Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout28-16 Valley Health Surgery Center Medical Office Building - PIN 53-A-68 - Gainesboro - BackfilePlease note: The site plans associated with this file are located in the file room. RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM DATE ' NO ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. z �O CHECK �.� PAID J BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER CC)2001 �FOrlm. ®8L818 SITE PLAN TRACKING SKEET Comment Sheets: GIS VDOT Sanitation Authority Winchester Inspections Stephens City Public Works Middletown Parks & Rec Airport Health Dept. Fire V One copy of Site Plan application form ✓ Payment of site plan review fee ✓ One reproducible copy of Site Plan OPEN FILE: (o File Opened 9 Reference Manual updated/number assigned D-base updated Application Action Summary updated CLOSE FILE: Approved (or denied) letter mailed to applicant/copy to file and cc's (� File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" 11 Ili Reference Manual updated ( D-base updated l L Application Action Summary updated l ,1C2 CQ 1 I 7 _ Ot - u x-e Sys ID # Updated 3113114 September 13, 2016 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 4 6. Setbacks: On Sheet C4.01, please note the Zoning Ordinance required and proposed front, read, and side setbacks for the B2 Zoning District. RESPONSE: This has been corrected as requested. 7. Building Height: Please revise the note to reflect a maximum height of 35 feet for the B2 Zoning District. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 8. Landscaped Area: On Sheet C4.01, please note the required minimum landscaped area of (percentage of lot area) of 15%. Please provide a calculation showing the landscaped area being provided on -site. RESPONSE: This information has been added to the plan as requested. 9. Signs: Please revise the notes on the proposed monument sign on Sheet C4.01 that the total sign area shall be no more than 50 square feet as permitted, and be no more than 12 feet tall as permitted for signs along collector roads. Please provide a rendering of the proposed monument sign within the Detail sheets. RESPONSE: These changes have been made as requested and the rendering of a typical Valley Health sign has been added to the plans as requested.- 10. Outdoor Trash Receptacles: Any structure, such as trash containers and/or similar structures, shall be surrounded on all sides abutting parking spaces or aisles by a six-inch concrete curb. The structure shall be separated from the curb by a distance of three feet. Please ad a note to the effect on sheet C4.01 and any Details sheets. RESPONSE: This curb has been added to the drawings as requested and language added to the plan sheet, as well as the details, which specify this offset distance. 11. Landscape Plan: Please make the following revisions on Sheet C4.02: a) As required by the Zoning Ordinance, a minimum three (3) foot talk evergreen hedge, fence, berm, or wall shall be provided to prevent headlights from shining on public rights -of -way and adjoining properties. Please revise the Landscape Legend to reflect a 36" minimum height for the provided evergreen hedge. The hedge should be extended to shield all adjoining properties and roadways; RESPONSE: This change has been made to the legend and the additional hedge has been added to the plans as requested. b) Please depict all shrub plantings, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, on the Landscape plan; and RESPONSE: This has been added as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com September 13, 2016 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 3 of 4 c) Landscaping notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with § 165- 203.01 B of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department. RESPONSE: These notes have been added as requested. 12. Transportation: Please address to the following comments: a) Please note the posted speed limit of existing adjacent roadways RESPONSE: These have been added as requested. Please note, the roadway on the eastern side of our project does not have a posted speed limit. b) Please provide traffic generation estimates for the proposed use as required by the approved Proffer Statement RESPONSE: This information has been added to the plans as requested. c) Please ensure VDOT was provided a plan set for comment as Botanical Boulevard is future major collector roadway, and RESPONSE: The plans have been provided to VDOT for review and comment. d) It noes no appear that the entrance on Botanical Boulevard will meet the entrance spacing requirements per VDOT. Please confirm with VDOT that this entrance is appropriate. RESPONSE: This entrance has been shed to provide the maximum distance between the existing intersections and an exception has been requested from VDOT to allow this entrance construction to take place. The basis for our exception request is that when this subdivision was originally planned, the requirements now being place on this parcel for entrance locations did not exist, and if they had, an alternate layout may have been provided. 13. Outdoor Lighting: Please provide the following revisions to the Phorometric Plan and Photometric Details: a) Please depict and provide details on any building mounted fixtures. If no building mounted fixtures will be provided, please add a note to this effect, and RESPONSE: The wall mounted fixtures have been added to the photometric plan as provided with this submission. b) Add a note that all lighting will conform to Section 165-201.07, Outdoor lighting standards, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and will be full cutoff. RESPONSE: This note has been added as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com September 13, 2016 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 2 6. Your calculations indicate the 100 year storm flows will not impact proposed improvements. Indicate the 100 year storm elevations across site. Also, you need to analyze the off -site impact to ensure no downstream structures are impacted. RESPONSE: The 100 year water surface elevation within the proposed stormwater facilities reaches elevation 807.14. The adjacent parking is at elevation 809.70 (TIC) at its lowest elevation. The proposed facility has a finished floor elevation of 812.75. As you can see, no portion of the site will be impacted by the 100 year water surface elevation. In the event of total failure of the proposed and existing piping systems, overland relief exists which will prevent the inundation of water into the proposed facility. The offsite piping we are discharging our site into consists of a 36" HDPE pipe at slope = 3.9% which is followed by a downstream pipe of the same size and pipe material at a slope = 0.8596. The 36" HDPE at slope = a85% has a flow capacity of 66.61 cfs. Given our discharge, 1 Oyear = 5.80 cfs and 100year =10.54 cfs, the resulting flow depth in the 36" HDPE pipe equals 0.60' and 0.81'respectively. Asyou can see, the existing downstream piping system is more than capable of receiving our proposed flows and no downstream modifications are required. 7. Your stormwater quality calculation indicates a "B" soil type for site. However, the erosion and sediment control narrative indicates a "C" soil. We concur with the erosion and sediment control narrative based on site conditions and local geology. Revise calculations based on this design assumption. RESPONSE: The VRRM Spreadsheet has been revised as requested and is attached to this resubmittal. Given this change, the site is still in compliance with the requirements as designed. 8. You are indicating the use of DI-7. Due to safety issues related to a pedestrian foot slipping into a Type I grate, provide Type 3 grates across site. Ensure storm sewer is designed with this type of grate. Provide hydraulic grade line for proposed storm sewer system. RESPONSE: All DI-7 inlets have been specified to have a Type 3 Grate. The requested Hydraulic Grade Line calculations have been prepared and are included with the resubmission. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com September 13, 2016 Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Page 2of2 6. Van accessible parking spaces shall measure Win width with an 8' unloading area or 10" parking width with a 5' unloading area. All accessible spaces shall be identified correctly. RESPONSE: As shown on the previously submitted plans, all Van Accessible spaces are 10' wide and are adjacent to an isle with a minimum width off(all (all but one space has a 10' isle). All Van spaces are delineated as such on the drawings and will include signage and painting as specified within the details 7. Accessible parking signage for van shall include $500.00 fine. See USBC Section 1106.8 for van signage. RESPONSE: The detail as previously specified on the plans states the $500 fine for improper use of a HC space, including Van spaces 8. Medical facilities shall be provided with an accessible passenger loading zone. Loading zone shall comply with ANSI A117.1-09. A minimum of 60" deep x 20' in length shall be marked and identified as the unloading area. Please provide the location of the striping/unloading on the plans. RESPONSE: This loading zone has been added as requested. 9. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 of USBA/IBC for special inspection requirements on the type of structure (Soils, concrete, etc.) Compaction/soil bearing/soil testing shall be required for placement of new facility. A geotechnical evaluation shall be performed and submitted with application as required USBC/IBC Section 1803. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans outlining this requirement as requested. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com September 9, 2016 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 3 9. Add note stating contractor shall adjust existing FCSA facilities as requested by inspector. RESPONSE: This note has been added as requested. 10. Add table with daily water and sewer demands in gpd. RESPONSE: This table has been added to the plans as requested. 11. Clarify callout stating that wet tap and valve will be by FCSA. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 12. Clarify profile stating that wet tap and valve will be by FCSA. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 13. Provide restrained joints on water main through controlled fill and a minimum of 20' in each direction into original material. RESPONSE: This specification has been added to the plans as requested. 14. Specify 18" minimum clearance in profile between water main and storm sewer. RESPONSE: This has been specified on the plans as requested. 15. Extend water main 1 full pipe length and install flushing assembly. RESPONSE: This has been specified on the plans as requested. 16. Combine fire, domestic, and FH off one branch, 6" minimum. RESPONSE: The proposed water has been revised per this alternate as provided. 17. Extend water 10' past storm sewer and pre -blast minimum of 25'. RESPONSE: The water design has been revised to show this extension and notes have been added to require pre -blasting as requested. 18. Update Gate Valve detail to reflect April 09 detail. RESPONSE: This has been revised on the plans as requested. 19. Add FCSA details 4, 7, and 9. RESPONSE: These have been added to the plans as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 January 18, 2017 Daniel K. Michael, PE Valley Engineering 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #28-16; Valley health Surgery Center Property Identification Number (PIN): 53-A-68 Dear Mr. Michael: The above -referenced site plan was approved on January 18, 2017. The site plan is approved for a 21,000 square foot (SF) one-story medical office building including 113 parking spaces, 2 of which are ambulance spaces, and 12 of which are designates as handicapped parking at the Winchester Medical Center — West Campus. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with three (3) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, M. Tyler Klein, AICP Planner MTK/pd Attachments cc: Bill Ewing, Gainesboro District Supervisor Kevin W. Kenney and Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue Valley Health, 1836 Amherst Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 • 2. 91 4. SITE PLAN APPLICATION - OVi°ce Use Onit'- Date Application Received: LC Application #: Z8-/(-p Fees Received: ,33U) .00 Receipt #: 5q 100 � Initials: Project Title: Valley Health - Surgery Center Location of Property 300 Marriott Drive (Street address) Winchester, Virginia 22603 Applicant/Designer: Name: Valley Engineering Telephone: 540-434-6365 Address: 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Property Owner (if different than above): Name: Valley Health Telephone: 540-5536-4538 Address: 1836 Amherst Street Winchester, Virginia 22604 5. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number: b. Total acreage of the parcel to be developed: C. Total disturbed area of the parcel: d. Present Use: e. Proposed Use: f. Magisterial District(s) 8 53-A-68 3.00 3.20 C q,ej F8dY1A 1p ULIL Vacant Medical Office Building Gainesboro CJ 6. Site Plan Type: a. Is this an original or new site plan? b. Is this a revised site plan? If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: c. Is this a minor site plan? If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: 0 Yes Pe No Yes F] No Yes II No 7. Zoning Information: a. Current Zoning: BUS b. Was this property Rezoned? Yes F] No ✓ c. If yes provide the rezoning number for this property: d. Are there any proffers for this property? Y e. Has a MDP been approved for this property? Y f. If yes provide the MDP number for this property: _ -st-J ;s No No ✓ F] MV 8. Adjoining property zoning and use: USE ZONING North Vacant 82MS East Hotel B-2 South Vacant B-2 Jest Vacant B-2 I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: / e4w Date: z g I & 9 • 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST The checklist shown below specifies the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application. The Department of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). (1) One (1) set of approved comment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: nFrederick County Department of Planning & Development Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Department of GIS (Geographic Information Services) F✓ Frederick County Sanitation Authority Frederick County Building Inspections Department Frederick County Department of Public Works F✓ Frederick County Fire Marshal Virginia Department of Health Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Winchester Regional Airport Authority Frederick County Public Schools (for residential plans) (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form. �L— (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. (4) Two (2) copies of the site plan for review. (5) Completed Special Limited Power of Attorney (original). II (6) Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable). 