Loading...
PC 01-03-24 Meeting Agenda1.Call to Order 2.Adoption of Agenda – Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission should adopt the Agenda for the meeting. 3.Election of Officers, Committee Assignments, Meeting Schedule, & Adoption of Bylaws & Roles & Responsibilities 2024 3.A.Election of Officers, Committee Assignments, Meeting Schedule, & Adoption of Bylaws & Roles & Responsibilities 2024 4.Meeting Minutes 4.A.November 1, 2023 Meeting Minutes 5.Committee Reports 6.Citizen Comments 7.Public Hearings 7.A.Rezoning #06-23 for Winchester Gateway, LLC - (Mr. Klein) Submitted to rezone approximately +/- 34.26-acres of a 71.85+/- acre parcel from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers to develop warehousing, distribution or data center uses. The property is located at the intersection of Apple Valley Road (Route 652) and Middle Road (Route 628) and is bounded by Route 37 to the west and is identified by Property Identification Number (PIN) 63-A-80I in the Back Creek Magisterial District. 7.B.Conditional Use Permit #11-23 for 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding, LLC - AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2024 7:00 PM THE BOARD ROOM FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA PC01-03-24ElectionofOfficers.pdf PC01-03-24MinutesNovember1.pdf PC01-03-24REZ06-23_Redacted.pdf 1 (Mrs. Peloquin) Submitted for a recreation area and resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility. The property is located at 231 Vaucluse Spring Lane, Stephens City, Virginia and is identified with Property Identification Number 84-A-53A in the Back Creek Magisterial District. 7.C.Ordinance Amendment to the Frederick County Code - Signs - (Mr. Klein) Revision to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 165 to amend sign regulations to ensure consistency within the section and increase the allowed height for signs in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. ARTICLE II Supplementary Use Regulations; Parking; Buffers; and Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 201 - Supplementary Use Regulations §165-201.06 Signs 8.Action Item 8.A.Rezoning #05-23 for Round Hill Crossing - Phase 2 - (Mr. Klein) Request for a minor amendment to the approved proffer statement associated with Rezoning (REZ) application #03-03 (WWW, LC) to modify the number of allowed commercial entrance connections to U.S. Route 50 West. The amendment would enable one (1) additional right-in only entrance for a total of up to four (4) entrances for the development. All other previously approved proffers would remain in effect (unchanged). 9.Other 9.A.Current Planning Applications 10.Adjourn PC01-03-24CUP11-23_Redacted.pdf PC01-03-24OA_Signs.pdf PC01-03-24REZ05-23_Redacted.pdf 2 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Election of Officers, Committee Assignments, Meeting Schedule, & Adoption of Bylaws & Roles & Responsibilities 2024 Title: Election of Officers, Committee Assignments, Meeting Schedule, & Adoption of Bylaws & Roles & Responsibilities 2024 Attachments: PC01-03-24ElectionofOfficers.pdf 3 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Wyatt Pearson, Director SUBJECT: 2024 Election of Officers, Committee Appointments, Meeting Schedule DATE: December 20, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________ ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2024 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission elects a Chairman, Vice - Chairman and Secretary. These three Planning Commission officers assume office immediately and hold such office for the duration of the calendar year. For each office, the Commission will: open the nominations; accept nominations; close nominations; and vote to fill the officer position. The Planning Director will conduct these elections. ADOPTION OF MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2024 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their meeting schedule for the ensuing year. Historically, the Commission has held meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., to be held in the Board of Supervisors meeting room. The Comprehensive Plans & Programs Committee (CPPC) meets on the second Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the first-floor conference room and the Development Review & Regulations Committee meets on the fourth Thursday of each month at 4:00 p.m.* in the first-floor conference room. The Planning Commission’s meeting schedule for inclement weather states that in the event that weather causes the cancelation of a regularly scheduled Wednesday evening meeting, the meeting will be held on the following Thursday evening. *The DRRC time was recently changed after polling the committee membership. 4 Memorandum: Elections, Appointments, and Meeting Times December 20, 2023 Page 2 of 2 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2024 At the first meeting of each year, the Chairman appoints the membership for the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) and the Development Review & Regulations Committee (DRRC). The Chairman also appoints a Planning Commission liaison to the: Transportation Committee (TC), Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB), Conservation Easement Authority (CEA), Frederick Water, and the Winchester Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION BY-LAWS FOR 2024 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their Bylaws, and Roles and Responsibilities for the ensuing year. Mid-year last year the Commission added electronic attendance capabilities to the By-Laws, that is the only change since last year. These documents are attached. Please contact staff should you have questions. Attachments: Proposed 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Proposed 2024 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities 5 PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS County of Frederick, Virginia Proposed by Planning Commission January 3, 2024 ARTICLE I - AUTHORIZATION 1-1 The Frederick County Planning Commission is established by and in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County, and in accord with the provisions of Section 15.2-2210 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 1-2 The official title of this body shall be the Frederick County Planning Commission, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission". ARTICLE II - PURPOSE 2-1 The primary purpose of the Commission is to advise the Frederick County Board of Supervisors and to carry out all duties and functions described by the Code of Virginia, as amended. ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP 3-1 The membership of the Commission shall be determined by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as specified in Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. Methods of appointment and terms of office shall be determined by Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. 3-2 Within the first month of initial appointment, new Commissioner appointees shall: 1) participate in an orientation to familiarize themselves with the operations of the Department and the Commission, and 2) meet with planning staff representatives in an effort to review and better understand specific agenda items by no later than their second Planning Commission meeting. 6 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 2 ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS 4-1 Officers of the Commission shall consist of a chairman, vice-chairman and secretary. The chairman and vice-chairman must be voting members of the Commission. The secretary shall be a member of the Commission or a county employee. 4-2 Selection 4-2-1 The officers shall be elected by the voting members of the Commission at the first meeting of the calendar year. 4-2-2 Nomination of officers shall be made from the floor. Elections of officers shall follow immediately. A candidate receiving a majority vote of the entire voting membership shall be declared elected. 4-3 Duties 4-3-1 The Chairman shall: 4-3-1-1 Preside at meetings. 4-3-1-2 Appoint committees. 4-3-1-3 Rule on procedural questions. A ruling on a procedural question by the chairman shall be subject to reversal by a two-thirds majority vote of the members present. 4-3-1-4 Report official communications. 4-3-1-5 Certify official documents involving the authority of the Commission. 4-3-1-6 Certify minutes as true and correct copies. 4-3-1-7 Carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission. 4-3-2 The Vice-Chairman shall: 4-3-2-1 Assume the full powers of the chairman in the absence or inability of the chairman to act. 4-3-2-2 When acting as chair, the vice-chairman shall carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission Chairman. 7 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 3 4-3-3 The Secretary shall: 4-3-3-1 Ensure that attendance is recorded at all meetings. 4-3-3-2 Ensure that the minutes of all Commission meetings are recorded. 4-3-3-3 Notify members of all meetings. 4-3-3-4 Prepare agendas for all meetings. 4-3-3-5 Maintain files of all official Commission records and reports. Official records and reports may be purged in accordance with applicable state codes. 4-3-3-6 Give notice of all Commission meetings, public hearings and public meetings. 4-3-3-7 Provide to the Board of Supervisors reports and recommendations of the Commission. 4-3-3-8 Attend to the correspondence necessary for the execution of the duties and functions of the Commission. 4-4 Term of Office 4-4-1 Officers shall be elected for a one-year term or until a successor takes office. Vacancies shall be filled for an unexpired term by a majority vote of the Commission. In such cases, the newly elected officer shall serve only until the end of the calendar year or until a successor takes office. 4-5 Temporary Chairman 4-5-1 In the event of the absence of both the chairman and the vice-chairman from any meeting, the Commission shall designate from among its members a temporary chairman who shall act for that meeting in the absence of the chairman or vice-chairman. ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES 5-1 The Commission shall establish committees necessary to accomplish its purpose. 5-2 In establishing committees, the Commission shall describe the purpose for each committee. 8 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 4 5-3 Members of the committees shall be appointed by the chairman and will serve for a term of one year. The chairman may request recommendations from the Commission or committee members on committee appointments. 5-4 Commission members, employees of the County, and citizen volunteers may be members of the committee. 5-5 The chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning Commission shall be ex-officio members of every committee. 5-6 The committees will elect a chairman and vice-chairman annually. These officers shall be current Commission members and should represent different Magisterial Districts, if possible. 5-7 The committees may operate as a committee of the whole or by executive committee, with current and past Commission members serving as members of the executive committee. 5-8 The committees may establish standing subcommittees whose activities will be a specific responsibility of the parent committee. One executive committee member will serve as liaison to the standing subcommittee and will assist staff in managing its activities. Membership will be comprised of past Commission members and citizens. Membership will be appointed by the chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the Commission Chairman. 5-9 The committees may establish working groups to assist in specific, carefully-defined tasks for a limited period of time. Important considerations for membership on the working group are skills and experience necessary to assist in providing acceptable solutions. Membership will be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the Commission Chairman. ARTICLE VI – COMMISSION MEETINGS 6-1 At the first meeting of each calendar year, the Commission shall fix the date, time, and place of all its regular meetings for the ensuing calendar year and shall fix the day on which a regular meeting shall be continued should the Chairman declare that weather or other conditions make it hazardous for members to attend. 6-2 Special meetings may be called by the chairman or by the secretary after due notice and publication by the secretary. 6-3 Notice of all meetings shall be sent by the secretary with an agenda at least five calendar days before the meeting. 9 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 5 6-4 All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public except for Closed Sessions held in accordance with the provision specified under Section 2.2-3711(A) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 6-5 Remote Meeting Participation [Adopted October 18, 2023] The Planning Commission adopted the following policy to permit individual Commissioners to participate via electronic communication means in Planning Commission meetings, as permitted by Virginia Code §2.2-3708.3. Section §2.2-3708.3 states, with respect to such a policy: “The policy shall be applied strictly and uniformly, without exception, to the entire membership and without regard to the identity of the member requesting remote participation or the matters that will be considered or voted on at the meeting.” A Commissioner may participate from a remote location when he or she experiences a personal matter or medical condition or disability that prevents attendance in person, or when a family member’s medical condition that requires the member to provide care for such family member prevents the member’s attendance in person. Whenever a Commissioner wishes to participate from a remote location, the following requirements apply: •On or before the day of the meeting, the Commissioner must notify Chair, or, if the Commissioner who wishes to participate remote is the Chair, the Chair must notify the Vice Chair, and indicate the nature of the matter necessitating remote participation, as set forth below. •The Commissioner’s absence must be due to a personal matter or medical condition or disability that prevents attendance in person, or when a family member’s medical condition that requires the member to provide care for such family member prevents the member’s attendance in person. o In the case of absence due to a personal matter (not medical/disability), the Commissioner may not participate remotely more than 25% of the meetings in one calendar year, and the Commissioner shall identify the personal reason, for inclusion in the Planning Commission’s minutes to note remote participation for that reason. o In case of absence due to medical/disability reason, or a family member’s medical condition, the minutes must note the fact of remote participation for that reason, but minutes need not note the particular condition/disability. There is no limit on the number of times a Commissioner may participate remotely for medical/disability reasons. 10 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 6 •The Commissioner must identify the location of his or her participation (which itself need not be open to the public), for inclusion in the Planning Commission’s minutes. •The Commissioner’s voice must be audible to all persons attending the meeting in person. •The Planning Commission must approve such participation on the particular occasion and note the fact in the minutes, including the reason for remote participation and the remote location from which the member participated. If the Planning Commission denies participation, the Planning Commission also must note that fact in the minutes, with the reasons for disapproval. With respect to approval/denial, the Planning Commission must uniformly apply the policy (denial can only be for noncompliance with the policy). •A Quorum of the Planning Commission must be physically present at the meeting location. ARTICLE VII - VOTING 7-1 A majority of voting members shall constitute a quorum. No action shall be taken, or motion made unless a quorum is present. 7-2 No action of the Commission shall be valid unless authorized by a majority vote of those present and voting. ARTICLE VIII - OPERATING RULES 8-1 Order of Business for a regular meeting 8-1-1 Call to Order. 8-1-2 Adoption of the Agenda. 8-1-3 Consideration of Minutes. 8-1-4 Committee Reports. 8-1-5 Citizen Comments on Items not on the Agenda. 8-1-6 Public Hearings. 8-1-7 Action Items. 8-1-8 Information/Discussion Items 11 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 7 8-1-9 Other. 8-1-10 Adjournment. 8-2 Minutes 8-2-1 The Commission shall keep minutes of each meeting. The chairman and secretary shall sign all minutes following approval by the Commission certifying that the minutes are true and correct. Minutes made available to the public prior to formal approval by the Commission shall be clearly identified as a draft version of the meeting. 8-3 Procedures 8-3-1 Parliamentary procedure in the Commission meetings shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, except where otherwise specified in these procedures. 8-3-2 Whenever an agenda item involves a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, the Commission shall continue to consider the item until a definite recommendation is made. If a motion has been made and defeated, additional, different motions may be made concerning the item under consideration. 8-3-3 The initial motion on an agenda item shall be made by a member representing the application’s Magisterial District. If both District representatives are absent or decline to make the initial motion, then any other Commissioner may act. 8-3-4 Business items on the agenda shall be considered using the following procedures: 8-3-4-1 Report by County Staff. 8-3-4-2 Presentation by Applicant. 8-3-4-3 Citizen Comment. 8-3-4-4 Applicant Response. 8-3-4-5 Staff Summary. 8-3-4-6 Discussion by Commission. 8-3-4-7 Motion and Action by Commission. 12 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 8 8-3-5 Public comment shall be allowed in all cases required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or the Code of Frederick County. In other cases, the chairman may allow public comment. 8-3-6 The Commission members may ask questions of clarification and information after the staff report, applicant presentation, and/or citizen comment. 8-3-7 Petitions, displays, documents or correspondence presented at a meeting may be made part of the official record of the meeting by motion of the Commission and are to be kept on file by the secretary. Such items need not be made part of the published minutes. 8-3-8 Public Hearings 8-3-8-1 The Commission shall hold public hearings on all items for which hearings are required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or by the Code of Frederick County. Such public hearing shall be advertised and notifications provided as required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 8-3-8-2 The Chairman may establish special rules for any public hearing at the beginning of said hearing. These rules may include limitations on the time of staff report, applicant presentation and citizen comment. 8-3-8-3 In addition to those required by law, the Commission may hold public hearings on any matter, under the purview of the Commission, which it deems to be in the public interest. In such cases, the public hearings shall follow all procedures described for public hearing in these bylaws. 8-3-8-4 The 90-day period (Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance) for the Planning Commission to make a rezoning recommendation to the Board will start after the first Commission meeting following the referral of the amendment to the Commission. 8-3-9 Tabling 8-3-9-1 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to postpone agenda items 45- calendar days (less if reaching the limits of Section 165-102.03) for any one of the following: A)The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 13 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 9 B)The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of Frederick County. C)Insufficient information has been provided for the agenda item. D)Revised proffers have been received from the applicant less than eight (8) calendar days of the advertised Planning Commission meeting. E)Issues or concerns that arise during formal discussion of the agenda item warrant additional information or study. F)The applicant provides the Frederick County Planning Department with a written request to postpone the agenda item. G)The Frederick County Planning Department is advised of an emergency situation that prevents attendance by the applicant. H)The applicant fails to appear at the meeting in which the application has been advertised to appear. 8-3-9-2 The applicant shall be permitted to request that an agenda item be postponed from a scheduled Planning Commission meeting one time. The Planning Commission shall table the application for a specific period of time to ensure that the requirements of Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance are not exceeded unless the applicant requests a waiver from this requirement. In no case shall an application be postponed for more than 12 months from the time the complete application was received by the Zoning Administrator or applicable staff. 