Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-01 County of Frederick - Sanitary District (Shawneeland) - Back Creek - Backfile (2)
CUP TRACKING SHEET (To be completed by Frederick Co. Staff only.) CUP # 05 D 1 Owner/Applicant Fre�p_r(,CK co.�,,�,��� Application Date Fee Paid � �O *as- r10 Sign Deposit "- fA-' Submittal Cut -Off Date P/C Mtg. date: 5-� _O initials: --ems" Sign return date: u BOS Mtg. date:5-�3-OP AGENCY REVIEW COMMENTS VDOT 'ti Airport Authority Inspections City of Winchester Fire Marshal Co Sanitation Authority Health Dept. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS OF w Oo (date) APPROVAL (WITH CONDITIONS) ZY e s no DENIAL Signe Sec'ret ry Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING ACTION Av e23 A00I (date) APPROVAL Signed el,Co t;A ` . aDENIAL Date / Q n InTCC Date: 4-10-o 1 File opened Reference Manual updated/number assigned D-base updated One black & white location map (81/2" x 1 1 ") requested from Mapping Dept, V Four sets of labels requested from Data Processing ( 0.0I File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary OGlk� CLOSE OUT FILE: -5-,A:o j Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" Reference Manual updated D-base updated File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary U \Carol\Common\CUP.TRK Revised 3/12/0) FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 May 24, 2001 Mr. Gary DuBrueler Frederick County Fire & Rescue 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: CUP #05-01 of County of Frederick, Fire & Rescue Telecommunications Tower Property Identification Numbers: 49B03-123-276 49B03-123-277 49B03-123-278 49B03-123-279 49B03-123-273 491303-123-272 49B03-123-271 49B03-123-270 Dear Gary: This letter is to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 24, 2001. Your Conditional Use Permit, #05-01 for a 190-foot telecommunication tower, was approved with the following conditions: All Zoning Ordinance requirements and review agency comments shall be addressed and complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating personal wireless service providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by the County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. All lots included in this request shall be consolidated into a single parcel. The request for a reduction to the setbacks and to use lattice -type construction for the tower were approved. If you have any questions regarding this action or the site plan approval process, please feel free to call this office. S .ICP, CZA Deputy Director ERL/ch cc: Commissioner of Revenue 0:\Agendas\APPR_DEN.LTR\CUP's\2001 \FredCoTower. wpd 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 PC REVIEW: 05/02/01 BOS REVIEW: 05/23/01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-01 COUNTY OF FREDERICK - FIRE & RESCUE Telecommunications Tower LOCATION: At the top of Great North Mountain in Shawneeland; bounded by Timber, Elmwood, and Archwood Trails. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS: 491303-123-276 491303-123-277 491303-123-278 49B03-123-273 491303-123-271 491303-123-279 491303-123-272 491303-123-270 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R5 (Residential Recreation Community) District; Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned R5 (Residential Recreation Community) District; Land Use: Residential / Vacant PROPOSED USE: 1.90-foot Telecommunications Tower REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Inspections Department: Structures shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, Use Group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Plans submitted for tower shall have seal by a Virginia - licensed design professional. Special Inspections per Chapter 17 of BOCA shall be required. Fire Marshal: Comments during site plan review. County of Frederick Fire & Rescue CUP #04-01 Page 2 May 16, 2001 Winchester Regional Airport: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority has no objections to the proposed conditional use permit; however, we do request site plans be submitted to us for comment and review and that the applicant file an FAA Form 7460-1. Planning and Zoning: Background The applicant proposes to build a 190-foot lattice Telecommunication Facility to accommodate emergency services telecommunication equipment. The tower will also be constructed to accommodate additional commercial telecommunication carriers. The proposed facility will be located on a 3.67-acre site located atop Great North Mountain, in the Shawneeland development. The site currently encompasses eight individual lots; the applicant intends to consolidate the lots into a single parcel if the CUP is granted. Zoning Ordinance Requirements Commercial Telecommunication Facilities are permitted in the R-5 (Residential Recreational Community) District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies that a CUP for a Commercial Telecommunication tower may be permitted provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. Furthermore, additional performance standards shall apply to the CUP review in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. Zoning Ordinance Conformance The applicant has provided an engineer's report regarding RF testing for the existing emergency services facilities on Great North Mountain. The report states that the existing tower facilities in the vicinity are unable to accommodate the emergency services frequency range without significant disturbance. The report concludes that the emergency services communication facilities should be relocated to another tower free of high level VHF interference. Staff would concur that there are no existing facilities or appropriate structures available for collocation in this general area. Should the tower be required to be lighted by the FAA, it would be provided with a dual lighting system which provides red lights for nighttime and medium intensity flashing white lights for daytime and twilight use. The Zoning Ordinance requires that these lights be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. Landscaping and screening maybe required to screen accessary structures from adjoining properties and right-of-ways. Application of this screening requirement will be determined at time of site plan review. The proposed Commercial Telecommunication Facility is generally in conformance with the County of Frederick Fire & Rescue CUP #04-01 Page 3 May 16, 2001 requirements of the zoning ordinance. Request for setback reduction The applicant is requesting a reduction of the setbacks pursuant to Section 165-48.6(B)1 of the Zoning Ordinance as they are proposing to locate the Commercial Telecommunication Facility approximately 190 feet from the property boundaries. The Zoning Ordinance provisions require that towers of 190 feet in height (as is proposed) be placed a minimum of 190 feet from road right-of-ways, and 170-feet from side property lines. The Planning Commission may reduce the required setback distance for Commercial Telecommunication Facilities if it can be demonstrated that the location is of equal or lesser impact. The applicant has attempted to place the facility in the middle of the site, maximizing the structural setback. The request for a reduced setback has been made in order to provide increased flexibility in the exact location for the placement of the tower. Request to use lattice -type tower construction The applicant is requesting the ability to utilize lattice -type material construction pursuant to Section 165-48.6(B)2 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance requires that new commercial telecommunication towers be of monopole -type construction. The Planning Commission may allow lattice -type construction for new commercial telecommunication towers that are located outside the Urban Development Area, and are not adjacent to properties that are identified historic areas. The proposed site is located outside of the UDA, and is not in close proximity to an identified historic areas. Therefore, allowing a lattice -type tower would be in conformance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Conformance with the requirements of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Actf1996 The applicant is a governmental body charged with providing emergency response services to the community, and will be in conformance with the Telecommunication Act. In evaluating this application, it has been demonstrated that there is a need for the infrastructure within the area of the County identified. The approval of this application would be in conformance with the requirements of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1986. STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 05-02-01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Staff believes that this application for a Commercial Telecommunication Facility has adequately addressed the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in that a need for this facility, based on a lack of coverage and capacity in this part of the County, has been demonstrated. Further, a reduction of the setback requirements, as well as the allowance for a lattice -type tower construction may be appropriate. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this application, the following County of Frederick Fire & Rescue CUP #04-01 Page 4 May 17, 2001 conditions of approval would be appropriate: 1. All Zoning Ordinance requirements and review agency comments shall be addressed and complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating personal wireless service providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by the County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. All lots included in this request shall be consolidated into a single parcel. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 05-02-01 MEETING: The Director of Fire & Rescue Services,for Frederick County, Gary A. Dubrueler, explained that a waiver of the setbacks was requested in order to provide increased flexibility in the placement of the tower; and, the request for the lattice -type tower instead of the monopole was based on the rocky soil conditions at the site and the desire to use the least expensive construction, method in order to save county money. Members of the Commission were concerned about the perceived credibility and precedence of establishing requirements for telecommunication facility providers to adhere to when constructing towers in Frederick County and then to waive all of those requirements when the applicant is Frederick County; therefore; Commissioners felt it was not appropriate to grant the waiver. Members of the Commission also. discussed with Mr. Dubrueler his plans for securing the area. There were no public comments. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit, by a majority vote, with the same conditions as recommended by staff, as follows: All Zoning Ordinance requirements and review agency comments shall be addressed and complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating personal:wireless service providers. . 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by the County. County of Frederick Fire & Rescue CUP #04-01 Page 5 May 17, 2001 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. All lots included in this request shall be consolidated into a single parcel. The majority votes was as follows: YES (TO APPROVE): Watt, Unger, Morris, Light, Kriz, Triplett, DeHaven NO: Wilson, Thomas, Ours, Fisher, 0:\Agendas\COMMENTS\CUP'S\2001\FredCo_F&R CUP.wpd BEATTI E 49B03113 48 FCSD MERRILL '41C, 1.,3 a 49BM 123 49 DENTON PULLIAM 49BM 123 50 SELDON T. LANGENSTEIN._ --_ 49B03123 51 FCSD 49BM 123279 FCSD LA NSTE49BO3 123 2 FCSD 49BJ3123 277 SCFWALLENBERG FCSD CARSON 49800 123 53 FCSD 49W, 123 L73 _ ... 49303123278 FCSD FCSD 49B03123 54 ..FCSD 49803 123 272 GILL 49BM 123 279 FCSD FCSD 10)3123771 FCSD CUMMI NGS -PM12327J /�� 49B03123238 FCSD FCSD d`� 49BM 123246 , 4413 23:131 FCSD ALFRIEND 45k:': '.._ +:,1, 49B03 123 245 CLARK 123 SLATER 49BM 123 243 � 4BB03123278 4BB031232n �, NB03123273 49@00123 278 r�'����� �oeo�lzlzn 4seo31z3 z7, CUP #05-01 - LOCATION MAP Frederick County Sanitary District (Frederick Co. Fire & Rescue) PIN. 491303-123-270 491303-123-271 491303-123-272 491303-123-273 491303-123-276 491303-123-277 491303-123-278 491303-123-279 Office of Mapping and GIS, 04/01, Agray i • Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK ;COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the. owner X other) NAME: ADDRESS: 107 N. Kent Street Winchesters VA 22601 TELEPHONE 540-665-5618 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: Fw� �tn�c►� C�� . Sanitary District 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 4. The property has a road frontage of L4 00 feet and a depth of Hoo feet and consists of acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Cvo' Co- SrMt1-Nj.y I 1JL1Li as evidenced by deed from (5 0AP Le)1,%A6NL ' CePPdeA71gc-J recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. '] cl on page L{o® as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14-Digit Property Identification No. SeE q i i l�-r-4r.0 Magisterial District Bank C rppk Current Zoning R5 7. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North vacant R5 East vacant R5 South vacant R� West vacant RS 4. The property has a road frontage of 400 feet and a depth of 400 feet and consists of 3.67 areas. 5. The property is owned by the Frederick County Sanitary District as evidenced by deed from Charlemagne Corporation recorded in deed book no. 799 on page 400, as recorded in the recorded of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14-Digit Property Identification Number: 49B03-123-276 49B03-123-277 491303-123-278 49B03-123-279 49B03-123-273 491303-123-272 491303-123-271 49B03-123-270 10. Adjoining Properties: 49B03-123-48 491303-123-49 491303-123-50 491303-123-51 491303-123-52 49B03-123-53 49B03-123-280 491303-123-269 491303-123-238 49B03-123-274 49B03-123-275 49B03-123-248 49B03-123-246 491303-123-245 49B03-123-244 49B03-123-243 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 9. It is proposed that,the following buildings -will be constructed: Equipment Building 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified.by mail of this application: NAME Lyndel Seldon ADDRESS P.O. Box 67, Highview, WVA 26808 PROPERTY ID#49B03-123-275 NAME Mary H Gill ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-248 NAME PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-247 ADDRESS NAME FC2p ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-246 NAME Edward W. Alfriend ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-245 NAME Alice Clark PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-244 ADDRESS NAME John David Slater ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-243 NAME �tleh�d Deleris Pelusl ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 49B03-123-246 • Pl �c ?QoPoSED TOWEL ECjLAprAt--W't' BOG• • 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: 04/06/01 10:31 FAb 7037291416 FALCON RIDGE HOMES f 0U1 • • SMAWNEELAND SANITARY DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 150 Tomahawk Trail Winchester, VA 22602 John Riley, County Administrator Fredenck County Board of SupenJisors 107 North Kent Street Winchestei, VA 22601 Thursday, April 05, 2001 Dur Mr. Riley_ During our regularly scheduled monthly mooting April 2, 2001, the Department of Fire and Pcscue ex-pl nii d their interest in using Shawneeland properly at the top of the mountain to vrcct a communications toW-r. The SlhawneCland Sanitary District Advisory Committee went into executive session to discuss the terms of such an action. We propose, • An outright sale for Lots 270, 271, 272, 273, 276, 277, 278 and 279 for $500 per lot • All cost of transfer to be paid by the Fire and Rescue Departmm and the Shcriff s departinent The Advisory Cbmntittcc has final approval of the site plans • A buffer zone of trees for privacy screening be maintained • The yearly cost of the improved ptoperty Sanitary District tax rate. Currently at S370. Respectfully submitted, charity cmcnts Chairperson, Sanitary District Advisory Conmuttee Cc lac REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Frederick County Fire Marshal ATTN: Fire Marshal 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-6350 The Frederick County Fire Marshal is located at 107 North Kent Street, 1st floor of the County Administration Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver.this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: County of Frederick 107 N Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601 54$ 665-5618 Name of development and/or description of the request: Location: At top of mountain, Shawnee land, Timber Ridge Tr. between Elmwood Tr. & Flamewood. Tr. Fire Marshall Comments: ��1lGt,��lc.C.S cG✓.e�,c.