The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-05 ApplicationVARIANCE APPLICATION #10 -05 HARRY AND RUTH NEWMAN Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals Prepared: May 6, 2005 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staffto provide information to the Board of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE: May 17, 2005 Action Pending APPROITPD LOCATION: 115 Maverick Court MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER(S): 76R -1 -3 -160 PROPERTY ZONING USE: Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) District Land Use: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING USE: North: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential East: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicants are requesting a five foot left side yard variance. REASON FOR VARIANCE: Existing basement steps extend into side yard setback Variance Request #10 -05, Harry and Ruth Newman May 6, 2005 Page 2 STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant was cited for violating the building setback requirements for the RP (Residential Performance); the side setback is five (5) feet over the required side setback line. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires building setbacks for the RP zoning district to be: Front 35'; Sides 10'; Rear 25'. The steps and wall on the left side of the dwelling are encroaching five (5) feet over the setback line. The permit holder was required to have two (2) survey reports. Section 165 -23 H (1) Frederick County Zoning Ordinance provides the survey location requirements for primary structures. It states that: "A surveyor licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia shall establish the location of any primary structure that is five feet or less from any minimum setback requirement Exhibit "A" is the building permit with the minimum setbacks written by the Zoning Administrator and a copy of the final subdivision plat with the setbacks. This was submitted with the building permit. Exhibit "B" is a copy of is a sealed survey setback report showing the left setback as 11.0 feet, where the proposed house will be located. Exhibit "C" is a copy of the final house location survey with plat that depicts the house location. The building setbacks on this survey show the left side as setback 11.1 feet. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE MAY 17, 2005 MEETING: The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2- 2309(2), states that no variance shall be authorized by the Board unless it finds that a) strict application of the Ordinance would produce an undue hardship; b) that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity; and, c) that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. The applicant should have constructed the dwelling within the proposed setbacks indicated on the recorded plat and building permit. Since the applicant did not situate the dwelling within the proposed setbacks, consistent with the information submitted with the recorded plat and building permit, the subject front setback violation and subsequent variance application resulted. The applicant's failure to accurately construct a dwelling according to the information submitted on the recorded plat and building permit does not constitute a hardship. Therefore, denial of this variance would be justified as the applicant has not met the requirements of Section 15.2 -2309 (2) of Code of Virginia. A21OD32JD' M BSlCl 891 0 cts O c N E CO 0 Z M i 0 0 m CO o L 1 N (a 6 5 a 2 O w 0 iThanty et Fredei.:J2 ?Eli Winto?ste LlEN nCENT: VS 22i7] Cli(NER' 3AEZ03: C:TF AliCESC 6:01T3607 NnNF/A7C322EFT: EAGLN ?LAC: iNDUSTRiES C.O. Box 1065 84-2 1866 Witti VA 22604 Canien Nstat4a, L6t 11“i. .Linn 3 ii.tnneater. VA 22604. PHONE: 6405620:157 FH011E: 548 682 008 P1 ACCDUNT: 4210? DC8CRIPTION OF 30N5'TF001TIN L0042103 TAN YAP NO 7 EF i 3 :60 30? i 50 FLOCE: STCTIO: 3 3L.134 4:0 ,482 HEALTH E3Y7l DESTE107: NUATNL ii.:5FT:CT: BO' 2 7103: 85 FLO8DFLa2N: LEFT: 2110 AKA: FNtienint(iwn2 LON: naei.tnnia3 Per[,:nitiance 0.F. TO S:TE: Ta'ae F22 i8 new ent..1.2a84 42 Estant(ts 7.2eiie a on Nawerink n.1:2 Ss nn 3L4 lefi 85E CEOPP: UFe Urcup "R" Reeideniia I CBE CODE: 0ingie 0NST.TFPE: ley. NAICRE/RX: Single Faity Ftweihus FLCG. SIZE 70X7I 4 FiTCE2ES BSMT 50 FE iiF 2870 TOTAL 4 RN 11 Type Censt Fcctin8 1 7::7(1f2r 324ring PT S(inke Net. NOTC GARAGE 23X24iCOVERED NOTE NCTE NOTE 305 VALUE: PEPMST FEE: E-nrcaarge 150,000.00 648.30 6.40 Applicant (810chiu'e) V 7 6 di Applicant (please print) ATTACHMENT "A" Bli:L07.7.16 PE R3! T iii27inO0MS lontidenlan Relliir FEAR FEnY 10X.17, Egreeta I iiereby aq:Hie in romply a!: nrnvlitionn 02 tna Virgiela 0 170(. TT' the Innitla Ordlnancea aa atiopla6 by Cinit80y of Frn0n: Hitt. CABO 1'1; 2 FANi iY 8WELL 3005 St.t,VEY 'STANDARDS RECUiRED? c 303A NAT.:C:4AL liiiiLDINO CODE 4 aiiMRC0 2 Rntaf Cynt_ it) DETAILEI! NIi's: PLAN REQUIRED? 