The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About40-18 Northeastern Supply Warehouse (Office) - PIN 54-A-36Q - Stonewall - BackfileSITE PLAN TRACIUNG SHEET Comment Sheets: GIS VDOT Frederick Water Winchester Inspections _ Stephens City Public Works Middletown Parks & R e c _ Airport Health Dept. Fire 'X One copy of Site Plan application form Payment of site plan review fee ✓ One reproducible copy of Site Plan nplw..N F YY .Fi'.• File Opened Reference Manual updated/number assigned I D 1 1 zi 1 D-base updated b Scan documents to Planning S: drive 10 1 lad I k Application Action Summary updated Scan additional items as needed (Project Planner to direct) CLOSE FILE: c�� l Approved (or denied) letter mailed to applicant/copy to file and cc's 5 ' File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" l Reference Manual updated 1 �✓ D-base updated L� Scanning updated Application Action Summary updated Sys ID # DATE `- RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS FOR CLJ 19 1 -KJ r�4_ ACCOUNT HOW PAID BEGINNING CASH BALANCE AMOUNT PAID i �) /9� % CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER RECEIPT 43 i 340 a o BY i©2001 rWPEOM—Q; S1657N-CL Please note: The site plans associated with this file are located in the file room. FREDERICK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Site Inspection Form GENERAL lurORMT1014 Permit Holder Name Property Identification Number (PIN) Site Plan or Subdivision Plan Number Building Permit Number hocation Contact Information INSPECTION OF ROADS. DRIVEWAYS & TRAVEL AISLES (Check when completed - note all incomplete work): Street & Traffic Signs Striping Surface Material Comments Inspector Inspector Sidewalks & Lighting Dimensions Overall Layout Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ INSPECTION Op PARKING. MANEWERINO AREAS & LOADING AREAS (Check when completed - note all incomplete work): Number of Spaces Striping Surface Material Comments Inspector Inspector Sidewalks & Lighting Dimension of Spaces overall Layout Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS (Check when completed - note all incomplete work): Number of Trees Size of Plants Soil Stabilization Screens Comments Inspector Inspector Number of Shrubs Species of Plants Seeding Overall Layout Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ INSPECTION OF OTHER IMPROVEMENTS (Check when completed - note all incomplete work): Setbacks Recreational Facilities Proffered Conditions Preservation Areas Signs Curb & Gutter Comment: Inspector Inspector Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ w`RMRTCR. COUN 'Y DSpART14WT OP ptAkWING & DSVZ iOpMENT - FINAL SITE APPROVAL Signature Date of Approval Is site approval contingent on a monetary guarantee? Yes* No Bond Number (*If ,yes, all site improvements noted on this form must be complete prior to the release of a monetary guarantee. in addition, all relevant review agencies shall provide final site approval. A checklist of these agencies is provided below for documentation purposes.) Fire Marshal Virginia.. Department of Transportation Building Inspections i_ v �. Sanitation Authority --- Public Works City of Winchester: ------ Parks & Recreation Other (Please date & initial when all site work is complete & all .relevant review agencies have approved) Date Monetary Guarantee Released ___ __., __.._ _ initials __. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 March 15, 2019 Jon K. Erickson, PE Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 43760 Trade Center Place, Suite 110 Sterling, VA 20164 Re: Approval for Site Plan #40-18, Northeastern Supply Property Identification Number (PIN): 54-A-36Q Dear Mr. Erickson: The above -referenced site plan was approved on March 15, 2019. The site plan is approved for a one- story 35,000 square foot (SF) warehouse facility in the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District in the Stonewall Magisterial District. The site plan also includes 5 loading spaces, 55 employee parking spaces, landscaping, screening and site lighting. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan. Attached are three (3) hard copies of the signed site plan by the Zoning Administrator. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Further, once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, M. Tyler Klein, AICP Senior Planner MTK/pd Attachments cc: Judith McCann -Slaughter, Stonewall Magisterial District Gary R. Oates & William H. Cline, Stonewall District Planning Conunissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue Patrick Barker, Frederick County Economic Development Authority (email) Kenneth Scott, Frederick County Fire & Rescue (email) Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply, 8323 Pulaski Highway, Baltimore, MD 21237 107 North Kent Sheet, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Frederick County Department of Fire and Rescue Office of'the Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstare Drive tVinchrster, VA 22602 (540) 665-6350 Fax: (540) 673-4739 Eniai1.-fiiio@J,*Pa.us Plan Review & Comments Date Received 1/812019 PlanlPermit Type Site Plan Rev. #1 1-8-19 Name Northeastern Supply Address 131 West Brooke RD Winchester Project Name Applicant Name & Number RE# Permit Number Emergency Vehicle Access: Hydrant Location: Siamese Location: Fire Lanes Required: Plan Approval Status Comments Areas hi -lighted in orango shall Areas HI -lighted in yellow shall Single Story Office and Warehouse Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 703-994-4047 Ad quate Inadequate NIA Adequate Inadequate N/A Ade late Inadequate NIA Y� No NIA Approve No Parking Fire Lane signs Installed igetf,4n yellow Reviewed By: Konneth Scott, Jr. Title:§ZE Date Reviewed 111512019 VA 22601 0 • REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Fire Marshal Comment Mail to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Attn: Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 Hand deliver to: Public Safety Building 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone: (540) 665-6350 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicants Name: Cook Limited Partnership Go Northeastern Supply Email Address: scoo@northeastem.com Mailing Address: e323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Telephone: 410-574-0010 r tiv Name of development and description of the request: to OCl 2 ?� constriction a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road Winchester,VA 22601 Fire Marshal Comments: -FREDERICK COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL USE ONLY - Date Received /�,,/ Review Numbe6) 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed _ 6 Ws Revision Required < < Date Approved Signature & Date: 9L/L ** Please Return Form to Applicant** 25 Date Received 10/1212018 Plan/Permit Type Name Address Project Name Frederick County Department of Fire and Rescue Office of the Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 665-6350 Fax: (540) 678-4739 Email: fmo@afcva.us Plan Review & Comments Northeastern Supply 131 West Brooke RD Applicant Name & Number RE# Permit Number Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location: Siamese Location: Fire Lanes Required: Plan Approval Status Comments Items to be corrected: Site Plan 10-12-18 Date Reviewed 10/26/2018 Winchester VA 22601 Single Story Office and Warehouse Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply 410-574- 0010 Ade ate Inadequate N/A Adequate Inad5pq16ate N/A Ade ate Inadequate N/A / No N/A Disapprove Frederick County No Parking Fire Lane signs shall be used Fire hydrants do not meet the d stant requirements per Frederick County Code 90-4E(2) Water Supply Signa Reviewed By: Kenneth Scott, Jr. Title: r �� Example of Fire Lane Markings APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS` Referenced From The 2012 Frederick County Fire Prevention Code i z D103.6 Signs Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING —FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. SIGN TYPE "A" SIGN TYPE "C" SIGN TYPE "D" SIGN TYPE MODIFIED "D" No NO NO NO PARKING PARKING PARKING T PARKING 18' 18" FIRE LANE FIRE LANE FIRE LANE FIRE: LANE FIGURE D103.6 FIRE LANE SIGNS 1234 N. Coverstone Dr. FD Fire Department Connection (FDC) Sign Details D103.6.1 Roads 20 to 26 feet in width Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on both sides of fire apparatus access roads that are 20 to 26 feet wide (6096 to 7925 mm). D103.6.2 Roads more than 26 feet in width Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on one side of fire apparatus access roads more than 26 feet wide (7925 mm) and less than 32 feet wide (9754 mm). APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADSp, Referenced From The 2012 Frederick County Fire Prevention Code D103.7 Curb Designation. Where curbing is provided adjacent to the fire lane, it must be painted yellow within the limits of the fire lane. In areas without curbing a 6-inch yellow line shall be applied to the edge of the pavement. Paint shall be highway traffic grade. 6" 611 ,611 Curbs shall be identified by a 6 inch Rolled curbs shall be Identified by a 6 Roads with no curbs shall be�� yellow paint stripe on the top and side. inch yellow stripe to the top. identified by a 6 Inch yellow stripe. D103.8 Fire Lane Marking Example of fire Lane Markings 0 9 APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS Referenced From The 2012 Frederick County Fire Prevention Code SECTION D104 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. D104.2 Buildings exceeding 62,000 square feet in area Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet (5760 m2) shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet (11520 m2) that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. SECTION D105 AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS D105.1 Where required Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS Referenced From The 2012 Frederick County Fire Prevention Code SECTION D106 MULTI PLE-FAMI LYRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS D106.1 Projects having more than 100 dwelling units Multiple -family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings, including nonresidential occupancies, are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2. D106.2 Projects having more than 200 dwelling units Multiple -family residential projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. SECTION D107 ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS D107.1 One- or two-family dwelling residential developments Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3. Exceptions: 1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the International Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required. 2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. D108 REFERENCED STANDARDS ASTM F 2200-05 Standard Specification for Automated Vehicular Gate Construction D103.5 ICC IFC-12 International Fire Code D101.5, D107.1 UL 325-02 Door, Drapery, Gate, Louver, and Window Operators and Systems, with Revisions through D103.5 February 2006 FREDERI CK FREDERZCK AVATER 0 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PO Box 1877, Winchester, VA 22604-8377 315 Tasker Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 Project Applicant m d 90:! •L/ PG- 540.868.1061 voice 540.868.1429 fax REVIEW STATUS attention — review number Z correct & resubmit approved asnoZ number of items to be corrected approved You may submit just gover §beet and the revised sheets. DRAWINGS GG,, send me by f U 1. print of sheets /�,� r,• 2. two CDs: each disc shall contain: the following plan sheets -Z �a % a) One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in PDF format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and be in landscape orientation. Each File shall be titled with the project name and appropriate sheet number. b) One CD shall be in DWG format; (1) in Model Space, (2) in state plane coordinate system NAD 83, (3) compatible with AutoCAD 2006. c) Each of the two CDs shall be labeled with its format and project name, and placed in its own paper CD envelope. EASEMENTS (%' YJ/ N A copy of the recorded onsite FW easement s) is/are required.] O/o N A copy of the recorded offsite easement(s) is/are required. The easement document shal contain: a plat and both shall be signed by the Frederick Water. o The Frederick Water requires specific language in its deed of easement. o Vi _ . o A copy of the recorded deed(s) of easement shall be received before service will be authorized. OTHER Y 1 1G This project also requires DEQ - Valley Region Office approval. Y / 19 This project also requires VDH — Lexington Field Office approval. �� N This project also requires VDH — Lexington Field Office — Project Summary Report. BY DATE FOR DRAWINGS ABOVE, see VDH website for form Y 0 This project has a sewer pump station that FW will own. Title to the pump station site shall be granted to the Frederick Water in fee simple absolute. Also, (1) a copy ofDEQ's Certificate to Construct, (2) a copy of DEQ's Certificate to Operate, and (3) two copies of the FW approved O & M manual are required. These documents must be received before service will be authorized. (4) Work cannot commence that would connect to FW facilities or require FW inspections until the contract is returned y o this office. _ Date: ! �i #fi`v r " Fart W. Wiley — Fngineerin?ssistant JAN 18 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Mail to: Frederick Water Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Frederick Water Comment Hand deliver to: Frederick Water 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia 22655 Phone: (540) 868-1061 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicants Name: Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply Email Address: scoo@northeastern.com Mailing Address: 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Telephone: 410-574-0010 Name of development and description of the request: construction a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road Winchester,VA 22601 Frederick Water: Date Received _ Date Reviewed _ Revision Required Signature & Date: -FREDERICK WATER AUTHORITY USE ONLY- Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Approved ** Please Return Form to Applicant" 34 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Request for Street Name Comment Mail to: Frederick County Information Technologies, GIS Division Attn: GIS Manager 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Hand deliver to: \40 Frederick County Information Technologies, GIS Division 107 North Kent Street, I" Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: (540) 665-5614 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northe !1% Telephone: Mailing Address: 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 (410) 574-0010 Name of development and/or description of the request: Construction a single story office and warehouse w/ associated storage yards, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Rd, Winchester, VA 22601 GIS Manager Comments: No new road name needed. The 131 West Brooke Road is the correct address based on the plan. -GIS MANAGER USE ONLY - Date Received 10/11/2018 Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed 10 2 018 Revision Required Date Approved 10/22/2018 Signature & Date: ** Please Return Form to Applicant** 17 0 0 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Request for Street Name Comment Mail to: Frederick County Information Technologies, GIS Division Attn: GIS Manager 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Information Technologies, GIS Division 107 North Kent Street, I" Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: (540) 665-5614 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicants Name: Cook Limited Partnership Go Northeastern Supply Email Address: scoo@northeastern.com Mailing Address: 8323 Pulaski Hwy Telephone: 410-574-0010 Baltimore, MD 21237 Name of development and description of the request: construction a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road Winchester,VA 22601 GIS Manager Comments: Date Received I Date Reviewed Revision Required i Signature & Date: I -GIS MANAGER USE ONLY - Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Approved ** Please Return Form to Applicant** 17 0 0 March 14, 2019 Mr. Jon K. Erickson, PE, LS Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 43760 Trade Center Place Suite 110 Sterling, Virginia 20166 RE: Site Plan Comments —'Northeastern Supply Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Erickson: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/ 665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the site plan dated October 1, 2018, we recommend approval of the subject plan. Joseph W. Johnson, P.E. Civil Engineer JC W/kco cc: Planning and Development file Sincerely, Joe C. Wilder Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street, Second Floor, Suite 200 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Taylor, Devon From: Timothy Rhodes <timothy.rhodes@vdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 10:S0 AM To: Erickson, Jon Cc: Matthew Smith; Rhonda Funkhouser; Tyler Klein; Edwin Carter; John Bishop; Gregory. Hoff man @vdot.virginia.gov; Taylor, Devon Subject: Northeastern Supply Site Plan Approval R ..�� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staunton/Edinburg Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 Jon, A VDOT review has been conducted for the Northeastern Supply Site Plan signature dated February 27, 2019. Based off of the review of the Drawings, all of the previous VDOT comments have been addressed and the Site Plan is now approved by our office. Please ensure that all applicable agencies have the most recent set of approved Drawings. We offer the following general comments: Our review and comments are general in nature. Should details be overlooked during plan review or conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the department. Materials used and methods of construction shall adhere to the current observed VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, Road and Bridge Standards, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and Land Use Permit Special Provisions. A preconstruction conference shall be held by the engineer and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies, utility companies, and VDOT prior to initiation of work. 0 t All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. Any construction related changes to the approved plan must come through the design engineer to VDOT for approval. Please allow a minimum of 5 business days for VDOT review. A Land Use Permit shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of- way. The permit is issued by this office and may require application fees, the salary & expenses of a State assigned inspector, and surety bond coverage. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Timothy Rhodes MOOT —Land Development Engineer Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA. 22824 (540)-984-5630 MORRIS & RITCHASOCIATES, INC. Engineers, Architects, Planners, 00W�t� Surveyors and Landscape Architects 43760 Trade Center Place, Suite 110, Sterling, VA 20166 703-674-0161 /FAX 703-478-0137 TO: Frederick County Information Technologies, GIS Division Attn: GIS Manager 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter go LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/ 1 1 /2018 JOB NO.: ATM RE: Northeastern Supply L] Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 10/1 1/2018 Site Plan 1 10/1 1/2018 Request for comments sheet THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS COPY TO ❑Resubmit (Submit ❑ Return SIGNED: Jon K. Erickson, P.E., L.S. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints Pam Deeter To: Judy McCann -Slaughter, Gary Oates; wcline.fredcogovpc@icloud.com Cc: Patrick Barker, CEcD; Kenneth Scott Subject: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply Attachments: Approval Ltr - SP #40-18 Northeastern Supply.docx Good morning, Please find attached the approval letter from Mr. Klein for the site plan #40-18 Northeastern Supply which is in your magisterial district. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Klein. Pam Deeter, Secretary II Dept. Planning & Development 107 N. Kent St. Suite 202 540-665-5651 pdeeter@fcva.us Pam Deeter From: Microsoft Outlook To: Kenneth Scott Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:50 AM Subject: Delivered: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply Your message has been delivered to the following recipients: Kenneth Scott (kscott@fcva.us) Subject: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply 9 Pam Deeter From: Microsoft Outlook To: Patrick Barker, CEcD Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:50 AM Subject: Delivered: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply Your message has been delivered to the following recipients: Patrick Barker, CEcD (pbarker(ftesfrederickva.com) Subject: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply 0 9 Pam Deeter From: Microsoft Outlook To: Judy McCann -Slaughter Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:50 AM Subject: Delivered: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply Your message has been delivered to the following recipients: Judy McCann -Slaughter (jslaughter0fcva.0 ) Subject: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply 0 L.J Pam Deeter From: Microsoft Outlook To: Gary Oates Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:50 AM Subject: Relayed: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: Gary Oates (oatesgr@aolxom� Subject: Site Plan approval #40-18 Northeastern Supply VDOTVirginia Dep�-gent Xof Transport • February 2015 ACCESS MANAGEMENT EXCEPTION REQUEST: AM-E ACCESS MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS 24 VAC 30-73 SECTION 120 Submitted by: Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. Date: 2/26/19 Email Address: jerickson@mragta.com Phone: 703-994-4047 Address: 604 South King Street, Ste 200, Leesburg, VA 20175 Project Name: Northeastern Supply Rte # 1322 Locality: Frederick County Description of Project: Construction of a single -story warehouse with an outdoor storage yard and parking area. Two entrances are proposed- one of of Brook Road, Rt 1322 and one off of West Brooke Road, Rt 1320. VDOT District: Staunton Area Land Use Engineer: NOTES: (1). Submit this form and any attachments to one of the District's Area Land Use Engineers. (2). See Section 120 of the Regulations for details on the requirements, exceptions, and exception request review process. (3). Attach additional information as necessary to justify the exception request(s). (4). If a traffic engineering study is required, the decision on the request will be based on VDOT engineering judgment. (5). Use the LD-440 Design Exception or the LD-448 Design Waiver forms for design and engineering standards, e.g. radius, grade, sight distance. See I I N14LU-227 on VDOT web site for additional instructions. Select the Exception(s) Being Requested ❑ Exception to the shared commercial entrance requirement. (Access M. Regulations Section 120 C.2) Reason for exception: ❑ A. An agreement to share the entrance could not be reached with adjoining property owner. ❑ Attached: Written evidence that adjoining property owner will not share the entrance. ❑ B. Physical constraints: topography, adjacent hazardous land use, stream, wetland, other. ❑ Specify constraint: ❑ Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. ❑ Exception to the vehicular connection to adjoining undeveloped property requirement. (section 120 CA) Reason for exception: ❑ A. Physical constraints: topography, adjacent hazardous land use, stream, wetland, other. ❑ Specify constraint: ❑ Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. ❑ B. Other reason: • • February 2015 ❑ Exception to the commercial entrance shall not be located within the functional area of an intersection requirement. (See Regulation Section 120 C. 1; Appendix F, Rd Design Manual) ❑ Attached: A traffic engineering study documenting that the operation of the intersection and public safety will not be adversely impacted. ❑✓ EXCEPTION TO THE SPACING STANDARDS FOR: • Commercial entrances; intersections/median crossovers (Table 2-2); • Commercial entrances/intersections near interchange ramps (Tables 2-3, 2-4); or • Corner clearance (Figure 4-4). Appendix F, Road Design Manual Information on the Exception Request © ON A STATE HIGHWAY Functional classification: Principal Arterial: ❑ Minor Arterial: Collector: © Local: Posted speed limit: 35 mph NEAR AN INTERCHANGE RAMP (Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) CORNER CLEARANCE (Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) Type of intersection/entrance: Signalized Unsignalized ❑ Full Access © Partial Access Required spacing distance 335 ft Proposed spacing distance 255.38 ft Requested exception: Reduction in required spacing 79.62 ft REASON FOR EXCEPTION: ❑ A. To be located on an older, established business corridor along a highway where existing spacing did not meet the standards prior to 7/1/08 or 10/14/09. (Regulation Section 120 C.3.c) ❑ Attached: Dated aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location. Q B. Not enough property frontage to meet spacing standard, but the applicant does not want a partial access right-in/right-out entrance. (Section 120 C.3.f) ❑ Attached: A traffic engineering study documenting that left turn movements at the entrance will not have a negative impact on highway operation or safety. ❑ C. To be located within a new urbanism mixed use type development. (Section 120 C.3.d) ❑ Attached: The design of the development and compliance with intersection sight distance. ❑ D. The proposed entrance meets the signal warrants but does not meet the signalized intersection spacing standard. The applicant requests an exception to the spacing standard. ❑ Attached: A traffic engineering study that (i) evaluates the location's suitability for a roundabout and (ii) provides documentation that the proposed signal will not impact safety and traffic flow. (Section 120 C.5) N 0 February 2015 ❑ E. The development's 2nd (or additional) entrance does not meet the spacing standards but is necessary for the streets to be accepted into the secondary system. (section 120 C.3.e) ❑ Attached: Information on the development that identifies the location of entrances. ❑ F. To be located within the limits of a VDOT and locality approved access management corridor plan. ❑ Attached: Aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location. (sect 120 C.3.b) FOR VDOT USE ONLY Recommendation on Exception Request: Approve Denyl I Date: 03.13.2019 Area Land Use Engineer or: Land Development Engineer Name Timothy L. Rhodes Remarks: Edinburg Residency recommends approval based on the following: - This is an existing corridor and is the last lot to develop with limited frontage for access. - The developer pursued shared access and the adjacent property owner was not willing to share. - The entrance location for this AM-E is necessary to accommodate internal site circulation for the business. - The access is on an internal street to an industrial park with more than adequate sight distance. - Frederick County also supports this AM-E request. Exception Request Action: Approvedn Denied❑ I Date: March 13, 2019 District Administrator or Designee: Jeffery A. Lineberry, P.E. - Designee Name (and position if Designee) Jeffery A. Lineberry, P.E. - Transportation and Land Use Director Remarks: The AM-E is approved as recommended by Edinburg Residency Office. District Staff: Please email copy to Bradley. SheltonCoWDOT.Virginia.gov 3 Taylor, Devon From: Amy Feltner <alight@fcva.us> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 10:21 AM To: Taylor, Devon Subject: RE: Message from INS Konica We found them. I have approved the site plan and walked a copy over to planning. Your roll of plans and comments are at the front counter and you may pick them up Amy From: Taylor, Devon <dtaylor@mragta.com> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 9:57 AM To: Amy Feltner <alight@fcva.us> Subject: FW: Message from INS Konica See attached. Devon Taylor MORRIS & RITCHIE ASS®CIATES, INC. i 604 South King Street, Suite 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 Tel: 703-994-40471 www.mragta.com Services: Planners • Architects • Landscape Architects Civil & Structural Engineers • Surveyors Offices: Abingdon, Baltimore, Laurel & Towson, MD Leesburg, VA • Georgetown & New Castle, DE • Raleigh, NC From: Taylor, Devon Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 8:49 AM To: 'Amy Feltner' <alight@fcva.us> Subject: RE: Message from INS Konica Good Morning Amy, Please review the sheet areas of refuge have been added to and let me know if you would like to see anything else on the plans to satisfy your comments before we resubmit hard copies. Three areas of refuge have been added to the landings in the rear of the building and a note has been added to the layout sheet as note 2 referring to the building code and the dimensions of the areas. Thanks, Devon Taylor ORRIS his RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. 604 South King Street, Suite 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 Tel: 703-994-4047 Visit us at www.mragta.com Services: Planners • Architects • Landscape Architects Civil & Structural Engineers • Surveyors Offices: Abingdon, Baltimore, Laurel & Towson, MD Leesburg, VA - Georgetown & New Castle, DE • Raleigh, NC MRA — Since 1979 From: Amy Feltner <alight@fcva.us> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 9:20 AM To: Taylor, Devon <dtaVlor@mragta.com> Subject: FW: Message from INS Konica Amy Feltner Plans Examiner Frederick County Department of Inspections 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 alight@fcva.us 540 665-5650 ext 8233 From: printme@fcva.us <printme@fcva.us> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:34 AM To: Amy Feltner <alight@fcva.us> Subject: Message from INS Konica NORTHEASTERN SUPPLY GENERAL. NOTES I. n¢ IwaRRn pfE«urtn xv(fax rs LourzD a rRErcecx w«n TRR Wv ISR-A-JBI LoarzD tt u, wfTl eaaaE «ru z xmlz.,xrw IxxsY��s�eAs�ED ux WAD epirorsAnr°ii u.1L'�w n x.'�gD w wn • '"Ic,eE .swfurtc xc Ix uc mle • I M Baww. rs BAsm ax q�sxc ✓(n scams wo . slw.cr 3.sww[D eY xrRars • xrLYxE Asxcme. «c « AxE ; ms.nwE wlrx caxmDl xEAu«Es -1 « m ED « Rcw -c arx M }«cxv. fwarx wx sEnRExr peppx wo IxE vmaxa callm [Rosox Rr( xDx( cpnxA aswxE OE nrts rIA>sF-wL « xD lrr xlxxY. M �.pvEn au w•cxl p w. IfvE RCSra'OxvBu OURED Br nE COOE p Lwlu pexwtF Ewct[O er IRUx�cR cuvxl. e. IMamROUxDIE Ia T1RF R�wnp p ,WY �uB TUR KY WigwUM RIN ..JTICRrrt S OCR/+A. �'' rrfaP(5 CPoOP IO M rO51xuClxx xRurec IEST wngGSLLr ,CgIf�15�O L= UmERfROur�gTUMRES x5 xEU55w«. x IKS[ CLvS �F MO afPRFYMAtxx 6 la TUltiI,W4Y �]pIDIIIOrx AMO M CaExwp 'a wIE44R¢ WiER OR M SUBSIAECE CRA«wX lµiR(> pwtV11C( ( 6 xEREw vrO[ re ((REu Iw Ru E»SIWO .R1t(RApI1D(.RIIe SS rRF SEgwO('cw I W�aWCOMBxCrre'S AVO�tw IK xER'S RESRpMm TO COMAci aMl CGVRRrt> w4 t0 YfA KORWTipx S �AxO EOfilmn p wI fa - CwRmR i0 SVNICW rxF YAAIxC� ro REJ'wL1C5 x OR [Rdl , vEROx SY«LL BE REPov � 1OO1M w4 ! R,r<x�E Asspcu,fs. «c Dw(xcxc wxmmctaN. aReE TIE EWT Oe Nrµ NW x LOCATR� a A M UMy W i0 M1 Ih IO p(Ax E xFS EAw�MxG p TC[Iw IO�C[Rx. up s • mlpi ATBp l.�K. � itD HAEpx LF�Rtun BE LY 111 RRat TO COU[xC(IG <OxS1MIC�ex IgwS RR xOT MGO[D 0 BE NNOCLI5w4 w.0 xpr RE�^.F M [MmKfc AxD/Oa pYR•a p IK Rf5Pp6ram p pa61xO .wxMIaVY RP �� 0 iF�ED B. Kluw vl: rpAmpX15� �REP.xpIS rpRO�&.F1x .CNµ wA ASSu[p COxp'gM swLL BE i R•,fpy,IC RrtglRx p ! x( ASSOCA25. II AFPlrovµ C OOfS xOr ;,R,UI MCRINµ TO MSC/ 3 ON pr-vlF RRDC[T+ rT. Yerzv RNU 5/rxRRr SCIrq UNURS SxwE N «xlw L[O x wxrCNVVICf rO rtQlEleG WIEA. IJ R[OpaEM[m5. Cr MSE PUWS TxNE xOi RCIILaY MC O«rLV a COVx Yrc (rvI OM4 AMIG&S EOUL TiAtE, ! Etpxw R xi M KID � RfUM OwE115 rROu L[wM�Y(IG Illx µL OM'REL[fX ICW41[vIn0.�Flp,G N iM�aiw�p RSpIE ACCESS ANp 5'IS1EV5 , pMTquctlpl uanti. ai4UDT(: YW. MpEFCx aVwir RICMEI, wq OEO x xfOERxO MqR 10 n4 5!ARr p s. � OU 1C .�xE000FAfF SLAW U�x wM u[Ou.TR• Al 16 rtCM IXRMY 5[RYw-ET 4x0 WYas, Rrx An MILWF IO IWi A aSUYECwmY Rl(CSN n4 SUEEO AW Ixt Ilpc[O Cw[x5Rr6 Srax Ox COMRµ:IOx SLAVE NDrz x GSE p ME Cvws. IxE RURrn wuFU15Rx5 vwc wxxx 1e LOxCIfl[ ME «plEtt «WE xoWl Rf11Mr MRCON'WCOII p xl5 RT°pISIB TTl "Ir vringN SUCI�nOgxlY BF PCgMEp 10 wrn�n� �splzlY�sesrvxsaz rpx rnsmunloN rAxs. rlwrrs. rtp(.aE;. xaarRcfs. IR,wfp«r� «n Twrn m IcarIlRAcrox TWu xDRY M ra.Epww wix.:s AT E[reT cs rr! .a«w DR.s BE[pn slwllRlc .rnx vn.l, a„ . E.ss anlm el p ISTI SxRII CGWACRO 'O . ImxuV CFMIp YSi « --ID xTN r.STu - x Wa�IR.V 5 Nl fT I- Cgli[iMro IY rAVP[p RL xl,ev Ixn RW TR n«T RRA TO MSnIO 1.sulwlpN I�IBO ICngO-ceA�� Arn cOWV[nDx VUA a(nY x�M wn(S[ ' S[Crox u-JO] IT SEMED Br CUOI+c VAILx BNa SEMR. zJ. • xmRCIDx pwL Rxrr TD Mv . aE rRu( L«nxvRx xuums vwpR m wl•xwsxrxl p vn EORx. xW w,E( IWl BE TuvNEF rre SIxuCIaW riy Oa nwi M T1aI11YmPM WI 1OR .. SUES NLL a(SPor6l9Un M K1Wi ERROwOxI rRA8a5 fxWxrtR� OIAbC <C.KI«Klmx xµIMO ASS 1 u iTcw CEL ,Apaq ,µR TV 4w xlYipE II x lEwss aR Ep I>IFT, 1l 1 x-1r7 M'! 5[YEA SxwE H Cx1N1lD RR M rnEOCaICR COuxry Y✓.IEx • tA9 [OxSTIMTmx STAW«m5 • ��.� alx> DIOG(4. ,RSR«x. —Ell OR C[Va — ME aSfOn:xU IAxRG gCAYAMx M CpnRClre 5 �SIOC RIE«Y tx M RR(A Or IktiOWEM A "O IR[OECeCx CWxp RRO VpIxS • RI'pK AS'AC«IES. CK [uxlxlN ML«R x[ ARU TxµE BE RRxOxO I— R.LSED BY REOfR"[. fp«Ir ..xJ IXMBYa ! RatnR RSSOCNRS. '.M. ra. w« xaRxEw scxACE IWI Ax(ff ul wm BE Rc'RE«Ep ,wc .wvwrtD xr rarpfmcx worm RRIDa Ic �Nnwuml zB. w«Ir AwnD.fp srz vox ra+ Ix�s vIE. sm xw, x E. 12-re. wnvrnfD s-x-rare. . RF.9 CF::ulL1. 1.40 51.;ruNFlR MARE -.. ._....— ..... rm wrc N—e•wwu. Lao - l,wl. I« .s.�c ,.,I u,. SITE PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA YREDDEERICK YyJATER VICINITY MAP SCALE. 1" - 0000' QRNE DEVE60PER COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O NORTHEASTERN SUPPLY 8323 PUI ASKI HIGHWAY --------- q. •nY uE BALTIMORE. MD 21237 flL P1p1'p1^ `(` CONTACT: STEVE COOK _ q .w. oarcfnR ISE q. 10' Cplrpx PHONE# 410-574-0010 p1z L0M101' EMAIL: scoo®northeasternxom IX. BlEdxc fa. CAYEVfx1 Ea cults IX YWItMr q. MOR4 DR.w ..• q. SINIRM � IX. ppx,EW E IX. uMERGxOuxi• LVYA �I UT I ENGINEER MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. 43760 TRADE CENTER PLACE, SUITE 110 STERLING, VA 20166 -'- EX all wEA CONTACT: JON K. ERICKSON PHONF #; 703-674-0161 EMAIL: jerickson®mrogto.com o Tsvrl` RExRrE .RaI q. RnA«Ia: (wE - - — — — — — — -- xoa,B IAE AI'f'RITt'F'T R1' 'fRF: F'Rk'llh:lilt I: tl)1; I:'I'S ZU/:INf 111RIA I�"I'N.11 D1� MPRUVAE 0A❑ _ 91r PUN mo raP nW (5) IFARS vRlBfr AR1PWAf UAR LEGEND xON CEt fats •nx vr[ sfT PM]C. SAViARY L«F --- vRDR sroal Dw« Euf IR.S. fN'E R(BwI rYT�—e,--.s.—?vOP. [L ylx —r—,.— •. IX UCen COLL —••,r ' q. UMY IKKE DYffiW�UM uxOO1fAC�vD CpUll" _rwn— Rxem. eSBEr IY LRF CROC EEECIRE lM _ vRav m __. ..__- '1cDxrpun rpmEO 5(T Rxa _ _ — swER vu rtxc[ rxxw. Irmwxl Ram. 2' canal« CONTOUR .IYV'v'vYWY CRM IRE( L«F . ..._ . -.. M[U( 10 9E RYMO x CIMEcnd m CM1DC. SWE Aem CRDC. SWI fEEwMx rORST Cpx[RWp« ExE v CROC. Lan WLE ___ aAov B�.a� snB,n uE ® RBDR. w«.c swcr. ,nlx, — -- wav was O Ro'. slaRw smucnRE _______ rpov. cEsoaiDRrxire�� ,Drolne • TK rcnubsA w.. tR-urAS Nuwewa. xnrn. rcwwrcP.mF x .rc.v nw�rsrsmrewrwsd sr+roNallo� u�Ymas.mw xae Kw•.�w'-111„n.wP �n�d,w.L Ieu �Ixnu. elwv TIA e r n xeoew lnii ��t ^w.£�.w�� sANwrus IIANI)R APPI'U PARKING NMI:. H.WPGw[0 VNUIIC •pn.YS AAO AAFS 9eNl 40Ff rtl fMAhF1 111IW ]S W ALL WSCiXYeS I'IRF. MARSI IAI: S NOIT.: MI T 0-- AUI rfudv FNNRD IC 4R 1Of.AR I�W1 a N�ST:i[D P n -II :NSMCMW AT M OWlCTIou rc M FW[ un55Rn.Y LFFNI U"1'IEI1Y CON FAC I S: aA1FA7WYR. 115 i+41P RND nu 1r NqA_ 7T4x RBAOi14eoAE.Rw�i iltP/ (sb) ara-lasi YA (w1) oM-6Ml waA. tAF. caMNRAn1F °"% Xeo. Bono "Ravi vi Tlxw rs ISMl 6rz-Nm lsw) Bonal. 51-T--DATA PROJECT: NORTHEASTERN SUPPLY ZONING: MI - UGRT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT SURROUNDING LAND USES (SOOFT): INDUSTRIAL TAX MAP j 54-A-360 OWNER OF RECORD: COON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP REFFRFNCF: INSTRUMENT NUMBER 18000W89 PROPOSED USE: WAREHWSE CURRENT USE: VACANT FLOW ZONEZONE N - AREAS DETERMINED TO RE OUTSOF 500-WAR FLOODPLNN, AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF FREDERICR CWNIY. VIRGINIA, COMMUNI-Y PANEL I^ NUMBER 51069CO2091), EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. TO -AL AREA . 4.14 ACRES 1.T LW - 4.74 ACRES =� BUIL0ING: +.