�i Si7� Fire Marshal Signature & Date O 2 (NOTICE TO FIRE MARSHAL - PLE40E IVVRTO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also., please attach a copy of your application form, location map and any other pertinent information: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662-2422 The Winchester Regional Airport is located on Route 645, off of Route 522 South, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: rniin- it of Frad-ri roci. j():7 N.$-nt_$�'r��Wincho�ster-, VA 276101 540-665-5618 Name of development and/or description of the request: Shawnee Land Sanitary Distric Location: At top of mountain., Shawnee 1 any Timber —Ridge Tr_ bQtRXQ-Qn Elmwood Tr. & Flamewood Tr :Winchester Regional Airports Comments: wtvsx • .. Airport Signature and Date: (NOTICE TO AIRPORT. * PLEASE k rVl (k S on akl tab un s oe r 10n AD eS i e0 i P r ci QJ)J 4� L�IC'lo � THIS FORM TO APPLICANT. NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form.as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your. application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and all other pertinent information. Please Type or Print on This Form* Form Approved OMB No. 2120-0001 © FOR FAA USE ONLY Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing of Your Notice Aeronautical study Number Us. Deporknect of Trorsportation Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration FWerd Avldbn AdnYWterion 1. Sponsor (person, company, etc. proposing this action) : 39 O 11.579 . Gary A. DuBrueler s. Latitude: Attn.of: 7$ 0 22.311 10. Longitude: Name:County Ore eric WGS 84 Address: 107 N. Kent Street 11. Datum: ❑ NAD 83 ❑ NAD 27 Other City: Winchester State: VA Zip: 22601 12. Nearest: City: Winchester State: VA Telephone: (540) 665 -5618 Fax: 540 678 -4739 13. Nearest Public -use (not private -use) or Military Airport or Heliport: Winchester Regional Airport 2. Sponsor's Representative (if other than #1) : 13 miles (air) 14. Distance from #13. to Structure: Attn.of: Name: 16. Direction from#13. to Structure. West Address: 16. Site Elevation (AMSL): 2322 g 17. Total Structure Height (AGL): 190 ft. City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: 18. Overall Height (#16. + #17.) (AMSL): 2512 19. Previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number (if applicable): Notice of: X ew construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Existing N/A -OE 4. Duration: XX Permanent ❑ Temporary (—months,—days) June 2001 20. Description of Location: (Attach a USGS 7.5 minute 6. Work Schedule: Beginning End Quadrangle Map with the precise site marked and any certified survey) Type: 1�1 'ntenra Tower ❑ Crane ❑ Building ❑ Power Line 7 Lanafiil ❑ Water TanK ❑ Other 7. Marking/Painting and/or Lighting Preferred: ❑ Red Lights and Paint ® Dual - Red and Medium Intensity White ❑ White - Medium Intensity ❑ Dual - Red and High Intensity White ❑ White -High Intensity ❑ Other 8. FCC Antenna Structure Registration Number (if applicable): N/A 1. Complete Description of Proposal: Frequency/Power (kW) 1901 Communications Tower for public safety Primary Fire 1S4.220 0.1 KW Primary Police lSS.010 0.1 KW Notice is required by 14 Code of Federal Regulations, part 77 pursuant to 49 U.S.C., Section 44718. Persons who knowingly and willingly violate the notice requirements of part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to 49 U.S.C., Section 46301 (a). I hereby certify that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I agree to mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary. Date Typed or Printed Name and Title of Person Filing Notice C.4 Signatur /; . ; p S'r ,ZOO 1 C,-7- A t" PC. D v.B lUA Et."- r "?. YL A IIA/U. Gee Pnrm 7d60-1 r11-881 Supersedes Previous Edition NSN: 0052-00-012-0008 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5650 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 107 North Kent Street, 4th Floor of the County Administration Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: County of Frederick, 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Va, 22601 540-6655618 Name of development and/or'description of the request: Shawneeldndt'Sanitary District Location: AT top of the monutain off Timber Ridge Tr. between Elmwood Tr, and Flamewood Tr. Inspection Department Comments: Structures shall compy with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and section 312, use group U (Uitility' and Miscellaneous) of The BOCA National Building Code / 1996. Plans submitted for tower.shall have seal by a Va. Lic. design professional. Special Inspections per chapter 17 5�f BOCA shall be required. Code Administrator Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT.*PLEASE RN THIS FORM RD AP.. -TC1k T..) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your application form, location map and all other pertinent information. vJ� BKi 09rr,0400 DEED OF GIFT THIS DEED, made and dated this Sth day of October, 1992, by and between CHARLEMAGNE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation authorized to transact business in Virginia, party o' the first pat'-, hereinafter called the Grantor; and FREDERICK COUi,TY SANITARY DISTRICT of Shawnee -Land, of the County of Frederick in the State of Virginia, 9 Court Square, Winchester, VA 22601, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grentre. WITNESSF,TH: That for and in consideration of the s,im of Ten Dollars ($iU.00), cash in hand paid and other good and valuable considiratior, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the GRANTOR does grant and convey with Special Warranty unto the GRANTEE, in ter simple, to-gether with all rights, rights of way, privileges, improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto belonging, the following Lots, Tracts or Parcels of land lying and being situate in Back Creek Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, as described in Erhibit A attached tc and made a part of this deed. This conveyance 1_) made subject tc all legally enforceatle restrictive covenants, liens, easem^nits and encumbrnnces constituting constructive notice in the chain of title and to matters visible upon inspection affecting the aforesaid realty. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sot my hand ai,d seal, this Sth day of October, 1932. CHARLEMAGNE CJn'OR/ATIO`N 17, 1 Green, � i/ de:itPhill ?AL i STATE OF FLORIDA I CUJNTY Or NO , to -wit: I, _7.C-7llr+tilA,\/ - a notary Public in and for the State and jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that I PHILLIP L. GREEN, President of CHARLEMA:;NE CGRPORAT:Gro who,e name is signed t� the foregcing DeeO, bearing date of the Sth day of October, 1932, has this day personally appeared before me and acknowledged the sane in m and Y State Ju[is1ict.oa I aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand this Jday of i9?2. / I 4y CC'L:11551C.i eXpZrES• .Notar;,iJLl-,c ; I � i BK799FC,0�101 ATTA 12 EIU THIS DEED is in a form approved by Lawrence R. Ambrogi, County Attorney for the County of Frederick, Virginia and is accepted by him on behalf of the said County, he having been authorized to act on behalf of the said County by resolution duly opted by the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, which approval and acceptance is evidenced by the execution of this conveyance by the undersigned. WITNESS the following signature,and seal: / UW ENCE P. AAMB,iOGI STA-TE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK: The foregoing was acknowledged before me this the Z day of May, 1993, by LAWRENCE R. AMBROGI,. l/UnAt� ' Notary Public My Commission Expires: LL['�t Exhibit A cK799ef040? Lot 83, Section 3 Lot 19, Section 7 Lot 22, Section 7 Lot 9, Section 16 Lot 23, Section 9 Lot 79, Section 5 Lot ?'