The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-07 Renaissance Commercial Center Commercial - Back Creek - Backfile (2)MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRACKING SHEET (Note: The application does not need to be complete to be accepted but will not be scheduled for the PC or BOS until all items have been received.) Submission Package Comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: VDOT County Engineer Fire Marshal City of Winchester Sanitation Authority GIS (Mapping) Inspections Dept. Parks & Recreation Health Department Winchester Regional Airport ✓ One copy of the master development plan application. L—" Appropriate number of blueprint plans, colored maps, etc. to cover the PC and BOS meetings. Submission Fee TRACKING Date g�qo Application received o Fee Paid (amount: S 7 f ) / Preliminary MDP heard by Planning Commission - Action taken: Preliminary MDP heard by Board of Supervisors - Action taken: *74-�� Letter to applicant regarding Board action and revisions (if required). Final MDP submitted with review agency, PC and BOS comments addressed. Final MDP signed by County Administrator and Planning Director (send two copies to applicant). ] Administratively approved; letter sent to applicant. NOTES: M DATE: /� n7 File opened. t t� Reference Manual updated/number assigned. t 0 *1 D-base updated. o List of adjoiners given to staff member for verification. e 6L�o/C-- O ' laek °- -- ate location map requested from Mapping & Graphics. Four sets of labels requested from Data Processing. 14 D i e given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary. CLOSE OUT FILE: Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant (*Note: Be sure Joe Wilder in Public works and Jane Anderson in Real Estate receive a copy of the administrative approval letter. Jane wants a copy of the final action letter even if the application was denied or withdrawn.) File stamped "approved" T„denied" or "withdrawn." /4 d Reference Manual updated. l 07 D-base updated. l� D *V- 'Ile given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary. File in file drawer. U \Cool\CommonlTrackmg sheets\TRACKING.MDP Rev OIR1103 v N O O N O N N DATE Q- NO. 7'285 ❑ FOR RENT c f� r`f �j� n ❑FOR '1 ��} 1�e3 `ill-- l � .�� AMT. OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID �� CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER -75 A-, BY -0. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-565 Z FAX: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Memo to Files: Artillery Business Center Rezoning (Rezoning #08-07) vRenaissance Commercial Center (MDP #10-07) FROM: John A. Bishop AICP, Deputy Director - Transpbrtation� RE: CSX Crossing DATE: March 16, 2009 Written correspondence and working papers directly related to the procurement on a new railroad crossing associated with this development and connecting with Renaissance Drive on the Renaissance Commercial Center is located in a separate file in the transportation files labeled "New CSX Crossing —Renaissance Drive". JAB/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 v sow,� ti••- • Benjamin P. Biesterveld Principal Engineer -Public Projects 500 Water Street (S/C J301) Jacksonville, FL 32202 Tel. 904-359-1158 Benjamin_Biesterveld@csx.com March 10, 2009 Mr. John A. Bishop Deputy Director -Transportation County of Frederick 107 North Kent St., Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Subject: Establishing a new crossing in Stevens City, Virginia: Renaissance Drive. Dear Mr. Bishop: This letter is to acknowledge your letter dated February 17, 2009 received by CSX Transportation Public Projects March 9, 2009 regarding a formal request for a new crossing at the above location. CSXT is willing to work with the County to establish the new crossing as long as the following requirements are met: ♦ The three (3) crossings shown below will be closed: o Springdale Road (Route 649) o Cougill Road (Route 634) o Emporia, Virginia — Park Avenue (Closure already in process) ♦ CSX will not be responsible for any costs associated with the design and construction of the subject project as will be laid out in the Preliminary Engineering and Construction Agreements. If I can be of further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, Benjamin iesterveld Principal Engineer, Public Projects cc: David Farley COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 November 14, 2007 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-07 FOR RENAISSANCE COMMERCIAL CENTER; Final Master Development Plan Approval Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2C and 75-A-2R Dear Evan: Frederick County administratively approved the above -referenced final master development plan on November 9, 2007. The master development plan is approved for the potential development of 10.84 acres in the B2 (Business General) Zoning District and 11.26 acres in the B3 (Industrial Transition) Zoning District within the Back Creek Magisterial District. This site is approved for commercial land uses as depicted on the plan. The properties which would comprise this development are located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of its intersection of Prosperity Drive. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors granted staff administrative approval authority on September 26, 2007. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance have been addressed in the plan. Please note that approval of a site plan is required prior to the development of this parcel. I am providing you with five (5) copies of the approved master development plan. Please ensure that these plans are distributed accordingly. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this Master Development Plan. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/bad cc: Barbara Van Osten, Back Creek District Supervisor Cordell Watt and Greg Unger, Back Creek District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Patrick Barker, EDC Commissioner of Revenue Public Works Jasbo, Inc., P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-07 RENAISSANCE .COMMERCIAL CENTER Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: September 17, 2007 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also he useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Planning Commission: 09/05/07 Board of Supervisors: 09/26/07 Action Recommended Approval Pending LOCATION: The subject property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of its intersection of Prosperity Drive. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER(s): 75-A-2, 75-A-2B, 75-A-2C and 75-A-2R PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: B2 (General Business) District Use: Vacant and Commercial . B3 (Industrial Transition Business) District ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North: RA (Rural Areas) B2 (Business General) B3 (Industrial Transition) South: RA (Rural Areas) B2 (Business General) East: B2 (Business General) West: RA (Rural Areas) PROPOSED USE: Commercial Uses Use: Agricultural Commercial Commercial Use: Religious/Residential Commercial/DMV Use: Commercial/Vacant Use: Agricultural • MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center September 17, 2007 Page 2 \ REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virsinia Department of Transportation: The preliminary master plan for this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. While the preliminary master plan, appears acceptable, VDOT requests clarification of the existing commercial entrance on the east side of Route 11 in reference to the proposed entrance location for this development. Before making any final comments, this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the `I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of- way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Prior to construction on the State's right-of-way, the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Plans approved as submitted. Frederick County Public Works: We have no comments at this time. However, we reserve the right to perform a detailed review at the time of the site plan review. At that time, we will expect a regional stormwater facility to be designed on property 75-A-2 to serve the entire area included in the MDP dated March 2007. Frederick County Inspections Department: Please note that demolition shall be required prior to the removal of any existing structures. No additional comment required at this time. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: 2nd review. Approved. GIS Department: Renaissance Dr. has been approved and added into the Frederick County Road Naming System. Winchester Regional Airport: This Master Plan has been reviewed and it appears that it should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's close in Part 77 surfaces. Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all. requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center September 17, 2007 Page 3 B) Location The subject property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of its intersection of Prosperity Drive. C) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephens City, VA Quadrangle) depicts the zoning for the four subject parcels as B2 (Business General) District. Parcels 75-A-2 and 75- A-213 are historically zoned B2 and, therefore, there are no proffers associated with them. With Rezoning #11-98, Parcel 75-A-2R (75-A-2R was part of 75-A-2D when the site was rezoned) was rezoned to the B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning district with proffers. With Rezoning #12-86, Parcel 75-A-2D was rezoned from the B2 (Business General) zoning district to the B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning district. This property does not have proffers. D) Site Suitability & Project Scope Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use Compatibility: The properties are located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Sewer and Water Service Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of planned, commercial and industrial development will occur. In addition, the Renaissance Commercial Center properties are located within the area encompassed by the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan. The Southern Frederick Land Use Plan envisions this area remaining commercial. The properties are currently zoned B2 (Business General) and B3 (Industrial Transition) and, therefore, the development is in accordance with the goals of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan identifies a new major collector road running through this property which would connect Valley Pike (Route 11) to Shady Elm Road. Prosperity Drive would also be extended from its current terminus and would intersect with this new road. This Master Development Plan provides for the dedication of an 80 foot right-of-way to accommodate the new major collector road and is constructing two lanes of the road through the development. The MDP also accounts for the extension of Prosperity Drive to connect into the new road as well as the construction of an additional thru lane on Valley Pike and five foot sidewalks along the front of the property. MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center September 17, 2007 Page 4 The Master Development Plan currently shows one full entrance onto Valley Pike (Route 11) with the public street connection of Renaissance Drive. The MDP also has a note that states that only one full entrance will be permitted on Valley Pike, but this note also states that right- in/right-out entrances will not be prohibited. Valley Pike is classified as a minor arterial street and since this property will have direct access to Renaissance Drive, individual access to Valley Pike should be prohibited with this MDP. Staff Note: At the September S, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting, the applicant stated that they were willing to restrict the entrances on the property to one full entrance (Renaissance Drive) and a right in only between Renaissance Drive and the northern property line and a right out only between Renaissance Drive and the southern property line. Buffer Modification The MDP accounts for the required full screen buffers between the B2 and the B3 zoned properties as indicated by buffer areas 1 and 2. The plan also shows an area shaded with a 50 foot distance screen which is associated with buffer area 2. The detail for buffer area 2 references a buffer modification. § 165-37D(7) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance states: Where B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning adjoins B2 (Business General) zoning on land contained within a master development plan, the Planning Commission may allow for specific modifications in screening requirements. This modification is at the Planning Commission's discretion. The area requesting the modification is internal to the development, the buffer distance has not been reduced and the number of trees has not been reduced, only shifted. The applicant is proposing to take the 60 required buffer plantings from the area shaded for the distance screen and use these plantings to supplement the remainder of the buffer. Staff Note: The Planning Commission at their September S, 2007 meeting approved the applicant's request for a buffer modification; action from the Board of Supervisors is not required for this modification. Proffers — Only parcel 75-A-2D, which is part of the Kernstown Business Park, has proffers. The proffers from Rezoning #11-98 state that a strip of land 60 feet in width shall be dedicated to the County of Frederick for the purpose of providing a future collector road which will connect Valley Pike with Shady Elm Road. This proffer is accounted for with the Master Development Plan. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/05/07 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The master development plan for the Renaissance Commercial Center depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. All of the issues brought forth by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. With this application, the applicant is also requesting that the Planning Commission grant them a modification for the zoning district buffer. This is strictly a Planning Commission permitted modification; action from the Board of Supervisors is MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center • September 17, 2007 Page 5 not required. Staff would note that there are two actions required with this application, one for the MDP and another for the modification request. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 09/05/07 MEETING: There were members of the Commission who did not support the addition of right -in, right -out accesses on Route 11 and believed Renaissance Drive should be the sole access point. Their view was that multiple exits and entrances through this area would create a confusing situation for the traveling public, especially after Renaissance Drive is extended to Shady Elm. Some preferred to see the same entrance design as Prosperity Drive with the open front area and green space, the building setback, and a consistency of design through this area. A member of the Commission suggested that any additional entrance should have its own taper lane to get traffic out of the movement going into Renaissance Drive. Another member of the Commission wanted to see Renaissance Drive extended further north. The County's Transportation Planner stated that principles of access management would identify Route 11 to be the priority in the hierarchy of roads in this area and as such, Route 11 should keep traffic moving with minimal delays. In addition, this area is not median -controlled. He noted that the applicant can meet entrance spacing per the county code; however, the staff s preference is to have Renaissance Drive be the sole access for this development. It was the applicant's opinion that the right -in, right -out options would assist traffic movement by providing additional access as opposed to funneling all of the traffic to one point, which could create future stacking and queuing problems. The applicant stated they would be willing to limit the access points to a right -in at the northern portion of the site and a right -out at the southern portion of the site. The applicant added that their reasons for shifting the buffer elements were based on the potential for shared parking and better land use planning between the two parcels. There were no public comments. Given the current ordinance requirements, the Commission's view was that the applicant was making a compromise on what the entrance spacing situation could be at this location. By a majority vote, the Planning Commission approved the buffer modification and recommended approval of the master development plan. The majority vote was as follows: YES (TO APPROVE): Mohn, Kerr, Kriz, Ours, Thomas, Light, Morris, Manuel, Unger NO: Oates, Wilmot (Note: Commissioners Triplett and Watt were absent from the meeting.) STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/26/07 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The master development plan for the Renaissance Commercial Center depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, the preliminary Master Development Plan for the Renaissance Commercial MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center September 17, 2007 Page 6 Center is in a form that is administratively approvable. All of the issues brought forth by the Board of Supervisors should be appropriately addressed by the applicant. The applicant is seeking approval authorization of the preliminary master development Plan by the Board of Supervisors. The Board's authorization will grant staff with administrative approval authority for the final master development plan. I 37 Frederick County, VA 63 iirATTS, q RICHARD L yFs y TF�? Master Development Plan A MDP # 10 - 07 37 _ �9 `� Application a�P 37 Renaissance 75 A 1 VENTURE IOF WINCHESTER,LLC �yP?