0 NO INTiiAL tiCN8E3:: 9000823 2003 1i780: 6.301. :0AT:077 DATE: 3/2:/200.3 2133206833 0673- was-03 J873H 34i1/2007 03VE:2ND FRONT PORCH 31310 laeWr‘b HQUIRED NIGNATUHS Building Code Ot 3.0 '10 Adminielr DATE DATE CURVE 127 125 0 I!! 10' =Etna im moms nstraerat GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) Engineers Surveyors Founded In 1971 x7.96' 50 25' 6TRL 20 GE a 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 167 34179 SQ. FT: N N NN 159 SEE SHEET 6 F7NAL SUBDMSION PLAT CANTER ESTATES SECTION THREE, PHASE 1 SHAWNEE DISTRICT FREDERICK` COUNTY. VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" 60' 1 DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 GREENWAY;,I ENGINEERING 161 WINDY HILL LANE AINCH$9T8R,, VA. 22602 TEIEPHONE:;; ((540) 862 -4185 FAX: (640) 722 -6628 c r.greeowayeng.00m TM. WAKELAND 7MANO(R>LANDOIR D.B. 776, PG. 685 ZONE RP USE: AGM. 162 Lo 7 60 250:9 SQ`' FT [-A 1 1R.■10 S 4- 4 THOp DARREN S, FOLTZ No, 0o2257C tit X 0• �M 2291 SHEET 7 OF :Z S :EN AC SCT VA 22SR: FE: -RACKS FONT: EACK: KS (CISTJ RSA :N: RTCEIT: IFFT: AREA: E: CNTS FRTGE: DIRT:CT:DNS TO KITE 522 Lew r.:11 L: ATTACHMENT "B" NRTS2S/TtS3E: :2 :y 7.‘:11.AC A 2 P=:EHil FEE: STSVSYSS :NFORMAT MPR.Sniat /01-et-ISE S ATE 7 SC 51110 SAX EAT 7SE 1 I _SE FIESS Di STR :CC: KKANSE SlE TEE c'iTE Pr FRoNT: 59.2: EATS: 40.6 z SITS: k, Ion .sp,LTIT 0 )2 #12/4-44 140 1 4 r e 0 C- H.-BRUCE EDENS No. 000162-B .57 03 ,Jty cf i;ehb te: V=. EIRFCF,DONZ TO' FIFE: ATTACHMENT "C" ESCRiPTIGN OF CIRST=UCE7.ON PlUDOPE 11/4-1ar5u w LE-1`16-7 :57.9' 4 er. tC uS. DOUGLAS C. 1 No. 1197 4 19 NO su 00 t CL.WVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC LENGTH TANGENT CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING C1 273853" 144.00' 69.49' °a ∎,35.43' 68.B7 S 467544" E a4TE: 11/12/03 SCALE» SHEET 1 OF 1 Marsh Legge Land' Surveyors, P.L.C. LOT 161 EXISTING DWELLING X. 10' GAS LINE EASEMENT 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET WINCHE:R, VIRGINIA 22601 DRAWN BY: C.GREENSPAN PHONE (540) 667 -0468 es FAX (540) 667 -0469 r V EMAIL offoeGmarshandlegge.con DWG NAME: ID5288 -HLS LEGEND: TR TRANSFORMER 'FRB TELE. RISER BOX WM WATER METER DHF DRILL HOLE FOUND FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION BFE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION BRL BUILDING RESTRICTION UNE' X(708.0) EXISTING SPOT ELEV. LOT 126 \e Se iftp GRATE ELEV (703.81) FLOOD NOTE: ZONE: C COMMUNITY NO.: 510063 PANEL: 0200 B DATE: 07 -17 -78 LOT 159 1 NOTES: NO 1 TITLE REPORT FURNISHED 2.) PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. 76B -1 -3 -160" N 3.) EASEMENTS OTHER THAN SHOWN MAY EXIST. 4.) IRON RODS TO BE SET AT LOT CORNERS WH" FINAL LOT GRADING IS COMPLETE. 5.) THIS LOT IS SUBJECT TO A 15' UTIUTY EASEME AND AN 8' ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ALONG MAVERICK COURT. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON NOVEMBER 13, 2003 AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS OR VISIBLE EASEMENTS UNLESS SHOWN. NT HOUSE LOCATION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOT 160 SECTION THREE PHASE 1 CANTER ESTATES' i f 115 MAVERICK COURT SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA PP` R R CEP p/q N 40' 15' VIA Eft_ ASEMENT 80' SCALE rJ 1" 40' APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA APR 1 a5 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT MUST BE TYPED OR FILLED OUT IN INK PLEASE PRINT I The applicant is the owner 2. APPLICANT: NAME: ADDRESS //5 MAv1z CZ S/ p2fNs 6,2v,//4aa655 TELEPHONE: S i k v 2 9 /%g/ A4,4t M,AN i.