_ Section 14 Lot 20, Section 15 Lot 22, Section 15 Lot 3, Section 18 Lot 10, Section 18 Lot 10, Section 19 Lot 28, Section 15 Lot 59, Section 15 Lot 33, Section 13 Lot 314, Section 5 Lot. 12, Section 0 Lot 24, Section O Lot 34, Section D Lot 15, Section H Lot 16, Section H Lot 24, Section P Lot 10, Section LE Lot 11, Section EE Lot 8, Section L Lot 22, Section T Lot 35, Section T Lot 86, Section A Lot 94, Section A Lot 58, Section f Lot 81, Section F Lot 8, Section R Lot A, Se^tion R Lot C, 3ection R Lot E, Sec`.ion R Lot 42, Section S Lot 5U, Section S Lot 54, Section S Lot 1, Fection W Lot 36, Section W Lot 5, Section X Lot 21, Section X Lot 2, Section 21 Lot 17, £ec:ion 21 Lot 75, Section W Lot 29, Section 10 Lot 52, Section X Lot 51, Section 10 Lot 53, Section 10 Lot 54, Section 10 Lot 18, Section 1.1 Lot 24, Section 11 Lot 39, Section 11 Lot 45, Section 11 Lot 51, Section 11 Lot 220, Section 5 Lot 101, Section 11 Lot 102, Section 11 Lot 132, :-ction 11 Lot 133, Section 11 Let 113, Section 11 ✓Lot 144, Section 11 Lot 150, Section 11 Lot 87, Section 11 Lot 88, Section 11 Lot 89, Section 11 Lot 117, Section 11 Lot 155, Section 11 Lot 156, Section 11 Lot 76, Section 23 Lot 9, Section 15 Lot 169, Section 5 Lot 71, Section 11 Lot 163, Section 11 Lot 165, Section 11 Lot 171, Section 11 Lot 175, Section 11 Lot 186, Section 11 Lot 177, Section 11 Lot 178, Section 11 Lot 130, Section 11 Lot 78, Section 22 Lot 72, Section 22 Lot 76, Section 22 Lot' 70, Section 22 Lot 1-3, Section 22 Lot 16, Section 22 Lot L3, Section 12 Lot 162, Section 22 Lot 165, Sectioi, 22 Lot 125, Section 22 Lot 123, Scction 22 Lot 157, Section 22 Lot 132, Section 22 Lot 154, section 21 Lot 4E, Section 22 Lot 43, Section 22 Lot ., Section 23 Exhibit A QK 7 g g Pc 0 lE 0 3 Lot 8, Section 23 Lot 93, Section 25 Lot 102, Section 23 Lot 105, Section 25 Lot 106, Section 25 Lot 70, Section 23 Let 75, Section 23 Lot 63, Section 25 Lot 64, Section 25 Lot 65, Section 25 Lot 98, Section 23 Lot 71, Section 25 Lot 107, Section 23 Lot 115, Section 23 Lot 52, Section 25 Lot 18, Section 23 Lot 132, Section 23 ✓Lot 161, Section 23;"' Lot 164, Section 23 Lot 150, Section 23 Lot 153, Section 23 Lot 158, Section 23 Lot 54, Section 25 Lot 55, Section 25 A of 57, Section 25 Lot 58, Section 25 Lot 60, Section 25 Lot 61, Section 25 Lot 141, Section 23 Lot 179, Section 23 Lot 138, Section 2� Lot 172, Section 23 Lot 177, Section 23 Lot 197, Section 23 Lot '99, Section 23 Lot 205, Section 23 Lot 51, Section 25 Lot 6, Section 25 Lot 14, Section 25 Lot 21, Section 25 Lot 2, Section 25 Lot 25, Section 25 Lot 26, Sectioa 2s Lot 28. 3ection 25 Lot 30, Section 25 Lot 32, Suction 25 Lot 218, Section 23 Lot 219, Section 23 Lot 220, Scction 23 Lot 251, Section 23 Lot 47, Section 23 Lot 224, Section 23 Lot 54, Section 23 Lot 246, Sectior. 23 Lot 241, Section 23 Lot 259, Section 23 Lot 371, Section 23 Lot 287, Section 23 Lot 368, Section 23 Lot 353, Section 23 Lot 357, Section 23 Lot 319. Section 23 JLot 344, Section 23 Lot 347, Section 23 Lot 365, Section 23 Lot 297, Section 23 Lot 308, Section 23 Lot 109, Section 23 Lot 339, Section 23 Lot 328, Section 23 Lot 332, Section 23 Lot 333, Section 23 Lot 335, Section 23 Lot 336, Section 23 Lot '44, Section 3 Lot 95, Section 5� Lot 22, Section 5 Lot 47, Section 16 Lot 33, Fection H Lot 6, Section H Lot 34, Section A Lot 88, Section A Lot 149, Section A Lot 109, Section 23 Got"110, Sectior. 13 Lot 111, Section 23 Lot 166, Section 23 Lot 167, Section 23 Lot 33, Section 23 Lot 34, Section 23 Lot 40, Section 23 Lot 41, Sect ior, 23 Lot 44, Section 23 Lot 45, Sectior. 23 Lot'276, Section 23 Lot 277, Section 2? Lo, 278, Section 2', Lot 279, Section 23 • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 IUT1r1CAr! A I Jr PUBLIC HEARING May 9, 2001 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-01, COUNTY OF FREDERICK - FIRE & RESCUE On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on May 23, 2001 at 7:15 p.m. in the board room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following: Conditional Use Permit #05-01 of the County of Frederick for a telecommunications tower. This property is located at the top of Shawneeland on Timber Ridge Trail, between Elmwood Trail and Flamewood Trail, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 49B03-123- 276/277/278/279 and 49B03-123-270/271/272/273 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this meeting. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library approximately one week prior to the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Sincerely, -h Eric R. Lawrence, AICP, CZA lbo Deputy Director ERL/ch 0: Agendas\Adj of ners\2001 \FredCoF&R_CUP. wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • • This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on Moo- 1 9 C-) I from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Vir inia: 49B03- 1 23 243 491303. 1.23. 275- SELDON,LYNDEL PO BOX 67 HIGH VIEW, WVA 26808.0067 49803- 1-23- 246- 9-ILj- al�o FREDERICK COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT IN) c Ylar owls-Fm' I WINCHESTER,VA 22601.4736 491303- 1-23. 248- GILL, MARY H 3244 CONOWINGO RD STREET, MD 21154.2026 491303- 1-23- 245- ALFRIEND, EDWARD W. IV PO BOX 357 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0357 491303- 1-23.244- CLARK, ALICE J PO BOX 1552 TAVARES, FL 32778-1552 491303- 1-23. 238- CUMMINGS, CARROLL D CIO JEAN CUMMINGS 7181 SUGARBIN ST ORLANDO, FL 32822.5812 yq�o3 - 1- a3-so David A. Deffwr) y jor, (w 5 WWI aso l 1 q (n l 8 K STATE OF V� IRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK SLATER, JOHN DAVID 183-B FRANCIS STREET WALDORF, MD. 20603 491303. 1-23- 48- BEATTIE, JUNO MARIE 412 W OAKLAND PARK BLVD FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33311.1712 491303- 1-23- 49. MERRILL, JESSE H. & BESSIE L. 2610 GARFIELD ST NW WASHINGTON, D.C. 20008.4104 49B03. 1-23. 51- LANGENSTEIN, HORST & MARILYN 1028 TIMBER CREEK DR ANNAPOLIS, MD 21403.1944 49B03. 1-23. 53- SCHWALLENBERG, THOMAS L. HILLSMERE SHORE 110 GREAT LAKE DR ANNAPOLIS, MD. 21403.3726 Eric R. Mwrence, Deputy Director Frederick County Planning Department I, 66h N n H-D ` I , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Eric R. Lawrence, Deputy Director for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated ',), q , QI , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this ` +h day of MOJa , cZX) My commission expires on 02c)03 -LbL-H,Lu ARY PUBLIC COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 tF, 11 L uj — C5, C:D uj CQ U- LU C> 49B03- 1-23- 243- SLATER, JOHN-W PPFrANCIS STREET DORF, MD. 20603 � E 0 • TO: RE: Onbf COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX:540/665-6395 �� J'rlrlrMl J! I Jr ;'J3L lr ;-lEAiRlNIG 18, 2001 THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-01, COUNTY OF FREDERICK - FIRE & RESCUE half of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing held on May 2, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the board room of the Frederick County Administration .ng at 107 N. Kent SItreet, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following: Conditional Use Permit #105-01 of the County of Frederick for a telecommunications tower. This prop�rty is located at the t6 of Shawneeland on Timber Ridge Trail, between Elmwood Trail and Flamlewood Trail, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 491303-123- 276/177/278/279 and 49B'03-123-270/271/272/273 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this meeting. A copy of the appliLation will be available for review at the Handley Library approximately one week prior to the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Windhestol, Virginia. f Sincire , i t Eric, /awre"nce, ZA Deputy Director ERL/ch A:\A.djoiners\200I \FredCoF&R_CUP.wpd 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 TAX: 540/ 665-6395 NI JTlrlrATI JI I 0 f PU-3L lr HEAl"WINIG April 18, 2001 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-01, COUNTY OF FREDERICK - FIRE & RESCUE On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on May 2, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the board room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following: Conditional Use Permit #05-01 of the County of Frederick for a telecommunications tower. This property is located at the top of Shawneeland on Timber Ridge Trail, between Elmwood Trail and Flamewood Trail, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 491303-123- 276/277/278/279 and 49B03-123-270/271/272/273 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this meeting. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library approximately one week prior to the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Wincheste, Virginia. 14- Eric 'R`'Lawrenc Deputy Director ERL/ch AAAdj oiners\200 I \FredCoF&R_CUP.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County- _ - 491303. 1.23.248 -- - 49B03 1 23 275 GILL, MARY H SELDON, LYNDEL PO BOX 67 3244 CONOWINGO RD HIGH VIEW, WVA 26808.0067 STREET, MD 21154.2026 491303. 1.23.245- - - - --___ ------ 491303. 1.23- 246 ALFRIEND, EDWARD W. IV FREDERICK COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT PO BOX 357 " 56dytal�auil' 7v a i WINCHESTER, VA 22601446)- ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313.0357 491303.1.23. 