Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01 Blake & Rebecca Watts - Gainesboro - BackfileBOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Variance Request Tracking Sheet Date: 3-2'Ol File opened Reference Manual updated/number assigned D-base updated L_ 1 g� V/ location maps requested from GIS Two sets of labels requested from Data Processing �3 D File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary 9'4-� MEETING DATE: 4_ f 7_ o I FINAL ACTION: APPROVED CLOSE OUT FILE: �( Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" ✓ Reference Manual updated _ D-base updated 41) 4• 0/ File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary 0 U:\C=ACommon\7'RACKING.BZA Revised 11/2/98 CASH RECEIPTDat�.�— i I 002153 -. aReceived From Addres -- f'' 1.�.t AMT. OF ACCOUNT S - CASH ti� BY AMT PAID CHECII. BALANCE DUE - MONEY ORDER MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department C:'OUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5,1€1/ 665-5651 FAX. 540/ 665-6395 FROM: Karen A. Cain, Receptionist/Office Assistant II � SUBJECT: Return Qf Sign Deposit DATE: April 20, 2001 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in -line item #1-0=911=08 for the person named below as a deposit for a sign for Variance Application #04-01, They have now returned the sign and are therefore entitled to the return of their deposit. You may pay this through the regular biffi cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: Mr. Blake Watts '605 -Glendobbin Road Winchester, VA 22603 RSA/kac ,. A U--TKir4-n\l(arens' stuffiCommon\SfGNRTRN.LST)STGNDEP.PER r W May 9, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Blake Watts 605 Glendobbin Road Winchester, VA 22603 r FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 * * * CORRECTION * * * RE: VARIANCE APPLICATION #04-01 OF BLAKE AND REBECCA WATTS; P.I.N. 43-13-1-3 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Watts: This letter replaces the approval letter dated April 20, 2001 which erroneously listed the variance as being approved for 30 feet. This will not affect your building permit which was issued properly reflecting a 24-foot setback variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals approved your application for a 24-foot rear yard variance for an addition to a single-family residence at their meeting on April 17, 2001. If you have any questions, please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, Y Patrick T. Davenport Zoning Administrator PTD/ch cc: Frederick Co. Inspections Department A:\WATTS2appr. pd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 V,T FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 April 20, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Blake Watts / 605 Glendobbin Road Winchester, VA 22603 RE: VARIANCE APPLICATION #04-01 OF BLAKE ND E A WATTS; P.I.N. 43-13-1-3 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Watts:0 This letter is to confirm action take by the derick County Board of Zoning Appeals at their meeting on April 17, 2001. The Board of Zoning Apppr ved our application for a 30-foot rear yard variance for an addition to a single-familyffs�idnce. j If you have any questions regkrd)ng the Wproval of this application, please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, Patrick T. Davenport Zoning Administrator PTD/ch cc: Frederick Co. Inspections Department A:\WATTS_eppr. pd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 BZA REVIEW DATE: 04/17/01 VARIANCE #04-01 BLAKE AND REBECCA WATTS LOCATION: This property is located at 605 Glendobbin Road. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 43-13-1-3 PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land use - Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land use - Residential and Orchard VARIANCE: Request for a 30-foot rear yard variance for an addition to a single-family residence REASON FOR VARIANCE: The applicant states, "A planned home addition would not comply with a zoning ordinance requiring a 200-foot setback from the property line of an orchard. It would extend to a point 176 feet from the line." STAFF COMMENTS: The subject property is formally known as Lot 3, Section 1 of Glendobbin Hills and contains approximately five acres in area. The subject property is adjoined by an orchard to the north (rear) and by residences to the other adjoining sides. Within the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District, the minimum rear yard setback is determined by the adjoining use. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies a 200-foot setback when the adjoining use is an orchard. The applicant has prepared architectural and building plans for an addition to the main residence indicating that the proposed addition will extend to within 176 feet from the adjoining orchard property. The applicant is requesting a 30-foot rear yard variance to accommodate the proposed addition. The property is not affected by any extraordinary conditions or features that would preclude conformance with all applicable setback standards. The adjoining orchard contains an area ofnatural • E Blake and Rebecca Watts Page 2 April 6, 2001 growth woods on rocky terrain along the property line and lies between the planted fruit trees and the applicant's property as indicated by the sketch provided. The width of the relatively narrow wooded area ranges from approximately 20 feet to several hundred feet at its widest points. This wooded area did not justify a change in the determination of the adjoining use because the wooded area is not wide enough to be considered an agricultural (forested) use with a 100-foot setback. The vegetation pattern led the applicant to believe that a lesser setback would be applicable and the plans were drawn to reflect that observation and interpretation of adjoining use. According to the enclosed letter from the adjoining orchard owner, the area is not suitable for planting fruit trees and has indicated that no fruit trees will ever be planted there in the foreseeable future. STAFF CONCLUSION: The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2309(2), states that no variance shall be authorized by the board unless it finds that a) strict application of the Ordinance would produce an undue hardship approaching confiscation; b) that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity, and; c) that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. Staff is of the opinion that the submitted variance does not meet the requirements set forth by the Code of Virginia. The hardship endured by the applicant arises from an oversight of the related ordinance. The inability to create an addition to an existing home does not constitute an undue hardship. However, it should be noted that the adjoining property owners`have no objections with the applicant's request for the variance and the proposed addition will remain over 200 feet from any planted fruit trees. CACaroIShare\W atts_VAR.wpd < i 42 A 356 43 114 1 43 ""' 1 FRUIT HILL ORCHARD FRUIT HILL ORCHARD ., 43 123 16 FRUIT HILL ORCHARD] 1" 1 '. KUCHYT WATTS 43 173 4 43 131 3- /, •., SALMON 43 131 2 -- RUS SHADE V A L-17� # 04 _ 01 1� jj- 131 43 131 4 VOSTRI KOV 43 131 5 43 131 6 Location Map For: Watts, Blake & Rebecca a CURTIS 43 A 17E PIN: l� RUTHERFORD 43-13-1-3 43 14 1 ■ Office of Mapping and GIS, 04/01, Agray • E Page I of s APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA MUST BE TYPED OR FILLED OUT IN INK - PLEASE PRINT 1. The applicant is the owner other (Check one) 2. APPLICANT: NAME : B CE H . � I bo" C !VAT1-5 ADDRESS 6M Qe►i (o,4,o R4 Wi Kchc92k,�. VA 1,4D 3 TELEPHONE: 5�0 •-665 -V72- OCCUPANT: (if different) NAME: S titC ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 3. The property is located at (give exact directions and include State Route numbers): �zYrh Rfe 52-2- rior�h c �r��c��Fsf '' . fa�� a rl�htoi Rfe 73q 64PA9 Fa AAL, V i ott Ji_ mes G)oo4 ff;S/A 9c6,00/. Go 1.7 M;IeS xtl 4 ., �A& hatt c11 �fe �73 (�%r1�ob���1 /mot CD-exetly R 4 farts" {'!06(S C I S Cyt LF 6 c 5 C�!�laG�O �j �j► h /�G� . 4. The property has a road frontage of -3/6Y feet and a depth of 3q,&'L feet and consists of If-, qq 7 acres. (please be exact) 5. The property is owned by pool% H- A,p ffi avf4 &ecc i A14t as evidenced by deed from Ra 4h B. a*d ze/ A . drn o. recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. I%7q on page 08'2-7 of the deed books of the Clerk of the Court for Frederick County. Attach a copy of the deed. Page 2 of 5 RECEIVED 6. Magisterial District: MAR 3 200 7. 14-Digit Property Identification No.: 13 f 3DEPT.OFPLANNINGIDEVELOPMENT 8. The existing zoning of the . property is: iQS deatti % RA 9 The existing use of the property is: reSiWemf!q l 10. Adjoining Property: USEZONING North ©re-hq/ a( RA East f p-Sr` N.1 r4 RA South I e-{r det, toy RA West re-s"de-utta/ IV S, am*;q RA 11. Describe the variance sought -in -terms of distance and type. (For example: "A 3.5' rear yard variance for an attached two car garage.") 'CJ'.r"r ygre( ViVr"Ce- - 0r qn q'fftc-lte� 6111e- 6?W it,6lII , 12. List specific reason(.