-STaVY FA MAMMUM BURRING HEIGHT ALLOWED = 60 FEET PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT - 26.92 FEET a5 ' dUILDINC ROCK AREA = ./-35.OW SOFT, yp '.A.N. MAXIMUM ALLOWED - t 0 05,,1 F.AR PROPOSED - 35.000 SF / 206,36T SF F A.R. PROPOSED - O.I7 w)a 8•C M Wg E TRIP GENERATION FOR WAREHOUSE _ ZW VEHICLES PER DAr LOT TO BE SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER 10 TITLE REPORI FURNISHED. { b: F S TO 2035 FREDFRICI( COUNTY fgIPREHENSVF Nr J flake Skw� fW G�9 VNtNiNG_If$441IF;ZY 5 OFIACE - I SPACE PER 250 S.F. WAREFQM- 1.5 PER EMKOYEE .1 PER EACH COMPANY . "•••••••,,,., VEI1k"ti l OFFICE 1620 SF/250^ 7 SPACCS _ I/jsQ`, ,, •; WAR —SE. 1.5/ 15 CMPIOYFES R J COMPANY YERICIES. 26 SPACES RIWIRI.D HAWACAV - 0 —01— 9-FS IOTAL 601IREO ACIS - PRL%OSED SPACES - 56 SPACES 2 IROPDSFD HANON.N' . ! SPACES o� ♦ SP.M;ES ,At(R M SPACR } m U _. � AHFA LAG ILMk d N a K-KO LOADING AREA 1 IN EACH Q.000 SF OF FLOOR AREA d ()�l' PROPOSED LPADIAC AREA - I U) T g 5 ZZ,Cw �Ac.e s N w g 3 Lua u- REOLF-I VERMLILR - I INEE PER 2,000 SF OF Rift!;: IOO,000 S1 O F- DO I TREE PER 5.000 SF OF KAINWNG MK CUS AR. 2 U) F- Q w < nLu PROPOSED IIFPERMOUS AREA-146.54D SF H W U 0 4t00.O00/2.000 . 50 FREES UO 2 O Q C • 6.540/5,000 - 10 TREES �Z1 REWIRED NTERIOR I TREE PER 10 SPACES o Z L. 51/10- 6 IRLESo Z Q RLES RLOURLU - W a0 'REFS PROVIDED • MI a QPEY SPACE CALCDiABOms REWIRED 15% MPERVAUS AREA 146.540 9 OR 3-1 AC. 4.74-3.41- 1.� AC OR 0.78% OPEN SPACE PROVIDED Sr[F. 3A rc 7' 1 SFr �SAL • � � �.•, Masi � _ ---- , - �- -- ---------------- \ - � \ � • �Yn g'Lwdp �� - De wvi 5"r1 L � �w'�lii S� '"" .'� e�"t CfI ,Q�� o,., �tti`, 5`�►• �t +s'�� -•\ 1 , ,\ \ �------------ -- ---.__ ._ _ _ _. --- ..._� � �Y t - -.-.- .. 1 .`_� ._._. _ .-__.. ._ -._ _._. ---. _ _._.-._._ _ _._.- __ ._.-._ _ _ Y J m v j my �� i`w.uc z:: 1 as. wooa.no a 1lr11so a� _ - - E% ...a,r neasr J a H M vxn ��. r a �ni �imwr — — N w O w2LL z O 1 was�aa n .arna%x ..na. o rusty . .w.i a conoaw,m w,x i lx .. '` •w %w vs �arsaw F.--- • i , 2C l j `l � s ,' ',,.A� � � e� F�j A IDS ►`�� WA�R� 1',�• �xG+s� F� t�IB�Gu1 AR CeeSS� JOKO yn� 1 1 � � �, � � �_ —-�:__�. , �� 11 ', �• �R•�tpRP 1� �6aQrltitt��rLf�� .., a CL mNa a. g =) O�c U) Z a n rr w ) L _ w - AFMI N O W 2 I MqM f `' r - xS NM iOFm W I -' fl i0' ,f rww fAVIIfM: .. _. Ab • It (ori'i dw S�oK VaT Coed jmA�a�'h .I Fa4S�Af� ti ��'i,�1� T illl (� e S�imts..� PAL �oj,(L�LlX w�.,R'(�i 'S vwsf o S WATMRLRIR A tROFRX sum~ s or a 4A- 9MORMS & Mc, Hlm: r!, W 0, V, TM EIA 1J! rI RaZ-11 C' h.a ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS, AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS March 14, 2018 Frederick County RE: Additional review comments for Site Plan #40-18, Northeastern Supply Property Identification Number (PIN): 54-A-36Q Dear Mr. Klein, In response to your additional comments in your email dated December 4, 2018 regarding the above referenced project, we offer the following: Department of Planning and Development 1. Comment: Sheet 2 — "Zoning General Notes" # 3 incorrectly references "Clarke" County; it should reference "Frederick" County. Response: Note 3 has been revised accordingly on sheet 2. 2. Comment: Sheet 2 — Revise the note for the number of loading spaces provided to five (5) as consistent with the number of spaces depicted on Sheet 4. Response: The note has been revised to reference 5 loading spaces. 3. Comment: Sheet 5 — Specify the sheet number (27) referenced for dumpster screen details note. Ensure consistency of sheet numbers and page references throughout the plan set. Response: The sheet number 27 has been referenced for the dumpster screen details and page references have been reviewed for consistency throughout the plan set. 4. Comment: Sheet 21 — Specify the sheet number (25) reference in the "Proposed Pavement See Detail Sheet XX" note. Ensure consistency of sheet numbers and page references throughout the plan set. Response: The sheet number 25 has been added in reference to the proposed pavement detail on sheet 22. 5. Comment: Please ensure your required setbacks are noted correct on the plan set (sheet 2); the provided setbacks are correct. Front (W. Brooke Road & Brooke Road) — 75' Side/Rear — 50' 604 South King Street, Ste 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 (703) 994-4047 www.mragta.com Abingdon, MD C Laurel. MD <J Towson, MD -0 Georgetown, DE New Castle, DE Sterling, VA (410) 515-9000 (410) 792-9792 (410) 821-1690 (302) 855-5734 (302) 326-2200 (540) 974-5334 Oil Staff confirms the BRL's are shown correctly. Response: Required setbacks have been revised on sheet 2. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 703-994-4047. Sincerely, zz'� — Jon Erickson, PE, LS Principal 604 South King Street, Ste 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 (703) 994-4047 Abingdon, MD {> Laurel, MD 4 Towson, MD 4 Georgetown, DE (410) 515-9000 (410) 792-9792 (410) 821-1690 (302) 855-5734 www.mragta.com New Castle, DE 4 Sterling, VA (302)326-2200 (540)974-5334 0 0 w_kt— Aaxep+zvxt,-� REQXWS17 FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department Comment Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Applicant's Name Email Address: Mailing Address: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspectirons_DeR EC E I V E D 107 North Kent Street, 2"d Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 OCT 12 2018 Phone: (540) 665-5650 Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply Telephone: 410-574-0010 scoo@northeastern.com 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Name of development and description of the request: construction a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road Winchester,VA 22601 ons Department Comments: 18 Building shall comply with the 2015 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code Sections 311, S Storage. Other Code that applies is ICC Al 17.1-3-09 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, The International Fire Code and the Virginia Energy Code. Proposed warehouse shall meet height and area as required in T503 or shall meet the Unlimited area building in VBC 507.2. Building is fully sprinklered with identification of FDC. Storage of materials and those of high pile storage shall meet the International Fire Code for the applicable hazards. All required egress shall be handicap accessible. Accessible egress shall comply with VBC Section 1009. Exits shall meet the required distance apart and the travel distance shall not be exceeded (1006). All required egress shall be accessible in accordance with ANSI Al 17.1-09. Door threshold shall not exceed %Z". All landing shall be max 1:48 slope and sidewalks shall maintain 2% slope or comply with ANSI Al 17.1-09 for accessible ramps. Exits that do not lead away from the building or to a public way shall be protected in accordance with VBC Section 1009.7 for assisted area of rescue. Wall and door openings shall be rated 10' in all directions from the required area of rescue landing Parking is provided in accordance with T1106.1(1) of the IBC. 60% of all entrances shall be accessible. Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located near the accessible entrance. A minimum of one van accessible parking and unloading is required. Max slope of parking and unloading shall not exceed 2%. Signage for parking shall be provided as required per USBC 1106.8 Please provide elevation marks on all four corners of the accessible parking and unloading area Entrances open to more than 3000 sq ft shall be provided with a vestibule All structural plans submitted for permit application shall be sealed by a VA Design Professional Special inspection requirements of Chapter 17 of VBC shall apply to this type of structure. (soils, concrete, steel etc.) 1/29 Accessible rear exits required for remoteness as required in the Building Code. All accessible parking spaces shall be served by an unloading area that has access to accessible sidewalk to main entrance 2/21 parking and unloading areas less than 1 %. Curb is flush. Area of assisted rescue provided as required s:\site plan comments\2015\storage, northeastern supply.doc • 01 From: Tyler Klein To: 'yerickson(d)mragta.com" Subject: SP #40-18 - Northeastern Supply, additional review comments Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 11:47:00 AM Planning & Development staff have reviewed the resubmission of the above site plan dated 11/30/18. Staff acknowledges comments 1 through 7 have been addressed. Staff offers the following additional comments: • Sheet 2 — "Zoning General Notes" # 3 incorrectly references "Clarke" County; it should reference "Frederick" County. • Sheet 2 — Revise the note for the number of loading spaces provided to five (5) as consistent with the number of spaces depicted on Sheet 4. • Sheet 5 — Specify the sheet number (27) referenced for dumpster screen details note. Ensure consistency of sheet numbers and page references throughout the plan set. • Sheet 21 — Specify the sheet number (25) reference in the "Proposed Pavement See Detail Sheet XV note. Ensure consistency of sheet numbers and page references throughout the plan set. Once the above comments are addressed, and all review agency comment letters/approvals are received, please resubmit at least five (5) hard copies of the plan set for signature by the Zoning Administrator, plus copies of review agency comment letters and a digital (PDF) copy on a disk for the file. Should you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me directly. Thank you and happy holidays! M. Tyler Klein, AICP Senior Planner Department of Planning & Development Frederick County, Virginia 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540)722-8248 tklein@fcva.us COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 October 15, 2018 Jon K. Erickson, PE Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 43760 Trade Center Place, Suite 110 Sterling, VA 20164 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #40-18, Northeastern Supply Property Identification Number (PIN): 54-A-36Q Dear Mr. Erickson: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. Site plan approval will not be granted until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Site Plan Reference. Add the site plan reference number, SP#40-18, to the Cover Sheet. 2) Site Data. The following revisions should be made to Sheet 2: • Monument Sign. Specify the total sign area allowed, not to exceed 50 SF and 12-feet (FT) tall. Add a note that all signage requires a separate building permit and will be consistent with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. • Landscape Calculations. Update the number of required trees to 66. The number of trees proposed, as noted, and the number of tree's depicted on the Landscape Plan (Sheet 16) should also be updated. • Open Space Calculations. A minimum of 25% of the site should be "open space" as required for the M1 — Light Industrial Zoning District (§ 165-601.02). Staff aclalowledges approximately 28% of the site is set aside as "open space. " 3) Curb & Gutter. A minimum 6-inch (IN) concrete curb and gutter (CG-6) is required around the perimeter of all parking areas. It is not clear from the plan set what type of curb and gutter is being proposed; the curb and gutter on Sheet 4 should be labeled accordingly. 4) Outdoor Storage. Provide details of the proposed security fence shown on Sheet 4. The "Proposed Storage Yard" shall be completely screened from view by a 6-foot tall opaque fence, wall, been or evergreen screen. In no case shall chain -link fencing with slats be utilized for screening (§165-201.10). 5) Sidewalks. Add a note that the proposed sidewalks will be a minimum of 5-feet (FT) wide. 6) Loading Spaces. Label the required loading area and provide the dimensions of the loading 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Re: SP #40-18, Northeastern Supply October 15, 2018 Page 2 space. Loading spaces shall be a minimum of 12-FT by 45-FT. Staff acknowledges only one (1) loading space is required. 7) Site Lighting. On Sheet 19, further specify that the proposed light poles will not exceed 25-FT and a note should be added specifying that all lighting will conform to Section § 165-201.07 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and will be downcast and full cutoff. 8) Agency Approvals. Comment sheets approvals are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Department ofBuilding Inspections, the Fire Marshal, Frederick rater, the Frederick County Department of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), and the Frederick Count)) Engineer (Public Yi7orks). After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one (1) hard copy so that Staff may verify the information contained on the plan addresses the above comments. Staff will also need all approved review agency continent sheets, at least five (5) copies of the final plan, and a digital (PDF) copy for approval. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, or if you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, M. Tyler Klein, AICP Senior Planner MTK/pd cc: Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply, 8323 Pulaski Highway, Baltimore, MD 21237 1 0 0 If SITE PLAN APPLICATION - O face Use Only - Date Application Received: 1 v 1 a Application #: Fees Received: , y y Sj I Receipt #: f 5� 3 �`� Initials: i t 1. Project Title: Northeastern Supply 2. Project Description: Construction of a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, and stormwater management pond. 3. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road (Street address)131 West Brook Road Winchester, VA 22601 4. Applicant/Designer: Name: Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. Telephone: 703-674-0161 Primary Point of Contact: Jon K. Erickson email: Jerickson@mragta.com Address: 43760 Trade Center PI, Ste 110 Sterling, VA 20164 5. Property Owner (if different than above): Name: Cook Limited Partnership Telephone: 410-574-0010 Address: 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 6. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number: 54-A-36Q b. Total acreage of the parcel to be developed: 4.74 ac c. Total disturbed area of the parcel: 4.74 ac d. Present Use: Vacant e. Proposed Use: Commercial f. Magisterial District(s) Stonewall D�c�.,.�,od19 O C T 1 2 2018 FREDERICK COUNTY ! PLANNING AND DFVFI_r)PMFNT r F-1 7. Site Plan Type: a. Is this an original or new site plan? Yes IV-1 No b. Is this a revised site plan? Yes o No If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: Is n No F c. this a minor site plan? Yes If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: 8. Zoning Information: a. Current Zoning: b. Was M1 Yes No this property Rezoned? !1 c. If yes provide the rezoning number for this property: d. Are there any proffers for this property? Yes No ✓ e. Has a MDP been approved for this property? Yes i9 No ✓ f. If yes provide the MDP number for this property: 9. Adjoining property zoning and use: North East South West USE COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC ATTRACTION ZONING M1 M1 M1 M1 I have read the material i�nclud�ed 'ELtbis package and 'und rsr✓`stand at is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also nd'ersta` nd that all requir�016aterial will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Name (Printed):10_�� t Date: r/ 9 FREDERICK COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES Adopted April 23, 2008 — Effective May 1, 2008, Revised 2/24/2010, 4/28/2010, 5/2011, 1/25/2012 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN $ 3,000 non-refundable REZONING $ 1,000 — Proffer amendments not requiring a public hearing $ 5,000 base + $100/acre — 2 acres or less $ 10,000 base + $100/acre more than 2, less than 150 $ 10,000 base + $100/acre first 150 + $50/acre over 150 acres SITE PLAN Non-residential $ 2,500 base $ 200/acre to 5 acres $ 100/acre over 5 acres Residential $ 3,500 base $ 300/unit to 20 units $ 100/unit over 20 units Minor Site Plan $ 500 for revision that increases existing structure area by 20% or less & does not exceed 5,000sf of disturbed area. SUBDIVISION POSTPONEMENT of any Public Hearing or Public Meeting by Applicant after Advertisement, Non -Residential $1,000 base to include Applicant requests to TABLE an Design Plan $ 200/lot agenda item $ 500/occurrence. Plat $ 100/lot Residential (RP, R4, R5) THIRD & SUBSEQUENT PLAN REVIEWS Design Plan $ 2,500/base $100/lot (including County Attorney review) for a single Plat $ 200/lot to 50 lots development application $ 500/review. $ 100/lot over 50 lots Rural Areas (RA) BOND MANAGEMENT Sketch (Design) $ 2,500 base $200/acre Establishment of bond $ 500 Plat $ 200/lot Reduction/Release $ 300 Rural Areas (RA) Replacement $ 500 Minor — 3 lots or less $ 200/lot Lot Consolidation $ 200/lot TDR PROGRAM Boundary Line Ad j. $ 200/lot TDR Application Review $300 (*Review includes TDR Letter of Intent) VARIANCE $ 400 TDR Certificate $200 Certificate Ownership Transfer $50 BZA APPEAL $ 250 Receiving Property Approval $200 Review of Sending Property ZONING CERTIFICATION LETTER $ 250 Deed Covenant $100 Review of Deed of Transfer (Extinguishment ZONING DETERMINATION LETTER $ 100 Document) $100 SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 161 FEES EXCEPTION $ 500 Installation License $300 Septic Haulers Perinit $200 Residential Pump and Haul $50 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Commercial Pump and Haul $500 $ 3,000 base + $100/acre for first 150 +$50/acre over 150 acres CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Cottage Occupation $ 75 Telecommunication Tower $ 7,000 Other $ 750, r ') SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST The checklist shown below specifies the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application. The Department of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). (1) One (1) set of approved comment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan. It is recommended that J applicants contact the Department of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Department of GIS (Geographic Information Services) Frederick Water Frederick County Building Inspections Department Frederick County Department of Public Works Frederick County Fire Marshal nVirginia Department of Health Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation nCity of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Winchester Regional Airport Authority Frederick County Public Schools (for residential plans) (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form. ✓� (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. (4) Two (2) copies of the site plan for review. N/A (5) Completed Special Limited Power of Attorney (original). N/A (6) Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable). 