8-3-9-3 An application that has been postponed for an unspecified period of time shall be re-advertised for consideration by the Planning Commission once the following steps have been completed: A)The applicant has requested in writing that the agenda item be considered by the Planning Commission. B)The applicant has provided all required information to the Frederick County Planning Department which addresses all concerns of the Planning Commission. 14 2024 Planning Commission Bylaws Page 10 8-3-10 Work sessions 8-3-10-1 The Commission may hold work sessions at which the procedural rules of these bylaws shall not apply. 8-3-10-2 Work sessions shall be held after the adjournment of regular meetings or at the time and place set by the Commission and/or the Board of Supervisors. 8-3-10-3 Notice of work sessions shall be sent to the Planning Commissioners at least five days before the session. 8-3-10-4 The chairman shall lead the session and require orderly behavior and discussion. 8-3-10-5 No actions shall be taken, or motions made at a work session. 8-3-10-6 Work sessions shall be open to the public. Public comment is not required at a work session. 8-3-10-7 The secretary shall keep a general record of all work sessions and the items discussed. 8-3-11 Adjournment 8-3-11-1 In no case shall the Commission consider any new items after 10:30 P.M. and the meeting shall be adjourned by 11:00 P.M. In the instance that an item begun before 10:30P.M. has not been acted on by the 11:00 P.M. hour, the Commission may, by majority vote, lift the adjournment time until a recommendation has been made, or such time, after 11:00 P.M., as the Commission may fix. ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENTS 9-1 These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the entire voting membership after thirty days prior notice at any time during the calendar year. 9-2 The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of these bylaws each calendar year to ensure their accuracy. 9-3 At the first meeting of the calendar year, the By-Laws will be adopted. 15 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES PROPOSED - JANUARY 3, 2024 This document has been prepared to assist Frederick County Planning Commissioners in understanding what their role and responsibilities are in the myriad of activities that they accept as a member of the Planning Commission. This compilation is a companion document to the Commission’s By-Laws. APPLICATION COMMUNICATIONS There are three primary sources of information gathered by and weighed by the Planning Commission in order to make quality planning recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. They are ex-parte communications; staff reports and public input. Ex-Parte Communications: Individual meetings between Commissioners and an applicant/developer regarding a specific application shall follow the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. During this discussion or at any other time prior to action taken by the Commission on the application, a Planning Commissioner should make no commitments or endorsements. Any new written materials provided by the applicant to any one Commissioner shall be made available to all commissioners and staff by the applicant prior to the application appearing on the agenda. To not do so may result in the application being tabled at the Planning Commission public hearing. Staff Application Briefings/Work Sessions: Prior to the first public hearing being held, staff will hold a briefing for the Planning Commissioners, with an invitation extended to the Board of Supervisors to participate, regarding any application deemed sufficiently complicated / controversial to warrant detailed explanation. The purpose is to apprise the Commissioners regarding the details of the application, both those items that meet the ordinance and those that do not. This provides the opportunity for the Commissioners to have a common understanding of the application prior to the public hearing. The decision to hold a briefing on a specific application will be made jointly by the Director of Planning and the Chairman of the Planning Commission. In addition to complexity, the application shall be basically complete prior to scheduling the briefing. The Planning Commission may request a work session for an application which, after the first public hearing is concluded, is subsequently postponed. The purpose of the work session is to discuss amongst each other and with staff details of the application, any 16 Page 2 2024 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Proposed - January 3, 2024 revised proffers provided or anticipated by the applicant, and other improvements which could be made to the application. For either a briefing or a work session: -The applicant should attend but will not have an active role. -The format of a Planning Commission work session as identified in paragraph 8- 3-10 of the Commission’s By-Laws will be used. -In no case will the legal timeline for consideration before the Planning Commission be changed. Public Hearing/Meeting: Efficient and effective public hearings are an essential part of enabling the Commission to make reasoned recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Every attempt will be made to obtain focused and broad representation of opinion or information from the public. When possible, specific time limitations will not be used. However, both rules of order as well as time constraints most appropriate for the specific application will be implemented when there is either large interest in or controversy regarding an application. One constant during this process on both the part of the public, the applicant, and the Commission itself is civility and respect for information offered or a differing opinion. Deviation from this behavior is unacceptable. COMMISSIONER DEVELOPMENT: Each Commissioner shall be committed to preparing for and keeping knowledge current in order to do the most effective job for the community. New initial appointees should strive to obtain Planning Commissioner certification from an acceptable training program within the first year of appointment. This training is supported by the Planning Department budget. Further continuing education through many offerings should be pursued and will be supported by the Planning budget as possible. These opportunities should be shared amongst the number of Commissioners who are serving. Examples include seminars or workshops from the Virginia Commonwealth University Land Use Education Program, and publications or opportunities from the American Planning Association. A library is maintained by the Planning office. 17 Page 3 2024 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Proposed - January 3, 2024 COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE: Commissioners are expected to participate in 80% of the regularly scheduled meetings per year. Members who cannot attend a meeting due to illness, business, and other governmental or family reasons should notify the Commission Chairman and/or staff Administrative Assistant prior to the scheduled meeting in order for the absence to be noted. It may affect quorum considerations. Especially essential is preparation and readiness for each of the Commission’s meetings in order to use not only the Commission’s but the staff’s and public’s time wisely. COMMISSION COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: Appointments to a Commission committee or liaison assignments are made by the chairman and shared by the membership. Generally, they involve a once per month meeting. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Each Commissioner needs to be familiar with Commonwealth of Virginia information on conflict of interest. If a Commissioner is unsure if there is conflict, the County Attorney is the correct resource. Upon determination that there is or might be perceived to be a conflict, the Commissioner should state immediately after the agenda item is read that recusal action is necessary (with, preferably, stating the reason) then step down from the dais until the item is concluded. PUBLIC REPRESENTATION: Commissioners are citizens, too. If there is a public item that is of interest, the Commissioner should participate, but not identify themselves as members of the Frederick County Planning Commission unless acting in an official capacity and directed to do so. Implied endorsements by the Commission should be avoided. 18 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES PROPOSED - JANUARY 3, 2024 This document has been prepared to assist Frederick County Planning Commissioners in understanding what their role and responsibilities are in the myriad of activities that they accept as a member of the Planning Commission. This compilation is a companion document to the Commission’s By-Laws. APPLICATION COMMUNICATIONS There are three primary sources of information gathered by and weighed by the Planning Commission in order to make quality planning recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. They are ex-parte communications; staff reports and public input. Ex-Parte Communications: Individual meetings between Commissioners and an applicant/developer regarding a specific application shall follow the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. During this discussion or at any other time prior to action taken by the Commission on the application, a Planning Commissioner should make no commitments or endorsements. Any new written materials provided by the applicant to any one Commissioner shall be made available to all commissioners and staff by the applicant prior to the application appearing on the agenda. To not do so may result in the application being tabled at the Planning Commission public hearing. Staff Application Briefings/Work Sessions: Prior to the first public hearing being held, staff will hold a briefing for the Planning Commissioners, with an invitation extended to the Board of Supervisors to participate, regarding any application deemed sufficiently complicated / controversial to warrant detailed explanation. The purpose is to apprise the Commissioners regarding the details of the application, both those items that meet the ordinance and those that do not. This provides the opportunity for the Commissioners to have a common understanding of the application prior to the public hearing. The decision to hold a briefing on a specific application will be made jointly by the Director of Planning and the Chairman of the Planning Commission. In addition to complexity, the application shall be basically complete prior to scheduling the briefing. The Planning Commission may request a work session for an application which, after the first public hearing is concluded, is subsequently postponed. The purpose of the work session is to discuss amongst each other and with staff details of the application, any 19 Page 2 2024 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Proposed - January 3, 2024 revised proffers provided or anticipated by the applicant, and other improvements which could be made to the application. For either a briefing or a work session: -The applicant should attend but will not have an active role. -The format of a Planning Commission work session as identified in paragraph 8- 3-10 of the Commission’s By-Laws will be used. -In no case will the legal timeline for consideration before the Planning Commission be changed. Public Hearing/Meeting: Efficient and effective public hearings are an essential part of enabling the Commission to make reasoned recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Every attempt will be made to obtain focused and broad representation of opinion or information from the public. When possible, specific time limitations will not be used. However, both rules of order as well as time constraints most appropriate for the specific application will be implemented when there is either large interest in or controversy regarding an application. One constant during this process on both the part of the public, the applicant, and the Commission itself is civility and respect for information offered or a differing opinion. Deviation from this behavior is unacceptable. COMMISSIONER DEVELOPMENT: Each Commissioner shall be committed to preparing for and keeping knowledge current in order to do the most effective job for the community. New initial appointees should strive to obtain Planning Commissioner certification from an acceptable training program within the first year of appointment. This training is supported by the Planning Department budget. Further continuing education through many offerings should be pursued and will be supported by the Planning budget as possible. These opportunities should be shared amongst the number of Commissioners who are serving. Examples include seminars or workshops from the Virginia Commonwealth University Land Use Education Program, and publications or opportunities from the American Planning Association. A library is maintained by the Planning office. 20 Page 3 2024 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Proposed - January 3, 2024 COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE: Commissioners are expected to participate in 80% of the regularly scheduled meetings per year. Members who cannot attend a meeting due to illness, business, and other governmental or family reasons should notify the Commission Chairman and/or staff Administrative Assistant prior to the scheduled meeting in order for the absence to be noted. It may affect quorum considerations. Especially essential is preparation and readiness for each of the Commission’s meetings in order to use not only the Commission’s but the staff’s and public’s time wisely. COMMISSION COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: Appointments to a Commission committee or liaison assignments are made by the chairman and shared by the membership. Generally, they involve a once per month meeting. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Each Commissioner needs to be familiar with Commonwealth of Virginia information on conflict of interest. If a Commissioner is unsure if there is conflict, the County Attorney is the correct resource. Upon determination that there is or might be perceived to be a conflict, the Commissioner should state immediately after the agenda item is read that recusal action is necessary (with, preferably, stating the reason) then step down from the dais until the item is concluded. PUBLIC REPRESENTATION: Commissioners are citizens, too. If there is a public item that is of interest, the Commissioner should participate, but not identify themselves as members of the Frederick County Planning Commission unless acting in an official capacity and directed to do so. Implied endorsements by the Commission should be avoided. 21 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Meeting Minutes Title: November 1, 2023 Meeting Minutes Attachments: PC01-03-24MinutesNovember1.pdf 22 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4070 Minutes of November 1, 2023 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on November 1, 2023. PRESENT: John F. Jewell, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S. Molden, Opequon District; Justin Kerns, Stonewall District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Elizabeth D. Kozel, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Jason Aikens, Gainesboro District; Betsy Brumback, Back Creek District; Mollie Brannon, Back Creek District; Tim Stowe, Red Bud District; Charles Markert, Red Bud District; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney. ABSENT: William A. Orndoff, Stonewall District STAFF PRESENT: Wyatt G. Pearson, Director; M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Kayla Peloquin, Planner I; Shannon L. Conner, Administrative Assistant. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jewell called the November 1, 2023 meeting of the Frederick County Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Jewell commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join in a moment of silence. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Upon a motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Manuel, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting. MINUTES Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Kozel, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the September 6, 2023 meeting. ------------- 23 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4071 Minutes of November 1, 2023 COMMITTEES None to present ------------ CITIZEN COMMENTS Chairman Jewell called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comments portion of the meeting. ------------- PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit #10-23 for Roses Plumbing (Michael and Brenda Rose) submitted for a cottage occupation (plumbing service). The property is located at 311 Paddys Run Road, Star Tannery, Virginia and is identified with Property Identification Number 80-A-22 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Action – Recommend Approval Kayla Peloquin, Planner I, reported this Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application is for a cottage occupation to operate a plumbing business. She shared a location map of the property and noted the Applicant is proposing the following: • Using an existing warehouse for the storage of materials. • One (1) employee not residing on the premises to access the property periodically to gather materials. • Typical hours of 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday – Friday along with afterhours visits for emergency calls. • No customers to visit the property. Ms. Peloquin shared the definition of a cottage occupation per the Zoning Ordinance (§165-101.02). She presented the conditions of this CUP as recommended by Staff: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. One (1) employee that is not residing on the premises is permitted. 3. No customers permitted on the property. 4. Any expansion or modification of this use will require the approval of a new CUP. The Commission asked Staff why a cottage occupation CUP is necessary, and Staff explained, because there is an employee of the business a cottage occupation CUP is required as this does not meet the definition of a home occupation. The Commission directed Staff to consider amending the cottage occupation definition in the Zoning Ordinance to allow for an employee with a standard home occupation. 24 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4072 Minutes of November 1, 2023 Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. A neighbor of the Applicant spoke in support of the application and stated they do not see why a CUP is required to operate in this proposed manner. No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Upon a motion made by Commissioner Brumback and seconded by Commissioner Stowe BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #10-23 for Roses Plumbing (Michael and Brenda Rose) submitted for a cottage occupation (plumbing service). The property is located at 311 Paddys Run Road, Star Tannery, Virginia and is identified with Property Identification Number 80-A-22 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. (Note: Commissioner Orndorff, Stonewall District was absent from the meeting) Ordinance Amendment to the Frederick County Code – revisions to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 165 to amend “Allowed Uses” tables contained in the planned development (Article V0, and business and industrial districts (Article VI) to update and convert the permitted uses terminology to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), remove reference to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) in other sections of the Zoning Ordinance, and to add or remove specific uses from the business and industrial districts “Allowed Uses” tables. Action – Recommend Approval M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported There are two (2) proposals for consideration. They are not mutually exclusive; staff has separated the proposals to ensure the potential changes outlined below in “Proposal B” do not get lost in the complexity of “Proposal A.” Please note new topic for consideration in bold below under “Proposal B.” Proposal A: Conversion of Allowed Uses Terminology The first proposal is to amend “Allowed Uses” tables contained in the planned development (Article V), and business and industrial districts (Article VI) to update and convert the permitted uses terminology to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and remove reference to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) in other sections the Zoning Ordinance. The NAICS is an alternative system in classifying business establishments that is maintained and updated on a regular basis by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The 2022 edition of the NAICS classification system was reviewed by staff and used in drafting ordinance revisions to convert from SIC to NAICS. As amended, the “Allowed Uses” list for each district was updated to reflect NAICS terminology and to remove numeric SIC coding. A statement was added to the “Intent” section of each district specifying how the Zoning Administrator may interpret use definitions, using those definitions provided through NAICS resources. Given the broad impact this change will have on the Zoning Ordinance, the information contained herein is limited only to the use tables impacted. The permitted uses list contained in the MS (Medical Support) District was condensed into a single section with use group subsections removed to provide additional clarity and remove duplicative uses. Other sections of the ordinance that reference SIC have also been amended to ensure consistency throughout (for example the “Additional Regulations for Specific Uses” section). 