HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-10 AT&T, Hall, Helsley, Pollack 120' Lattice Telc Facility - Stonewall - BackfileOPEN FILE:
CLOSE FILE:
CUP TRACKING SHEET
File opened
Reference Manual updated/number assigned
D-base updated
Location maps requested from Mapping Dept.
Adjoiner list given to Planner
Application Action Summary updated
ACTION
Planning Commission Meeting
Board of Supervisors Meeting
Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant, copy to Inspections
Dept., copy to file and other cc's
)/0 File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn"
a O Reference manual updated
/d D-base updated
`a jZ O Application Action Summary updated
Sys ID # � M 3
RECEIPT /J (iDAz TEE
.. -- -. -- r--.A ( TV.T.. 1 )
i
ao.
DOLLARS $
(� 1JU 1 pp�
FOR RENT `�CI�I`�� ')� T(:,, Zj�+J�� Il L.�
❑FOR
BY
AMT. OF
CASH
ACCOUNT
f
AMT, PAID
CJ -�
CHECK
BALANCE
MONEY
DUE
ORDER
Founded in 1971
GREENWAY ENGINEERING
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
T R A N S M I T T A L
M AY 2 8 2010 f
L
Project Name: AT&T Commercial Telecommunication Facility CUP Application
Historic Resources Advisory Board Filing Packet
File No: 5387
Date May 28, 2010
To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt
Attn: Mark Cheran GREENWAY ENGINEERING
Phone: 540-662-4185
Copied Fax: 540-722-9528
Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up
❑ Other
❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ® Please Comment
Message:
Hi Mark,
Please review the attached information for the AT&T Commercial Telecommunication Facility
located on Martinsburg Pike and schedule this matter for the June 2010 HRAB Agenda.
Thank you, Evan
Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only:
Received By: Date: Time:
r
Please Print Name:
r r
L
HISTORIC RESOURCE ADVISORY BOARD
REVIEW APPLICATION
Frederick County
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 MEETING DATE
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Telephone: (540) 665-5651
Fax: (540) 665-6395 DATE STAMP
ADDRESS OF PROJECT: 2042 & 2060 Martinsburg Pike Winchester, VA 22603
PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: AT&T Corp. & Melissa
Helsle Hall; Wesley Helsle , Sr.; & Bradley G. Pollack
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (908) 234-8819
1 (540) 327-4195
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS: One AT&T Way; Room 1A113A Bedminster, NJ 07921
& P.O. Box 1924 Winchester, VA 22604
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER: N/A I TELEPHONE NUMBER: N/A
Description of Application: Please describe briefly the request of the application: (rezoning, master development plan,
conditional usepermit). Please be specific:
AT&T is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a 120' free standing class 3
galvanized steel lattice microwave tower microwave tower in support of a long haul line sight radio communication route.
This application is not complete until all of the following information has been provided to the Department
of Planning and Development. Please check the materials that have been submitted.
X Copy of required application as described in 1.1 (1.1.1-1.1.4)
X Description of proposed development or construction project, including proposed uses and general timeframe for
development (1.2)
X Status of any identified historic or archaeological resources on the site or adjacent to the site (e.g., located in any
identified historic area, survey area, or battlefield site or individually listed on a local, state or national historic
register, relevant information on record with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources) and presence of
other historic structures or significant landscape features or archaeological sites; (1.3)
N/A Photographs (color) of all historic resources on the property (1.4)
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (PIN): 43-A-130; 43-A-132
Name of Applicant: Greenway Engineering
Telephone Number (540) 662-4185
Address: Street 151 Windy Hill Lane
City Winchester
State VA Zip 22602
Signature:
L, L •
Print Name:
VAN A .' -Y ii
Date:
's' '� Ito
Please note that the applicant or his/her appointed representative must be present at the meeting.
GREENWAY ENGINEERING, wo.
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
Founded in 1971
May 28, 2010
Frederick County Planning Department
Attn: Mark Cheran
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
RE: AT&T Corp. Conditional Use Permit — HRAB Comments
Dear Mark:
The purpose of this letter is to request inclusion on the Historic Resources Advisory
Board (HRAB) agenda in June 2010 to discuss the referenced Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) application. The subject properties are located near the Interstate 81 Exit 317
interchange and front on the east side of Martinsburg Pike adjacent to AT&T's existing
communications building at 2032 Martinsburg Pike. AT&T is requesting permission to
construct a 120' free standing, class 3 galvanized steel lattice tower in support a of a long
haul line sight radio communications route. The tower design will support the radio
route, plus have cellular and first responder capabilities. AT&T has chosen this location
because of the existence of a network access point (POP). Construction of this route will
primarily serve federal customers location at Mt. Weather, VA in support of mission
critical customer network applications.
AT&T contracted with Comsearch to survey existing structures within a one -mile radius
of the required access point and evaluate the ability of these structures to support 6-foot
diameter and 5-foot diameter microwave dishes. None of the existing structures can
support dishes at the required height. Due to the size and weight of the microwave dish
antennas, a lattice tower is deemed the best means of support at this tower height.
Additionally, the lattice tower will provide for less visual impact than a large diameter
(6'±) monopole tower.
The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey identifies the five sites as potentially
significant, which are located between t/2 to 3/4 miles from the subject site. The closest
site is identified as 34-727 Rutherford's Farm, which has been developed as a retail and
office center. Additionally, the subject site is located within a portion of the Second
Winchester core battlefield area defined by the National Park Service Study of Civil War
Sites in the Shenandoah Valley. The subject property was previously located within
defined Developmentally Sensitive Area (DSA); however, this designation has been
removed from the subject property by the Board of Supervisors due to the significant
amount of development and planned development in this area of the County, as well as
Engineers Surveyors Planners Environmental Scientists
Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528
www.greenwayeng.com
Prgject
the planned corridor for the Route 37 eastern bypass. A map exhibit entitled AT&T
Microwave Tower Developmentally Sensitive Areas and Historic Features has been
created to provide a reference for these sites for review by the Historic Resources
Advisory Board (HRAB).
Please find attached all applicable information for the June 2010 HRAB meeting. Please
contact me to advise of the date of this meeting and if you need any additional
information at this time.
Sincerely,
-----------
Evan Wyatt, AICP
Greenway Engineering
Cc: Robert R. Ericksen, AT&T Corp.
Thomas M. Lawson, Lawson & Silek P.L.C.
Prorci V5387 2
Submittal Deadline
P/C Meeting
BOS Meeting
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. Applicant (The applicant if the ® owner ® other)
NAME: AT&T Corp. Attn: Robert R. Ericksen, P.E., CCIM
ADDRESS: One AT&T Way; Room 1A113A
Bedminster, NJ 07921
TELEPHONE (908) 234-8819
2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property:
AT&T c/o Robert R. Ericksen
Melissa Helsley-Hall
Wesley Helsley, Sr.
Bradley G. Pollack
The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of our road
or street)
The subject properties (Tax Map Parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132) are located on the east side of
Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11 North), approximately 3/4-mile northeast of Interstate 81 Exit 317.
4. The properties have a road frontage of 261'± feet and a depth ranging between 402'± and 604'±
feet and consist of a total of 3.32± acres. (Please be exact) Please refer to attached deed and
plat information for tax map parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132.
Tax Map Parcel 43-((A))-130 is owned by AT&T Corporation as evidenced by deed from
Tad J. Naegeli and Maria Sunshine Doyle-Naegeli (previous owner) recorded as Instrument No.
080006084, as recorded in the records of the clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick.
Tax Map Parcel 43-((A))-132 is owned by Melissa Helsley-Hall and Wesley Helsley, Sr., as
evidenced by deed from John E. & Shannon K. Hart (previous owner) recorded as Instrument No.
050026775, as recorded in the records of the clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick.
6.
7.
91
a
Property Identification Numbers 43-((A))-130 (AT&T); 43-((A))-132 (Helsley-Hall)
Magisterial District Stonewall District
Current Zoning RP, Residential Performance District
Adjoining Property: Please refer to the attached Zoning Map Exhibit.
USE
North Residential; Unimproved
East Church; Unimproved
South Church; Unimproved
West Residential
Unimproved
ZONING
RP, Residential Performance District
RP, Residential Performance District
RP, Residential Performance District
RP, Residential Performance District
RA, Rural Areas District
The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing)
Commercial Telecommunication Facility
It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: 120' microwave lattice tower
with accessory equipment building_
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both
sides and rear and in from of (across the street) the property where the requested use will be
conducted. (Continue on next page if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this
application: Please refer to the attached Adjoining Property Owner Map and Table.
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
2
11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on
the property, including measurements to all property lines.
Please refer to the AT&T Microwave Tower Fall Zone Exhibit that is included as information with this
Conditional Use Permit Application. Please note that the exhibit reflects current property boundary
information and that the two subject t properties will be consolidated subsequent to the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit Application to ensure that the fall zone established for the microwave tower
will be contained within the project boundary.
12. Additional comments, if any:
The proposed AT&T microwave tower properties are located outside of the County's defined
Urban Development Area (UDA) and are not adjacent to identified Developmentally Sensitive
Areas (DSA) as depicted in the Comprehensive Policy Plan Northeast Land Use Plan. The
location of the 120' microwave tower is situated adjacent to Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11
North) and is within close proximity to Interstate 81 and the planned route for the Route 37
Eastern Bypass. The location of the proposed 120' microwave tower is positioned to provide
service for existing land use and is strategically located for future growth and development within
this geographic area of Frederick County.
If (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of
Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued
to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days
prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'
public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick
County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect
your property where the proposed use will be conducted.
Signature of Applicant:
Signature of Owner:
Owner's Mailing Address: AT&T Services, Inc.,
One AT&T Way Room IAl 13A Bedminster, NJ 07921
Owner's Telephone Number: (908) 234-8819
Signature of Owner:
Signature of Owner:
Owner's Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1924 Winchester, VA 22604
Owner's Telephone Number: (540) 327-4195
leej 006 slenbe pul L :3WOS
' izr°'•^"'
an '
" M�
1SV3 L£ 31noLl 43SOdONd H11M
3MQ 'AB 43N91S3 L8£S OI 1D3fOad OIOZ aVW 131V4
v se on xra
VINI9Nin'A1NnOO NOIH3(13Nd
zcvzz mw.. .»i.•
10IN1SIO IVIH31SISVW llVM3NOIS
dVW NOIlVOOI 2i3M01 3nVMOZIOIW 1 8 1V
JNIU33NIJN3 AVMN33NO
�
1SV3 LE 31nON a3SOdOHd H1IM
dVW NOI1VOOl N3MO1 3AVMOHOIW 1'81V
"g
i E u
w
a
J'
C i
O
{ a
0
z
AT & T Microwave TowLi
��� //rFAyF� W
��� UDA Map JP� s° z
A
y� � _ I � o �'Pp
/ 2fC sy e�~ Or CS
6e3 `/Nc e `� eea W i?
fAtR `N Q 3 °y
^y _ 837
Q
7st
eet vc�� eFFt °�° �HARIES J�4 _......_ c e.
l�rp 9y R° T°wN-RD v s
JOP cr 9P o� 4.01
,••. C!' a H, G a .c
ry
D D J\ O ® W
eet
P�C` cq �JQ2 .r O
S w
JESSICA LN a
, QQ' �'�S.RO
Q'
�yo`�� o •p`'as` �STSr O Q
cyFF p �
g JQet
e eo e v H
0 w
\ \ / 732 �F9 U�q �• �D J
p
j es U o
D Z —
LU
Q J _
� Q >
w }
a
w F.
q Q
�° 3 cjo
c°
/ PAC71V WAY (N_', X O Q OQ V �i
/ a fop eau �..,,. Inside UDA U o
7 `y�o 04~'•.��q Legend ;"..,,..,w. ~ a w o "
7 �t q! QSubjectProperties �'DutsideUDq w o
3 Feet .R 1=3 UDA ` o 1., Q
C FOe � Parcel Boundary —
{ �Fs 1,000 500 0 1,000 0o u w
v
z
AT & T Microwave Tower
LU
/
Fall Zone Exhibit �>
,;;
z
a
W
� �
3.y g�g
6 r
�) o
w
120 Foot Fall Zone
�
f— om
AT&T Microwave Tower
j X
tL
Q
W
11
Q Q
U N
Q
O0
�m
U
w
O
Line of Sight
to Mt. Weather
w
z
m
V
//
o
j
m
X
a >
W}
n
Legend
Q
0
W
ZLLI
O
F Z
N 0
¢ 00
6
o
w LL
�=P
AT & T Property
<
U
<
¢ o
a
Building Footprints
j \
v
Feet
as
Q
3 LU
z
o
Parcel Boundary
100 50 0 100
w w
a
o N
Map — .10UfC2'. —... I 1,,nty. 1, 111 UeparimeflL —, lUU'J U,l
z
AT & T Microwave Tower FE
Adjoining Property Owners Map z
c;
N z
LU
Q ai 22"
> a
q mi
�73 rn
A u 3 UJ
0
0
++ 3
43`A 1104
43 U O
/ A 13o i a
c7
m z
Q z
i� 43 A 132 p0
43 A 132B W
CC(00 S2
w z Cn
3 Z o u
o3: a>
w O Cr M
_Ln Z 9
O wa 0 0 �
U_ O U w LL
a U O 8
Legenz l h
.0z L.
Feet Subject Properties Q z Z W R g
j Adjoining Property O �
200 100 0 200I Boundary ~ LL
Parcel Bounds y
Adjoining Property Owners Listing
File 5387
Tax Map Number
Owner
. Address
City & State
ZIP
43 A 110
THOMAS E. & JANET RIDDICK, JR.
2045 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
44 A 24
RITA WILSON
PO BOX 2996
WINCHESTER, VA
22604
43 A 113
JANE M. DEHAVEN, TRUSTEE
2073 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
43 A 132B
TRUSTEES OF MARANATHA BAPTIST CHURCH
2O40 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
1 22603
43 A 129
IWILLIAM & SANDRA LIGHT
1405 SPRING VALLEY DR
IWINCHESTER, VA
1 22603
Source: Frederick County GIS, May 2010 Page 1 of 1
Virginia Department of Historic Resources Survey Form Exhibits
➢ File Number 34-112
➢ File Number 34-703
➢ File Number 34-727
➢ File Number 34-729
➢ File Number 34-950
Carter -Hardesty House
Helm -McCann Property
Rutherford's Farm
Thomas McCann House
Milburn Cemetery
Civil War Sites In The Shenandoah Valley Exhibits
➢ Second Winchester
➢ Opequon or Third Winchester
I
VIRGINIA
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARKS
HISTORIC DISTRICT/BRIEF
SURVEY FORM
File no. 34-112
Negative no(s). 10082 ,10083
City/Town/Village/Hamlet Rural Uounty County rreaericx
Street address or route number off of Rt. 662 U.S.G.S. Quad Stephenson
Historic name Stottlemeyer House Commonname Carter -Hardesty House
Present use abandoned (burned) Building Style Vernacular Greek revival
Original use residential Building Date(s) r 184(1-1 86o
1. Construction Materials
❑ wood frame
H'6rick
bond: ❑ English
❑ Fjemish
Er5 -coutx American
❑ stretcher
❑ other
D stone
❑ random rubble
❑ coursed rubble
❑ ashlar ❑ dressed
❑ rock -faced
❑ log.
❑ squared
notching:
❑ V-notch
❑ saddle
❑ square
❑ concrete block
❑ terra cotta
❑ steel frame
❑ other
❑ unsquared
❑ half dovetail
❑ full dovetail
❑ diamond
2. Cladding Material
❑ weatherboard
❑ composition siding
❑ vertical siding
❑ stucco
❑ board & batten
❑ aluminum or vinyl siding
❑ shingle:
❑ cast iron
❑ wood
❑ sheet metal
❑ asbestos
❑ enameled metal
❑ asphalt
❑ glass
❑ bricktex
❑ other
3. Stories (number) 2
❑ low basement 5 raised basement
4. Bays (number): front 5 side (church)
symmetrical ❑ asymmetrical
S. Roof Type
❑ shed
❑ hipped
E -parapet?
❑ pyramidal?
Q gable
❑ mansard
❑ pediment?
❑ false mansard
❑ parapet?
❑ gambrel
❑ clipped end?
❑ flat
❑ cross gable?
❑ parapet?
❑ antral front gable?
❑ roof not visible
❑ other
6. Roofing Material
❑ shingle
❑ composition (asphalt, asbestos, etc.)
P wood
a metal
❑ ending seam
L7 corrugated
❑ pressed tin (simulated shingles)
❑ We
❑ pantile ❑ flat ❑ glazed
❑ slate
❑ not visible
7. Dormers (number): front side
❑ gable ❑ pediment?
❑ shed
❑ hipped
8- Prim-YOF&cular
style
stories
levels full height bays 3
materials wood
description and decorative details
chamfered columns decorative brackets: porch
sits on stone piers
9. General supplementary description and decoration: 6/6 windows;
wooden lintels w/corner blocks over winodws; 6-light
basement windows;2 interior end brick chimneys; 2,4-1
16. Major additions and alteration., '-ji Greek Revival door surrooun
Had a rear 2-story frame fluted trim and corner bock
ell; part of the house 5-light sidelights,4-light
rr. vutouuamgs:ldestroyin the rear ell and creating a
Many outbldgs. _ large hole in the roof of t
including a frame garage, fron tion of the house
12. Landscape Features-12
large frame bank barn w/ silo, 20t
Mature trees, house -el concrete tank for sprayi
sits back off of roaHbrick springhouse (partially r
13. Significance: Fine example of the Vernacular —Greek Rev
Style of Antebellum Frederick County. House is vacant
as it has not been fixed since it burned. Someone liv
behind the house in a trailer.
Surveyed by: M. Kalbian Date: 1/90
VIRGINIA
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
SURVEY FORM 34-112
File Number
1. County Frederick
Town Winchester
Street No. E. of Rt. 662, N. Of Ht.
661.
USGS Quad Name Stephenson
Quad Date 1966
Original Owner John Carter
Original Use Home
PresentOw-r Harry L. McCann
Present Owner Address Jerrerson St.
Winchester, Va.
2. Historic Name
Present Name Carter —Hardesty House
Date or Period (exact or estimate) ea. 1810
Architect ----
Builder, craftsman, etc. ---
Source of Name Quarles, Old Homes
Source of Date Gue s s
3. No. stories (dormers count as %: story):
2
Wall construction
Present Use I Brick
Acreage
Home Unknown
4. Historical Significance (Chain of Title, Families and Events, etc., connected with the property)
See Quarles, Some Old Homes it red_ Co., Va.
5. Architectural Significance (Note interesting interior and exterior details, etc. cite significant alterations and additions)
I believe 1810 is a fairly accurate date. Tie W. wing of the building
Is a Victorian addition, as all of the windows have been Victorianized.
I did not gain entry into the house.
6. Physical Condition
Structure
Grounds
Neighborhood
Excellent Good Fair Poor
:i
7. State potential threats to preservation of structure
None
(over)
I DIVISION Or HISTORIC LANDMARKS Negative no(s), 1 UU'/'/
�P SURVEY FORM 34 -703 .
Historicname Heim House, Bellevue, Fort Common name a in- c ann roper y
County/Town/City Rural Fred. Co. Helm.
Street address or route number R t. 662
USGS Quad Stephenson Date orperiod mid -late 18th C.,mid 19th C.,late 1
Original owner Col. Meredith'Helm Architect/builder/craftsmen
Original use residential unknown
Present owner James K. McCann Sourceofname Quarles
Present owner address Jefferson Ave. Source of date
Winchester, Va . Stories 2
Present use ruins Foundation andwallconst'n part of the house was log,
Acreage unknown part was stone and part was frame.
Rooftvve qable
State condition of structure and environs
The .house is no longer standing. The area is in very poor condition due ne-
glecl
State potential threats tostructure Neglect/development.
Note any archaeological interest
In 1809 it was referred to as Fort Heim. Is included in the Stephenson's Deppt
Battlefield.