10 F A A SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The Site Plan Checklist, shown below, lists the information which is required to be on each site plan. Site plans which are incomplete or missing information will be returned to the applicant (s) for revision. Project Information Section (1) N/A (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) A title that includes the name of the proposed or existing business and a subtitle which describes the proposed development. The name, address, and phone number of the land owner, developer, and designer. The Frederick County Property Identification Number (PIN) of all lots included on the site plan. The number and type of dwelling units included on the site plan for residential uses. The total land area and total developed land area of all lots included on the site plan. A detailed description of the proposed use or uses of the development, as well as a description of the existing use or uses. A reference to any other site plan, master development plan approved by the county for the site. The date the site plan was prepared and a list of all revisions made, including the date and a description of why the site plan was revised. A table of contents including all pages of the site plan. A list of all proposed utility providers, with their address and phone number. A location map showing the location of the site, along with the location of sheets, roads and land uses within five hundred (500) feet of the property. A statement listing all requirements and conditions placed on the land included in the site plan resulting from approval of conditional zoning or a conditional use permit. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of an approved variance. (14) The name of the Magisterial District the property is located within. Calculations Section (15) Calculations showing the Floor Area Ration (FAR) of the site, including the maximum allowed FAR, total ground floor area, total floor area, and total lot area. (16) Calculations showing the total number of required and proposed parking spaces, 0 0 including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. W1(17) Calculations showing the total number of required handicap spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (18) Calculations showing the total number of required loading spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (19) Calculations showing the total number of required perimeter and interior trees required, including the number of provided trees. (20) Calculations showing the percentage of the property that will be landscaped and the percentage of woodlands disturbed. (19) Calculations showing the total number of required perimeter and interior trees required, including the number of provided trees. Site Plan & Details Section (21) The location of all adjoining lots with the owner's name, specific use, zoning, and zoning boundaries shown. (22) The location of all existing or planned right-of-ways and easements that are located on or adjoin the property, with street names, widths, and speed limits shown. (23) All nearby entrances that are within two hundred (200) feet of any existing or proposed entrances to the site. (24) All existing and proposed driveways, parking and loading spaces, parking lots and a description of surfacing material and construction details to be used. The size and angle of parking spaces, aisles, maneuvering areas, and loading spaces shall be shown. (25) A North arrow. (26) A graphic scale and statement of scale. A legend describing features description. (27) all symbols and other that need L� (28) A boundary survey of the entire parcel and all lots included with distances described at least to the nearest hundredth of a foot. (29) The present zoning of all portions of the site, with the location of zoning boundaries. (30) The location of all existing and proposed structures, with the height, specific use, ground floor area, and total floor area labeled. (31) The location of all existing and proposed outdoor uses, with the height, specific use, and land area labeled. (32) Existing topographic contour lines at intervals acceptable to the Zoning Administrator. Proposed finished grades shall be shown by contour. 12 0 0 (33) The location of the front, side, and rear yard setback lines required by the applicable zoning district. (34) The location and boundaries of existing environmental features, including streams, floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, steep slopes, and woodlands. (35) The location of outdoor trash receptacles with details for all required screening elements. (36) A Photometric Plan per § 165-201.07. (37) The location, dimensions, and height of all signs. (38) The location of required buffers, landscaping buffers, and landscaped screens, including examples, typical cross sections or diagrams of screening to be used. The location and dimensions of required fencing, berms, and similar features shall be specified. (39) The location of recreational areas and common open space. (40) The location of all proposed landscaping with a legend. The caliper, scientific name, and common name of all deciduous trees. The height at planting, scientific name, and common name of all evergreen trees and shrubs. ❑� (41) The height at planting, caliper, scientific name, and common name shall be provided for all proposed trees. The height at planting, scientific name and common name shall be provided for all shrubs. (42) The location of sidewalks and walkways, including all sidewalks or bicycle paths required along any road right of way. (43) The location and width of proposed easements and dedications. (44) A stormwater management plan describing the location of all stormwater management facilities with design calculations and details. (45) A soil erosion and sedimentation plan describing methods to be used. V I (46) The location and size of sewer and water mains and laterals serving the site. 13 .0 El (47) Facilities necessary to meet the requirements of the Fire Code. ❑� (48) A signed seal of the certified Virginia land surveyor, architect, or engineer who prepared the plan. The seal and signature of the engineer, surveyor or architect shall be on each sheet of the site plan. (49) A space labeled "Approved by the Frederick County Zoning Administrator" for the signature of the Zoning Administrator, approval date, and a statement that reads "site plan valid for five (5) years from approval date." (50) All requirements specified elsewhere in the County Code, including but not limited to the Subdivision Ordinance. 14 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Mail to: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicants Name: Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply Telephone: 410-574-0010 Email Address: scoo@northeastern.com Mailing Address: 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Name of development and description of the request: construction a single story office and warehouse with associated storage yard, parking, stormwater management pond, and two commercial entrances. Location of Property: 131 West Brooke Road Winchester,VA 22601 Department of Planning & Development Comments: -PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY - Date Received Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed Revision Required Date Approved Signature & Date: ** Please Return Form to Applicant** PLEASE REVIEW rHE ATTACHED DOC MENT o TE TINS DOCUMENT REETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE IXITIAAL AIYD PRO X yDE TIDE DATE A�� T IIi�E QE YOUR APPROVAL. Initiafs Bate & Tine Candice Afark Wave Tyler f 1I X Af ke ,Tohn COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): (S:Office on BlackboxWormsWocument Approvsl Form-61712016) _ MORRIS & RITS ASSOCIATES, INC. ` �� .6 1k.� I +PJ — Engineers, Architects, Planners, I Surveyors and Landscape Architects 43760 Trade Center Place, Suite 110, Sterling, VA 20166 703-674-0161 / FAX 703-478-0137 TO: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester. VA 22601 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Attached ❑ Prints ❑ Change order 46 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/1/2018 JOB NO.: ATTN: RE Northeastern Supply ❑ Under separate cover via _ ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 10/1/2018 Site Plan 1 10/1/2018 Site Plan Application 1 10/1/2018 Site Plan Application Checklist 1 10/1/2018 Site Plan Checklist 1 10/1/2018 Request for comments sheet 1 10/1/2018 Fee Check 10/1/2018 S W M Report THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REMARKS For approval For your use As requested For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ ❑Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints r:: ., i�OCT 'I �u�a i PI AN^JINC; y COPY TO SIGNED: Jon K. Erickson, P.E., L.S. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS, AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS November 30, 2018 County of Frederick Department of Community Development RE: Review Comments for Site Plan #40-18, Northeastern Supply Property Identification Number (PIN): 54-A-36Q Dear 1VIr. Klein, In response to your comment letter dated October 15, 2018 regarding the above referenced project, we offer the following: Department of PlanninLy and Development 1. Comment: Site Plan Reference. Add the site plan reference number, SP#40-18, to the Cover Sheet. Response: Site Plan reference number has been added to cover sheet. 2. Comment: Site Data. The following revisions should be made to Sheet 2 • Monument Sign. Specify the total sign area allowed, not to exceed 50 SF and 12-feet (FT) tall. Add a note that all signage requires a separate building permit and will be consistent with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. • Landscape Calculations. Update the number of required trees to 66. The number of trees proposed, as noted, and the number of tree's depicted on the Landscape Plan (Sheet 16) should also be updated. • Open Space Calculations. A minimum of 25% of the site should be "open space" as required for the Ml-Light Industrial Zoning District (16-601.02). Staff acknowledges approximately 28 % of the site is ser aside as "open space' . Response: The above revisions have been added to sheet 2. Landscape calculations have been revised in sheet 18 as well. 3. Comment: Curb & Gutter. A minimum 6-inch (IN) concrete curb and gutter (CG-6) is required around the perimeter of all parking areas. It is not clear from the plan set what type of curb and gutter is being proposed; the curb and gutter on Sheet 4 should be labeled accordingly. Response: The curb and gutter on sheet 4 has been labeled as CG-6. 604 South King Street, Ste 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 (703) 994-4047 www.mragta.com Abingdon, MD 4 Laurel, MD ? Towson, MD 4 Georgetown, DE ? New Castle, DE Sterling, VA (410) 515-9000 (410) 792-9792 (410) 821-1690 (302) 855-5734 (302) 326-2200 (540) 974-5334 4. Comment: Outdoor Storage. Provide details of the proposed security fence shown on Sheet 4. The "Proposed Storage Yard" shall be completely screened from view by a 6-foot tall opaque fence, wall, berm or evergreen screen. In no case shall chain - link fencing with slats be utilized for screening (165-201.10) Response: Details for the fence are provided on sheet 24. 5. Comment: Sidewalks. Add a note that the proposed sidewalks will be a minimum of 5-feet (FT) wide. Response: The note for proposed sidewalks has been added to sheet 4. 6. Comment: Loading Spaces. Label the required loading area and provide the dimensions of the loading space. Loading spaces shall be a minimum of 12-FT by 45-FT. Staff acknowledges only one (1) loading space is required Response: Typical loading space area has been added to sheet 4. 7. Comment: Site Lighting, On Sheet 19, further specify that the proposed light poles will not exceed 25-FT and a note should be added specifying that all lighting will conform to Section 165-201.07 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and will be downcast and full cutoff. Response: A note specifying the above has been added to sheet 19. 8. Comment: Aj!ency Approvals. Comments sheets approvals are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Department of Building Inspections, the Fire Marshal, Frederick Water, the Frederick County Department of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), and the Frederick County Engineer (Public Works). Response: Comment acknowledged. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 703-994-4047. Sincerely, ZC� Jon Erickson, PE, LS Principal 604 South King Street, Ste 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 (703) 994-4047 Abingdon, MD 4 Laurel, MD Towson, MD v Georgetown, DE (410) 515-9000 (410) 792-9792 (410) 821-1690 (302) 855-5734 www.mragta.com New Castle, DE Sterling, VA (302) 326-2200 (540) 974-5334 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. i ` M k V j '& W Engineers, Architects, Planners, Surveyors and Landscape Architects 43760 Trade Center Place, Suite 110, Sterling, VA 20166 703-674-0161 /FAX 703-478-0137 U TO: Frederick County 3 r„ Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester. VA 22601 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Attached ❑ Prints ❑ Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/30/2018 JOB NO.: 20057 TTN. " Toif7 K16hr f RE;___ Northeastern Supply -: r7v.'Try . ❑ Under separate cover via _ ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 11/30/2018 Site Plan 1 11/30/2018 Comment Response Letter 1 11/30/2018 SWM Report 2 11/30/2018 Esmt Plat THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS COPY TO ❑ Resubmit ❑Submit ❑Return SIGNED: Jon K. Erickson, P.E., L.S. copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. NOTES I. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS DESIGNATED AS FREDERIGK COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENT PARCEL PIN 54-A-360, LOCATED AT 131 WEST BROOKE ROAD, AND 15 ZONED MI. 2. THE PROPERTY IS NOW IN THE NAME OF GOOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT IS-0008OSG AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF FREDERIGK, VIRGINIA. OWNER OF RECORD: GOOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ADDRESS: 8323 PULASKI HWY, BALTIMORE, MD 21231 3. THE BOUNDARY AND NORTH INFORMATION IS BASED ON EXISTING LAND RECORDS AND A SURVEY PREFORMED BY MORRIS AND RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. IN JUNE 2018. 4. THE PROPERTY 5HOWN HERON IS NOT IN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. IT LIES IN ZONE "X" (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR FREDERIGK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMUNITY -PANEL 51O69GO2OGD EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2000. 5. ALL PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS OR OTHER INTEREST OF THE COUNTY REMAIN IN FULL FORGE AND EFFECT UNLESS OTHERN15E SHOWN ON THI5 PLAT. 6. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CERTIFIED TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT NECE55ARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. 1. THIS PLAT 15 PURSUANT TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER 5TPL 40-18: APPROVED XX-XX-XXXX. SHEET INDEX SHEET I - COVER SHEET 2 - EXISTING EASEMENTS SHEET 3 - PROPOSED EASEMENTS �NLTH K. ERICKSON �Lic. No. 2951 11/30/18 J4. `�FFAIrE Ppp BRDOK F RD B MORNI NGS/DE /cf DR 0 0,jG4-IS4 51TE FDR� FST °R p� DOE eD'9�pT0,1, / RTc �Pv J c R��tiSr \ P��QQ VICINITY MAP 5GALE: I " = 2000' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, JON K. ERICKSON, A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED BY PARCEL ID #54-A-360 IS CURRENTLY OWNED BY GOOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND WAS AGOUIRED BY DEED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 180008OSG, AS FOUND AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF FREDERIGK COUNTY, VIRGINIA. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS DAY OF 20_ JON K. ERICKSON VLS #2G51 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. PLAT SHOWING ! ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRAGTA.COM INST# 180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHEET: 1 OF 3 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA ' SCALE: 1 "=N/A 'DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 1 DRAWN BY: CRW ' DESIGN BY: N/A ' REVIEW BY: JKE 'JOB N0. 20057 1 LINE TABLE LINE # LENGTH DIRECTION L-1 7.34 N 27' 16' 30" E L-2 36.05 N 83' 28' 47" E L-3 18.96 S 06' 33' 33" E L-4 31.09 N 06' 33' 33" W L-5 23.02 S 83' 26' 27" W L-6 34.64 N 38' 31' 30" E L-7 20.19 S 51' 28' 48" E * = TIE (T) = TOTAL FORT COLLIER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-A-36A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL I I 1 I S 60' 34' 02" E 309.66' _ IRF S 27' 16' 30" W 65.88' IRF L-1 9—L-7 L-6L-2 m PROPOSED 20' I FREDERICK I I "I WATER EASEMENT S 38' 33' 04" W I c° 336.12' i I o r I SHOCKRALPHMDS D& S 38' 31' 30" W M TAX MAP: 54-1 -A 304.32'(T) I I ZONED: MI a LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 100 FORT COLLIER CIVIL WAR CENTER INC I PROPOSED 20' I 1 TAX MAP: 54-A-81G FREDERICK INST# 020005394 WATER EASEMENT I I o o I ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL I I I m L-3 * \ L-4(T) w S 06' 31 ' 13" E N 38' 31 ' 36" E N 38' 33' 05" E 28.54' 623.84' 687.93' I L-5 S 51' 28' 29" E 65.96' I I COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TAX MAP: 54-4-360 1 ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 4.7374 ACRES IRF _ R/ I � R1• �322 �60 Wi 04E IRF POKE 90 3� pG'•�23 5 65 00 6R 0, WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC ' TAX MAP: 54-4-3 INST# 030005223 �p,LTI] / ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL f WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC TAX MAP: 54-4-1 INST#030005223 J K. ERICKSON a ZONED: MI Lic. No. 2951 LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 11/30/18 120 0 120 240 360 t4 svRVEScale 1 " = 120' PLAT SHOWING !)'s I SHEET: 3 OF 3 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS INEERS. ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRAGTA.COM INST# 180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 -= 120' J DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 1 DRAWN BY: CRW I DESIGN BY: N/A 'REVIEW BY: JKE I JOB NO. 20057 1 CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C-1 66.73' 50.00' 76.47' N 71' 17' 01 " E 61.89' FORT COLLIER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-A-36A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL EX. 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT DB: 786 PG: 1701 EX. 20' SANITARY S 60' 34' 02" E SEWER EASEMENT 309.66' _ INSTR. #090007865 _ _ - - _---""-" IRF IRF, I III j I EX. 50' POWER EASEMENT I j j DB: 763 PG: 811 I EX. CENTERLINE OF POWER I I o EASEMENT (NO WIDTH SPECIFIED) I EX. 10' TELEPHONE EASEMENT DB: 164 PG: 538 j DB: 556 PG: 305 I ICN I �II 00 FORT COLLIER CIVIL WAR CENTER INC I j TAX MAP: 54-A-81G INST# 020005394 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I Y o ZONED: MI TAX MAP: 54-4-36Q I o SHOCKEY, JAMES D & RALPH D TAX MAP: 54-1 -A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL ZONED: MI I I of LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 4.7374 ACRES j 3 N 38' 31 N 38' 33' 05" E I j 623.84' 687.93' I j Ij I,I I I III EX. 20' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT DB: 768 PG: 1443 1 j EX. POWER EASEMENT �I DB: 839 PG- 1020 1 IRF 36" E EX. TELEPHONE EASEMENTS JR1 �6�RDB: 785 PG: 495IRO Rj pG� 3 DB: 864 PG: 552 p4 �0 OKE 31 , i 5 6� gR0 0� 215.40 , WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC / TAX MAP: 54-4-3 INST# 030005223 nERICKSON , ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC TAX MAP: 54-4-1 INST#030005223 ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 120 0 120 240 360 I Scale 1 " = 120' MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS PLAT SHOWING ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG. VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP wwrwol (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRAGTA.COM INST# 180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHEET: 2 OF 3 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 "=120' DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 DRAWN BY: CRW DESIGN BY: N/A REVIEW BY: JKE JOB NO. 20057 NOTES I. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON 15 DESIGNATED AS FREDERIGK COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENT PARCEL PIN 54-A-360, LOCATED AT 131 WE5T BROOKE ROAD, AND 15 ZONED MI. 2. THE PROPERTY 15 NOW IN THE NAME OF COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT 18-OOOSOBg AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF FREDERIGK, VIRGINIA. OWNER OF RECORD: COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ADDRE55: 8323 PULASKI HWY, BALTIMORE, MO 21251 3. THE BOUNDARY AND NORTH INFORMATION IS BASED ON EXISTING LAND RECORDS AND A SURVEY PREFORMED BY MORRIS AND RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. IN JUNE 2018. 4. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERON 15 NOT IN A 100-YEAR FLOOOPLAIN. IT LIES IN ZONE "X" (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR FREDERIGK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMUNITY -PANEL 5106gCO20GD EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 200g. 5. ALL PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS OR OTHER INTEREST OF THE COUNTY REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 6. TH15 PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CERTIFIED TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. 1. THIS PLAT 15 PURSUANT TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER STPL 40-18: APPROVED XX-XX-XXXX. SHEET INDEX SHEET I - COVER SHEET 2 - EXISTING EASEMENTS SHEET 3 - PROPOSED EASEMENTS �NLTH 00 V K. ERICKSON 9 ic No. 2951 11/30/18 1 PJO `CFFAVF O �0�P0 SRoo Rp A MpRNIRGSIDFiR iCr ~ o O J o \ � W �L O j ? l OUp�Sq�R/��lTV� 51 TE "0 RRFST O bbE Fp Q e� p� T"F'4 CT p<<F � � qt,F • RRo �� J C R��tis Pao e7 VICINITY MAP SCALE: I "= 2000' SURVEYOR'S GERTIFIGATE I, JON K. ERICKSON, A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED BY PARCEL ID #54-A-360 IS CURRENTLY OWNED BY GOOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND WAS ACQUIRED BY DEED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 180008O8g, A5 FOUND AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF FREDERIGK COUNTY, VIRGINIA. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS DAY OF 20_ JON K. ERICKSON VLS #2g51 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. PLAT SHOWING ! a CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRACTA.COM INST# 180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHEET: 1 OF 3 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 "=N/A 'DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 1 DRAWN BY: CRW ' DESIGN BY: N/A ' REVIEW BY: JKE 'JOB NO. 20057 1 LINE TABLE LINE # LENGTH DIRECTION L-1 7.34 N 27' 16' 30" E L-2 36.05 N 83' 28' 47" E L-3 18.96 S 06' 33' 33" E L-4 31.09 N 06' 33' 33" W L-5 23.02 S 83' 26' 27" W L-6 34.64 N 38' 31' 30" E L-7 20.19 S 51' 28' 48" E ' = TIE (T) = TOTAL FORT COLLIER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-A-36A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL I I I I S 60' 34' 02" E 309.66' _ IRF S 27' 16' 30" W 65.88' 1 I IRF / L-1 I L-6 ` I L-2 L-7 Im PROPOSED 20' FREDERICK I I WATER EASEMENT S 38' 33' 04" W I I I 336.12' I I o I SHOCKRALPHMDES D& S 38' 31' 30" W I M TAX MAP: 54-1 -A 304.32'(T) I 1 ZONED: MI a LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 100 FORT COLLIER CIVIL WAR CENTER INC I I PROPOSED 20' TAX MAP: 54-A-81G FREDERICK I INST# 020005394 i t WATER EASEMENT I I o o I ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL I I m L-3 ► \ L-4 (T) LA S 06' 31' 13" E -3: N 38' 31' 36" E N 38' 33' 05" E 28.54' 623,84' 687.93' 1 L-5 S 51' 28' 29" E 65.96' 1 I 1 1 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TAX MAP: 54-4-360 1 ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 4.7374 ACRES IRF R/ 1 _123 (60 Wi S 65 p0 Oq E � IR BROOKE R DB/ , WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC / TAX MAP: 54-4-3 INST# 030005223 ED ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LCTAX MAP: 54-4-1 INST#030005223 aZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 120 0 120 240 360 Scale 1 " = 120' MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. PLAT SHOWING ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FFWW)l CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRAGTA.COM INST# 180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHEET: 3 OF 3 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 -= 120' DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 DRAWN BY: CRW DESIGN BY: N/A REVIEW BY: JKE JOB NO. 20057 CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C-1 66.73' 50.00' 76.47' N 71' 17' 01 " E 61.89' FORT COLLIER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-A-36A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL EX. 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT DB: 786 PG: 1701 I EX, 20' SANITARY S 60' 34' 02" E SEWER EASEMENT 309.66' _ INSTR. #090007865 _ _ - - - IRF IRF. ! !!I II EX. 50' POWER EASEMENT I j DB: 763 PG: 811 I EX. CENTERLINE OF POWER I ! 1 EASEMENT (NO WIDTH SPECIFIED) I EX. 10' TELEPHONE EASEMENT DB: 164 PG: 538 o M SHOCKEY, JAMES D & DB: 556 PG: 305 I I M I RALPH D IjI TAX MAP: 54-1 -A ZONED: MI II ! I I a LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 00 FORT COLLIER CIVIL WAR CENTER INC I j ow 1 TAX MAP: 54-A-81 G INST# 020005394 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ! I Y o ZONED: MI TAX MAP: 54-4-360 ! I o LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL ZONED: MI ! I I m LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL IjI N 4.7374 ACRES I j 3 N 38' 31' 36" E N 38' 33' 05" E I j 623.84' 687.93' 1 j I Ij 1,1 j II j II EX. 20' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT DB: 768 PG: 1443 1 j 1 EX. POWER EASEMENT !1 DB: 839 PG: 1020 I IRF EX. TELEPHONE EASEMENTS , - ! 1322 '60' DB: 785 PG: 495 DB: 864 PG: 552 % p0 0q E IR BRooKE R0p8 3A PG' S 6 40 , WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC TAX MAP: 54-4-3 �NLTH �P / / ' WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC TAX MAP: 54-4-1 INST# 030005223 ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL J K. ERICKSON 9 INST#030005223 ZONED: MI Lic. No. 2951 LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL l 11/30/18 120 0 120 240 360 I Scale 1" = 120' MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. PLAT SHOWING ! ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CREATION AND DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS ON THE LAND OF 604 SOUTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VA 20175 COOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (703) 994-4047 WWW.MRAGTA.COM INST#180008089 COPYRIGHT 2018 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHEET: 2 OF 3 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 "=120' J DATE: 1 1 /30/2018 1 DRAWN BY: CRW ' DESIGN BY: N/A ' REVIEW BY: JKE 'JOB NO. 20057 1 REPORT OF Stormwater Management Northeastern Supply 131 West Brooke Road Winchester, Virginia Tax Map 54-A-36Q September 25, 2018 Revised November 6, 2018 Revised November 30, 2018 Prepared for: Cook Limited Partnership c/o Northeastern Supply 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Owner: Cook Limited Partnership 8323 Pulaski Hwy Baltimore, MD 21237 Prepared by: Devon Taylor Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 604 South King St, Ste 200 Leesburg, VA 20175 (703)994-4047 MRA Job Number: 20057 *O 323JV V i ft f . Zvi ■ -/ • Virginia Professional Certification I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Virginia. License Number 32355 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................... I Site Description & Proposed Construction StormwaterManagement.................................................................................................... 2-3 Pre -development & Post -development Conditions..............................................2 WaterQuality..........................................................................................2 Water Quantity & Adequate Outfall................................................................3 StormwaterManagement Calculations...............................................................................4-62 Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Compliance Spreadsheet.............................5-15 Pre -developed TR-55 Calculations...........................................................16-18 Post -developed TR-55 Calculations.........................................................19-22 Pre -developed and Post -developed Hydrograph Report ..................................23-36 Post -developed Hydrograph Report.........................................................37-60 Energy Balance Equation..........................................................................61 Stormwater Quantity Control Sura nary.........................................................62 Appendices..............................................................................................................................63 Drainage Area Map INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION & PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The project consists of a new development of a property located northwest of the intersection of Brooke Road and West Brook Road in Winchester, Virginia as shown on tax map 54-A-36Q. The address is 131 West Brooke Road. The property contains approximately 4.74 acres and is zoned M1. Currently, the property is vacant and consists of undeveloped grass areas with some trees. The Fort Collier Civil Water Center is located to the west and an existing non-residential structure located to the north. The project proposes to construct a one-story office and warehouse building with an associated storage yard, access drive, parking areas, and stormwater management pond. Access to the site will be provided by from West Brooke Road and Brooke Road. The total limits of disturbance is 4.74 acres. 1 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Pre -development Conditions The pre -developed condition consists of two drainage areas, DA-A and DA-B, containing a total of approximately 4.74 acres of grass areas with some trees. Runoff sheet flows southeast to the intersection of West Brooke Road and Brook Road where it flows into .an existing culvert under West Brooke Road. The pre -developed CN for the site using the TR-55 method was found to have a peak discharge of 2.90 cfs for the 1-year storm and 11.33 cfs for the 10-year storm. Post -development Conditions In the post -developed condition, all new impervious areas will be directed to a proposed SWM pond located in the southern portion of the site. Runoff from the impervious areas will be conveyed to the pond via a storm sewer system. The pond outfalls southwest where runoff will flow into the existing culvert under West Brooke Road. Runoff flows along Brook Road and Park Center Drive and ultimately outfalls into Redbud Run. The post -developed CN without stormwater management using the TR-55 method was found to have a peak discharge of 11.78 cfs for the 1-year storm and 23.80 cfs for the 10-year storm. Water Quality Stormwater runoff fiom the site will be conveyed to the proposed SWM pond. The post - developed site consists of 3.35 acres of impervious areas and 1.39 of managed turf. The Virginia Runoff Reduction Method for new development was used for the disturbed area of 4.74 acres. The total phosphorus load reduction required is 6.01 lb/yr. Stormtech Chambers with an isolator row will be used to treat a portion of the site. Approximately 0.43 acres will drain to the stormtech chambers which reduces the total phosphorus load to 5.65 lbs/yr. Nutrient credits will be purchased to meet the required phosphorus load reduction. Water Quantity and Adequate Outfall Currently, the stormwater runoff leaves the property as concentrated flow through an existing 16x24 inch pipe and flows north into an inlet on the south side of Virginia State route #7 bypass (outfall 41). After leaving the property, runoff is conveyed through a ditch along Brooke road and Park Center Drive which outfalls southeast of Park Center Drive into an existing channel that ultimately discharges into Redbud Run. The proposed SWM pond was designed to meet the required SWM quantity requirements for the site. 2 Per the conveyance system protection requirements, a maximum peak flow for the post - development 1 year, 24-hour storm was calculated using the Energy Balance Equation Method to be 0.67 cfs and the post -developed flow rate was calculated to be 0.59 cfs, which is below the maximum allowable peak flow rate. Per VSMP requirements for flood protection for conveyance systems that currently do not experience localized flooding during the 10-year, 24-hour storm event, this condition must persist in the post -developed condition. The post -developed peak discharge for all storm events have been reduced to below pre -development flows and therefore meet the current non -flooding conditions of downstream stormwater conveyance infiastructure. Based on meeting the SWM requirements of the VSMP regulations, adequate outfall has been provided. Storm Water Management Calculations Project Name: NORTHEASTERN Date: 11/29/2018 SMP Design spechcorions List 2013 Draft Stds & Specs Post -Development Project (Treatment Volume and Loads) A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils T—b Po /Op.. space (am.) -undisturbed, prole—d forest/open space .... forested land °'0° M.n.gm mrr (acre.( - einprbea, gradee mr yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 1.39 1.39 Impareb.. Cee.r (.C..) 3.35 3.35 4.74 Constants Annual Rainfall (inches) 43 Target Rainfall E-1(inches) 1.00 Total Phasphona: (TP) EMC (mg/L) 0.26 Total NRragen(TN) EMC(mg/L) 1.86 Target TP Load(lb/acre/yr) 0.41 Pj(unRless Correction f.Ct") 0,90 A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Tprest/°pen5pa<e 0.02 1 0.03 OD4 0.05 Managed Tud 0.15 0.20 0.22 0.25 Poem— co— 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 Treatment Volume and Nutrient Loads Treatment Volume (acre-nl o. Treatment Volume (cubic feet) 1] TP Load (ib/yr) Drainage Area A D,—a A— A land cove (aay.) Stormwater Best Manaeement Practices IRR = Runoff Reduction) eew cmpaea_seuwlea_vf onrolr lal Total PNmplierv. Availa6lp ter R.—A In D A. A (Ibl,) D 93 Pest Development Treatment Volume In D.A. A(ft) I 1.496 1. Ve8etat.d Roof (RR) ®. ® a000 �mm� 2. Rovkop DlsconMctien (RR) ■�■000aommmm�� 0000amm�m� m®�0000®�mmm� o®�0000®mmmm� m��0000®�mmm� �oa000mmmm� 00000�mmm� 3. PeemaaMe P.vemant (RR) m � 000® mmm� .. Gnss ❑tame) (RR) 5. Dry 6wal. (RR) b. &orpbnUon (RR) NltmRen Nitieren load Untreated Nitro[en R.milNstE R.-I ham Upstream NitreR.nlwdto Removed BY NNropnLead Ellkhru Mj Practices llh) Pracnce(lb.) Practic.(IW) pis) 000 0.00 D.00 p.00 D. D.OP p.ap • aw aoo Dw 0- 11 — 11 0.0a e- aW a - too e� D tioo PW � e� w oao Dao oro �. PF.., A OA IT. IFMnratlon (PERI t. EKpM.a D.tenUon Pontl (RR) 9. SheeMow to Filt.r/Open SWce I ERR) o��00000�mm TOTALIMPERVIOUSCOVERTREATEDIac) O.OD AREACHECK'.OK. T0TAL MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED 1- 0.00 AREA CHECK'. OR. TOTALRUNOFFREDUCTK)NIND.A A(R') 0 TOTAL PHO5PHORUS AVAILABLE FOR REM0VALIND.A.A(Ib/Yr) 0.92 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN DA.AIIb/YF) 0.00 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMAINING AFTER APPLYING RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D A. A Ilb/Yrl 09x 13. iilterin[ Pruliuf (no RR) 33. Con WaHaA,I(nRRR) lAd 33-W.t Pn RP) (ro TOTAL RUNOFF REDUCTION IN D.A. A IN) 0 i JITROGEN REMOVED WITH RUNOFFREDUCTIONRRACTICEStND.A.A(Ib/yr) 0.00 30. W.t Sw.l. (OpaF1AI M.{n) Iro RR) 13. FineriK Practke.(ro RR) am�mm ®mom ix. raFFavl,Ke.a w.wna Iro RRI 1!. W.t Pont (ro RR) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED (.O OAi ARFACHECK'OR, TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED (ai) O.OI AREA CHECK: OR. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL REQUIRED ON SITE Rb/YI) 6.01 TOTALPIi PH.