� ea 01- sa a S 2h it EN cign other (Check one) OCCUPANT: (if different) NAME: gK J A �l c-J m 4 tv Page 5 of 9 ADDRESS: //4- M4vie;c a,, /E fl /LNs Cr VI aa ls5 TELEPHONE: l `-t) qa 7 3. The property is located at (give exact directions and include State Route numbers): �F CI Al 1- e d4e j s, 7,1- 7,1- t n 5 Er 0 j s ;d(�ucc s /0(ASE�/ o A) Lie. 1 %f n np 4. The property has a road frontage of 7/ feet and a depth of a 4 3 feet and consists of acres (please be exact). a 6, %g9ft 5. The property is owned by 24,7 -f as evidenced by deed from En 4A 2 :0 dg m recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. on page of the deed books of the Clerk of the Court for Frederick County. Please attach a copy of the recorded deed. n kar4Ed 6. Magisterial District: n w N ti 7. Property Identification No.: 2 -3-40 8. The existing zoning of the property is: sit 9. The existing use of the property is: E/P 10. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North /I,r5:1. :-2 ;g/ gP East South West 11. Describe the variance sought in terms of distance and type. (For example: "A 3.5' rear yard variance for an attached two -car garage. f} /7N o F� 1 /7 /144. d AS L 12. List specific reason(s) why the variance is being sought in terms of: exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of property, or exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of property, or the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto dC L= Ck F /f (7,1 Yee /IACKfly� "'r�SNkL'S- Page 6 of 9 f�cn f.44) Caro 7c,d- Karen S, S ti 1 1) j7 Address ii .u""rr cJ< c-e, S fohhn..5 C"fl VA L2.45 Property ID ovtes, Iii :tit& rc.1 D. Address 117- 44avor ;c.14 c -f. 6. r.-1 c.ti ✓k 2265'5' Property ID 7 is_ 1_ 346 1 LOU` kr LvFr t+ a; d L1ncFa Co Address 1123 3•., El 64. s ic'e[t rns cif. V 4 2Ze, Property ID 7 6 2 ci_ l -2- 1 Emir Lan G., 4 C c f1,� C`, Address C* S fc el, 5 C ;*5 VA 22 45 4 Property ID 7(B -2 x24, 4 ant I n Zeo Dew a A. Jcdt ,q, Address 11LI 341.,^;.2 c stc,,,,, „s Ce VA 2,1c s Property 7G 1 125 Be;, \-0 nit, 4- S 1 n n• L Address i 1G Ali °ive'-i ct 4- re r i, e.,5 c; -I- va 2_2. 6 5s- Property ID 7 &3 ..1._ 3 1 6 t Address Property ID Address Property ID NAME 13. Additional comments, if any: 4 4s 4 /1-141E1 Mchic 14. The following names and addresses are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to the property for which the variance is being sought, including properties at the sides, rear and in front of (across street from) the subject property. (Use additional pages if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: Page 7 of 9 15. Provide a sketch of the property (you may use this page or attach engineer's drawing). Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines and to the nearest structure(s) on adjoining properties. Please include any other exhibits, drawings or photographs with this application. CELT N4 (4 Page 8 of 9 AGREEMENT VARIANCE 10'05 (Number to be assigned by the Planning Dept.) I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application, and petition the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to grant a variance to the terms of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance as described herein. I agree to comply with any conditions for the variance required by the BZA. I authorize the members of the BZA and Frederick County officials to go upon the property for site inspection purposes. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) daysprior to the BZA public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road or right -of -way until the hearing. I hereby certify that all of the statements and information contained herein are, to the best of my knowledge, true. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE /I R 5 SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE BZA PUBLIC HEARING OF SA 7 1./ APPROVAL (if other than applicant) OFFICE USE ONLY- -DA SIGNS 4 6 4 U BZA C AIRMAN Page 9 of 9 ACTION: DENIAL DATE: s II 7 IOC"— Harry and Ruth Newman 115 Maverick Court Stephens City, VA 22655 March 31, 2005 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development ATTN: Board of Zoning Appeals 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 -5651 To Whom It May Concern: This application is a formal request for a "variance" from Frederick County to allow the existing basement steps at the above address to remain in their current location. This is an "extraordinary" situation that we and the County find ourselves in. Reference the Department of Planning and Development letter, dated February 28, 2005, RE: 115 Maverick Court; Property Identification Number (PIN): 76 -1 -3 -160 Zoning District: RP (Residential Performance). This letter notified us of the building code violation by the basement steps of