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes ❑ no K1
Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration, taking care to point
out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations and additions. List any outbuildings and
their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
All that remains now of the Helm -McCann house is a stone springhouse. There
are ruins! of the house, which burned in 1958, and the brick meathouse is
alsmost completely collapsed. There are some stone ruins (foundation) of the
bank barn as well. Across the road is what is left of Milburn Chapel cemetery.
The old Milburn chapel, an 18th century Methodist church, was abandoned and
torn down many years age. All that remains is a cemetery surrounded by a stone
wall. Many of the local citizens are buiried in this cemetery including Col.
Meredith Helm.
I was able to find 2 historic photographs of the house; one taken in the 1890s
and one in the late 1930s. The photos do not indicate from what view they wer
taken,ibut the 1930s view appears to be a southern one because of the faint ou
line of the stone springhouse which is present in the lower left hand corner..
It appears that the house was partially log, stone and frame. The house's
final configuration was an I hou ve with a rear 2 story wing. The stone spring -
house probably dates.to the original house (c.1752) and is in fairly reasonabl
-condition.
Interior inspected?
Historical significance (Chain of title; individuals, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)
From Quarles and others!
1752 Lord Fairfax to Col. Meredith Helm (died in 1804)
1809 appears on Charles Varle Map as "Fort Helm"
1872 to James McCann
1958 destroyed by fire
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARKS Negative no(s). 10083 -
SURVEY FORM 34-?Z 9
_..---••--•------......------•---
Historic name The Milburn House
Common name Thomas McCann House
County/Town/City Rural Frederick County
Street address or route number off of RE. 662
USGS Quad Stephenson
Date or period c1.842, c.1890-1910
Original owner
John Milburn
Architect/builder/craltsmen
Original use
residential
unknown
Present owner Thomas McCann
Source of name Quarles
Present owner adaress Rt. 8 Box 491
Source of date owner, architectural evidence
Stories
Present use Winchester, VA 22601
Foundation and wall const'n Stone
Acreage residential
unknown
Roof type gable-w/standing seam metal.
State condition of structure and environs The house and outbuildings are in fair condition.
State potential threats to structure Unknown
Note any archaeological interest
Unknown
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes ❑ no IX
Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration, taking care to point
out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations and additions. List any outbuildings and
their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
According to Quarles, this house was built around 1744-1760. Architecturally I was not able ti
verify this date. My findings lead me to believe that the house was built in the mid- 19th Cenr
Tne size of the windows, the type of chimneys, the window and door trim, as well as the config-
uration of the house all seem to date from this period. Mr. Thomas McCann, now 92, has lived
this house his whole life. He says the house was built in 1842. A rear 2 story frame wing was
added in c.1880-1910. The front stone portion is laid in a random rubble pattern with corner
quoins. It is 2 stories, sits on a split-level basement, is 4 bays wide and assymetrical. It
has a gable roof with standing seam metal roofing and 2'interior end brick chimneys. The wind(
are 2/2 and the front door has a transom light (unable to see number of lights). The door surrc
is a flat architrave trim with bull's eye corner blocks. A 2-bay 1 story porch with square dor:
columns as supports is centered on the front (north) facade of the house. The east gable end :
a blind one with no openings. On the other hand; the west gable end is pierced by windows on
levels; 2, 4-light square attic windows; 6/6 windows on the first and seconds stories; and 3-1:
windows in the basement. The rear 2 story frame wing was added in the late 19th-early 20th cel
tury . It has german lap siding, 6/6 windows, an interior end brick chimney, and a side 3-bay '
story porch. This property has many of its original outbuildings. They include a board and bat
meathouse; a frame chicken coop; a frame shed; a frame barn on stone foundation and a fine frar
corn crib. The setting around the Thomas McCann house is exceptionally beautiful. It is locat
on top of a knoll off of Lick .Run.
The house is architecturally significant in that it has had very few alterations since early
this century. Also, it is significant because of its connection with the Milburns and McCanns,
two very prominent families in the history of Frederick county.
Interior inspected?
Just the rear frame section.
Historical significance (Chain of title; individuals, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)
According to Quarles:
1735 Governor of Colony of Virginia to John Frost
1744 John Frost to John Milburn I
1761 83 acres to son John Milburn II
? acres to grandson John Milburn III (son of Robert Milburn, brother of John Milburn II)
John Milburn II built Milburn Chapel by 1786. It was one of the oldest Methodist churchE
in the Valley.
1813 to William Hickman Harris
nd to Jesse Wood
1854 to Thomas Brown
1856 to George Keen
1869 to Jonathen Keen
1888 to Elizabeth Mulvahill
1893 to James K. McCann
1918 to son, Charles R. McCann
1966 to son Thomas Kemp McCann
tl
i i..
-
1
w
a M'��
- + J
VIRGINIA File no. — 50
t ,, Ne ative n s . 632
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARKS
HISTORIC DISTRICT/BRIEF
SURVEY FORM
City/Town/ Village/ Hamlet Rural County County Frederielt
Street address or route number Rt. 622 U.S.G.S. Quad Stephenson
Historic name Milburn Methodist Cha el Common name Milburn Chapel & Cemetery
Present use Abandoned Building Style Vernacular
Oriemal use Church & Cemetery Building Date(s) ca.1788, ca.1887, ca.1945
I. Construction Materials
❑ wood frame
❑ brick
bond: ❑ English
❑ Flemish
❑ _-course American
❑ stretcher
❑ other
❑ stone
❑ random rubble
❑ coursed rubble
❑ ashlar ❑ dressed
❑ rock -faced
❑ log:
❑ squared
notching:
❑ V-notch
❑ saddle
❑ square
❑ concrete block
❑ terra cotta
❑ steel frame
❑ other
❑ unsquared
❑ half dovetail
❑ full dovetail
❑ diamond
2. Cladding Mateiial
❑ weatherboard
❑ composition siding
❑ vertical siding
❑ stucco
❑ board & batten
❑ aluminum or vinyl siding
❑ shingle:
❑ cast iron
❑ wood
❑ sheet metal
❑ asbestos
❑ enameled metal
❑ asphalt
❑ glass
❑ bricktex
❑ other
3. Stories (number)
❑ low basement
❑ raised basement
4. Bays (number): front side (church)
1 ❑ symmetrical ❑ asymmetrical
5. Roof Type
❑ shed
❑ parapet?
❑ gable
❑ pediment?
❑ parapet'?
❑ clipped end?
❑ cross gable?
❑ central front gable?
❑ other
❑ hipped
❑ pyramidal'?
❑ mansard
❑ false mansard
❑ gambrel
❑ flat
❑ parapet?
❑ roof not visible
6. Roofing Material
❑ shingle
❑ composition (asphalt, asbestos, etc.)
❑ wood
❑ metal
❑ standing seam
❑ corrugated
❑ pressed tin (simulated shingles)
❑ the
❑ pantile ❑ flat ❑ glazed
❑ slate
❑ not visible
7. Dormers (number): front side
❑ gable ❑ pediment?
❑ shed
❑ hipped
8. Primary Porch
style
stories
levels
materials
description and decorative details
bays
9. General supplementary description and decoration: It is believed
that Milburn Chapel ims built in 1788, halting it one
of the earliest Methodist Chapels in Frederic}: Co.
T+ diE3manteled around 1887 & the logs were sold
10. Major additions and alterations: to a Mr. Schreck vilio used
them to build a barn on his property (which no long—
er stands). The money eras used to help build the re
placement church Eirunanuel Meth. Church (34-940) in
11. Outbuildings: Stephenson. The cemetery still remains.
Its stone wall ,ras repaired by Mr. Paul Sternitzke,
a German prisoner of war staying in Winchester durin.
the early winter of 1944. Some important families &
12. Landscape Features: figures are buried pare incivaing
the Helm (Amelia 1803, Meredith 1804). It is also
presumed that John Milburn was buried here.
13. Significance:
Surveyed by: - r ,1-,1 ti Date: 11 /90
Landmark
awaits restoration
preachers, held regular services at
the newly constructed church on
ne of Frederick
his property.
County's oldest
Of the many notable Methodist
landmarks- " -
ministers who preached at Milburn
Milburn Cemetery,
Chapel, the most prominent was
appears almost abandoned at its
Francis Asbury, the first American
quiet location beside a little-
bishop of the Methodist church.
travOled gravel road near — —`-"John
SLOW Bala-thAr before
Stephenson.
construction was completed at
Its most ardent visitors these
Milburn Chapel, Asbury stood on a
days are the groundhogs that have
work bench and preached in 1788.
burrowed deep under the silent
It was more than 11 years later
graves and the cattle that graze
when Asbury returned to Milburn
beside the vine -covered, limestone
Chapel. The reason for his visit
wall that defines the graveyard.
was to honor Milburn's retirement
To one side of the cemetery is a
from itinerant preaching.
rocky mound —all that remains of
Although Milburn died in 1813,
the once historic Milburn Method-
services were held at the chapel
ist Chapel.
until it was severely damaged by
According to "Milburn Method-
Civil War battles fought in the
ist Chapel in Frederick County,
area.
Virginia," by area historian Wilbur
Sometime between 1882 and
S. Johnston, the log church and its
1884, Milburn's congregation met
cemetery were established around
to decide whether to repair the old
1788 by John Milburn.
chapel or rebuild at a new location.
Johnson said that Milburn
Church members opted for the
Chapel is believed to have been the
latter and in 1887 built Emmanuel
first Methodist church to be built
Methodist Episcopal Church South
in Frederick County and was one
(now the Emmanuel United Meth -
of the oldest in the Northern
odist Church) in Stephenson on
Shenandoah Valley.
U.S. 11.
Its founder, who was a grandson
At the time the congregation
of the First Milburn to settle in the
decided to relocate, the land
Frederick County area, wasn't
surrounding the chapel and cem-
Methodist by birth. He was a
etery was owned by James Kemp
convert from Quakerism.
McCann, who purchased the
Milburn's grandparents, John
property in 1872.
and Elizabeth Milburn, moved to
Johnston said that at about the
the county between 1743 and 1747
time the new church was built,
to settle on what is now Milburn
McCann dismantled the old chapel
Road (Route 662), which was a
and sold the logs to a farmer, who
primary road in the late 1700s and
used them to build a barn near the
the early 1800s.
site of the former
The Milburns
Jordan Springs Hotel
were members of the (By 1920)
I
on Route 664. The
Hopewell Quaker barn is no longer
Meeting near even the standing.
Clearbrook. McCann gave the
In 1779, the paths and proceeds from the
younger Milburn lanes sale of the logs to the
was dismissed from
new church.
the meeting because became'
There's no indica-
he married his first-
tion that Milburn
cousin, Elizabeth. occupied was buried in the
According to cemetery, but
Johnston's book, the and the Johnston said it is
marriage was
considered "contrary opening
reasonable to believe
of that he was.
to discipline." rave "If his grave
Eight years after anew gmarker were stone, it
Milburn was dis- invariably is likely fallen and
missed from the
buried with subse-
Quaker meeting, he struck quent plant growth
became a traveling or, like many others,
preacher and helped unmarked stolen," Johnston
form the Milburn
said in his book.
Methodist Society in remains.
Of the few remain -
hie community, —Arvre historian in g grave markers
Johnston said only two date earlier
Wilbur
that Milburn be-
S. Johnston
than Milburn's
came an ordained
death —Ann Amelia
minister in 1789 Photos b Magruder in 1803,
and, along with % and Meredith Helm
other traveling Rick
Foster See Graves, page E4
i
i>
i+new ,tuedwc L
_U.(j li-, al 9 w
P=
Graves from page E3
in 1804.
Helm's grave is marked by a
full-length, horizont-1 sandstone
slab on the ground. The stone's
inscription says: "Sacred to the
memory of Meredith Helm who
departed this life October 12,
1804 in his 51st year of age."
Johnston said that Helm is
probably had the "most illustri-
ousburial in Milburn Cemetery."
Helm was a colonel in the Vir-
ginia militia during the Revolu-
tionaryWar. Helm's father, also
Meredith Helm, was the sixth
sheriff of Frederick County and
one of Winchdster's foundingfa-
thers.
Johnston said that burials
continued at the small cemetery
until about 1920, "when even
the paths and lanes became oc-
cupied and the opening of a new
grave invariably struck un-
marked remains."
After burials ceased at the
cemetery, the McCann family
kept it weeded and mowed for
many years.
The last professional repairto
the limestone wall around the
cemetery was during World War
II. The repairs were paid for by
the McCanns, who hired several
German prisoners of war from a
prison camp in Winchester lo-
cated near Virginia Avenue.
Today, the site of the chapel is
owned by the McCann family.
Care of the cemetery —planned
for complete restoration —is pro-
vided by the Emmanuel church.
. Emmanuel's minister, the
Rev. Mark Miller, said that the
restoration of the cemetery has
been slow and costly.
"It's slow partly because ofthe
economy and because the people
at the church don't have an at-
tachment to the cemetery," Miller
said.
Early this year, the church's
Boy Scout troop and youth group
began clearing away brush and
undergrowth from the cemetery.
The church has also estab-
lished a Milburn Cemetery fund
and takesup a collection three or
four times a year to help with the
restoration.
"Our objective is to raise
enough money to eventually have
the cemetery professionally
cleared and maintained," Miller
said. "So far, we have about $100
in the fund."
"We would also like to put a
historical marker at the cem-
etery,"Johnston said recently as
he stood beside the cemetery
wall.
"Phis is such abeautiful spot."
Anyone interested in making
a tax-deductible donation to the
Milburn Cemetery Fund can call
662-1269. Copies of Johnston's
book can be purchased at the
Winchester -Frederick County
Historical Society office at 401
National Ave. in Winchester.
11. Outbuildings: Stephenson. Tae cemetery still remain:
Its stone wall ;aas repaired by Mr. Paul Sternitzlce
a German prisoner of Saar staying in Winchester dur
the early winter of 1944. Some important families
12. Landscape Features; figures are buried here incluaing
the Helms (Amelia 1803, Meredith 1804). It is als
presumed that John Milburn was buried here.
13. Significance:
Surveyed by: rt;Date:
�rat S. Kalbian 11/90
IT
F1
'�•�• '1 •�{.� �. .�i,+" �.,;r. 't 3' C dui 7.,'� I rL L
�'` •+�'"
IZ
qL
�-• ,.;!r ' �� •. � � {r • t • � �. Ij}, .. �'• � � r fit' ' �'! Q 1
rill' � � •fir ►• +F y ��'.•► �ii '!!: , h ,fir. �' ! � ,� �� �' .i7 � I
'�,,. .r�+ •>l.,�;i ,2 `b+ ♦ "':�)���t w ;{i. �'L� LT. -
ems:'. 3', -t' ui���' ''% 3. '.' •` !
.wr♦. �t� :� '� •,; r �r �� r'►� �sa�L ty s..=� • , � ,. .. � '• . ,'r ,� ��• i �";F
1
.
N
y V 1lCh111111,
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
0
Historic name Rutherford's Far
County/Town/City Rural County
Street address or route number Rt. 11
USGS(luad Winchester
Original owner
Original use
Present owner
Present owner address
Present use
Acreage
ix
File . 3�-727
Negative no(s). 10082
SURVEY FORM
m Common name Rutherford's Farm
Date or period July 20, 1864
Architect/builder/craftsmen
Source of name
Source of date
Stories
Foundation and wall const'n
State condition of structure an° envnvn-
d's Farm
The main house
threatsoto structure erforThe site is threatened demolished -
State p
threatenedby development.
Note any archaeological interest
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes — °O _X period of all alterations
ures �OfPlan'
Architectural desO1n pout aspectsnotvisible(ortclear from photographs. Explain nature an.ctu,.Jsyste- and d an;
exterior decoration,
taking care top approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
and additions. List any outbuildings and their
All that remains of the hous
11 up e at Rutherford's house is aset ohotos)f There
steps
that lead from Rt. to the site of the -house (see p
is a historical marker south of the site of the house on Rt. 11 identifying
it.
interiorinspecteu: -
Historical significance (Chain of title; individuals, families, events, etc-, a
By James Tubbesing: April 3, 1990 Confederate General Ste
On July 20, 1664 at the Battle of Rutherford-s Farmion attacking force led by
phen Ramseur's division was routed by a sup ed Ramseur's rep -
General William Averell. This debacle, which severely damaged
utation as a division commander, resulted in the loss of 470 men and four can -
General as being the
non. Unionaisualties were fewer than 300. The battle itself had little
strategic importance to either side, futhiswnotablhaP of iliss Tillie Russell,
scene of one of the enduring lewho sat up all night on that field of death,
Winchester's "Angel of tlercy"
cradling a grievously wounded Confederate office in her arms and thereby
saving his life. ,
• ° i 1 � I .'� �.� i l;�t I- l f (� l f 1' ' ,. 1 1 t t �1 i L•, I', i i i;`
id
WINCHESTER QUADRANGLE
VIRGINIA %yoo`
7.5 MINUTE
SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) y��.t10
745
746 ; 2 100 000 FEET
747 780,,7' 9 6 15,
CD
lip
4348
65
� S3,
"
_
s
Quwry.
7717
4
9
570000
FEET
764+
730
.90
4346
b
v \ .
709
� '•�1
i
0
7 1 0 • •a
•!@
p
_
_
66
.•� ,
N
-ea'�a
..
�i •'
O
nl
10
c
4345
•
d
it
I::
4� ♦
o
' o
y1NTERC NGE 82. 6�
,S
i;0
Ll
•
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
SECOND WINCHESTER Virginia ever did." The battle was won by deft flanking
(13-15 JUNE 1863) maneuvers and underscores the inadequacy of relying on
entrenchments when confronted by a mobile attacking
force.
County: Frederick VA, and City of Winchester
General Location: Valley Pike (US 11 at Abrams Creek),
Apple Pie Ridge and "Louisiana Heights" W of town,
West Fort, Fort Milroy, and Star Fort; S. of present day
Stephenson's (US 11 S of 761).
Size of Study/Core Areas: 22,274/3,113 acres
GIS Integrity of Study/Core Areas: 48/52 percent; Poor/
Fair
Field Assessment of Study Area Integrity: Poor
USGS Quadrants: Winchester, Stephenson
Campaign: Gettysburg Campaign
Principal Commanders: [c] Lt. Gen. Richard S. Ewell; [u]
Maj. Gen. Robert H. Milroy.
Forces Engaged: [c] Second Corps ANV, two divisions
(Early and Johnson), about 12,500; [u] Three infantry
brigades (Elliott, Ely, McReynolds), numbering about
7,000.
Casualties: [c] 269 (47k/219w/3m); [u] 4,443 (95k/373w/
3,975m&c).
Significance: After the Battle of Brandy Station (9 June
1863), Gen. Robert E. Lee launched his plan for a second
invasion of the north. He ordered the Second Corps,
Army of Northern Virginia, under Maj. Gen. Richard
Ewell to attack the US force at Winchester and clear the
Lower Valley of Union opposition. In the resulting three-
day battle (13-15 June), Ewell's corps defeated, routed,
and nearly destroyed a US division under Maj. Gen.
Robert Milroy. This victory (the apogee of Ewell's career)
offered high hopes for the success of Lee's second invasion
of the North, hopes that were dashed on the battlefield of
Gettysburg in July. In the words of Confederate artillerist
Maj. Robert Stiles, "This battle of Winchester ... was one of
the most perfect pieces of work the Army of Northern
DESCRIPTION OF THE BATTLE
Prelude (12 June): On 12 June 1863, the Second Corps of
the Army of Northern Virginia under Lt. Gen. Richard S.
Ewell, three divisions nearly 19,000 strong, entered the
Valley at Chester Gap and pressed on to Front Royal. Two
divisions under Maj. Gen. Jubal A. Early and Maj. Gen.
Edward Johnson continued north on the Valley Pike and
the Front Royal Road to converge on the Union defenders
of Winchester under Maj. Gen. Robert Milroy. Despite
the superior forces that were rumored to be approaching,
Milroy was confident that the strength of his fortifications
would enable him to repel the Confederates or withstand a
siege. The ridges west of town were heavily fortified and
consisted of trenches linking central strong points or
"forts". The strongest of these were Fort Milroy and Star
Fort. West Fort, a redoubt of six guns, featured promi-
nently in the action.
