. The applicant has researched possible methods to guarantee the facility's removal. The applicant proposes that the County not require a monetary guarantee, but accept Shentel's (Shenandoah Mobile Company) business practice as a guarantee. The applicant, Shentel, states "It is our accepted and understood business practice to remove any tower that no longer serves a purpose." The Zoning Ordinance requires that a guarantee be provided for removal of facilities; therefore, this needs to be resolved prior to this application's review before the Board of Supervisors. The structure will be a 100-foot monopole -type tower initially equipped for operation of a wireless communications services system. Should the tower be required to be lighted, it will be provided with a dual lighting system which provides red lights for nighttime and medium intensity flashing white lights for daytime and twilight use. The Zoning Ordinance requires that these lights be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. In addition, the proposed accessory structures may be visible from the adjoining Route 610 road right-of-way. Therefore, landscaping and screening of any accessory structures will be required. Request for Construction -Type Waiver: The applicant is proposing to construct a monopole -type tower at this location. Therefore, the waiver is not required. Staff Recommendation for January 7, 1998: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating comparable communication service providers, at reasonable rates. 3. An acceptable guarantee be established with the County for the removal of the tower within one year of tower abandonment. 4. A minor site plan be approved by the County. 5. Screening any proposed accessory structures from the adjoining road right-of-way, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, is provided. Shenandoah Mobile Co. CUP #021-97 Little Timber Ridge Site Page 4 January 21, 1998 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 01/07/98: The applicant proposed two alternative tower locations on the site: Option #1, the applicant and property owner's preferred option, would locate the tower directly adjacent to the adjoining Potomac Edison Company's electrical substation, and requires a reduction of the setback requirement; and, Option #2, which complies with setback requirements. Commission members believed the location of the tower in Option #1, next to the electrical substation, would be less obtrusive than locating the tower in the middle of an open field. The applicant also requested that the Commission waive the requirement for screening; however, the ordinance does not provide for a waiver of this screening requirement. There were no public comments on this application. The Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Little Timber Ridge Site for a 100' monopole tower with conditions as recommended by the staff and a waiver of setback requirements to locate the tower as stated in Option #1, adjacent to Potomac Edison Company's electrical substation. (Mr. Wilson was absent from the meeting.) 0: WGEN DASICOMMENTS\TMB RIDGE.CUP s SRO* H TOP OF VRGRAA / December 16, 1997 WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager Shenandoah Mobile Company Post Office Box 280 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (703) 662-2422 Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit Comments Installation of Commercial Telecommunications Facilities TWR167 - Smith Property TWR78 - Guthridge Property TWR79 - Anderson Property TWR84 - Poole Property TWR180 - Ritter Property Dear Mr. Greisz: Based on review of the above referenced projects by our engineering firm, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority does not anticipate that the above towers will penetrate FAR Part 77 Surfaces that will impact operations at Winchester Regional Airport. Final comment on these request will be contingent on receiving favorable responses from the Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of Aviation on the FAA Form 7460-1 submittals. I would like to request that a copy of each response from FAA be forwarded to this office as soon as you receive it. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office (540) 662-5786. I appreciate your cooperation on this matter. Sincerely, 0� Douglas P. Strand Executive Director N � 67 54 CO • E 60A `a d _ > -� 69 1 .io S 30E 60B 60C S �06 0 60 / 370 1 312 62 J0 3 7 v 2 Pri. 9 See Sec.26 6 6 t3 �07 tt N p ^i •t 5» 19 •' 4 9 � 12 13 1 4 a�tl R ry (p 70 15 3 207 71 3 208 `9A 4B 4C A4 2 t =11 a 210 209 596 '09A. 4A Sioncker `� Cubenusen 590 72A 19C ro 5 55 s-ssoo 1 S3 7g ��.• > Prt. � 7C 66 6A 6 Potomoc Edison 59C rtc s!ns Malcolm 72 1 BA' 56 Hohn Proposed Tower 7 8 i 76 7A 55 Pugh Pugh s s' 52 9 wain 536 73 f� 8 50 51 74 53A s 1. a ftitho55 53A Orchard National Fruit Prod. 75 52 11 c8 �� Rood 51 9 49 10 m m 44 .� 95 ti 50 / �• 42 90 12d of ) 41 0) 40 � 43A CUP #021 PIN: 27—A-8 Shenandoah Mobile Co. Little Timber Ridge Site 51 TPIRC079 Little Timber Ridge Submittal Deadline /Z-/�-q% P/C Meeting - BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. AAmlicant (The applicant if the owner x CUP #0.;2,1-q i other) NAME: Shenandoah Mobile Company ADDRESS: Post Office Box 280,212 Piccadilly St., Edinburg, VA 22824 TELEPHONE (540) 984-3003 Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: Norman Robert Anderson and Pansy M. Anderson, husband and wife 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) From intersection of Roues 37 and 50, proceed west on Rt. 50 approximately 12.1 miles to intersection of Rts. 50 and 610. Proceed south on Rt. 610 for approximately 0.38 miles to tower site on left. 4. The property has a road frontage of 570.36 feet and a depth of 22n9.95 feet and consists of 39.074 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Norman Robert Anderson and Pansy M.dasson evidenced by deed from Pvel yn A- W-raul ey, et al recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. 