our recently constructed and purchased new home extending into the County- required "side -yard setback We do not dispute the fact that the basement steps are in violation, now that this has been brought to our attention. Having now reviewed the code restrictions, the steps obviously do not meet the County requirements, however, it must be noted that the walls of the steps are an integral part of the basement structure of the house, as built originally. This is a newly constructed home we bought in November 2003. We have lived in this home since and have made no changes to the outside of the home since moving in, and it is very disconcerting to be notified of this violation at this time (some 15 months after purchase and required Frederick County inspections), knowing that Frederick County issued a building permit for the construction by Eagle Place Industries and also issued an occupancy permit, allowing us to close on the house and to occupy it. It must be noted that there was never a "complaint" from anyone regarding this issue, as the above referenced letter states. There was not even a concern expressed by a neighbor or anyone else in the neighborhood. The violation was noticed by the Department of Planning and Development on the Housing Location Topographic Survey (on file at the County Offices) while reviewing county documents while addressing a neighbors question regarding HIS property. The County has had this documentation on file since the Building Permit was issued (site survey, etc), and the House Location and Topographic Survey (attached) was filed with the deed. One would think that a proper review of this documentation along with proper inspections earlier would have revealed the violation 1 well before the occupancy certificate was issued in November 2003. This clearly was not done. Our neighbors most affected by this violation (the basement steps are on their side of the property), Karen and Gary Shipp, have indicated with their letter, attached, that they have no issues with the basement steps in their current location, nor the issuance of a "variance" allowing this. Obviously then, this requested "variance" would not be a detriment to this adjacent property, and it would rectify a serious County inspection mistake. The following facts justify the approval of this "variance The Building Permit #523 -2003) was issued by Frederick County on April 24, 2003 (a copy is attached along w/ County documentation). I can only assume that this action went through the proper process at the Department of Planning and Development, to include a Final Site Plan approval. There were also many on -site inspections (as one would expect) of the house during construction, as evidenced by documentation in your County office (a copy is attached). There was also a "Setback Report" filed with the County by Marsh and Legge Surveyors, dated 21 March 2003 (a copy is attached). The Final Certificate of Occupancy inspection by the County was accomplished on November 10, 2003 (a copy is attached). This allowed us to close on the property on November 18, 2003 and move in the next day. It is important to note that the walls for the basement steps that are in violation of code by being too close to the property line, are part of the "poured" basement itself. We did not add the steps to the house following the purchase. In this regard, the house is today, as we purchased it, as new, in November 2003. Please see the attached photographs of the outside basement steps for a visual understanding of the situation. One can clearly see that the step walls are part of the poured foundation. It was mentioned at one of our meetings with the Department of Planning and Development Office that the referenced "side yard setback" codes are there for a purpose, such as a fence put up by our neighbor could block our access to the basement steps. We understand the issues involved here, however, it should be pointed out that Article VII Use Restrictions and Covenants of Canter Estates Homeowners Association, Para 5, Page 15. (I will have a copy at the BZA hearing) clearly states that, "No fence or hedge shall be constructed or planted in the front, nor along the side of any residence As you can determine from the attached photos, no fence or hedge on the adjacent property would impact these basement steps if positioned appropriately and according to the community restrictions. If I am forced