`'� JP e v 37 Commercial m� o Center � 37 Parcel ID: 37 Location in the County 75 - A - 2,75 - A - 213 75 - A - 2C, 75 - A - 2R W W t- tn Q w Map Features _ O Hamlets _ �J/<<Fp�s� ^• Future Rt37 Bypass •SaeamPonds ✓AS,90, 1s G� streets U ✓ q TSB 1 O OS �7�, �lFs ^� Primary /NC ~ Secondary O 9 Te ciary Winchester Rds OIL s 5 s Q W,.,hW" 1p J� Ln 0"- 7 Cy�isr r OF o Z 09 � Ba on 0 y(gtt Q �o yZj n J u7 W st, hcns Cry Location in Surrounding Area nOPequOn Ere 0 0 250 y 9yo yip © Case Planner: Candice o� Map Document: (N:\Planning_And_Development\_1_Locator_Mps\Renaiss anceCommercialCenter_MDP1007_081407.mxd) 8/14/2007 -- 2:18:49 PM Frederick County, VA Master Development Plan MDP410-07 Application Renaissance Commercial Center 411 Parcel ID: Location in the Gounty 75 - A - 2,75 - A - 2B 75 - A - 2C, 75 - A - 2R Map Features O Hamlets Long Range Land Use 4%, Future Rt37 Bypass Rural Community Center - Application Residential fi Lakes/Ponds Business -- Streams .< Industrial streets ,±O Institutional �. Primary Recreation ^. Secondary Z6 Historic ti Terciary ® Mixed -Use Winchester Rds Xin Planned Unit Development Wit+ Urban Development Area aY SWSA lei Wnehsahr 0 o� 0 Ba on s/wn.n. cry wrgma Location in Surrounding Area c* co 0 250 © Case Planner: Candice Map Document: (N:\Planning_And_Development\ 1_Locator_Mps\RenaissanceCommercialCenter_MDP1007_081407.mxd) 8/14/2007 -- 2:18:49 PM On • _, B3 Ining RP zoning Frederick County, VA Master Development Plan MDP # 10 - 07 Application Renaissance Commercial Center Parcel ID: Location in the County 75 - A - 2,75 - A - 2B 75-A-2C,75-A-2R Map Features O Hamlets Zoning ^. Future Rt37 Bypass B7 (Business, Neighborhood District) - Application B2 (Business, General District) 0 Lakes/Ponds 41111, B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District) Streams 4M EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) Streets 40 HE (Higher Education District) ^u Primary 40 M7 (Industrial, Light District) ti Secondary M2 (Industrial, General District) �. Tertiaryeta MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) Winchester Rds e0 MS (Medical Support District) �• Urban Development Area . R4 (Residential Planned Community District) 4w R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) RA (Rural Area District) RP (Residential Performance District) ti SWSA vrgmr r` o� Be n slrphens LHf w gmi Location in Surrounding Area `CF CpG 0 250 uReetP" - � Y © Case Planner: Candice Map Document: (N:\Planning And_Development\ 1_Locator_Mps\RenaissanceCommercialCenter_MDP1007_081407.mxd) 8/14/2007 -- 2:18:49 PM Frederick County, VA Location in the County Map Features O Hamlets �+ Future Rt37 Bypass - Application 8 Lakes/Ponds ^-- Streams streets Primary 'V Secondary ti Terciary Winchester Rds .• Urban Development Area ti SWSA Master Development Plan MDP# 10-07 Application Renaissance Commercial Center Parcel ID: 75 - A - 2, 75 - A - 2B 75 - A - 2C, 75 - A - 2R Location in Surrounding Area 0 2. c © Case Planner: Candice Map Document:(N:\Planning_And_Development\_1_Locator_Mps\RenaissanceCommercialCenter_MDP1007_081407.mxd) 8/14/2007 -- 2:18:49 PM c� • • AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: Recommended Approval on September 2, 1998 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Approved October 14, 1998 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP Rezoning #011-99 of R T & T Partnership (Kernstown Business Park) WHEREAS, Rezoning Application 4011-98 of R T & T Partnership (Kernstown Business Park) was submitted to rezone 17.84 acres from B2 (Business General) to B3 (Industrial Transition). This property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11 South), approximately 'Amile south of the Route 37 interchange and is identified with Property Identification Number 75-A-2D in the Back Creek Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on September 2, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors helda. public hearing on this ordinance adoption on October 14, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisorsthat Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 17.84 acres from B2 (Business General) to B3 (Industrial Transition) as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRcs #22-98 0 • This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 14th day of October, 1998 by the following recorded vote: James L. Longerbeam, Chairman Abstained Richard C. Shickle absent W. Harrington Smith, Jr. Aye Margaret B. Douglas Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. Aye Robert M. Sager Aye A COPY ATTEST J John R iley, Jr. Frederick County Admi - "strator O.\Agendas\RL-'ZON ElltESOLUrN\RT&T _ P ILT. RE S • REZONING REQUEST PROFFER Property Identification Number 75-A-2D R T 8 T PARTNERSHIP (Kernstown Business Park) Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 et. seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicants hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application #011-98 for the rezoning of 17.B4 acres from B-2, Business General District to B-3, Industrial Transition District, development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicants and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon the applicant and their legal successors or assigns. PROFFERED CONDITIONS A strip of land sixty (60) feet in width shall be dedicated to the County of Frederick for the purpose of providing a future collector road which will connect Valley Pike (Route 11) with Shady Elm Road (Route 651). The location of this dedicated strip of land is from the end of Prosperity Drive to the western limits of parcel 75-A-2D, as demonstrated on the attached plat which is referred to as Exhibit 1. This voluntary dedication of land shall be valid for as long as the Winchester Area Transportation Plan identifies thi.s area as a potential route for a collector road between Route 11 South and Route 651, due to the possible expansion or change of the I-81 - Route 37 South Interchange. This shall not be used for any private expansion of a road or development of private lands to the west or south of this land. If, after eight years from the date signed, this land has not been used or is not in the definite plans as a collector road between Route 11 and Route 651, land will reve t back to the owner of record of each parcel. THOMAS C. BAKER, PARTNER THOMAS C. GLASS RALP GREGOffY DATE /'1-,1- /Y DATE DATE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF FREDERICK, To -wit: Sworn to and acknowledged before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Virginia, this ' I day of October, 1998, by Thomas C. Baker, Partner, Thomas C. Glass, Partner and Ralph Gregory, Partner of R T & T Partnership. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES May 31, 2002 NOTARY 10 6` 0 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package h1t1R 1 5 2007 APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Department of Planning and Development Use Only. Date application received J54147 Application Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return 1. Project Title: Renaissance Commercial Center 2. Owner's Name Jasbo, Inc. & Alizarin Crimson, LLC 3. Applicant: Address: Phone Number: 4. Design Company: Address: (Please list name of all owners or parties in interest) Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Greenway Engineering Same Phone Number: Same Contact Name: Evan Wyatt, AICP 10 F Frederick County, �ginia Master Development Plan Application Package 5. Location of Property Valley Pike (Route 11), 200' south of intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike 6. Total 22.10 acres Acreage: 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number (PIN): b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: 75-A-2, 75-A-2B, 75-A-2C, 75-A-2R B2 and B3 75-A-25 75-A-213, 75-A-2R: Vacant 75-A-2C: Commercial Commercial Property Identification Numbers North 75-A-21-1, 75-A-2I, 75-A-2J, 75-A-2Q, 75-A-1 South 75-3-9, 75-3-21, 75-A-2A, 75-A-12 East 75-A-2G, 75-A-11C West 75-A-71 f) Magisterial District: Property Uses Commercial, Agricultural Commercial, Dept Motor Vehicles, Religious Commercial Agricultural Back Creels S. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: 30-'n P1 Date: Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Planning Office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Alizarin Crimson, LLC (Phone) (540) 869-1800 (Address) PO Box 480 Stephens City VA 22655 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 060001096 on Page Instrument No. 060013844on Page and is described as Parcel: 75 Lot: 2B Block: A Section: Subdivision: Parcel: 75 Lot: 2R Block: A Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) GreenwayEngineerin� (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described Property, including: ❑ Rezoning (Including proffers) ❑ Conditional Use Permits ® Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site Plan ❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this 141��'day of M R 1200 Signature(s) State of Virginia, wit: I, b)n 1, Ae,( 0 a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this I l'i day of_HOW �200 1 My Commission Expires: *2-?-q 2-608 Notary Public W * 14W Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Planning Office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Jasbo, Inc. (Phone) (540) 869-1800 (Address) PO Box 480 Stephens City, VA 22655 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 050014247 on Page Instrument No. 050004466 on Page and is described as Parcel: 75 Lot: 2 Block: A Section: Subdivision: _ Parcel: 75 Lot: 2C Block: A Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineering (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described Property, including: ❑ Rezoning (Including proffers) ❑ Conditional Use Permits ® Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site Plan ❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this 4:ih day of N&Si 200 "% Signature(s) State of Virginia, City/ ount fEiLe&-&JTo-wit: I, w1 ina L HEdioa Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has ac wledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this 1day of JW1200_. bll/dCL J My Commission Expires: 2- ?A 2-6 Notary Public A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Located in: ' Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Bowman -Shoemaker Companies P.O. Box 480 Stephens City, VA 22655 Prepared by: rPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. LcndsccpeArchitects. 10212 Governor Lane Boulevard PH l1007 R+A 95 T301223:Williamsport,0Maryland 21768 T 301.223;4010 • F 301.223.6831 February 23, 2007 i I • • OVERVIEW ' Report Summary ' Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center development located along the west side of Route 11, south of Prosperity Drive in ' Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project is to be comprised of 97,500 square feet of office and 95,00 square feet of retail. Access to the development will be provided via a proposed site -driveway located along Route 11 and the existing Prosperity Drive. Build - out is anticipated to occur by the Year 2010 over one transportation phase. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed Renaissance . Commercial Center development with respect to the surrounding. roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Renaissance Commercial Center development were obtained through the following sequence of activities: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the study. area; ' • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center development; • Distribution and assignment of the Renaissance Commercial Center I' development -generated trips onto the study area roadway network; • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway capacity software, HCS+, for existing and future conditions. A Traffic hnpact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 1 • • No Scale 4- OS 4 " r". a 'ComAton..eaKn a P %C t �4 Cl rO ,S ITE, / l Bartonsvllie w? N Olt D7 r Case Qr w- n Figure 1 Vicinity Map - Renaissance Commercial Center, Frederick County, VA A Traffic Impact Anahsis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23. 2006 PHR+APage 2 • EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR+A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersection of Prosperity Drive/Route 11. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 9.0% based on the published Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data. Figure 2 shows the existing ADT (Average Daily Trips) and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 3 illustrates.the respective existing lane geometry and levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. 1 P H R+A 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 3 • No Scale a Figure 2 SITE lie `% e r PHRA AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Existing Traffic Conditions A Traffic hnnact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14949-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 4 No Scale Figure 3 SITE shed `. Unsignalized Intersection Denotes Center. Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic lntpact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center PHR+A ProjectNumber: 14948-I-o February 23, 2006 5 5 r 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Based upon the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average daily traffic data, a growth rate of 5% was calculated and applied to Route 11 to obtain the 2010 base conditions. Additionally, PHR+A included specific future developments located within the vicinity of the proposed site. Using the 7tb Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Tables la thru 1e to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation. Figure 4 shows the location of the background developments within the vicinity of the proposed development. Figure 5 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 6 shows the 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. Table la 2010 "Other Developments" - Kernstown Commons Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Kernstown Commons (From Limited Access Break Report dated February, 2006) 310 Hotel 120 rooms 31 20 51 38 33 71 701 444 Theater w/ Mat. 16 screens . 11 3 14 129 194 324 2,453 820 Retail 85,500 SF 87 56 . 142 271 294 1565 6,134 853 Conven. Mart w\pumps 4,250 SF 97 97 194 129 129 258 3,594 912 Drive-in Bank 3,500 SF 24 19 43 80 80 160 895 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 932 H-T Restaurant 4,000 SF 24 22 46 27 17 44 509 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 934 Fast Food w/ DT 3,500 SF 95 91 186 63 58 121 1,736 Total 477 407 884 856 882 1,738 18,310 *Total Pass By 25 25 50 62 62 124 1,459 Total "New Trips": 452 382 833 794 820 1,614 16,851 * Pass By trips are fifteen percent (1.%) of total retail development and Lonvemence Mart A Traffic Impact Anahvis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 6 i • Table lb 2010 "Other Developments" : Crosspointe Center Development (Phase 2) Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 775 units 138 414 552 .435 245 679 7,750 230 Townhouse/Condo 200 units 15 74 89 73 36 109 1,740 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 100 units 4 3 7 6 4 10 348 710 Office 90,000 SF 151 21 171 31 150 180 1,224 820 Retail 440,000 SF 236 151 386 801 868 1,669 17,673 Total Trips 544 661 1,205 1,346 1,302 2,648 28,735 Total Internal 80 80 159 330 330 660 - 6,954 Total Pass -by 29 29 58 125 125 250 2,651 Total "New Trips" 435 553 988 890 847 1,737 19,130 Table lc 2010 "Other Developments": Volvo Car Delarship Trin Generation Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total 841 Car Sales 23,446 SF 36 12 48 27 43 70 782 Total Trips 1 36 12 48 1 27 43 70 1 782 Table I 2010 "Other Developments" : Ryland/Russell Property Trin Generation Summary In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 110 Light Industrial 470,448 SF 410 56 466 61 448 509 3,412 210 Single -Family Detached 233 units 43 129 173 145 85 230 2,330 230 Townhouse/Condo 123 units 10 51 61 48 24 71 1,070 820 Retail 156,816 SF 125 80 205 404 438 842 9,098 Total 1 588 316 904 1 658 995 1,653 1 15,910 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center AProject Number: 14948-1-0 PH + February 23, 2006 Page 7 � I 0 � I i,l n 11 F 11 Table le 2010 "Other Developments": Villages at Artrip (Phase 2) Tr f_a rntinn .Cnmmnry Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Land Bay A 210 Single -Family Detached 102 units 20 60 81 69 40 109 1,017 230 . Townhouse/Condo 438 units 29 140 168 135 67 202 3,811 820 Retail 10,000 SF 24 15 39 66 71 137 1,520 Land Bay B 210 Single -Family Detached 37 units 9 27 36 28 16 44 373 Land Bay C 488, Soccer Complex 3 field 2 2 4 43 19 62 214 Total Trips 84 244 328 340 214 554 6,935 Total Internal 1 1 .2 16 16 31 107 Total "New Tri s" 83 243 326 325 198 523 6,828 1 PH1iA 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 8 • No Scale eo m wa� Ct 3 5t Q �f C, Q r.