417 on page 700 , as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14-Digit Property Identification No. 27-A-8 Magisterial District Back Creek Magisterial District Current Zoning Rural Area 7. Adjoining Property: USE North ResicT_Htial East Agri rul turaI South Orchard West Residential ZONING 4 RA RA .. ,,,, L RA RA 2 i. TWRC079 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) Commercial telecommunications facilities. 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: One hundred foot (100') monopole and an eight foot (81) by ten foot (10') concrete equipment pad 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, rear and in front of (also across street from) the property where requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14-DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME Joan P. & Hugh Luebehusen Address 3706 Conduct Road Colonial Height-s, VA 2-18-34 Property ID# 27-A-5 Eunice M. Slonaker Address 188 Parishville Road Gore VA 22637 Property IDS 27-A-6 Donald Lee Slonaker Address 192 Parishville Road Gore, VA 22637 Property IDI# 27-A-6A Paula M. Slonaker c/o Paula Finlayson Address 3517 Virginia Drive Virginia Beach VA 23452 property IDS 27-A-6B David A. & Deborah Hahn Address 103 West Bond Street Property IDS` 27- - Allen Eugene Hahn Address 8199 Northwestern Pike Gore. VA 22637 Property ID# 27-A-7B 4 r,� i TWRC079 NAME Wesley C. and Loretta A. Malcolm Address 113 Doe Trail Property ID# 27-A-7C Norman Robert Anderson Address 339 Parishville Road Gore VA 22637 Property ID# 27-A-8A Dale & Regina T. Swain, Jr Address 440 Parishville Road Gore, VA 22637 Property ID# 27-A-9 National Fruit Products, Inc. Address P. O. Box 2040 Winchester, VA 22604 Property ID# 27-A-11 Eathel M. Pugh Address 230 Pugh Lane Gore VA 22637 Property ID# 27-A-53 Dennis V. & Elizabeth J. Bolduc Address 516 Deer Creek Road Property ID# 26-2-1-52 Whitham Orchards, Inc. Address 446 Merriman's Lane Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 27-A-10 Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# TWRC079 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. MOBILE COMPANY Signature of Applicant Proj ect Manager Signature of Owner x 339 Parishville Road Owners' Mailing Address Gore, Virginia 22637 Owners' Telephone No. (540) 858-3198 Shenandoah Mobile Co. (540) 984-3003 TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: cA �� Ef''_o _ 0 TOP MOUNTED 0 ROTATAOLE z u— PLATFORM o Ln v � 1�5' 130'— - Q (Fl1TURE) a 120'---- 0 - (OPTIONAL) 110' 1 U Z 0 N m of 0 z 0 41 J a — 70' r� ')IU 30' o c\ I9 n t\� 7 ,9r;�1 CLk.L. TYPICAL MONOPOLE hlnin(i Rod Extension 152' - — 150' Feedline Exit Port Hole rt 6-0 DISHES MONOPOLE SECTION DESCRIPTION CHART CONFIGURATION k SECTION ELEVATION PIPE MATERIAL SIZE �• WEIGHT (LBS PER SECTION I - A 1 10' - 145 18" O.D. x .375" WALL 2790 2 - 9 70' - 110' 30" O.D. x .375" WALL 5124 s - c 30' - 70' 42" O.D. x .375" WALL 7194 4 - 0 1 0' - 30' 1 54" O D. x .375" WALL 7270 ANTENNA INFORMATION ANTENNA TYPE ELEVATION (12) ALP 9212 PANELS W/ROTATAOLE PLATFORM ® 150' (12) ALP 9212 PANELS W/SECTOR MOUNT PLAIFORA ® 130' ? MICROWAVE DISHES OPTIONAI © 120' Hand Holes (t Main Feedline Port Holes �8," 10.50 kips--ejo- 1056.49 It -kips 20"0 Manwoy 33.37 kips V BASE REACTIONS GENERAL NOTES: 1.) All Splice Bolts Per A325. 2.) All Pipe Material Is (FY Z 42 ksi). All Plate Material Is ASTM A36 (FY Z 36 ksi). 3.) Standard Grounding Is Required. 4.) Climbing Ladder Is Provided. 5.) Some Deloil Is Omitted For Clarity Of Illustration. 6.) Using Spread Wrench: "Snug Tight" Nuts Al Each Location With Full Effort. Then Turn An Additional 1/2 Turn To Achieve Proof Load. ( �?) j_113"0 x _?2_" A449 Anchor Bolts Are Req'd. With _9-" Of Thread On Each End. This Structure Is Designed To Meet ANSI/EIA-222-F 1996 Std. For A Bosic Wind Speed 01 _7_5 MPH With 1/2'. MARKING NOTES: 1. Base Section Is To Be Stomped ® The Bose Plate. All Other Sections Are To Be Stomped At The Top. 2.) Section Labeling System Information Is Given In The Detailed Information Chart. The Labeling System Is To Be Used For Proper Identification Of All Sections And To Ensure Proper Installation. S A M P L E °' Of Cnmo-- L—tlm To CF14TRAL TOWER JOINT VENTURE 105 sC1atADER AVE EVANSVILIZ Di"A M12 • 111.61-1i10 REVI$K)NS By TITLE INSTALLATION do FABRICATION OVERVIEW XXXXX XXXXXX XXXP.-.".-xxxxx1 -XFESSITE. XXXx) �NED BY: B.T. : C. Rohrer X-X-X None AU[. NO, •.ercnaui:Cat JiI:CV NumCer (o, TWR0 79 Notice of - -oposed Construction or Alteration JS. Deocrtmenr of'rcr oondltion Failure To Provide Al, .._quested Information May Delay Processing Of Your r. rice Federal Aviation Administration Nature of Proposal 2. Complete Description of Structure Type B. Class C. Work Schedule Dates P!ease describe the proposed construc::cn or alteration. X❑ New Construction © Permanent Beginning 2 / 1 / 9 8 A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include ❑ Alteration 't ❑ Temporary (Duration months( End 1 effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned frequency. not known, give frequency band and maximum EnP. If Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number, if available : B. For proposals involving overhead wire, transmission line �. Name, address, and telephone number of individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the etc., include the size and the configuration of the wires a construction or alteration. (Number, Street City, State, and Zip Code( their Supporting structures. Shenandoah Mobile Company C. For buildings, include site orientation, dimensions, and Post Office 459 