10 0 • SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The Site Plan Checklist, shown below, lists the information which is required to be on a ach site plan. Site plans which are incomplete or missing information will be returned to the applicant (s) for revision. Project Information Section (1) A title that includes the name of the proposed or existing business and a subtitle which describes the proposed development. F✓ (2) The name, address, and phone number of the land owner, developer, and designer. ✓� (3) The Frederick County Property Identification Number (PIN) of all lots included on the site plan. Z(4) The number and type of dwelling units included on the site plan for residential uses. (5) The total land area and total developed land area of all lots included on the site plan. _Fy-1 (6) A detailed description of the proposed use or uses of the development, as well as a description of the existing use or uses. (7) A reference to any other site plan, master development plan approved by the county for the site. _ ✓� (8) The date the site plan was prepared and a list of all revisions made, including the date and a description of why the site plan was revised. (9) A table of contents including all pages of the site plan. (10) A list of all proposed utility providers, with their address, name and phone number. �-� (11) A location map showing the location of the site, along with the location of streets, roads and land uses within five hundred (500) feet of the property. (12) A statement listing all requirements and conditions placed on the land included in the site plan resulting from approval of conditional zoning or a conditional use permit. (13) A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of an approved variance. (14) The name of the Magisterial District the property is located within. Calculations Section (15) Calculations showing the Floor Area Ration (FAR) of the site, including the maximum allowed FAR, total ground floor area, total floor area, and total lot area. (16) Calculations showing the total number of required and proposed parking spaces, 11 0 • including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (17) Calculations showing the total number of required handicap spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (18) Calculations showing the total number of required loading spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (19) Calculations showing the total number of required perimeter and interior trees required, including the number of provided trees. (20) Calculations showing the percentage of the property that will be landscaped and the percentage of woodlands disturbed. (19) Calculations showing the total number of required perimeter and interior trees required, including the number of provided trees. Site Plan & Details Section (21) The location of all adjoining lots with the owner's name, specific use, zoning, and zoning boundaries shown. _ ✓� (22) The location of all existing or planned right-of-ways and easements that are located on or adjoin the property, with street names, widths, and speed limits shown. (23) All nearby entrances that are within two hundred (200) feet of any existing or proposed entrances to the site. (24) All existing and proposed driveways, parking and I oading spaces, parking 1 ots and a description of surfacing material and construction details to be used. T he s ize and angle of parking spaces, aisles, maneuvering areas, and loading spaces shall be shown. (25) A North arrow. (26) A graphic scale and statement of scale. ✓� (27) A legend describing all symbols and other features that need description. (28) A boundary survey of the entire parcel and all lots included with distances described at least to the nearest hundredth of a foot. _ W-1 (29) The present zoning of all portions of the site, with the location of zoning boundaries. ✓� (30) The location of all existing and proposed structures, with the height, specific use, ground floor area, and total floor area labeled. ✓� (31) The location of all existing and proposed outdoor uses, with the height, specific use, and land area labeled. (32) Existing topographic contour lines at intervals acceptable to the Zoning Administrator. Proposed finished grades shall be shown by contour. 12 • 11 21 (33) The location of the front, side, and rear yard setback lines required by the applicable zoning district. _ ✓� (34) The location and boundaries of existing environmental features, including streams, floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, steep slopes, and woodlands. (35) The location of outdoor trash receptacles. F (36) A Photometric Plan per § 165-201.07. �J— (37) The location, dimensions, and height of all signs. (38) The location of required buffers, landscaping buffers, and landscaped screens, including examples, typical cross sections or diagrams of screening to be used. The location and dimensions of required fencing, berms, and similar features shall be specified. (39) The location of recreational areas and common open space. (40) The location of all proposed landscaping with a legend. The caliper, scientific name, and common name of all deciduous trees. The height at planting, scientific name, and common name of all evergreen trees and shrubs. W1(41) The height at planting, caliper, scientific name, and common name shall be provided for all proposed trees. The height at planting, scientific name and common name shall be provided for all shrubs. ✓� (42) The location of sidewalks and walkways, including all sidewalks or bicycle paths required along any road right of way. — Fy—I— (43) The location and width of proposed easements and dedications. _ ✓I (44) A stormwater management plan describing the location of all stormwater management facilities with design calculations and details. ✓� (45) A soil erosion and sedimentation plan describing methods to be used. —L] (46) The location and size of sewer and water mains and laterals serving the site. 13 0 U ✓� (47) Facilities necessary to meet the requirements of the Fire Code. ✓� (48) A signed seal of the certified Virginia land surveyor, architect, or engineer who prepared the plan. The seal and signature of the engineer, surveyor or architect shall be on each sheet of the site plan. ✓� (49) A space labeled "Approved by the Frederick County Zoning Administrator" for the signature of the Zoning Administrator, approval date, and a statement that reads "site plan valid for five (5) years from approval date." ✓� (50) All requirements specified elsewhere in the County Code, including but not limited to the Subdivision Ordinance. 14 CJ Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Valley Health (Address) 1836 Amherst Street, Winchester, Va. 22604 (Phone) 540-5364538 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 12098 on Page , and is described as Parcel: 53 Lot: 68 Block: A Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Valley Engineering (Daniel K. Michael, P.E.) (Phone) 540-434-6365 (Address) 3231 Peoples Drive, Harrisonburg, Va. 22801 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: Rezoning (including proffers) 7.Conditional Use Permit __Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) Subdivision Site Plan _Variance or Appeal My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise escinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this _� day of , 20_Zjk, Signature(s) --��,�U" 4-2, - State of Virginia, To -wit: a Notary Public in and for that the persons) o signed to the foregoing instrument personally apI ledged the sine before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this _/ day of Z& My Commission Expires: otary Public ��Ntt�ttttttt f 30NFS �. . �oa•o.•�y 6, •s. 'JgLIC •, 2 i lictio af0"11 AUG 42016 '' "y - r, FREDERIC�:,pUNTY SANITATION AUTI-�[TY SII�PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PO Box 1877, Winchester, VA 22604-8377 315 Tasker Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 Project 5W61rZy c&y)(4 540.868.1061 voice 540.868.1429 fax Applicanty l-LO r Nb�N IZtS%+� G REVIEW STATUS attention MF• AtsjLr&L IMU L review number o2 correct & resubmit approved as noted number of items to be corrected approve You may submit just cover sheet and the revised sheets. DRAWINGS send me by 1. print of sheets % A LL 1 6 A 2. two CDs: each disc shall contain the following plan sheets 60.61, C 2.O 11 C e Z T a) One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in PDF format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and be in landscape orientation. Each file shall be titled with the project name and appropriate sheet number. b) One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in DWG format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and each sheet shall be titled with the project name and with the appropriate sheet number. Each sheet shall (1) be in landscape orientation, (2) be without border, (3) be in state plane coordinate system NAD 83, and (4) be compatible with AutoCAD 2006. c) Each of the two CDs shall be labeled with its format and project name, and placed in its own paper CD envelope. EASEMENTS 1�c 5yq 0 N A copy of the recorded onsite an or easement(s) is/are required. Y,6 A copy of the recorded offsite water and/or sewer easement(s) is/are required. o The easement document shall contain a plat and both shall be signed by the Authority. o The Authority requires specific language in its deed of easement. o Contact this office to obtain a copy of the form. o A copy of the recorded deed(s) of easement shall be received before service will be authorized. OTHER Y N This project also requires DEQ - Valley Region Office approval. Y N This project also requires VDH — Lexington Field Office approval. N This project also requires VDH — Lexington Field Office — Project Summary Report. BY DATE FOR DRAWINGS ABOVE Y N© This project has a sewer pump station that FCSA will own. Title to the pump station site shall be granted to the Authority in fee simple absolute. Also, (1) a copy of DEQ's Certificate to Construct, (2) a copy of DEQ's Certificate to Operate, and (3) two copies of the FCSA'approved 0 & M manual are required. These documents must be received before service will be authorized: Date: Earl W. Wiley— Engineering Assistant NIA)' 2015 � s Daniel Michael From: Rhodes, Timothy (VDOT) <Timothy.Rhodes@vdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 12:20 PM To: Daniel Michael Cc: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT); Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT); 'Candice Perkins'; Hoffman, Gregory (VDOT); Seth Roderick Subject: Valley Health Surgery Center Site Plan Approval (Botanical Blvd) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staunton/Edinburg Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 Daniel, A VDOT review has been conducted for the Valley Health Surgery Center Site Plan with a signature date of October 12, 2016. Based off of the review of the Drawings, all of the previous VDOT comments have been addressed and the Site Plan is approved by our office. Please ensure that all applicable agencies have the most recent set of approved Drawings. We offer the following general comments: • Our review and comments are general in nature. Should details be overlooked during plan review or conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the department. • Materials used and methods of construction shall adhere to the current observed VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, Road and Bridge Standards, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and Land Use Permit Special Provisions. • A preconstruction conference shall be held by the engineer and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies, utility companies, and VDOT prior to initiation of work. • All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. • Any construction related chaRiges to the approved plan must com*rough the design engineer to VDOT for approval. Please allow a minimum of 5 business days for VDOT review. A Land Use Permit shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and may require application fees, the salary & expenses of a State assigned inspector, and surety bond coverage. Please submit one electronic set of the plans to this office for file and permitting. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Timothy Rhodes VDOT—Land Development Engineer Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA. 22824 (540)-984-5630 REQUEST FOR STTE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department Comment Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. 107 North Kent Street, 2"d Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: (540) 665-5650 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Phase attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Valley ETelephone: 54o3+-&365 Mailing Address: 3231 Peoples eve RECEIVED Harrisonbwg, w&ia nap, JUL 1 9 24 ?UUic rLS '~ Name of development and/or description of the request: Valley Heaton - SLaVery center Location of Property: Sao Ma"+Oq.Drive, Windiwer, vir{pnla MM Department Comments: -FREDERICK COUNTY INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT USE ONLY - Date Received --1jz4jRp R1141, Review Numb, > 1 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed 8-1 t S 1 r V l o 1 W 1 lv Revision Required Dat Approved I bt 6 L b Signature & Date: t7 ** Please Return Form to Applicant** 18 Building shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 304 Business of the International Building Code/2012. Other codes that apply are ICC/ ANSI Al 17.1-2009 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities and Virginia Energy Code 2012. Building shall maintain height and area as required under T503 with allowable increases. Building full NFPA 13 system installed and FDC located on plans. All required exits shall be accessible. Maximum threshold at doorways shall not exceed Y2". All public entrances shall be accessible and comply with the 2012 Virginia Energy Code. Van accessible and accessible parking and unloading shall be provided as required per Table 1106.1. Hospital outpatient facilities require 10% and Rehabilitation and outpatient facilities require 20% accessible parking. Please verify the required percentage of accessible spaces in relation to the proposed Use Group. Van accessible parking spaces shall measure 8' in width with an 8' unloading area or I 'parking width with a 5' unloading area. All accessible spaces shall be identified correctly. Accessible parking signage for van shall include $500 fine. See USBC Section 1106.8 for van signage. Medical facilities shall be provided with an accessible passenger loading zone. Loading zone shall comply with ANSI Al 17.1-09. A minimum of 60" deep x 20' in length shall be marked and identified as the unloading area. Please provide the location of the striping/unloading on the plans. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 of USBC/IBC for special inspection requirements on the type of structure ( Soils, concrete etc.) Compaction/soil bearing/soil testing shall be required for placement of new facility. A geotechnical evaluation shall be performed and submitted with application as required USBC/IBC Section 1803. 10/7/16 10% ANSI parking for outpatient surgery center calculated. Unloading area identified and striped. - Sec 609.2 VPC two water services are met. r 10 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Fire Marshal Comment Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Public Safety Building Attn: Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive tRECEj11VF� 1800 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 JUL 2 9 10]6 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone: (540) 665-6350 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Valley Engineering Telephone: 540-434-6365 Mailing Address: 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Name of development and/or description of the request: Valley Health - Surgery Center Location of Property: 300 Marriott Drive Winchester Virginia 22603 Fire Marshal Comments: IV c -FREDERICK COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL USE ONLY - Date Received ? �'9It Review Numbed 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed 4` Revision Required A,�b. % Date Approved l Signature & Date: ** Please Return Form to Applicant*-, r 9 0 Date Received 7/29/2016 Frederick County Department of Fire and Rescue Office of the Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive 6f'inchester, VA 22602 (540) 665-6350 Fax: (540) 678-4739 Email. fmoCa�fcva.us Plan Review & Comments Plan/Permit Type Site Plan 07-29-16 Name Valley Health Surgery Center Address Botanical BLVD Winchester Project Name New Commercial Building -Surgery Center Applicant Name & Number Valley Engineering 540-434-6365 RE# Permit Number Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location. - Siamese Location: Fire Lanes Required: Plan Approval Status A eq to Inadequate N/A A eq to Inadequate N/A Act!?