` SITE Volvo t'd Delarst fYo� 44 .s Ba►tonsvl Ile Y Rayland- 3 Crosspointe Kernstown Center c Cfp- k Artrip �efs� Of Development Or Figure 4 Location Map - 2010 Background Developments PHIZA A Traffic hnpact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 9 • No Scale Figure 5 PHRA AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 2010 Background Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 10 • • No Scale Signalized "Suggested" Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(B) Signalization NB/SB - 1 thru/ri Ike) 11 1 Unsignalized Intersection Afo s Jd SITE s;� �� e ��eway.42,2. Unsignalized Lo Intersection eo Ray Signalized "Suggested Intersection I Improvements" LOS=B(C) Signalization Denotes Center Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Figure 6 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PH A Traffic /mnact Anahsis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 1 I • TRIP GENERATION Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Triip Generation Report, PHR+A has prepared Table 2 to summarize the trip generation for the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center. Table 2 Proposed Development: Renaissance Commercial Center Trin G,-nerntinn Snmmnry Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 710 Office 97,500 SF 162 22 184 32 156 188 1,308 820 Retail 95,000 SF 93 59 152 290 315 605 6,568 Total 254 81 336 1 322 471 793 1 7,877 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distributions of trips for the Renaissance Commercial Center are shown in Figure 7 and were based upon local travel patterns for the surrounding roadway network. Figure 8 shows the respective development -generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Renaissance Commercial Center development assigned trips (Figure 8) were II' added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 5) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. In addition, construction of the Renaissance Commercial Center site -driveway will provide an alternative route for traffic using Prosperity Drive.. Therefore, a portion of existing traffic was re-routed from Prosperity Drive to the Renaissance site -driveway. ' Figure 9 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and. AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations within the study area. Figure 10 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane ' geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analvsis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 12 0 • No Scale 85 % 11 s d�rGer�� e SITE dam. pew ay dnGe 11 15% �T TP+/ Figure 7 Trip Distribution Percentages A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center PHR+A ProjectNumber: 14948-1-0 February 23, 200613 Page l3 • 9 No Scale Figure 8 b~ SITE red nGe w � ay earsIL r��pJ ��iGe 69 r�l�ja ��► AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Development -Generated Trip Assignments P A Traffic Lnnact Analysis of the Renaissance er1 Center Projectt Num Number:: 14948-(-0 H_� February 23, 2006 Page 14 No Scale NZ. pNb b Ar o I6 SITE ed.`-- f1 pe may �efjafs (y3jJ . d�Gea�ee � j o bb 11 ti~ AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 9 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions PH A Traffic bnpnct Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 15 • No Scale Signalized -Suggested" Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(B) Signalization NB/SB - I thru/ri ht 11 SITE 400, e may 4a�ss4 • G� Unsignalized A Intersection f°s )d * e �e unslgnauzea ��p 0(�J* Intersection ay Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(C) Signalization NB - 1 left & i thru SB - 1 thru/right EB - 1 left & 1 thru/rii � Denotes Center Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Figure 10 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PH A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-i-0 February 23, 2006 Page 16 0 1 s CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Renaissance: Commercial Center development are acceptable and manageable. Assuming the suggested improvements, all intersections will maintain overall levels of service "C" or better during 2010 build -out conditions. The following describes the suggested roadway improvementsfor each of the study area intersections as shown in Figure 6 and 10. • Route 11/Prosperity Drive: Traffic signalization along with a northbound and southbound shared thru/right lane will be required to maintain acceptable levels of service during 2010 background and build -out conditions • Route .l l/Renaissance Drive: Traffic signalization will be required .t6 maintain acceptable levels of. service during 2010 background conditions. An eastbound leg (fourth leg) will be added to the intersection during 2010 build -out conditions. In addition, a northbound left and through lane, a southbound through/right shared lane and an eastbound left and through/right sharedlane will be required to maintain acceptable levels of service during 2010 build -out conditions. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 17 /:j7\ i i GREENWAY ENGINEERING %ft\4oP'7 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 SEP 1 9 2007 T R A N S M I T T ACL Project Name: Renaissance Commercial Center MDP File No: 4613 Date September 19, 2007 To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ® As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Hi Candice, Please find attached 30 sets of the Renaissance Commercial Center MDP as requested for the September 26t" Board meeting. Please note that the Narrative Section has been revised to reflect the right -in only and right -out only language under Item #5 and that a new narrative has been provided under Item #7 identifying the Planning Commission waiver action since this waiver is not a requirement of the Board. I will be forwarding an updated JPG of Sheet 2 for the Board meeting - please contact me if you need anything else at this time. Thank you, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: Please Print Name: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-07 RENAISSANCE COMMERCIAL CENTER Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: August 16, 2007 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, Senior Planner M , ..,.. »,m,» .. „ ., M., , m, .. This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Planning Commission: 09/05/07 Board of Supervisors: 09/26/07 Action Pending Pending LOCATION: The subject property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of its intersection of Prosperity Drive. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER(s): 75-A-2, 75-A-2B, 75-A-2C and 75-A-2R PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: B2 (General Business) District Use: Vacant and Commercial B3 (Industrial Transition Business) District ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural B2 (Business General) Commercial B3 (Industrial Transition) Commercial South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Religious/Residential B2 (Business General) Commercial/DMV East: B2 (Business General) Use: Commercial/Vacant West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural PROPOSED USE: Commercial Uses MDP # 10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center August 16, 2007 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The preliminary master plan for this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. While the preliminary master plan appears acceptable, VDOT requests clarification of the existing commercial entrance on the east side of Route 11 in reference to the proposed entrance location for this development. Before making any final comments, this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of- way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Prior to construction on the State's right-of-way, the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Plans approved as submitted. Frederick County Public Works: We have no comments at this time. However, we reserve the right to perform a detailed review at the time of the site plan review. At that time, we will expect a regional stormwater facility to be designed on property 75-A-2 to serve the entire area included in the MDP dated March 2007. Frederick County Inspections Department: Please note that demolition shall be required prior to the removal of any existing structures. No additional comment required at this time. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: 2nd review. Approved. GIS Department: Renaissance Dr. has been approved and added into the Frederick County Road Naming System. Winchester Regional Airport: This Master Plan has, been reviewed and it appears that it should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's close in Part 77 surfaces. Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center August 16, 2007 Page 3 B) Location The subject property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of its intersection of Prosperity Drive. C) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephens City, VA Quadrangle) depicts the zoning for the four subject parcels as B2 (Business General) District. Parcels 75-A-2 and 75- A-213 are historically zoned B2 and, therefore, there are no proffers associated with them. With Rezoning #11-98, Parcel 75-A-2R (75-A-2R was part of 75-A-2D when the site was rezoned) was rezoned to the B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning district with proffers. With Rezoning #12-86, Parcel 75-A-21) was rezoned from the B2 (Business General) zoning district to the B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning district. This property does not have proffers. D) Site Suitability & Project Scope Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use Compatibility: The properties are located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Sewer and Water Service Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of planned commercial and industrial development will occur. In addition, the Renaissance Commercial Center properties are located within the area encompassed by the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan. The Southern Frederick Land Use Plan envisions this area remaining commercial. The properties are currently zoned B2 (Business General) and B3 (Industrial Transition) and, therefore, the development is in accordance with the goals of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan identifies a new major collector road running through this property which would connect Valley Pike (Route 11) to Shady Elm Road. Prosperity Drive would also be extended from its current terminus and would intersect with this new road. This Master Development Plan provides for the dedication of an 80 foot right-of-way to accommodate the new major collector road and is constructing two lanes of the road through the development. The MDP also accounts for the extension of Prosperity Drive to connect into the new road as well as the construction of an additional thru lane on Valley Pike and five foot sidewalks along the front of the property. The Master Development Plan currently shows one full entrance onto Valley Pike (Route 11) 0 0 MDP #10-07, Renaissance Commercial Center August 16, 2007 Page 4 with the public street connection of Renaissance Drive. The MDP also has a note that states that only one full entrance will be permitted on Valley Pike, but this note also states that right- in/right-out entrances will not be prohibited. Valley Pike is classified as a minor arterial street and since this property will have direct access to Renaissance Drive, individual access to Valley Pike should be prohibited with.this MDP. Buffer Modification The MDP accounts for the required full screen buffers between the B2 and the B3 zoned properties as indicated by buffer areas 1 and 2. The plan also shows an area shaded with a 50 foot distance screen which is associated with buffer area 2. The detail for buffer area 2 references a buffer modification. § 165-37D(7) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance states: Where B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning adjoining B2 (Business General) zoning on land contained within a master development plan, the Planning Commission may allow for specific modifications in screening requirements. This modification is at the Planning Commission's discretion. The area requesting the modification is internal to the development, the buffer distance has not been reduced and the number of trees has not been reduced, only shifted. The applicant is proposing to take the 60 required buffer plantings from the area shaded for the distance screen and use these plantings to supplement the remainder of the buffer. Proffers — Only parcel 75-A-2D, which is part of the Kernstown Business Park, has proffers. The proffers from Rezoning 411-98 state that, a strip of land 60 feet in width shall be dedicated to the County of Frederick for the purpose of providing a future collector road which will connect Valley Pike with Shady Elm Road. This proffer is accounted for with the Master Development Plan. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/05/07 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The master development plan for the Renaissance Commercial Center depicts appropriate land uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. All of the issues brought forth by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. With this application, the applicant is also requesting that the Planning Commission grant them a modification for the zoning district buffer. This is strictly a Planning Commission permitted modification; action from the Board of Supervisors is not required. Staff would note that there are two actions required with this application, one for the MDP and another for the modification request. Following the Planning Commission discussion, it would be appropriate to forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding this MDP conformance with County codes and review agency comments. All issues and. concerns raised by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. Staff is ultimately seeking administrative approval authority of the Master Development Plan once all issues have been addressed. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING September 12, 2007 TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #10-07 OF RENAISSANCE COMMERCIAL CENTER On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This meeting is to consider Master Development Plan 910-07 for Renaissance Commercial Center, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for Commercial Uses. The property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of the intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2C and 75-A-2R in the Back Creek Magisterial District. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the Planning Department's Web Page at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerel , cQ Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virgin : �. -- --- - - -- -- = - - --- - - --- 75 - A- . 2.0. 75 A• - 2- PIPPIN ENTERPRISES, LLC JASBO, INC PO BOX 480 164 MEADOW TRACE LN STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655.0480 MIDDLETOWN, VA 22645.1851 75-A--1- -- I VENTURE I OF WINCHESTER, LLC 827 ARMISTEAD ST Greenway Engineering WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4017 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 ---- 75 3 9 MILLER AUTO SALES, INC ALIZARIN CRIMSON, LLC 3985 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-2465 PO BOX 480 75 3 21 STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 0480 I GARDEN OF EDEN, LLC 75 -A- - 2-H 1231 W BROAD ST NEWLIN, CARLTON R FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046.2117 2984 WARDENSVILLE GRADE 75 - A- - 2-A WINCHESTER, VA 22602.3040 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 75 . A- . 2.1 PO BOX 2249 CRIDER & SHOCKEY, INC OF WV STAUNTON, VA 24402.2249 PO BOX 2530 - -- --------- -- -- — —._ --- WINCHESTER,VA 22604.1729 75 . A• - 2•J r i BEAN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 3625 Candice E. Per ms, Senior Planner WINCHESTER, VA 22604-2527 Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do h eby certify that Cand ce E. Perkins, Senor Planner for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated j ` , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the'same in my State and o'unty aforesaid. Given under my hand this l II day of E 00-7 My commission expires on Q-'//' ♦ Q d d T • C • CHURCC H OFF CHRIST OF j CIO RARRIE HEISHMAN 4661 MIDDLE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22602-2780 75 - A- - 2-G VALLEY FARM CREDIT, FLCA PO BOX 2700 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1900 75 -A- - 11-C MILLER AUTO SALES, INC & DEALERSHIP MGMT CO, LLC 3951 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.2465 75 - A- - 7- VANCO, LLC 102 ELDERBERRY DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING August 24, 2007 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN # 10-07 OF RENAISSANCE COMMERCIAL CENTER On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, September 5, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the, Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This meeting is to consider Master Development Plan #10-07 for Renaissance Commercial Center, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for Commercial Uses. The property is located on Valley Pike (Route 11), 200 feet south of the intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike, and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2C and 75-A-2R in the Back Creek Magisterial District. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kelit Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the Planning Department's Web Page at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, /,7 (.." ayw&c-r Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Y This is to cert' th t the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on J ,R o'T from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: - - _ - - _ - 75 - A• - 2.0. 75 A- . 2- PIPPIN ENTERPRISES, LLC JASBO, INC PO BOX 480 164 MEADOW TRACE LN STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655.0480 MIDDLETOWN, VA 22645.1851 j 75 • A• - 2-B 75 . A- - 1- ALIZARIN CRIMSON, LLC VENTURE I OF WINCHESTER, LLC 827 ARMISTEAD ST PO BOX 480 WINCHESTER, VA 22601.4017 STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655.0480 -- 75 -3- - 9- MILLER AUTO SALES, INC Greenway Engineering 3985 VALLEY PIKE 151 Windy Hill Lane WINCHESTER, VA 22602.2465 Winchester, VA 22602 - - -- 75 - 3- - 21- _ 75 - A• - 2-H - GARDEN OF EDEN, LLC NEWLIN, CARLTON R 1231 W BROAD ST 2984 WARDENSVILLE GRADE FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046.2117 WINCHESTER, VA 22602.3040 75 - A• - 2-A COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 75 • A• - 2.1 CRIDER & SHOCKEY, INC OF WV PO BOX 2249 STAUNTON, VA 24402.2249 PO BOX 2530 - - -- -- - - - - - -- ---- WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1729 75 - A- - 2-J ' F` f BEAN PROPERTIES, LLC % PO BOX 3625 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.2527 Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERRICK I, 0 - , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner for t Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, datedS0� , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my Stat County aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of a,, 1 ;2 0_ My commission expires on 1E c g NOTARY PUBLIC D (If 75 A- 12- . CHURCH OF CHRIST OF r CIO RARRIE HEISHMAN 4661 MIDDLE RD WINCHESTER, VA 22602-2780 75 - A- - 2-G VALLEY FARM CREDIT, FLCA PO BOX 2700 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1900 75 -A- - 11-C MILLER AUTO SALES, INC & DEALERSHIP MGMT CO, LLC 3951 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.2465 75 - A- - 7- VANCO, LLC 102 ELDERBERRY DR WINCHESTER, VA 22603 *:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING Frederick County, Virginia Master Developm FROM-BEV - Pla ning Dept. �Pl�easer t sets of labels by 5. Location of Property Valley Pike (Route 11), 20, THANKS! Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike 6. Total 22.10 acres Acreage: 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number - - - (PIN) : b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: Property Identification Numbers ✓ North 75-A-2FIr75-A-2I✓75-A-2J,✓ 75-A-2Q,351A-111 ✓ South ZL9,a'5-3-2Y75-A-2A,- 75-A-12✓ � ✓ East .75-A-2C3!15LA-11C West 75-A-71,Wof on ale Zhrive 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2C, 75-A-2R B2 and B3 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2R: Vacant 75-A-2C: Commercial Commercial Property Uses Commercial, Agricultural Commercial, Dept Motor Vehicles, Religious Commercial Agricultural f) Magisterial District: Back Creek 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: )aAn P1 . Date: 3 O _t0141440- /e� ASS C 0 . OO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING Frederick SINGFrederick County, Virginia Master Develo m FROM: - l Pn in Dept. Plensegpr, ) sets of labels by 5. Location of Property Valley Pike (Route 11), 20� THANKS! Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike 6. Total 22.10 acres Acreage: 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number - (PIN): b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: 75-A-2, 75-A-2B, 75-A-2C, 75-A-2R B2 and B3 75-A-2, 75-A-213, 75-A-2R: Vacant 75-A-2C: Commercial Commercial Property Identification Numbers ✓ North 75-A-21-1, 75-A-2I, 75-A-2J, 75-A:�Q, 75-A-1 South ZL.L_9, 75-3-21, 75-A-2A, 75-A-12 ✓ East ..757A-2G_, West 75-A-71 f) Magisterial District: Property Uses Commercial, Agricultural Commercial, Dept Motor Vehicles, Religious Commercial Agricultural Back Creek 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: Date: 3 t- -t-OeAI-140— Renaissance Commercial Center - P urinary Master Development Plan -I V T Comm... Page 1 of 1 Steve McVeigh From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [Lloyd.Ingram @VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 3:13 PM To: Steve McVeigh Cc: Ingram, Lloyd; Eric Lawrence Subject: Renaissance Commercial Center - Preliminary Master Development Plan - VDOT Comments The preliminary master plan for this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. While the preliminary master plan appears acceptable, VDOT requests clarification of the existing commercial entrance on the east side of Route 11 in reference to the proposed entrance location for this development. Before making any final comments; this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Prior to construction on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Edinburg Residency - Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 Phone # (540) 984-5611 Fax # (540) 984-5607 8/8/2007 0 • Frederick County Fire and Rescue a Department _ Office of the Fire Marshal VIRGINIA' Plan Review and Comments Control number Date received Date reviewed Date Revised MDP0 7 - 0 0 01 3/12/2007 3/13/2007 Project Name Applicant renaissance Commercial Center Greenway Engineering Address City State Zip Applicant Phone 151 Windy Hill Ln. Winchester VA 22602 540-662-4185 Type Application Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District Master Development 75-A-2 11 11 Current Zoning Election District B Recommendations Back Creek Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System Yes Yes No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Adequate Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No 's MAR 1 3 2007 J y�I3�� Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes J. Neal Title r . Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County TT Department of Public Works 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5643 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach three (3) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway En ing eering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Renaissance Commercial Center Location of property: Valley Pike (Route 11), 200' south of intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valle nPnnrtment of Pnhlic Wnrlks Cnmmentc- Department of Public Works use only CU -7 , Date reviewed Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Date approved Revision required Signature and Date , � U n umATX4110 07 G APR 1 2007 0 • Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department 7 Floor Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Inspections Department with their review. Please attach one (1) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Renaissance Commercial Center Location of property: Valley Pike (Route 11), 200' south of intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike Frederick County Inspections use only Date reviewed Date reviewed Signature and Date Review Number 1 Date approved ,a 3 5 (please circle one) 9` p Revision required GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Renaissance Commercial Center -Master D File No: 4613 D L?= l� l?n U W LE; Date: March 12, 2007 To: FCSA _F11 FCS From: Steve McVeigh/dlm Attn: John Whitacre GREENWAY ENGINEERING Copied Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: 0 Fed Ex 0 U.S. Mail v❑ Courier Pick Up Other Q Urgent 0 For Your Review As You Requested Fv� Please Comment Message John, Attached please find 2 copies of the revised MDP for Renaissance Commercial Center per your comments. Thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions. C, �'/YQ 1516-Y1167 W ,9 PP,q o uF'o o7 Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: MAR � 2007 0 m Request for Master Development Plan Comments Department of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of GIS, Attn: GIS Manager Department of GIS 107 North Kent Street 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5614 (540) 665-5614 The GIS Department will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County Street Name System. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will prevent duplicate street names from being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name: Greenway En ineering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester. VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Renaissance Commercial Center Location of property: Valley Pike (Route 11), 200' south of intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike GIS OFFICE USE ONLY: Date reviewed Incomplete Date reviewed Signature and Date Date revision received Date approved Incomplete Date approved Revision required _ C ■ 1 5 2007 • 0 REGIO/yq�\ O SERVING THE \4 P OF VIR61NIA UTHOR1`- WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT March 13, 2007 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Greenway Engineering Steve McVeigh 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Master Development Plan Renaissance Commercial Center Back Creek Magisterial District Dear Mr. McVeigh: The above referenced Master Plan has been reviewed and it appears that it should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's close in Part 77 surfaces. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director MAR 15 2007 y uLQ�3 yn AV • 0 • 0. MIIf!IPA IT, Al Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 March 26, 2007 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Preliminary Review Comments for Renaissance Commercial Center Master Development Plan Property Identification Number (PINS): 75-A-2, 75-A-211, 75-A-2C, 75-A-211 Dear Evan: Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to review the preliminary master development plan for the proposed development referred to as Renaissance Commercial Center. Staff s review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Dimensional Requirements. On the cover sheet, label the second column B3, not B2. 2. Proffers. Any proffers associated with PIN# 75-A-2R need to be included in this MDP. 3. Landscaping. On the coversheet, there is a statement regarding landscaping; these options do not apply to commercial developments. 4. MDP Narrative. On sheet 2 under the narrative, a statement should be provided that no individual entrances will be permitted on Route 11. 5. Signalization. Ensure that the proposed road and signal align with the entrance on the opposite side of Route 11. 6. Route 11 Improvements. Curb and gutter need to be shown/labeled on the MDP for Route 11, and a sidewalk needs to be shown. Ensure that the improvements being proposed with this development implement the planned widening of Route 11. 7. Existing Structures. Any existing structures and entrances need to be shown on the MPD. Any existing entrances on Route 11 should be removed and access limited to the new road being constructed. 8. Existing Use of Structures. As you are aware, there is currently a cheerleading/karate business being operated from the structure located on 75-A-2C. The approved site plan for this structure is not for this use and, therefore, this is a violation of the approved site plan. This violation should be resolved before the MDP is processed. 9. Adjoining Properties. The zoning for 75-A-2H and 21 is labeled incorrectly. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Evan Wyatt; Greenway Engineering Renaissance Commercial Center MDP March 26, 2007 Page 2 10. Zoning District Buffer. The buffers on this site are listed as Category A, no screen. If buffers were not provided on the B3 properties (trees and opaque element), they are required to be constructed with this development; PINs 75-A-2A (DMV), 75-A7-2B (Alizarin) and 75-A-2C (Jasbo) do not appear to have any buffers and, therefore, they will need to be provided as necessary. 11. Renaissance Drive. Renaissance Drive is listed as a major collector (four lane divided roadway) in the Frederick County Eastern Road Plan. The proposed MDP only shows a 60 foot ROW and a two lane road. A minimum 80 foot ROW is necessary for this road and the four lanes need to be constructed with this project. All entrances proposed on Renaissance Drive need to be shown on this MDP. The ROW for Renaissance Drive also needs to touch the property lines for PIN(s) 75-A-21-1 and 75-A-2R. 12. Prosperity Drive. Label the ROW width and the legal reference for the extension of Prosperity Drive to Renaissance. A cross section needs to be provided for the extension of Prosperity Drive. 13. Review Fee. The review fee submitted with the preliminary MDP is being returned to you; once the application is complete and ready to be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, please resubmit the fee. In order to continue the review of this Master Development Plan, you will need to submit a complete MDP application, all review agency comments and review fee, to this department. Once this information is received, and all review comments addressed, staff will schedule the application for review by the Planning Commission. Review comments are required from the following agencies: Frederick County Fire Marshal, Frederick County Department of Building Inspections, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Department of G.I.S., Frederick County Health Department, Frederick County Parks & Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, `Fi n Candice E. Perkins Planner II Attachments CEP/bad A �n1 GREENWAY ENGINEERING, N� 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 1971 August 13, 2007 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: Candice Perkins, Senior Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Renaissance Commercial Center Master Development Plan Dear Candice: Thank you for meeting with me last week to discuss the referenced Master Development Plan (MDP) and to review your March 26, 2007 comments to determine any additional revisions for this project. The following information was incorporated onto Sheet 2 of 2 of the MDP as a result of our meeting: ➢ Renaissance Drive has been labeled with a minimum right-of-way width of 80 feet, which adjoins tax map parcels 75-((A))-2H and 75-((A))-2R. ➢ A narrative has been provided that commits to the elimination of the existing entrances serving tax map parcels 75-((A))-2B and 75-((A))-2C at the time that Renaissance Drive is constructed to serve these parcels. ➢ The MDP reflects the frontage improvements to implement the planned widening of Valley Pike, including an additional southbound travel lane, turn/taper lane, curb and gutter and a 5-foot sidewalk. ➢ A narrative has been provided that restricts left turn movement access to Valley Pike via Renaissance Drive and limits access to the remaining Valley Pike frontage to right -in and right -out entrances meeting VDOT and Frederick County design standards. ➢ A 50-foot distance buffer area has been incorporated between tax map parcels 75-((A))- 2B and 75-((A))-2C as discussed. Additionally, the landscaping element from this area has been relocated to the 50-foot frill screen buffer adjoining tax map parcel 75-((A))-2A (DMV Office). This 50-foot distance buffer will remain until land uses are determined and a waiver will be applied for at that time if the future land uses meet this criterion. Please find attached all applicable information necessary to place this MDP on the September 5, 2007 Planning Commission agenda. Please contact me if you have any questions at this time, or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Evan Wy tt, AICP Greenway Engineering Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 File #4613/EAW www.greenwayeng.com COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 5401665-6395 March 26, 2007 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Preliminary Review Comments for Renaissance Commercial Center Master Development Plan Property Identification Number (PINS): 75-A-2, 75-A-2B, 75-A-2C, 75-A-2R Dear Evan: Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to review the preliminary master development plan for the proposed development referred to as Renaissance Commercial Center. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Dimensional Requirements. On the cover sheet, label the second column B3, not B2. 2. Proffers. Any proffers associated with PIN# 75-A-2R need to be included in this MDP. 3. Landscaping. On the coversheet, there is a statement regarding landscaping; these options do not apply to commercial developments. 4. MDP Narrative. On sheet 2 under the narrative, a statement should be provided that no individual entrances will be permitted on Route 11. 5. Signalization. Ensure that the proposed road and signal align with the entrance on the opposite side of Route I I . 6. Route 11 Improvements. Curb and gutter need to be shown/labeled on the MDP for Route 11, and a sidewalk needs to be shown. Ensure that the improvements being proposed with this development implement the planned widening of Route 11. 7. Existing Structures. Any existing structures and entrances need to be shown on the MPD. Any existing entrances on Route 1 I should be removed and access limited to the new road being constructed. 8. Existing Use of Structures. As you are aware, there is currently a cheerleading/karate business being operated from the structure located on 75-A-2C. The approved site plan for this structure is not for this use and, therefore, this is a violation of the approved site plan. This violation should be resolved before the MDP is processed. 9. Adjoining Properties. The zoning for 75-A-2H and 21 is labeled incorrectly. 107 North Rent Street, Suite 292 - Winchester Virginia Evan Wyatt; Greenway Engineering Renaissance Commercial Center MDP March 26, 2007 Page 2 10. Zoning District Buffer. The buffers on this site are listed as Category A, no screen. If buffers were not provided on the B3 properties (trees and opaque element), they are required to be constructed with this development; PINS 75-A-2A (DMV), 75-A-213 (Alizarin) and 75-A-2C (Jasbo) do not appear to have any buffers and, therefore, they will need to be provided as necessary. 11. Renaissance Drive. Renaissance Drive is listed as a major collector (four lane divided roadway) in the Frederick County Eastern Road Plan. The proposed MDP only shows a 60 foot ROW and a two lane road. A minimum 80 foot ROW is necessary for this road and the four lanes need to be constructed with this project. All entrances proposed on Renaissance Drive need to be shown on this MDP. The ROW for Renaissance Drive also needs to touch the property lines for PIN(s) 75-A-2H and 75-A-2R. 12. Prosperity Drive. Label the ROW width and the legal reference for the extension of Prosperity Drive to Renaissance. A cross section needs to be provided for the extension of Prosperity Drive. 