construction materials. Edinburg, Virginia 22824 D. Optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking ant 984-3003 lighting system desired. The FAA will consider this in the ( 540 ) study. Area Code Telephone Number 3. Name, address and teiephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above. Leonard L. Greisz c/o Shenandoah Mobile Company Post Office Box 459 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 ( 540 1 984-3003 Area Code Telephone Number Location Of Structure Coordinates f to hundredths of seconds, if known) atitude 0 r 39 16 32.8, xlgitude 0 78 21 56.0E D. Source for item SA data. USGS 7.5' Other Quad Chart ❑ Survey ❑ Specify I B. Nearest City or Town rr 1 and State Winchester, VA (1). Distance to 4B 12 Miles (2). Direction to 48 118 Degrees C. Nearest public or military airport helip rt, ftigh park, r seaplane base OKV � incnest.er Recrional (1). Distance from structure to nearest point of nearest runway 13.006 rim (2). Direction from structure to airport 127.73 Degrees Exhibit 4 5. Height and Elevation ftonearestioot) A. Elevation of ground above mean sea level. Exhibit 1 1,277 B. Height of structure including all appurtenances and lighting above ground or water. 100 C. Overall height above mean sea !even 1,377 icate the reference da, :,. 4E. Description of site location with respect to highways, street, airports, prominent terrain, features, NAD 27 [I NAD 83 ❑ SOpecify existing structures, etc. Please attach a U.S. Geological Survey Map (or equivalent) showing the construction site. If available, attach a copy of a documented site survey with the surveyor's certification. Exhibits 2 & 3 -lice is required by Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. Part ir) pursuant to Section 1101 of the Feceral Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. aco.: 1 Sol). Persons who owingly and willfully violate the Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject :o a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Section 901(a) of the Feceral Aviation Act of 58, as amended (49 U S.C. aop ; 1s71la)) as well as the fine (criminal penalty) of not more than S500 for the first offense and not more than S2,000 for subsequent offenses. pursuant to Sec::on 2(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amenced (49 U.S.C. aop c 147 21a)) iERE3Y CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I free to obstruction mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking & li hting standards as necessary. e Typed or Pr:n:ed ;pane and 71re of Perscn F::ng r:o::ce Signature 11 l 12/10/97 Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager, PCS DR FAA USE ONLY FAA will either return thiAAn or issue a separate acknowledgement. he Pro Osa� - . - Supplemental Notice of Construction, FAA Form 7460-2, ;s required any time the project is abandoned. or P ,:. a - Does rot regwre a rot ce to FAA. ❑ At least 48 hours before the s'art of construction 1 Is nc .dentifeii , an obstruction under any srar%.Jd of FAR Part 77, . Within five days after the construction reaches its greatest height Subpart C, and wou!d not be a hazard to air nay.gapon : This d temiinaGon expires on — - unless ❑ Is de p_fied as an obstruction under the standards of FAR,'Par17r la) extended, revised or term Hated by the issusing office, r Subpar C,-but would not be a hazard to air navigator • '- _ (b) the cons•,ructton is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission IFCC) and an application for a construction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such cases -.,e determination . :. expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construct on, or on the date the FCC denies the application.17 . Shou'd be obslrt,ction ❑marked ❑ lighted per FAA .NOTE Fie vast for extension of the effective nod of this determination must be q period postmarked or delivered!a the issuing otfice A v sort' Circular 70 7a80-1, Chaa?ers at least 15 days prior to the expirahori date %r Obstructio marinng znd lighcng are not necessary - N the stricture sub ed to th_e'hcensm -autho of e FCC thtermination writ eb seat to that agency a coPY of this We termination ow i"i ti .ac. p �..;—i:_1 :.�. 1�- _os - �L�'a a� tri _ ��'l z�_• r� -C�-;'�' �Z-`C's- v �.�a �,�.,.a. '. �•'�.- h' S+}rL `'lir �'�-i- •,►�T,re -; « •' .:"�• •�1 1_ 7. NO I r l.1 _`_ r 1.r.`,• = „'�f4 ` ,.el.`r 'ram.' ,{�"' = v `„+r�,:.-�.` f :-ci l rr �•1..•. _ --mot � - � - +T -✓` 4 �" �' . lA*i K' ��.'S.1.l M(ii'M .%�--�� (Use t ese cooro n ?es for any - , , 4D 83 Coo�dlnates future cer espongy nc vnth the FAA) Latitude _ Longitude .. Y .. yea in I S,gratu:e � Form 7460-1 = -- 5_c- .-=es = e•: __s °_ NS`: C-2Z-CC-012-CC NOTE: NU I DRAWN Tr` SCALE TWR079 - Little Timber Ridge Shenandoah Mobile Company Exhibit 1 OVERALL HEIGHT: 1,377 ft. AMSL v / \ GROUND ELEVATION: 1,277 ft. AMSL Little Timber Ridge, VA VERTICAL PLAN SKETCH OF PROPOSED ANTENNA AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY MAP SHOWING PROPOSED SITE '� 'Ir - = G Exhibit 2 TWR079 - Little Timber Ride' Shenandoah Mobile Company 12/97 1 ! , l �\ ,; •`.f: , ; i is •:.. henezer •ISM �, •,,� _s _ \•, �� I, rh Cem �� i 1` i1 TIMBER R_I GE -/RFI•ELA. l � V r .�� % Iltlil n �. �• • ��' �.. 1.1 le fj 1) \ 1 ���`�.��:'�: ��"•\�1 • ,To-t 1 1 ...L ✓, i 1 1 ' t �- • d � - , ram 972 0 Id f}� :'' -fir\ - ,! _ _ ,.,\,. - •I -62 07 200 J. OS di Ti _ '� __� �...-� •(`�`' - ------•--- ='�--.—_'.''' _• _ _:__! _.. _ _-r gam_ _r- --:::- -- !- ' - -- --•- - - - -• _ - a' �_:: -- _-� \ •_ _ `_r .•1�=�1 �. . - r_ _yam\. _ \. � /' �Il� --f,� ;, _..'\I ;-; , :;; 96�.y . =a+ Gore V I;� aM70 �•a4.. ' r!"