Phase One. US Dispositions (13 June): On 13 June,
Milroy advanced elements of Elliott's brigade to
Pritchard's Hill at Kernstown and sent elements of Ely's
brigade to intercept any advance on the Front Royal Pike.
McReynolds brigade was at Berryville.
Phase Two. CS Advance on Front Royal Pike (13 June):
Edward Johnson's Division of four brigades (Steuart,
Williams, Walker, Jones) advanced on the Front Royal
Pike driving back Union pickets. Approaching the
intersection of Millwood Road about 1400 hours, Johnson
deployed and swept forward, driving Union skirmishers
from behind stone fences. US troops withdrew to high
ground north of Abrams Creek under cover of a battery
and the heavy guns of Fort Milroy. Johnson brought up a
battery and engaged Union field artillery, driving several
pieces from the field. The CS guns lacked the range to
reply to Fort Milroy's guns and eventually were forced to
withdraw. Johnson's,advance was stalled, and he awaited
the arrival of Early's division to the west on the Valley
Pike.
Phase Three. CS Advance on Valley Pike (13 June):
Early's division of four brigades (Hays, Smith, Avery,
a
r
1
71
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
Gordon) marched toward Winchester on the Valley Pike
in conjunction with Johnson's division on the Front Royal
Road. Late afternoon, Early's column reached the
outskirts of Kernstown and drove back the US skirmish
line encountered at Pritchard's Hill. US forces retreated to
Cedar Creek Grade and briefly counterattacked, but Early
extended his line to the west, out -flanking successive
Union positions. US cavalry attacked several times up the
Valley Pike to ease pressure on the infantry. Eventually,
the Union force retreated north of Abrams Creek under
cover of the heavy guns from Bower's Hill and Fort
Milroy.
Phase Four. Milroy Withdraws into the Forts (13 June):
After dark Milroy concentrated his forces inside a triangle
defined by Fort Milroy, Star Fort, and West Fort.
McReynolds' brigade reached Fort Milroy after marching
a round -about route from Berryville, harassed by Confed-
erate cavalry. Milroy's soldiers had fought well during the
previous afternoon, and he was confident that he could
withstand renewed Confederate assaults in the morning.
In the meantime, Ewell ordered his third division under
Maj. Gen. Robert E. Rodes to advance on Martinsburg via
Berryville to cut offMilroy's retreat in that direction.
Phase Five. Early's Flank March (14 June): At dawn of 14
June, one of Early's brigades (Gordon) swept forward to
capture Bower's Hill with little resistance. Johnson
extended his line to the right against very. light opposition;
there was fitful skirmishing in the streets of Winchester.
Early and Ewell conferred on Bower's Hill and decided on
a flanking strategy. Gordon's brigade and two batteries
were left on Bower's Hill, while Early led his three other
brigades back to Cedar Creek Grade, west beyond Apple
Pie Ridge where it was out of view of US fortifications,
then north over Cloverdale Plantation to Walnut Grove.
His column was accompanied by 20 guns. While Early
made this march, Johnson advanced a line of skirmishers
on the right to occupy the Federals' attention. The CS
batteries on Bower's Hill opened up, touching off a duel
with the Union guns in Fort Milroy. By mid -afternoon,
Early's force had gained a position opposite West Fort on
Apple Pie Ridge. Eight guns were positioned on the
Brierly Farm northwest of the fort, while 12 guns were
placed in an orchard southwest of the fort. By this time
the field had quieted, and the US forces believed that the
Confederates had been repulsed from Winchester.
Phase Six. Attack on West Fort (14 June): About 1800
hours, Early's artillery opened fire on West Fort. The
twenty guns fired for 45 minutes, while Brig. Gen. Harry
T. Hays stealthily advanced his Louisiana brigade through
the corn and wheat fields at the base of Apple Pie Ridge.
On command, the brigade rushed forward across 300
yards of open fields and swept upward into the works.
After a brief hand-to-hand struggle, US defenders aban-
doned the works, retreating to Fort Milroy. Hays was
supported in the attack by two brigades (Smith and
Avery). Early consolidated his line on West Fort Ridge,
but darkness prevented further gains. An artillery duel
continued until long after dark. After the battle, Ewell
christened West Fort Ridge as "Louisiana Heights" in
honor of Hays's brigade.
Phase Seven. Johnson's Flank March (14-15 June): Ewell
assumed that Milroy would retreat during the night and
ordered Johnson to prevent his escape by cutting the
Charles Town Road. About 2100 hours, Johnson (with
Steuart's and Williams's brigades and 8 guns) marched
north to Berryville Pike and west to Jordan Springs Road,
where he turned north toward Stephenson's Depot.
About midnight, the Stonewallbrigade disengaged and
joined the rear of the column, leaving one brigade (Jones)
astride the Berryville Pike east of town.
Phase Eight. US Withdrawal (14-15 June): After confer-
ring with his officers, Milroy made the decision to try to
"cut their way through" to Harpers Ferry on the old
Charles Town Road. All of the cannons were spiked and
their carriages destroyed. Shortly after midnight, the
Union soldiers left their works so quietly that Early's
Confederates did not know they were gone until morning.
The column massed in the low ground between Star Fort
and Fort Milroy, then moved down the railroad and the
Valley Pike toward the Charles Town crossroad, just south
of Stephenson's Depot.
Phase,Nine. i US Surrender at Stephenson's Depot(15
June): Near dawn, Johnson's skirmishers encountered the
head of Milroy's retreating column near the intersection of
the Valley Pike and old Charles Town road. Milroy faced
his column to the right on the pike and prepared to fight
his way out of a "murderous trap." Johnson deployed his
regiments along Milburn Road as they came up and
advanced to the railroad and placed two guns on either
•
72
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
1•
•
91
side of the Charles Town Road railroad bridge. The rest of
the artillery was deployed on the heights east of Milburn
Road. As it grew light, US forces made several desperate
but uncoordinated attacks against the bridge and railroad'
embankment. The Confederates were being steadily
reinforced and repulsed each attempt. The Stonewall
brigade now came up in line of battle north of the road
and advanced to cut the Valley Pike. This was the final
blow;,Union regiments hoisted the white flag. Between
2,500 and 3,000 surrendered. Milroy and his staff, and
other small units escaped to the west. (Note: US casualty
figures for Second Winchester vary widely. This is
explained by the fact that about two thousand Union
soldiers not belonging to Milroy's command were in field
hospitals in the city and were often added to the number
of captured and missing. Milroy, of course, played down
his losses.)
CURRENT CONDITION OF THE BATTLEFIELD
Contrary to popular perception, Second Winchester is
not a "lost" battlefield. Because of the wide-ranging
Confederate maneuvers involved, the battlefield covers a
great deal of ground, but the major fighting and casualties
occurred at five locations: Pritchard's Hill; the intersection
of Millwood and Front Royal pikes (interchange 82 of I-
81); Abrams Creek and Bower's Hill; Apple Pie Ridge and
West Fort; and Stephenson's Depot. Three of these
locations retain high levels of integrity: Pritchard's Hill,
Apple Pie Ridge and West Fort, and Stephenson's Depot.
The parcel of ground at Pritchard's Hill figured promi-
nently in both battles of Kernstown and in the rear guard
actions of Opequon. The parcel of ground at
Stephenson's Depot figured in cavalry actions during the
battle of Opequon and in the engagement of Rutherford's
Farm (20 July 1864). Although the field over which the
Louisiana Brigade attacked West Fort has been divided by
the rte. 37 bypass, the terrain is still intact and adds to the
interpretation of the battle.
Central to understanding the Union ring of fortifica-
tions at Winchester are Fort Milroy, Star Fort, and West
Fort. Of these, Star Fort is well preserved, while remnants
survive of Fort Milroy and West Fort. Portions of related
entrenchments survive on ridges north and west of
Winchester, although the extent of survivals has not been
measured. The view from Star Fort is essential for
understanding the US position at Second Winchester.
Access to Fort Milroy and creation of a viewshed among
trees would enhance the ability to interpret the Union
situation.
The routes of CS flanking maneuvers (Early to the
west and Johnson to the east) can be followed. Early's
route traverses well preserved rural tracts north from
Cedar Creek Grade along Apple Pie Ridge. The exact
route can only be followed on foot across private property.
Johnson's route crosses a portion of the Opequon
battlefield and follows rural roads past Jordan Spring to
the intersection of rtes. 761 and 11 near Stephenson.
Much of this course is through scenic farmland, although
the density of housing along segments of these roads is
increasing. Driving this route offers an appreciation of CS
strategy and of the final action at Stephenson's Depot.
Many historic structures associated with the battle
remain in and around the city of Winchester, including
Taylor's Hotel which served as the US headquarters, and
Cloverdale and Walnut Grove, which were passed by
Early's flank march.
PERCEPTION OF THREATS TO BATTLEFIELD
The city of Winchester has grown up around the US
defensive position, which was anchored by West Fort, Star
Fort, Fort Milroy, and connecting entrenchments. In
most cases, however, the ridge crests have been the last to
develop as residential tracts have filled the valleys. As a
result, Star Fort is well preserved; portions of Fort Milroy
remain; and traces of West Fort can be located. Recently,
housing has been built along West Fort Ridge ("Louisiana
Heights") destroying or otherwise segmenting surviving
earthworks. The northern portion of Fort Milroy was
recently purchased for the purpose of development; the
southern portion is owned by National Fruit Products.
Seven acres of Star Fort are owned by a local preservation
group, but the surrounding 50 acres are zoned commer-
cial/business and are currently for sale; portions of
earthworks at Star Fort are in need of stabilization;
grounds would need to be cleared, planted with grass, and
maintained to expand visitation and interpretation.
Commercial and industrial development along rte. 522
intrudes somewhat on the viewshed.
Of the five main engagement areas, Bower's Hill is a
housing subdivision and site of a high school, elementary
school, and water tower. A degraded portion of the field
(also fought over during First Winchester) remains along
railroad tracks west of US 11, but this land is scheduled for
high density residential development. Johnson's position
73
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
on June 13-14 at the intersection of Front Royal and
Millwood pikes lies beneath I-81 interchange #82. Land
contours have been extensively altered and viewsheds
blocked by dense commercial/industrial development in
the vicinity. These two segments for most interpretive
activities have been lost.
Pritchard's Hill is privately owned and remains in a
relatively pristine state. The land between Pritchard's Hill
and Bower's Hill has already been densely developed for
residential and commercial purposes. The Apple Pie
Ridge -West Fort parcel across which the Louisiana brigade
attacked West Fort is bisected by rte. 37-bypass but is
visually well preserved, maintained as pasture and apple
orchards. Two historic stone houses survive adjacent to
the highway, which runs through a ravine and is not
particularly intrusive to the view from Apple Pie Ridge.
An excellent vantage point for understanding this phase
exists just south of the intersection of rtes. 522 and 679.
The area south of Stephenson's Depot, site of the
massive US surrender, is by far the best preserved parcel of
Second Winchester. Except for power lines and towers,
the land retains its Civil War appearance. This parcel
covers much of the ground where the battle culminated,
where the most desperate fighting occurred, and where
nearly 3,000 Union soldiers surrendered; its significance
should not be underestimated. The parcel is owned by a
local developer, but is not currently serviced by sewage
lines.
IDENTIFIED SITES AND FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH
THE BATTLEFIELD (UNSURVBYED*)
Abrams Creek
Milburn Road
Abrams Delight
Milltown
Apple Pie Ridge
National Cemetery
Battery Hill
Northwestern Pike
Battery Heights
Old Charles Town Road
Berryville Pike
Old Town Winchester
Bower's Hill
Parkin's Mill
Camp Hill
Pritchard's Hill
Cedar Creek Grade
Star Fort
Cloverdale*
Stephenson's Depot
Collier Redoubt
Stine's Chapel (site of)
Entrenchments
Stone Houses
Fort Milroy
Stonewall Cemetery
Front Royal Pike
Taylor's Hotel
Jonathan Smith House
Tidball's Spring
Jordan Springs
Tollgate (site of)
Keckley Mills
Valley Pike
Kernstown
West Fort
Louisiana Heights
Walnut Grove*
Middle Road
Willow Lawn*
Milburn Cemetery
Winchester & Potomac
Railroad
0
E-1
74
/*
-N
tz X
ZY b City of inchester
^'` ' {t F �' €. f J �yy,,�� ) ( �.. �.�'4/ �` � +tom. Y O �t
J
N
I
A,
'N
Rataind btwity
SU* Am bwadwy
cam An* 93wadwy
stq� dw Rhea 0
C"wV or Cy,
MAP 25: SECOND WINCHESTER
INTEGRITY ® 1991
(Numbers keyed to baule phases)..
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
0
•
9-
OPEOU N OR THIRD WINCHESTER
(19 SmEMBER 1864)
County: Frederick, VA and City of Winchester
General Location: Area east of Winchester from I-81
along Berryville Pike (VA 7) to Opequon Creek. Also
combat north of Red Bud Run W to US11. Stephenson's
Depot. Star Fort. Collier Redoubt.
Size of Study/Core Areas: 11,670/4,914 acres
GIS Integrity of Study/Core Areas: 54/47 percent; Fair/
Poor
Field Assessment of Study Area Integrity: Poor
USGS Quadrants: Winchester, Stephenson
Campaign: Sheridan's Valley Campaign
Principal Commanders: [c] Lt. Gen. Jubal Early; [u] Maj
Gen. Philip Sheridan.
Forces Engaged: [c] Four divisions (Gordon, Rodes,
Ramseur, Breckinridge/Wharton), two cavalry divisions
(Fitz Lee, Lomax), about 15,200; [u] Three infantry corps
(Wright, Emory, Crook), cavalry corps (Torbert), about
39,236.
Casualties: [c] 3,611 (226k/1,567w/1,818m&c); [u] 5,018
(697k/3,983w/338m).
Significance: Opequon or Third Winchester (fought 19
September 1864) was the largest and most desperately
contested battle of the Civil War in the Shenandoah
Valley, resulting in more than 9,000 casualties. The battle
was a turning point of the war in the Valley, marking the
rise of Sheridan and the decline of Confederate power.
Sheridan defeated the Confederate army again three days
later at Fisher's Hill (22 September), forcing it to retreat
up the Valley to near Waynesboro. The CS army of Lt.
Gen. Juba] A. Early suffered about 23 percent casualties.
Casualties for the larger Union army under Maj. Gen.
Philip Sheridan exceeded 5,000, nearly 20 percent. The
Union XIX Corps sustained 40 percent casualties (2,074
men) and lost every regimental commander during its
assaults on the Middle Field and Second Woods. The
most severe fighting and casualties occurred in the large
parcel east of I-81, north of rte. 7, west of rte. 656, and
south of rte. 661. The Middle Field ranks with some of the
most sanguinary fields of the Civil War, witnessing more
than 3,000 casualties. CS general Robert E. Rodes and US
general D. A. Russell were both killed within a few
hundred yards of the Dinkle Barn site at the entrance to
Winchester Mall.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BATTLE
Phase One. US Advance (19 September): Maj. Gen.
Philip Sheridan's army advanced from the vicinity of
Berryville on the Winchester -Berryville Pike about 0200
hours, 19 September 1864. At earliest light, Brig. Gen.
James Wilson's cavalry division crossed the Opequon at
Spout Spring and advanced through a defile known as
Berryville Canyon, followed by the US infantry (VI Corps,
XIX Corps, and Crook's corps). At the canyon's mouth
the cavalry met the first elements of Maj. Gen. Stephen
Ramseur's CS division and drove them back on their
supports. Johnston's brigade deployed across the pike and
held back the Union advance, while the rest of the division
came into line to cover the Berryville Pike and Senseny
Road farther to the south. The US cavalry launched
several mounted and dismounted charges, driving the CS
infantry back about 150 yards to the vicinity of the Dinkle
Barn. Here Ramseur stiffened his defense with artillery,
and the US cavalry withdrew as its infantry began to
deploy. Wilson's division moved to cover the US left flank
where it remained for the rest of the battle.
Phase Two. Cavalry Action: About 0200 hours Brig. Gen.
Wesley Merritt's cavalry division of three brigades (Custer,
Devin, Lowell) advanced toward Seiver's and Locke's fords
from the vicinity of Berryville. Their crossings were
resisted by Brig. Gen. John McCausland's cavalry brigade
dismounted behind barricades. The Reserve brigade
(Lowell) pushed across at Seiver's Ford against fitful
opposition. Custer's brigade met heavier resistance at
Locke's Ford and made several mounted charges before
securing a foothold on the western bank. By 0800 hours
both wings were across the creek, but the cavalry did not
advance for several hours. About 1030 hours,
McCausland's skirmishers withdrew, and Merritt's
division moved cautiously forward. Waiting for them was
93
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
Wharton's infantry division about a mile west of the fords,
deployed across the roads in woods and behind stone
fences. About 1100 hours, the US cavalry began testing
the CS defenses with skirmishers and artillery. Custer
launched one mounted attack but was quickly repulsed.
About noon, Sheridan's main infantry attack was under-
way, and Wharton's division withdrew to cover the CS left
flank on the Valley Pike north of Winchester. Merritt
continued forward along Charles Town Road. Custer
followed the line of the Winchester & Potomac Railroad.
About 1400 hours Merritt's division converged with
Averell's cavalry division on the Valley Pike near
Stephenson's Depot. (See phase seven.)
Phase Three. Deployment of US Infantry: In the mean-
time, the Union infantry bogged down in the narrow
confines of Berryville Canyon, dashing Sheridan's hopes of
quickly taking Winchester and defeating the CS army in
detail. Maj. Gen. Horatio Wright's VI Corps of three
divisions (Getty, Ricketts, Russell) emerged from the
canyon in order. Getty's division deployed south of the
pike with its left flank resting on Abrams Creek. Ricketts'
division formed north of the pike on Getty's right and
extending to Redbud Run. Russell's division was held in
reserve. The XIX Corps of two divisions (Dwight and
Grover) did not begin crossing until after 0900 hours and
eventually deployed north of the pike into the First
Woods, connecting with Ricketts' right. Sheridan
established his headquarters near the Berryville Pike,
probably south of the road on the Eversole Farm. As the
US infantry deployed, the CS batteries opened a furious
fire from behind the Dinkle Barn. Union batteries swung
into action on both sides of the pike to engage the CS
guns.
In the meantime, Lt. Gen. Jubal Early concentrated his
scattered divisions. Rodes' division, marching from near
Stephenson's Depot, deployed to the left and rear of
Ramseur's division in the West Woods. Gordon's division
extended the line across the Hackwood Farm to Redbud
Run. Wharton's infantry and Fitz Lee's cavalry division
drew a line across the Valley Pike north of town near
Stephenson's Depot. CS batteries deployed on high
ground along Baker Lane north and south of the West
Woods, and north of Redbud Run. Skirmishing contin-
tied along Ramseur's front.
Phase Four. Fighting in Middle Field: At 1140 hours, a
US signal gun boomed and Grover's division of four
brigades (Birge, Molineux, Sharpe, and Shunk) launched
its attack from the First Woods across Middle Field
toward the Second Woods behind which Gordon's
division waited. CS horse artillery north of Redbud Run
played havoc with the flanks of Grover's attacking line.
Birge's brigade reached the woods, driving back skirmish-
ers, but then came 'up against Gordon's main line and
were staggered. Sharpe's brigade came up on Birge's left,
and the fighting became desperate. The Confederate line
broke, falling back across the Hackwood property. Seven
CS cannon in the Hackwood Lane fired canister
pointblank into the US attackers, throwing them back.
Gordon now launched a counterattack with two brigades,
driving Birge and Sharpe out of the Second Woods and
back across Middle Field. Grover ordered Molineux to
advance and plug the gap that had opened between Birge
and Sharpe. The firing was so intense that Molineux's
flanks seemed to "melt away." Shunk's brigade was
thrown forward to bolster the wavering Union line,
coming in on Molineux's right rear. Shunk closed to
within sixty yards of the CS line in the Second Woods.