13. Review Fee. The review fee submitted with the preliminary MDP is being returned to you; once the application is complete and ready to be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, please resubmit the fee. In order to continue the review of this -Master Development Plan, you will need to submit a complete MDP application, all review agency comments and review fee, to this department. Once this information is received, and all review comments addressed, staff will schedule the application for review by the Planning Commission. Review comments are required from the following agencies: Frederick County Fire Marshal, Frederick County Department of Building Inspections, Frederick County Department of ' Public Works, Frederick County Department of G.I.S., Frederick County Health Department, Frederick County Parks & Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this Ietter. Sincerely, 6""', '() �� Candice E. Perkins Planner 11 Attachments ('I;P/bad /tN GREENWAY ENGINEERING %47 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Renaissance Commercial Center Master Development Plan File No: 4613 Date August 13, 2007 To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt/ Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Other ❑ Urgent ® For Your Review Message: Hi Candice, ® Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ As You Requested ® Please Comment Please find attached the filing information for the Renaissance MDP as we discussed last week. Please note my letter dated today, which identifies the plan revisions based on our meeting. I have included copies of the application and SLPOA and have been advised that you still have the originals. Please review this information and contact me if you need anything else at this time. Thank you, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: 7� • Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice; Angie Mark Dana Eric Mike John Lauren COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): 81 Ni g U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd GREENWAY ENGINEERING MAR 7 5 2007 151 Windy Hill Lane Founded in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22601 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Renaissance Commercial Center File No: 4613 Date: March 15, 2007 To: EC Planning Attn: Mike Ruddy Copied Delivery: � Fed Ex ❑ Other ❑ U.S. Mail From: Evan Wyatt/dlm GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 0 Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Urgent Q For Your Review ❑ As You Requested M Please Comment Message Mike, Attached is the following for your preliminary review and comments: -Master Development Plan application -Application fee check for $4,210.00 -Signed Special Limited Power of Attorney forms (2) -2 copies of the Master Development Plan -Planning comment sheet We are in the process of obtaining all appropriate review agencies approvals and will forward to your office. As always, thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: E • Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County 4` Floor Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number 540-662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Renaissance Commercial Center Location of property: Valley Pike (Route 11), 200' south of intersection of Prosperity Drive and Valley Pike Department of Planning and Development's Comments: Department of Planning and Development use only Date reviewed Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Date approved Revision required Signature and Date 0 0 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Required Information Checklist MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN The following information must be included on the master development plan. If the submitted master development plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and will be returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Yes No ✓' l . Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and telephone number of owner. ✓ 3. Name, address, and telephone number of developer. ✓ 4. Name, address, and telephone number of designer. 5. Signed certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. ✓ 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. ✓ 7@ A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional zoning approval. Rezoning file; number should be cited. 11�9YnIftu*1 ✓ 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Director of Planning and Development" for the approval signature and date of approval. ✓ 9. A space labeled "Approved by the County Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. ✓ 10. Magisterial District. 11. Sheet size less than 42 inches. 1 Page 13 f Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package General Information Yes No ✓ 1. Location map (scale 1:2000). %/ 2. Scale of the MDP is not to exceed 1:100. ✓ (D North Arrow. -- SV�'Z 4. Legend describing all symbols. . y/ 5. Surveyed boundaries of all lots and parcels. 6. Acreage of all parcels included in the MDP. 7. Topography contour lines at acceptable intervals. P 8. A schedule of phases, boundary of phases, and order of development. G) Use, zoning, and property owner of all adjoining properties. 10. Location of proposed uses (location, boundaries, arrangement). 11. Location and treatment of historic structures and sites. ✓ 12. History of all land divisions in relation to this tract. 13. Acreage, Location and boundaries of environmental features: floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, steep slopes, woodlands. Ot✓ 14. Amount and percentage of disturbed and protected land in common open space. Page 14 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package_ Residential Development Information Yes No 1/ Location and dimension of Residential Separation Buffers. 2. Acreage in common open space, in housing type, in road rights -of -way, and for the entire development (by Phase). ,j 3. Location and boundaries of housing types. Residential l Performance (RP) dimensional requirements should be p indicated. Number of dwelling units (by type, phase, and in total). 5. Location and configuration of required recreational facilities. Statement of required and type of facilities to be provided. Infrastructure Information Yes No f 1. Location of adjoining streets and utilities. 2. Location, arrangements, and right-of-way widths of roads and property access. f (D Location and arrangement of street entrances, driveways, and parking areas. E,� -e' `^ v` Location of entrances to the development from public streets. / 5. Type of road design (rural or urban). 0 Use of inter -parcel connectors. Page 15 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package y 7. Traffic impact analysis. To be submitted to the Virginia / Department of Transportation. V 8. Location of sewer and water mains with statements concerning the connection with and availability of facilities. 9. Location and arrangement of electric and gas utilities. Other Design Information Yes No, Location of Zoning District and Road Efficiency buffers, and examples specifying the screening to be provided. 2. Plan for stormwater management. Location of stormwater facilities. 3. Acreage of each type of environmental protection land. (Amount and percentage of disturbed and protected land in common open space.) Shown in a table format. 4. Amount, boundaries, and location of common open space. (Indicate the percentage of the entire site to be placed in common open space.) 5. Location of environmental protected areas to be included in common open space. Page 16 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package County Health Department Information Yes No ✓ 1. Statements and locations pertaining to sewer and water % availability. y 2. Statements and locations concerning any existing pre- or / post -water treatment facilities. y 3. Statements and location of any planned private treatment facilities. Page 17 APPENDIX HCS+ Worksheets ' Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 11 11 11 11 � I � I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA . Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Year 2010 Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 20 381 8 49 395 97 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 22 0 2 1 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 --T -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 21 0 2 1 0 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h .51 415 102 21 401 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Lenat and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9. 10 11 12 Lane. Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 21 51 1 6 24 C (m) (veh/h) 1049 1150 327 649 352 lc 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.07 5% queue length 0.06 0.14 0.01 0.03 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.3 16.0 10.6 16.0 LOS A A C B C kpproach Delay -- -- 11.4 16.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k88E.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Approach LOS -- -- 8 C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:31 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k88E.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Proiect Description Renaissance Commercial Center Intersection Pros erit Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Existing Conditions East/West Street:. Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 478 4 46 523 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 53 0 16 17 0 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9. 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 51 0 16 17 0 54 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 48 550 23 9 503 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Lenat and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 91 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 9 48 17 56 69 C (m) (veh/h) 1000 1058 279 569 294 lc 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.23 5% queue length 0.03 0.14 0.19 0.33 0.89 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.6 18.7 12.0 21.0 OS A A C B C Ipproach Delay -- -- 13.6 21.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k895.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach LOS I -- I -- I 8 ( C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:34 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k895.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co: PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 . Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 24 677 10 60 843 118 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0:95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 27 0 2 1 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes i 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 26 . 0 2 1 0 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 63 887 124 25 712 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 25 63 1 7 29 C (m) (veh/h) 686 880 150 432 163 lc 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.02 p.18 5% queue length 0.11 0.23 . 0.02 0.05 0.63 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 9.4 29.2 13.5 31.8 LOS B A D B D file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k8Fl.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 15.4 31.8 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- C D Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:35 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k8Fl.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page I of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 . Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 11 1194 5 56 1070 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 65 0 20 22 0 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 3 r-- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L. T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L. T R Volume veh/h 62 0 19 21 0 66 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 58 1126 28 11 1256 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 t 2 2 2 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration I LTR LT R Delay, queue Len at and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration IL L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 11 58 22 69 85 C (m) (veh/h) 605 548 88 208 62 /c 0.02 0.11 0.25 0.33 1.37 5% queue length 0.06 0.35 0.90 1.38 7.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 12.3 59.0 30.7 353.4 . LOS B B F D F file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k937.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2'of 2 pproach Delay 37.5 353.4 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- E F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:36 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k937.tmp 8/9/2007 I Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timina InDu EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L. TR Volume, V (vph) 26 0 2 1 0 7 24 677 10 60 843 118 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3X 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 33.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 45.0 IY= G= G= G= 6 1Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntroi Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 31 1 8 27 763 67 1068 Lane Group Capacity, c 567 642 592 174 1805 292 1776 v/c Ratio, X 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.16 0.42 0.23 0.60 Total Green Ratio, g/C . 0.37 . 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, di 18.4 18.1 18.1 12.2 14.3 12.7 16.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.19 ' file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2DF7.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4. 0.2 0.4 1 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Control Delay 18.5 18.1 18.1 12.6 14.4 13.1 16.7 Lane Group LOS B B B B B B B Approach Delay 18.5 18.1 14.4 16.5 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 15.7 X = 0.37 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2DF7.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'M bETAILED REPORT' General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center -Suggested Improvement Volume and Timina InDu EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT I TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L. TR Volume, V (vph) 62 0 19 21 0 66 11 1194 5 56 1070 27 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0. 2.0 2.0. 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3. 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing W Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing = 28.0 LG G= G= G= IY= G= 50.0 G= G= G= = 6 1Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= iY = Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 90 23 73 12 1333 62 1219 Lane Group Capacity, c 444 457 502 166 2008 133 2002 v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.05 0.15 0.07 0.66 0.47 0.61 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56, 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, di 22.8 21.7 22.4 9.3 14.1 12.0 13.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.11 0.19 ' file://CADocuments and SettingAranadeTocal Settings\Temp\s2k2E0D.trnp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0. 0.1 0.2. 0.8 2.6 1 0.5 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 23.0 21.7 22.5 9.4 14.9 14.6 14.0 Lane Group LOS C C C A 8 8 8 Approach Delay 23.0 22.3 14.9 14.0 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 15.0 X = 0.50 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Venerated: 8/9/Zoo/ 4:44 rM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranadeTocal Settings\Temp\s2k2EOD.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background . Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo Driveway North/South Street: Route .11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 700 5 30 816 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 2 0. 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2. -- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 . 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 31 858 0 0 736 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR qth, and Level of Service Delay, Queue Leng pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L. LR (veh/h) 31 13 C (m) (veh/h) 866 374 lc 0.04 0.03 5% queue length 0.11 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 15.0 LOS A B file://C:\Docurnents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k97C.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 15.0 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:37 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k97C.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background . Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo Driveway North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudv Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1174 4 23 1087 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 6' 0. 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 . 36 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 24 1144 0 0 1235 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration . LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 24 43 C (m) (veh/h) 562 210 /c 0.04 0.20 5% queue length 0.13 0.75 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 26.5 ins B D file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9BF.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 26.5 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- D Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:37 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9BF.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page .1 of 2 HCS+'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or. Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11, Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing Input .EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 0 1 1 Lane Group LR TR L.. T Volume, V (vph) 2 11 700 5 30 816 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 1 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns . 0 1 1 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 20.0 IY= G= G= G= IY= G= 58.0 G= G= G= 6 . Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT. LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 14 784 33 907 Lane Group Capacity, c 371 1223 374 1224 v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.64 0.09 0.74 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay, di 27.5 9.7 6.0 10.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 .Delay Calibration, k 0.1 i 0.22 M 0.30 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.1 2.5 file:HCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E23.