�ee-.. ---` • 1)i' 11(` �•- �•�� /:', j• y9 '�aisl fa'A •O' ��'' t. //. �,'l, • �y,,/��' /•1 C`-, _ �I,'�) r. �1,' •� -�-�. p -- \. .1� i, �1'�i—� i j /�; _' �' '•/`_ % o` \ ;'J ,i •/r'1 ;' %sr l._ SCALE 1:24000 -�y m�w I'. j I 1 f 0 1 MILE ,'�' `"• ' 10^-10 0 :cco 2000 3000 4000 5000 6CCo 7000 FEET 5 0 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET - NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 ; ' - , in rc A .es7 PAL- N 3 .6:5-4 ;V,,� L4 MAP SHOWING PROPOSED SITE Exhibit 3 el y rings 10 1 7,'�,-. 7 TWR079 Little Timber Ridge 4:3. (237)-9 3 Shenandoah Mobile Company 12!97 Xf F� !6* Al ffv, a 0 Lr 88 G: I V A7. 18,0 b)Y" gF K: g 9 ..3r)CE 223 y ni2fS48 spriPF4rd A QV'214' 2-9 2615 e, . �.'s . heph . Qa-: tows j 799T �T. 'A 17 t < 93 ig - . ...... SMAONTUA. RB. -n-ood 7r '0 30, Romney'"1756 24-- .W: Fer' f F I'- �A, 70 12; 2-9 w -'*- " Ff.TO 5C"ZT U T g525 Ic -A ch U, 112. 1 4 A'Ir R -7 770; 11 - - L L � 14� 'Nt LW7 A ore 8t T-\ g j & 6-zll 11 _- t— . (300) N__w F:r, E.7F 7� 4 A 9; -w 5;4. a L-7Y3 1r A FurceIM 2 .IY Be, jr 71 rN T7, cat 24y.S101-1 A: Gdst M 0; :Cloa 0 25- A� !J 225- 88,0 05 7 nI*N f-A - :c- 0z); W-1 32 RZ' AN � C�! • Qrkho.. z. 40 0 T79 .9- c i&n JI j k T C. Ploim$ T 2- ! I # LOO, -fig f N-111 N -c4�4, 6o F Z, L Y,111, ;[Iry L eon M ::D 20z 28 1 —17' -IC NAUT�:-%�. Lv�.�s o7 120 101 1 gIATUTE- ML- 50 60 In 2 130 14 .j//170 M' w. I - - , "• - i " _ - . Icer? 0' ,te1•ti�v .E. - ILT -122.1R- q- SANL C-A 1-16.3,Ch"ilo CCN 72 9-` 7 3 05 73 Z- j waj LLi:: ER A (c.26 4 -z t V-, A-- TWR079 - Little Timber Ridge VA Exhibit 4 Shenandoah Mobile Company Item 2.A (FAA Form 7460-1): The structure will be a 100 steel monopole initially equipped for operation of a wireless communications services system operating in the frequency band of 825 - 845 or 865 - 895 at a max ERP of 100 watts. See Exhibit 1 for pertinent structure and topographic measurements. Item 2.1) (FAA Form 7460-1): Because the height of this structure is less than 200 feet, we do not plan to mark it. If the FAA requires that it must be marked, we would prefer to use a dual lighting system with red lights for night time and medium intensity flashing white lights for day time and twilight use. SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS P.O. Box 459 - Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0459 - (540) 984-4141 December 16, 1997 Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, Planner I Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Ruddy: Please find attached additional information which Shenandoah Mobile Company is submitting in support of the five conditional use permit applications recently filed by Shenandoah Mobile Company and pending with Frederick County. Listed below by site number are descriptions of the type of installation we propose to install at each location: (1) TWR078 Hunting Ridge (Self Supporting Lattice -type) — We propose to build a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons: A. This site is outside the Urban Development Zone; B. A comparatively large structure is necessary; C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; and D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive. (2) TWR079 Little Timber Ridge (Monopole) — A monopole will be used at this location due to the relatively small size of the required structure. (3) TWRO84 Bowling Green Ridge (Monopole) -- A monopole will be used at this location due to the relatively small size of the required structure. (4) TWR167 Parkins Mills (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site because: A. This site is outside the UDZ; B. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing; SHENANDOAH TELEPHONE COMPANY - SHENTEL SERVICE COMP.; ,Y • SHENANDOAH CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY SHENANDOAH LONG DISTANCc COMPANY SHENANDOAH VALLEY LEASING COMPANY SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY SHENANDOAH NETWORK COMPANY WE MUST SERVE WELL TO PROSPER • WE MUST PROSPER TO SERVE WELL Mr_ Michael T. Ruddy December 16, 1997 Pam 2 C. The proposed design is consistent with another structure viewable from the same area; and D. Monopoles of this size are not cost advantageous. (5) TWR180 Sherando (Self Supporting Lattice -type) - We propose building a self-supporting lattice -type structure at this site for several reasons: A. This site is outside the UDZ; B. A comparatively large structure is necessary; C. The structure must be readily modifiable for sub -leasing, and D. Monopoles of this size are cost prohibitive. We appreciate your continued assistance and cooperation as we proceed through the conditional use permit process. Sincerely yours, Leonard L. Greisz, Project Manager (PCS) Shenandoah Mobile Company LLG/lsh Enclosures ATTACHMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION, ..,,,���``'�'��<�� OR COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNCATIONS FACILITIV '�C95 Submitted by Shenandoah Mobile Company Tower No. TWR079 QQ�• o� Little Timber Ridge`` 95v�,2 Property Owned by Norman Robert Anderson & Pansy M. Anderson In accordance with Frederick County Zoning Ordinance Section 165.48.6, Subsections A (1) through A (4), the following information is attached: (1) Attachment 1 — A topographic map depicting the search area. (2) Attachment 2 — Identification of other service providers or commercial telecommunications facilities within the proposed service area. (3) Attachment 3 — Compliance with ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. (4) Attachment 4 - Statement of procedure for tower and equipment removal. ATTACHMENT 1 s •ff ' I Shenandoah Mobile Company a`� TWR079 of Conditional Use Application i• / I' I•r- s:= =s sq ,' ` `•• - - / . _�-' • - benezer C`', �'•/ --`\ g9 - O; I 1 �'•` TIMBER RIDGE—IR FIEL- 1 ,� _. / 7� em/i ._i_ I /•• O \v1. . __ �.