to correct the oversights by the builder, surveyor and Frederick County inspections, it would be very costly and certainly an undue hardship. An estimate is attached for $9,500. Note that the steps can not be simply "turned" toward the back of the house to be in compliance. First, there does not appear to be sufficient room (between the house and the property line) to do that, and secondly, the gas line to the house would be 2 in the way. The basement steps would have to be moved to another location, thereby requiring another entrance to the basement and the closure of the existing entrance. Obviously this would also be very disruptive, not to speak of having to invade the structural integrity of the existing basement wall. That is never good. The risk of adequately sealing the current opening is monumental. The risk in adequately invading the structural integrity of the basement wall in another location is also considerable. Both could easily result in a very leaky basement due to poor drainage around the outside of the basement walls and potentially very expensive to correct. We, as residents of the Frederick County, must (and do) depend and rely on the County to protect us (through the required inspections) in the purchase of a new home by ensuring the various codes covering construction are met by the builder surveyors. As the Frederick County "Site Plan Application Package" clearly states on Page 5, in Paragraph 6, "Final Certificate of Occupancy: The inspection is necessary to ensure that all requirements shown on the approved site are completed. And clearly (as stated earlier) there were a number of inspections leading up to this final inspection for occupancy that should have detected this violation, including the final inspection. This is clearly what we would have expected from the County inspectors. Now we are realistic enough to know and understand that mistakes can and are made, however, it appears the County is now holding us, the current owners, responsible for correcting a costly code violation that we depended on the County to ensure were not there to start with (just as County documents state, it is the County's responsibility). This is very much unfair and just plain wrong. Both Mr. Beniamino and Mr. Cheran of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development Office agreed that this violation "...should have been caught during the various inspections 1 certainly agree with their assessment. Regardless what an inspector does or fails to do, or who the County depends upon for information (the builder and/or surveyor), the County should be responsible for its mistakes. If a Frederick County resident can not depend on his county to ensure the various building codes are met during construction, then why does the county have the requirement for the county inspections in the first place? Also, Mr. Beniamino and Mr. Cheran both told me the County depends on the surveyor to be correct in his survey as a certified surveyor (by the State of Virginia). It certainly appears that in this case the surveyor placed the house and steps correctly on the plat (and was properly filed with the County), and the County simply missed what we were told the County depends on to properly address compliance of the building codes. It would appear that the plat was not even looked at until over a year after the house was built and sold. We acquired this property in good faith, depending on Frederick County to conduct the proper inspections to "ensure that all requirements shown on the approved site are complete We have made no changes to the house that caused this violation of the required setback. The walls of the steps were and are an integral part of the basement wall construction. This is clearly an instance of an extraordinary situation condition. Mistakes are made by all of us, but none of us should be made to pay for those mistakes of others. Authorization of this requested "variance" would certainly not change the character of the district nothing would be changed from the current state by the 3 issuance of this variance. Keep in mind also that no one has complained about the situation of the basement steps extending into the required side yard setback, and there is no detriment to the adjacent property as evidenced by the attached letter from the adjacent property owner. Also attached for your reference is a map to the site location for attachment