�hte Inadequate N/A No N/A Approve Comments **The location of fire lane signs have been identified with orange **The location of fire lane striping have been identified with yellow Signature: '�?ZUV Reviewed By- Kenneth Scott, Jr. Title: Date Reviewed 8/8/2016 VA 22602 • DUPLICATE RECEIPT DEED RECEIPT DATE: 11/09/16 TIME: 08:25:11 ACCOUNT: CASHIER: 069CLR160011273 RECEIPT: 16000022055 RPH REG: WE17 TYPE: PM INSTRUMENT : 160011273 BOOK: PAYMENT: FULL PAYMENT GRANTOR: WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER PAGE: RECORDED: 11/09/16 AT 08:25 GRANTEE: WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER EX: N LOC: CO Co AND ADDRESS : . EX: N PCT: 100* RECEIVED OF : BEN BUTLER CHECK: $21.00 DESCRIPTION 1: GA DIST 00-12098) PAGES: 000 OP: 0 2' CONSIDERATION: .00 A/VAL: NAMES: 0 .00 MAP: 53-A-68 301. DEEDS 14.50 " 145 VSLF PIN: 1.50 106 TECHNOLOGY TRST FND 5.00 TOTAL TENDERED 21.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 21.00 CHANGE ANT : .00 ISSUED BY: RPH PAYORIS COPY i e L] FINAL PLAT CD CD SUBDIVISION OF 3.000 ACRES OF LAND PRESENTLY IN THE NAME OF WINCHES TER MEDICAL CENTER GAINSBORO MAGISTERIAL DIS0 1 TRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA CHAMBERS- VILLE LANE 0 o� ) S1 TE v i/ n "IrT 1"WESITERN PIKL / // / / -n"' i VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 " = 2, 000' —v c-) �.7 C7 OWNER / DEVELOPER: WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND IS BASED ON DATA COMPILED FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY, THAT THIS PLAT MEETS MINIMUM ACCURACY STANDARDS AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND ORDINANCES OF THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA, REGARDING THE PLATTING OF SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 26 TH DAY of MAY, 2016, REVISED OCTOBER 3, 2016. VALLEY E N G I N E E R I N G IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 PEOPLES DRIVE HARRISONBURG, VIRGINIA 22801 TELEPHONE (540) 434-6365 OR (800) 343-6365 FAX (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 10668-1. dwg SHEET 1 OF 3 i%3/i6 or JEFFRY S. SiMMONS 5: Llr. No.0024Sg f9 4 FILE No. 10944-5, EXP. No. 7767-2 -o c> LEGEND o SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, c=' DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENTS AND CURVE DATA 0 5/8 IRON REBAR SET a O POINT WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER �u 89.510 ACRESf REMAINING PORTION O 1 1 11 1 1 INST, No. 000012098 N _ T.M. 53—A-68 1 1 i1 1 1 raj ZONE B2MS cv VACANT LOT Z `O S 75 31 '25" E 339.70' II 1 1 11 1 C 20_SETBACK f ^ II " I u B i I I II 1 I i ► �10 W I 1 I l g W Q Y 3.000 ACRES JJ i TT _ z R TION T.M. 53 A o68 1 Q I I JJ 11 Q z W ml ZONE B2MS m I I J I I U mLn aj J I I I I 1J l� fi • • p N C 1 C 35' SETBACK � Zv _N 7531'25" W CS �iy 65:32,2 73.61 8 W 102 28 9 / \ C J L - J LOT 2 LOT 1 PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT ZONE 82 ZONE 82 INSTT, No. 080006461 VACANT LOT VACANT LOT (MARRIOTT DRIVE) LINE BEARING DISN L1 S 38 44'11 " W SCALE 1" = 50' MAY 26, 2016 REVISED OCTOBER 3, 2016 LOTS 1 AND 2 WMC DIVISION INST. No. 080006462 VALLEY ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 PEOPLES DRIVE HARRISONBURG, VIRGINIA 22801 TELEPHONE (540) 434-6365 OR (800) 343-6365 FAX (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 10668-1.dwg B A R S C A L E 50' 25' 0 50' 100' SHEET 2 OF 3 0 If WINCHESTER HOTEL PARTNERS l!l, L.P. INST. No. 140001445 T.M. 53—A— 68A ZONE B2 COMMERCIAL L 0 T WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER 89.510 ACRES± REMAINING PORTION OF INST No. 000012098 T.M. 53—A-68 ZONE 82MS VACANT LOT (JEFFRY �,N'TN 0 S. SIMMONS S. No. 090246A FILE No. 10944-5, EXP. No. 7767-2 NOTES 1) DATUM AS SHOWN HEREON IS ACCORDING TO RECORDED INFORMATION AND A .CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 2) THIS PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY ZONED "B2MS" AND IS A PORTION OF TAX MAP 53—A-68. 3) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED IMTHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, AND DOES NOT REFLECT ALL ENCUMBRANCES. 4) BEARINGS ARE ROTATED TO WGS 84. 5) THE SURVEYED PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE 'X' (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMUNITY MAP No. 51069CO204D, EFFECTIVE DATE, SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING C1 15'42'53" 280.00' 76.80' 76.56' S 3005244" W C2 61 '2541 " 7. 50' 8. 04' Z 66' S 69'27'01 " W C3 48'5258" 50.00, 42.66' 41.38' S 75'4323" W C4 59'36'28" Z 50' Z 80' Z 46' S 81 '05'08" W C5 1'31'57" 1030.00' 2Z55' 27.55' N 74'45'27" W C6 62'44'02" 45. 00' 49.27' 46. 85' N 44 b9'24" W C7 21 '54'16" 280. 00' 1OZ 04' 106. 39' S 12'04'09" W OPRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT, INST. No. 080006461 OFCSA WATER & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, INST. No. 080006461 OGAS PIPELINE EASEMENT, INST. No. 110000149 OWNER'S CONSENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESIGNATED AS "FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT OF 3.000 ACRES STANDING IN THE NAME OF MNCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER," IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA. THIS SUBDIVISION OF 3.000 ACRES IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER THEREOF AND BEING THE SAME PROPERTY CONVEYED FROM THE TRUST COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC. NOVEMBER 17, 2000 RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 000012098 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FRE ERICK COUNT VIRGINIA. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS DAY of &61v 2016. BY. is WINCHESTER I I J. • �' 6 NOTARY CERTIFICATE ,A.11 STATE OF VIRGINIA: CITY / �OUNIOF We C)f TO- WI T.- THE-F40REGOING OWNER'S CONSENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME BY THIS DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ;-pd o0� APPROVALS �-3�zo3373 REGISTRATION NUMBER VICTORIA P. LORD NOTARY PUBUC CommonweaHh of Virginia Reg. #340363 M cammisdon Ex Iron 9e t. 80, NO I)a J" fj-� NOTARY PUBLIC "THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS "FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION OF 3.000 ACRES OF LAND PRESENTLY IN THE NAME OF WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER" IS APPROVED BY THE UNDERSIGNED PURSUANT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE AND MAY BE ADMITTED TO RECORD. ldzr z.oi � DATE 0 DA TE FREDERICK COUNTY T DcriL DA TE FF VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 PEOPLES DRIVE HARRISONBURG, VIRGINIA 22801 TELEPHONE (540) 434-6365 OR (800) 343-6365 FAX (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 10668-1.dwg TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR SHEET 3 OF 3 AyMfiallly FILE No. 10944-5, EXP. No. 7767-2 • 0 0 v1KL;INlA: FR23DERICK COUNTY.SCi. This instrument of writing was produced to me on ff-0 v eAX69 R-A -2016at 0 s AS a.m. and with certificate acknowledgement thereto annexes; was admitted to recmd. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of and 58.1--801 have been paid, if assessable. Omhl )Oasr"..- , Clerk c� 0 0 J • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 August 11, 2016 Daniel K. Michael Valley Engineering 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center Property Identification Number (PIN): 53-A-68 Dear Mr. Michael: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Site Plan Reference. Add the site plan number, SP# 28-16, to all sheets in the plan set. 2) Previous Approvals. Add a reference to and ensure consistency with any previously approved rezoning's, proffers, and/or plans (as applicable) for the property; specifically Rezoning (REZ) #02-03, Winchester Medical Center — West Campus and Master Development Plan (MDP) #06-04, Winchester Medical Center H. 3) Subdivision. If this development is planned to be on a separate lot, the plat for the lot needs to be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. The site plan should show the new lot layout. 4) Vicinity May. On the Title Sheet, please revise the vicinity map to reflect the full extent of the parent tract parcel, 53-A-68, and further delineate the 3-acre portion subject to Site Plan (SP) #28-16. 5) Zoning. Please note that the full acreage of the subject property is split zoned between B2 (General Business) and MS (Medical Support) Zoning Districts as identified on the approved Master Development Plan (MDP #06-02). However, the 3-acre portion subject to this site plan is identified as solely B2 on the MDP. Requirements of the B2 Zoning District shall be noted and/or reflected throughout the site plan. 6) Setbacks. On Sheet C4.01, please note the Zoning Ordinance required and proposed front, rear and side setbacks for the B2 Zoning District. 7) Building Height. Please revise the note to reflect a maximum height of 35 feet for the B2 Zoning District. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 9 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Re: SP #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center August 10, 2016 Page 2 8) Landscaped Area. On Sheet C4.01, please note the required minimum landscaped area of (percentage of lot area) of 15%. Please provide a calculation showing the landscaped area being provided on -site. 9) Signs• Please revise the notes on the proposed monument sign on Sheet C4.01 that the total sign area shall be no more 50 square feet as permitted, and be no more than 12 feet tall as permitted for signs along collector roads. Please provide a rendering of the proposed monument sign within the Details sheets. 10) Outdoor Trash Receptacles. Any structure, such as trash containers and/or similar structures, shall be surrounded on all sides abutting parking spaces or aisles by a six-inch concrete curb. The structure shall be separated from the curb by a distance of three feet. Please add a note to this effect on sheet C4.01 and any Details sheets. 11) Landscape Plan. Please make the following revisions on Sheet C4.02: • As required by the Zoning Ordinance, a minimum three (3) foot tall evergreen hedge, fence, berm, or wall shall be provided to prevent headlights from shining on public rights -of -way and adjoining properties. Please revise the Landscape Legend to reflect a 36" minimum height for the provided evergreen hedge. The hedge should be extended to shield all adjoining properties and roadways; • Please depict all shrub plantings, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, on the Landscape Plan; and • Landscaping notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with §165-203.01B of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department. 12) Transportation. Please address to the following comments: • Please note the posted speed limit of existing adjacent roadways; • Please provide traffic generation estimates for the proposed use as required by the approved Proffer Statement; • Please ensure VDOT was provided a plan set for comment as Botanical Boulevard is future major collector roadway; and • It does not appear that the entrance on Botanical Boulevard will meet the entrance spacing requirements per VDOT. Please confirm with VDOT that this entrance is appropriate. 13) Outdoor Lighting. Please provide the following revisions to the Photometric Plat: and Photometric Details: 0 0 Re: SP #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center August 10, 2016 Page 2 • Please depict and provide details on any building mounted fixtures. If no building mounted fixtures will be provided, please add a note to this effect; and • Add a note that all lighting will conform to Section 165-201.07, Outdoor lighting standards, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and will be full cutoff. 14) Agency Approvals. Comment sheets (approvals) are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Frederick County G.I.S., the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) and the Frederick County Engineer. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one (1) copy so that staff may verify the information contained on the plan addresses the above comments. Staff will also need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five (5) copies of the final plan for approval. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, M. Tyler Klein, AICP Planner MTK/pd Attachment cc: Valley Health, 1836 Amherst Street, Winchester, VA 22601 0 • Daniel Michael From: Tyler Klein <tklein@fcva.us> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:50 PM To: Daniel Michael Cc: Candice Perkins Subject: Review of SP# 28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center Daniel Michael, good afternoon. Planning and Development staff has reviewed and confirmed changes made to the site plan set; from our end all changes have been made to the plan set. Once all agency review comments including VDOT are received and addressed, please resubmit five (5) copies for signature by the Zoning Administrator. Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me directly if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you. M. Tyler Klein, AICP Planner Department of Planning & Development Frederick County, Virginia 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540)722-8248 tklein(&fcva.us • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/66S-S643 FAX: 540/678-0682 Mr. Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Valley Engineering 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 October 17, 2016 RE: Valley Health — Surgery Center — Revised Site Plan Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Michael: Upon review of the revised site plan dated September 9, 2016, all of our previous comments have been addressed. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject plan. Sincerely, aLC t/Lay Joe C. Wilder Deputy Director of Public Works JCW/kco cc: Planning and Development file 107 North Kent Street, Second Floor, Suite 200 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Ben Lloyd From: Joe Wilder <jwilder@fcva.us> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 3:44 PM To: Ben Lloyd Cc: Daniel Michael Subject: RE: Valley Health Surgery Center - Revised site plan Mr. Lloyd, the changes look fine. Please forward me a revised set of plans for our file along with hard copies of included exhibits. The 5 hard copy sets that you need to be signed need to be signed by Planning Department I suppose. You will need to coordinate with them on getting final signed drawings. Thanks, Joe Wilder Frederick County, Va. From: Ben Lloyd [mailto:blloyd@valleyesp.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 12:04 PM To: Daniel Michael; Joe Wilder; Dellinger, Kevin; Peter Heffern Cc: Sean C. Gainor; Eric Lowman; rod@pineknollconstruction.com Subject: RE: Valley Health Surgery Center - Revised site plan Mr. Wilder, The following ShareFile link is to a PDF of the Surgery Center plans with your comments addressed and the plan revisions clouded. Also attached is a response letter addressing your most recent comments. If those couple of sheets look good (C3.02 & C6.01), then I will prepare 5 hardcopy final sets without clouds and deliver them for approval signatures. Let me know if you have any trouble either accessing or opening the file. https://valleyesp.sharefile.com/d-s897c8933f8d423da Thanks, Benjamin Lloyd Civil Engineering Designer A I AUTODESK' AUTOCAD' 2015 CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL VALLEY 1 ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 www.valleyesp.com Office: (540) 434-6365 X139 Fax: (540)432-0685 Email: blloyciddwalleyesp.com • • VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL January 4, 2017 County of Frederick Department of Public Works Joe C. Wilder, Deputy Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Second Floor, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center-12/20/2016 Submittal Response Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Mr. Wilder, This letter is in reference to the above mentioned site plan comments. Below are your comments followed by our responses. 