%; ; \_/_ - as , � „' _ — �' •� - •�� - +ism / 1/ •._ , .. �yI'I .. �..r -- •� ham_ 018 ''�� 50 �- - •f Iez � o � _ __ _ i - - pri 17 - • - `-' . wry,, -- _1 - - ' � _ - / / _ _ �! � ('--) � _ ; _ � / ES %' - - _ _ �� q� _ � '//^- `\��::/ � • Via•''/' '— _- -./, t ` _ �� IY - _vim% `, .V.6 _ar��11` _ ._•_-- , Qq, - Jam: � •• � .� .- p- �;q• - i\ � rQtl3fPy'r �:WT"f'I S-.\. i ATTACHMENT 2 Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR079 Conditional Use Application SHENTEL IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS AND COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The comparable FCC license holders operating in the search area of the prospective site are... Cellular A -- Cellular One B -- Shenandoah Cellular PCs A -- American Personal Communications (Sprint Spectrum) B -- AT&T Wireless PCS C -- CFW Communications (Virginia PCS Alliance) D & E -- Shenandoah Mobile Company F -- Devon Mobile Communications There are no commercial telecommunications facilities within the search area of the prospective site. ATTACHMENT � Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR079 Conditional Use Application COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL COMMUNCIATIONS COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED ANSUIEEE STANDARDS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD LEVELS AND RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION As set forth in 0I7Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August 1997, entitled Eraluating Compliance irith FCC Guidelines for Huniatt Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields, states on Page 14: "Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular telephone, PCS, and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) operations warrant a somewhat different approach for evaluation. While there is no evidence that typical installations in these services cause ground -level exposure in excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers has been a topic of ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it necessary to ensure that there is no likelihood of excessive exposure from these antennas. Although we believe there is no need to require routine evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the ground, out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted installations be evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters above �7round and the total power of all channels being used is over 1000 watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for broadband PCS. These hei`;ht and power combinations were chosen as thresholds recoy-nizing that a theoretically `worst case' site could use many channels and several thousand watts of power. At such power levels a height of 10 meters above `round is not an unreasonable distance for which an evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher than 10 meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated that ground -level power densities are typically hundreds to thousands times below the new NIPE limits." (Emphasis added.) (A copy of excerpt from OET BulleliI7 65 is being submitted with this package. ) The antenna installation planned under this Conditional Use Permit will be at a height in excess of twenty (20) meters. � �pMMU4 W � i � {n •C�kM159��• Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Duman Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01 August 1997 Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields OET BULLETIN 65 Edition 97-01 August 1997 AUTHORS Robert F. Cleveland, Jr. David M. Sylvar Jerry L. Ulcek Standards Development Branch Allocations and Standards Division Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission .Washington, D.C. 20554 The first edition of this bulletin was issued as OST Bulletin No. 65 in October 1985. This is a revised version of that original bulletin. NOTE. Mention of commercial products does not constitute endorsement by the Federal Communications Commission or by the authors. 2.1091 and 2.1093 (for portable and mobile devices). This requirement applies to some, but not necessarily all, transmitters, facilities or operations that are authorized under the following parts of our rules: 5, 15, 21 (Subpart K), 22 (Subpart E), 22 (Subpart H), 24, 25, 26, 27, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), 80 (ship earth stations), 90 (paging operations and Specialized Mobile Radio), 97 and 101 (Subpart L). Within a specific service category, conditions are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A to determine which transmitters will be subject to routine evaluation. These conditions are generally based on one or more of the following variables: (1) operating power, (2) location, (3) height above ground of the antenna and characteristics of the antenna or mode of transmission. In the case of Part 15 devices, only devices that transmit on millimeter wave frequencies and unlicensed Personal Communications Service (PCS) devices are covered, as noted in rule parts 2.1091 and 2.1093 (see section on mobile and portable devices of Appendix A). Transmitters and facilities not included in the specified categories are excluded from routine evaluation for RF exposure. We believe that such transmitting facilities generally pose little or no risk for causing exposures in excess of the guidelines. However, as noted above, in exceptional cases the Commission may, on its own merit or as the result of a petition, require environmental evaluation of transmitters or facilities even though they are otherwise excluded from routine evaluation. Also, at multiple -transmitter sites applications for non -excluded transmitters should consider significant contributions of other co -located transmitters (see discussion of multiple -transmitter evaluation in Section 2). If a transmitter operates using relatively