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 27.5 10.8 6.1 13.3 Lane Group LOS C B A B Approach Delay 27.5 10.8 13.1 Approach LOS C B B Intersection Delay 12.2 X = 0.56 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+' M Version 5.21 ueneratea: aiaizuui w:,+a rivi file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E23.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 0 1 1 Lane Group LR TR L. T Volume, V (vph) 6 36 1174 4 23 1087 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 IY= IY= G= G= G= IY= G= 63.0 G= G= IY= G= 6 Y= IY= 6 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 47 1308 26 1208 Lane Group Capacity, c 278 1329 234 1330 v/c Ratio, X 0.17 0.98 0.11 0.91 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.17 0.70 0.70 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 32.2 13.0 4.4 . 11.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.49 0.11 0.43 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1 1 120.9 0.2 9.4 file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E39.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 32.4 33.9 4.6 20.5 Lane Group LOS C C A C Approach Delay 32.4 33.9 20.1 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Delay 27.3 X = 0.83 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:45 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E39.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 12 . 759 10 60 1051 59 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF .0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 12 798 10 63 1106 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 13 0 1 1 0 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 13 0 1 1 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration I I LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement — - -- 1 - 4 - 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 12 .63 1 7 14 C (m) (veh/h) 598 817 154 386 162 lc 0.02 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.09 95% queue length 0.06 0.25 0.02 0.06 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 9.8 28.5 14.5 29.3 LOS B A D B D Approach Delay -- -- 16.3 29.3 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E43.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:46 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E43.tmp 8/9/2007 . i Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Page 1 of 2 Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -Out Conditions ' ' ' Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 1638 5 56 1397 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 5 1724 5 58 .1470 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 31 0 10 21 0 66 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 32 0 10 22 0 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Configuration I LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 5 58 22 69 42 C (m) (veh/h) 454 365 67 110 0 lc 0.01 0.16 0.33 0.63 5% queue length 0.03 0.56 1.21 3.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.0 16.7 83.0 81.4 LOS B C F F F -- -- 81.8 pproach Delay file:HCADocuments and Settings\ranade\l-ocal Settings\Temp\u2k2E4B.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:47 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E4B.tmp 8/9/2007 I Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 _ Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timina InDu EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 13 0 1 1 0 7 12 759 10 60 1051 59 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0. 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0. 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 i 3.2 3.2 I .3.2 I Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 34.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 44.0 G=. G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 15 1 1 13 810 63 1168 Lane Group Capacity, c 615 665 610 132 1765 262 1755 v/c Ratio, X 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.46 10.24 0.67 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 Uniform Delay, di 17.6 17.4 17.4 12.4 15.2 13.3 17.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 file: //C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E71.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 1 1.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 17..6 17.4 17.4 12.7 15.3 13.8 18.4 Lane Group LOS B B B B B B B Approach Delay 17.6 17.4 15.3 18.2 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 17.0 X� = 0.39 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:48 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E71.tmp 8/9/2007 ' Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center- Suggested Improvement Volume and Timina In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 31 0 10 21 0 66 5 1638 5 56 1397 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0. 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 .0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated ' A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3, 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 TO 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 20.0 IY= G= G= G= IY= G= 58.0 G= G= G= 6 1Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 22 63 5 1729 59 1485 Lane Group Capacity, c 326 326 359 144 2330 92 2328 v/c Ratio, X 0.13 0.07 0.18 6.03 0.74 0.64 0.64 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay, di 28.1 27.6 28.3 5.8 10.9 9.7 9.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.30 1 0.22 0.22 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E87.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.3 14.2 1 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 28.3 27.7 28.6 5.9 12.2 23.9 10.3 Lane Group LOS C C C A 8 C 8 Approach Delay 28.3 28.3 12.2 10.8 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 12.2 Xc = 0.60 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:49 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E87.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo/Renaissance Drive Intersection Orientation: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street _ Northbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume veh/h .38 688,, Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 40 724 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Eastbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume veh/h 82 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h 86 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L . ✓ (veh/h) 40 31 C (m) (veh/h) 649 875 ✓lc 0.06 0.04 95% queue length 0.20 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 9.3 LOS B A Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions South Street: Route 11 Period (hrs): 0.25 3 4 R L 5 30 0.95 0.95 5 31 -- 2 Two Way Lett Turn Lane 0 0 1 TR L 9 10 R L 13 2 . 0.95 0.95 13 2 2 2 outnoouna 5 6 T R 815 .208 0.95 0.95 857 218 0 1 0 TR 0 Westbound 11 12 T R 0 11 0.95 0.95 0 11 2 2 0 N 1 0 1 0 LTR Eastbound 10 .11 12 L TR 86 13 200 309 0.43 0.04 1.99 0.13. 35.9 17.2 E C file:HC:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E53.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:47 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E53.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information iSite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 ,Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo/Renaissance Drive Intersection Orientation: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume veh/h 61 1168 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 1229 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Eastbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume veh/h 444 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 467 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized Lanes 1. 1 Configuration L Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L v (veh/h) 64 24 C (m) (veh/h) 456 565 v/c 0.14 0.04 95% queue length 0.48 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.2 11.7 LOS B B Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions South Street: Route 11 Period (hrs): 0.25 Southbound 4 5 6 L T R 23 1077 .327 0.95 0.95 0.95 24 1133 344 2 -- -- /ay Left Turn Lane 0 1 1 0 L TR 0 Westbound 10 11 12 L T R 6 0 36 0.95 0.95 0.95 6 0 37 2 2 2 0 N 1 0 0 1 0 LTR Nestbound Eastbound 8 9 10 11 12 LTR L TR 43 467 87 109 83 196 0.39 5.63 0.44 1.63 51.41 2.08. 58.1 2182 37.3 F F E file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E5B.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:48 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E5B.tmp 8/9/2007 I Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 . Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID. Center- Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group L TR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (v h) 82 0 13 2 0 11 38 688 5 30 815 208 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 D 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 112.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 28.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 50.0 G= G= IY= G= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y=. Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 ` Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination - EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 86 14 7 40 729 32 1077 Lane Group Capacity, c 445 492 517 207 2008 358 1948 v/c Ratio, X 0.19 0.03 0.01 0.19 0.36 0.09 0.55 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, di 22.7 21.5 21.4 10.0 11.1 9.4 12.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 1 0.11 0.15 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settin s\Tem \s2k2E9D.tm g p p 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Delay Calibration, k Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 22.9 21.6 21.5 10.4 11.2 9.5 13.2 Lane Group LOS C C C 8 8 A 8 Approach Delay 22.7 21.5 11.2 13.1 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 12.9 X = 0.42 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:49 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E9D.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'°' DETAILED REPORT General information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/0412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Volume and Timing In ut Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center -Suggested Im rovement Volumes LT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 Lane Group I L Volume, V (vph) 444 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A EB TH 1 TR 1,0 0 0.95 A WB RT LT TH RT 0 0 1 0 LTR 83 6 0 36 2. 0 0 0 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 A A A A LT 1 L 61 2 0.95 A NB TH 2 TR 1168 0 0.95 A RT 0 LT SB TH RT 1 2 0 L TR 4 0 0.95. A 23 1077 327 0 0 0 0.95 0.95 0.95 A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0HN Ped /Bike / RTOR 0 0 0 0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 1.000 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N Parking Maneuvers, Nm 12.0 0 12.012.0 N N 0 N 12.0 0 12.0 12.0 N N 0 N IBuses Stopping, Ns 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 0 3.2 0 3.2 0 0 3.2 0 0 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 Timing G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G I G= G= 43.0 G= G= IY= 6 Y= 6 Y= ly= ly= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 . Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit , Control Delay, and LOS Determination 1 08 G= Y=. C6 WB LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 46 887 38 NB LT TH RT 64 1233 SB LT TH RT 24 1478 Lane Group Capacity, c 572 616 3 00 83 1728 108 1668 v/c Ratio, X 0.82 0.14 0.11 0.77 0.71 1,048 0.22 0.89 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.39 0.39 0.22 0.48 0.48 0.48 Uniform Delay, di 5.6 17.8 27.9 19.4 18.6 13.7 21.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.36 0.11 0.11 0.32 0.28 0.11 0.41 ' file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2EB3.tm 1? 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Delay Calibration, k Incremental Delay, 02 9.0 0.1 1 0.1 135.0 1.4 1.0 6.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 34.6 117.9 28.0 54.5 20.0 14.8 27.4 Lane Group LOS C B C D C B C Approach Delay 32.0 28.0 21.7 27.2 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Delay 25.9 X = 0.85 Intersection LOS I C Lopyright (0.2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Versiori 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:50 PM fileWCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2EB3.tmp 8/9/2007 I I I II u I I Traffic Counts C Intersection: E-W: PROSPERITY DR Weather DRY File Na el N-S: ROUTE 1 1 Count By JJP Input By JJP Location WBYCHESTER,VA Count Date 10/16/2006 15 Minute EB: PROSPERITY DR WB: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE 11 SB: ROUTE 11 15 Min. Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W Period Begining 7:00 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 2 42 0 44 4 45 10 59 109 7:00 7:15, 7 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 2 74 2 78 11 58 Jan-00 70 157 7:15 7:30 7 0 0 7 0 0 2 2 5 98 3 106 9 95 26 130 245 7:30 7:45 2 00 2 1 0 0 1 5 108 1 114 20 110 27 157 274 7:45 8:00 4 0 1 5 0 0 3 3 6 104 3 113 10 117 27 154 275 8:00 8:15 8 0 1 9 0 0 1 1 4 71 1 76 10 73 17 100 186 8:15 8:30 7 0 2 9 1 0 0 1 2 90 1 93 6 72 9 87 190 8:30 8:45 10 0 2 12 1 0 6 7 2 80 5 87 5 104 8 117 223 8:45 A.M. Total 51 0 8 59 3 0 12 15 28 667 16 711 75 674 125 874 1659 A.M. Total 16:00 12 0 3 15 3 0 3 6 6 124 0 130 10 129 8 147 298 16:00 16:15 9 0 3 12 6 0 17 23 2 109 3 114 10 135 5 150 299 16:15 16:30 14 0 3 17 5 0 16 21 1 126 1 128 7 132 6 145 311 16:30 16:45 16 0 7 23 3 0 18 21 0 119 0 119 19 127 3 149 312 16:45 17:00 28 0 6 34 7 0 25 32 1 103 1 105 12 107 4 123 294 17:00 17:15 13 0 1 14 4 0 11 15 1 110 0 111 9 142 S 156 296 17:15 17:30 6 0 1 7 4 0 13 17 0 126 0 126 13 134 7 154 304 17:30 17:45 3 0 2 5 3 0 7 10 0 100 0 100 12 91 2 105 220 17:45 P.M. Total 101 0 26 127 35 0 1 10 145 11 917 5 933 . 92 997 40 1129 2334 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: PROSPERITY DR WB: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE 11 SB: ROUTE I 1 1 Hour Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W Period Begining 7:00 22 0 2 24 1 0 2 3 14 322 6 342 44 308 64 416 785 7:00 7:15 20 0 3 23 1 0 5 6 18 384 9 411 50 380 81 511 951 7:15 .7:30 21 0 2 23 1 0 6 7 20 381 8 409 49 395 97 541 980 7:30 7:45 21 0 4 25 2 0 4 6 17 373 6 396, 46 372 80 498 925 7:45 8:00 29 0 6 35 2 0 10 12 14 345 10 369 31 366 61 458 874 8:00 16:00 51 0 16 67 17 0 54 71 9' 478 4 491 46 523 22 591 1220 16:00 16:15 67 0 19 86 21 0 76 97 4 457 5 466 48 501 18 567 1216 16:15 1630 71 0. 17 88 19 0 '70 89 3 458 2 463 47 508 18 573 1213 16:30 16:45 63 0 15 78 18 0 67 85 2 458 1 461 53 510 19 582 1206 16:45 17:00 50 0 10 60 18 0 56 74 2 439 1 442 46 474 18 538 1114 17:00 1 Hour EB: PROSPERITY DR WB: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE I 1 SB: ROUTE 11 1 Hour Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W Period Begining 7:30 21 0 2 23 1 0 6 7 20 381 8 409 49 395 97 541 980 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.64 PHF = 0.58 PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.86 0.89 A.M. Peak 16:00 51 0 16' 67 17 0 54 71 9 478 4 491 46 523 22 591 1220 16:00 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.73 PHF = 0.77 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.99 0.98 P.M. Peak A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Located in: ' Frederick County, Virginia ' Prepared for: ' Bowman -Shoemaker Companies P.O. Box 480 I� Stephens City, VA 22655 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc. Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. LcndscaoeArchltects. 10212 Governor Lane Boulevard Suite 1007 H Williamsport, Maryland 21795 T 301.223.4010 • F 301.223.6831 ' February 23, 2007 OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center development located along the west side of Route 11, south of Prosperity Drive in. Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project is to be comprised of .97,500 square feet of office and 95,00 square feet of retail. Access to the development will be provided via a proposed site -driveway located along Route 11 and the existing Prosperity Drive. Build - out is anticipated to occur by the Year 2010 over one transportation phase. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center development with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Renaissance Commercial Center development were obtained through the following sequence of activities: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the study area; • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center development; • Distribution and assignment of the Renaissance Commercial Center development -generated trips onto the study area roadway network; • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway capacity software, HCS+, for existing and future conditions. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Cornmercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page I No Scale " —✓ 2r < aye. ll k'ay Comqjdrr.Mfffi a t 3 St t;r i; SITE /" a . 4" l a _ ,.-- o C i Of ,� w � Figure 1 Vicinity Map - Renaissance Commercial Center, Frederick County, VA A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center PH R+A Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR+A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersection of Prosperity Drive/Route 11. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 9.0% based on the published Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data. Figure 2 shows the existing ADT (Average Daily Trips) and AM/PM peak hour traffic. volumes at key locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 3 illustrates the respective existing lane geometry and levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 P + February 23, 2006 H Page 3 No Scale N ryr''1 Ar o (SjJ2 d�Ge�jf 6(S �ro� o SITE sate dfiL � e •a�io_ Figure 2 PHRA AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Existing Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 4 No Scale Figure 3 SITE Seed `� n•. `. Unsignalized Intersection Denotes Center Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Ahalysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 PH + February 23, 2006 Page 5 F_ L I 7i L I .1 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Based upon the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average daily traffic data, a growth rate of 5% was calculated and applied to Route 11 to obtain the 2010 base conditions. Additionally, PHR+A included specific future developments located within the vicinity of the proposed site. Using the 71h Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Tables la thru le to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation. Figure 4 shows the location of the background developments within the vicinity of the proposed development. Figure 5 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 6 shows the 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. Table la 2010 "Other Developments" - Kernstown Commons Trip Generation Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total Kernstown Commons (From Limited Access Break Report dated February, 2006) 310 Hotel 120 rooms 31 20 51 38 33 71 701 444 Theater w/ Mat. 16 screens 11 3 14 129 194 324 2,453 820 Retail 85,500 SF 87 56 142 271 294 565 6,134 853 Conven. Mart w\pumps 4,250 SF 97 97 194 129 129 258 3,594 912 Drive-in Bank 3,500 SF 24 19 43 80 _ 80 160 895 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 932 H-T Restaurant 4,000 SF 24 22 46 .27 17 44 509 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 934 Fast Food w/ DT 3,500 SF 95 91 186 63 58 121 1,736 Total 477 407 884 856 882 1,738 18,310 *Total Pass By 25 25 50 62 62 124 1,459 Total "New Trips": 452 382 833 794 820 1,614 16,851 *Pass By trips are fifteen percent (15%) of total retail development and Convenience Mart 1 PH R+A 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 6 Table lb 2010 "Other Developments" : Crosspointe Center Development (Phase 2) Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 775 units 138 414 552 435 245 679 7,750 230 Townhouse/Condo 200 units 15 74 89 73 36 109 1,740 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 100 units 4 3 7 6 4 10 348 710 Office 90,000 SF 151 21 171 31 150 180 1,224 820 Retail 440,000 SF 236 151 386 801 868 1,669 17,673 Total Trips 544 661 1,205 1,346 1,302 2,648 28,735 Total Internal 80 80 159 330 330 660 - 6,954 Total, Pass -by 29 29 58 125 125 250 2,651 Total "New Trips 435 553 988 890 847 1,737 19,130 Table le 2010 "Other Developments": Volvo Car Delarship Trin ('_eneratian Rnmmnry AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT Code Land Use. Amount In Out Total In Out Total 841 Car Sales 23,446 SF 36 12 . 48 27 43 70 782 Total Trips 1 36 12 48 1 27 43 70 1 782 Table ld 2010 "Other Developments" : Ryland/Russell Property Trin (:ene.ratinn Summary In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 110 Light Industrial 470,448 SF 410 56 466 61 448 509 3,412 210 Single -Family Detached 233 units 43 129 173 145 85 230 2,330 230 Townhouse/Condo 123 units 10 51 61 48 24 71 1,070 820 Retail 156,816 SF 125 80 205 404 438 842 9,098 Total 1 588 316 904 1 658 995 1,653 1 15,910 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 PH + February 23, 2006 Page 7 � I 11 11 l Table le 2010 "Other Developments": Villages at Artrip (Phase 2) Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Land Bay A 210 Single -Family Detached 102 units 20, 60 81 69 40 109 1,017 230 Townhouse/Condo 438 units 29 140 168 135 67 202 3,811 820 Retail 10,000 SF 24 15 39 66 71 137 1,520 Land Bay B 210 Single -Family Detached 37 units 9 1 27 36 28 16 44 373 _ Land Bay C 488 Soccer Complex 3 field 2 2 4 43 19 62 214 Total Trips 84 244 328 340 214 554 6,935 Total Internal 1 1 2 16 16 31 107 Total "New Trips" 83 243 326 325 198 523 6,828 1 PHRn 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 8 No Scale 0 Plainne C� Id pr �Fr �Q' ill i 00 Ilk,� Commonwealth Ct 4 Crosspointe Hock Kerns town 9 Center nCt Com4�1 CQ SITE ' Volvo ` Delarship fl Ito oy,�fi � 4n - Bartonsville 11 W o Cr eek Artrip g- Y QflP ID, Rayland-� Russell _"caaC Gr Figure 4 Location Map - 2010 Background Developments A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 PH February 23, 2006 Page 9 No Scale AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 5 2010 Background Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center p-R , ^ Project Number: 14948-I-0 10 f- tl \i February 23, 2006 Page 10 No Scale Signalized 3uggesreu Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(B) Signalization NB/SB - 1 thru/ri > nwo 11 � Unsignalized Intersection Afo s Jd C(�J� SITE G� s'% e ��eway.�'e�ai Unsignalized Lo f B(dJ* Intersection R dy Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(C) Signalization C(C) U Denotes Center Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Figure 6 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center PH R+A Project Number: 14948-I-0 February 23, 2006 Page I I � I � I TRIP GENERATION Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has prepared Table 2 to summarize the trip generation for the proposed Renaissance Commercial Center. Table 2 Proposed Development: Renaissance Commercial Center WA_ (`nn aratinn Q.-Mary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 710 Office 97,500 SF 162 22 184 32 156 188 1,308 820 Retail 95,000 SF 93 59 152 290 315 605 6,568 Total 254, 81 336 1 322 471 793 1 7,877 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distributions of trips for the Renaissance Commercial Center are shown in Figure 7 and were based upon local, travel patterns for the surrounding roadway network. Figure 8 shows the respective development -generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Renaissance Commercial Center development assigned trips (Figure 8) were added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 5) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. In addition, construction of the Renaissance Commercial Center site -driveway will provide an alternative route for traffic using Prosperity Drive. Therefore, a portion of existing traffic was re-routed from Prosperity Drive to the Renaissance site -driveway. Figure 9 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations within the study area. Figure 10 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 12 No Scale 85 % it s e fiyer�� .SITE Slfe�� Ge4 ay d `e 11 15% ■-T TP+ Figure 7 Trip Distribution Percentages A Traffic Imoact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 PRA February 23, 2006 HPage 13 No Scale b~ SITE SC ape w ay e� (SlOOJ69 d�dGe, r:>IJjz N�► AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 8 Development -Generated Trip Assignments PCommercialA Tras Impact Annlysis of the RenaissancCenter Project Number: 14948-1-0 H'_�+_A February 23, 2006 Page 14 No Scale AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 1. Figure 9 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 PH February 23, 2006 Page I5 No Scale Signalized "Nuggestea- Intersection Improvements" LOS=B(B) Signalization NB/SB - 1 thru/ri ht PQ �1 &c, 11 � Unsignalized A Intersection ros Jd SITE *� S;te� "Pi,lb ��e ice c d G0 t)* Unsignalized LN Intersection Signalized "Suggested [ntersection Improvements" LOS=B(C) Signalization NB - 1 left & I thru SB - 1 thru/right EB - I left & I thru/ri1 Denotes Center Turn Lane AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Critical Left -turn Movement Figure 10 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PH A Traffic /mpact Anahsis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 16 CONCLUSION ' The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Renaisgance. Commercial Center development are acceptable and manageable. Assuming the suggested improvements, all intersections will maintain overall levels of service "C" or better during 2010 build -out conditions. The following describes the suggested roadway improvements for each of the study area intersections as shown in Figure 6 and 10. • Route l l/Pros erit Drive: Traffic signalization along with a ,northbound and southbound shared thru/right lane will be required to maintain acceptable levels of rservice during 2010 background and build -out conditions • Route 11/Renaissance Drive: Traffic signalization will .be required to maintain ' acceptable levels of service during 2010 background conditions. An eastbound leg (fourth leg) will be added to the intersection during 2010 build -out conditions. In addition, a. northbound left and through lane, a southbound through/right shared ' lane and an eastbound left and through/right shared lane will be required to maintain acceptable levels of service during 2010 build -out conditions. 11 1 PHTtn 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Renaissance Commercial Center Project Number: 14948-1-0 February 23, 2006 Page 17 1 .1 APPENDIX HCS+ Worksheets Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst HR+A Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Agency/Co. HR+A Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed IM 210412006 Analysis Year 2010 ExistingConditions Analysis Time Period Peak Hour Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 20 381 8 49 395 97 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ourly Flow Rate, HFR eh/hercent Iv 22 0 2 1 0 6 Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 21 0 2 1 0 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 51 415 102 21 401 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Lenat and Level of Service Approach . Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9. 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 21 51 1 6 24 C (m) (veh/h) 1049 1150 327 649 352 lc 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.07 5% queue length 0.06 0.14 0.01 0.03 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.3 16.0 10.6 16.0 OS A A C B C Ipproach Delay -- -- 11.4 16.0 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\MB_Pub1ic\Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2k88E.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:31 PM file: //CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k88E.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page I of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY (General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Year 2010 Existing Conditions nal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Proiect Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 478 4 46 523 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 53 0 16 17 0 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9. 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 51 0 16 17 0 54 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 48 550 23 9 503 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 i 2 r 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 91 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 9 48 17 56 69 C (m) (veh/h) 1000 1058 279 569 294 /c 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.23 5% queue length 0.03 0.14 0.19 0.33 0,89 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.6 18.7 12.0 21.0 LOS A A C B C pproach Delay -- -- 13.6 21.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k895.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 s/veh pproach LC Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:34 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k895.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive Street: Route 11 . Intersection Orientation: North -South forth/South ud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 24 677 10 60 843 118 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 27 0 2 1 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 26 0 2 1 0 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 63 887 124 25 712 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 25 63 1 7 29 C (m) (veh/h) 686 880 150 432 163 lc 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.18 5% queue length 0.11 0.23 . 0.02 0.05 0.63 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 9.4 29.2 13.5 31.8 LOS I B A I D B D file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k8Fl.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 15.4 31.8 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- C D Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k8F1.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Pros erit Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 11 1194 5 56 1070 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate,.HFR veh/h 65 0 20 22 0 69 . Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 3 T -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1. 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 62. 0 19 21 0 66 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 58 1126 28 11 1256 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N. N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R IlDelay, Queue Lencoith and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 11 58 22 69 85 C (m) (veh/h) 605 548 88 208 62 /c 0.02 0.11 0.25 0.33 1.37 5% queue length 0.06 0.35 0.90 1.38 7.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 12.3 59.0 30.7 353.4 . 1 n.q B B F D F file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k937.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:36 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k937.tmp 8/9/2007 ' Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 LA 11 HCS+'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement . Volume and -Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 26 0 2 1 0 7. 24 677 10 60 843 118 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0. 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped /Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N flOOS12.0Parking N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 33.0 IY= IY= G= G= G= G= 45.0 G= IY= G= G= 6 Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB I NB SB LT TH RT LT I TH RT I LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 31 1 8 27 763 67 1068 Lane Group Capacity, c 567 642 592 174 1805 292 1776 v/c Ratio, X 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.16 0.42 0.23 0.60 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.37 0.37 0.37 10.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 18.4 18.1 18.1 12.2 14.3 12.7 16.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.19 ' fileWCADocuments and Settin s\ranade\Local Settin s\Tem \s2k2DF7.tmp 8/9/2007 g g P Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0:4 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 18.5 18.1 18.1 12.6 14.4 13.1 16.7 Lane Group LOS 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Approach Delay 18.5 18.1 14.4 16.5 Approach LOS 8 8 8 8 Intersection Delay 15.7 X = 0.37 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2DF7.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 7 U HCS+'"DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1. 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L.- TR Volume, V (vph) 62 0 19 21 0 66 11 1194 5 56 1070 27 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3. Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 L 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 28.0 IY= G= G= G= IY= G= 50.0 G= G= IY= G= 6 JY= Y= JY= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 90 23 73 12 1333 62 1219 Lane Group Capacity, c 444 457 502 166 2008 133 2002 v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.05 0.15 0.07 0.66 0.47 0.61 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, di 22.8 21.7 . 22.4 9.3 14.1 12.0 13.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.00o1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 J 1 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.11 0.19 ' file://CADocuments and Setting s\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2EOD.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.1 1 0.2 . 0.8 2.6 1 0.5 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 23.0 21.7 22.5 9.4 14.9 14.6 14.0 Lane Group LOS C C C A 8 8 8 Approach Delay 23.0 22.3 14.9 14.0 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 15.0 X� = 0.50 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Uenerated: 8/9/2oot 4:44 FM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E0D.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information I Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A. Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period M Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center ' East/West Street: Volvo Driveway North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 700 5 30 816 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 2 0 11 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane ' RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0. 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 1 0 0 ' Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 31 858 0 0 736 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 2 2 2 2 2. Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 ' FT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service 'Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR 'v (veh/h) 31 13 C (m) (veh/h) 866 374 ' /c 5% queue length 0.04 0.11 0.03 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 15.0 ' LOS A B 1 file://CADocuments and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k97C.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:37 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k97C.tmp 8/9/2007 E Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background . Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo Driveway North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1174 4 23 1087 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 6 0. 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 36 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 24 1144 0 0 1235 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration . ILR Delay, Queue Lenat and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 24 43 C (m) (veh/h) 562 210 lc 0.04 0.20 5% queue length 0.13 0.75 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 26.5 LOS B D file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9BF.