to the application for appeal. Thank you for your consideration of this request for "variance" on our property. RespeCtfull and Ruth Newman (540) 869 -4274 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Marsh Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. House Location Topographic Survey dated November 11, 2003 2. Karen and Gary Ship letter, dated March 22, 2005 3. Building Permit (includes County file)ed April 25, 2003 4. Building Inspection History of Inspections for 115 Maverick Court 5. Setback Report by Marsh Legge Surveyors, dated March 21 2003 6. Certificate of Occupancy (includes County file) dated November 10, 2003 7. Photographs of Property 8. Estimate by David R. Dill, Inc, dated March 22, 2005 9. Site Location Map 4 Mr. and Mrs. Gary Shipp 113 Maverick Court Stephens City, VA 22655 March 22, 2005 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202 ATTN: Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Winchester, VA 22601 -5000 To Whom It May Concern: We have been made aware of a property violation notice for our neighbors, Ruth and Harry Newman 115 Maverick Court; Property Identification Number (PIN): 768 -1 -3- 160. The issue, as we understand it, is that the property's basement steps extend into the County's required side yard setback. Reference the Department of Planning and Development Office letter to the Newman's, dated February 28, 2005. This letter is to inform the BZA that we have no issue with the current location of the referenced basement steps of the Newman home. Other then insuring that if we should sell our home at 113 Maverick Court and expand our existing garage to the legal setback limits that there will be no conflicts in doing so. This is not something they added since moving into the newly constructed home, but rather the way it was built when they purchased the home. The location of the steps does not adversely impact our property, and we support the Newman's appeal and request for a "variance allowing the existing structure to remain. cerely, ar and Gary Shipp County.f Virginia INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT THIS CARD MUSTPBEPOSTED ON, ;THEJOB.SO,.IT:CAN,BE SEEN FROM THE.ROA Protect:: From Meather ,i;: This PERMIT is issued for construction in accordance with the provisions of the` VIRGINIA: UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING;: Permit Number sa3 •arn Date cl•as -,3 Rare w(6are9c Owner E [r Place rrrl Type Building at t. Crtnrrtt Pncr c, l ocation -4 Fsialf-A lnt Rao If peelers iillals o.k. Date INSPECTIONS C ntractors, Erectors, or Owners of buildings or structures must notify the Inspector at the following points of construction, and they shall: n• t proceed beyond these points until the Building Inspector has Inspected and approved the work. Failure to call for inspections constitutes A VIOLATION OF THE LAW. 1.) FOOTING INSPECTION: Call for footing inspection after the footings have been excavated, any forms and steps have been constructed, any reinforcement has been installed and grade pins have been set prior to placing any concrete. 2.) FOUNDATION INSPECTION: Call for foundation Inspection after, foundation walls have been constructed" and waterproofed, anchor bolts have been Installed, prior to doing any backfilling. 3.) SLAB INSPECTION: Basement and floor slabs, poured concrete foundation walls, and any self supporting slabs must be Inspected to ensure placement of vapor barriers and reinforcements, or contraction joints, 30' on center. 4.) FRAMING INSPECTION: Call for framing Inspection after all framing, flrestopping, rough plumbing and electrical, masonry, including fireplaces and chimneys are complete and prior to concealing same. 5.) INSULATION INSPECTION: Call for insulation inspection after insulation Is installed. 6.) FINAL INSPECTION: Call for final Inspection when structure is complete and ready for occupancy. 7.) OTHER INSPECTION: In addition to the called Inspections above, the Building Department may make or require any other inspec- tions to ascertain compliance with the Code. etc, 8.) Call for plumbing and electrical inspections as needed and prior to concealing same. To schedule ariyof the above listed Inspections please call 665.5650. MECHANICS LIEN AGENT INFORMATION Name: Address: Number: /Phone NONE DESIGNATED r.. i•.. 