Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-08 Shenandoah Gas Extension of Tower - Shawnee - Backfile
A Date: NOTES File opened Reference Manual updated/number assigned D-base updated One location map requested from Mapping Dept. A 'b.Z L1S j W CU Four sets of labels requested from Data Processing 7 ho JV6 WHe given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary CLOSE OUT FILE: V--2-s* Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file and other applicable cc's S File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" ` - OK Reference Manual updated Z 0 g D-base updated 6?1,� 6) File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary U \Carol\Common\Tracking sheets\CUP. TRK Revised 12/19/02 DATE L' NO. RECEIVED FROM 1 , A REss ��� Ag N. W, G�,�c DOLLARS $ ii I0 501 C ❑FOR RENT c) 19 C i ce _ { !11 /_ _ o FOR 1. f �1� (V �` �j�, AMT OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID 7T� o ti� ; '�'� CHECK I vl �} '�'9ht_7tfiCE �.. MONEY `-f ORDER J BYPao.a A/C AIR CONDITIONING MGR MANAGER ADJ ADJUSTABLE MIN MINIMUM AFT ABOVE FINISH FLOOR MISC MISCELLANEOUS APPROY APPROYIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR N NORTH TESTING AND MATERIALS NA NOT APPLICABLE AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT BLOC BUILDING NTS NOT TO SCALE BLK BLOCK OC,o/c ON CENTER BMR BASE MOBILE RADIO 00 OUTSIDE DIAMETER B/S BUILDING STANDARD ORO OPENING OPP OPPOSITE CLC CEILING CLR CLEAR PLYWO PLYWOOD CONC CONCRETE PR PAIR CONST CONSTRUCTION PROJ PROJECT CONT CONTINUOUS PROP PROPERTY PT PRESSURE TREATED DBL DOUBLE DIA, a DIAMETER REO'D REQUIRED OVG DIAGONAL RM ROOM DIM DIMENSION RO ROUGH OPENING ON DOWN OTL,DETL DETAIL 5 SOUTH OWG DRAWING SHT SHEET Sim SIMILAR E EAST SPEC SPECIFICATION EA EACH 50 SQUARE EL.ELEV ELEVATION SS STAINLESS STEEL ELECT ELEC7PKIAL STL STEEL EO EQUAL STRUC7 STRUCTURAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT SUSP SUSPENDED EW EACH WAY SV SHEET VINYL EXIST EYISTING EYT EYTERIOR THRU THROUGH TNND TINNED FIN FINISH TOG TOP OF CONCRETE FLUOR FLUORESCENT TOM TOP OF MASONRY FLR FLOOR TYR TYPICAL FT FOOT GA GAUGE U8C UNIFORM BUILDING GALV GALVANIZED) UNO CODE UNLESS NOTED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR OTHERWISE GRND GROUND GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD VERT VERTICAL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD VIF VERIFY IN FIELD HARD WO HARDWOOD VT VINYL TILE HORIZ HORIZONTAL W WEST HR HOUR W/ WITH H7 HEIG. WIN WINDOW HVAC HEATING, VENTING & W/0 WITHOUT AIR CONDITIONING WP WATERPROOF IO ONSIDE DIA. N NCH INFO INFORMATION INSUL. INSULATION ANT INTERIOR A ANGLE LB(S) POUND(S) & AND MAX MAYIMUM It CENTER LINE MECH MECHANICAL R PROPERTY LINE MET.MTL METAL ® AT MFR MANUFACTURER ,f NUMBER Q REVISION DETAIL REFERENCE 0 KEY NOTE ELEVATION REFERENCE 100 ROOM NUMBER 17 KEYED NOTE SECTION REFERENCE ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ENGINEER PATTON, HARRIS. RUST & ASSOCIATES P_0 80Y 46 116 N. MAIN STREET BRIDGEWATER, VA 22812 JOHN 0. RENO - PROJECT MANAGER (540) 828-2615 - PHONE 540 828-6437 - FAY CONSULT SHEET NUMBER D S .RIPTION T-1 TITLE SHEET S-1 GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS S-2 TOWER LOCATION PLAN S-3 SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION S-4 SECTIONS & DETAILS E-1 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-2 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-3 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E - 4 ELECTRICAL NOTES SHEETINDEX PROJECT MANAGER: - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: - NETWORK OPERATIONS MANAGER: - NATIONAL DIRECTOR MANAGER: - SIGNATORF APPROVED BY WASHINGTON GAS SITE NAME WASHINGTON GAS SITE N IMB R S17E ADDRESS MO HILLANOALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 517E OWNER WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22602 1-888-816-7436 - PHONE (540) 932-2381 - FAY APPLICANT WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANOALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 1-888-816-7436 - PHONE (540) 9,32-2381 - FAY GENERAL INFORMATION LATITUDE - N 39' 07' 32' LONGITUDE - W 71F 11' 06- ELEVATION - 748.0' 3 AMSL AT BASI PROJ 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 PARCEL NUMBER T.M. 63 ((2)) B MING I Il_y. RISDICTIQ FREDERICK COUNTY 70NING CLASS MI DECO BOOK & PAGE D.B. 380 PG. 239 FEI.M FLOOD PLANE LANDOWNER: - SIGNATLRE f1ATT LANDOWNER APPROVAL Y x, ✓AOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 ol 800 'a . f. ~+�T.�n.� 644 3-.' - ,b ��)_ L •,t �/ Shenandoa F I ` >. �. I I 1 % t � 11' Qy . Memorial. Pa•4 - / , 1 1 � VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT INCLUDES: INSTALLATION OF MONOPOLE TOWER AND RE -LOCATION OF DISH AND GROUND PLANE ANTENNAS. NO WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE PUN TO SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SIGNATURE DATE MUNICIPAL APPROVAL SITE DIRECTIONS: FROM THE I-64 & I-81 NTERCHANGE PROCEED NORTH ON I-M FOR APPROT. 89 MITES TO EMIT 310, AT TOP OF EYIT RAMP TURN RIGHT ON70 FIT. 37, TAKE IMEDIATE LEFT ONTO HILLANOALE LANE. PROCEED ON HRLANOALE LANE FOR APPROX..25 MILES. WASHINGTON CAS WILL BE ON YOUR RIGHT, SITE IS ON 8ACKSIOE OF BUILDING (DIRECTIONS TO SITE SIGNATURE DATF INSPECTOR APPROVAL lwnewAB Ltd. Pmt OfOce Box 956 SM nton, VA. 24402 I-888-e16-7436 i >cc 1pi U � a� m�m m� U a o� C �e M ..A • m m N M d m�ySo 4��6Y1� ALL DRAWINGS " WR1ITEN MATERIAL CCNTNNEE HEREIN ARE M PROPERTY OF PHR & A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR D6aDSED WITHOUT THE IRRTEN CONSENT OF PHR It A RET EASE 611E 05/29/02 06/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REVISIONS Na DATE ,! DB/19/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF TW DINER. FT IS PRODUCED SOUR FOR USE BY TIE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FOI MOV4 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN MUSSION OF THE OWNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED 8Y: J. RENO 571E NAME WASHINGTON GAS SOE --- SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHIEST NLA18E7L T-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 A/C AIR CONDITIONING MCR MANAGER A ADJUSTABLE MIN MINIMUM AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR MISC MISCELLANEOUS APPROX APPROXIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR N NORTH TESTING AND MATERIALS NA NOT APPLICABLE AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NITS NOT TO SCALE BLDG BUILDING BILK BLOCK OC,o/E ON CENTER BMR BASE MOBILE RADIO OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER B/S BUILDING STANDARD OPG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR PLYWD PLYWOOD CONE CONCRETE PR PAIR CONST CONSTRUCTION PROJ PROJECT CONT CONTINUOUS PROP PROPERTY PT PRESSURE TREATED DER. DOUBLE / RMQ D RE D C DIACONAL ROOMIRED DIM DIMENSION RO ROUGH OPENING ON DOWN DTL.DETL DETAIL S SOUTH DWG DRAWING SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR E EAST SPEC SPECIFICATION EA EACH SQ SQUARE LESS STEEL EELE�CELECTRICAL A STEEL EO EQUAL sI KUCT STRUCTURAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT SUSP SUSPENDED EW EACH WAY SV SHEET VINYL i EXIST EXISTING EXF EXTERIOR THRU THROUGH TNND TINNED FIN FINISH TOC TOP OF CONCRETE FLUOR FLUORESCENT TOM TOP OF MASONRY FLR FLOOR TYP TYPICAL FT FOOT UBC UNIFORM BUILDING GA GAUGE CODE GALV GALVANIZE(D) UNO UNLESS NOTED IC GENERAL CONTRACTOR OTHERWISE GRIND GROUND GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD VERT VERTICAL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD VLF VERIFY IN FIELD VT VINYL TILE HARD'WO HARDWOOD HORIZ HORIZONTAL W WEST HR HOUR W/ WITH HT HEIGHT WIN WINDOW MAC HEATING, VENTING & W/Q WITHOUT I. AIR CONDITIONING Wp WATERPROOF 10 INSIDE DIA. IN INCH i INFO INFORMATION INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR d ANGLE LB(S) POUND(S) & AND z CENTER LINE MAX MAXIMUM 2 PROPERTY LINE MECH MECHANICAL MET,MTL METAL O AT MFR MANUFACTURER r NUMBER 1 8 REVISION �e DETAIL REFERENCE Q KEY NOTE 4(;� ELEVATION REFERENCE 1M ROOM NUMBER * SECTION REFERENCE �J KEYED NOTE ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 ENGINrER PATTON. HARRIS. RUST & ASSOCIATES 401 EAST MARKET STREET, SUITE 209 ClAARLOTTESMLLE. VA. 22901 JOHN D. RENO - PROJECT MANAGER 434 295-3130 - PHONE 434 295-3005 - FAX CHFET NUMBER QESCRIPTION 7-1 TITLE SHEET S-I SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEETINDEX PROJECT MANAGER: - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: - NETWORK OPERATIONS MANAGER - NATIONAL DIRECTOR MANAGER: - cKY4ATURE DAU APPROVED BY SITE RAMC PARE WASHINGTON GAS NUMBER T.M. 63 ((2)) B rrrr NUMBER MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SHAWNEE SITE ADDRESS 20NING 350 HILLANDALE LANE JURISDICTION FREDERICK COUNTY WINCHESTER VA. 22602 ZONING SITE OWNER WASHINGTON GAS CLecc ul 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER. VA. 22602 1-888-815-7438 - PHONE D rD BOOK u -AQL (540) 932-2381 - FAX D.B. 3B0 PG. 239 FFUA WASHINGTON GAS FL DOn a1ANF N/A 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22802 1-888-816-7435 - PHONE (540) 932-2381 - FAX rFNFRAL INFORMATION LATITUDE - N 39' 07' 32' LONGITUDE - W 78' 11' 05" ELEVATION - 748.0' 3 AMSL AT BASE LANDOWNER: - cK:usn IRE D11IE LANDOWNER APPROVAL x,�IP"N"r1H OF yf� 4 JOHN D. RENO NLic. No. 32989 ONAL 37, 551) � Memori-I Park \ r j. < PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT INCLUDES: RE -LOCATION OF DISH NO WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE RUN TO SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN IS VALID FOR 5 YEARS SIGNAtt1RF DAIS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL aTc DIRECTION`' FROM THE 1-84 & I-81 INTERCHANGE PROCEED NORTH ON 1-81 FOR APPROX M MILES 70 EXIT 310. AT TOP OF EXIT RAMP TURN RIGHT ONTO FIT. 37. TAKE IMFAIA7E LEFT ONTO HILLANDALE LANE PROCEED ON HIL.LANDALE LANE FOR APPROX .25 MILES WASHINGTON CAS WILL BEYOUROH YOUR RIGHT, SITE 8 ON BACKSIDE OF BUILDING. SITE SIGNATURE DATE INSPECTOR APPROVAL d d d> n 1 0�o A 23 w�Q m� r m Ad I all a SU: ALL DRAWII" AND WRTTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR & A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED MTHOUT THE TRIM CONSENT OF PHR & A Iff1Fi►SE DATE 05/2D/02 06/06/02 PREIJMINARY 07/02/02 REVASM FINAL 04/09/08 REVISED FINAL fiV410H5 N0. I DATE 108/)9/021 REVISED PER COMMENTS 12/03/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS 01/13/03 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE 0*4UL IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFULIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED N IT IS F'ORBIOOEN WITHOUT THE MUM PERMISSION OF THE DOEL DRAWN EM R. ESTES CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NINE WASHINGTON GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADORE95 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA• 22602 SHEET nnz TITLE SHEET SHIST NUMBER T-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 1 EX. DRIVEWAY PROP. B' TALL WOODEN PRIVACY FENCE Y /£X. !VERHEAC`, t c ci �s !NLET 30. \ \�gQri Ex. \N/ U) 4^, 1E, r OP. 180' MONOPOLE TOWER a 0 0 fV �.. .-iX 1''0' U:: ch N 00 r 0 a — C m EL m U) NOTES: 1. ADVERTISING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ON THE FACILITY EXCEPT FOR a SIGNAGE PROVIDING OWNERSHIP IDENTIFICATION AND EMERGENCY o INFORMATION. NO MORE THAN TWO SIGNS SHALL BE PERMITTED AND THEY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1.5 SQ. FT. IN SIZE AN NO 2 HIGHER THAN 10 FEET ABOVE GRADE, 2. TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH U MATERIALS OF GALVANIZED FINISH OR PAINTED A NONCONTRASTING y BLUE OR GRAY UNLESS OTHERWISE MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL a AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OR FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION. MI W_ 1 SITE PLAN I"? S-1 SCALE: 1" - 10' M GRAPHIC SCALE m 20 0 10 20 40 a 1 inch = 20' ft+ j I/ FUTURE LOCATION OF METERBOARD �.l o. 01 I/ I OHN D. RENO Lic. No. 32989 Q;; NALE�� fN Lil x J CL O � � a O U � o J a LLJ ir x O o= o CIL Q W O U a ¢ o t 0 0 W I y1 I -4, TOP OF EX. *ilF ANTE . v_ `�VA11ON 860.5t i� w or cY.. MON-:Ipr c i ii E OVA+,ON 85E.Ot i ;� xI I iit � I of 0' r� c O a� t7 a: u' WLJ 0 a O GV O TOP OF PROPOSEDMONOPOLE ELEVATION 928.0f ®RAD CENTER OF DISHES rEE ION 925.Of TO F OF FX 3r_ F uFF ,F.T O<YF SE A tON7 9.0.07 2 MONOPOLE TOWER ELEVATION S-1 SCALE: N.T.S. VE•.t VA II.iI4 748:J� ► � n o � U W m 0 0 o ALL ORAWO AND WIEN MAIVIIAL WANED HUM ARE 1HE PRO MM OF PHR R A AND HAT NOT HE MUPLICATM USM OR DWLOSED R1Tf10UT THE MUM CONSENT OF PHR d A RFIFASE DATE 05/29/02 09/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL 04/09/08 REVISED FINAL RENS10N5 N0. I DATE 107/02/021 WMED PER COMMENTS 12/03/02 REVSED PER COMMENTS ® Ot/13/03 REVISED PER COMMENTS a/09/01 04/00/08 PROPERTY OF M 040,10L IT 6 PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY TFE 0*8 AM ITS AFFILIATES, REPROOLICTION OIL USE OF 1HIS DRAMMN9 AND/OR THE NFORNATION CONTAINED N IT IS FORBODEN WTHOUT THE MEOTIEN PERM9SSM OF THE OPUL DRAWN BY: R. ESTES CHECKED BY: J. RENO _ NAME WAS HI NGTO N GAS Sa Nwea sITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22802 SHEET ME SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER S-1 PLOT SCALE• 1-20 1V1r1V1V19 1. JIHIVU/AFxLJ I-NuvIJIUIVJ GENERAL NOTES I. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, .EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES. AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. VERIFY ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH PROJECT MANAGER. 2. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT, INCLUDING DEMOLITION, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND SHALL ADJUST 910 ACCORDINGLY. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND CONFIRM THAT WORK AS INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (ALSO KNOWN AS CONSTRUCTION PLANS) CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN BEFORE PROCEEDING. { N OT FY PRO JECT MANAG ER F Y O AN MAJOR DISCREPANCY REGARDING D G THECONTRACT Ni CO C7 DOCUME NTS, S EXISTING $ G CONDITIONS, DESIGN RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS CLARIFICATION PRIOR ETO PROCEEDINCONTRACTOR WITH THEWORKOR RELATED WORK IN QUESTION, 5. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED, OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT JOB SITE TO REVIEW SCOPE OF WORK AND EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. MECHANICAL SERVICE. ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND OVERALL COORDINATION. 7. ALL TELEPHONE/RADIO EQUIPMENT UT, SPECIFICATIONS, PERFORMANCE. INSTALLATION AND THEIR FINAL LOCATION ARE TO BELAYOAPPROVED BY PROJECT MANAGER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK AND CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY OTHERS RELATED TO SAID EQUIPMENT. 8. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE HIGHEST TRADE STANDARDS. AS A MINIMUM STANDARD. CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES RAVING JURISDICTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS. ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBUC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK, 9. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER N.E.C. AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPUCABLE UTILTLY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES. ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. IO.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION WHILE ANY SUBCONTRACTORS OR WORKMEN ARE ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALL WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. It. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-AI08C WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA INURING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC) 1994 EDITION, ALONG WITH 1994 UPC, UMC, AND THE 1994 NEC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING FINISHES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION. 14.SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS WITH U.L LISTED OR F.M. APPROVED MATERIALS. 15. DETAILS AND SCHEMATICS ARE TO PROPOSE TO SHOW END RESULT OF THE DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY DEEM TO BE NECESSARY TO SUIT JOB CONDTTONS MO DIMENSIONS. SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK. 16. VERIFY ALL FINAL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 17. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISH SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18. CLEANUP AND SAFETY: KEEP PROJECT AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE. AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS. RUBBISH AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED AND NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER, ETC. LEAVE PREMISES IN A VACUUM AND BROOM CLEAN CONDITION: FREE FROM PLANT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT IN A CLEAN WORKING ORDER UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY PROJECT MANAGER. 19. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REDUNING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE THE AS -BUILT CONDITION OF THE SITE. THIS WILL BE DONE AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN AWARDED THE FINAL INSPECTION. TWO (2) COPIES OF RECLINED DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED TO PROJECT MANAGER AND THE ARCHITECT. (1 EACH) DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02100 EARTHWORK AND DRAINAGE PART 1 GENERAL 1. WORK INCLUDED A. REFER TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PAN AND SITE PLAN FOR WORK INCLUDED. 2. RELATED WORK A. CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDATION B.INSTALLATION OF UTILITY h GROUNDING SYSTEM C. ERECTION OF FENCE 3. DESCRIPTIONS A. ACCESS ROAD, TURNAROUND AREAS. AND SITES ARE CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE A WELL DRAINED, EASILY MAINTAINED. EVEN SURFACE FOR MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT DELIVERIES AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ACCESS. 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. APPLY SOIL STERILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION (USE AS NEEDED). B. GRASS SEEDS SHALL BE APPLIED AND MAINTAINED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SEED PRODUCER (IF REQUIRED). C. VEGETATION LANDSCAPING, IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONTRACT, WILL BE PLACED AND MANTAMED AS RECOMMENDED BY NURSERY INDUSTRY STANDARDS (IF REQUIRED). 5. SEQUENCING A. CONFIRM SURVEY STAKES AND SET ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION B. THE COMPLETE ROAD AND SITE AREA WILL BE GRUBBED PRIOR TO FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF PLACEMENT OF BACK FILL OR SUB -BASE MATERIAL. C. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE ACCESS DRIVE O.THE SITE AREA WILL BE BROUGHT TO SUB -BASE COURSE ELEVATION AND THE ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FORMING FOUNDATION. E. APPLY SOIL STERILIZER PRIOR TO PLACING BASE MATERIALS. F. GRADE, SEED FEN nUZER AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS IMMEDIATELY AFTER BRINGING SITE AND ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION, WATER TO ENSURE GROWTH. C. REMOVE GRAVEL FROM TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE TO AN AUTHORIZE AREA OR AS DIRECTED BY PROJECT MANAGER. H.ATER APPUCATIONS OF FINAL SURFACES, APPLY SOIL STERILIZER TO THE STONE SURFACES. 5. SUBMITTALS A BEFORE CONSTRUCTION I.IF LANDSCAPING IS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTRACT, TWO COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PAN UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD, IF A LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE WAS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT, AN ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPOSED COSTS UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD (REFER TO SITE PLAN 2.SUBMIT FORAPPROVALF 1/2 CUBIC FOOT OF TIHE MPROPOSED SURFACE COURSE MATERIAL. B.AFTER CONSTRUCTION 1. MANUFACTURER'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT AND WARRANTY STATEMENT ON SOIL STERILIZED. 2. MANUFACTURER'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT ON GRASS AND FERTIUZER 3. LANDSCAPING WARRANTY STATEMENT. /. ~MAN IY A. IN ADDITION TO THE WARRANTY ON ALL CONSTRUCTION COVERED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE AND REPAIR AREA BACK AS CLOSE TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AS POSSIBLE TO LEASE AREA PROPERTY OR SURROUNDING CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION, 8. SOIL STERILIZATION APPLICATION WILL GUARANTEE VEGETATION FREE ROAD AND SITE AREAS FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION. C. DISTURBED AREAS WILL REFLECT GROWTH OF NEW GRASS COVER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. D. LANDSCAPING, IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT. WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION. PART 2 DEMOLITION I. DEMOLITION SHALL BE CONTROLLED TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DUST TO OCCUPIED PORTIONS OR THE BUILDING. 2. EXISTING WORK TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. WORK DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED TO MATCH EXISTING WORK. 3. AT THE N F E D O EACH WORK AY AND R D 0 DU LNG INCLEMENT W iH WEATHER. CLOSE7 ALL EXTERIOR OR LAIN IT E GS W H WEA THERPROOF ERPROOF COVER 4. REMOVE DEBRIS AND RUBBISH FROM THE SITE DAILY. 00 NOT ALLOW DEBRIS AND RUBBISH TO ACCUMULATE IN BUILOING OR ON SITE. 5. FOR FLOOR AND WALL PENETRATIONS: A. CONTRACTOR MUST LOCATE REINFORCING BARS IN EXISTING FLOOR SLA85 USING A REUABLE NON-OESTRUCTNE TESTING METHOD APPROVED BY THE OWNER. CORE DRILL AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW CABLE PENETRATION WITHOUT CUTTING EXISTING REINFORCING BARS. a. FILL OPENING AFTER CABLE INSTALLATION WITH INSTA-FOAM'S INSTA-FIRE SEAL SILICONE RTV FOAM. PART 3 PRODUCTS I. MATERIALS A. SOIL STERILIZERS TOTAL KILL PRODUCT 910 - EPA 10292-7 AMBUSH HERSC OE - EPA REGISTERED PHASAR CORPORATION FRAMAR INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS P.O. BOX 5123 1435 MORRIS AVE. DEARBORN, MI 48128 TEL 313 563-8000 UNION, NJ 07083 TEL 800 526-4924 e. SOIL STERILIZER SHALL BE EPA REGISTERED OF LIQUID COMPOSITION AND OF PRE EMERGENCE DESIGN. C. SOIL STABILIZER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAR - SOOX D. ALL ON -SITE AND IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOIL OR SOIL -ROCK MIXTURE WHICH IS FREE FROM ORGANIC MATTER. FROZEN MATERIALS AND OTHER DELETERIOUS SUBSTAGE, IT SHALL CONTAIN NO ROCKS OR LUMPS OVER SIX (5) INCHES IN GREATEST DIMENSION, AND NOT MORE THAN 15% OF THE ROCKS OR LUMPS SHALL BE LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN GREATEST DIMENSION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. W E. BEDDING FILL SHY L BE A GRADED ANGULAR STONE AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COARSE AGGREGATES, PER VDOT STD SPEC SECTION 203. SIZE NO. 68, F. TOPSOIL SHALL 86 SANDY LOAM, CLAY LOAM, LOAM, SILT LOAM, SANDY CLAY LOAM OR SOIL FROM THE SITE WHICH HAS SUFFICIENT ORGANIC MATERIAL TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF TURF GRASS. IT SHALL NOT HAVE A MIXTURE OF SUBSOIL AND CONTAIN NO SLAG, CINDERS. STONES, LUMPS OR SOIL, STICKS, ROOTS, WEEDS, TRASH OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS LARGER THAN 1-1/2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION. 2. EQUIPMENT A. COMPACTION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL MEANS. 1.LARGER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY SHEERS FOOT VIBRATOR OR RUBBER TIRED ROLLERS WEIGHING AT LEAST FIVE TONS. 2.SMALLER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY POWER-ORNER, HAND HELD TAMPERS. PART 4 EXECUTION 1. INSPECTIONS A.LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTORS SHALL BE NOTIFIED NO LESS THAN 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF CONCRETE POURS. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY OWNER OR LOCAL. JURISDICTION. B.CQNTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS RELATIVE TO EACH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL INSPECTION REPORTS ARE TO BE DELIVERED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF SAID INSPECTION REPORTS. 2. PREPARATION A.CLEAR TREES, BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM SITE AREAS AND ACCESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS DIRECTED BY PROJECT MANAGER. B. PRIOR TO OTHER EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS GRUB ORGANIC MATERIAL TO A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES BELOW ORIGINAL GROUND LEVEL. C. UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED BY PROJECT MANAGER TRANSPORT ALL REMOVED TREE, BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM THE PROPERTY TO AN AUTHORIZED LANDFILL.. O. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE MATERIALS, ROLL THE SOIL. E.WHERE UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED, UNE OF THE GRUBBED AREAS WITH STABILIZER MAT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE MATERIAL 3. INSTALLATION ATHE SITE AND TURNAROUND AREAS SHALL BE AT THE SUB -BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FORMING FOUNDATIONS. GRADE OR FILL THE SITE AND ACCESS ROAD REQUIRED IN ORDER THAT UPON EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF SPOILS RESULTING FROM FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS. THE RESULTING GRACE WILL CORRESPOND WITH SAID SUB -BASE COURSE. ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE CALCULATED FROM FINISHED GRADES OR SLOPES INDICATED. B. IF ANY, EXCESS SPOILS WILL BE CLEARED FROM JOB SITE AND NOT SPREAD BEYOND THE OMITS OF LEASE PROPERTY UNLESS AUTHORIZE BY PROJECT MANAGER / AS AGREEMENT BY LANDOWNER. C. THE ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE BROUGHT TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT USE COMPACTION AND OBSERVATION DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE. D.AVOID CREATING DEPRESSIONS WHERE WATER MAY POND. E.THE CONTRACT SHALL BE ASSUMED TO INCLUDE GRADING BANKING, DITCHING AND UNLESS OTHERWISE INOICATED, COVERING TWO INCHES OF SURFACE COURSE. ALL ROADS OR ROUTES UTILIZED FOR ACCESS TO THE SITE COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NEAREST PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. F. WHEN IMPROVING AN EXISTING ACCESS RCAD. GRADE THE EXISTING ROAD TO REMOVE ANY ORGANIC MATTER AND SMOOTH THE SURFACE BEFORE PLACING FILL OR STONE. C. PLACE FILL OR STONE IN SIX INCH MAXIMUM AND COMPACT BEFORE PLACING NEXT LIFT. H. THE FINISH GRADE, INCLUDING TOP SURFACE COURSE, SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT BEYOND THE SITE FENCE AND SHALL COVER THE AREA AS INDICATED. I. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SIDE SLOPES OF ALL FENCED SITE AREAS, PARKING AREAS. AND TO ALL OTHER SLOPES GREATER THAN 2:1. J. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SIDES OF DITCHES OR DRAINAGE SWALES. K. RIPRAP ENTIRE DITCH FOR SIX FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT CULVERT OPENINGS. L. SEED FERTILIZER AND STRAW COVER SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS. AND DITCHES. DRAINAGE. SWALES. NOT OTHERWISE RIPRAPPED. M. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL DITCHES, SWALES, NOR CULVERTS BE PLACED SO THEY DIRECT WATER TOWARDS, OR PERMIT STANDING WATER IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RAILROAD BALLAST. F DESIGNS OR ELEVATIONS CONFLICT WITH THIS GUIDANCE ALVAN SHOULD BE ADVISED IMMEDIATELY. N.IN DITCH LIES WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN TEN PERCENT, MOUND DIVERSIONARY HEADWALLS IN THE DITCH AT CULVERT ENTRANCES. THE HEADWALL SHALL BE POSITIONED AT AN ANGLE NO GREATER THAN 60 DEGREES OFF THE DITCH LINE. RIPRAP THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE HEADWALL AS WELL AS THE DITCH FOR SIX FEET ABOVE THE CULVERT ENTRANCE. 4. BACKFIIL ANO COMPACTION A. 00 NOT ALLOW OR CAUSE ANY OF THE WORK PERFORMED OR INSTALLED TO BE COVERED UP OR ENCLOSED BY WORK OF THIS SECTION PRIOR TO ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS, TESTS, AND APPROVALS. B. SHOULD ANY OF THE WORK BE 50 ENCLOSED OR COVERED UP BEFORE IT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOVER ALL SUCH WORK. C- AFTER THE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETELY TESTEO, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED, MAKE ALL REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS NECESSARY TO RESTORE THE WORK TO THE CONOITION IN WHICH IT WAS FOUND AT THE TIME OF UNCOVERING. 0. FOR SETTING AND ESTABLISHING FINISH ELEVATIONS AND LINES. SECURE THE SERVICES OF A SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER, CAREFULLY PRESERVE ALL DATA AND MONUMENTS SET BY THE SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER AND, IF DISPLACED OR LOST, IMMEDIATELY REPLACE TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. E. AREAS THAT RECEIVE SEEDING SHALL BE GRADED BELOW FINISHED GRADES SHOWN, LEAVING SPACE FOR TOPSOILING F. DEPRESSIONS: WHERE DEPRESSIONS RESULT FROM. OR HAVE RESULTED FROM, THE REMOVAL OF SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS, OPEN THE DEPRESSION TO THE EQUIPMENT WORKING WIDTH AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS AND SOFT MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. C. OTHER AREAS: EXCAVATE TO GRADES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. WHERE EXCAVATION GRADES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE THE INSTALLATION. H. OVEREXCAVATION: BACKFILL AND COMPACT ALL OVEREXCAVATED AREAS AS SPECIFIED FOR FILL BELOW. I. STRIP EXISTING TOPSOIL. LEAF MOLD AND ORGANIC MATERIALS. MEETING TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. DEPOSIT IN STORAGE PILES SEPARATE FROM OTHER EXCAVATED MATERIAL. J. STOCKPILE EXCAVAT EO SOIL MATERIAL SATISFACTORY FOR BACKEILL OR FILL UNTIL REQUIRED. PLACE, GRAD E AN D SHAPE STOCKPILES FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. N. REMOVE FROM PROJECT SITE AND DEBRIS, AND OF MATERIAL UNSATISFACTORY FOR FILL. T BACKFl OR LL RASH AN D NO O RI AN A X EB S, D ALL EXCESS MATERIAL.CUT L. EXCAVATE SD THATBANKS V E B 5 OF EXCAVATION STURB WILL NOT BE UNDERCUT AND STRATUM FOR FOUNDATIONS WILL NOT BE DISTURBED. M. PROOFROLLING: PRIOR TO FILLING. AND AFTER TOPSOIL AND PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED UNSATISFACTORY SUBGRADE MATERIAL RAS BEEN REMOVED, PROOFROLL IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER AREAS WITHIN 10 FEET OF BUILDING LIMITS USING DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WORKS-03310 1 I. QUALITY ASSURANCE: 3RD PARTY CONCRETE TESTING IS MANDATORY FOR ALL FOUNDATIONS. ALL BREAK TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE CROWN REPRESENTATIVE ON SAME DAY OF BREAK. COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, EXCEPT WHERE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED: A ACI 301-89 'SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS'. B. AC318 'aUILOING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE' (REVISED 1992) ANO ACI}18-89 COMMENTARY" (REVISED 1992)) C. CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI),"MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE". 2. REINFORCING MATERIALS: A. RIENFORCINGASTM A 615,GRADE 60 DEFORMED. 8. WELDING WIRE FABRICASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC. C. SUPPORTS FOR REINFORCEMENT: BOLSTERS, CHAIRS. SPACERS AND OTHER DEVICES FOR SPACING, SUPPORTING AND REINFORCING BARS IN PLACE- USE WIRE BAR TYPE SUPPORTS COMPLYING WITH CRSI SPECIFICATIONS. 3. CONCRETE MATERIALS: A PORTLANO CEMENT: ASTM C 150. TYPE 1. B. LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATES: ASTM C 330 C. AIR -ENTRAINING ADMIXTURE ASTM C 260 CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER REQUIRED ADMIXTURES. 4. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES: DESIGN MIX TO PROVIDE LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES: A 3000 PSI 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH B. WEIGHT: 110 PCF. C. W/C RATIO: 0.44 MAXIMUM (NON MR -ENTRAINED). 0.35 MAXIMUM (AIR -ENTRAINED) 0. BREAK SCHEDULE - 3 DAY, 7 DAY, 28 DAY, AND 1 SPARE DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220 I. CONCRETE BLOCKS: A STANDARD BLOCK SHALL BE THE SIZE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. LIGHT GRAY OR NEUTRAL COLOR, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 90, TYPE I. GRADE N, LIGHTWEIGHT TYPE WITH EXPAND SLAG AGGREGATE. 2. MORTAR: A. All MORTAR FOR CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C 270. TYPE S AND SHALL. HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IN 28 DAYS. 3. WIRE REINFORCING IN BED JOINTS: A TRUSS TYPE REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE OUR-O-WALL, OR EQUAL FABRICATED WITH A SINGLE PAIR OF SIDE AND CONTINUOUS DIAGONAL CROSS -RODS SPACED NOT MORE THAN 8' ON CENTER. WIRE IN FABRICATION SHALL BE GALVANIZED ACCORDING TO ASTM 116, CLASS 3. SIDE RODS SHALL BE 9 GAGE 3/16' MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE 10'-0" WITH MATCHING CORNER AND TEE UNITS. B. SPACING: TYPICAL, IN BED JOINTS, AT 16" VERTICAL INTERVAL. CT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND C. AT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND BELOW EACH OPENING PUCE REINFORCING IN ONE ADDITIONAL JOINT TO EXTEND 3'-0" PAST THE OPENING EACH WAY. SPLICE LENGTHS FOR HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST 8" FOR TRUSS AND 16' FOR STRAIGHT TYPE, 4. INSTALL STEEL LINTELS ABOVE EACH OPENING. FILL CORES WITH GROUT 3 COURSES BELOW LINTEL BEARING. DIVISION 5: STRUCTURAL STEEL-051 20 I 1. QUALITY ASSURANCE: COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, EXCEPT WHERE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED: A AISC 'CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE". B. AJSC 'SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS - ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN AND PLASTIC DESIGN'. INCLUDING THE 'COMMENTARY" AND SUPPLEMENTS, C. AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS) D 1. 1 -92, "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - STEEL." 2. MATERIALS: A STRUCTURAL STEEL PLATES, SHAPES AND BARS: ASTM A 36. B. HIGH STRENGTH THREADED FASTENERS: ASTM A 325. C. ELECTRODES FOR WELDING: E70XX. 0. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A 153. E. CEMENT GROUT: EMBECO BY MASTER BUILDERS OF AN APPROVED EQUAL F. NON-METALUC, SHRINKAGE -RESISTANT, 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH GROUT, PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: I. EUCO N.S. BY EUCLID CHEMICAL CO. 2. MASTERFLOW 713 BY MASTER BUILDERS 3. INSPECTIONS AS PER ALL CODES AND ORDINANCES DIVISION 7: SEALANTS AND CAULKING-07900 1. PROVIDE JOINT SEALERS, JOINT FILLERS AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH ONE ANOTHER AND WITH JOINT SUBSTRATES UNDER CONDITIONS OF SERVICE AND APPLICATIONS. PROVIDE COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES. PROVIDE BLACK OR OTHER NEUTRAL COLOR WHEN NO OTHER COLOR IS AVAILABLE. 2, ONE -COMPONENT POLYSULFIOE BASED. ONE PART ELASTOMERIC SEALANT, COMPLYING WITH FS 7T-S-00230,CLASS A TYPE II (NON -SAG), FOR JOINTS AT PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE COMPOUND BEARING THE THIOCOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION SEAL OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: A. FLEXISEAL 900 SERIES BY DAP, INC. B. HORNFLEX ONE - COMPONENT BY W.R. GRACE 8 CO. I 3 ONE -COMPONENT ACRYLC SEALANT: ACRYLIC TERPOLYM R SOLVENT ONE -PA RT THERMOPLASTIC T LAS C SEALANT COMPOUND SOLIDS NOT THAN P L OS E LESS AN 9 N ACRYLIC. COMPLYING WITH FS Ti-S-00230, CLASS B TYPE it, FOR PERIMETER OF METAL AND DOOR FRAMES, THRESHOLDS AT EXTERIOR DOORS, AND PIPE SLEEVES THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS AND FLOOR SLABS. PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OF AN APPROVED EQUAL: A. GAP ACRYLIC BY DAP, INC. B. GACO AS-3 BY GATES ENGINEERING/SMC 4. OLEO -RESINS CAULKING COMPOUND: OIL BASED RESINOUS CAULKING, COMPLYING WITH FS TT-C-598, NON -BLEEDING, PAINTABLE. FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: A. VULGATE% BY W.R. GRACE k CO. GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 1. THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK AND FOR ANY DAMAGESTHAT OCCUR BY FAILURE TO LOCATE OR PRESERVE THESE UTILITIES. IF DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD ENCOUNTER UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, HE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND TAKE NECESSARY AND PROPER STEPS PROTECT THE FACILITY AND ASSURE THE CONTINUANCE OF SERVICE. 2. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND SITE CONDITIONS OR ANY INCONSISTENCIES OR AMBIGUITIES IN THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE OWNER, WHO SHALL PROMPTLY CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES OR AMBIGUITIES. WORK DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHOUT DIRECTIONS OR ANY DISCOVERY OF SUCH INCONSISTENCIES. DISCREPANCIES, OR AMBIGUITIES, SHALL BE DONE AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY MISS UTILITIES (800) 552-7001 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATIONOF ELECTRICAL, GAS, TELEPHONE. AND CAN SERVICES. NOTE: INSTALLATION AND INSPECTIONS AS PER ALL CODES AND ORDINANCES. �-- H OF JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 10NAL NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Poll pIro Box 966 SlaunMn, VA. 24402 1-88B-816-7436 ALL DRAMC$ AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR & A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR a A RELEASE DATE DS/29/02 D6/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REYSX A NO. DATE Q 07/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS IL 11 PROPERTY OF THE ONNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLE. FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAMNG AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO 5RE WIVE WAS H I N GTO N GAS SRE -LIMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NUMBER S-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 N o JOHN D. RENO y No. 32989 NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Put 001ka 6nx 956 Staunton, VA. 24402 1-666-616-7436 ALL DAAMN6S AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHI B A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE MUTTER CONSENT OF PHIL 6 A RELEASE ONIE D5/29/02 06/86/92 PRELIMINARY 97/82/e2 REVISED FINAL REVISIONS NO. MATE Qi DB/19/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS MtDKRTT OF THE DWREN. IT 15 PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE SY THE OWNER AND STS AFFILIATES, REPRODOCTION ON USE OF THIS DOMINO AAD/OR To INFORMATION COIITAIRED IN IT IS FORBIDDER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OMIER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMA.N CHECKED BY: J. REND SRE "E WASHINGTON GAS WE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE TOWER LOCATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER S-2 PLOT SCALE: 1 1 sr 1 EX. DRIVEWAY aoF \ \ \ EX. INLET \1 X. OVERHEAD\ ELECTRIC �T 1 \ q �0' \ EX. DRIVEWAY 1 42SEL r PROP. 180' MONOPOLE TO ER 1 \ su ORT row R1 / 1 \ \ EX 1TS' MON OLE 10. `q EX. BUILDING \ \ \ �\ �00 L 746 *off FUTURE LOCA N OF METER80 D SITE PLAN S-3 SCALE: 1" = 20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 inch = 20' ft. Q o JOHN D. RENO v No. 32989 ZMAL O 1- 0 a a V) w V) 0 Li.l Q to z 0 Z a w aZ a 0 = o z z z Ld o CL o o z ¢ o au =o z 0- 0 Lea 0 w p O Z = 0 X W O- W L� 0 0 O n a o p p o LLJ I � O f0 N I D: N � N z W U 0 a 0 0 170 h TOP OF EX. WHIP ANTENNA ELEVATION 860.5t 3 O a a Ln X W 0 CN 0 STOP OF PROPOSED SELF SUPPORT TOWER ELEVATION 928.Dt BRAD CENTER OF DISHES ELEVATION 828.0t STOP OF EX. SELF SUPPORT TOWER ELEVATION 790.0t 2 MONOPOLE TOWER ELEVATION S-3 SCALE: N.T.S. NANDOAH -wer Service, Ltd. P— Office Box g% SlAumon, VA. 2NO2 1-888-816-7436 10 4 'd , ;y �np _y Ff38 o6F�>�s U m a� m m$ U e D � m ,o m � � a F m S 5 m rnsm e. ISzC�Cm Rm.A�ad� ALL DRAWINGS ANO 11WTTEN MAIERIAL CONTAINED MERIDN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR R A AND MAT NOT BE DUPUCATED. USED OR DISCLOSED MTHOIT-THE WRTTEN CONSENT OF PHR R A RELFAM DATE D5/2R/02 05/06/02 PREUMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL RE'ASIONS NO, DATE �t 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE OAHER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLE FOR USE BY THE OIWNEFI AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUC110N OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/DR THE WFORMATION CONTAINED N IT S FDRBNDOEN WITHOUT THE WRIITEN PERWSSION Of THE OWNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAWAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO - NAAS WAS H I NGTON GAS SITE N116ER SRE ADORESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER S-3 PLOT SCALE; 1-20 0 0 0 c w 12" MAX. A� 1'-0" GROUND BAR STRAPPED TO TOWER MUNONULE TOWER RELOCATED 6' DISH (TYP.) rj--� ANTENNA PLAN DETAIL S-4 SCALE: N.T.S. 4'-6" O.C. MAX. 3'-0" O.C. MAX. COAX CABLE CALDWELD GROUND LEAD ICEBRIDGE TO ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT SUPPORT POST, 6"-12" ABOVE GRAVEL GRADE (TYP.) PVC (TYP.) CONC. FOOTING TO #2 TINNED LEADS TO BE BELOW GRADE GROUNDING RING (TYR) SIDE ELEVATION �CABLE GUARD SHEATH LDCATE AT EACH END OF ICEBRIOGE (TYP.) EX. m EQUIPMENT SHELTER CONC. PAD 2 ICE BRIDGE DETAIL S-4 SCALE: N.T.S. ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE SECTOR Al B1 N/A AZIMUTH 144.2' 263' N/A ANTENNA 6' DISH 6' DISH HF GROUND PLANE MOUNTING HEIGHT 80' 80' 120' MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0' 0' N/A COAXIAL CABLE EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING 24" CLEAR BRIDGE CHANNEL BY MICROFLECT 1/2" ALLTHREAO COAX SUPPORT; 20' UNISTRUT W/NUT AND WASHER EACH SIDE/ EACH LEVEL 7 U. USE COAX HANGERS COAX TERMINATOR FRAME PER PROJECT MANAGER'S INSTRUCTIONS HEAD BY MICROFLECT 3 1/2"0 GALV., SCHED 40 POST; TO DRAIN; TYPICAL 12"0 x 36' DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING; TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION "A" t20'-O" "B" t 7'-6" •+ NOTES: IF THE ICE BRIDGE (DIM. "A') IS 20' OR LESS, TWO (2) GROUNDING POINTS ARE REQUIRED AT OPPOSITE ENDS OF THE ICE BRIDGE, CALDWELD TO THE ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST. IF THE ICE BRIDGE (DIM. 'A") IS 20' OR GREATER, THREE (3) GROUNDING POINTS ARE REQUIRED. ONE (1) EACH AT OPPOSITE ENDS AND ONE (1) NEAR THE CENTER OF THE ICE BRIDGE, CALDWELD TO THE ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST o JOHN D. RENO U > No. 32989 sjONAL V-�2AH Ltd. Pot Office Box 956 Staunta n. VA. 24402 1-68E-E16-7436 n >4 5ggqy`m z5UgZ,41 U as Q ma �U e ox m ,a m a 69 aJ m N 1131 a_ � : e � L O � m pp O r � 0 ab 4�m� ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR d A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DSCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 06/03/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVSED FINAL REW9DN5 NO. DATE D 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE DWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLar FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT 6 FDREIIODEN WITHOUT THE WITEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAYS WAS H I NGTO N GAS SRE NUMBER SRE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TTTLE SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHEET NUMBER S-4 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 GROUND GRID DESIGN PROVIDED BY OTHERS. THIS DESIGN MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT A TYPICAL GROUNDING DESIGN BY PHR&A. PHRBA SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE IN THE EVENT DAMAGE OCCURS TO EQUIPMENT. EX. DRIVEWAY INSPECTION PORT 1 PER GROUNDING RING EX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 0' MONOPOLE -z1#'0EX. 42' SELF 11 SUPPORT TOWER OO EX. BUILDING SF - . \ \ 0 EX. INLET FL \ \ JO \ PFq i L J i \PROP. 180' SELF / \SUPPORT TOWER \ 4F /Lp \ \ <F \\\gsFq.TO. \ NOTES 1. 02 BARE, TINNED, SOLID COPPER GROUND + 30" BELOW GRADE. 2. CADWELD TO FENCE POST 6'-12" ABOVE GRADE. 3. BOND GATE LEAF TO GATE POST WITH A FLEXIBLE, y2 INSULATED WELDING CABLE WERE, CADWELDED TO EACH POST. 4. ICE BRIEGE 20'OR LESS, GROUND SUPPORT POLES AT BOTH ENDS. ICE BRIDGE OVER 20' GROUND SUPPORT POLES AT BOTH ENDS AND ONE POLE IN THE MIDDLE. 5. GROUND TO ICE BRIDGE SUPPORTS TO BE CADWELDED. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TO BE /6 STRANDED GREEN INSULATED. OINSPECTION PORT (j)GROUND ROD - 5/8"xB' ■ CADWELD CONNECTION i GROUNDING PLAN E-� SCALE: N.T.S. FUTURE LOCATION OF METERBOARD EX. DRIVEWAY THREE (3) TAILS (TYPO EACH LEG) GROUND RING 18' (MIN) (1) BUSS BAR CLEAR FROM EDGE OF (1) TOWER LEG CONCRETE FOUNDATION GROUND ROD --' TD'-0' C/C (TYP) GROUND BAR LOCATED 1'-2' BELOW TRANSITION MOUNT DIRECTLY TO TOWER INSPECTION PORT MP TWO PER TOWER) MONOPOLE TOWER TAILS FOR BUILDING/ PAD GROUND RING 2 TOWER GROUNDING PLAN E-j SCALE: N.T.S. NOTE: ADDITIONAL GROUND BAR IS REQUIRED AT MID POINT IF COAX CABLE EXCEED 200' (TO BE MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO TOWER). GROUND BAR LOCATED 1'-4' ABOVE TRANSITION MOUNT DIRECTLY TO TOWER COAX CABLE GROUND KIT COAX CABLE COAX CABLE GROUND KIT - (2) jl2 TINNED GROUND TO EQUIPMENT CABINET LEADS TO GROUNDING RING TOWER GROUND RING s ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAM E-j SCALE: N.T.S. FROM METERBOARD (PENDING LOCATION) GRADE-,,., CADWELD GROUND RING p2 AWG BCW (TINNED) ROUND ROD Dr OPPERWELD 8"0 x 10'-0" LONG " MIN. SPACING BETWEEN RODS GROUNDING ROD DETAIL_ E-j SCALE: N.T.S. FINISH GRADE 6' PVC PLUG 6" PVC CPLG. (THIRD.) I }2 SOLID TEST LOOP z NOTCH SIDES OF 6' PVC SCH 40 CADWELD PIPE TO ALLOW EXIT.ENTRANCE OF GROUND RING 6' CLR. TYP. TGROUND RING TRENCH BOTTOM o 5/8' X 8'/10' GROUND ROD INSPECTION PORT a E-j SCALE: N.T.S. Eel )JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 J �10NALl NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Post ol6(e 8o 956 Suunlon, VA. 24402 I-Ee6-L16-7436 ALL DRAWNIZ AND WRTTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR t A AND VAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED MTHOUT THE MRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR h A RELEASE 617E D5/2B/D2 OS/OB/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/D2 REVISED FINAL REVISIONS NO. DATE Qi 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLEL' FOR USE BY THIS OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAVNG AND/DR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FORBIDDEN RRHCUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE DINNER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAM: WAS HINGTON GAS SIRE N-11 SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 ICEBRIDGE 3TX 2TX 1TX YEL-1 BL-1 RD-1 3RX/TX 2RX/TX IRX/TX YEL-2 BL-2 RD-2 10 0 0 0 COAXIAL CABLE W/ STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD CABLE HANGER 5/8" DIA. THREADED ROD W/ NUTS AND OVERHEAD WASHERS CABLE SUPPORT ® 4'-0' O.C. MAX. `- ROD TO EXTEND 1/2" MAX. BELOW CABLE SUPPORT NOTE: VIEW -BACK TO EQUIPMENT LOOKING AT TOWER i SECTION E-2 SCALE. N.T.S. 3 a 0 0 2 j BLETO ANTENNA ANDREW WEATHERPROOFING KIT ANDREW COAX CABLE GROUNDING CLAMP KIT GROUND CONDUCTOR LE TO BTS r2'� COAX CABLE GROUND E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. TIN PLATED COPPER GROUND BAR LEGEND: 1. - TIN PLATED COPPER GROUND BAR 1/4" X 4- X 12" MIN. HANGER LIGHTER PROTECTION, P/N TGB 14412CIGBE . HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION. 2. - 5/8" LOCKWASHERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3015-B OR EQUIVALENT. 3. - WALL MOUNTING BRACKET, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. A-6056 OR EQUIVALENT. 4. - 5/8-11 X 1" H.H.C.S. BOLT, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3012-1 OR EQUIVALENT. 5. - GROUND BAR SHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS REQUIRED PLUS PROVIDE 50% SPARE CAPACITY. 5 GROUND BAR E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. COMPRESSION GROUND LUG TO BE BURNDY OR EQUAL, SIZE PER TABLE. SS BOLT k NUT W/ LOCK GROUND CONDUCTOR WASHERS (TYP) SEE TABLE GROUND CONDUCTOR TABLE WIRE SIZE LUG A BOLT DIA. #2 YA2CL-2TC14 1/4" 12/D YA25-21-N 1/2" COMPRESSION LUG GROUND CONNECTION E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. #6 AWG FROM ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT AND SUPPORT MAST. BRACKET. ETC. GROUND BAR ON WALL OR AT ANTENNA MAST o ®� ®® o SEE ALSO a o 0 0 0 0 no E-2 CAD WELD CAD WELD2 AWG TO GROUND ONLY ONLY BAR OR GROUND RING GROUND WIRE INSTALLATION TO GROUND BAR SCALE: N.T.S. OF o� o JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 1� SIONAL AH V-kEewLtd. P., Office so. 956 Staunton. VA 24402 I-aaa-a16-7436 � > n _ VZ351ww U U m a� m u m� m� U C o m c� 4 N m fix � s m o g.9 �mys m to > to c,smm ALL DRAWINM MID WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PfiR Wt A AND WAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED MTHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR ! A RE IASE DATE D5/29/02 D5/DB/1)2 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REY610N5 NO. DATE Qt 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS Al PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLW MR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AMUATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAINING AND/OR THE INFORMATION OONTAM&D IN IT IS FORBIDDEN WRHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. DRAwN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAINE WAS H I NGTO N GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22802 SHEET TIRE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-1 PLAT SCALE: 1-20 11 a'-O" PLAN VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. a U Wa (L O � am t x N 1 `v N 0 18" TYP. CONC. I L }. METER BOARD ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. FINISHED GRADE IOTTOM L TRENCH n iG ' PPccoiior To�,rc� �..�r� ND. FNn view JLALC: N.I.J. 0 METER BOARD ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. Am* 1. LUMBER IS INDICATED AS PRESERVATIVE TREATED OR IS SPECIFIED TO BE TREATED. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF AWPA C2 (LUMBER). 2. PRESSURE TREAT ABOVE GROUND ITEMS WITH WATERBORNE PRESERVATNES TO A MINIMUM RETENTION OF 0.25 ID/cu.ft. (4.Dkg/cu.m). AFTER TREATMENT, KILN LUMBER TO MAXIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF 19 PERCENT. 3. PRESSURE TREAT WOOD MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH GROUND OF FRESHWATER WITH WATERBORNE PRESERVATIVE TO A MINIMUM RETENTION OF 0.40 ID/cu.ft. (5.4 kg/cu.m) 4. LUMBER CUT AFTER TREATMENT, APPLY FIELD TREATMENT COMPLYING WITH AWPA M4 TO CUT SURFACE. 5. ALL BOARDS TO BE PRE -DRILLED TO PREVENT SPLITTING. 5. 16 PENNY -GALVANIZED, SPIRAL NAILS, THREE (3) PER BOARD/6x6 POST. ___ ._......._ .....EAD TOP VIEW NIPPLE BETWEEN WIREWAYS SCALE. N.T.S. : 1 ►/ MOUNTINGTELCO � I I; � r B'X 8'X 24' WIREWAY TELCO J 4' PVC FROM TELCO SERVICE PVC (ELECT) TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT PER CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION -SQUARE D METER- PAK MP642DO -4-2-1/2' x 6' NIPPLE W/ MEYERS HUB -12" X 12" X 36" ELECTRIC WIREWAY -l'-O' 4" PVC FROM UTILITY SERVICE POLE OR XFMR CAP 2' ABOVE FIN. GRADE (SPARE) /4' PVC FROM UTILITY SERVICE POLE OR XFMR TELCO AND ELECTRIC SIDE SCALE: N.T.S. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 6" x 6' x 14' PT POST 2 ea 2 2' x B" x 10' PT BOARDS 21 ea 3 15 PENNY -GALVANIZED, SPIRAL NAILS 2 ID 4 CONCRETE 15 cu. ft. t 5 2' X 8' X 6' PT BOARD 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION ttPPLIER / COMMENTS 1 SQUARE D METER PAK #MP64200 2 SPECTX TRANSFER SWITCH/SURGE 3 WIREWAYS (ALL SIZES) 4 PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER 5 CONDUIT (ALL SIZES) 6 CONDUIT FITTINGS k HARDWARE 7 CONDUIT NIPPLES (ALL SIZES) 8 WIRE FOR ALL CONNECTIONS 9 LIGHT CONTROLLER(S) k SO CABLE 10 ALARM MONITORING SYSTEM ENCLOSURE 11 RIFE MANUAL ENCLOSURE 12 TELCO DEMARC r. Q �. � JOHN D. RENO No. 32989 6% SIONAL 2-1/2" DIA. NIPPLE IN FROM TELCO SERVICE 2-1/2' DIA. NIPPLE OUT TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT 8' X 8' X 24" WIREWAY TELCO FINISHED GRADE CADWELD TO NEAREST FENCE POST END VIEW TO GROUND RING B' x B" x 72' 4' PVC FROM SERVICE SCALE: N.T.S. WIREWAY ELECTRIC W/3-1" INTERDUCTS PVC (TELCO) TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT PER CUSTOMER SPEC. TOWER LIGHTING CONTROL SIDE SCALE: N.T.S. C TELCO DEMARK MOUNTING AREA 0 NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Pw Office 60x 956 Staunton. VA. 24402 I-666-6I6-7436 i n o api �633A»�Y B� — yy NCg j.ti O �8mc.9>r■ � u U a. a� 61 m o U Q oY m A m � d3 N m C N n a's e mo 0.9 I-t a� tyro tlY� em 0 Q x y 'O o ALL DRAWINGS AND '!KITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR i A AND VAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHCUT THE ITRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE D5/29/02 06/D6/D2 PRELIMINARY REy5016 MD DATE Qi 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS m PROPERTY OF THE UWIER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLEL FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AMUATES. REPRODUCTICN OR USE OF THIS DRAW►ID AID/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT 15 FORBIDDEN MTHOUI THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. DRAwN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENC SITE NAME WAS HI NGTON GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TFRE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-2 PLOT SCALE: 1-2D As EI FCTRICAL SPFCIOCATION 1. FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT SERVICES FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK AS INDICATED IN ACCORD WITH PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. COORDINATE WITH WORK OF ALL OTHER TRADES. FURNISH AND INSTALL AL SUPPLEMENTARY DR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND DEVICES TO SECURE ALL COMPLETE INSTALLATION 2. FOR EXACT LOCATION OF BUILDING ELEMENTS, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL OWG'S, FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ARRANGEMENT OF ALL EXISTING SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 3. ALL EXTERIOR DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF, NEMA-3R. 4, PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORD WITH FOLLOWING CODES: L FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDIANCES. 2. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC), 1996 EDITION. 3. ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. S. USE UL LABELED ELECTRICAL MATERIALS WHERE LISTING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR MATERIALS OR DEVICES IN QUESTION. 6. SAFETY SWITCH: HEAVY DUTY TYPE IN NEMA-1 IN DAMP OR WET LOCATIONS, 7. CONDUIT: ALL ELECTRIC METALUC TUBING CONNECTORS SHALL BE COMPRESSION TYPE (NO POT -METAL AND SET SCREW), MIN. 3/4 IN. USE FLEXIBLE METAL (STEEL) CONDUIT FOR CONNECTION TO ALL VIBRATING EQUIPMENT AND CASEWORK. 8. WIRE IN CONDUIT SIZED JIO AWG AND SMALLER SHALL BE SOLID COPPER VAT TYPE THWN/THHN 600 VOLT INSULATION. THE MIN, CONDUCTOR SIZE SHALL BE NO 12 AWC. CONTROL WIRING MAY BE NO. 14 AWG. A GROUND WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CIRCUITS. WIRE OF SIZES 8 AWC OR LARGER SHALL BE STRANDED COPPER WITH TYPE XHHW, THW OR THHN 500 VOLT INSULATION. SPUCES FOR WIRE SIZES OF jB AWG OR LARGER SHALL BE SPLIT -BOLT CONNECTORS WITH SUFFICIENT LAYERS OF TAPE TO EQUAL INSULATION OR WIRE BEING SPLICED. 9. PROVIDE NAMEPLATES ON ALL PIECES OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS, CIRCUIT BREAKERS, DISCONNECT SWATCHES, PANELBOARDS, ALL PULL BOXES. NAMEPLATESAHALL BE ENGRAVED WITH WHITE LETTERS ON A BLUE FIELDS, 2-1/2'X3/4' WITH 1/4" HIGH (MIN,)'SETONFLEX- TO WITHSTAND EXTREME INDOOR AND OUTDOOR TEMPERATURES. PLATE SHALL HAVE PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE BACKING SUITABLE FOR OUTDOORS. 10, THE CABINET SHALL BE PROVIDED AS A PREFABRICATED PACKAGED UNIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT AND CABLING FOR A COMPLETE JOB. il. ALL TERMINATIONS SHALL BE LISTED AND IDENTIFIED FOR USE WITH 75' C RATED CONDUCTORS. 12. POWER COMPANY OR THE CONTRACTOR WHERE REQUIRED BY THE POWER COMPANY, SHALL TERMINATE THE POWER CABLES(SUPPUED BY THE POWER CO.) AT THE UTILITY METER LOCATED ON THE CABINET. 13. CONDUIT LINES SHALL HAVE A CONTINUOUS SLOPE DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM THE CABINET TO THE PROPERTY LINE SO THAT WATER WILL FLOW AWAY FROM THE CABINET_ TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED ALONG STRAIGHT LINES BEFORE CONDUITS ARE LAID SO THE ELEVATION CAN BE ADJUSTED, IF NECESSARY, TO AVOID UNSEEN OBSTRUCTIONS. MANUFACTURED BENDS SHALL HAVE A MIN. RAD. 36" FOR CONDUITS. 14. BENDS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS 36- FOR CONDUITS. ALL CONDUITS ENTERING THE SHELTER SHALL BE SEALED WITH SEALANTS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED FOR USE WITH THE CABLE INSULATION. SHIELD, OR OTHER COMPONENTS. A BEAD OF SILICONE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND ALL CONDUIT PENETRATIONS INTO THE CABINET, 15. METER SOCKET TO BE SUPPLIED BY OR AS PER POWER COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. 16. GROUND FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ANY UTIUTY RECEPTACLES. 17. WHITE/NEUTRAL, GREEN/GROUND, SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE SITE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. CABLE WORKS GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CABLE SHALL BE ANDREWS LOF SERIES WITH NF CONNECTIONS AT BOTH ENDS. 2. ALL JUMPERS AT THE ANTENNA TO BE LOP SERIES (NO SUPERFLEX), 6-FOOT, 1 /2'NM x OM. 3. ALL JUMPERS AT THE EQUIPMENT TO BE LDF SERIES 18"-6' MAX., 1/2-NM n 1/2'NM (SUPERFLEX ALLOWED IN SHELTER). 4. ALL EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF TAPED. 5. ALL GROUND KITS SHALL BE 2 HOLE LUC (NO SCREW -ON LUGS ALLOWED). 6. ALL COAX CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE, WHERE POSSIBLE. NO HANGERS WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN CABLES ARE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE. 7. ALL COAX CABLES RUN ON A WAVEGUIOE LADDERS, ON STANDOFF, ON THE EXTERIOR OF A MONOPOLE, ON A GUYED TOWER, ON A SELF SUPPORT TOWER OR ON A POLE SHALL BE SUPPORTED EVERY FOUR (4) FEET. QENERAL NOTES TO FIFCTRICAL CONTRACTOR I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE (FURNISH AND INSTALL) ALL NECESSARY CONDUITS, WIRING AND OUTLET BOXES TO SUPPORT THE FURNISHED ITEMS. 2. PROVIDE WIRING IN CONDUIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND N.E.C. 3. FOR LOCATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET & ANTENNAS, SEE SITE PLAN. 4. COORDINATE IN ADVANCE ALL WORK TO BE DONE WITH POWER UTILITY CO. 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL CONNECTIONS AND MAKING A COMPLETE OPERATIONAL SYSTEM AS APPROVED BY CROWN COMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATIVE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFER, COORDINATE, AND COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 7. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE THE FINAL CONNECTION WORK AND REQUIRED PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS TO COMPLETE THE POWER AND TELEPHONE CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR EQUIPMENT CABINET. 8. PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR ORDERING OR ANY MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE EXISTING SERVICE VOLTAGE IS THE SAME VOLTAGE AS SHOWN FOR THE NEW EQUIPMENT. IF THE VOLTAGES ARE THE SAME, THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROCEED. IF DIFFERENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CROWN COMMUNICATIONS IMMEDIATELY AND OBTAIN FURTHER DIRECTION. 1.1 MATERIALS ALL GROUNDING WIRE SHALL BE TIN COATED COPPER, / 2/GREEN INSULATED WALL BE USED FOR EQ. GROUNDS TO RING. - 12 AWG BARE STRANDED SOFT DRAWN COPPER CABLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWING- - LYNCOLE -XIT" GROUND RODS (REFER TO SECTION 2.1) - CAD WELD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM 1.2 GROUND RING PLACEMENT THE OUTSIDE GROUND RING SHALL BE PLACED AROUND THE STRUCTURE AT A DISTANCE OF ONE FOOT FROMTHEFOUNDATION AT A DEPTH OF TWO FEET OR SIX INCHES BELOW FROST UNE, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER. 1.3 UNITS OF BEND RADIUS IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE WIRE CONNECTING THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE GROUND RINGS BE AS STRAIGHT AS POSSIBLE, WITH NO TURN SHORTER THAN A ONE FOOT RADIUS, DEVIATING FROM THESE GUIDELINES WOULD ADD INDUCTIVE REACTANCE. WHICH WILL EFFECTIVELY DECOUPLE THE TWO SYSTEMS IF LIGHTNING ENERGY IS INTRODUCED. THIS IS DUE TO THE VERY FAST RISE TIMES ENCOUNTERED WITH LIGHTNING STRIKES. AVOID ALL 90' TURNS. 1.4 CONNECTION METHODS ALL EXTERIOR & BURIED CONNECTIONS WILL CAD WELD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM, CONNECTIONS TO THE SKID ON METAL BUILDING MAY BE MADE WITH MECHANICAL. CONNECTORS. RF GROUND CONNECTIONS TO BUSS BAR WILL BE MECHANICAL CONNECTED WITH TWO HOLE LUGS, GROUND CONNECTION SHALL BE FREE OF DIRT, GREASE & PAINT. ALUMINUM WIRE MAY NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING AND SOLDER BONDS ARE PROHIBITED FOR ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS. 1.5 A PO R GROUNDING PONNECTIGN AT THE ON -SITE RISER POLE OR METER PEDESTAL, THE AC. SERVICE NEUTRAL SHALL BE MECHANICALLY BONDED TO THE AC. SERVICE ENTRANCE GROUND AS SPECIFIED BY THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, ARTICLE 250, ANO/OR APPROPRIATE LOCAL CODES, TWO GROUND RODS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THIS POINT, INDEPENDENTLY FROM THE GROUND RING. A SEPARATE AC SERVICE GROUND AND NEUTRAL SHALL THAN BE ROUTED AND CONNECTED TO THE MAIN DISCONNECT MOUNTED INSIDE OR ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE CABINET. THE GROUND ROD, BONDING AND DOWN CONDUCTORS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM MATERIALS AND CONNECTION METHODS. ALL GROUND ROOS SHALL BE SIB- X 8' COPPERCLAD THE TOP OF THE ROOS SHALL BE BURIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'-6' (OR 6' BELOW THE FROST LINE WHICHEVER IS DEEPER). THE DCWN CONDUCTOR SHALL BE Y2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WARE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE GROUND ROD TO THE AC SERVICE NEUTRAL/GROUND BONGING. CONNECTION TO THE GROUND ROD SHALL BE CAD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM. CONNECTION TO THE NEUTRAL/GROUND BONDING SHALL BE MECHANICAL. 1.6 COAXIAL/CAB F CROUINQINC THE NORMAL INSTALLATION GUIDELINE FOR ANTENNA COAXIAL/ CABLE GROUNDING PER TRANSMISSION LINE PER TOWER HEIGHT IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. TOWERS LESS THAN 200' USING AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER-3 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE: TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT AND AT THE BUILDING PENETRATION. 2. TOWERS OVER 2.00' USING AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER -4 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE; TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER MIDDLE ATTACHMENT POINT, TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT AND AT THE BUILDING PENETRATION. 3. TOWERS LESS THAN 200' USING EXTERIOR CABINETS-2 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE; TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT AND TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT. 4, TOWERS OVER 200' USING EXTERIOR CABINETS-3 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, I-Z' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER MIDDLE ATTACHMENT POINT AND TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT. 1.7 ANTENNA GROUNDING A CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS ALL TOWER/ANTENNA GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CADWELD. ALL BENDS IN THE TOWER GROUNDING SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1'. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE, GENERALLY A STRAIGHT UNE. B. ICE BRIDGE CAD 'WELD y2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE TO EACH PIPE SUPPORTING THE CABLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE IN THE FRONT/BACK AND MIDDLE IF OVER 20'. BOND TOGETHER EACH SECTION OF ICE BRIDGE USING p2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WRE CAD WELDED TO EACH SECTION. 1.8 PERWEIM PENCE GROUNDING WHEN INSTALLED, THE PERIMETER FENCE SHALL BE CONNECTED IN AT LEAST SIX PLACES TO THE MAIN EXTERIOR GROUND RING. CAD WELDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE CORNER METALLIC 6' - 12" ABOVE FENCE POSTS AND THE TWO POSTS SUPPORTING THE GATE AND THE EXTERIOR GROUNDING RING USING /2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE. EACH CATE LEAF SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EACH GATEPOST USING 2/0 INSULATED WELDING CABLE CAD WELDED TO THE GATEPOST AND THE GATE LEAF FRAME. 3.2 TESTING A. CERTIFIED MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN AND SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO MAIN SERVICE UTIUTY GROUND. GROUND GRID RESISTANCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 OHMS. B. UPON COMPLETION OF THE GROUND INSTALLATION AND BEFORE CONNECTION TO THE PERMANENT FACILITY POWER, THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AT HIS EXPENSE. A MEASUREMENT OF THE NEW EARTH GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. THE TESTING SHALL UTILIZE AN EARTH RESISTANCE METER AND BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IEEE STANDARD 3 POINT FALL OF POTENTIAL METHOD, C. NOTIFY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVES THREE DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TESTING DATE 50 THEY MAY BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF TESTING. 0. THE GROUNDING SYSTEM SHALL PASS A 'SIXTY TWO PERCENT FALL -OF -POTENTIAL - TEST. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE TEST CONDUCTORS SHALL BE 150 FEET. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A CURVE OF RESISTANCE VS. DISTANCE PREPARED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IF THE MEASURED RESISTANCE IS ABOVE 5 OHMS. u o JOHN D. RENO a v No. 32989 �SIONAL S�nlAH Service, Ltd. Post ONlcc Box 956 SIA-lon, VA. 24402 1-666-616-7436 ALL ORAMNGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTNNEt HU04 ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR k A ARID MAT NOT BE DIPUCATED, USED OR DISCLOSED MTHWT THE MIRTEN CONSENT OF PHR It A RELEASE RITE 05/29/O2 OS/D6/D2 PREUMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL ROA9015 NO. DATE Qt i07/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE O0M. IT IS PRODUCED SOLE. FOR USE BY THE 000 AND ITS AMUATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF INS DRAW& AND/OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE MIITEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAME WAS H I NGTON GAS SITE NUMBER 5(fE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TFTI.E ELECTRICAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER E-3 PLAT SCALE: 1-20 13 O A/C AIR CONDRIONING MGR MANAGER A ADJUSTABLE MIN MINIMUM AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR MISC MISCELLANEOUS APPROX APPROXIMATELY ASTIIA AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR N NORTH TESTING AND MATERIALS NA NOT APPLICABLE AWG AMERICAN MIRE GAUGE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NIS NOT TO SON BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCK OC.o/c ON CENTER BMR BASE MOBILE RADIO OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER B/S BUILDING STANDARD OPG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE OLD CEILING CLR CLEAR PLYWD PLYWOOD CONC CONCRETE PR PAR CONSF CONSTRUCTION PROJ PROJECT CONT CONTINUOUS PROP PROPERTY Pi PRESSURE TREATED DEL DOUBLE DI& a DIAMETER REO'D REQUIRED DIAL DIAGONAL RM ROOM DIM DIMENSION RO ROUGH OPENING ON DOWN OIL .DETL DETAL S SOUTH DWG DRAWING SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR E EAST SPEC SPECIFICATION EA EACH SO SQUARE EL..ELEV ELEVATION SS STAINLESS STEEL ELECT ELECTRICAL STL STEEL EQ EOuAI STRUCT STRUCTURAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT SUSP SUSPENDED EW EACH WAY SV SHEET VINYL EXIST EXISTING EXT EXTERIOR THRU THROUGH TNND TINNED FIN FINISH TOC TOP OF CONCRETE FLUOR FLUORESCENT TOM TOP OF MASONRY FLR FLOOR TYP TYPICAL FT F007 UBC UNIFORM BUILDING GA GAUGE CODE GALV GALVANIZE(D) UNO UNLESS NOTED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR OTHERWISE GRNO GROUND GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD VERT VERTICAL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD VIF VERIFY IN FIELD VT VINYL TILE HARD WD HARDWOOD HORIZ HORIZONTAL W WEST HI HOUR W/ WITH HT HEIGHT WIN WINDOW HVAC HEATING, VENTING & W//0 WITHOUT AR CONOIDONING Wp WATERPROOF ID INSIDE CIA N NCH INFO INFORMATION INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR A ANGLE LB(S) POUND(S) & AND Z CENTER UNE MAX MAXIMUM p- PROPERTY LINE MECH MET,MTL MECHANICAL METAL O AT MFR MANUFACTURER NUMBER 1 REVISION '-, DETAIL REFERENCE <> KEY NOTE + ELEVATION REFERENCE 100 ROOM NUMBER SECTION REFERENCE 5 KEYED NOTE LY WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 ENVINEER PATTON, HARRIS. RUST & ASSOCIATES 401 EAST MARKET STREET, SURE 209 CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA. 22901 JOHN O. REND - PROJECT MANAGER 434 295-3130 - PHONE 434 295-3005 - FAX SHEET NUMRFR OFSC�RIPaION 7-1 TITLE SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEET INDEX 7771 PROJECT MANAGER: - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: - NETWORK OPERATIONS MANAGER: - NATIONAL DIRECTOR MANAGER: - SIGNATURE D� APPROVED BY SITE NAME PARCEL WASHINGTON GAS NUMBER T.M. 63 ((2)) B �rtF N 1MB R MAGESTERIAL OU-iRICT SHAWNEE SITE ADDRESS ZONING 350 HILLANDALE LANE JURISDICTION FREDERICK COUNTY WINCHESTER VA. 22602 SITE OWNER 20N WASHINGTON GAS MI CLASS M1 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER VA. 22602 1-888-818-7436 - PHONE DEED BOOK & -AG (540) 932-2381 - FAX DAL 380 PG. 239 APW-ICANT FI'A1A WASHINGTON GAS FLDDD PUKE N/A 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22802 1-888-815-7436 - PHONE (540) 932-2381 - FAX GENERAL INFORMATION LATITUDE - N 39' 07' 32- LONGITUDE - W 78' 11' 06- ELEVATION - 748.0' 3 AMSL AT BASE LANDOWNER: - S AT'IRF ')ATE LANDOWNER APPROVAL Ill VLiPW-- a /"'` ;, OHN D. RENO e. No. 32989 Q� �15�4ONAL Y. ,` 3l a 51 !/t• i 1 50 Shenand0a p A I f (Zy Memoriel Park w. AIL 842 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT INCLUDES: RE -LOCATION OF DISH NO WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE RUN TO SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SITE PUN IS VAUD FOR 5 YEARS SIGNATURE DACE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL = 2000' SITE OIRECTION< FROM THE 1-04 & I -el INTERCHANCE PROCEED NORTH ON I-61 FOR APPROX. MILE S ES TO EXIT 310. AT TOP OF EXIT RAW TURN RIGHT ONTO RT. 37. TAKE IMEDIATE LEFT ONTO HILLANDALE LANE PROCEED ON HILLANDALE LANE FOR APPROX .25 MALES WASHINGTON GAS WILL BE ON YOUR RIGHT. SITE IS ON BACKSIDE OF BURDING DIRECTIONS TO SITE SIC ATUR GAIE INSPECTOR APPROVAL d J � i 10 �d >d a qgag i o ' U g w� m rOA m .ai m � m d - I � � I a s � ALL DRAWrNGS AND 'MaTTEN MAIERAI COUTANED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR & A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR 060..OSFD ■DLWT THE KNfTTBN CONSENT OF PMW & A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 O6/O6/02 PRF]1MINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL 04/09/08 RE?ASED FINAL REV90N5 N0. I DATE t 105/19/OZI REUSED PER COMIMENTS 12/03/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS O1/13/03 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY Or THE D04UL IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY M OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AID/OR THE NFORMATIDN CONTANFD N IT IS FORBIDDEN MTHWT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE 004EL DRAWN B1^. R. ESTES CHECKED BY: J. RENO SRE WINE WASHINGTON GAS 511E NUMBER SITE ADDRE95 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER T-1 PLOT SCALE. 1-2n s EX. DRIVEWAY\\ PRIV ROP. 8' TALL WOODEN ACY FENCE \ �gsFk J \ \ \ —EX. INLET ' \ p. \ EY. DRIVEWAY 0�-PROP. 180' MONOPOLE TOWER S'.1 • N OR1 TOWh 0 )'a 3 Lu 0 a. a C m a NOTES: 1. ADVERTISING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ON THE FACILITY EXCEPT FOR D- SIGNAGE PROVIDING OWNERSHIP IDENTIFICATION AND EMERGENCY `2 INFORMATION. NO MORE THAN TWO SIGNS SHALL BE PERMITTED 15 AND THEY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1.5 SQ. FT. IN SIZE AN NO 2 HIGHER THAN 10 FEET ABOVE GRADE. 2. TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ° MATERIALS OF GALVANIZED FINISH OR PAINTED A NONCONTRASTING a BLUE OR GRAY UNLESS OTHERWISE MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL m AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OR FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION. 9 w SITE PLAN 17 S-1 SCALE: 1" = 10' m GRAPHIC SCALE rsOi 20 0 10 20 40 a 1 inch = 20' fL d FUTURE LOCATION OF METER60ARD o���ALTH OF GS OHN D. REND � Lic. No. 32989 � q�-� �- off' w�,, loN AL E�Gti J�TOP OF PROPOSED M0N0P0LE a ELEVATION 928.0f -- CE TER OF DISHES ERLEAD VATION 925.0f p+- TOF OF EX. W+!iF AN iENt:A ��,�F6•A110N 860.5t .i'c`c\'A ON 358.Dt ! E 1 i i i i I iF,TGP OF SELF SUPPORT 70'� R �.Et'A ;10H 790-t I , II wi �I f' 2 MONOPOLE TOWER ELEVATION S-1 SCALE: N.T.S. ► � b i n I N°� T � s U a� m y m � 0 31.1 m i! o m� ail � m I ::. rV w All muwvres AND warm! MATERAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE lfE PROPERTY ff PHR d: A AND MAT NOT BE DUPUCATFA USED OR 019C1A5ED MTFNfUT THE waTTEN CRISENT OF PHR 3 A RE1fASE WE 05/29/02 08/08/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL 04/07/08 REVISED FINAL RE115i0N4 Na DATE 07/oz/02REvlsm PER couwENts 12/03/02 REVISED PER couMENTS ® 01 /13/03 REVISED PER CCLI.EN15 04/0e/oe a/os/ae PROPFH!Y OF 7HE OMEit R IS PROOUCm 90lF7.Y FOR USE BY THE OMEN AND ITS uFRWTES REPROOUCBON OR USE OF 1H6 DRAW Aro/DR THE NFOFOIATION CONTAINED N R is FORBUOER WIl}10UT THE wmteN PERIYSS70N of THE OWNER, DRAWN EM: R. ESTES CHECKED BY, J. REND srtE NANE WASHINGTON GAS SITE NUILER srrr: ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22802 SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER S-1 FIAT SCALE: 1-20 I!• A/C AIR CONDITIONING MGR MANAGER ADJ ADJUSTABLE MIN MINIMUM AFT ABOVE FINISH FLOOR MISC MISCELLANEOUS APPROY APPROXIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR N NORTH TESTING AND MATERMLS NA NOT APPLICABLE AWG AMERICAN WINE GAUGE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT SLOG BUILDING NTS NOT TO SCALE 13LK BLOCK OC,n/c ON CENTER 8MR BASE MOBILE RADIO OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER B/S BUILDING STANDARD OPG OPENING Opp OPPOSITE CLC CEILING CLR CLEAR PLYWO PLYWOOD GONG CONCRETE PR PAR GO MST CONSTRUCTION PROD PROJECT CONT CONTINUDUS PROP PROPERTY DBL DOUBLE PT PRESSURE TREATED DA, 8 DIAMETER REO'D REQUIRED DAG DIAGONAL RM ROOM OIM DIMENSION RO ROUGH OPENING ON DOWN OTL.DETL DETAIL DWG DRAWING SHT SHEET Sim SIMILAR E EAST SPEC SPECIFICATION EA EACH SO SQUARE EL.ELEV ELEVATION SS STAINLESS STEEL ELECT ELECTRICAL 5TL STEEL EQ EQUAL STRUCT STRUCTURAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT SUSP SUSPENDED EW EACH WAY SV SHEET VINYL EXIST EYISTING EYT EYTERIOR THRU THROUGH TNND TINNED FIN FINISH 70C TOP OF CONCRETE FLUOR FLUORESCENT TOM TOP OF MASONRY FUR FLOOR TYR TYPICAL FT FOOT GA GAUGE UBC UNIFORM BUILDING GALV GALVANIZE(D) LINO CODE UNLESS NOTED GC GRIND GENERAL CONTRACTOR GROUND OTHERWISE GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD VERT VERTICAL GYP BO GYPSUM BOARD AF VERIFY IN FIELD HARD WD HARDWOOD VT VINYL TILE HORIZ HORIZONTAL Wr WEST HR HOUR YN/ WITH HT HEIGHT WIN WINDOW HVAC HEATING, VENTING k W/0 WITHOUT AIR CONDITIONING WP WATERPROOF ID INSIDE DA. N NCH INFO INFORMATION INSUL, INSULATION INT INTERIOR A ANGLE LB(S) POUNO(S) AND MAX MAYIMUM Q CENTER LINE MECH MECHANICAL R PROPERTY LINE MET.MTL METAL 0 AT MFR MANUFACTURER j NUMBER . 0 REVISION �e DETAIL REFERENCE © KEY NOTE ELEVATION REFERENCE F171 ROOM NUMBER ©2 KEYED NOTE SECTION REFERENCE ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ENGINEE PATTON, HARRIS. RUST h ASSOCIATES P.0 80X e6 116 N. MAIN STREET BRIDGEWATER, VA 22812 JOHN D. REND - PROJECT MANAGER 540)) 828-2616 - PHONE 540) 828-6437 - FAY SULT SHEET NUMBER pESCRIPTION T-1 TITLE SHEET S-I GENERA- NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS S-2 TOWER LOCATION PLAN S-3 SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION S-4 SECTIONS k DETAILS E-1 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-2 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-3 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-4 ELECTRICAL NOTES SHEETINDEX PROJECT NA L46ER: - CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS - NETWORK OPERATIONS MANAGER: - NATIONAL DIRECTOR MANAGER: - SICNAruRE 'l�ASE APPROVED BY WASHINGTON GAS SITE NAMF WASHINGTON GAS SITE N 1MB R SITE ADOR SS MO HILLANDALE LANE WINNCHESTER, VA. 22602 SITE OWNER WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 1-888-816-7436 - PHONE (540) 932-2381 - FAX APPLICANT WASHINGTON GAS 350 HILLANOALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 1-888-816-7436 - PHONE (540) 932-2381 - FAX C•ENERAI INFORMATION UATITUDE - N 39' 07' 32' LONGITUDE - IN78' 1 V 06" ELEVATION - 748.0' 3 AMSL AT BAST SUMMARY 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 PARCEL NUMBER T.M. 63 ((2)) B 2QNING JURISDICTION FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING CLASS MI DEED BOOK h PAGE D.B. 380 PG. 239 EEIA F ODD PIANF LANDOWNER: - S_IC NATURE -DATE LANDOWNER APPROVAL F ✓AOHN D. RENO a No, 32989 `�IONAL 37-, 6p0 *f y [yYW1 s 37� - 1 ♦ - ?.50 644 1 •`.� �-J � 1B' Qy �" �77pp Memorial. Parts � /' •A» VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT INCLUDES: INSTALLATION OF MONOPOLE TOWER AND RE -LOCATION OF DISH AND GROUND PLANE ANTENNAS, NO WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE RUN TO SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SIGNATURE QATE MUNICIPAL APPROVAL SITE DIRECT....'. FROM THE 1-64 A:1-81 INTERCHANGE PROCEED NORTH ON 1-81 FOR APPROY. 89 MILES TO EXIT 310. AT TOP OF EMIT RAMP TURN M04T ONTO RT. 37. TAKE MEDIATE LEFT ONTO HILLANDALE LANE. PROCEED ON HRLANOALE LANE FOR APPROX. .25 MILES. WASHINGTON CAS MALL BE ON YOUR RIGHT, SITE IS ON BACKSIDE OF BUILDING. I DIRECTIONS TO SITE SICNA7UR -ATE INSPECTOR APPROVAL lwnewAH Ltd. Pml CfBce Elm 956 SMunron, VA. 24402 1-888-616-7436 ddi 8i> n U � a� m�m mg u n o� 6 m N r s e� o xA .. 1 o 0 Pill of mLL� TL 1u .. Ci n ALL DRAWNM AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINEE HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR R A AND MAT NOT BE DIIPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED %THOUT IHE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE _ D5/29/02 06/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REvws NO. DATE T 08/19/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLE. FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFRLIATES, REPROMUCIION OR USE OF THIS DRANNO AND/06 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT S FORBIDDEN CRTNOUT TK OTTEN PER16SION OF THE ONNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED IV: J. RENO BITE NAME WASHINGTON GAS SITE NIA6ER STTE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22W2 SHEET TTTUE TITLE SHEET SHEET NlJMBER T-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 vi.ww11 1. .)IHIVu1ANu 1"Nuvi�)wiNb GENERAL NOTES 1.ORAWINOS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS. EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES, µ0 LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. VERIFY ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH PROJECT MANAGER. Z. PRIOR TO FAMILIAR WITH ALLI NG A B CONOITIONS AFFECTING TH10 THE E VISIT SHALL PROPOSEDPROJECT. INCLUJINCLUDING DEMOLITION, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND SHALL ADJUST 910 ACCORDINGLY. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND CONFIRM THAT WORK AS INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (ALSO KNOWN AS CONSTRUCTION PLANS) CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN BEFORE PROCEEDING. 4. NOTIFY PROJECT MANAGER OF ANY MAJOR DISCREPANCY REGARDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND OR DESIGN INTENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RELATED WORK IN QUESTION, 5.INS7ALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED, OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT JOB SITE TO REVIEW SCOPE OF WORK AND EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING. BUT NOT LIMITED TO. MECHANICAL SERWCE, ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND OVERALL COORDINATION. 7. ALL TELEPHONE/RADIO EQUIPMENT LAYOUT, SPECIFICATIONS, PERFORMANCE. INSTALLATION AND THEIR FINAL LOCATION ARE TO BE APPROVED BY PROJECT MANAGER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK AND CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY OTHERS RELATED TO SAID EQUIPMENT. B. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE HIGHEST TRADE STANDARDS. AS A MINIMUM STANDARD, CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES HAVING JURISDICTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS. ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 9. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER N.E.C. AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE UTIUTY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPUCA13LE REGULATIONS. IO.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION WHILE ANY SUBCONTRACTORS OR WORKMEN ARE ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALL WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 11. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-AIOBC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (USC) 1994 EDITION, ALONG WITH 1994 UPC. UMC, µ0 THE 1994 NEC. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING FINISHES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION. 14.SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR F.M. APPROVED MATERIALS. 15. DETAILS AND SCHEMATICS ARE TO PROPOSE TO SHOW END RESULT OF THE DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY DEEM TO BE NECESSARY TO SUIT JOB CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK. 16. VERIFY ALL FINAL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 17. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISH SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18. CLEANUP AND SAFETY: KEEP PROJECT AREA CLEAN. HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS. RUBBISH AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED AND NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER, ETC. LEAVE PREMISES IN A VACUUM AND BROOM CLEAN CONDITION: FREE FROM PLANT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT IN A CLEAN WORKING ORDER UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY PROJECT MANAGER. 19. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REDLINING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE THE AS -BUILT CONDITION OF THE SITE. THIS WILL BE DONE AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN AWARDED THE FINAL INSPECTION. TWO (2) COPIES OF REDLINED DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED TO PROJECT MANAGER AND THE ARCHITECT. (I EACH) DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02100 EARTHWORK AND DRAINAGE PART 1 GENERAL 1. WORK INCLUDED A. REFER TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN FOR WORK INCLUDED. 2. RELATED WORK A. CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDATION B.INSTALLATIQN OF UTILITY $ GROUNDING SYSTEM C. ERECTION OF FENCE 3. DESCRIPTIONS A. ACCESS ROAD, TURNAROUND AREAS, AND SITES ARE CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIOE A WELL DRAINED, EASILY MAINTAINED, EVEN SURFACE FOR MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT DELIVERIES AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ACCESS. 4, QUALITY A55URANCE A. APPLY SOIL STERILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION (USE AS NEEDED). B. GRASS SEEDS SHALL BE APPLIED µ0 MAINTAINED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SEED PRODUCER (IF REQUIRED). C. VEGETATION LANDSCAPING, IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONTRACT, WILL BE PLACED AND MAINTAINED AS RECOMMENDED BY NURSERY INDUSTRY STANDARDS (IF REQUIRED). 5. SEQUENCING A. CONFIRM SURVEY STAKES AND SET ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION B. THE COMPLETE ROAD AND SITE AREA WILL BE GRUBBED PRIOR TO FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF PLACEMENT OF BACK FILL OR SUB -BASE MATERIAL C. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE ACCESS DRIVE O. THE SITE AREA WILL BE BROUGHT TO SUB -BASE COURSE ELEVATION AND THE ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FORMING FOUNDATION. SOIL STERILIZER F. GRADE, SEED FERTILIZER P AND MULCH DISTURBED BED AREASIMMEDIATELYAFTER BRINGING SITE µD ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION, WATER TO ENSURE GROWTH. ,.AND GRAVEL FROM TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE TO AN AUTHORIZE AREA OR AS DIRECTED BY PRCJECT MANAGER, RAFTER APPLICATIONS OF FINAL SURFACES, APPLY SOIL STERILIZER TO THE STONE SURFACES. 6. SUBMITTALS A. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION I.IF LANDSCAPING IS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTRACT, TWO COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD, IF A LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE WAS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT, AN ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPOSED COSTS UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD (REFER TO SITE PLAN F0LANDSCAPING 2. SUBMIT FORAPPROVAL.1/2CUBIFOOT OF LITHE MPROPOSED SURFACE COURSE MATERIAL, B.AFTER CONSTRUCTION 1. MANUFACTURER'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT AND WARRANTY STATEMENT ON SOIL STERILIZED. 2. MANUFACTURER'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT ON GRASS AND FERTILIZER 3. LµOSCAPINC WARRANTY STATEMENT. A. wAnNAVIr A. IN ADOITION TO THE WARRANTY ON ALL CONSTRUCTION COVERED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE AND REPAIR AREA BACK AS CLOSE TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AS POSSIBLE TO LEASE AREA PROPERTY OR SURROUNDING CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION B. SOIL STERILIZATION APPLICATION WILL GUARANTEE VEGETATION FREE ROAD AND SITE AREAS FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION. C. DISTURBED AREAS WILL REFLECT GROWTH OF NEW GRASS COVER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. 0. LANDSCAPING, IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT, WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION. PART 2 DEMOLITION 1. DEMOLITION SHALL BE CONTROLLED TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DUST TO OCCUPIED PORTIONS OR THE BUILDING. 2. EXISTING WORK TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. WORK DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED TO MATCH EXISTING WORK. 3. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY AND DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER, CLOSE ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS WITH WEATHERPROOF COVER 4, REMOVE DEBRIS µ0 RUBBISH FROM THE SITE DAILY. 00 NOT ALLOW DEBRIS AND RUBBISH TO ACCUMULATE IN BUILDING OR ON SITE. 5. FOR FLOOR AND WALL PENETRATIONS: A. CONTRACTOR MUST LOCATE REINFORCING BARS IN EXISTING FLOOR SLABS USING A RELIABLE NON-OESTRUCTIVE TESTING METHOD APPROVED BY THE OWNER. CORE DRILL AS NECESSARY TD ALLOW CABLE PENETRATION WITHOUT CUTTING EXISTING REINFORCING BARS. B. FILL OPENING AFTER CABLE INSTALLATION WITH INSTA-FOAM'S INSTA-FIRE SEAL SILICONE RTV FOAM. PART 3 PRODUCTS 1. MATERIALS A. SOIL STERILIZERS TOTAL KILL PRODUCT 910 - EPA 10292-7 AMBUSH HERBICIDE - EPA REGISTERED PHASAR CORPORATION FRAMAR INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS P.O. BOX 5123 14,55 MORRIS AVE. DEARBORN. MI 48128 TEL 313 563-8000 UN K)N, NJ 070E3 TEL 800 526-4924 S. SOIL STERIUZER SHALL BE EPA REGISTERED OF LIQUID COMPOSITION AND OF PRE EMERGENCE DESIGN. C. SOIL STABILIZER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAR - 50OX D. MIL ON -SITE AND IIMPORTEO FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOIL OR SOIL -ROCK MIXTURE WHICH 15 FREE FROM ORGANIC MATTER, FROZEN MATERIALS AND OTHER DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE, IT SHALL CONTAIN NO ROCKS OR LUMPS OVER SIX (5)INCHES IN GREATEST DIMENSION, AND NOT MORE THAN 15% OF THE ROCKS OR LUMPS SHALL BE LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN GREATEST DIMENSION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 1.00 E. BEDDING TILL SHAL L BE A GRADED ANGULAR STONE AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COARSE AGGREGATES. PER VOOT STD SPEC SECTION 203. SIZE NO. 6B, F. TOPSOIL SHALL 86 SANDY LOAM, CLAY LOAM, LOAM, SILT LOAM, SANDY CLAY LOAM OR SOIL FROM THE SITE WHICH HAS SUFFICIENT ORGANIC MATERIAL TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF TURF GRASS. IT SHALL NOT HAVE A MIXTURE OF SUBSOIL AND CONTAIN NO SLAG, CINDERS, STONES, LUMPS OR SOIL, STICKS, ROOTS, WEEDS, TRASH OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS LARGER THAN 1-1/2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION. 2. EQUIPMENT A. COMPACTION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL MEANS. 1.LARGER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY SHEEPS FOOT VIBRATOR OR RUBBER TIRED ROLLERS WEIGHING AT LEAST FIVE TONS. 2.SMALLER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY POWER -DRIVER, HAND HELD TAMPERS. PART 4 EXECUTION I. INSPECTIONS A.LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTORS SHALL BE NOTIFIED NO LESS THAN 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF CONCRETE POURS. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY OWNER OR LOCAL JURISDICTION. B.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS RELATIVE TO EACH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ALL INSPECTION REPORTS ARE TO BE DELIVERED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF SAID INSPECTION REPORTS, 2. PREPARATION A.CLEAR TREES, BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM SITE AREAS AND ACCESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS DIRECTED BY PROJECT MANAGER. B. PRIOR TO OTHER EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS GRUB ORGANIC MATERIAL TO A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES BELOW ORIGINAL GROUND LEVEL. C. UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED BY PROJECT MANAGER TRANSPORT ALL REMOVED TREE, BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM THE PROPERTY TO AN AUTHORIZED LANDFILL.. D.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE MATERIALS, ROLL THE SOIL. E.WHERE UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED, LINE OF THE GRUBBED AREAS WITH 5TABIUZER MAT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE MATERIAL. 3. INSTALLATION A,THE SITE µ0 TURNAROUND AREAS SHALL BE AT THE SUB -BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FORMING FOUNDATIONS. GRADE OR FILL THE SITE AND ACCESS ROAD REQUIRED IN ORDER THAT UPON EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF SPOILS RESULTING FROM FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS. THE RESULTING GRADE WILL CORRESPOND WITH SAID SUB -BASE COURSE, ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE CALCULATED FROM FINISHED GRADES OR SLOPES INDICATED. B.IF ANY, EXCESS SPOILS WILL BE CLEARED FROM JOB SITE AND NOT SPREAD BEYOND THE OMITS OF LEASE PROPERTY UNLESS AUTHORIZE BY PROJECT MANAGER / AS AGREEMENT BY LANDOWNER. C. THE ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE BROUGHT TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT USE COMPACTION AND OBSERVATION DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE. D. AVOID CREATING DEPRESSIONS WHERE WATER MAY POND. E. THE CONTRACT SHALL BE ASSUMED TO INCLUDE GRADING BANKING, DITCHING µ0 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, COVERING TWO INCHES OF SURFACE COURSE. ALL ROADS OR ROUTES UTILIZED FOR ACCESS TO THE SITE COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NEAREST PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. F. WHEN IMPROVING AN EXISTING ACCESS ROAD. GRADE THE EXISTING ROAD TO REMOVE ANY ORGANIC MATTER AND SMOOTH THE SURFACE BEFORE PLACING FILL OR STONE. C. H. PLACE ECFINISH GRADE. INCLUDING SIX INCH TOP SURFACE DUXIMUM DRS�,MPACT SHALLBEFORE PLACING NEXT XTENO A INIMUM OFLIFT. FOOT ONE BEYOND THE SITE FENCE µ0 SHALL COVER THE AREA AS INDICATED. 1. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SIDE SLOPES OF ALL FENCED SITE AREAS, PARKING AREAS, AND TO ALL OTHER SLOPES GREATER THAN 2:1. J. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SIDES OF DITCHES OR DRAINAGE SWALES. K. RIPRAP ENTIRE DITCH FOR SIX FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT CULVERT OPENINGS. L. SEED FERTILIZER AND STRAW COVER SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS, AND DITCHES, DRAINAGE, SWALES. NOT OTHERWISE RIPRAPPED. M .UNDER NO IF C CUMSTANCES WILL DITCHES, SWALES, NOR CULVERTS BE PLACED SO THEY DIRECT WATER TOWARDS, OR PERMIT STANDING WATER IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RAILROAD BALLAST. IF DESIGNS OR ELEVATIONS CONFLICT WITH THIS GUIDANCE ALVAR SHOULD BE ADVISED IMMEDMTELY. N.IN DITCH UES WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN TEN PERCENT, MOUND DIVERSIONARY HEADWALLS IN THE DITCH AT CULVERT ENTRANCES. THE HEADWALL SHALL BE POSITIONED AT AN ANGLE NO GREATER THAN 60 DEGREES OFF THE DITCH LINE. RIPRAP THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE HEADWALL AS WELL AS THE DITCH FOR SIX FEET ABOVE THE CULVERT ENTRANCE. 4. BACKFILL AND COMPACTION A. 00 NOT ALLOW OR CAUSE ANY OF THE WORK PERFORMED OR INSTALLED TO BE COVERED UP OR ENCLOSED BY WORK OF THIS SECTION PRIOR TO ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS, TESTS, AND APPROVALS. B. SHOULD ANY OF THE WORK BE SO ENCLOSED OR COVERED UP BEFORE IT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOVER ALL SUCH WORK. C. AFTER THE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETELY TESTED. INSPECTED. AND APPROVED. MAKE ALL REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS NECESSARY TO RESTORE THE WORK TO THE CONDITION IN WHICH IT WAS FOUND AT THE TIME OF UNCOVERING. D. FOR SETTING AND ESTABLISHING FINISH ELEVATIONS AND LINES, SECURE THE SERVICES OF A SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER. CAREFULLY PRESERVE ALL DATA AND MONUMENTS SET BY THE SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER AND, IF DISPLACED OR LOST. IMMEDIATELY REPLACE TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. E. AREAS THAT RECEIVE SEEDING SHALL BE GRADED BELOW FINISHED GRADES SHOWN, LEAVING SPACE FOR TOPSOILING F. DEPRESSIONS: WHERE DEPRESSIONS RESULT FROM. OR HAVE RESULTED FROM, THE REMOVAL OF SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE OBSTRUCTIONS. OPEN THE DEPRESSION TO THE EQUIPMENT WORKING WIDTH µ0 REMOVE ALL DEBRIS µ0 SOFT MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. C. OTHER AREAS: EXCAVATE TO GRADES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. WHERE EXCAVATION GRADES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE THE INSTALLATION. H. OVEREXCAVATION: BACKFILL AND COMPACT ALL OVEREXCAVATED AREAS AS SPECIFIED FOR FILL BELOW. 1. STRIP EXISTING TOPSOIL LEAF MOLD AND ORGANIC MATERIALS, MEETING TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. DEPOSIT IN STORAGE PILES SEPARATE FROM OTHER EXCAVATED MATERIAL, J. STOCKPILE EXCAVATED SOIL MATERIAL SATISFACTORY FOR BACK FILL OR FILL UNTIL REQUIRED. PLACE. GRADE AND SHAPE STOCKPILES FOR PROPER DRAINAGE. K. REMOVE FROM PROJECT SITE AND DISPOSE OF MATERIAL UNSATISFACTORY FOR BACKFIFILL, T OR LL RASH AN D NO DEBRIS EB S AND ALL EXCESS MATERIAL. ES E CAI. L. EXCAVATE A THAT BANNS OF E DISTURB WILL NOT BE UNDERCUT AND STRATUM FOR FOUNDATIONS WILL NOT BE DISTURBED. M. PROOFROLLING: PRIOR TO FILLING. AND AFTER TOPSOIL AND PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED UNSATISFACTORY SUBGRADE MATERIAL HAS BEEN REMOVED, PROOFROLL IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER AREAS WITHIN 10 FEET OF BUILDING LIMITS USING I DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WORKS-03310 I 1. QUALITY ASSURANCE: 3RD PARTY CONCRETE TESTING 15 MANDATORY FOR ALL FOUNDATIONS. ALL BREAK TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE CROWN REPRESENTATIVE ON SAME DAY OF BREAK. COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, EXCEPT WHERE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED: A ACI 301-89 "SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS". B. ACI 218 'BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE" (REVISED 1992) AND AC1318-89 COMMENTARY" (REVISED 1992 C. CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI),"MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE". 2. REINFORCING MATERIALS: A. RIENFORCINCASTM A 615,GRADE 60 DEFORMED. B. WELDING WIRE FABRICASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC. C. SUPPORTS FOR REINFORCEMENT: BOLSTERS, CHAIRS, SPACERS AND OTHER DEVICES FOR SPACING, SUPPORTING AND REINFORCING BARS IN PUCE. USE WIRE BAR TYPE SUPPORTS COMPLYING WITH CRSI SPECIFICATIONS. 3. CONCRETE MATERIALS: A PORTIAND CEMENT: ASTM C 150, TYPE 1. S. LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATES: ASTM C 330 C. AIR -ENTRAINING ADMIXTURE ASTM C 260 CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER REQUIRED ADMIXTURES_ 4. PROPORTIONING µ0 DESIGN OF MIXES: DESIGN MIX TO PROVIDE LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES: A 3000 PSI 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH B. WEIGHT: 110 PCF. C. W/C RATIO: 0.44 MAXIMUM (NON NR-ENTRAINED), 0.35 MAXIMUM (AIR -ENTRAINED) D. BREAK SCHEDULE - 3 DAY, 7 DAY, 28 DAY, µ0 1 SPARE DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220 I 1. CONCRETE BLOCKS: A STANDARD BLOCK SHALL BE THE SIZE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, LIGHT GRAY DR NEUTRAL COLOR, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 90, TYPE 1. GRADE N. LIGHTWEIGHT TYPE WITH EXPAND SLAG AGGREGATE. 2. MORTAR: A All MORTAR FOR CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL CONFORM TO A5TM C 270, TYPE 5 µ0 SHALL RAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IN 28 DAYS. 3. WIRE REINFORCING IN BED JOINTS: A TRUSS TYPE REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DUR-O-WALL, OR EQUAL FABRICATED WITH A SINGLE PAIR OF SIDE AND CONTINUOUS DIAGONAL CROSS -RODS SPACED NOT MORE THAN 8" ON CENTER. WIRE IN FABRICATION SHALL BE GALVANIZED ACCORDING TO ASTM 116, CLASS 3. SIDE RODS SHALL BE 9 CAGE 3/16" MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE 10'-0- WITH MATCHING CORNER AND TEE UNITS. B. SPACING: TYPICAL, IN BED JOINTS. AT 16" VERTICAL INTERVAL. CT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND C. AT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND BELOW EACH OPENING PLACE REINFORCING IN ONE ADDITIONAL JOINT TO EXTEND 3'-0" PAST THE OPENING EACH WAY. SPLICE LENGTHS FOR HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST 8" FOR TRUSS AND 16' FOR STRAIGHT TYPE. 4. INSTALL STEEL UNTELS ABOVE EACH OPENING. FILL CORES WITH GROUT 3 COURSES BELOW LINTEL BEARING. IDIVISION 5: STRUCTURAL STEEL-05120 I I. QUALITY ASSURANCE: COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. EXCEPT WHERE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED: A AISC :CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE. B. ASC 'SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS - ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN AND PLASTIC DESIGN". INCLUDING THE COMMENTARY" AND SUPPLEMENTS. C. AMERICµ WELDING SOCIETY (AWS) D 1. 1 -92, "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - STEEL." 2, MATERIALS: A. STRUCTURAL STEEL PLATES, SHAPES AND BARS: ASTM A 36. B. HIGH STRENGTH THREADED FASTENERS: ASTM A 325. C. ELECTRODES FOR wELOING: E70%X. O. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A 153. E. CEMENT GROUT: EMBECO BY MASTER BUILDERS OF AN APPROVED EQUAL F. NON-METALLIC, SHRINKAGE -RESISTANT, 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH GROUT, PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: 1. EUCO N.S. BY EUCLID CHEMICAL CO. 2. MASTERFLOW 713 BY MASTER BUILDERS 3. INSPECTIONS AS PER ALL CODES AND ORDINANCES DIVISION 7: SEALANTS AND CAULKING-07900 1. PROVIDE 'DINT SEALERS. JOINT FILLERS AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH ONE ANOTHER AND WITH JOINT SUBSTRATES UNDER CONDITIONS OF SERVICE AND APPLICATIONS. PROVIDE COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES. PROVIDE BLACK OR OTHER NEUTRAL COLOR WHEN NO OTHER COLOR IS AVAILABLE. 2. ONE -COMPONENT POLYSULROE BASED. ONE PART ELASTOMERIC SEALANT. COMPLYING WITH FS TT-S-00230,CLASS A TYPE II (NON -SAG), FOR JOINTS AT PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE COMPOUND BEARING THE THIOCOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION SEAL OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: A, FLEXISEAL 900 SERIES BY DAP. INC. B. HORNFLEX ONE - COMPONENT BY W.R. GRACE do CO. . ONE -COMPONENT ACRYLIC 3 E SEALANT: RY RP YM ACRYLIC LC TE OL ER SOLVENT BASED 0 E N -PART THERMOPLASTIC SEALANTCOMPOUND, SOLIDS NOT LESS THAN95R ACRYLIC. COMPLYING WITH FS 7T-S-00230,CLASS B TYPE il, FOR PERIMETER OF METAL µ0 DOOR FRAMES, THRESHOLDS AT EXTERIOR DOORS. AND PIPE SLEEVES THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS AND FLOOR SLABS. PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OF AN APPROVED EQUAL: A. DAP ACRYLIC BY DAP, INC. B. GACO AS-3 BY GATES ENGINEERING/SMC 4, OLEO -RESINS CAULKING COMPOUND: OIL BASED RESINOUS CAULKING, COMPLYING WITH FS TT-C-598. NON -BLEEDING, PAINTABLE. FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL: A. VULCATEX BY W.R. GRACE h CO. GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 1. THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK AND FOR ANY DAMAGESTHAT OCCUR BY FAILURE TO LOCATE OR PRESERVE THESE UTILITIES. IF DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD ENCOUNTER UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. HE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND TAKE NECESSARY AND PROPER STEPS PROTECT THE FACILITY AND ASSURE THE CONTINUANCE OF SERVICE, 2. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND SITE CONDITIONS OR ANY INCONSISTENCIES OR AMBIGUITIES IN THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE OWNER, WHO SHALL PROMPTLY CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES OR AMBIGUITIES. WORK DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHOUT DIRECTIONS OR ANY DISCOVERY OF SUCH INCONSISTENCIES, DISCREPANCIES, OR AM8IGUITIES, SHALL BE DONE AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY MISS UTILITIES (800) 552-7001 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATIONOF ELECTRICAL, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND CATV SERVICES. NOTE: INSTALLATION AND INSPECTIONS AS PER ALL CODES AND ORDINANCES. NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Pass Office Sax 956 SI4ummn, VA. 24402 1-889-816-7436 r � � n > � >(I+�.A . 1 U ao s g o`��9Srr U m a� W v m 0 U a 0 cj m A d� �pp NN 7 OC °L e a m m 15 mP3Inym esI ❑ = i a 0 m Z s m a�a ALL DRA04 S AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR R A AND MAT 401 BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR 8 A RELEASE DATE D5/29/02 06/06/D2 PRELIMINARY 07/02/D2 REMVED FINAL RDASIDNS NO. GATE Qi 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS m ® Z� ' PROPERTY OF 1HE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLEL FOR USE BY THE OINNER AND ITS AFFILIATES REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRATANG AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED W IT IS FORBIDDEN MTHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE DINNER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAME WAS H I NGTO N GAS SITE NUMBER �ALTH OF L.� SffE ADDRESS `J 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 JOHN D. RENO a SHEE TITLE No. 32989 GENERAL NOTES -)� 63 & SPECIFICATION F_ ' NUMBER ONAL - S_1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 ri1 o JOHN D. RENO v No. 32989 SIGNAL NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Pmt OYRn Box 956 StLuntnn, VA. 24402 1-"8-816-7436 4 y U m 0.� m y m U O u m e m 9 a� 46 N p� C m N x4 ; e cm�5 F" S Z to m 0 S z 9 i 2P I. mah ALL DNAMMS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPEM OF PHA 6 A AND RAT NOT SE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PNR S A RELEASE OKIE DS/29/02 06/06/62 PRELIMINARY 67/92/82 REVISED FINAL REV610N5 40. DATE 1Q 08/19/02 REV6ED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT 15 PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE SY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION ON USE OF THIS DRAWING ANDJOR THE INFORKATTON CONTAINED IN IT IS FORSIDDEN WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. REND SrrE NAME WASHINGTON GAS SITE NUMELER SRE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE TOWER LOCATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER S-2 PLOT SCALE: 1 7 X. OVERHEAD\ \ ELECTRIC - EX. DRIVEWAY N F6 \ x \\ \\ 1 EX. INLET 1 EX. DRIVEWAY 1\ 42' SEL r PROP. 180MONOPOLE TO ER 1 sU ORT TOWER\ / 1 \ \ EX ITV M N OLE 1 \ 12 nGlG i .gyp. � \\ \\ \ pq \> C00 EX. BUILDING \ \ � N h *oso FUTURE \LOCA OF METER90A SITE PLAN S-3 SCALE: T" = 2D' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 inch = 20' it. i I L-746 N 'CA o JOHN D. RENO v No. 32989 �Sj�NAL �'l H 0 a a Ln N w In 0 w Z 0 Z CL dZ a 0 w O = o z z z LJ o CL. - o I p Q0 0 C2 o a z 0 L:) o w 0 o z N z � o O W L� o cj� 0 o a- a 0 0 o F J o a F- I o L'- N _ o I IY N W N z z w U 0 ir 0 $TOP OF EX. WHIP ANTENNA ELEVATION 860.5t $TOP OF EX. MONOPOLE ELEVATION 858.Ot 3 0 Cr O a a LU LU LA X W 0 a 0 TOP OF PROPOSED SELF SUPPORT TOWER ELEVATION 928.0t $RAD CENTER OF DISHES ELEVATION 828.0t hTOP OF EX. SELF SUPPORT TOWER ELEVATION 790.0t 2 MONOPOLE TOWER ELEVATION S-3 SCALE: N.T.S. 9-��ewAH Ltd. Pm, OIDm 8— 956 St&-Wn, VA. 24402 1 -888-816-74 36 i O�m 5i► q �S U U a a� M mm U a O ID a m d m � a a a a >m m 9 � aA irI ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR t A AND MAT NOT 9E DUPLICATED. USED OR OISMOSEO MTHOUT-THE MITTEN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 06/05/02 PREUMINARY 07/02/D2 REVISED FINAL REVISIONS 90, DATE Qt 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS m 0 PROPERTY OF THE 000. IT IS PRODUCED SOLD. FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/OR THE DNFORMATION CONTAINED N IT IS FDRWDEN IHTHOUT THE 1RITTEN PERWSSIDN OF THE DFMR DRAWN BY: J. FLAXNM CHECKED BY: J. RENO SIFE NIAE WAS HI NGTON GAS SITE NU6ER SITE A-RESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TRLE SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER S-3 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 0 r 0 0 0 12" MAX. A� 1'-0' GROUND BAR STRAPPED TO TOWER MONOPOLE TOWER RELOCATED 6' DISH (TYP.) ANTENNA PLAN DETAIL S-4 SCALE: N.T.S. "A" - 4'-6" O.C. MAX. S-O" O.C. MAX. COAX CABLE CALDWELD GROUND LEAD ICEBRIDGE TO ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT SUPPORT POST, 6"-12- ABOVE GRAVEL GRADE (TYP.) 3/4- PVC (TYP.) CONIC. FOOTING TO #2 TINNED LEADS TO BE BELOW GRADE GROUNDING RING (TYP.) SIDE ELEVATION CABLE GUARD SHEATH LOCATE AT EACH END OF ICEBRIDGE (TYR) EX. EQUIPMENT m SHELTER CONC. PAD 2 ICE BRIDGE DETAIL S-4 SCALE: N.T.S. ?A" rI FAR ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE SECTOR Al B1 N/A AZIMUTH 144.2' 263' N/A ANTENNA 6' DISH 6' DISH HF GROUND PLANE MOUNTING HEIGHT 80' BD' 120' MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0' 0' N/A COAXIAL CABLE EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING BRIDGE CHANNEL BY MICROFLECT 1/2' ALLTHREAD COAX SUPPORT; 20' UNISTRUT W/NUT AND WASHER EACH SIDE/ EACH LEVEL USE COAX HANGERS COAX TERMINATOR FRAME PER PROJECT MANAGER'S INSTRUCTIONS PIPE HEAD BY MICROFLECT 3 1/2"0 GALV., SCHED 40 POST; CROWN TO DRAIN; TYPICAL 12'0 x 36' DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING; TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION 'A' t20'-0" "B. t 7'-6' 'C. f 6'-6" 44 NOTES: IF THE ICE BRIDGE (DIM. "A') IS 20' OR LESS, TWO (2) GROUNDING POINTS ARE REQUIRED AT OPPOSITE ENDS OF THE ICE BRIDGE, CALDWELD TO THE ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST. IF THE ICE BRIDGE (DIM. "A') IS 20' OR GREATER, THREE (3) GROUNDING POINTS ARE REQUIRED. ONE (1) EACH AT OPPOSITE ENDS AND ONE (1) NEAR THE CENTER OF THE ICE BRIDGE, CALDWELD TO THE ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST. F o JOHN D. RENO U 9 No. 32989 SjONAL� AH 9-�TeR� Ltd. Posh Cffi- Box 956 Slaunlo n, VA. 24402 I-WWE-W16-7436 a > n � I U Di U p o Y d03 ° N ama m m a N aat e p � m, 'Gm55 c 1n>„ C m 0 Y N pO Q. A0 =mso ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR At A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISODSED MTHOUT THE WHIN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 06/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REVISIONS NO. DATE Q 07/02/021 REVISED PER COMMENTS 0 PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATE. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAW C AND/OR THE RKORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE 07TEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXM4N CHECKED BY: J. RENO - _ WASHINGTON GAS 50E NUMBER SRE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET ITTLE SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHEET NUMBER S-4 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 GROUND GRID DESIGN PROVIDED BY OTHERS. THIS DESIGN MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT A TYPICAL GROUNDING DESIGN BY PHR&A. PHR&A SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE IN THE EVENT DAMAGE OCCURS TO EQUIPMENT. EX. DRIVEWAY INSPECTION PORT 1 PER GROUNDING RING EX. OVERHEAD MONOPOLE -'/-10EX. 42' SELF SUPPORT TOWER OO EX. BUILDING \ 441 / r\ EX. INLET EX. DRIVEWAY i \PROP. 180' SELF / \$\PORT TOWER (F gR 0• \ / \\ qao. \ NOTES: 1. #2 BARE, TINNED, SOLID COPPER GROUND + 30" BELOW GRADE. 2. CADWELD TO FENCE POST 6'-12" ABOVE GRADE. 3. BOND GATE LEAF TO GATE POST WITH A FLEXIBLE, #2 INSULATED WELDING CABLE WIRE, CADWELDED TO EACH POST. 4. ICE BRIEGE 20'OR LESS, GROUND SUPPORT POLES AT BOTH ENDS. ICE BRIDGE OVER 20' GROUND SUPPORT POLES AT BOTH ENDS AND ONE POLE IN THE MIDDLE. 5. GROUND TO ICE BRIDGE SUPPORTS TO BE CADWELDED. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TO BE /6 STRANDED GREEN INSULATED. OINSPECTION PORT AGROUND ROD - 5/8"xB' ■ CADWELD CONNECTION T GROUNDING PLAN E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. FUTURE LOCATION OF METERBOARD THREE (3) TAILS (TYP O EACH LEG) GROUND RING 18" (MIN) (i) BUSS BAR CLEAR FROM EDGE OF (1) TOWER LEG CONCRETE FOUNDATION (1) SPARE GROUND ROD � 1D'-D" c/c (TYP) GROUND BAR LOCATED 1'-2' BELOW TRANSITION MOUNT DIRECTLY TO TOWER INSPECTION PORT MP TWO PER TOWER) MONOPOLE TOWER TAILS FOR BUILDING/ PAD GROUND RING 2 TOWER GROUNDING PLAN E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. NOTE: ADDITIONAL GROUND BAR IS REQUIRED AT MID POINT IF COAX CABLE EXCEED 200' (TO BE MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO TOWER). GROUND BAR LOCATED V-4' ABOVE TRANSITION MOUNT DIRECTLY TO TOWER COAX CABLE GROUND KIT COAX CABLE COAX CABLE GROUND KIT �-TO EQUIPMENT CABINET (2) #2 TINNED GROUND LEADS TO GROUNDING RING TOWER GROUND RING s ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAM E-1 SCALE: N.T.S. FROM METERBOARD (PENDING LOCATION) GRADE CADWELDGROUND RING #2 AWG BCW (TINNED) ROUND ROD Dr OPPERWELD 8"0 x 10'-0" LONG " MIN. SPACING BETWEEN RODS 3 GROUNDING ROD DETAIL E-j SCALE: N.T.S. FINISH GRADE 6" PVC PLUG .'116" PVC CPLG. (THRD.) z I j2 SOLID TEST LOOP NOTCH SIDES OF 6" PVC SCH 40 N CADWELD PIPE TO ALLOW EXIT.ENTRANCE OF GROUND RING 6" CLR. TYP, I OUND RING TRENCH BOTTOM c4�rT'/10' GROUND ROD a INSPECTION PORT E-j SCALE: N.T.S. )JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 -19- 6 z SjONAL 0 NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. Pose ORi, 6— 956 SMummn, VA. 24402 1-869-E16-7436 ALL DRAWNGS NA WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED H004 ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR ! A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED. USED OR DISCLOSED NTHOUT THE MITTEN CONSENT OF PHR k A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 08/06/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REN90N5 NO. DATE Qi 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS 11 PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLED FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AMLIATES. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWNG AND/OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FDRBIODEN WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, DRAWN 0Y: J. FLAXWN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAME WAS H I NGTON GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 ICEBRIDGE 3TX 2TX 1TX YEL-I BL-1 RD-1 3RX/TX 2RX/TX 1RX/TX YEL-2 BL-2 RD-2 0 0 0 COAXIAL CABLE W/ STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD CABLE HANGER 5/8" DIA. THREADED ROD W/ NUTS AND OVERHEAD WASHERS CABLE SUPPORT ® 4'-0" O.C. MAX. ROD TO EXTEND 1/2" MAX. BELOW CABLE SUPPORT NOTE: VIEW -BACK TO EQUIPMENT LOOKING AT TOWER SECTION E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. J BLE TO ANTENNA ANDREW WEATHERPROOFING KIT ANDREW COAX CABLE GROUNDING CLAMP KIT GROUND CONDUCTOR LE TO BTS COAX CABLE GROUND E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. LEGEND: TIN PLATED COPPER GROUND BAR 1/4" X 4" X 12" MIN. HANGER LIGHTER PROTECTION. P/N TGB 14412CIGBE . HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION. 2. - 5/8" LOCKWASHERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3015-B OR EQUIVALENT. 3. - WALL MOUNTING BRACKET, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. A-6056 OR EQUIVALENT. 4. - 5/e-11 X 1" H.H.C.S. BOLT, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3012-1 OR EQUIVALENT. 5. - GROUND BAR SHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS REQUIRED PLUS PROVIDE 50X SPARE CAPACITY. GROUND BAR SCALE: N.T.S. COMPRESSION GROUND LUG TO BE BURNOY OR EQUAL, SIZE PER TABLE. SS BOLT k NUT W/ LOCK GROUND CONDUCTOR WASHERS (TYP) SEE TABLE GROUND CONDUCTOR TABLE WIRE SIZE LUG A BOLT DIA. #2 YA2CL-2TC14 1/4" 12/D YA25-21-N 1/2" COMPRESSION LUG GROUND CONNECTION E-2 SCALE: N.T.S. I6 AWG FROM ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT AND SUPPORT MAST, BRACKET, ETC. GROUND BAR ON WALL OR AT ANTENNA MAST 0 ®® u SEE ALSO ® ® 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 ig CAD WELD CAD WELD #2 AWG TO GROUND ONLY ONLY BAR OR GROUND RING GROUND WIRE INSTALLATION Et 2 TO GROUND BAR SCALE: N.T.S. v JOHN D. REND a No. 32989 SjONAL �� 0'��ewAH Ltd. Post Off" 60" 966 ....... ; VA. 24402 1-666-66-7436 U n p a� ai o d� p o m mU G 6 � N p CK i a Imo Ln O m esro C: p 4 tN mEC v�i ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR t A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED MTHOUT 1HE RRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR 3 A RELEASE DATE D9/29/02 06/1)6/02 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL REN510N5 N0. 1341E 7/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS m PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLW FOR USE By THE 000 AND ITS AFFILIATES REPROOUCTON OR USE OF THIS DRAMNG ANO/OR THE N FORMATION CONTAINED N IT G FORBIDDEN MFFHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE DWNER. DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAME WASHINGTON GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-1 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 I B'-0.1 PLAN VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. a Wa 5O Ln — � 0.W am I m? I f It N ' `v N O 18• TYP. CONC. 0 I i METER BOARD ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. "INISHED GRADE IOTTOM ( TRENCH 11 NO! END VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. 0 METER BOARD ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. 8'-0' I TELCO MOUNTING AREA I N� 8" X 8' X 24' WIREWAY TELCO 4' PVC FROM TELCO SERVICE PVC (ELECT) TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT PER CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION NOTES_ 1. LUMBER IS INDICATED AS PRESERVATIVE TREATED OR IS SPECIFIED TO BE TREATED. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF AWPA C2 (LUMBER). 2. PRESSURE TREAT ABOVE GROUND ITEMS WITH WATERBORNE PRESERVATIVES TO A MINIMUM RETENTION OF 0.25 lb/tuft. (4.Okg/cu.m). AFTER TREATMENT, KILN LUMBER TO MAXIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF 19 PERCENT. 3. PRESSURE TREAT WOOD MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH GROUND OF FRESHWATER WITH WATERBORNE PRESERVATIVE TO A MINIMUM RETENTION OF 0.40 Ib/cu.ft. (6.4 kg/cu.m) 4. LUMBER CUT AFTER TREATMENT, APPLY FIELD TREATMENT COMPLYING WITH AWPA M4 TO CUT SURFACE. S. ALL BOARDS TO BE PRE —DRILLED TO PREVENT SPLITTING, B. 16 PENNY —GALVANIZED, SPIRAL NAILS, THREE (3) PER BOARD/6x6 POST __ _ .._......__ .....EAD TOP VIEW NIPPLE BETWEEN WIREWAYS SCALE: N.T.S. SQUARE D METER- PAK MP642GO 4-2-1/2'x 6' NIPPLE W/ MEYERS HUB 12' X 12" X 36' ELECTRIC WIREWAY - 4' PVC FROM UTILITY SERVICE POLE OR XFMR CAP 2' ABOVE FIN. GRADE (SPARE) 4" PVC FROM UTILITY SERVICE POLE OR XFMR TELCO AND ELECTRIC SIDE SCALE: N.T.S. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1 6' x 6' x 14' PT POST 2 ec 2 2' x 8' x 10' PT BOARDS 21 eD 3 16 PENNY —GALVANIZED, SPIRAL NAILS 2 lb 4 CONCRETE 15 Cu. ft. t 5 2" X 8' X 6' PT BOARD 2 ea. 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIER / COMMENTS 1 SQUARE D METER PAK #MP64200 2 SPECTX TRANSFER SWITCH/SURGE 3 WIREWAYS (ALL SIZES) 4 PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER 5 CONDUIT (ALL SIZES) 6 CONDUIT FITTINGS k HARDWARE 7 CONDUIT NIPPLES (ALL SIZES) 8 WIRE FOR ALL CONNECTIONS 9 LIGHT CONTROLLER(S) k SO CABLE 10 ALARM MONITORING SYSTEM ENCLOSURE 11 RFE MANUAL ENCLOSURE 12 TELCO DEMARC JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 6% srONAL TELCO DEMARK MOUNTING AREA 0 END VIEW TO GROUND RING�x 72' SCALE: N.T.S. WIREWAY ELECTRIC 2-1/2' DNA. NIPPLE IN FROM TELCO SERVICE 2-1/2' CIA. NIPPLE OUT TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT 8' X 8' X 24' WIREWAY TELCO FINISHED GRADE CADWELO TO NEAREST FENCE POST 4' PVC FROM SERVICE W/3-1' INTERDUCTS PVC (TELCO) TO CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT PER CUSTOMER SPEC. TOWER LIGHTING CONTROL SIDE SCALE: N.T.S. (wneRI2AH Ltd. Pml an« Sox 356 Sl untnn, VA. 24402 I-aea-ale-I436 ALL DRAYWM AND VTTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR A A AND MAT NOT BE DUPUCATED, USED OR DNSCLOSED MTHWT THE ARITTEN CONSENT OF PHR NL A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 05/05/02 PRELIMINARY R VWNS N0 DATE © 7/02/02 REVISED PER CDMMENTS m m PROPERTY OF THE D*4 R. fT IS PRDDUCED SOLEL FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND ITS AFPUATES REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRMNO AND/DR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT IS FDRWDE1 WITHCUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE DINNER, DRAWN BY: J. FLAXMAN CHECKED BY: J. RENC sli NMIE WAS H I NGTO N GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILL.ANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TITLE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER E-2 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATION 1, FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT SERVICES FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK AS INDICATED IN ACCORD W1TH PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. COORDINATE WITH WORK OF ALL OTHER TRADES. FURNISH AND INSTALL AL SUPPLEMENTARY OR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND DEVICES TO SECURE ALL COMPLETE INSTALLATION 2. FOR EXACT LOCATION OF BUILDING ELEMENTS, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL OWC'S. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ARRANGEMENT OF ALL EXISTING SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 3. ALL EXTERIOR DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF, NEMA-3R. 4. PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORD NTH FOLLOWING CODES: 1. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODES, REGULATIONS AND OROIANCES. 2. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC). 1996 EDITION. 3. ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 5. USE UL LABELED ELECTRICAL MATERIALS WHERE USTING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR MATERIALS OR DEVICES IN QUESTION. 6. SAFETY SWITCH: HEAVY DUTY TYPE IN NEMA-I IN DAMP OR NET LOCATIONS. 7. CONDUIT: ALL ELECTRIC METALUC TUBING CONNECTORS SHALL BE COMPRESSION TYPE (NO POT -METAL AND SET SCREW), MIN. 3/4 IN. USE FLEXIBLE METAL (STEEL) CONDUIT FOR CDNNECT10N TO ALL VIBRATING EQUIPMENT AND CASEWORK. 8. WIRE IN CONDUIT SZED /10 AWG AND SMALLER SHALL BE SOLID COPPER WIT TYPE THWN/THHN 600 VOLT INSULATION. THE MIN. CONDUCTOR SIZE SHALL BE NO 12 AWG. CONTROL WRING MAY BE NO. 14 AWG. A GROUND PARE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CIRCUITS. WIRE OF SIZES 8 AWG OR LARGER SHALL BE STRANDED COPPER WITH TYPE XHHW. THW OR THHN 600 VOLT INSULATION. SPUCES FOR WIRE SIZES OF /B AK OR LARGER SHALL BE SPLIT -BOLT CONNECTORS WITH SUFFICIENT LAYERS OF TAPE TO EQUAL INSULATION OR WIRE BEING SPLICED. 9. PROVIDE NAMEPLATES ON ALL PIECES OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS, CIRCUIT BREAKERS, DISCONNECT SWITCHES, PANELBOARDS, ALL PULL BOXES. NAMEPLATESAHALL BE ENGRAVED WITH WHITE LETTERS ON A BLUE FIELDS, 2-1/2'X3/4- WITH I/4' HIGH (MIN.)-SETONFLEX- TO WITHSTAND EXTREME INDOOR AND OUTDOOR TEMPERATURES. PLATE SHALL HAVE PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE BACKING SUITABLE FOR OUTDOORS. 10. THE CABINET SHALL BE PROVIDED AS A PREFABRICATED PACKAGED UNIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT AND CABLING FOR A COMPLETE JOB, 11. ALL TERMINATIONS SHALL BE LISTED AND IDENTIFIED FOR USE WITH 75' C RATED CONDUCTORS. 12. POWER COMPANY OR THE CONTRACTOR YMERE REQUIRED BY THE POWER COMPANY, SHALL TERMINATE THE POWER CABLES(SUPPUED BY THE POWER CO-) AT THE UTIUTY METER LOCATED ON THE CABINET. 13. CONDUIT LINES SHALL HAVE A CONTINUOUS SLOPE DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM THE CABINET TO THE PROPERTY LINE SO THAT WATER WILL FLOW AWAY FROM THE CABINET_ TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED ALONG STRAIGHT LINES BEFORE CONDUITS ARE LAID SO THE ELEVATION CAN BE ADJUSTED, IF NECESSARY, TO AVOID UNSEEN OBSTRUCTIONS. MANUFACTURED BENDS SHALL HAVE A MIN. RAO. 36" FOR CONDUITS. 14. BENDS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS 36" FOR CONDUITS. ALL CONDUITS ENTERING THE SHELTER SHALL BE SEALED WITH SEALANTS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED FOR USE WITH THE CABLE INSULATION, SHIELD, OR OTHER COMPONENTS. A BEAD OF SILICONE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND ALL CONDUIT PENETRATIONS INTO THE CABINET. 15. METER SOCKET TO BE SUPPLIED BY OR AS PER POWER COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. 16. GROUND FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ANY UTIUTY RECEPTACLES. 17. WHITE/NEUTRAL, GREEN/GROUND. SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE SITE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. CABLE WORKS GFNFRAI NOTFc 1. ALL CABLE SHALL BE ANDREWS LDF SERIES WITH NF CONNECTIONS AT BOTH ENDS. 2. ALL JUMPERS AT THE ANTENNA TO BE LDF SERIES (NO SUPERFLEX), 6-FOOT, T/2-NM x DM. 3. ALL JUMPERS AT THE EQUIPMENT TO BE LOF SERIES W-6' MAX., 1/2'NM x 1/2'NM (SUPERFLEX ALLOWED IN SHELTER). 4. ALL EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF TAPED. 5. ALL GROUND KITS SHALL BE 2 HOLE LUG (NO SCREW -ON LUGS ALLOWED). 6. ALL COAX CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE, WHERE POSSIBLE. NO HANGERS WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN CABLES ARE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE. 7. ALL COAX CABLES RUN ON A WAVEGUIDE LADDERS, ON STANDOFF, ON THE EXTERIOR OF A MONOPOLE. ON A GUYED TOWER, ON A SELF SUPPORT TOWER OR ON A POLE SHALL BE SUPPORTED EVERY FOUR (4) FEET. GENERAL NOTES TO EI FCTRICAI CONTRACTOR 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE (FURNISH AND INSTALL) ALL NECESSARY CONDUITS, WIRING AND OUTLET BOXES TO SUPPORT THE FURNISHED ITEMS. 2. PROVIDE HIRING IN CONDUIT IN ACCORDANCE PATH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND N.E.C. 3. FOR LOCATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET & ANTENNAS, SEE SITE PLAN. 4. COORDINATE IN ADVANCE ALL WORK TO BE DONE NTH POWER UTILITY CO. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ALL CONNECTIONS AND MAKING A COMPLETE OPERATIONAL SYSTEM AS APPROVED BY CROWN COMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATIVE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFER, COORDINATE, AND COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 7. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE THE FINAL CONNECTION WORK AND REQUIRED PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS TO COMPLETE THE POWER AND TELEPHONE CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. COORDINATE PATH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR EQUIPMENT CABINET. 8. PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR ORDERING OR ANY MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE EXISTING SERVICE VOLTAGE IS THE SAME VOLTAGE AS SHOWN FOR THE NEW EQUIPMENT. IF THE VOLTAGES ARE THE SAME, THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROCEED. IF DIFFERENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CROWN COMMUNICATIONS IMMEDIATELY AND OBTAIN FURTHER DIRECTION. 1.1 MATERIALS ALL GROUNDING WARE SHALL BE TIN COATED COPPER, Y 2/GREEN INSULATED WILL BE USED FOR EQ. GROUNDS TO RING. - #2 AWG BARE STRANDED SOFT DRAWN COPPER CABLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWING. - LYNCOLE -XIT" GROUND RODS (REFER TO SECTION 2.1) - CAD WELD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM 1.2 GROUND RING PLACEMENT THE OUTSIDE GROUND RING SHALL BE PLACED AROUND THE STRUCTURE AT A DISTANCE OF ONE FOOT FROM THE FOUNDATION AT A DEPTH OF TWO FEET OR SIX INCHES BELOW FROST UNE, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER. 1.3 LIMITS OF RENO WADI R IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE WIRE CONNECTING THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE GROUND RINGS BE AS STRAIGHT AS POSSIBLE. WITH NO TURN SHORTER THAN A ONE FOOT RADIUS. CEVIATINC FROM THESE GUIOEUNES WOULD ADD INDUCTIVE REACTANCE. WHICH WILL EFFECTIVELY DECOUPLE THE TWO SYSTEMS IF LIGHTNING ENERGY IS INTRODUCED. THIS IS DUE TO THE VERY FAST RISE TIMES ENCOUNTERED WITH LIGHTNING STRIKES. AVOID ALL 90' TURNS. 1.4 CONNECTION METHODS ALL EXTERIOR & BURIED CONNECTIONS WALL CAD WELD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM. CONNECTIONS TO THE SKID ON METAL BUILDING MAY BE MADE WITH MECHANICAL. CONNECTORS. RF GROUND CONNECTIONS TO BUSS BAR WILL BE MECHANICAL CONNECTED 'NTH TWO HOLE LUGS. GROUND CONNECTION SHALL BE FREE OF DIRT, GREASE & PAINT. ALUMINUM WIRE MAY NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING AND SOLDER BONDS ARE PROHIBITED FOR ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS. L5 AS_PONER GROUNDING CONNECTIONS AT THE ON -SITE RISER POLE OR METER PEDESTAL THE AC. SERVICE NEUTRAL SHALL BE MECHANICALLY BONDED TO THE AC. SERVICE ENTRANCE GROUND AS SPECIFIED BY THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. ARTICLE 250, AND/OR APPROPRIATE LOCAL CODES. TWO GROUND RODS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THIS POINT, INDEPENDENTLY FROM THE GROUND RING. A SEPARATE AC SERVICE GROUND AND NEUTRAL SHALL THAN BE ROUTED AND CONNECTED TO THE MAIN DISCONNECT MOUNTED INSIDE OR ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE CABINET. THE GROUND ROO. BONDING AND DOWN CONDUCTORS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOYANC MINIMUM MATERIALS AND CONNECTION METHODS, ALL GROUND RODS SHALL BE 5/8- X 8' COPPERCLAD THE TOP OF THE ROOS SHALL BE BURIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'-6" (OR 6' BELOW THE FROST LINE WHICHEVER IS DEEPER). THE DOWN CONDUCTOR SHALL BE Y2 SOLID TINNED COPPER PARE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE GROUND ROD TO THE AC SERVICE NEUTRAL/GROUND BONGING. CONNECTION TO THE GROUND ROD SHALL BE CAD OR OTHER APPROVED EXOTHERMIC WELDING SYSTEM. CONNECTION TO THE NEUTRAL/GROUND BONDING SHALL BE MECHANICAL 1.6 COAXIAL/CABLE OROLJNnING THE NORMAL INSTALLATION GUIDELINE FOR ANTENNA COAXIAL/ CABLE GROUNDING PER TRANSMISSION LINE PER TOWER HEIGHT 15 AS FOLLOWS: 1. TONERS LESS THAN 200' USING AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER-3 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE: TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT PONT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT AND AT THE BUILDING PENETRATION. 2. TOWERS OVER 200' USING AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER -4 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE; TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER MIDDLE ATTACHMENT POINT, TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT AND AT THE BUILDING PENETRATION. 3. TOWERS LESS THAN 200' USING EXTERIOR CABINET'S-2 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE; TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT AND TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT. 4. TOWERS OVER 200' USING EXTERIOR CABINE7S-3 GROUNDING CONNECTIONS PER COAX CABLE; TOWER TOP ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-2' BELOW TRANSITION POINT, TOWER MIDDLE ATTACHMENT POINT AND TOWER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, 1-4' ABOVE TRANSITION POINT. 1.7 ANTENNA GROUNDING A. CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS ALL TOWER/ANTENNA GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CAOWELD. ALL BENDS IN THE TOWER GROUNDING SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1'. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE. GENERALLY A STRAIGHT UNE, B. ICE BRIDGE CAD WELD /2 SOLID TINNED COPPER 'AARE TO EACH PIPE SUPPORTING THE CABLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE IN THE FRONT/BACK AND MIDDLE IF OVER 20'. BOND TOGETHER EACH SECTION OF ICE BRIDGE USING #2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE CAD WELDED TO EACH SECTION. 1.8 EERIMETER FENCE ROUNDIN WEN INSTALLED, THE PERIMETER FENCE SHALL BE CONNECTED IN AT LEAST SIX PLACES TO THE MAIN EXTERIOR GROUND RING. CAD WELDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE CORNER METAWC 6' - 12" ABOVE FENCE POSTS AND THE TWO POSTS SUPPORTING THE GATE AND THE EXTERIOR GROUNDING RING USING p2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE. EACH GATE LEAF SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EACH GATEPOST USING 2/0 INSULATED WELDING CABLE CAD WELDED TO THE GATEPOST AND THE GATE LEAF FRAME. 3.2 TESTING A. CERTIFIED MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN AND SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO MAIN SERVICE UTIUTY GROUND. GROUND GRID RESISTANCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 OHMS. B. UPON COMPLETION OF THE GROUND INSTALLATION AND BEFORE CONNECTION TO THE PERMANENT FACIUTY POWER, THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AT HIS EXPENSE. A MEASUREMENT OF THE NEW EARTH GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. THE TESTING SHALL UTILIZE AN EARTH RESISTANCE METER AND BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IEEE STANDARD 3 POINT FALL OF POTENTIAL METHOD. C. NOTIFY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVES THREE DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TESTING DATE SO THEY MAY BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF TESTING. D. THE GROUNDING SYSTEM SHALL PASS A 'SIXTY TWO PERCENT FALL -OF -POTENTIAL - TEST. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE TEST CONDUCTORS SHALL BE 150 FEET. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A CURVE OF RESISTANCE VS. DISTANCE PREPARED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IF THE MEASURED RESI5TANCE IS ABOVE 5 OHMS. N I (_)JOHN D. RENO No. 32989 ZSIONAL NANDOAH ower Service, Ltd. POST OIfl¢ Sox 9S6 Si4un-, VA. 24402 1-I8E-816-7436 ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTNNEE HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF PHR A A AND MAT NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WTHOUI THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PHR t A RELEASE DATE 05/29/02 OB/DB/D2 PRELIMINARY 07/02/02 REVISED FINAL RCN510N6 40. DATE Q1 07/02/02 REVISED PER COMMENTS PROPERTY RS THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLE. FOR USE BY THE 00" AND ITS AFFILIATES, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING AND/OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED AR IT IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER DRAWN BY: J. FLAWAN CHECKED BY: J. RENO SITE NAME WAS HI NGTON GAS SITE NUMBER SITE ADDRESS 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 SHEET TTRE ELECTRICAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER E-3 PLOT SCALE: 1-20 Section 106 Review Washington Gas Tower 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia ECS Project No. 2322-A Dated May 14, 2008 ECS MID -ATLANTIC, LLC May 14, 2008 Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental - Facilities Mr. Marc Holma ' Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 ECS Project No. 2322-A Subject: Review of Historic Places or Resources Washington Gas Tower 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma: ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC (ECS) is currently involved in a proposed tower extension on an existing 120-foot monopole cellular tower project located in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The 120-foot monopole communications tower is proposed to be extended by 60-feet to the new height of 180-feet at the subject site. Attached are the Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet, FCC Form 621, and the project area as indicated on a U.S.G.S. quadrangle map. An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic. Resources Data Share System (DHR-DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system. Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the V2 mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126, recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site, the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034- 0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site, the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feel �., the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE), which were listed on the NRHP. A previous architectural survey conducted by Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002, indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinity of the site. No archaeological sites were identified within the immediate vicinity of the proposed tower site, which would suffer a direct impact from the proposed tower site construction. This tower has previously undergone SHPO review and the site was detenmined to have an affect on historical properties in the vicinity of the site; however, the affect would not be adverse. A copy of the previous determination is attached. We are asking for concurrence that this tower extension will not impact the surrounding area. We would appreciate your review of the Cell Tower Review Form, the Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet, FCC Form 621, the project area and the available information. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact me at (540) 362-2000. Sincerely, ' ECS MID-ATLA II LC lCaili Hutchison / ' Staff Environmental Scientist Heather N. McEI Environmental D 320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F, Roanoke, VA 24019 - (540) 362-2000 - FAX (540) 362-1202 - www.ecslimited.com Aberdeen, MD • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlottesville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City, MD* Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Virginia Beach, VA • Waldorf, MD • Williamsburg, VA • Winchester, VA • York, PA * .ate,:.,,, .. h' Department of Historic Resources Cell Tower Review Form Please complete one form for each proposed tower. All attachments such as the project map, results of archives search (including inventory forms), and photographs including photosimulations of any listed or eligible National Register of Historic Places sites must accompany form. Review does not begin until all information is complete. I. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Project Name (one or two word identifier) Washington Gas Tower 2. Project Location (City or County) Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia 3. Carrier (Sprint, Verizon, SunCom, etc.) Not Applicable 4. Preparer's Name Applicant's Name ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC -for- Washington Gas Company Kaili Hutchison (contact) Mr. Lynn Koerner 5. Preparer's Address Applicant's Address 5320 Peters Creek Road Suite F 3126 South Ox Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 6. Height (in feet) & Type of Tower (lattice, monopole) to be constructed An existing 120-foot monopole tower is proposed to be increased in height by 60-feet for a new tower height of 180-feet. H. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT (APE) AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES: 7. Were an, properties located during the archives search that are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or are eligible for listing on the NRHP? Xes 110 An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic Resources Data Share Svstem (DHR-DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the % mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126 recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984 not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site the Barton - Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and 4034-0983 not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980 not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE) which were listed on the NRHP. A previous architectural review conducted by Cultural Resources Inc (CRI) dated July 23 2002 indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinjty of the site. This space for DHR response only: Additional information needed: Based on the information provided, we find that: No Historic properties will be affected t No Adverse effect Adverse effect Signature Phone No.(804) 367-2323, ext. Date DHR File No. 1 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 ' Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Submitted for collocations that have been excluded from Section 106 Review by the Collocation Agreement or the Nationwide Agreement. Where a collocation is to be completed but no submission will be made to a SHPO or THPO due to the applicability of one or more exclusions, the Applicant should retain in its files documentation of the basis for each exclusion should a question arise as to the Applicant's compliance with Section 106. The CO Submission Packet is to be used only for the collocation of an antenna or I' antennas on an existing communications tower or a non -tower structure. New tower constructions that are subject to Section 106 review should be submitted using the New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet (FCC Form 620). General Instructions: Form CO Fill out the answers to Questions 1-5 and provide the requested attachments. Attachments should be numbered and provided in the order described below. For ease of processing, provide the Applicant's Name, Applicant's Project Name, and Applicant's Project Number in the lower right hand corner of each page of Form CO and attachments.5 1. Applicant Information Full Legal Name of Applicant: Washington Gas Compan Name and Title of Contact Person: Mr. Lynn Koerner Address of Contact Person (including Zip Code): 3126 South Ox Road, Edinbura. Virainia 22824 Phone: 540-335-0030 Fax: 214-594-5985 E-mail address: Lynn Ka-shentel.net 2. Applicant's Consultant Information Full Legal Name of Applicant's Section 106 Consulting Firm: ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5 Some attachments may contain photos or maps on which this information can not be provided. Applicant's Name: Washington Gas Company/ECS t Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Project Number: 2322-A FCC Form 621 January 2005 ' CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Name of Principal Investigator: Heather N. McElvery Title of Principal Investigator: Environmental Department Manager Investigator's Address: 5320_Peters Creek Road, Suite F City: Roanoke State: Virginia Zip Code: 24019 Phone: 540-362-2000 Fax: 540-362-1202 E-mail Address: hnmcelverV(a-)- ecslimited.com Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards? YES / NO Areas in which the Principal Investigator meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards: N/A Other "Secretary of the Interior qualified" staff who worked on the Submissions Packet (provide name(s) as well as well as the area(s) in which they are qualified): Ms. Kimberely S. Zawacki of Cultural Resources Inc (CRI) previously conducted an architectural historical review for subiect site when the tower was in the process of being constructed and is Secretary of the Interior Qualified 3. Collocation and Site Information ■ a. Street Address of Site: 350 Hillandale Lane ' City or Township: Winchester County / Parish: Frederick State: VA Zip Code: 22602 b. Nearest Cross Roads: Highway 37 / I' 6 The Professional Qualification Standards are available on the cultural resources webpage of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior: <http://www.cr.nps.gov/local-law/arch stnds 9.htm>. The Nationwide Agreement requires use of Secretary -qualified professionals for identification and evaluation of historic properties within the APE for direct effects, and for assessment of effects. The ' Nationwide Agreement encourages, but does not require, use of Secretary -qualified professionals to identify historic properties within the APE for indirect effects. See Nationwide Agreement, §§ VI.D.1.d, VI.D.1.e, VI.D.2.b, VI.E.5. Applicant's Name: Washington Gas Company/ECS Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Project Number: 2322-A ' FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours c. NAD 83 Latitude/Longitude coordinates (to tenth of a second): N 39° 07' 32.1 "; W 78° 11' 6.60" d. Tower or non -tower structure height above ground level, including proposed collocation:? 