25 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4073 Minutes of November 1, 2023 Proposal B: Additions & Deletions to the Allowed Uses List; Other Changes: The second proposal is to add or remove specific uses from the business and industrial districts “Allowed Uses” tables. Specific additions and deletions are detailed below for each district. B1 (Neighborhood Business) District “Car washes” were removed from the “Allowed Uses” list. This deletion was on the recommendation of the Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC). B2 (General Business) District The following uses were added to the “Allowed Uses” list: Broadcasting and Content Providers, Automotive Oil Change and Lubrication Shops, and Technical and Trade Schools. B3 (Industrial Transition) District The following uses were added to the “Allowed Uses” list: Warehousing and Storage, Gasoline Stations with or without Convenience Stores (and excluding Fuel Dealers), Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services including Testing Laboratories including General Business Offices, Electronic Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance, Consumer Goods Rentals and Car, Truck, Utility Trailers, and RV (Recreational Vehicle) Rental and Leasing. TM (Technology-Manufacturing Park) District The following uses were added to the “Allowed Uses” list: Storage Batteries and Primary Battery Manufacturing. M1 (Light Industrial) District The following uses were added to the “Allowed Uses” list: Storage Batteries and Primary Battery Manufacturing, and Waste Management & Remediation Services limited to glass, cardboard, and plastics recycling and excluding incinerators. M2 (Industrial General) District Tractor truck and tractor truck trailer parking was moved from the “Conditional Uses” list to the “Allowed Uses” list. MS (Medical Support) District Remove requirement for locating “Continuing Care Retirement Communities” within a two-mile radius of the Route 37 Medical Center Interchange (§165-504.02(B)(c)(1)). HE (Higher Education) The permitted use list was expanded to include accessory and secondary uses typically associated in conjunction with education campus settings, for example restaurants and retail uses. EM (Extractive Mining) District “Parks” was added to the “Permitted Uses” list. Other Topics for Consideration: Staff requests the Planning Commission consider the addition of battery storage as a conditional use (requiring an approved conditional use permit or CUP) in the TM (Technology Manufacturing), M1 (Light Industrial) and M2 (Industrial General) Zoning 26 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4074 Minutes of November 1, 2023 Districts. Battery storage operations enable energy from renewables, like solar, to be stored and then released when the power is needed most. This is a new and emerging industry. Staff notes battery storage is a separate, distinctive, use from primary battery and storage battery manufacturing which has previously been allowed as a by-right use M2 District, and is proposed as part of this ordinance amendment to also be allowed by-right in the TM and M1 Districts. Current Zoning Ordinance Standard: The ordinance currently classifies industries using the Standard Industrial Classification System (SIC), which was last updated in 1987. The SIC includes many uses that have outdated terminology and definitions. Use of SIC presents a challenge to staff in making interpretations and determinations regarding uses, especially for new and emerging industries. The Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC) met and discussed this item at their February 23rd, March 23rd, and April 27, 2023, meetings. The primary discussion among the DRRC was whether there were additional uses to be added to the permitted use list, or if specific uses should be removed. The DRRC endorsed the proposed changes, including the additions outlined above and specifically recommended the deletion of “car washes” from the B1 District. The Committee expressed support for the conversion of the “Allowed Uses” tables to NAICS, stating it made the ordinance more “user friendly” to existing and potential new businesses and updated outdated industry terminology. The Planning Commission discussed this item on July 5th. The Planning Commission unanimously supported Proposal A (Conversion of Use Terminology); the Planning Commission was generally supportive of Proposal B (Additions & Deletions to Allowed Uses Lists). Commissioner Thomas expressed reservation about additional uses proposed for the HE (Higher Education) Zoning District, noting that development of the district without the school/college campus component could be problematic. The Board of Supervisors discussed this item on August 9th and were generally supportive of the proposals. The Board through consensus requested a specific revision to the MS (Medical Support) district text to remove the requirement for locating “Continuing Care Retirement Communities” within a two-mile radius of the Route 37 Medical Center Interchange as they stated it may be prohibitive to the establishment of another medical campus and continuing care facilities elsewhere in the County. Staff is seeking a recommendation by the Planning Commission on Proposal A (Conversion of “Allowed Uses” Terminology”) and/or Proposal B (Additions & Deletions to “Allowed Uses” List) to send forward to the Board of Supervisors Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comment portion of the hearing. The Planning Commission expressed reservation and did not offer a recommendation on the inclusion “battery storage” as a conditional use in the TM, M1 and M2 districts. In their discussion regarding “battery storage” the Planning Commission noted this was a very new and emerging industry with lots of variables and it may not be the right time to include the use with so many potential unknowns. Upon a motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Aikens 27 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4075 Minutes of November 1, 2023 BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval of Ordinance Amendment to the Frederick County Code – revisions to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 165 to amend “Allowed Uses” tables contained in the planned development (Article V0, and business and industrial districts (Article VI) to update and convert the permitted uses terminology to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), remove reference to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) in other sections of the Zoning Ordinance, and to add or remove specific uses from the business and industrial districts “Allowed Uses” tables. (Note: Commissioner Orndorff, Stonewall District was absent from the meeting) ------------- OTHER Ordinance Amendment – Sign Ordinance (Revisions and RA Sign Height) M. Tyler Klein reported, the following changes are proposed to Signs Ordinance (§165- 201.06) section of the Zoning Ordinance: • To remove §165-201.06(1)(C) which is no longer necessary as “signs allowed in certain districts” are no longer listed in each zoning district. Table 1, outlined later in the Sign Ordinance, specifies the sign types allowed in each zoning district. • To increase the allowed height permitted in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District from four (4) feet to eight (8) feet in height. This ordinance amendment was initiated by staff. Mr. Klein shared a comprehensive revision to the sign ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in May 2023. In implementing the revised ordinance staff have identified inconsistencies in the sections that require immediate attention. The sign height currently permitted in the RA District (four feet) was carried over from the previous version of the ordinance. Mr. Klein concluded, the Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC) discussed this ordinance amendment on September 28, 2023, and sent the item forward for discussion. Staff is seeking comments from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors for additional discussion. Planning Commission member offered no comments and forwarded to the Board of Supervisors. Ordinance Amendment – Telecommunication Facilities (Setback Waiver) M. Tyler Klein reported, this is a proposal to amend the supplementary use regulations for commercial telecommunication facilities to modify the criteria for a setback waiver by the Board of Supervisors (§165-204.19(C)(3)(a)). He noted this ordinance amendment was initiated by a telecommunications provider. Current Zoning Ordinance Standard: The Zoning Ordinance §165-204.19(C)(3)(a) specifies: “The Board may reduce the required setback distance for the wireless facility or wireless support structure as required by § 165-201.03B(8) of this Code if it can be demonstrated that the location is of equal or 28 Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4076 Minutes of November 1, 2023 lesser impact. When a reduced setback is requested for a distance less than the height of the tower, a certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification to the Board that the wireless facility or wireless support structure is designed, and will be constructed, in a manner that if the wireless facility or wireless support structure collapsed the wireless facility or wireless support structure will be contained in an area around the wireless facility or wireless support structure with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the wireless facility or wireless support structure. In no case, shall the setback distance be reduced to less than 1/2 the distance of the height of the wireless facility or wireless support structure.” Mr. Klein shared; the current commercial telecommunication facilities were comprehensively updated in 2019. The DRRC discussed this item on September 28, 2023, and endorsed the proposed changes. Staff is seeking comments from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors for additional discussion. Planning Commission Bylaws Amendment Wyatt G. Pearson, Director, reported, included in your packet is an amendment to the Planning Commission bylaws to allow for code compliant electronic participation by Planning Commissioners. The draft changes mirror the adopted board policy. Staff would call attention to the limits established for “personal matters” which do not allow more than two (2) instances in a given year. The State code does allow for two (2) instances annually or 25% of the meetings held per calendar year rounded up, whichever is greater. Consequently, the Commission could elect to include the 25% allowance which would roughly equate to six (6) meetings assuming no cancellations in a given year. Chairman Jewell made a motion to include the 25% allowance, seconded by Commissioner Thomas and was unanimously accepted by the Commission. ------------- ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner Thomas to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Aikens and unanimously passed. The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ John F. Jewell, Chairman ___________________________ Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary 29 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Public Hearings Title: Rezoning #06-23 for Winchester Gateway, LLC - (Mr. Klein) Attachments: PC01-03-24REZ06-23_Redacted.pdf 30 REZONING APPLICATION #06-23 WINCHESTER GATEWAY, LLC Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: December 12, 2023 Staff Contacts: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Senior Planner Reviewed Action Planning Commission 01/03/24 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/24/24 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 01/03/24 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is a request to rezone approximately +/- 34.26-acres of a +/-71.85-acre parcel from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers to develop warehousing, distribution or data center uses as stated in the application materials. Staff would note the proffers do not restrict the use of the property to only these uses listed on the application materials. The proposed rezoning generally implements uses typically associated with an “industrial” land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. However, staff notes the following deficiencies with the proposed rezoning to be brought to the attention of the Planning Commission for additional consideration: • The proposed rezoning materials do not address the “high quality architecture and site design” envisioned for the “Shady Elm Economic Development Area,” as described in the County’s Kernstown Area Plan, which includes the subject parcel. This may include stamped/painted concrete, brick, stone and/or glass. • The site may develop with any of the allowed uses in the M1 Zoning District, some of which could have a negative impact (noise, odor, glare vibrations) beyond those identified in the Impact Analysis Statement on adjoining residential uses and historic resources. Proffered use restrictions have not been proposed to address mitigating impacts on adjoining properties. • The proffer statement (dated November 28, 2023) and generalized development plan (dated May 25, 2023) include a green space buffer which is intended to screen the property from adjoining residential uses to the north of the subject property. However, the proffered buffer language is not specific in how the buffer intent would be fulfilled if the existing landscaping is disturbed for utility installation and maintenance or if road improvements are required to widen Apple Valley Road and widening would need to occur within the proffered buffer area. • The proposal does not fully address all traffic impacts on Apple Valley Road or the future condition of the roadway as an improved collector roadway. Specifically, widening proposed in the proffer statement along Apple Valley Road is limited to only up to the first commercial entrance. When a second commercial entrance is proposed, Apple Valley Road improvements would only be made if the vehicles per day (VPD) exceed 2,000 trips. Staff (and as noted on the December 2023 VDOT comment letter) would not support a proffer that does not commit to making the full Apple Valley Road improvements, regardless of trips, along the property frontage, including pedestrian facilities (sidewalk). These improvements would be consistent with the existing frontage from 31 Rezoning #06-23 Winchester Gateway, LLC December 12, 2023 Page 2 Shady Elm Road west to the limits of the existing Blackburn Commerce Center. Further, the traffic study notes a large percentage of the trips anticipated to be generated from this development are tractor trucks and trailers. Finally, improvements proposed assume only warehouse, distribution or data center uses; however, the proffer statement does not restrict use of the property to only those uses. The proffer statement is in a form acceptable to the County Attorney. Following a public hearing, a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 32 Rezoning #06-23 Winchester Gateway, LLC December 12, 2023 Page 3 This report has been prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. PROPOSAL: This is a request to rezone approximately +/- 34.26- acres of a 71.85+/- acre parcel from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. LOCATION: The subject property is located at the intersection of Apple Valley Road and Middle Road and is bounded by Route 37 to the west. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 63-A-80I PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) & M1 (Light Industrial) PRESENT USE: Vacant/Unimproved ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Church/Residential/Agricultural South: M1 (Light Industrial) Use: Warehouse/Distribution East: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential (single-family detached) West: Route 37/RA Use: Roadway/Agricultural REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The subject property was previously rezoned through rezoning (REZ) application #01-15 (Blackburn Commerce Center). A +/-34.26-acre portion of the tract included in the Blackburn rezoning was left split zoned RA (Rural Areas) and M1 (Light Industrial) Districts. At the time of the rezoning, the RA zoned portion of the subject property was intended to remain undisturbed along Apple Valley Road to serve as a buffer between existing residential uses to the east and future industrial uses to the west. 2) Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The Plan is developed with the input of the public and adopted by the Board of Supervisors (last updated November 2021). The Plan is a vital tool that provides direction for future growth, aimed at ensuring orderly well-planned development to promote, preserve and protect the health, safety, general welfare, and quality of life for the citizens and businesses of Frederick County. The Area Plans in Appendix I of the Comprehensive Plan are the primary implementation tools and are instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County. 33 Rezoning #06-23 Winchester Gateway, LLC December 12, 2023 Page 4 Land Use Compatibility The Comprehensive Plan and the Kernstown Area Plan (adopted 2017) provide guidance on the future development of the subject property. The Plan identifies the subject properties with an “industrial” land use designation and as being within the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and Urban Development Area (UDA). Further, the Kernstown Area Plan identifies the subject property within the “Shady Elm Economic Development Area.” As described in the plan: “The Shady Elm Economic Development Area is designed to be a significant area of commercial/industrial (C/I) opportunity that is fully supportive of the Frederick County Economic Development Authority’s targeted goals and strategies. The intent of the industrial designation is to further enhance the County’s C/I areas and to provide focus to the County’s future regional employment centers. In specific areas a mix of flexible uses, with office uses in prominent locations, is encouraged. Such areas are supported by substantial areas of C/I opportunity and provide for areas that are well designed with high quality architecture and site design. It is the intent of such areas to promote a strong positive community image.” The proposed rezoning generally implements uses typically associated with an “industrial” land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed rezoning does not speak to the intended “high quality architecture and site design” envisioned for the “Shady Elm Economic Development Area” as described above. The M1 Zoning District, as proposed and unrestricted, contains uses that may negatively impact adjoining residential properties. Staff would note the proposed uses allowed should be carefully selected to minimize impacts to adjacent residential uses and the Kernstown Battlefield Park to the north and east across Apple Valley Road. The applicant may further consider a commitment to high quality building materials, building height restrictions, restriction of site lighting mounting height, and other site elements to ensure development of the site achieves implementation of the Shady Elm Economic Development Area as envisioned in the Plan. 3) Site Access and Transportation Apple Valley Road (Route 651/652) is identified in the Comprehensive Plan/Eastern Road Plan as an “improved minor collector” roadway. The Kernstown Area Plan states that the plan goal is “an acceptable level of service on area roads and overall transportation network, level of service C or better. The rezoning application proposal limits the number of commercial entrances on Apple Valley Road to two (2) and intends to provide inter-parcel connection to the existing Blackburn Commerce Center to the south and east. Further, the application proposes improvements (timing varies) to widen Apple Valley Road to match the existing segment to the east from Route 11 to the limits of the Blackburn Commerce Center site. This widening would include two (2) travel lanes and a center turn lane. The proffer statement does not include any right-of-way reservation for the future condition of Apple Valley Road as an improved minor collector roadway should the owner not be required to make the improvements themselves. Additionally, the proffer statement does not make a commitment to inter- parcel connectivity to the existing Blackburn Commerce Center. The “Typical Section” detail included on the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) does not include pedestrian accommodations to match the existing roadway cross section to the east. Pedestrian access is required by the Zoning Ordinance for all new development (§165-202). 