high power, and there is a possibility that workers or the public could have access to the transmitter site, such as at a rooftop site, then routine evaluation is justified. In Table 2 of Appendix A, an attempt was made to identify situations in the various services where such conditions could prevail. In general, at rooftop transmitting sites evaluation will be required if power levels are above the values indicated in Table 2 of Appendix A. These power levels were chosen based on generally "worst -case" assumptions where the most stringent uncontrolled/general population MPE limit might be exceeded within several -meters of transmitting antennas at these power levels. In the case of paging antennas, the likelihood that duty factors, although high, would not normally be expected to be 100% was also considered. Of course, if procedures are in place at a site to limit accessibility or otherwise control exposure so that the safety guidelines are met, then the site is in compliance and no further environmental processing is necessary under our rules. Tower -mounted ("non -rooftop") antennas that are used for cellular telephone, PCS, and Specialized Mobile Radio (STNIR) operations warrant a somewhat different approach for evaluation. While there is no evidence that typical installations in these -services cause ground - level exposures in excess of the MPE limits, construction of these towers'has been a topic of ongoing public controversy on environmental grounds, and we believe it necessary to ensure that there is no likelihood of excessive exposures from these antennas. Although we believe there is no need to require routine evaluation of towers where antennas are mounted high above the ground, out of an abundance of caution the FCC requires that tower -mounted installations be evaluated if antennas are mounted lower than 10 meters above around and the total power of all channels being used is over 1000 watts effective radiated power (ERP), or 2000 W ERP for 14 broadband PCS.13 These height and power combinations were chosen as thresholds recognizing that a theoretically "worst case" site could use many channels and several thousand watts of power. At such power levels a height of 10 meters above ground is not an unreasonable distance for which an evaluation generally would be advisable. For antennas mounted higher than 10 meters, measurement data for cellular facilities have indicated that ground -level power densities are typically hundreds to thousands of times below the new MPE limits. In view of the expected proliferation of these towers in the future and possible use of multiple channels and power levels at these installations, and to ensure that tower installations are properly evaluated when appropriate, we have instituted these new requirements for this limited category of tower -mounted antennas in these services. For consistency we have instituted similar requirements for several other services that could use relatively high power levels with antennas mounted on towers lower than 10 meters above ground. Paging systems operated under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90 of our rules previously have been categorically exempted from routine RF evaluation requirements. However, the potential exists that the new, more restrictive limits may be exceeded in accessible areas by relatively high-powered paging transmitters with rooftop antennas.14 These transmitters may operate with high duty factors in densely populated urban environments. The record and our own data indicate the need for ensuring appropriate evaluation of such facilities, especially at multiple transmitter sites. Accordingly, paging stations authorized under Part 22 (Subpart E) and Part 90 are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure if an antenna is located on a rooftop and if its ERP exceeds 1000 watts. Mobile and Portable Devices As noted in Appendix A, mobile and portable transmitting devices that operate in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, the Personal Communications Services (PCS), the General Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communication Service, the Satellite Communications services, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and Specialized Mobile Radio Service authorized, respectively, under Part 22 (Subpart H), Part 24, Part 25, Part 26, Part 27, Part 80, and Part 90 of the FCC's Rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. Unlicensed PCS, NII and millimeter wave devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. All other mobile, portable, and unlicensed transmitting devices are normally categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure (see Section 2 and Appendix A for further details). I' For broadband PCS, 2000 W is used as a threshold, instead of 1000 W, since at these operating frequencies the exposure criteria are less restrictive by about a factor of two. " For example, under Part 90, paging operations in the 929-930 MHz band may operate urith power levels as high as 3500 W ERP. 15 ATTACHMENT / Shenandoah Mobile Company TWR079 Conditional Use Application SHENTEL REMOVAL OF ABANDONED COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The Conditional Use Permit application process (ordinance) in Frederick County for Commercial Telecommunications Facilities requires that the applicant provide "information delineating procedures for guaranteeing the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility within one year of abandonment of operation." Having worked with the Planning Commission in the development of the ordinance it is our understanding that the intent of this section (§165-48.6. A. (4)) is threefold, (i) "not" to burden the applicant with a requirement to post a bond, (ii) not