1. On sheet C3.02 under Stormwater Management, the note shall read "As it relates to quantity', not quality as stated in note. Also, more clearly note about the water quality being part of the master plan (i.e. bold and large bubble or highlight). RESPONSE: Sheet 3.02 has been revised as requested. 2. What will happen with the sediment basin #2 area in the final condition? It appears that the basin will remain but there is not a discharge pipe or drain once the basin is not operating as a sediment basin. RESPONSE: The intent of our design was to keep the sediment basin area in question and remove it once the site is stabilized before completing the site by constructing the entrance to Marriot Drive. Water would then be directed to the proposed grate inlet (Str#1). Proposed grading on sheet C6.01 has been revised in that area to reflect that ultimate condition. 3. Once this plan is approved, ensure that the on -site SWPPP is updated accordingly. RESPONSE: Noted. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge Ben Lloyd From: Daniel Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 2:38 PM To: Joe Wilder Cc: Karen Orndorff, Ben Lloyd Subject: RE: Valley Health Surgery Center - Revised site plan Joe, Thanks for the quick response and this. We'll get these changes address this week and the plans back to you for final approval. Have a wonderful day! Daniel K. Michael, PE Partner/Principal-in-Charge VALLEY I ENGINEERING 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Cell: (540) 908-6333 Office: (540) 434-6365 X106 n Fax: (540) 432-0685 X Email: dmichael0valleveso.com www.valleyesa.com From: Joe Wilder [mailto:jwilder@fcva.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 201611:14 AM To: Daniel Michael <dmichael@valleyesp.com> Cc: Karen Orndorff <korndorf@fcva.us> Subject: RE: Valley Health Surgery Center - Revised site plan Mr. Michael, I am currently reviewing the revised site plan dated Dec. 20, 2016. 1 have a couple comments: 1. On sheet C3.02 under Stormwater Management, the note shall read "As it relates to quanti , not quality as stated in note. Also, more clearly note about the water quality being part of the master plan (i.e. bold and large bubble or highlight). 2. What will happen with the sediment basin #2 area in the final condition? It appears that the basin will remain but there is not a discharge pipe or drain once the basin is not operating as a sediment basin. 3. Once this plan is approved, ensure that the on -site SWPPP is updated accordingly. Please provide a revised site plan for final approval once these comments are addressed. Joe C. Wilder Deputy Director of Public Works Frederick County, Va. Email: !wilder@fcva.us 1 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 November 3, 2016 Daniel K. Michael, PE Valley Engineering 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center Property Identification Number (PIN): 53-A-68 Dear Mr. Michael: The above -referenced site plan was approved on November 3, 2016. The site plan is approved for a 21,000 square foot (SF) one-story medical office building including 113 parking spaces, 2 of which are ambulance spaces, and 12 of which are designates as handicapped parking at the Winchester Medical Center — West Campus. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with three (3) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, M. Tyler Klein, AICP Planner MTK/pd Attachments cc: Robert A. Hess, Gainesboro District Supervisor Kevin W. Kenney and Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue Valley Health, 1836 Amherst Street, Winchester, Virginia 2260 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL September 13, 2016 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Planner 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Mr. Klein, This letter is in reference to the above mentioned site plan comments. Below are your comments followed by our responses. 1. Site Plan Reference: Add the site plan number, SP# 28-16, to all sheets in the plan set. RESPONSE: This information has been added as requested. 2. Previous Approvals: Add a reference to and ensure consistency with any previously approved rezoning's, proffers, and/or plans (as applicable) for the property; specifically Rezoning (REZ) #02-03, Winchester Medical Center - West Campus and Master Development Plan (MDP) #06- 04, Winchester Medical Center II. RESPONSE: This information has been added to the plans and the proposed project has been found to be in compliance with the previous Rezoning and the approved Master Plan of Development. 3. Subdivision: If this development is planned to be on a separate lot, the plat for the lot needs to be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. The site plan should show the new lot layout. RESPONSE: This project will be located on a separate parcel and it is understood that this subdivision must be completed prior to site plan approval. 4. Vicinity Map: On the Title Sheet, please revise the vicinity map to reflect the full extent of the parent tract parcel, 53-A-68, and further delineate the 3-acre portion subject to Site Plan (SP) #28-16. RESPONSE: This map has been revised as requested. 5. Zoning: Please note that the full acreage of the subject property is split zoned between B2 (General Business) and MS (Medical Support) Zoning Districts as identified on the approved Master Development Plan (MPD #06-02). However, the 3-acre portion subject to this site plan is identified as solely B2 on the MPD. Requirements of the B2 Zoning District shall be noted and/or reflected through the site plan. RESPONSE: This has been clarified on the plans and all references to zoning now specify B2 and all B2 requirements have been specified and met. September 13, 2016 10 9 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 4 6. Setbacks: On Sheet C4.01, please note the Zoning Ordinance required and proposed front, read, and side setbacks for the B2 Zoning District. RESPONSE: This has been corrected as requested. 7. Building Height: Please revise the note to reflect a maximum height of 35 feet for the B2 Zoning District. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 8. Landscaped Area: On Sheet C4.01, please note the required minimum landscaped area of (percentage of lot area) of 15%. Please provide a calculation showing the landscaped area being provided on -site. RESPONSE: This information has been added to the plan as requested. 9. Signs: Please revise the notes on the proposed monument sign on Sheet C4.01 that the total sign area shall be no more than 50 square feet as permitted, and be no more than 12 feet tall as permitted for signs along collector roads. Please provide a rendering of the proposed monument sign within the Detail sheets. RESPONSE: These changes have been made as requested and the rendering of a typical Valley Health sign has been added to the plans as requested. 10. Outdoor Trash Receptacles: Any structure, such as trash containers and/or similar structures, shall be surrounded on all sides abutting parking spaces or aisles by a six-inch concrete curb. The structure shall be separated from the curb by a distance of three feet. Please ad a note to the effect on sheet C4.01 and any Details sheets. RESPONSE: This curb has been added to the drawings as requested and language added to the plan sheet, as well as the details, which speck this offset distance. 11. Landscape Plan: Please make the following revisions on Sheet C4.02: a) As required by the Zoning Ordinance, a minimum three (3) foot talk evergreen hedge, fence, berm, or wall shall be provided to prevent headlights from shining on public rights -of -way and adjoining properties. Please revise the Landscape Legend to reflect a 36" minimum height for the provided evergreen hedge. The hedge should be extended to shield all adjoining properties and roadways; RESPONSE: This change has been made to the legend and the additional hedge has been added to the plans as requested. b) Please depict all shrub plantings, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, on the Landscape plan; and RESPONSE: This has been added as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com September 13, 2016 0 0 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 3 of 4 c) Landscaping notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with § 165- 203.01 B of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department. RESPONSE: These notes have been added as requested. 12. Transportation: Please address to the following comments: a) Please note the posted speed limit of existing adjacent roadways RESPONSE: These have been added as requested. Please note, the roadway on the eastern side of our project does not have a posted speed limit. b) Please provide traffic generation estimates for the proposed use as required by the approved Proffer Statement RESPONSE: This information has been added to the plans as requested. c) Please ensure VDOT was provided a plan set for comment as Botanical Boulevard is future major collector roadway, and RESPONSE: The plans have been provided to VDOT for review and comment. d) It noes no appear that the entrance on Botanical Boulevard will meet the entrance spacing requirements per VDOT. Please confirm with VDOT that this entrance is appropriate. RESPONSE: This entrance has been shifted to provide the maximum distance between the existing intersections and an exception has been requested from VDOT to allow this entrance construction to take place. The basis for our exception request is that when this subdivision was originally planned, the requirements now being place on this parcel for entrance locations did not exist, and if they had, an alternate layout may have been provided. 13. Outdoor Lighting: Please provide the following revisions to the Phorometric Plan and Photometric Details: a) Please depict and provide details on any building mounted fixtures. If no building mounted fixtures will be provided, please add a note to this effect, and RESPONSE: The wall mounted fixtures have been added to the photometric plan as provided with this submission. b) Add a note that all lighting will conform to Section 165-201.07, Outdoor lighting standards, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and will be full cutoff. RESPONSE: This note has been added as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com r September 13, 2016 • ' Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 4of4 14. Agency Approvals: Comment sheets (approvals) are required from the following agencies: The Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Frederick County G.I.S., the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA), and the Frederick County Engineer. RESPONSE: The plans will be submitted to VDOT and Frederick County GIS for review and comment. The comments from all other agencies are being provided with this submission in the form of their response letter, with format similar to this letter. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com • VALLEY I E N G I N E E R I N G IDEAS MADE REAL September 13, 2016 County of Frederick Department of Public Works Joe C. Wilder, Deputy Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Second Floor, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Mr. Wilder, This letter is in reference to the above mentioned site plan comments. Below are your comments followed by our responses. 1. Provide a copy of the geotechnical engineering report for our review, if available. We are wanting to view the compacted fill recommendations and site permeability requirements. RESPONSE: The geortech report for this project has been added to the plans foryour review and contractor use during construction. 2. Provide reinforced silt fence along the east and west side of the site prior to any site grading work. The silt fence shall remain until final site completion. RESPONSE: This silt fence has been added as requested. 3. Provide a phase 2 erosion and sediment control plan to show more fully how the erosion and sediment plan will progress during project construction. RESPONSE: As discussed, a phase Z E&S plan is not being provided as it is felt the notes on the plans address this concern and compliance with these notes will be stressed to the selected contractor, as well as others bidding this project 4. As required in the Frederick County Code, Chapter 143, the emergency spillway for the sediment basin shall safely pass a 100 year design system. Also, the "C" valve for site shall be 0.7 not 0.3 for runoff coefficient of site. RESPONSE: The water quantity and qualityfeatures as designed limit the elevation of the 100 year storm event such thatalltlows are carried from the facility via the proposed piping system. The emergency spillway, while provided, does not receive anytlows from the proposed facility. 5. Since this area is susceptible for karst formations, the bio retention area shall have an impermeable liner. RESPONSE: A Bentonite Liner for the Forebay, the Sand Filter, and the Bio-Retention facilities has been specified on the plans as requested. . September 13, 2016 • • RE: Valley Health Surgery Center —1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 2 6. Your calculations indicate the 100 year storm flows will not impact proposed improvements. Indicate the 100 year storm elevations across site. Also, you need to analyze the off -site impact to ensure no downstream structures are impacted. RESPONSE: The 100 year water surface elevation within the proposed stormwater facilities reaches elevation 80Z14. The adjacent parking is at elevation 809.70 (TIC) at its lowest elevation. The proposed facility has a finished floor elevation of 812.75. As you can see, no portion of the site will be impacted by the 100 year water surface elevation. In the event of total failure of the proposed and existing piping systems, overland relief exists which will prevent the inundation of water into the proposed facility. The offsite piping we are discharging our site into consists of a 36" HDPE pipe at slope = 3.996, which is followed by a downstream pipe of the same size and pipe material at a slope = 0.85 6. The 36" HDPE at slope = 0.8596 has a flow capacity of 66.61 cfs. Given our discharge, 1 Oyear = 5.80 cfs and 100 year =10.54 cfs, the resulting flow depth in the 36" HDPE pipe equals 0.60' and 0.81'respectively. Asyou can see, the existing downstream piping system is more than capable of receiving our proposed flows and no downstream modifications are required. 7. Your stormwater quality calculation indicates a "B" soil type for site. However, the erosion and sediment control narrative indicates a "C" soil. We concur with the erosion and sediment control narrative based on site conditions and local geology. Revise calculations based on this design assumption. RESPONSE: The VRRM Spreadsheet has been revised as requested and is attached to this resubmittal. Given this change, the site is still in compliance with the requirements as designed. 8. You are indicating the use of DI-7. Due to safety issues related to a pedestrian foot slipping into a Type I grate, provide Type 3 grates across site. Ensure storm sewer is designed with this type of grate. Provide hydraulic grade line for proposed storm sewer system. RESPONSE: All DI-7 inlets have been specified to have a Type 3 Grate. The requested Hydraulic Grade Line calculations have been prepared and are included with the resubmission. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com �. VALLEY I ENGIN E E R I N G IDEAS MADE REAL September 13, 2016 County of Frederick Inspections Department John S. Trenary, CBO, Building Code Official 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Mr. Trenary, This letter is in reference to the above mentioned site plan comments. Below are your comments followed by our responses. 