34 Rezoning #06-23 Winchester Gateway, LLC December 12, 2023 Page 5 4) Proffers Statement & Impact Mitigation The proffer statement, dated November 28, 2023, proposes the following: • Substantial conformance with the referenced Generalized Development Plan dated May 15, 2023 (Proffer 1.1). • Screening of all loading docks from adjacent properties (Proffer 1.2) Staff Comment on Proffer 1.1: The specifics of what is intended (landscaping, earthen berm, fencing, etc.) for the loading dock area “screening” are not provided in the proffer statement. • A 200-foot-wide green space buffer along Apple Valley Road frontage. The green space buffer would be left undisturbed in a natural state (Proffer 1.3). Staff Comment on Proffer 1.3: The proffered buffer language is not specific in how the buffer intent would be fulfilled if the existing landscaping is disturbed (removed) for utility installation and maintenance or if road improvements are required to widen Apple Valley Road and widening would need to occur within the proffered buffer area. • To limit the number of commercial entrances to two (2) full movement entrances from Apple Valley Road (Proffer 2.1). • Construct improvements along Apple Valley Road including paving of two (2) full lanes of travel with a center turn lane. The road improvements would be installed to the first commercial entrance for the property. In the event the second entrance is required, the owner will continue the improvements to Apple Valley Road for the second entrance if the site generates more than 2,000 vehicle trips per day (VPD) (Proffer 2.2). Staff Comment on Proffer 2.1 and 2.2: The proffer statement does not fully address all traffic impacts on Apple Valley Road or the future condition of the roadway as an improved collector roadway. Specifically, widening proposed in the proffer statement along Apple Valley Road is limited to only up to the first commercial entrance. When a second commercial entrance is proposed, Apple Valley Road improvements would only be made if the vehicles per day (VPD) exceed 2,000 trips. If the trips do not exceed the threshold, the roadway will not be widened to match sections to the east. Staff (and VDOT) would not support a proffer that does not commit to making the full improvements along the property frontage with Apple Valley Road. Improvements should be included along the full frontage as has been done with previous industrial development in the area (Blackburn Commerce Center). Additionally, staff notes commercial entrances would require a separate VDOT approval as part of the site plan review and approval process prior to development. • Monetary contribution of $0.10 per square foot for any building constructed on the property (Proffer 3.1). 35 Rezoning #06-23 Winchester Gateway, LLC December 12, 2023 Page 6 Other Review Agency Comments: Review Agency Comment Issuance Date Status Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) October 13, 2023 December 5, 2023 VDOT has reviewed the latest redline proffers [11-28-23] rezoning for the Winchester Gateway application and we do not feel that a VPD trigger for frontage improvements would be appropriate given the nature of the development and the existing condition of Apple Valley Road. Additionally, knowing that some of the traffic from this development may opt to travel towards Middle Road to reach destinations to the west, we would feel more comfortable if full frontage improvements were being provided. Frederick County (FC) Attorney September 9, 2023 Acceptable form. Frederick-Winchester Health Department (VDH) August 24, 2023 No objections. FC Public Works September 19, 2023 No comments. FC Fire Marshal September 9, 2023 No comments. FC Parks & Recreation September 8, 2023 No comments. Frederick Water August 29, 2023 Caution to be exercised during design and development due to existing water and sewer infrastructure along Apple Valley Road. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) September 15, 2023 No comments. City of Winchester October 11, 2023 No comments. Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) September 20, 2023 Recommended proffered height restrictions for new buildings not to exceed height of existing structures on adjoining M1 zoned parcels. Following a public meeting, a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 36 COCA COLABUSINESS PARKSubdivision SEWELL &ROYSTONSubdivision ¬«37 63 A 80I 3735MIDDLE RD 351APPLEVALLEY RD 331APPLEVALLEY RD 260SHADYELM RD 321APPLEVALLEY RD 170SHADYELM RD 332APPLE VALLEY RD 336APPLEVALLEY RD 452APPLEVALLEY RD 472APPLE VALLEY RD 482APPLE VALLEY RD 492APPLE VALLEY RD 512APPLE VALLEY RD 502APPLE VALLEY RD 536APPLE VALLEY RD 520APPLEVALLEY RD 3426MIDDLE RD 554APPLE VALLEY RD 572APPLEVALLEY RD 564APPLE VALLEY RD 136JORDAN DR 116JORDAN DR 592APPLEVALLEY RD 3362MIDDLE RD 610APPLE VALLEY RD602APPLEVALLEY RD 3075MIDDLE RD3346MIDDLE RD 3352MIDDLE RD 632APPLEVALLEY RD 2877MIDDLE RD 3323MIDDLE RD 652APPLEVALLEY RD 640APPLEVALLEY RD 3322MIDDLE RD 3217MIDDLE RD 3210MIDDLE RD 3155MIDDLE RD 3175MIDDLE RD 3161MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RDAPPLE VALLEY RD Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels M1 (Light Industrial District) RP (Residential P erform ance District)µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 Winchester MIDDLE RDJONES RDAPPLE VALLEY RD VALLEY PIKESHADY ELM RDSTUART DR ROSEWOOD LNLANGHORNE DR¬«37 ¬«37 0 620 1,240310 Feet REZ # 06 - 23: Winchester GatewayPIN: 63 - A - 80IRezoning from RA to M1Zoning Map REZ #06-23 37 COCA COLABUSINESS PARKSubdivision SEWELL &ROYSTONSubdivision ¬«37 63 A 80I 3735MIDDLE RD 351APPLEVALLEY RD 331APPLEVALLEY RD 260SHADYELM RD 321APPLEVALLEY RD 170SHADYELM RD 332APPLE VALLEY RD 336APPLEVALLEY RD 452APPLEVALLEY RD 472APPLE VALLEY RD 482APPLE VALLEY RD 492APPLE VALLEY RD 512APPLE VALLEY RD 502APPLE VALLEY RD 536APPLE VALLEY RD 520APPLEVALLEY RD 3426MIDDLE RD 554APPLE VALLEY RD 572APPLEVALLEY RD 564APPLE VALLEY RD 136JORDAN DR 116JORDAN DR 592APPLEVALLEY RD 3362MIDDLE RD 610APPLE VALLEY RD602APPLEVALLEY RD 3075MIDDLE RD3346MIDDLE RD 3352MIDDLE RD 632APPLEVALLEY RD 2877MIDDLE RD 3323MIDDLE RD 652APPLEVALLEY RD 640APPLEVALLEY RD 3322MIDDLE RD 3217MIDDLE RD 3210MIDDLE RD 3155MIDDLE RD 3175MIDDLE RD 3161MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RDAPPLE VALLEY RD Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 Winchester MIDDLE RDJONES RDAPPLE VALLEY RD VALLEY PIKESHADY ELM RDSTUART DR ROSEWOOD LNLANGHORNE DR¬«37 ¬«37 0 620 1,240310 Feet REZ # 06 - 23: Winchester GatewayPIN: 63 - A - 80IRezoning from RA to M1Location Map REZ #06-23 38 COCA COLABUSINESS PARKSubdivision SEWELL &ROYSTONSubdivision ¬«37 63 A 80I 3735MIDDLE RD 351APPLEVALLEY RD 331APPLEVALLEY RD 260SHADYELM RD 321APPLEVALLEY RD 170SHADYELM RD 332APPLE VALLEY RD 336APPLEVALLEY RD 452APPLEVALLEY RD 472APPLE VALLEY RD 482APPLE VALLEY RD 492APPLE VALLEY RD 512APPLE VALLEY RD 502APPLE VALLEY RD 536APPLE VALLEY RD 520APPLEVALLEY RD 3426MIDDLE RD 554APPLE VALLEY RD 572APPLEVALLEY RD 564APPLE VALLEY RD 136JORDAN DR 116JORDAN DR 592APPLEVALLEY RD 3362MIDDLE RD 610APPLE VALLEY RD602APPLEVALLEY RD 3075MIDDLE RD3346MIDDLE RD 3352MIDDLE RD 632APPLEVALLEY RD 2877MIDDLE RD 3323MIDDLE RD 652APPLEVALLEY RD 640APPLEVALLEY RD 3322MIDDLE RD 3217MIDDLE RD 3210MIDDLE RD 3155MIDDLE RD 3175MIDDLE RD 3161MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RDAPPLE VALLEY RD Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Long R ange Land Use Residential Industrial Sensitive Natural Areas Institutional µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 Winchester MIDDLE RDJONES RDAPPLE VALLEY RD VALLEY PIKESHADY ELM RDSTUART DR ROSEWOOD LNLANGHORNE DR¬«37 ¬«37 0 620 1,240310 Feet REZ # 06 - 23: Winchester GatewayPIN: 63 - A - 80IRezoning from RA to M1Long Range Land Use Map REZ #06-23 39 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ# _____________ Rural Areas (RA) and Light Industrial (M1) to Light Industrial (M1) Previously approved rezoning application #01-15 PROPERTY: 71.85 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcel 63-A-80I (the “Property”) RECORD OWNER: Winchester Gateway LLC (“Owner”) ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: August 23, 2023 REVISION DATE(S): November 28, 2023 The undersigned Owner hereby proffers that the use and development of the above- referenced parcels, which are requested to be rezoned, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers on the Property that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above-referenced M1 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the Owner, these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with “final rezoning” defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors’ (the “Board”) decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board’s decision is contested, and the Owner elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term “Owner” as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. 1. Site Development 1.1 Owner proffers to develop the Property in substantial conformance with the Generalized Development Plan for Blackburn Property Rezoning dated May 15, 2023 by Greenway Engineering which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as “Exhibit A” (“GDP”). 1.2 Development of the Property shall include the following building restrictions: 40 2 All loading docks shall be screened from view from all adjacent properties zoned RA and RP with [insert type of screening]. 1.3 Development of the Property shall include the following landscape design features: Owner proffers to install a green space buffer between Apple Valley Road and the existing pond. The buffer will extend two hundred (200) feet from the edge of Apple Valley Road. The green space buffer is to be left undisturbed and remain in its natural state. The green space buffer may only be disturbed for installation and maintenance of utilities, and maintenance of the vegetation. The green space buffer shall be in general conformance with the location shown on the GDP. 2. Transportation 2.1 Owner proffers to construct not more than two full-movements entrances on Apple Valley Road in general conformance with the locations shown on the GDP. Owner also proffers to construct road improvements along Apple Valley Road which are generally consistent with the road improvements that were installed to the M1 property immediately adjacent to the west. This would include paving of two full lanes of travel with a center turn lane. It is anticipated that the road improvements shall be installed to the first entrance for the Property, which would be the westernmost entrance. In the event the second entrance is required to be installed, Owner proffers to install the aforementioned three lane road improvements on Apple Valley Road to the second entrance and at such time as a certificate of occupancy is issued for any industrial building constructed on the Property which pursuant to the ITE Manual generates more than two thousand VPD. Owner does not proffer to build any additional road improvements to extend across the remaining portions of Apple Valley Road to its intersection with Middle Road. 3. Fire and Rescue 3.1 Owner proffers to make a one-time payment to Frederick County for the purposes of fire and rescue services in the amount of $0.10 per square foot of any future building constructed on the Property. 4. Escalator 4.1 In the event the monetary contributions set forth in these Proffers are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by Owner, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in these Proffers which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index (“CPI-U”) published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of six percent (6%) per year, non-compounded. 41 3 Respectfully submitted, WINCHESTER GATEWAY LLC By: Winchester Advisors LLC Its: Manager By: Darius E. Saeidi Its: Manager STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF _________, AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF ____________, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2023, by Darius E. Saeidi, Manager of Winchester Advisors LLC, Manager of WINCHESTER GATEWAY LLC. ____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: ______________________ Registration number: 42 EX. Zoning Boundary (M1 & RA) Property Line Wetland "A" Delineated Wetland "DE" Wetland "FG" Off-Site Wetland "BC" Delineated Wetland "BC" Delineated Wetland "DE" Delineated Wetland "BC" Off-Site Wetland "BC" Delineated Wetland "BC" Delineated Wetland "HI" Spring 75' BRL 75 ' B R L 25' BRL 200' BUFFER WITH EXISTING VEGETATION PRESERVED PER PROFFER 25' BRLEx. 10" D.I.P. W/L Ex. 10" D.I.P. W/L Ex. 8" D.I.P. W/L Ex. Fire Hydrant (F-182) Static Pressure = 68 PSI Static Pressure = 1,233 GPM Residual Pressure = 54 PSI Test Date: 04/24/2007 Ex. Fire Hydrant (F-183) Static Pressure = 62 PSI Static Pressure = 1,198 GPM Residual Pressure = 51 PSI Test Date: 08/13/2012 Ex. Fire Hydrant (F-184) Static Pressure = 50 PSI Static Pressure = 1,140 GPM Residual Pressure = 46 PSI Test Date: 02/15/2005 Ex. 10" D.I.P. W/L FW 20" WL - ARV (V A R I A B L E W I D T H R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) V A R T E # 3 7 Existing Electric Transmission Line & Esmt. (Shown Approx.)Middle Road(VA SEC RTE #628)Property Line Ex. Pond PROP. PRIMARY ENTRANCE POTENTIAL INTER-PARCEL ACCESS PROP. PRIMARY/SECONDARY ENTRANCEEx. 8" D.I.P. W/LEx. 10" PVC W/LEx. 10" D.I.P. W/L PROP. APPLE VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (SEE TYPICAL SECTION)EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY & ROAD C/LEPEPSUBJECT PARCEL BOUNDARYC/L 10' ROADSIDE DITCHEX. FENCEEX. GRADE 55' 45'10' 35'10'10'EX. RIGHT-OF-WAYEPSUBJECT PARCEL BOUNDARYC/L 10' ROADSIDE DITCH55' 45'10' 12'19'12'12'EPTHRU TURN THRU C/LPROP. PAVEMENT PROP. GRADE 151 Windy Hill LaneWinchester, Virginia 22602Telephone: (540) 662-4185Fax: (540) 722-9528www.greenwayeng.comFND1971ENGINEERINGSHEET OF DESIGNED BY: FILE NO. SCALE: DATE:PROUDLY SERVING VIRGINIA & WEST VIRGINIAOFFICES IN: WINCHESTER, VA & MARTINSBURG, WVSCALE: 1" = 100' 100 0 100 200 1" = 100' 1GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANBLACKBURN PROPERTY REZONINGBACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTFREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIAOct 26, 2023 EJG / RLK 1 0036E A. Total Site Area = 71.85 AC. (3,129,844.14 SF) B. Proposed Zoning 1. M1, Light Industrial C. Building Setbacks 1. Front Yard Primary & Arterial Highways = 75' 2. Front Yard Collector & Minor Streets = 75' 3. Side = 25' 4. Rear = 25' D. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1. Maximum Permitted = 1.00 (3,129,844.14 GSF) 2. Maximum Proposed = 0.30 (938,953 GSF) E. Landscaped Area (% of Lot) 1. Minimum = 25% (782,461 SF) F. Height 1. Maximum = 60 feet G. Buffer Requirements 1. 200-ft buffer with existing vegetation preserved per proffer Preliminary Design Criteria: LEGEND: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT EX. APPLE VALLEY ROAD TYPICAL SECTION PROP. APPLE VALLEY ROAD TYPICAL SECTION 43 WINCHESTER GATEWAY REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT August 23, 2023 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Frederick County by the proffered rezoning of a 34.26 acre portion of the property identified as Tax Map Number 63-A- 80I to M1 Light Industrial. The subject parcel is situated at the intersection of Apple Valley Road and Middle Road. The property extends to the south east along Apple Valley Road. The western side of the property is bounded by Route 37. The property is currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and M1 (Light Industrial). This application proposes to rezone the 34.26 acre portion of the property from RA to M1. The property is currently vacant. The M1 portion of the property is subject to Rezoning #01-15. General Site Information Location: The parcel fronts on the southwest side of Apple Valley Road. Magisterial District: Back Creek District Tax Map Number: 63-A-80I Current Zoning: RA (34.26 acres) and M1 (37.59 acres) Current Use: Undeveloped Proposed Zoning: M1, Light Industrial District with proffers Proposed Use: Warehousing/Distribution Facility/Industrial Park Total Rezoning Area: 34.26 +/- acres with proffers COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional land use development is encouraged in the County. The subject acreage is located outside of the UDA. 44 Impact Analysis Statement Winchester Gateway 2 Sewer and Water Service Area The Property is outside of the limits of the County’s Urban Development Area (UDA) but wholly within the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). Comprehensive Plan Conformity The Kernstown Area Land Use Plan designates the subject acreage for Industrial use. Given the adjoining industrial uses as well as its proximity to Route 11, Route 37, and Interstate 81, the subject acreage is ideally situated for a warehousing/distribution facility/data center use. Its proposed development pursuant to the M1 District aligns with the goals of the Frederick County Comprehensive plan, notably by promoting the County’s goal of enhancing commercial/industrial areas and providing focus to the county’s future regional employment centers. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The subject acreage fronts on Apple Valley Road. Access to the site will be provided via two proposed full-movement entrances along Apple Valley Road. A Traffic Impact Analysis is provided with the rezoning application. Internal access between the proposed warehouse/distribution uses will occur through the extension of private service drives. Flood Plains The subject acreage does not contain areas of floodplain per FEMA NFIP Map #51069C0209E Effective Date January 29, 2021. Wetlands The subject acreage contains wetland areas as demonstrated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map information or from information identified in the Frederick County GIS Database. Environmental Features The subject acreage does not contain areas of steep slope, lakes or ponds or natural stormwater retention areas as defined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. There are no other environmental features that will constrain development of future M1 uses or such features will be managed during final engineering design in accordance with all applicable ordinances and regulations. Soils/Geology As per the Frederick County GIS Database, the following soil types are present on the subject acreage: Frederick Poplimento loams (#14B); Frederick Poplimento very rocky loams (#16C); Frederick Poplimento Rock Outcrop Complex (#17C), and Swimley Silt loams (#39B). 45 Impact Analysis Statement Winchester Gateway 3 These soil types are clay with an abundance of limestone rock. The characteristics of these soil types are manageable for development following the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control practices. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: RA, Rural Area District Use: Residential South: M1, Light Industrial District Use: Industrial East: RA, Rural Area District RP, Residential Performance District Use: Church and Residential West: RA, Rural Area District (Across Route 37) Use: Vacant TRANSPORTATION Please refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis Statement for Winchester Gateway dated July 13, 2023 prepared by Gorove Slade. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY The Property is located wholly within the Sewer and Water Service Area and is therefore entitled to be served by public water and sewer based on County Policy. Frederick Water is the provider of public water and sewer service within this area of the County. SITE DRAINAGE Topographic relief on the Property generally follows a pattern that directs drainage towards the east of the Property. A complete stormwater management plan will be designed at the time of final engineering design. All associated stormwater quantity and quality measures will be designed in conformance with all applicable state and local regulations; therefore, site drainage and stormwater management impacts to adjoining properties and the community will be mitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Solid waste generated by business activities will be collected in dumpster facilities and removed from the site by commercial refuse carrier. Solid waste will be transferred to the Frederick County landfill for ultimate disposal by said carrier. HISTORICAL RESOURCES The property adjoins the Kernstown Battlefield, a 388-acre historic site with a visitor center, historic buildings (Pritchard-Grim House), and interpretive walking trails. 