$)..why the variance is being sought in terms of: exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of property, or exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of property, or the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto 46f071 WOaId /10f Grmply XiYlt o14ol y ovd iyatice 1,:ect1f74g -00 �t aGk-&,m 7Zte fv �Lf 11Gle Of at, ®m6a4-4. if f 176 P. #o-,,, le- bile 13. Additional comments, if any p6se see_ af�-W4 15kee-t- page 3 of 5 14. The following names and addresses are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to the property for which the variance is being sought, including properties at the sides, rear and in front of (across street from) the subject property. (Use additional pages if necessary.) These people will be notifd by mail of this application: , NAME Sa lm on ..OrR h e. (. IWO( RON41d Address 66 � G- 0-0AU Ir Rct PropertyID# Lt-3 l 04 NAMER1uSSe(r, Imes Rodbe-etagGl�eepR, Address 5f5' C-,1eI4WOUt" A�{ Wflgcke te� V4 U160 3 Property ID# �f.� 13 � NAME Shade 9 Ckt-d -� Property ID# If3 f ' 3 6 Address 121 Quake- L11 wtickestze& IIA 7-Z-603 NAME FWf /4► (1 ©,- ( A G Address PO. 9OX 2�6� Property ID# �-Z 356 Z l6 NAME hla (fPW hl. Property ID#3 NAMERkA eP-(ra(, ClWtO-t L - Property ID# lf.3 / q / NAME CU1-tS, /Vf/(r'6(17(a,��lY Property ID# �-3 A 1 %C NAME Property ID# NAME Property ID# NAME Property ID# Address 2� 61e,"Ahl i ig Ln AliC�eSfr 144 27-663 Address 190. FQ 16 1 (Gei MrdS7eiA1II1 /I (/ 3-i2-0 Address 361 F 214114 RW - Ole, �'(a►�rs� U Zol i Address Address Address Page 5 of 5 AGREEMENT VARIANCE #—,%-/-T 0 1_ I '(we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application, and petition the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to grant a variance to the terms of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance as described herein. I agree to comply with any conditions for the variance required by -the BZA. I authorize the members of the BZA and Frederick County officials to go upon the property for site inspection purposes. I understand -that the..sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at,least seven (7) days prior to the BZA public hearing and -maintained so as to be visible from the road or right-of-way until the hearing. I hereby certify that all of the statements and information contained herein are, to the best of my knowledge, true. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT w (c �Jdb) DATE 3 - � k . o i SIGNATURE OF OWNER (if other than applicant) S'tmcr -OFFICE USE ONLY- DATE BZA PUBLIC HEARING OF Lr �') � 0 I ACTION: - DATE - APPROVAL SIGNED: B A CHAIRMAN DENIAL DATE: WATTS VARIANCE PACKAGE 13. Additional comments We feel that the variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1) While not in strict compliance with the zoning ordinance requiring a 200-foot setback from orchard property, our planned house addition does comply with the spirit of the regulation. From the property line directly behind our house, the closest apple trees are located at least 400 feet back from that line. In fact, it would be very unlikely that apple trees would ever be planted much closer to the property line than that, due to the presence of a broad rocky ledge, as well as a mature wooded area (see enclosed letter from Diane Kearns of Fruit Hill Orchard). The 200-foot setback rule assumes possible use up to the property line, and implies that a 200-foot distance is safe. If that is the case, then the purpose of the statute is complied with. To strictly enforce the restriction would be undue hardship. 2) When we bought our house in 1992, it was with full intentions of eventually adding a sun porch to the back of the home. The covenants of our subdivision specified only that we couldn't build closer than 60 feet from the rear property line. Back then, no orchard trees were present directly behind the home, so that we were operating under a less stringent 100-foot (agricultural) setback. There was clearly room for expansion at that time. We originally conceived of plans for a larger house addition, similar to those finally drawn up by our architects, at least 5 years ago, at which time there were still no apple trees directly behind the property. It has taken several years for us to acquire the funds needed to start the addition, and the setback requirement has changed in the meantime. The orchards present currently were just planted about two years ago. 3) Unfortunately, during the planning stages for our addition, we were unfamiliar with the ordinance requiring a 200-foot setback from the property line of an orchard, as were our architects and builder. We all assumed that with so much land (5 