1. Building shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 304 Business of the International Building Code/2012. Other codes that apply are ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities and Virginia Energy Code 2002. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans which outline these requirements as requested. 2. Building shall maintain height and area as required under T503 with allowable increases. Building full NFPA 13 system installed and FDC located on plans. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans which outline this requirement Please note that the location of the FDC was on the previously provided plans ... it'sjust to the left of the front entrance. 3. All required exists shall be accessible. Maximum threshold at doorways shall not exceed 0.5" RESPONSE: The grading plan has been revised based upon this request. 4. All public entrances shall be accessible and comply with the 2012 Virginia Energy Code. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans which outline this requirement. 5. Van accessible and accessible parking and unloading shall be provided as required per Table 1106.1. Hospital outpatient facilities require 10% and Rehabilitation and outpatient facilities require 20% accessible parking. Please verify the required percentage of accessible spaces in relation to the proposed Use Group. RESPONSE: The proposed facility is for outpatient surgery and the 10% requirement does apply. This 10% requirement is what was used for the determination of HC spaces on the previously submitted plans September 13, 2016 0 0 , Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Page 2 of 2 6. Van accessible parking spaces shall measure Win width with an 8' unloading area or 10" parking width with a 5' unloading area. All accessible spaces shall be identified correctly. RESPONSE: As shown on the previously submitted plans, all Van Accessible spaces are 10' wide and are adjacent to an isle with a minimum width of 5' (all but one space has a 10' isle). All Van spaces are delineated as such on the drawings and will include signage and painting as specified within the details 7. Accessible parking signage for van shall include $500.00 fine. See USBC Section 1106.8 for van signage. RESPONSE: The detail as previously specified on the plans states the $500 fine for improper use of a HCspace, including Van spaces. 8. Medical facilities shall be provided with an accessible passenger loading zone. Loading zone shall comply with ANSI A117.1-09. A minimum of 60" deep x 20' in length shall be marked and identified as the unloading area. Please provide the location of the striping/unloading on the plans. RESPONSE: This loading zone has been added as requested. 9. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 of USBA/IBC for special inspection requirements on the type of structure (Soils, concrete, etc.) Compaction/soil bearing/soil testing shall be required for placement of new facility. A geotechnical evaluation shall be performed and submitted with application as required USBC/IBC Section 1803. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans outlining this requirement as requested. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 0 VALLEY September 13, 2016 Frederick County Sanitation Authority Earl W. Wiley 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia 22655 RE: Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Site Plan #28-16; Valley Health Surgery Center (PIN 53-A-68) Mr. Wiley, is E N G I IDEAS N E E R I N G M AD E REAL This letter is in reference to the above mentioned site plan comments. Below are your comments followed by our responses. 1. Correct FCSA contact information on Cover Sheet. RESPONSE: This information has been corrected as requested. 2. Correct previously shown existing 4" lateral to identify 6" lateral that exists. RESPONSE: This information has been corrected as requested. 3. Why does existing lateral need to be replaced? RESPONSE: The design has been revised to show this existing lateral being used for this project. Notes have been added to the plans requiring contractor to locate the end of this lateral and ensure that minimum slopes can be maintained to provide the connection to the proposed facility. 4. Remove existing water line as shown. RESPONSE: This water line has been removed as requested. 5. Vacate this existing water easement. RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the plans which required the vacation of that easement as requested. 6. Add existing water and sewer abandonment notes. RESPONSE: These notes have been added as requested. 7. The 4" Fire Service Meter is not required and only the DDC is required inside of the building. RESPONSE: This meter has been removed as requested. 8. Repeat note for water line wet tap. RESPONSE: This note has been added as requested. September 9, 2016 • 0 Valley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 2 of 3 9. Add note stating contractor shall adjust existing FCSA facilities as requested by inspector. RESPONSE: This note has been added as requested. 10. Add table with daily water and sewer demands in gpd. RESPONSE: This table has been added to the plans as requested. 11. Clarify callout stating that wet tap and valve will be by FCSA. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 12. Clarify profile stating that wet tap and valve will be by FCSA. RESPONSE: This has been revised as requested. 13. Provide restrained joints on water main through controlled fill and a minimum of 20' in each direction into original material. RESPONSE: This specification has been added to the plans as requested. 14. Specify 18" minimum clearance in profile between water main and storm sewer. RESPONSE: This has been specified on the plans as requested. 15. Extend water main 1 full pipe length and install flushing assembly. RESPONSE: This has been specified on the plans as requested. 16. Combine fire, domestic, and FH off one branch, 6" minimum. RESPONSE: The proposed water has been revised per this alternate as provided. 17. Extend water 10' past storm sewer and pre -blast minimum of 25'. RESPONSE: The water design has been revised to show this extension and notes have been added to require pre -blasting as requested. 18. Update Gate Valve detail to reflect April 09 detail. RESPONSE: This has been revised on the plans as requested. 19. Add FCSA details 4, 7, and 9. RESPONSE: These have been added to the plans as requested. 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com r ,September 9, 2016 0 0 wValley Health Surgery Center -1st Submittal Response Page 3 of 3 20. Delete FCSA detail 10 from the plans. RESPONSE: This has been deleted as requested. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the comments. Regards, Valley Engineering, PLC Daniel K. Michael, P.E. Partner/Principal-in-Charge 3231 Peoples Drive • Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 • Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com r 0 0 PUBLIC UTILITIES CALCULATIONS Valley Health — Surgery Center Frederick County, Virginia VESP Project No. 10944-5 (Exp. 7767-2) OF O L e� DANIEL HAEL 5 o. 028947 �Ss�oNAt VALLEY I ENGINEERING DFA S M AD F R FA I 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com • Water and Fire Flow Calculations VALLEY I E N G I N E E R I N G IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com . f WATER SERVICE DESIGN SUPPLEMENTAL: CALCULATION OF DESIGN DEMAND A. FIXTURE: FIXTURE VALUE @ 60 PSI LOT: VH ASC FIXTURE NO. VALUE BATHTUB 8 X = 0 BEDPAN WASHERS 10 X = 0 BIDET 2 X = 0 DENTAL UNIT 2 X = 0 DRINKING FOUNTAIN - PUBLIC 2 X = 0 KITCHEN SINK 2.2 X = 0 LAVATORY 1.5 X 13 = 19.5 SHOWERHEAD (SHOWER ONLY) 2.5 X 2 = 5 SERVICE SINK 4 X 15 = 60 TOILET - FLUSH VALVE 35 X = 0 TOILET - TANK TYPE 4 X 11 = 44 URINAL - PEDESTAL FLUSH VALVE 35 X = 0 URINAL - WALL FLUSH VALVE 1*6 X 1 = 16 WASH SINK (EACH SET OF FAUCETS) 4 X 2 = 8 DISHWASHER 2 X = 0 WASHING MACHINE 6 X = 0 HOSE (50 FT WASH DOWN) - 1/2" 5 X = 0 HOSE (50 FT WASH DOWN) - 5/8" 9 X = 0 HOSE (50 FT WASH DOWN) - 3/4" 12 X = 0 TOTAL 152.5 B. DESIGN FLOWRATE FROM FIXTURE CHART (4-27C): 56 GPM C. DESIGN FLOWRATE ADJUSTED FOR PRESSURE: 35 psi 0.74 70 psi 1.09 40 psi 0.80 80 psi 1.17 50 psi 0.90 90 psi 1.25 60 psi 1.00 100 psi 1.34 61.0 GPM D. IRRIGATION: Sections* x 1.16 or 0.40** 0 GPM and/or Hose Bibs x Future Valve x Pressure Factor E. CONTINUOUS DEMAND FLOWRATE: 0 GPM F. DESIGN FLOWRATE: Flowrate (C+D+E) 61.0 GPM or Fire Suppression On Meter GPM * 1 Section = 100 sq. ft. area ** Spray Systems use 1.16; Rotary Systems use 0.40 4-27A • WATER SERVICE DESIGN SUPPLEMENTAL: SERVICE PRESSURE CALCULATION A. PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION (REQUEST FROM WATER DEPARTMENT): 1. HYDRANT NUMBER 2. WORKING PRESSURE 3. HYDRANT ELEVATION B. SERVICE INFORMATION: Not Provided 72.0 811.50 (FROM TAX MAPS) PSIG FEET 1. PROPOSED METER SIZE 2 INCH 2. ELEVATION OF METER 812.00 FEET 3. PIPE LENGTH, SIZE AND TYPE 6.0 FEET (FROM MAIN TO METER) 3 INCH AND COPPER MATERIAL 4. EQUIVALENT LENGTH 77.0 FEET (CORP. STOP AND METER SETTING*) 5. ELEVATION OF FIXTURE 816.50 FEET 6. ELEVATION OF BUILDING 812.50 FEET 7. PIPE LENGTH, SIZE AND TYPE 330.0 FEET (FROM METER TO FIXTURE) 3 INCH AND COPPER MATERIAL C. CALCULATIONS OF CONDITIONS AT THE METER: 1. STATIC PRESSURE = WORKING PRESSURE AT FH + ADJUSTMENT FOR ELEVATION 71.8 PSIG = 72.0 PSIG+[( 811.50 FEET - 812.00 FEET)*0.434] (Cl) (A2) (A3) (62) 2. RESIDUAL PRESSURE = STATIC PRESS. - PIPE LOSSES - C.V. LOSSES - METER LOSSES 64.1 PSIG = 71.8 PSIG - ( 83 FEET * 3.50 PSI/100') - (C2) (Cl) (133 + B4) 2.0 PSIG - 2.8 PSIG (CV) (METER) D. CALCULATION OF CONDITIONS BEYOND THE METER @ 61.0 GPM"*: CALCULATIONS BEYOND THE METER SHALL CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING CACULATIONS ARE RECOMMENDED TO HELP IDENTIFY POTENTIAL PROBLEM 1. STATIC PRESSURE @ FIXTURE = STATIC PRESSURE AT METER + ADJUSTMENT FOR ELEVATION 69.8 PSIG = 71.8 PSIG + [( 812.00 FEET - 816.50 FEET)*0.434] (131) (Cl) (B2) (B5) 2. RESIDUAL PRESSURE = RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT METER + ADJUSTMENT FOR ELEVATION - PIPE LOSSES - BACKFLOW LOSSES 50.3 PSIG = 64.1 PSIG + [( 812.00 FEET - 812.50 FEET) *0.434] (D2) (C2) (132) (B6) - ( 330.0 FEET* 3.5 PSI/100') - 2.0 PSIG (B7) (BACKFLOW) SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH HEADLOSS THROUGH TUBING, CHECK VALVES AND METERS. IF A BACKFLOW VALVE IS USED, THE SPECIFIC VALVE HEADLOSS CURVE MAY BE NEEDED. • EQUIVALENT LENGTH FOR CORP. STOP AND METER SETTING: 3/4" =18'; 1" = 22'; 2" = 58' (DOES NOT INCLUDE METER OR CHECK VALVE LOSSES.) •• USE 12 GPM FOR EACH SINGLE FAMILY REIDENTIAL METER. FOR ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS, USE THE DESIGN FLOW RATE CALCULATED ON FORM 4-27A 4-278 job#0"3-9 asp#53a1d • ISO FIRE CALCULATIONS • Valley Heath Surgery Center Construction Factor (Cj: Ci = 18F(A)0'5 F = Construction Factor F = 1.50 Class 1 (Frame) A; = Effective Area A; = Largest Undivided Area + 1/2 Second Undivided Area + 1/2 Second Floor A; = 21,500 ft2 21,500 ft2, First Undivided Area 0 ft2, Second Floor 0 ft2, Second Undivided Area C; = 18(1.5) (21500ft ^ 2) ^ 0.5 C; = 3,959 gpm C; = 4,000 gpm to the nearest 250 gpm if under 2,500 gpm Needed Fire Flow (NFF;): NFF; = (C;)(O;)(X + P); C; = 4,000 gpm O; = Type of Occupancy Oi = 1.00 C-3 (Combustible) Xi = Factor for Exposure X, = 0.00 —Buildings to the North X2 = 0.00 --Buildings to the South X3 = 0.00 —Buildings to the East X4 = 0.00 --Buildings to the West X; = 0.00 P; = Factor for Communication P; = 0.00 --There is no communcation involved with this construction X;+P;= 0.00 NFF; = (4000 gpm)(1)(1+0) NFF; = 4,000 gpm NFF; = 4,000 gpm to the nearest 250 gpm if under 2,500 gpm to the nearest 500 gpm if over 2,500 gpm Sprinkler System: yes If 'yes," then 50% of needed fire flow NFF; = 2,000 gpm 2 = 1,000 gpm if FH is < 300' away Fire Hydrant Credits: 2000 gpm 0 = 670 gpm if FH is 301' '600' away 0 = 250 gpm if FH is 601' -1000' away NFF; = 0 gpm NFF; = 1,000 aom minimum ALLEY I ENGINEERING IDFA S M A D F R F A I 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 0 • Water Model VALLEY I E N G I N E E R I N G I D F AS M AD F R F A I 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com WATER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC 6-4 FH-4 ai 6 16 + FH-3 to ai FH WH 1593 53-4 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg [08.11.06.1131 7/28/2016 U STATIC ID Label Elevation Demand (ft) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Pressure (ft) (psi) 33 3-7 811.80 0 978.32 72 35 1-5 810.00 0 978.32 73 43 3-2 810.50 0 978.32 73 46 1-3 811.50 0 978.32 72 50 3-6 811.44 0 978.32 72 52 1-4 811.00 0 978.32 72 53 1-1 1 810.001 01 978.321 73 Bentley WaterCAD V81 (SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg (08.11.06.1131 7/28/2016 • • STATIC FIRE HYDRANTS ID Label Hydrant Status Elevation Demand (ft) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Pressure (ft) (psi) 108' FH-1 Closed 811.00 0 978.32 72 111 FH-2 Closed 812.00 0 978.32 72 117 FH-3 Closed 812.00 0 978.32 72 120 FH-4 Closed 812.30 0 978.32 72 Bentley WaterCAD V81(SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg [08.11.06.1131 7/28/2016 • • FIRE FLOW + PEAK Label Satisfies Fire Demand Fire Flow Flow (Total Flow (gpm) (Available) Available) Constraints? (gpm) (gpm) Pressure Pressure (Calculated (Calculated Residual) System Lower (PSI) Limit) (psi) FH-1 True 0 2,069 2,069 40 48 FH-2 True 0 2,004 2,004 40 48 FH-3 True 0 1,847 1,847 40 47 FH-4 True 0 1,788 1,788 40 47 1-7 False 0 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 3-5 False 0 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 1-2 False 61 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 3-3 False 0 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 3-6 False 0 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 1-4 False 0 (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) (N/A) 3-1 False 0 (N/A) I (N/A) I (N/A) I (N/A) Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg [08.11.06.1131 7/28/2016 FLUSHING PIPE REPORT ID Label Length Diameter Velocity Peak Hour Flow Pressure (Start) Pressure (Stop) (ft) (in) (Maximum (gpm) (psi) (psi) Flushing) (ft/s) 41 6-1 9 6.0 11.35 0 72 73 44 6-2 11 6.0 11.35 0 72 72 47 6-4 14 6.0 11.35 0 72 72 48 6-3 15 6.0 11.35 0 72 72 56 P-FILL 1 96.0 0.05 -61 0 0 64 8-2-X 346 8.0 2.79 -15 73 73 65 8-1-X 53 8.0 6.77 -61 73 72 67 8-1 34 8.0 5.00 -46 73 73 109 8-3 18 8.0 3.59 15 72 72 110 8-2 164 8.0 3.75 15 72 73 114 8-4 166 8.0 2.79 -15 72 73 116 8-5 154 8.0 6.38 0 72 72 119 8-6 1 731 8.01 6.381 01 721 72 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.vAg [08.11.06.1131 7/28/2016 0 • PUMP REPORT Element Details ID 30 Notes Label WH_1593_53 -4 Pump Definition Type Pump Definition Type Standard (3 Design Head 147.84 ft Point) Shutoff Flow 0 gpm Maximum Operating Flow 3,687 gpm Shutoff Head 166.32 ft Maximum Operating Head 46.20 ft Design Flow 1,342 gpm Pump Efficiency Type Best Motor Efficiency 100.0 % Pump Efficiency Type Efficiency Point BEP Efficiency 100.0 % Is Variable Speed Drive? False BEP Flow 0 gpm Transient (Physical) i Inertia (Pump and Motor) 0.000 Ib•ft2 SI=25, Specific Speed uS=1280 t Speed (Full) 0 rpm Reverse Spin Allowed? True, Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg (08.11.06.113] 7/28/2016 0 0 175.00 150.00 125.00 100.00 w v m = 75.00 50.00 25.00 0.00 t 0 PUMP REPORT Graph 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Flow (gpm) 125.0 112.5 100.0 87.5 v c 75.0 3 -o m 62.5 Q. ro 50.0 0 37.5 25.0 12.5 0.0 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTsedes 6) WMC ASC.wtg WMC ASC.wtg [08.11.06.113] 7/28/2016 L • HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT Printed On: Location: WMCASC Date Test Hydrant: WH 1593_53-4 Elevation: 812 jPerformed by: Main Size: 8" 6/23/2013 Time FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY Gage: Static Pressure: Residual Pressure: Hydrant Opening Flow Flow Hydrant(s): Coefficient* Pitot Chart Series Diamater (in) (GPM) ) 2.5 0.9 1,342 1 *Typical unless otherwise noted Select Calculated Flows: Series Pressure (PSI) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 4,055 3,687 3,286 2,837 2,317 1,670 635 Flow @ 20 psi: 3,687 gpm Water Supply Graph 4,500 - ---- __ _ 4,000 - 3,500' 3,000 2,500 C 2,000 0 1,500 1,000 500 -- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pressure (PSI) x 10 VALLEY N :._ R N 3231 Peoples Drive Harriosnburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com HtED6R1C%PUPRY SANITATION AUTHORITY • oft Wafter Distribution Rre HydranDatm QIrd �3 20/& Hydrdd No. W H Location_ A M oar • -- Street Intersection "xdv , year '7CQ Modes Brand/Manufacturer�i,..,..