The two lines delivered pointblank volleys into each
others' ranks. Gordon again counterattacked, and the
Union attack collapsed. The wreckage of Grover's'
division went streaming back across the Middle Field to
the safety of the First Woods. The CS horse battery
(Breathed) north of Redbud Run again worked execution
among the retreating division. Every regimental com-
mander in Grover's division was killed or wounded;
casualties totaled nearly 1,500..-Beal's brigade of Dwight's
division deployed in the treeline at the east end of the
Middle Field and advanced into "that basin of Hell" to
stem the retreat. Gordon's men waiting along the treeline
of the Second Woods laid down a murderous fire. The
Union brigade did not reach within 200 yards of the
Second Woods before being pinned down. They ex-,
pended all of their ammunition before retreating back to
the First Woods. The 114th New York suffered casualties
of 60 percent (188 of 350 effectives). McMillan's brigade,
personally directed by Corps commander Maj. Gen.
William Emory, advanced. They reached a shallow ravine
about 200 yards from the Second Woods, where two
regiments (8VT and 12CT) clung on for nearly two hours.
By 1300 hours, the main thrust of the XIX Corps attack
was blunted and its ranks decimated. By 1400 hours,
firing on this end of the field sputtered out from sheer
exhaustion.
:•
•
0
l► 94
r
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
a
•
•
Phase Five. Fighting Near Dinkle Barn: At 1140 in
conjunction with the XIX Corps' advance on the right,
Getty's and Ricketts's divisions of the VI Corps launched
their attack against Ramseur's line, which was positioned
on high ground, stretching from the Dinkle Barn south
behind Abrams Creek Ricketts' division on the right was
ordered to guide its attack on the Berryville Pike, which
takes a sharp jog to the left in front of the Dinkle Barn. As
they advanced, a gap widened between the VI Corps and
the XIX Corps on the far right. Keifer's and Emerson's
brigades ruptured the Confederate center at the Dinkle
Barn and moved to capture.a battery of artillery in front of
the West Woods. Ramseur's left flank now gave way and
Confederates began to drift back toward Winchester.
Phase Six. Rodes's Counterattack: Just as Ramseur's left
flank gave way from the Union attacks, Maj. Gen. Robert
E. Rodes brought his division forward from its protected
position in the West Woods. About 1330 he launched a
devastating counterattack into the gap that had opened
between the VI and XIX Corps. Battle's Alabama brigade
"came out of the woods like a whirlwind," crushing
Ricketts's division, which formed the right flank of the VI
Corps. About this time, General Rodes was killed by
shrapnel. He fell somewhere along the woods line. Union
soldiers streamed back along the Berryville Pike, while two
US batteries astride the pike tried to slow the CS assault.
From his command post on Eversole's Hill, Sheridan and
Wright witnessed the disaster. Sheridan immediately
committed his reserves to stave off certain defeat; this was
David A. Russell's division of three brigades (Campbell,
Upton, and Edwards). Campbell advanced his brigade
astride the Berryville Pike with Edwards' brigade to his
right. General Russell, directing these maneuvers, was
mortally wounded. The two brigades struck Battle's
attackers head-on and stalled them in the ravine from
which they had emerged and drove them back on their
supports at the edge of the West Woods —the rest of
Rodes' division. Upton's brigade came in on Edwards'
right advancing from the edge of the Second Woods. The
two divisions—Rodes' and Russell's —closed, exchanging
murderous volleys. Upton's impetuous charge stopped
the CS counterattack and drove it back into the West
Woods. Russell's division was then withdrawn out of
range to regroup. Wright called Upton's attack the
turning point of the battle.
Phase Seven. Cavalry Action: Concurrent with the above
events, there was cavalry fighting along the Valley Pike
north of Winchester. About 0500 hrs. the Union cavalry
division of William Averell crossed the Opequon near
Darkesville and moved to the Valley Pike, steadily pushing
back the 23rd Virginia Cavalry, which fought a delaying
action back to Bunker Hill. There the 23VA were rein-
forced by the 62nd Virginia mounted infantry.
About 10 o'clock, Union cavalry attacked at Bunker
Hill, forcing the CS cavalry to retire. Averell continued
pushing south on the pike to link up with Merritt's
division about 1400 hours, near Stephenson's Depot.
South of the old Charles Town road, the Confederate
cavalry units were stiffened by Smith's infantry brigade
(Wharton's Division). About 1330, Devin's brigade
arrived on the road to the depot. About one mile south of
the depot, it encountered McCausland's brigade drawn up
in line of battle and attacked, driving the Confederates
back in confusion. The 23VA cavalry and the 62VA.
mounted infantry attacked the Union flank disrupting the
charge. McCausland and Smith retired one mile to the
lightly entrenched line at near Collier Redoubt where they
were reinforced by Fitz Lee's two brigades (Wickham and
Payne) and Wharton's infantry division. Maj. Gen.
Fitzhugh Lee fell wounded, during the fighting south of
Stephenson's Depot. The Union cavalry deployed five
brigades in line of battle, stretching from the railroad west
toward the ridge near the intersection of the Valley Pike
and Welltown Road:
Phase Eight. Crook' ,Al nkAttack About 1300 hours,
Sheridan directed CrooVs corps of two divisions
(Thoburn and Duval) to advance from its reserve position
near Spout Spring. The divisions marched to near the
"Factory" on Redbud Run, where they split up.
Thoburn's division moved west on the south bank of
Redbud into the First Woods to relieve the XIX Corps.
Duval's division crossed the run and turned west accom-
panied by the artillery of Capt. Henry DuPont. Duval's
division deployed near the Huntsberry House. DuPont
unlimbered 18 guns on what has been named DuPont
Hill, opposite Gordon's flank in the Second Woods and
opened fire. Crook now ordered Duval's division forward
into a "wall of flame." They swept across Redbud Run at
the Hackwood House, turning Gordon's flank and
advancing against Wharton's line, stretching from Collier
Redoubt east. About this time, Thoburn's division
95
CML WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
charged out of the First Woods into the Middle Field.
This two -pronged assault forced Gordon to abandon the
Second Woods and align himself with Breckinridge to his
left rear. The CS line was now drawn into a compact L-
shape, anchored by cavalry at Star Fort. Wharton's
division faced north. Gordon's division made the turn of
the L and Rodes' and Ramseur's divisions extended the
line south to Abrams Creek.
Phase Nine. Collapse of CS Line: With the success of
CrooVs attack on the right, Sheridan ordered a general
advance against the constricted CS position on the plateau
just north and east of the town. The Confederates were
posted behind stone fences, rail barricades, and in shallow
earthworks constructed in 1862. They could retreat no
farther without losing organization in the streets of
Winchester. As the Union advance closed from east and
north, firing.became fierce and desperate. The massed
artillery of both sides fired case shot and canister. General
Sheridan rode forward to the battle lines to urge his troops
forward. About 1530 hours, as the infantry fighting
reached a crescendo, Averell and Merritt advanced their
cavalry divisions astride the Valley Pike, first at a walk and
then at a thundering gallop. They swept over the CS line
at Collier Redoubt driving back the CS cavalry on the low
ground below Star Fort. Schoonmaker's brigade of
Averell's division repeatedly attacked Munford's cavalry at
Star Fort, eyentually overrunning the work The CS
infantry withdrew to another line about 150 yards to the
rear but the damage was done. The sound of Union
cavalry pounding in their rear spread panic all along the
Confederate line, and soldiers began streaming to the rear
and "whirling through Winchester." Wharton's and
Gordon's divisions seemed to disintegrate. Seven Federal
horseman captured Confederate battle flags, each earning
a Medal of Honor. Rodes's division (commanded now by
Grimes) performed the difficult maneuver of "changing
front" to the north to stop the onrushing US cavalry.
Early's army retreated in disorder.
Phase Ten. Rear Guard Actions: General Early fashioned
a defensive line at Kernstown (probably at Pritchard's Hill
and behind Hoge's Run) which saved his wagons and
most of his artillery. Cavalry and elements of the VI Corps
probed this makeshift CS defense as night fell, but the US
forces were too disorganized by success to mount an
effective pursuit. After dark, the CS army withdrew up the
Valley Pike to Fisher's Hill south of Strasburg. Gen.
Sheridan established his headquarters in Winchester at
the home of Lloyd Logan. Casualties were so severe that.
nearly every sizeable structure in Winchester served as a
hospital after the battle.
CURRENT CONDITION OF THE BATTLEFIELD
The Opequon battlefield is large and sprawling,
covering thousands of acres east and north of Winches-
ter. In general, much of the battlefield has been greatly
degraded or destroyed by the expanding urban environs
of Winchester, but several significant parcels currently
remain, perhaps 800-900 acres: these include the Cavalry
Field north of Collier Redoubt, the Hackwood Estate,
northern half of Middle Field and First Woods adjacent
to Redbud Run, and the heights (including DuPont's
Hill) north of Redbud Run. Together, these parcels form
a block of battlefield core that retains a high degree of
integrity.
Many historic structures remain in the vicinity,
including Hackwood; Spout Spring (Wood House) on
rte. 7 adjacent to a sewage treatment plant; an old house,
mill site, and a dye house where rte. 656 crosses Redbud
Run; an old log house where rte. 659 crosses Redbud
Run; Brumley House; Valley Mill Farm; Jordan Springs;
Tanquary House; and others. The Hackwood Estate
dates from 1777 and is a historic treasure in its own right.
Preservation of this house and parcel alone would allow
substantial interpretation of the battle of Opequon.
Other parcels, such as the Opequon Crossing and
Spout Spring, Seiver's and Locke's fords, and the Second
Winchester parcel at Stephenson's Depot (which was
scene of cavalry actions during this battle) would expand
interpretation. Star Fort and Collier Redoubt appear
protected, although without sufficient buffers.
Although. hemmed in by development and severely
degraded, the Dinkle Barn site adjacent to the I-81
entrance ramp off rte. 7 is key to understanding the
attack of the VI Corps and Rodes' counterattack. A
portion of the ravine down which Rodes attacked is
intact northeast of I-81 interchange in front of the Dinkle
Barn site at the entrance of Winchester Mall. The battery
heights west of I-81 are being developed for business,
industrial, and residential uses. The last surviving parcel
of West Woods (adjacent to I-81) is currently being
bulldozed for townhouses.
is
•
•
96
CIVIL WAR SITES IN THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY OF VIRGINIA
0-
0
•
The Hastings marker is the only monument erected on
the battlefield that remains. It is enclosed by an iron fence
and sits next to the road in the midst of Fort Collier
Business/Industrial Park east of Collier Redoubt. Nearby
are the remains of old stone fences and an old farm lane
defended by CS troops in the battle's later phases.
PERCEPTION OF THREATS TO BATTLEFIELD
Threats are immediate and of large order. If contin-
ued as planned, the residential development of Caleb
Heights and associated development would destroy the
last remaining intact parcels of the infantry fighting at the
battle of Opequon. According to county -approved plans,
construction would occupy most of the area south of
Redbud Run with more than 600 single family homes,
townhouses, and a commercial strip. A connector road
would be pushed through from the north, separating
Hackwood and DuPont's Hill. As of this writing, con-
struction has not begun and has been held up by financial
transactions.
The Hackwood House and property (144 acres) was
recently offered for auction but the sale was postponed.
This property could potentially be subdivided. Regency
Lakes subdivision was built several years ago on southern
portions of Middle Field and First Woods. Further phases
of housing development, if constructed, would cover the
last portion of Second Woods, "Rodes' Ravine," and
another segment of the First Woods. Star Fort itself is
owned by a Civil War reenactment group but the sur-
rounding 50-acres is for sale and zoned commercial/
industrial.
The Shenandoah Valley Civil War Foundation, a local
preservation group, has negotiated to preserve a small
portion of the Second Woods area as a park if develop-
ment proceeds. The developer, Top of Virginia Corpora-
tion, has agreed to set aside 63 acres in the area adjacent to
Hackwood as a commemorative park. A forty -acre parcel
of Middle Field next to Redbud Run is privately owned;
the owner has stated in the past that he will not develop it.
IDENTIFIED SITES AND FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH
THE BATTLEFIELD (UNSURVEYED*)
Baker House (site of)
Milburn Cemetery
Berryville Canyon
Middle Field
Berryville Pike
Morgan's Mill (ruin)
Brumley House
National Cemetery
Burnt Factory Farm
Old Town Winchester
C. Wood's Mill (site of*)
Opequon Crossing
Carter House
Ravine up which Rodes attacked
Cleridge Farm
Red Bud Mill (site of)
(Opequon Inn)
Rutherford House (site of)
Collier Redoubt
Second Woods
Dinkle Barn (site of)
Seiver's Ford
DuPont's Hill
Spout Spring (Wood House)
Eversole House (site of)
Star Fort
First Woods
Stephenson's Depot (site of)
Greenwood Church
Stonewall Cemetery
Hackwood
Tanquery's Ford
Hackwood Lane
Thomas McCann House
Hasting's Monument
Valley Mill Farm
Hoffmann House (site of*)
Valley Pike
Huntsberry House (site of)
West Woods
I. Wood House
Wood's Mill (site of*)
Jordan Springs
Wright's Ford
Locke's Ford
97
Ex,
U.S. 1 11
.... . .......
4F
%
R.,
AW
*RN "N
ER:
. ..........
V
R
pplipill N M.111, M
..... . . . . . .....
4M
%
$1
Ji z
-q!m
M
—M
iL
it
.. ..........
I't
RM!,
7 1 z
C i ty of W inchester
f
.......... .
x
Hl
40 s.
. .. ..... . .......
. . . . . . . . . . . ...; . . .. ... IFFederick Co f Clarke c
.............
Retained Integrity
Lost Ini4grity
Study Area Boundary
e
Core Area Boundary
2, Roads
I'L I Mi Streams and Rivers
mfts County or City Boundary
MAP 35: OPEQUON INTEGRITY - 1991
(Numbers keyed to battle phases)
VIRGINIA
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARKS
HISTORIC DISTRICT/BRIEF
SURVEY FORM
File no. 34-112
Negative no(s). 10082 ,10083
City/Town/ Village/ Hamlet -_ Kurai County County r reaericK
Street address or route number off of Rt . 662 U.S.G.S. Quad Stephenson
Historic name Stottlemeyer House Common name Carter -Hardesty House
Present use abandoned (burned) Building Style Vernacular Greek revival
Oriminal use rp--i d-nri al Building Date(s) c 1,940-1 860
1. Construction Materials
❑ wood frame
rick
bond: ❑ English
❑ Fjemish
5 5 -course American
❑ stretcher
❑ other
❑ stone
❑ random rubble
❑ coursed rubble
❑ ashlar ❑ dressed
❑ rock -faced
❑ log:
❑ squared
notching:
❑ V-notch
❑ saddle
❑ square
❑ concrete block
❑ terra cotta
❑ steel frame
❑ other
2. Cladding Material
❑ weatherboard
❑ vertical siding
❑ board & batten
❑ shingle:
❑ wood
❑ asbestos
❑ asphalt
❑ bricktex
❑ other
❑ unsquared
❑ half dovetail
❑ full dovetail
❑ diamond
❑ composition siding
❑ stucco
❑ aluminum or vinyl siding
❑ cast iron
❑ sheet metal
❑ enameled metal
❑ glass
3. Stories (number) 2
❑ low basement raised basement
4. Bays (number): front S side (church)
symmetrical ❑ asymmetrical
5. Roof Type
❑ shed
❑ hipped
-parapet?
❑ pyramidal?
G gable
❑ mansard
❑ pediment?
❑ false mansard
❑ parapet?
❑ gambrel
❑ clipped end?
❑ flat
❑ cross gable?
❑ parapet'?
❑ central front gable?
❑ roof not visible
❑ other
6. Roofing Material
❑ shingle
❑ composition (asphalt, asbestos, etc.)
P wood
2 metal
Ttanding m
seaorrugated
❑ pressed tin (simulated shingles)
❑ the
❑ pantile ❑ flat ❑ glazed
❑ slate
❑ not visible
7. Dormers (number): front side
❑ gable ❑ pediment?
❑ shed
❑ hipped
8- Prima'YFR acular
style
stories
levels full height bays 3
materials wood
description and decorative details
chamfered columns decorative brackets: porch
sits on stone piers
9. General supplementary description and decoration: 6/6 windows;
wooden lintels w/corner blocks over winodws; 6-light'
basement windows;2 interior end brick chimneys; 2,4-1
10. Major additions and alterations - Greek Revival door surroom
Had a rear 2-story frame fluted trim and corner bock
ell; part of the house 5-light sidelights,4-light)
' `. ',JULUUUU111&'' ),destroying -the rear ell and creating a
Many outbldgs.----- ,large hole in the roof of t
including a frame garage, front.nortion of the house
-
12. Landscape Features- large frame bank barn w/ silo, 20t
Mature trees, house century concrete tank for sprayi
sits back off of roa brick springhouse (partially n
13. Significance: Fine example of the Vernacular uyreek Rev,
Style of Antebellum Frederick County. House is vacant{
as it has not been fixed since it burned. Someone li
behind the house in a trailer.
Surveyed by: M. Kalbian Date: 1/90
VIRGINIA
' IN
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
SURVEY FORM F34-112_j
1. County Frederick
Tow►r Winchester
Street No. E. of Rt. 662, N. Of Rt.
661.
USGS Quad Name Stephenson
Quad Date 1966
Original Owner John Carter
Original Use Home
Present O`x�ner Herr. y L. McCann
Present Owner Address_ Jerrerson St.
Winchester, Va,
Present Use
File Number
2. Historic Name -------
Present Name Carter —Hardesty House
Date or Period (exact or estimate) ea. 1810
Architect ----
Builder, craftsman, etc. ---
Source of Name Quarles, Old Homes
Source of Date Gue s s
3. No. stories (dormers count as %2 story):
2
Wall construction
Brick
Acreage
Home Unknown
4. Historical Significance (Chain of Title, Families and Events, etc., connected with the property)
See Quarles, Some Old Homes inFred Co , Va.
5. Architectural Significance (Note interesting. interior and exterior details, etc. cite significant alterations and additions)
I believe 1810 is a fairy accurate date. The W. Laing of the building
is a Victorian addition, as all of the windows have been Victorianized.
I did not gain entry into the house.
6. Physical Condition Excellent Good X Fair Poor
Structure A
Grounds - --
Neighborhood — -- -----
7. State potential threats to preservation of structure
None
(over)
r, HISTORIC
no(s).
DIVISION Or ISTORIC LANDMARKS � N-gative
= o -�4 -- gyp?
SURVEY FORM
Historic name Helm House, Bellevue, Fort Common name
e m- c ann roper y-
County/Town/City Rural Fred. Co. Helm.
Street address or route number R t. 662
USGS Quad Stephenson l� t • er;nrlmid-late 18th C. ,mid 19th C. , late 1
Original owner Col. Meredith' Helm
Original use residential
Present owner James K. McCann
Present owner address Jefferson Ave.
Winchester,Va.
Present use ruins
Acreage unknown
aeo► p
Architect/ builder/craftsmen
unknown
Source of name Quarles
Source of date
Stories 2
Foundation and wall const'n part of the house was log,
part was stone and part was frame.
Roof type cfable
State condition of structure and environs
The .house is no longer standing. The area is in very poor condition due to
leci
`_hate potential threats to structure Neglect/development .
Note any archaeological interest
In 1809 it was referred to as Fort Helm. Is included in the Stephenson's Deppt
Battlefield.
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes O noK1
Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration, taking care to point
out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations and additions. List any outbuildings and
their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
All that remains now of the Helm -McCann house is a stone springhouse. There
are ruins! of the house, which burned in 1958, and the brick meathouse is
alsmost completely collapsed. There are some stone ruins (foundation) of the
bank barn as well. Across the road is what is left of Milburn Chapel cemetery.
The old Milburn chapel, an 18th century Methodist church, was abandoned and
torn down many years age. All that remains is a cemetery surrounded by a stone
wall. Many of the local citizens are buiried in this cemetery including Col.