to leave the landowner "holding the bag" with an abandoned site, unless, or course, that was the agreement with the landowner, and (iii) to ensure the tower itself is removed, not necessarily the foundation. In the spirit of complying with this requirement, Shentel considered several possibilities, including the purchase of a removal bond, entering into an irrevocable letter of credit to ensure removal, and the establishment of a self -funded sinking fund. Each possibility was rejected either because of cost, or because it restricted the use of critical working capital. Shentel is a locally established, successfully operating telecommunications company that has been doing business in the Shenandoah Valley continuously since 1902. It is our accepted and understood business practice to remove any tower that no longer serves a purpose. Shentel stands behind that practice. Most recently Shentel decommissioned a cable TV tower in Shenandoah County and arranged to remove it along with our equipment. The landowner, however, asked us to leave the tower in place so he could use it for amateur radio purposes. We readily complied with his request, removing all of our equipment and cabling from the structure and the surrounding grounds, turning the site over to the landowner as requested. All of our site lease agreements contain a provision allowing us to remove our communications tower and all related equipment upon the termination of the rental period. mosan PWIE Y. FRMEAt7E =MY. A (A6as4JU UM - "10 AmcLim I•.2007 IIEFaaFKnc NFERYocllor or Krumu E it AND ROUTE 37 AT Em 310: PRO= toa1N In ROUTE 37 APPROCIA LT U rLES 70 DE INTERSECTION OF AWE 37 AND NWTE . PROCEED JEST ON ROUTE 50 FOR APPfOSaAUEET 12.1 MIS TO THE RRERSECTION CIF ROM 50 NO ROUTE 610. PR= SOUTH ON RWTE 610 FOR APPFOSMTFIT O.b LN.ES TO Ili TONER S0E ON THE LEFT. iEPR7P� AREA ANO ACCESS AND UtU11ES EAYfOrt ARE =UU ON PROPERTY OURR£NILT DESOATED AS FR77EROL CDIANTT TAX PARCEL 27-A L AND CLQADRLY CWME DD BY NORHW ROBERT AND PANSY IL AI10 A 2. SOE PAN Wd PREPARED TRH UE BENEFIT OF A TRUE 11PUn PSiOWU BY BROW At CADLANL PLC FLU M457 1 TINS PROPERLY 6 SLIBIEC TO ALL R£SLRCT1014 FAIY?DNIS OR ROM OF IW OF aCDTD PRIOR TO DIE DUE OF TR6 PLAT. C THE U%CJUSTED RAM OF PSEO90N FOR TAS SURVEY FZ= 1:10= S. 0E11106 ARE RASED ON USC/GS STAION STDINDIS' M. • ]BITS'. NLYO 29 BENCH NCH N41N 6 A RAUiPAO SPN(E N A POND POLE. OLY. f267.49' 7. Et6TNC PROPERTY CONTAR6 APPOCKMIATMT 120.472 ACRES L ZOWC OATH: CURRENT ZO IQ RANL AREA FA PROPOSED LM SOI-SUPPORONO COrR14UTri6 LONER WN NE" 9NTF7QR W41E DAY TAR AND RFD Np(T L*a (IF REOIAFRFD BY THE FAN PROPOSED loom HOW. too' RECU6ED SEmFm FONT - 12Y FROM ROAD ROR-C<-BUT SCE - 165 REAR - toy L DoNER 14'Rw RCBRT ANO Pri6Y r ANDERSON 339 PM RISMIX ROAD GORE V17CM 22637 IO APPLCAKT: %ENYOOAN ICE CO~ IN SOAK MN STREET Pb BOK 459 ECRBIR' M P,6 2M74-O (540) 964-4141 It. POWER CD~. NIED"Y POWER P.Q mm= WWO43TEX ,N 2m (BOO) 654-3317 12. TELD'l E CT7Nf+MlT. BELL ATArtC 2900 N FAR" PARK ORNE FALLS oitxn , Y1 22046 (540) 954-62B2 li MIS STE DOES NOF LE WDIN A KUA DESK a IM YEAR FLD00 ZONE. i4. HAD 27 VKM FOR PFCFQSFD TO" it: LAMUDE 39'RE31C0" 11 wo 27 MULES FOR PROPOSED Moo p WO1DE 3P1S723I- LOOM 7RF21'S7XC 1L M*QDL IONOR BASE OEY.. 177L0 t7. THS PUT RE)'RESENTS THE SKY OF rC PROPOSED LEASE AREA APO ACCESS FALSDIONTS YAS SILKY 1NRS CDNNQ.CTED BR AIQISUI It ASSOWE5. 7722 IAAN ST- N60UETOW W� 2264s a 5 SEP% 1997 NO DOES NOT REPRESENT A COMPLETE BOUNKMY SURVEY OF TIE ANDERSON PROPERTY gw4TTS CERTFTCATE: TK Wa AREA AND EAYIENiS AS 940VW N OPTIONI/ OP, OF THS RAT. 6 ,NTH TK FREE =61SDIT AND N A=DROAAa NTH THE DESIRES OF TK UNDERSIGNED 0104Fii5, PR7PRVOS OR TRSTEES THS 6 N A02EDAW Vn EATER ,PTU4 1 OR OPTION 2. SLAM a7WICUL TO A R7NNA wT, l A NOURT PUBLC N AND FOR RE STATE AND CCUNR AFO RIUM CID HEREBY COMFY THAT PC RINN ROBERT ANDERSON NNROSE NAME 6 SOO 10 X FOKC094 NKTNC; BA C DLTE OF . 19— 146 PF WVILLT APPEARED BEFORE tE ANO AOOORLOME) TTE SAFE C" U47;7R NT W40 ANO SEAL ON D6 _ DQ OF . 19_ NOtARY FUBUC K CONA'SS:]L EAPFES T NT: l A WMARY P1wr N AND FOR THE SGTE PAO COU4R MDRESW CID N43tLBY CERFI Y TtW PN OST NL AR[ERS74 NNNDSE MW 6 SO[D TO THE FUREC7NC 1NRRC. 9EXb4C DUE OF I9_ W6 PERS'OMl1T APPEARED BEFORE WE AND ALTOAOK= DE SANC CA47N LOW K NANO NO SEAL OR TNS _ CAY OF . 19 NOTARY PLBC N C.71R4mmm ETPi¢S 79C1I 971112.1246 I ELP/RBC comt T4l ND1 BRASS CAP Flo P070'AC EOWN L:arAw \ 3' \ \ \ TAX PAFCEIL 27-A-BA \ D.A 435 PC. 22B \ T.. \ \ PortR POLE `~ \ \ TR AJS„S" LINE TOWER \ \ \ \ \ \ \ CONC. WIN \BRASS CAP \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Or+�,ALTR �Ai UX38377 \ too* UONoPOLE \ \ \ (Tomtit No. 1) \ UTI.rT BNQXBOAIRO POLE\ s V \ POLE NORUM ROBERT AMDEtSON I 115' UX OEl P A227 tR 700 I 1 F k USE- ACRIC1JLTU AL I PROPOSED LEASEA:EAL I CW L4oNL WTm I 900 SO. FT. OR 0.112 ACCES 8ibl55 GP FID IRON ROOS TO BE SET AT APPROPRATE I LOT CORIERS. ONCE FINAL TOWER OPTION T 6 CHOSEN CII1tAAa A I NNOTE: PHOPERF7 OWNER PREFERS oPTtON 1 To n Q F'AD I s sT-sa'sr s R alsi SRE MTH E705TN,OFLG POWER SUB-STAT _ 1D.oD $ N r F., fl = Q PAD ______ S_UK-________________________�I \ 11 t250' I I I � 100' IN0N40FNOlE I I I OfSAPEAKE At POTLI AC EASEIAENT MR BURIED CllT pooO POLE mbq To Rim 50 \ \TELEPHONE \ TrRYGMS9d4 LIE TONER \ \ \ \ ASPIlALT -�ELXHMARK • RAJJMAO POWER POLE %I< N POR£R POLE M. • 1267.49' POLE NdaAAN R06M ANDERSON PANST K ANDERSON TAX PARCEL 27-A-8 O.$ 417 PC. 700 ZOPIEE: RA LbL ACRRLTATUiAI. PRESDWTNE E!W LJNEJ NUINEER oswrnON DGIA 4CE Ll S 4P1741- E 4936' L2 N 51'Urlr E 13857' U S 3533.06- E 5L15' L4 N 5rDrl7- E 114-80' L5 S -WMU- E &Ul' N 51-15 15- E SOLOS _ ] OFRr,E3N WRCNLA POWER CO~ EASE]" OF UE'ECM MTN DB 174 PO 373 NU61BER DELTA CYO. BRf. RADKb ' ARC ' 01ORD ' Cl 15746"31- N 6tT54i13- E SO.DO 1375E 9613 C2 B-0630- N I6'34'03- E 50M Soil 5472 C3 9U19'37- S U4754- E 50M 7E.63 70AI C4 9P19'3r S E342'S4- E SOLO 7E.E3 7091 50 25 0 50 100 150 SCnLE 1' - SO' ANDERSONDOCUMENT N40. 