acres) we would be able to add on to the house without any problems. Our plans are now finished, and we hoped to start building this spring. To redraw the plans from scratch would negate 15 months of work by our architects and would result in considerable additional expense and hardship to us, as well as a costly delay to our builder. Also, as you can see from the attached drawing, the only direction left to us to add on to our house is in the back, since we have a garage on one end of the house and a part of the addition already planned for the other end. Even if we decided to redraw our plans, we would probably be unable to satisfy the 200-foot setback rule since there is just 216 feet between the current structure and the rear property line. • 0 4) It seems inequitable that we would be unable to proceed with a house addition that would lie more than 400 feet from fruit trees, while just east of our home on Glendobbin Road and Payne Road there are several homes surrounded by orchards, with trees in some cases growing within 20 feet of the homes. Presumably these houses were built prior to the 200-foot ordinance, but if the purpose of the ordinance is to protect a homeowner's health, then our house addition would certainly be located a much safer distance from any orchard spraying than are these homes. C) Ooc* Z:3 tcq Or c FRUIT'INC, d P V 0 (D a CD - Co C� ' R oGK Rom LEp6E ,� L �'�6E M WA n s f Rofep-T � �Ldr 3 - EG G�NDog�►ni N11.Ls PL Atil a b ,4LblTtoN �Voop S 'F PREE11rS CT s► C pArNNj�b hDDrrroN r � HoMt t � t� �t r ell O 9 663 Glendobbin Road Winchester, VA 22603 March 11, 2001 To the Board of Zoning Appeals, Frederick County, VA: Our property adjoins that of Blake and Rebecca Watts, 605 Glendobbin Road. Please record that we have no objection to the variance necessary to build the planned addition to their house. Thank you, Ronald and Diane Salmon 0 595 Glenbobbin Road Winchester, Virginia 22603 March 17, 2001 Zoning Appeal Board of Frederick County, Virginia 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Sirs: We do not object to Dr.'s Blake and Becky Watts adding an addition to their now existing home at 605 Glendobbin Road, Winchester, Virginia 22603. Sincerely yours, Mrs. Colleen B. Russell J. Robert Russell r '0 220 Glendobbin Lane Winchester, Virginia 22603 March 14, 2001 To the Board of Zoning Appeals: This is to advise you that we are aware of Blake and Rebecca Watts' plans to build an addition to their home at 605 Glendobbin Road. As residents of the adjoining property, we have no objections to this construction and support their appeal to the Board. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Patricia F. Kuchyt • Ms. Diane Kearns Fruit Hill Orchard, Inc. P.O. Box 2368 Winchester, Va. 22604 March 21, 2001 Frederick County Board of 'Zoning Appeals Dear Sirs: This letter is a follow up of a visit to the home of Blake and Rebecca Watt at 6U5 Cilendobbin Road which adjoins Fruit Hill's property to the south. Currently Fruit Hill 'has the property behind - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - their home set in apple orchard but there remains between the orchard and the property line a strip of rocky woodland.. This strip is more than 40 ft wide directly behind their proposed addition but narrows to the west. Due to this strip and the lay of the land Fruit Hill does not foresee ever planting apple orchard any closer than it already is. Using Mr. Watts' rough sketch showing the proposed addition 176 ft from the property line and the at least 40 ft rough strip, I feel this project is in accordance with the desired 200 It set back requirements. Thank you very much for considering Fruit Hill's comments. We feel the 200 ft set back is of great benefit to all and therefore any variances from this need to known and addressed by all interested parties. I can be reached at (540) 667-3390 or the above address with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Diane Kearns Treasurer Fruit Hill Orchard, Inc. %/LL 0�Fy ACRES ARO / NC S�4 S6 52T DEtL 0, CT/ON J LOT 3 E 58 -04, 4.997 ACRES IRf AW I Z N 1 TWO STORY N o z BRICK & FRAME J IRF DWELLING #605 0> 145, 9' 6' / Lorsj /oTs ' S5rj4,. II IRF /Or I I Rol a -I O 3 N � N ~ � o N I� 90I I OI Z rs76 5 24'W FLOOD NOTE.- ZONE.- C COMMUNITY NO.: 510063 PANEL: 0105 B DA TE.• 07-17— 78 NOTES: 1. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. 2. PROPERTY IDEN77FICAT70N NO. 43-13-1-3. 3. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 4. IRF — IRON ROD FOUND 5. BOUNDARY INFORMA77ON SHOWN HEREON TAKEN FROM PLAT OF SURVEY DATED JUNE 11, 1992 MADE BY THOMAS A. SHOCKEY, L.S. 31.64 50' R fW g73 VA. SEC. NQOggIN ROAD GLE PLAT SHOWING GRAPHIC SCALE 200 100 0 200 LOCATION OF EXISTING DWELLING ON LOT 3 - SECTION I - GLENDOBSIN HILLS CAINESBORO MAGISTERAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE.• 22 MARCH 2O01 iSCALE. 1 "=200' I SHEET 1 OF 1 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.0 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 — EMAIL mlls®shentel.ne 1 INCH = 200 FEET A'!5'tTH OF f Douglas C. Legge No. 001197 4 1- ND suxv� DRAWN BY: HH DWG NAME: ID2633 Bx779pc0827 THIS DEED made and dated this 22nd day of June, 1992, by and between RALPH B. ORNDORFF and HAZEL M. ORNDORFF, his wife, parties of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantors, and BLAKE H. WATTS and REBECCA G. WATTS, his wife, parties of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantees. WITNESSETH: That for and in the consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00) Dollars, cash in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of whereof is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors do grant and convey, with General Warranty and English covenants of title, unto the Grantees, as tenants by the entirety in fee simple, with survivorship as at common law, together with all rights, rights of way, privileges, improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto belonging, all of the following realty: All of that certain lot or parcel of land, lying and being situate in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, lying on the North side of State Route 763 (otherwise known as Baker's Lane), and being more particularly described as Lot 3, Section I, as set forth on the plat of Glendobbin Hills - Section I, dated April 7, 1986 drawn -by Thomas A. Shockey, L.S., attached to that certain Deed of Dedication dated April 30, 1986, of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 616, at Page 261; and being the same property conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed dated June 30, 1986, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 620, at Page 161. Reference is here made to the aforesaid plat, deed of dedication, deed and the references contained therein for a further and more particular description of the property conveyed herein, 2nd tr �rkh y- ofE;Cr; 1✓rj A-N I, � eC �ha, Kit 5 }) This conveyance is made, however, subject to all legally enforceable restrictive covenants and easements of record affecting the aforesaid realty. SCULLY. TNROCKMORTON 6 GLASS IATTORNEYS AT LAW 70 SOUTH KENTSTRfET BK779Pcp82a WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (SEAL) HAZEL M. ORNDORFF STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/Cffd*TY OF JjL,1t,1 ktA;-tR_ , To -wit: I, a Notary Public in and I for the jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that RALPH B. ORNDORFF, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this day of �4 ..'L9.9�Z My commission expires L(,,( c.: NotAry Publie STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/eOUNT-f- OF �/1( (�(l�i (_ , To -wit: I, ,o a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that HAZEL M. ORNDORFF, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this Q day of / 1992. My commission expires Nq ary Public L_ `' ........•�/j N c` SCULLY, TNROCKMORTON d GLASS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 20 SOUTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 Rff/I"il�f)%�Z� N 0 It(D FRUIT HILL —.`'• s T40 56'.52" ORCHARD , 1111C 52 E o — 582.04' p M W LOT 3 — SEC. I SHED d0 W _ N-N GLENDOBBIN HILLS I o cn a) 4.997 AC. f i0 M POW. PED. 3 UNDERGROUND �,TEL. PED.IZ PdW .... O g fiEL--- �� o O �- Z u 2 STORY BRICK — 14�9�� O OO a GARAGE`,', Or WELL ti O N o N T4 56 " �, ►, 52 W_ = LOT - I 5 I _ o LOT LOT 4 I I 6 11 3, N 0 ;' _ (D 11 N F- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON I aD OJ W } V) JUNE 11, 1992, I MADE AN = ; o ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE PRE- MISES SHOWN HEREON AND THAT THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS VISIBLE ON THE GROUND OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON. NOT IN HUD 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE. M�. Y %0 ' 5k Rove NWUj W_ O too N (D11 011 Z II II 0 O'L The above plat is a survey of Lot 3 - Section 1 - Glendobbin Hills as recorded in Deed Book 616 - Page 267 and is the same Lot conveyed to Ralph B. Orndorff and Hazel M. Orndorff June 30, 1986 in Deed Book 620 - Page 161, less that portion con- veyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Deed Book 