�,. Static Pressure , Flow �3y� Condition: Poor Good Exceliento�_ Lower Barrel Diameter y5 Hose Nozzle size 07,6 Pumper Nozzle size y 5 Bonnet Color CM �e n Flushed: Ye No . Lubricated: Yes0�­No Painted: Yes No� Auxiliary Vahre:. - Yes,EJ— No F__j Auxlllary Valve - Turns to Open dL OR Operating Nut: OL 0W” Remartcs• Checked w FREDEnicfPunnv sAvrrATIow AuTHoninr 0 . of Water Distribution location - t. Fire Hydrent Deta Card Hydrant No. lit/ /69f- Gal v intersection Year 61bo Model f" `� Q Pressure 73 ,ResiduaGCo Flow /3&3 Condition: Poor a Good EkellentB— Lower Barrel Dlameter �- Hose Nozzle size Pumper Nozzle size color O n wa Flushed: Yes•- No Lubricated: Yes 0- o Painted: Yes N0,0— Repaired: AuAlaryVaIve:. Yes 1Vd [] AuxlliarVvalve-Tumsto open OL OR Operating Nut: OL [] Me — Rama Al y S • � <.'� / "'P'��#,�i''�� � iY�'r',+�i �•;I? . % n e: �t Y1y° : � r .r , a�.{ rrr(r`{q,Jx�, V1� `r '-' N 1 5;J0. 53-4 ,r P' t � yl��� M � ir��i-'w; � y' Jjl� } ,. f �:`-% ar •,+'. J / j,` 12 �- o-� / L:�, t < �'�R�,� .� / r', ��� 1,! �► .. �:`:.:^,�t_.�r::Rau,�a::;gala..i�i.`.:iiFfi.�t.%�%ei,:4�.u�tt.:i�'.',t.Yi:,, �Mvr IPIO I a h • = r :SPt 7 ..-� 77f�.� r!a .,rlrra. r'i: , J 'i? / rid' � ► � ' �� •►,�F, �rr^ J , WH 1582 53 W1.1 1593 53-4 < r Az 40;;� A• / r 53-4 �• j ' rSM1^✓k i,,ir 97 53-4 o - /I �1]� l� O WH 2253' 1 22 s; f t r j' /I r r. r r;Pf 2254. a 1 ! /.._„111 ,/ / ! I • /fir 1 � .y' ..} ;.. ` t�(J if, y � (1�:�14 �.f� �:%�)l'�'�], �r?li�fl iC?S��t l•��`.,i<lr�,l��� � " jinl� f i `/y� r , ✓�� rrc, r'� •' vra+ 1' • �. • -/�, <� CQlrbl �� ll��y f �2C )1'lrr? r,ijPrl �r u:y� c i I< ' f q .fig% }Ii'.(f I � 14)f rJ ., a STORMWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY, EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS VALLEY HEALTH SURGERY CENTER Frederick County, Virginia July 29, 2016 VESP Project No. 10944-5 (Exp. 7767-2) hI O �O cf . V DANIEL ICHAEL -JLjc o.028947 A4 6r 1 01VAt VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com 1. 0 0 Table of Contents 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Calculations 2. Storm Water Management and Water Quality Calculations VALLEY( E N G I N E E R I N G IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com • Erosion and Sediment Control Calculations VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com I i • 9 Design Calculations for Sediment Basin Project Name • The following is the calculations for the volume of the proposed basin: Drainage Area Contributing to Sediment Basin: 3.10 acres Total Storage Required = 134 C.Y./acre = 134 C.Y./acre x 3.1 acres: 415 C.Y. or 11,216 C.F. Cleanout Storage Required = 34 C.Y./acre = 34 C.Y./acre x 3.1 acres: 105 C.Y. or 2,846 C.F. Wet Storage Required = 67 C.Y./acre = 67 C.Y./acre x 3.1 acres: 208 C.Y. or 5,608 C.F. Dry Storage Required = 67 C.Y./acre = 67 C.Y./acre x 3.1 acres: 208 C.Y. or 5,608 C.F. • Pond Design Data: Area = 3.10 acres C = 0.30 Tc = min Q25 = cfs Q2 = cfs Outlet Pipe Dia. �= 24 inches (From Plate 3.14-8) • The following displays the contour area for the proposed basin: Elevation contour Area 802.00 717 803.00 1,280 804.00 1,994 805.00 2,754 806.00 3,545 807.00 4,369 808.00 5,220 • The following chart displays the total storage for the basin in increments of varying feet. 0 corresponds to the bottom elevation 1802.00 Elevation (ft) Total Storage (C.F.) Total Storage (C.Y.) 0.00 0 0 1.00 998 37 2.00 2,711 100 3.00 5,206 193 4.00 8,512 315 5.00 12,715 471 6.00 17,811 660 0 VALLEY I ENGINEERING IOFA S DNA D r RFA/ 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com • • The following graph is the total storage plotted against the elevation: Total Basin Storage 20000 18000 y = 411.45x2 + 483.71 x + 50.405 16000 RI-0.9999 14000 v: j 12000 m 10000 0 rn 8000 R 6000 4000 2000 0 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 Height (ft) • The wet storage elevation was calculated to be at a volume of 5,608 C.F. or 208 C.Y. The equation from the graph can be solved for x to determine the elevation corresponding to the required wet storage volume: Height,x (ft) Wet Storage,y (C.F.) 3.13 5,608 The wet storage elevation is 3.13 ft from the bottom: 805.13 • The dry storage elevation was calculated to be at a volume of 11,216 C.F. or 415 C.Y. The equation from the graph can be solved for x to determine the elevation corresponding to the required dry storage volume: Height,x (ft) Dry Storage,y (C.F.) 4.65 11,216 The dry storage elevation is 4.65 ft from the bottom: 806.65 • Cleanout: The sediment must be removed when it occupies half of the wet storage volume. The c/o storage elevation was calculated to be at a volume of 2,846 C.F. or 105 C.Y. The equation from the graph can be solved for x to determine the elevation corresponding to the required cleanout storage volume: Height,x (ft) Cleanout Storage,y (C.F.) 2.08 2,846 The cleanout storage elevation is 2.08 ft from the bottom: 804.08 • Dewatering Orifice: Using the modified version of the discharge equation and the basic equatior for the area of a circular orifice in Chapter 3 of VESCH, the dewatering orifice is sized to provide a minimum 6 hour drawdown time: 0 = S / 21,600 sec. = 5,608 / 21,600 sec. = 0.26 cfs A = Q = 0.26 = 0.06 S.F. 0.6 164.32 x h O.V 64.32 x 0.76 d = 2 FA/3.14 = 2 0.06 /3.14 = 0.28 ft = Orifice Diameter = 3 in Perforated Tube Diameter = 5 in (orifice diameter + 2") Perforated Tube Height = 1.02 ft Top of Dam = 809.65 • Anti -Seep Collar Design (From VESCH) Depth of water at principal spillway crest m = Slope of upstream face of embankment (Z) _ Slope of principal spillway barrel (Sb) _ Length of barrel in saturated zone (LS) _ Number of collars required = Projection M Principal Spillway Diameter = Projection (P) = Collar Spacing from Riser (2P) _ Collar Spacing from previous collar (14P) _ • Final Design Elevations Top of Dam = Emergency Spillway Elevation = Top of Riser = Dewatering Orifice Invert = Cleanout Elevation = Bottom Elevation = Riser Diameter = Dewatering Orifice Diameter = VALLEY 4.65 ft 2 :1 0.15 ft/ft 69.8185 ft 1 3.4 ft 2 ft 0.7 ft 1.4 ft 9.8 ft 808.65 807.65 806.65 805.13 804.08 802.00 48 Inch 3 Inch 3 in (From Plate 3.14-12) (From Plate 3.14-12) E N G I N E E R I N G IDEA S MADE RI -At 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com Storm Water Management & Water Quality Calculations VALLEY I ENGINEERING IDEAS MADE REAL 3231 Peoples Drive Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com • 1 .Hydrograph S u m ma Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 Rational 5.233 1 9 3,772 — Ex to Str Ex 1 2 Rational 0.484 1 5 194 — Ex to Ex Sir 2 3 Rational 0.074 1 5 30 -- Ex to Ex Sir 3 4 Rational 2.084 1 5 835 — Ex to Ex Sir 4 5 Rational 0.579 1 5 232 — Structure 1 6 Rational 0.968 1 5 387 — — — Structure 2 7 Rational 0.819 1 5 328 — Structure 3 8 Rational 1.079 1 5 432 -- Structure 4 9 Rational 0.930 1 5 373 — Structure 5 10 Rational 1.389 1 5 556 — — Structure 6 11 Rational 0.289 1 5 116 — — Structure 8 12 Rational 6.698 1 5 2,683 — -- Structure 14 13 Combine 6.988 1 5 2,725 11,12 -- Out of Structure 7 - Ultimate Develo 14 Rational 0.403 1 5 161 — Sturcture 9 15 Rational 0.149 1 5 60 — — Structure 10 16 Rational 0.149 1 5 60 — — Structure 11 17 Rational 0.215 1 5 86 — -- Structure 12 18 Rational 1.861 1 5 745 — Proposed Building 19 Rational 0.589 1 5 236 — -- Structure 13 20 Combine 11.79 1 5 4,600 7, 8, 9,10 13, 1&— — Total out of Structure 3 21 Combine 2.777 1 5 1,083 14, 15, 16, 17, 14-- -- Total out of Structure 9 22 Combine 16.12 1 5 6,286 5, 6, 20, 2 — Total to Structure 1 23 Reservoir 0.088 1 13 927 22 805.40 6,273 Sediment Basin 1 24 Combine 15.54 1 5 6,060 6, 20, 21, -- Total to SWM Facility 25 Reservoir 0.868 1 13 3,540 24 806.35 5,764 SWM Facility 26 Rational 4.342 1 5 1,739 — — Existing Site WMC ASC Development.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Friday, Jul 29, 2016 TR55 Tc Worksheit 3 Hyd. No. 1 Ex to Str Ex 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.011 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 85.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.73 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 7.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.70 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.70 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 180.00 25.00 350.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.20 20.00 0.29 Surface description = Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.39 7.22 0.87 Travel Time (min) = 1.25 + 0.06 + 6.71 = 8.03 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 9.00 min Hydrograph Repo 0 5 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 3 Ex to Ex Str 3 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.020 ac Intensity = 4.135 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 3 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.074 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 30 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Ex to Ex Str 3 Hyd. No. 3 — 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repol 7 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 5 Structure 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.579 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 232 cuft Drainage area = 0.400 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Intensity = 4.135 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 5 Structure 1 Hyd. No. 5 — 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Report 9 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 7 Structure 3 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.220 ac Intensity = 4.135 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 7 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.819 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 328 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 3 Hyd. No. 7 — 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .13 Time (min) • 11 Hydrograph Repo* Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 9 Structure 5 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.250 ac Intensity = 4.135 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 9 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.930 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 373 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 5 Hyd. No. 9 — 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) • Hydrograph Repo* 13 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 11 Structure 8 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.200 ac Intensity = 4.135 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 00 0.05 j/ 0.00 Z, 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 11 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.289 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 116 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 8 Hyd. No. 11 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo • 15 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 13 Out of Structure 7 - Ultimate Development Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 6.988 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,725 cuft Inflow hyds. = 11, 12 Contrib. drain. area= 2.000 ac • Hydrograph Repo* 17 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 15 Structure 10 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.149 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 60 cuft Drainage area = 0.080 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.45 Intensity = 4.135 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 15 Structure 10 Hyd. No. 15 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 10-00 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Report • 19 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 17 Structure 12 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.215 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 86 cuft Drainage area = 0.130 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.4 Intensity = 4.135 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 - -- 0,/ - 000 -Z, I 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 17 Structure 12 Hyd. No. 17 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) • Hy�drograph Repo* 21 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 19 Structure 13 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.589 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 236 cuft Drainage area = 0.190 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.75 Intensity = 4.135 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 19 Structure 13 Hyd. No. 19 — 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo* 0 23 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 21 Total out of Structure 9 Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Q (cfs 3.00 1.00 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 2.777 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 1,083 cuft Contrib. drain. area= 0.930 ac Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 're "10 ovum 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hyd No. 21 - Hyd No. 14 - Hyd No. 15 - Hyd No. 17 - Hyd No. 18 9 10 11 12 - Hyd No. 16 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo# 25 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 23 Sediment Basin 1 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyd. No. = 22 - Total to Structure 1 Reservoir name = Sediment Basin 1 Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 a M .M 3.00 0.00 — 0 180 — Hyd No. 23 Sediment Basin 1 Hyd. No. 23 -- 2 Year Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.088 cfs Time to peak = 13 min Hyd. volume = 927 cuft Max. Elevation = 805.40 ft Max. Storage = 6,273 cuft 360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440 Hyd No. 22 7— Total storage used = 6,273 cuft Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 . 1 O� 3.00 --j- 0.00 1620 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo* 0 27 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 24 Total to SWM Facility Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 15.54 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 6,060 cuft Inflow hyds. = 6, 20, 21 Contrib. drain. area= 0.260 ac Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 • wa AM 3.00 0.00 ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 24 Total to SWM Facility Hyd. No. 24 — 2 Year 3 4 5 — Hyd No. 6 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 • IX 3.00 ' 0.00 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) — Hyd No. 20 Hyd No. 21 Pond Report 0 0 29 ' Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Pond No. 2 - SWM Facility Pond Data Pond storage is based on user -defined values. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (tuft) 0.00 803.00 n/a 0 0 1.00 804.00 n/a 918 918 2.00 805.00 n/a 1,026 1,944 3.00 806.00 n/a 2,706 4,650 4.00 807.00 n/a 3,248 7,898 5.00 808.00 n/a 3,127 11,025 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] ID] Rise (in) = 15.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 12.57 15.