10e2 M Building Official Inspect 75/01 SETBAC 2003/05/23 BLD 200 3/05/29 BLD 2003/06/06 BLD 2003/06/09 PLUMB 2003/06/09 PLUMB 200 3/06/10 BLD 200 3/06/10 BLD 003/06/19 BLD )03/06/20 BLD )3/07/28 ELECT 3/08/21 BLD 1/08/21 MECH /08/21 ELECT TYPE INSPECTION TYPE setback surveyl Private Engineering Repor•p MARSH AND LEGGE FRONT 59.2' BACK 60.8' RIGHT 25.2' Footing LEFT 11.0' Private Engineering Repor *p NO COLUMN FOOTINGS INSPECTED AT THIS TIME. Wall RUCKMAN Private Engineering Repor•P (11) INTERIOR COLUMN FOOTINGS ALSO INSPECTED, (3) 44 REBARS TOP AND BOTTOM OVER DOOR, 44 REBAR 18" OC VERTICAL AT BRICK LEDGES OVER 2' RUCKMAN Backfill /Draint Private Engineering e 9 por•P INTERIOR CROCK AND PUMP USED, CONTRACTOR TOLD TO BACKFILL NO MORE THAN 3' UNTIL FL00R SYSTEM IS PLACED. RUCKMAN Gioundworke Mike Puffinberger .p BACK WATER VALVE IN PLACE Groundworke Mike PuEfinberger Basement Slab •R Private Engineering Aepo r•P WWM USED. CONTROL JOINTS RECOMMENDED. DRAIN TILES TO INERIOR CROCK AND PUMP Gaza RUCKMAN 9e Slab Private Engineering Repor•P STRUCTURAL SLAB. (4) 1 6 "X16" GRADE BEAMS EQUALLY SPACED WITH (5) 45 REBARS 2" FROM BOTTOM IN BEAM POCKETS AT EACH END, 44 REBAR 12" OC EACH WAY DOWLED 3" INTO WALL PLACED MIDWAY IE 4" THICK SLAB WITH 6 MILL POLY FILM ON EARTH. FRONT OF SLAB ON SUBWALL AT DOORS. RUCKMAN Private Engineering Repor•p TRENCH FOOTING DUG RUCKMAN Private Engineering Repor•P 44 REBAR DOWLED AND EPDXYED INTO EXISTING WALL ON 4' CENTERS WITH 3 44 REBARS HORIZONTAL AND 44 REBAR VERTICAL 3' O.C. CONTRACTOR TOLD TO PROTECT CONCRETE FROM RAIN. RUCKMAN •p NO CUT -OFF NEEDED Kirby B. Place .p 200 AMP U&M 422894 Kirby B, p lace •F deck footing wall repair Service Framing BUILDIN 03/06/20 PLUMB1 Water Sewer Kirby B. Place Gas Piping Kirby B. Place Rough Electric Kirby B. Place CTION HISTORY OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR RSLT P T NUMBER: 0000523 2003 C O M M E N T S CO 32879 BRACE GABLE TRUSS ON BACK PORCH TO DETAA NEED SOLID BLOCKING ON OPEN AND JOISTS IN BASEMENT. ADD COLLAR TIES ON RAFTERS. NEED LVL DETAILS. GAS PIPING NOT INSTALLED. •F GAS PIPING NOT INSTALLED. •P t A if LIEN ACENT: NASE/A:::RESS ?WT..: PLACE :NI:USSR:HS Box :265 n .12;111- 1 S40S67.7 COUNT li p SITE AT:DRESS CONT:::OTO:=; OWNS? :E 2E CCUSTRUOTiC LCISMTISN 1071 IGO 23:.00Y ES-SACKS" HS.1:1:TH IsS NO.: RONT: 'JO' 5ACK: S5' SISOODPLAIN: SU3-DIVSSION: SISSER ES7AMSS 'S' ARI-IA: ditown:-. Z0NE: S,::::: S2s:01 RIOHT-OF-WhS: SF'S CUP SO.: S:TE PLAN: ::1ECTIONS TI.) CITE: nke S22 Scc ne:v EFTFIA.CKS 'FRONT "IF NAME: COPI2SIntiCIA-C1--14€ Jkil SI.Jr.:vL:V: 51003 2ECT::: I;SBC: I 9 r_ITITF: 2:: I rATt: 7!ENEI•IAL 7. 7Y.24/231F IIURVEYIR INFORMATION FRONT: 5,2: 40,e ZS•2 :LET MO' 44+4. H O 'ft? ata Fi. BRUCE EDENS A-- Mo. 000162 B RECIF:PED SIGNATI1RES uu..3 its 'X 51 lei/hi/et 57 /43 1-: o rx eritrarice :2 Ci,riter I;r: Job EIts thE 19'; 4 e midy t I Photos of Steps at 115 Maverick Court Stephens City The following photographs depict the Basement steps in question. The property line (where in the photograph) has been drawn in. Entrance to Basement (clearly, part of original foundation) NOTE: The walls for the basement steps are part of the original foundation and were planned from the beginning with the Build' g Permit #523- 2003), issued by Frederick County on April 24,2003. LAS •S4 CArtP%Jel 41. Showing Proximity to Adjacent Property (113 Maverick Court) 1 Showing Pro imity to Adjacent Property (113 Maverick Ct) 2 2 0 111, 1 11 Lam PI Angle Toward Street View From Front Yard Toward Back of Lot 3 View From Back of Lot Look Along the Property Line Toward the Street 4 0'd Submitted to: Der submitted' ,Job Location: ?repaired by Date: Eagle Maas Industries PO Box 1880 wlnchostor, VA 28004 March 22. 2005 Mreit Mrs Ii Total Estimated Case k eme Only 11 RtiIIW[Qti i 18"CAT Loader Hourly Rata will apply in the event of ROCK CONDITIONS Attclitional Conaxte/l,abor itt footings/a1dK (Le. liost footings, roofings dug w/Iwckhoc, t°R ground. holt: out oflevel, other soil conditions, etd s4 Reim Horizontal Ur Vootings and/or Vortical in Walh (Lc due to Soil Conditions and/or Darafill Height To be detertnined hip Inspector At tutu: of Inrpettoal jumps in Footings and/or Stops in Walls Angled or lily Comers Wtnu:r Conditions Hot Water Callum Additive to Concrete poured in \Vilna Temperatures Brickledge and/or Slabled}Ie Pump ro Pour rooting and/or Walls Accepted by: Rote: Z a..1 L6980trg Newman Lot #160 Canter Estates J N I HltN0JW:2a r.313N`7N0 11I t DAVID R DILL CONCRETE. 