HomeMy WebLinkAbout25-07 Comments 2FAX TRANSMISSION
TO: 1 7 Onn)e &d ✓c
COMPANY: l 1c4 pplega
t
FAX a— 31c
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
Telephone: 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665 -6395
Date:
Number of Pages (including cover sheet) 5
Remarks:
From the desk of:
Date Time Destination
Dec. 12. 1:55PM
Immediate TX Result Report Dec. 12. 2007 1:56PM )xxx
Fax Header)
File
Mode TXtime Page Result User Name No.
5406623192 G3TES) 043' P. 5 OK 7091
Batch M Memory L Send later Forwarding
E ECM S Standard D De ail F F
ne
Reduction LAN —Fax Delivery O RX Notice Req.
A RX Notice
December 4, 2007
NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND /OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S)
RE: VARIANCE REQUEST #25 -07 OF RED APPLE GROUP
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665 -5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals, you are hereby notified of a public
hearing being held on Tuesday, December 18, 2007, at 3:25 p.m., in the Board Room of the
Frederick County Administration Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. This is a
public hearing to consider the following application:
Variance Request #25 -07 of Red Apple Group, for a 30 foot left side yard variance, resulting in a
left side yard setback of 20 feet. This property is located at 277 White Hall Road (Route 671), and is
identified by Property Identification Number 32- A -68E, in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
Any interested parties may attend this hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review
at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of
Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia.
Sincerely,
Mark R. Cheran
Zoning Administrator
MRC/bhd
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000
This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on
from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick
County, Virginia- /1/` °7
32 A- 68 -E
RED APPLE GROUP LLC
277 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA
32 A- 68 -C
MILLER E CHRISTIAN
261 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA 22603 -2752
32 A- 63 -A
TRAMMELL LAWRENCE R. JR.
260 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA. 226032749
32 A- 68 -D
PRICE DONALD E
PRICE NANCY L
263 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA
32 -A- 6B -B
FRYE TERRY L DAWN P
271 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA 22603-2752
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
I, 4� /A �A,�M a Notary Public in and for the State and County
aforesaid, do! ereby certify that M. k R. Cheran, Zoning Subdivision Administrator for the
Depart eny of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated
/a 07 has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my
State and County aforesaid.
Given under my hand this of
My commission expires on
22603 -2752
22603 -2752
BEVERLY H. DELLINGER
NOT,4RY ID 331878
H PUBLIC
;.WEALTH OF VIRGINIA
^..N EXPIRES JULY 31, 2011
Cheran, Zoning Subdivision Administrator
Frederick County Planning Department
t 2/,
32 A- 68 -F
NEAL JARED T
NEAL KATHRYN E
313 WHITE HALL RD
WINCHESTER VA 22603.2753
32 A- 63-
HALL MARK R KELLI E
170 FARRIS LN
WINCHESTER VA
d& a
NOTARY P i BLIC
22603.2717
VARIANCE APPLICATION #25 -07
RED APPLE GROUP
Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals
Prepared: December 6, 2007
Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board
of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to
others interested in this zoning matter.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE:
December 18, 2007 Action Pending
LOCATION: 277 White Hall Road (Route 671)
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 32 -A -68E
PROPERTY ZONING USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas)
Land Use: Residential
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING USE:
North: RA (Rural Areas) Use Residential
South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential
East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential
West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential
VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a left side yard variance of 30 feet, which
will result in a 15 foot left side yard setback for an existing dwelling.
REASON FOR VARIANCE: To correct building encroachment on building restriction line which
was not discovered until resale.
Variance #25 -07, Red Apple Group
December 6, 2007
Page 2
STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a left side yard variance of 30 feet which will
result in a 15 foot left side yard setback for an existing dwelling. This property is located within the
RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District and the building setbacks for this property by approved plat are
front 60 feet, right side 50 feet, left side 45 feet and rear 50 feet. The left side of the dwelling is
encroaching 30 feet over the left setback line. It is noted that this new setback would be measured
from an existing right -of -way to an adjacent lot.
Section 165 -23 H (1) Frederick County Zoning Ordinance provides the survey location requirements
for primary structures and states that, "A surveyor licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia shall
establish the location of any primary structure that is five feet or less from any minimum setback
requirement The permit holder submitted an application for building permit #451- 2004), on
March 15, 2004, with setbacks of 80 feet front, 165 feet right side, 65 feet left side and 180feet rear.
Therefore, the applicant was not required to submit setback surveys for this property. The Frederick
County Building Official issued a certificate of occupancy for this dwelling on November 24, 2004.
This setback violation was discovered during a title search for resale of this property.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE DECEMBER 18, 2007 MEETING:
The Code of Virginia 15.2 -2309 (2), states that no variance shall be granted unless the application
can meet the following requirements:
1) The strict application of the Ordinance will produce an undue hardship.
2) The hardship is not generally shared by the properties in the same zoning district and
vicinity.
3) That the authorization of such variance will not be a substantial detriment to the adjacent
property and the character of the district will not be changed by the variance.
It appears that this variance meets the intent of the Code of Virginia, Section 15.2 -2309 (2). The
property was acquired in good faith by the owner and with no previous knowledge of the setback
violation. This request from the current setbacks of the RA zoning district may be justified.