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 15.00.:,,, 6.00 `' ' 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 806.50 807.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 803.00 805.25' 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser - - - Length (ft) = 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes Yes No No Slope (%) = 0.05 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .012 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exrii.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area) Multi -Stage = We Yes No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Stage (ft) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (cc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (1c) and submergence (s) Stage / Discharge Elev (ft) 808.00 807.00 806.00 805.00 804.00 0.00 _1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 803.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 Total Q Discharge (cis) 9 31 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 Rational 7.049 1 9 5,082 — — Ex to Str Ex 1 2 Rational 0.651 1 5 261 — — Ex to Ex Sir 2 3 Rational 0.100 1 5 40 — -- Ex to Ex Str 3 4 Rational 2.802 1 5 1,122 — Ex to Ex Str 4 5 Rational 0.778 1 5 312 — — Structure 1 6 Rational 1.301 1 5 521 — — Structure 2 7 Rational 1.101 1 5 441 — Structure 3 8 Rational 1.451 1 5 581 — Structure 4 9 Rational 1.251 1 5 501 — Structure 5 10 Rational 1.868 1 5 748 — — — Structure 6 11 Rational 0.389 1 5 156 — -- --- Structure 8 12 Rational 9.007 1 5 3,607 -- -- Structure 14 13 Combine 9.396 1 5 3,665 11,12 — Out of Structure 7 - Ultimate Develo 14 Rational 0.542 1 5 217 — — Sturcture 9 15 Rational 0.200 1 5 80 — -- Structure 10 16 Rational 0.200 1 5 80 -- -- — Structure 11 17 Rational 0.289 1 5 116 — -- -- Structure 12 18 Rational 2.502 1 5 1,002 — Proposed Building 19 Rational 0.792 1 5 317 -- — Structure 13 20 Combine 15.86 1 5 6,185 7, 8, 9.10 13, 49--- Total out of Structure 3 21 Combine 3.734 1 5 1,456 14, 15, 16, 17, 1&,— -- Total out of Structure 9 22 Combine 21.67 1 5 8,452 5, 6, 20, 2 Total to Structure 1 23 Reservoir 0.202 1 13 3,094 22 806.06 8,398 Sediment Basin 1 24 Combine 20.89 1 5 8,149 6, 20, 21, — ---- Total to SWM Facility 25 Reservoir 5.809 1 11 5,629 24 806.74 7,034 SWM Facility 26 Rational 5.838 1 5 2,338 — — — Existing Site WMC ASC Development.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hydrograph Repo# Ol 33 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 2 Ex to Ex Str 2 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.130 ac Intensity = 5.560 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20-- 04 0.10 1/1 0 00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.651 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 261 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Ex to Ex Str 2 Hyd. No. 2 --10 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) • Hydrograph Repo# 35 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 4 Ex to Ex Str 4 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 2.802 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,122 cuft Drainage area = 0.560 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Intensity = 5.560 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 r 1' 0 1 2 Hyd No. 4 Ex to Ex Str 4 Hyd. No. 4 --10 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 MR1141 3d- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Report* � 37 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 6 Structure 2 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.260 ac Intensity = 5.560 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 x I ' 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 6 Structure 2 Hyd. No. 6 --10 Year Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 1.301 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 521 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 %- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repop 39 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 8 Structure 4 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.451 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 581 cuft Drainage area = 0.290 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Intensity = 5.560 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 -k 0 Structure 4 Hyd. No. 8 --10 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - Hyd No. 8 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 x- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Reporlp 41 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 10 Structure 6 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.420 ac Intensity = 5.560 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 9 ' ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 10 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 1.868 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 748 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.8 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1 /1.67 Structure 6 Hyd. No. 10 —10 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 2.00 MKIIII X- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo* � 43 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 12 Structure 14 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 1.800 ac Intensity = 5.560 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 .Ma 4.00 2.00 0.00 r I ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 12 Structure 14 Hyd. No. 12 --10 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 9.007 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 3,607 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 10.00 M . M 4.00 2.00 'I IN 0.00 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hy►drograph Reporfo 0 45 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 14 Sturcture 9 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.542 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 217 cuft Drainage area = 0.130 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.75 Intensity = 5.560 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00./I I 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 14 Sturcture 9 Hyd. No. 14 --10 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo# 47 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 16 Structure 11 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.090 ac Intensity = 5.560 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 000 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 16 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 0.200 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 80 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.4 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 11 Hyd. No. 16 --10 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo# 49 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 18 Proposed Building Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 2.502 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,002 cuft Drainage area = 0.500 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Intensity = 5.560 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 IFI ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 18 Proposed Building Hyd. No. 18 —10 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 I M1111 '- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo 0 51 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 20 Total out of Structure 3 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 15.86 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 6,185 cuft Inflow hyds. = 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 19 Contrib. drain. area= 1.370 ac Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 •M �0I0] 3.00 Total out of Structure 3 Hyd. No. 20 --10 Year Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 .M 3.00 0.00 I I ' I I I I I 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 - Hyd No. 20 Hyd No. 7 - Hyd No. 8 - Hyd No. 9 Time (min) - Hyd No. 10 - Hyd No. 13 - Hyd No. 19 Hydrograph Repo 0 53 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 22 Total to Structure 1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 21.67 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 8,452 cuft Inflow hyds. = 5, 6, 20, 21 Contrib. drain. area= 0.660 ac Total to Structure 1 Hydrograph Repo 9 55 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 24 Total to SWM Facility Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 6, 20, 21 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 20.89 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 8,149 cuft Contrib. drain. area= 0.260 ac • Hydrograph Report• 57 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 26 Existing Site Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 5.838 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,338 cuft Drainage area = 3.000 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Intensity = 5.560 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 6.00 411114 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 rr ' ' 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 26 Existing Site Hyd. No. 26 --10 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 Q (cfs) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 'I 1 13 0.00 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hkdrograph Repo# 0 59 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 1 Ex to Str Ex 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 4.350 ac Intensity = 6.362 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 . O 4.00 2.00 0.00 1 ' ' 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 6 6 Ex to Str Ex 1 Hyd. No. 1 —100 Year Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 9.686 cfs Time to peak = 9 min Hyd. volume = 6,982 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Tc by TR55 = 9.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 10.00 IMIN 2.00 ' I i N 0.00 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Time (min) . Hydrograph Repo � 61 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 3 Ex to Ex Str 3 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.139 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 56 cuft Drainage area = 0.020 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Intensity = 7.739 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 —40 000 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 3 Ex to Ex Str 3 Hyd. No. 3 —100 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) • Hydrograph Reporp 63 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 5 Structure 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.083 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 434 cuft Drainage area = 0.400 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Intensity = 7.739 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 2.00 i91I11 0.00 -M 0 Structure 1 Hyd. No. 5 --100 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hyd No. 5 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 w- 0.00 13 Time (min) . Hydrograph Reporti • 65 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 7 Structure 3 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.220 ac Intensity = 7.739 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 Ir I ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 7 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 1.532 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 614 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 3 Hyd. No. 7 —100 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 x- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo • 67 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 9 Structure 5 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.250 ac Intensity = 7.739 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 W I ' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 9 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 1.741 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 697 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.9 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1 /1.67 Structure 5 Hyd. No. 9 —100 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 X- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo 0 69 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 11 Structure 8 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.542 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 217 cuft Drainage area = 0.200 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.35 Intensity = 7.739 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 - Hyd No. 11 Structure 8 Hyd. No. 11 --100 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0/ 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo. 71 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 13 Out of Structure 7 - Ultimate Development Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 13.08 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 5,101 cuft Inflow hyds. = 11, 12 Contrib. drain. area= 2.000 ac Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 . M M111l 2.00 0.00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 13 Out of Structure 7 - Ultimate Development Hyd. No. 13 —100 Year 3 4 5 — Hyd No. 11 6 7 8 9 — Hyd No. 12 Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 � �1 4.00 2.00 0.00 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo � 73 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 15 Structure 10 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.279 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 112 cuft Drainage area = 0.080 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.45 Intensity = 7.739 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 15 Structure 10 Hyd. No. 15 —100 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo 0 75 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 17 Structure 12 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.402 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 161 cuft Drainage area = 0.130 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.4 Intensity = 7.739 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min OF Curve = WMC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 Of 000 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 17 Structure 12 Hyd. No. 17 —100 Year Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time (min) . Hydrograph Reporlb • 77 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Hyd. No. 19 Structure 13 Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.190 ac Intensity = 7.739 in/hr OF Curve = WMC.IDF Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 be I' 0 1 2 — Hyd No. 19 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Peak discharge = 1.103 cfs Time to peak = 5 min Hyd. volume = 442 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.75 Tc by User = 5.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1.67 Structure 13 Hyd. No. 19 —100 Year 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 %L- 0.00 13 Time (min) Hvdroaraph Repo 0 79 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 21 Total out of Structure 9 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 5.197 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 5 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,027 cuft Inflow hyds. = 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Contrib. drain. area= 0.930 ac Total out of Structure 9 MKIM �WAMKM ME Hjrdrograph Repo � 81 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve vg.