46 Impact Analysis Statement Winchester Gateway 4 IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES Educational Facilities: This project will add no children to the school system. Emergency Services: Police protection will be provided by the Frederick County Sheriff’s Department. The property is located in the first response area for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company. Response times from the station to the site are reasonable. Parks and Recreation: This project will not add to the population of Frederick County and therefore will not increase the demand for parks and recreational services. Libraries: This project will not add to the population of Frederick County and therefore will not increase the demand for library services. 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 Frederick Home Frederick County Virginia LIFE AT THE TOP Pay/Lookup Taxes Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous 2023 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticket#RE2023 / 33140002 Frequency 2 Supplement#0 Name WINCHESTER GATEWAY LLC Map#63 A 80I Account#8034928 Name 2 Bill Date 04/15/2023 Acreage 71.850 Address 15 S KING ST Due Date 12/05/2023 Improvements $0.00 LEESBURG VA Desc 71.85 ACRES Land Value $2,297,300.00 Land Use $55,400.00 Zip 20175 2903 Minerals $0.00 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 11/03/2023 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due $141.27 ($141.27)$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Transaction History Date Type Transaction#Amount Balance 4/15/2023 Charge 0 $141.27 $141.27 11/3/2023 Principal Paid 725 ($141.27)$0.00 Previous Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Pay FOIA Charges Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email 114 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Public Hearings Title: Conditional Use Permit #11-23 for 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding, LLC - (Mrs. Peloquin) Attachments: PC01-03-24CUP11-23_Redacted.pdf 115 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #11-23 231 VAUCLUSE SPRING HOLDING LLC Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: December 18, 2023 Staff Contact: Kayla Peloquin, Planner This report has been prepared by the Frederick County Planning and Development Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 01/03/24 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/24/24 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding, LLC, for a recreation area and resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility. Should the Planning Commission find this application to be appropriate, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. A site plan shall be submitted and approved by Frederick County prior to the establishment of this use. The site plan shall meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance in §165-204.30 for Special Event Facilities. 3. Special events may not exceed 130 guests. 4. Amplified outdoor music must conclude by 9:00 p.m. and all events shall conclude by 11:00 p.m. 5. Approval of this CUP will void previous CUP #02-95. 6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require approval of a new CUP. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. 116 Page 2 CUP #11-23, 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding LLC December 18, 2023 LOCATION: The property is located at 231 Vaucluse Spring Lane, Stephens City, Virginia. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 84-A-53A PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Bed and Breakfast ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA Use: Residential/Agricultural/Forestal South: RA Use: Residential East: RA Use: Undeveloped/Agricultural/Forestal West: RA Use: Undeveloped/Agricultural/Forestal PROPOSED USE: The application proposes a recreation area and resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility on 44.25 +/- acres. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning and Zoning: Proposal: The application proposes the continued operation of a 15-room bed and breakfast, opening an existing restaurant for guests of the inn and to the public, and 12-15 special events per year, with no more than 130 guests that will conclude by 11:00 p.m. The Inn at Vaucluse Spring has been operating under CUP #02-95, which was approved for a 15-room bed & breakfast with a restaurant to serve only guests staying at the Inn. Since that time, the Zoning Ordinance has changed to cap bed and breakfasts to 10 rooms, therefore the new CUP application is under the recreation area and resort category. The current CUP application does not propose an expansion in the number of guest rooms or any additional structures. The existing commercial kitchen and dining areas would not be expanded. The property would be open seven days a week, with hours varying seasonally. The application proposes several full-time and part-time staff members such as servers, housekeepers, and maintenance personnel. The application proposes only minor cosmetic renovations to existing structures to preserve the historic integrity of the property. Staff met with the applicants on site on December 8, 2023. The applicants stated that if a special event were to be held, it would require a “full buy-out” of the property, meaning all rooms would be booked by those attending the event, therefore reducing the total amount of people and vehicles on the property. The applicant confirmed that portable restroom facilities will be brought in for special events and removed after each event. The applicant stated willingness to add additional graveled parking areas, if necessary, along with accessible parking and access to 117 Page 3 CUP #11-23, 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding LLC December 18, 2023 the manor house. Comprehensive Plan Conformance: The Comprehensive Plan, last updated by the Board of Supervisors in 2021, provides guidance when considering land use actions. The Plan identifies the subject property with a “rural” land Use designation. The property is outside the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the Urban Development Area (UDA). The property is not part of any small area plan. Chapter 2 of the Plan (Rural Areas) states the goal to “promote the County’s preferred uses for the rural areas, including supportive uses for agriculture, historic preservation, tourism, and strengthening land conservation initiatives” (pg. 14). Chapter 4 (Business Development) outlines the goal of recognizing diverse land use for tourism related activities with a strategy to “Ensure that business owners are supported in their efforts to bring tourism activities to the local consumer market” (pg. 34). The application proposal would bring visitors to the County to enjoy the many attractions and businesses. The proposed uses are generally consistent with the rural planned land use identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Ordinance Requirements: The Zoning Ordinance defines a resort as “A facility for transient guests where the primary attraction is recreational features or activities” (§165-101.02). The proposed use meets this definition. The Zoning Ordinance defines a restaurant as “A facility in which food and drinks are prepared, served, and consumed” (§165-101.02). The proposed use meets this definition. The Zoning Ordinance defines a special event facility as “A facility or site utilized for events that are typically conducted on a single day, but which may be conducted for up to three consecutive days, for which attendance is permitted only by invitation or reservation; special events include, but are not limited to, meetings, conferences, banquets, dinners, weddings and private parties” (§165-101.02). The proposed use meets this definition. The Zoning Ordinance includes “Additional Regulations for Specific Uses” for special event facilities (§165-204.30) to mitigate potential negative impacts on adjoining properties. Special events facilities shall be subject to the following requirements: A. An illustrative sketch plan in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII shall be submitted with the conditional use permit application. This plan shall identify access for the facility, the location of all parking areas, the location and square footage for all structure(s) to be used, and the location of sewage disposal facilities. B. All structures associated with a special events facility shall require a review and approval by the Building Official. 118 Page 4 CUP #11-23, 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding LLC December 18, 2023 C. All parking spaces and travel aisles shall be graveled. The Board of Supervisors may require through the conditional use permit process that all travel aisles and/or parking spaces be paved with a minimum double prime and seal or alternative dust-free surface. D. Portable toilets shall be permitted for special event facilities, provided that they are screened from all adjoining properties and roads by topography, structures or new or existing landscaping. E. Special events facilities that share a private access easement with another property owner/s must show the easement allows a use of this type or written permission must be obtained by the sharing parties. The proposed uses, as described in the application narrative, meet the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The Additional Regulations for Specific Uses listed above will be addressed through the site plan process. Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 638, Vaucluse Road. The existing entrance is located on Route 638 is in good condition. There are trees to the west restricting sight distance. I met on site with Ms. Taylor; she was agreeable to the removal of the trees in question. Once the trees are removed, the entrance will meet VDOT entrance requirements. Based on this information, VDOT can support the CUP request. If the business expands, VDOT reserves the right to re-evaluate the entrance. Please see the attached letter from Lloyd Ingram, Transportation Engineer dated October 31, 2023. Winchester-Frederick Health Department: The Frederick County Health Department cannot make favorable comments to the change of use for this property. An OSE from the list provided will need to assess the current use and future use of this property to make sure sewage disposal systems are adequate for additional use. The pool, restaurant and transient lodging would require a plan review to be applied for at the Frederick County Health Department. Issues that may need addressed would involve pool turn over rate and disinfection, restaurant increased use, drainfield records for the gallery and inn keeper’s quarters, loss of reserve drainfield area due to subdivision of land and overall increase of use. Please see the attached letter from Kevin Yost, Environmental Health Specialist Supervisor dated November 6, 2023. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Approved with Conditions. The proposed change of use to include an Assembly Use Group and the increased occupancy load shall require the addition of Approved Fire Lanes in accordance with 503.7 of the Frederick County Fire Prevention Code (SFPC-2018). These Fire Lanes shall ensure an uninterrupted Fire Department Access to all Assembly Use Group structures and be designed and marked in accordance with Section 503 of the above code. Additionally, Appendix D of the same code may be referenced to aid with this design. 119 Page 5 CUP #11-23, 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding LLC December 18, 2023 Additional fire and life safety codes may become applicable, pending the approved designed occupant load from the Building Official’s Office. Please see the attached letter from William Pifer, Lieutenant Assistant Fire Marshal dated October 20, 2023. Frederick County Public Works: We offer no comments. Please see the attached letter from Joe Wilder, Director of Public Works dated November 2, 2023. Frederick County Inspections Department: Request to use dining areas of existing bed and breakfast for a restaurant open to the general public utilizing existing commercial kitchen and dining areas. The dining areas shall require a change of use and shall comply with the 2018 Existing Building Code and the 2018 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code Section 304, us group B. Business. Other codes that apply are the International Fire Code 2018 and the Virginia Plumbing Code. Building accessibility and restroom requirements shall comply with Chapter 4 of the Virginia Existing Building Code. Handicap parking shall comply with ANSI A117.1-09. Van accessible parking shall have a minimum of 11’ width with 5’ unloading area or a minimum of 8’ unloading area with an 8’ width. Maximum 2% slope required for parking and unloading. Maximum threshold at door shall not exceed ½”. Walkways shall not exceed 5% slope. Slopes exceeding 5% shall be designed as ramps. Accessible parking and unloading area shall have a striped area leading to entrance when traveling over vehicular. Please see the attached letter from Mark Fleet, Building Official dated November 23, 2023. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Following their review of this application, the HRAB recommended that the applicants apply for the Inn at Vaucluse Spring to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Please see the attached letter from Kayla Peloquin dated November 29, 2023. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. 120 84 A 53A 520KLINESMILL RD 566KLINESMILL RD 478KLINESMILL RD 172KLINESMILL RD 245VAUCLUSE RD 211VAUCLUSESPRING 619VAUCLUSE RD 831VAUCLUSE RD 388VAUCLUSE RD 530VAUCLUSE RD V A U CLUSE RD VAUCLUSE SPRING LNApplication Parcels µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 Stephens City HITES RDVALLEY PIKEVAUCLUSE RD CLARK RD KLINES MILL RDMARSH BROOK LN CONESTOGA LN §¨¦81 §¨¦81 £¤11 0 460 920230 Feet CUP # 11 - 23: 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding, LLCPIN: 84 - A - 53ARecreation Area and Resort, Restaurant, and Special Event FacilityZoning Map CUP #11-23 121 84 A 53A 478KLINESMILL RD 520KLINESMILL RD 566KLINESMILL RD 172KLINESMILL RD 245VAUCLUSE RD 211VAUCLUSESPRING 619VAUCLUSE RD 831VAUCLUSE RD 388VAUCLUSE RD 530VAUCLUSE RD V A U CLUSE RD VAUCLUSE SPRING LNApplication Parcels µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 Stephens City HITES RDVALLEY PIKEVAUCLUSE RD CLARK RD KLINES MILL RDMARSH BROOK LN CONESTOGA LN §¨¦81 §¨¦81 £¤11 0 460 920230 Feet CUP # 11 - 23: 231 Vaucluse Spring Holding, LLCPIN: 84 - A - 53ARecreation Area and Resort, Restaurant, and Special Event FacilityLocation Map CUP #11-23 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 November 29, 2023 Carole Taylor 6474 Main Street The Plains, VA 20198 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Inn at Vaucluse Spring Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Application Property Identification Number (PIN): 84-A-53A Magisterial District: Back Creek Dear Ms. Taylor: The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered the above referenced Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application during their meeting on November 21, 2023. This application proposes a campground/tourist camp/recreation area/resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility on a +/-44.25 acre property (Property Identification Number: 84-A-53A). The property is zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located west of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) and south of Vaucluse Road (Route 638). Following their review of this application, the HRAB recommended that the applicants apply for the Inn at Vaucluse Spring to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Kayla Peloquin, Planner Planning & Development cc: Gary Crawford, HRAB Chairman 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Public Hearings Title: Ordinance Amendment to the Frederick County Code - Signs - (Mr. Klein) Attachments: PC01-03-24OA_Signs.pdf 160 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Amy Felter, Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment – Signs – Public Hearing DATE: December 27, 2023 Proposal: This proposed amendment to the sign ordinance was initiated by staff. §165-201.06(B)(1)(c). The proposal is to remove this section. The conversion to the NAICS (North American Industrial Classification System) from the SIC (Standardized Industrial Classification) removed specifically listed signs from the permitted uses contained in each zoning district. The sign ordinance amendments in May 2023 created a new table that conveniently lists the type of signs permitted in each zoning district. (§165-201.06(B)(4)). §165-201.06(B)(1)(c) refers to “signs allowed in certain districts.” Since the listed signs were removed with the NAICS conversion December 13, 2023, this section is no longer necessary. §165-201.06(B)(4)(a)[3] The proposal is to increase the permitted height of signs in the RA (Rural Area) to a maximum height of 8’. Current ordinance allows for a maximum of 50 square feet in area with a maximum of 4’ in height. (§165- 201.06(B)(4)(a)). Staff felt that doubling the number was a more appropriate allowance. Meeting Summary & Requested Action: The Development Review & Regulations Committee (DRRC) discussed this item on September 28, 2023, and endorsed the proposed changes. The Planning Commission discussed this item on November 1, 2023, and sent the item forward with no comments. The Board of Supervisors discussed this item on December 13, 2023, and sent the item forward to a public hearing. Staff is seeking a recommendation on the proposed ordinance amendment from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors. ALF/ks Attachments: 1. Revised ordinance 161 Proposed Changes – Sign Ordinance Revisions Drafted August 30, 2023 (4) Specific sign regulations by zoning district. (a) RA (Rural Areas) District. For parcels in the RA District with an allowed by-right use (excluding residences) or an approved conditional use permit (CUP) the maximum size and number of signs that the owner or owners of the property may erect and maintain at the entrances to the property are subject to the following requirements: 1. Signs in the RA District may be pole-mounted, hanging or monument style signs. 2. Number. One sign is permitted per parcel. 3. Height. Signs in the RA District must not exceed four eight feet in height. 4. Size. Signs in the RA District must not exceed 50 square feet in sign area. 5. Illumination. All sign illumination must comply with requirements outlined in § 165- 201.06B(2)(c), Sign illumination. 162 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Action Item Title: Rezoning #05-23 for Round Hill Crossing - Phase 2 - (Mr. Klein) Attachments: PC01-03-24REZ05-23_Redacted.pdf 163 REZONING APPLICATION #05-23 ROUND HILL CROSSING PHASE 2 (WINCHESTER WAREHOUSING INC. & SILVER LAKE, LLC.) Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: December 11, 2023 Staff Contacts: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Senior Planner Reviewed Action Planning Commission 01/03/24 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/24/24 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 01/03/24 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is a request for a minor amendment to the approved proffer statement associated with rezoning (REZ) application #03-03 (WWW, LC) to modify the number of allowed commercial entrance connections to U.S. Route 50 West. The amendment would enable one (1) additional right-in only entrance for a total of up to four (4) entrances for the development. All other previously approved proffers would remain in effect (unchanged). The proposed minor proffer amendment is in general conformance with Comprehensive Plan policies. There are no outstanding agency comments, and the proffer statement (dated November 20, 2023) is in a form acceptable to the County Attorney. This is an action item not requiring a public hearing. Following a public meeting, a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 164 Rezoning #05-23 Round Hill Crossing, Phase 2 (Winchester Warehousing Inc. & Silver Lake, LLC.) December 11, 2023 Page 2 This report has been prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. PROPOSAL: This is a request for a minor amendment to the approved proffer statement associated with rezoning (REZ) application #03-03 (WWW, LC) to modify the number of allowed commercial entrance connections to U.S. Route 50 West. The amendment would enable one (1) additional right-in only entrance, for a total of up to four (4) entrances for the development. LOCATION: The subject property, +/- 28.17-acres, is located northwest of the intersection of Retail Boulevard and Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50 West). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 52-A-B PROPERTY ZONING: B2 (General Business) District PRESENT USE: Vacant/Unimproved ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant South: B3 (Industrial Transition) & B2 (General Business) Use: Storage Yard (VDOT) & Vacant East: B2 (General Business) Use: Commercial (Round Hill Crossin) West: B2 (General Business) Use: Vacant REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The 28.17-acre subject property was previously rezoned through the rezoning (REZ) application #03-03 (WWW, LC) and subsequently amended through REZ #08-16 (WWW, LC – proffer amendment) which developed as the Round Hill Crossing shopping center. The original proffer statement limited the number of commercial entrances from Route 50 West (Northwestern Pike) to three (3) points of access. 