Meredith Helm.
I was able to find 2 historic photographs of the house; one taken in the 1890s
and one in the late 1930s. The photos do not indicate from what view they wer
taken,lbut the 1930s view appears to be a southern one because of the faint ou
line of the stone springhouse which is present in the lower left hand corner..
It appears that the house was partially log, stone and frame. The house's
final configuration was an I houv.e with a rear 2 story wing. The stone spring -
house probably dates -to the original house (c.1752) and is in fairly reasonabl
-condition.
Interior inspected?
Historical significance (Chain of title; individuals, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)
From Quarles and others:
1752 Lord Fairfax to Col. Meredith Helm (died in 1804)
1809 appears on Charles Varle Map as "Fort Helm"
1872 ', to James McCann
1958 destroyed by fire
It DIVISION OF HISTORIC .LANDMARKS
.R SURVEY FORM
Negative nos . 10083
34--7z 9
Historic name The Milburn House Common name Thomas McCann House
County/Town/City Rural Frederick County
Street address or route number off of RE, 662
USGS Quad Stephenson Date or period cA42, c.1890-1910
John Milburn
Original owner Architect/ builder/cr tsmen
Original use residential unknown
Present owner Thomas McCann Source of name Quarles
Present owner aclaress Rt. 8 Box 491 Source of date owner, architectural evidence
Stories
Present use Winchester, VA 22601 Foundation and2wall const'n Stone
Acreage residential
unknown Roof type gable-w/standing seam metal.
State condition of structure and environs The house and outbuildings are in fair condition.
State potential threats to structure Unknown
Note any archaeological interest
Unknown
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes El no CC
Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration, taking care to point
out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations and additions. List any outbuildings and
their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
According to Quarles, this house was built around 1744-1760. Architecturally I was not able t,
verify this date. My findings lead me to believe that the house was built in the mid- 19th Cen
TINe size of the windows, the type of chimneys, the window and door trim, as well as the config.
uration of the house all seem to date from this period. Mr. Thomas McCann, now 92, has lived
this house his whole life. He says the house was built in 1842. A rear 2 story frame wing was
added in c.1880-1910. The front stone portion is laid in a random rubble pattern with corner
quoins. It is 2 stories, sits on a split-level basement, is 4 bays wide and assymetrical. It
has a gable roof with standing seam metal roofing and 2'interior end brick chimneys. The wind(
are 2/2 and the front door has a transom light (unable to see number of lights). The door surrc
is a flat architrave trim with bull's eye corner blocks. A 2-bay 1 story porch with square dor:
columns as supports is centered on the front (north) facade of the house. The east gable end
a blind one with no openings. On the other hand; the west gable end is pierced by windows on
levels; 2, 4-light square attic windows; 6/6 windows on the first and seconds stories; and 3-L
windows in the basement. The rear 2 story frame wing was added in the late 19th-early 20th cel
tury . It has german lap siding, 6/6 windows, an interior end brick chimney, and a side 3-bay
story porch. This property has many of its original outbuildings. They include a board and bai
meathouse; a frame chicken coop; a frame shed; a frame barn. on stone foundation and a fine fray
corn crib. The setting around the Thomas McCann house is exceptionally beautiful. It is local
on top of a knoll off of Licic .Run.
The house is architecturally significant in that it has had very few alterations since early
this century. Also, it is significant because of its connection with the Milburns and McCanns,
two very prominent families in the history of Frederick county.
Interior inspected?
Just the rear frame section.
Historical significance (Chain of title; individuals, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)
According to Quarles:
1735 Governor of Colony of Virginia to John Frost
1744 John Frost to John Milburn I
1761 83 acres to son John Milburn II
? acres to grandson. John Milburn III (son of Robert Milburn,
John Milburn II built Milburn Chapel by 1786. It was one of
in the Valley.
1813 to William Hickman Harris
n.d to Jesse Wood
1854 to Thomas Brown
1856 to George Keen
1869 to Jonathen Keen
1888 to Elizabeth Mulvahill
1893 to James K. McCann
1918 to son, Charles R. McCann
1966 to son Thomas Kemp McCann
brother of John Milburn II)
the oldest Methodist churchE
0
71- -_-- tl: --
T�f
I-P., L-101
PPOV
I Z,
O."L
VIRGINIA File no. — 50
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARKS Ne alive nos . 10632
HISTORIC DISTRICT/BRIEF
SURVEY FORM
City! Town/ Village/ Hamlet Rural County County Frederick
Street address or route number Rt . 622 U.S.G.S. Quad Stephenson
Historic name Milburn Methodist Cha el Common name Milburn Chapel & Cemetery
Present use Abandoned Building Style Vernacular
Original use Church & Cemeter Building Date(s) ca .1788, ca .1887 , ca .1945
I. Construction Materials 3. Stories (number)
❑ low basement
❑ wood frame
El brick 4. Bays (number): front
bond: ❑ English I ❑symmetrical
❑ Flemish
❑ -course American
❑ stretcher
❑ other
❑ stone
❑ random rubble
❑ coursed rubble
❑ ashlar ❑ dressed
❑ rock -faced
❑ log:
❑ squared
notching:
❑ V-notch
❑ saddle
❑ square
❑ concrete block
❑ terra cotta
❑ steel frame
❑ other
2. Cladding Material
❑ weatherboard
❑ vertical siding
❑ board & batten
❑ shingle:
❑ wood
❑ asbestos
❑ asphalt
❑ bricktex
❑ other
❑ unsquared
❑ half dovetail
❑ full dovetail
❑ diamond
❑ composition siding
❑ stucco
❑ aluminum or vinyl siding
❑ cast iron
❑ sheet metal
❑ enameled metal
❑ glass
5.
Roof Type
❑ shed
❑ parapet'?
❑ gable
❑ pediment?
❑ parapet'?
❑ clipped end'?
❑ cross gable?
❑ central front gable?
❑ other
6. Roofing Material
❑ raised basement
side (church)
❑ asymmetrical
❑ hipped
❑ pyramidal'?
❑ mansard
❑ false mansard
❑ gambrel
❑ flat
❑ parapet'?
❑ roof not visible
❑ shingle
❑ composition (asphalt, asbestos, etc.)
❑ wood
❑ metal
❑ standing seam
❑ corrugated
❑ pressed tin (simulated shingles)
❑ the
❑ pantile ❑ flat
❑ slate
❑ not visible
7. Dormers (number): front side
❑ gable ❑ pediment'?
❑ shed
❑ hipped
8. Primary Porch
�r.,lo
stories
levels
materials
description and decorative details
bays
❑ glazed
9. General supplementary description and decoration: It is believed
that Milburn Chapei was built in 1788, malting it one
of the earliest Methodist Chapels in Frederick Co.
lt was dismanteled around 1887 & the logs w re sold
10. Major additions and alterations: to a Mr. Schreek t•ino used
them to build a barn on his property (which no long—
er stands). The :Honey :ras used to help build the re
a acement church Manuel Meth. Church 34-940 in
11. Outbuildings: Stephenson. The cemetery still remains.
Its stone wall was repaired by Mr. Paul Sternitzke,
a German prisoner of war staying in Winchester durin
the early winter of 1944. Some important families &
12. Landscape Features: figures are buried :sere incluaing
the Helms (Amelia 1803, Meredith 1804). It is also
presumed that John Milburn eras buried here.
13. Significance:
Surveyed by: ,r-,11; nn Dace' 1 1 /90
Landmark
awaits restoration
preachers, held regular services at
the newly constructed church on
ne of Frederick
County's oldest
his property.
Of the many notable Methodist
landmarks— `
ministers who preached at Milburn
Milburn Cemetery,
Chapel, the most prominent was
appears almost abandoned at its
Francis Asbury, the first American
quiet location beside a little-
bishop of the Methodist church.
""—
travdied gravel road near
—John stow said- that- before
Stephenson.
construction was completed at
Its most ardent visitors these
Milburn Chapel, Asbury stood on a
days are the groundhogs that have
work bench and preached in 1788.
burrowed deep under the silent
It was more than 11 years later
graves and the cattle that graze
when Asbury returned to Milburn
beside the vine covered, limestone
Chapel. The reason for his visit
wall that defines the graveyard.
was to honor Milburn's retirement
To one side of the cemetery is a
from itinerant preaching.
rocky mound —all that remains of
Although Milburn died in 1813,
the once historic Milburn Method-
services were held at the chapel
ist Chapel.
until it was severely damaged by
According to "Milburn Method-
Civil War battles fought in the
ist Chapel in Frederick County,
area.
Virginia," by area historian Wilbur
Sometime between 1882 and
S. Johnston, the log church and its
1884, Milburn's congregation met
cemetery were established around
to decide whether to repair the old
1788 by John Milburn.
chapel or rebuild at a new location.
Johnson said that Milburn
Church members opted for the
Chapel is believed to have been the
latter and in 1887 built Emmanuel
first Methodist church to be built
Methodist Episcopal Church South
in Frederick County and was one
(now the Emmanuel United Meth -
of the oldest in the Northern
odist Church) in Stephenson on
Shenandoah Valley.
U.S. 11.
Its founder, who was a grandson
At the time the congregation
of the first Milburn to settle in the
decided to relocate, the land
Frederick County area, wasn't
surrounding the chapel and cem-
Methodist by birth. He was a
etery was owned by James Kemp
convert from Quakerism.
McCann, who purchased the
Milburn's grandparents, John
property in 1872.
and Elizabeth Milburn, moved to
Johnston said that at about the
the county between 1743 and 1747
time the new church was built,
to settle on what is now Milburn
McCann dismantled the old chapel
Road (.Route 662), which was a
and sold the logs to a farmer, who
primary road in the late 1700s and
used them to build a barn near the
the early 1800s.
site of the former
The Milburns
Jordan Springs Hotel
were members of the (By 1920)
on Route 664. The
Hopewell Quaker barn is no longer
even the standing.
Meeting near
Clearbrook. McCann gave the
paths and proceeds from the
In 1779, the
younger Milburn sale of the logs to the
lanes
was dismissed from
new church.
the meeting because became' There's no indica-
he married his first-
tion that Milburn
cousin, Elizabeth. occupied was buried in the
According to cemetery, but
Johnston's book, the and the Johnston said it is
marriage was
considered "contrary opening
reasonable to believe
of that he was.
to discipline." a new
Eight years after
grave "If his grave
marker were stone, it
Milburn was dis- Invariably is likely fallen and
missed from the
buried with subse-
Quaker meeting, he struck quent plant growth
became a traveling or, like many others,
preacher and helped unmarked stolen," Johnston
form the Milburn
said in his book.
Methodist Society in remains.
Of the few remain -
his community, —Arprt historian ing grave markers
Johnston said Wilbur S. Johnston only two date earlier
that Milburn be -
came an ordained
than Milburn's
death —Ann Amelia
minister in 1789 Photos b Magruder in 1803,
and, along with Y and Meredith Helm
other traveling Rick Foster See Graves, page E4
�
i�
Graves
iuedwi
'1 9 w
»., pl
in 1804.
Helm's grave is marked by a
full-length, horizontal sandstone
slab on the ground. The stone's
inscription says: "Sacred to the
memory of Meredith Helm who
departed this life October 12,
1804 in his 51st year of age."
Johnston said that Helm is
probably had the "most illustri-
ous burial in Milburn Cemetery."
Helm was a colonel in the Vir-
ginia militia during the Revolu-
tionary War. Helm's father, also
Meredith Helm, was the sixth
sheriff of Frederick County and
one of Winchester's foundingfa-
thers.
Johnston said that burials
continued at the small cemetery
until about 1920, "when even
the paths and lanes became oc-
cupied and the opening of a new
grave invariably struck un-
marked remains."
After burials ceased at the
cemetery, the McCann family
kept it weeded and mowed for
many years.
The last professional repairto
the limestone wall around the
cemetery was during World War
II. The repairs were paid for by
the McCanns, who hired several
German prisoners of war from a
prison camp in Winchester lo-
cated near Virginia Avenue.
Today, the site of the chapel is
owned by the McCann family.
Care of the cemetery —planned
. 0 from page E3
for complete restoration —is pro-
vided by the Emmanuel church.
. Emmanuel's minister, the
Rev. Mark Miller, said that the
restoration of the cemetery has
been slow and costly.
"It's slow partly because of the
economy and because the people
at the church don't have an at-
tachmentto the cemetery," Miller
said.
Early this year, the church's
Boy Scout troop and youth group
began clearing away brush and
undergrowth from the cemetery.
The church has also estab-
lished a Milburn Cemetery fund
and takes up a collection three or
four times a year to help with the
restoration.
"Our objective is to raise
enough money to eventually have
the cemetery professionally
cleared and maintained," Miller
said.'"So far, we have about $100
in the fund."
"We would also like to put a
historical marker at the cem-
etery,"Johnston said recently as
he stood beside the cemetery
wall.
"This is such abeautiful spot."
Anyone interested in making
a tax-deductible donation to the
Milburn Cemetery Fund can call
662-1269. Copies of Johnston's
book can be purchased at the
Winchester -Frederick County
Historical Society office at 401
National Ave. in Winchester.
11. Outbuildings: Stephenson. Tile cemetery still remains.
Its stone gall was repaired by Mr. Paul Sternitzlce,
a German prisoner of war staying in Winc'riester durin,
the early winter of 1944. Some important families &
12. Landscape Features; figures are buried n`re inclu
the Helms (Amelia 1803, Meredith 1804). It is
presumed that John Milburn eras buried here.
13. Significance:
Surveyed by: Date:
M:�ral q. Katbian 11/90
also
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/ 665-6395
Auau'srT2, 2010
Evan Wyatt, AICP
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
RE: CUP #05-10 AT&T Corp., Melissa Hall, Wesley Helsley and Bradley Pollack
Property Identification Numbers 43-A-130, 43-A-132
Dear Evan:
This letter is to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August
11, 2010. Conditional Use Permit 405-10 was approved to enable the construction of a 120 foot Monopole
Telecommunication Tower. Conditions associated with the approval of this Conditional Use Permit include
the following:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
5. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of
abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit.
8. Aircraft Warning Lights (AWL) shall be placed on the tower.
9. The tower shall be limited to two microwave dishes.
If you have any questions regarding this action, please feel free to call this office.
Sincerely,
Mar R. Cheran
Zoning and Subdivision Administrator
MRC/bad
cc: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Stonewall District Supervisor
Gary Oates and Stan Crockett, Stonewall District Planning Commissioners
Jane Anderson, Real Estate
Commissioner of Revenue
John Trenary, Building Official
AT&T Corp., Property Tax Dept., I ATT Way Rm. 3B 220C, Bedminster, NJ 07921
Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, PO Box 1924, Winchester, VA 22604
Bradley Pollack, 148 N. Main St., Woodstock, VA 22664
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-10
c�
AT&T CORP.
Ww 1 MELISSA HALL AND WESLEY HELSLEY
BRADLEY POLLACK
Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors
13.
Prepared: August 2, 2010
Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on
this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
Reviewed
Planning Commission: 07/21/10
Board of Supervisors: 08/11/10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Action
Denied waiver to enable a lattice
tower; monopole would be
required
Recommended approval of a
monopole CUP
Pending
The applicant applied for Conditional Use Permit to enable the construction of a 120-foot Lattice
Telecommunication Tower. In reviewing this application the Planning Commission felt that a
monopole facility would be less visually obtrusive than a lattice type tower, and unanimously
voted to deny the applicant's request for a waiver from the monopole requirement. By ordinance,
the Planning Commission is empowered to approve or deny waiver requests regarding the type
of telecommunication facility; therefore, no Board action is necessary regarding this waiver
request.
The Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation for approval of the Conditional Use
Permit which would enable the construction of a 120-ft monopole telecommunication facility.
Should the Board of Supervisors find this use appropriate, the Planning Commission
recommends the following conditions be placed on the Conditional Use Permit:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
5. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12)
Page 2
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
months of abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit.
8. Aircraft Warning Lights (AWL) shall be placed on the tower.
9. The tower shall be limited to two microwave dishes.
Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to
adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors.
0 0
Page 3
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on
this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
LOCATION: The properties are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North),
approximately 1/4 mile northeast of Interstate 81, Exit 317.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 43-A-130 and 43-A-132
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
Zoned: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use: Residential and Public Utility
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE:
North: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Residential
South: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Church
East: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Church
West: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Residential
PROPOSED USE: This application is for a 120 foot Lattice Telecommunication Tower.
(requires a Planning Commission waiver of the monopole requirement)
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this
property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would
provide access to the property. Prior to operation of the facility, a low volume commercial
entrance must be constructed to our standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property
and positive drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a
land use permit. The permit is issued by this office and requires inspection fee and surety bond
coverage.
Frederick County Fire Marshall: No comments.
Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building
Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building
Code 2006. The structure is required to comply with Chap 15 & 16 of the IBC 2006 for
9 •
Page 4
Conditional Use Pen -nit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
structural load, as well as Section 3108 for Towers. The tower shall be located and equipped
with step bolts and ladders so as to provide ready access for inspection purposes. The tower
shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public space, or encroach upon any privately
owned property without written consent of the owner of the encroached -upon property. (See
3108.2, Location and Access.) Special instructions per Chap 17 IBC 2006 apply to this
structure. Plans submitted for review shall be sealed by a Virginia Registered Design
Professional.
Winchester Regional Airport: We determined that the proposed tower does not penetrate any
FAR Part 77 surfaces; therefore a tower located at the proposed site should not impact current or
future operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Our comment is based on the
determination study completed by the Federal Aviation Administration, Aeronautical Study
Number 2009-AEA-383-OE dated May 5, 2009. If at any time the tower height exceeds 150
AGL, the Winchester Regional Authority requests the following condition be met: Towers over
200 feet AGL, are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL,
the Winchester Regional Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in
accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K, Change 2. Please note on the
determination study, that any variation from the information submitted by your firm for review
would require a separate notice to the FAA. In addition, the determination does include
temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derrick, etc., which may be used during
construction of the structure as long as the equipment does not exceed the 120' height
submitted. Should temporary construction equipment exceed that height, a separate notice to
the FAA must be filed. This comment should be included on the building plans to ensure the
contractor meets this Federal regulation.
Historic Resources Advisory Board: The Frederick County HRAB considered this
Conditional use Permit proposal during their meeting on June 15, 2010. The HRAB reviewed
information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by Greenway
Engineering. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley, published by the National
Park Service, shows that this site is located in the core area of the Second Battle of Winchester
and the study area of Third Winchester. While this property is located within an area identified
as having lost integrity, the area directly behind this site is identified as core area for the Second
Battle of Winchester that has retained its integrity. In addition to these concerns, the HRAB
noted that the home located at 2042 Martinsburg Pike was built in 1947. As it is older than fifty
years in age, the structure should be documented and a DHR survey should be completed.
Ultimately, the HRAB was concerned about the visual impact of the tower on the core battlefield
area and felt that the tower, which is proposed to serve the FEMA development across the street,
should be located on the roof of the FEMA building or on the FEMA site. It was the Board's
expressed priority that the applicants first make a serious and genuine effort to locate the tower
on the FEMA site where existing trees and development would make the tower less visible from
0 0
Page 5
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
the battlefield. The HRAB expressed a preference for a monopole telecommunication facility
over a lattice facility such as has been proposed. It was suggested that monopole facilities with
limited microwave dish mountings (due to the size of the microwave fixtures) would minimize
visual disruption to the historic battlefield viewshed. The HRAB does not support this request
because of its visual impacts on the historical character and significant Civil War battlefields in
the area. As in the 2009 review of a CUP for the same site, the Board continues to recommend
that the applicant document the dwelling at 2042 Martinsburg Pike, complete the DHR survey,
and assure that the home remains intact.
Planning and Zoning: The 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick County
("Comprehensive Plan") provides guidance when considering land use actions. This proposed
120 foot lattice -type commercial telecommunication facility will be located on properties located
within the Northeast Land Use Plan (NELUP). One of the primary objectives of NELUP is for
the development of industrial and commercial use along the Route 11 north corridor. The
properties are located within the Sewer Water Service Area (SWSA) and outside the Urban
Development Area (UDA) as indicated in the 2007Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick
County.