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:37 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\MB_Public\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9BF.tmp 8/9/2007 ' Detailed Report ■ Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11. Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and-Timingand-fin7ing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 0 1 1 Lane Group LR TR L .. T Volume, V (vph) 2 11 700 5 30 816 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 13.0 1 3.0 3.0 13.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking / Grade /Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm -7-[ Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 1 07 08 G= 20.0 G= G= G= G= 58.0 G= G= LGTiming Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y== Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB I NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 14 784 33 907 Lane Group Capacity, c 371 1223 374 1224 v/c Ratio, X 0.04 0.64 0.09 0.74 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 27.5 9.7 6.0 110.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.30 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.1 0.1 2.5 fileWCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E23.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 275 10.8 6.1 13.3 Lane Group LOS C 8 A 8 Approach Delay 27.5 10.8 13.1 Approach LOS C 8 8 Intersection Delay 12.2 X = 0.56 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2001 4:4b VM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E23.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo Dr & Route 11. Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 0 1 1 Lane Group LR TR L. 'T Volume, V (vph) 6 36 1174 4 23 1087 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor,.PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 13.0 L 3.0 13.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 I G= G= G= G= 63.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 47 1308 26 1208 Lane Group Capacity, c 278 1329 234 1330 v/c Ratio, X 0.17 0.98 0.11 0.91 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.17 10.70 0.70 0.70 Uniform Delay, di 132.2 13.0 4.4 11.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration,.k 0.11 0.49 10.11 10.43 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 20.9 0.2 9.4 P file:HCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E39.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 32.4 33.9 4.6 20.5 Lane Group LOS C C A I C Approach Delay 32.4 33.9 20.1 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Delay 27.3 X = 0.83 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:45 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E39.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY [(General Information Site Information. Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Page 1 of 2 Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions ' ' ' Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L. T R Volume veh/h 12 759 10 60 1051 59 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 12 798 10 63 1106 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 ' ' ' ' 'jApproach Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement . 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 13 0 1 1 0 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 13 0 1 1 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 12 63 1 7 14 C (m) (veh/h) 598 817 154 386 162 /c 0.02 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.09 5% queue length 0.06 0.25 0.02 0.06 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.1 9.8 28.5 14.5 29.3 LOS B A D B D Delay -- -- 16.3 29.3 8/9/2007 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E43.tmp Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 I Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+" Version 5.21 uenerarev: onu4vvi �.�u rw file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E43.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour. Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -Out Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center EastNWest Street: Prosperity Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 1638 5 56 1397 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 5 1724 5 58 1470 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street . Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 31 0 10 21 0 66 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 32 0 I 10 22 0 ] 69 - Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach . N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LTR (veh/h) 5 58 22 69 42 C (m) (veh/h) 454 365 67 110 0 /c 0.01 0.16 0.33 0.63 5% queue length 0.03 0.56 1.21 3.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.0 16.7 83.0 81.4 LOS B C F F F pproach Delay -- 81.8 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E4B.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 i1 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:47 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E4B.tmp S/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A . Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr & Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center- Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 13 0 1 1 0 7 12 759 10 60 1051 59 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2:0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 '3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, 1GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 kEW = 34.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= GTiming = 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 15 1 1 13 810 63 1168 Lane Group Capacity, c 615 665 610 132 1765 262 1755 v/c Ratio, X 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.46 0.24 0.67 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 Uniform Delay, d1 17.6 17.4 174 12.4 15.2 13.3 174 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 ' file:HCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E7Ltmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 . 0.2 0.5 1 1.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 17.6 17.4 17.4 12.7 15.3 13.8 tL Lane Group LOS B B B B B B Approach Delay 17.6 17.4 15.3 18.2 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 17.0 X = 0.39 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:48 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E71.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page I of 2 HCS+'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A . Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Prosperity Dr &. Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center- Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing InDU EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Group LTR LT R L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 31. 0 10 21 0 66 5 1638 5 56 1397 13 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N. 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 F7 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 20.0 . IY= IY= G= G= G= G= 58.0 G= G= IY= G= IY= 6 I Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 44 22 63 5 1729. 59 1485 Lane Group Capacity, c 326 326 359 144 2330 92 2328 v/c Ratio, X 0.13 0.07 0.18 0.03 0.74 0.64 _ 0.64 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 8.1 27.6 28.3 5.8 10.9 9.7 9.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.30 0.22 0.22 ' fileWCADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E87.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.3 14.2 1 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Control Delay 28.3 27.7 28.6 5.9 12.2 23.9 10.3 Lane Group LOS C C C A 8 C 8 Approach Delay 28.3 28.3 12.2 10.8 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 12.2 X = 0.60 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:49 FM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E87.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo/Renaissance Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 38 688-, 5 30 815 .208 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 40 724 5 31 857 218 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Tye Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes. 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR jjpstream Si 7a_lj 10 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 82 0 13 2 0 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 86 0 13 2 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L TR (veh/h) 40 31 13 86 13 C (m) (veh/h) 649 875 353 200 309 /c 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.04 5% queue length 0.20 0.11 0.11 1.99 0.13. Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 9.3 15.6 35.9 17.2 I.OS I B A C E C file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E53.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 15.6 33.5 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- C D Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:47 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E53.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information __ Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A . Date Performed 1210412006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo/Renaissance & Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Renaissance Commercial Center East/West Street: Volvo/Renaissance Drive North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 61 1168 4 23 1077 327 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 64 1229 4 24 1133 344 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Two Way Lett Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 444 0 83 6 0 36 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 467 0 87 6 0 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1. 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR L TR (veh/h) . 64 24 43 467 87 C (m) (veh/h) 456 565 109 83 196 lc 6.14 0.04 0.39 5.63 0.44 5% queue length 0.48 0.13 1.63 51.41 . 2.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.2 11.7 58.1 2182 37.3 LnS B B F F E file:HC:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E5B.tmp 8/9/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 pproach Delay 58.1 1845 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- . F F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:48 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\u2k2E5B.tmp 8/9/2007 ' Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo/Renaissance &. Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010: Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID. Center - Suggested lm rovement Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N1 1 1 0. 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 .2 0 Lane Group L TR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (v h) 82 0 13 2 0 11 38 688 5 30 815 208 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor; PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0' 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 IN 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 .Parking/ Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp r 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm, 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 28.0 IY= G= G= G= IY= G= 50.0 G= G=. IY= G= 6 Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y=. Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT I LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 86 14 7 40 729 32 1077 Lane Group Capacity, c 445 492 517 207 2008 358 1948 v/c Ratio, X 0.19 0.03 0.01 0.19 0.36 0.09 0.55 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, di 2.7 1.5 21.4 10.0 11.1 9.4 12.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 11.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 0.11 0.11 041 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E9D.tmp . 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Delay Calibration, k Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 22.9 121.6 21.5 1 10.4 1 11.2 9.5 13.2 Lane Group LOS C I C C B I 8 A 8 Approach Delay 22.7 21.5 11.2 13.1 Approach LOS C C 8 8 Intersection Delay 12.9 X = 0.42 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All, Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:49 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2E9D.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 � I 11 . I - HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information' Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1210412006 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Volvo/Renaissance.& Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 201,0 Buildout Conditions Renaissance Commercial Project ID Center - Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing Input EB LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR Volume, V (v h) 444 0 83 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 2. Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated. A A A A WB NB SB LT 0 6 0 0.95 A TH 1 LTR 0 0 0.95 A' RT 0 36 0 0.95 A LT 1 L 61 2 0.95 I.A TH 2 TR 1168 0 0.95 A RT 0 4 0 0.95. A LT 1 L 23 0 0.95 A TH 1 RT 2 TR 1077 0 0.95 A 0 327 0 0.95 A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2. Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 . Green, e 22.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR 0 0 Volumes 0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 6 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 3 3.0 1.000 0.0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 Parking Maneuvers, Nm N N 12.0 0 N 12.0 N 12.0 0 N 12.0 N 12.0 0 N Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 0 3.2 0 0 3.2 0 0 3.2 Phasing EB Only I EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 1 08 Timing G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= G= G= 43.0 G= G= G= IY= 6 IY= 6 Y= Y IY= 6 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca acit ,Control Delay, and LOS Determination Adjusted Flow Rate, v EB LT TH RT 467 87 WB LT TH RT 38 NB LT TH RT 64 1233 SB LT I TH RT 24 1478 Lane Group Capacity, c 572 616 360 83 1728 108 1668 v/c Ratio, X 0.82 0.14 0.11 0.77 0.71 0.22 0.89 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.39 0.39 0.22 L1.000 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 25.6 17.8. 27.9 19.4 18.6 13.7 21.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.36 0.11 0.11 0.32 0.28 0.11 0.41 ' file:HC:\Documents and Settin s\i•anade\Local Setti � nos\Tcmp\s2k2EE3.tmp 8/9/2007 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 Delay Calibration, k Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.1 0.1 35.0 1.4 1.0 6.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 34.6 17.9 128.0 54.5 20.0 14.8 1274 Lane Group LOS C B I C D C 8 I C Approach Delay 32.0 28.0 21.7 27.2 Approach LOS. C C C C Intersection Delay 25.9 X = 0.85 Intersection LOS C t;opyright c�J 2005 University of Honda, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 8/9/2007 4:50 PM file://CADocuments and Settings\ranade\Local Settings\Temp\s2k2EB3.tmp 8/9/2007 Intersection: . E-W: PROSPERITY DR Weather DRY File Name N-S: ROUTE 11 Count ByjJJP Input By JJP Location WINCHESTER,VA Count Date 10/16/2006 15 Minute EB: PROSPERITY DR WB: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE I 1 SB: ROUTE 11 15 Min. Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W Period Begining 7:00 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 42 0 44 4 45 10 59 109 7:00 7:15 7 0 2 9 0 0. 0 0 2 74 2 78 11 58 Jan-00 70 157 7:15 7:30 7 0 0 7 0 0 2 2 5 98 3 106 9 95 26 130 245 7:30 7:45 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 5 108 1 114 20 110 27 157 274 7:45 8:00 4 0 1 5 0 0 3 3 6 104 3 113 10 117 27 154 275 8:00 8:15 8 0 1 9 0 0 1 1 4 71 1 76 10 73 17 100 186 8:15 8:30. 7 0 2 9 1 0 0 1 2 90 1 93 6 72 9 87 190 8:30 8:45 10 0 2 12 1 0 6 7 2 80 5 87 5 104 8 117 223 8:45 A.M.-Total 51 0 8 59 1 3 0 12 15 28 667 16 711 75 674 125 874 1659 A.M. Total 16:00 12 0 3 15 3 0 3 6 6 124 0 130 10 129 8 147 298 16:00 16:15 9 0 3 12 6 0 17 23 2 109 3 114 10 135 5 150 299 16:15 16:30 14 0 3 17 5 0 16 21 1 ' 126 1 128 7 132 6 145 311 16:30 16:45 16 0 7 23 3 0 18 21 0 119 0 119 19 127 3 149 312 16:45 17:00 28 0 6 34 7 0 25 32 1 103 1 105 12 107 4 123 294 17:00 17:15 13 0 1 14 4 0 11 15 1 110 0 111 9 142 5 156 296 17:15 17:30 6 0 1 7 4 0 13 17 0 126 0 126 13 134 7 154 304 17:30 17:45 3 0 2 5 3 0 7 10 0 100 0 100 12 91 2 105 220 17:45 P.M. Total 101 0 26 127 35 0 110 145 11 917 5 933 92 997 40 1129 2334 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: PROSPERITY DR WB.: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE i l SB: ROUTE 11 1 Hour Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W1 Period Begining 7:00 22 0 2 24 1 0 2 3 14 322 6 342 44 308 64 416 785 7:00 7:15 20 0 3 23 1 0 5 6 18 384 9 411 50 380 81 511 951 7:15 .730 21 0 2 23 1 0 6 7 20 381 8 409 49 395 97 541 980 7:30 7:45 21 0 4 25 2 0 4 6 17 373 6 396 46 372 80 498 925 7:45 8:00 29 0 6 35 2 0 10 12 14 345 10 369 31 366 61 458 874 8:00 16:00, 51 0 16 67 17 0 54 71 9 478 4 491 46 523 22 591 1220 16:00 16:15 67 0 19 86 21 0 76 97 4 457 5 466 48 501 18 567 1216 16:15 16:30 71 0 17 88 19 0 70 89 3 458 2 463 47 508 18 573 1213 16:30 16:45 63 0 15 78 18 0 67 85 2 458 1 461 53 510 19 582 1206 16:45 17:00 50 0 10 60 18 0 56 74 2 439 I 442 46 474 18 538 1114 17:00 1 Hour EB: PROSPERITY DR WB: PROSPERITY DR NB: ROUTE 11 SB:. ROUTE 11 1 Hour Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total N,S, E & W Period Begining 7:30 21 0 2 23 1 0 6 7 20 381 8 409 49 395 97 541 980 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.64 PHF = 0.58 PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.86 0.89 A.M. Peak 16:00 51 0 16 67 l: z 0 54 71 9 478 4 491 46 523 22 591 1220 16:00 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.73 PHF = 0.77 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.99 1 0.98 P.M. Peak