2) Comprehensive Plan & Land Use Compatibility The Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities, and other key components of community life. The Plan is developed with the input of the public and adopted by the Board of Supervisors (last updated in November 2021). The Plan is a vital tool that provides direction for future growth, aimed at ensuring orderly, well-planned development to promote, preserve and protect the health, safety, general welfare, and quality of life for the citizens and businesses of Frederick County. The Area Plans in Appendix I of the Comprehensive Plan are the primary implementation tools and are 165 Rezoning #05-23 Round Hill Crossing, Phase 2 (Winchester Warehousing Inc. & Silver Lake, LLC.) December 11, 2023 Page 3 instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County. The Plan and Round Hill Area Plan (approved 2007) identifies the subject property with a “business” land use designation, reflective of the current zoning (B2) and as being within the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and outside of the Urban Development Area (UDA). The proposed rezoning does not propose a change in the use of the property and the minor proffer amendment is in conformance with the Plan. 3) Site Access and Transportation The approved proffer statement for the subject property limits the number of commercial entrances from Route 50 West (Northwestern Pike) to three (3) points of access. Two (2) of these points-of-access already exist (Retail Boulevard & a right-in from Route 50 between Echo Lane and Retail Boulevard). A third commercial entrance, which would serve the subject property, was approved on the subject property to align with the existing crossover between eastbound and westbound Route 50. The proposed rezoning modifies the previously approved proffer statement to allow for one (1) additional right-in only commercial entrance on the 28.17-acre subject property. The included “Generalized Development Plan” (GDP) depicts the approximate location of this additional right-in commercial entrance, approximately 248-feet west of the existing signalized intersection Retail Boulevard and Route 50. The Eastern Road Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Plan, identifies Route 50 as a “primary highway.” When considering proposals along arterial roadway, new commercial entrances should be limited to “preserve corridor rights-of-way” and that “new movements do not degrade the transportation system, increase delays, or reduce service levels” (Chapter 5 – Transportation). A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report (May 2023) included with the rezoning application materials notes that the proposed right-in (and exclusive right-turn lane) proposed would “accommodate the traffic flow efficiently” (TIA page 38). The proposed proffer is in general conformance with plan transportation policies. 4) Potential Impacts & Proffers The previously approved proffers (REZ #03-03) remain unchanged. This is a minor proffer amendment limited only to a modification to allow for one (1) additional right-in commercial entrance. There are no changes to the zoning, use, or density enabled with the previously approved rezoning. Other Review Agency Comments: Review Agency Comment Issuance Date Status Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) November 16, 2023 Comments resolved. Frederick County (FC) Attorney November 8, 2023 Acceptable form. Following a public meeting, a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 166 STONEWALLORCHARDSubdivision £¤50 52 A B 324ROUNDHILL RD 2275NORTHWESTERN PIKE 2275NORTHWESTERNPIKE 137ROUNDHILL RD 100STONEWALL DR 101STONEWALL DR 107STONEWALL DR 109STONEWALL DR 2177NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2161NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2147NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2153NORTHWESTERNPIKE 180CROCKWELLS MILL 110CROCKWELLS MILL 130CROCKWELLS MILL 150CROCKWELLS MILL 2340NORTHWESTERNPIKE 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 141WALMART DR 2106NORTHWESTERNPIKE 201PROMINENCECIRCLE ROUNDHILL RDRETAIL BLVDWALMART DR S T ONE WAL LDR CROCK WELLS MILL DR NORTHWESTERNPIKE Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels B2 (General Business District) B3 (Industr ial Transition District) MS (Medical Support District)µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 WinchesterRound H ill ECHO LNROUND HILL RD N AT I O N A L L U T H E R A N B L V D RETAIL BLVD¬«37¬«37 0 380 760190 Feet REZ # 05 - 23: Round Hill Crossing, Phase 2PIN: 52 - A - BProffer AmendmentZoning Map REZ #05-23 167 STONEWALLORCHARDSubdivision £¤50 52 A B 324ROUNDHILL RD 2275NORTHWESTERN PIKE 2275NORTHWESTERNPIKE 137ROUNDHILL RD 100STONEWALL DR 101STONEWALL DR 107STONEWALL DR 109STONEWALL DR 2177NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2161NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2147NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2153NORTHWESTERNPIKE 180CROCKWELLS MILL 110CROCKWELLS MILL 130CROCKWELLS MILL 150CROCKWELLS MILL 2340NORTHWESTERNPIKE 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 141WALMART DR 2106NORTHWESTERNPIKE 201PROMINENCECIRCLE ROUNDHILL RDRETAIL BLVDWALMART DR S T ONE WAL LDR CROCK WELLS MILL DR NORTHWESTERNPIKE Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 WinchesterRound H ill ECHO LNROUND HILL RD N AT I O N A L L U T H E R A N B L V D RETAIL BLVD¬«37¬«37 0 380 760190 Feet REZ # 05 - 23: Round Hill Crossing, Phase 2PIN: 52 - A - BProffer AmendmentLocation Map REZ #05-23 168 STONEWALLORCHARDSubdivision £¤50 52 A B 324ROUNDHILL RD 2275NORTHWESTERN PIKE 2275NORTHWESTERNPIKE 137ROUNDHILL RD 100STONEWALL DR 101STONEWALL DR 107STONEWALL DR 109STONEWALL DR 2177NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2161NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2147NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2153NORTHWESTERNPIKE 180CROCKWELLS MILL 110CROCKWELLS MILL 130CROCKWELLS MILL 150CROCKWELLS MILL 2340NORTHWESTERNPIKE 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 501WALMART DR 141WALMART DR 2106NORTHWESTERNPIKE 201PROMINENCECIRCLE ROUNDHILL RDRETAIL BLVDWALMART DR S T ONE WAL LDR CROCK WELLS MILL DR NORTHWESTERNPIKE Application Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Long R ange Land Use Business Rural Community Center µ Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 14, 2023 WinchesterRound H ill ECHO LNROUND HILL RD N AT I O N A L L U T H E R A N B L V D RETAIL BLVD¬«37¬«37 0 380 760190 Feet REZ # 05 - 23: Round Hill Crossing, Phase 2PIN: 52 - A - BProffer AmendmentLong Range Land Use Map REZ #05-23 169 170 171 172 173 Transportation Impact Study Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Frederick County, Virginia Submission Date: August 2023 174 175 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development May 2023 iii Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Scope Of The Report .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 13 Site Conditions And Adjacent Land Uses ................................................................................................................................... 13 Transportation Facilities ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Traffic Volumes.......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Transportation Impact Study ............................................................................................................... 19 Year 2024 Background Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 19 Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Right-Turn Lane Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Access Spacing Requirements ................................................................................................................................................... 33 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 38 References ..................................................................................................................................... 41 176 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development May 2023 iv Kittelson & Associates, Inc. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map .................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2. Overall Site Plan .................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3. Existing Lane Configurations, Existing Traffic Conditions and Lane Group LOS ................... 17 Figure 4. In-process Development Trips .............................................................................................. 21 Figure 5. Year 2024 Background Traffic Conditions ............................................................................. 24 Figure 6. Estimated Trip Distribution Pattern ...................................................................................... 27 Figure 7. Proposed Lane Configurations and Site-Generated Trips ..................................................... 28 Figure 8. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions ........................................................................................ 32 Figure 9. US 50 at proposed Driveway – 2024 Total Traffic – Right-Turn Lane Warrant .................... 33 Figure 10. Access Management Evaluation ......................................................................................... 36 177 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development May 2023 v Kittelson & Associates, Inc. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations ............................................... 13 Table 2. Existing Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results ................................... 16 Table 3. Estimated Trip Generation (Winchester Shops Development) .............................................. 20 Table 4. 2024 Background Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results ................... 22 Table 5. Estimated Trip Generation ..................................................................................................... 25 Table 6. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results ........... 30 Table 7. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions – SimTraffic – Maximum Queuing Results ..................... 31 Table 8. Upstream Functional Area – US 50/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (#1) – North Leg ............... 34 Table 9. Downstream Functional Area – US 50/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (#1) – West Leg ........... 35 178 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development May 2023 vi Kittelson & Associates, Inc. APPENDICES Appendix A Scoping Correspondence Appendix B All Turning Movement Count Data Sheets Appendix C Year 2023 Existing Conditions Level-of-Service Worksheets Appendix D Winchester Shops Development Site Plan Appendix E Year 2024 Background Traffic Level-of-Service Worksheets Appendix F Year 2024 Total Traffic Level-of-Service Worksheets 179 Section 1 Introduction 180 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Introduction July 2023 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wilkins Company proposes to construct the Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station development (the “Project”) in Frederick County, Virginia. The subject property is located in the northwest quadrant of the US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Route 37 interchange. Round Hill Crossing is a proffered commercial 70- acre property for which a portion of the development has already been built-out (including the WalMart center) with access provided via Retail Boulevard and Chambersville Lane along US 50. Additional development is planned in the northwest quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard intersection; however, a transportation impact analysis is proffered at such time that the development generates over 15,000 vehicles per day. The intent of this analysis is to evaluate the ability of the existing roadway network to accommodate the development of the Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station without additional development on the larger Round Hill site. The site is planned to consist of a 5,915 square-foot convenience store and 16 gasoline fuel pumps in the NW quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road intersection. Specifically, this analysis includes:  Year 2023 existing land use and transportation system conditions within the site vicinity;  Planned development improvements in the study area;  Forecast year 2024 background traffic conditions during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak periods, including regional growth;  Trip generation and distribution estimates for the proposed development users;  Trip generation and distribution estimates for “in-process” developments identified through the scoping process to the roadway network;  Forecast year 2024 background traffic conditions with full build-out of “in-process” developments during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak periods;  Trip generation and distribution estimates for full build-out of the proposed development;  Forecast year 2024 total traffic conditions during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak periods;  Evaluate VDOT turn lane warrants at the site-access driveways and adjacent study intersections;  Access management evaluation;  Conclusions and recommendations. 181 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Introduction July 2023 9 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Figure 1 illustrates the site vicinity. Prior to full build-out of the larger Round Hill development, access is proposed via the existing partial entrance at Chambersville Lane, full-movement entrance at Retail Boulevard, and a proposed right-in to the convenience store development. The anticipated full build-out year is 2024. Figure 2 illustrates the conceptual site development plan. SCOPE OF THE REPORT This analysis determines the transportation-related impacts associated with the proposed Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station development and was prepared in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements for traffic operation analyses. The study intersections, time periods for analysis, land use, growth rate, trip generation assumptions, and overall scope of this project were confirmed with VDOT staff and are provided in Appendix A. Operational analyses were performed at the following intersections: 1. US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Route 803 (Round Hill Road)/Retail Boulevard 2. Retail Boulevard/Crock Wells Mill Drive 3. US 50/Future Right-in Entrance (Site Driveway) 182 50 522 50 11 81 81 11 37 522 259 7 - Study Intersections## N H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Jul 03, 2023 - 12:22pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 01Site Vicnity Map Frederick County, VA 1 Round Hill Wawa July 2023 Figure FREDERICK COUNTY, VA SITE - Future Study Intersections 37 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEBOTANICAL BLVDECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 183 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Jul 03, 2023 - 12:22pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 02 Conceptual Site PlanProvided by Bohler (April 2023)Frederick County, VA2Round Hill WawaJuly 2023Figure184 Section 2 Existing Conditions 185 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Existing Conditions July 2023 13 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing conditions analysis identifies the site conditions and current operational and geometric characteristics of the roadways within the study area. SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES The proposed site is a commercial property to build a 5,915 square-foot convenience store and 16 gasoline fuel pumps in the northwest quadrant of the US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection. The site will be located in an area bounded by Wal- Mart Drive on the north, Northwestern Turnpike to the south, Retail Boulevard to the east and VDOT Maintenance Driveway in the west. The site lies approximately half a mile west of the Route 37/US 50 interchange. Surrounding land uses in the vicinity of the site are predominantly commercial and low-density residential uses. The Walmart Supercenter is located along Retail Boulevard just north of Crock Wells Mill Drive. Three restaurants and two banks are also located along Crock Wells Mill Drive that likely use Retail Boulevard as their main egress point. The Virginia Department of Transportation maintenance facility is located in the southwest quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road intersection. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Table 1 summarizes the existing transportation facilities and roadways in the study area. Retail Boulevard and Crock Wells Mill Drive provide access to the Walmart Supercenter and restaurants parking. Table 1. Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations Roadway Functional Classification1 AADT2 Number of Lanes Posted Speed (mph) Roadway Width (ft) Shoulder Width (ft) Sidewalks Bicycle Lanes On- Street Parking US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) Principal Arterial 19,000 5 35 100 0-4 Yes No No Route 803 (Round Hill Road) Major Collector 1,100 2 35 24 4 Yes No No Retail Boulevard Local Road Not available 4 30 62 0 Yes No No Crock Wells Mill Drive Local Road Not available 3 25 35 0 Yes No No 1 Per the VDOT Functional Classification Map (Reference 1). 2 2021 AADT Volumes per the VDOT Traffic Counts Map (Reference 2). Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Crosswalks are provided across the north leg of the US 50 and Retail Boulevard intersection as well as across the east leg of the Crock Wells Mill Drive and Retail Boulevard intersection. Currently, pedestrian signals are not installed at any of these crosswalk locations. 186 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Existing Conditions July 2023 14 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. There are no bicycle facilities in the study area along public roadways. Sidewalks are available on the west side of Round Hill Road, the north side of US 50, and both sides of Retail Boulevard. A quarter mile path exists on the north side of US 50 between Retail Boulevard and Echo Lane, offering a recreational walking route for pedestrians in the vicinity. Transit Facilities There are no public transit services available in the study area. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing volumes at the Northwestern Turnpike/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road intersection was obtained from an ongoing STARS Study for the US 50 corridor between the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Area Headquarters (AHQ) and Keating Drive within Frederick County and the City of Winchester, Virginia. Traffic data collection was conducted with schools in session on November 9, 2022. Peak hour turning movement counts for the intersection of Retail Boulevard and Crock Wells Mill Drive were estimated based on the following assumptions: o During the a.m. peak hour, approximately 65 percent of the trips along Retail Boulevard originate from Walmart, while the remaining 35 percent are generated by the restaurants and bank located along Crock Wells Mill Drive. o During the p.m. peak hour, approximately 85 percent of the trips along Retail Boulevard originate from Walmart, while the remaining 15 percent are generated by the restaurants and bank located along Crock Wells Mill Drive. o Out of the trips originating from Walmart, around 70 percent use the northern access point, representing the southbound approach volumes. The remaining 30 percent utilize the southern access point to Walmart, which corresponds to the westbound approach volumes. o All trips generated from the restaurants and bank along Crock Wells Mill Drive would exclusively use Crock Wells Mill Drive for their movements which corresponds to the westbound approach volumes. Appendix B contains all turning movement count data sheets and intersection approach photographs. Existing Conditions Analysis Traffic operations were evaluated in accordance with VDOT’s Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM) (Reference 3). Synchro 11 was used to evaluate existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour conditions. The software was used to evaluate several measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for the 187 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Existing Conditions July 2023 15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. study area including per-vehicle delay, level-of-service, volume-to-capacity ratio, and queuing. Level of service (LOS) analysis was performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (Reference 4). Operational Analysis Figure 3 shows the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices, existing conditions intersection operational results and lane group LOS for the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours. Capacity analysis results for the study intersections are summarized in Table 2. Appendix C includes the existing level-of-service worksheets for existing traffic conditions. The results indicate that the signalized study intersection currently operates at LOS C or better during all time periods under existing traffic conditions, and unsignalized critical movement/approaches are operate at LOS B or better. However, there are a few individual movements with undesirable LOS at the following location: US 50/Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd (#1) o During the weekday a.m. peak hour, the left-turn movements on eastbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS E. However, the approaches operate below capacity (volume-to- capacity [v/c] ratio of 0.7). o During the weekday p.m. peak hour, the left-turn movements on all approaches as well as right- turn movement on northbound approach operate at LOS E. However, the movements operate below capacity (volume-to-capacity [v/c] ratio of 0.76). 