'o°ibi¢ "` SSCCALE AS S"OWW 1NOW 97 9 7 A PORTION OF ANDERSON PROPERTY BACK CREEK MAMSTERIAL Q�Q� AND ' �*R� M ow�D Rec/ELP TO BE LEASED BY T 14323-004 ASSOCIATES, Inc. PSonrws TH-� IN CHECXED: CP SHENMDOA-Li MOBILE COMPANY (TWR79-LITTLE TIMBER RIDGE) - _ - � � 2 YOfPf 1� i••2oD� WWI. . Or NWTE Al NO ROM 37 Al Dal 310; PQOCCED NORTW ON N= 37 FOR APPQ=RWEIY 53 W-ES 10 TIE NIERSM'11 1 OF NWTE 37 00 NWTE 50 PROCEED NEST CIN NWTE 50 FOR APPRCaaVMY 12-1 ULM TO THE NTOMECfUN OF ROUTE 50 AND 111= $10. PROCEED SOU 4 ON ROUTE 610 FOIL APPR=NATELT 03B 1NfS TO M TONER SAE ON THE LEFI. I LEASE MICA NO ACCESS AND LOX M EASE)" ARE LOD= ON PRWOM O)MU MT D30AM AS FRfDf337: ISII 1AX PARCEL 27-A L AND OJ00 LY a1O) IC N>bM ROBERT ANO PANSY N. AOOWN. 2. WE PUN IFAS PAEtM WIN M 8'JEM OF A TOMP REPORT PRE)Wa BY WM A CXEMAK PLC FI E) 32457 1 THIS PRCPOM 6 SUBEC TO ALL RMTRCRONLC EASEMENTS. OR NGFQ OF INO DF XDC�= PRCA M RE DATE OF MS PUT. 4. TIE UMQAFSTED MD0 Or PRECISION FOR INS S1J EY tIIiE05 I:ICI= 1 E r*=NS ARE 51al) ON 'Kt STATION STEAE76' ELLY.. 761-W. WCQ 29 L BENCH NMI( 6 A MC1t1E0 SPIRE N A PONEIR POLL M. - 1767.W 7. F3STNC PfOFE)tTY CWL406 APPfDM%IUY 12CL472 ACIM L 20" DUK 0X IIENF Z0102 NAML AREA NA PAW050 LISL• SEIi-StI PORFw6 OOMMLINO=PG It)" WON ME" NtENSM OfTE DAY LOO AND RED 11>ff UCM (F RRMLXU BY THE FAA) PROPOSED TONER NE -. ICY 11101mi D sETB m FROG - 12T FROM RLDAD RTGM-CF-IRv sOE - 115' REM - Iw L 0111E! IDR NAN 408M No PANSY ML ANDOMO N 339 PFAISN3E Rao CORE VKW 22LU ID APPLIOW: SiE7wDOw WOBU CM~ 124 SWM NAN STREET Pb BFL 459 EDNNBIAO. 1N 27924-O&S 0< W-4141 11. PONE11 CDP~. ALLED01Y POEM P. 0. BO[ 32D0 NN4[STER 1N I26D4 (D00) 454-M17 12. TELEPHONE CO~. SELL AITAKTC 2980 N. FAIRVIEW POK )FINE FALLS CMAOI M 2M4 11 1I9S SI(E HOES N4 LIE INTHIN A0. 0.m1ATM IM TEAR RM b}E. 14. NND 27 MNUES FOR PiIOPOSED TONER h: L1IITLEE 3rlrlUr L.ONOMJ E 782155.71' 13 1MD 27 Wile FOR POPOSED Told (A LAONDE 3rlg'=I- LIDNQIUOE 7821 VAr iL APPROL FOOD 86E ELEV. - 127LD FT. 17. R6 PLAT RfPIEmF6 TIE ABET OF THE PROPMM LEASE AREA APO ACCESS EASEMENTS T1G SAWY WAS CONIXCTED BY ANDOWNN t AS500UT3. TM MAN ST. 110OLF10OK WL. 22645. ON 5 Sn- 1"7 AND DOES NOT FURE.SDR A CNAPLETE BOADMRY SIAKY OF TIE A1(EIWN PiOPERIY- rE LEASE MEA AND FA4lE1RS AS 9-10M N DYTXNI/ WMIC OF TARS PLOT, 6 11 M DE FREE C016M AID N ACSDIOWa " THE DESIRES OF DIE LOCOZ30 D DW 0M PFtQWM OR TZSRIi THIS S N ACKE" wM EITHER WTXXN 1 OR WTX)N 2. l9D MET — SLAM To WT: l . A IOSAR'I PLRBLL N AND FM INE STATE AND COONtt AFOWS40 co 1o7 ar" TwU IIORNMM W" ANOOAON WHOSE 1MIE 6 S0a 10 INE FOE.CONC IIWTNC BFARK DUE OF 19— HIS Pt7601N11Y APPEARM BEFORE ME A10 A000V-M iD RE SAME. DION LROER NY %ND NO SEAL ON TINS — DAY O 19_ 1OLHR1' K" NY CD W NSSON DPRES amm NN TO wT- 1 A NOIARY PLaL N AND FOR THE SLUE AND C9LArtY A/ORESAD DOIWY awnry IwU PN6Y IL AfOEit9JN WI435E NAME 6 SNOO ARE FOEGLrt IIRITNW, KAWC DAZE OF n— KIS POWOLLY APPEARED AFIRE ME APO ACDDgEDMD rE SAhf- oo LINER NY wle AND sm ON Rb _ )Fv or . 19— mizar Pat WY OON1eisoN EAPICS R79\79C2 1971111.2038 I ELP/R9C 10 11 9 2 8 e�° PROJECT SITE 3 6 5 4 PROPERTY OWNER LIST (�J t) EUNICE A AONAACrR 5) TAX PARCEL 27-A-6 PARCEL 227--A„ 55 DA 639 PG. 372 $ cbF. RESIDENTIAL ZONED: RA RA .L 2) JOAN KXH LUEBE}DSEM 6) DALE _7A-A TAX PARCEL 27-A-5 1AXPARCEL 27-A-9 DA 481 PG. 462 526 PO LSE: ACit=LTURAL USE RESIDENTIAL ZONED: RA ZONED: RA 3) EAITEL IL K04 7) WJ?%RIL S P" Luc PARCEL 27-A-53 TAX PARCEL 27-A-52 DA 86 PG 551 DA 406 PO. 106 \ ISE: AGRICULTURAL USE- RESDIXiiAL ZONED: RA ZONED: RA \ 4) KVIONAL FRUIT PRODUCTS 6) DAYO NO" DARN! TAX PARCEL 27-A-11 S 03 f PO.-Ua0101AN tAX pp RCEL 27-A-7 HARD \ \ � RA DA 671 PC. 522 USE: RE MENUAL \ ZONED: RA 2T- Pm 27- CD to C0dAWFF \ Ta PAFCQ A-0A �23 �Sue`-sl) \ \ \ V \ \c1jJl \ \ \ \ t0D' 10NOPME \ \ \ POKER POLE \ / v \ r7� \ \ `f, a Lw6 - iil \ I \ \ \ \ 115' ($ G wLLX76l qLEYPARCH 27-A-71C 671 PG. 521 / USE R£5OENTX ZONED: RA 10) DONAED L. AONAKER TAX PARCEL 27-A-GA DA 446 PG 701 LSE R131DENT1AL ZONED: RA 11) POTOaAC EDSON COMPANY TAX PARCEL 27-A-BA DA 435 PC. 226 USE: CORE SUBSTATION ZONED: RA �1\ 1 I I 1 I I� I i 1 1 I 1 11 1 I 1. I—E . rD. m M .os*>; 1Np.J� 14•Y0[ .IOC M t.[ rcoor 1 0`� M n101 r. 1P cY INE IDc " C.00 . — M 11�N UC ..1m 1zn. N3109oN or ra.c ..o uwt .ilo M >4}oa yl! /i4 111I S ?�� Ilk ruiIIIII do�oti DETAIL -SILT FENCE ICRMAN 208MI NCE3=N PAIaY W. AIQERSDN FAX PAiCEL 27-" 717J DA 417 PC 700 WrtM v IPASRED www 1 -0P11ON1 , FENCE E WON i $ BrraffD 1NNE � R aPr1oN 2 I L �IdOACFW 4V I I 1A \ If�liwCQQAm \ I I Auas I a l r LNNIPIDNc ItyD I I N Sr I-P01F NVr4326 E V" \ \ BEIUNMRIL N4XRDAD \ \ SP E N POKER PO.E \ \ ELFV.. 1267.49' \ \ \ \ \ PONEIR POLE FAW 71� NDTE: PQOPEm OVER PREFERS o'Op1 , TO RIMER SITE INM 02SW POWER SUB-SWX7l DNK00N DISTANCE LI S 4PIY41" E 49-W L2 N 51'0rl E I L3 S 3rmw E 5L15 L4 N 5t-Gr1 E II4.& INN 208M ANDDt04 LS S 3r33W E 8431 PA16T N. ANCOWN IAI Pruim 27-A-I CA 417 M M zcNm USE* A060ATLA1l I ) ----------------------- INA.NepL aLu O E m RIINOA 5 ARC o4m Cl IV4101' N RT54t1T" E 50D0 IRAs 9L13 Q WD6 N 16'31 E 5000 6N131 yLT2 C7 9019 S 6747'54" E 5OD0 78E3 17021 CA 9019 S LT4Y54" C 50M 78L3 17CL91 =.,-*t, �I Ir � I ■ 51'15.15" E/607m, APPROVED BY THE ZONING DESIGNER ADMINISTRATOR ANDERSON k ASSOCIATES 7722 LWN STREET ONING ADUIN OR MIDDLETOWN. VA 22645 (540) 869-2501 DATE 30 15 0 30 60 90 SCALE I' - 30' LEM D �+�+N W Er wom ��' M SCALE : AS SHOWNDATE I I NOV ? 1 7 DOCULNENt N0. A PORTION OF ANOERSON PROPERTYyorsa..H+NN..19c oE9cNED: BLACK CREEK �� DISTRICT t4,�:i-oosASSOCIATES. Inc. Pkxv s re� TM �ED CCP SHMMDOAH MOBILE COMPANY NY 79 LITTLE TIMBER RiDCI) FREDEMCK COUNTY. ViRC4NIA 2 BEET z