1NC 1135 SULPHUR SPRING ROAD. MIDDLETOWN, VA 22645 (5401 869 -3854 15401 869 -7721 FAX VIRGINIA CONTRACTORS LICENSE 2701 039519A Tear Out Exlstin; Welled Exit Wills en St Close in Existin; Doocwa Install Welled Exit Walla St Ste on opposite side of house: Cut nut new Doorway. Estimated Coat to include the excavation required to perform tearing out tis replacins welled exits as scared above; waterproofing new welled exit walla; Luatalltn_ new exterior drvinttle in these sum; and removal of ell concrete debris S 123, 01Hour S 175.00/Ya 3 0,7511.inf 125.0{1 /loch S 130,00/Each 2.50/Yard L 350 /Sail 5950.00/14inituum per Pour .i •V -.•U 1 11.111 e I P 1• 1 •:1! 1 L. ill..l 1 W T At. II. r AL: .1 1. 1 •11 1 1 0:•:10. •1 III Q :1 a q y 1. ._•j, l •.l l 11! •.•11= 11-15•N, It 1 •1•. 4l. •••..1L= •t .1L1 1 I. 1 11 r In' l= 1. 1 1 1. 1 11•. 11 1 •t 1 1 1111:1: ll .1 lit l• tl 1 l,il I ill 1 ,t1 a L 1 .11 111 a 11 1 t1 '.•11 ri =111 1 1.: ..1 1• •1! 1- 1• 1 t] 11 1 r 1 1. .:l 1 •1 "lt 1' 'A 1• ll 1 y •1 h. 1 1 1 l .11_t__. .11 1'. i.r l P. •A- •1 11 I ^:.•1• 1 1 IP .L •t '1 1 9,500,00 Wd 6S: 0i SAt3Z— ZZ— ZIkiW Exig-310 CE lTa ACR q, Y Itre&rJ Boar Reran! f kfu �g Fi¢.am G zsB SHEI ANDO fusFee Gttt r PlceacNIag P13 re6lnttS f` 'Q Shed erg SWimming Pagi" 1F ss LMFWO MANCI WRIGHT RUN ACR 14. r Poking PUSH pa Water Treatmanl r Plain PARKINS r!4 Sacred Heart M artery ARMEL,_ R0 oUN I on 1 SLUE KINCHELOE EARDQN 7 AGENT: °whiz.; 'N=Y:F/AFDR:..EI: SAGE:: PLACE INDUSTRIES P.O. Sox 13E: VA 22604 PHONE: 540E:20927 1 CCOUNT HSS‘ PI: 0? LUIAT T?S SAP NCI.. i&O :sir. 7:6C ir LEFT: 2:'/C? (NR:. FRT5E: RICHT FitS. OH NJ.: DIEIFC':IONS TO SITI: Take .22 Sooth to hew enviiice Istauuw USE OPECUP: Use Croup n R" Reeiiienliul USE CODE: Sihgie Dwelilui SO FEET: 257C CNST.TYPE: New NATURER.RK: Single Family Dweiling BLDO. SIZE 731.71 STOR:ES BSNT SQ FT US 2570 TOTAL OS. 14 Type Coiu5t oulirde: Bearing ST Eooe Der. NOTE 1 :ARA0s 23X24:COVEE),ES NOTE NOTE NOTE 305 VALUE.: 150.000.00 PERMIT FEE: 6'3. 30 TOTAL 75E3 554.7 ApplicrlaYAiure) 04 9 Applicant (please print) SeCt1071 2?Sui, E3=NO a ESDROOXE 7 LOATEROOR 2 Ro:c Syst SEA:. OFT: 1 41011 1PEHiO N(JSU7'.9., tTtfif.:2; 2003 (tNTRACTOR NAN?. /45:IRFRE :HONE: 545 52 OEE 1407? COVERE5 FRONT POFCH 55X10 holeoy oo:4s to oiihply with c: tte gt"itewido Sgthivizio: OrT:InRuces 2 by the County or FEe.i.e:,ok. CASIO 1 2 FASILY iiWIN; ITOE SOCA NATIONAL POIFUINL 0005 SURVEY STANDARDS REOUiRED? NO INITIAL: oET15.ILED sir? PLAN REOUiRED :0, NC INTIIAL: PQUIREE SIGNATURES A 714-- i Code Of"Ciai r —3 DATE Zoning ig7i4/6 EATE t-4 -a'-i)3 1 e,t; /Lei 1944,T1;/' F of ere eri ck_ Winchester, VA 22601 I USBC: 1996 SY. "SELECT: MECH PLUMB PLUMB1 SETBAC 7/09/2003 6/05/2003 6/04/2003 4/25/2003 OWNER NAME /ADDRESS SITE ADDRESS CONTRACTOR NAME /ADRESS EAGLE PLACE INDUSTRIES Eagle Place Industries P.O. Box 1866 115 Maverick Court P.O. Box 1866 Winchester, VA 22604 Canter Estates, Lot 160, Section 3 Winchester, VA 22604 PHONE: 5406620967 RE ACCOUNT 41107 TAX MAP NO.: 768 1 3 160 PER PHONE: 540 662 0967 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION SECTION: 3 BLOCK: LOT: 160 BLDG NO.: 1B ER�L�d0052�v INSPECTION DATE: (11/10/2003 INSPECTION TIME: SET- BACKS: HEALTH PERMIT NO.: DISTRICT: SHAWNEE FRONT: 60' BACK: 55' FL000PLAIN: SUB- DIVISION: CANTER ESTATES RIGHT: 18' LEFT: 11' AREA: Frederioktowne ZONE: Residential Performance CNTR FRTGE: RIGHT -OF -WAY: GREEN CARD: S/E CUP NO.: SITE PLAN: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: Take 522 South to new entrance of Canter Estates make a right on Maverick Court job site will be'on the left Page 261 B -2 NATURE OF WORK: Single Family Dwelling USE GROUP: Use Group "R" Residential USE CODE: Single Family Dwelling CONST. TYPE: New ISS.DATE: 4/25/2003 RENEWAL DATE: BUILDING PERMIT CONTRACTOR: EAGLE PLACE INDUSTRIES BLDG. SIZE 73X71 STORIES 1 BEDROOMS 3 BATHROOM 2 1/2 BSMT SQ FT OF 2570 TOTAL RM 14 Type Const Footing Foundation Flr. Joist Girder Walls Header Roof Syst. Bearing PT Smoke Det. Egress NOTE GARAGE 23X24;COVERED NOTE REAR DECK 10X17; NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTES TO INSPECTOR: Inform Dave of Final Sewer Cut -Off May Be Required Certified As -Built Required for Final final":- '.Inspection Results: SCHEDULED INS ECTOR: DJB PASS: FAIL: INSPECTOR SIGNATURE: +1 RESCHEDULE 11 124 SQ FEET: 2570 C O M M E N T S 3 DATE: TIME: COVERED FRONT PORCH 33X10 01161 '.joti1 1t -1 0'3L� °Y p- 1 per, '74