The applicant applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP # 01-09) for a 120 foot monopole
commercial telecommunication facility to be located on these properties, and was denied by the
Board of Supervisors at their meeting held on May 13, 2009. The denial was based on the
location of the proposed facility within a Developmentally Sensitive Area (DSA) and the
surrounding historical sites, as noted in the 2007 Frederick County Comprehensive Polices
The Board of Supervisors at their June 9, 2010, meeting updated the NELUP component of the
Comprehensive Plan and modified the DSA in this area of the NELUP. The properties that are
subject to this proposed CUP were removed from the DSA.
The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in
the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit
(CUP). Commercial telecommunication facilities may be subject to additional performance
standards in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts
to adjoining properties. These performance standards are to ensure that scenic areas and
properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. In addition to these
performance standards, the zoning ordinance requires that all proposed telecommunication
facilities shall be of a monopole -type construction. The applicant has applied for a Conditional
Use Permit for a 120-foot lattice -type commercial telecommunications facility on the above -
referenced properties. The Zoning Ordinance empowers the Planning Commission to grant
waivers from the monopole requirement and allow a lattice -type telecommunication tower
provided that tower is located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites.
The general surrounding area of this proposed site contains sites of significant historical
Page 6
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
importance, which include the Hackwood property, established residential areas, and the Milburn
Road corridor. The Hackwood property and the Milburn Road corridor are less than 1 1/2 miles
from this proposed commercial telecommunication facility. Furthermore, the subject properties
of this proposed commercial telecommunication facility will be located within the core area of
the Second Battle of Winchester Civil War Battlefield historic site, and the study area of the
Third Battle of Winchester. Frederick County has traditionally set a higher expectation for land
use actions with regard to properties that are located within the vicinity to historic sites.
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB), as referenced above,
reviewed this application and had concerns. The HRAB had the most concern with the visual
impact of this proposed facility on the core battlefield area of the Second Battle of Winchester
and the study area of Third Winchester. The HRAB expressed a preference for a monopole
telecommunication facility with limited microwave dish mountings over a lattice facility. The
HRAB also recommended that the applicant locate this facility on property located on the 150
acre industrially and commercially zoned Rutherford Farm development, which includes a
multistory office building, commercial center, and vacant properties. This development may
provide satisfactory coverage for this applicant and future co -location opportunities in this area
of Frederick County.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 07/21/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
This is a request to seek approval for the construction of a 120 foot lattice -type commercial
telecommunication facility. Staff would note that the proposed site does meet the requirements
as set forth by the zoning ordinance for a lattice -type facility. However, this facility may have a
visual impact on historical sites in the viewshed. Therefore, a monopole- type facility may be
appropriate to mitigate any impacts to the historical sites, and service the applicants' needs and
the future needs in this area of the County. Planning Commission approval is needed for a
lattice -type facility. Should the Planning Commission find a lattice -type facility to be
inappropriate, the CUP is required to be for monopole -type construction.
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
Page 7
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
5. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12)
months of abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 07/21/10 MEETING:
The applicant's representative said several events occurred since the Planning Commission first
considered this application over a year ago: the DSA (Developmentally Sensitive Area) line had
been moved, the Graystone property was rezoned, and Route 37 was realigned. Also, during the
previous consideration of this tower, there was a misunderstanding about the exact location of
the UDA line and consequently, a request for a lattice tower was not made. The applicant noted
that with this new application, the proposed tower location is clearly outside of the UDA and the
applicant believed he was now eligible for the waiver from a monopole. The applicant's
representative pointed out that the only negative comments they have received were of a visual
nature; it's difficult to screen a tower but the applicant believes a lattice tower is less obtrusive.
There were no citizen comments during the public comment portion of the hearing.
Referring to a representation of the tower supplied by the applicant, Commission members
questioned why the tower height exceeded the placement of two dishes attached to the tower.
The applicant's representative said the extra height allowed for flexibility if the dishes needed to
be moved up in the event an obstruction blocks the point-to-point communication between the
tower and the mountain. Commission members questioned if the applicant had intentions of
placing additional dishes toward the top of the tower.
A member of the Planning Commission asked if there would be AWL (Aircraft Warning Lights)
on the tower. It was understood that Winchester Regional Airport comments had requested
lighting for towers exceeding 150 feet; however, he was concerned about the medivac helicopter
service based at the airport which provides service throughout the region. He believed it would
be beneficial to have some modest AWL on the tower for safety. Other members of the
Commission agreed especially due to the tower's proximity to the Route 37 expansion, I-81, and
Route 11. A number of Commissioners did not agree that a lattice tower was less visually
obtrusive than a monopole tower. A Commissioner remarked that the massiveness of a
monopole tower would be less than a lattice -type tower and, consequently, less visually
intrusive. It was noted that a 6-foot wide monopole base (28 square feet) would occupy a
footprint less than 30 percent of that required by a 10-ft by 10-ft (100 square foot) base lattice
Page 8
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
August 2, 2010
structure.
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to deny the applicant's request for a waiver from
the monopole requirement.
The Planning Commission next unanimously recommended approval of the CUP for a 120-foot
monopole telecommunications tower with the following conditions:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
5. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of
abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval
of this conditional use permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new conditional use permit.
8. Aircraft Waming Lights (AWL) shall be placed on the tower.
9. The tower shall be limited to two microwave dishes.
(Note: Commissioners Mohn, Lemieux, and Madagan were absent from the meeting.)
Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to
adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors.
N
./��.a'.�` 0 125 250 500 Feet
W yF, 1 1 I
AT & T - Hall & H elsley & Pollack (*D
CUP # 05 - 10 (CUP # 0l - 09) 120ft Lattice
PIN: 43 - A - 130 ; 43 - A - 132 Type Tower
We
"v
A- LIN
#
> , Approximate location
of 120ft Lattice
&gas. Type Tower
J .
led
t s
;i
i
At-
(a;e Planner_ Hark
*"♦s Future Rt37 Bypass Zoning M2 (Industrial, General District)
QAppheation BI (Business. Neighborhood District) - MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
iBuildings B2 (Business, General Distrst) - MS (Medical Support District)
• R SewerWaterServiceArea - 83 (Boieess, Industrial Transition District) - R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
•
�MlUrban DecelopmentArea-EM (Erinttice Manufacturing District) RS(Residestial Recreational Community District)
- HE (Higher Education District) t _ ) RA (Rural Area Distrito
- MI (ladastrial, LightDistrict) BY (Residential Performance Distrito
Map Document. (F.1_1_Locator_MpsV2009\CUP0109_ATT_WesleyHelsley_012609 mxd) 1/26/2009 -- 10.15.30AM
�6Eq_NIE
1 ` JUN 2 5 M�j,,,,V
r,
Plan...
•
Submittal Deadline
P/C Meeting O
BOS Meeting 17 bl 140
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. Applicant (The applicant if the ® owner ® other)
NAME: AT&T Corp. Attn: Robert R. Ericksen, P.E., CCIM
ADDRESS: One AT&T Way; Room 1 Al 13A
Bedminster, NJ 07921
TELEPHONE (908) 234-8819
2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property:
AT&T c/o Robert R. Ericksen
Melissa Helsley Hall
Wesley Helsley, Sr.
Bradley G. Pollack
3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of our road
or street)
The subject properties (Tax Map Parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132) are located on the east side of
Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11 North), approximately'/ -mile northeast of Interstate 81 Exit 317.
4. The properties have a road frontage of 261'f feet and a depth ranging between 402'f and 604'f
feet and consist of a total of 3.32f acres. (Please be exact) Please refer to attached deed and
plat information for tax map parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132.
5. Tax Map Parcel 43-((A))-130 is owned by AT&T Corporation as evidenced by deed from
Tad J. Naegeli and Maria Sunshine Do l� eli previous owner) recorded as Instrument No.
080006084, as recorded in the records of the clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick.
Tax Map Parcel 43-((A))-132 is owned by Melissa Helsley-Hall and Wesley Helsley, as
evidenced by deed from John E. & Shannon K. Hart (previous owner) recorded as Instrument No.
050026775, as recorded in the records of the clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick.
•
0
6. Property Identification Numbers 43-((A))-130 (AT&T); 43-((A))-132 (Helsley-Hall)
Magisterial District Stonewall District
Current Zoning RP, Residential Performance District
7. Adjoining Property: Please refer to the attached Zoning Map Exhibit.
USE ZONING
North Residential; Unimproved RP, Residential Performance District
East Church; Unimproved RP, Residential Performance District
South Church; Unimproved RP, Residential Performance District
West Residential RP, Residential Performance District
Unimproved RA, Rural Areas District
8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Plamiing Dept. before completing)
Commercial Telecommunication Facility
9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: 120' microwave lattice tower
with accessory quipment building.
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both
sides and rear and in from of (across the street) the property where the requested use will be
conducted. (Continue on next page if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this
application: Please refer to the attached Adjoining Property Owner Map and Table.
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
NAME ADDRESS
PROPERTY ID#
OA
0
Adjoining Property Owners Listing
0
File 5387
Tax Map Number
Owner
Address
City & State
ZIP
43 A 110
THOMAS E. & JANET RIDDICK, JR.
2045 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
44 A 24
RITA WILSON
PO BOX 2996
WINCHESTER, VA
22604
43 A 113
JANE M. DEHAVEN, TRUSTEE
2073 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
43 A 132B
TRUSTEES OF MARANATHA BAPTIST CHURCH
2O40 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
43 A 129
IWILLIAM & SANDRA LIGHT
1405 SPRING VALLEY DR
IWINCHESTER, VA
1 22603
Source: Frederick County GIS, May 2010 Page 1 of 1
•
l l . Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on
the property, including measurements to all property lines.
Please refer to the AT&T Microwave Tower Fall Zone Exhibit that is included as information with this
Conditional Use Permit Application. Please note that the exhibit reflects current property boundary
information and that the two subject t properties will be consolidated subsequent to the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit Application to ensure that the fall zone established for the microwave tower
will be contained within the project boundary.
12. Additional comments, if any:
The proposed AT&T microwave tower properties are located outside of the County's defined
Urban Development Area (UDA) and are not adjacent to identified Developmentally Sensitive
Areas (DSA) as depicted in the Comprehensive Policy Plan Northeast Land Use Plan. The
location of the 120' microwave tower is situated adjacent to Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11
North) and is within close proximity to Interstate 81 and the planned route for the Route 37
Eastern Bypass The location of the proposed 120' microwave tower is positioned to provide
service for existing land use and is strategically located for future growth and development within
this geographic area of Frederick County.
If (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of
Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued
to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days
prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'
public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick
County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect
your property where the proposed use will be conducted.
Signature of Applicant:
Signature of Owner: V �i/`� /�✓'TG�
Owner's Mailing Address: AT&T Corp.
One AT&T Way Room I A113A Bedminster, NJ 07921
Owner's Telephone Number: (908) 234-8819
Signature of Owner:
Signature of Owner:
Owner's Mailing Address
) I --
P.O. Box 1924 Winchester, VA 22604
Owner's Telephone Number: (540) 3274195
11
•
11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on
the property, including measurements to all property lines.
Please refer to the AT&T Microwave Tower Fall Zone Exhibit that is included as information with this
Conditional Use Permit Application. Please note that the exhibit reflects current property boundary
information and that the two subject t properties will be consolidated subsequent to the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit Application to ensure that the fall zone established for the microwave tower
will be contained within the project boundary.
12. Additional comments, if any:
The proposed AT&T microwave tower properties are located outside of the County's defined
Urban Development Area (UDA) and are not adjacent to identified Developmentally Sensitive
Areas (DSA) as depicted in the Comprehensive Policy Plan Northeast Land Use Plan. The
location of the 120' microwave tower is situated adiacent to MartinsburgP(U.S. Route 11
North) and is within close proximity to Interstate 81 and the planned route for the Route 37
Eastern Bypass. The location of the proposed 120' microwave tower is positioned to provide
service for existing land use and is strategically located for future growth and development within
this geographic area of Frederick County.
If (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of
Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued
to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days
prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'
public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick
County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect
your property where the proposed use will be conducted.
Signature of Applicant:
Signature of Owner:
Owner's Mailing Address: AT&T Corp.
One AT&T Way Room 1 Al 13A Bedminster, NJ 07921
Owner's Telephone Number: (908) 234-8819
Signature of Owner: YA
Signature of Owner: -
Owner's Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1924 Winchester, VA 22604
Owner's Telephone Number: (540) 327-4195
AOL 0 •
Special Limited Power of Attorney
County of Frederick, Virginia
Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us
Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia,
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601
Facsimile 540-665-6395 Phone 540-665-5651
Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We)
(Name) AT&T Corp. (Phone) (908) 234-8819
(Address) One AT&T Way Bedminster, NJ 07921
the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by
Instrument No. 080006084 on Page , and is described as
Parcel: 43 Lot: 130 Block: A Section: Subdivision:
do hereby make, constitute and appoint:
(Name) AT&T Corp. c/o Robert R. Ericksen, P.E., CCIM (Phone) (732) 501-0221
(Address) One AT&T Way Room 1A113A Bedminster, NJ 07921
To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and
authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described
Property, including:
❑ Rezoning (Including proffers)
® Conditional Use Perw`ot
❑ Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final)
® Subdivision
® Site Plan
® Variance or Appeal
❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment
My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to
previously approved proffered conditions except as follows:
This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or
modified.
In witness thereof, 11=)�have,hero set my (our) hand and seal this day of to-, 204
Signature(s)
We-0 Jersey
State of 4ar-Eitg/County of 3o to e, r4 e- t , To -wit:
1, G'rejery Do C, IC,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who
signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has
acknowledged the ame before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this Lday of I" � 2op-a—.
My Commission Expires: 0 30 �01
Notary P*icu Registration #: aX 6 i 8
Revised 3/17/08
Gregory J. DoA
Nobry Pubie of Now Jersey
My Commission Expires �� o r�
r�
Special Limited Power of Attorney
County of Frederick, Virginia
Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us
Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia,
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601
Facsimile 540-665-6395 Phone 540-665-5651
Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We)
(Name) Melissa Helsley-Hall & Wesley Helslev, Sr. (Phone) (540) 327-4195
(Address) P.O. Box 1924 Winchester, VA 22604
the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by
Instrument No. 050026775 on Page , and is described as
Parcel: 43 Lot: 132 Block: A_ Section: Subdivision:
do hereby make, constitute and appoint:
(Name) AT&T Corp. c/o Robert R. Ericksen, P.E., CCIM (Phone) (732) 501-0221
(Address) One AT&T Way Room 1A113A Bedminster, NJ 07921
To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and
authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described
Property, including:
❑ Rezoning (Including proffers)
® Conditional Use Permit
❑ Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final)
® Subdivision
® Site Plan
® Variance or Appeal
❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment
My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to
previously approved proffered conditions except as follows:
This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or
modified.
In witness thereof, I (we) Lave hereto seynkyJogp) hand and seal tlii§;J.J f!
Signature(s)
State of Virginia-,-Git'y/County of , To -wit:
I, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who
signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appe ed before me and has
a knowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this Wda,,
.�� aU ..... • 04,
My Commissions410TARY
Notary Public Registration #: Z. BLIC
Revised 3/ 17/08 _ REG # 174329
_ • MY �CMh11SSIC40.
�Z=
•
Special Limited Power of Attorney
County of Frederick, Virginia
Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us
Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia,
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601
Facsimile 540-665-6395 Phone 540-665-5651
Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We)
(Name) Bradley G. Pollack (Phone) (540) 459-8600
(Address) 148 North Main Street Woodstock, VA 22664
the party in interest of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property"), by deed recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by
Instrument No. 050026775 on Page , and is described as
Parcel: 43 Lot: 132 Block: A Section: Subdivision:
do hereby make, constitute and appoint:
(Name) AT&T Corp. c/o Robert R. Ericksen, P.E., CCIM (Phone) (732) 501-0221
(Address) One AT&T Way Room 1A113A Bedminster, NJ 07921
To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and
authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described
Property, including:
❑ Rezoning (Including proffers)
® Conditional Use Permit
❑ Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final)
® Subdivision
® Site Plan
® Variance or Appeal
❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment
My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to
previously approved proffered conditions except as follows:
This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or
modified.
In witness thereof, I
Signature(s)
this L4 day of,204
`---\1� 49a-rTPublic in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who
1 strument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has
acknowle ed the same fore the jurisdiction aforesaid this R!S'�day of (Y-\ a 200 t O .
My Commission Expires: .sue .
Notary Public Registration #: rl a'l p t k
Revised 3/17/08
LESLIE MARIE LAND-FRAVEL
NOTARY PUBLIC
REGISTRATION # 7270211
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
FEBRUARY 28, 2013
U*E /
43 A 110
c�
z_
AT & T Microwave Tower °C
W
Adjoining Property Owners Map z
a
z
CCg4'
NSR� z�C
� W �
of C0
LU
44 A 24 0 z
o 3:
w O
O
w
A f� o
43
q 130 n
c�
o6 z
a �
\43 A 132 O
Q
\
\/ 43 A 132B
a
i
t-
W a
Xln
�Z�
3w
o�w
O
-
Z
3
a >
y
W
O
a�
W'}'9
0
j
o
W
o
U OIL
U
d
w LL
U
Y
J
0
/ L¢gend
as
z
3 W
o
o -
Suo7ecl Properties
Q
Z
Z Ow
o
Feet � Adjoining Property
°
� �
u
�
4Cn
200 100 200 Parcel Boundary
<Q
m
u u
Q
� y
DAW Source. FRdWck Canty. VA GIS Dlpar—M. May ZUlU
�FROPOSED 120'LATTICr TORE
PROPOSED 8'DISPI
/-PROPOSED 1() ' DI5H
•
PROPOSED 120"MONOPOI_F
0
0
•
5�
CO MSEA R CH`
A Com r,Scom-a Compiny
19700 Janelia Farms Blvd
Ashburn, VA 20147
703-726-5500
Analysis of Communication Towers in the Vicinity of the Proposed
AT&T Corporation Microwave Tower in Winchester, Virginia
Comsearch was contracted by AT&T Corporation to identify all commercial
communication facilities within a 1.0 mile search radius of their proposed 120' height
telecommunications tower to be located at an existing AT&T facility on Route 11,
Martinsburg Pike, in Winchester, Virginia. The purpose of this study is to provide the
analysis required by the local Zoning Ordinances to obtain a Conditional Use Permit for
the proposed telecommunication tower.
Comsearch performed a database search from multiple sources including the Federal
Communication Commission (FCC) Universal Licensing System (ULS) and Antenna
Structure Registration (ASR), a database of the top ten tower owners in the United
States, and the Comsearch databases of all microwave and land mobile radio (LMR)
commercial telecommunications systems licensed for operation in the United States.
The database search determined that there were 4 commercial communication facilities
registered within a 1.0 mile radius of the proposed AT&T tower. Table 1 identifies the
communication facilities and lists their pertinent parameters including service, frequency
band, FCC Call Sign, latitude and longitude, antenna height and licensee. Figure 1
shows the location of these communication facilities with respect to the proposed AT&T
tower.
Table 1
Commercial Communication Facilities within 1.0 Mile
of the Proposed AT&T Tower
Frequency
FCC Call
Antenna
ID
Service
Band
Sign.
Latitude
Longitude
Height m
Licensee
1
Land Mobile
152 MHz
KNGB739
39-12-58
78-08-28
24
A E JOHNSON INC
Microwave
2
Site
956 MHz
WEF653
39-13-20
78-07-57
9.14
H H OMPS, INC
SHIRLEY WELL
3
Land Mobile
31 MHz
WNGE496
39-14-00
78-06-57
29
DRILLING INC
460-470
4
Land Mobile
MHz
WPFR957
39-12-45
78-08-29
23
PACTIV CORP
In addition to the database search identified above, Comsearch also performed a
physical site visit to document the identified communication facilities and to determine if
any other commercial communication facilities are present that were not identified in the
database search. The on -site evaluation also focused on the area within a 1.0 mile
search radius of the proposed AT&T facility.