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 23 Sediment Basin 1 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 3.033 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 6,406 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 22 - Total to Structure 1 Max. Elevation = 806.82 ft Reservoir name = Sediment Basin 1 Max. Storage = 11,370 cuft Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0 60 120 — Hyd No. 23 Sediment Basin 1 Hyd. No. 23 —100 Year 180 240 — Hyd No. 22 300 360 420 480 540 Total storage used = 11,370 cuft Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 —L- 0.00 600 Time (min) Hydrograph Repo 83 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.2 Friday, Jul 29, 2016 Hyd. No. 25 SWM Facility Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 10.54 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 10 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 8,822 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 24 - Total to SWM Facility Max. Elevation = 807.14 ft Reservoir name = SWM Facility Max. Storage = 8,323 cuft Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 U114I1I 5.00 SWM Facility Hyd. No. 25 —100 Year 0.00 011i/ 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 — Hyd No. 25 — Hyd No. 24 Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Time (min) �' Total storage used = 8,323 cult Tt:::, m -I .■ ■■■ MEN ■ ■■■ ■..■ ■■IRM ■■ so IMMINSIMMIN EMISSIONS ME A MEN ME MOMMISMOME MOMMINERNIM ■EarSMOS■ ■ON■ ■OE■ ■OE■ Su bject ^ ' ' '_--- -- ' UU��� I ENG|NEER|NE SheetNo /oc^, w^oE REAL Job No. ao31PEOPLES DR,HARR|SONBURG.VAuu8o1 �- �4o)4n+6os* 800'843'6305 FAX (o4n)4ao-o6a5 �^ ----' ' vvvvWxxLLsve8p.COM Date DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Now Development Compliance Spreadsheet - Version 3.0 2011 BMP Standards and Specificatiuns 2013 Draft BMP Standards and Specifications Project Name: Valley Health Surgery Center data input reps Date_ 7/8/2016 constant values BMP Design Specifications List: 2013 Draft Stds & Specs calculation cells Site Information Post -Development Project (Treatment Volume and Loads) Land Cover (acres) A 50ils B Soils C Soils U Soils Total Forest/Open Space (acres) — undisturhed, protected forest/open space or reforested land U.UU Managed Turf (acrca) disturbed, graded tar yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 1.113 1 18 Impervious Cover (acres) 1 97 1.82 ______ _______ _____________________________ ____________________ 3.00 rnnstaof4 Annual Raintall (inches) 44 I arget Raintall Event (inches) 1.00 I nial YhntiphnnlS ('f P) hN11 (mg/1) 11 1h Total Nitrogen (TN) EMC (mg/L) 1.86 Target TP Load (lb/acre/yr) M41 "Pi (uriitleas curlcdiuri fautur) 0.90 Land Corer riumniary fnrh:;l,/or,fm Spare Cevur (tic t•-,) 0.00 Weighted Rv (forest) 0.00 % Forest 0% Managed Turf Cover (acres) 1..18 Weighted Rv (turf) n 2n % Managed Turf 39% Impervious Cover (acres) 1.82 Rv (impervious) 0.95 % Impervious 61% Site Area (acres) 3.00 Site Rv 0.66 Runoff Coeffirients (Rvl A %nds K SnilS C Soils 11 %rnls Forest/Open Space 0.01 U U3 0.04 U.U5 Managed f urf 0. i 5 A.20 0.22 1),29 Impervious Cover 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Trcatmcnt Volume and Nutrient Loads Treatment Volume (acre-ft) U.1b;l8 Treatment Volume (cubic feet) 7,133 TP Load (Ib/yr) 4.48 ------- -------- —---- --------------------------------- I IV Load (lb/yr) -------------- --------- ., �Z•Q6 ' ` • 2016-07-08 VRRM_New_ CompFarce_Spreadsheet_v3_O52016 xlsm • • CAA Drainage Area A Drainage Area A Land Cover facresl A Suils B Sulk C Soils U bolls I Otals Land Cover Rv Forest/Open Space (acres) 0.00 0.00 Managed Turf (acres) 1.18 1.18 0.20 Impervious Cover (acres) 1.82 1 11.82 l Total'` 3.00 Stormwater Rest Management PradiCes (RR = Runuff ReIJULOOF ) Total Phosphorus Available for Removal in D.A. A (lb/yr) 4•� Post Development Treatment Vninme in D.A. A (fta)'. --Select from droodown lists- Runoff Managed Impervious Vol m fi u u u a u r u ff Ru u Nerndinin Tutdl nnnN g i Phosphnnis Ilntre,,ii-I r Phosphorus I I Phosphorus Remaining Load from Phosphorus Downstream Practice to be Practice Reduction Turf Credit Cover Credit Upstream P Reduction Runoff Treatment 1 Removal Upstream Load Removed By Phosphorus Employed Credit % ( ) Area acres (acres) Area acres (acres) a Practice (ft) a (ft) 3 a Volume (k) Volume (ft) to Efficiency (%) Practice [lb) Load (lb) practices (lb) Practice (lb) 1. Vegetated Roof (RR) La. Vegetated Roof #1 (Spec #5) 45 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 D.00 Lb. Vegetated Roof #2 (Spec #5) 60 i � <,. � 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 O.Oq "2. Rooftop Disconnection (RR) 1 2.a. Simple Disconnection to A/B Soils 50 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Spec fill 2.b. Simple Disconnection to C/D Soils 2S ,, 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 2.c. To Soil Amended Filter Path as per SO 0 0 0 0 0 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 specifications (existing C/D soils) (Spec #4 2.d. To Dry Well or French Drain #1, 50 �t2 p n n n 25 0,00 0.00 0.00 6.CO Mia'o lnfl 4toi,#1(p ___ ___-_____ ( ';;- _. ..........,.,. ...,.,., 0 __ ...._,.,_.. 0 0 25 n OR 0 on 0.00 0.00 __._. 2.e. t o Dry Wem French a#2, __._._._._ 90 .4e.... ?� h. `. _........ 0 Micro -Infiltration #2 (Spec ^'"'!% 2.r To Rain Gm den #1, a0 '� i i 0 0 0 0 25 _ U.UU ____ _ _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 Micro-Bioretention #1 (Spec #9) D n n n 50 0.00 0.0o aoo c�.r„� 41 to Rain Carden #2 Bu Micro Oiorctcnticr, #2 (5,,,.� aD) ___._._._._.-__ . 0 ------------ 0.00 ------ ____ 0.00 Z.n. 10 Rainwater HaiveOng (Spec #b) 0 i iAFj� 0 0 0 0 -_ O.00 0.00 .._. 2 1. To Stormwater elamer, 40 ', : rr�. 9 /- 0 0 0 -......_._._._.. 0 _............... ___..................__ 2S n m !lee 0.00 0.00 1I h,n Borer :4. Grass Channel (RR) 4.9. 01a,a Chanurl A/B Suils (iuet. x3i m U 0 0 0 iJ u.w U.UU U.UU 0.00 4.b. Grass Channel C/D Soils (Spec #3) 10 0 0 0 0 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.c. Grass Channel with Compost Amended Soils 20 0 0 0 0 15 0.00 0.00 0.110 0.00 as per specs (see Spec #4) 5.a. DrySwale #1 (Spec #10) 40 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.b. DrySwale #2 (Spec #l0) 60 0 0 0 0 4l1 0.00 0.00 I. 0.00 f:: 6.a. Bioretention #1 or Micro-Bioretention #1 or Urban Bioretention (Spec #9) 40 7,089 2,836 4,254 7,089 25 1.56 0.00 0.86 0.70 6.b. Bioretention #2 or Micro-Bioretention #2 (Spec #9) 8U 0 0 0 D 50 0.D0 0.00 OAO 0.00 7. Infiltration [RR) Ta. Infiltration #1 (Spec #8) 50 0 0 0 0 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.b. Infiltration #2 (Spec #8) 90 0 0 0 0 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I Nitrogen Nitrogen Load Untreated Nitrogen Remaining Removal from Upstream Nitrogen Load tciRemoved By Nitrogen Efficiency (%) Practices (Ibs) Practice (Ibs) Practice (Ibs);' Load (lbs) 0 B 0.010 I 0.00 I 0.00 0 ff 0.00 1I 0.00 1 0.00 2. Rooftop Disconnection 0 0 (RR) 0.00 ._Do 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 0 no 0.0, 0.00 n no 15 U.UU 0.00 0.00 0.00 40 60 0 9100 0.00 0.00 0110 0-DO 0.00 In m O.'ki 0.DO n on LLOU 0.00 0.00 4U UAU O.h7 0.00 3. Permeable Pavement (RR) 20 0.00 OCO 0.00 0.00 20 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 35 0.00 0.00 0.D0 0,00 i6. Bioretention (RR) 40 17.51 0.03 11.20 6.30 60 0.00 O.CO 0.00 0.00 7. Infiltration (RR) 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 /29/2016 1 of 3 0094M 0 • 201 "7 08 VRRM-New Comph-rceSpreadsheet v3_052016 xism • DA A B.a. ED 41 (Spec 415) 0 n n 0 0 0 0.00 5 u.uu 0 -00 0.00 O.Do 030 U.L. LD 42 (3u -------- --- ----- -- V 9. Sheerflow tO Filter/open Space (kk) 9... Sheetflnw to Consen,.,i- A-, \/e Soil, Spec 12) 75 n u U 0 0 0.00 0'tx) 0.00 0.00 9.b. Sheetflow to Conservation Area, C/D Soils (Spec 42) 50 --------------- ------ 0 0 0 0 U (J,GU 0.00 0.00 0 Of) 9.c. Sheettlow to Vegetated Filter Strip, A Soils or ------------ ------- ----------------- Compost Amended B/C/D Soils 50 0 0 0 0 0 I 0.00 0.00 0 DO 0 rol TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED 01)(I ARE CHECK: OK. TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED �Z 0.00 AREA CHECK: OK. TOTAL RUNOFF REDUCTION IN D.A. A (ft')�v TOTAL PHOSPHORUS AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAI IN D.A A (Ihfyr) TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A. A �:b/yr) 0-96 TOTAL. PHOSPHORUS REMAINING ArTER APPLYING RUNOFF REuuLlIUN PRALI ICES IN D.A. A b SEE WATER QUALITY COMPLIANCE TAB FOR SITE COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS 12. Construam Wftland RR) (no 12-Cont-t,d WLtl.11d 41 (Spec Oil) 000 O.UU -- - --_ 7 h C-1--nd 1-11-H #2 (Sp�� $11J) 0 0 u-T vVeL POhO 111 (,,Poe 414) 0 ------------- 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 50 45 -- - 75 0.00 0.00 - --------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------- 0.00 0,00 0.00 ---------- ------ 0.00 ------ 13.b. Wet Pond 41 (C-t.1 P1.11.) (Spec 414) J onn 16- Wet Pond 92 (Spec 414) 0 0 ----------- U 0 ----- 0 a -- --- 0 U 0 0.00 0.00 -------- I I d W- Pnnd 42 (Coastal Pl.a.) (SyL, 1414) 0 -------- 65 0.00 0-00 0,00 - -- - ---------- 0.00 14. ManUfaCtUl'ist] Treatment Devices (no RA) 14.a. Manufactured I reatmpnt Dpvim- Hydn.dy i, 0 r" 0 0 0,00 0.00 C.00 ------------------ 0.00 0.00 O� 0.00 0.00 14 b Marmfim-d 1-t-rit U-ca riltering a u 0 0 0 0 M 20 0.00 0.00 14.c. Manufactured Treatment Device -Generic 0 0 0 0 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED (ac) 1.82 AREA CHECK: OK. TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED (ac)l 1.12 1 AREA CHECK: OK. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL REQUIRED ON SITE (lb/yr) 3.25 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAL IN D.A. A (lb/yr) 4.48 )j TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITHOUT RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A. A (Ib/yr2.89 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A. A (lb/yr) 0.86 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED IN D.A. A (lb/yr) 3.75 W 0.00 J.0 0.00 0.00 - - --- ------- ----------- 1A 0.00 0-00 0.00 0, --------------------- t--] 9 Sheetflow to Filter/Open Space (RR) 0 0.00 0.03 O.DO 000 a u.uu O.0j ODO 0.00 u U.UO O.On 0.00 0.00 - - ---------- - TOTAL RUNorr REDUCTION IN D.A. A (rt') NITROGEN REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A. A (lb/yr) 11.20 SEE VVA I ER QUALITY CUMPLIANCE 7AB FOR SITE CALCULATIONS (information Only) 10. Wet Swale (Coastal Plain) (ho RR) tr 12. dWetlandinaRR) ss ---! :0-+- 0 O.qO Will 13, Wet Pondr. (no FIR) 31J 0.00 0.00 non 0.00 20 a no fl 11A Ono (I on n no U.uk' U.01) 3u O.W 000 Ono n nn 14. Manufactured BMP 0 0 0,00 (no�kk) O.00 Ono 0.00 O.oc 0.00 U.". 0.00 0.0( 0,00 0- 2 of 3 7/2912016 10 09 AM 2016-07-08 VRRM_Ne Compliance Spreadsheet_v} 052016,xism DA A 7/29/2016 10:09 AM V=rginia Runoff Redv.-tk n Method Worksh--et i 0 DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Sprea dsheet - Version 3.0 BMP Design Specifications Lat., 2013 Draft Stds & Specs Site Summary Total Rainfall = 43 inches Site Land Cover Summary A soils BSoils CSoils DSails Totals %of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 C.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 g C Managed Turf(acres) 3.00 1.18 000 0.00 1.18 39 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 1.82 000 0.00 1.82 61 3.30 1C0 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads Site Rv Treatment Volume fts TP Load (lb/yr) E32,06 TN Load (lb/yr) Total TP Load Reduction Required (lb/yr) 3.25 Site Compliance Summary Total Runoff Volume Reduction (W) 2,836 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 3.75 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr; 225.53 Remaining Post Development TP Load (lb/yr) 0.73 Remaining TP Load Reduction (lb/yr) Required 0 "• TARGET—P REDUCTION EXCEEDED BY 0.5 LE/YEAR'• Sumnary Print • JrgWa Runoff Feduction Me�.hud Worksheet 0 Drainage Area Summry I. A. A D.A. 8 D.A. C D.A. D J.A. E Total Forest/Open (acres) 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -COO Managed Turf (acres) 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _.18 Impervious Cover -acres) 82 I 0.00 O.CO O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _.82 3.00 Total Area (acres) :.00 - 0.00 Drainage Area-omyFance Sunnati DA. A DJL. 8 D.A C D.A. D 7.A. E Total TP Load Reduced 'b/yr; 3.75 C.00 O.C7 0.00 0.00 1.75 ' 7N Load Reduced tlb/vn 1 25.53 1 C.00 O.CO 0.00 0.00 25.53 Scmmary Pnrt Virginia Runoff Redt ction Method Works-ieet s ' • 0 Runoff Volume and CN Calculations 1-ew storm 2—earstorm 10. ear storm Target Rainfall Event (i 1 000 0.00 000 Drainage Areas RV & CN Cramage Area A Drainage Area B Drainage Area C Lrainage Area D Dra nage Area E CN 83 7 a 0 0 RR ft' 2,836 J d 0 0 1-year return period RV vo PF (ws n) O.00 Goo 0.00 0.00 7.00 RV • Rt 1—in) 0.0C 000 0.70 0.00 100 CN adjusted 100 7 f• J 0 2-year return period RV — RR (sssin) 0.00 0.00 O JO 0.00 3.00 RV w RR (—In) 0.00 0.00 0.'M 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 100 J C' J 0 10.year return period RV wo RR (..in) 0.00 0.00 0J10 0.00 1.00 RV w RP. (wain) 0.30 0-30 0.r10 0.00 100 CT, ad"usted 100 9 C 7 0 Summer Pnnt Site Results (Water Quality Compliance) Area Checks F D.A. A D.A. B j D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E AREA CHECK FOREST/OPEN SPACE (ac) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. IMPERVIOUS COVER (ac) 1.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED (ac) 1.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. MANAGED TURF AREA (ac) i.18 U.UU 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED (ac) 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 OK. AREA CHECK OK. OK. OK. OK. ,r OK. Site Treatment Volume (ft3) 0 Runnff Redurtinn Vnlume and TP Rv Drainavp Area D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E TOTAL RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME ACHIEVED (fl3) 2,83G 0 0 U 0 2,836 TP LOAD AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAL (Ib/yr) 4.48 U.UU 0.00 n-no 0.00 4.18 TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (lb'- r} 375 U.UU 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.75 ----- -- TP LOAD REMAINING (Ib/yr) 0.73 U.UU U.UO 0.00 0�00 0- NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) :5.5:31 0.00 0.00 j 0,00 I 0.00 2S.S3 Total Phosphorus FINAL POST -DEVELOPMENT TP LOAD (lb/yr) 4.48 TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (lb/yr) 3.25 TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr ) 3.75 TP LOAD REMAINING (Ib/yr): 0.73 REMAINING TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (lb/yr): 0.00 ** TARGET TP REDUCTION EXCEEDED BY 0.5 LB/YEAR ------- --- Total Nitrogen (Fnr Information Purposes) POST -DEVELOPMENT LOAD (Ib/yr) 32.ub NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr)jj 25.53 REMAINING POST -DEVELOPMENT NITROGEN LOAD (Ib/yr)jj b.53 i s j Document Approval Form FnE0E- Ii K COU, -T. Y PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. Initials Date & Time Candice Mark Dave Tyler Mike John S:_ Un-I-Lu..a N_e-a—t 4h Vaq I iL. chv Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time) (S:Office on BlackboxWormsWocument Approval Form—6/7/2016 ) 0 DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, 2"d Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name: Valley Health — Surgery Center VESP Project No.: 10944-5 From: Daniel K. Michael P.E. Date: July 29, 2016 WE ARE TRANSMITTING: ❑ Originals ❑ Copy of Letter ® Prints/Copies DESCRIPTION: VALLEY'G ENGINEER_I_NG I D E ,L'M A D U` R,� A,..L... . i JUL 2 9 2016 ' Sent Via: ❑ Mail ❑ Overnight (AM) ❑ Overnight (PM)- ® Hand Delivered ❑ Client Pick-up ❑ Invoice ❑ For Your Use ❑ Check ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Contract ® For Review and Comment r - ❑ Sign and Return ITEMS BEING TRANSMITTED Date # Prints Site Plans 7/29/16 2 Site Plan Application Package 7/29/16 1 Utility Calculations Package 7/29/16 2 Stormwater Calculations Package 7/29/16 2 REMARKS: Site Plan Review Fee Check and Limited Power of Attorney form to be delivered by Valley Health under separate cover. FRE:DERICK COL*,!T,' ❑ Sign, Record and Return ❑ Accepted as submitted ❑ Accepted as noted ❑ Returned for corrections Received By: Date: 3231 Peoples Drive a Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Phone (540) 434-6365 a Fax (540) 432-0685 www.valleyesp.com