- AVAILABLE FOR REMOVALIN D.A.A(Ib/YN 0.92 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITHOUT RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES INO.AyF)1 0.37 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A A Ob/yll 0.00 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED IN DA, A (Ibly,)l 0.3) TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMAINING AETER APPLYING BMP LOAM REDUCTIONS IN DA.A(Ib/yr) 0.55 I I rIR iQEI Al !TV (OMPI./AN(E TAB FOR QEE (O MP1I11N(F(AI NITROGEN REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A A (Ib/yr) 000 NITROGEN REMOVED WITHOUT RUNOF F REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D A. A Ubjv,)j GOO TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVED IN DA. A IIb/yTI 0.00 Site Results (Water Quality Compliance) Area Checks D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A D D.A. E AREA CHECK FOREST/OPEN SPACE (ac'I 0.00P-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK IMPERVIOUS COVER lac) 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED lac) 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. MANAGED TURF AREA (ac) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED (ac) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 OK. AREA CHECK OK. OK. OK, OK. Site Treatment Volume (ft) 12,663 Runoff Reduction Volume and TP By Drainage Area D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E TOTAL RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME ACHIEVED (ft') 0 0 0 0 0 0 TP LOAD AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAL (Ib/yr) 0.92 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0 92 TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) 0.37 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.37 TP LOAD REMAINING (Ib/yr) 0.55 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.55 NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Phosphorus FINAL POST -DEVELOPMENT TP LOAD (Ib/yr) 7.96 TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (Ib/yr) 6.01 TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED lIb/yr) 0.37 TP LOAD REMAINING (Ib/yr): 7.59 REMAINING TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (Ib/yr): Total Nitrogen (For Information Purposes) POST -DEVELOPMENT LOAD (Ib/yr) 56.91 NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) 0.00 REMAINING POST -DEVELOPMENT NITROGEN LOAD (Ib/yr) 56.91 Runoff Volume and Curve Number Calculations Enter design storm rainfall depths (in): 1-year storm 2-year storm 10 ear storm 2.40 2.88 4.18 Use NOAA Anus 14 (http://hdsc.nws.noaagov/hdsr/pfd v:) -Notes see below): [!I The curve numbers and runoff volumes Computed in this spreadsheet For each drainage area are limited in their applicability for determining and demonstrating compliance with water quantity rqunemems. See VR.RM User's Guide and Documentation for additional mformapnm (2) Runoff Volume (RV1 for prc and postA,elopment drainage areas must be in volumetric units (e g., acre feet or cubic fret) when using the Energy Balance Equation Runoff measured in watershed -inches and shown in the spreadsheet as RVlwatershed-inch; can only be used in the Energy Balance Equation when the pre and post development drainage areas are equal. Otherwise RV(watershed-inch) must be multiplied by the drainage area. [31 Adjusted CNs are based on runoff reduction volumes as calculated in D.A. tabs. An alternative CN adjustment calculation for Vegetated Roofs is included in BMP specification No. 5. Drainage Area Curve Numbers and Runoff Depths* Curve numbers (CN, CNadj) and runoff depths (RV De,ero ) are computed with and without reduction practices. Drainage Area A A Solis B Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area [acres): 0.43 Forest/Open Space-- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area acres CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume (R): 0 Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area acres CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.01 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area acres CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.42 96 0.D0 98 CN D.A. A 97 1-year storm 2-year storm 30- ear storm RVDe„o d (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction• 2.06 2.54 3.83 RVD,aeloped (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction- 2.06 2.54 3.83 Adjusted CN' 97 97 97 'See Notes above Drainage Area B A Soils B Soils C Soils D soils Total Area (acres): 0.00 Forest/Open Space-- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area acres CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume ft' : 0 _ Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area acres CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area acres CN 0.00 98 0.00 9898 0.00 0.00 98 _ CNDA.a 0 RVDevel a (WRKrshed-Inch) with no Runoff Reduction' RVD•wl a (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction' 1-year storm 2-year storm SO- ear storm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 Adjusted CN' 0 0 0 See Notes above Drainage Area C A Soils a Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area (acres): 0.00 Forest/Open Space-- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area acres CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume (ft): 0 Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area acres CN 0,00 39 0.00 61 0,00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area aces CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0,00 98 CND.A.c 1-year storm 2-year storm 10 ear storm RVIDievelop,d (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction' 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVDevelopea (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction` 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ad usted CW 0 0 0 'See Notes above Drainage Area D A Soils a Soils C soils D Soils Total Area (acresl: 0.00 Forest/Open Space-- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area acres CN 0.00 30 0.00 55 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume In'): 0 Managed Turf-- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area acres CN 0.DO 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 so _ Impervious Cover Area acres CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 _ 777 CNR.A.o 0 1-year storm 2- ear storm 10- ear storm RVOe„e d (watershed4ach) with no Runoff Reduction' 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVD,wlo d (watershed -Inch) with Runoff Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 Ad usted CN* 0 0 0 'See Notes above Drainage Area E A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total Area (acres): 0.00 Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area acres CN 0.00 30 0.00 S6 0.00 70 0.00 77 Runoff Reduction Volume (ft): 0 Managed Turf — disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area acres CN 0.00 39 0.00 61 0.00 74 0.00 80 Impervious Cover Area acres CN 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 0.00 98 CN D.A. E - a 1-year storm 2-year storm SO- ear storm RVa_1opad (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction` 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVDeo.loped (watershedJnch) with Runoff Reduction* 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ad usted CN' 0 0 0 *See Notes above 11 Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Spreadsheet - Version 3.0 BMP Design Specifications List: 2013 Draft Stds & Specs Site Summary Project Title: NORTHEASTERN Date: 43433 Total Rainfall = 43 inches Site Land Cover Summary A soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Totals % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.00 1.39 29 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 3.35 0.00 3.35 71 4.74 100 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads Site Rv 0.74 Treatment Volume ft' 12,663 TP Load (lb/yr) 7.96 TN Load (lb/yr) 56.91 Total TP Load Reduction Required (lb/yr) 6.01 Site Compliance Summary Total Runoff Volume Reduction (ft) 0 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.37 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.00 Remaining Post Development TP Load (lb/yr) 7.59 Remaining TP Load Reduction (lb/yr) Required ---------"- '--'--'-"- ----'--' ---'-- '-"-----'-----'-'-- --- ----- Drainage Area Summary D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Managed Turf (acres) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,42 Total Area (acres) 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 Drainage Area Compliance Summary D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E Total TP Load Reduced (lb/yr) 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 TN Load Reduced (lb/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Summary Print 11) Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet Drainage Area A Summary Land Cover Summary A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0 01 2 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.42 98 ( 0.43 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious BMP Treatment TP Load from TP Load TP Removed TP RemainingPractice Credit Area Cover Credit I (ftto Upstream Practice (Ibs) (lb/yr) (lb/yr)(acres)Area TDwnstreamUntreated ment to beVolume (acres) Practices (Ibs) mployed Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.42 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.01 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.37 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (I b/y r) 0.00 Drainage Area B Summary Land Cover Summary A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ( 0.00 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious BMP Treatment TP Load from Untreated TP load U TP Removed TP Remaining Downstream Practice Credit Area Cover Credit , Volume (ft 1 Upstream to Practice (Ibs) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) Treatment to be (acres) Area (acres) Practices (Ibs) Employed Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.00 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (I b/yr) 0.00 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (I b/yr) 0.00 Drainage Area C Summary Land Cover Summary Summary Print 1 `2 Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious BMP Treatment TP Load from Untreated TP Load TP Removed TP Remaining Downstream Practice Credit Area Cover Credit 3 Volume (ft) Upstream to Practice (Ibs) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) Treatment to be (acres) Area (acres) Practices (Ibs) Employed Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.00 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.00 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (I b/y r) 0.00 Drainage Area D Summary Land Cover Summary A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0 1 0.00 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious BMP Treatment TP Load from Untreated TP Load TP Removed TP Remaining Downstream Practice Credit Area Cover Credit Volume (ft) Upstream to Practice (Ibs) (lb/yr) I (lb/yr) Treatment to be I (acres) Area (acres) Practices (Ibs) Employed Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.00 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.00 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (I b/yr) 0.00 Drainage Area E Summary Land Cover Summary A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total % of Total Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Summary Print A Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet Impervious Cover (acres) 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 BMP Selections Managed Turf Impervious BMP Treatment TP Load from Untreated TP load TP Removed TP Remaining Downstream Practice Credit Area Cover Credit 3 Volume (ft) Upstream to Practice (Ibs) (lb/yr) (lb/yr) Treatment to be (acres) Area (acres) Practices (Ibs) Employed Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.00 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.00 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.00 - - ._. ---- --- Runoff Volume and CN Calculations 1-year storm 2-year storm 10-year storm Target Rainfall Event (in) 2.40 2.88 4.18 Drainage Areas RV & CN Drainage Area A Drainage Area B Drainage Area C Drainage Area D Drainage Area E CN 97 0 0 0 0 RR (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 1-year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RV w RR (ws-in) 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 1 97 0 0 0 0 2-year return period RV wo RR (.s-in) 2.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RVwRR(ws-in) 2.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 97 0 0 0 0 10-year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 3.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RV w RR (ws-in) 3.83 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 1 97 0 1 0 0 0 Summary Print 15 TR-55 Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff Project Northeastern By DLT Date 8/31/2018 Location DA-A Frederick Co, VA Checked Date Check one: * Present 0 Developed 0 Developed w/Credits Soil name and hydrologic group g p (appendix A) Cover Description (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent impervious; unconnected/connected impervious area ratio) CN' Area acres ❑ sq.mi. ❑ % Product of CN x area N N d Ca H C N a) D a) LL N a) IL C Meadow 71 1 2.87 203.77 C Woods, Good condition 70 0.07 4.9 ' Use only one CN source per line total product CN (weighted) _ _ total area Totals 208.67 = 2.9 2.94 71.0 208.67 Use CN 71 Frequency .................................. Rainfall, P (24-hour).................................. Runoff, Q.................................. (use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2-4) yr in in Storm #1 1 2.40 0.44 Storm #2 2 2.88 0.69 Storm #3 Storm #4 10 100 4.18 6.54 1.52 3.34 \Users\dtaylor\Desktop\Northeastern Supply\Comps\SWM\Northeastern TR-55 9/21/2018 16 TR-55 Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (T,) or Travel Time (Tt) Project By Date Northeastern DLT 8/31 /2018 Location DA-A Checked Date Frederick Co, VA Check One: U Present O Developed O Developed w/Credits Check one: El Tc ❑ Tt through subarea Note: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Segment ID AB 1. Surface description (table 3-1)..................................... . ........ Range 2. Manning's roughness coefficient, n (table 3-1) ............................. 0.13 3. Flow length, L (total L -< 100 ft) .......................................... ft 100 4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, Pz.................................................... in 2.88 5. Land slope, s................................................................... ft/ft 0.058 0.007 (nL)08 Compute Tt ............ hr 0.100 + 6. Tt = Pz o 5so 4 Segment ID CD 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) - _ ........... - Unpaved 8. Flow length, L................................................................... ft 232 9. Watercourse slope, s - _ - ......1. 1...-1. - ................ ..-.. - ft/ft 0.034 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1)................................... ft/s 2.98 L Compute Tt ............ hr 0.022 + 11. Tt = 3600 V Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ftz 13. Wetted perimeter, pw.................................................. ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = a/pw Computer _..... __ .. _...... . . ft 15. Channel slope, s................................................................ ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n............................................. 17. 1.49 rzis stiz V = Compute V ............. ft/s n 18. Flow length, L................................................................ ft Ll L Compute Tt ............ hr + - 19. Tt = 3600 V 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11 and 19) .................... ..................... hr 0.12 U.wseibtutdywitvesKtuPuvuiuieastein OuPPty\UU111Ps\Ovviwuvuitneastern i M-Oz) 9/21 /2018 17 TR-55 Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff Project Northeastern By DLT Date 8/31/2018 Location DA-B Frederick Co, VA Checked Date Check one: * Present O Developed O Developed w/Credits Soil name and hydrologic roU group (appendix A) Cover Description (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent impervious; unconnected/connected impervious area ratio) CN' ❑ ❑ Area acres sq.mi. % Product of CN x area N N �, H M N �, LL q N a) IJ_ C Meadow 71 1.33 94.43 C Woods, Good condition 70 0.47 32.9 ' Use only one CN source per line total product CN (weighted) _ _ total area Totals 127.33 = 1.8 1.80 70.7 127.33 71 B�* Frequency .................................. Rainfall, P (24-hour).................................. Runoff, Q.................................. (use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2-4) yr in in Storm #1 1 2.40 0.44 Storm #2 2 2.88 0.69 Storm #3 Storm #4 10 100 4.18 6.54 1.52 3.34 C:\Users\dtaylor\Desktop\Northeastern Supply\Comps\SWM\Northeastern TR-55 9/25/2018 18 TR-55 Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (TJ or Travel Time (Tr) Project By Date Northeastern DLT 8/31 /2018 Location DA-B Checked Date Frederick Co, VA Check one: 0 Present O Developed O Developed w/Credits Check one: 0 T� ❑ Tt through subarea Note: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Segment ID AB 1. Surface description (table 3-1) __................. ___....... .. Range 2. Manning's roughness coefficient, In (table 3-1) ............................. 0.13 3. Flow length, L (total L <- 100 ft) ............. ......... ........... ft 100 4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, Pz.................................................... in 2.88 5. Land slope, s................................................................... ft/ft 0.046 6. Tt = 0.007 (nL)08 Compute Tt ............ Pz o ss0 4 hr 0.110 + Segment ID CD 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved)......................................................... Unpaved 8. Flow length, L................................................................... ft 380 9. Watercourse slope, s............................................................... ft/ft 0.021 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1)................................... ft/s 2.34 11. TtL Compute Tt ............ = hr 0.045 + 3600 V Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a --- - -- - ..... ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pw.................................... I............. ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = a/p, Computer __ ......._...._ ........ ft 15. Channel slope, s......................................................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n .................I ........................... 17. 1.49 rzi3 Svz V = Compute V ............. ft/s In 18. Flow length, L........................................................... ft 19. Tt = L Compute Tt ............ hr + - 3600 V 20. Watershed or subarea T, or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11 and 19) ............ .............. I ................ hr 0.16 .wsetstutaytuttvesKwPuvututeastern OUPPiyw,urttPstwvivtuvurtneastern t M-ZK) 9/21 /2018 19 TR-55 Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff Project Northeastern By DLT Date 11/29/2018 Location DA-A Frederick Co, VA Checked Date Check one: p Present Q Developed O Developed w/Credits Soil name and hydrologic roU group (appendix A) Cover Description (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent impervious; unconnected/connected impervious area ratio) CN' Area D acres ❑ sq.mi. ❑ % Product of CN x area N N cc H I N IJ N W rn IJ_ C Impervious areas (roofs, driveways, etc.) 98 3.35 328.3 C Open Space, Good condition 74 1.33 98.42 ' Use only one CN source per line total product _ CN (weighted) = total area Totals 426.72 4.7 = 4.68 91.2 426.72 Use CN 91 Frequency .................................. Rainfall, P (24-hour) .............................. Runoff, Q.................................. (use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2-4) yr in in Storm #1 1 2.40 1.52 Storm #2 2 2.88 1.96 Storm #3 Storm #4 10 100 4.18 6.54 3.19 5.49 \\Leesburg-NAS\MRA\Projects\Northeastern Supply\Comps\SWM\Northeastern TR-55 11 /29/2018 20 TR-55 Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (TJ or Travel Time (TJ Project By Date Northeastern DLT 8/31 /2018 Location DA-A Checked Date Frederick Co, VA Check one: O Present Developed O Developed w/Credits Check one: 0 Tc Tt through subarea Note: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Segment ID AB 1. Surface description (table 3-1)...... ...... .......... ....... ...... ........... Smooth 2. Manning's roughness coefficient, In (table 3-1) ............................. 0.011 3. Flow length, L (total L <- 100 ft) 1. 1 -... ...........1... ft 100 4. Two-year 24-hour rainfall, Pz......................................... in 2.88 5. Land slope, s............................................................ I...... ft/ft 0.02 6. 0.007 (nL)08 Compute T, ............ T, _ P2 0 5S0 4 hr 0.021 + Segment ID BC BC 7. Surface description (paved or unpaved) -............_.._......... Paved Unpaved 158 8. Flow length, L......................................... I........................ ft 28 9. Watercourse slope, s -- .... .................... ft/ft 0.02 0.02 10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1)............. I..................... ft/s 2.87 2.28 11. L Compute Tt ............ _ T, hr 0.003 = 0.022 + 0.019 3600 V Segment ID 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft2 13. Wetted perimeter, pW.................................................. ft 14. Hydraulic radius, r = a/pv, Compute r _ .. ....... ...I ........ .._.... _.. ft 15. Channel slope, s........................................................... ft/ft 16. Manning's roughness coefficient, n........................................... 17. 1.49 rzis s"z V = Compute V ............. ft/s n 18. Flow length, L........................................................... ft 19. L Compute Tt ............ = Tt hr + - 3600 V 20. Watershed or subarea T, or T, (add T, in steps 6, 11 and 19) ......... ................................. hr 0.04 %.,.wociotutdyiUiwasKiuP\rveiuiedstern 0uPpiyw,ernps\avvivnivorineastern I m-oo 9/21 /2018 21 TR-55 Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff Project Northeastern By DLT Date 8/31 /2018 Location Other Areas Frederick Co, VA Checked Date Check one: O Present * Developed O Developed w/Credits Soil name and hydrologic group (appendix A) Cover Description (cover type, treatment, and hydrologic condition; percent impervious; unconnected/connected impervious area ratio) CN' Area acres ❑ sq.mi. ❑ % Product of CN x area N CN d R H M N a) :3 m u- N a)0 IL C Open Space, Good condition 74 0.06 4.44 ' Use only one CN source per line total product CN (weighted) _ _ total area Totals 4.44 = 0.1 0.06 74.0 4.44 Use CN 74 Frequency .................................. Rainfall, P (24-hour).................................. Runoff, Q.................................. (use P and CN with table 2-1, figure 2-1, or equations 2-3 and 2-4) yr in in Storm #1 1 2.40 0.55 Storm #2 2 2.88 0.83 Storm #3 Storm #4 10 100 4.18 6.54 r 1.73 3.64 \Users\dtaylor\Desktop\Northeastern Supply\Comps\SWM\Northeastern TR-55 9/25/2018 22 1 Watershed Model Schematic Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 w V3 Legend yd Origin Description 1 SCS Runoff PRE DA-A 2 SCS Runoff PRE DA-B 3 Combine PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff POST DA-A Project: DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw I Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Return Period Recap Hydra w Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph No. type hyd(s) Description (origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 1 SCS Runoff ----- 1.810 3.059 ----- ------- 7.056 ------- ---- -- 15.58 PRE DA-A 2 SCS Runoff ------ 1.096 1.852 ------ ----- 4.272 ------- ------- 9.433 PRE DA-B 3 Combine 1,2 2.905 4.911 ---- ------- 11.33 ------- --- 25.01 PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff ---- 11.78 15.02 ------ ------- 23.80 ----- ------ 39.53 POST DA-A Proj. file: DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description PRE DA-A 1 SCS Runoff 1.810 2 720 4,719 ------ ------ ------ 2 SCS Runoff 1.096 2 720 2,857 ----- ------ ------ PRE DA-B 3 Combine 2.905 2 720 7,576 1,2 ------ ------ PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff 11.78 2 716 24,204 -- ------ ------ POST DA-A DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk(D Civil 3138 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE DA-A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 2.940 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 2.40 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor Q (Cfs) 2.00 1.00 PRE DA-A Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 Hyd No. 1 4 Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 = 1.810 cfs = 720 min = 4,719 cuft = 71 = Oft = 7.20 min = Type II = 484 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) 26 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 3.059 2 720 7,389 ------ ------ ------ PRE DA-A 2 SCS Runoff 1.852 2 720 4,474 ------ ------ ------ PRE DA-B 3 Combine 4.911 2 720 11,863 1,2 ------ ------ PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff 15.02 2 716 31,210 ------ ------ ------ POST DA-A DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Report 6 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE DA-A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 2.940 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 2.88 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor Q (Cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 PRE DA-A Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 Hyd No. 1 Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 = 3.059 cfs = 720 min = 7,389 cuft = 71 = Oft = 7.20 min = Type II = 484 Q (Cfs) 4.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) m Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 7.056 2 720 16,208 ------ ----- ------ PRE DA-A 2 SCS Runoff 4.272 2 720 9,813 ---- ---- ------ PRE DA-B 3 Combine 11.33 2 720 26,020 1,2 --- ------ PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff 23.80 2 716 50,805 ------ ---- ------ POST DA-A DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Report 8 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE DA-A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 2.940 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 4.18 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 0 (Cfs) 8.00 . 00 4.00 2.00 PRE DA-A Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 = 7.056 cfs = 720 min = 16,208 cuft = 71 = Oft = 7.20 min = Type II = 484 0 (Cfs) 8.00 M 4.00 2.00 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) 30 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 15.58 2 718 35,641 ------ ------ ------ PRE DA-A 2 SCS Runoff 9.433 2 718 21,579 ----- ------ ------ PRE DA-B 3 Combine 25.01 2 718 57,220 1,2 ------ ------ PRE DEVELOPED 4 SCS Runoff 39.53 2 716 87,383 ----- ------ ----- POST DA-A DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Hydrograph Report 10 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE DA-A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 2.940 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 6.54 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 15.00 12.00 WIN .W 3.00 Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 = 15.58 cfs = 718 min = 35,641 cuft = 71 = Oft = 7.20 min = Type II = 484 PRE DA-A Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Q (Cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 M I 3.00 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) Mott Hydraflow Rainfall Report 11 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Return Period Intensity -Duration -Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) (Yrs) B D E (N/A) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 2 69.8703 13.1000 0.8658 -------- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------- 5 79.2597 14.6000 0.8369 ----- 10 88.2351 15.5000 0.8279 -------- 25 102.6072 16.5000 0.8217 -------- 50 114.8193 17.2000 0.8199 ----- 100 127.1596 17.8000 0.8186 ------- File name: SampleFHA.idf Intensity = B / (Tc + D)^E Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Return Period Intensity Values (in/hr) (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 0.00 25 30 35 40 45 50 0.00 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 5.69 4.61 3.89 3.38 2.99 2.69 2.44 2.24 2.07 1.93 1.81 1.70 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 6.57 5.43 4.65 4.08 3.65 3.30 3.02 2.79 2.59 2.42 2.27 2.15 10 7.24 6.04 5.21 4.59 4.12 3.74 3.43 3.17 2.95 2.77 2.60 2.46 25 8.25 6.95 6.03 5.34 4.80 4.38 4.02 3.73 3.48 3.26 3.07 2.91 50 9.04 7.65 6.66 5.92 5.34 4.87 4.49 4.16 3.88 3.65 3.44 3.25 100 9.83 8.36 7.30 6.50 5.87 5.36 4.94 4.59 4.29 4.03 3.80 3.60 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60. Storm Distribution SCS 24-h o SCS 6-Hr Huff-1 st Huff-2nd Huff-3rd Huff-4th Huff-Indy Custom r-reci . ma e name: am ie. c Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr ur 2.40 2.88 0.00 3.30 4.18 5.03 6.80 6.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 0.00 5.38 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 &00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.80 0.00 5.25 6.00 0.00 Hydraflow Table of Contents DRAINAGE AREAS.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Friday, 09 / 21 / 2018 Watershed Model Schematic...................................................................................... 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap............................................................................. 2 1 -Year SummaryReport ......................................................................................................................... 3 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, PRE DA-A............................................................................ 4 2 - Year SummaryReport ......................................................................................................................... 5 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, PRE DA-A............................................................................ 6 10 -Year SummaryReport ......................................................................................................................... 7 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 8 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, PRE DA-A............................................................................ 8 100 - Year SummaryReport ......................................................................................................................... 9 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 10 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, PRE DA-A.......................................................................... 10 OFReport .................................................................................................................. 11 34 1 Watershed Model Schematic Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk(D Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Legend yd Origin Description 1 SCS Runoff Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine Outfall #1 Project: POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Hydrograph Return Period ReHydra wcap Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph No. type hyd(s) Description (origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 1 SCS Runoff ------ 11.78 15.02 ------ ------- 23.80 ------- ------ 39.53 Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir 1 0.576 1.097 --- ----- 11.11 ------- ------- 14.50 SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff ------ 0.055 0.084 ----- ------- 0.176 ------- ------- 0.367 Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine 2,3 0.587 1.105 ------- ------- 11.20 ------ ----- 14.69 Outfall #1 Proj. file: POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Tuesday, 09 ! 25 / 2018 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 11.78 2 716 24,204 ------ ------ ------ Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir 0.576 2 782 24,197 1 707.55 12,069 SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff 0.055 2 718 113 --- ----- ----- Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine 0.587 2 720 24,310 2,3 ------ ------ Outfall #1 POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hydrograph Report 4 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 31DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 1 Post -Developed A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 11.78 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 24,204 cuft Drainage area = 4.680 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.40 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 12.00 10.00 out . 80 4.00 2.00 M Post -Developed A Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Q (Cfs) 12.00 10.00 m . We 4.00 2.00 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 2 SWM Pond Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Post -Developed A Max. Elevation Reservoir name = SWM Pond Max. Storage Storage Indication method used 10.00 :IS . 8 4.00 2.00 0.00 0 SWM Pond Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 0.576 cfs = 782 min = 24,197 cuft = 707.55 ft = 12,069 cuft Q (Cfs) 12.00 10.00 00 . We 4.00 2.00 0.00 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Total storage used = 12,069 Cuft Time (min) 39 Pond Report 6 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Pond No. 1 - SWM Pond Pond Data Pond storage is based on user -defined values. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 705.50 n/a 0 0 0.50 706.00 n/a 398 398 1.50 707.00 n/a 4,663 5,060 2.50 708.00 n/a 12,800 17,860 3.50 709.00 n/a 16,732 34,592 4.50 710.00 n/a 18,456 53,048 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 18.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 18.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 707.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 705.50 705.50 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = 1 --- --- --- Length (ft) = 36.