The results of the on -site physical visit are contained in Figures 2 — 5 for the database
identified facilities. Figures 6 and 7 provide documentation for two additional facilities
determined during the on -site visit and Figure 8 indicates the location of these additional
communication facilities with respect to the proposed AT&T tower.. Notes are provided
with each figure identifying the type of tower and a determination concerning the viability
of the existing facility to support the proposed AT&T communication requirements. This
determination is based on a number of criteria including 1) the ability of the tower to
adequately support the proposed 6' microwave antenna, 2) the sufficient height of the
existing tower to support the planned AT&T microwave link, and 3) proximity to the AT&T
facility where the required communication must terminate.
The results of this analysis determined that there are no existing commercial
communications facilities present within a 1.0 mile radius of the proposed AT&T 120'
height tower that will support the requirements of AT&T. The proposed AT&T tower is
required to support a highly reliable point-to-point microwave path between the AT&T
facility and a location on Mount Weather, which is in excess of 16 miles away in a
direction of approximately 132 degrees from true north. The proposed tower will be
required to support at minimum a 6' solid parabolic antenna. None of the identified
existing communication facilities will meet the stringent requirements of AT&T.
Street Atlas USAO20D6 Plus
321
Wstllovm
t
}
It
.
� r
Stephenson
s
1 � t
AT3T Proposed T,
—�
ID2,
r
ID 1,
It !ID ♦':
lT _ le
t
�-
� "
Scale 1 28,125
Data use subject to lc e fi
O 20J43eL. Street Ad as USW 2005 R us ""ttO "'�,I
wvtidelorme can V O 1' = 2,343 V tl Data Zoom 12-7
Figure 1
Commercial Communication Facilities in Database within 1.0 Mile
of the Proposed AT&T Tower
0 0
Site: ID 1
Coordinates: 39' 13' 0.4" N, 780 8' 28.4" W
Tower Height: 64' AGL Guyed
Owner/Licensee: AE Johnson, Inc.
Notes: This site is located behind an Exxon gas station at the intersection of US-
11 and Welltown Road. This tower will not support the proposed AT&T microwave
antenna requirements.
Figure 2 — Database Site ID 1
0 •
Site: ID 2
Coordinates: 390 13' 20.4" N, 780 7' 57" W
Tower Height: N/A
Owner/Licensee: HH Omps, Inc.
Notes: No tower or communication facilities are at this location. It is assumed that
the facility has been deactivated and is no longer in operation.
Figure 3 — Database Site ID 2
■
7
Site: ID 3
Coordinates: 39' 13' 59.1" N, 78° 6' 59.0" W
Tower Height: 105' AGL Guyed
Owner/Licensee: Shirley Well Drilling
Notes: This site is located behind Shirley Well Drilling Company off of US-11. This
facility will not support the proposed AT&T microwave antenna requirements.
Figure 4 — Database Site ID 3
0 0
Site: ID 4
Coordinates: 39' 12' 45.4" N, 78° 8' 29.0" W
Tower Height: N/A
Owner/Licensee: Pactiv Corp.
Notes: Site coordinates are located within private property of Pactiv Corporation
behind loading dock located southeast of main entrance. No tower is present at
this location and this facility will not support the proposed AT&T microwave
antenna requirements.
Figure 5 — Database Site ID 4
0 0
Site: Power Line Cellular Array
Coordinates: 39° 13' 6.4" N, 78' 8' 25.2" W
Tower Height: 125' AGL
Owner/Licensee: Unknown
Notes: This is a cellular base station site positioned on a high power transmission
pole located at the end of Mercedes Drive in Winchester, VA. This facility will not
support the proposed AT&T microwave antenna requirements.
Figure 6 — Additional Telecommunication Facility Found During Site Visit
u
Site: Land Mobile Antenna
Coordinates: 39° 13' 59.1" N, 78' 7' 38.6" W
Tower Height: 110' AGL self support
Owner/Licensee: Unknown
Notes: Site is located behind Agri Court in Winchester, VA. This facility will not
support the proposed AT&T microwave antenna requirements.
Figure 7 — Additional Telecommunication Facility Found During Site Visit
Street Atlas USA®2006 Plus
wdaows�
r
Stephenson
a
. t.1NR Antenna'
It
IATiT Proposed Tower
jcall Antenna on Power POW h
Q ;
,r Sole t 79,125
Data use sub$e t m Incense
(92IpM Dddmte Street ldas USAt920ll5 Plus r.tnrn1 L — _ _
vww+debmecvm M1 1'=2.3439R Data Zoom 12-7
Figure 8
Additional Commercial Communication Facilities Identified in On -Site Visit
Within 1.0 Mile of the Proposed AT&T Tower
Oolap
AT & T Microwave Tower {FAy� lu
Cr/GLEN 9� UDA Map rr� o� �sotiR z
0
tiF s� e� oc C7
sse W
663 rHC S
s, F a Q
fA tN m•
y 3 qq
$37 PO / W 3
' O W
D R cc
llo J0 0
9O� F6 7st
eet T F,pT DHARIES J? L
�t�ro �9� RQ TDwN-RD— U
JOP �hcr 'p OQ- ••*•
�° J ••
+S d o 4 � o
O G QG �• �
�� y �2 •-_.. Lli
eet Q. cC J • �
SAP 0 S W
q I
Q Nhs.R JESSiCA LNjf� O � RgG Q
O
o• Rsr 0
5 a .,°� • s� Q
9pc /,�i z Go t1 876 0= L)
Cy 3
FF pQ p y +� O r
�/,, 06
J c
732 0Q' ■ ycR !/O,a y� D°rd JO w
CF D C ygyr �o.....■r■■.,■`c b a�f
O� `� / • \ ~
082 U o
g z
�.�� °ate ■ W Ln Z N
o >: w
.tea o
40 / LC>
o° w U }
O 9 ¢ C UJ Z
k0 < 00
0o
cQ O ¢ 00� a
PACTIVWgy/ x 0j Q U w
a�P - ♦ C° Up Inside UDA ' v
o
Legen�
� po�R�� �• q d I .�.•_�•. ~ Q � a -
e
tt/et " R 6 .UQq Subject Properties
AO A w O
Nw
FeetUDA
X
o
ONE- - Parcel Boundary 01
Fs 1,000 500 0 1,000
o
<ti` n R a3,� ° o y
Z
AT & T Microwave Tower Cr
LU
Fall Zone Exhibit LU
z
Z
0 Z =¢
w
o
C 720 Foot Fall Zone F- m
AT&T Microwave Tower uJ X
LLJ
W
V`
tt (If O
o
~ Lal
\ f-
Q
f-
U
V Q
Line of Sight Z
to Mt. Weather 3 r p W w
G / J
0 m ¢ >
Q� r.... W 2 Of r
W LLI
Z
L1J = O
Legend �; L J U o -
`O ¢ U w 1pi
lr J J ci 0 S
J
AT & T Property d a
�0 3 LU
Building Footprints Feet a o
LU
Parcel Boundary 100 50 0 100 w W
a
o y
, Dnla Source, Frederick County, V. GIS Depa--, May 2009 Data
o
` .
o
n x e vo
y 3= In m r 1
m m o
m o CL
3 1
3 0 3 2 g y 1
o -- "
� 1
in
0
m
o c
0
m m
y N
C) �l
0
0
a) o �c:)
0 o
TI n /
CD m
/
IV /
O /
CD /
I
WW >v
A A A A A
0 J J 0
100 J W N
0 Z7
c N NCA
3
3 0 3 2
U 0 N O D
m
0 3 0 x (D
N = N 0
c
m Q
D N N
N N
AT & T MICROWAVE TOWER
DEVELOPMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS
AND HISTORIC FEATURES
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
DATE: 27 MAY 2010 PROJECT ID: "'t, DESIGN
SCALE: 1 Inch equals 1,200 Feet
d
NOsyd d
�w
=1� d
iv ..
co Igi
�e,m Y
h/oR mom . o
0
(D
G
(D
>0
Q- 3
=o
o —
-TIv
ID
v L m
—0C4 G
(D (D
(n Dm
I
v
AT & T MICROWAVE TOWER GREENWAY ENGINEERING
DEVELOPMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS .166
AND HISTORIC FEATURES
cK , Co
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #05-10
AT&T CORP.
MELISSA HALL AND WESLEY HELSLEY
w d BRADLEY POLLACK
.I, Staff Report for the Planning Commission
73A
Prepared: July 6, 2010
Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on
this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 07/11/10 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 08/11/10 Pending
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to enable the construction of a 120 foot Lattice
Telecommunication Tower.
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
5. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12)
months of abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit.
Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
Page 2
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
July 6, 2010
LOCATION: The properties are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North),
approximately '/a mile northeast of Interstate 81, Exit 317.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 43-A-130 and 43-A-132
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
Zoned: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use: Residential and Public Utility
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE:
North: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Residential
South: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Church
East: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Church
West: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Residential
PROPOSED USE: This application is for a 120 foot Lattice Telecommunication Tower.
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this
property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would
provide access to the property. Prior to operation of the facility, a low volume commercial
entrance must be constructed to our standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property
and positive drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a
land use permit. The permit is issued by this office and requires inspection fee and surety bond
coverage.
Frederick County Fire Marshall: No comments.
Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building
Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building
Code 2006. The structure is required to comply with Chap 15 & 16 of the IBC 2006 for
Page 3
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
July 6, 2010
structural load, as well as Section 3108 for Towers. The tower shall be located and equipped
with step bolts and ladders so as to provide ready access for inspection purposes. The tower
shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public space, or encroach upon any privately
owned property without written consent of the owner of the encroached -upon property. (See
3108.2, Location and Access.) Special instructions per Chap 17 IBC 2006 apply to this
structure. Plans submitted for review shall be sealed by a Virginia Registered Design
Professional.
Winchester Regional Airport: We determined that the proposed tower does not penetrate any
FAR Part 77 surfaces; therefore a tower located at the proposed site should not impact current or
future operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Our comment is based on the
determination study completed by the Federal Aviation Administration, Aeronautical Study
Number 2009-AEA-383-OE dated May 5, 2009. If at any time the tower height exceeds 150
AGL, the Winchester Regional Authority requests the following condition be met: Towers over
200 feet AGL, are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL,
the Winchester Regional Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in
accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K, Change 2. Please note on the
determination study, that any variation from the information submitted by your firm for review
would require a separate notice to the FAA. In addition, the determination does include
temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derrick, etc., which may be used during
construction of the structure as long as the equipment does not exceed the 120' height
submitted. Should temporary construction equipment exceed that height, a separate notice to
the FAA must be filed. This comment should be included on the building plans to ensure the
contractor meets this Federal regulation.
Historic Resources Advisory Board: The Frederick County HRAB considered this
Conditional use Permit proposal during their meeting on June 15, 2010. The HRAB reviewed
information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by Greenway
Engineering. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley, published by the National
Park Service, shows that this site is located in the core area of the Second Battle of Winchester
and the study area of Third Winchester. While this property is located within an area identified
as having lost integrity, the area directly behind this site is identified as core area for the Second
Battle of Winchester that has retained its integrity. In addition to these concerns, the HRAB
noted that the home located at 2042 Martinsburg Pike was built in 1947. As it is older than fifty
years in age, the structure should be documented and a DHR survey should be completed.
Ultimately, the HRAB was concerned about the visual impact of the tower on the core battlefield
area and felt that the tower, which is proposed to serve the FEMA development across the street,
should be located on the roof of the FEMA building or on the FEMA site. It was the Board's
expressed priority that the applicants first make a serious and genuine effort to locate the tower
on the FEMA site where existing trees and development would make the tower less visible from
0 0
Page 4
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
July 6, 2010
the battlefield. The HRAB expressed a preference for a monopole telecommunication facility
over a lattice facility such as has been proposed. It was suggested that monopole facilities with
limited microwave dish mountings (due to the size of the microwave fixtures) would minimize
visual disruption to the historic battlefield viewshed. The HRAB does not support this request
because of its visual impacts on the historical character and significant Civil War battlefields in
the area. As in the 2009 review of a CUP for the same site, the Board continues to recommend
that the applicant document the dwelling at 2042 Martinsburg Pike, complete the DHR survey,
and assure that the home remains intact.
Planning and Zoning: The 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick County
("Comprehensive Plan") provides guidance when considering land use actions. This proposed
120 foot lattice -type commercial telecommunication facility will be located on properties located
within the Northeast Land Use Plan (NELUP). One of the primary objectives of NELUP calls
for the development of industrial and commercial use along the Route 11 north corridor. The
properties are located within the Sewer Water Service Area (SWSA) and outside the Urban
Development Area (UDA) as indicated in the 2007Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick
County.
The applicant applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP # 01-09) for a 120 foot monopole
commercial telecommunication facility to be located on these properties, and was denied by the
Board of Supervisors at their meeting held on May 13, 2009. The denial was based on the
location of the proposed facility within a Developmentally Sensitive Area (DSA) and the
surrounding historical sites, as noted in the 2007 Frederick County Comprehensive Polices
The Board of Supervisors at their June 9, 2010, meeting updated the NELUP component of the
Comprehensive Plan and modified the DSA in this area of the NELUP. The properties that are
subject to this proposed CUP were removed from the DSA.
The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in
the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit
(CUP). Commercial telecommunication facilities may be subject to additional performance
standards in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts
to adjoining properties. These performance standards are to ensure that scenic areas and
properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. In addition to these
performance standards, the zoning ordinance requires that all proposed telecommunication
facilities shall be of a monopole -type construction. The applicant has applied for a Conditional
Use Permit for a 120-foot lattice -type commercial telecommunications facility on the above -
referenced properties. The Planning Commission may allow a lattice -type telecommunication
tower provided that tower is located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites.
The general surrounding area of this proposed site contains sites of significant historical
importance, which include the Hackwood property, established residential areas, and the Milburn
0
Page 5
Conditional Use Permit 405-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
July 6, 2010
Road corridor. The Hackwood property and the Milburn Road corridor are less than 1 1/2 miles
from this proposed commercial telecommunication facility. Furthermore, the subject properties
of this proposed commercial telecommunication facility will be located within the core area of
the Second Battle of Winchester Civil War Battlefield historic site, and the study area of the
Third Battle of Winchester. Frederick County has traditionally set a higher expectation for land
use actions with regard to properties that are located within the vicinity to historic sites.
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB), as referenced above,
reviewed this application and had concerns. The HRAB had the most concern with the visual
impact of this proposed facility on the core battlefield area of the Second Battle of Winchester
and the study area of Third Winchester. The HRAB expressed a preference for a monopole
telecommunication facility with limited microwave dish mountings over a lattice facility. The
HRAB also recommended that the applicant locate this facility on property located on the 150
acre industrially and commercially zoned Rutherford Farm development, which includes a
multistory office building, commercial center, and vacant properties. This development may
provide satisfactory coverage for this applicant and future co -location opportunities in this area
of Frederick County.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 07/21/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
This is a request to seek approval for the construction of a 120 foot lattice -type commercial
telecommunication facility. Staff would note that the proposed site does meet the requirements
as set forth by the zoning ordinance for a lattice -type facility. However, as with the previous
application, this facility will have an impact on adjacent historical sites. Therefore, a monopole -
type facility may be appropriate to mitigate any impacts to the historical sites, and service the
applicants' needs and the future needs in this area of the County. Planning Commission approval
is needed for a lattice -type facility. Should the Planning Commission find a lattice -type facility
to be inappropriate, the CUP is required to be for monopole -type construction or denied as
presented.
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers.
3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County.
4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated.
Page 6
Conditional Use Permit #05-10
AT&T, Melissa Hall & Wesley Helsley, and Bradley Pollack
July 6, 2010
The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12)
months of abandonment of operation.
6. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid.
7. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit.
Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
•
Mark Cheran
From: Angela Whitacre
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Mark Cheran
Subject: RE: [66306] ACH Payment to COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Yes- the delinquent amount was paid in full on Friday 7/16/10. They are now current.
Thanks- Angela
-----Original Message -----
From: Mark Cheran
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:35 AM
To: Angela Whitacre
Subject: FW: [66306] ACH Payment to COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Angela are the taxes for this property now up to date thanks ....... Cheran
-----Original Message -----
From: Ty Lawson [mailto:tlawson@lsplc.com]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:56 PM
To: Mark Cheran
Subject: FW: [66306] ACH Payment to COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Mark, do your records confirm this payment? Ty
-----Original Message -----
From: bpollack@shentel.net [mailto:bpollack@shentel.net]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:25 PM
To: TLawson@lsplc.com
Subject: Fwd: [66306] ACH Payment to COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Forwarded Message:
> To: <bpollack(@shentel.net>
> From: <BORNDOFF@co.frederick.va.us>
> Subject: [66306] ACH Payment to COUNTY OF FREDERICK
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:18:58 -0400
> -----
> Below is the receipt for your Electronic Payment you made today,
> Please save this for your records:
> Transaction Number: 66306
> Total Taxes Paid: $865.02
> Convenience Fee: $0.00
> Total Charges: $865.02
> Please Allow 24 Business Hours for payment to be processed.
> Detailed items paid for this transaction:
> Principal
Penalty
Interest Total
1
> Dept Ticket # De�ription Paip
Paid
Paid Paid
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
> RE2009 161520002 2.19 ACRES $339.85
$33.99
$24.92 $398.76
> RE2010 163780001 2.19 ACRES $416.93
$41.69
$7.64 $466.26
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using Shentel WebMail.
http://WebMail.Shentel.Net
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3005 - Release Date: 07/16/10 06:35:00
2
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/ 665-6395
NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
July 28, 2010
TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S)
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #05-10 FOR AT&T CORP., MELISSA
HELSLEY-HALL & WESLEY HELSLEY AND BRADLEY POLLACK
On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing
being held on Wednesday, August 11, 2010, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick
County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the
following application:
Conditional Use Permit 905-10 for AT&T Corp., Melissa Helsley-Hall & Wesley Helsley and
Bradley Pollack, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for a 120 foot Monopole
Telecommunications Tower. The properties are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (Route
11 North), approximately '/4 mile northeast of Interstate 81, Exit 317, and are identified with
Property Identification Numbers 43-A-130 and 43-A-132 in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy
of the agenda will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week
of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street
in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the
Planning Department's website at www.fiederickcountyva.gov.
Sincerely,.
Mark R. Cheran
Zoning Administrator
MRC/bad
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202. • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Ii_--
L_'
This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on
Ld from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick
County, Virginia: -- — -- --
_ _--- --- - 43 -A- -113-
43 - A• -130- 1 DEHAVEN JANE M TRUSTEE
AT&T CORP 2073 MARTINSBURG PIKE
CIO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT WINCHESTER VA 22603.4715
1 ATT WAY RM 3B 220C — — ,.
BEDMINSTER NJ 07921.2693 I 43 - A• .132-B
_ TRUSTEES OF MARANATHA BAPTIST CH
43 - A- - 132-
HELSLEY HALL MELISSA - 2040 MARTINSBURG PIKE
HELSLEY WESLEY SR WINCHESTER VA 22603
PO BOX 1924--
WINCHESTER VA 22604-8074 43 . A• .129.
- -- - - __-- LIGHT WILLIAM
Bradley Pollack
148 N. Main St.
Woodstock, VA 22664
i
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
43 -A- .110 - - -
i RIDDICK THOMAS E. JR. & JANET
2045 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER VA 22603.4715
44 - A• - 24-
WILSON RITA
PO BOX 2996
WINCHESTER VA 22604.2196
& LIGHT SANDRA
i405 SPRING VALLEY DR
WINCHESTER VA 22603.2949
fk R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator
ierick County Planning Department
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICJK t
a Notary Public in and for the State and County
aforesaid, do ereby certi that k �R.Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator for the
4tated
nt Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated
has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my
C unty aforesaid.