180 feet; meters ' e. Description of antennas to be collocated (e.g., type, number, shape, dimensions, color): The existing 120-foot monopole tower is proposed to be extended 60-feet to the height of ' 180-feet. f. Approximate height of collocation above ground level: 180 feet; meters; if antennas to be located on different levels, describe their placement. g. Structure. This Form CO pertains to collocation of antenna(s) on: [ ] a communications tower or [X] a non -tower structure (check one). If a non -tower structure, briefly describe the structure: The collocation is proposed to be placed on an existing monopole tower. h. If the antennas will be collocated on a communications tower, check the appropriate box: guyed lattice tower self -supporting -lattice monopole other (briefly describe tower) i. Structure Completion. Indicate the date that the existing communications tower or non -tower structure was built (date on which construction activities ended): ' The existing 120-foot monopole tower was constructed in 2002 j. Section 106 Review. Has the communications tower or non -tower structure been ' the subject of SHPO/THPO review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act? If so, identify the company that made the submission, the date it was submitted, and the SHPO/THPO reference number. This is an existing 120-foot monopole tower and has undergone previous SHPO review (DHR File No. 2002-1165). k. Based on the Applicant's research (see Attachments 8 and 9), is the existing ' communications tower or.non-tower structure listed or eligible for listing in the National Register? Yes XD No 7 Include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods. Applicant's Name: Washington Gas Company/ECS Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Project Number: 2322-A FCC Form 621 January 2005 Lynn Koerner Site Acquisition and Project Development 3126 South Ox Road Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone: 540-335-0030 E-Mail: lynnk@shentel.net CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 4. Current Status of Collocation:8 a. [X] Construction and/or installation not yet commenced; ' b. [ ] Construction and/or installation commenced on [date] ;or, c. [ ] Construction and/or installation commenced on [date] and completed 5. Applicant's Determination of Effect: a. Direct Effects (check one): No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects ("APE") for direct effects; ii. [ ] "No effect" on Historic Properties in APE for direct effects; iii. [X] "No adverse effect" on Historic Properties in APE for direct effects; iv. [ ] "Adverse effect" on one or more Historic Properties in APE for direct effects. b. Visual Effects (check one): No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects ("APE") for visual effects; ii. [ ] "No effect" on Historic Properties in APE for visual effects; iii. [X] "No adverse effect" on Historic Properties in APE for visual effects; iv. [ ] "Adverse effect" on one or more Historic Properties in APE for visual effects. e Failure to provide the Submission Packet and complete the review process under Section 106 of the NHPA prior to beginning construction or other installation activities may violate Section 110(k) of the NHPA and the Commission's rules. See Section X of the Nationwide Agreement. Applicant's Name: Washington Gas Company/ECS Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Project Number: 2322-A i FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Certification and Signature I certify that all representations on this Form CO (FCC Form 621) and the accompanying complete. Heather N. McElvery Printed Name C� ate Environmental Department Manager Title WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACIiMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1) AND/ OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). Applicant's Name: Washington Gas Company/ECS Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Project Number: 2322-A FCC Form 621 January 2005 Attachment 1 Resumes HEATHER N. McELVERY Environmental Department Manager EDUCATION: B.S. Geology, Radford University, 2000 YEARS EXPERIENCE: 8 TRAINING: Historic Section 106 Evaluations Wetlands Delineations RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: • Numerous Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Facilities — Phase I Environmental Assessments • Numerous Cellular Tower Sites — Phase I Environmental Assessments, NEPA Screenings and Section 106 Reviews — VA, WV, NC • Numerous Photograph Simulations of Tower Sites for SHPO Review and Zoning — VA, WV, NC • Virginia Community College System — EIRs EXPERIENCE: Ms. McElvery is an Assistant Environmental Department Manager with ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC in Roanoke, Virginia and responsibilities include conducting field reconnaissance, historical and regulatory research, interviews, and report preparation. She has conducted Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, reviews pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and reviews pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Nationwide Programmatic Agreement - Section 106 — National Historic Preservation Act for new and collocated cellular towers/antennas in the states of Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina. Ms. McElvery received professional training in Historical Resources pursuant to Section 106 in September 2000. Representative sampling of key assignments and experience: ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS — Ms. McElvery has performed or provided oversight on numerous Phase I environmental assessments in the states of Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina to determine environmental liabilities for Real Property transfers. She has experience performing preliminary environmental site assessments to evaluate on -site and off -site concerns which may impact the site. Scope of work typically includes performance of an on -site and off -site reconnaissance, reviewing regulatory lists, obtaining and reviewing aerial photographs, topographic maps, wetlands inventory maps, Fire Insurance Maps, city directories and other published information. • NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (NEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS AND SCREENINGS — Ms. McElvery has conducted or provided oversight on numerous NEPA Screenings to address federal and state wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, endangered species, historic places, Indian religious sites, floodplains and surface features (e.g., wetlands and floodways) in the states of Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina. She has also conducted Environmental Impact Reviews for Capital Projects in Virginia. • FCC NATIONWIDE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT — SECTION 106 REVIEW — NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT - Ms. McElvery has conducted or provided oversight of numerous Section 106 reviews for both new and collocated cellular towers/antennas in the states of Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina, specifically consultation with local, state and federal agencies in the attempt to identify and keep impacts to historical structures at a minimum, through the use of precise site reconnaissance, mapping, photographs and photo simulations. • PHOTOGRAPH SIMULATIONS — Ms. McElvery has prepared photograph simulations for cellular tower i sites as part of historic impact reviews and for planning/zoning purposes in the states of Virginia, West " Virginia and North Carolina. • WETLANDS - Ms. McElvery has conducted wetland delineation projects on various sites, including commercial sites, industrial sites and institutional sites, and U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers verification. KAILI HUTCHISON Staff Environmental Scientist EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Policy, Roanoke College, 2005 YEARS EXPERIENCE: 3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: • Commercial Phase I ESAs — Virginia • Industrial Phase I ESAs — Virginia • Institutional Phase I ESAs - Virginia Industrial Landfill Groundwater Sampling • Various Gasoline Station Groundwater Sampling • Cellular Tower Sites — Phase I Environmental Assessments and NEPA Screenings • Phase II Assessments EXPERIENCE: Ms. Hutchison is a Staff Environmental Scientist with ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC in Roanoke, Virginia and responsibilities include conducting field reconnaissance, historical and regulatory research, interviews, and report preparation. She has conducted Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, field drilling, sampling and groundwater sampling. She has planned and executed environmental assessments on sites ranging from undeveloped sites to large industrial facilities. Representative sampling of key assignments and experience: ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS — Ms. Hutchison has performed numerous Phase I environmental assessments to determine environmental liabilities for Real Property transfers. She has experience performing preliminary environmental site assessments to evaluate on -site and off -site concerns which may impact the site. Scope of work typically includes performance of an on -site and off -site reconnaissance, reviewing regulatory lists, obtaining and reviewing aerial photographs, topographic maps, wetlands inventory maps, Fire Insurance Maps, city directories and other published information. • GROUNDWATER SAMPLING — Ms. Hutchison has conducted groundwater sampling at landfills and underground storage tank sites. Sampling has followed established groundwater monitoring plans. • NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (NEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS AND SCREENINGS — Ms. Hutchison has conducted NEPA Screenings to address federal and state wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, endangered species, historic places, Indian religious sites, floodplains and surface features (e.g., wetlands and floodways). • PHOTOGRAPH SIMULATIONS — Ms. Hutchison has prepared photograph simulations for cellular tower sites as part of historic impact reviews and for planning/zoning purposes. • DRILLING AND SAMPLING — Ms. Hutchison has supervised drilling of soil borings, conducted soil sampling, and performed soil classifications on various projects. Attachment 2 Additional Site Information Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site in conjunction with the proposed collocation and related facilities. Use this attachment to provide additional details needed to provide a full and accurate description of any structural alterations, additions, or other construction activities that will take place to complete the collocation. The subject site currently consists of a 120-foot monopole tower, equipment shed and asphalt paved access road that is part of the Washington Gas Company. The current tower is proposed to be extended 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. Please refer to the attached original plans for the construction of the 180-foot tower. It should be noted that the tower was constructed to the height of 120-feet, not 180-feet as the original plans suggested. It should also be noted that the former towers identified on the plans, have been dismantled and removed from site. 11 NANDOAH i ower Service, Ltd. •ic :n �R �aoRo•B,.w .east n�rB» nsw. •M+soawm, .Krcw sawn rea s.sssrr:R sift sern,i+caus » »o,.» •�•t u.¢ ROr Kl Rn wi to srAat Ba".s ers aBor°MG ,a]•vL aaoe auoaw armwo � ro " anmi o•scrtR ow �».,; io»�i "'w niiecr Via. MR.ERh MB9URE ,M•1tD o�M �.orn Oo.NE D+ o�� eauwr aRtra»c sro snrR CI.UF' CtIC, Q�tyyyr flLOwDt [aM�M,nr Sb SWIM BsrfC SMCa1Ure» s+aRM1[Ts trrEE m sMEt �� S,R11aRAal EP.s Evl t*T1ar riuoR � r u�a•sdr nBM tppr �� � sass�o-rnv raP nMU! M Q v LRMa 4�'R � GKQ (p) t�latltrt[tMMalaR a�SyinMi eD''°a�• U•a c U�MDM1EInw� R,[0 W 1 .tA�N� ww nfr0 »ouRI w�ms K ui•iMG, grtraa • .e aoRD�B..�a WlaabF •ro .a,BR� RRRaaDr e iro � Raa os. wrawro» ,e(s) a�naoR90° °ouRanl i uo t a aRrt+ t�»f MG �.srtt �Cw`�rMµ �u ! RRaRtRn rvf • av •CTNfR / MRe[R Q M•rsnM S� OETM •tRITRa m `� RarL ® � Btwrox RERRFucE aao» B.aatEx ® MYED Waf � SCRB» MStAEta:E vaota R.RreR: __ _ R.mw oMtc,o. RwwtR. - _ out APPROVEDBV WASHINGTON GAS S1 v+K w.M[� rnw¢Ev sxw•cn:» us *.». w can e zzae.a�Bstm .+Rr aS,E,... Z. a , atED eaaR . Dui w e aea w. nv fswl 9J1-i avow • [ttvrow - PPROVAL 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22602 ll - �40HN D. RENO No. 32989 9 S J9-0Z Sri/ ih1'f�•k'.tl � ii; . � r \. `���\ 110[ft ae}MagY1 Dr aplePpt[ 1pe(R RN• RC-LOael0lr o< oeR .ao oRa•o MARE asam•Bs ouv¢ r �O�n a � ra �.. a A t M m m—E " b SM aw& aaro[ nRc w wE a .aB w,a see M PROJECT DESCRIPTION DIRECTIONS TO WE SGmflmE PPROVAL PROVAL M 2D H Dave Sernce, Ltd. � aH �6 Et au •u.a3 r• aattEn wREw mrrnc 1m1 R x 1WIY of M11 a aM Yl IN t ORt !R 1®R lBE® anbn x aam,n EL®rl 6 Me .. eerae< wrt m/b/eR m/m/ot RerleMMr 0]/D/Nl I e[stsn NBL aebDB � sa art /19/P! 11[\AID PFA CWtN15 MT44h e x owt rt B rf Wa® 0II qe u5t N x Oaap rae IA antllRi a[R'DDIat•a OA Y6L 6 R16 euaNv aa•(a• waanaBlaRl taRDRm » n B ibaam Rpn M apald fUla3ge a n[ D•[R De,MN [n: J. FLA*" CreaRp M J. P[iJ0 fM — WASHINGTON GAS rrt Been vrt .�oiv_ 050 HRIANDpIE LANE WINCHESTER, VA 22802 9Q1 ,rrla TITLE SHEET srm RuwEn T-t nm suu: ,-to GENERAL NOTES WNL3 NE Ibr m A( SVLFT. PESE NM6 AR[ NIDA[n ro % aKwlsssAR I. CNLY. IIIE -CAP nOC iFR d r �pReNy6 SWIL wCIWE EUEMSNML WIHWS. aER1Y NE Ew*EPEPIrdr L �.s NN :RaEcr m cawl[TE nF wRl. L. IxaOreAwro SdAIIrteA; A H0. iN[ mxM1bClOR SHaL s8r Tx[ +oB SIIf ANo 9ELaIE sEtAIAN K ELECNrJ[ MSTAlUnd3 M9 51WL 0� KCOPOfA M0.1bx. CDOM[I0p sN-t s(piY Kl iF20 mMFERAAS AEA wDVBpb d »( AB SrR %mYHeu Ywr »DAx .s +ur ho d Mf mxsNurnd DOCIPFYR xtq-P mEsmlEcnd °UNst cw BE KmralBLo M aEOPx BEiLRE PBW[Cl LUNAGD R Nn soot D'SwEwRs[Y PELAAORA: M DLrtPAI'r OOOTp15, EYSma CiroRpq. wD d OC9d whxf. M mNwctd .aMtl Bf d �� � awr�xes LURYrnbx P.aR m =»ac[mNc wm n< xoa LOEr AxD u.mrAEs NTr NwrndfRs mwF.00F:nars vxlEx PstoKrctANiir anFp-[r NauTv, d -N[Y[ Lace mD¢ d afCPITxNi TNF Af�pCr. rOR SwLL »Si JOe Sr2 10 pEs-w EIEG�NYf S. A wapx SFMf.-. E m COHeeaNf sstLyDIRL, BVr NOI l'YRD i0. F.EC14Ul35FMY[ AP:a CALL moxgASnd. i[IDIaEr/RAgO E0.R+rAEECE 4sDUi. SILGYYArpS, PD»dewxC[. aSUVAiax Ax0 1NER HIEAI LOCAIM ARE ro BE AaPRw[p w PWFR 4ANY:ER. ME COMMI Uf vIAIE x .[srDAmel< ID. com.nnEc Ns YRN «M Mt .ara Aw arA..ltE REOEHFD ar oRLBs REEARn zD vD FOUPYfM. wDAx P[NONECB AM wAh-ALs sEYu IE[[-. M! NrEs• OMS ,PAD! nANDNavos. AnPI11N srANDNp. CQ60RY fYM A1y APPLG'BIF CODES. REQIAOORpN%KEs tIA'Aslt ARSOtIT.N. ImrRACIGP S1uLL EM Nl YOrKFs Axp f YfLv »ml Mi uws. aEoN �N+DN�NEc»iR t�l- wo�M aRxPs R w PLE-1c NrTrdBr A AAgA'AL1�1eE %Si4ll0 PFR Nf.L Na N KLWnNCf fOx ME C[U6, aRDIxW[ts ANp sP41Y AIE PCQYA1d6LOGV. YA Sn0[ •MB.cIYwY O. caMaACld SHALL nRD•pC tDxTIM10g SVP(NIS10R -NEE Ab sUBcpxrRAGrals d p ARF d rN FIB SnC No SNIRl fuPEJFSE AM CPFcf +EL RO,x fNO.draKmp swLL ff mnr aESPolgaE rd wE coNslNma Iw:s, xEnccs. RCIPR0VE3, YUFxCLs ANp PRm[dM6 RIO moPpwrwc Au Po,rarr3 R M IIpI UNOD M CDxiRKr. I I. � � �Q� � Erb Api+R�ilO KL �ICRxs R f�xC s`pJ[n .xpA 12 iortlolmi"s. i[awR"'4Nm �.eE w KGoa»s anN L»RORu elnnxc cove Nee) In. 11 COYlRACtOP � DwTf�:C w aAsc �xAPf�t�O PEuw. oONmKP IA W NAE SPpF1aAILNIS MppVaE RS Rot➢ MLK NN uL LKID d CN. APEnOrfO u aRAxa A.n sNDNics Aa[ ro m wd Exo P¢uLY R � DLvcx SSL�1 Y00 Y Mx6 N�iNimelRwRIfIW�il! oAm oCN+DME wOIN. PYD6tOs6 I (. �A�NYE r[DFNCMr LOU110rf5 fnx OwxEas K�RfSIXrATNE. o . FRw zuxnc6 un[s 01»LiNY xartD. Is�ntew ul s+rE.r: xEm AIe).lT AM,A c[cw. N+EAPD�11�yp �DEvas[ or wl pAR'1. OfTlt. MPIesSN AM [OSIosfM AEYO.ED axp xT R[f11[p PolAfmlG MC sYSO^IXn R itE OwIIR. [m. IF E w0.11LQ5 N A vMlFs N0 pR00Y gEAy PKi�l�Nr RESfpq SEE rd 1Nw1VfNG µE lYSTf»s Fq IEMTI N A Irsrt4 KCfwulE Or MC vRMCT w Plp¢r xw.c-0. �f. M fAN-Al CM,KrpR 6 RtSpD-Sdf rd NN1rY Tl COIGNULra+ PLwN m LL161Mh TE r-L%i cOFIOrtW R ME SPE. AA MLL B[ OOYE wTEP NC 91C - n1V01! [AN� °as yr IFK�DLSF�`n DR"�.ei;siu eE Paonoro ro .Rosa u.rcu Na JUIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02100 i EARTPLVN- MID OANNL WlAsl r. Ao-r .InmLlm� .[rw two oLse[vRllNf n.wl ANo vle nAN wp +o,. Na;rom. i. m 0.��Cnox W�iM� mm [. [ALTId R R11c[ .A y ArNrovxT Aaus. NED lira Aa�m-lrwm,sD m Mw« A .nL LAIIIpWA;E rt-AtSaS. AfNKE Fd 1FNL NQ faAEP CEV..WES No R. Mutt s uw APPLY Sd S1FAt11D w KmrIAxCL I-rN NwIP'ACm Mp's RCCOrsMYid 111Y As L OKIrtS >gD3 SIwE eF ✓RFO Av0 vAYGAxECO As MfaAAAEMnO M TE SEID C'2R<" A tfpr� IEtA-os[A II' w A-P . MnM M CO`rrRsci m PI/CEO ASIC ANEC AS P[[OSNFNptp BY IEAlS(wr I-DIISIW Sr,v+yp05 (fIXftdNR[0} !. A w SlMscv O L TE[ (axlRf RaDN—AND SRF�ARAE�AMxs PPId r0 ANY CCMERU[nOx W-SPNCIw R RKOq-I g �x ntiEa4 Sue 0fla5FR wiiAN,. � 01iSON CIr�E IMUE� LVD)L-i �sue�-Blq fo�.P�flfMnd M'p nR KcfSs -DM [ s �ms� ro- Ned 10 rouuxc fwaumw. r. wDE sfm aarluDTT'AM °� wuEws ro e•sE LnFrsE t0 wm�- rao psE�.¢Y d�ow:xDwEaa sh n R[sO.E �Arl fADM TEWONm COYSn1Uti4 IDxE 10 W AUngNCE CPU d As x. VTRT[APPIFA*ll6 R fNw.C3UMACt3. AP0.r 9oF SrzwllU ro r NE s"dC yERrEC(5. e. e°�wF P�co-siPpnld }.RosuH-c s APxlclDcwmDf caRPAci. Tro cd[s d nc Lvnwaf PUN RR xdaRi IArr[b.CAp A UMxOSUP[ AILpwNLC w45 Nnuom N M m-TRAC1. YE ^frll0 USTum plptpSED COSIS IMDEI WaSEW 'ltR3lP/D IEEEP m SRE P:,w rOR IAWyppo aCDRMEMENR) L �%R �wu. /z wx tom R Tc PrbNisED swrKc mu.0 -a(aN. KmRRS DSCRPigx R PPmuCr AIU -A"NIY S1ATMx1 d 501 STMEIRD. I. EAMYACT%fYs o6CRgIK+N R MOOVGr ON GRAss AND iCMPEEfR 1. Lf1oSDl'PIt w:q-A-ry 3"AIF-F1P. E POOA.F-rS M cL111nACrOrt -1 LApDM NL W4CL�Np VM MG !� .5 CLOSI RLIxN ' OPxN AS PoSLLE LEASE AaU PPd[an' ex sur+DENOwe UxKO R C016NUCTd 8�STA0.WTON VeVGfmN -AL GWRAxhC KORAtfIN rRR ROK AFO SIh MEAS OSF YCp [pd M'[ R FlAu NSNCrM. c.DsnNBm�REA3 xf1 nfrttR LIORTN R ME- GP4S5 CO.W sPd 10 fWy IAYRtTpI O.O F YOA lifw WI R�fNK fN � Us MF COxmK'r. RL i PMNNC® PJR I. pC n[ ��MKL eC CdnROLIT m MEsfM 1HE SPRnb R m3r m OttlIP-0 IOIG10Ir3 I. ]. Al Z Ov;R wdr RLN.w SxNL R MOTEREO F-ON OAYKE. vOw DA»NJp 0• s CARm m Wxx (aSTMG eO,x. M -tt �AitC �or�Ep�te ppfy w[tEstNr vUrxEx. no% rl FxTPUF o�K uu F Iu BU DK d ON . FIE NLr. 00 xm Nld OE9L5 ND nUBLsx d RoOP Au0 »Atl RU4 Pn-Y5: xex-O(SPIFiM: rzSlfa 1-TIfA B ENSdc tt00p SE.r31EnK . P[WBIF AWiwpw�En K M OA'r-P. CORE IENL AS MEC(SSMr UBIE MKn nou armON � E)n51Nc a[f+[rcaG 9ers m OP"fWG KrE GBIL Ix54Wibx N5tt-rpAY'S wsiA-MC SUE yltdE PAM J PBmDtr3 A f06 SrtPLQFFs w!� RPu PRapc* f to - ErA ioxlz-[ .Leu>w IExenR - Ew .masiaEo so. eoc �Iziav°x . ss Aw P%wcrs vc.eDRx, r ytEA t¢ 31a srs-eam e:a-.n. 6 SOl 51[AMF11 SNLL V [M Rf['mER£O R IAW cgiVSElpv ArosR A-F FsureEN¢ otsd. C. E0. STABtICER EAB%t StN1 E M-M � sml n n a -fa ao N-uvrEo nL Yut K suEL eL sd d s0(-xtDE IAFnwE wwcN 6 1AQ 1rYIIERORdtI-i Wi1FA. iPOIIN WrnEWS ANO OMA OCtFTnn.3 d�WN3Ww �Mm dN� x IS[P � M o0�Cx5 OR�II m (fSiWLM 9�f L �,��tvQM x Ao ulREss oMc..rsE ar-crzo ar nL rNdcD. E. 1NN III Bll L % CODRADFD /e1alM srOrEE ANO SNc slRr M ,IVIlR/IUsi3 rd MKt SPEC ADtREEAhs. P[n soot 410 RCTox 1RSOL SIMEE d SAxOT L%N. CUY LRN, IOW. Ri IOW, SNbr nAY Idu Op Stt FICy r-[ SIC FMC- 1Y3 SEA�n[Nr daYlc Wtoest ro ReNSOh IFC ONP11N R D!/q, SIENA wR »w•C A AeTURC R stIBS9E ANp �An+ W SUG alas. smx[5. VAo3 d sd, sites. ROTS. M[syK. nrSAl d OMd EP-Nx[OV5 WIpM15 vskla rtYN I- /I wtNS N Assr DASRs9d' 2 EafprNr . �nlozcmN vwE EL KmlEwym w YEfiEINIUL IErA.s. R AAC/S swLL R COAtPKTO A sNlFws IWr Mwsd d auwrtw 'md-0 1.auR0�'a'ilE: w�NOs s+wLL a mr�+DiO�o Br Pwrm-DlPcn. I.wo Im r»+Ens. wL M>c IxSR.tmRS swµ BF Agw1m W ILss itur: 4 IAOIws w AOvw'[ CMRErE POtwb uxLL4 OnF1MY sPEC+lO er IwxIR d LO[K AYe$C'p. LALLCOMw �mf 6 a6PDMsaI r�0 E o[1flN�i+mpa R+CNa�iwip ws�iFnurt�tr N�arsOnERin PEcial�i°IroaR„ri wnFK.� Pa04G w�,mOY N[ ufns uD K[tis MN Imlt R w.r e PAroR t0 OrxlR fN APlfms aw- dlwl rAeVo ttresn� � WhPK TO . c�sANmFFwlsc +Azrnxrm a. PpaFT NxNRII *AwISPORr NA Pmco uR. c�R �eals �N M PRopt. ��,xmnlsm I� _ .wnizn Yap Pwmo ro�n.m wr w ni o: e�.sERWT�ewRe�D � �vrtDO o . Ta nwNAArnI w-a swu eE n rK R.seAu caws w.,.r,d ..a. <�T+L0.uEm OULLEw6na GMo6 M siR4 rxoc�.srm. . lus'ouNs ARE ANr RR55 SPy3 r%1 8[ C1f�IN iNaY ASe 53R ANp YDI aF O gDlp M e iwrn'R laE faoPEnn urEss AVnlwLf Br PPYfCt NwI�R / c ADlmprt c TR ASS ROb SNNI R RPDFaR ro BASE mIIEY E[LYA1IOx PPlort b E01-Milx -OF6AUCT:OIs m Pf1Mi V3L CawKmn ANp aBsilrvArax axsy wrs*NK v+ M NwE AN, BY K.YMK K IIEII M n tllcl 1. - RR A- M .. b03E1 EEU CLweoox mSrAm lair ap°cxu �`ir w°`aNMa mI! ucro: -R ro ui �Ear°Em wsrfnloa. TE AM-wKs csltxLD : � 5�� w sr»sOu u�N.am.3ma AdiL s�wru9.ow euarc rt ws BEEN YwEloiFl -aR- NAs BEEN mwEErzu rESTn. ersweclm. AND APPRD.To. YAxE uPAPI WD P[nAcaExrs NEaSv.Rr TO AaTdc nl wow m M Dlniax w wleor n n! Eauo AT rrt rfR: R EAID.E+-c L v Rine Ifi airr.�E"'ai"vxlnn�:Nro�MOircL. uwMss*cLs AR!SRNE ALL dry AYp MPMIOEIS SR M MC SUAst»M d rM twf EFf w,D. 06RUC[D d LCS, wtDAlgv MPIACE m Mc APPROVK R nl dxEP. M`- [ APUS TNI RECAE SECCWL SHNL % d.AOE➢ a[ld rYaSHm fs+A%S SNPTC tEuwt sPK[ rOR i0P500.wG r. OEPPESSINS w1iEPE Y_vaE55WK ff3tAl F JR IIAV4 4FYJLrzO rROY. nL sBsgrAL 6 LMfKC OVPCSSIOx lO TNC EOIAMM -DeeNL wIOM A'o I;Yp.E ALL DEBPK AM SOR Wi[pN As dLtTO M ixE ENCRSEE 1 L. DIIEA Aa[As CrUxAR fNdN M RLIWlIDN KCOYNaOAi[ TIE Ivsr�lAiEYEN dAVNtS. CAUrh Ala(Ar11C0 10 I stt�cEEe fd ruL enE� uav Nu nRCRK YAlfnws. rnNt 1R C�fUMhD�iUYL �ttPOSO w 9dAGf PIEK %PApsr[ raON plHp Sd .. NOOmYE fxCWAh3 SOIL s--EASN SArryKmw rOR E - Ed Rl UxrA KOtfREn PI.N£. cRAnE ANL SMFSmtPPq[S lVP MRER OxNxKE. r. eAoT EaPmNMi,� is SpSbSEAND RiE-- iLLYREASL - AI�1d L. RJw3 x'tl � B[SUNO[icl�ii AFIe SIPatNI DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WORKS-03310 wxT.loAr wP wI mrEnTYYrs u art x res MSYLIE AK lD eF raMApOa ro M[ dOM1 MPnadNmE d S.NE yY R BATAa R MC FalaA'R-: coots. sPFCY%Arorw AM swrDSPoS. [YRPr -NDC YORE S*PNGEM IQOUEFs1G3 Mf }UwN pl SPEgIEB. A. Sot-rJ S^[6Ur10n rR SMLCDIAAL mNOFrE rd BUNxWs'. B.ArsISKOtr e-ef 'LdMxr PIffSEO�oi))DrTTLFD CDKAErE' (,EKED IMz) C COxCPErz MwNRM. SSEEE nvSrrtVC (CRN1.lWAN[ OE srAxOAPo rpKTICf E-MNIOR.Y�c A.ifasNS: A REYrON' K,-,fsTl 1 6t S.cRKt W O[Fdwm P. YpENK-�rrl-eC.MM ♦ les eF1DED sRR P�ACC�ABrIt. _ EMpa[RlM:eDL$IEM. CxAwS. CON:,OG�ANPORINL � PFf40eC%c BAR N PIACL, UY -RE BM IS'PC SVPoIITS -aEto[h YArTW3: ♦PONIINL CbM1. M1Y C ISO MC I. LwNVExa.T wxarzs. ArN'c Sa G �Ac � K�:WYRIYG��DC�wUR� i0 BY 1EE [WPFaCMEB EO PE A. ADwovrNl. A110 faUl R NR[S •. DlJOOD M P-OAB Yt�mVKESM SIfEYf.M YIIN D[ EgEAl6 PPRFRIFS B. -(rcNr: It L-/sRMUS[ ONEDUL - a yy..EM°" : m AM ArNI wort W-OfnYO-N AM 9NE DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220 fFAi A S+N9ASe MOIX Sswa eE TC ST: ,IOcsT:O W M dlGr do d AM dAOF�w, UlYrwllLxr is'PE �xAM 31AC OUWCwiA R ATrll G 90. is'!C I. swat wR! . cD+PMssAc n� Ecn'a C°"imoiO�Pn fmi xr's AN, A NUE TrP! ArfFp% Axp mN1rNnU5�DIAGOwt�[NSs-Ilmi igrtD xprMr IpK TWs CI Ss Sos�oC nMWi YssO. E LMspOrGC3//I Y L£xc 9wt R lane twN Wrwt,.w00� Rw io r.m.Ar ,f a R[N.cx rw2 .n NOPENxYa: AevfE AAb and Eire o+iFR�+vri �a%rOPCRl w Dlc AmmpwL L � m txrtw s -o• .Asr ME oxNwc 1Anl LtxT1s rd rEorzNFK ,swrdcrER+rt 9xAE a AT Lune rd f-izs Axo rr rd srwf-xe :r. LAOtIIeLWIDLIYRLs tlOsf ctw Rpwy rLL Owls +nN cARD f fLlw6[S soot IDIVISION b: STRUCTURAL STEEL-05120 COMriY rPTI PRweata R M ADEa-NG mOEt SMC1RAnp-B Aro NANOYerS. �Y� N¢ R ESA�Ai p�PRAtttu C�RNro ME Maxu d SPEcfIFD: S^F�R' TW rd SIMSrsvN, n[(L BUtDl4 - /uDFIIBIE sIN.55 c. AYflef rRIDINL SODRY�A-51 oIJ 9 . 'ANCMM( Axp ALAIDFxiS. : SAVcnN1 -t3.D+lc mDE - Sr[[y 2 W'ERwLS. e. xFN S1pFNLTi nTRfAUD fAmfICiDS�SN A 6LTP00[s fd -4PG: ESOxx. C. KL SIMMIUPK SIRL StAw1 K GN.xN M N AmdONSCE wM ASM Atom. [. GFYfII1 t>M)K: [YBLW W YAtt@ eulnens R A- 4ONNm EPML P Pa�OsM 01�- o' ISfE1E�wlc�rDl�i w APmO.Fo aErC� SiaPCM LTaR, L 1pm HS e1' DKlO OLSIt/1 t0. J wSPfcldS esP EP SALL caMSRAxO oWPNpC[t. ........... I- .RD.+O[ JmEr SCALCaS. Alit AND AEQ OrNCP .f YATERNS TLi ARC OM4 SCrvICI. l[O. -E CDVAn A IICN ONE ANOnFR Aq Nnl NM sUBS1WiEs UxDCR CRdlldR M �[ 6 I BIADc On 01 IANpeI t�R-NFN slnxn TtFA C0. Ny10{E 2 aNE-caNPoxfxr varsLtroE BLscB. wR PARr E,.Ktarmc s(atAN1. msIPLYMO wmE I eN !.f l.H .rAAa . irN r ( - ). rd mins a vc,R+*+raws nwamx �RMM wAls. PR0.1Cf COSOgM BEARwG !NF 1Efmm CxEYfN fOfpOaAhw SGl � APPnorL I,ront oxF TF FamwxG d Ax .PPpo.Tn mJlL A. � RU! 900 SERFS M D.V. PEG aNRE! -.a. • e 7 ^ B. LPKE A m. J. -NT - GDPoYFSG BY u �yT `� g 99 E nIrnMd sUK�KCdiP�Dl D. 5� 5 N�Oro lEn iir fNsz AIL coN0.r�wc wml ^_6 1NRE9Eg163 AI'EnEa� oODRS AM 1� 9�LEt SSind�OLµGw flf �PaR NA SW3. NpWC d[ R 1K rOlLOwxsL R Aw APPRafO EDIN: aGP ADTL(: BY DP, wC. fico Ao-a w WTa MDxEDfa/sue Y . .. R[o-R[na wRn.c ca.ouo as xars cYumc. .AN wm O Y p ? �m Es rr-c-xe. Aax-�tIDfc. rARirMlt o.E R nF rauT.x o+ AN �x GENERAL NOTES b GENERAL NOTES a a I. THE ❑r6bSG UEgFxdDW UTt1nE5 SNOrN Nl BE APE BASET UPW IE PF'ORMAMN INE CONTW SWLL BE SEBIE C4 t BETS AU CF0K NV BETS- 1NE EX CT LOC - 6 AU BY F BETRCE EDE•EOR Mpf- AND PUC WY OAYACF$TIAr EpiLR 9Y iAt1RE YO LOUTE OR 'J ` rlS e PRCSCPTEE tONTUCTOR 51EfNA0 rNC0 MR uPUTES DITHER MAN IMSC 9*. M TEE "s. s j : EEE SHALL NOSEY TFEE ENDNEER AND tI NECESWY AND PBWN STEn PROTECT TEE FAC MO ASRWE ME DONSM MM A R SDrAa 6 =if G 1. ANY Ds REPANPES FU BEENEEN TEE MAMIOS AM SN [dDIT S OR ANY NCON45/pItKS d 081 N TEE DRAY SwA11 Au lNfW4 .wo wIRN Wl[fNL mrtsBPp 4N -U Y K-" 10 ME -El. Y 9 U P oNE B_Y CgW-U INCONSIS1ENp s d AMDUFIES R01EN DONE BY TFE WN MACTRE NTEOUT DPECnONS M ANY DISCOVERY R SUCH INC0NVSMJClES xppr NE M PlVtfIT 6 M L ♦AID Mi ND1 6 OIFEIUTEA I®m ®D[® r11xM A frfTM EfaBDf16 tlf e A OISLRfPANOU, On u@Ci11TEl. -- BE C-trEE AT EdMACTCR3 RISK. IDIA4 I COIIRALI•JII SHALL PESPONERIE idV AGTAIRNG ALL NECW- 0!R K S .. KW BEEOPE ANY DV+siRUD S BEGINS. CMIECACT)R SHALL N01.rY PISS V1-U (BOD) 552-'COD AS HDSRs PB-R ro CYCC- td/M/OQ U}r1RAC1pE gµy �DtDEUIr wsiALUTOHOf 2CIRILAL. GAS BA OE/m/Bt RRFIYNA-I IELCPSI0IE. MO CAN sCRSAaE 07/02/02 KMMD FH NOTE. Ns.AElAr4s wA wSPCCMw3 . P!R ALL -, AND TLww M JOHN D. RENO y No. 32989 'sYy�;,S10NAL �. �3II:LrL�:1 n� IRTM R 11F OVA G 6 PEO-JQC 40.6 rot IH 9Y M OfND AIG 171 NIKNEE IDIadlTION d Is rc TB R.wc Ar/a H ff01YARr CeY1IAm N R 6 rrEl,(P frDplt M gtld PDIlefw O M dwP CMfN BY J. FlAIOJ.V1 LSECO?➢ C: J. A.0 M - WASHINGTON GAS STf Y YB[P Sm AODN33 350 HILLANDALE LANE VANCHESTER, VA 229D2 !1m TTL GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS 91QTIeAOlrl si PLOT SCAs[: 1+EO NANDOAH wer SeMee. LEd. \ 1brt01W Iu fSa q2 w . 8S• \ E jig / - 43 O1 ro /� ,u Rrm ,e.nim rrtRr^o�m c% / s r1IDm, w i imnn A.v j oy/ nea n art n mem Plot ad.oes 3 � / y/ rNr R ie rd n a,res me Fl r R T! M r R. FLL1eR. 6 c PROP. 1e0RR1fYRR RR=RRIR MUR • wOnartt[ TovRa / r1Rn 1R e.n. ewanr s r eea / ..ner R: J. FiAaNN OK12D R: J. FEND / M MIE / WASHINGTON / GAS ■R rr. / (OD, 2p. WING1E97ER V0.226O2 yo�GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 w 100 200 / TOWER LOCATION TOWER LOCATION PLANP�N 1 inch = 100' }L S 66•g 5 SULE: 1' - 1BB's2 no=.cur. \ 1 s \ \\ I EX. DRIVEWAY \ 1 I \\ \ \ .I( \\ II \ \ . OVERHEAD\ ELECTRIC ) / PROP. 180' MONOPOLE 42' \ \ 5 OR T TO T\ / EX. BUILDING DE METER 1 SITE PLAN 5-3 s AE: I' - 20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 I tneh 20' ft. \ KET \ EX. DRIVEWAY 1` 1 ER t r r 1 1 1 r 1 I LT46 JOHN D. RENO No. 32989 .k7W OF PROPOSED SMF SOFPORT z MONOPOLE TOWER ELEVATION 5-3 SCALE Mm NANDOAH ec..r i d� iX ;SEEA' `e A�• m s , u6❑Ea v< aaac WM and aEMR CMMIID .lEMORM1 6 iNl • • MO a1 p1 t W V4wk ®a pn>® �MUf'K f11BF OBIR 6IIR f , mua n/a/m a/oe FewNNRr 67AVRT RED FMu ama a art x[W.+m Fu oaNCRa roanax< RNn RXN b H R % Oda — RS MAIN$ ec mi m�i0 s rt wFFea mm� K � rwmeR a >K a,o CIMIM M: J. FUXM l bI m . J. RFNO NR N WASHINGTON GAS I — AU U fnc .calm 350 HILLANDALE LANE VANCHE'STEFL VA 22802 oai Tall SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION s — S�5 nar wir. I-te r m m m = m m a-RElOCATED6'DISH(TV) O' MONOPOLE TOYER N-- eANTENNA PLAN DETAIL S-4 SCALE. N.T.S ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE SECTOR Al BI N/A AZIMUTH 144.2' 263' N/A ANTENNA 6' DISH 6' DISH HF GROUND FLAME MOUNTIAG HEIGHT Be. BD' 120' MFCHANICAL OOWNTILT 0' 0" N/A -- � wnxvLL �nr>_I. 1 eua nru I uolRw Auplmo 'A- 7-0" O.0 YA1L ----�I 1 12 1'-0' LAO.E GUARD SHE ND LOCALE AT EACH FIND OF ICFHRIDGE (TV) 24- CLEAR 6RDCE CXMMEL II PI M"OFUCT 1/2' ALLTHILEAD — cw SUPPORT: 20' UM6IRUT M/NUT TABNAATION DM. - AHD -%f EAU' SIDE/ EACN IML L USE COAX HANGERS BAR CTRAP COAX CABLE 'C' 3 6'-6- EAI"D SiRAPPCO TO COAX TERMNAGE FRAME PER PROLCT MANAGERS NSiRUC11U15 �' NOTES TOWER E THE ICE BRIDGE (DIM "A') IS 20' O7 LESS. TWO (2) EX GROUNDING POINTS ARE REOARED AT OPPOSITE ENDS OF EOIAPMENT PPE HEAD BY M U ECT THE ICE BRIDGE. CALDWELD TO THE ICE BRIDGE. SUPPORT SHELTER POST, CALDWM GROUND LEAD TO ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT E ME ICE BRIDGE (DIM. -A-) IS 20' OR GREATER, THREE iCERROGE SUPPORT PoSi, 8"-t2" AeOVF "VE (3) GROUNDING PUNTS ARE REOURED. ONE (1) EACH AT GRAVEL GRADE 3 t/2'A CALv. SIDED 40 POST: OPPOSITE ENDS AND ONE (1) NEAR THE CENTER OF THE ICE BRIDGE, CALOWELo TO THE ICE BRIDGE SUPPORTRR 1/4' PVC (TYP,) GONG, PAD CROWN TO DRAIN TYPICAL OF '(. 12'0 R 3V DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING -mcAl ��PtiRH Gr� - a O '� BBE ELOWGRADE GROUNDING aNc iTv.) O JOHN D. RENO 9 U No. o. 29 9 8 3299 SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION z ICE BRIDGE DETAIL' I ' ti $-4 SCALEN.T.S. IQNAL NANDOAH _ ower Service, Lld. b[ i � ai lu w a�9ma ALL IWAt.4 W wllTd MEOK OM/�f➢ .11N A% 1< 1v01tRtt R eP A A W T Ma R 14Ru1fIl I3E a E60S[l RTU11 M FrtEN CDI®Il e' PM A A 14fA4 as m/3!/R2 lb/D6/D'2 PRCIMNMY D)/M/'J2 � IIEM.RFD iIMY WV®e .n Mrz 7/02ZM RIF—CI PR UI MFA15 RATDIR CX IT 6 AR]UXtD aa. N 16Y m AE d1n W IR —n RpRalz9w a uY 6 Te sA�s W/a RI1Rau1 M RRim v�v�YeR 00' M�dY DRNtM a: J, c! AJLRINv oR'ult0 m: J. REND m— -- WASHINGTON GABS L_ 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER VA. 225M vm n X SECTIONS AND DETAILS I--- �� S-4 rm — 1-2P m m m m m m m m m m w m m m w F OUND GPoD DESIGN PROVDED BY DINERS THIS DESIGN NAY DT NECESSARYELED? A TYPOAL GROUNDING DF,SXN BY PMK PNRA'A SHALL NO BE NEW BLE M ME EVENT DAMhCE OCCUAS 10 EOUPYENT. N EX DRIVEWAY GR / \ \ / \ Ex. WLEi INSPECTION PORT 0 J \ 1 PER GDODWG B16 EX. OVERHEAD y?`�' ��•` �..0. \ ��.Q'x.{A. \ \ ELECTRIC ZR � O \ � / Ex. DRIVEWAY • \ PROP. IW SELF /° / \SUPPORT TOWER EX. 0' MONOPOLE J EX. 42' SELF SUPPORT TOWER Jb- .y \ EX. BUILDING •� \ \ / •\ J •� FUTURE LOCATION OF MEIERBOARD Rolm t f2 BAILS• RUiD. SOLD COPPER ORONM ♦ 30• BELOW GRADE. 2. DIDRELD 70 FENGE POST 6--7r ABOVE CRADE. 3. BOND CAN LEAF TO DATE POST MIN A nDm E. 12 MSAAIED WELDING CARE WALE. CADWELDED To FA01 POST. 4. ICE TIMM 2ODR LESS, GROUD SUPPORT POLES AT BONG EMS ICE BRIDGE OVER 20r MUM SUPPORT POLES AT BOTH ENDS AND ONE POLE N THE MOM. S. GROUND TO DE BRIDGE SUPPORTS TO BE CADWEIM 6. ALL EOUrMnT GROUNDS TO BE 06 STRANDED GREEN NSAATED, QUSPECTION PORT Oc GRONO ROD - S/6-AB• ■CADNELD U*MT% GROUNDING PLAN E-) SCALE: ILI.S 2 TOWER GROUNDING PLAN E-1 SCALE: KT.S GROUND BAR LOCATED COAX CARE GROUND ITT 1'-Y BELOW TRANSITION MOUNT DIRECTLY 70 TOWER • • - NOTE- ADDITIONAL Qt011MD BAR IS REREQUIREDCOAX CARE AT MD PONT IF COAX CARE EXCEED 2OV (To BE MOUNTED DIR MY 70 70NER} GROUND BAN LOCATED' COAX CARE GROUND 107 f -4• ABOVE I RARIIIIO 1 MOUNT dREC7LY 1D 10MFN (2) /2 1NNED OIlOUMD —'�70 EOUPMENT CARNET LEADS TO GROUNDING RD TOWER GROUND RING n ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAM Eel SCALE N.I.S. C,Yt CADWE i2 AWGR BCW (TNNED) CQPPERw1F C 8-.. I 0' LONG �: 6'-0- MIK SPACING BETWEEN RODS TWO PER TOWER) DETAIL 3 GROUNDING ROD E-T SCALE: N.7.S V FINISH CRAOE 6' PVC PUUC 6 PVC CRG OERDJ 12 SOLD TEST LOOP IF MORN SIDES of 6• PVC WH W GIDIWLD PPE 70 ALLOW oT GROUND WIND 6- CLTR. M, I GOM ROIL TRENCH BOIDM b yr x C/lo. GROUND, TOO INSPECTION PORT E�T SCALE N.T.S. NiN D. RENO No. 32989 -19-02 NAN oHANw SeMca Lcd. i Z� AI B g N C pe9£'S s IOHAWMNS A! WWIG IMQN fGRWIG Ia• NE H Hnm1Y O WW ! A M MW MDI M AII11P4YD. 6II M IRBA® WIMn K MIN ROM)W d M ! A WIN MNPICR PHL,m NY O)/WR/m R[MEo PAWL ALIMWW m A.W RT �@ ACYEED HNR LTMYPN16rae faWer7s HHDIpIW R HIE WP[l R N IWN� SOLD' M IR R N AA M H6 MnIMII EWEOIC.OI YZ ? 1K OM.N M/EE x reEMM. osnum • n s wand WRWI M HwtnN PHaeaeH a wU sn ONMN !f: A. FLANMW ci- m R J. BEND HAT ME WAS HINGTON GAS m Huep PO[ AHXIw9l 330 HILLANDAU LAM W WCHESTER. VA 22M yfIl IME ELECTRICAL DETAILS W41 wwG ET nm w . — m PLAN VIEW METER BOARD ELEVATION END VIEW N.TS au c, tos. I' PRESSURE TREATED POSTS 2• • B' PRESSURE TREATED ENDS AS SHORN / WBER (1R PCS) >r METER BOARD ELEVATION LE. RTS. 7, 4- , TOPVIEW SCALE KT.S. 1. LUMBER IS NOCATED AS PRESERN11NE TREATED OR 15 SPECFED TO EE TREATED. COMPLY WITH APPUCABLE REOIIINEMEMS OF ANPA C2 (LUMBER). 2. PRESSURE TREAT MINE GROUND ITEMS NEN oTERBWK PRESERVATIVES TO A W16RN RETENTION OF 0.25 D/cu.R. (,DPm RN UAeOR 10 MOWN MSRCMERAIMFM. S. PRESSURE TREAT ROOD MEMBERS N CONTACT WITH GROUND OF iRESHUATER PRN .ATERWI E PRESERVATIVE ID A MRILM RETENNM OE (0.4 Aq/—) 0.,0 D/CLLR. ,. UMBER CUT AFTER IREATYFNT. APPLY MELD TREATMENT COMPLYRIO WITH AURA M1 TO M SURFACE S ALL BOARDS 10 BE PRE-DRRLED Eo PREVENT SPLITTING. A 16 PDW-CALYAAAZEO. SPR& MU. THREE (3) PER BOARD/6M POST. ION ORMMIIY. 1,' PT POST T w 10 PE BOARDS 21 w-GALVANRED SP6ML NALlS W 2 D75 eu It. tT 6PT BARD2 w. ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIER / COMMENTS I SOWS D PETER PAN /MP642OO 2 SPEM TR MSFER SWITCH/911FICE J RRERAYS (ALL S¢ES) , PRESSURE TREATED LUIBER 5 CONCERT (ALL SIZES) 6 CONDUIT (BANGS • MARDRARE 7 CONDUIT MPPLES SM) 6 RATE FOR ALL COINECTIONS R PARR COHIROUDT(5) k So CABLE 10 ALARM LIOMIORNC SYSTEM ENttfl91RE 11 ME wom ENCLOSURE 12 IELCO OEMW I II-mmD METER- y` TELCO NDurtNs AREAPm W,5420u00 i h2-1/2' . 6' IiRE M/ LEYO6 nM6 12'%12'A Sr ELECTMC I RENAY O O r_D' i rItr12,' RREIIAT T r ,• PVC MIA UTERY SERVICE END VIEW To OROUNO RNDJ ,• PVC FROM TELCO SERMCE POLE OR REAR CAP 2' ABOVE FN. GRADE (SPARE) r . B' SCALE: N.T.S. MREMY PVC IElF[f) TO CUSTOMEWPMF/O PER OSN(RR ,• PYC rPoPOLN UTILITY SPECRICATENI SERVICE E OR YFMR TELCO AND ELECTRIC SIDE 57F MLTS. ' �JOHNb D. RENO No. 32989 f9-07 TELCO OELWRR MDINENO AREA 2-1/2- OM MPPLE N FROM TELCO SERVICE 2-1 2' DM. /APPLE our TO EOUIPNENI O rRr R 21• RRERAY TELOD FRRSIAD GRACE CAONEID TO NEAREST FENCE POST 72' 1' PYC FROM SERVICE EIECIRIC YI/3-1' OIERNICS PVC (IELco) TU CUSTOMER EOUIVMFM VEAL CUSTOMER SPEC. TOWER LIGHTING CONTROL SIDE SCAIL NJ.& NANDOAH ower SRAM, Lld HI k ys gdy �y TJL WA —IS r A1MMM at" mPR.m m Am x FROM:ARRAr Yl N6f r MFGRR ,M A RSQ® RNIRVI FIVE IIRnI11 f/®n O(Rt , Y /OT HOAINAM RQI®IB R6 LqE RLY@6 PO fJf1R[MIS. NIRax a 1wr wa. rt R weNm m rRR a IY K RRtA r m RIRMn RORMRePR1 a r s n� eRrc rp1 K NIyAlY10rtARo N n R FRImRd RRWI RR tJIIAM Avaas • 1K aRRI MMMN W. J. PIAIWMN tl161RR . J. FOOD WASHINGTON GAS I— —M m ANtllm WO NUANDALE LANE VVINCHESTER. VA. ZM HEFT MALE ELECTRICAL DETAILS ,.e, MRRY E-2 P1m IBM I. FOR ALL EJECYNCAAL NT AS NNCAim N ,ACCORD NM DAONLDa550F CONTRACT DOONEE '& COOIDNIAW NR WTAEC O IL OMER RACES IllPESN ARD MI AL SLERLDRENTARY M wsLIILAEAS VEM6 ARE) KMQS TO TCNE IAA COREW MsIALLARN L FOR EMT LOAnN Q WILDING ELEWDM RErCR t. ARENTECTNA, .v. X.T,'MY LOGNM AND ANIAMCINENT O ALL ETSTWG 5K1EYS ARE EDJMNEMT S. All EYWRDN K-CES AM EDLIP ENT SHNL BE W A.E.R00. NEMA_N A PERFNM ALL RUIN N ACCND WM FOEORIG CODES TEONAE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. IEILAA—S AMC OIDIANCES- 2 NATMMAL BECNE,M aE (NEC). I. EOTN 3. ALl AUTIW Ws NAME MNImDRN. i IE[ LL IABBSD EILCTRCN NAIENALB HERE Lsw WAS BEEN EsrAB TN YAIENAAS N OELNKS N OLESTMN. s GFFTr SW WH: 1EIM WTT -1 IN NEMA-I N 1 N REr LOCATIC" COOLER- NL C.E, BID MEIA[lIC nDMG CP INME MALL Br COEPESSW TTPC (Np Pol-FETAL AMD $lT SOIE"I YN L/a M LIE FLEDNE —A, (sm.) CENq FTR C,,E,,A TO ALL NB`EA`M, EONPMERT ATD GgED Rt. 8 MIRE N CONDUIT 92EO IRO IM WO MILLER STALL BE SOLD L(PHN NI MEMO? w a alRlc�iur c II�D i� �Yc ADroINo �a!�swt N Nl CNOITS 1NC O 5$s B AM N wRQR 91NL PEOR WM TTPE DNA. TM N TMN 6W Sp_T NSW TDxENE 9S5 Q A A11G W UAQR SMALL BE SRJT-BOT MM sEFIDEur uKaS a<TAPE R EWAL NsuLATDM NRrLn.9. (PNlES N ALL PIECES O U.,MCAL EWIPYEx'T. SJOI AS CNRMi NEWBNs, tliCORECT SIITNFB. PANFIBONDS, ALL ALR ROES MAI[PwI ft BE ENNIMD NM RMTE WWII ON A BLA TELm 2-1/t'T3/a' CAM /a' MN (Yw,J YTpMZETr R w1NSTAlD "'Am NNN1N NO WiCON IEMPRAMRCS. MW 9M1LL NM PRQSyW DII AOESIME BADOD sMTANE FN WDWRS 1. Of CABINET SHALL BE PICNICKEDP M A PREFABRICATED RACEGQD THELaEt TCON_5 TO PPoYIW ALL DTEN """N"COEWT AM GBUNG 11 A COI -LET[ KB - II, Nl C MTEn `ED DONMNMS SI/Nl W USWD AND iOEMTiED FN USf NM �' )OCiDRi 12. PORM COMPANY OR M CUNNCIN NpE REOINED BY THE DOPER :ANY, SNNL TEINHAE T( PUMA CA&M%PFEX BY THE POWER CD) TCE MITI LEWEL LOCATED N DIE CABLE[ 1]. —11 LNES SMALL NAVE A COTMI SLOPE DOWLNARD AND AI FTOLI DE CA91ET TO THE PROPERTY LINE 50 TAUT 1 MLL fLOM AWAY (ROC THE CABW[T. PRUNES SHALL BE EYCAYAHEp ALONG SRA4MT IREs BEFOE GOAOATS ME WD 50 rNE E]ivNMnN CAN BE MAlSTEO, F NECESSµY, To AVOD UNISIIH OBSRUCIDNS LLANIFAGIUII6 LANDS SMALL HAM A YN RA0. !A' NpR CON01N1S a. BEADS SHALL NAVE A YNRYUY RAOUs O6' fOR LOHWLIS All CwNNT3 ENWNNO THE S1EH.lEP SMALL K TALID WiH TALWts T1Ul AW DONmFD FOR RASE NM IW uLILt NSUAMW, SMELD. aN OTHN CWRT1[N15 BEM V RAVE 91ALL K P-AaO ABOlNn ALL CO.OUIT PDNCRA1101$ MO T1K wBNET. RS METER SOCAET TO BE SUPPLIED BT OR Al PER POMN C0IPAHY REOAREYNK 16. MERINO 'ALAS PWTECTN IS REWIRED FN ANY UTAJII REM"AgL! —T ME"I"AL. GRE[W/CRO,wp, SMALL BE _'ANED _C, IUT I) i1T 4TC UCCIMCAL SKTFM. M N I. ALL CABLE SHALL BE NNI E SNEs Er.M K CDNECTW AT BOTH ENDS L ALL .NRAPEAS Al THE ARENA TO BE LOT AERIES (NO BUOERTLEY). B-FEIDT, I/]lN . W. L ALL I M S AT THE, EDUNMCNT TO BE IN SUHES 1B"-E MRY., 1/2'MY . 1/2'N (SNEPELT ALLONED N BNgWRI a. ALL ERTFZR CONECTONS SHALL K KATIDERODr TAPED. S ALL PHpND DIS SWL UC 2 HOE, WG (NO lole - LUGS B ORIMI AALES ALL WAR CABTO BE RN MSDE MCI MIEK POBSBLE. Nn HANGERS qL BE PEOR RED LAMA CABLES ARE RUN INSBE NODPOLE /. AIL AT COCAREM RAR1 ORI A MAVEp)l1E IADONS ON STAxpNF. ON THE TERROR Or A MONNOE, N A OITLn HOMIER, N A SRF SARPORT TONR N N A POE, SNNI. K SNPNTED EYNv SRAM LE 11NE CNTRACIN SHALL PDYDE ITUPRSH µO NSTNl) ALL 'ECE4MT CNOUR. NMNC AID Ann BOgs D PAPA** RE fUPR.EO ITEMS 2 "GIVE NAND N CONDUIT N ACCORDANCEMM u+MIMMTIWR'S RECgMMBO , AD M.EC S IN LOCATION O NEM EOLO WNr GBwE1 A µREAMS, TC 4W PLAN A WNNMW N ADYAMCE ALL — TO N ONE WM PONT, UD.,, CO 5 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL W REV.— LE IN AMONG ALL CONKCTNS AND MAAMC A CNRCI( DPRADNµ SKWM AS APPROVED BY CROWN COIYUNCATNs PPIETMATIE —TRACTOR SHALL C". COOONVE. AND C LY NM RECPA iNEATINS MADE BY ENE NEM CARYDIT CANWT MANFACMWR'S RCPRESEYTATIY[. > F["REAL CNRMiIW i0 HIULDE 1HE 1MAL CONNECTP TER AN Af0 RCRMRTMC NNT NIMPMENCENTRE W HE TI Of AND RIEPRA T ORN(ETN TO TCQW, [ABWCf. COONpRIATC NO, TE QNFRAL .N AciN rN LWvu(Mr cADw[T. e PLAN ro µY IIDRR E DIOE,ND N AWT YATRICE s ➢E COIRMCIOR 4 . vER FOR THE ME QDAPN T, IF M;rAQ N THE SAYE `AIEAGE AS SHOW fN TIE YEA' E, W DINT. C TIE E CORTR AP THE SALE BE LTNRACtN MAY PROCEED IE DM L, AND OR CNR MEP, PULL NM CROW COMINGllNS YIEIN4TFLY AND OBTN ARIHEA DMEC110M. 1.I EIB6ALALS ALL CRBLADWG NRE NAL W IN COURT, _. 12/GBEN TNSQAWO WIEL BE LISFD IN EO FRWNDS TO ANC. R AMG BARE sWANDEO SOT.RAN COPPER CABLE LNEESS OTERNSE NOTED ON 'HE NANNL LM1COLE — CP— R (VEER 10 SECTION LI) - CAT MID OR .MN ♦ pL40 EYOMFRMC WLDMC MXN 1.2 NOM RMC RACF]FHT 1FE AISDE NERAC PRIG SMALL BE PLACED APoND THE SIRUCTNE AT A DISTANCE Q OME FOOT TIN THE FULNN ION AT A DEPN O IND FEET OR 21 NOES BELOW LIRE —K A M DEEPER. Ta LMK IF BIRD RAGIS IT ¢ wAnaxr TwT tIE NNE rnAECTNz TIE Ws[E Axp Wr4x caDRD MACS K AS DEMATIr AS ON NEE WM R.D ➢INN SNORTER Mµ 4 ONE ROOT ANDNIi ION MLt (M MET E WINEB E I ADD MDI.I REACTANCE. MBDI R.L ETTECT out TO KLE 1ME END astSYSTEMSTwE i IRNTMA CJEED'Y B NRITH tIC MH N RUC R THE MRY FAST LASE TIES FNWIx`EPED CAN UOBNNG sTMES WW) All N)' TINS. i.a CD1N:C1EDu LEnrppS Ill [YMITId1 A HARD GAME NNE Rrll Gp WQD BOB.TER ANMROWD EMAY EIBRC EELDMG SKIfY COMCCTNs ro THE ON IIEIAL NILInIA W MADE MIR RIM MOTANM.Y. L OMMECRS R NOMO MERLE IORR TO NI55 Bµ RILL � YECHµEAt CONECWO NM TN) HDIE IUCi CROWD CORNEC" SNNL BE FREE pr DPI..EASE A PAN, ALLMNW WWE MAY NET BE USD IN CAMINO MC SEDER BONDS WE PROHBIIEP N ALL NAND CON E_l jai% AT LEE dF-SWF PYR POLE N LET@ PEDESTAL. TIE AC SEANCE WURN MALL BE wCMNWALIY BDLMn TO ME Ac SAME ENR.wQ CROU D AS 9ECIIFD BY M xAlgiAL FIfLRE COTE µTOE 23q APo/ON ANPRNNAW LOCAL CURIES SAD NOCNIO RWs SNAP BE PROAOEO A) nAs POP, AND KETIK mpM AE NBE P PMG A D DONNE: AC TAME OCKINDSCOAR CT M[VRIL SHILL TI1Ax W ROf1FD AND , KC1:N D 'HE YN DNCO.NECf AAOITm IMSW N N THE EIrIDNN O IlE CNBP:FT THE WOUND W. BODMO ARD ON N CNOICINS SMALL CNSST 0, TIE EDLOMEC MI MJN WE M5 AND CW NE,'ROR IETMQS ALL CRDMO —S STALL BE SAY T r CdoEAci+O. TE TN N TW R.DA 5NAI1 BE ALINED TO A MaAMN WIN OF 2'i (OR r TLDN ICE ROSE ERE RIDETER IS DEEPEN. THE DDN CTMNICIOR SMALL BE /2 SOLD TARED COPPER CARE µD SMALL BE WALLED FRN THE 0MRI D ROD TO RE AC SRVKF NELRIRNATIOIMD BODMC CCMECTN RT DE OEOR O RIL SHALL W CA. N OMCR APPRd.ED ERB-AN —MC S IEER. COMECTOR TO IE NEYIRAL/DIQMD BMRDMO 91AL1 W MEOUMcu. ME RNMAL MTAALAYON OAELNE TOP µ1TAw♦ CO.ADAL/ CABLE O+ONMND PER RRN4N54N LAE PET HOER NE1Ni 6 AS FOLOWS: I. TOgRs L 114AM ZOO I15NG AREOWYENI SMUWR-] OR-- CMECINM PER COAY GALL TOWER Tlr AlUCIEAT POINT, 1-E BE20E RASIRCH INT, IONER DO nON ATT—T —1, T-A ABOK TRµ91gN POMT µ0 AT ME BOLUEE PERCNA— 7. TORENS OVER MINI' — AR 1-1 SWLIN -a CgOMOR4 : ME — PR CGY CABLE: TNER TN ATTACHMENT P.IIE 1-2' BOON RNISIC L ROW, 'MAR MIDDLE ATTACHMENT PONI, TEAM W M ATTACHMENT PONT. 1-1 AMOK TRN6NN PONT AND AT TIE BULONG PEWIIMTNw L TONERS ! MSS MAN EN' USRD [TWIN CNRM 1 NONORC INMEC PER LDAY CABLE, IdG IN ATTACH N'T PONT. 1-7, BE DN Rµ4BN —1 AND ROARER BOTTOM AWAOMNT PONT. I -a' ANME RARSTDN POMT 1. TOME"' OMEN 2N' — ENTOLNN CABIEK-] NANOD _TON, PER COAT CaBt — TOP ATTACMENT ft., 1-r BEEN, TRAMSRN —,, TOMER HOME ATTACHMENT PONT AID MIER BOTTOM ATTACHMENT POINT, H-,, IDOL: TRAH4RN PONT 1.7 µWRNA (m A LNI ung. RETLERTNEM, ALL TONER/ANIENA NOIDNG CONECTM SWL W CMW'LO. ALL KMDS N THE TENIN CNTR"NG MTEM BRAE NAVE A M.MN RADUS Of I'. CONIECBONS SHALL K MAN BY ME SHNWST R OLL HAW, CENERALLY A SRALMT LIRE e. CAD KID u I CA/2 SOLO INNED"' COPPER MR TO C, PPE SALE IT EVE THE CABLE SIPPNr EACH s RE N ENE FRINt/BMU R, NDO,E P REP 2D. BOND *DIETER EACH -C Q NX BBOR USNG f2 SQD TIMED CODER MK CAD WIDER TO EAM TCTN. I A PRMERM FpNC AONRDwc MEN NSRwILD. ME RERREER rERCE SHALL K CONNECTED N Al LEAST AT PACES 10 THE MIA ERTNDR NERD HMG. CM 1,Elw CONNECTIONS %A, BE MADE N THE CORNER METALLIC r - 12. ABIW rEl10 POSTS AND ME IWD POSES SIPPOIRRIC TE CAW AD NE CNnRNN NNMDNG NRP USNL R SRD NWD CNPa MBE. EAR CATE LEI 4MLL K CONNECTED TO EAN W EPOS* IJSNG t/0 NSIIAiED WLDMG CABLE CM WI1;0 r0 iMt w1FROSi ANO 1W CARE iEK NMIE D2 BMW A CER-0 NE_". Ex -DR AND SIIBWTTEO PINK r0 CDAAECPON 0 NAN 5 TAME UWITY ORLAND, CHARD NO RESSIµQ $MALL NOT EMCEED ONES IE LAP)I CNPLITNN O IME ORL AAT INSTNLAD01 A. REFLNE CONECBN TO THEPE rAcutt P011FR, tEE UCCENCLL COTRICTN SMALL RPoSDE Al MS ETPERSE A YE+SORELEYI O THE NEW EARN CROMMINIC EUCTIOOE SKWY. TIC RESNIG SWL MIZE µ EARN RESDTAME METER AND BE CODUCWD N ACC(NANCL NM THE BEE STArDARD S PONT FALL ar POTENTIAL NI C. NEWT THE OMERS RIDADR—VES TNBEE DAn PBRN TO THE NEC fEEZ IFSRIL DATE SO THEY YAY BE PRED.I Al RE TIE DF TESTNC. D. THE DROUNINC SnTCM 9RALL PA55 A V VIT TWO PFRQNY FALL -a-POEHIK' TES TIME INYIW LENGTH W THE TEST CEHBUCNAS s W IN FEET, CLMTNKrON 9 ALL HAVE A DOA[ OF REACTANCE K OSHA RE PREPARED. MC CONTRACTOR SHALL NMET/ATELY NOM ME OTHER'S NPRESNTAINE R TIE MEASURE. WSRTµOIB ABOVE . OHMS JOHN D. RENO a No. 32989 SjONAL �..� NANDOAH YWIB Serv/te, Ltd. VE 3 �2 O o= C® n C� �1=9 `RN�N D. CC AIL aRCS AR VENIENN ftIMNIB EMHAW Nr -O ut D t —TEL ®Ma NMBANE9 INORKsDMEDE I W PEER B A 0(AS NE O/09/02 FIIELRNMY 07/02/DI MEMO FINAL, rDTms n aW /OT IIEW4D PER DNWrNTs m M RI, O ME — R 8 PMEII® SOLD IBEN EE OTHER AM R ATAR4S ININIc. N TIE O TW RANNN. ME MI NA— CDNMEEO W D B FONBO.G NMNN BY J. FtAXMAN CMOED RY. J. NE)LU WASHINGTON GAS Q— srt4 ADonEm 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VA. 22002 BHLEr mLE ELECTRICAL NOTES NDo MMO Ed PLOT N AE. 1- Attachment 3 Tribal and NHO Involvement Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the collocation within the Areas of Potential Effect (APE) for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. Information regarding this proposed tower was submitted on the online FCC Tower Construction Notification System. A response was received from the TCNS System indicating the tribes that were notified of this proposed tower. The Cherokee Nation of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, the Shawnee Tribe of Miami, Oklahoma, and the Catawba Indian Nation have requested that they be sent more information. These entities have been sent the information. To date, we have not received responses. The Tuscarora Nation and the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma have requested that they be given a 30-day response ' period. The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma responded and stated that they have no objection to the proposed collocation. Copies of the pertinent information are attached. Tower Construction Notification Pagel of 2 FCC Home I Search I Updates ( E-Filing I Initiatives I For Consumers I Find People Tower Construction Notification m FCC > WTB > Tower Construction Notification Logged In: (Log Out) FCC_Site Map Tower Construction Notification New Notification NotificationsHome Review the summary below to confirm that your information is complete and accurate. Use the edit capabilities to correct information as necessary. Once you are confident that the information is ready for submission, click on the "Submit" button below. Only click the "Submit" button once; doing so multiple times may result in multiple submissions. Notification Information Notification Date: 04/04/2008 Notifier Information Tower Owner Individual: Tower Owner Entity: ECS, Ltd. Consultant: Heather McElvery PO Box: Address: 5320 Peters Creek Road Suite F City: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA Zip Code: 24019 Phone: 540-362-2000 Email: hmceivery@ecslimited.com Structure Data Structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole NAD83 Latitude: 39 ° 07 ' 32.1 " N(+) NAD83 Longitude: 78 ° 11 ' 6.6 " W(-) i Address or Geographical Location Description: 350 Hillandale Lane City: Winchester State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK http://wireless2.fcc.gov/TribalHistorieNotification/asrSummary.htm 04/04/2008 Tower Construction Notification Page 2 of 2 Ground Elevation: 237.7 meters Support Structure Height: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Structure Height: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height Above Mean Sea Level: 298.4 meters Attachments There are 1 attachments associated with this notification Notice to Individuals View/Add Attachments ASR Help ASR License Glossary - FAQ - Online Help - Documentation - Technical Support ASR Online TOWAIR- CORES ASR Registration - ASR Online Filing. - Application Search - Systems —Registration Search About ASR Privacy. State me nt - About ASR - ASR Home ... . ........... ... .................. ................. . ................. . ...... . . ............. .... -- .... . ...... ............................. ..... . . . .................. . .......... ...... ... .. ......... . . ... . . . . ... .... ......... . .................. . . . ............... . ......... -- .............. ....... . .. ........ . . ... . ............................... . . - ...... ................. Federal Communications Commission Phone: 1-877-480-3201 - Web Policies & Privacy Statement 445 12th Street SW TTY: 1-717-338-2824 - Required Browser Plug -ins Washington, DC 20554 Fax: 1-866-418-0232 - Customer Service Standards Submit Help -REnUQSt .More FCC Contact Information— - Freedom of Information Act http://wireless2.fcc.gov/TribalHistoricNotification/asrSummary.htm 04/04/2008 I Tower Construction Notification Page I of I FCC Home I Search I Updates ( E-Filing ( Initiatives I For Consumers I Find People Tower Construction Notification FCC > WTB > Tower Construction Notification 0 Logged In: (Log Out) Tower Construction Notification New Notification i Notifications_Home FCC_Site _Map Your Notification has been successfully submitted to the FCC. The date for this Notification is 04/04/2008. Your Notification ID number is 37975. Please make a note of this Notification ID — print out this page for your records A confirmation of this submitted notification will also be emailed to the email address specified in your notification This system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act by providing early notification of proposed construction to Tribes and State Historic Preservation officers. This system is not to be used in place of Section 106 consultation, and use of this notification system in itself does not satisfy parties' obligations with respect to historic preservation review under the Commission's rules. 1 Please note: the submission of this notification is NOT to be considered a submission for Antenna Structure Registration. Tower Structures that require antenna structure registration based on FCC Rules 47 C.F.R. Part 17 must complete FCC Form 854 after FAA clearance is obtained. ASR Help ASR _License.._Glossary_ - FAQ - Online Help - Documentation. - Technica.I..Su.pport ASR Online TOWAIR- CORES/ASR Registration - ASR Online Filing - Application Search - Systems Registration Search About ASR Priv..acv Statement - About ASR - ASR Home Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information... Phone:1-877-480-3201 TTY:1.-717-338-2824 Fax: 1-866-418-0232 Submit Help Request - Web Policies & Privacy Statement - Required Browser Plug -ins - Customer Service Standards - Freedom of Information Act 1 http://wireless2.fcc.gov/TribalHistoricNotification/asrConfirmation.htm 04/04/2008 KHutchison ■ From: HMcElvery Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:26 pm 'To: KHutchison Subject: FW: Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #1822865 Heather N. McElvery 20th Anniversary color logo Environmental Department Manager ECS -- Mid- Atlantic, LLC 5320-F Peters Creek Road 'Roanoke, Virginia 21111 (540) 362-2000 (540) 362-1202 (Fax) hmcelvery@ecslimited.com http://www.ecslimited.com -----Original Message----- From: towernotifyinfo@ftc.gov [mailto:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:29 PM To: HMcElvery Subject: Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID 01822865 Dear Heather McElvery, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed structure via the Tower Construction Notification Application. Note that the FCC has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed structure. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the tower you have proposed to construct: Notification,Received: 04/04/2008 ■ Notification ID: 37975 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: ECS, Ltd. Consultant Name: Heather McElvery Street Address: 5320 Peters Creek Road Suite F City: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA ' Zip Code: 24019 Phone: 540-362-2000 Email: hmcelvery@ecslimited.com Structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole Latitude: 39 deg 07 min 32.1 sec N Longitude: 78 deg 11 min 6.6 sec W Location Description: 350 Hillandale Lane City: Winchester State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Ground Elevation: 237.7 meters Support Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level ' 1 Overall Height AMSL: 298.4 meters above mean sea level o FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Wireless Telecommunications Bureau V. 1270 Fairfield Road ,,- Gettysburg, PA 17325-7245 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION ECS, LTD. Date: 04/ 11 /2008 5320 PETERS CREEK ROAD SUITE F ROANOKE, VA 24019 Dear Sir or Madam: Reference Number: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribes"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribes and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribe and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribes may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribes and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribe or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribes and NHOs who have set their geographic preferences on TCNS. If the information you provided relates to a proposed antenna structure in the State of Alaska, the following list also includes Tribes located in the State of Alaska that have not specified their geographic preferences. For these Tribes and NHOs, if the Tribe or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribe or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event such a Tribe or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribe or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05-176). Page 1 of 6 FCC 680 January 2008 Letter to ECS, Ltd. Heather McElvery Date: 04/11/2008 Page 2 1. Chief - Leo Henry - Tuscarora Nation - Via: Lewistown, NY - regular mail Exclusions: If the. Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must IMMEDIATLY notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 'i 2. Policy Analyst - Richard Allen - Cherokee Nation - Tahlequah, OK - electronic mail Exclusions: The TCNS Details do notprovide me enough information to conduct a proper assessment of the projects on behalf of the Cherokee Nation. Therefore IJ request that I be sent a brief summary of the Phase I findings [please try to limit the summary to between I--10 pages], a topo of the area, and relevant photos. Please send these by email to rallen@cherokee.org. Please treat this request for additional material as a routine supplement to the TCNS Details Notification for each of your projects that fall within our Tribe's areas of geographic interest. Consequently, if you do not receive a response from me within 30 days from the date on which you e-mailed the supplemental items to me, you may move forward with the 20-Day Letter procedures pursuant to the FCC's guidelines. Thank you. -- Dr. Richard L. Allen 3. Administrative Assistant - Jo Ann Beckham - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - Seneca, MO - electronic mail Exclusions: If you, the Applicant and/or tower constructor, do not receive a response from us, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, within 30 days from the date of the TCNS notification, then you may conclude that we do not have an interest in the site. However, if archeological resources or remains are found during construction, you must immediately stop construction and notify us of your findings in accordance with the FCC's rules. (See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1312(d)) 4. Manager, Cell Tower Consultation - Belinda Pryor - Shawnee Tribe - Miami, OK - electronic mail Exclusions: THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS BUILT IN OUR AREAS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST. ATTENTION, NEW INFORMATION: Our procedures were updated on 14 January 2008. Please call Belinda Pryor at 918-542-2441 so that she can send you a copy. If your tower is a co -location, please fax us this information to let us know. We cannot always tell from the TCNS web site that a tower is a co -location. We require a written response from you to let us know that it is a co -location. If a co -location project includes some new ground disturbance (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or construction of an ancillary structure), the Shawnee Tribe treats such a project the same as any other non co -location project. Our correct mailing/physical address is: 29 South Highway 69A. Our correct phone number is (918-542-2441) and our historic preservation fax line is (918-542-9915). Belinda Pryor, manages all cell tower consultation. As of 26 June2006, all of the faxed responses of our final comments on a tower site will contain an original Shawnee Tribe signature. Each final comment fax is signed individually. Copies may be compared, for authentication, against the original in our files. If afinal comment fax does not contain a signature, it is not valid. ALL FINAL COMMENT,$ + FROM THE SHAWNEE TRIBE ARE WRITTEN; FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEVER PROVIDED VERBALLY. IF FCC 680 Page 2 of 6 January 2008 Letter to ECS Ltd. HeatherMcEIv ery ' Date:0411112008 Page 3 THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS CREDITED WITH HAVING GIVEN A VERBAL RESPONSE, THAT RESPONSE IS NOT VALID. If you receive notification through the TCNS listing the Shawnee Tribe, that is an indication that the Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider that our official indication of interest to you. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e-mail to be the first notification that we receive that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern. We do not view the TCNS notificationas completion of 106 consultation obligations. The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures - most recently updated on 14 January 2008 - please contact us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. Call us at 918-542-2441 orfax us at 918-542-9915. It is the tower builder's responsibility to make sure that you have our most recent consultation procedures. PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. SINCE 1 DECEMBER 2005, WE HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION, INQUIRIES, OR CORRESPONDENCE VIA E-MAIL. 5. THPO and Director - Dr. Wenonah Haire - Catawba Indian Nation Cultural Preservation Project - Rock Hill, SC - regular mail Exclusions: The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office requests that you send us by regular mail the following information needed to complete our research for the your proposed project: Project Name Project Number 1. The name, complete address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address of the project manager 2. The project location plotted on a USGA 7.511opo map. 3. The project name, address and location; street or highway, city, county, state. 4. A brief description of the proposed project. Please include the size of the proposed project site and the size of the area where ground -disturbing activities will be taking place and the type of disturbance anticipated. Please include the height of towers. S.Abrie f description of current and former land use. We are primarily interested in ground i d disturbance and don t p p Y bn' o need detailed information or photographs of historic structures in the project area. 6. A list of all recorded archaeological sites within one mile of the project area. 7. A list of all eligible and potentially eligible National Register of Historic Places sites within one mile of the proposed project area. - I Page 3 of 6 FCC 680 January 2008 Letter to ECS, Ltd. Heather McElvery Date: 04/11/2008 Page 4 8. If there has been an archaeological survey done in the area, a copy of that report. 9. It is not necessary to send original color photos if you can provide high -resolution color copies. 10. A letter of concurrence from the appropriate State Historic Preservation Office. If you use the FCC Form 620, please do not send Attachments 1 through 6. They are not necessary for our determination. We do not have an interest in projects that require no ground disturbance. The information you provided was also forwarded to the additional Tribes and NHOs listed below. These Tribes and NHOs have NOT set their geographic preferences on TCNS, and therefore they are currently receiving tower notifications for the entire United States. For these Tribes and NHOs, you are required to use reasonable and good faith efforts to determine if the Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by its proposed undertaking. Such efforts may include, but are not limited to, seeking information from the relevant SHPO or THPO, Indian Tribes, state agencies, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, or, where applicable, any federal agency with land holdings within the state (NPA, Section IV.B). If after such reasonable and good faith efforts, you determine that a Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties in the area and the Tribe or NHO does not respond to TCNS notification within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort to follow up, and must seek guidance from the Commission in the event of continued non -response or in the event of a procedural or substantive disagreement. If you determine that the Tribe or NHO is unlikely to attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties within the area, you do not need to take further action unless the Tribe or NHO indicates an interest in the proposed construction or other evidence of potential interest comes to your attention. The information you provided was also forw i, ded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA. 6. Environmental Review Coordinator - Renee GledhillEarley - NC State Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 7. Deputy SHPO - David Brook - Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 8. Manager - Office of Review & Compliance - Ethel Eaton - Department of Historic Resources - Richmond, VA - electronic mail FCC 680 Page 4 of 6 January 2008 Letter to ECS, Ltd. Heather McElvery Date: 04/ 11 /2008 Page 5 9. Deputy SHPO - Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail and regular mail 10. Deputy SHPO - Susan Pierce,- West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail "Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribe, NHO, or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of tower notifications that the Tribe, NHO, or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribes, NHOs, and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal, as well as Tribes and NHOs that have not limited their geographic areas of interest. However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribe, NHO, or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular Tribe, NHO, or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribe routinely requests, or a policy that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). If you are proposing to construct a facility in the State of Alaska, you should contact Commission staff for guidance regarding your obligations in the event that Tribes do not respond to this notification within a reasonable time. Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 04/04/2008 Notification ID: 37975 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: ECS, Ltd. Consultant Name: Heather McElvery P.O. Box: Street Address: 5320 Peters Creek Road Suite F City: Roanoke State: VA Zip Code: 24019 Phone: 540-362-2000 Email: hmcelvery@ecslimited.com Structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole Latitude: 39 deg 7 min 32.1 sec N Longitude: 78 deg 11 min 6.6 sec W Location Description: 350 Hillandale Lane City: Winchester State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Ground Elevation: 237.7 meters Support Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Page 5 of 6 Letter to ECS, Ltd. Heather McElvery Date: 04/ 11 /2008 Page 6 Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: `298A meters above sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notifi&ation/contact-fcc.html. You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission FCC 680 Page 6 of 6 January 2008 I KHutchison ■ From: HMcElvery Sent: Friday, April 18; 2008 04:44 pm To: KHutchison Subject: FW: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID #37975) - EmaillD #1839773 ' Heather N. McElver Y 20th Anniversary color logo Environmental Department Manager ' ECS -- Mid- Atlantic, LLC 5320-F Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (540) 362-2000 (540) 362-1202 (Fax) 'hmcelvery@ecslimited.com http://www.ecslimited.com -----Original Message ----- From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov [mailto:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 4:12 PM To: HMcElvery Cc: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Subject: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID #37975) - EmailID #1839773 Dear Heather McElvery, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized 'user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TONS. The following message has been sent to you from Manager, Cell Tower Consultation Belinda Pryor of the Shawnee Tribe in reference to Notification ID #37975: 'WE HAVE UPDATED OUR PROCEDURES FOR 2008 (EFFECTIVE 1-14-08). PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED AND READ A COPY OF OUR UPDATED PROCEDURES . Please use only the following address when sending materials to us: Please use this fax number to contact us: 918-542-9915. Please do not contact us via e- mail. SHAWNEE TRIBE ATT: B. PRYOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT. 29 SOUTH HIGHWAY 69A MIAMI, OK 74354 The Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on this tower, as we are in all towers in this geographic area. Ms. Belinda Pryor is our manager for cell tower consultation. Please contact Belinda Pryor, Asst. THPO, at 918-542-2441 if you have any questions on this or any other TCNS project. 1 For this particular tower to which we are responding, please follow our consultation procedures. If this tower is a CO -LOCATION, please fax us and let us know. We cannot always reliably tell from the TCNS web site when a tower is a co -location. PLEASE, when you are mailing us regarding a cell tower, be sure to put Belinda Pryor's name and Historic Preservation Department in the address. If you send any mailing just generally to the Shawnee Tribe, without including the name and department, several days or more may pass before the mailing is properly directed. In the event that you are building another tower in this state and you did not receive a response from us through the TCNS, it is because the project was omitted from the TCNS web site, as we respond to ALL towers listed in our geographic areas on that web site. We take this opportunity to remind you that, even if a tower has been omitted from the TCNS web site, as occasionally happens, we are still interested in consulting on it. WE HAVE UPDATED OUR PROCEDURES FOR 2008 (EFFECTIVE 1-14-08). PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED AND READ A COPY OF OUR UPDATED PROCEDURES . Please use only the following address when sending materials to us: ' Please use this fax number to contact us: 918-542-9915. Please do not contact us via e- mail. SHAWNEE TRIBE ATT: B. PRYOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT. 29 SOUTH HIGHWAY 69A MIAMI, OK 74354 The Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on this tower, as we are in all towers in this geographic area. Ms. Belinda Pryor is our manager for cell tower consultation. Please contact Belinda Pryor, Asst. THPO, at 918-542-2441 if you have any questions on this or any other TCNS project. For this particular tower to which we are responding, please follow our consultation ' procedures. If this tower is a CO -LOCATION, please fax us and let us know. We cannot always reliably tell from the TCNS web site when a tower is a co -location. PLEASE, when you are mailing us regarding a cell tower, be sure to put Belinda Pryor's name and Historic Preservation Department in the address. If you send any mailing just generally to the Shawnee Tribe, without including the name and department, several days or more may pass before the mailing is properly directed. 'In the event that you are building another tower in this state and you did not receive a response from us through the TCNS, it is because the project was omitted from the TCNS web site, as we respond to ALL towers listed in our geographic areas on that web site. We take this opportunity to remind you that, even if a tower has been omitted from the TCNS web site, as occasionally happens, we are still interested in consulting on it. 'WE HAVE UPDATED OUR PROCEDURES FOR 2008 (EFFECTIVE 1-14-08). PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED AND READ A COPY OF OUR UPDATED PROCEDURES . Please use only the following address when sending materials to us: Please use this fax number to contact us: 918-542-9915. Please do not contact us via e- mail. 2 I KHutchison From: HMcElvery Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 02:20 pm To: KHutchison Subject: FW: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID #37975) - EmaillD #1839418 Heather N. McElvery 20th Anniversary color logo Environmental Department Manager ECS -- Mid- Atlantic, LLC 5320-F Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (540) 362-2000 (540) 362-1202 (Fax) hmcelvery@ecslimited.com http://www.ecslimited.com -----Original Message----- From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov [mailto:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:19 PM To: HMcElvery Cc: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Subject: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID #37975) - EmailID #1839418 Dear Heather McElvery, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from Administrative Assistant Jo Ann Beckham of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma in reference to Notification ID #37975: April 18, 2008 To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for notice of the referenced project(s). The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma is currently unaware of any documentation directly linking Indian Religious Sites to the proposed construction. In the event any items falling under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) are discovered during construction, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe request notification and further consultation. The Eastern Shawnee Tribe has no objection to the proposed construction. At present, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe does not wish to participate as a consulting party on the above referenced project(s). However, if any human skeletal remains and/or any objects falling under NAGPRA are uncovered during construction, the construction should stop immediately, and the appropriate persons, including state and tribal NAGPRA representatives contacted. Sincerely, Jo Ann Beckham, Administrative Assistant 1 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 04/04/2008 Notification ID: 37975 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: ECS, Ltd. Consultant Name: Heather McElvery Street Address: 5320 Peters Creek Road ' Suite F City: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA Zip Code: 24019 ' Phone: 540-362-2000 Email: hmcelvery@ecslimited.com Structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole Latitude: 39 deg 7 min 32.1 sec N Longitude: 78 deg 11 min 6.6 sec W Location Description: 350 Hillandale Lane ' City: Winchester State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Ground Elevation: 237.7 meters Support Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 298.4 meters above mean sea level 1 n u 1 ECS MID -ATLANTIC, LLC Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities May 14, 2008 Dr. Wenonah Haire Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office P.O. Box 750 Rock Hill, South Carolina 29731 Via Facsimile: 803-328-5791 ECS Project No. 2322-A Dear Dr. Haire: Per your request for additional information, via the TCNS System, here is a copy of the information requested by the Catawba Indian Nation regarding the Washington Gas Tower, TCNS #37975. The subject site consists is located at 350 Hillandale Lane in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The site consists of a 120-foot monopole tower with an existing 12-foot by 18-foot equipment shed. The existing 120-foot monopole tower is proposed to be increased 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. No new ground disturbance is proposed. An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic Resources Data Share System (DHR- DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system. Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the V2 mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126, recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site, the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site, the Barton -Sprinkle H )u e (DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034- 0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE), which were listed on the NR_HP. A previous architectural review conducted by Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002, indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinity of the site. Please refer to the attached U.S.G.S. topographic map, aerial photograph, site photographs, photosimulations, the architectural review, and the previous response from the SHPO indicating that the proposed tower will have an affect on historic properties in the vicinity of the site; however, the affect will not be adverse. We ask for concurrence that this proposed tower extension will not impact potential or known tribal lands. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 540-362-2000. Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, 2 Ason &ALC aAHut Staff Environmental Scientist 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F, Roanoke, VA 24019 • (540) 362-2000 • FAX (540) 362-1202 • www.ecslimited.com I Aberdeen, MD • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlottesville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City, MD* Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Virginia Beach, VA • Waldorf, MD • Williamsburg, VA - Winchester, VA • York, PA * testing services only ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC SOURCE: FIGURE 1 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES HISTORIC SITE LOCATION MAP Roanoke, Virginia 24019 N WINCHESTER, STEPHENS WASHINGTON GAS TOWER IMI�TLANMC (540) 362-2000 phone CITY QUADRANGLES, 350 HILLANDALE LANE (540) 362-1202 fax VIRGINIA DATED 1966 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA " PHOTOREVISED 1987, 1986 ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A LEGEND - Approximate Location of the existing 120-foot Monopole Tower. + j5o�eM *� ® - DHR-DDS #034-0126, eligible for listing on the NRHP ' ; ofl ® - DHR-DSS #034-0984, razed c; © - DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated Ne © - DHR-DSS #034-0982, razed ' © - DHR-DSS #034-0983, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated'77 4• • \g, V i Old Ol"Iton • t �i One -Half Mile Radi s Id D 'r i li/or J ,1 _ i �` � � •V /�i Jr � `, jilef100pDBi1 �.. .i . • J I .f ' •''.i ( '* V ASS..// i - Memorial Pxrk . SCALE (IN FEET) �' x i}/ % 1000 2000 2000 0 1I ra SOURCE: DHR-DSS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 2002 LEGEND Approximate Site Boundaries SCALE (IN FEET) 100 200 200 0 FIGURE 2 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 1 VIEW OF THE EXISTING 120-FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER FACING SOUTHEAST. Photograph No. 2 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE NORTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 3 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE EAST OF THE EXISTING TOWER. Photograph No. 4 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Project Number: 2322-A Roanoke, Virginia 24019 L� Phone: (540)362-2000 PAGE 1 Date: April 2, 2008 SaoD-Ai Amioc Fax: (540)362-1202 Photograph A : View of the Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) a 50+ year old structure and is recommended for listing on the National Historic Register, located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph A: I Photosimulation of the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph A. - ---- - ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 LLO" Phone: (540)362-2000 (540)362-1202 PAGE 2 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph B View of the former location of Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984), located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph B: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph B. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC F 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 Fax: (b40)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 3 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph C: View of the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981 ) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph C: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph C. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F 59. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: 540 362-2000 a�voau��v� Fax: (540)362-1202 I Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 4 Date: April 2, 2008 Photographs D and E: View of the former locations of houses on Route 11 South (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983), located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph D and E: Line of sight of the proposed collocation tower site as seen from Photographs D and E. ® ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Project Number: 2322-A 6 Phone: (540)362-2000 PAGE 5 Date: April 2, 2008 sao��va� Fax: (540)362-1202 Photograph F: View of the Robert Wilson, Sr. House ( PHR-DSS #034-0980) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph F: ' Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph F. v U= U 1l its JLJL 2 5 20[Te ) CULTURAL RESOURCES, INC. I July 23. 2002 1 Nir. Marc Holma go�,. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 RE.- Section 106 Review of a Proposed Washington Gas Telecommunications Tower, Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma HR&A On behalf of our client, Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C., we are requesting your concurrence with our determination that construction of a proposed telecommunications tower in %N inchester, Virginia will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Our request is made pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800. Protectio17 of Historic Properties, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). The proposed tower is a 180-foot lattice self-support. The proposed project site is located adjacent and behind the existing Shenandoah Gas Building ' and approximately 450 feet east of Interstate 81 (Figure 1). The tower will be located beside two existing towers, a 112-foot monopole and a 42-foot lattice self-support. Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as that area where effects to historic properties can reasonably be expected to occur regardless of whether such properties currently exist. For the purposes of this project, the APE is defined as all areas located within a 1.0-mile radius of the proposed cell tower site. Situated in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, the terrain surrounding the APE is characterized by rolling hills, with some steeper relief around Hoge Run and Opequon Creek in the southeastern portion of the project area. The cell tower will be located just east of an industrial area west of Interstate 81. ■ The proposed tower will be located immediately adjacent to an existing 42-foot lattice tower and a 1 10-foot monopole (Appendix A and Appendix B). The setting of the project area includes a water tower, an additional cell tower, and an industrial complex (Figure 1). The 200-foot water to„-er is approximately % mile southwest of the proposed tower. A 200-foot lattice self-support tower is across I-81 adjacent to the industrial site. Three large industrial plants in the vicinity ' include the Carquest Distribution Plant, General Electric, and Allegheny Power Company. In =0=9 Ironbound Road, Suite 300 ' -Wlliamsburg, Vuginia 23188 - (757) 564-9652 - Fax (756457 - cueneCaol com05 C7Si 1aroine Street - Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 - (540) 370-1973 - Fax (540) 370.0904 - crifburg@aol.com .- A addition to the industrial facilities, the surrounding landscape consists of single-family residential dwellings and small businesses. Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Effects A review of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) cultural resource inventory and survey information was conducted in an effort to identify all previously recorded historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register within the APE. The results of this research indicated that nineteen architectural resources had been previously recorded within the APE (Figure 2). A total of thirty-four archaeological resources had been previously recorded either in or immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location (Figure 3). Due to the limited footprint of the proposed tower, construction of the facility is expected to have no effect on archaeological resources. Also, the area of the cell tower has been previously graded for construction of the Shenandoah Gas building and the other two towers, therefore, no additional archaeological investigations are recommended. In addition to the archive check, a windshield survey was conducted of the APE by staff from Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI). The survey included a visual assessment of the proposed tower site, a windshield survey of all structures 50 years of age or older within APE, and an assessment of potential visual effects to resources 50 years of age or older within the APE. Representative views of the siteline between the proposed tower site and historic and potentially historic resources within the APE were also photographed. All public roads within the APE were surveyed and photographs were taken from public rights -of -way. All structures identified on the U. S. G. S. Winchester quadrangle were visually inspected if access was permitted. For those properties where access was restricted, photographs were taken of the property from the closest point in a public right-of-way and views back towards the proposed tower taken from the same point. The results of the windshield survey and the assessment of effects are discussed below. Previously Identified Resources within a One -Mile Radius (:amp Rucs-cell Historic District (VDHR #034-5036). This historic district includes the Hillandale House and the Camp Russell Earthworks. It extends from Interstate 81 to Hoge Run, more or less due east of the intersection of I-81 and Route 37. The district is wooded on the eastern portion with open fields to the west adjacent to the Hillandale House (Figure 4). The eastern half of the site has previously been compromised by modern visual impacts, including existing cell towers and the water tank, while the wooded western position of the district is somewhat shielded from these impacts. Given the presence of modern elements already in the viewshed, construction of the proposed structure will not adversely affect those qualities and characteristics that qualify the district for listing on the NRHP. 2 � I Hillandale-Cra►vford House (VDHR #034-0126). There are three distinct phases of construction/additions to this house (Figure 5). The central portion of the house was originally constructed ca 1780-1800. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable house constructed of coursed limestone, with a full fagade 1-story front porch and an interior end chimney_ The second phase of construction (ca 1875-1890) added what is now the main facade of the house. This section of the house is 2-story random limestone. It is a 3-bay side -gable structure with central front gable, two central brick chimneys, and a partial 1-story porch with Doric columns. The third phase of construction (ca 1910-1930) added the 2-story, gable frame addition with weatherboard siding on a split-level stone basement. The roof over the entire structure is pressed tin shingles. There are several outbuildings associated with this structure. These buildings include a stone springhouse, a possible log or frame meathouse, several frame sheds, a frame barn, carriage house, machine shed, frame bank barn with stave silo, and a frame tenant house about V2 mile northwest of the main house. Hillandale has been determined potentially eligible for the listing on the NRHR The outbuildings, nearby tenant house and historic district, and general setting on the landscape are contributing factors to the eligibility of this structure. The view toward the proposed cell tower ' overlooks the tenant house and the current towers are visible in the distance (Figure 6). Since this view has already been altered by modem intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Hillandale House to the NRHP. Camp Russe&Hillandale Earthworks (034-0321). The Hillandale Earthworks are located about 2000 feet northeast of Cary's Brook (034-0319). These earthworks are associated with the Union occupation of this area of the Shenandoah Valley during the fall of 1864 and are considered eligible for listing on the NRHP in the area of military history. The earthworks are within a predominantly wooded area and somewhat shielded from view of the proposed cell tower due to the fact that they are situated on a lower elevation (see Figure 3). The view towards the west has been compromised by extant cell towers and the water tower. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthworks eligible for the NRHP. House (TIDHR ;T034-0021). This house is a Federal style building dating to ca.. 1840_ It is a 5- bay, 2-story brick structure with a stone foundation, side gable, and an interior end chimney (Figure 7). The roof is standing seam metal. Windows are 6/6 on the first floor, but 9/6 on the second floor and the main door has a 4-light transom. There is a 1-story asymmetrical 3 bay addition to the east of the main structure. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP under Criterion C as an example of Federal architectural style. The natural setting of this property has been severely altered as it is surrounded by 1970s era apartment buildings. In addition, the view towards the cell tower, while partially obscured by vegetation, is dominated by telephone utility lines (Figure 8). The 'II proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing in the NRHP. Cwy's Brook (VDHR #034-0319). This structure was in very poor condition when it was recorded and the several surrounding associated outbuildings already existed in a ruinous condition. CRI staff inspected the landform identified as the location of the house and found nothing but an overgrown area of tall grass and weeds (Figure 9). It appears that this house is no longer standing and therefore the proposed cell tower will have no effect on this resource. Cam's Brook Reboubt (034-0320). This Civil War redoubt is located 200 feet northwest of Cary's Brook. It is associated with the Union troop activity in the area during the fall of 1864. After General Sheridan secured this portion of the Shenandoah Valley in 1864, Union forces occupied it. The redoubt is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP for its association with an historic event. The current cell towers are not visible from this property because of the vegetation and the lower elevation of the earthwork (see Figure 9). The water tower just to the southwest, however, is visible from the western potion of the site (Figure 10). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthwork potentially eligible for the NRHP. Sa>>age-Seal House, 3172 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-972). This structure is a vernacular 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable, frame structure on a limestone foundation with a low basement, and an ell addition off the back (west elevation) of the house (Figure 11). The house dates to ca. 1890 to 1910, with additions dating to the 1940s. It has weatherboard siding, a standing seam metal roof, and twin exterior end chimneys and one central chimney on the ell. Additions include an enclosed shed roof porch on the south side of house, and a 1-story shed roof addition of the west side. There is only one outbuilding, a 1-story frame garage with aluminum siding. Other features include 2/2 sash windows, wood shutters and return cornice and frieze boards. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The natural setting of this structure has been completely altered, as it stands near a major intersection adjacent to a 7-11 convenience store. Commercial and residential structures and vegetation obstruct the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 12). This typical weatherboard I -house retains its original fabric; however, given the existing modern visual intrusions, construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure's potential eligibility for the NRHP. Lantz H.nise (VDHR 4034-0974). This frame structure is a 2'/2 -story, 3 bay, hipped roof, Colonial Revival (ca. 1905-1920) style house (Figure 13). It has a lowered basement and the foundation is not visible. The roof is slate with two hipped dormers. Only a fraction of the original fabric of the house appears to remain. I � I Vegetation and commercial structures obstruct and already modernized view toward the proposed cell tower (Figure 14). Due to the extensive remolding of the house, it does not appear to retain any of the characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for the NRHP and, therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no affect on this structure. House, Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0975). This is a Iv story, front gable, frame vernacular style house with a lowered stone basement, weatherboard siding, and standing seam metal roof (Figure 15). The roof has central gables on the north and south sides of the house and paired 6/1 I' windows in the gable ends. The front porch is a 1-story Colonial Revival style with Tuscan columns on brick piers. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRl iP as an example of vernacular architecture. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by other residential and commercial buildings as well as by vegetation (Figure 16). With the commercial development in the area and industrialization of the Route 11, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this vernacular structure. House. 3284 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0976). This house has been converted to a commercial business. The original portion is built on a stone foundation with low basement (Figure 17). The house is a frame constriction with composition siding and 3-bay front fagade with 6/6 paired windows. The roof is standing seam metal with a side gable. There is an exterior end chimney that has become an interior chimney with construction of two one-story additions built on concrete block foundations in the 1950s. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial businesses and vegetation partially obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower site (Figure 18). The proposed cell tower will have no affect on this structure. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0977). This house is a 2%-story American Four Square (ca. 1910- 1930) style with its original fabric (Figure 19). The house is built on a concrete foundation with a low basement. It has a frame construction with stretcher bond brick: veneer and 3-bay y front fagade with 3 pyramidal ' F /1 windows with flat arches. The roof is standtn seam m hipped roof ,A-Ith one hipped dormer on the front fagade and an interior coney. Porches adorthe east and west elevations of the house. The front fagade (east elevation) has a 1-story full fagade Craftsman style porch with wooden battered columns on brick piers. The west elevation has a two-story porch, with the first story enclosed. This structure was considered eligible for listing ' on the NRHP as an example of an American Four Square, while several other examples are nearby, this structure appears to retain most of its original materials. Several frame outbuildings associated with this house, including a chicken coop, garage, and rneathouse were standing in I1990 but have since been razed. The natural setting of this resource has been considerably altered by the commercial ' development along Route 11. Industrial and commercial businesses partially obscure the view i 1 5 towards the proposed cell tower site and modern intrusions dominate the landscape (Figure 20). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3328 valley Pike ODHR #034-0978). This is a large Folk Victorian house made of concrete block (Figure 21). It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a complex floor plan and several cross gables and central gable in the front (west facade). The roof is standing seam metal with a boxed cornice with a laurel motif in the cornice. There is a central flue. The windows are 1/1 and concrete lintels, some paired. The primary porch is a 1-story, enclosed wrap around. There are also enclosed side, 2-story porches. On the back of the house, there is a I -story wing addition. While this structure was at one time potentially eligible for the NRHP, it has seen multiple modifications and additions and is in disrepair. The natural setting is comprised of commercial businesses and would have no bearing on its eligibility for listing. The View from this structure towards the proposed cell tower is dominated by commercial development, with and existing cell tower visible in the background. (Figure 22). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3400 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0979). This house has been converted into a commercial business. The house is a 2'/a-story, 2-bay, American Four Square (ca 1920-1940) with a hipped, pyramidal roof (Figure 23). The foundation is covered by stucco, but the building appears to be a wood frame structure with an enclosed porch on the west elevation. The roof is asphalt shingles (replaced) with a hipped dormer on the west elevation and with boxed cornice. The windows are 1/1 and there are two interior flues. There is an enclosed 2-story porch on the east elevation (rear) that was added to the house. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial and commercial businesses dominate the immediate landscape and an existing cell tower is clearly visible in the distance (Figure 24). The proposed cell tower will have no effect on this structure. Robert Wilson Sr. House (YDHR #034-0980). This house contains what is believed to be the site of the early settler, Robert Wilson. The rear portion of the house is Iog and dates to ca. 1800 to 1810. Overall, the house is a vernacular I -House with the earlier portion forming an ell of the east elevation. The house sits on a stone foundation with a split-level basement (Figure 25). The log portion is 2-story with an enclosed porch and is shorter than the main portion of the house. The main or front portion of the house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3-bay 1-house with one interior end chimney and standing seam metal roof. There is a 1-story full -facade porch on the west facade of the I -House, with chamfered columns and sawn brackets. The windows are mostly 6/6 with some newer 8/8 and there is a three -light transom over the front door. There are many farm -related outbuildings around the house, including a large frame gambrel -roofed bank barn with attached corn crib, several machine sheds, chicken coops, and pig pens. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP due to its association with early settlement in the ral area. The natural setting, with various outbuildings, mature trees and nearby spring, added to its significance when originally recorded in 1990. This house currently sits immediately adjacent to an industrial center. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a large Carquest Autoparts Distribution Center and other industrial buildings (Figure 26). Since this view has already been altered by modern intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Wilson House to the .N ational Register. Barton -Sprinkle House (VDHR #034-0981). This house once stood near the intersection of Route 11 and Route 37, and was moved to its present location around 1970. The house sits on a new concrete block foundation and has a low basement under the main house and a split-level basement under a rear 1-story addition (Figure 27). The house is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a one-story porch on main elevation (south) and an enclosed 2-story porch on the north side of the house, with the 1-story addition. Other elements include 6/6 windows, two interior end flues, 3-light sidelights and a broken transom about the door. Since this house was moved from its original setting, the immediate surroundings would not have bearing on its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. The house sits in a small subdivision surrounded by 1960s and 1970s ramblers, The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a motel and the Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center (Figure 28). Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. ' House, Route 11 (1'DHR #034 0982). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. House, Route 11 (irDHR #034-0983). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRBP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. ' Village Auto Sales (VDHR 4034-0984). The Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center currently occupies the site. This house has been demolished and is not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0985). The house is a 2-story, 2 bay, cross gable structure with a pressed tin metal roof it is in the vernacular style dating to ca. 1880-1910 and has a 1-story porch with turned spindles on the main elevation (Figure 29). Other elements include 2/2 i windows (some paired), boxed cornice, and a central flue. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHIP as an example of an early 20th century frame barn. The natural setting of this property has been commercialized as a retail nursery. ' The view towards the proposed cell tower consists of Interstate 81, a water tower and commercial businesses (Figure 30). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NRHP_ Russell House #2 (VDHR #034-1191). This house is a vernacular side passage dating to ca. ' 1870-1910 (Figure 31). The house is a 2'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable with central front gable on a stone foundation with a low basement. The house is clad in stucco and has a standing seam metal roof. The porch off the north facade is a full -facade 1-story porch with turned supports, ' hipped roof, and plain friezeboard. Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), 1 /1 window in central front gable, boxed cornice, and interior brick flue. There is a rear 2-story gabled wing on a stone foundation with 2/2 and 3/1 windows. A later addition to the south ' elevation of the house is a 1-story enclosed porch with German lap siding. There are several outbuildings associated with this house, including a concrete shed, several frame sheds, chicken coop, concrete silo, concrete garage, and a trailer home. This house is potentially eligible for ' listing on the NRIP as an example of vernacular architecture. The immediate setting, with the exception of a few modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, which contributes to the resource's significance. The view towards the cell tower is relatively unobstructed but with the existing cell towers visible in the distance (Figure 32). In addition, interstate 81 contributes some visual impact, as it is located approximately 500 feet west of the house. Although construction of the proposed tower will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of this structure, it will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the N, TRHP. Russell House #1 (T'DHR #034-1192). This house is a vernacular American Four Square (ca. 1910-1930) on a stone foundation with a low basement (Figure 33). The house is a 21/2-story, 2- bay, frame structure with new vinyl siding. The roof is a standing seam metal, hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the north (northeast) facade and two interior brick flues. The porch on the north facade is full -facade with a concrete pad, turned spindles, wrought iron balustrade, plain friezeboard, and a hipped roof. The 2-story enclosed porch on the south elevation is newer with an exterior concrete flue. Several outbuildings around the house include a gambrel -roofed concrete block barn, several machine sheds, a concrete silo, metal silos, and a trailer home. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Vernacular American );our Square. As with Russell House 42, the immediate setting, with some modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, contributing to the resource's significance. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes the existing monopole tower and Interstate 81 (Figure 34). The house sits about 1000 feet east of the interstate with little vegetation shielding the viewshed. As such, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this house. H. .Steele -Clark House (IDHR #034-1339). This house is a hall -parlor I -House with some Folk Victorian elements on the porch (Figure 35). The house dates to ca. 1870. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with twin interior -end brick chimneys. It is a wood frame structure with asphalt shingle sidings and sits on a stone foundation. The windows are 6/6 on the first floor and ' 2/2 on the second floor. The porch is nearly a full-fagade, hipped roof ]-storyporch with f P our posts (or columns) with side -brackets. There is also a meathouse outbuilding and a concrete modern garage. The house retains most of its natural setting and is potentially eligible for listing on the NR -IP as an example of Folk Victorian style. ' The view towards the proposed cell tower is obstructed by vegetation (Figure 36). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of the house. Resources Recorded During the Current Survey Lens°in-I°ount Company-3167 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century concrete block building with porch across the front fagade (Figure 37). The building was standing around 1948, according to the present owner, Philip Yount, who remembers it as a Civil War Museum during that time. The building later was used as a "day -old" bread store in the 1960s. The present owner purchased and renovated the building in 1980-81, and opened the current business. There is a 2-year old metal frame garage north of the main building. The naain building is a concrete block, 3-bay, front -gable structure. There is an interior brick flue towards the rear of the building, and the roofing material was replaced in the 1980s renovation of the building, currently asphalt shingles. The front porch columns were purchased in 1980 and replaced the original square posts. All the windows and doors were replaced, except for the door on the east elevation. The windows on the north and south elevations were out out during the 1980 renovations. Views toward the proposed cell tower are obstructed by other buildings and tree growth (Figure Due to the extensive renovation and lack of significant architectural style, this structure is recommended not elisdble for listing on the NREP. Therefore, the proposed cell tower construction would not effect this structure. Erie Insurance Group Building-3186 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century 2 './i- ' story house with a low basement with several additions (Figure 39). The original portion of the house is a 3-bay with a partially enclosed central portico, two dormers on the main elevation and one shed dormer on the west (rear) elevation, and an exterior end chimney. There are additions to the west and to the south. The two additions to the south are less than 10 years old. Constructed on a cinder block foundation, this frame structure has gabled dormers and 6/6 windows. This structure is located just to the south of 034-0972. ' N%sews toward the proposed cell tower are characterized by residential/commercial buildings and trees, which obscure the view of the proposed facility from the property (Figure 40). The Erie 1 Insurance Group building is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the construction of the proposed cell tower would not effect this structure. House, 3222 Valley Pike. This structure appears to have a brick veneer that may be covering an older frame structure. The house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3 bay structure with a low basement (Figure 41). The foundation, if not brick, is obscured by the brick veneer. There are 8/8 windows on the first floor and 6/6 windows on the second and wooden shutters only on the main facade of the house. There is a brick exterior -end chimney and a shed roof porch with two posts on brick piers on the north elevation and an enclosed frame shed roof porch that has been covered in brick veneer on the west elevation. There are entry doors on all four elevations. The roof is asphalt shingles. The brick all looks very new, but the windows and other elements appear older, including a broken triangular pediment door surround. The brick veneer was visible behind the door pediment. This structure has been significantly remodeled and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by trees and other structures (Figure 42). Visible from this structure are some of the industrial plants located on the east side of Route 11. The house is surrounded by mature trees and has houses in close proximity to the north and south. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not have an effect on this structure. House, 3 256 Valley Pike. This structure is situated behind a 1960-1970s structure. The structure is a P/a story concrete block -house with 3-bay, front -gable with weatherboard siding in the gables (Figure 43). The windows are 6/6 and there is a central brick flue. The roof is standing seam metal. There are two porches on the main (east facade) and west elevations. The main elevation porch is a four -post, full -facade, shed roof porch. The west elevation has a full -facade, shed roof porch that has been enclosed. This structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the N'RHP as it is a common standing structure in the vicinity with no distinctive characteristics. Trees and other structures obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 44). Therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. House, 3504 Valley Pike. This Bungalow -type structure is on a concrete block foundation with wood frame structural system (Figure 45). The house is 11h-story, front gable, 2-bay (door and a double window) structure with a possible low basement or crawl space. The house appears to be ca. 1930s. The windows are 6/6 and the exterior is weatherboard siding. There is a central brick flue and a single gable dormer on the south elevation. There is a full -facade porch with posts on brick piers on the main (east facade) elevation. Associated with this house are two shed outbuildings (ca 1960s) and another cinder block, shed roof building used as a business (ca 1960s). This structure has been significantly remodeled, and; therefore, it is recommended not eheible for listing on the NRHP. 10 ' The proposed cell tower would be in plain view of this structure, but there is another cell tower associated with the Allegheny Power Plant building, directly across the street from this house (Figure 46). Construction of the proposed tower, therefore, would have no effect this structure. Business, .3908 Valley Pike. This is a 1'/.—story, 2-bay, side gable, cinder block structure with a low basement (Figure 47). The main elevation (east faga.de) has a door aAd bay window. On the west elevation there is a 1-story shed roof addition. The roof is asphalt shingles and there is an interior brick flue. There are two concrete block gable sheds in the rear of the building. This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by vegetation (Figure 48). The proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Conclusions and Recommendations Construction of the proposed telecommunications cell tower at the Shenandoah Gas Company building will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of properties 50 years of age or older within the APE that are either listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. However, based upon the results of the windshield survey and assessment of effects, it is Patton, l iarris, Rust & Associates' opinion that in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5(b), construction of the proposed 180-foot tower will not diminish the characteristics that would qualify those Properties within the APE for listing on the NRHP. If you concur with our recommendation of no adverse effect, please indicate by signature and date below. Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 54013 70-1973 . Sincerely, Kimberly S. Zawacki Principal Investigator CC' John Reno. PHR&A Construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. � 1 concur: Date: it COMMONWEALTH Of VIRGINIA ' Department of Historic Resources W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 2322) Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secretary ofNalural Resources Director ' Tel: (804) 367-2323 Fax: (804) 367-2391 NEFMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 wwwAhr.state.va.us ' DATE: ��� v DHR File # ' FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader > $ion of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: r i This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. No farther identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. We have previously reviewed this project. correspondence. Other (Please see comments below) CONEgENTS: Proararn Services Div 10 Courthouse Ave. Petersburg, VA 23803 Teh (804) 863-1685 ' Fax: (904) 862-61.96 Petersburg Office 19-B Bollinabrook Street Petersburg. VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863-1620 Fax: (804) 863-1627 Portsmouth Office 612 Court Street, Yd Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Attached is a copy of our Roanoke Office 1030 Penmar Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 857-7585 Fax: (540) 85 7-7588 Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (540) 722-7535 9 -1 TLLJL6 Are ECS MID -ATLANTIC, LLC MID-ATLAWIC Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental - Facilities May 14, 2008 Mr. Richard Allen The Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office Tahlequah, Oklahoma ECS Project No. 2322-A Dear Mr. Allen: Per your request for additional information, via the TCNS System, here is a copy of the information requested by the Cherokee Nation regarding the Washington Gas Tower, TCNS #37975. The subject site consists is located at 350 Hillandale Lane in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The site consists of a 120-foot monopole tower with an existing 12-foot by 18-foot equipment shed. The existing 120-f6ot monopole tower is proposed to be increased 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. No new ground disturbance is proposed. An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic Resources Data Share System (DHR-DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system. Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the 'h mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126, recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site, the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034- 0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site, the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and 4034-0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE), which were listed on the NRHP. A previous Archeological Review conducted by Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002, indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinity of the site. Please refer to the attached U.S.G.S. topographic map, aerial photograph, site photographs, photosimulations, the architectural review, and the previous response from the SHPO indicating that the proposed tower will have an affect on historic properties in the vicinity of the site; however, the affect will not be adverse. We ask for concurrence that this proposed tower extension will not impact potential or known tribal lands. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 540-362-2000. Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, 4HtchisonX�� TTIC, LLC a� Staff Environmental Scientist 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F, Roanoke, VA 24019 - (540) 362-2000 - FAX (540) 362-1202 - www.ecslimited.com Aberdeen, MD • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlottesville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City, MD* Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Virginia Beach, VA • Waldorf, MD • Williamsburg, VA • Winchester, VA • York, PA * testing services only �#jl ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC SOURCE: FIGURE 1 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES HISTORIC SITE LOCATION MAP fly Roanoke, Virginia 24019 N WINCHESTER, STEPHENS WASHINGTON GAS TOWER MID -ATLANTIC (540) 362-2000 phone CITY QUADRANGLES, 350 HILLANDALE LANE (540) 362-1202 fax a VIRGINIA DATED 1966 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA PHOTOREVISED 1987, 1986 ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A LEGEND - Approximate Location of the existing 120-foot Monopole Tower. OM 73� ® - DHR-DDS #034-0126, eligible for listing on the NRHP ® - DHR-DSS #034-0984, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated f.�. - DHR-DSS #034-0982, razed ± © - DHR-DSS #034-0983, razed •_i' o Y :, DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated '' y. \; 4 -� • `` ;' Old 01"t44o _ � ,' /IC11 *I,: * ,. Crm.. is f •� 1p a diu fil nI_ CP 13i } �! •fit- � : � - ,, �� � " r (�' J ::� r D 5lrenandoaht _ i ( /„ r•� �£, i•',./ta B ark M moria� P 1 <, t .. ,! , �' d } :•ws- ski ��-�._ (� „! t, ` ), ,�._ '' � `�� e C.:!": ♦ � r ' j t +ti • _trra7 ,�f,�'i , r l ,� �-_ ! •�" '� , e�c''�;, ..., ttt� sue.•-�./.,�..:�� . �'�-�[ ' `,�.. ���,� il-... � �.� 1 SCALE (IN FEET) 1000 2000 2000 0 W LEGEND -- - Approximate Site Boundaries 9 SOURCE: DHR-DSS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 2002 SCALE (IN FEET) 100 200 661%im� 200 0 FIGURE 2 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 1 VIEW OF THE EXISTING 120-FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER FACING SOUTHEAST. Photograph No. 2 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE NORTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. ms. p i 1 4 } 4'k"tEC' yJ g p �tGi`�, K i 1 PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A „L Photograph No. 5 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING TOWER, Photograph No. 6 VIEW OF THE ACCESS ROAD FACING NORTHEAST. 'i ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 —� Phone: (540)362-2000 mFax: (b40)362-1202 1 1 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 1 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph A iView of the Crawford Hillandale Hou, (DHR-DSS #034-0126) a 50+ year old structure and is recommended for listing on the National Historic Register, located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph A: ' Photosimulation of the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph A. 1 ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Project Number: 2322-A Phone: (540)362-2000 PAGE 2 Date: April 2, 2008 �0)362-1202 Photograph B : ' View of the former location of Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984), located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph B: I' Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph B. � I ZECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 w,AoD fay -nc, Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 3 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph C: View of the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph C: I Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph C. � I ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Project Number: 2322-A Phone: (540)362-2000 PAGE 4 Date: April 2, 2008 Aar _�&TL +mIn Fax: (540)362-1202 Photographs D and E: View of the former locations of houses on Route 11 South (DHP DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983), located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph D and E: I Line of sight of the proposed collocation tower site as seen from Photographs D and E. q® ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F ' l�J Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 �mu®�a� Fax: (b40)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 5 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph F: View of the Robert Wilson, Sr. House ( DHR-DSS #034-0980) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph F: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph F. � I � I � I CULTURAL RESOURCES, INC. I lull, 23. 2002 ' Q (� Mr. Marc Holma EJ .r Virginia Department of Historic Resources 1 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 �'1� nUU _ �� Jill 2 5 2002 P H R & RE: Section 106 Review of a Proposed Washington Gas Telecommunications Tower, Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma: On behalf of our client, Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C., we are requesting your ' concurrence with our determination that construction of a proposed telecommunications tower in Winchester, Virginia vvill not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Our request is made pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800- ' Nrotection of Historic Properties, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). The proposed tower is a 180-foot lattice self-support. The proposed project site is located adjacent and behind the existing Shenandoah Gas Building ' and approximately 450 feet east of Interstate 81 (Figure 1). The tower will be located beside two existing towers, a 112-foot monopole and a 42-foot lattice self-support. Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as that area where effects to historic properties can ' reasonably be expected to occur regardless of whether such properties currently exist. For the purposes of this project, the APE is defined as all areas located within a 1.0-mile radius of the proposed cell tower site. Situated in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, the terrain surrounding the t APE is characterized by rolling hills, with some steeper relief around Hoge Run and Opequon Creek in the southeastern portion of the project area. The cell tower will be located just east of an industrial area west of Interstate 81. ' The proposed tower will be located immediately adjacent to an existing 42-foot lattice tower and a 1 10-foot monopole (Appendix A and Appendix B). The setting of the project area includes a water tower, an additional cell tower, and an industrial complex (Figure 1). The 200-foot water tower is approximately 3/4 mile southwest of the proposed tower. A 200-foot lattice self-support toNver is across I-81 adjacent to the industrial site. Three large industrial plants in the vicinity include the Carquest Distribution Plant, General Electric, and Allegheny Power Company. In -0=9 Ironbound Road, Suite 300 - Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 - (757) 564-9652 - Fax (757) 564-8157 • culresinc@aol.com ' 705 Caroline Street - Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 - (540) 370-1973 - Faz (540) 370-0904 - crifburg@aol-corn n addition to the industrial facilities, the surrounding landscape consists of single-family residential dwellings and small businesses. Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Effects A review of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) cultural resource inventory and survey information was conducted in an effort to identify all previously recorded historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register within the APE. The results of this research indicated that nineteen architectural resources had been previously recorded within the APE (Figure 2). A total of thirty-four archaeological resources had been previously recorded either in or immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location (Figure 3). Due to the limited footprint of the proposed tower, construction of the facility is expected to have no effect on archaeological resources. Also, the area of the cell tower has been previously graded for construction of the Shenandoah Gas building and the other two towers, therefore, no additional archaeological investigations are recommended. In addition to the archive check, a windshield survey was conducted of the APE by staff from Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI). The survey included a visual assessment of the proposed tower site, a windshield survey of all structures 50 years of age or older within APE, and an assessment of potential visual effects to resources 50 years of age or older within the APE. Representative views of the siteline between the proposed tower site and historic and potentially historic resources within the APE were also photographed. All public roads within the APE were surveyed and photographs were taken from public rights -of -way. All structures identified on the U. S. G. S. Winchester quadrangle were visually inspected if access was permitted. For those properties where access was restricted, photographs were taken of the property from the closest point in a public right-of-way and views back towards the proposed tower taken from the same point. The results of the windshield survey and the assessment of effects are discussed below. Previously Identified Resources within a One -Mile Radius (:amp Russell Historic District "HR #034-5036). This historic district includes the Hillandale House and the Camp Russell Earthworks. It extends from Interstate 81 to Hoge Run, more or less due east of the intersection of I-81 and Route 37. The district is wooded on the eastern portion with open fields to the west adjacent to the Hiillandale House (Figure 4). The eastern half of the site has previously been compromised by modern visual impacts, including existing cell towers and the water tank, while the wooded western position of the district is somewhat shielded from these impacts. Given the presence of modern elements already in the viewshed, construction of the proposed structure will not adversely affect those qualities and characteristics that qualify the district for listing on the NRHP. 2 ' Hillandale-Crawford House (VDHR #034-0126). There are three distinct phases of construction/additions to this house (Figure 5). The central portion of the house was originally constructed ca 1780-1800. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable house constructed of coursed ' limestone, with a full fagade 1-story front porch and an interior end chimney. The second phase of construction (ca 1875-1890) added what is now the main fagade of the house. This section of the house is 2-story random limestone. It is a 3-bay side -gable structure with central front gable, ' two central brick chimneys, and a partial 1-story porch with Doric columns. The third phase of construction (ca 1910-1930) added the 2-story, gable frame addition with weatherboard siding on a split-level stone basement. The roof over the entire structure is pressed tin shingles. There are several outbuildings associated with this structure. These buildings include a stone springhouse, a possible log or frame meathouse, several frame sheds, a frame barn, carriage ' house, machine shed, frame bank barn with stave silo, and a frame tenant house about lh mile northwest of the main house. ' Hillandale has been determined potentially eligible for the listing on the NRMR The outbuildings, nearby tenant house and historic district, and general setting on the landscape are contributing factors to the eligibility of this structure. The view toward the proposed cell tower ' overlooks the tenant house and the current towers are visible in the distance (Figure 6). Since this view has already been altered by modem intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Hillandale House to the NRHP. Camp Russell/Hillandale Earthworks (034-0321). The Hillandale Earthworks are located about ' 2000 feet northeast of Cary's Brook (034-0319). These earthworks are associated with the Union occupation of this area of the Shenandoah Valley during the fall of 1864 and are considered eligible for listing on the NRHP in the area of military history. ' The earthworks are Aithin a predominantly wooded area and somewhat shielded from view of the proposed cell tower due to the fact that they are situated on a lower elevation (see Figure 3). ' the view towards the west has been compromised by extant cell towers and the water tower. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthworks eligible for the NRHP. House (VDHR ;1034-0021). This house is a Federal style building dating to ca. 1840. It is a 5- bay, 2-story brick structure with a stone foundation, side gable, and an interior end chimney (Figure 7). The roof is standing seam metal. Windows are 6/6 on the first floor, but 9/6 on the second floor and the main door has a 4-light transom. There is a 1-story asymmetrical 3 bay ' addition to the east of the main structure. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP under Criterion C as an example of ' Federal architectural style. The natural setting of this property has been severely altered as it is surrounded by 1970s era apartment buildings. In addition, the view towards the cell tower, while partially obscured by vegetation, is dominated by telephone utility lines (Figure 8). The I' proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing in the NRBP. ■ Cwy's Brook (VDHR #034-0319). This structure was in very poor condition when it was recorded and the several surrounding associated outbuildings already existed in a ruinous ' condition. CRI staff inspected the landform. identified as the location of the house and found nothing but an overgrown area of tall grass and weeds (Figure 9). It appears that this house is no longer standing and therefore the proposed cell tower will have no effect on this resource. ■ Carv's Brook Reboubt (034-0320). This Civil War redoubt is located 200 feet northwest of Cary's Brook. It is associated with the Union troop activity in the area during the fall of 1864. After General Sheridan secured this portion of the Shenandoah Valley in 1864, Union forces occupied it. The redoubt is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP for its association with ' an historic event. The current cell towers are not visible from this property because of the vegetation and the lower ' elevation of the earthwork (see Figure 9). The water tower just to the southwest, however, is visible from the western potion of the site (Figure 10). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthwork potentially eligible for the NRHP. ■ Smage-Seal House, 3172 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-972). This structure is a vernacular 2-story, ' 3-bay, side -gable, frame structure on a limestone foundation with a low basement, and an ell addition off the back (west elevation) of the house (Figure 11). The house dates to ca. 1890 to 1910, with additions dating to the 1940s. It has weatherboard siding, a standing seam metal roof, ' and twin exterior end chimneys and one central chimney on the ell. Additions include an enclosed shed roof porch on the south side of house, and a i-story shed roof addition of the west side. There is only one outbuilding, a 1-story frame garage with aluminum siding. Other ' features include 2/2 sash windows, wood shutters and return cornice and frieze boards. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The natural setting of this structure has been completely altered, as it stands near a major intersection adjacent to a 7-11 convenience store. Commercial and residential structures and vegetation obstruct the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 12). This typical weatherboard I -house retains its original fabric; however, given the existing modern visual intrusions, construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure's potential eligibility for the NRHP. ■ L vitz Hcwse (VDHR-034-0974). This frame structure is a 2'/z -story, 3 bay, hipped roof, Colonial Revival (ca. 1905-1920) style house (Figure 13). It has a lowered basement and the foundation is not visible. The roof is slate with two hipped dormers. Only a fraction of the original fabric of the house appears to remain. 11 ' Vegetation and commercial structures obstruct and already modernized view toward the proposed cell tower (Figure 14). Due to the extensive remolding of the house, it does not appear to retain any of the characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for the NRHP and, ' therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no affect on this structure. ' House, Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0975). This is a I V2-story, front gable, frame vernacular style house with a lowered stone basement, weatherboard siding, and standing seam metal roof (Figure 15). The roof has central gables on the north and south sides of the house and paired 6/1 ' windows in the gable ends. The front porch is a 1-story Colonial Revival style with Tuscan columns on brick piers. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRIIP as an example of vernacular architecture. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by other residential and commercial buildings as well as by vegetation (Figure 16). With the commercial development in the area and industrialization of the Route 11, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this vernacular structure. House. 3284 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0976). This house has been converted to a commercial business. The original portion is built on a stone foundation with low basement (Figure 17). The house is a frame construction with composition siding and 3-bay front facade with 6/6 paired windows. The roof is standing seam metal with a side gable. There is an exterior end chimney that has become an interior chimney with construction of two one-story additions built on concrete block foundations in the 1950s. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial businesses and vegetation partially obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower site (Figure 18). The proposed cell tower will have no affect on this structure. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0977). This house is a 2V2-story American Four Square (ca. 1910- 1930) style with its original fabric (Figure 19). The house is built on a concrete foundation with a low basement. It has a frame construction with stretcher bond brick veneer and 3-bay front facade with 3/1 windows with flat arches. The roof is standing seam metal, pyramidal hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the front facade and an interior chimney. Porches adorn the east and west elevations of the house. The front facade (east elevation) has a 1-story full facade Craftsman style porch with wooden battered columns on brick piers. The west elevation has a two-story porch, with the first story enclosed. This structure was considered eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of an American Four Square, while several other examples are nearby, this structure appears to retain most of its original materials. Several frame outbuildings associated with this house, including a chicken coop, garage, and meathouse were standing in 1990 but have since been razed. The natural setting of this resource has been considerably altered by the commercial development along Route 11. Industrial and commercial businesses partially obscure the view 5 towards the proposed cell tower site and modern intrusions dominate the landscape (Figure 20). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3328 Palley Pike (VDHR #034-0978). This is a large Folk. Victorian house made of concrete block (Figure 21). It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a complex floor plan and several cross gables and central gable in the front (west facade). The roof is standing seam metal with a boxed cornice with a laurel motif in the cornice. There is a central flue. The windows are 1/1 and concrete lintels, some paired. The primary porch is a 1-story, enclosed wrap around. There are also enclosed side, 2-story porches. On the back of the house, there is a l-story wing addition. While this structure was at one time potentially eligible for the NRHP, it has seen multiple modifications and additions and is in disrepair. The natural setting is comprised of commercial businesses and would have no bearing on its eligibility for listing. The View from this structure towards the proposed cell tower is dominated by commercial ' development, with and existing cell tower visible in the background. (Figure 22). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. ' House, 3400 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0979). This house has been converted into a commercial business. The house is a 2'/z-story, 2-bay, American Four Square (ca 1920-1940) with a hipped, ' pyramidal roof (Figure 23). The foundation is covered by stucco, but the building appears to be a wood frame structure with an enclosed porch on the west elevation. The roof is asphalt shingles (replaced) with a hipped dormer on the west elevation and with boxed cornice. The windows are 1/1 and there are two interior flues. There is an enclosed 2-story porch on the east elevation (rear) that was added to the house. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the N1W. ' Industrial and commercial businesses dominate the immediate landscape and an existing cell tower is clearly visible in the distance (Figure 24). The proposed cell tower will have no effect I on this structure ' Robert Wilton Sr. House (,DHR #034-0980). This house contains what is believed to be the site of the early settler, Robert Wilson. The rear portion of the house is log and dates to ca. 1800 to 1810. Overall, the house is a vernacular I -House with the earlier portion forming an ell of the east elevation. The house sits on a stone foundation with a split-level basement (Figure 25). The ' log portion is 2-story with an enclosed porch and is shorter than the main portion of the house. The main or front portion of the house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3-bay 1-house with one interior end chimney and standing seam metal roof. There is a 1-story full-fagade porch on the west facade of the I -House, with chamfered columns and sawn brackets. The windows are mostly 6/6 ' with some newer 8/8 and there is a three -light transom over the front door. There are many ' farm -related outbuildings around the house, including a large frame gambrel -roofed bank barn with attached corn crib, several machine sheds, chicken coops, and pig pens. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP due to its association with early settlement in the I' r area. The natural setting, with various outbuildings, mature trees and nearby spring, added to its significance when originally recorded in 1990. This house currently sits immediately adjacent to an industrial center. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a large Carquest Autoparts Distribution Center and other industrial buildings (Figure 26). Since this view has already been altered by modern intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Wilson House to the ?rational Register. Barton -.Sprinkle House (VDHR #034-0981). This house once stood near the intersection of Route I 1 and Route 37, and was moved to its present location around 1970. The house sits on a new concrete block foundation and has a low basement under the main house and a split-level basement under a rear 1-story addition (Figure 27). The house is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a one-story porch on main elevation (south) and an enclosed 2-story porch on the north side of the house, with the 1-story addition, Other elements include 6/6 windows, two interior end flues, 3-light sidelights and a broken transom about the door. Since this house was moved from its original setting, the immediate surroundings would not have bearing on its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. The house sits in a small subdivision surrounded by 1960s and 1970s ramblers. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a ' motel and the Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center (Figure 28). Construction of the proposed cell takver, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (b'DHR #034-0982). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0983). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not ' eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. Village Auto Sales (VDHR #034-0984). The Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center currently occupies the site. This house has been demolished and is not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (YDHR #034-0985). The house is a 2-story, 2 bay, cross gable structure with a pressed tin metal roof it is in the vernacular style dating to ca. 1880-1910 and has a I -story ' porch with turned spindles on the main elevation (Figure 29). Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), boxed cornice, and a central flue. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the N7RHP as an example of an early 20th century frame barn. The natural setting of this property has been commercialized as a retail nursery. 7 The view towards the proposed cell tower consists of Interstate 81, a water tower and commercial businesses (Figure 30). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NRHP_ Russell House .#2 (VDHR #034-1191). This house is a vernacular side passage dating to ca. 1870-1910 (Figure 31). The house is a 2%z-story, 2-bay, side gable with central front gable on a stone foundation with a low basement. The house is clad in stucco and has a standing seam metal roof. The porch off the north facade is a full -facade 1-story porch with turned supports, hipped roof; and plain friezeboard. Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), 1/1 window in central front gable, boxed cornice, and interior brick flue. There is a rear 2-story gabled wing on a stone foundation with 2/2 and 3/1 windows. A later addition to the south elevation of the house is a 1-story enclosed porch with German lap siding. There are several outbuildings associated with this house, including a concrete shed, several frame sheds, chicken coop, concrete silo, concrete garage, and a trailer home. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The immediate setting, with the exception of a few modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, which contributes to the resource's significance. ' The view towards the cell tower is relatively unobstructed but with the existing cell towers visible in the distance (Figure 32). In addition, interstate 81 contributes some visual impact, as it is located approximately 500 feet west of the house. Although construction of the proposed tower v �] introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of this structure, it will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NTRHP. Russell House #1 (VDHR #034-1192). This house is a vernacular American Four Square (ca. 1910-1930) on a stone foundation with a low basement (Figure 33). The house is a 21/2-story, 2- bay, frame structure with new vinyl siding. The roof is a standing seam metal, hipped roof with ' one hipped dormer on the north (northeast) facade and two interior brick flues. The porch on the north facade is full -facade with a concrete pad, turned spindles, wrought iron balustrade, plain fiezeboard, and a hipped roof. The 2-story enclosed porch on the south elevation is newer with an exterior concrete flue. Several outbuildings around the house include a gambrel -roofed concrete block barn, several machine sheds, a concrete silo, metal silos, and a trailer home. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Vernacular American Four Square. As with Russell House 42, the immediate setting, with some modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, contributing to the resource's significance. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes the existing monopole tower and Interstate 81 (Figure 34). The house sits about 1000 feet east of the interstate with little vegetation shielding i the viewshed. As such, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this house. 0 Steele -Clark House (I,DHR #034-1339). This house is a hall -parlor I -House with some Folk Victorian elements on the porch (Figure 35). The house dates to ca. 1870. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with twin interior -end brick chimneys. It is a wood frame structure with asphalt shingle sidings and sits on a stone foundation. The windows are 6/6 on the first floor and 2/2 on the second floor. The porch is nearly a full-fagade, hipped roof 1-story porch with four posts (or columns) with side -brackets. There is also a meathouse outbuilding and a concrete modern garage. The house retains most of its natural setting and is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Folk Victorian style. The view towards the proposed cell tower is obstructed by vegetation (Figure 36). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of the house. Resources Recorded During the Current Survey Le41n-l'ount Company-3167 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century concrete block building with porch across the front fagade (Figure 37). The building was standing around 1948, according to the present owner, Philip Yount, who remembers it as a Civil War Museum during that time. The building later was used as a "day -old" bread store in the 1960s. The present owner purchased and renovated the building in 1980-81, and opened the current business. There is a 2-year old metal frame garage north of the main building. The main building is a concrete block, 3-bay, front -gable structure. There is an interior brick flue towards the rear of the building, and the roofing material was replaced in the 1980s renovation of the building, currently asphalt'shingles. shingles. The front porch columns were purchased in 1980 and replaced the original square posts. All the windows and doors were replaced, except for the door on the east elevation. The windows on the north and south elevations were cut out during the 1980 renovations. Views toward the proposed cell tower are obstructed by other buildings and tree growth (Figure 18). Due to the extensive renovation and lack of significant architectural style, this structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the proposed cell tower construction would not effect this structure. .Erie Insurance Group Building--3186 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century 2 'h- stor_y house with a low basement with several additions (Figure 39). The original portion of the house is a 3-bay with a partially enclosed central portico, two dormers on the main elevation and one shed dormer on the west (rear) elevation, and an exterior end chimney. There are additions to the west and to the south. The two additions to the south are less than 10 years old. Constructed on a cinder block foundation, this frame structure has gabled dormers and 6/6 i windows. This structure is located just to the south of 034-0972. Views toward the proposed cell tower are characterized by residential/commercial buildings and trees, which obscure the view of the proposed facility from the property (Figure 40). The Erie Insurance Group building is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the construction of the proposed cell tower would not effect this structure. House, 3222 Valley Pike. This structure appears to have a brick veneer that may be covering an older frame structure. The house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3 bay structure with a low basement (Figure 41). The foundation, if not brick, is obscured by the brick veneer. There are 8/8 windows on the first floor and 6/6 windows on the second and wooden shutters only on the main facade of the house. There is a brick exterior -end chimney and a shed roof porch with two posts on brick piers on the north elevation and an enclosed frame shed roof porch that has been covered in brick veneer on the west elevation. There are entry doors on all four elevations. The roof is asphalt shingles. The brick all looks very new, but the windows and other elements appear older, including a broken triangular pediment door surround. The brick veneer was visible behind the door pediment. This structure has been significantly remodeled and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by trees and other structures (Figure 42). Visible from this structure are some of the industrial plants located on the east side of Route 11. The house is surrounded by mature trees and has houses in close proximity to the north and south. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not have an effect on this structure_ House, 3 256 Valley Pike. This structure is situated behind a 1960-1970s structure. The structure is a 11/a story concrete block -house with 3-bay, from -gable with weatherboard siding in the gables (Figure 43). The windows are 6/6 and there is a central brick flue. The roof is standing seam metal. There are two porches on the main (east facade) and west elevations. The main elevation porch is a four -post, full -facade, shed roof porch. The west elevation has a full -facade, shed roof porch that has been enclosed. This structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NNRHP as it is a common standing structure in the vicinity with no distinctive characteristics. Trees and other structures obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 44). Therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. House, 3504 Valley Pike. This Bungalow -type structure is on a concrete block foundation with wood frame structural system (Figure 45). The house is I1/z-story, front gable, 2-bay (door and a double window) structure with a possible low basement or crawl space. The house appears to be ca. 1930s. The windows are 6/6 and the exterior is weatherboard siding. There is a central brick flue and a single gable dormer on the south elevation. There is a full -facade porch with posts on brick piers on the main (east facade) elevation. Associated with this house are two shed outbuildings (ca 1960s) and another cinder block, shed roof building used as a business (ca 1960s). This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. 10 I The proposed cell tower would be in plain view of this structure, but there is anther cell tower associated with the Allegheny Power Plant building, directly across the street from this house (Figure 46). Construction of the proposed tower, therefore, would have no effect this structure. Business, 3908 Valley Pike. This is a 1'/z-story,2-bay, side cinder block structure with a gable, low basement (Figure 47). The main elevation (east facade) has a door and bay window. On the ' west elevation there is a 1-story shed roof addition. The roof is asphalt shingles and there is an interior brick flue. There are two concrete block gable sheds in the rear of the building. This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRBP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by vegetation (Figure 48). The proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. ' Conclusions and Recommendations Construction of the proposed telecommunications cell tower at the Shenandoah Gas Company building will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of properties 50 years of age or older within the APE that are either listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. However, based upon the results of the windshield survey and assessment of effects, it is Patton, Hams, Rust & Associates' opinion that in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5(b), consiTuction of the proposed 180-foot tower will not diminish the characteristics that would qualify those properties within the APE for listing on the NRHP. If you concur with our recommendation of no adverse effect, please indicate by signature and date below_ Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 540/3 70-1973 . Sincerely, Kimberly S. Zawacki Principal Investigator cc� John Reno. PHR&A Construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 1 concur: Date: 11 11 COMMONWEALTH of VIRG \TU ' Department of Historic Resources W. Tayloe Murphy. Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221 Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secretary of Natural Resources Director ' Tel: (804) 367-2323 Fax: (804) 367-2391 MEMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 www.dhr.state.va.us DATE: "� �� v DHR File # eCS L FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader (,,n 'Fiision of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: _-- ' �-7i� (c:_-LC: C ��:-•-�,.:t✓, iL �STv�S ��L �v�...