48- 491303 1 23 244 BEATTIE, JUNO MARIE 412 W OAKLAND PARK BLVD j CLARK, ALICE J i FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33311.1712 PO BOX 1552 TAVARES, FL 32778-1552 - 491303 1 23 49 MERRILL, JESSE H. & BESSIE L. 491303 1 23 243 2610 GARFIELD ST NW SLATER, JOHN DAVID WASHINGTON, D.C. 20008.4104 183-B FRANCIS STREET WALDORF, MD. 2060.3 G 491303.1-23. 50- 1 DENTON, DAVID A. RR 2 BOX 2966 BERKLEY SPRINGS, WVA 25411.9618 EricWLawrence, Deputy Director Frederick County Planning Department STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDE jRICK I, (� I�c- I , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Eric R. Lawrence, Deputy Director for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated � B - , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this I F)th day of (� I My commission expires on I l �(� n a �, (Q—CCD5 TARY PUBLIC 49B03.1.23. 51- LANGENSTEIN, HORST ,ARILYN 1028 TIMBER CREEK DR ANNAPOLIS, MO 21403.1944 491303. 1.23. 53- SCHWALLENBERG, THOMAS L. HILLSMERE SHORE 110 GREAT LAKE DR ANNAPOLIS, MD. 21403.3726 491303-1.23.238- CUMMINGS, CARROLL D CIO JEAN CUMMINGS 7181 SUGARBIN ST ORLANDO, FL 32822.5812 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 U.S. POSTAGE 01 AV09101 Z Z Z Z Z ii H METER 71 ;4 93 CL, 49B03-1-23. - - go SLATER, APA*DArVID cj.r /L(J/w aEtw HANCIS STREET RF, MD. 20603 COUNTY of FR EDERICK Department of Planning and.Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 1 I J7IFIC4"VI )I I Or PUBLIC HEARING May 9, 2001 a. TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-01, COUNTY OF FREDERICK - FIRE & RESCUE On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on May 23, 2001 at 7:15 p.m. in the board room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following: Conditional Use Permit #05=01 of the County of Frederick for a telecommunications tower. This property is located at the top of Shawneeland on Timber Ridge Trail, between Elmwood Trail and Flamewood Trail, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 49B03-123- 276/277/278/279 and 49B03-123-270/271/272/273 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this meeting. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library approximately one week prior to the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in ) Ti chester, Virginia. Sincerely, Firir R T axxrranra AT(''P r7A ` MAY 15 2001 DEPT, OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT OakwoodElecttonlc�, l of 11 �� 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 To: Sheriff Robert T. Williamson Date: November 16, 2000 Re: Purchase Order 17682 By: Stephen J. Cuccio Jr. Introduction This document describes RF testing performed at the following sites: North Mountain, Tasker Road, Frederick County Middle School, Shawne( Cannery. These tests were performed to establish performance benchmarks of existing communications equipment. The tests were carried out usinj the following equipment: Hewlett Packard HP8920 signal analyzer, Bird 8343 3dB power attenuator, Bird 43 wattmeter and slug (for secondar, power measurements), HP778D directional coupler, Fluke 8060A RMS voltmeter, Autek Research RF-5 VSWR analyzer, telephone bridging transformer, Tektronix 475A 200 MHz scope, and RG-142 Teflon cable assemblies. The following sections contain a site by site commentary to th( results of the tests. Test Notes • Normal telephone interface levels are regarded as between —13 and —3 dBm, with a maximum of +6 dBm before clipping per Belcor( specifications (dBm in this instances equals 1 milliwatt into a 600 ohm load). • Benchmarks for average speech audio levels were substituted by using a 1 kHz tone with a +/- 3 kHz peak deviation. The radios are designed tc provide +/- 5 kHz peak deviation before clipping (audio distortion). • Cable loss during RF measurements affected readings by less than 0.2 dB. • Receiver desensing tests were done by inserting the HP778D directional coupler between the radio and antenna, keying the transmitter an( observing receiver sensitivity variations for several minutes. In full duplex cases, the transmitter alone did not desense the receiver, but th( addition of other co -site transmitters had profound impacts as noted in test data. • In all cases, both receivers and transmitters were within the specified accuracy of their assigned frequencies. IeGClrnlnvil;c� fiOvv-r por Fri 60 F/�P.t Ajcqc Oahwood�Iecttlaocs, zorll �� 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 North Mountain Sheriff's Radio Channel 1 (Tested 10/15/00) The Motorola MSR-2000 is configured as a repeater using two pairs of telephone lines, one for receive audio and the other for transmit audio. Tone signaling is used for controlling the transmitter. This radio repeats received radio transmissions from both dispatch and mobiles. This system has an integral duplexer filter assembly built into the rack which is internally cabled, so all RF tests were performed at the antenna port of the duplexer. Summary of Performance The receiver sensitivity measured 0.5 microvolts from the specified 0.35 microvolts. This represents a power change of 3 dB and relates to a coverage decrease of 25% of the expected receive footprint. Since the Tasker Road radio sensitivity measured 0.35 microvolts with its own internal duplexer, it is thought that North Mountain can be improved to meet spec through minor adjustment. It should be noted that any adjustment to the duplexer be performed with either a scaler network analyzer or a highly sensitive spectrum analyzer (preferably on the bench). The receiver audio drive level into the telephone line was adequate although the audio returned back to the transmitter was adjusted 6 dB too high (twice as loud to the ear), resulting in distortion of the rebroadcasted mobile audio. Since the transmit audio level sensitivity was measured within normal telephonespecification limits, it can be deduced that the internal modulation sensitivity of the transmitter is set too high. A receiver desense test was performed only to check the effect the transmitter being keyed. This test did not include any co -site signals introduced through the antenna. This was due to a rush to complete testing after it was discovered that disabling North Mountain resulted in complete loss of mobile to mobile communications. Tasker Road does not handle voted mobile audio, only dispatch audio. It should be mentioned that RF carrier levels from co -site transmitters were in excess of the signal handling capabilities specified for this radio (see test data). A further interference study is warranted to determine the severity of this problem, although an immediate recommendation would be to re -locate the antenna away from other VHF high band communications systems located on the same tower. In all, thirteen antennas were counted on a tower approximately 150 feet tall, which may prevent an easy solution to interference from other services. Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. The transmitter power level was lower than expected at 74 watts. The radio is specified at 110 watts maximum, which is 1.7 dB higher. This loss may be attributed to the duplexer, but no model or manufacturer's label was present to obtain specifications for this unit. 3 of 11 Oahwoocllecttonics, lot. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Visual Inspection • Back-up battery has corrosion on the terminals • Antenna connector was loose when first removed .for testing. • Ground system is not adequate to sustain a lightning strike to the telephone or utility service. A single number 10 gauge wire was mechanically attached to what appeared to be an aluminum wire, without any anti -oxidant grease applied at the joint. The aluminum wire disappeared through a wall into the generator room, but was not attached to the tower grounding system or any other visible ground rod. The tower and shelter grounds must be bonded together per National Electrical Code to prevent a difference of voltage potential if lightning enters through the telephone or utility service. j • Factory installed surge protectors were disconnected from the receive audio entry point inside the radio rack. • A small disc ceramic capacitor was soldered across the DC battery leads at the radio connector. These leads were exposed and could be accidentally shorted if moved, resulting in loss of service or incineration of the battery wire. Any filtering device must be placed within the radio enclosure, not only for proper RF filtering, but for safety issues when dealing with high DC currents. • Two volts peak to peak of RF was measured across the telephone lines (differentially) at the surge protector on the radio. This RF was attributed to 91.3 MHz WTRM. Filtering on both the power supply4nd the telephone entry points will need to be improved to reduce the occurrence of WTRM audio from being broadcast on this radio.' • The radio transmitter is still functional when. introducing mobile signals at the antenna, despite the North Mountain voter card removal. This transmitter cannot be disabled from the EOCwith regard to mobile signal repeating. • There is no UHF back-up radio present at the: North Mountain site as previously thought. • There is no secondary system that will provide;; mobile to mobile communications on channel 1. • Rodent feces were found throughout equipment and shelter. Despite the destruction of equipment by the corrosive nature of animal urine, this is a health hazard to anyone breathing in the dust while working in the shelter. a of 11 Oahwood�leci+tonic6, �.� 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 North Mountain Fire and Rescue Radio Channel 1 (Tested 10/15/00) The Motorola MTR-2000 radio is configured as a remote base using a single pair of telephone lines which electrically switch between transmit and receive audio. Tone signaling is used for controlling the transmitter and changing radio channels. Summary of Performance The receiver sensitivity could not be measured down to 12 dB SINAD because the squelch setting closed the receiver down at 1 microvolt. The SINAD measured at 1 microvolt was approximately 15 dB, so the receiver may be close to spec. A observation was made regarding the high squelch setting which revealed a combination of interference from other services on the same channel, as well as random noise breaking squelch. This high squelch setting results in a loss of greater than 37 % of the coverage footprint, which is detrimental to handheld users trying to talk back to the dispatch outside a radius of 5 miles. A receive desense test was performed. The Sheriff's repeater was keyed up while observing the receiver sensitivity. While this did not cause immediate desensing, an occasional burst would occur and reduce the receiver sensitivity by about 6 dB, which is the equivalent to a 50 % coverage loss. RF power from the Sheriff's transmitter was entering this radio at a level just beyond the threshold of spurious rejection (-10 dBm). An additional high level signal at 155.660 MHz was found to exacerbate the problem when both transmitters were on simultaneously. Receiver audio drive level into the telephone line as a little on the low side at —15.7 dBm. A 10 dB increase at the radio (and a subsequent decrease at the EOQ would provide for better signal to noise over the telephone system. The transmit audio sensitivity was not tested due to time constraints. These constraints were based upon the lack of coverage during down time by using only the Tasker Road back-up system. The coverage was not thought to be adequate to dispatch into the southwest end of the county from Tasker Road (North Mountain Fire Hall). The transmitter power level was lower than expected at 87 watts. The radio is specified at 100 watts maximum. Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. Visual Inspection • No ground for lightning protection. 0 No battery back-up for instantaneous recovery; relies on the generator starting up. Oahwoocl S of 11 7ect�onics, �� �°. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Tasker Road Sheriffs Radio Channel 1 (Tested 10/29/00) The MTR-2000 radio is configured as a remote base station, not as a repeater, despite installed- duplexers. Tone signaling is used for controlling the transmitter. No mobile audio is retransmitted from this system, only dispatch audio. When this transmitter is not used for broadcasting the dispatch during normal conditions, the receiver is used as a secondary remote receiver in conjunction with the voting comparator. This allows the received audio from this site to be re -broadcast by the North Mountain transmitter (if the signal quality is better than the other radio sites). It is significant to say that this current configuration will not provide a suitable back-up system to North Mountain, since it will not support mobile to mobile communications by itself. Summary of Performance The receiver sensitivity is within spec. The transmitter is lower than expected at 63 watts compared to its spec of 100 watts (2 dB lower). This reduction appears to be consistent with the North Mountain transmitter power and may be accounted for by the loss of the duplexer, although there is no current set of documentation to support this. The receive audio drive level into the telephone line was within limits, but could be increased about 6 dB to improve the signal to noise over the telephone line. The transmitter audio sensitivity was set too high, which resulted in hum and noise from the telephone line to become noticeable during testing. The transmit audio input level should be increased to at' least —13 dBm as measured at the telephone entry in the shelter to provide +/- 3 kHz peak deviation of transmitted signal (using a 1 kHz tone). The current setting is down at —22 dBm. The most noticeable problem with this radio was its receiver desensitization when the Tasker Road Fire and Rescue transmitter was keyed. The receiver was desensed by 12 dB which results in a reduction of receiver coverage of 66 %. This would mean complete blockage of hand held radios in the Stephens City area and marginal coverage with the mobiles for that same area. The amount of power introduced into the receiver when the Fire and Rescue transmitter was keyed was 100 milliwatts. This is significantly close to the threshold of destruction for most receiver front ends. Motorola does not spec maximum non-destructive input power to the receiver, but it is between 100 milliwatts and 1 watt. The reason for this large amount of power return is due to the close coupling of the two antennas mounted at the top of the water tank. A swept isolation test showed 25 dB of isolation between the two antennas in the VHF high band. A preferred level of isolation would be greater than 60 dB. Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. Visual Inspection • A single ground wire connected this radio to an electrical outlet outside the shelter. It is unclear as to the integrity of this ground. It would be better to Cadweld this ground directly to the water tank superstructure directly behind the radio. • This radio does not support mobile to mobile communications in its current configuration. • Very small battery back-up; estimate approximately less than 10 amp/hour capacity. This would provide approximately 20 minutes of operation. Oahwoocl6 of 11 lect�onlcs, ��� 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Tasker Road Fire and Rescue Channel 2 (Tested 10/29/00) The MTR-2000 radio is configured as a remote base station. Tone signaling is used for control. Summary of Performance" The receiver sensitivity and receiver audio drive level into the telephone service were within spec. Transmitter output power was low at 82 watts compared to the 100 watt spec for this radio. The transmitter audio sensitivity was set too high, which resulted in hum and noise from the telephone line to become noticeable during testing. The transmit audio input level should be increased to a( least —13 dBm as measured at the telephone entry in the shelter to provide +/- 3 kHz peak deviation of transmitted signal (using a 1 kHz tone).' The current setting is down at —31 dBm. The most noticeable problem with this radio was its receiver desensitization when the Tasker Road Sheriff's transmitter was keyed. This receiver does not have the benefit of duplexer filtering to reduce the returned power from the Sheriff's transmitter. The receiver was desensed by 25 dB which renders it unusable for handhelds and only marginal for mobiles within a radius of a less than 5 miles. This radio has the potential for a loss of communications if both Sheriff's and Fire and Rescue services had to operate from Tasker Road simultaneously. Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. Visual Inspection • A single ground wire connected this radio to an electrical outlet outside the shelter. It is unclear as to the integrity of this ground. It would be better to. Cadweld this ground directly to the water tank superstructure directly behind the radio. • Very small battery back-up; estimate approximately less than 20 amp/hour capacity. This would provide approximately 40 minutes of operation. - OA•7 of 11 awo0 lecttonlcb, . �°. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Frederick County Middle School Sheriff's Radio Channel 2 (Tested 10/29/00) This MSR-2000 is configured as a repeater. Tone signaling is used for control. Summary of Performance The receiver sensitivity and receiver audio drive level into the telephone service is within spec. The transmitter audio sensitivity from the telephone service is within spec. The transmitter modulation -'sensitivity to repeated audio from mobiles is a little high at about 4 dB, which can cause some mobiles to become distorted if the user close -talks the microphone. Receiver desensitization occurred randomly as paging signals from another site were keyed on and off. It is thought that these signals were not causing fundamental overload, but spurious intermo,dulation response since none of the interferers were in excess of —10 dBm. Identifiable paging tones could be heard during receive desense testing. The desense was approximately 7 dB, which reduces the coverage footprint by just over 50 % when the pagers are active. The transmitter low at 67 watts compared to the 110 watt spec, although the duplexer losses may be involved with this reduction as mentioned in early site evaluations. The Station Master antenna was mounted less than two feet off the side of the tower, which may create a pattern null (or blind spot) on the hidden side. I Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. Visual Inspection • No grounding: • No back-up power supply. 8of11 Oahwood EleettonlOp . �. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Shawnee Springs Cannery Sheriffs Channel 1 Remote Receiver (Tested 10/29/00) This MTR-2000 is configured as a receiver only. It sends a 2175 Hz tone over the telephone lines during non -receive conditions to support the voting comparator. Summary of Performance The receiver sensitivity and receiver audio drive level is within spec. Antenna VSWR (matching) was within limits. Visual Inspection • The UPS back-up power supply "Fail" light is on: • A large amount of black dust was present on the radio. This dust is from the carbon brushes of the electric elevator motor located less than six feet away. This dust is partially conductive and will destroy the radio if allowed to accumulate in the circuitry. i. Oahwood riecitonlebe., 9 of 11 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Frederick County Middle School SIRS Radio (Tested 10/29/00) Summary of Performance This radio is configured as a remote base. There is no documentation for this radio. The receiver is very sensitive at 0.16 microvolts. The receiver drive level is at the upper end of the telephone level at 1.5 dBm while applying a 1 kHz tone at +/- 3 kHz peak deviation. No change is necessary if the audio is not distorted at the EOC. The transmitter appears low at 70 watts, with a presumed specification of 100 watts. The antenna VSWR is 3.3:1, which indicated either a broken antenna or a bad feedline. Visual Inspection • No .grounding. • No back-up power supply. Lawrence Farm Fire and Rescue Channel 1(Inspected 10/29/00) Visual Inspection Only This radio was not tested. It is a pole mounted remote base radio of late 1970's vintage which has been upgraded in past years. The seal around the weatherproof enclosure is leaking and has caused insects to get into the radio. The antenna is missing one of three radials and the other two are bent downward. The utility pole supporting the radio is listing at 5 degrees and has not beenchemically treated. This pole should be taken down or replaced. Oahwood 10of13 rlecitonicbp . • C 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Summary of Actions for Radio Sites • The Tasker Road antenna implementation must be changed. A second site for either the Sheriff or Fire and Rescue radios needs to be implemented to prevent extreme desense and possible radio damage. • The North Mountain Fire and Rescue radio should be moved to another site free of high level VHF interference. The current amount of interference and desense, in addition to the high squelch setting reduce the effective coverage of the receiver. • Grounding at North Mountain needs to be improved by bonding the shelter ground to the tower ground using either number 2 gauge wire or copper strap. This will also reduce the amount of RF interference from WTRM in addition to reducing potential damage from lightning. • Tasker Road grounding should not depend on the utility service ground external to the shelter. A Cadweld bond or other fastening to the water tower superstructure should be done. • The Shawnee Springs remote receiver must be removed from the elevator shaft. It is only a matter of time before degraded receiver performance occurs due to the amount of carbon dust introduced in the radio. Fix the back-up power supply failure. • A standard procedure for setting telephone audio line levels must be in place to assure best signal to noise performance and uniformity between radios. This must also include proper audio settings at the voting comparator. Set the drive levels to between 0 and -6 dBm (using a 1 kHz tone at +/- 3 kHz peak deviation). Set the transmitters at the opposite end of the telephone line to provide +/- 3 kHz peak deviation using the corrected audio from the voting comparator or Cerntracom Console. Verify that repeated audio from receiver to transmitter is unity gain with respect to a receive signal modulated with I kHz tone. • Improve the back-up power supply at Tasker Road. Back-up supplies should be added to Middle School Sheriff's Channel 2 and SIRS. • Fix the SIRS antenna; Move the Sheriff's Channel 2 antenna at least four feet away from the tower to improve coverage. • Dismantle the Lawrence Farm utility pole before it falls down. • Restore an auxiliary UHF link to North Mountain in the event that the telephone lines fail (during an ice storm or lightning strike). • MOST IMPORTANT: A solution needs to found that will provide mobile to mobile communication through the Tasker Road Sheriff's Radio, in the event of a catastrophic failure on North Mountain. Oahwood 11of11 �Iecttonics. . �°. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Test Data Date Measured 10/15/00 10/15/00 10/29/00 10/29/00 10/29/00 10/29/00 10/29/00 Location N.M Shf N.M. F&R Tasker Shf Tasker F&R M.S. Shf M.S. SIRS S.S. Shf Notes Receive Sensitivity 12 dB SINAD 0.5 1 0.28 0.2 0.35 0.16 0.22 In microvolts C-Message weighted 'EIA Specified Receiver Sensitivity 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 N/A 0.35 Receiver Audio Level -8.2 -15.7 -11.9 -9.4 -3.8 1.5 -6.2 Usina a 1 kHz tone at +/- 3 kHz peak deviation Transmitter Audio Level -10.4 N/A -22 -31 -6 -9.4 N/A TX driven to +/- 3 kHz peak deviation Receiver Desensitization NIA 6 12 25 7 0 0 In dB relative to 12 dB SINAD sensitivity Receiver Spurious Specification 100 100 100 100 100 100 In dB relative to 12 dB SINAD sensitivity Receiver Sensitivity derived from u -113 -107 -118 -121 -116 -120 dBm into 50 ohms Maximum PermissibleZ ur Power -13 -7 -18 -21 -16 -20 dBm into 50 ohms Maximum Measured Interference -10 -10 23 22 -15 Worst case measured carrier power level in dBm dB in excess of Spur Rejection 3 -3 41 43 1 Does not include IMD spurious Interference Frequency 152.66 152.66 154.37 155.01 152.148 Additional Interference Frequency 154.22 155.01 158.1 Transmitter Output Power 76 87 63 82 67 70 N/A Watts into 50 ohms Specified Transmit Output Power 110 100 100 100 110 Tolerance= -34 -13 -37 -18 -43 Does not include losses through du lexer Receiver Frequency Accuracy 159.0300 154.2200 159.0300 154.3400 158.7901 39.5400 159.0300 In MHz S ecified Receiver Frequencv 159.0300 154.2200 159.0300 154.3400 158.7900 39.5400 159.0300 In MHz +/- .0005 % Tolerance= 0.00001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 % Transmit Frequency Accuracy 155.01011 154.2200 155.0100 154.3400 155.5501 39,5400 In MHz Specified Transmitter Frequency 155.0100 .154.2200 155.0100 154.3400 155.5500 39.5400 In MHz +/- .0005 % Tolerance= 0.0001 0.0000 0.00001 0.00001 0.0001 0.0000 % Worst Case Antenna VSWR 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.51 1.41 3.31 ITypical= 1.5:1 Voltage Standing Wave 12of13 Oak�!,Woocl lecttonl cb, . �. 