681 - Page 480. The said Lot fronts the Northern side of Route 673 and lies in Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia. Beginning at a point in the Property Line of Route 673 and corner to Lot 4, Thence with Lot 4 N 060 58' 20" E - 605.48' to an iron pin(found), said course passing thru an iron pin(set) at 20'; Thence with Lot 4 and Lot 5 N 740 56' 52" W - 551.74' to an iron pin(found) corner to Lot 6 and Lot 4 - Section 3; Thence with Lot 4 - Section 3 N 06° 58' 20" E - 346.62' to a post in the line of Fruit Hill Orchard, Inc.; Thence, therewith, _. so 56' 52" E - 582.04' to an iron pin(found) corner to Lot 2; Thence with Lot 2 S Me 58' 20" W - 937.77' to a point in the Property Line of Route 673, said course passing thru an iron pin(found) at 917.77'; Thence with Route 6?3 S 780 25' 24" W - 31.64, to the point of beginning. Containing - 4.997 Acres ��ALTN pf, Surveyed - June 11, 1992 THOMAS A. SHOCKEY HC 34, Box 3587 p A. H ..ram inchester, VA 22601 (UCENS I : 1271 i 1 ' IA of Q� ( Q ��•�� -. c:. 1 `'i � ., ts� , .,r, O 1 , i:, , � s�lr?O. qN0 SURVE'1C Application Process Evaluation We would like to learn how we might improve this process. Please complete this form and submit it to the Planning Department. You can submit it to us separately from the application if you wish. You may submit it anonymously. 1. Which type of application did you complete? Rezoning Site Plan Master Development Plan Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Variance —� 2. Which part, if any, of the application process did you find particularly difficult? (Check as many as you wish.) Completing the application form Tax verification Agency review comments Adjoiner identification information Other (Please specify) 3. Did you have a scussion with a staff member before submitting the application? YES V NO 4. Were you able to receive the assistance or information that you needed from the staff? YES ✓ NO 5. What portion of this process took the longest for you? Completing plans Completing the application Tax Verification Agency review comments Other (Please specify)_ 6. What do you think could have been done differently to make this process quicker? 7. Do you have any suggestions about what we could do to make this process work better? May 17, 1996 (K:\wp\cmn\bah_cr\apphc.rev) AA I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 April 3, 2001 PUBLIC Fls "(fi IG TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: VARIANCE APPLICATION #04-01 OF BLAKE AND REBECCA WATTS On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Tuesday, April 17, 2001, at 3:25 p.m., in the board room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This is a public hearing to consider Variance #04-01 of Blake and Rebecca Watts for a 30-foot rear yard setback variance to enable an addition to a single-family residence. This property is located at 605 Glendobbin Road and is identified with Property Identification Number 43-13-1-3 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this meeting. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library (temporary Apple Blossom Mall location) the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia. Sincerely, pav- Mco"104 Patrick T. Davenport Zoning Administrator PTD/ch AABZA Adjoiners\2001 Adj\Watts.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r" • • This is to ertify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick Coun Virginia: 43 -13. 1. 4- RUSSELL, JAMES ROBERT & COLLEEN B 595 GLENDOBBIN RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3336 43 -13. 1. 5- SHADE, RICHARD S. 121 QUAKER LN WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.3355 43 -12.3- 16- FRU1T HILL ORCHARD PO BOX 2368 WINCHESTER, VA. 22604.1568 43 -11.3- 4- KUCHYT, WALTER W 220 GLENDOBBIN LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3322 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK 43 -14- - 1- RUTHERFORD, CLIFTON L. PO BOX 101 GERRARDSTOWN, WV 25420.0101 43 - A- - 17-E CURTIS, WILLIAM BLAKELY 3618 ZULLA RD THE PLAINS, VA 20198.2146 43 -13- 1. 2- SALMON, DIANE G & RONALD 663 GLENDOBBIN RD WINCHESTER, VA 22603.3337 Blake H & Rebecca G. Watts 605 Glendobbin Road ` Winchester, VA 22603 Patrick T. Davenport, Zoning Administrator Frederick County Planning Department I, hi ) " if 1 C _U I ( , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Patrick T. Davenport, Zoning Administrator for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated q - , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this 3—d day of k6 1 , 0—w My commission expires on oZ�3 9, 'H'U TARY PUBLIC