Given under my hand this
My commission expires on
BEVERLY H. DELLINGER
NOTARY ID # 331878
NOTARY PUBLIC
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 31, 2011
of
i
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
5401665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
July 9, 2010
TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S)
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #05-10 FOR AT&T CORP., MELISSA
HELSLEY-HALL & WESLEY HELSLEY AND BRADLEY POLLACK
On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public
hearing being held on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick
County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the
following application:
Conditional Use Permit #05-10 for AT&T Corp., Melissa Helsley-Hall & Wesley Helsley and
Bradley Pollack, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for a 120 foot Lattice Telecommunications
Tower. The properties are located on the' east side of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North),
approximately 1/4 mile, northeast of Interstate 81, Exit 317, and are identified with Property
Identification Numbers 43-A-130 and 43-A-132 in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy
of the agenda will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week
of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street
in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the
Planning Department's website at www.frederickeountyva.gov.
Sincerely,
���'
` Mark R. Cheran
Zoning Administrator
MRC/bad
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
This is to ce , ify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on
p from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick
County, Virg> ia: - --- — - -- - -----
43 • A. -113-
43 - A- -130- DEHAVEN JANE M TRUSTEE
AT&T CORP 2073 MARTINSBURG PIKE
CIO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT WINCHESTER VA 22603.4715
1 ATT WAY RM 313 220C —
BEDMINSTER NJ 07921.2693 43 A. 132•B - -- — - ---
43 l TRUSTEES OF MARANATHA BAPTIST CH
A. -132- l
HELSLEY-HALL MELISSA 2040 MARTINSBURG PIKE
HELSLEY WESLEY SR WINCHESTER VA 22603
PO BOX 1924
WINCHESTER VA 22604.8074 43 -A. - 129 --- -- - -
-- LIGHT WILLIAM
� -- - - - --- - - - -- - - - - � � & LIGHT SANDRA
Bradley Pollack j 405 SPRING VALLEY DR
148 N. Main st. I WINCHESTER VA 22603.2949
Woodstock, VA 22664
I
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
43 -A- -110-
RIDDICK THOMAS E. JR. & JANET
2045 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER VA 22603.4715
44 - A• - 24. /
WILSON RITA f 1�
PO BOX 2996
WINCHESTER VA 22604.2196 lark R. Cheran, Zoning &Subdivision Administrator
ederick County Planning Department
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
l�. W, , a Notary Public in and for the State and County
aforesaid, do ereby certify that Nork R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator for the
Departm nt f Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated
A, has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my
State Wd ounty aforesaid. _
Given under my hand this <� day of
My commission expires on
86 F.I2LY 19. C)i>.Llh'Olr� 3
? NOIAf\Y ID n 331878 ,
NOTARY PUBLIC
COMMONWEALTH Or- VIR a
,r •; C;CJA�9tvI1SSIONEXPII2ES JULY3GINI A
1, z0xr7�,.,,w�,l
N
djoining Property Owners Listing
File 5387
Tax Map Numoer
Owner
Address
City & State
ZIP
43 A 110
THOMAS E. & JANET RIDDICK, JR.
2045 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
44 A 24
RITA WILSON
PO BOX 2996
WINCHESTER, VA
22604
43 A 113
JANE M. DEHAVEN, TRUSTEE
2073 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
43 A 132B
TRUSTEES OF MARANATHA BAPTIST CHURCH
2O40 MARTINSBURG PIKE
WINCHESTER, VA
22603
43 A 129
IWILLIAM & SANDRA LIGHT
1405 SPRING VALLEY DR
WINCHESTER, VA
1 22603
TO: BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING
FROM:BEV - Planning Dept.
Please pr' t sets of els by
THANKSI
Source: Frederick County GIS, May 2010
Page 1 of 1
� oq a°vo
6
'r- , �o 7. b�
s�
AT & T Commercial Telecom nication Facility - Page 1 of 1
Evan Wyatt
From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd
[Lloyd.ingram @ VDOT.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 3:14 PM
To: Evan Wyatt
Cc: John.Bishop; Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Parlett, Joshua
Subject: AT & T Commercial Telecommunication Facility
Ref: AT & T Commercial Telecommunication Facility
Route 11, Martinsburg Pike
Frederick County
The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact
on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Prior to operation of the
facility, a' low volume commercial entrance (per attached) must be constructed to our standards to allow
for safe egress and ingress of the property and positive drainage. Any work performed on the State's
right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. The permit is issued by this office and requires
an inspection fee and surety bond coverage.
<<S C N_20100524151118_001. pdf>>
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate
to call.
Lloyd A. Ingram, Land Development Engineer
VA Department of Transportation — Land Development
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
Phone # (540) 984-5611
Fax # (540) 984-5607
5/25/2010
Low Volume Commercial Entrance Design along Highways with Shoulders
LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DESIGN
ALONG HIGHWAYS WITH SHOULDERS
Site Requirements For This Design
Maximum Highway VPD : 5,000
Maximum Entrance VPD : 200
Maximum Entrance VPD
Truck Trips : 1 O%
SINGLE TWO - WAY ENTRANCE
Imo— Limits of Parking Lot --- —
R/W �— I }.� W Tc��7-
U� �U
Edge of Pavement
G-93
LETTER
SYMBOL
DIMENSIONS
C
2S Minimum
U -&
26 Minimum. Curb and Gutter
or Curbing Is not required.
W
1B' Minimum
30' MaAmum
y
go, Prefered
60' Minimum
s�Fhto�oort�S�ltddubdMalon Streets and All�Ya� radtl, width and angle
Design Gulden
Inntthre Rceed �6�gnn Manua, Appendix B.
Notes:
fldfspcneeonumt specific site requirements
as directed or_ pp _ b>� sed onwat the
�Idr�„n op9i ppcf,
FIGURE 4-15 LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DESIGN ALONG HIGHWAYS WITH SHOULDERS
Note: All entrance design and construction shall accommodate pedestrian and bicycle users of the highway in accordance
with the Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations".
C � J
•
Conditional Use Permit Comments
Frederick County Fire Marshal
ONMOSONOW,
Mail to:
Frederick County Fire Marshal
Fire & Rescue Department
1080 Coverstone Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
(5540) 665-6350
Hand deliver to:
Frederick County
Attn: Fire Marshal
Public Safety Building, 1" Floor
1080 Coverstone Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency
with their review. Also, please attach one (1) copy of your application form, location map, and
all other pertinent information.
Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering Attn: Evan Wyatt, AICP
Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
Phone Number: 540-662-4185
Name of development and/or description of the request: AT&T Commercial Telecommunication
Facility. Construction of a 120' microwave lattice tower with accessory equipment building.
Location of property: The subject properties (Tax Map Parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132)
are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11 North), approximately 3/a-mile
northeast of Interstate 81 Exit 317.
Fire Marshal's Comments:
Fire Marshal's use only
Date received
Incomplete
Date reviewed
Signature and Date
Signature and Date (revisiv,,)
Date revision received Date approved
•
Frederick County Fire and Rescue
Department
DAVIRGINIOA
Office of the Fire Marshal
Plan Review and Comments
Control number
Date received Date reviewed
Date Revised
CUP 10 - 0 0 0 6
5/14/2010 5/25/2010
Project Name
Applicant
AT&T
Greenway Engineering
Address
City State Zip
Applicant Phone
151 Windy Hill
Winchester VA 22602
540-662-4185
Type Application
Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District
Site Plan
43-A-130 13 13
Current Zoning
Election District
RA
Recommendations
Stonewall
Automatic Sprinkler System
Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System
No
No
No
Other recommendation
Emergency Vehicle Access
Not Identified
Siamese Location
Not Identified
Emergency Vehicle Access Comments
Access Comments
Additional Comments
Plan Approval Recommended
Yes
Requirements
Hydrant Location
Not Identified
Roadway/Aisleway Width
Not Identified
Fire Lane Required
No
Special Hazards
No
}r
Reviewed By Signature
D.D. Linaburg
Title
Conditional Use Pest Comments
•
Frederick County Inspections Department
Mail to:
Frederick County Inspections Dept.
Attn: Building Official
107 North Kent Street, Suite 200
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(540) 665-5650
Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Inspections Department
Attn: Building Official
County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor
107 North Kent Street, Suite 200
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency
with their review. Also, please attach two (2) copies of your application form, location map, and
all other pertinent information.
Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering Attn: Evan Wyatt, AICP
Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Phone Number: 540-662-4185
Name of development and/or description o: the request: AT&T Commercial Telecommunication
Facility. Construction of a 120' microwave lattice tower with accessory equipment building
Location of property: The subject properties (Tax Map Parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132)
are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11 North), approximately 3/a-mile
northeast of Interstate 81 Exit 317.
Inspection Department Comments: rf2� pc In ;-VL nA
Public Works use only
Date received
Incomplete
Date reviewed
Signature and Date
Signature and Date (revision)
Date revision received
Incomplete
Date reviewed
Date approved
ra"4 �"+�
.,.E :�.. '.." r E" 9 i...., D
MAY 14 2010
Frederick County
Public Works & Inspections
Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use
group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2006. The structure is
required to comply with Chap 15 & 16 of the IBC 2006 for structural load, as well as, Section
3108 for Towers.
The tower shall be located and equipped with step bolts and ladders so as to provide ready access
for inspection purposes. The tower shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public
space, or encroach upon any privately owned property without written consent of the owner of
the encroached -upon property (Sec 3108.2, Location and Access)
Special inspections per Chap 17 IBC 2006 apply to this structure.
Plans submitted for review shall be sealed by a Virginia Registered Design Professional.
0
•
Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use
group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2006. The structure is,
required to comply with Chap 15 & 16 of the IBC 2006 for structural load, as well as, Section
3108- for Towers.
The tower shall be located and equipped with step bolts and ladders so as to provide ready access
for inspection purposes. The tower shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public
space, or encroach upon any privately owned property without written consent of the owner of
the encroached -upon property (Sec 3108.2, Location and Access)
Special inspections per Chap 17 IBC 2006 apply to this structure.
Plans submitted for review shall be sealed by a Virginia Registered Design Professional.
0 •
Conditional Use Permit Comments
Winchester Regional Airport
Mail to:
Winchester Regional Airport
Attn: Executive Director
491 Airport Road
Winchester, Virginia 22602
540-662-2422
Hand deliver to:
Winchester Regional Airport
Attn: Executive Director
491 Airport Road
(Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South)
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency
with their review. Also, please attach two (2) copies of your application form, location map, and
all other pertinent information.
Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering Attn: Evan Wyatt, AICP
Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Phone Number: 540-662-4185
Name of development and/or description of the request: AT&T Commercial Telecommunication Facility.
Construction of a 120' microwave lattice tower with accessory equipment building.
Location of property: The subject properties (Tax Map Parcels 43-((A))-130 and 43-((A))-132) are
located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11 North), approximately 3/4-mile northeast of
Interstate 81 Exit 317.
Winchester Regional Airport's Comments:
s-ee co m m-P-n�- \ e ems- e h-P
0
e
WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT
z 491 AIRPORT ROAD
1"�7)
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602
(540) 662-5786
May 25, 2010
Evan Wyatt, AICP
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
Re: Site Plan Final Comment
120' Monopole — AT&T POP Tower
2042 Martinsburg Pike — Winchester
Dear Mr. Wyatt:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority offers the following final comment on the above referenced request for a
conditional use permit as conditions to be complied with at all times:
We determined that the proposed tower does not penetrate any FAR Part 77 surfaces therefore a tower located
at the proposed site should not impact current or future operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Our
comment is based on the determination study completed by the Federal Aviation Administration, Aeronautical
Study Number 2009-AEA-383-OE dated May 5, 2009.
If at any time the tower height exceeds 150 AGL, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority requests the following
condition be met:
1. Towers over 200 feet AGL are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL,
the Winchester Regional Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in accordance with FAA
Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 K, Change 2.
Please note on the determination study, that any variation from the information submitted by your firm for review would
require a separate notice to the FAA.
In addition, the determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derrick, etc., which may
be used during construction of the structure as long as the equipment does not exceed the 120' height submitted.
Should temporary construction equipment exceed that height, a separate notice to the FAA must be filed. This comment
should be included on the building plans to ensure the contractor meets this Federal regulation.
Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact this office (540) 662-5786.
Sincerely,
S. R. Manuel
Executive Director
0
0
COUNTY of FREDERICIK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
June 21, 2010
Mr. Evan Wyatt
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
RE: Telecommunications Tower Conditional Use Permit
Location: 2042 Martinsburg Pike, Winchester, VA
Property Identification Numbers (PINs): 43-A-130 and 43-A-132
Zoning District: RP (Residential Performance)
Dear Mr. Wyatt:
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered the above referenced
Conditional Use Permit proposal during their meeting on June 15, 2010. The HRAB reviewed
information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia
Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by Greenway Engineering.
Historic Resources Advisory Board Concerns
The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley, published by the National Park Service,
shows that this site is located in the core area of the Second Battle of Winchester and the study
area of Third Winchester. While this property is located within an area indentified as having lost
integrity, the area directly behind this site is identified as core area for the Second Battle of
Winchester that has retained its integrity.
In addition to these concerns, the HRAB noted that the home located at 2042 Martinsburg Pike
was built in 1947. As it is older than fifty years in age, the structure should be documented and a
DHR survey should be completed.
Ultimately, the HRAB was concerned about the visual impact of the tower on the core battlefield
area and felt that the tower, which is proposed to serve the FEMA development across the street,
should be located on the roof of the FEMA building or on the FEMA site. It was the Board's
expressed priority that the applicants first make a serious and genuine effort to locate the tower on
the FEMA site where existing trees and development would make the tower less visible from the
battlefield.
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Mr. Evan Wyatt
RE: Telecommunications Tower Conditional Use Permit
June 21, 2010
Page 2
The HRAB expressed a preference for a monopole telecommunication facility over a lattice facility,
such as has been proposed. It was suggested that monopole facilities with limited microwave dish
mountings (due to the size of the microwave fixtures) would minimize visual disruptions to the historic
battlefield viewshed.
The HRAB does not support this request because of its visual impacts on the historical character and
significant civil war battlefields in the area.
As in the 2009 review of a CUP for the same site, the Board continues to recommend that the applicant
document the dwelling at 2042 Martinsburg Pike, complete the DHR survey, and assure that the home
remains intact.
Please contact me with any questions concerning these comments from the HRAB.
Sine rely,
Eric awrence, AICP
HRAB Staff Support
ERL;/bad
cc: Rhoda Kriz, HRAB Chair
.
"j
6*_ ;i,
C
0 0.
�z
U H�
(a
c
0
E
M
C
0
� c
C Y
ca C
v •�
M y
C
a�
N
3
c
c�
a�i 3
4) 0
� C
N N
0 •
080006084 0
N
110
DEED ti
THIS DEED, made and dated this / ? I day of May, 2008, by and between
TAD J. NAEGELI and MARIA SUNSHINE DOYLE-NAEGELI (formerly known as
MARIA SUNSHINE DOYLE), parties of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantors,
and AT&T CORP., a New York Domestic Business Corporation, party of the second
part, hereinafter called the Grantee.
WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00),
cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of all of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors do hereby grant and convey with General
Warranty and English Covenants of Title, in fee simple absolute, unto the Grantee, the
following property:
All that certain lot or parcel of land, lying and being situate along the
Southeastern side of Virginia U.S. Highway No. 11, about three miles North
of Winchester, in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia,
fronting on said highway for a distance of 103.8 feet, more or less, having a
depth on the northern and southern sides of 400 feet and a width on the
eastern side of 103.8 feet, more or less; and being the same real property
which the Grantors herein acquired by Deed dated September 1, 2004,
from James L. Boone and Sharon H. Boone, husband and wife, which said
Deed is of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick
County, Virginia as Instrument No. 040017922, Reference is hereby made
to the aforesaid Deed, and to the references therein contained, for a further
and more particular description of the property hereby conveyed.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way and restrictions
of record, if any, affecting the subject property.
WITNESS the following
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF CHESTER, to- it:
/ U a Notary Public in and for the State and
Jurisdiction aforesaid do hereby certify that TAD J. NAEGELI and MARIA
SUNSHINE DOYLE-NAEGELI, whose names are signed to the foregoing DEED
bearing date the / 9 day of May, 2008, have personally appeared before me and
acknowledged the same in the City of Winchester, Virginia.
Given under my hand this /� day of May, 2008.
Commission ex es
A ff7/.
Notary Pdblic .Notary Registration Number
; A
• it •..... �� `;`
C.%Oita1RRHOEEDSWM MP TO SPWAEGELI TO AT&T. DEED.09p' 141 , t•N••.
•. atc' a
i�00'�� v
VIRGINIA: FREDERICK COUNTY.SCC.
This instrument of writing was produced to me on
at
and ��ith ccrtili�atc ad. MINI ledeement thereto annewed
%Kati admitted to rcxvrd_ fsc imlx�srd by $ec 5$.1$Q20f
5 rl f0 0and i5-I -W I have been paid, if a
e� /) J , OPA
•
n
0,566 �?. 7 76"
THIS DEED made and dated this /J day of November, 2005, by and
between JOHN E. HART and SHANNON K. HART, hereinafter called the
Grantors, and MELISSA HELSLEY-HALL and WESLEY HELSLEY, SR,
hereinafter called the Grantees.
WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Grantors do hereby grant and convey, with General Warranty
and English covenants of title unto the Grantees, in fee simple, as joint tenants with
right of survivorship as at common law, all the following described certain real
estate together with the improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto
belonging:
All that certain tract or parcel of land containing 6.87 acres, more
or less, lying and being situate along the eastern side of U.S. Highway No.
11, about 3 '/z miles north of Winchester, in Stonewall District, Frederick
County, Virginia. LESS AND EXCEPT 4.4066 acres, more or less,
conveyed in Deed Book 552, page 6 with Correction in Deed Book 556,
page 729. FURTHER LESS AND EXCEPT 4,647 square feet, more or
less, conveyed in Deed Book 856, page 1454. AND BEING a portion of
the same property conveyed to John E. Hart and Shannon K. Hart from
Ernest D. Rowe, by Deed dated March 15, 1971 of record in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book
374, page 260.
Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the
references therein contained for more particular descriptions of the property
hereby conveyed.
This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way and
restrictions of record, affecting the subject property.
1 DMOM MCC."
Ivweys i cmade s at Law
lm WOE h,nwe 9"d
sutate. VW6 22W
''
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
G L Z• 1¢ � (SEAL)
OHN E. HART
k. 00- — (SEAL)
SHANNON K. HART
STATE OF • '
COUNTY OF K4L.. �, fr:�� , to -wit:
Acknowledged before me this 14-_ day of November 2005 by John E. Hart and
Shannon K. Hart, husband and wife.
My commission expires:
NOT PUBLIC
ViRGINIA: FREDERICK COUNTY, SC .
Thia instrument of writing web
Produced to the on
or• is
pp at y'3� fl m
Ott with certificate of acknowlcdgerttent
`•'Ltheretoanrtexcd
" admitted to record. T im
Pad try Sc _ X 1-W2 of
, and 58.1.801 hsve been paid, if ttaees"ble
4'--4 444�, C:lert
1 Douyc McCu"
mrom t ca q'ia t it Uv
p1 W.9106o S"d
WV00W. Vk" -*d
40
0
m
rn
w
0 0
/J7\ GREENWAY ENGINEERING
%47 151 Windy Hill Lane
F,,,,,dcJ !n ,,;; Winchester, Virginia 22602
T R A N S M I T T A L
Project Name: AT&T Microwave Tower — CUP Application
File No: 5387
Date June 24, 2010
To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt
Attn: Mark Cheran GREENWAY ENGINEERING
Phone: 540-662-4185
Copied Fax: 540-722-9528
Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail ® Courier ❑ Pick Up
❑ Other
❑ Urgent ® For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ® Please Comment
Message:
Hi Mark,
Please find attached the information required for filing of the AT&T Microwave Tower
Conditional Use Permit Application. Please review this information and advise me if you need
anything else at this time.
Thank you, Evan
Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only:
Received By:
Please Print Name:
Date:
eQ I�
2 10
'T