261 Winding Ridge Lane, Winchester, VA 22603 1-540-888-3031 Fax / Data 1-540-888-4041 Voting Comparator Review (11/26/00) Based on earlier findings during radio site testing;,' an investigation was made to determine why the Tasker Road Sheriffs repeater was not transmitting mobile audio when the dispatcher activated this system.: It was determined that mobile audio was transmitted only by the North Mountain site. A review of both mobile and dispatch console audio routing was made at the EOC on November 26, 2000. The following observations were made to conclude, that the installation of the voting comparator (Spectra Tac unit) is improperly installed and configured: • Voted audio from the Spectra Tac was hard -wired exclusively to the North Mountain site. No provision was made to switch voted audio to a secondary repeater. • The North Mountain site re -transmitted mobile audio regardless of the active repeater selection at the dispatch console. The CentraCom manual illustrates the selection of primary and secondary repeater sites is made at the CentraCom central electronics bank by the dispatch console. This requires the Spectra: Tac voting comparator to be wired prior to the audio selection made by the CentraCom bank. Currently, the Spectra Tac unit is. wired after the CentraCom bank. i A review of the CentraCom installation manual revealed detailed information to add a Spectra Tac voting comparator. A comparison between the manual and the hardware in the EOC revealed the following:, • Specific hardware is missing to interface between the CentraCom bank and the Spectra Tac voting comparator. Chapter 3 of the Centracom installation manual, page 3-59 specifies Motorola part numbers BLN1165C (voting comparator I/O module), BLN6082A (25 pair calbe), BLN1147 (punchblock / spark gap board) with a usage of two each of these items for the 8 channel Spetra Tac. None of these items were observed as being present or installed at the EOC. • An additional part for the CentraCom bank, Motorola part number KN88AA (relay board) is shown in Figure 3-8 (page 3-66) of the Centracom . installation manual for use in modifying the CentraCom for "Main / Standby Comparator Switching Modification". This part was not observed as being installed in the CentraCom bank. • The Spectra Tac voting comparator manual did not have specific instructions to interface with the CentraCom bank. Motorola will need to provide this information which will possibly specify and additional interface card. Other observations: • No ground wire on the Spectra Tac voting comparator. • Number 8 or 10 gauge wire was used to ground the CentraCom bank and the dispatch consoles. Figure 3-2 in the CentraCom installation manual on page 3-12 specifies a minimum size of number 6 gauge to the console and number 2 gauge to the CentraCom central electronics bank rack. i W, W-1, PEG C A --I 5. F76% SO I 18 EI -223 !�c Q2 st -26 4 ON 4 C, 18-T S EOHERD Q 1240V�l I .rp er. �l .70 -MSPS�, 'F 25 R, O mi. I loi (3upi) T, rd ir 109 1, I LI-*-- I n A-7 & NI U A= G. 727--7L 46.42.f\. 73 sci X.. zt- -WLE= :7 m, ION 5 1 41- f-,q sMF / F. O o�J1:L80 3r n / `S "� t-13F 1,i 1 2�. cevill 3 -3 F FF p Hlcocirl •g -n dsicc. . !!W- - - 6. 219 A.. v) 32]9Plains Zblum� nave —NO R --ko -1 14;W. A -11 At 13 of 2Z 12.2Z' LE no L X caincu X awl 0 D'A"I 36 A= fobo' .5eq NjW I AIASIVr? OP rr . . . . . . F Fct 32(20 450' NOR 040-,A�V` I S P•C MILES 20 crrenicn forf� 101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 STATUTE MLES to - ---- - (Pvt To I I I 1 442 2 .,70 -,perr -le MY 310A� 8) 12C6 - (31 ts) J.&LOW �S"-IXA 6u) U C5Ni;;,--. WRAY- cj 2 .8- E F ER ille _ESBUU Midla -2 .8 LLE e .. sr qANT t. Y -252 qrt-7zi- 000 ealelon ems' riL BE 326 el� A ]1 - yEGIO;44ALcQCBE) Y AWOsu; 28.625 E NIEW'(Pyt \ ..1771 Kornney OcsTiM'70UNTA(N 525 ••� - 602 r (265 ys 6rd p f017 i •0 rirI 299 o- ee NOTAMsID'reet 1 1884 rClasst e�d� 7 0- - meise i 2F 58 T1 r 92e t �' 8 H€FHERDI RB) A4AZ.';vge G 4�q5 Be<e•' „t f ` nwood j 7r 71ry'� ;?� •;:.>122. RJ .i'. 'Fere AL: 's if • Q$ --. .3-_ �a _ '�, nesbrorcli0- 56 � i= ,.> � - �� 1f8 f050 /max ( •�L' o 'our^ � ( tc.c •R n � r 619 409 (r \.. J '! Y _ a W Sr,ESTER . � °- : / ; •. N 7�R (OKV)' U � R (�73). I Purcellv�lt -� •� .e+ .i .r golF 416• i 173Pw �A° t� _ I �•S•>• I +k ' l!C' Ts� ,2°.1R 1'^ - "i ,fin � r-t/ - ,c +�- �t •- R! - y � � -e 45:,\ y 1 00 s- �vI(80, a nn j �Ip-2 "1 1-1�31 4 9�!r�~25 0 _ I` 320. -2gj (^� =�' ( •� 88 der �.yY 81 �k- 1 199 mane'~ a.� . Mi 2Dur9 1: <<Pvt) HIC .ORS k v - - - _ •1 c T.y+;, y ` �_' - !C� n ^ ._ f Cwr, 5Z4 - Y c �- �' o. zs FRR) ': ioYe: MerkFiem F dnl I :r'• 32 c(3V70!�o dsTo/ckf!�(• �4s2o Q _,Qr3cNoC _ , o.O ' 0 a.jlL9t��fF�� �R951Pfil`aern132383S`9 2 (317) �gCol4 1U . �Z .. r22oF3 — • 122 e - .. UC' �,..� t , ,I Man ^^ nn^^ �olt eours .,'., " Edinbu � � ' ,.' r ��:�y � ;• J ,e_ � 5 S° � _ �i ^t w 1810 tr: 1271RM A'. en(onnlf a» € > ; ..L1, rj' p• e 'Ski {291) [� 'IONGc. P r +' 2 5 10 See Ms/D4. �ccnie j' 28: si ' % ;~ F(Lpt H G9s O, Fo Cles/ °v k e :`Ile 28gYr2 ! _elf'�� 20 : tq t cksor e TZ. Or'een (300 r _: �'^-6r./(2/'"; l -• FRI cgcWZ)_c� ,/(P3�2167�it�'y3vvOlEff%: (206) r pL2 - 10 1 0 NAUTICAL MILES I O 20 20 30 ✓) /(1 ���s / 10 0 STATUTE MILES IO �� •ss� / 10 0 1(ILOt.£TERS IO 20 30 40 50 "542�N�ON (j 7Ox (Purl •.� i \sf o �Vf H\ORaE• Ef��fHE 72,98 Lure-�.p".A •c',�.., aT - :. Perry�vrUe 3g'S % ID, 1R NIc vrse /R> = /ram ,1` '1 - �sn /1200 " 4' 45ANG``�A O f / 116 3 Ch110 CSN _ x �CRESYIPv'r:�O -•!C@E\V,.r .: ��F304 CURaY 1 (22 yflYr .Ct-.rl%rl. 1305 s�•.�435 R Midle (260) gJ975 L'3t 2 8 ,�1-1q\. s 1 ` �f ti IEESBURGtI / ;'¢ 1 5 T / JV� oa AWoodvllle le5r �/ to 185 i� ,ter;': P EA15aNTDnIEiP s CUCPIEPER �� t as F t r Sto y.4 j ,�� O Ig T�•� �252C:�: — c� BEiRv�SCE ,R. tu26 O t"ya �•/tY. /_ � � � ;i.� � � ✓- 3, $ •/^��.�+0�gi � s ..� ....C�-y,••.•11f.S3:,'--�-.r•r_-Ior G�-,r\.( �.v.,I 6 7� y {/ er REGtCE aL�CBE.) 3 Y sio r AWOr' 328.625 HCICO y 76'L50122:8��; 01 )77 029 = 18-0 r — XEYEIL criirr'se ,o 4 r FJa VIEW' t _ s.. a� S90 '( 6 .h �4_ j QE-;ee493 4 - �.iSos O - - - � �w \- �h � �1 '�'� � ( MI'��,•� ���.' }`�11 ,�°' • �'�. MCAT >�T Q L i1 A � o •:�,�" y /� EATER � � Eeie•tF-1520 -j' lR2g - 181 (2vo ;; SHE°HERDI RB �-•01 nwood 1-777 Romrtey�R7:756" tea` �+ CT �124,3'aw."a f. 122. R� A gY✓ / Fe(" 3 ( r 5 C•7012295- r o OGTiM UNTA(N 525 R v_ /�?T UC _ cccrw 3 o960 �1 (28S Car ,7 4 " 1yo TM 112.1E IC�i yG1RB 7 0 Au us ome� .N Ila � •. ��^ - - ''� c" J)� � ! (300) f050 s� C •vy�"r+ o .' our... f �`y �� •: � .O � � i 2619 !/ F 1109 01) -:\ �fl �` Po1rt �c-J ro_fccec "C t;�'iy W'. .lv 1�a ,l.. r,ESTERI( vn �S S rZi3' 'r ^�= ees �R (CCV)I (Z/93). U ^i /q•"\ Pu_rce'l11i -i tA`�Nj5 1,7 / Een' 11 �'-' ''•e �F .� f �3C t .x L ,-+ a.t.' 7c� • ESQ r p pi6, s. i 173 • % Y !.1 (446 : ...3P :a• l G.0 ! _ LEEse'a �lsvil e - +�+ •. '%r 0i� �st O Milli Lt• il a3� x 2oz�2o TOLE �7.,; 100 `�1.L80 1eG n % _ -�"1` -1.737 T 4 ?J y�2.7 f - 0 . . 3 +; rr scary 1' .1 r._ r � ' L�- �i=" - -- UE aNnle _ .i: - ':� -;•�'� .1 g� 'f(f Mic!££reb. 9 � i 3260 a sr9c 2 ti 'U it i ' O �. �i•_..308.•`^ a /� .>� 4 - - y (36� $t _ �•7 ry �(Avtf ..3 CIE) a•n..'JYe�� r.. rt'wr• . R 1 - ; I a�a (_ i j i.. t :P)I,, ZV`Jo�ds)cc �•388 Sd �EMa kham . 56� 2� . (31�) 313 9p 21gColumb� note J f t• mac^ '1` °r " Ue -i 0 .' p p I �'� r:Y:.B�yC_a p �` /i %" UC•� nG 6 26 i M csnal u� 4 x- _ 6F Ci 1 s 1 �9='tcoun' � Edinbur. .� � � 7 ?�'I :•• .^''.yyr• % s s � ' ` `r � 1810 _ 127 R,>Rr P� K enfcnvrl a `s ^' 3� ';LtCJ r ® 1:251 „v 335w "80�" V 1 S c �'F c :i 1° . : i r°�. '% 11 w ME oe (�) '" See N�TA s/D;ri �Mcccnie eJ i.a Ya s FIiAH r'ys� 1 Ord zo' Clas il(sfeti ��281- (•%, r cxsor �. ti,.4��": �T =cr. / . / C o / ,� a tI�A P ` �• J 1.�s� Si i �vr) 67�Y_v1EvV ��o���Jl}h�ng{on. o.- a:.:1 F4 �4�c� �'r, :: t ���2" 32 (206)'"•' �. ' ;\Ils fo.l 10 I I I o NAUTICAL MILES 10 zo / crrentOn • 10 1 1 10 STATUTE MSS 10 30 � ! 'r0 1 10 I 0 KILOMETERS 10 20 30 20 40 50 `••: RF=NEON /''�° 70� ( J. j_ 442 22 Jf y` � � Pvt " )erryvrlle 1 -a' 7 a. 7_' ` yo r ! HOgE-fEyAI4TH 95 n T22 1R` � '��aurse � /,+'1`^ 39(Z=:24� ( 8) f 1200 ray " .. :r , +Y 'i (1 ? 45.sNCYyA__: �l'®®� 3 urs� �30' (220) 9 '? A, x o v s116 3 C1�110 CSN .- A CRES tPvr:� %'J975 -2 r8>�' 3_'.� LURAr tr. a /, '�z i. 1005 ' cu •' t l"' : \' \ Midla f Woodville t LEESBURC�I ,• 5 /T le5 a e��* Acoo + 185 ► P.. ANTO�iE1P s CUL'P�EPER 1 J'A � T o 18 1..'�252L& =__ 7� `o BE=RIVv L``R ,• 826 ® \ /, ( leton���}/