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes No No No Slope (%) = 0.50 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area) Multi -Stage = n/a No No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Note- Culvert/Ordice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 705.50 0.00 0.00 --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.000 0.05 40 705.55 0.00 0.01 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- 0.006 0.10 80 705.60 0.00 0.02 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- 0.024 0.15 119 705.65 0.00 0.05 is --- --- 0.00 -- --- --- --- 0.050 0.20 159 705.70 0.00 0.08 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.083 0.25 199 705.75 0.00 0.12 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.119 0.30 239 705.80 0.00 0.15 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.154 0.35 278 705.85 0.00 0.18 is --- -- 0.00 --- --- --- -- --- 0.180 0.40 318 705.90 0.00 0.20 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- 0.203 0.45 358 705.95 0.00 0.22 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.224 0.50 398 706.00 0.00 0.24 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.243 0.60 864 706.10 0.00 0.28 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.277 0.70 1,330 706.20 0.00 0.31 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- -- --- --- 0.307 0.80 1,796 706.30 0.00 0.33 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.334 0.90 2,263 706.40 0.00 0.36 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- -- 0.360 1.00 2,729 706.50 0.00 0.38 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.383 1.10 3,195 706.60 0.00 0.41 is --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.406 1.20 3,661 706.70 0.00 0.43 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.427 1.30 4,128 706.80 0.00 0.45 is --- -- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.447 1.40 4,594 706.90 0.00 0.47 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.467 1.50 5,060 707.00 0.00 0.49 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.485 1.60 6,340 707.10 0.00 0.50 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.503 1.70 7,620 707.20 0.00 0.52 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- -- 0.520 1.80 8,900 707.30 0.00 0.54 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.537 1.90 10,180 707.40 0.00 0.55 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.553 2.00 11,460 707.50 0.00 0.57 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.569 2.10 12,740 707.60 0.00 0.58 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.584 2.20 14,020 707.70 0.00 0.60 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.599 2.30 15,300 707.80 0.00 0.61 is --- --- 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- 0.614 2.40 16,580 707.90 2.14 oc 0.63 is --- --- 2.10 --- --- --- --- --- 2.727 2.50 17,860 708.00 5.96 oc 0.64 is --- --- 5.96 --- --- --- --- --- 6.599 2.60 19,533 708.10 10.06 oc 0.66 is --- --- 10.06 s --- --- --- --- --- 10.71 2.70 21,206 708.20 10.97 oc 0.67 is --- --- 10.97 s --- --- --- --- --- 11.64 2.80 22,879 708.30 11.55 oc 0.68 is --- --- 11.54 s --- --- --- --- --- 12.22 2.90 24,552 708.40 12.02 oc 0.69 is --- --- 12.01 s --- --- --- --- --- 12.70 3.00 26,226 708.50 12.44 oc 0.71 is --- --- 12.44 s --- --- --- --- --- 13.15 3.10 27,899 708.60 12.84 oc 0.72 is --- --- 12.83 s --- --- --- --- --- 13.55 3.20 29,572 708.70 13.21 oc 0.73 is --- --- 13.19 s --- --- --- --- --- 13.93 Continues on next page... 40 FA SWM Pond Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Civ C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 3.30 31,245 708.80 13.56 is 0.74 is --- --- 13.54 s --- --- --- --- --- 14.28 3.40 32,919 708.90 13.83 is 0.76 is --- --- 13.77 s --- --- --- --- --- 14.52 3.50 34,592 709.00 14.09 is 0.77 is --- --- 14.02 s --- --- --- --- --- 14.79 3.60 36,437 709.10 14.35 is 0.78 is --- --- 14.26 s --- --- --- --- --- 15.04 3.70 38,283 709.20 14.60 is 0.79 is --- --- 14.49 s --- --- --- --- --- 15.28 3.80 40,129 709.30 14.85 is 0.80 is --- --- 14.77 s --- --- --- --- --- 15.57 3.90 41,974 709.40 15.09 is 0.81 is --- --- 14.98 s --- --- --- --- -_ 15.79 4.00 43,820 709.50 15.33 is 0.82 is --- --- 15.31 s --- --- -- --- -- 16.13 4.10 45,666 709.60 15.57 is 0.83 is --- --- 15.45 s --- --- --- --- --- 16.29 4.20 47,511 709.70 15.80 is 0.84 is --- --- 15.79 s --- --- --- --- --- 16.64 4.30 49,357 709.80 16.02 is 0.85 is --- --- 15.91 s --- --- --- --- --- 16.76 4.40 51,202 709.90 16.25 is 0.86 is --- --- 15.94 s --- --- --- --- --- 16.81 4.50 53,048 710.00 16.47 is 0.87 is --- --- 16.25 s --- --- --- --- --- 17.12 ...End 41 Hydrograph Report 8 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 31DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 0.060 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 2.40 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor AM 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 3 -- 1 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 0.055 cfs = 718 min = 113 cuft = 74 = Oft = 5.00 min = Type II = 484 Q (Cfs) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 42 Hydrograph Report 9 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 4 Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 0.587 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 24,310 cuft Inflow hyds. = 2, 3 Contrib. drain. area = 0.060 ac Q (Cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 4 -- 1 Year Q (Cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 - __1 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 — Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 43 10 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 15.02 2 716 31,210 ------ ---- ----- Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir 1.097 2 750 31,204 1 707.82 15,592 SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff 0.084 2 718 170 ------ ------ ------ Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine 1.105 2 750 31,374 2,3 ------ ------ Outfall#1 POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hydrograph Report 11 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 31DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 1 Post -Developed A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 15.02 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 31,210 cuft Drainage area = 4.680 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.88 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 15.00 12.00 • IN WE 3.00 0.00 0 Post -Developed A Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year Q (Cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 .0 3.00 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) 45 Hydrograph Report 12 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 2 SWM Pond Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Post -Developed A Max. Elevation Reservoir name = SWM Pond Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. 15.00 12.00 .IM 3.00 0.00 0 SWM Pond Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 1.097 cfs = 750 min = 31,204 cuft = 707.82 ft = 15,592 cuft Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 . �1 3.00 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Total storage used = 15,592 cult Time (min) 46 Hydrograph Report 13 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 0.060 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 2.88 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor M.. W 1- 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 0.084 cfs = 718 min = 170 cuft = 74 = Oft = 5.00 min = Type II = 484 Q (Cfs) 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 47 Hydrograph Report 14 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 4 Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyds. = 2, 3 Contrib. drain. area Q (Cfs) 2.00 1.00 Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 4 -- 2 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 1.105 cfs = 750 min = 31,374 cuft = 0.060 ac Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 48 15 Hydrograph Summary Report Peak Time Time to Hyd. HydraFlow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) ----- 1 SCS Runoff 23.80 2 716 50,805 --- ------ Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir 11.11 2 722 50,799 1 708.14 20,256 SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff 0.176 2 718 353 --- ------ ------ Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine 11.20 2 722 51,152 2,3 ------ ------ Outfall #1 POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 16 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 1 Post -Developed A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 23.80 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 50,805 cuft Drainage area = 4.680 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 4.18 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 e 4.00 Post -Developed A Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year 120 240 360 480 600 Hyd No. 1 720 Q (Cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 4.00 0.00 840 960 1080 1200 Time (min) 50 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 2 SWM Pond Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Post -Developed A Max. Elevation Reservoir name = SWM Pond Max. Storage Storage Indication method used Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 51 SWM Pond Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year 17 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 11.11 cfs = 722 min = 50,799 cuft = 708.14 ft = 20,256 cuft Q (cfs) 24.00 16.00 12.00 I 4.00 0.00 1200 1440 1680 1920 Total storage used = 20,256 cult Time (min) Hydrograph Report 18 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 0.060 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 4.18 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor Q (Cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 0.176 cfs = 718 min = 353 cuft = 74 = Oft = 5.00 min = Type II = 484 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 52 Hydrograph Report 19 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 4 Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 11.20 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 51,152 cuft Inflow hyds. = 2, 3 Contrib. drain. area = 0.060 ac Q (Cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0 240 480 720 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year Q (Cfs) 12.00 10.00 W we] 4.00 2.00 0.00 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 I - Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 53 20 Hydrograph Summary ReportN ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk®Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 39.53 2 716 87,383 ------ ------ ------ Post -Developed A 2 Reservoir 14.50 2 722 87,377 1 708.91 32,776 SWM Pond 3 SCS Runoff 0.367 2 716 744 ------ ------ ------ Other Areas to Outfall #1 4 Combine 14.69 2 722 88,121 2,3 ------ ------ Outfall#1 POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Tuesday, 09 ! 25 12018 Hydrograph Report 21 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 1 Post -Developed A Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 39.53 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 716 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 87,383 cuft Drainage area = 4.680 ac Curve number = 91 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 6.54 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 40.00 9M 20.00 10.00 Post -Developed A Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year 120 240 360 480 600 Hyd No. 1 720 840 Q (Cfs) 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 960 1080 1200 Time (min) Hydrograph Report 22 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3130 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 2 SWM Pond Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Post -Developed A Max. Elevation Reservoir name = SWM Pond Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 SWM Pond Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 14.50 cfs = 722 min = 87,377 cult = 708.91 ft = 32,776 cuft 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Total storage used = 32,776 cuft Q (cfs) 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1920 Time (min) M. Hydrograph Report 23 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 0.060 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 6.54 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 Other Areas to Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Year Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 = 0.367 cfs = 716 min = 744 cuft = 74 = Oft = 5.00 min = Type II = 484 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) 57 Hydrograph Report 24 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3DO 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Hyd. No. 4 Outfall #1 Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 14.69 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 88,121 cuft Inflow hyds. = 2, 3 Contrib. drain. area = 0.060 ac 12.00 AMR • l eJ 3.00 Outfall #1 Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Year 240 480 720 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 960 1200 - Hyd No. 3 1440 1680 Q (Cfs) 15.00 12.00 1N 3.00 0.00 1920 Time (min) Hydraflow Rainfall Report 25 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3138 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Return Period Intensity -Duration -Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) (Yrs) B D E (N/A) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----- 2 69.8703 13.1000 0.8658 --- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------- 5 79.2597 14.6000 0.8369 -------- 10 88.2351 15.5000 0.8279 ------ 25 102.6072 16.5000 0.8217 -- 50 114.8193 17.2000 0.8199 -------- 100 127.1596 17.8000 0.8186 -------- File name: SampleFHA.idf Intensity = B / (Tc + D)^E Return Period Intensity Values (in/hr) (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 5.69 4.61 3.89 3.38 2.99 2.69 2.44 2.24 2.07 1.93 1.81 1.70 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 6.57 5.43 4.65 4.08 3.65 3.30 3.02 2.79 2.59 2.42 2.27 2.15 10 7.24 6.04 5.21 4.59 4.12 3.74 3.43 3.17 2.95 2.77 2.60 2.46 25 8.25 6.95 6.03 5.34 4.80 4.38 4.02 3.73 3.48 3.26 3.07 2.91 50 9.04 7.65 6.66 5.92 5.34 4.87 4.49 4.16 3.88 3.65 3.44 3.25 100 9.83 8.36 7.30 6.50 5.87 5.36 4.94 4.59 4.29 4.03 3.80 3.60 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60. Precio. file name: SamDle.ncn Storm Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 60-yr 100-yr SCS 24-hour 2.40 2.88 0.00 3.30 4.18 5.03 6.80 6.54 SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 0.00 5.38 6.50 0.00 Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.80 0.00 5.25 6.00 0.00 Hydraflow Table of Contents POST -DEVELOPED TO POND-2.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Tuesday, 09 / 25 / 2018 Watershed Model Schematic...................................................................................... 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap............................................................................. 2 1 -Year SummaryReport......................................................................................................................... 3 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Post -Developed A................................................................ 4 Hydrograph No. 2, Reservoir, SWM Pond................................................................................ 5 PondReport - SWM Pond................................................................................................... 6 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Other Areas to Outfall#1...................................................... 8 Hydrograph No. 4, Combine, Outfall#1................................................................................... 9 2 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 10 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 11 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Post -Developed A.............................................................. 11 Hydrograph No. 2, Reservoir, SWM Pond.............................................................................. 12 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Other Areas to Outfall#1....... :............................................ 13 Hydrograph No. 4, Combine, Outfall#1................................................................................. 14 10 -Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 15 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 16 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Post -Developed A.............................................................. 16 Hydrograph No. 2, Reservoir, SWM Pond.............................................................................. 17 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Other Areas to Outfall#1.................................................... 18 Hydrograph No. 4, Combine, Outfall#1................................................................................. 19 100 - Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 20 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 21 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Post -Developed A.............................................................. 21 Hydrograph No. 2, Reservoir, SWM Pond.............................................................................. 22 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, Other Areas to Outfall#1.................................................... 23 Hydrograph No. 4, Combine, Outfall#1................................................................................. 24 OFReport.................................................................................................................. 25 w ENERGY BALANCE COMPUTATIONS 1 YEAR STORM HYDROLOGY SUMMARY PRE -DEVELOPED POST DEVELOPED NO RR TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 4.74 4.74 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 71 91 RUNOFF VOLUME (IN) 0.44 1.52 RUNOFF VOLUME (AC -FT) 0.17 0.60 PEAK DISCHARGE (CFS) 2.90 11.78 POST DEVELOPED ALLOWED PEAK DISCHARGE (CFS) N/A 0.67 STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED (AC -FT) N/A 0.33 POST -DEVELOPED ALLOWED PEAK DISCHARGE WITHOUT RR gpost<_ gpre(Rvpre/Rvpost)(IF) gpost<_ 2.90 cfs (0.44/1.52) (0.8) gpost<_ 0.67 cfs STORAGE REQUIRED WITHOUT RR Vs/Vr= Vs/0.60= 0.55 vs= 0.33 qo/qi= 0.67/11.78= 0.06 Vs/Vr= 0.55 61 STORMWATER QUANTITY CONTROL SUMMARY PRE -DEVELOPMENT POST -DEVELOPMENT 1-YR EVENT 10-YR EVENT 100-YEAR EVENT 1-YR EVENT 10-YR EVENT 100-YEAR EVENT FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) FLOW (CFS) VOLUME (AF) 2.91 1 0.17 11.33 0.60 2S.01 1.31 0.59 0.27 11.20 0.70 14.69 1 1.2S 62 Appendices 63 \ 7, 0�21 J ,1 1 \ WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC TAX MAP: 54-4-1-� INST#030005223 1 ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL \ 7 9 1 y EX CABLE PEWST WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC 1 TAX MAP. 54-4-3 1r` INST/ 030DO5223 ` ZONED: MI 1 LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 1 1 1 1 "]7'Di te'E �687 97' i \ I SHOCKEY, JAMES D & RALPH D \ TAX MAP: 54-1-A \ •`\ ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL PRE -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA SGALE: I "= 50' RR It 1 1 1 ,I 1,1 FORT COLDER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-A-36A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL \ 1 1 1 I t 1 N 7S 04' 18' E I• t �887.9J' 1 L RF 1 1 1 10 92 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ww _. _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 1 11, \ 1 I 1 I WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC 1 ,\ ,� , \ \ 11 FORT COLLIER GROUP LC TAX MAP: 54-4-1 \ 1� 11 I q DA-A 1 1 rax MAP: 54-A-36A INST/030005223 - I m \ZONED: MI ZONED: MI 1 ` \ 4.68 AC TO SWIM II 1 LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 1 7 9. £. \ 1 POND p 1 S 6 49• E 30 9.e4, yp,. •��`F LLOWPATH J \ EX CABLE PEKS1 WINCHESTER COLD STORAGE LC ' TAX MAP: 54-4-3 \- INST# 030005223 C ZONED: MI 1 LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL 3J'02.49' ______-_-___-___-_ _____-_-______________ IG 81:vv -ury -u a1v— urv—.—cnrv—un—uW iv—urvux—rwn_1_T�a'_�J}._ ..�,t716 -..- WEST BReoKE ROAD-- ROD - - CABL��EDESTAL 35 MPH SPEEPLIILL� SHOCKEY, JAMES D & RALPH D TAX MAP: 54-1-A ZONED: MI LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL POST -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA SGALE: I "= 50' w 111 F V Z U Co J m� Q o_� W Q Lu Lu E Q < W ~ Q LLJ 0 � Lu O Q QU)W2i� Z w _J ILLi-Q>Lw > O Of O 1Z Z Q 0 aU) [C a JOB NO.: 20057 SCALE, 1*-W 50 0 50 100 150 DATE: 10/01/16 DRAWN BY: DLT Scale 1" = 50' DESIGN BY JKE REVIEW BY: JKE SHEET: 14 OF 26