��'�l� This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic Further c properties. onsultatlon with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. No farther identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. We have previously reviewed this project. correspondence. Other (Please see comments below) COMMENTS: Program Services Div, 10 Courthouse Ave. Petersburg, VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863-1685 Fax: (904) 862-6196 Petersburs Office 19-B Boliinsbrook Street Petersbure. VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863-) 620 Fax: (804) 863-1.627 Portsmouth Office 612 Court Street, 3d Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Attached is a copy of our Roanoke Office 1030 Penmar Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 85'-7585 Fax: (540) 857-7588 Winchester office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (i40) 722-7535 ECS MID -ATLANTIC, LLC Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities May 14, 2008 Shawnee Tribe Att: B. Pryor Historic Preservation Dept. 29 South Highway 69A Miami, Oklahoma, 74354 ECS Project No. 2322-A Dear Ms. Pryor: Per your request for additional information, via the TCNS System, here is a copy of the information requested by the Shawnee Tribe regarding the Washington Gas Tower, TCNS #37975. The subject site consists is located at 350 Hillandale Lane in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The site consists of a 120-foot monopole tower with an existing 12-foot by 18-foot equipment shed. The existing 120-foot monopole tower is proposed to be increased 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. No new ground disturbance is proposed. An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic Resources Data Share System (DHR-DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system. Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the '/s mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126, recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site, the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034- 0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site, the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE), which were listed on the NRHP. A previous architectural survey was conducted by Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002, indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinity of the site. Please refer to the attached U.S.G.S. topographic map, aerial photograph, site photographs, photosimulations, the architectural review, and the previous response from the SHPO indicating that the proposed tower will have an affect on historic properties in the vicinity of the site; however, the affect will not be adverse. We ask for concurrence that this proposed tower extension will not impact potential or known tribal lands. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 540-362-2000. Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, RUKaiili Hutchison Staff Environmental Scientist 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F, Roanoke, VA 24019 • (540) 362-2000 • FAX (540) 362-1202 • www.ecslimited.com I Aberdeen, MD • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlottesville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City, MD* Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Virginia Beach, VA • Waldorf, MD • Williamsburg, VA • Winchester, VA • York, PA * testing services only ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC SOURCE: FIGURE 1 wim�5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F HISTORIC SITE LOCATION MAP Roanoke, Vir inia 24019 H U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES LLCg WINCHESTER, STEPHENS WASHINGTON GAS TOWER (540) 362-2000 phone CITY QUADRANGLES, 350 HILLANDALE LANE (540) 362-1202 fax VIRGINIADATED 1966 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA " PHOTOREVISED 1987, 1986 ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A LEGEND r s - Approximate Location of the existing 120-foot Monopole Tower. ® - DHR-DDS #034-0126, eligible for listing on the NRHP o o DHR-DSS #034-0984, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated �'• ° , - DHR-DSS #034-0982, razed © • w DHR-DSS #034-0983, razed � `a � ���• �. © - DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated tl' •. Old `�' 1 t,h •`1� ' f ss�) ( s• n -Half it Radius i 3l t j�� �i a ,• j�� �� ) t Shenandoah\ . ! Qj hlemeriel`Park • �• ! tom' !1 r _!� \� ;� J. - - �. 8 kl% L' t 1 �f�� 1 S� A i •� � � I 'i AJ Jp`41 i Al i > , ,..) / 'w �l \ i!' C►E14tJri�a ` t L,f i` f' J (� l r , �,.,�5. r,•_ � rash �� \ � - ( .� X1.16t .t t t 7( t� .. �\• , ,;II�i 1J %•�o. t +�' •i � �.-, �a/�' �:� �51� .i �'� ��-� "j � � ,G� j 'tie r v jj :iCRI • ► J �% rt ` , '•'"--':.� -c. i� 1 ` ;�' `rt) i i l �'i' �: z, , ' i��I�`� -,! �}�,� ,''� .�'� � ... r.. `'7 ��. "�.fi� �it�;t:� � `•'t•-: �� at 'j� _ )) ,J r�'*�� , .t �•-•�i �'0 1� ,- ,,, l J ,o' ,gyp r• � �' l , •"s:. . SCALE (IN FEET) i 1000 2000 �\ ` 'yam `}•j a W LEGEND - Approximate Site Boundaries E SOURCE: DHR-DSS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 2002 SCALE (IN FEET) 100 200 LLJM 200 0 FIGURE 2 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 1 VIEW OF THE EXISTING 120-FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER FACING SOUTHEAST. r PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 3 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE EAST OF THE EXISTING TOWER. 14 Photograph No. 4 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. I PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A ffiz Photograph No. 5 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING TOWER, Photograph No. 6 VIEW OF THE ACCESS ROAD FACING NORTHEAST. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Project Number: 2322-A Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 PAGE 1 Date: April 2, 2008 o�n nv�a�a�o� Fax: (540)362-1202 Photograph A : View of the Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) a 50+ year old structure and is recommended for listing on the National Historic Register, located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the ' proposed collocation extension. fl Approximate line of sight from Photograph A: ' Photosimulation of the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph A. a - ECS - Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F .' Roanoke, Virginia 24019 L2 Phone: (540)362-2000 (540)362-1202 L r PAGE 2 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph B : View of the former location of Village Auto S�-1?s (DHR-DSS #034-0984), located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph B: I Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph B. -- ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC ' T� 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F U1 Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 Sao®��ra a s�va� Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 3 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph C: View of the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph C: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph C. —+ ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 aaa� v=Fac' Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 4 Date: April 2, 2008 Photographs D and E: View of the former locatic is of houses on Route 11 South (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983), located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph D and E: Line of sight of the proposed collocation tower site as seen from Photographs D and E. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC ` ' 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 �au��s�sra Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 5 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph F: View of the Robert Wilson, Sr. House ( DHR-DSS #034-0980) a 50+ yea; old structure, located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph F: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph F. CULTURAL RESOURCES, INC. luiv 23. 2002 N,1r. Marc Holma 90 •i Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 JLJL 2 5 2002 PHR8q I RE: Section 106 Review of a Proposed Washington Gas Telecommunications Tower, Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma: On behalf of our client, Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C.,we are requesting your ' concurrence with our determination that construction of a proposed telecommunications tower in %�"inchester, Virginia will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Our request is made pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800- Protection of Historic Properties, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). The proposed tower is a 180-foot lattice self-support. The proposed project site is located adjacent and behind the existing Shenandoah Gas Building ' and approximately 450 feet east of Interstate 81 (Figure 1). The tower will be located beside two existing towers, a 112-foot monopole and a 42-foot lattice self-support. Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as that area where effects to historic properties can reasonably be expected to occur regardless of whether such properties currently exist. For the purposes of this project, the APE is defined as all areas located within a 1.0-mile radius of the proposed cell tower site. Situated in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, the terrain surrounding the ' APE is characterized by rolling hills, with some steeper relief around Hoge Run and Opequon Creek in the southeastern portion of the project area. The cell tower will be located just cast of an industrial area west of Interstate 81. ' The proposed tower will be located immediately adjacent to an existing 42-foot lattice tower and a 1 10-foot monopole (Appendix A and Appendix 13). The setting of the project area includes a ' +A--ater tower, an additional cell tower, and an industrial complex (Figure 1). The 200-foot water tower is approximately 3/4 mile southwest of the proposed tower. A 200-foot lattice self-support tower is across I-81 adjacent to the industrial site. Three large industrial plants in the vicinity ' include the Carquest Distribution Plant, General Electric, and Allegheny Power Company. In ' 4029 Ironb,mnl Road, Suite 300 - Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 - (757) 564-9652 - Fax (757) 564-8157 - culresine@aol.com 705 Caroline Street - Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 - (540) 370-1973 - Fax (540) 370-0904 - crifhurg@aol-com t% addition to the industrial facilities, the surrounding landscape consists of single-family residential dwellings and small businesses. Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Effects A review of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) cultural resource inventory and survey information was conducted in an effort to identify all previously recorded historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register within the APE. The results of this research indicated that nineteen architectural resources had been previously recorded within the APE (Figure 2). A total of thirty-four archaeological resources had been previously recorded either in or immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location (Figure 3). Due to the limited footprint of the proposed tower, construction of the facility is expected to have no effect on archaeological resources. Also, the area of the cell tower has been previously graded for construction of the Shenandoah Gas building and the other two towers, therefore, no additional archaeological investigations are recommended. In addition to the archive check, a windshield survey was conducted of the APE by staff from Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI). The survey included a visual assessment of the proposed tower site, a windshield survey of all structures 50 years of age or older within APE, and an assessment of potential visual effects to resources 50 years of age or older within the APE. Representative views of the siteline between the proposed tower site and historic and potentially historic resources within the APE were also photographed. All public roads within the APE were surveyed and photographs were taken from public rights -of -way. All structures identified on the U.S.G.S. Winchester quadrangle were visually inspected if access was permitted. For those properties where access was restricted, photographs were taken of the property from the closest point in a public right-of-way and views back towards the proposed tower taken from the same point. The results of the windshield survey and the assessment of effects are discussed below. Previously Identified Resources within a One -Mile Radius Camp RuKvell Historic District ('PDHR #034-5036). This historic district includes the Hillandale House and the Camp Russell Earthworks. It extends from Interstate 81 to Hoge Run, more or less due east of the intersection of I-81 and Route 37. The district is wooded on the eastern portion with open fields to the west adjacent to the Hillandale House (Figure 4). The eastern half of the site has previously been compromised by modern visual impacts, including existing cell towers and the water tank, while the wooded western position of the district is somewhat shielded from these impacts. Driven the presence of modern elements already in the viewshed, construction of the proposed structure will not adversely affect those qualities and characteristics that qualify the district for listing on the NRHP. 2 Hilla7a,ale-Crawford House (YDHR #034-0126). There are three distinct phases of construction/additions to this house (Figure 5). The central portion of the house was originally constructed ca 1780-1800. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable house constructed of coursed ' limestone, with a full facade 1-story front porch and an interior end chimney. The second phase of construction (ca 1875-1890) added what is now the main fagade of the house. This section of the house is 2-story random limestone. It is a 3-bay side -gable stricture with central front gable, two central brick chimneys, and a partial 1-story porch with Doric columns. The third phase of construction (ca 1910-1930) added the 2-story, gable frame addition with weatherboard siding on a split-level stone basement. The roof over the entire structure is pressed tin shingles. ' There are several outbuildings associated with this structure. These buildings include a stone springhouse, a possible log or frame meathouse, several frame sheds, a frame barn, carriage house, machine shed, frame bank barn with stave silo, and a frame tenant house about % mile northwest of the main house. ' Hillandale has been determined potentially eligible for the listing on the NRHP. The outbuildings, nearby tenant house and historic district, and general setting on the landscape are contributing factors to the eligibility of this structure. The view toward the proposed cell tower overlooks the tenant house and the current towers are visible in the distance (Figure 6). Since this view has already been altered by modem intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Hillandale House to the NRHP. Camp Russell/Hillandale Earthworks (034-0321). The Hillandale Earthworks are located about ' 2000 feet northeast of Cary's Brook (034-0319). These earthworks are associated with the Union occupation of this area of the Shenandoah Valley during the fall of 1864 and are considered eligible for listing on the NRHP in the area of military history. The earthworks are Mthin a predominantly wooded area and somewhat shielded from view of the proposed cell tower due to the fact that they are situated on a lower elevation (see Figure 3). ' ,Yhe view towards the west has been compromised by extant cell towers and the water tower. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthworks eligible for the NRHP. House (UDHR ;T034-0021). This house is a Federal style building dating to ea. 1840. It is a 5- bay, 2-story brick structure with a stone foundation, side gable, and an interior end chimney (Figure 7). The roof is standing seam metal. Windows are 6/6 on the first floor, but 9/6 on the second floor and the main door has a 4-light transom. There is a 1-story asymmetrical 3 bay addition to the east of the main structure. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP under Criterion C as an example of Federal architectural style. The natural setting of this property has been severely altered as it is surrounded by 1970s era apartment buildings. In addition, the view towards the cell tower, while partially obscured by vegetation, is dominated by telephone utility lines (Figure 8 j. The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing in the NRHP. Cwy's Brook (VDHR #034-0319). This structure was in very poor condition when it was recorded and the several surrounding associated outbuildings already existed in a ruinous condition. CRI staff inspected the landform identified as the location of the house and found nothing but an overgrown area of tall grass and weeds (Figure 9). It appears that this house is no longer standing and therefore the proposed cell tower will have no effect on this resource. Cary's Brook Reboubt (034-0320). This Civil War redoubt is located 200 feet northwest of Cary's Brook. It is associated with the Union troop activity in the area during the fall of 1864. After General Sheridan secured this portion of the Shenandoah Valley in 1864, Union forces occupied it. The redoubt is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP for its association with an historic event. The current cell towers are not visible from this property because of the vegetation and the Iower elevation of the earthwork (see Figure 9). The water tower just to the southwest, however, is visible from the western potion of the site (Figure 10). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthwork potentially eligible for the NRW. .Smage-Seal House, 3172 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-972). This structure is a vernacular 2-story, ' 3-bay, side -gable, frame structure on a limestone foundation with a low basement, and an ell addition off the back (west elevation) of the house (Figure 11). The house dates to ca. 1890 to 1910, with additions dating to the 1940s. It has weatherboard siding, a standing seam metal roof, ' and twin exterior end chimneys and one central chimney on the ell. Additions include an enclosed shed roof porch on the south side of house, and a 1-story shed roof addition of the west side. There is only one outbuilding, a 1-story frame garage with aluminum siding. Other ' features include 2/2 sash windows, wood shutters and return cornice and frieze boards. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The natural setting of this structure has been completely altered, as it stands near a major intersection adjacent to a 7-11 convenience store. Commercial and residential structures and vegetation obstruct the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 12). This typical weatherboard I -house retains its original fabric; however, given the existing modern visual intrusions, construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure's potential eligibility for the NRHP. Law., House (VDHR W034-0974). This frame structure is a 2'/2 -story, 3 bay, hipped roof, Colonial Revival (ca. 1905-1920) style house (Figure 13). It has a lowered basement and the foundation is not visible. The roof is slate with two hipped dormers. Only a fraction of the original fabric of the house appears to remain, Vegetation and commercial structures obstruct and already modernized view toward the proposed cell tower (Figure 14). Due to the extensive remolding of the house, it does not appear to retain any of the characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for the NRHP and, therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no affect on this structure. House, Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0975). This is a IV2-story, front gable, frame vernacular style house with a lowered stone basement, weatherboard siding, and standing seam metal roof (Figure 15). The roof has central gables on the north and south sides of the house and paired 6/1 ' windows in the gable ends. The front porch is a 1-story Colonial Revival style with Tuscan columns on brick piers. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NR1lP as an example of vernacular architecture. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by other residential and commercial buildings as well as by vegetation (Figure 16). With the commercial development in the area and industrialization of the Route 11, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this vernacular structure. House. 3284 Valley Pike (YDHR #034-0976). This house has been converted to a commercial business. The original portion is built on a stone foundation with low basement (Figure 17). The house is a frame construction with composition siding and 3-bay front facade with 6/6 paired windows. The roof is standing seam metal with a side gable. There is an exterior end chimney that has become an interior chimney with construction of two one-story additions built on concrete block foundations in the 1950s, This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial businesses and vegetation partially obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower site (Figure 18). The proposed cell tower will have no affect on this structure. House, Route 11 (YDHR #034-0977). This house is a 2Y,—story American Four Square (ca. 1910- 1930) style with its original fabric (Figure 19). The house is built on a concrete foundation with a low basement. It has a frame construction with stretcher bond brick veneer and 3-bay front facade with 3/1 windows with flat arches. The roof is standing seam metal, pyramidal hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the front facade and an interior chimney. Porches adorn the east and west elevations of the house. The front facade (east elevation) has a 1-story full facade Craftsman style porch with wooden battered columns on brick piers. The west elevation has a two-story porch, with the first story enclosed. This structure was considered eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of an American Four Square, while several other examples are nearby, this structure appears to retain most of its original materials. Several frame outbuildings associated with this house, including a chicken coop, garage, and meathouse were standing in 1990 but have since been razed. The natural setting of this resource has been considerably altered by the commercial development along Route 11. Industrial and commercial businesses partially obscure the view 5 towards the proposed cell tower site and modern intrusions dominate the landscape (Figure 20). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3328 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0978). This is a large Folk Victorian house made of concrete block (Figure 21). It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a complex floor plan and several cross gables and central gable in the front (west facade). The roof is standing seam metal with a boxed cornice with a laurel motif in the cornice. There is a central flue. The windows are 1/1 and concrete lintels, some paired. The primary porch is a 1-story, enclosed wrap around. There are also enclosed side, 2-story porches. On the back of the house, there is a 1-story wing addition. While this structure was at one time potentially eligible for the NRHP, it has seen multiple modifications and additions and is in disrepair. The natural setting is comprised of commercial businesses and would have no bearing on its eligibility for listing. The view from this structure towards the proposed cell tower is dominated by commercial development, with and existing cell tower visible in the background. (Figure 22). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. iHouse, 3400 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0979). This house has been converted into a commercial business. The house is a 2'/a-story, 2-bay, American Four Square (ca 1920-1940) with a hipped, pyramidal roof (Figure 23). The foundation is covered by stucco, but the building appears to be a wood frame structure, with an enclosed porch on the west elevation. The roof is asphalt shingles (replaced) with a hipped dormer on the west elevation and with boxed cornice. The windows are 1/1 and there are two interior flues. There is an enclosed 2-story porch on the east elevation (rear) that was added to the house. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial and commercial businesses dominate the immediate landscape and an existing cell lower is clearly visible in the distance (Figure 24). The proposed cell tower will have no effect on this structure. Robert Wilson Sr. House (kDHR #034-0980). This house contains what is believed to be the site of the early settler, Robert Wilson. The rear portion of the house is log and dates to ca. 1800 to 1810. Overall, the house is a vernacular I -House with the earlier portion forming an ell of the east elevation. The house sits on a stone foundation with a split-level basement (Figure 25). The log portion is 2-story with an enclosed porch and is shorter than the main portion of the house. The main or front portion of the house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3-bay i-house with one interior end chimney and standing seam metal roof. There is a 1-story full -facade porch on the west facade of the I -House, with chamfered columns and sawn brackets. The windows are mostly 6/6 ' with some newer 8/8 and there is a three -light transom over the front door. There are many farm -related outbuildings around the house, including a large frame gambrel -roofed bank barn with attached corn crib, several machine sheds, chicken coops, and pig pens. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP due to its association with early settlement in the R area. The natural setting, with various outbuildings, mature trees and nearby spring, added to its significance when originally recorded in I990. ' This house currently sits immediately adjacent to an industrial center. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a large Carquest Autoparts Distribution Center and other industrial buildings (Figure 26). Since this view has already been altered by modern intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Wilson House to the rational Register. ' Barton -Sprinkle House (VDHR #034-0981). This house once stood near the intersection of Route i 1 and Route 37, and was moved to its present location around 1970. The house sits on a new concrete block foundation and has a low basement under the main house and a split-level basement under a rear I -story addition (Figure 27). The house is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a one-story porch on main elevation (south) and an enclosed 2-story porch on the north side of the house, with the 1-story addition. Other elements include 6/6 windows, two interior end flues, 3-light sidelights and a broken transom about the door. Since this house was moved from its original setting, the immediate surroundings would not have bearing on its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. The house sits in a small subdivision surrounded by 1960s and 1970s ramblers. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a motel and the Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center (Figure 28). Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (i'DHR #034-0982). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NPBP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. ' House, Route 11 ' (bDHR #034 0983). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. Pillage Auto Sales (VDHR 4034-0984). The Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center currently occupies the site. This house has been demolished and is not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (YD R 34 H # 0 - _ 0985). The house is a 2 story, 2 bay, cross gable structure with a ' pressed tin metal roof it is in the vernacular style dating to ca. 1880-1910 and has a l-story porch with turned spindles on the main elevation (Figure 29). Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), boxed cornice, and a central flue. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of an early 20th century frame barn. The natural setting of this property has been commercialized as a retail nursery. I The view towards the proposed cell tower consists of Interstate 81, a water tower and ' commercial businesses (Figure 30). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NRHP_ Russell House #2 (VDHR #034-1191). This house is a vernacular side passage dating to ca. 1870-1910 (Figure 31). The house is a 2'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable with central front gable on a stone foundation with a low basement. The house is clad in stucco and has a standing seam metal roof. The porch off the north facade is a full -facade i-story porch with turned supports, hipped roof; and plain friezeboard. Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), 1/1 window in central front gable, boxed cornice, and interior brick flue. There is a rear 2-story gabled wing on a stone foundation with 2/2 and 3/1 windows. A later addition to the south elevation of the house is a 1-story enclosed porch with German lap siding. There are several outbuildings associated with this house, including a concrete shed, several frame sheds, chicken coop, concrete silo, concrete garage, and a trailer home. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture_ The immediate setting, with the exception of a few modem structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, which contributes to the resource's significance. The view towards the cell tower is relatively unobstructed but with the existing cell towers 1 visible in the distance (Figure 32). In addition, interstate 81 contributes some visual impact, as it is located approximately 500 feet west of the house. Although construction of the proposed tower will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of this s',ructure, it will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NTRHr. Russell House #1 (VDHR #034-1192). This house is a vernacular American Four Square ca. 1910-1930) on a stone foundation with a low basement (Figure 33). The house is a 21/z-story, 2- bay, frame structure with new vinyl siding. The roof is a standing seam metal, hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the north (northeast) facade and two interior brick flues. The porch on the north facade is full -facade with a concrete pad, turned spindles, wrought iron balustrade, plain friezeboard, and a hipped roof. The 2-story enclosed porch on the south elevation is newer with an exterior concrete flue. Several outbuildings around the house include a gambrel -roofed concrete block barn, several machine sheds, a concrete silo, metal silos, and a trailer home. This ' structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Vernacular American Four Square. As with Russell House 42, the immediate setting, with some modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, contributing to the resource's significance. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes the existing monopole tower and Interstate 81 (Figure 34). The house sits about 1000 feet east of the interstate with little vegetation shielding the viewshed. As such, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this house. 8 1 .lreele-Clark House (,DHR #034-1339). This house is a hall -parlor I -House with some Folk Victorian elements on the porch (Figure 35). The house dates to ca. 1870. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with twin interior -end brick chimneys. It is a wood frame structure with asphalt shingle sidings and sits on a stone foundation. The windows are 6/6 on the first floor and 2/2 on the second floor. The porch is nearly a full -facade, hipped roof 1-story porch with four posts (or columns) with side -brackets. There is also a meathouse outbuilding and a concrete modern garage. The house retains most of its natural setting and is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Folk Victorian style. The view towards the proposed cell tower is obstructed by vegetation (Figure 36). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of the house. Resources Recorded During the Current Survey Lenin-l°aunt Company-3167 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century concrete ' block building with porch across the front fagade (Figure 37). The building was standing around 1948, according to the present owner, Philip Yount, who remembers it as a Civil War Museum during that time. The building later was used as a "day -old" bread store in the 1960s. The present owner purchased and renovated the building in 1980-81, and opened the current business. There is a 2-year old metal frame garage north of the main building. The main building is a concrete block, 3-bay, front -gable structure. There is an interior brick flue towards the rear of the building, and the roofing material was replaced in the 1980s renovation of the building, currently asphalt ' shtngles. The front porch columns were purchased in 1980 and replaced the original square posts. All the windows and doors were replaced, except for the door on the east elevation. The windows on the north and south elevations were cut out during the 1980 renovations. Views toward the proposed cell tower are obstructed by other buildings and tree growth (Figure N. Due to the extensive renovation and lack of significant architectural style, this structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the proposed cell tower construction would not effect this structure. .brie Insurance Group Building-3186 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century 2 1./2- story house with a low basement with several additions (Figure 39). The original portion of the house is a 3-bay with a partially enclosed central portico, two dormers on the main elevation and one shed dormer on the west (rear) elevation, and an exterior end chimney. There are additions to the west and to the south. The two additions to the south are less than 10 years old. Constructed on a cinder block foundation, this frame structure has gabled dormers and 6/6 windows. This structure is located just to the south of 034-0972. Views toward the proposed cell tower are characterized by residential/commercial buildings and trees, which obscure the view of the proposed facility from the property (Figure 40). The Erie M Insurance Group building is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the ' construction of the proposed cell tower would not effect this structure. House, 3222 Valley Pike. This structure appears to have a brick veneer that may be covering an older frame structure. The house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3 bay structure with a low basement (Figure 41). The foundation, if not brick, is obscured by the brick veneer. There are 8/8 windows on the first floor and 6/6 windows on the second and wooden shutters only on the main facade of the house. There is a brick exterior -end chimney and a shed roof porch with two posts on brick piers on the north elevation and an enclosed frame shed roof porch that has been covered in brick veneer on the west elevation. There are entry doors on all four elevations. The roof is asphalt shingles. The brick all looks very new, but the windows and other elements appear older, including a broken triangular pediment door surround. The brick veneer was ' .risible behind the door pediment. This structure has been significantly remodeled and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. ' The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by trees and other structures (Figure 42). Visible from this structure are some of the industrial plants located on the east side of Route 11. The house is surrounded by mature trees and has houses in close proximity to the north and south Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not have an effect on this structure. House, 3.156 Valley Pike. This structure is situated behind a 1960-1970s structure. The structure is a P/, story concrete block -house with 3-bay, front -gable with weatherboard siding in the gables (Figure 43). The windows are 6/6 and there is a central brick flue. The roof is standing seam metal. There are two porches on the main (east facade) and west elevations. The main elevation porch is a four -post, full -facade, shed roof porch. The west elevation has a full -facade, shed roof porch that has been enclosed. This structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NR.HP as it is a common standing structure in the vicinity with no distinctive characteristics. Trees and other structures obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 44). Therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Hwise, 3504 Valley Pike. This Bungalow -type structure is on a concrete block foundation with wood frame structural system (Figure 45). The house is 1'h-story, front gable, 2-bay (door and a double window) structure with a possible low basement or crawl space. The house appears to be ca. 1930s. The windows are 6/6 and the exterior is weatherboard siding. There is a central brick flue and a single gable dormer on the south elevation. There is a full -facade porch with posts on brick piers on the main (east facade) elevation. Associated with this house are two shed outbuildings (ca 1960s) and another cinder block, shed roof building used as a business (ca 1960s). This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. 10 The proposed cell tower would be in plain view of this structure, but there is another cell tower associated with the Allegheny Power Plant building, directly across the street from this house (Figure 46). Construction of the proposed tower, therefore, would have no effect this structure. Business, 3908 Valley Pike. This is a 1'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable, cinder block structure with a low basement (Figure 47). The main elevation (east facade) has a door and bay window. On the west elevation there is a 1-story shed roof addition, The roof is asphalt shingles and there is an interior brick flue. There are two concrete block gable sheds in the rear of the building. This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by vegetation (Figure 48). The proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Conclusions and Recommendations Construction of the proposed telecommunications cell tower at the Shenandoah Gas Company building will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of properties 50 years of age or older within the APE that are either listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. However, based upon the results of the windshield survey and assessment of effects, it is Patton, Hams, Rust & Associates' opinion that in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5(b), construction of the proposed 180-foot tower will not diminish the characteristics that would qualify those properties within the APE for listing on the NRHP. If you concur with our recommendation of no adverse effect, please indicate by signature and date below. Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 540/3 70-1973. Sincerely, Kimberly S. Zawacki Principal Investigator cc: John Reno. PHR&A Construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing in the '_stational Register of Historic Places. 1 concur: Date: 11 COMMONWEALTH of V]RGINIA Department of Historic Resources W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 3322 ] Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secretory of Nona a! Resources Director Tel: (804) 367-2323 MEMORANDUM Fay: (804)367-23 TDD: (804)) 367-2386 v�ww.dhnstate.va.us DATE: ,DHR File # ,?- G I s TO: fl/j.S NC,4 i (�E� LCS Lc--,) FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader i sion of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. No further identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be ' affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. ' We have previously reviewed this project. Attached is a copy of our correspondence. _ Other (Please see comments below) COMMENTS: ' Proeram Services Div. Petersburg Office 10 Courthouse Ave. 19-B Boll -'in -brook Street 'Petersburg, VA 23803 Petersburg. VA 23803 Tel: (804) 863-1685 Tel: (804) 863-1620 Fax: (804)862-61.96 Fax: (804)863-1627 Portsmouth Office 612 Court Street, 3N Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Roanoke Office 1030 Penmar Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 857-7585 Fax: (540) 85 7-7588 Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (i40) 722-7535 d Attachment 4 Local Government I Has any local government been contacted? If so, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. ECS has submitted information to the Winchester -Frederick County Historical Society. To date we have not received a response. A copy of the submittal is attached. e u 11 ECS MID -ATLANTIC LLC May 14 2008 1 � y mio- . is Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities Winchester -Frederick County Historical Society 1 1340 South Pleasant Valley Road Winchester, Virginia 22601 ECS Project No. 2322-A 1 Subject: Solicitation of Comments Washington Gas Tower Site 350 Hillandale Lane 1 Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia To Whom It May Concern: The subject site consists is located at 350 Hillandale Lane in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The site consists of a 120-foot monopole tower with an existing 12-foot by 18-foot equipment shed. The existing 120-foot monopole tower is proposed to be increased 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. No new ground disturbance is proposed. An archives search was performed at the Department of Historic Resources Data Share System (DHR-DSS) and on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) information system. Six properties were identified on the DHR-DSS within the % mile APE. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126, recommended for listing on the NRHP) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site, the Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034- 0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site, the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR- DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and 4034-0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site and the Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. No properties or structures were present within the area of potential effect (APE), which were listed on the NRHP. A previous architectural survey conducted by Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002, indicated that the proposed 120-foot monopole tower would have no adverse effect on the historical properties in the vicinity of the site. Please refer to the attached U.S.G.S. topographic map, aerial photograph, site photographs, photosimulations, the architectural review, and the previous response from the SHPO indicating that the proposed tower will have an affect on historic properties in the vicinity of the site; however, the affect will not be adverse. We are asking that you review the increase in the height of the tower and determine whether or not you anticipated an impact. We ask that any comments or your response be forwarded to ECS via facsimile or telephone within 30 days of receiving this letter. Comments/Opinions: Please provide your comments ASAP. Thank you for your assistance. We appreciate any information you can provide us with. Should you have any additional questions or concerns, please contact me at (540) 362-2000. If you choose to facsimile your response please use 540-362-1202. Sincerely, r -Atlantichis n Staff Environmental Scientist 1 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F, Roanoke, VA 24019 • (540) 362-2000 • FAX (540) 362-1202 • www.ecslimited.com Aberdeen, MD • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlottesville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City, MD* Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Virginia Beach, VA • Waldorf, MD • Williamsburg, VA • Winchester, VA • York, PA * testing services only 1 LUMV4Y' . w..� JPHOTOREVISED .S. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES HI Roanoke, Virginia 24019 CHESTER, STEPHENS rae®,an.wNnc (540) 362-2000 phoneY QUADRANGLES, (540) 362-1202 fax GINIA DATED 1966 1987, 1986 LEGEND - Approximate Location of the existing 120-foot Monopole Tower. ® - DHR-DDS #034-0126, eligible for listing on the NRHP ® - DHR-DSS #034-0984, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated - DHR-DSS #034-0982, razed © _ DHR-DSS #034-0983, razed .t? DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated `'•• i ', !, Old ofagµpp./'.•. 3 ` m Vy Obi �10 e ...: i - r.� .�� INTO .,. t . *'-- ,�7 �.}�; �° .t „-, •� ,.+ One -Half Mile Ra r- : nCP S l URIC St 1 E LUCA I IUN MAY WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO.2322-A .� /r r; 1i t •L� ,, r , }� >� •'.r.)„ Shenan oah — 1� �� �J� t ) Memorial'Pa,k ,1�� (7 O k +. SCALE (IN FEET) 2000 0 IAA LEGEND - Approximate Site Boundaries E SOURCE: DHR-DSS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 2002 SCALE (IN FEET) 100 200 200 0 FIGURE 2 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO.2322-A Photograph No. 1 VIEW OF THE EXISTING 120-FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER FACING SOUTHEAST. Photograph No. 2 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE NORTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. � i�i •7! 6 ; ,. H a c 7. Ax- ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 �MLLtJPhone: (540)362-2000 moD_A rL,&m- ors Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 1 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph A : View of the Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) a 50+ year old structure and is recommended for listing on the National Historic Register, located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph A: Photosimulation of the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph A. ECS - Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 o`,aooz-T¢r4..m-nc Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 2 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph B : View of the former location of Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984), located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph B: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph B. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ' Phone: (540)362-2000 mo®,-&-ra.mva(c Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 3 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph C: View of the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph C: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph C. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone:(540)362-2000 Fax:(540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 4 Date: April 2, 2008 Photographs D and E: View of the former locations of houses on Route 11 South (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983), located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph D and E: Line of sight of the proposed collocation tower site as seen from Photographs D and E. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginiia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 wouD-j,,TLA;ava:� Fax:(b40)362-T202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 5 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph F: View of the Robert Wilson, Sr. House ( DHR-DSS #034-0980) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph F Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph F. I JUL 2 5 20T CULTURAL RESOURCES, INC. July 23, 2002 90 Mr. Marc Hohna �. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 RE: Section 106 Review of a Proposed Washington Gas Telecommunications Tower, Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma: A On behalf of our client, Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C., we are requesting your concurrence with our determination that construction of a proposed telecommunications tower in k inchester, Virginia will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Our request is made pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, Protection of Historic Properties, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). The proposed tower is a 180-foot lattice self-support. The proposed project site is located adjacent and behind the existing Shenandoah Gas Building and approximately 450 feet east of Interstate 81 (Figure 1). The tower will be located beside two existing towers, a 112-foot monopole and a 42-foot lattice self -support - Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as that area where effects to historic properties can reasonably be expected to occur regardless of whether such properties currently exist. For the purposes of this project, the APE is defined as all areas located within a 1.0-mile radius of the proposed cell tower site. Situated in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, the terrain surrounding the APE is characterized by rolling hills, with some steeper relief around Hoge Run and Opequon Creek in the southeastern portion of the project area. The cell tower will be located just east of an industrial area west of Interstate 81. The proposed tower will be located immediately adjacent to an existing 42-foot lattice tower and ' a 1 10-foot monopole (Appendix A and Appendix B). The setting of the project area includes a water tower, an additional cell tower, and an industrial complex (Figure 1). The 200-foot water tower is approximately 3/4 mile southwest of the proposed tower. A 200-foot lattice self-support ' toNver is across I-81 adjacent to the industrial site. Three large industrial plants in the vicinity include the Carquest Distribution Plant, General Electric, and Allegheny Power Company. In 9 Ironbound Road, Suite 300 7dliameburg, Virginia 23188 - (757) 564-9652 - Fax (757) 564-8157 - culresinc@ ol.com 705 Caroline Street - Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 - (540) 370-1973 - Fax (540) 370-0904 - crifburg@aol.com IFo addition to the industrial facilities, the surrounding landscape consists of single-family residential dwellings and small businesses. Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Effects A review of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) cultural resource inventory and survey information was conducted in an effort to identify all previously recorded historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register within the APE. The results of this research indicated that nineteen architectural resources had been previously recorded within the APE (Figure 2). A total of thirty-four archaeological resources had been previously recorded either in or immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location (Figure 3). Due to the limited footprint of the proposed tower, construction of the facility is expected to have no effect on archaeological resources. Also, the area of the cell tower has been previously graded for construction of the Shenandoah Gas building and the other two towers, therefore, no additional archaeological investigations are recommended. In addition to the archive check, a windshield survey was conducted of the APE by staff from Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI). The survey included a visual assessment of the proposed tower site, a windshield survey of all structures 50 years of age or older within APE, and an assessment of potential visual effects to resources 50 years of age or older within the APE. Representative views of the siteiine between the proposed tower site and historic and potentially historic resources with"a the APE were also photographed. All public roads within the APE were surveyed and photographs were taken from public rights -of -way. All structures identified on the U.S.G.S. Winchester quadrangle were visually inspected if access was permitted. For those properties where access was restricted, photographs were taken of the property from the closest point in a public right-of-way and views back towards the proposed tower taken from the same point. The results of the windshield survey and the assessment of effects are discussed below. Previously Identified Resources within a One -Mile Radius (;amp Ruscell Historic District (VDHR #034-5036). This historic district includes the Hillandale House and the Camp Russell Earthworks. It extends from Interstate 81 to Hoge Run, more or less due east of the intersection of I-81 and Route 37. The district is wooded on the eastern portion with open fields to the west adjacent to the Hillandale House (Figure 4). The eastern half I' of the site has previously been compromised by modern visual impacts, including existingcell towers and the water tank, while the wooded western position of the district is somewhat shielded from these impacts. Given the presence of modern elements already in the viewshed, construction of the proposed structure will not adversely affect those qualities and characteristics that qualify the district for listing on the NRHP. 2 Hillmulale-Crawford House (VDHR #034-0126). There are three distinct phases of ' construction/additions to this house (Figure 5). The central portion of the house was originally constructed ca 1780-1800. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable house constructed of coursed limestone, with a full fagade 1-story front porch and an interior end chimney_ The second phase ' of construction (ca 1875-1890) added what is now the main fagade of the house. This section of the house is 2-story random limestone. It is a 3-bay side -gable structure with central front gable, two central brick chimneys, and a partial 1-story porch with Doric columns. The third phase of construction (ca 1910-1930) added the 2-story, gable frame addition with weatherboard siding on a split-level stone basement. The roof over the entire structure is pressed tin shingles. There are several outbuildings associated with this structure. These buildings include a stone spring -house, a possible log or frame meathouse, several frame sheds, a frame barn, carriage house, machine shed, frame bank barn with stave silo, and a frame tenant house about '/2 mile ' northwest of the main house. Hillandale has been determined potentially eligible for the listing on the NRHP. The outbuildings, nearby tenant house and historic district, and general setting on the landscape are contributing factors to the eligibility of this structure. The view toward the proposed cell tower overlooks the tenant house and the current towers are visible in the distance (Figure 6). Since this view has already been altered by modem intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Hillandale, House to the NRHP. Camp Russel!/Hillwzdale Earthworks (034-0321). The Hillandale Earthworks are located about 2000 feet northeast of Cary's Brook (034-0319). These earthworks are associated with the 1 Union occupation of this area of the Shenandoah Valley during the fall of 1864 and are considered eligible for listing on the NRHP in the area of military history. The earthworks are "ithin a predominantly wooded area and somewhat shielded from view of tthe proposed cell tower due to the fact that they are situated on a lower elevation (see Figure 3). The view towards the west has been compromised by extant cell towers and the water tower. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not adversely affect those qualities that make the ' earthworks eligible for the NRHP. House (VDHR T034-0021), This house is a Federal style building dating to ca. 1840. it is a 5- bay, 2-story brick structure with a stone foundation, side gable, and an interior end chimney (Figure 7). The roof is standing seam metal. Windows are 6/6 on the first floor, but 9/6 on the second floor and the main door has a 4-light transom. There is a 1-story asymmetrical 3 bay addition to the east of the main structure. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRBP under Criterion C as an example of Federal architectural style. The natural setting of this property has been severely altered as it is surrounded by 1970s era apartment buildings. In addition, the view towards the cell tower, while partially obscured by vegetation, is dominated by telephone utility lines (Figure 8). The � I proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing in the NRHP. Cary's Brook (VDHR #034-0319). This structure was in very poor condition when it was recorded and the several surrounding associated outbuildings already existed in a ruinous condition. CRI staff inspected the landform. identified as the location of the house and found nothing but an overgrown area of tall grass and weeds (Figure 9). It appears that this house is no longer standing and therefore the proposed cell tower will have no effect on this resource. rCarv's Brook Reboubt (034-0320). This Civil War redoubt is located 200 feet northwest of Cary's Brook. It is associated with the Union troop activity in the area during the fall of 1864. ' After General Sheridan secured this portion of the Shenandoah Valley in 1864, Union forces occupied it. The redoubt is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP for its association with an historic event. The current cell towers are not visible from this property because of the vegetation and the lower elevation of the earthwork (see Figure 9). The water tower just to the southwest, however, is visible from the western potion of the site (Figure 10). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthwork potentially eligible for the NRHP. Savage -Seal House, 3172 Valley Pike (VDHR 4034-972). This structure is a vernacular 2-story, ,,-bay, side -gable, frame structure on a limestone foundation with a low basement, and an ell addition off the back (west elevation) of the house (Figure 11). The house dates to ca, 1890 to j1910, with additions dating to the 1940s. It has weatherboard siding, a standing seam metal roof, and twin exterior end chimneys and one central chimney on the ell. Additions include an enclosed shed roof porch on the south side of house, and a 1-story shed roof addition of the west ' side, There is only one outbuilding, a 1-story frame garage with aluminum siding. Other features include 2/2 sash windows, wood shutters and return cornice and frieze boards. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The natural setting of this structure has been completely altered, as it stands near a major intersection adjacent to a 7-11 convenience store. Commercial and residential structures and vegetation obstruct the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 12). This typical weatherboard I -house retains its original fabric; however, given the existing modern visual intrusions, construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure's potential eligibility for the NRHP. Lantz House (VDHR 034-0974). This frame structure is a 21/2 -story, 3 bay, hipped roof, Colonial Revival (ca. 1905-1920) style house (Figure 13). It has a lowered basement and the foundation is not visible. The roof is slate with two hipped dormers. Only a fraction of the original fabric of the house appears to remain. 4 1 1 Vegetation and commercial structures obstruct and already modernized view toward the proposed cell tower (Figure 14). Due to the extensive remolding of the house, it does not appear to retain any of the characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for the NRIP and, therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no affect on this structure. House, Malley Pike (VDHR #034-0975). This is a IV2-story, front gable, frame vernacular style ' house with a lowered stone basement, weatherboard siding, and standing seam metal roof (Figure 15). The roof has central gables on the north and south sides of the house and paired 6/1 windows in the gable ends. The front porch is a 1-story Colonial Revival style with Tuscan columns on brick piers. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRI W as an example of vernacular architecture. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by other residential and commercial buildings as well as by vegetation (Figure 16). With the commercial development in the area and industrialization of the Route 11, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this vernacular structure. House. 3284 Valley Pike (YDHR #034-0976). This house has been converted to a commercial business. The original portion is built on a stone foundation with Iow basement (Figure 17). The house is a frame construction with composition siding and 3-bay front fagade with 6/6 paired windows. The roof is standing seam metal Mth a side gable. There is an exterior end chimney that has become an interior chimney with construction of two one-story additions built on concrete block foundations in the 1950s. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial businesses and vegetation partially obscure the view g P Y towards the proposed cell tower site (Figure 18). The proposed cell tower will have no affect on this structure. Hrnrse, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0977). This house is a 2Y2-story American Four Square (ca. 1910- 'i' 1930) style with its original fabric (Figure 19). The house is built on a concrete foundation with a low basement. It has a frame construction with stretcher bond brick veneer and 3-bay front fagade with 3/1 windows with flat arches. The roof is standing seam metal, pyramidal hipped ' roof with one hipped dormer on the front fagade and an interior chimney. Porches adorn the east and west elevations of the house. The front fagade (east elevation) has a 1-story full fagade Craftsman style porch with wooden battered columns on brick piers. The west elevation has a two-story porch, with the first story enclosed. This structure was considered eligible for listing on the NRIIP as an example of an American Four Square, while several other examples are nearby, this structure appears to retain most of its original materials. Several frame outbuildings ' associated with this house, including a chicken coop, garage, and rneathouse were standing in 1990 but have since been razed. ' The natural setting of this resource has been considerably altered by the commercial development along Route 11. Industrial and commercial businesses partially obscure the view 5 � I towards the proposed cell tower site and modern intrusions dominate the landscape (Figure 20). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. ' House, 3328 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0978). This is a large Folk Victorian house made of concrete block (Figure 21). It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a complex floor plan and several cross gables and central gable in the front (west facade). The roof is standing seam metal with a boxed cornice with a laurel motif in the cornice. There is a central flue. The windows are 1/1 and concrete lintels, some paired. The primary porch is a 1-story, enclosed wrap around. There are also enclosed side, 2-story porches. On the back of the house, there is a ' I -story wing addition. While this structure was at one time potentially eligible for the NRHP, it has seen multiple modifications and additions and is in disrepair. The natural setting is comprised of commercial businesses and would have no bearing on its eligibility for listing. ' The Ivriew from this structure towards the proposed cell tower is dominated by commercial development, with and existing cell tower visible in the background. (Figure 22). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. ' House, 3400 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0979). This house has been converted into a commercial business. The house is a 2'/a-story, 2-bay, American Four Square (ca 1920-1940) with a hipped, pyramidal roof (Figure 23). The foundation is covered by stucco, but the building appears to be ' a wood frame structure with an enclosed porch on the west elevation. The roof is asphalt shingles (replaced) with a hipped dormer on the west elevation and with boxed cornice. The windows are 1/1 and there are two interior flues. There is an enclosed 2-story porch on the east elevation (rear) that was added to the house. This structure has been significantly remodeled, ' altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial and commercial businesses dominate the immediate landscape and an existing cell ' tower is clearly visible in the distance (Figure 24). The proposed cell tower will have no effect on this structure. Robert Wilson Sr. House (VDHR #034-0980). This house contains what is believed to be the site of the early settler, Robert Wilson. The rear portion of the house is log and dates to ca. 1800 to 18I0. Overall, the house is a vernacular I -House with the earlier portion forming an ell of the east elevation. The house sits on a stone foundation with a split-level basement (Figure 25). The log portion is 2-story with an enclosed porch and is shorter than the main portion of the house. The main or front portion of the house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3-bay I•house with one interior end chimney and standing seam metal roof. There is a 1-story full-fagade porch on the west facade of the I -House, with chamfered columns and sawn brackets. The windows are mostly 6/6 with some newer 8/8 and there is a three -light transom over the front door. There are many farm -related outbuildings around the house, including a large frame gambrel -roofed bank barn with attached corn crib, several machine sheds, chicken coops, and pig pens. This structure is Potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP due to its association with early settlement in the lol area. The natural setting, with various outbuildings, mature trees and nearby spring, added to its significance when originally recorded in 1990. This house currently sits immediately adjacent to an industrial center. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a large Carquest Autoparts Distribution Center and other industrial buildings (Figure 26). Since this view has already been altered by modern intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Wilson House to the ?rational Register. Barton -.Sprinkle House (VDHR # 034-0981). This house once stood near the intersection of Route I I and Route 37, and was moved to its present location around 1970. The house sits on a new concrete block foundation and has a low basement under the main house and a split-level basement under a rear 1-story addition (Figure 27). The house is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a one-story porch on main elevation (south) and an enclosed 2-story porch on the north side of the house, with the I -story addition. Other elements include 6/6 windows, two interior end flues, 3-light sidelights and a broken transom about the door. Since this house was moved from its original setting, the immediate surroundings would not have bearing on its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. The house sits in a small subdivision surrounded by 1960s and I970s ramblers. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a motel and the Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center (Figure 28). Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, w'.! not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0982). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0983). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. Village Auto Sales (1TDHR 4034--0984). The Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center currently occupies the site. This house has been demolished and is not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0985). The house is a 2-story, 2 bay, cross gable structure with a pressed tin metal roof. It is in the vernacular style dating to ca. 1880-1910 and has a 1-story porch with turned spindles on the main elevation (Figure 29). Other elements include 2/2 ' windows (some paired), boxed cornice, and a central flue. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of an early 20th century frame barn. The natural setting of this property has been commercialized as a retail nursery. VA The view towards the proposed cell tower consists of Interstate 81, a water tower and ' commercial businesses (Figure 30). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NRHP_ Russell House #2 (VDHR #034-1191). This house is a vernacular side passage dating to ca. 1870-1910 (Figure 31). The house is a 2'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable with central front gable on a stone foundation with a low basement. The house is clad in stucco and has a standing seam metal roof. The porch off the north facade is a full -facade 1-story porch with turned supports, hipped roof; and plain friezeboard. Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), 1/1 window in central front gable, boxed cornice, and interior brick flue. There is a rear 2-story gabled wing on a stone foundation with 2/2 and 3/1 windows. A later addition to the south elevation of the house is a 1-story enclosed porch with German lap siding. There are several ' outbuildings associated with this house, including a concrete shed, several frame sheds, chicken coop, concrete silo, concrete garage, and a trailer home. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture_ The immediate setting, with the I exception of a few modem structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, which contributes to the resource's significance. The view towards the cell tower is relatively unobstructed but with the existing cell towers ' visible in the distance (Figure 32). In addition, Interstate 81 contributes some visual impact, as it is located approximately 500 feet west of the house. Although construction of the proposed tower will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of this structure, it will not ' adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NTRHP. Russell House #1 (VDHR #034-1192). This house is a vernacular American Four Square (ca. 1910-1930) on a stone foundation with a low basement (Figure 33). The house is a 21/z-story, 2- bay, frame structure with new vinyl siding. The roof is a standing seam metal, hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the north (northeast) facade and two interior brick flues. The porch on the north facade is full -facade with a concrete pad, turned spindles, wrought iron balustrade, plain friezeboard, and a hipped roof The 2-story enclosed porch on the south elevation is newer with an exterior concrete flue. Several outbuildings around the house include a gambrel -roofed concrete block barn, several machine sheds, a concrete silo, metal silos, and a trailer home. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Vernacular American Four Square. As with Russell House #2, the immediate setting, with some modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, contributing to the resource's significance. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes the existing monopole tower and Interstate 81 (Figure 34). The house sits about 1000 feet east of the interstate with little vegetation shielding the viewshed. As such, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this house. M. Steele -Clark House ({'DHR #034-1339). This house is a hall -parlor I -House with some Folk Victorian elements on the porch (Figure 35). The house dates to ca. 1870. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with twin interior -end brick chimneys. It is a wood frame structure with asphalt shingle sidings and sits on a stone foundation. The windows are 6/6 on the first floor and 2/2 on the second floor. The porch is nearly a full-fagade, hipped roof I -story porch with four posts (or columns) with side -brackets. There is also a mmthouse outbuilding and a concrete modern garage. The house retains most of its natural setting and is potentially eligible for listing on the NRB P as an example of Folk Victorian style. The view towards the proposed cell tower is obstructed by vegetation (Figure 36). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of the house. Resources Recorded During the Current Survey Le -On -fount Company-3167 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century concrete block building with porch across the front fagade (Figure 37). The building was standing around 1948, according to the present owner, Philip Yount, who remembers it as a Civil War Museum during that time. The building later was used as a "day -old" bread store in the 1960s. The present owner purchased and renovated the building in 1980-81, and opened the current business. There is a 2-year old metal frame garage north of the main building. T'_e main building is a concrete block, 3-bay, front -gable structure. There is an interior brick ' flue towards the rear of the building, and the roofing material was replaced in the 1980s renovation of the building, currently asphalt' shingles. The front porch columns were purchased in 1980 and replaced the original square posts. All the windows and doors were replaced, except ' for the door on the east elevation. The windows on the north and south elevations were cut out during the 1980 renovations. Views toward the proposed cell tower are obstructed by other buildings and tree growth (Figure 18). Due to the extensive renovation and lack of significant architectural style, this structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the proposed cell tower construction would not effect this structure. Erie Insurance Group Building-3186 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century 2 './z- story house with a low basement with several additions (Figure 39). The original portion of the house is a 3-bay with a partially enclosed central portico, two dormers on the main elevation and one shed dormer on the west (rear) elevation, and an exterior end chimney. There are additions to the west and to the south. The two additions to the south are less than 10 years old. Constructed on a cinder block foundation, this frame structure has gabled dormers and 6/6 windows. This structure is located just to the south of 034-0972. Views toward the proposed cell tower are characterized by residential/commercial buildings and trees, which obscure the view of the proposed facility from the property (Figure 40). The F,rie OJ 1 Insurance Group building is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHT. Therefore, the ' construction of the proposed cell tower would not effect this structure. ' House, 3222 Valley Pike. This structure appears to have a brick veneer that may be covering an older frame structure. The house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3 bay structure with a low basement (Figure 41). The foundation, if not brick, is obscured by the brick veneer. There are 8/8 ' windows on the first floor and 6/6 windows on the second and wooden shutters only on the main facade of the house. There is a brick exterior -end chimney and a shed roof porch with two posts on brick piers on the north elevation and an enclosed frame shed roof porch that has been ' covered in brick veneer on the west elevation. There are entry doors on all four elevations. The roof is asphalt shingles. The brick all looks very new, but the windows and other elements appear older, including a broken triangular pediment door surround. The brick veneer was ' .risible behind the door pediment. This structure has been significantly remodeled and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. ' The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by trees and other structures (Figure 42). Visible from this structure are some of the industrial plants located on the east side of Route 11. The house is surrounded by mature trees and has houses in close proximity to the north and south. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not have an effect on this structure. House, 3256 Valley Pike. This structure is situated Lehind a 1960-1970s structure. The structure is a P/z story concrete block -house with 3-bay, front -gable with weatherboard siding in the gables (Figure 43). The windows are 6/6 and there is a central brick flue. The roof is standing seam metal. There are two porches on the main (east facade) and west elevations. The main elevation porch is a four -post, full -facade, shed roof porch. The west elevation has a full -facade, shed roof porch that has been enclosed. This structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the N'RHP as it is a common standing structure in the vicinity with no distinctive characteristics. Trees and other structures obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 44). Therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Hcrose, 3504 Valley Pike. This Bungalow -type structure is on a concrete block foundation with ' wood frame structural system (Figure 45). The house is P/2-story, front gable, 2-bay (door and a double window) structure with a possible low basement or crawl space. The house appears to be ca. 1930s. The windows are 6/6 and the exterior is weatherboard siding. There is a central brick ' flue and a single gable dormer on the south elevation. There is a full -facade porch with posts on brick piers on the main (east facade) elevation. Associated with this house are two shed outbuildings (ca 1960s) and another cinder block, shed roof building used as a business (ca 1960s). This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not II eligible for listing on the NRHP. T I The proposed cell tower would be in lain view of this structure, but there is another cell tower P P P associated with the Allegheny Power Plant building, directly across the street from this house 1 1 (Figure 46). Construction of the proposed tower, therefore, would have no effect this structure. Business, 3908 Valley Pike. This is a 1'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable, cinder block structure with a low basement (Figure 47). The main elevation (east facade) has a door and bay window. On the west elevation there is a 1-story shed roof addition. The roof is asphalt shingles and there is an interior brick flue. There are two concrete block gable sheds in the rear of the building. This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by vegetation (Figure 48). The proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Conclusions and Recommendations ■ Construction of the proposed telecommunications cell tower at the Shenandoah Gas Company building will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of properties 50 years of age or older within the APE that are either listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. However, based upon the results of the windshield survey and assessment of effects, it is Patton, Hams, Rust & Associates' opinion that in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5(b), construction of ' the proposed 180-foot tower will not diminish the characteristics that would qualify those properties within the APE for listing on the NRHP. If you concur with our recommendation of no adverse effect, please indicate by signature and date below. ' Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 540/3 70-1973 . ISincerely, Kimberly S. Zawacki Principal Investigator cc: John Reno. PHR&A Construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely effect properties fisted or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 1 concur: 11 Date: COMMONWEALTH of VIRCINIA Department of Historic Resources W. Tayloe Murphy. Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 2322 ] Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secretan ofN'annal Resources Director Tel: (804) 367-2323 ' Far (804) 367-2391 MEMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 wwwAhr.state.vaus DATE: �� o Z DHR File # TO: /1�.5 t-IC/i FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader iv lion of Resource Services and Review C"M PROJECT: This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. ' No farther identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. We have previously reviewed this project. Attached is a copy of our correspondence. Other (Please see comments below) I COMMENTS: Proeram Services Div. Petersburs Office Portsmouth Office 10 Courthouse Ave. 19-B Bollinebrook Street 612 Court Street, 3" Floor ' Petersburg, VA 23803 Petersburs. VA 23803 Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (804) 863-1685 Tel: (804) 863-1620 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Fax: (804) 862-6).96 Far (804) 863-1627 Far (757) 396-6712 Roanoke office 1030 Penmar Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 857-7585 Fax: (540) 857-7588 Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (540)722-7535 Attachment 5 Public Involvement ' Describe measures taken to obtain public involvement in this project (e.g., notices, letter, or public meetings). Provide copies of relevant documentation. ' Refer to the attached FCC/NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist conducted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc dated October 15, 2008, which address the individual parties that were consulted for the original construction of the tower. FCC/NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist Site Name: Washington Gas Address: 350 Hillandale Lane Location: Winchester, Virginia PI IR+A Project No. 11036-1-3 Date: October 10, 2002 _ Contact Person: John D. Reno Contact Number: 540-828-2616 Yes No X 1. Will the facility be located in an officially designated urilderness area? X 2. Will the facility be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? X 3. Will the facility affect listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats? X# _ _ 4. Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? X 5. %Vill the facility affect Indian religious sites? X 6. Will the facility be located in a 100-year floodplain? X 7. Will construction of the facility involve a significant change in surface features (e.g. wetland fill, deforestation, or water diversion)? X 8. Will the antenna tower and/or supporting structure be equipped with high intensity white lights and be located in a residential neighborhood, as defined by applicable zoning laws? * According to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR), this project will have an effect on historic resources. However, the DHR stated that the effect will not be adverse. A copy of a completed FCC Environmental Compliance Survey documenting the process used in arriving at the above answers must be attached. If all of the questions above were answered "NO", no further action is required for FCC environmental purposes. If any of the questions were answered "YES", an Environmental Assessment (EA) must be prepared and filed with the FCC in accordance with applicable procedures. No construction may begin until the FCC has reviewed the EA and approved the proposal. /v Signature Date SENIORPROJECT ENGINEER Title PATTON I-G\RRIS RUST & ASSOCLITES, pc Company FCC Environmental Compliance Survey Site Narne: Washington Gas Address: 350 Hillandale Lane Location: Winchester, Virginia PHR+A Project No. 11036-1-3 Date: October 10, 2002 This Survey will identify whether a proposed facility will require the preparation and filing of an FCC Environmental Assessment. In completing the survey, the consultant may analyze accurate, up-to- date information obtained from a commercial service in conjunction with consultation with the appropriate agencies and sources listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the consultant is not required to consult each of the listed agencies. A site inspection must be performed in all cases. This Survey supports the completion of the FCC/NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist and shall be attached as an addendum to the Checklist. Answer "yes/no" questions only after completing the enumerated steps. Yes No X 1. Based upon a site inspection and information provided by a commercial service, or consultation with the National Park Service (Department of Interior), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of Interior), Bureau of Land Management (Department of Interior) and the U.S. Forest Service (Department of Agriculture), as appropriate, will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area? 1(a): Contact National Park Service. See EDR Report, Natural Areas Section, Federal Lands Database National Park Service Contact Name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: 1(b): Contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. See EDR Report, Natural Areas Section, Federal Lands Database U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contact Name: Phone: Date (s): Comments: 1(c): Contact U.S. Forest Service. PHRIA Project No. 11036-1-3 See EDR Report, Natural Areas Section, Federal Lands Databasc U.S. Forest Service Contact Name: Phone: Date(s): l (d): Contact Bureau of Land Management. See EDR Report, Natural Areas Section, Federal Lands Database Bureau of Land Management Contact Name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: 1(e): If contact with National Park Service reveals a wilderness area in a National Park, contact specific National Park Superintendent. National Park Superintendent Name: Phone: Date(s): Continents: 1(0: If contact with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reveals a wildemcss area in a National Wildlife Refuge, contact specific Wildlife Refuge Manager. Wildlife Refuge Manager Name Phone: Date(s): Comments: IIf contact with the U.S. Forest Service reveals a wilderness in a National Forest, contact National Forest Director. National Forest Director Name: ■ Phone: Date(s): ' Comments: If the ycs/no answer was based in whole or in part upon information provided by a commercial service, specif}, the name of the service, the contact person, the dates of contact, and provide all correspondence to/from the service. The above information was provided in a report prepared by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). A copy of this report is included as an attachment. In addition, no evidence of an officially designated wilderness area was observed on or adjacent to the subject property during the on -site reconnaissance. 2of8 PHR+A Projecl No. 11036-1-3 EDR maintains a database that includes information on endangered or threatened species provided by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Based on the EDR report, no listed species were identified as being present at or in the vicinity of the proposed site. We contacted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for information on federally designated critical habitats in the vicinity of the proposed site. According to Jolie Harrison with the USFWS, three ' fish species (slender chub, spotfin chub and yellowfin madtom) are listed as critical habitats in Virginia. However, these fish species are located in Southwest Virginia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contact Name: Julie Harrison Phone: 804-693- 6694 Date(s): October 10 2002 Comments: 3(b): If contact with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicates a listed or proposed species or habitat may be present, attach written response from or approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service detailing whether the species or habitat may be affected. 3(c): If contact with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicates a threatened or endangered species located in a National Wildlife Refuge, contact specific Wildlife Refuge Manager. Wildlife Refuge Manager Name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: Yes No ' X* — 4. Based upon a site inspection and written response provided by the State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO"), and taking into consideration the views of interested persons, will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? I 4(a): Consult the National Register of Historic Places I See EDR Report, H"lsroric Sites Section 4(b): Contact the SHPO in writing to determine whether the proposed facility will affect property that is proposed or is eligible to be listed on the Register. 4 of 8 PHR 1 A Project No. 11036-1-3 A letter requesting comments on the proposed tower site was sent to the SHPO. According to the SHPO, this project will have an effect on historic resources. However, the SHPO stated that the effect will not be adverse. A copy of this response letter is attached to this survey. If the SHPO issues a "no effect" letter, this question can be answered "no." If the SHPO issues a "no adverse effect" or "adverse effect" finding, this question must be answered "yes." 4(c): Contact local government preservation offices. Local government contact Phone: Date(s). Comments: No other local government preservation offices were identified relative to this project. 4(d): Contact any local special interest groups who may have an interest in the property. Special Interest group contact: Phone: Date(s): Comments: No local special interest groups were identified relative to this project. Provide copies of all correspondence from all parties contacted. See attached information. Yes No X 5. Based upon a site inspection and consultation with the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer ("THPO"), or the SHPO and the approved Tribal Representative, will the facility affect an Indian religious site? 5(a): Consult the National Register of Historic Places. See EDR Report, Historic Sites Section 5(b): Consult the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or the National Park Service to determine if a THPO exists. Contact: Mr. lion Sutherland Phone:(202) 208-4791 Date(s):.. October 16. 2000 ' Comments: Mr. Don Sutherland is the THPO for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Mr. Sutherland stated that no federally recognized Indian 5of8 PFIR+A Project No. 11036-1-3 Religious sites exist in this area of the State A copy of the telephone interview is included with this surve .__- 5(c): If a THPO exists, contact the THPO in writing. If no THPO exists, consult the parties identified in 5(d) and 5(e). THPO name: Don Sutherlgnd Address: 5(d): Contact the SHPO in writing. SHPO name: See above Address: 5(e): Contact the approved Tribal Representative. Tribal Representative name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: N/A Provide copies of all correspondence from all parties contacted. See attached information. Yes No X 6. Based upon FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map ("FIRM") will the facility be located in a 100-year floodplain? If FIRMs are not available for the community where the site is located, consult other sources in accordance with FEMA guidelines. 6(a): Review FENfA's FIRM. Attach relevant portion of map. The relevant portion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain map is included in the attached EDR Report. 6(b): If a review of the map indicates that the site is on a border of a 100- year floodplain and the site's precise location cannot be reasonably determined using the map, consult with FEMA or its local delegate to determine whether the facility will be located within the 100-year floodplain. In the event that a written statement is obtained from FEMA or the local agency delegated authority to implement the National Flood Insurance Program, stating that the area is no longer within the 100-year floodplain, the facility will not be considered to be within the 100-year floodplain for the purpose of the Checklist (attach correspondence, if applicable). 6of8 PIIR 1-A Project No. 11036.1-3 Yes No X 7. Based upon a site inspection and consultation with the appropriate agency, will construction of the facility involve a significant change in surface features (e.g. wetland fill, deforestation, or water diversion)? 7(1): Review the National NX'edands Inventory or obtain information from a commercial service to determine if a wetland is identified on the property. No wetlands are shown on the subject property in the EDR Report, Wedands Section, National Wedands Inventory Database. 7(b): Perform a site inspection to identify evidence of wetland conditions on the property. No evidence of wetland conditions was observed on the subject property during the on -site reconnaissance. 7(c): Review the Soil Conservation Service County maps to determine soil type, vegetation type and hydrology of the property. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia, the site is primarily underlain by the Clearbrook channery silt loam. This soil type is moderately deep, somewhat poorly drained and gently sloping with a moderately slow permeability. 7(d): If a wetland is identified or water diversion will occur on the property, consult the Army Corps of Engineers ("ACOE") regarding the effect of wetland fill or water diversion. The project will not involve wetland fill or water diversion. Contact: Phone: Date(s): Comments: 7(e): If forests will be cleared, consult with U.S. Forest Service regarding effect of deforestation. Construction of the proposed tower site will not include forest clearing. Contact: Phone: Date(s): Comments: 7 of 8 ' PHR+A Project No. 11036-1-3 Attach copies of any permits obtained (e.g., Nationwide Permits) from the ACOE in the case of wetlands. Yes No X 8. Will the antenna tower and/or supporting structure be equipped with high intensity white lights and be located in a residential neighborhood, as defined by applicable zoning laws? The proposed tower is not located within a residential neighborhood and it is less than 200 feet above ground surface. 8(a): If necessary, contact the FAA to determine whether the site must have high intensity white lights. The FAA has determined that lighting will not be required for this proposed tower. 8(b): Contact the local zoning authority to determine the zoning of the proposed 1 site. The proposed tower is located within an area currently zoned as Light Industrial District (Mi). If you have answered yes to any of the yes/no questions, an FCC Environmental Assessment (EA) must be filed with the FCC and a Finding of No Significant Impact granted per the applicable procedures prior to proceeding with any construction. Signature Date SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER Title PATTON H ARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES, pc Company 8 of 8 P} 1R+A Project No. 1 1036-1-3 1 Yes No X 2. Based upon a site inspection and information provided by a commercial service or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of Interior), and state and local wildlife preservation agencies, will the facility be ' located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? 2(a): Contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and consult the Division of Realty's ' National Refuge System list. See EDR Report, Natural Areas Section, Federal Lands Database ' U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contact Name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: 2(b): If contact with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reveals a National Wildlife Refuge, contact specific Wildlife Refuge Manager. Date(s): Comments: ' 2(c): Contact state and local government wildlife preservation offices. Contact Name: Phone: Date(s): Comments: If the yes/no answer was based in whole or in part upon information provided by a commercial service, specify the name of the service, the contact person, the dates of contact, and provide all ' correspondence to/from the service. The above information was provided in a report prepared by Environmental Data Resources, ' Inc. (EDR). A copy of this report is included as an attachment. In addition, no evidence of an officially designated wilderness area was observed on or adjacent to the subject property during the on -site reconnaissance. Yes No X 3. Based upon a site inspection and consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Department of Interior), will the facility affect listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats? 3(a): Contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and consult the list of threatened or endangered species to determine whether a listed or proposed species or habitat may be present in the area affected by the project. 3 of 8 1 rrQ z 1 Aviation A=Inlscr tion ArRONA[tTICAL $TUG ray a ri Regional OjEfLca r 2002-Aa-1095-OE 1 i tlan ?lax&-AEA-520 PR[OA STUDY NO. ,7amki a. NY 11434 &Lem ras t•: 2 /1/2002 P.IR g Pic 9AFt Y "ALYerB CORP WAS 410G, GA 190 PHO NIX L D STS 250 ATL %Nt.N GA 0 9 ! a DaYS'*iiliIX"TOM or 100 TO All XAVZdRsx0K ry Ttha F4d el A i tion Administrati rs completed on aeronautical study and ritlo pro i ions of 49 U.S.C., S ction 4471e and, it applicable, Title 14 21fic Cod t Federal Rogulatl oru , part, '77, concerning: Sit ctur Type; Antenna Tows Laid tion: WINCHESTER, A a ude. 39-7-32.1 1008, A itude, c 78-11-6.6 k1 to: 195 feet above ground level (AU) 942 feet abo • can sea level (A►M9L) Thi 1a aut c 1 study revealed a the structure does not exceed otiz r c on s a dards and would no e a hazard to air navigation provi d the f 1 wing c ndition(a), iZ any, s(are) mat: To obr note t equency activation a 4 verity that no interference is cau ed MA f cilitiea, prior to b ginning any Lranomiosion from h site y u rau3t contact FAA rtlnsburg 33C at 304�267-E121. Boa i d'. this *Valuation, marking n lighting are not nacaasary for avi t�o sate y However, Si m■r in and/or lighting are accomplishes n v 1µn ry b s s, we reeotmend It installed and maintained in actor nce wit advi o y Circular 70, 1 K Change 1. tlhi ait str c ure does not const c to a hazard to air navigation, it woo d� local ad within or near a military training area and/or route. Thi Y raini t on expires on 4/1/ 0 4 unle99t i `aj ext nceck, revised or ter i sted by the issuing otrioe. Sbj the a notruction lc oub7 c to the licensing authority of the F doral Communicatio s Commission (FCC) and on app i ation for a constr ac ion permit tins been filed , as rd by the FCC, wit i 6 months of the date of this dnation. In such :ass, the determination expires on to prescribed by tic FCC for completion of i cetion, or the dat he rrc denies the application. NOT , 9R �QSJED "TZ24810N Or Ttt FFECTlvr6 PERIOD Or TOTS OETEAMINATI lv MOB BE OR DELIVERED TO T I3 OFFICE AT L,E�►T :15 DAxe PRIOR TO THE YXP�RAT MN DA .+n ern•• a,v. nrnnl•[[OT, ,nn1 1AA7 ♦n•Tnn ThiB 1 e main t on is based, Inc u�lC $DOC £ c cocrdinatt cha spa, n co r inetes, hell voi �h act r 'nation. At inc • s to n i hta, power, aep rt noti a to the rAA. Thi (be rmin-t: on does inc? Cr& ef, darricks, etC., whi( str Ic u 41. However, this se ind c t abo a equipment at c a re i es separate Th1 beif rein t on concerns eft c� use o navigable spa •pr c p iance rsepo: roQ I t n of e y Federal, t A C4 p thi eterntination co i�a, n if t e structure If aIIc be r furthar ossi (71 ) is 3497 n any futur cof r t J1ero ical study Nor a in Spa i 1 I t t t I i i i i o boo/Eoo'd LS6fi in pa t or the foregoing description whin .s. hai h a, frequency(ies) and power. Any ihts, d frequencies or use of greater powe will iy fut a construction or alteration, inolud ng or Ln a dieion of other tranemiteera, requ'coo ude to h may u 1 porter which not i cE the a� irepat Sabi 1j tote, will La sub stance t, Corr Vumbe r rary construction equipment such a e used during actual construction of the hall not exceed the overall height as a a might greater than the studied to the MA. fQ t of this struoture on the safe an e y aircraft and does not reliave th ties relating to any law, ordinance;'gr r local government bony, e forwarded to the Federal CommunIcac one e r; to their licensing authority. lease contact our office at s endence concerning this matter, pl s• 2 Q2-AEA-1495^OE. (DUE) 015-V8Y YV3 f69V4R1i_AZL A6:49 7nOx,TO_aa0 �_ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN" ' Department of Historic Resources w. Tayioe Murphy, Jr 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221 Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secrewry of Natural Resources Director Tel: (904) 367-2323 Fex:(804)367-2391 MEMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 www.dhr.state.vaus DATE: S`(;�P vZ DHR File # ' TO: NC LR 4) Me- GL-1)ER � y FROM: Ethel R Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader �aon of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: �� 1,�(rc�•J Gt�S, c�� ► �.✓, c �r-r�d.�Js C -��� .�i� This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation -with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. ' Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. No further identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DER. ' — We have previously reviewed . this project. Attached is a copy of our correspondence. Other (Please see comments below) ' COMMENTS: Program Services Div. 10 Courthouse Ave ' Petersburg. VA 23803 7e1:(804)963-1685 Fay: (804) 862-6196 Petersbur; Office 19-B Bollingbrook Street Petersburg. VA 23803 Tel: (804) 663-1620 Fa.%: (804) 86--1627 Portsmouth Office 612 Court StreeL 3" Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Te): (757) 396.6709 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Roanokc Office 1030 Penmar Avenue. SE Roanoke, VA 24U13 Tel (i40) 85,-7585 Fax- lidni RSL :cot Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suitt 203 Winchester, VA22601 Tel: (%40) 722-3427 EDR NEPACheck® Washington Gas 'Power Site 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Inquiry Number: 857245.1s October 02, 2002 Environmental Data Ejy: Resources, Inc. The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06890 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EDR NEPACheck*'Description............................................. 1 Map Findings Summary ........................................................ 2 NaturalAreas.......................................................................... 3 HistoricSites.......................................................................... 5 FloodPlain............................................................................. 8 Wetlands................................................................................. 10 Wetlands Classification System .......................................... 13 FCC& FAA Sites.................................................................... 17 Key Contacts and Government Records Searched........... 19 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT, ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCI-UDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE. WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. Entire contents copyright 2001 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission EDR and the edr logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR NEPACheck"`' DESCRIPTION The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies include in their decision -making processes appropriate and careful consideration of all environmental effects and actions, analyze potential environmental effects of proposed actions and their alternatives for public ' understanding and scrutiny, avoid or minimize adverse effects of proposed actions, and restore and enhance environmental quality as much as possible. The EDR NEPACheck provides information which may be used, in conjunction with additional research, ' to determine whether a proposed site or action will have significant environmental effect. The report provides maps and data for the following items (where available). Search results are provided in the Map Findings Summary on page 2 of this report. Section Natural Areas Map • Federal Lands Data: Officially designated wilderness areas Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries and refuges Wild and scenic rivers Fish and Wildlife • Threatened or Endangered Species, Fish and Wildlife, Critical Habitat Data (where available) Historic Sites Map • National Register of Historic Places • State Historic Places (where available) Flood Plain Map • National Flood Plain Data (where available) Wetlands Map • National Wetlands Inventory Data (where available) FCC & FAA Map • FCC antenna/tower sites, AM Radio Towers, FAA Markings and Obstructions, AM Radio Interference Zones Airports, Topographic gradient Key Contacts and Government Records Searched Regulation 47 CFR 1.1307(1) 47 CFR 1.1307(2) 40 CFR 6.302(e) 40 CFR 6.302 47 CFR 1.1307(3). 40 CFR 6.302 47 CFR 1.1307(4); 40 CFR 6.302 47 CFR 1.1307(6); 40 CFR 6.302 47 CFR 1.1307(7); 40 CFR 6.302 47 CFR 1.1307(8) TC857245 1s Page 1 of 24 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY The databases searched in this report are listed below. Database descriptions and other agency contact information is contained in the Key Contacts and Government Records Searched section on page 19 of this report. Search Distance Item within Item within 1/8 mile Database (Miles) Search Distance of Target Property NATURAL AREAS MAP US Federal Lands 1.00 NO NO VA Endangered Species 1.00 NO NO HISTORIC SITES MAP National Register Hist. Places 1.00 NO NO VA Historic Sites 1.00 NO NO APPAL -TRAIL 1.00 NO NO FLOODPLAIN MAP FLOODPLAIN 1.00 NO NO WETLANDS MAP NWI 1.00 YES NO FCC & FAA SITES MAP FCC Cellular 1.00 NO NO FCC Antenna 1.00 NO NO FCC Tower 1.00 YES NO FCC AM Tower 1.00 NO NO FAA DOF 1.00 YES YES TC857245.1s Page 2 of 24 Natural Areas Map 11"A A Target Property 0 Locahons Roads Federal Areas County Boundary Federal Linear Features Waterways State Areas Water State Linear Features 1.14 1 , 12 1 Miles TARGET PROPERTY: Washington Gas Tower Site CUSTOMER: Patton Harris Rust & Assoc. ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane CONTACT: Sam Slyers CITY/STATE/ZIP: Winchester VA 22602 INQUIRY #: 857245.1s LAT/LONG: 39.1256/ 78.1850 DATE: October 02, 2002 X957,145.1s hrejdN Capynghl :, 2002 EN lee -- 2001 GDT Inc A.1 07120DI All Fk.ghis AOS.Nd NATURAL AREAS MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available government records within the search radius around the target property. TC857245.1 s Page 4 of 24 Historic Sites Map Target Property !`. Streets County Boundary Waterways Water ♦ Historic Sites j Federal Historic Areas State Historic Areas Scenic Trail .7 i ^s \3 9Q \ rG \s 174 ,f2 1 MMS TARGET PROPERTY: Washington Gas Tower Site CUSTOMER: Patton Harris Rust & Assoc. ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane CONTACT: Sam Styers CITY/STATE/ZIP: Winchester VA 22602 INQUIRY B: 857245.1s LAT/LONG: 39.1256 / 78.1850 DATE: October 02, 2002 TC851245.ls I'agc i 624 Copp,pM , 2002 FDA tM a 200'. GpT.Inc ft� 07,20C1 Ap Nghl, 9e«,vu HISTORIC SITES MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database No mapped sites were found in EOR's search of available government records within the search radius around the target property. 7C057245.1s Page 6 of 24 UNMAPPABLE HISTORIC SITES ' Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Status EDR ID ' Database Name: NEWTOWN-STEPHENS BURG HISTORIC DISTRICT (STEPHENS CITY) Unmappable VLR Date: 12/11/91 VA10000543 Date Added: 08/18/92 VA Historic Sites City: Not reported County: FREDERICK COUNTY Site Number: 304-01 Description: Chartered in 1758, what is today Stephens City is the second -oldest town in Frederick County. Originally called Stephensburg, it was named Newtown-Stephensburg in 1879 and renamed Stephens City in 1887. The town grew up along a major crossroads on th e Valley Pike and became known for its wagon -making trade. The nationally known Newtown wagon was manufactured here. The ' community's buildings are chronologically and stylistically diversified. 18th-century log structures stand among buildings echoin g 19th-century revival styles. Typical of small Valley towns, most dwellings here are simple vernacular types that set off a scattering of more high -style works. The historic character is reinforced by a lack of significant construction over the past sixty years. During the Civil War constant troop movements caused the town to change hands many times, six times in one day alone, but with minimal destruction. TC857245.1s Page 7 of 24 Flood Plain Map Major Roads Contour Lines Waterways County Boundary 0 1/e 1Q 1 Wes Power Lines ® Water i -- -- i Pipe Lines 100-year flood zone Fault Lines i —, 500-year flood zone Electronic FEMA data available Electronic FEMA data not available TARGET PROPERTY: Washington Gas Tower Site CUSTOMER: Patton Harris Rust & Assoc. ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane CONTACT: Sam Styers CITY/STATE/ZIP: Winchester VA 22602 INQUIRY #: 657245.1s LAT/LONG: 39.1256 / 78.1850 DATE: October 02, 2002 TC857%5 Is Ng 9o(24 Cop1n,9A1 , 2002 FOR Inc C. 2001 GOT Inc fief 07i2001 AU Rpn1e Reserved FLOOD PLAIN MAP FINDINGS Source: FEMA Q3 Flood Data ' County FEMA flood data electronic coverage FREDERICK, VA NO WINCHESTER CITY, VA NO Flood Plain panel at target property: None Reported II, , Additional Flood Plain panel(s) in search area: None Reported TC857245.1s Page 9 of 24 National Wetlands Inventory Map major Roads Contour Lines Waterways %`✓ County Boundary 0 1A 112 1 AWM. Power Lines ® Water ------ — —•-- ---- --J Pipe lines Wetlands Fault Lines Electronic N WI data available �} Electronic N WI data not available TARGET PROPERTY: Washington Gas Tower Site CUSTOMER: Patton Harris Rust & Assoc. ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane CONTACT: Sam Styers CITY/STATE/ZIP: Winchester VA 22602 INQUIRY N: 857245.1s LAT/LONG: 39.1256 / 78.1850 DATE: October 02, 2002 TC857245.6 Pa<c 10of 24 CapyriChl :: 2002 FOR. Inc -, 200A GOT Inc RN 07/2001 All Rghts R.sved WETLANDS MAP FINDINGS Source: Fish and Wildlife Service NWI data NWI hardcopy map at target property: Winchester Additional NWI hardcopy map(s) in search area: Stephens City Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Code and Description* Database 1 PUBHh NWI East [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H) Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/4-1/2 mi Diked/Impounded 2422 2 PUBHh NWI SSW [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/4-1/2 mi Diked/Impounded 2446 3 PUBHh NWI North [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/4-1/2 mi Diked/Impounded 2507 4 PUBHh NE [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 112-1 mi Diked/Impounded 2951 5 PUBHh SW [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/2-1 mi Diked/Impounded 3137 6 PUBHx NW [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [x] Excavated 1/2-1 mi 3522 7 PEM1A West [P] Palustrine, [EM] Emergent, [1] Persistent, [A] Temporarily Flooded 1/2-1 mi 3559 8 PUBHx WSW [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [x] Excavated 1/2-1 mi 3812 9 PUBHh West [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/2-1 mi Diked/Impounded 4203 'See Wetland Classification System for additional information. NWI NWI NWI M"All NWI TC857245.1s Page 11 of 24 WETLANDS MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Code and Description" Database 10 PUBHh NWI North [P] Palustrine, [UB] Unconsolidated Bottom, [H] Permanently Flooded, [h] 1/2-1 mi Diked/Impounded 4254 `See Wetland Classification System for additional information. TC857245.1s Page 12 of 24 WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a sub -department of the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1974, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service developed a criteria for wetland classification with four long range objectives: to describe ecological units that have certain homogeneous natural attributes, to arrange these units in a system that will aid decisions about resource management, to furnish units for inventory and mapping, and ' to provide uniformity in concepts and terminology throughout the U.S. High altitude infrared photographs, soil maps, topographic maps and site visits are the methods ' used to gather data for the productions of these maps. In the infrared photos, wetlands appear as different colors and these wetlands are then classified by type. Using a hierarchical classification, the maps identify wetland and deepwater habitats according to: system subsystem class subclass modifiers (as defined by Cowardin, et al. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/013S 79/31. 1979.) The classification system consists of five systems: 1. marine 2. estuarine 3. riverine 4. lacuslrine 5. palustrine The marine system consists of deep water tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands. The riverine system consists of all wetlands contained within a channel. Thelacustrine systems includes all nontidal wetlands related to swamps, bogs & marshes. The estuarine system consists of deepwater tidal habitats and where ocean water is diluted by fresh water. The palustrine system includes nontidal wetlands dominated by trees and shrubs and where salinity is below .5% in tidal areas. All of these systems are divided in subsystems and then further divided into class. National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by transferring gathered data on a standard 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. topographic map. Approximately 52 square miles are covered on a National Wetland Inventory map at a scale of 1:24,000. Electronic data is compiled by digitizing these National Wetland Inventory Maps. TC857245.1s Page 13 of 24 = = M = SYSTEM MARINE SUBSYSTEM 1-SUBTIDAL CLASS RB-ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC BED RF-REEF OW -OPEN WATER / BOTTOM BOTTOM Unknown Bottom Subclass I Bedrock l Cobble -Gravel I Algal I Coral 2 Rubble 2 Sand 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Worm 3 Mud 5 Unknown 4 Organic Submergent SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subclass SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subclass n m Uf th A N v m m A 0 E - ESTUARINE I - SUBTIDAL RB-ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC BED KF-REEF OW -OPEN WATER BOTTOM BOTTOM Unknown Bottom I Bedrock I Cobble -Gravel 2 Rubble 2 Sand 3 Mud 4 Organic I Algal 2 Mollusk 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Worm 4 Floating Vascular 5 Unknown Submergent 6 Unknown Surface 2 - INTERTIDAL AB -AQUATIC BED RF-REEF RS-ROCKY SHORE US-U NCONSOLIDATED SHORE I Algal 1 Coral I Bedrock I Cubble-Gravel 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Worm 2 Rubble 2 Sand 5 Unknown Submergent 3 Mud 4 Organic 2 - INTERTIDAL AB -AQUATIC BED RF-REEF SS - STREAMBED RS-ROCKY SHORE US -UNCONSOLIDATED EM-EMERGENT SS -SCRUB SHRUB FO-FORESTED SHORE 1 Algal 2 Mollusk 1 Cobble- Gravel 1 Bedrock I Cobble- Gravel I Persistent 1 Broad -Leaved 1 Bruad-Leaved 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Worrn 2 Sand 2 Rubble 2 Sand 2 Nonpersistent Deciduous Deciduous 4 Floating Vascular 3 Mud 3 Mud 2 Needle -Leaved 2 Needle -Leaved S Unknown Submergent 4 Organic 4 Organic Deciduous Deciduous 6 Unknown Surface 3 Broad -Leaved 3 Broad -Leaved Evergreen Evergreen 4 Needle -Leaved 4 Ncedle-Leaved Evergreen Evergreen 5 Dead 5 Dead 6 Deciduous 6 Deciduous 7 Evergreen 7 Evergreen SYSTEM R - RIVERINE SUBSYSTEM 1 - TIDAL 2 - LOWER PERENNIAL 3 - UPPER PERENNIAL 4 - INTERMITTENT 5 - UNKNOWN PERENNIAL CLASS RB-ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIDATED •SB-STREAMBED AB -AQUATIC BED RS-ROCKY US -UNCONSOLIDATED "EM-EMERGENT OW -OPEN W ATFW BOTTOM BOTTOM SHORE SHORE Unknown Bottom Subclass i Bedrock t Cobble -Gravel I Bedrock I Algal I Bedrock I Cobble -Gravel 2 Nonpenatent 2 Rubble 2 Sand 2 Rubble 2 Aquatic Moss 2 Rubble 2 Sand 3 Mud 3 Cobble -Gravel 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Mud 4 Organic 4 Sand 4 Floating Vascular 4 Organic 5 Mud 5 Unknown Submergent 5 Vegetated 6 Organic 6 Unknown Surface 7 Vegetated • STREAMBED is limited to TIDAL and INTERMITTENT SUBSYSTEMS, and comprises the only CLASS in the INTERMITTENT SUBSYSTEM. —EMERGENT is limited to TIDAL and LOWER PERENNIAL SUBSYSTEMS. SYSTEM L - LACUSTRINE SUBSYSTEM 1 - LIMNETIC CLASS RB-ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC BED OW -OPEN WATER/ BOITOM BOTTOM Unknown Bottom Subclass I Bedrock I Cobble -Gravel 1 Algal 2 Rubble 2 Sand 2 Aquatic Moss 3 Mud 3 Rooted Vascular 4 Organic 4 Floating Vascular 5 Unknown Submergent 6 Unknown Surface SUBSYSTEM 2 - LITTORAL CI CD �' CLASS RB-ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC RS-ROCKY US -UNCONSOLIDATED EM-EMERGENT OW -OPEN WATER' N BOTTOM BOTTOM BED SHORE SHORE Unknown Bottom v Subclass I Bedrock I Cobble -Gravel I Algal I Bedrock I Cobble -Gravel 2 Nonpersistcnt v 2 Rubble 2 Sand 2 Aquatic Moss 2 Rubble 2 Sand LID 3 Mud 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Mud CD 4 Organic 4 Floating Vascular 4 Organic c 5 Unknown Submergent 5 Vegetated N 6 Unknown Surface A = ' = = = M = M = M = M = = = M = 1 r7 oa rn V N N 0 SUBSYSTEM P-PALUSTRINE CLASS RB--ROCK UB--UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC BED US --UNCONSOLIDATED I ML--MOSS- EM--EMERGENT SS--SCRUB-SHRUB FO--FORESTED OW -OPEN WATER/ BOTTOM BOTTOM SHORE LICHEN Unkno-n Bottom Subclass I Bedrock 1 Cobble -Gravel I Algal I Cobble -Gravel I Moss I Persistent I Broad -Leaved I Broad-Leuced 2 Rubble 2 Sand 2 Aquatic Moss 2 Sand 2 Lichen 2 Nonpersistent Deciduous Deciduous 3 Mud 3 Rooted Vascular 3 Mud 2 Needle -Leaved 2 Needle -Leaved 4 Organic 4 Floating Vascular 4 Organic Deciduous Deciduous 5 Unknown 5 Vegetated 3 Broad -Leaved 3 Broad -Leased Submergent Evergreen Evergreen 6 Unknown Surface 4 Needle -Leaved 4 Needle -Leaved Evergreen Evergreen 5 Dead 5 Dead 6 Deciduous 6Deciducus 7 Evergreen 7 Evergreen MODIFIERS In order to more adequately describe wetland and deepwater habitats one or more of the water regime, water chemistry, soil, or special modifiers may be applied at the class or lower level in the hierarchy. The fanned modifier may also be applied to the ecological system. WATER REGIME WATER CHEMISTRY SOIL SPECIAL MODIFIERS Non -Tidal Tidal CoastalHahnitylnlandSatinitypHModirrersfor all Fresh Water A Temporarily Flooded H Permanently Flooded K Artificially Flooded •S Temporary -Tidal 1 Hyperhaline 7 Hypersaline g Organic b Beaver B Saturated IIntermittently Flooded L Subtidal •R Seasonal -Tidal 2 Euhaline 8 EuWine a Acid n Mineral d Partially DrainedlDitched C Seasonally Flooded K Artificially Flooded M Irregularly Exposed •T Semipermanent -Tidal 3 Mixohaline (Brackish) 9 Mixosaline t Circumneutral f Farmed D Seasonally Flooded/ W Intermittently N Regularly Flooded V Permanent -Tidal 4 Polyhaline 0 Fresh i Alkaline h Diked/impounded Well Drained Flooded(remporary P Irregularly Flooded U Unknown 5 Mesohaline r Artificial Substrate E Seasonally Flooded/ Y Saturated/Semipermanent/ 6 Oligohaline s Spoil Saturated Seasonal 0 Fresh x Excavated F Scmiperrnanently 2 Intermittently *These water regimes are only used in Flooded E xposediPermanent tidally influenced, freshwater systems. G Intcrmittently U Unknown Exposed o Source: U.S. Department of -the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service o National Wetlands Inventory a FCC & FAA Sites Map Streets , Sites Contour Lines Omni Directional AM Interference i County Boundary I ,i Directional AM Interference Waterways ISWater _F VI N1!n�S •' u va ! rz i M ies I' TARGET PROPERTY: Washington Gas Tower Site CUSTOMER: Patton Harris Rust & Assoc. ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane CONTACT: Sam Styers CITY/STATE/ZIP: Winchester VA 22602 INQUIRY: 857245.1s LAT/LONG: 39.1256 / 78.1850 DATE: October 02, 2002 TC857245 Is P,1ge 17 of 24 Copyri9hl •v 2002 FDR, Inc a. 2(N11 GOT Inc Rol ON2001 All Righli Rhgowed FCC & FAA SITES MAP FINDINGS Map Direction Distance EDR ID ' Distance (tt.) Database 1 ' ESE 0-1/8 mi 655 Unique ID: 476138 City: KERNSTOWN Verification Status: unverified ' Latitude: 39 07 30N Frequency: Not Reported Above Ground Level Height (Ft.): Above Mean Sea Level Height (Ft.): ' Horizontal Accuracy: Not Reported Painted/Marked: Not Reported 2 NW 1/4-1/2 mi 2389 Obstruction #: State: Obstruction Type: Longitude: Type of Lighting: Not Reported 0110 00850 Vertical Accuracy: FAA Study #: Tower ID: 95587 Tower Owner Name: ALLEGHENY POWER SERVICE 0.6MLS NORTH, WINCHESTER, VA Latitude: 39 7' 140868" Latitude (in seconds): Longitude: 78 11' 29" Longitude (in seconds): Transmitter Latitude: 390748 Transmitter Longitude Construction Date: 99/99/1999 Activation Date: FAA Date: Mar 13 1989 FCC Date: File Number: 0747944 FAA 10: Antenna Height: 0.0000 Antenna Height (M): Beacon Height: 0.0000 Beacon Height (M): Elevation: 943.0000 Elevation FAA: Elevation FAA (M): 287.4000 Elevation (M): Structure Height: 200.0000 Structure Height (M): Structure Height FAA: 200.0000 Structure Height FAA (M): Supporting Struct Hgt: 0.0000 Supporting Struct Hgt (M): Tower Height: 0.0000 Tower Height (M): Structure Type: TOW Tower Type: Key Remarks: Date: Key Site: 44694 Record Action: ID Exam: ASB6 ID_ASB_ACC: Paint and Lighting Specs: Special Conditions/Remarks: This record is for a license, and it may or may not indicate a site which has been built. DOF000000068823 FAA DOF 6138 Virginia TOWERS 2 078 10 59W Not Reported 66DC0118 TOW 100000087520 TOWER 140868 281489 0781129 Mar 30 1989 Feb 23 1989 88-AEA-1402-OE 0.0000 0.0000 943.0000 287.4000 61.0000 61.0000 0.0000 0.0000 E MOD C TC857245.1s Page 18 of 24 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Various Federal laws and executive orders address specific environmental concerns. NEPA requires the responsible offices to integrate to the greatest practical extent the applicable procedures required by these laws and executive ' orders. EDR provides key contacts at agencies charged with implementing these laws and executive orders to supplement the information contained in this report. ' NATURAL AREAS Officially designated wilderness areas Government Records Searched in This Report FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS ' Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data From Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service and Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service. National Parks - Forests ' Monuments Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 09/01/1997 Federal Contacts for Additional Information National Park Service, Northeast Region 200 custom Street, Fifth Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-597-7013 National Park Service, National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive, SW Washington, DC 20242 202-619-7256 USDA Forest Service, Southern 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30367 404-347-2384 BLM - Eastern States Office 7450 Boston Blvd. Springfield, VA 22153 703-440-1713 Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries and refuges Government Records Searched in This Report FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service and Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments - Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 09/01/1997 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 TC857245.1s Page 19 of 24 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED _ State Contacts for Additional Information Wild and scenic rivers Government Records Searched in This Report FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-64 8-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service and Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service. National Parks Forests Monuments Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version. 09/01/1997 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Endangered Species Government Records Searched in This Report VA Endangered Species: VA Endangered Species Virginia Endangered Species Source: Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Telephone: 804-367-1000 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 State Contacts for Additional Information Div. Of Natural Heritage, Dept. of Conservation & Recreation 804-367-1000 LANDMARKS, HISTORICAL, AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES Historic Places Government Records Searched in This Report National Register of Historic Places: The National Register of Historic Places is the official federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. These contribute to an understanding of the historical and cultural foundations of the nation. TC857245. is Page 20 of 24 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED The National Register includes: All prehistoric and historic units of the National Park System; - National Historic Landmarks, which are properties recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as possessing national significance; and Properties significant in American, state, or local prehistory and history that have been nominated by State Historic Preservation Officers, federal agencies, and others, and have been approved for listing by the National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2000 VA Historic Sites: The Virginia Landmarks Register A listing of historic sites on the State register. A compliation of the states buildings structures sites and districts that have been officially designated as historic landmarks by the Virginia Board of Historic Resources over the past thirty years. Source: Department of Historic Resources. Telephone: 804-367-2323 ' Federal Contacts for Additional Information Park Service; Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ' 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240 Phone: (202) 208-6843 State Contacts for Additional Information ' Department of Historic Resources 804-367-2323 Indian Religious Sites Federal Contacts for Additional Information Department of the Interior- Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Public Affairs ' 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 Office: 202-208-3711 Fax: 202-501-1516 National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers 1411 K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 Phone:202-628-8476 Fax: 202-628-2241 State Contacts for Additional Information A listing of local Tribal Leaders and Bureau of Indian Affairs Representatives can be found at: http://www.doi.govlbia/areas/agency.htmi TC8572/5.1s Page 21 of 24 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Scenic Trails Government Records Searched in This Report APPAL TRAIL: Appalachian Trail Source: Appalachian Trail Conference Telephone_ (304) 535-6331 ' Appalachian Trail centerline. State Contacts for Additional Information Appalachian Trail Conference 799 Washington Street P.O. Box 807 ' Harpers Ferry, WV 25425-0807 (304) 535-6331 Potomac Heritage Partnership ' 1623 28th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20007 202-338-6222 ' FLOOD PLAIN, WETLANDS AND COASTAL ZONE Flood Plain Management Government Records Searched in This Report ' Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Federal Emergency Management Agency 877-3362-627 State Contacts for Additional Information Department of Emergency Services 804-897-6500 ' Wetlands Protection Government Records Searched in This Report NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service 813-570-5412 ' State Contacts for Additional Information Dept. of Game & Inland Fisheries 804-367-9231 TC857245.1s Page 22 of 24 ' KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Coastal Zone Management Government Records Searched in This Report CAMA Management Areas Dept. of Env., Health & Natural Resources 919-733-2293 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management NORM, SSMC4 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-3102 State Contacts for Additional Information ' Coastal Program, Dept. of Environmental Quality 804-698-4320 FCC & FAA SITES MAP For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, the FCC requires evaluation of Antenna towers and/or supporting structures that are to be equipped with high intensity white lights which are to be located in residential neighborhoods, as defined by the applicable zoning law. ' Government Records Searched in This Report Cellular Federal Communications Commission Mass Media Bureau 2nd Floor - 445 12th Street SW Washington DC 20554 USA Telephone (202) 418-2700 Portions copyright (C) 1999 Percon Corporation. All rights reserved. Tower Federal Communications Commission Mass Media Bureau 2nd Floor - 445 12th Street SW Washington DC 20554 USA Telephone (202) 418-2700 Portions copyright (C) 1999 Percon Corporation. All rights reserved. Antenna Registration Federal Communications Commission ' Mass Media Bureau 2nd Floor - 445 12th Street SW Washington DC 20554 USA Telephone (202) 418-2700 Portions copyright (C) 1999 Percon Corporation. All rights reserved. AM Tower Federal Communications Commission Mass Media Bureau 2nd Floor - 445 12th Street SW Washington DC 20554 USA Telephone (202) 418-2700 TC857245.1s Paoe 23 of 24 . KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED FAA Digital Obstacle File National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Telephone: 301-436-8301 Describes known obstacles of interest to aviation users in the US. Used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to manage the National Airspace System. Excessive Radio Frequency Emission For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the determination of whether the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radio frequency in excess of certain limits. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Phone: 202-418-2470 OTHER CONTACT SOURCES STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION (c) 2001 Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Rel. 07/2001, This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Unauthorized use, including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures, of this product is expressly prohibited. TC857245.1s Page 24 of 24 Attachment 6 Additional Consulting Parties 1 List any additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or those who were independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. Refer to Attachment 5. Attachment 7 Area of Potential Effect IDescribe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for direct effects is the area that will be disturbed by the proposed collocation. The subject site currently consists of an existing 120-foot monopole tower and an existing equipment shelter and asphalt paved access road. Access to the property is from Hillandale Road which is located to the northwest of the subject site. The collocation ' extension is proposed to extend the current height of the tower 60-feet to the height of 180-feet. No new ground disturbance is proposed outside of the existing equipment compound. 1 Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for the tower is one-half mile. This was determined because the proposed collocation extension height is less than 200 feet. Attachment 8 Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects � I A.) Provide name, address, including ZIP for each property in the APE for visual effects that are listed on the National Register, has been formally determined to be eligible for listing on the NRHP, or is identified as considered eligible for listing by the SHPO/THPO. ' One historical property was identified as eligible for listing on the NRHP. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site. B.) Provide name, address, including ZIP for each property not listed in A above that will suffer a visual impact that was identified through comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual group and describe how the identified property satisfies the criteria of eligibility. The Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984, not evaluated and razed) is located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the subject site. The Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the subject site, Two residential dwellings located on Route 11 (DHR-DSS #034-0982 and #034-0983, not evaluated and razed) are located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site The Robert Wilson, Sr. House (DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated) is located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the subject site. C.) For any properties listed above in A, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion on the NRHP, explain the basis for this recommendation. Mn Reconnaissance Level Surveyv^ - DHR Id#: 034-0126 Other DHR ID#: . Resource Information Property Name(s): Hillandale, Crawford House {Historic) Hill and Dale {Historic) Hillandale (Current) Property Date: 1780 ' Local Historic District: Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia County/Independent City: Frederick Magisterial District: Town/Village/Hamlet: Winchester Tax Parcel. Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. Route 642, Near (Current) USGS Quadrangle Name: STEPHENS CITY ' UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/EIN: UTM Center coordinates Z/EIN: l l UTM Data Restricted?. Resource Description Ownership Status: ' Government Agency Owner: Acreage: 0.0 ................ Surrounding area: ............. Open to Public: Yes Site Description:......... Secondary Resource Secondary resources are outbuildings. Summary: Historic District Information National Register Eligibility Status Property is Historic (50 years or older) Property has been recommended Eligible for listing or is listed on the National Register of Historic Places The property recieved an evaluation rating of 34.00 Report generated 3/28/2008 U Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0126 Resource Type: No. Resource Types Historic? I Smoke/Meat House Contributing 1 Spring/Spring House Contributing 1 Carriage House Contributing 0 Shed Contributing 1 Single Dwelling Contributing I Silo Contributing 1 Single Dwelling Contributing 2 Barn Contributing NR Resource Count: Other DHR ID#: Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0126 Other DHR ID#: ' Individual Resource Information ' Resource Type. Carriaee House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 ' Form: Condition: ............... Good Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... None Description: Architecture Summary: frame, hipped roof with apshalt shingles, also called the "garage," horizontal siding, vertical plank doors with diagonal plank bracing. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Silo Primary Resource? .... No ' Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Fair Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... None Description: Architecture Summary: This is a wood stave silo. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End ' Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Spring/Spring House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ ' Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... I Form: Condition: ............... Fair Interior Plan Type: One -room Threats to Resource:... Neglect ' Description: Architecture Summary: stone, standing -seam metal gable roof End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Shed Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 1 Form: Condition: ............... Poor Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Neglect ' Description: Architecture Summary: There are several frame sheds and a machine shed. The photos show two timber -frame sheds with standing -seam metal gable roofs. One has vertical board siding, the other has weatherboard siding. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description I Report generated 3/28/2008 ' V Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0126 Other DHR ID#: Resource TvDe. Smoke/Meat House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... I Form: Condition: ............... Fair Interior Plan Type: One -room Threats to Resource:... Neglect Description: Architecture Summary: small, board -and -batten siding, gable metal roof, small frame addition on one side with weatherboard siding End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Barn Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Fair Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... None Description: Architecture Summary: There are two bams. They are both frame, have vertical board siding, and gable roofs. One is a bank barn, the other has a projecting roof overhang at the end of one gable. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Single Dwelling Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ No Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Fair Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... None Description: Architecture Summary: This is a frame tenant house with an L-plan, standing -seam metal gable roof, stucco siding, 6/6 sash windows, and a small front porch with squared posts. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Tvpe. Single Dwelline Primary Resource? .... Yes Date of Construction: ca1780 (Written Data) Accessed? ................ Yes Architectural Style: Victorian, Folk Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Good Interior Plan Type: Central Passage, Double Pile Threats to Resource:... None Description: Architecture Summary: End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0126 Other DHR ID#: Resource Exterior Component Description: Component Comp Tyne/Form Chimneys Chimneys - Interior end Roof other other Foundation Foundation - Solid/Continuous Porch Porch - 1-story, 3-bay Roof other Structural System Structural System - Masonry Windows Windows - Sash, Double -Hung Chimneys Chimneys - Central interior Material Material Treatment Stone other Wood other Wood other Stone Foundation - Rubble, Random Lead other Metal Roof - Shingle, Pressed Stone other Wood Windows - 2/2 Brick Chimneys - Not visible Significance Statement ' "Many events have taken place on this property, for instance, during the Civil War General Emory of the Union is said to have camped in the front yard of the house." National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): National Register Criteria: Significant Person, Criterion B:..... Level of Significance: Historic Context(s):.............. Property Retains Integrity of Period of Significance: Architecture/Community Planning I)Association 5)Material 2)Design 6)Setting 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4)Location ' Graphic Media Documentation Depository ID # Photorraphic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name 9612 B&W 35mm April/ 1989 Photos 9613 B&W 35mm April/ 1989 Photos ' 12044 B&W 35mm June/ 1992 Photos 2521 B&W 35mm August/ 1973 Photos ' 2522 B&W 35mm August/ 1973 Photos Report generated 3/28/2008 v Reconnaissance Level Survey I' DHR Id#: 034-0126 Other DHR ID#: ' Bibliographic Documentation Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events ' CRM Event # 1, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... DHR Staff: Eligible Date: ........................................................ August/16/1993 CRM Person: ................................. DHR CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: Hillandale, Frederick County (DHR 1 34-126), was rated at the local level for ' .......-11•••••• significance in the area of architecture. It was found to be eligible with a score of 34. CRM Event # 2, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Survey:Phase 1/Reconnaissance I' Date: ........................................................ April/ 1989 CRM Person: ................................. M. Kalbian CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: ................... CRM Event # 3, Cultural Resource Management Event........ DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible ' Date: ........................................................ October/01 / 1992 CRM Person: ................................. B ran Mitchell CRM Organization: ................................. VDHR Project 1D # Associated with Event:. 1991-445 ' CRM Event Notes or Comments: CRM Event # 4, ' Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Date: ........................................................ August/14/1973 CRM Person:—.-- ....................... Michael Quinn CRM Organization: ......................... CRM Event Notes or Comments: .................... IBridge Information I Cemetery Information I Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation Ownership Information I Surveyor Notes: Miscellaneous Survey Notes: Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0984 Other DHR ID#: Resource Information Property Name(s): Village Auto Sales {Current) Property Date: 1900 Local Historic District: Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia County/Independent City: Frederick Magisterial District: TownlVillage/Hamlet: Tax Parcel: .......................... Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. Rt. 11 S (Current) USGS Quadrangle Name: WINCHESTER ' UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/E/N.- UTM Center coordinates Z/EIN. UTM Data Restricted?. Resource Description Ownership Status: Government Agency Owner: Acreage: 0.0 Surrounding area: ' Open to Public: Not Evaluated Site Description:......... Secondary Resource ' Summary: Historic District Information ' Resource Type: No. Resource Types Historic? 1 Single Dwelling Contributing ' I Bam Contributing I Office/Office Building. Contributing NR Resource Count: 1 Register Eligibility Status is Historic (50 years or older) has not been evaluated Report generated 3/28/2008 v Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0984 Other DHR ID#: Individual Resource Information Resource Type Single Dwellini; Primary Resource? .... Yes Date of Construction: cal900 (Site Visit) Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Other Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... vacant Description: Architecture Summary: Protruding central bay w/ brackets on snd floor; exposed rafters; basement windows; overhanging eaves. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type Office/Office Building. Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: Concrete block. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Barn Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: 3 bay barn w/ standing seam metal roof; concrete block office. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Primary Resource Exterior Component Description: Component Comp Type/Form Material Material Treatment Chimneys Chimneys - Exterior side Brick other Chimneys Chimneys - Interior Brick other other Wood other Foundation Foundation - Solid/Continuous Concrete Porch Porch - Hood/Overhang Wood Roof Roof - Gable other Roof - Shingle Structural System Structural System -Frame Wood other Windows Windows - Sash, Double -Hung Windows - 6/1 Significance Statement Unusual style for this area. Was used as a relay station for a I trucking company. The drives slept in the concrete block section. 1 Now used as a car lot. National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0984 Other DHR ID#: National Register Criteria: ' Significant Person, Criterion B:..... Level of Significance: Period of Significance: Historic Context(s):.............. Domestic i' Property Retains Integrity of ])Association 5)Material 2)Design 6)Setting 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4)Location Graphic Media Documentation Depository ID # Photoeraohic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name 10638 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 Photos 10639 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 I Photos ' Report generated 3/28/2008 CWj DHR Id#: 034-0984 1• Bibliographic Documentation ' Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events CRM Event # 1, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Date: ........................................................ CRM Person: ................................. CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: CRM Event # 2, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Date: ........................................................ CRM Person: ................................. CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: ................... Bridge Information Cemetery Information Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation ' Ownership Information Surveyor Notes: Miscellaneous Survey Notes: Reconnaissance Level Survey Other DHR ID#: SurveyThase I/Reconnaissance December/ 1990 Maral Kalbian DHR Staff. Not Eligible October/01 /1992 Bryan Mitchell Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0981 a• Resource Information Property Name(s): Property Date: .................... Local Historic District Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia ' County/lndependent City: Barton -Sprinkle House (Historic) Hanover Lodge (Current) 1870 Frederick ' Magisterial District: Town/village/Hamlet: Kemstown Tax Parcel: .......................... Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. Route 814, Off Of (Current) USGSQuadrangleName: WINCHESTER ' UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/E/N: UTM Center coordinates Z/E/N. UTM Data Restricted.?. ' Resource Description Ownership Status: ' Government Agency Owner: Acreage: 0.0 Surrounding area: ' Open to Public: Not Evaluated Site Description:......... Secondary Resource Summary: Historic District Information Resource Type: No Resource Types Historic? 1 Smoke/Meat House Contributing 1 Single Dwelling Contributing 1 Carriage House Contributing 2 Garage Non-Contributi NR Resource Count: Other DHR ID#: t Register Eligibility Status is Historic (50 years or older) has not been evaluated Report generated 4/2/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0981 Other DHR ID#: ' Individual Resource Information ' Resource Type. Single Dwelling Primary Resource?.... Yes Date of Construction: cal870 (Site Visit) Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Other Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: 2 int. end flues; siding is cut above windows so it look like segmental arches; rear ell is ' unusual - is like a flounder house w/ 6/6 windows, central flue., per recon. survey. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End interior Description Resource Tyne. Carriage House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: carriage shed from original site End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Garage Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ ' Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... ' Description: Architecture Summary: 2 modem garages End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End interior Description ' Resource Type. Smoke/Meat House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... ' Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior . Description: End Interior Description Primary Resource Exterior Component Description: Component Comp Type/Fonn Material Material Treatment Chimneys other Brick other other Wood other Foundation Concrete Foundation - Block Roof Roof - Gable other Roof - Shingle Structural System Structural System - Frame Wood Structural System - Siding, Aluminu Windows Windows - Sash, Double -Hung Wood Windows - 1/1 Windows Windows - Sash, Double -Hung Wood Windows - 6/6 Porch Porch - I -story, 3-bay Wood other Report generated 4/2/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0981 Other DHR ID#: Significance Statement House was moved to present site around I III by T.G. Adams (present I owner). Used to sit on Routw I I where Route 37 intersects it., per 1 recon.survey. National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): National Register Criteria: Significant Person, Criterion B:..... Level of Significance: Period of Significance: Historic Context(s):.............. Domestic Property Retains Integrity of.- !)Association 5)Material 2)Design 6)Seuing 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4JLocation ' Graphic Media Documentation Depository ID # Photographic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name 10638 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 Photos Report generated 4/2/2008 I, DHR Id#: 034-0981 Reconnaissance Level Survey Other DHR ID#: Bibliographic Documentation ' Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events CRM Event # 1, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Date: ........................................................ CRM Person :................................. CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: CRM Event # 2, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... ' Dale: ........................................................ CRM Person: ................................. CRM Organization :................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: .................... Bridge Information Cemetery Information Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation ' Ownership Information Surveyor Notes: Miscellaneous Survey Notes: SurveyThase I/Reconnaissance December/ 1990 Maral S. Kalbian DHR Staff. Not Eligible October// 1 / 1992 H. Bryan Mitchell Report generated 4/2/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey 1 U DHR Id#: 034-0982 Other DHR ID#: I' Resource Information PropertyName(s): House, Route 11 South {Historic} L' National Register Eligibility Status Property Date: .................... Local Historic District : Property has not been evaluated Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia County/Independent City: Frederick ' Magisterial District: Town/Village/Hamlet: Tax Parcel: .......................... I' Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. { } USGS Quadrangle Name: WINCHESTER UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/E/N: ' UTM Center coordinates Z/E/N. l l UTM Data Restricted?. 1 Resource Description Ownership Status: Government Agency j 1 Owner: Acreage: 0.0 .............................. I' S urr a und i n g a re a: ' Open to Public: Not Evaluated Site Description:......... Secondary Resource ' Summary: Historic District Information ' Resource Type: NR Resource Count: Individual Resource Information ' Description: Report generated 3/28/2008 I Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0982 Other DHR ID#: I' Primary Resource Exterior Component Description: Significance Statement National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): II National Register Criteria: Significant Person, Criterion B:..... ' Level of Significance: Period of Significance: Property Retains Integrity of I)Association 5)Material 2)Design 6)Seuing 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4)Location Graphic Media Documentation Depository ID # Photographic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name 010638 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 Photos 010638 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 Photos Report generated 3/28/2008 ' V ' Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR ld#: 034-0982 Other DHR ID#: Bibliographic Documentation I Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events CRM Organization: ................................. I Bridge Information ' Cemetery Information Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation I' Ownership Information Surveyor Notes: I Miscellaneous Survey Notes: Report generated 3/28/2008 1 I r..' ) Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0983 Other DHR ID#: ' Resource Information Property Name(s): House, Rt. I IS (Function/Location) Property Date: 1910 ........... I........ Local Historic District Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia County/Independent City: Frederick Magisterial District: Town/1/illage/Hamlet: Tax Parcel: ' Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. Rt. 11 S (Current) USGS Quadrangle Name: WINCHESTER ' UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/E/N. UTM Center coordinates Z✓EIN. UTM Data Restricted?. ' Resource Description Ownership Status: Government Agency ' Owner: Acreage: 0.0 Surrounding area: Open to Public: Not Evaluated Site Description:......... Secondary Resource Summary: Historic District Information Resource Type: No. Resource Types Historic? 1 Garage Contributing 1 Single Dwelling Contributing NR Resource Count: Report generated 3/28/2008 v Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0983 Other DHR ID#: Individual Resource Information Resource Tvpe. Single Dwelling Primary Resource? .... Yes Date of Construction: cal910 {Site Visit} Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Other Number of Stories:.... 3 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: Boxed cornice; flat arches over windows; row of headers below cornice; integral rear 2 story porches w/ upstairs closed -in. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Garage Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: Frame. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Primary Resource Exterior Component Description: Component Comp Type/Form Material Material Treatment Chimneys Chimneys - Central interior Brick other other other Roof Roof - Hipped Wood Roof - Shingle Porch Porch - 1-story, 2-bay Roof Roof - Pyramidal other Roof - Shingle Structural System Structural System - Frame Wood other Windows Windows - Sash, Double -Hung other Significance Statement Oldest houses on this stretch of Rt. 11 South. Identical to 34-982. National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): National Register Criteria: Significant Person, Criterion B:..... Level of Significance: Period of Significance: Report generated 3/28/2008 Reconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0983 Other DHR ID#: Historic Context(s):.............. Domestic Property Retains Integrity of !)Association 5)Material ' 2)Design 6)Setting 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4)Location Graphic Media Documentation Depository ID # 10638 Photographic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name B&W 35mm December/ 1990 Photos Report generated 3/28/2008 I L J DHR Id#: 034-0983 M Bibliographic Documentation 'Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events CRM Event # 1, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Date: ........................................................ CRM Person: ................................. CRM Organcation:................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: Bridge Information Cemetery Information Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation ' Ownership Information Surveyor Notes: Miscellaneous Survey Notes: 1 Reconnaissance Level Survey Other DHR ID#: SurveyThase I/Reconnaissance December/ 1990 Maral Kalbian Report generated 3/28/2008 LLJReconnaissance Level Survey DHR ld#: 034-0980 Other DHR ID#: ' Resource Information Property Name(s): Wilson, Robert, Sr., House (Historic) National Register Eligibility Status ••••••••••••• Adams, Mervel, House {Current} Property is Historic (50 years or older) Property Date: 1800 Property has not been evaluated Local Historic District Location of Resource Commonwealth of Virginia ' Countyllndependent City: Frederick Magisterial District: Town/Village/Hamlet: Kemstown Tax Parcel: .......................... Zip Code:... Address(s):.................. Route 11 South, Off Of (Current) USGS Quadrangle Name: WINCHESTER ' UTM Boundary Coordinates Z/E/N. UTM Center coordinates Z/EIN. UTM Data Restricted?. ' Resource Description Ownership Status: Government Agency Owner: Acreage: .............................. Surrounding area: ' Open to Public: Site Description:......... Secondary Resource ' Summary: Historic District Information 1 F 0.0 Not Evaluated Resource Type: No. Resource Types Historic? 0 Pen Contributing 0 Shed Contributing 1 Single Dwelling Contributing 1 Barn Contributing 0 Chicken House/Poultry Contributing House Report generated 3/28/2008 DHR Id#: 034-0980 Reconnaissance Level Survey Other DHR ID#: INR Resource Count: Individual Resource Information Resource Tyne. Single Dwelling Primary Resource? .... Yes ' Date of Construction: ca1800 {Site Visit} Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Other Number of Stories:.... 2 Form: Condition: ............... interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: rear 2 story wing appears to be log & is shorter than front of house. Wing has central & side porch. Primary Porch - chamfered columns; sawn brackets., per recon. survey. End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End interior Description Resource Type. Pen Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: indeterminate number of pig pens End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End Interior Description Resource Type. Barn Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 ' Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: large frame gambrel -roofed bank bam w/ attached corn crib End Architecture Summary ' Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End interior Description Resource Type. Chicken House/Poultry House Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... Description: Architecture Summary: indeterminate number of chicken coops End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations interior Description: End interior Description ' Resource Type. Shed Primary Resource? .... No Date of Construction: Accessed? ................ Architectural Style: Number of Stories:.... 0 ' Form: Condition: ............... Interior Plan Type: Threats to Resource:... ' Description: Architecture Summary: indeterminate number of machine sheds End Architecture Summary Additions and alterations: End Additions and alterations Interior Description: End interior Description ' Report generated 3/28/2008 I LLJReconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0980 Other DHR ID#: ill � Significance Statement Only remaining historical property in area. Rear portion appears to I be earlier & is log. Is believed to be the site of original homestead 1 ' of early settler Robert Wilson., per recon. survey. National Register Eligibility Information (Intensive Level Survey): National Register Criteria: Significant Person, Criterion B:..... Level of Significance: Period of Significance: ' Historic Context(s):.............. Domestic Property Retains Integrity of !)Association 5)Material 2)Design 6)Setting ' 3)Feeling 7)Workmanship 4)Location Graphic Media Documentation ' Depository ID # Photographic Media Photo Depository Photo Date File Name 10638 B&W 35mm December/ 1990 ' Photos Report generated 3/28/2008 UReconnaissance Level Survey DHR Id#: 034-0980 Other DHR ID#: Bibliographic Documentation Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Events CRM Event # 1, Cultural Resource Management Event:....... Date: .... *,*,**,,* ... * ..... * ... ****,,* ............... CRM Person: ................................. CRM Organization: ................................. CRM Event Notes or Comments: Bridge Information ' Cemetery Information Cemetery(s) Ethnic Affiliation I Ownership Information Surveyor Notes: Miscellaneous Survey Notes: SurveyThase I/Reconnaissance December/ 1990 Maral S. Kalbian Report generated 3/28/2008 Index By State County National Register Information System No filter 03/28/2008 17:26:48 Include filter in navigation r] Resource 11'mv State County Name Address V City Listed ° Multiple' VA Frederick Cather, Willa, NW of Gore on Gore 1978-11- Birthplace U.S.50 16 VA Frederick Cedar Creek and On 1-81 bet. Middletown 2003-02- Belle Grove Middletown and 02 National Historical Strasburg Park VA Frederick Cedar Creek On 1-81 between Middletown 1969-08- Battlefield and Middletown and 11 Belle Grove Strasburg t VA Frederick Crumley--Lynn-- 3641 Apple Pie Winchester 2006-09- 1-odge House Ridge Rd. 06 VA Frederick Forge Farm, Old 7326 Middle rd. Middletown 2004-02- 11 +> VA Frederick Fort Collier One mile N of Winchester 2006-04- Winchester on 28 VA 11 VA Frederick Frederick County 20 N. Loudoun Winchester 2001-07- N� Courthouse St. 05 VA Frederick Frederick County VA 654 E side, Round Hill 1993-08- Poor Farm S of jct. with VA 12 679 VA Frederick Hite, John, House US 11 Bartonsville 1982-07- 08 VA Frederick Homespun 949 Cedar Winchester 2002-12- ND Creek Grade 1 131 Page 1 Fire Next, I efre5h E , m Pale , Page° http://www.nr.nps.gov/iwisapi/explorer.dlI/x2_3anr4_3aNRIS 1/script/report.iws 03/28/2008 Index By State County National Register Information System No filter State: VA Countv: Frederick 03/28/2008 17:30:27 Include filter in navigation Resource Roti, Name Address City I Listed Multiple 11 Hopewell Friends W of Clear Brook off VA 672 Clear Brook 1980-03-28 Meetinghouse 12 Long Meadow 1946 Jones Rd. Winchester 2005-07-27 N 13 Middletown Historic Bounded by Main St., Church St., Middletown 2003-06-23 District Senseney Av., 1 st, 4th, 6th & 3rd Sts. 14 Monte Vista 8100 US 11 Middletown 1987-11-16 1 5 Newtown-- Roughly, Main St. from city limit to Stephens 1992-08-18 Stephensburg Farm View Dr. and adjacent areas of City Historic District Mulberry and German Sts. 10 Old Stone Church Approx. 1 mi. W of jct. of VA 671 Whitehall 2001-07-05 and VA 739 17 Opequon Historic Jct. of VA 622 and VA 620 Winchester 2002-05-16 District 18 Opequon 217 Opequon Church Ln. Winchester 2001-02-16 , \� Presbyterian Church I" 19 Rose Hill Farm 1985 Jones Rd. Winchester 1997-02-21 20 Springdale Mill US 11 Bartonville 1982-07-08 Complex Page 2 Paine N t Kefre51h Export`'`' 9 http://www.nr.nps.gov/iwisapilexplorer.dll/x2_3anr4_3aNRIS 1/scriptlreport.iws?IWS_R... 03/28/2008 Index By State County National Register Information System No filter State: VA County: Frederick 03/28/2008 17:30:55 Include filter in navigation Row Resource Name Address City I Listed ' Multiple 21 St. Thomas Chapel Jct. of SR 1102 and 1105 Middletown 1973-04-11 2 2 Sunrise 975 Hollow Rd. Gore 1995-02-08 23 Valley Mill Farm 1494 Valley Mill Rd. Winchester 2006-02-09 Rio 24 Willow Shade Jct. of Frederick Co. Rd. and US 50 Winchester 1990-12-18 Page 3 PaNa x� F'efrv5h Effort 9 9 http://www.nr.nps.gov/iwisapi/explorer.dll/x2_3anr4_3aNRIS 1/script/report.iws?IWS_R... 03/28/2008 Attachment 9 Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects I G I A.) List all properties identified in Attachment 8A or 8B that are within the APE for direct effects. 1 No properties were identified within the APE for direct effects. ' B.) Provide name, address, including ZIP for each property in the APE for direct effects that are listed on the National Register, has been formally determined to be eligible for listing on the NRHP, or is identified as considered eligible for listing by the SHPOITHPO. One historical property was identified as eligible for listing on the NRHP. The Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) is located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the subject site. C.) Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify historic properties within the APE for direct effects. If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicated that cultural resource -bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth. A previous architectural survey was conducted by Ms. Kimberly Zawacki of Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI) dated July 23, 2002. The survey indicated that the historical properties within one -mile of the cellular tower will not be adversely affected by the proposed undertaking. JUL 2 5 2002 CULTURAL RESOURCES, INC. JQ� July 23. 2002 P,� Nfr. Marc Holma go •' ,. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 A RE: Section 106 Review of a Proposed Washington Gas Telecommunications Tower, Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Holma: 1 On behalf of our client, Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C., we are requesting your concurrence with our determination that construction of a proposed telecommunications tower in \N� inchester, Virginia will not adversely effect properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Our request is made pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, Protection of Historic Properties, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended). The proposed tower is a 180-foot lattice self-support. The proposed project site is located adjacent and behind the existing Shenandoah Gas Building 1 and approximately 450 feet east of Interstate 81 (Figure 1). The tower will be located beside two existing towers, a 112-foot monopole and a 42-foot lattice self-support. Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) is defined as that area where effects to historic properties can reasonably be expected to occur regardless of whether such properties currently exist. For the purposes of this project, the APE is defined as all areas .located within a 1.0-mile radius of the proposed cell tower site. Situated in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, the terrain surrounding the APE is characterized by rolling hills, with some steeper relief around Hoge Run and Opequon Creek in the southeastern portion of the project area. The cell tower will be located just cast of an industrial area west of Interstate 81. 1 The proposed tower will be located immediately adjacent to an existing 42-foot lattice tower and a 1 10-foot monopole (Appendix A and Appendix B). The setting of the project area includes a I water tower, an additional cell tower, and an industrial complex (Figure 1). The 200-foot water tower is approximately 3/4 mile southwest of the proposed tower. A 200-foot lattice self-support tower is across I-81 adjacent to the industrial site. Three large industrial plants in the vicinity include the Carquest Distribution Plant, General Electric, and Allegheny Power Company. In -(r9 lroriound Road, Suite 300 - Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 - (757) 564-9652 - Fax (757) 564-8157 - culresinc@aol.com /05 Caroline Street - Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 - (540) 370-1973 - Fax (540) 370-M4 - crifliurg@aol.com Ij addition to the industrial facilities, the surrounding landscape consists of single-family residential dwellings and small businesses. Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Effects A review of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) cultural resource inventory and survey information was conducted in an effort to identify all previously recorded historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register within the APE. The results of this research indicated that nineteen architectural resources had been previously recorded within the APE (Figure 2). A total of thirty-four archaeological resources had been previously recorded either in or immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location (Figure 3). Due to the limited footprint of the proposed tower, construction of the facility is expected to have no effect on archaeological resources. Also, the area of the cell tower has been previously graded for construction of the Shenandoah Gas building and the other two towers, therefore, no additional archaeological investigations are recommended. In addition to the archive check, a windshield survey was conducted of the APE by staff from Cultural Resources, Inc. (CRI). The survey included a visual assessment of the proposed tower site, a windshield survey of all structures 50 years of age or older within APE, and an assessment of potential visual effects to resources 50 years of age or older within the APE. Representative views of the siteline between the proposed tower site and historic and potentially historic resources within the APE were also photographed. All public roads within the APE were surveyed and photographs were taken from public rights -of -way. All structures identificd on the U.S.G.S. Winchester quadrangle were visually inspected if access was permitted. For those properties where access was restricted, photographs were taken of the property from the closest point in a public right-of-way and views back towards the proposed tower taken from the same point. The results of the windshield survey and the assessment of effects are discussed below. Previously Identified Resources within a One -Mile Radius (;amp Russell Historic District (VDHR #034-5036). This historic district includes the Hillandale House and the Camp Russell Earthworks. It extends from Interstate 81 to Hoge Run, more or less due east of the intersection of I-81 and Route 37. The district is wooded on the eastern portion with open fields to the west adjacent to the lUlandale House (Figure 4). The eastern half of the site has previously been compronused by modern visual impacts, including existing cell towers and the water tank, while the wooded western position of the district is somewhat shielded from these impacts. Given the presence of modern elements already in the viewshed, construction of the proposed structure will not adversely afflict those qualities and characteristics that qualify the district for listing on the NRHP. 2 Hilla7ulale-Crawford House (YDHR #034-0126). There are three distinct phases of construction/additions to this house (Figure 5). The central portion of the house was originally constructed ca 1780-1800. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side -gable house constructed of coursed limestone, with a full fagade 1-story front porch and an interior end chimney. The second phase of construction (ca 1875-1890) added what is now the main fagade of the house. This section of the house is 2-story random limestone. It is a 3-bay side -gable structure with central front gable, two central brick chimneys, and a partial 1-story porch with Doric columns. The third phase of construction (ca 1910-1930) added the 2-story, gable frame addition with weatherboard siding on a split-level stone basement. The roof over the entire structure is pressed tin shingles. There are several outbuildings associated with this structure. These buildings include a stone ' spring -house, a possible log or frame meathouse, several frame sheds, a frame barn, carriage house, machine shed, frame bank barn with stave silo, and a frame tenant house about '/2 mile northwest of the main house. Hillandale has been determined potentially eligible for the listing on the NRHP. The outbuildings, nearby tenant house and historic district, and general setting on the landscape are contributing factors to the eligibility of this structure. The view toward the proposed cell tower overlooks the tenant house and the current towers are visible in the distance (Figure 6). Since this view has already been altered by modem intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Hillandale House to the NRHP. Camp RusselUHillarzdale Earthworks (034-0321). The Hillandale Earthworks are located about 2000 feet northeast of Cary's Brook (034-0319). These earthworks are associated with the Union occupation of this area of the Shenandoah Valley during the fall of 1864 and are considered eligible for listing on the NRHP in the area of military history. The earthworks are Aithin a predominantly wooded area and somewhat shielded from view of the proposed cell tower due to the fact that they are situated on a lower elevation (see Figure 3). The view towards the west has been compromised by extant cell towers and the water tower. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not adversely affect those qualities that make the earthworks eligible for the NRHP. House (VDHR 11034-0021). This house is a Federal style building dating to ca.. 1840. It is a 5- bay, 2-story brick structure with a stone foundation, side gable, and an interior end chimney (Figure 7). The roof is standing seam metal. Windows are 6/6 on the first floor, but 9/6 on the second floor and the main door has a 4-light transom. There is a 1-story asymmetrical 3 bay addition to the east of the main structure. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP under Criterion C as an example of Federal architectural style. The natural setting of this property has been severely altered as it is surrounded by 1970s era apartment buildings. In addition, the view towards the cell tower, while partially obscured by vegetation, is dominated by telephone utility Iines (Figure 8). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing in the NR 2. Cary's Brook (VDHR #034-0319). This structure was in very poor condition when it was recorded and the several surrounding associated outbuildings already existed in a ruinous condition. CRI staff inspected the landform identified as the location of the house and found nothing but an overgrown area of tall grass and weeds (Figure 9). It appears that this house is no ' longer standing and therefore the proposed cell tower will have no effect on this resource. ' Caty's Brook Reboubt (034-0320). This Civil War redoubt is located 200 feet northwest of Cary's Brook. It is associated with the Union troop activity in the area during the fall of 1864. After General Sheridan secured this portion of the Shenandoah Valley in 1964, Union forces occupied it. The redoubt is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP for its association with an historic event. ' The current cell towers are not visible from this property because of the vegetation and the lower elevation of the earthwork (see Figure 9). The water tower just to the southwest, however, is visible from the western potion of the site (Figure 10). The proposed cell tower will not ' adversely affect those qualities that make the earthwork potentially eligible for the NRHP. ' Sm,age-Seal House, 3172 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-972). This structure is a vernacular 2-story, -bay, side -gable, frame structure on a limestone foundation with a low basement, and an ell addition off the back (west elevation) of the house (Figure 11). The house dates to ca. 1890 to 1910, with additions dating to the 1940s. It has weatherboard siding, a standing seam metal roof, and twin exterior end chimneys and one central chimney on the ell. Additions include an enclosed shed roof porch on the south side of house, and a 1-story shed roof addition of the west side. There is only one outbuilding, a 1-story frame garage with aluminum siding. Other features include 2/2 sash windows, wood shutters and return cornice and frieze boards. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRBP as an example of vernacular architecture. ' The natural setting of this structure has been completely altered, as it stands near a major intersection adjacent to a 7-11 convenience store. Commercial and residential structures and vegetation obstruct the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 12). This typical weatherboard I -house retains its original fabric; however, given the existing modern visual intrusions, construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure's potential eligibility for the NRHP. Lantz House (MHR 034--0974). This frame structure is a 2'/2 -story, 3 bay, hipped roof, Colonial Revival (ca. 1905-1920) style house (Figure 13). It has a lowered basement and the foundation is not visible. The roof is slate with two hipped dormers. Only a fraction of the original fabric of the house appears to remain. 4 I Vegetation and commercial structures obstruct and already modernized view toward the proposed cell tower (Figure 14). Due to the extensive remolding of the house, it does not appear to retain any of the characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for the NTMP and, therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no affect on this structure. House, Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0975). This is a I V2-story, front gable, frame vernacular style house with a lowered stone basement, weatherboard siding, and standing seam metal roof (Figure 15). The roof has central gables on the north and south sides of the house and paired 6/1 windows in the gable ends. The front porch is a 1-story Colonial Revival style with Tuscan columns on brick piers. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRIIP as an example of vernacular architecture. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by other residential and commercial buildings as well as by vegetation (Figure 16). With the commercial development in the area and industrialization of the Route 11, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this vernacular structure. House. 3284 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0976). This house has been converted to a commercial business. The original portion is built on a stone foundation with low basement (Figure 17). The house is a frame construction with composition siding and 3-bay front facade with 6/6 paired windows. The roof is standing seam metal with a side gable. There is an exterior end chimney ' that has become an interior chimney with construction of two one-story additions built on concrete block foundations in the 1950s. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial businesses and vegetation partially obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower site (Figure 18). The proposed cell tower will have no affect on this structure. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0977). This house is a 2%6-storyAmerican Four Square (ca. 1910- 1930) style with its original fabric (Figure 19). The house is built on a concrete foundation with a low basement. It has a frame construction with stretcher bond brick veneer and 3-bay front facade with 3/1 windows with flat arches. The roof is standing seam metal, pyramidal hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the front fagade and an interior chimney. Porches adorn the east and west elevations of the house. The front fagade (east elevation) has a 1-story full fagade Craftsman style porch with wooden battered columns on brick piers. The west elevation has a two-story porch, with the first story enclosed. This structure was considered eligible for listing on the NRI.1P as an example of an American Four Square, while several other examples are nearby, this structure appears to retain most of its original materials. Several frame outbuildings associated with this house, including a chicken coop, garage, and meathouse were standing in 1990 but have since been razed. The natural setting of this resource has been considerably altered by the commercial development along Route 11. Industrial and commercial businesses partially obscure the view 5 ' towards the proposed cell tower site and modern intrusions dominate the landscape (Figure 20). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3328 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0978). This is a large Folk Victorian house made of ' concrete block (Figure 21). It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a complex floor plan and several cross gables and central gable in the front (west facade). The roof is standing seam metal with a boxed cornice with a laurel motif in the cornice. There is a central flue. The windows are 1/1 and concrete lintels, some paired. The primary porch is a 1-story, enclosed wrap around. There are also enclosed side, 2-story porches. On the back of the house, there is a 1-story wing addition. While this structure was at one time potentially eligible for the NRHP, it has seen multiple modifications and additions and is in disrepair. The natural setting is comprised of commercial businesses and would have no bearing on its eligibility for listing. ' The view from this structure towards the proposed cell tower is dominated by commercial development, with and existing cell tower visible in the background. (Figure 22). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect this structure. House, 3400 Valley Pike (VDHR #034-0979). This house has been converted into a commercial ' business. The house is a 2'/a-story, 2-bay, American Four Square (ca 1920-1940) with a hipped, pyramidal roof (Figure 23). The foundation is covered by stucco, but the building appears to be a wood frame structure with an enclosed porch on the west elevation. The roof is asphalt shingles (replaced) with a hipped dormer on the west elevation and with boxed cornice. The windows are 1/1 and there are two interior flues. There is an enclosed 2-story porch on the east elevation (rear) that was added to the house. This structure has been significantly remodeled, altering the characteristics that made it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. Industrial and commercial businesses dominate the immediate landscape and an existing cell tower is clearly visible in the distance (Figure 24). The proposed cell tower will have no effect on this structure. Robert Wilson Sr. Haase (VDHR #034-0980). This house contains what is believed to be the site of the early settler, Robert Wilson. The rear portion of the house is log and dates to ca. 1800 to 18I0. Overall, the house is a vernacular I -House with the earlier portion forming an ell of the east elevation. The house sits on a stone foundation with a split-level basement (Figure 25). The log portion is 2-story with an enclosed porch and is shorter than the main portion of the house. The main or front portion of the house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3-bay I -house with one interior end chimney and standing seam metal roof. There is a 1-story full -facade porch on the west facade of the I -House, with chamfered columns and sawn brackets. The windows are mostly 6/6 with some newer 8/8 and there is a three -light transom over the front door. There are many farm -related outbuildings around the house, including a large frame gambrel -roofed bank barn with attached corn crib, several machine sheds, chicken coops, and pig pens. This structure is Potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP due to its association with early settlement in the rel area. The natural setting, with various outbuildings, mature trees and nearby spring, added to its significance when originally recorded in 1990. ' This house currently sits immediately adjacent to an industrial center. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a large Carquest Autoparts Distribution Center and other industrial ' buildings (Figure 26). Since this view has already been altered by modern intrusions, the additional proposed cell tower will have no adverse effect on the eligibility of the Wilson House to the' ational Register. Barton -Sprinkle House (VDHR #034-0981). This house once stood near the intersection of Route 11 and Route 37, and was moved to its present location around 1970. The house sits on a new concrete block foundation and has a low basement under the main house and a split-level basement under a rear 1-story addition (Figure 27). The house is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with a one-story porch on main elevation (south) and an enclosed 2=story porch on the north side of the house, with the 1-story addition. Other elements include 6/6 windows, two interior end flues, 3-light sidelights and a broken transom about the door. Since this house was moved from its original setting, the immediate surroundings would not have bearing on its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. The house sits in a small subdivision surrounded by 1960s and 1970s ramblers. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes a motel and the Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center (Figure 28). Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0982). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRI-1P_ Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no erect. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0983). This house has been demolished and is, therefore, not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Construction of the proposed cell tower will have no effect. Village Auto Sales (VDHR 4034-0984). The Carquest Auto Parts Distribution Center currently occupies the site. This house has been demolished and is not eligible for listing on the NRI-HP. Construction of the proposed cell tower, therefore, will not effect this resource. House, Route 11 (VDHR #034-0985). The house is a 2-story, 2 bay, cross gable structure with a pressed tin metal roof it is in the vernacular style dating to ca. 1880-1910 and has a 1-story porch with turned spindles on the main elevation (Figure 29). Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), boxed cornice, and a central flue. This structure is potentially eligible ' for listing on the NRHP as an example of an early 20th century frame barn. The natural setting of this property has been commercialized as a retail nursery. � I � I � I 7 The view towards the proposed cell tower consists of Interstate 81, a water tower and commercial businesses (Figure 30). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NRHP_ Russell House#2 (VDHR #034-1191). This house is a vernacular side passage dating to ca_ 1870-1910 (Figure 31). The house is a 2'/z-story, 2-bay, side gable with central front gable on a stone foundation with a low basement. The house is clad in stucco and has a standing seam metal roof. The porch off the north facade is a full -facade 1-story porch with turned supports, hipped roof, and plain friezeboard. Other elements include 2/2 windows (some paired), 1/1 window in central front gable, boxed cornice, and interior brick flue. There is a rear 2-story gabled wing on a stone foundation with 2/2 and 3/1 windows. A later addition to the south elevation of the house is a 1-story enclosed porch with German lap siding. There are several outbuildings associated with this house, including a concrete shed, several frame sheds, chicken coop, concrete silo, concrete garage, and a trailer home. This house is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of vernacular architecture. The immediate setting, with the exception of a few modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, which contributes to the resource's significance. The view towards the cell tower is relatively unobstructed but with the existing cell towers visible in the distance (Figure 32). In addition, Interstate 81 contributes some visual impact, as it is located approximately 500 feet west of the house. Although construction of the proposed tower Nvill introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of this structure, it will not adversely affect those qualities or characteristics that may qualify the property for listing on the NTRFIP. Russell House #1 (VDHR 9034-1192). This house is a vernacular American Four Square (ca. 1910-1930) on a stone foundation with a low basement (Figure 33). The house is a 21/z-story, 2- bay, frame structure with new vinyl siding. The roof is a standing seam metal, hipped roof with one hipped dormer on the north (northeast) facade and two interior brick flues. The porch on the north fa.gade is full -facade with a concrete pad, turned spindles, wrought iron balustrade, plain friezeboard, and a hipped roof. The 2-story enclosed porch on the south elevation is newer with an exterior concrete flue. Several outbuildings around the house include a gambrel -roofed concrete block barn, several machine sheds, a concrete silo, metal silos, and a trailer home. This structure is potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP as an example of Vernacular American Four Square. As with Russell House 42, the immediate setting, with some modern structures, is overall a fairly pristine environment, contributing to the resource's significance. The view towards the proposed cell tower includes the existing monopole tower and Interstate 81 (Figure 34). The house sits about 1000 feet east of the interstate with little vegetation shielding the viewshed. As such, the proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of this house. N. lceele-Clark House (i,DHR #034-1339). This house is a hall -parlor I -House with some Folk Victorian elements on the porch (Figure 35). The house dates to ca. 1870. It is a 2-story, 3-bay, side gable structure with twin interior -end brick chimneys. It is a wood frame structure with asphalt shingle sidings and sits on a stone foundation. The windows are 6/6 on the first floor and 2/2 on the second floor. The porch is nearly a full-fagade, hipped roof 1-story porch with four posts (or columns) with side -brackets. There is also a meathouse outbuilding and a concrete modern garage. The house retains most of its natural setting and is potentially eligible for Isting on the NRHP as an example of Folk Victorian style. The view towards the proposed cell tower is obstructed by vegetation (Figure 36). The proposed cell tower will not adversely affect the natural setting of the house. Resources Recorded During the Current Survey Letts°in-}'aunt Company-3167 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century concrete block building with porch across the front fagade (Figure 37). The building was standing around 1948, according to the present owner, Philip Yount, who remembers it as a Civil War Museum during that time. The building later was used as a "day -old" bread store in the 1960s. The present owner purchased and renovated the building in 1980-81, and opened the current business. There is a 2-year old metal frame garage north of the main building. The main building is a concrete block, 3-bay, front -gable structure. There is an interior brick flue towards the rear of the building, and the roofing material was replaced in the 1980s renovation of the building, currently asphalt'shingles. The front porch columns were purchased in 1980 and replaced the original square posts. All the windows and doors were replaced, except for the door on the east elevation. The windows on the north and south elevations were cut out during the 1980 renovations. Views toward the proposed cell tower are obstructed by other buildings and tree growth (Figure ' 38)_ Due to the extensive renovation and lack of significant architectural style, this structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the proposed cell tower construction would not effect this structure. .brie Insurance Group Building-3186 Valley Pike. This structure is a mid -twentieth century 2 './2- ' story house with a low basement .vith several additions (Figure 39). The original portion of the house is a 3-bay with a partially enclosed central portico, two dormers on the main elevation and one shed dormer on the west (rear) elevation, and an exterior end chimney. There are additions ' to the west and to the south. The two additions to the south are less than 10 years old. Constructed on a cinder block foundation, this frame structure has gabled dormers and 6/6 windows. This structure is located just to the south of 034-0972. ' %%iews toward the proposed cell tower are characterized by residential/commercial buildings and trees, which obscure the view of the proposed facility from the property (Figure 40). The Erie 9 Insurance Group building is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, the construction of the proposed cell tower would not effect this structure. House, 3222 Valley Pike. This structure appears to have a brick veneer that may be covering an older frame structure. The house is a side -gable, 2-story, 3 bay structure with a low basement (Figure 41). The foundation, if not brick, is obscured by the brick veneer. There are 8/8 windows on the first floor and 6/6 windows on the second and wooden shutters only on the main fagade of the house. There is a brick exterior -end chimney and a shed roof porch with two posts on brick piers on the north elevation and an enclosed frame shed roof porch that has been covered in brick veneer on the west elevation. There are entry doors on all four elevations. The roof is asphalt shingles. The brick all looks very new, but the windows and other elements appear older, including a broken triangular pediment door surround. The brick veneer was visible behind the door pediment. This structure has been significantly remodeled and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRBP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by trees and other structures (Figure 42). Visible from this structure are some of the industrial plants located on the east side of Route 11. The house is surrounded by mature trees and has houses in close proximity to the north and south. Therefore, the proposed cell tower would not have an effect on this structure. House, 3256 Valley Pike. This structure is situates: behind a 1960-1970s structure. The structure is a 1'/, story concrete block -house with 3-bay, from -gable with weatherboard siding in the gables (Figure 43). The windows are 6/6 and there is a central brick flue. The roof is standing seam metal. There are two porches on the main (east fagade) and west elevations. The main elevation porch is a four -post, full-fagade, shed roof porch. The west elevation has a full-fagade, shed roof porch that has been enclosed. This structure is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHp as it is a common standing structure in the vicinity with no distinctive characteristics. Trees and other structures obscure the view towards the proposed cell tower (Figure 44). Therefore, the proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. House, 3504 Valley Pike. This Bungalow -type structure is on a concrete block foundation with wood frame structural system (Figure 45). The house is 1'/z-story, font gable, 2-bay (door and a double window) structure with a possible low basement or crawl space. The house appears to be ca. 1930s. The windows are 6/6 and the exterior is weatherboard siding, There is a central brick flue and a single gable dormer on the south elevation. There is a full-fagade porch with posts on brick piers on the main (east farrade) elevation. Associated with this house are two shed outbuildings (ca 1960s) and another cinder block, shed roof building used as a business (ca 1960s). This structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. 10 ' The proposed cell tower would be in plain view of this structure, but there is another cell tower associated with the Allegheny Power Plant building, directly across the street from this house (Figure 46). Construction of the proposed tower, therefore, would have no effect this structure. Business, 3908 Valley Pike. This is a 1'/2-story, 2-bay, side gable, cinder block structure with a low basement (Figure 47). The main elevation (east fagade) has a door and bay window. On the west elevation there is a I -story shed roof addition. The roof is asphalt shingles and there is an interior brick flue. There are two concrete block gable sheds in the rear of the building. This ' structure has been significantly remodeled, and, therefore, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. The view towards the proposed cell tower is partially obscured by vegetation (Figure 48). The proposed cell tower would have no effect on this structure. Conclusions and Recommendations ' Construction of the proposed telecommunications cell tower at the Shenandoah Gas Company building will introduce a new visual element into the viewshed of properties 50 years of age or older within the APE that are either listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. However; based upon the results of the windshield survey and assessment of effects, it is Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates' opinion that in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5(b), construction of the proposed 180-foot tower will not diminish the characteristics that would qualify those ' properties v6thin the APE for listing on the NRHP. If you concur with our recommendation of no adverse effect, please indicate by signature and date below. Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 540/3 70-1973, Sincerely, Kimberly S. Zawacki Principal Investigator cc: John Reno_ PHR&A Construction of the proposed cell tower will not adversely effect properties fisted or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. I concur: 11 Date: COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department of Historic Resources W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond Virginia �-3 Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Na Secretary ofnnal Resources ' Director Tel: (804) 367-2323 Fax: (804) 367-2391 MEMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 www.dhr.s=e.vaus DATE: � v DHR File # L S, (<<' FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader '$� on of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: [A)Mwn;ti) Ct IC-LC,Cu: ,,•:zJ,�I�C.�Tiri�� CCt L �� This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the informatio: provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. No fiarther identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. We have previously reviewed this project. correspondence. Other (Please see conanients below) COMMENTS: Program Services Div. Petersburg Office Portsmouth Office 10 Courthouse Ave. 19-B Bollinobrook Street 612 Court Street, 3' Floor Petersburg, VA 23803 Petersburs. VA'_3803 Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (804) 863-1685 Tel: (804) 863-1620 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Fax: (804) 862-61.96 Fax: (804) 863-1627 Fax: (757) 396-6712 Attached is a copy of our Roanoke Office ) 030 Penmar Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 857-7585 Fax: (540) 857-7588 Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 72_1-3427 Fax: (540) 722-7535 Attachment 10 Effects on Identified Properties ' For each property identified as a Historic Property in Attachments 8 and 9: Indicated whether... I No Effect No Adverse Effect Adverse Effect Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. M Six historical properties were identified within the APE; however, based on the site evaluation of this property, topography, and the height of the proposed collocation, it is not anticipated that the proposed extension would significantly impact the historical property. Also provide copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communications with the SHPO/THPO. ECS previously submitted this tower for review to the SHPO. It was determined that the historical properties in the vicinity of the site would be affected; however, they would not be adversely affected. A copy of the SHPO response is attached. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant's conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. No alternatives were considered as the current undertaking has very limited impact on the historical surroundings and project area. I ' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department of Historic Resources ' W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 2801 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221 Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Secreiory ofNawro! Resources Director Tel: (804) 367-2323 ' Fax: (804) 367-2391 MEMORANDUM TDD: (804) 367-2386 www.dhr.state.va.us DATE: �� P v DER File # 1 � To: C-) FROM: Ethel R. Eaton, Ph.D., Project Review Team Leader > $ion of Resource Services and Review PROJECT: V This project will have an effect on historic resources. Based on the information provided, the effect will not be adverse. This project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. Further consultation ' with DHR is needed under Section 106 of the NHPA. Additional information is needed before we will be able to determine the effect of the project on historic resources. Please see the attached sheet. NO further identification efforts are warranted. No historic properties will be affected by the project. Should unidentified historic properties be discovered during implementation of the project, please notify DHR. We have previously reviewed this project. Attached is a copy of our correspondence. Other (Please see comments below) COMMENTS: ' Proaram Services Div 10 Courthouse Ave. Petersburg VA 23803 ' Tel: (804) 863-1685 Fax: (804) 862-6196 Petersbure Office 19-B Bollinobrook Street Petersbure. VA'_3803 Tel: (804) 863-1620 Fax: (804) 863-1627 Portsmouth Office 612 Court Street. Yd Floor Portsmouth, VA 23704 Tel: (757) 396-6709 Far (757) 396-6712 Roanoke Office 1030 Penmar Avenue. SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Tel: (540) 857-7585 Fair (540) 857-7588 Winchester Office 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 203 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 722-3427 Fax: (540) 722-7535 Attachment 11 Photographs Include photographs from each direction (N, E, S and W) as taken from the collocation site. Photos in color, referenced to a U.S. G.S. Topographic map, marked to identify the project, dated, distance from proposed site and indicate the focal length of the lens. Include photos of each historic structure as well as a line -of -sight back to the collocation site. Refer to the attached photographs. Focal lengths of the lens range from 35mm to 105mm. No archaeological sites were located within the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Photographs of the subject site are included. ' PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 1 VIEW OF THE EXISTING 120-FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER FACING SOUTHEAST. Photograph No. 2 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE NORTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A rgsz Photograph No. 3 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE EAST OF THE EXISTING TOWER. - 14 Photograph No. 4 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE SOUTH OF THE EXISTING TOWER. ' PROJECT NUMBER 2322-A Photograph No. 5 VIEW OF THE AREAS TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING TOWER, Photograph No. 6 VIEW OF THE ACCESS ROAD FACING NORTHEAST. ® ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 ® Fax: to40)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 1 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph A : View of the Crawford Hillandale House (DHR-DSS #034-0126) a 50+ year old structure and is recommended for listing on the National Historic Register, located approximately 1,500 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph A: Photosimulation of the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph A. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540)362-2000 p�aa�a Fax: (540)362-1202 PAGE 2 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph B: View of the former location of Village Auto Sales (DHR-DSS #034-0984), located approximately 2,300 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph B: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph B. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 �-% Phone: (540)362-2000 mum Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 3 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph C: View of the Barton -Sprinkle House (DHR-DSS #034-0981) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,900 feet to the southwest of the proposed collocation extension. Approximate line of sight from Photograph C: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph C. 0 ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F N� Roanoke, Virginia 24019 L' Phone: (540)362-2000 �ao� avu_ Hvo�, Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 4 Date: April 2, 2008 Photographs D and E: View of the former locations of houses on Route 11 South (DHR-DSS #034-0K2 and #034-0983), located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph D and E: Line of sight of the proposed collocation tower site as seen from Photographs D and E. ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 L=�ZN Phone: (540)362-2000 Fax: (540)362-1202 Project Name: Washington Gas Tower Site Project Number: 2322-A PAGE 5 Date: April 2, 2008 Photograph F: View of the Robert Wilson, Sr. House ( DHR-DSS #034-0980) a 50+ year old structure, located approximately 2,500 feet to the northwest of the proposed collocation extensions. Approximate line of sight from Photograph F: Line of sight to the proposed collocation extension as seen from Photograph F. Attachment 12 Maps L-.� ECS — Mid -Atlantic, LLC SOURCE: FIGURE 1 W Fn� 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F HISTORIC SITE LOCATION MAP � Roanoke, Virginia 24019 N U. INC ES MINUTE SERIES WINHTER, STEPHENS WASHINGTON GAS TOWER MI1®_^ (540) 362-2000 phone CITY QUADRANGLES, 350 HILLANDALE LANE (540) 362-1202 fax VIRGINIA DATED 1966 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA " PHOTOREVISED 1987, 1986 ECS PROJECT NO. 2322-A LEGEND - Approximate Location of the existing 120-foot Monopole Tower. _ ` ,50 OpeM3.'' ® - DHR-DDS #034-0126, eligible for listing on the NRHP - o ® - DHR-DSS #034-0984, razed '� ,:'�r'' `J �� O i © - DHR-DSS #034-0981, not evaluated .: - DHR-DSS #034-0982, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0983, razed © - DHR-DSS #034-0980, not evaluated Old Op qu6n �, t � :�•;��•b. i l �� lam'-•i�.. (1 A � • / aff Mile Radius 750 ;. ;'• Q �( ti Shenandoah�i Memoriel'Pero k `y loll, B • �i�,y /-) / 1 '`lj sec -'T `---, �.,,��., f%: rr� f � ' �=�iV�� �\� � it ( / �.�'"i 1'w.�, i '� tL .� 1• �.. �. f �� ` �� , _.Cem 'y.� r L C���� � -� � ^7j '•3 (,� 11J 1 � -� 7 r` yL �/ - �11� ` /, ..l •� 1 J�11 (mil �\ 1, �', C �i' li !-Z SCALE (IN FEET) 1000 2000 l ^ to { '/� `,� Q `,• ` I •• t° �o t ti .NEEF w n SOURCE: LEGEND - Approximate Site Boundaries DHR-DSS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 2002 SCALE (IN FEET) 100 200 200 0 FIGURE 2 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WASHINGTON GAS TOWER 350 HILLANDALE LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO.2322-A Bibliography Federal Communications Commission — Federal Register — Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review Under the National Historic Preservation Act — Dated January 4, 2005 Collocation Agreement "CO" Submission Packet — FCC Form 621 — Federal Register dated January 4, 2005 FCC — Tower Construction Notification System — Tribal Notification dated April 4, 2008 National Park Service Webpage — National Register Information System - National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) — Online Database Accessed March 28, 2008 Virginia State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) — Department of Historic Resources (DHR) — Data Share System (DSS) — Online Account Accessed March 28, 2008 U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Winchester, Virginia, dated 1966, photorevised 1987 U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Stephens City, Virginia, dated 1966, photorevised 1986 DHR-DSS, Aerial Photograph, dated 2002 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc, Site Plan for the Washington Gas Tower, August 19, 2002 Cultural Resources Inc. (CRI), Architectural Survey for the Proposed Washington Gas Tower, dated July 23, 2002 Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 . ---------•--------�-_--__-----�----____.._____.-.�-_�..____--------=------------FAX: - MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: September 26, 2008 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item #3-010-019110-0008 for the company named below had a deposit for one sign for Conditional Use Permit #08-08 for Shenandoah Gas. Extension of Tower. The company has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: Washington Gas Light Co. 101 Constitution Ave N.W. Washington, DC 20080 ,107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 00 800Z/L HZNOW HHZ fldHZ ZSH'dRINI/) ZIq Nd SHafl'IONI HNa HONK'IVE SnODIVA # 88'Z89ZT �39LIO JNINNVrld Aq Pd $ anCI aoueTeg, 00'OS $ pTed junouiV 00 * $ Jsa.zaqul Ii � 00' $ A4Teuad 00'09 $ pTed buiag TedTouTzd �i 00'OS $ aoueTeg ' snoTna.zd #goov S60T # -4daQ j 5968b # • sue.zs, LSHNI/HN.0 :39JSTbag L_--_ 86OZ/TT/L Tinnnnnnnnn•.� a�eQ -���-�T7 r 1, a r tit _ ZI ONINNK`Id SZ OdS 9ZZO-6MZ VA 8 It SZG A r ,dr 3,IOON'do ,UNAO-, . OL1NTY T�ASURER I STREE �; St11TE 100 F` ation cy, V A.US Tax Inform T)E WWW •Co. MEMgER S TO RE tnenil icense DATE . gusineSe filed p Must bdue 'Business License to r L First halt Taxes Due AP • al property J,me 5 person Estate Sanitary )istrict Street LtYt es Due Second 11ali Tax Dec- 5 personal property Real Estate Sanitary District Street Lift P on eyptration of rabies cert" Dogtags renew u e ales as billed by the COtnrnts ptheT due dOffice• Revenues Address Mailin Treasurer Frederick O County p •• j30, 2?604-02% Vdtnche� 40) 665-5601 Email Address doff@pO'frederick.v BOrn Treasurer's Office Hr Friday g;30 an r A Q V thrOU& resrP.ci durmi a 1, CEIPT DATE RECEIVED FJ30M ADDRESS q j()o -Q2 -1 J FOR RENT UFOR- OF IN 0 509- 0. 0 9 lu Q bol-LARS $ '- ACCOUNT CAASMH T AMT. PAID C, IAL-A.CE DUE CHECK BY o", ter NEY MONEY tORDER RECEIPT DATE No. 0510 RECEIVED FROM(. - ADDRESS DOLLARS $ J Q FOR RENT JFOR— d- T CASH ACCOUNT CC 7AM AMT. PAID CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER RECEIPT DATE A M� RECEIVED FROM` , C PPRESS /j/ 5 -c s )0, 00 -ACLI. DOLLARS $ ---- 'EIFOR' RE NTI UFOR RY oile Will �Uolvlym:ril AMT. OF ACCOUNT c ASH AMT. PAID 7 CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE U-! I FIDER I BY NO. 05121 , 2008 Ms. Lynn Koerner Shenandoah Gas 3126 South Ox Rd. Edinburg, VA 22824 RE: Conditional Use Permit #08-08 Property Identification Number 63-A-2 Dear Ms. Koerner: C NTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 This letter is to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting on September 24, 2008. Conditional Use Permit #08-08 was approved for an extension of previously approved monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. Conditions associated with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit include the following: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The telecommunication tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 3. In the event a telecommunication tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval of this conditional use permit, then the conditional use permit will be deemed invalid. 4. The telecommunications tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of abandonment of operation. 5. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new conditional use permit. 6. Approval of this conditional use permit will void CUP #11-02 of Shenandoah Gas for a 120-foot monopole structure. If you have any questions regarding this action, please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, ``�y� Mark R. Ch'�r -- Zoning and Subdivision Administrator MRC/bad cc: Gene Fisher, Shawnee Magisterial District Supervisor Lawrence Ambrogi and H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee Magisterial District Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 c� co CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #08-08 SHENANDOAH GAS w� Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors w Prepared: September 16, 2008 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator t)JB This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/06/08 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 09/24/08 Pending LOCATION: This property is located at 350 Hillandale Lane (Route 651). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 63-A-2 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: M-1 (Industrial Light) District Land Use: Washington Gas ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: M-1 (Industrial Light) South: RP (Residential Performance) East: RP (Residential Performance) West: Route 81 Land Use: Telephone Company Land Use: Vacant Land Use: Vacant Land Use: Interstate Highway PROPOSED USE: This application is for an extension of previously approved monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 65 f, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed CUP 408-08, Shenandoah Gas September 16, 2008 Page 2 use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. FIRE AND RESCUE: Plan approval as submitted. INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT: Building permit required for construction. Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2003. Structured plans submitted for permit application shall be sealed by a VA Licensed Design Professional for antenna attachment. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 Special Inspections for this type structure, soils, concrete, bolts, etc. Note: All Chapter 1 VUSBC min. inspections shall be conducted by the Frederick County Inspections Staff. Request to utilize a third party inspection agency that complies with the Frederick County policy shall have prior approval granted by the Building Code Official. WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT: The existing tower does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surfaces of the Winchester Regional Airport based on the Federal Aviation Administration's Aeronautical Study Number 2002-AEA-1095-OE dated October 1, 2002 at a maximum height of 196 feet (AGL). That determination study expired on April 1, 2004; therefore, the applicant must re -file with the FAA for a new study. Regardless of the FAA's determination regarding lighting regulations, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority requests the following be considered as a requirement for approval of this CUP: 1. Towers over 200 feet AGL are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL, the Winchester Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K, Change 2, Obstruction Marking and Lighting. 2. Applicant is required to file with the Virginia Department of Aviation and applicant should send a copy of the FAA Aeronautical Study and a quadrangle map showing the proposed tower location for their review and comment. Provided these conditions are met, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has no objections to the Conditional Use Permit application. Plannine and Zoning: This proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is for an extension•of the current monopole -type telecommunication tower from 120 feet to 180 feet, located on a 10.9- acre site on Hillandale Lane (Route 651) adjacent to Interstate 81. This 180 foot telecommunication tower will have setbacks of approximately 300 feet from Hillandale Lane (Route 651), 152 feet from the rear property line, 337 feet from the right property line, and 595 feet from the left side property line. These setbacks were calculated with Conditional Use Permit #11-02 to meet future extension of this tower from 120 feet to 180 feet. CUP #11-02 was approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors on November 13, 2002. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for Commercial Telecommunication Facilities in the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies that a CUP for a commercial CUP #08-08, Shenandoah Gas September 16, 2008 Page 3 telecommunication tower may be permitted provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. Furthermore, additional performance standards shall apply to the CUP review in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 08/06/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The telecommunication tower shall be available for co -locating personal wireless services providers. 3. In the event a telecommunication tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, then the Conditional Use Permit will be deemed invalid. 4. The telecommunication tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 08/06/08 MEETING: Commission members inquired if additional setbacks were needed for the extended structure and if the applicant had agreed to the requirements of the Winchester Regional Airport. Staff replied that setbacks and fall ratio for CUP #11-02 were calculated to meet the extension of the structure to 180 feet. Staff also noted that the applicant has met all the requirements from the Federal Aviation Administration, including comments on lighting. A representative for Shenandoah Gas was available to answer questions from the Commission. There were no citizen comments. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of CUP #08-08 with the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The telecommunication tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 0 0 CUP #08-08, Shenandoah Gas September 16, 2008 Page 4 3. In the event a telecommunication tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval of this conditional use permit, then the conditional use permit will be deemed invalid. 4. The telecommunications tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of abandonment of operation. 5. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new conditional use permit. 6. Approval of this conditional use permit will void CUP #11-02 of Shenandoah Gas for a 120-foot monopole structure. (Note: Commissioners Kerr, Ruckman, and Triplett were, absent from the meeting.) 30 9A 63 A ■ '�SO ■ Winehester,VA 63 A 146 i,r ■ '� ° QR 53 A 110 ��,� City of Wi R,t \\v1� � - 63 A 87 03■ A 91A t / ■ Ql I eo I e b Q ■ 63 4 660 6.3 4 66e P'Z�z� 0 63 A 86A nchaster \ a 0 9 f% 4 �O >>sF ■ ■ Q ■ 63 A 116 75 A 94 r/11 ■ 75 A 90 �i Future R137 :. 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Shenandoah Gas Conditional Use Permit CUP #08-08 PIN: 63 - 2 - A .ri:4gli Case Planner: Mark Future Rt37 Bypass Zoning M2 (Industrial, General District) �CUP0808 ShenandoahGas BI Business. Neighborhood Distnco - MHI (Mobile Home Community Distinct) Urban Dc,clopmem Area B2 (Business. General Duanst) - MS (Medical Support District) ^� S WSA B3 (Business. Indusmal Transition District) - R4 (Residential Planned Community District) - EM (Estrecuye Manufacturing Distinct) - R5 (Residential Recreational Commuml, DismcO • HE (Higher Education DISmet) `_ -` RA (Rural Area Distrito - MI (Industrial. Light District) RP (Residential Performance District) :: Document(N..\Planning_And_Development\_1_Locator_Mps\2008\ShenandoahGas_CUP0808_071008.mxd) 7/10/2008 -- 1-.57.31 PM Ile � 7 1� V// a �l 0 • Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting via e APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the X owner other) NAME: Shenandoah Gas ADDRESS: 350 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 TELEPHONE Orlando Spencer 703-750-4575 OSpencer@washgas.com 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street.) From Exit 310 Interstate 81 proceed East to Dead End and Traffic Light. Turn left and proceed 4110 turn right and proceed through gate. Bear left between buildings and the site is located to the left. 4. The property has a road frontage of 951.43 feet and a depth of 421.85 feet and consists of 10.985 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Shenandoah Gas _ as evidenced by deed from recorded .4, (previous owner) in deed book no. 311 on page 425 , as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14-Digit Property Identification No. 63 2 A Record #0041011 Magisterial District Shawnee District Current Zoning M-1 7. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North Commercial M-1 East Agricultural RARP South Commercial -1 West Commercial & M- 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) Extension of 120 foot monopole structure that was approved in November 02, CUP #11-02. Request to extend tower to 180 feet and move existing microwave dishes to a centerline of 177 feet. Additional height is required to meet company communications requirements 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed • No additional buildings are proposed 10. 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: NAME Hood, HP Inc, Attn: Sally Sevier ADDRESS 6 Kimball Lane, Lynnfield, MA 01940 PROPERTY ID# 63 A 6 A Record #0038637 NAME Harriman Investment CO Inc ADDRESS 931 Rnto Circle, Nohomis, FIL 34275 PROPERTY ID# 63 2 B Record# NAME Glaize Developments Inc ADDRESS Box 88, Winchester, A -2260-4 PROPERTY ID#75A91&94Record 24154 NAME Hodgson Construction LLC ADDRESS pp a ie i e, inces er, 22603 PROPERTY IN 75 A 91C Record # 003 3 NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY IN NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY IN NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY NAME ADDRESS ID# 1. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposea and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. See Attached Sketch and Construction Drawings kTIMPTRUMI - �.. fort Milroy 37 Op IILct.esit a ill 7F.f�; ,�'"'f Head Una Inc �. W lkSr i Y 622 cenn � a� ✓� et7� R � F �' 6 Q,Ly EM 7 37 i� t 313E — JIC,S4yy ZCx $R 6?2 MOUNT IN VIEW I,N/hw 9p9; Topo USAF" 6.0 Greenwood Heights. AFIELD GT � 17 Q r Kernstownl {y ! SS645 %Wichester R onal ��V//��` T /37 N 1 \T y 1 � �YR -k O,F IN, V1NELN, tt WashmgfooGasTowel N39-7-32 W78-11-6.6 1 10 ', } 17 AU in art Ville J 'CPe$ reek J-y I t • typ J �J w Mills R�A`SM +• R F i r-F� /f OLD KITOC'l RD \ 1 WA UT G9�� �}RsCj AVER R� ti 1 I i Data use subject to license. I ® 2006 DeLorme. Topo USA® 6.0. 0 114 '/z 1/a 1 1'/i vvww.delorme.com MN (10.0- W) Data Zoom 12-0 Fax sent by : 7037507945 RHEA 1&5-19-88 68:54a Pg: 1/1 12. Additional comments, if ny:N°ne I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make applicationn and petition the governing body of Crederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least. seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and mainr.ained so as to be visible until after the 13c>ard of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authori'es any member of the Prederick County Planning commission, Board of Supervisors or >I anniT1g and Dcvelopment Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant �AMt Jfs e-Qa1C� . Signature of Owner — owners' Mai.iinq Address 360 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 owners' Telephone No. Orlancb Spencer 7G3-750-4575 Cspencer@wahges.eom Consultant: Lynn Koerner 540-135-0030 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE Z014ING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE. RENEWAL DATE: . RC: HN 111dustries, 111C. File: 53790 Site: 1 Cycle: I Design: 2 Engineer: jon_g customer: 47ASIJINGTOM GAS F. EL,ECTRIC COMA, Site: Type: POLE-TPR Fole: Tapered JCeei S U M M A R Y O F A N A L Y S I S R E S U L T S Conditions ................... 80 mph Basic Wind Speed (0.50" raii.al ice) 50 mph Operational / Building Code ................ TiA/EIA-222-F 359E t/ Exposure ..................... C Crust re9poiise factor:........ 1.69 � Allowable Stress Increase.... 1,33 role :leioht - �eo.o� Lt �t1�� 1-7- X-;I171541�4Y) op Diameter ................. 27.380 in / Bottom Diameter.,............ 60.000 in , Embedment Depth .............. . 0.00 £t pole Shape ................... : 18-sided Polygon Joint Type ................... . Hybrid Shaft Steel Weight........... : 26.436 kips POLE SHAFT PROPERTIES: �- Page : 1. 01/10/2003 11 : 2 7 Af•i 1.3a11 1.1"-, 1 Top Bottom Slip Sect. Thickness Yield DiaFtwter Diameter Joint Steel Length [t) (F'y) (Dt] [Db) Overlap Taper weight --S-��e�aa _(ft) (in) (ksi), (i:) (in) (ir.} (in/ft) - (kips) 3.5.830 0.18750 65 27.380 �; 30.410 -is.013 0.1914 0.976 T(,V�Ul- 2 48.0_00 0.18,150 G5 29.170 38.370 0.00 -- 0.1917 3.460 _ 3 36.250 _ 0.25000 65 38.370 45.320 68.004 0.1917 4.315 4 48,000 0.31250 65 43.610 52.810 79.00 0.1917 8:2.25 5 48.000 0.21250 65 SO.Rno 60.000 0.1917 9,460 POLE. SHAFT SECTION MA}:IMLJ14 FORCES AND MOMENTS; At Base of Section mc2x. Ratio Sect. Axial Bending _ Horiz. Actual Elev. Load Moment Shear Torsion Allowable Seaf Load Case (ft.)_ fft i;ips} ((;ins) (ft-Kites}_ _[e_otiLb) _(kips) Combo008 164.17 3.2763 20.9972 3.6591 3.4971 0.0461 3il011 2 Co_mbo008 120_00 11.2863 458.4064 12.3586 _ 11.3216 0.5914 3 Combo00e 80.92 18.0092 974.3685 16.2606 12,6016 0.6411 4 COmbo80e 38.13 29.41.5I 1769.9300 22.1188 17.0547 O.GG52 5 Combo002 0.00 39.7500 2865.7518 26.1995 11.0547 6.8733 >> MAX REACTIONS: --------- -A a' 48,1341 2875.2925 26,3847 17.0547 c< SECTION PROPERTIES: Diam Across Thick Thick Weight Elev Flats (t) (w/t) (D/t) Area J T Seca (kips) Location - (ft) (in) (in) Ratio Ratio (in'2) (in'4) (in'43 1 0.976 QTop 180.00 27.380 0.1875 23.S1 146.03 16.18 3031.1 1511.8 .1Splice 168.00 29.680 25.68 158.29 17.55 3867.2 1928.0 i3Bot 164.17 30.410 26.36 162.19 3.7-99 4161.5 20?5:6 2 3.460 aTop 168.00 29.170 0.1875 25.20 155.57 17.26 3670.0 1830.4 CBot 120.00 38.370 33.85 204.64 22.72 8391.7 4189.4 3 4.315 ATop 117.17 38.370 0.2500 25.30 153.46 30.25 11134.1 5553.2 ,?Splive. 86.58 44.780 2.9.82 179.12 35.33 1.7748.2 8852.0 QQBOt 80.52 45.320 30.20 181.28 35.76 18401,7 9178.0 4 8.225 Glop 86.13 43.610 0,3125 23.13 139.55 42.94 20393,G 101.71.4 ",splice 44.'11 52.180 27.96 166.98 51.44 35058.4 17485.6 gBot 38,13 52.010 2.6.32 168.99 52.07 36351.5 18130.5 5 9.460 CKTop 48.00 30.800 C.3125 27.18 162.56 50.08 32333 9 16126.7 ,1Bot 0.00 60.000 32.37 192.00 59.20 53426.4 26646.8 Total Shaft Steel Weight = 76.436 • Washington P.O. Box 2400 Gas Winchester, Virginia 22604 Shenandoah Division (540) 869-1111 Jul 9, 2008 Frederick County Shenandoah Gas is requesting authorization to modify its existing 120' monopole tower. We need to raise the tower to 180' for the following reasons. Over the years we have expanded our natural gas service area and we are forecasting continued growth in this region. With this expanding service area we must be able to control and monitor the flow of natural gas through the vast pipeline system. We must be able to effectively and efficiently dispatch personnel to service the pipeline. To continue providing a safe and reliable product to its customers, Washington Gas/Shenandoah Gas is installing a digital voice and data system that will provide communication coverage of its current and projected service area for the next 15+ years. In the system design, we need to add a link to our current communication network. In order to complete this link, we must add a microwave dish at 120' to the tower at our Blue Mountain site. This site also connects to our Winchester site. The new Blue Mountain dish must be at 120' to clear obstructions to the Columbia Gas tower. This additional dish will result in three dishes at the top of the Blue Mountain tower. This tower can not support this additional loading and it is at its maximum height. To overcome this issue, we must raise the Winchester tower to 180' which will allow us to lower the dish linking Winchester and Blue Mountain to 80'. This will enable the project to move forward and expand our private voice and data communications over our complete Shenandoah service area. Thank you for your cooperation on this request. Orlando Spencer Wireless Communication Architect Washington Gas 703.750.4575 Office 703.408.6419 Cell 703.750.7945 Fax ospencer@washgas.com Federal Aviationaunistration Aeronautical Study No. Air Traffic Airspace Branch, ASW-520 2008-AEA-3165-OE 2601 Meacham Blvd. Prior Study No. <= =' Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 2003-AEA-1614-OE Issued Date: 08/06/2008 Orlando Spencer Washington Gas 6801 Industrial Rd Springfield, VA 22151 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION uX The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Antenna Tower Winchester Location: Winchester, VA Latitude: 39-07-31.70N NAD 83 Longitude: 78-11-06.00W Heights: 195 feet above ground level (AGL) 941 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. Any height exceeding 195 feet above ground level (941 feet above mean sea level), will result in a substantial adverse effect and would warrant a Determination of Hazard to Air Navigation. This determination expires on 02/06/2010 unless: (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office. (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will Page 1 of 4 void this determination. Any Ore construction or alteration, including *,ase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (816) 329-2525.On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2008-AEA-3165-OE. Signature Control No: 584352-103160911 Donna ONeill Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data Map(s) Page 2 of 4 (DNE) Wrequency Data for ASN 2008-AEA-3 * OE LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 6.765 6.765 GHz 64.6 dBm 48.2 48.2 MHz 85 W 6.805 6.805 GHz 64.6 dBm Page 3 of 4 0 Verified Map for ASN 2008-AEA-31OE 'iu Page 4 of 4 CO- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 908-08 SHENANDOAH GAS w� Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: July 19, 2008 n^ Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran Zoning Administrator 17 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/06/08 Pending Board of Supervisors: 09/24/08 Pending LOCATION: This property is located at 350 Hillandale Lane (Route 651). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 63-A-2 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: M-1 (Industrial Light) District Land Use: Washington Gas ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: M-1 (Industrial Light) Land Use: Telephone Company South: RP (Residential Performance) Land Use: Vacant East: RP (Residential Performance Land Use: Vacant West: Route 81 Land Use: Interstate Highway PROPOSED USE: This application is for an extension of previously approved monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 651, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed CUP #08-08, Shenandoah Gas July 19, 2008 Page 2 use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. FIRE AND RESCUE: Plan approval as submitted. INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT: Building permit required for construction. Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2003. Structured plans submitted for permit application shall be sealed by a VA Licensed Design Professional for antenna attachment. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 Special Inspections for this type structure, soils, concrete, bolts, etc. Note: All Chapter 1 VUSBC min. inspections shall be conducted by the Frederick County Inspections Staff. Request to utilize a third party inspection agency that complies with the Frederick County policy shall have prior approval granted by the Building Code Official. WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT: The existing tower does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surfaces of the Winchester Regional Airport based on the Federal Aviation Administration's Aeronautical Study Number 2002-AEA-1095-OE dated October 1, 2002 at a maximum height of 196 feet (AGL). That determination study expired on April 1, 2004; therefore, the applicant must re -file with the FAA for a new study. Regardless of the FAA's determination regarding lighting regulations, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority requests the following be considered as a requirement for approval of this CUP: 1. Towers over 200 feet AGL are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL, the Winchester Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K, Change 2, Obstruction Marking and Lighting. 2. Applicant is required to file with the Virginia Department of Aviation and applicant should send a copy of the FAA Aeronautical Study and a quadrangle snap showing the proposed tower location for their review and comment. Provided these conditions are met, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has no objections to the Conditional Use Permit application. Planning and Zoning: This proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is for an extension of the current monopole -type telecommunication tower from 120 feet to 180 feet, located on a 10.9- acre site on Hillandale Lane (Route 651) adjacent to Interstate 81. This 180 foot telecommunication tower will have setbacks of approximately 300 feet from Hillandale Lane (Route 651), 152 feet from the rear property line, 337 feet from the right property line, and 595 feet from the left side property line. These setbacks were calculated with Conditional Use Permit #11-02 to meet future extension of this tower from 120 feet to 180 feet. CUP #11-02 was approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors on November 13, 2002. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for Commercial Telecommunication Facilities in the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies that a CUP for a commercial CUP #08-08, Shenandoah Gas July 19, 2008 Page 3 telecommunication tower may be permitted provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. Furthermore, additional performance standards shall apply to the CUP review in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 08/06/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Should the Plamling Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The telecommunication tower shall be available for co -locating personal wireless services providers. 3. In the event a telecommunication tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, then the Conditional Use Permit will be deemed invalid. 4. The telecommunication tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. S s 1 Y a� �j 1'213'0'8 � 1 ■ REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540) 984-5600 The local office of the Transportation Department is located at 2275 Northwestern Pike in Winchester if you prefer to hand deliver this form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Shenandoah Gas, 350 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 703-750-4575 Consultant: Lynn Koerner 540-335-0030 Name of development and/or description of the request: Extension of existing monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. Extension required to raise existing microwaves to meet company communications requirements Location: 350 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Va. Dept. of Transportation Comments: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this propeappears to have little measurable im{Zct on Route 651, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. VDOTSignature and Date: %� � `519710Y (NOTICE TO RESIDENT ENGIfthIRPLEASE RE N THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach two (2) copies of your application form, location map and all other pertinent information. • Control number CUP08-0006 Project Name Shenandoah Gas -Monopole Structure Address 350 Hillendale Lane Type Application Conditional Use Current Zoning M1 Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Siamese Location Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Plan approved as submitted. • Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marsha; Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Date Revised 5/22/2008 5/30/2008 Applicant Shenandoah Gas City State Zip Applicant Phone Winchester VA 22602 540-335-0030 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District 63-2-A 11 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Roadway/Aisleway Width Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required No Special Hazards No Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes J. Neal Title 05/30;1008 12:50 678& k4c"*--b 41 tj PAGE 04 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Frederlek, County Inspections Depantutent Attn: Building O®clal 101 North Kent Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 2260t (540) 665-5650 ^Me Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 107 North Kent Street, 2nd floor of the County Administration North Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's ),tame, address and phone number. Shenandoah Gas, 350 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Consultant: Name of development and/or description of~the request: Extension of existing monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. Extension required to raise existing microwaves to meet company communications requirements IAWAtion: 350 Hillandale Lane, Winchester, VA Inspections Code Administrator Signature & Date., (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT "F C/ THIS NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach two (2) copies of your application form, location map and all other pertinent information. -0 / 30//2008 12: 50 678& • PAGE 05 Structure shall comply with The Virginia Urniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2003. Structural plans submitted for permit application shall be sealed by a Va. Licensed Design Professional for antenna attachment. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 Special Inspections for this type structure, soils, concrete, bolts, etc. Note: All chapter 1 V1)SBC min. inspections shall be conducted by the lat+ederick County inspection staff. bequest to utilize a third party inspection agency that Complies with the Frederick County policy, shall have prior approval granted by the Building Code Official. • C� WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT mmlr r �i 491 AIRPORT ROAD ry x vtt�►+w WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 vI,__�t 9 (540) 662-2422 May 15, 2008 Lynn Koerner, Consultant Shenandoah Gas 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Comment 195' Monopole — Extension of Existing Tower - Washington Gas 350 Hillandale Lane — Winchester Dear Mr. Koerner: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority offers the following final comment on the above referenced request for a conditional use permit to extend an existing tower from 122' to 180' above ground level. The existing tower does not penetrate the FAR Part 77 surfaces of the Winchester Regional Airport based on the Federal Aviation Administration's Aeronautical Study Number 2002-AEA-1095-OE dated October 1, 2002 at a maximum height of 195' (AGL). That determination study expired on April 1, 2004 therefore the applicant must re -file with the FAA for a new study. Regardless of the FAA's determination regarding lighting regulations, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority requests the following be considered as a requirement for approval of this CUP: 1. Towers over 200 feet AGL are required by FAA to be lighted. For towers between 150 and 199 feet AGL, the Winchester Airport is requiring all structures to be marked and lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 K, Change 2, Obstruction Marking and Lighting. 2. Applicant is required to file with the Virginia Department of Aviation and applicant should send a copy of the FAA Aeronautical Study and a quadrangle map showing the proposed tower location for their review and comment. Provided these conditions are met, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has no objections to the Conditional Use Permit Application. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact this office (5401 662-5786. Sincerely, S. R. Manuel Executive Director Cc: Chad Carper, FAA.'WADO wlencl Scott Denny, VDOA wlencl John Longnaker, Delta Airport Consultants wlencl Project Submission Successr>Project Name: WASHI-000098453-O.S Page 1 of 2 Project Submission Success Project Name: WASHI-000098453-08 Project WASHI-000098453-08 has been submitted successfully to the FAA. Please return to the system at a later date for status updates. https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/extemal/eFiling/locationAction.jsp 7/7/2008 Notice of Proposed Constr fo n or Alteration - Off Airport 0 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration - Off Airport Project Name: WASHI-000098453-08 Sponsor: Washington Gas Project Summary: WASHI-000098453-08 Add Anothe? Case to this Project Structure City, State Lat/Long Map Actions Winchester Winchester, VA 39° 7' 32.10" N X Verify Map Delete Draft 78° 1 V 6.60" W Clone To submit this project, you must verify the coordinates of each case listed above. https:Hoeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/extemaUeFiling/locationAction.j sp?action=showProj ectForm&r... 7/7/2008 • I • t i - •_�. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 2008 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #08-08 FOR SHENANDOAH GAS On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, September 24, 2008, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Conditional Use Permit #08-08 for Shenandoah Gas, for an extension of a previously approved monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. This property is located at 350 Hillandale Lane), and is identified with Property Identification Number 63-A-2 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the agenda will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the Planning Department's website at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, 9 Ar� Cheran Zoning Administrator MRC/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r • This is to cjify th the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virgi ia: 63 - 2- - A- SHENANDOAH GAS COMPANY 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, VA 22602 63 -2- - 8- HAMMAN INVESTMENT CO INC 931 PINTO CIR NOHOMIS FL 34275.1611 75 - A- - 91. GLAIZE DEVELOPMENTS INC PO BOX 888 WINCHESTER VA 22604-0888 75 -A- - 91-C HODGSON CONSTRUCTION LLC 1180 APPLE PIE RIDGE RD WINCHESTER VA 22603.3301 63 . A• - 86-A H P HOOD INC ATTN: SALLY SEVIER 6 KIMBALL LN STE 400 LYNNFIELD MA 01940.2685 M R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator Frederick County Planning Department STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDER1CK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, d ereby certify that k R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator for the De�rt en of fanning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated p p r , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and .ounty aforesaid. Gives My IV COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING July 25, 2008 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS(S) RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #08-08 FOR SHENANDOAH GAS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, August 6, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Conditional Use Permit #08-08 for Shenandoah Gas, for an extension of previously approved monopole structure from 120 feet to 180 feet. This property is located at 350 Hillandale Lane), and is identified with Property Identification Number 63-A-2 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the agenda will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Information regarding this application will also be available via the Planning Department's website at www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, ark R. Cheran Zoning Administrator Oi:W11011 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 .• • This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on a 0 g from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 63 -2- - A- SHENANDOAH GAS COMPANY 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, VA 22602 63 -2- - B- HAMMAN INVESTMENT CO INC 931 PINTO CIR NOHOMIS FL 34275.1611 75 -A- - 91- GLAIZE DEVELOPMENTS INC PO BOX 888 WINCHESTER VA 22604.0888 75 - A- - 91-C HODGSON CONSTRUCTION LLC 1180 APPLE PIE RIDGE RD WINCHESTER VA 22603.3301 63 - A- - 86-A H P HOOD INC ATTN: SALLY SEVIER 6 KIMBALL LN STE 400 LYNNFIELD MA 01940.2685 Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator Frederick County Planning Department STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK r a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, hereby certify tb6f Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator for the Depa1 W f Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and ounty aforesaid. Given under my hand this a My commission expires on e RLY 14.°EL i�a a NOTARY PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY C0MMI5510N EXPIRES JUIY 31, 201 > day of `_ i NAME Hamman Investment CO Inc ADDRESS 931 Pinto Circle, NOhomfs, FL 34275 PROPERTY ID# ecor NAME Glaize Developments Inc ADDRESS PO Box_888, Winchester, A 04 PROPERTY ID,#75 A 91&94 Record #t00 4154 NAME Hodgson Construction LLC ADDRESS pp_e ie_ i_ge, inc es er, 22603 PROPERTY I D# -75 A 91C Record # 003 832 NAME 0 'b .ADDRESS PROPERTY ID NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTYID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY NAME ID# ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS 11-BARBARA-DATA PRO CESSING FROM:BEV - Planning Dept. Please print sets of labels by � � k ©K c�—H�f_vxsl) ECS MID -ATLANTIC, LLC Geotechnical v Construction Materials Environmental Facilitie 008 Mr. Lynn Koerner 3126 South Ox Road Edinburg, Virginia 22824 ECS Project No. 2322-A Subject: Review of Historic Places or Resources Washington Gas `Power 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Koerner: ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC (ECS) has completed the Section 106 for the Washington Gas Tower. proposed tower extension located in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia (Figure 1). The subject property is located in a rural, residential and conunercial area of Winchester, Virginia. The subject property is occupied by an existing 120-foot monopole tower and equipment shed. The site is provided access from the asphalt paved parking lot and drive affiliated with the adjacent Washington Gas facility. The existing tower is proposed to be increased to a height of 180-feet. A Cell Tower Review Form and Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet, FCC Form 621 has been submitted to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR). Copies of the forms are included as attachments. ECS has received the final response from the VDl-IR indicating that the proposed tower extension will have no adverse effect on historic properties in the vicinity of the site. ECS also received final responses from the Catawba Indian Nation, the Cherokee Nation and the Shawnee Tribe indicating that no known historic properties, cultural or sacred sites will be affected. ECS did not receive a response from the Winchester -Frederick County Historical Society. They were given more than 30-days to provide comment, therefore, it is understood that they do not wish to provide a comment on this proposed towel- extension. The responses are also provided as attachments. ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our environmental services for this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, ECS MID-XfLAN IC, LLC , Kaili Hutchison qFleaEly ry Staff Environmental Scientist Environmental De ent Mager 5320 Peters Creek Road. Suite F. Roanoke. VA 24019- (540) 362-2000< FAX (540) 362-1202a www.ecslimited.com Aberdeen. MD • Battimore. MD • Chantilly. VA • Chariorte wille, VA • Frederick, NID • Fredericksburg. VA • Manassas, VA • Ocean City. NID' Richmond. VA • Roanoke. VA • Virginia Beach. VA • Waldorf, NID • Williamsburg. VA • Winchester. VA • fork. PA testing services only I/13/2008 13:28 8043672 91 DEPT OF HIS�IC RES PAGE 01/01 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA L. Prostort Bryant, Jr. Department of Historic Resources Kothlcen S. Kilratricb hccr:oiry of Natural kcm)urces Director 1401 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221 TO: (8(1a1 }6--:3;3 Fax: (Rna)3f,7.230l Tnu: (Sttt1 St, 13 June2008 Ms. Kaili Hutchinson Ms, heather McElvery ECS Mid-Atlwi.tic,LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, VA 24019 Re: Washington Gas Tower 350 Hillandale Lane Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia ECS Project Number: 2322-A DHR File # 2008-0855 Dear Ms. Rees and Ms. Edwards: We have received your request for our review and comment regarding the above referenced project. We believe that the undertaking will Have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Should you receive any comments regarding the project's effects to historic properties please forward copies to the Department of Historic Resources (DHR). If you have any questions about our comments, please contact me at (804) 367-2323, Ext. 155. Sincerely, ulie V. Langan Director, Division of Resource Services & Review Adminktn,ti%c Sen ices 10 C'nurthouq: Avenue Petershurg. VA 23803 TeI: 114041 S(ii -162a Fax: (M.W) Sr,,..Fluh Cisprt;d kegion Orrice Tidewater Region Mice 2Q01 Kensincton Ave. 1441.1010 Ctnrnl,nutc NN'ny, 2"" Flnor Richmond. VA 23221 Newport News. VA 23008 Tol: Mai 36 -2323 Tel: (737) M-2807 Fax: (8n4) 367-2391 I`ux: 1757) 88 i-nOR Rtwmokc Region O Mcc I n30 Pcnmar Ave.. S E R(iunoka, VA 24013 TO: (540)R57-7595 Fn.v (54U) 95 %-75SR Winchester Region OfIlve 107 N, Kent $trect, Suitc 203 Winchester, VA 22601 TO: (54n)722.3427 Fix; (5401722-7i?c KHutchison From: DVenteicher Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 08:42 am To: KHutchison Subject: FW: Washington Gas Tower Desi J. Venteicher Administrative Assistant ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, STE F Roanoke, VA 24019 540-362-2000 Phone 540-362-1202 Fax dventeicher ecslimited.com www.ecslimited.com From: Richard Allen [mailto:Richard-Allen@cherokee.org] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 04:49 pm To. DVenteicher Subject: RE: Washington Gas Tower The Cherokee Nation has no knowledge of any historic, cultural or sacred sites within the affected area. Should any ground disturbance reveal an archaeologic�U site or human remains, we ask that the all activity cease immediately and the Cherokee Nation and other appropriate agencies be contacted immediately. Thank you, Dr. Richard L. Allen Policy Analyst Cherokee Nation P.O. Box 948 Tahlequah, Oklahoma 74465 (918) 453-5466 (office) (918) 822-2707 (cell) (918) 458-5878 (fax) From: DVenteicher [mailto:DVenteicher@ecslimited.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:58 AM To: Richard Allen Cc: KHutchison Subject: Washington Gas Tower Desi J. Venteicher Administrative Assistant ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, STE F Roanoke, VA 24019 06/09/2008 ,540-36,� 2000 Phone . 540-362-1202 Fax dventeicher(a)ecslimited com www.ecslimited.com 06/09/2008 c 91F=oa inaian Ivanon Tribal Historic Preservation Off10 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 803-328-2427 Fax 803-328-5791 18 June 2008 Ms. Kali Hutchison ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC 5320 Peters Creek Road, Suite F Roanoke, Virginia 24019 2008-176-4 TCNS 37975 350 Hillandale Lane in Winchester, Frederick Co., VA Dear Ms. Hutchison, The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties, sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance. phase of this project. The research and processing fee for each project will be $150. For accounting Purposes, checks must be made out to the Catawba THPO (or CIN-THPO) Please note that we no longer use Post Office 750. Please send all mail to: Dr. Wenonah G. Haire CIN-THPO 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, SC 29730 If you have questions, please contact Sandra Reinhardt at 803-328-2427 ext. 233, or e- mail sandrar aC -ccpperaftrs.com. Sincerely, .ScAn ira ]-Z6wkp2ri t for Wenonah G. Haire Tribal Historic Preservation Officer -06/03/2008 11:00 19185429 915 SHAWNEETRIBE PAGE 01/01 SHAWNEE TRIBE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT 29 SOUTH HIGHWAY 69A MIAMI, OKLAHOMA 74354 918 ^ 542 - 2441 PHONE 918,&542 A� 9915 FAX FACSIMILE COVER PAGE ^ — & w —.& ^ ^ & w ^ A, w ^ & ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ & ^ ^ A. ^ — A. � ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ — w ^ ^ ^ ^ w ^ — L ^ & ^ � w - FIRM/AGENCY: FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: FROM: - DATE/TIME: + n ! Y No. OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER: MEMO: ^_�&^^&&^^ w^—A-w��&^�&^�&^—w& '�&&^'" & ,� & ,, w^ ^ awn, - &Aw A. Message: The Shawnee Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer concurs that no known historic properties will be negatively impacted by construction of this tower site (see memo line above for TCNS numbeNs), The Shawnee Tribe's archives do not reveal any issues of concern at this tower location, In the event that archaeological materials are encountered later during construction, use, or maintenance of this tower location, please re -notify us at that time as we would like to resume consultation under such a circumstance. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Dep"'.rent takes this opportunity to express its concerns that telecommunication towers can have a potentially destructive impact on bats and migratory birds, particularly those that migrate at night, including species listed as threatened and endangered by both states and the federal government, as well as other species. The Shawnee Tribe suggests that this tower be constructed in accordance with the guidelines available from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce the adverse effects of telecommunications towers on migratory birds; these guidelines may be found at: www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/issues/towers/corntow.ntrnl. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department is further concerned that the proliferation of cell towers may play a role in honey bee Colony Collapse Disorder. We acknowledge that cell phone technology may not be to blame, as other potential causative factors for the decline have been noted, such as insecticides, tracheal and varroa mites [an immunosuppressant], other parasites, pesticides used on hives to eliminate parasites, genetically modified plants, Nosema fungus, Israeli Acute Paralysis Viris (IAPV) perhaps introduced from Australia in 2004, Kashmir Bee Virus [KSV], climate change, and drought. While one or a constellation of these factors may be causative, it is undeniable that the evidence suggests as much of a behavioral as a pathogenic origin for Colony Collapse Disorder. On March 29`', 2007, Diana Cox -Foster, Pennsylvania State University, testified about Colony Collapse Disorder before the House Subcommittee on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, According to May Berenbsum, a member of Cox-Foster's working team and an insect ecologist at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign),"The main hypotheses are based on the interpretation that the disappearances represent disruptions in orientation behavior and navigation". One study at the Koblenz - Landau University, Germany, may suggest that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones could possibly cause such a disruption in the navigation systems of bees, preventing them from being able to return to their hives. This study is by no means conclusive. However, Departmental staff will continue to assess the potential role in Colony Collapse; Disorder of such electromagnetic emissions and would strongly urge the cell tower industry to do the same. Finally, the Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department requests that cell tower sites, whenever remotely feasible, be restored to native vegetation, In all cases, habitat restoration can protect a variety of species, even in small project areas. The large number of cell tower sites provides an as yet unrealized opportunity for region -wide habitat restoration, The Tribe urges the cell phone industry to provide a model for native habitat restoration for other industries. Please do not hesitate to call is for additional comment. Pecleral Communications Commission is yf' Wireless Telecommunications Bureau o � s Radio Station Authorization �cOMMIs'} 121 Page 1 of 1 Licensee: WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY FCC Registration Number (FRN) 0002lo8629 WIW76 JOHN WRIGHT File Number WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY 0002894227 6801 INDUSTRIAL RD Radio Service SPRINGFIELD VA 22151 MG - Microwave Industrial/ Business Pool SMSA Station Class FXO Grant Date Effective Date Print Date Expiration Date 02-26-2002 03-13-2007 03-14-2007 02-26-2012 LOCATION Fixed Location Address or Area of Operation 350 HILLANDALE LANE City County State WINCHESTER FREDERICK VA Antenna Structure Loc No. Location Name Latitude Longitude Elevation Registration No. 001 KERNSTOWN 39-07-30.4 N 78-10-59.0 W 227.1 002 BLUE MTN 1 38-57-23.0 N 78-01-28.0 W 667.2 003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NORTH MTN 39-05-38.4 N 78-30-09.0 W 719.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FREQUENCY PATHS Frequency Tol Emission EIRP Constr Path Seg Emit Ant Hgt Gain Beam POL AZIM Rec Rec (MHz) (%) Desig (dBm) Date No Loc (m) (dBi) (deg) (deg) Loc Call No Reflector No Sign Ht(m)xWd(m) 6765.0 0.00050 5MOOD7W 66.3 001 1 001 22.5 38.8 1.8 v 143.7 002 KZK52 6805.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.00050 5MOOD7W 66.3 002 1 001 21.3 38.8 1.8 H 263.0 003 WIW75 Additional Waivers/Conditions: NONE COPY Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 31 O(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. Section 606. FCC 601 - M June 2005 Blue Mountain to Columbia Gas Strasburg BLUE MTN 282.5575a (EI-0.982a) 38 57 23.00 N 102.3690a (EI +0.982a) 78 01 37.00 W 16.5207 mi 2300 2100 1900 1700 1500 1300 75 > 1100 0 Q 900 s 700 500 2 4 CTA Communications ...providing innovative and reliable solutions for the future HSMM I AECOM 6 8 10 12 Distance from Site (mi) 14 COLUMBIA GAS STRASBURG 39 00 29.07 N 78 19 35.61 W 2300 2100 1900 1700 1500 1300 1100 900 700 500 16 16.52 0 BLUE MTN 38 57 23.00 N 78 01 37.00 W 2300 2100 2 1900 1700 J 1500 a� 0 1300 Q LM 1100 = 900 700 500 1 2 3 4 BLUE MOUNTAIN TO KERNSTOWN CTA Communications ...providing innovative and reliable solutions for the future HSMM I AECOM 324.2362a (El -0.986a) 144.1379a (El +0.986a) 14.3524 mi 5 6 7 8 Distance from Site (mi) KERNSTOWN 39 07 30.40 N 78 10 59.00 W 2300 2100 • 1900 1700 1500 1300 1100 900 700 • 500 9 10 11 12 13 14.30 Page 1 of Ah �ederal Communications Commission 31S Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO AUTHORIZATION Licensee: SHENANDOAH GAS COMPANY FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0002107050 SHENANDOAH.GAS COMPANY 'P.O' BOX 2400 WINCHESTER VA.226o1 Call Sign File Number KDJ849 1 0001.755764 Radio Service IG - Industrial/Business Pool, 'Conventional Regulatory Status PMRS Frequency Coordination Number Grant Date . Effective.Date Expiration Date Print Date -' 0.6-02-2o.o4 06=02=2o0'4. 0.7-07=2014 o6-02-2004 STATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Fixed Location Address or Mobile Area! of Operation, Loc. i Address 4.52 MI NE ADJ TO TRI CO.F.IRETOWER .- _ :TCjty. County. State FRONT. ROYAL :. F'A000I,ER VA Cat- (NAD83):,38, 57-24.4 N L6ng--(NAD83): 78-•1-37.0 W ASR No.: Ground Elev: 671.0 L'oc. .. -2' Address E SIDE RT.81 N OF,I79 City County State FA0QUIER VA _ _KERNSTOWN Lat (NAD83)i 39-7-30,4 N Long-_(NAD83.):.78-,10-59.6 W ASR No.: ..Ground Elev: 226.0 =.toc; 3 Address RT 9 .25'MI E City- County State MARTINSBURG BERKELEY WV Lat .(NADS3): $9-26-17:4..N Long (NAD83): 77-57-37.0 W ASR No.; Ground Elev: 152.0 - 4 Area of Operation Operating'within a .161..0. km radius around fixed location number 1. ' Antennas- ' Loc. Ant." Frequencies Sta. _ No:. No. Emission Output ERP Ant. Ant. Construct No. 'No..- (MHZ). Cls. Units 'Pagers Designator Power (wa'tts)• Ht./Tp AAT Deadline (watts) meters meters Date 1 1.48.20000 FB 1 2-3 26KOF3E 100.000 85.000 40.0 1 .48.20000 FB. 1- -23 20K6F3E 100:000 85.000 34.0 Conditions: Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications•Act of'I934;.as amended, 47 U.S.G. Section 309(h),.this license is subject:to. the following..conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in ;the. use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither;the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act.of 1934, as amended. See 47-U.S.C. Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by Section'706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U-.S.C. Section 606. FCC 601 - LM January 2004 Page 2 of 2 10 Licensee Name: SHENANDOAH GAS COMPANY Call sign: KDJ849 File Number: 0001755764 Print Date: 06-02-2004 2 3 1 48.20000 FBS 1 23 20KOF3E 100.000 99.000 8.0 4 1 48.20000 MO 38 0 20KOF3E 100.000 Control Points Control Address Pt. No. 1 E SIDE RT 81 N I79 City County Kingstown State Telephone Number VA (703)750-4785 FCC 601 - LM World Meadquartai s -7!9 W, Plank. tid. Pa-'Ofia. IL a? 1ii? 0',A t•fSX' �1i9•Fiy(-ao12 MIndustfies, Inc. PURCHASER: WASIIINGTON GAS LIGHT NANuIE OF PROJECT: SHENANDOAH GAS/WINCHESTER FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 120 FT. TAPERED STEEL POLE ROIIN FILE NUMBER: 53780AE ROHN DRAWING NUMBERS: A030032RI AND A030120, 1-3 I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION -IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOADING AND SOIL CRITERIA SPECIFIED BY THE PURCHASER AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINI .- CERTIFIED BY., DATE: j` 7 Z r ��- DESIGN LOADING JE9,IGN WIND LOAD PER ANSI/fliVEIA-222-F-1996, 80.0 MPH BASIC. WIND SPECO (FASTEST MILE) (0.5- RADIAL ICE LOAD). + 7"HIS POLE IS DESIGNED TO SUPPOR- THE FOLLOWING LOADS ELEVATIONAtiTEN (FT) 176.0 A TYPE -�1 LINE SIZE U '-Li ) D� FEZ"PJ0 PANELS ON ANTENNA PLATFORM 12)1.SM m. 166.0 y23 0e844HW PANELS ON ANTENNA PLATFORM 1211-51E+n. 11550 12 DB844H90 PANELS DNAHTENNA PLAT:F RA1 (12Y-S+Ti • 140 0 (216' HIGH PFRFORMANCE DiSH4S I (21EW53 -" 120A i 4N 6-)UHF TST.1OLIN7 (1)71E n. 120SOFT, SO FT) 50.4OFPAA 2)6' iIGH I'ERF VCE 6!SH5, S j (2)EW is SEE STRESS ANALYSIS FOR A COURXTE LISTING OF ALL LOADS ON STRUCTURE ' INDICATES FUTURE LOADS WHEN TUNER WAS FJC(ENDED 11 20.00 FT TOP FLANGE SECTION 1 IS SIDES 89.25 FT _I _T SPLICE LENGTH MIN. = 61.200" DES!GN = 6e.000" - MAX. = 74.800" SECTION 2 1S SIDES 4$,00 PT I SPLICE LENGTH MIN. = 71.IOT i DESIGN = 79.000" MAX. = 86.90C" 3 I SECTION SCHEDULE HFIGHT DIAMETER (IN) WALL WEIGHT "Y SE3. THICK. (FT) (KSI) (KIPS) ESOT, TOP K (IN) 1 36.25 45-123 38.375 0,2600 BSA 4494 2 48.00 52,812 43.612 0,3125 650 B.225 40.00 80 000 SC.800 0.312!s 65.0 10.3?0 I FOR POLYGONAL POLES 91AMETER IS MEASURED ACROSS FLATS. BASE PLATS 2.000" X 68.750- Round WI (20) 1,500" DIA- X 74" LONG ANCHOR BOLTS EQUALLY SPACED ON 84.75" B.C. W! 7.5" ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION j ffMAXIMUrdI R�A&- ONS D)IIVIILOAD=2e/ KIP284 KIPSU,1.M 2S75 3 FT. -KIPS C��_GRAL 1, ROHN COMMUNICATION POLE DESIGNS CONFORM TO ANSVT:FIEfA-M-F UNLESS OTHER'✓'ISE SPECIFIED UNDER POLE DESIGN LOADING 2. THE DESIGN LOADING CRITERIA INDICATED HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ROHN.TH2 O$SIGN LOADING CRITERIA HAS BEEN ASSUMED TO BE BASED ON SITE -SPECIFIC: OATA IN ACCORDANCE 'MT H ANSL'T41lEIA-222-F AND MUST 6E VERIFIED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. ANTTENNAS AND LINES LIS ED IN POLE DESIGN LOADING TABLE ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. POLE MEMBER DESIGN DOES NOT INCLUDE STRESSES DUE TO ERECTION SINCE ERECTION EQUIPMENT AND CONDITIONS ARE UNKNOWN. DESIGN ASSUMES COMP. -TENT AND OUALI715D PERSONNEL WILL ERECT THE POLE, 5, WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE W-H ANSUTIAIEIA-222-F. 'STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERS AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING S I RUCTURES". 6. FIELD CONNECI'IONS SMALL SE SOL7E0. ND FIELD WELLS SFIALL Bi= ALLOYdED. 7. STRUCTURAL BOLTS SHALL CONFORM. TO ASTM A•325, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED 8 A NUT LOCKING DEVICE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL $TRUCTURAL BOLTS ON THE POLE 9. STRUCTURAL STEEL AND CONNECTION BOLTS SMALL BE HOTDIPPED GALVANIZED I AFTER FABRICATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSVTINEIA.-222-F. 70. ALL HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS ARE TO BE TIGHTENED TO A'"SNUGTIGHT` CONDMON AS DEFINED IN THE NOVEMBER 13, 1985, AISC S" ECIFICANON FOR STRUC TURAL JOINTS USING ASIM A325 OR A490 BOLTS". NO OTHER MINIMUM BOLT TENSION OR TORQUE VALUES ARE REQUiREO. 11. PURCHASER SHALL VERIFY THE INSTALLATION IS IN CONFORMANCEWITH LOCA)-, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR. OBSTRUCTION MARKING AND LIGHTING. 12. TOLERANCE ON POLE STEEL HEI3HI !S EQUAL TO PLUS 1% ON MINUS 112%, 13. OESIGN ASSUMES THAT, AS A MINIMUM. REAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION NIL': BE PERFORMED OVER THE LIFE OF THE STRUCIURE IN ACCORDANCE Y47TH ANSVTLA/EiA-=2 F. 14. DESIGN ASSUMES LEVEL GRADE AT POLE,51TE. 15. FOUNDATION$ SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE REACTIONS SHOWN FOR THE CONDITION$ EXISTING AT'THE SITE. 16, DESIGN ASSUMES ALL PANEL ANTENNAS VA7H MOUNTING FRAMES ARE MOUNTED SYMMETRICALLY. 17. DESIGN ASSUiV.ES ALL TRANSMISSION LINES ARE ROUTED INTERNALLY. 18. PULE SHAFT CONFORMS 10 ASTM A572 GRADE 65. POLE BASE PLATE S=ELL CONFORMS TO ASTM P433 GRADE E. POLE TOP PLA1E STEEL CONFORMS TO ASTM A36 (Fy = 35 KSI). POLE ANCHOR BOLTS CONFORM TO ASTM F1S34 G.WF 105, 19. THIS POLE HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A 6C' FUTURE EXTENSION. SITE: SHENANDOAH GAS111MCHESTIFR, VA CQUNTY. =REJERICK. VA ,OI3r: REr"ODVrEO. COPIED. 04 TRACED IN WHOLE H � OR PART M?I{Ow OUR WRITTEN CONSENT T� J� TV NON° By 120' TAPERED STEEL POLE DESIGN FOR o LPG 1nn0Q,3 WASHNGTON GAS LIGHT _ JS 1.31.Z12Q03_ J ENG. Fnr: _ (oaa� xo.: AR34tJ> _ ` I 7 53760AE �!� `srierT I or ' ------'-- NOTE: SEE POLF ASSEMBLY DRAWING FOR FOUNDATION LAYOUT AND ANCIAORAG E EMBEDMENT DPAWING NUMBER. 8.0/--~ |�---� 7�0y--°� ` 12.25' | � . ' -' -`-- - 12.25 '--i �"----'----' - 24,50' PLANI / 3"mAX-2"MIN -- ' 0.00, �' ------- l- ------ nBAR DIAMETER ( 732CKYDS AEAC'0ONS O.T.M. = 2875.3F['K|PS DOWNLOAD 481K|PS NO so|nouuVRTleanw s' cswrsmo (38) NO. ovcn7.BARS cuuAu.YopAocoowAo^^ om.CIRCULAR CAGE vwso`xnoxaxrBOTTOM (Tvr.) (30) NO 9 HORIZONTAL BARS EQUALLY SPACED EACH WAY, .25 . JOINT TO A FULL AMPLITUDE op1wr ELfl0Tl(}N SITE: SHENANDOAHGAS8m|NCHESTER FpcDER|CKCOUNTY, vA ' No, A Revision Description nomsREPRODUCED, COPIED, o*TRACED mwvIOIX; uePART WITHOUT OUR wR/rnsvCONSENT. Scale: NONE '- P/ERANDPAOFOUNDATONDETALS FOR VVASH/NGTONGAS LIGHT fJVG.RLE: DWG. NO,: 8030120 FOUNDATION GENERAL NOTES 1. Foundation design has been developed in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practices within the limits of the subsurface data provided. Foundation design ntodi.lications may be required in the event the following design parameters are not applicable for the subsurface conditions encountered. A) Allowable soil bearing pressure at 6 Ft. Depth = 3,000 psf. B) Ground water table below foundation depth. C) Maximum frost penetration depth less than foundation depth. 2. Work shall be in accordance with local codes, safety regulations and unless otherwise noted, the latest revision of ACI 318, 'Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete". Procedures for the protection of excavations, existing constriction and utilities shall be established prior to foundation installation. 3. Concrete materials shall conform to the appropriate state requirements for exposed structural concrete. 4. Proportions of concrete materials shall be suitable for the installation method utilized and shall result in durable concrete for resistance to local anticipated aggressive actions. The durability requirements of ACI 318 Chapter 4 shall be satisfied based on the conditions expected at the site. As a minimum, concrete shall develop a minimum compressive strength of 3000 psi (20.7 MPa) in 28 days. 5. Maximum size of aggregate shall not exceed size suitable for installation method utilized or 1/3 clear distance behind or between reinforcing. Maximum size may be increased to 2/3 clear distance provided Nvorkability and methods of consolidation such as vibrating will prevent honeycombs or voids. 6. Reinforcement shall be deforined and conform to the requirements of ASTM A615 grade 60 unless otherwise noted. Splices in reinforcement shall not be allowed unless otherwise indicated. 7. ;Melding is prohibited on reinforcing steel and ernbednlents. R. Minimum concrete cover for reinforcement shall be 3 inches (76 mn) unless otherwise noted. Approved spacers shall be used to insure a 3 inch (76 min) minimum cover on reinforcement. 9. Concrete cover from top of foundation to ends of vertical reinforcement shall not exceed 3 inches (76mm) nor be less than 2 inches (51min). 10. Foundation design assumes structural backfill to be compacted in 8 inch (200 min;) maximum layers to 95% of maximum dry density at optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM D698. Additionally, structural back -fill must have a minimum compacted unit weight of 100 pounds per cubic foot (16 kn/m3). 11. Foundation design has been based on geotechnical report no. 11036-1-3 dated 07/03/02 by Patton Harris Rust & Associates. P.C. ENG, FILE NO. 53780AE' DWG. NO. A030120-2 FOUNDATION GENERAL NOTES 12. Foundation depth indicated is based on the grade line described in the referenced geotechnical report. foundation modification may be required in the event cut or fill operations have taken place subsequent to the geotect-itical investigation. 13. Foundation design assumes level grade at pole site. 14. Foundation design assumes the recommendations in the referenced geotechnical report concerning verification of subsurface conditions are implemented prior to placement of concrete. 15. Foundation installation sftall be supervised by personnel knowledgeable and experienced with the proposed foundation type. Construction shall be in accordance v,,ith generally accepted installation practices. 16. Foundation design assumes installation procedures will incorporate the procedures recommended in the referenced geotechnical report. 17. Foundation design assumes field inspections will be performed to verify that construction materia.is, installation methods and assumed design parameters are acceptable based on conditions existing at the site. 18. For foundation and anchor tolerances see drawing A810214. 19. Loose material shall be removed from bottom of excavation prior to concrete placement. Sides of excavation shall be rough and free of loose cuttings. 20. Concrete shall be placed in a manner that will prevent segregation of concrete materials, infiltration of water or soil and other occurrences which may decrease the strength or durability of the foundation. 21. Concrete preferably shall be placed against undisturbed soil. When forms are necessary, they shall be removed prior to placing structural backfili. 22, Construction joints, if required at the base of the piers, must be intentionally roughened to a foil amplitude of 1I4 inch (6 min). Foundation design assumes no other construction joints. 23. Top of foundation outside Iimits of anchor bolts shall be sloped to drain with a floated finish. Area inside limits of anchor bolts shall be level with a scratched finish. 24. L:xposed edges of concrete shall be chamfered 3/4" x 3/4" (19mm x 19mm) minimuni. ENG. FILE NO. 53780At; MVG. NO. A030120-3 • 0 ROHN industries, Inc. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer.: jon_g Page; 2 Customer: WASHINGGTON GAS & ELECTRIC CO'11.1 01/10/2003 13.:27 AM Site: Type: POLES-TPR Pole: Tapered Steel PROPERTIES: ( 0 tiax Segment = 5.0 ft) Diam. Wall Diam/ Node Across Thick rhick Node Blev. Flays (t) (W/t) (D/t) Area J I No. (ft) (in) (in) Ratio Ratio_ (in^2) (in^4) (in"4) 56 180.000 27.38 0.3.875 23.52 146.03 16.18 3031.1 1511.8 55 178.800 27.61 0.1875 23.73 147.25 16.32 3108.6 1550.4 54 177.600 2.7.84 0.18'75 23.95 148.48 16.46 3187.3 1589.7 53 176.400 28.07 0.1875 24.16 149.70 16.59 3267.4 1629.6 52 175.200 28.30 0.3875 24,38 150.93 16.73 3348.8 1670.2 51 174.000 28.53 0.1875 24.59 152.15 16.87 3431.5 1711.5 50 172.800 28.76 0.1875 24,81 153.38 17.00 3515.7 1753.5 49 171.600 28.99 0.1875 25.03 154.60 17.14 3601.1 1796.1 48 170.400 29.22 0.1875 25,24 155.82 17.28 3687.9 1839.4 47 169.200 29.45 0.1875 25.46 157.05 17.41 3776.1 2883.4 460 1G8.000 2.9.68 0.1075 25.67 158.27 17.55 3065.7 1928.1 4GI 168.000 29.17 0.1875 25,20 155.58 17.25 3670.4 1830.6 45 164.167 29.90 0.187; 7.5.89 1E9.49 17.68 3956.2 1973.2 44 159.750 30.75 0.1875 26,69 164.01 18.19 4304.1 2146.7 43 155.333 31.60 0.1875 27.48 3.69.52 18.69 4671.7 2330.0 42 150.917 32.44 0.1675 28.28 173.04 19.20 5059.7 2523.5 41 146.500 33.29 0.1875 29.07 177.55 19.70 5468.5 2727.5 40 142.083 34.14 0.1.8,15 29.87 182.07 20.20 S89819 2942.1 39 137.GG7 34.98 0.1875 30.67 186.58 20.71 6351.3 3167.7 38 131.250 35.83 0.1875 31.46 191.10 21.21 6876.2 3404.6 37 129.833 36.68 0.1875 32,26 19S.61 21.71 7324.2 3653.0 36 124,417 37.52 0.1875 33.05 200.13 2.2.22 7845.9 3913.2 35F 120.000 38.37 0.1875 33.85 204.64 22.72 8391.7 4185.4 35F 120.000 38.37 0.2500 25.30 153.48 30.25 11134.1 55S3.2 34 116.942 38.96 0.2500 25.71 155.83 30.71 11655.9 5813.4 33 113.883 39.54 0.2500 26.13 158.17 31.19 1219-1.6 6081.6 32 110.825 40.13 0.2500 26.54 160.52 31.64 12747.7 6358.0 31 107.767 40.72 0.2500 26.95 162.86 32.11 13318.3 6642.6 30 104.708 41.30 0.2.500 27.37 165.21 32.57 13905.7 6935.6 29 101,650 41.89 0.2500 27.78 167.55 33.04 14510.0 7237.0 28 98.592 42.47 0.2500 28.19 169.90 33.50 15131.8 7547.1 2.7 95.533 43.OG 0.2500 28.61 172.24 33.97 15771.0 7865.9 26 92.475 43.65 0.2500 29.02 174.59 34.43 16427.9 8193.5 25 89.417 44.23 0.2500 29.44 176.93 34.90 17102.8 8530.2 240 86.583 44.78 0.2500 29.82 179.11 35.33 17744.4 88SO.1 251 99 4i'7 43.61 0.3125 23.13 139.55 42.94 20393.2 1017l.2 24 96.583 44.1.5 0.3125 23.43 141.29 43.48 21170.4 lu5Sb.9 23 63.750 44.70 0.3125 23.74 143.03 44.02 21_967.3. 10956.3 22 80.175 45.38 0.3125 24.13 14S.22 44.70 23000.3 11471.6 21 76.600 46.07 0.3125 24.51 147,41 45.38 24065.4 12002.8 20 73.025 46.75 0.3125 24.90 149.61 46.06 25162.9 12550.1 19 69.450 47.44 0,3125 25.29 151.80 46.74 26293.2 13113.9 18 65.675 48.12 0.3125 25.67 1S3.99 47.42 27457.1 13694.4 17 62.300 48.81 0.3125 26.06 156.18 48.20 28654.6 14291.7 16 58.725 49.49 0.3125 26.44 158.30 48.78 29886.4 14906.1 15 55.150 50.18 0.3125 26.83 160.57 49.46 31153.1 15537.8 14 S1.57S 50.86 0.1125 2".22 162.76 50.14 324S5.1 16187.2 13 48.000 51.55 0,1125 27.60 164.95 50.82 33792..8 16854.4 120 94.700 S2.18 0.312S 27.96 iGG.97 51.44 35056.6 17484.7 13I 48.000 50.80 0.3125 27.18 162.SG SO.08 32333.9 16126.7 12 44.f08 51.43 0.3125 4..54 1£'1.Se 50.170 335G1.?. 16738.9 11 41.417 S2.OG 0.3125 27.89 166.60 51.33 34819.3 17366.3 10 37.2.75 52.86 0.3125 28,34 169.14 52.11 36446.3 18177.8 9 33.133 53.65 0.3125 28.79 171.68 52,90 38123.2 19014.2 8 28.992 54.44 0.3125 25.24 174.22 53.69 392&1.0 1987S.9 7 24.850 55.24 0.3125 29.69 176.76 54.40 41630.0 20763.2 ROHN Industriwi, Inc. File-. 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: I Design: 2 Ecgineer: jon_g Customer: WAS;{1NGT0N GAS & ELECTRIC CO w•; site; Type: POLE-TPR Pole: Tapered Steel Diam. Wall Diam/ i:ade Across Thick Trick Node Elev. Flats [t) (t•)/t) [D/t) No. _ (EL) (in)� _(in) Ratio Ratio 6 20,708 56.03 0.3125 30.13 179.30 5 16.567 56.82 0.3125 30.58 181.84 4 12.425 57.62 0.33.25 31.03 184.38 3 8.283 58.41 0.3125 31.48 186.92 2 4.142 59.21 0.3125 31.93 3-89.46 1 0.000 60.00 0.3125 32.37 192.00 Page: 3 O1/10/2003 11:27 AM Area J I (in"2) (.in"4) (in"•i) 55.26 43461.2 21676.E 56.05 43345.3 22616.3 56.84 47283.1 23582.8 57.63 49275.6 24576.5 58.41 51.323.1 25597.7 59.20 53426.4 26646.0 ROHN Industries, Inc. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer: jon g Page: 4 Customer: WASHINGTON GAS 1, ELECTRIC COMM 01/10/2003 Site: 11:27 AM Type: POLL-TPR Pole: Tapered Steel DISCRETE APPURTENANCE PROPERTIES _ r;_=ght _ _ EPA Elev. I9/0 Ice W/ Ice W/0 Ice W/ Ice (t:t) nescri. Lion _ _ (_kips) (kills) (ft^2,) (£t'2) Lines 176.00 (12) DB8441190 PANELS ON 7.4' ANTENNA 140MIT 1.29 1.94 44.69 SIAS (12) 1-5/8 in. 166.00 (12) DB844H90 PANELS ON 14' ANTENNA MOUNT 1.29 1.94 44.69 51.65 (12) 1-5/8 in. f 166.00 (12) DR8441I90 PILURLS ON 14' ANTENNA MOMIT 1.29 1.94 44.69 SIAS (12) 1-5/6 in. 140.00 (2)6' HP DISHE'S 1.20 1.60 67.00 67.00 (2) EW63 120.00 UHF ANTWMA r;/DiOUNT(20 6QFT/30 SQFT) 0.30 0.45 20.00 30.00 (1) 7/8" 50.00 (2)6' HP DISHES 1.20 1.60 67.00 67.00 (2) EW63 / d t ROHN Indtwtries, Inc. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer: jan_g Page: 5 Customer: WASHMIGITOi4 GAS & ELECTRIC COPii4 01/10/2003 Site; 11:27 AM Type: POLE-TPR Pale: Tapered Steel PRESSURES Elay. 11/0 Ice With .ice operational - Seg. (Et) Kz --. qz- CE --- az Cf - - z - Cf 1-11 179,400 1.622 % 44.915 0.650 33.413 0.650 /'17.S45 0.650 1 10 178.200 1.619 44.829 0.650 33.349 0.650 17.511 0.650 1-9 177.000 1.616 44.743 0.6650 33.2.84 0.650 17.478 0.650 1-8 175.800 1..613 44.656 0.650 33.220 0.650 17.444 0.650 1-7 174.600 1.610 44.569 0.6SO 33,155 C-650 17.410 0.650 1-G 173.400 1.606 44.481 0.650 33.090 0.650 17,375 0.650 1-5 172.200 1.603 44.393 0.650 33.024 0.650 17,341 0.6650 1-4 171..000 1.600 44.304 0.650 32.958 0.650 17.306 0.650 1-3 169.800 1.597 44.215 0.650 32.892 0.650 17.272 0.650 1-2 168.600 1.594 44.126 0.650 32.825 0.650 17.237 0,650 1-1 166.083 1.587 43.936 0.650 32.685 0.650 17.163 0.650 2-11 166.083 1.587 43.936 0.650 32.685 0.650 17,163 0.650 2-10 161.958 1.575 43.622 0.660 32.451 0.650 17.040 0.650 2-9 157,542 1,563 43.279 0,650 32.195 0.650 16.906 0.650 2-8 1.53.125 1.550 42.928 0.650 31.935 O.GSO 16.769 0.650 2-7 148.708 1.537 42.571 0.650 31.669 0.650 16.625 0.650 2-6 144.292 1.52.4 42.206 0.650 31.397 0.650 1G,487 0.650 2-5 139.875 1.511 41.933 0.650 31.119 0.650 16,341 0.650 2-4 135.458 1.497 41.451 0.650 30.836 0.650 16.192 0.650 2-3 131.042 1.483 41.060 0.650 30.545 0.650 16.039 0.650 2-2 126.625 1.468 40.660 0.650 30.247 0.650 15.883 0.650 2-1 122.208 1.454 40.249 0.650 29.942. 0.650 15.722 0.650 2-0 218.471 1.441 39.894 0.650 29.677 0.650 15.584 .0.650 3-12 118.471 1.441 39.894 0.650 29.677 0.650 15.594 0.650 3-11 115.413 1.430 39.597 0.650 29.456 0,650 15.169 0-550 3-10 112.354 1.419 39.2.94 0.650 29.231 0.650 15.349 0.650 3-9 I09.296 1.408 38.99E, 0.650 29.002 0.650 15.229 0.650 3-8 106,238 1.397 38.671 0.650 28.767 0.650 15.106 0.650 3-7 103.179 1.385 38.349 0.650 28.528 0,650 14.980 C.650 3-6 100.121 1.373 38.021 0.650 28.284 0.650 1-1.852 0,650 3-5 97,063 1.361 37-GSG 0.650 2.8.034 0.650 14.721 0.650 3-4 94.004 1.349 37.342 0.650 27.779 0.650 14.587 0.650 3-3 90.946 1.336 36.991 0.650 27.518 0.650 14.450 0.650 3-2 88,000 1.323 36.645 0.650 27,260 0.650- 14.314 0,650 3-1 85.167 1.311 36.304 0.650 27.007 0.650 14,183 0.650 4-14 68.000 1.323 36.645 0.650 27.260 0.650 14.314 0.6SO 4-13 85,167 1.31.1 36,304 0.650 27.007 0.650 14.181 0.650 4-12 81.963 1.297 35.909 0.650 26,712 O.G50 14.027 0.650 4-11 78,388 1.280 35.453 0.650 26.374 0,650 13.849 0.650 4-10 74.813 1.263 34.984 0.650 26.025 0.650 13.666 0.650 4-9 71.238 1.245 34.493 0.650 25.663 0.6G0 3.3.476 0.650 4-8 67.663 1..228 33-994 0.650 2.5.286 01650 13.279 0.650 4-7 64.088 1.209 33.471 0.650 24.899 0.650 13.075 0.650 4-6 60.513 1.189 32.926 0.650 24.494 0.650 12.8G2 0.650 4-5 56.938 1.169 32..358 0.650 24.072 0.650 12.640 0.650 4-4 53.363 1..147 31,764 0.650 23.630 0.650 12.408 0.650 4-3 49.788 1.125 31.141. 0.650 23.16G 0.650 12,165 0.650 4-2 46.354 1,102 30.512 0.650 22.698 0.650 11.919 0.650 4-1 13.063 1.079 29.877 0.650 22.225 0.650 11.671 0.650 5-12 46.354 1.102 30.512 0.650 22.698 0.650 11,919 0.650 5-11 43.063 1.079 29.877 0.650 22.225 0.650 11.671 0.650 5-10 39.346 1..052 29.116 0.650 21.660 0.650 11..373 0.650 5-9 35,204 1.019 28.205 0.650 20.982 0.650 11.018 0.650 5-8 31.063 1.000 27.689 0.650 20.590 0.650 10.816 0.650 5-1 26.921 1.000 27.689 0.650 20.598 O.GSO 10.816 0.650 5-6 22.779 1.003 27,609 0.650 20.598 0.650 10,816 0.650 5-5 18.638 1.000 2.7,689 0.650 20.598 0.650 10.616 0,650 5-4 14.496 1.000 2'7,689 0.650 20.598 0.650 10.816 0.650 5-3 10.354 1.000 27.689 0.650 20.598 0.650 10.816 0.650 5-2 6.213 1.000 27.689 0.650 20.598 0.650 10.81G 0.650 5-1 2.071 I.000 27.601 O.E50 20.598 O.G50 10 816 0.650 ROHN Industries, iric. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer: jon_g Page: 6 customer: i4ASNTNGTON GAS & ELECTRIC CO14N 01/10/2003 Site: 11:27 AM Type: POLE-TPR Pole: 'Capered Steel MOMENTS, FORCES AND DEFLECTIONS Moment Shear _Gperational _ Axial My Node (kips) (ft-k) 56 -Elev. 180.000 0.035 0.00 55 178.900 0.138 0.04 54 177.600 0.186 0.17 53 176.400 1..140 0,43 52 175,200 1.668 2..37 51 174.000 1.766 5.21 50 172.800 1.865 8,14 '19 171.600 i.967 11.i7 48 170.400 2.081 3.4.30 47 169.200 2.244 17.54 46 168.000 3.276 20.87 45 164.167 4.485 35.82 44 159.750 5,125 0.00 43 155.333 6,674 0.00 42 150.917 7.142 0.00 41 146.500 7.621 0.00 40 142.083 6.74i 3.03 39 137.667 9.804 237.68 38 133.250 10.306 290.49 37 128.633 10.799 344.85 36 124.417 11..286 400,91 35 1,20.000 11.286 400.81 34 116,942 12.512 501.62 33 113.683 12.971 545.66 32 110.025 13.436 590.48 31 107,767 13.905 636.11 30 104.708 14.378 682.53 2.9 1.01.650 14.559 729,'75 28 98.592 15.315 777,80 27 95.533 15.834 826.GG 26 92.475 16.328 076.33 25 89.417 17.055 926.83 24 86,563 18.008 974.34 24 86.583 18.008 974.34 23 83.750 18.848 1022.56 22 80.175 1.9.576 1084.42 21 76.600 20.314 1147.40 2.0 73.025 21.061 1211.51 19 69.450 21.818 1276.73 18 65.875 22.581 1343.08 17 62.300 23.353 1410.56 iG 56.725 21.136 1 79.16 15 55.150 24.926 1548.07 14 f 51.515 26.398 1619,70 13 48.000 28.025 1695.62 12 44.708 29.415 1769.90 12 14.708 29,415 1769.90 11 41.437 30,595 1844.90 10 37.275 31.565 1940.57 9 33.133 32.547 2037.64 8 28.992 33.540 2136.11 1 24.650 34.546 2235.97 6 20.708 35.564 2337.26 5 16.567 36.593 2439.99 4 12.425 37.634 2544.19 3 8.283 30.686 2649.86 2 4.142 39.750 2757.04 1, 0.000 39.750 2865.74 74a vy - Vz Torsion Deflection -moist Sway (ft-k) (kip:) (kips) (it-k) _(in) {deg) (@�) 0.00 0.02 _ 0.03 0,000 36.947 0.041 1.683 % 0.02 0,05 0.08 0.000 36.524 0.041 1.683 0.10 0.10 0.16 0,000 36.101 0.041 1.683 1.G1 0.00 1.53 1.560 35.G78 0.041 1.683 1.51 0.00 2.24 2.341 35.255 0.04.1 1.G83 i.51 0.00 2.32 2.341 34.832 0.041 1.682 1151 0.00 2.39 2.3el 34.409 0.040 1.681 i.51 0.00 2.4,' 2.341 33.9911 0.040 l.680 1.51 0.00 2.54 2.341 33.565 0,040 1.679 1.51 0.00 2.62 2.341 33.143 0.040 1.670 2..27 0.00 3.66 3.497 32.72.1 0,039 1.676 3.10 0.00 4.89 -1.759 31.377 0.038 1.67). 62.21 5.46 0.00 0.000 29.836 0.017 1.658 89.39 7.31 0.00 0.000 28.310 0.035 1.640 123.80 7.62 0.00 0,000 2.6.802 0.034 1.617 159.69 7.93 0.00 0.000 25.318 0,032 1.589 157.9L `.'.f9 :. 0'9 0.000 23 p61 O.n30 1,997 6.52 0.00 11.31 11.322 22.436 0.028 1.520 6.52 0.00 11.65 11.322 21.048 0.026 1.478 6.52 0.00 12.00 11.322 19.700 0.024 1,432 6.52 0.00 12.36 11.322 3.8.398 0.022 1.381 6.52 0.00 12.36 11,322 17.144 0.020 1,327 7.00 0.00 13.69 12.602 16.302 0.019 1.297 7.00 0.00 13.94 12.602 15.481 0.018 1.266 7.00 0.00 14.20 12,602 14.679 0.017 1.234 7,nn 0_00 14,a5 12.602 13.898 0.016 1.201 7.00 0.00 14.71 12.G02 13.139 0,015 1.167 7.00 0.00 14,90 12.602 12.402 0.015 1.133 7.00 0.00 15.24 12.GO2 11.687 0.014 1.097 7.00 0.00 15.51 12.GO2 10,995 0.013 1.061 7.00 0.00 1.5.79 12.602 10.327 0.013 1.024 7.00 0.00 1G.03 12.602 9.682 0.012 0.987 7.00 0.00 16.26 12.602 9.102. 0.011 0.966 J.00 0.00 1.C,.2'u 12.GO2 9.102 0,03.1 0.966 7.00 0.00 16.53 12.602 8.534 0.011 0.945 7.00 0.00 16.05 12.602 7.840 0.010 0.907 7.00 0.00 17.17 12,902 7.174 0.010 0.869 7.00 0.00 17.49 12.602 6.536 0.009 0.830 7,00 0.00 17.82 12.602 5.930 0,009 0,791 7.00 0.00 i8.1.1 12.602 5.352 0.008 0.752 7.00 0.00 18.47 12.602 4.803 0.008 0.712 7.00 0.00 1P 80 12.602 4.285 0.007 0.672 7.00 0.00 i9,14 12.602 3.796 0.007 0.632 8.43 0.00 20.62 15.093 3.337 0,006 0.592 9.56 0.00 21.04 17.055 2.908 0.006 0.552 9.56 0.00 22.12 17.055 2.535 0.005 0.526 9.56 0.00 22.12 11.055 2.535 0.005 0.526 9.56 0.00 22.45 17.055 2.181 0.005 0.500 9.5.5 0.00 22.84 17.055 1.768 0.004 0.451 9.56 0.00 23.23 17.055 1.398 0.004 0.401 9.56 0.00 23.63 17.055 1.071 0.003 0.351 9.56 0.00 24.03 17.055 0.787 0.003 0.303, 9.56 0.00 24.45 '17.055 0.547 0.002 0.251 9.56 0.00 24.87 17.055 0,351 0.002 0.200 9.5G 0.00 2.5.30 17.055 0.198 0.001 0.150 9.56 0.00 2s.75 17.055 0.089 0.001 0.100 9.56 0.00 26.20 17,055 0.023 0.000 0.050 9.56 0.00 26.20 17.055 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 • R(. HN Industries, Ine. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design; 2 Engineer; jon_g Customer: 47A9FIINGTO14 OAS & ELECTRIC COMM, Site: Type: POLE-TPR Pole: 'Papered Steel ACTUAL A140 ALLO'NABLE STRESSES Actual Stresses Allowable Acktirl j Axial _ Rending Shear Torsion Combined Stress Allowable Elevation (fa) (fb] (fv) (fr) (Prot) (Fb) (Ftot/Fb) Node Ift) (kai) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (k_]i) _(ksi) Ratio J 56 180.000 0.002 0.060 0.005 0.000 0.008 52.,000 0,0002 55 178.B00 0.008 0,00.1 0.012 0.000 0.024 52,000 0.0005 54 177.600 0.011 0.020 0.023 0.000 0.051 52.000 0.0010 53 176.400 0.069 0.046 0.183 0.082 0.472 52.000 0.0091 52. 1,75.200 0.100 0.245 0.265 0.121 0.751 52.000 0.01,44 51. 174.000 0.105 0.5^,3 0.2'72 0.119 0.92G 52.000 0.0178 50 172.800 0.110 0.813 0.278 0.117 1.149 51.970 0.0221 49 171.600 0.115 1.099 0.285 0.115 1.397 51,795 0.0270 40 170.400 0.120 1.384 0,291 0.113 i.660 51.612 0.0322 47 169.200 0.129 1.671 0.297 0.111 1.934 51.429 0.0376 96p 168.000 0.3.87 1.957 0.413 0.1.64 2.365 S1.246 0.0461 461 168.000 0.190 2.02.7 0.420 0.169 2.440 51.649 0.0472 45 164.167 0.254 3.307 0.547 0.219 3.800 51..064 0,0744 44 15'3.750 0.282 5,347 0.000 0.000 5.629 50 390 0.111.7 43 155.333 0.357 7.273 0.000 0.000 7.631 49.715 0.1535 42 3,50.917 0.372 9,550 0.000 0.000 9.922 49.0,10 0.2023 41 3.46.500 0.387 11.694 0.000 0.000 12.081 48.365 0.2498 40 142.083 0.433 13.782 0.000 0.000 14.214 47.691 0,29B1. 39 137.667 0.473 15.993 1.081 0,380 16.659 47.016 0.3543 38 3.33.250 0.486 18.626 1.087 0.362 19.276 46.341 0.4160 37 128.833 0.497 21.095 1.094 0.345 21.736 45.666 0.4760 36 124.417 0.508 2.3.41,6 1.101 0.330 24.OS2 44.991 0.5346 35F 120.000 0.49'7 25.E01 1.076 0 115 26.209 44.317 0.5914 35F 1,20.000 0.399 19.296 0.880 0,265 19.794 51.564 0.3839 34 1.16.942 0.407 20.480 0.882 0.257 20.980 51.214 0.4097 33 113,883 0,41G 21.616 0.88S 0.249 22.119 50.663 0,4349 32 110,825 0.425 22.706 0.888 0.242 23.214 54.513 0.45S5' 31 107.767 0.433 23.755 0.891 0.235 24.266 50.162 0.483E 30 104.706 0.441 24.763 0.894 0.228 25.280 49,812 0,5075 29 101.650 0.450 25.734 0897 0.222 26.256 49.461 0.5308 28 98.'S92 0.450 26,670 0.900 0.216 27.196 49.1.11 0.5538 27 95.533 0.466 27,571 0.904 0.7.10 28.104 48.760 0.5'764 26 92.475 0.474 28.442 0,907 0.204 28,980 48.409 0.5986 25 89.417 0.489 29.282 0.909 0.199 29,832 48.059 0.6207 240 86.583 0.510 30.034 0.911 0.194 30.604 47.7734 0.6411. 251 89.417 0.397 24,211 0.739 0.164 24.658 52.000 0.4742 24 86.SB3 0.414 24.923 D.740 0.160 25.285 52.000 0.4863 23 83.750 0.428 25.415 0.743 0.1.56 25.891 52.000 0.4979 22 80.175 0.438 26.137 0.746 0.151 26.620 52,000 0.5119 2.1 76.600 0.448 26.830 0.749 0.147 27.322 52,000 0.5254 20 73.025 0.4.57 27.496 0.751 0.1,13 27.996 51.904 0.5394 19 69.450 0.467 28.137 0.754 0.139 28.646 51.577 0.5554 18 65.875 0.476 2B.754 0.757 0.1.35 29.271 51.249 0.5712 17 62.300 0.486 29.343 0,764 0.i31 29.874 50.921 C.5967 16 58.725 0.49S 29.922 0.763 0.1.27 30.456 50.593 0.6020 15 55.150 0.501 30.475 0.766 0.124 31,017 50.266 0.6171 14 51.575 0.527 31.007 0,814 0.144 31.578 49,938 O.G323 13 48.000 0.551 31.600 0.850 0.159 32.198 49.610 0.6490 120 44.708 0.572 32.100 0,851 0.155 32.798 49.309 0.6652 131 40.000 0.560 32.546 0.863 0,163 33,153 49.968 0.6635 12 4.1.708 0.580 33.132 0.863 0.159 33.759 49.666 0.6797 11 41.417 0.596 33.696 0,366 0.i55 34.338 43.365 0.€955 10 37.275 0.606 34.378 0.867 O.1S1 35.028 48.985 0.7151 9 33.133 0.615 35.028 0.869 0.146 35.686 48.605 0.7342 8 28.992 0.625 35.648 0.871 0,142 36.315 49.226 0.7530 7 24.850 0 414 36.241 0.873 0.1-38 36.917 47,846 0.7716 Page: 7 01!10/2003 11:27 AM 0 • ROI IN Industries, Inc. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer.: jon_g Page: 8 Cuatcxner : 6iAS11INGTON GAS i. ELECTRIC CCXdty 01/10/2003 Site: 11:27 AM Type: POLE-TPR Pole: Tapered Steel Stresses Allowable Actual / i�xi.al _Actual Rending Shear Torsion Combined Stress Allowable Elevation (fa) ffbi (iv) (rt) (Plot) (Fb) (Ftot/Pb) Node (ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) M_ (ksi) _ (ksi) _ _Ratio 6 20.708 0.644 35.808 0.875 0.134 37.493 47.466 0.7899 16.567 0.653 37.351 0.870 0.130 30.044 47.087 0.8080 4 3.2..425 0.662 37.872 0.861 0.127 38.S"13 46.107 0.8259 3 8.283 0.6'11 38.371 0.864 0.123 39.062 46.327 0.6436 7. 4.1.42 0.680 38.852 0.888 0.120 39.S71 45.948 0.8612 1 0.000 0.671 39.314 0.876 0.117 40.022 45.568 0.8783 i2OHN Industries, Inc. File: 53780 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 2 Engineer: jon_9 Page: 10 Customer: WASHUMT'ON GAS & FLECTRIC COMM 01/10/2003 Site: 11:27 A14 Type: POLU-TPR Pole: Tapered Steel i— S U I4 M A R Y O F B A S 9 P L A T E D E S I G N - P L A T G ----� A N C H O R B O L T S Pole Diameter at Base = 60.00 in. / Size = 1.50 in. X 74 in. Long Plate Diameter = 68.75 in. Grade = P1554 Gr. 105 / Plate Thickness = 2.00 in. i Plate 49eight Mlack) - 811.26 lbs No. Of Bolts = 20 .� Fy . 6o.0o ksi / '+ Bolt Circle = 64.750 in. / J.Fu y - . 75.00 ksi _ Fy _ = 105.00 ksi t1AXII4UM POLR REACTIONS: Axial = 48.13 kips A;oment = 2,875.29 ft-kips Shear. - 26.38 ki.po Torsion = 17.05 ft-kips ANCHOR BOV S: Axial - 8G.1 kips/bolt kxial Capacity = 148.0 kips/bolt Moment = 7.6 ft-kips/bolt Voment Capacity = 42.1 ft-kips/bolt Shear - 1.6 kips/bolt Shear Capacity = 111.0 kips/bolt ANCHOR BOLT STRESS RATIO - 0.897 < 1.0 OK a PLATE: Bolt Group Tension Capacity - 2,664.9 kips Plate Tension Capacity = 8,386.2 kips Plate Shear Capacity = 1-2,783.1 kips PLATE STRESS 'RATIO = 0.318 < 1.0 OK ✓ MAT FOUNDATION - v2 File No: 53780AC C4: 3 Client: IJashington Gas Electronic Cormninications Twriypo: POLF. TPR 180.0 Ft Site : Winchester, 'da. 14AT FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS - v2 Compression/Leg 0.00 Kips UI t Strength Concrete: 3.00 KSI i Tension/Leg 0.00 Kips Unit Weight Concrete 0.25 KCF / Total Tower Shear• 26.40 Kips / Yield Strength Rebar 60.00 KSI / Tote( Toter Height: 48.in eips / Max Soil Pressure 3.00 KSF / OverTurning Moment: 2967.70 FtKips Minimum Factor/Safety: 1,50 Tower Face Width 0.00 Feet Load Factor 1.30 1 Tower Offset 0.00 Inches Total Frd Thickness i.U() Feet AncBolt Diameter 1.50 Inches / AncBolt Per Leg 2.0 i EA Dimension 48.00 Inches AncBolt Length 74,00 Inches F EB Dimension 48.00 incites AnrBolt Circ Diam 64.75 Inches Mim mien Pocket Diam 0.00 inches AncBott Projection: 7.50 inches Final Hid Width 24.50 Feet MA1' FOUNDATION DESIGN RESULTS Total OTM at Base : 3046.90 Ft -Kips Act. Safety Factor for 0TM 2.00 Min. Safety Factor 1.50 / Act. Soil Pres/Diagonal Axis: 2.93 KSF Altowabte Soil Pressure 3.00 KSF Beam Shear Capacity 27.01 KipsfFt Actual Beam Shear 11.15 Kips/Ft Punching Shear Stress 0.19 KSI Punching Shear Capacity 0.19 KSi Moment with Load Factor 88.52 FK/F Structural Backfilt no FINAL MAT DIMENSIONS 24.50 FT SQUARE BY 3.00 FT THICK 1-1 Total Volrnne of Concrete j�T,4, cubic yards. Area of Steel Required 0.64 sq-in/foot Iwth Trays, top and bottom. Use 30 #9 re; ar on 9.72 inch centers, both ways, _oy) & hnttom Designed By: JPG Date: 01}/20103 Checked By: Date:/ t SHAFT REINFORCING PROGRAM VER. 91.4 DESIGNED BY: JPG ENG. FILE NO.: 53780AE DATE: 01/20/03 CUSTOMER: Ilashington Gas Etectronic Communications INPUT DATA C = 48.10 Kips / Vc = 26.40 Kips Mc = 2967.70 Ft-K T = .00 Kips Vt 26.40 Kips Mt = 2967.70 Ft-K Fy = 60.00 Ksi Fyt == 60.00 Ksi L.F. == 1.30 Ii = 96.00 In. Ds = 84.00 in. Frc = 3.00 Ksi U = 1.00 Irs = 1 / *** SHAFT CROSS SECTION IS ROUND *�* SU?IPARY Of ANALYSIS Minimum area of steel req'd. = '36.19 scl.in. l (Rhomin = .0050) Maximum steel area Limit = 579.06 sq.in. (Rhomax = .0800) CIRCULAR TIE DATA Vu <.85*Vc/2, shear reinforcement is not required. Use Irtaxinum; tie spacing specified in A.C.I. 318-83, j Section 7.10.5 for compression reinforcement. DEVELOPMENT LENGTII MODIFIERS FOR TENSION AND COMPRESSION BAR DEVELOPMENT DLMT = MODIFIER FOR TENSION DEVELOPMENT = .667 DLMC MODIFIER FOR COMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT .299 REQUIRED Lcl = MODIFIER * BASIC Ld * ACI 318 MODIFIERS (1?. in. min.) Limn Koerner— 5-10-335-0030 Site Acquisition and Project Development July 2, 2008 Mr. Mark Cheran Zoning and Subdivision Administrator Frederick County 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for Washington Gas-Kernstown, Tax Parcel 63 ((2)) B Dear Mr. Cheran: Please accept this letter as a checklist for the specific requirements detailed in sec. 165-48.6 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. The information to follow, and the packet of exhibits attached to this letter, should effectively address each requirement. Specific Requirements: A description of compliance with sec. 165-48.6 (A) 1. A map depicting the search area: A letter from Washington Gas outlining the company's communication system requirements. Because this proposal is not for a "typical" commercial telecommunications facility, this letter is being provided in place of a search area map. 2. Identification of all structures in the search area: This location does not have a search area per say (see 1 above). The company is seeking to meet the every changing needs of their communication system by raising the existing structure 60 feet. This tower extension would be done under the conditions of approval from Conditional Use Permit 11-02 which was approved Oct 16, 02. 3. FCC Compliance: Please find included a copy of the FCC license for Washington Gas and Light Company. Should you have questions, or require additional information, please contact me at 540-335-0030. Sincerely yours, Lyim Koerner Site Acquisition and Project Development f Document Approval Form JUL 9 2008 PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice �Mk Dana Eric Mike John Amber 01 i 04" &1 Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): (qsD 0 U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd • 1 METWOKK DEVELO►MENT Lynn Koerner Site Acquisition/Project Development Consultant 3126 South Ox Road Phone: 540-335-0030 Edinburg, VA 22824 EMail: LynnK@shentel.net