188 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Existing Conditions July 2023 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 2. Existing Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results Intersection Information AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Control Approach Lane Group Existing turn- lane lengths LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) US 50/ Round Hill Rd/ Retail Blvd (#1) Signalized EB EBL 300 E 104 67.5 E 114 69.3 EBT C 494 21.1 B 206 16.3 EBR 280 B 0 12.1 B 0 13.1 EB Approach C 23.6 C 22.4 WB WBL D 72 46.8 E 92 63.2 WBT A 70 9.2 B 389 13 WBR 1000 B 0 12.2 B 1 13.6 WB Approach B 13.0 B 15.6 NB NBLT D 21 53.1 E 30 56.9 NBR 250 D 0 52.9 E 0 56.1 NB Approach D 52.9 E 56.2 SB SBL 300 E 104 55.7 E 159 58.8 SBT D 14 48.4 D 31 47.7 SBR 275 D 0 48.5 D 76 48.3 SB Approach D 54 D 53.8 Overall LOS C 25.8 C 26.6 Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr (#2) Unsignalized WB WBL 160 B 17 10 B 38 12.9 WBTR A 0 8.6 A 0 8.7 WB Approach B 10 B 12.9 NB NBTR 0 0 0 0 NB Approach 0 0 SB SBL A 0 7.4 A 0 7.5 SBTR A 0 A 0 SB Approach 0.1 0 * Note that Back of Queue (BOQ) measures report 95th percentile queue lengths. LOS E or F NB=Northbound; SB=Southbound; EB=Eastbound; WB=Westbound; L=Left; T=Through; R=Right 189 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Aug 15, 2023 - 2:52pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 03 ex losExisting Lane Configurations Existing Traffic Conditions and Lane Group LOS Frederick County, VA 3 Round Hill Wawa August 2023 Figure N 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 2 1 2 Retail Blvd / Crock Wells Mill Dr 1 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill Rd - STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC SIGNAL (190')(150')(300')(250')(280') (300') CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (UNSIGNALIZED) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL DELAY (UNSIGNALIZED) V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 296111031231LOS=BDel=10.0V/C=0.156 527013212181 CM=WBLOS=BDel=12.9V/C=0.341 Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 1236 7 47 410 LOS=CDel=25.8V/C= 0.64 6 87 49 1734 1 592 8 64 1168LOS=CDel=26.6V/C= 0.65 5 60 240 28514 7 17 3679 A B A BA A(250')72 CM=WBCM=WB US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 B AEE C B DDD DDEEDDEE E B B B B 190 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Existing Conditions May 2023 18 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 3 Transportation Impact Study 191 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Year 2024 background and total traffic conditions were analyzed to determine impacts for full build-out of the development. YEAR 2024 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Year 2024 background traffic operations were analyzed to establish a baseline to measure the specific impacts of the proposed development. Transportation Improvements The existing traffic signal at the intersection will be upgraded to include pedestrian crossing signals and push buttons to activate the crossing phase when needed. This improvement aims to enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility in the area. The project is expected to be completed by the year 2024. To accommodate the future pedestrian crossing, the signal timing and phasing needed to be adjusted. The following inputs in Synchro were modified accordingly: Pedestrian Walking Speed: Based on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), an average walking speed of 3.5 feet per second (fps) was used for calculating pedestrian crossing times. This value aligns with the assumption that most pedestrians, including seniors and individuals with disabilities, can comfortably walk at this speed. Crosswalk Width: The crosswalk on the north leg of Retail Blvd measures 89 feet wide, which was taken into account for accurate pedestrian crossing time calculations. Pedestrian Clearance Interval (Do Not Walk Time): Following MUTCD guidelines, the pedestrian clearance interval, also known as the "Do Not Walk" time or "Flashing Don't Walk" time, was determined using the formula: Pedestrian Clearance Interval = (Crosswalk Width / Pedestrian Walking Speed) + Pedestrian Reaction Time = (89/3.5) +3 ~ 29 sec The pedestrian reaction time was assumed to be 3 seconds, accounting for the delay between the signal change and pedestrians beginning to clear the intersection. Pedestrian Walk Interval (Walk Time): As per MUTCD recommendations the walk interval should be at least 7 seconds in length so that pedestrians will have adequate opportunity to leave the curb or shoulder before the pedestrian clearance time begins. 192 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Approved Development Traffic During the scoping process, one background development project was identified with VDOT in the vicinity of the site. Winchester Shops Development will be located in an unoccupied area bounded by Echo Lane on the east side and Crock Wells Mill Drive on the west side. The development plan includes 13,562 square feet of strip retail center and is expected to be constructed by 2024. The proposed access plan includes two driveways on Crock Wells Mill Drive. The developer provided the site access locations. Appendix D contains the Winchester Shops Development Site Plan. A trip generation estimate was developed using ITE 11th Edition assuming ITE Land Use Code 822- Strip Retail Plaza (<40k). Fifty percent of new trips are assumed to originate to/from the east on US 50 and the other half originates to/from the west of project site. Pass-by trips were assumed for this type of land use. Eighty percent of the pass-by trips were assumed to originate to/from east on US 50 or from Route 37 and 20 percent originating to/from the west on US 50. The Shops are anticipated to generate a total of 642 new trips and 160 pass-by trips per day, 14 trips during the morning peak hour and 97 during the afternoon peak hour. Table 3 shows the estimated trip generation potential of Winchester Shops Development. The assignment of site-generated trips from “in- process” Development is presented in Figure 4. Table 3. Estimated Trip Generation (Winchester Shops Development) Land Use ITE Code Units Weekday Daily Peak Hour Adjacent Street Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 822 13.562 1,000 S.F. 802 35 21 14 97 48 49 Pass-bys (0% AM, 40% PM, 30% SAT) (160) 0 0 0 (39) (19) (20) Net New Trips 642 35 21 14 58 29 29 The background traffic volumes were developed by considering regional traffic growth within the study area and full build-out of Winchester Shops Development. 193 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Jul 03, 2023 - 12:23pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 5 bck tripIn-process Development Trips Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours Frederick County, VA Round Hill Wawa July 2023 Figure N 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 2 1 Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 040415 0 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 7 0 0 5 0 0 2 70 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 4 150 0 0 04BOTANICAL BLVD03018 0 3 194 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 22 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Regional Growth Per VDOT direction, a 1.0 percent annual growth rate was used to account for regional growth at the study intersections. 2024 Background Traffic Operational Analysis The 2024 lane configurations and traffic control devices are similar to the existing lane configurations. Figure 5 displays the overall intersection operational results of the year 2024 background traffic operations and lane group LOS for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 4 summarizes the peak hour levels of service, 95th percentile queue, and delay for each lane group by intersection. Table 4. 2024 Background Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results Intersection Information AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Control Approach Lane Group Existing/ Proposed turn-lane lengths LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) US 50/ Round Hill Rd/ Retail Blvd (#1) Signalized EB EBL 300 E 109 68.1 E 121 55.2 EBT C 504 21.4 B 212 16.7 EBR 280 B 0 12.2 B 0 13.3 EB Approach C 24 C 21.3 WB WBL D 73 48.2 E 95 64.7 WBT A 72 9.6 B 412 17.1 WBR 1000 B 0 12.4 B 1 15.1 WB Approach B 13.3 B 19.4 NB NBLT D 21 53.1 E 30 56.9 NBR 250 D 0 52.9 E 0 56.1 NB Approach D 52.9 E 56.2 SB SBL 300 E 107 55.9 E 169 60.3 SBT D 14 48.2 D 31 47.3 SBR 275 D 0 48.2 D 77 47.9 SB Approach D 54.2 D 54.6 Overall LOS C 26.2 C 28.5 Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr (#2) Unsignalized WB WBL 160 B 20 10.1 B 43 13.3 WBTR A 0 8.6 A 0 8.7 WB Approach B 10.1 B 13.3 NB NBTR A 0 0 A 0 0 NB Approach 0 0 SB SBL A 0 7.4 A 0 7.5 SBTR A 0 A 0 SB Approach 0.1 0 * Note that Back of Queue (BOQ) measures report 95th percentile queue lengths. NB=Northbound; SB=Southbound; EB=Eastbound; WB=Westbound; L=Left; T=Through; R=Right The results indicate that similar to the Existing Condition, the signalized study intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C or better during all time periods under 2024 background traffic conditions, and unsignalized critical movement/approaches are forecast to operate at LOS B or better. However, there are a few individual movements with undesirable LOS at the following location: 195 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. US 50/Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd (#1) o During the weekday a.m. peak hour, the left-turn movements on eastbound and southbound approaches are forecast to operate at LOS E. However, the approaches are anticipated to operate below capacity (volume-to-capacity [v/c] ratio of 0.7). o During the weekday p.m. peak hour, the left-turn movements on all approaches as well as right- turn movement on northbound approach are forecast to operate at LOS E. However, the movements are anticipated to operate below capacity (volume-to-capacity [v/c] ratio of 0.76). Appendix E contains the 2024 background traffic operational analysis worksheets. 196 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Aug 15, 2023 - 2:44pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 6 backg losBackground Lane Configurations Background Traffic Conditions and Lane Group LOS Frederick County, VA 5 Round Hill Wawa August 2023 Figure N 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 2 1 2 Retail Blvd / Crock Wells Mill Dr 1 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill Rd - STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC SIGNAL (150')(300')(250')(280') (300') CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (UNSIGNALIZED) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL DELAY (UNSIGNALIZED) V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 30641104131 1 CM=WBLOS=BDel=10.1V/C=0.167 527513282351 CM=WBLOS=BDel=13.3V/C=0.372 Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 1255 7 47 420 LOS=CDel=26.2V/C=0.65 6 88 51 1804 1 608 1 65 1190 LOS=CDel=28.5V/C= 0.67 5 61 246 30314 7 17 3684 A BAA (250')(190')(150') 76 B A US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 B AEE C B DDD DDEEDDEE E B B B B 197 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 25 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. YEAR 2024 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the transportation system in the study area will operate once the Gasoline Station is built out and operational. The total traffic volume estimates were developed by adding the predicted site-generated traffic to the background traffic volumes. These analyses are outlined in the following sections. Proposed Development Plan The proposed site is a commercial property located in the northwest quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road intersection. The plan includes the construction of a convenience store spanning 5,915 square feet, along with the installation of 16 gasoline fuel pumps. The primary entrance will be established through a fourth leg at the intersection of Retail Boulevard and Crock Wells Mill Drive. Additionally, a right-in entrance will be provided along US 50, situated just west of Retail Boulevard. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the proposed development were developed using the standard reference Trip Generation, 11th Edition (Reference 5) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 5 summarizes the trip generation estimates for the proposed development. The development is estimated to generate approximately 7,591 weekday daily trips, 540 weekday a.m. (270 in, 270 out), and 467 weekday p.m. (234 in, 233 out) peak hour trips when built out in year 2024. 76 percent of the total trips are assumed to be pass-by, including 10 percent internal trips between the site and the existing shopping center to the east. Additionally, 20 percent of the total trips are expected to be diverted from adjacent roadways, suggesting that they would have otherwise occurred on nearby roads. Therefore, only 4 percent of the total trips, approximately 380 daily trips, are estimated to be net new trips directly generated by the proposed site. Table 5. Estimated Trip Generation Land Use ITE Code Units Weekday Daily Peak Hour Adjacent Street Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 5.915 1,000 S.F. 7,591 540 270 270 467 234 233 Pass-bys (76% AM, 75% PM/SAT) (5,693) (410) (205) (205) (350) (176) (174) Internal to shopping center(10% of Pass-by trips) (569) (41) (21) (21) (35) (18) (17) Diverted (20% AM/PM/SAT) (1,518) (108) (54) (54) (93) (47) (46) Net New Trips 380 22 11 11 24 11 13 1Land Use Subcategory: 16 to 24 fueling positions. 198 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment Local and regional trip distribution estimates for the project were developed based on anticipated future travel patterns observed near the site and major origin/destination patterns in the site vicinity. Figure 6 illustrates the assumed trip distribution pattern. Approximately 50 percent of the net new trips were estimated to be traveling to and from the west on US 50, while the remaining 50 percent of the trips were allocated to the east on US 50. Additionally, it was assumed that approximately 78 percent of the pass-by and diverted trips were traveling to and from Route 37, with the remaining 22 percent of the trips allocated to the east on US 50 or considered internal trips within the Round Hill Crossing developments. Trip Assignment The following assumptions were made while assigning trips to the site access points and adjacent intersections: · Trips to/from east on US 50: o Approximately five to 10 percent of the trips (including net new, pass-by, and diverted trips) entering the site would utilize Retail Boulevard, while the remaining 90 to 95 percent of those trips would utilize the proposed right-in driveway along US 50. o All trips (net new, pass-by, and diverted) exiting the site would exclusively use Retail Boulevard. o Pass-by trips would exit towards the west on US 50, whereas net new trips and diverted trips would exit towards the east on US 50. · Trips to/from west on US 50: o All trips (net new, pass-by, and diverted) entering or exiting the site would utilize Retail Boulevard. o Pass-by trips would exit towards the east on US 50, while net new trips and diverted trips would exit towards the west on US 50. · Internal trips within the development would utilize Crock Wells Mill Rd. Figure 7 shows the assignment of site-generated trips to the surrounding roadway network during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 199 N3780350ROUND HILL RDWARD A V E BOTANI C A L B L V D E C H O L NCROCK WELLS MILL DRRET A I L B L V DVDOTMAINTENANCEDWY CHAMBERSVILLE LNH:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Jul 03, 2023 - 12:23pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 4 Assumed Trip DistributionFrederick County, VARound Hill WawaJuly 2023Figure49%1%50%XX%- ASSUMED NET- NEW TRIP DISTRIBUTIONSITE- ASSUMED PASS-BY/ DIVERTED/ INTERNAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION200 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Jul 03, 2023 - 12:23pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 7 new tripsProposed Lane Configurations and Site-Generated Trips Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours Frederick County, VA 7 Round Hill Wawa July 2023 Figure N 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 2 1 Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 3 14 14 13 13 200 172 00000 0 3 2 3 (190')(150') 1 (300')(250')(280') (300')(250')Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrUS 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill Rd37 BOTANICAL BLVDUS 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 -25 0 0 40 0 0 174 760 0 -21 0 0 35 0 0 150 660 0 11 1034US 50 / New DrivewayUS 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill Rd10 250 10 10 105000000 0 9 216 9 8 94439 201 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2024 Total Traffic Operational Analysis The year 2024 total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study locations will operate after full build-out of the proposed development. The site-generated trips shown in Figure 7 were added to the year 2024 background traffic volumes to develop the year 2024 build-out traffic volumes. 202 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 30 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Figure 8 shows the year 2024 total traffic overall intersection operations and lane group LOS for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 6 displays the peak hour levels of service, delays, and 95th-percentile queues for each lane group by intersection. All critical approaches of unsignalized study intersections are forecast to operate below capacity at LOS D or better under the total traffic condition. Appendix F contains the year 2024 total traffic level of service worksheets. As shown in the figures, all study intersections and site access driveways are forecast to continue to operate at LOS C or better under 2024 total traffic conditions. As would be expected, 95th percentile queues are forecast to generally grow slightly with the addition of site-generated traffic, but the change is incremental and does not change the overall queuing condition outlined under year 2024 background traffic conditions. Table 6. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions – Synchro 11 – Delay, LOS, and Queuing Results Intersection Information AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Control Approach Lane Group Existing/ Proposed turn- lane lengths LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) LOS BOQ (feet) Delay (sec) Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US 50 (#1) Signalized EB EBL 300 E #183 65.7 E #180 58.4 EBT C 491 24.1 B 204 17.7 EBR 280 B 0 13.8 B 0 14.2 EB Approach C 27.6 C 24.4 WB WBL D 74 48.7 E 95 66.7 WBT B 82 13.1 C 451 22.3 WBR 1000 B 0 15.7 B 3 17.1 WB Approach B 16.4 C 24.3 NB NBLT D 21 53.1 E 30 56.9 NBR 250 D 0 52.9 E 0 56.1 NB Approach D 52.9 E 56.2 SB SBL 300 D #160 54.5 E #209 62.5 SBT D 14 45.3 D 31 45.6 SBR 275 D 60 46.1 E #248 57 SB Approach D 50.5 E 59.4 Overall LOS C 30.6 C 34.6 Retail Blvd & Driveway 1/Crock Wells Mill Dr (#2) Unsignalized EB EBLTR B 32 10.5 B 35 11.9 EB Approach B 10.5 B 11.9 WB WBL 160 C 40 15.6 D 120 32.6 WBTR B 3 11 B 3 13.4 WB Approach C 15.2 D 31.8 NB NBLT A 3 7.6 A 3 8.2 NBTR A 0 A 0.1 NB Approach 2.6 2.1 SB SBL A 0 7.4 A 0 7.5 SBTR A 0 A 0 SB Approach 0.1 0 US50 & Driveway (#3) Unsignalized EB Approach A 0 A 0 WB Approach A 0 A 0 * Note that Back of Queue (BOQ) measures report 95th percentile queue lengths. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. NB=Northbound; SB=Southbound; EB=Eastbound; WB=Westbound; L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right Turn 203 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Based on the Synchro reports, it is evident that queues at several movements at the US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection are exceeding capacity. To ensure accurate assessment, maximum queue lengths have been obtained from SimTraffic reports, utilizing data from 10 microsimulation runs. The maximum queue length represents the longest observed or simulated queue during the analysis period. The data presented in Table 7 illustrates that all maximum queues on all approaches can be accommodated within the available storage lengths. Table 7. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions – SimTraffic – Maximum Queuing Results Intersection Information AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Control Approach Lane Group Existing/ turn-lane lengths Maximum Queue (feet) Maximum Queue (feet) Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US 50 (#1) Signalized EB EBL 300 271 169 EBT - 388 235 EBR 280 154 58 WB WBL - 136 123 WBT - 222 445 WBR 1000 60 52 NB NBLT - 54 60 NBR 250 147 74 SB SBL 300 213 251 SBT - 34 212 SBR 275 135 272 204 H:\28\28763 - Round Hill Wawa\report\figs\28763 - Figs.dwg Aug 15, 2023 - 3:11pm - fbaratian Layout Tab: 08 total LOS (2)Total Traffic Condition and Lane Group LOS Frederick County, VA 8 Round Hill Wawa July 2023 Figure N 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D CROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 2 1 CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (UNSIGNALIZED) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL DELAY (UNSIGNALIZED) V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 1230 7 47 460 LOS=CDel=30.6V/C= 0.67 6 88 225 2564 1 587 8 65 1225 LOS=CDel=34.6V/C= 0.74 5 61 396 36914 7 28 46118 3 US 50 / New DrivewayWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 3 1351 491 LOS=ADel=0.0V/C= N/A 713 1454 LOS=ADel=0.0V/C= N/A200 1720 Retail Blvd /Crock Wells Mill DrWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 2 B DA AAAUS 50 / New DrivewayWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 3 29641104131 1 10 250 10 10 1050CM=WBLOS=CDel=15.6V/C=0.296 52751328235 1 9 216 9 8 9440 114 CM=WBLOS=DDel=32.6V/C=0.679 AB B C AB US 50 / Retail Blvd / Round Hill RdWEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM 1 B BDE C B DDD DDEEDEEE E B B C B 205 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. RIGHT-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS The evaluation of the westbound right-turn lane warrant at the proposed right-in driveway was conducted, taking into consideration the total traffic conditions projected for the year 2024. The VDOT Road Design Manual (RDM)-Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards For Entrances and Intersections was used as guidance. Figure 9 presents the results of the warrant evaluation, indicating that the westbound approach satisfies the right-turn lane warrants during all peak hours under the projected year 2024 total traffic condition. Weekday a.m. peak hour Weekday p.m. peak hour Figure 9. US 50 at proposed Driveway – 2024 Total Traffic – Right-Turn Lane Warrant ACCESS SPACING REQUIREMENTS An evaluation of the proposed entrances to the Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station development was performed with respect to VDOT’s Access Management policies outlined in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (Reference 2). Figure 10 illustrates the proposed spacing of the site entrances with respect to adjacent intersections and commercial access points. 206 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 34 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Crock Wells Mill Drive and Retail Boulevard Intersection Based on Table 2-2 of the RDM, the proposed full access entrance on Retail Boulevard should be located outside the functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection. The upstream functional area of the signalized intersection is a function of several factors: 1. Distance traveled by during perception-reaction time, 2. Distance traveled to complete deceleration to a stop, and 3. Distance required to store the longest queue expected most of the time. Table 8 summarizes the functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection (#1) rounded to the nearest foot based on an assumed 30 mile-per-hour design speed, a 2.5-second perception-reaction time, and an 11.2 foot-per- second-per-second (ft./sec.2) deceleration rate. Table 8. Upstream Functional Area – US 50/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (#1) – North Leg Distance Measure Distance (ft.) Distance Traveled during Perception-Reaction Time (ft.) 110 Distance Traveled during Deceleration to Stop (ft.) 86 Distance Required to Store the Longest Queue Expected Most of the Time. (ft.) 31 Upstream Functional Area 227 Proposed Spacing 313 The distance required to store the longest queue expected most of the time was derived from the maximum queuing information estimated under weekday a.m. peak hour conditions in year 2024 total traffic conditions. As shown in Figure 10, the proposed entrance on Retail Boulevard is located outside the upstream functional area of the adjacent signalized intersection. The proposed full access entrance is located approximately 313 feet from the southbound stop bar at the adjacent signalized intersection. As such, the minimum spacing standard per RDM is met. US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) and Site Driveway (#3) Based on Table 2-2 of the RDM, the proposed right-in entrance on US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) should be located a minimum of 305 feet from adjacent intersections and commercial entrances. It should also be located outside the functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection (#1). The downstream functional area of the signalized intersection is a function of two factors: 1. Distance traveled by during perception-reaction time, and 2. Distance traveled to complete deceleration to a stop. 207 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Project #: 28764 Transportation Impact Study July 2023 35 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 9 summarizes the functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) intersection (#1) rounded to the nearest foot based on an assumed 35 mile-per-hour design speed, a 2.5-second perception-reaction time, and an 11.2 foot-per- second-per-second (ft./sec.2) deceleration rate. Table 9. Downstream Functional Area – US 50/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (#1) – West Leg Distance Measure Distance (ft.) Distance Traveled during Perception-Reaction Time (ft.) 128 Distance Traveled during Deceleration to Stop (ft.) 118 Downstream Functional Area 246 Proposed Spacing 248 As shown in Figure 10, the proposed entrance on US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) is located outside the downstream functional area of the adjacent signalized intersection. The proposed full access entrance is located approximately 248 feet from the adjacent signalized intersection to the east and 347 feet from the Virginia Department of Transportation maintenance facility driveway to the west. As such, the minimum spacing standard per RDM is met. 208 209 Section 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 210 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Conclusions and Recommendations May 2023 38 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the traffic impact analysis indicate that the proposed development can be constructed with minor impacts on operations on the surrounding transportation system. The findings of this analysis are discussed below. Existing Conditions All study intersections currently operate at level of service (LOS) C or better during all peak hours. Year 2024 Background Traffic Conditions  A 1.0-percent annual growth rate was identified to account for near-term regional traffic growth.  All study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at LOS D or better under 2024 background traffic conditions.  One in-process developments was identified by WVDOH for inclusion in background conditions: o Winchester shops: The development plan includes 13,562 square feet of strip retail center and is expected to be constructed by 2024. The Shops are anticipated to generate a total of 642 new trips and 160 pass-by trips per day, 14 trips during the morning peak hour and 97 during the afternoon peak hour  All study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at LOS D or better under 2024 background traffic conditions. Proposed Development Plan  The Gasoline Station development is anticipated to be fully built-out in year 2024, consisting of a 5,915 square-foot convenience store and 16 gasoline fuel pumps.  A right-in entrance will also be provided along US 50, just to the west of Retail Boulevard.  The development is estimated to generate approximately 7,591 weekday daily trips, 540 weekday a.m. (270 in, 270 out), and 467 weekday p.m. (234 in, 233 out) peak hour trips when built out in year 2024. Year 2024 Total Traffic Conditions  All study intersections and site access driveways are forecast to continue to operate at LOS C or better under 2024 total traffic conditions.  As would be expected, 95th percentile queues are forecast to generally grow slightly with the addition of site-generated traffic, but the change is incremental and does not change the overall queuing condition outlined under background traffic conditions. Queue lengths are projected to be accommodated within the available storage length. Access Management Evaluation  An evaluation of the proposed entrances to the Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station development was performed with respect to VDOT’s Access Management policies. 211 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development Conclusions and Recommendations May 2023 39 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.  The proposed full access entrance on Retail Boulevard is located approximately 313 feet from the adjacent signalized intersection to the south. It is located outside of the upstream functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) signalized intersection, meeting the minimum spacing standard per RDM.  The proposed right-in entrance on US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) is approximately 248 feet away from the adjacent signalized intersection to the east and 347 feet from the Virginia Department of Transportation maintenance facility driveway to the west. The spacing complies with the minimum requirement of 305 feet from adjacent intersections and commercial entrances per RDM. Additionally, it is located outside the functional area of the adjacent US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Retail Boulevard/Route 803 (Round Hill Road) signalized intersection, thus fulfilling the minimum spacing standard per RDM. Recommendation Based on the analysis conducted, no off-site improvements or mitigations have been identified as necessary concerning the intersection operations. However, based on the right-turn lane warrant analysis, it has been determined that the westbound approach meets the right-turn lane warrants for all peak hours under the projected year 2024 total traffic condition. Consequently, it is planned to provide an exclusive right turn lane at the proposed driveway along US 50 to accommodate the traffic flow efficiently. 212 Section 5 References 213 Round Hill Crossing Gasoline Station Development References May 2023 41 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. REFERENCES 1. VDOT Functional Classification Map. https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=3eca6c9adb6649c988d98734f8 5baddb. Accessed June 17, 2023. 2. VDOT Traffic Counts Map. https://www.virginiaroads.org/datasets/traffic-volume/explore. Accessed June 17, 2023. 3. VDOT’s Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM) 4. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 2016. 5. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 11th Edition. 2022. 214 Appendix A Scoping Correspondence 215 It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. PRE-SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM Information on the Project Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions The applicant is responsible for entering the relevant information and submitting the form to VDOT and the locality no less than three (3) business days prior to the meeting. If a form is not received by this deadline, the scope of work meeting may be postponed. Contact Information Consultant Name: Tele: E-mail: Andrew Butsick, PE & John Callow - Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (703) 885-8970 abutsick@kittelson.com Developer/Owner Name: Tele: E-mail: Richie Wilkins (540) 662 7215 rwilkins@wilkinsco.com Project Information Project Name: Round Hill Wawa Locality/County: Frederick Project Location: (Attach regional and site specific location map) See Figure 1 - attached Submission Type Comp Plan Rezoning Site Plan Subd Plat Project Description: (Including details on the land use, acreage, phasing, access location, etc. Attach additional sheet if necessary) Round Hill Crossing is a proffered commercial 70-acre property located in the northwest quadrant of the US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)/Route 37 interchange. A portion of the development has already been built-out (including the WalMart center) with access provided via Retail Boulevard and Chambersville Lane along US 50. Additional development is planned in the northwest quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard intersection; however, a transportation impact analysis is proffered at such time that the development generates over 15,000 vehicles per day. As part of a proposed proffer amendment to adjust the ADT threshold for a full TIA of the larger Round Hill development, this traffic study will be conducted to evaluate the ability of the existing and proposed entrances to accommodate the development of a 5,915 square-foot convenience store with 16 gasoline fuel pumps in the NW quadrant of the US 50/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road intersection. Prior to full build-out of the larger Round Hill development, access is proposed via the existing partial entrance at Chambersville Lane, full-movement entrance at Retail Boulevard, and a proposed right-in to the convenience store development. Figure 2 illustrates a conceptual site plan. Proposed Use(s): (Check all that apply; attach additional pages as necessary) Residential Commercial Mixed Use Other 216 It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. Residential Uses(s) Number of Units: ITE LU Code(s): Commercial Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): 945 (see attached Trip Gen table) Square Ft or Other Variable: 1,000 S.F. GFA Other Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): Independent Variable(s): Total Peak Hour Trip Projection: Less than 100 100 – 499 500 – 999 1,000 or more Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions Study Period Existing Year: 2023 Build-out Year: 2024 Design Year: Study Area Boundaries (Attach map) North: Wal-Mart Drive South: US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike) East: Route 37 NB Ramps West: VDOT Maintenance Driveway External Factors That Could Affect Project (Planned road improvements, other nearby developments) Future build out of the Round Hill Crossing development Winchester Shops (13,562 SF strip retail center along Crock Wells Mill Drive) Consistency With Comprehensive Plan (Land use, transportation plan) Yes Available Traffic Data (Historical, forecasts) 2021 AADT Volumes from VDOT US 50 (Round Hill Road West to Route 37) - 19,000 Route 803 (Round Hill Road) [Singhass Road to US 50] - 1,100 Trip Distribution (Attach sketch) Road Name: See Figure 3 Road Name: Road Name: Road Name: Annual Vehicle Trip Growth Rate: 1% on public roadways (see attached historical AADTs) Peak Period for Study (check all that apply) AM PM SAT Peak Hour of the Generator 6-9am 4-7pm Study Intersections and/or Road Segments (Attach additional sheets as necessary) 1.US 50/Retail Boulevard/Round Hill Road 6. 2.Retail Boulevard/Crock Wells Mill Drive 7. 3.US 50/Right-In Entrance (Turn 8. 217 It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. lane & access management evaluations only) 4. 9. 5. 10. Trip Adjustment Factors Internal allowance: Yes No Reduction: Internal trips from adjacent shopping center to be taken from pass-by trip estimates% trips Pass-by allowance: Yes No Reduction: 76 AM, 75% PM/SAT% trips Software Methodology Synchro HCS (v.2000/+) aaSIDRA CORSIM Other Traffic Signal Proposed or Affected (Analysis software to be used, progression speed, cycle length) Analysis Software: Synchro v11, Sim Traffic (oversaturated conditions) Results: HCM Methodology Improvement(s) Assumed or to be Considered Signalized pedestrian crossing across the north leg of the US 50/Retail Boulevard intersection Background Traffic Studies Considered Winchester Shops (13,562 SF strip retail center along Crock Wells Mill Drive) Plan Submission Master Development Plan (MDP) Generalized Development Plan (GDP) Preliminary/Sketch Plan Other Plan type (Final Site, Subd. Plan) Additional Issues to be Addressed Queuing analysis Actuation/Coordination Weaving analysis Merge analysis Bike/Ped Accommodations Intersection(s) TDM Measures Other Access Management Evaluation, Turn Lane Evaluations NOTES on ASSUMPTIONS: All parameters of the study will be compliant with the provisions and analysis procedures established in VDOT's Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM). Pass-by trips from the ITE trip generation estimate will be broken into pass-by, diverted (from Route 37), and internal trips as shown in Figure 3. 218 SCOPE OF WORK MEETING ADDITIONS TO THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS, CHANGES TO THE METHODOLOGY OR STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS, AND SIGNATURE PAGE Any additions to the Required Elements or changes to the Methodology or Standard Assumptions due to special circumstances that are approved by VDOT: _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ AGREED: _____________ DATE: ______________ Applicant or Consultant PRINT NAME: _____________________________ Applicant or Consultant SIGNED: __________________________________ DATE: ______________ VDOT Representative PRINT NAME: _____________________________ VDOT Representative SIGNED: __________________________________ DATE: ______________ Local Government Representative PRINT NAME: _____________________________ Local Government Representative Round Hill Wawa 04/26/2023 Andrew Butsick 219 50 522 50 11 81 81 11 37 522 259 7 - Study Intersections## N C:\Users\abutsick\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_35624\28763 - ScopingFigs.dwg Apr 03, 2023 - 10:25am - abutsick Layout Tab: 01Site Vicnity Map Frederick County, VA 1 Round Hill Wawa April 2023 Figure FREDERICK COUNTY, VA SITE - Future Study Intersections 37 803 50 ROUND HI L L R D WARD AVEBOTANICAL BLVDECHO LNCROC K W E L L S M I L L D RRETAIL BLVDVDOT MAINTENANCE DWY CHAMBERSVILLE LN SITE 220 C:\Users\abutsick\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_35624\28763 - ScopingFigs.dwg Apr 03, 2023 - 10:26am - abutsick Layout Tab: 02 Conceptual Site PlanProvided by Bohler (April 2023)Frederick County, VA2Round Hill WawaApril 2023Figure221 N3780350ROUND HILL RDWARD A V E BOTANI C A L B L V D E C H O L NCROCK WELLS MILL DRRET A I L B L V DVDOTMAINTENANCEDWY CHAMBERSVILLE LNC:\Users\abutsick\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_35624\28763 - ScopingFigs.dwg Apr 03, 2023 - 10:26am - abutsick Layout Tab: 03 Assumed Trip DistributionFrederick County, VA3Round Hill WawaApril 2023Figure49%1%50%XX%- ASSUMED NET- NEW TRIP DISTRIBUTIONSITE- ASSUMED PASS-BY/ DIVERTED/ INTERNAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION222 Round Hill Wawa ITE Trip Gen 11th Ed Using Convenience Store Size as Independent Variable1 Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 5.915 1,000 S.F.7,591 6,746 540 270 270 467 234 233 415 208 207 (5,693)(5,060)(410)(205)(205)(350)(176)(174)(311)(156)(155) 1,898 1,686 130 65 65 117 58 59 104 52 52 1Land Use Subcategory: 16 to 24 fueling positions Using Number of Fueling Positions as Independent Variable1 Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Convenience Store/Gas Station 945 16 Fueling postions 5,532 6,124 506 253 253 430 215 215 476 233 243 (4,149)(4,593)(385)(192)(193)(323)(161)(162)(357)(175)(182) 1,383 1,531 121 61 60 107 54 53 119 58 61 1Land Use Subcategory: GFA (5.5-10k) Peak Hour Adjacent Street Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour To be used in the analysis Saturday Daily2 Peak Hour Adjacent Street Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour 2Saturday Daily rates not available for LUC 945 using Subcategory: 16 to 24 fueling positions. Ratio of Weekday PM Peak Hour/Weekday Daily trips assumed to apply to Saturday Peak Hour/Saturday Daily trips to estimate Saturday Daily trips. Net New Trips Saturday Daily2Land Use ITE Code Net New Trips 2Saturday Daily rates not available for LUC 945 using Subcategory: GFA (5.5-10K). Ratio of Weekday PM Peak Hour/Weekday Daily trips assumed to apply to Saturday Peak Hour/Saturday Daily trips to estimate Saturday Daily trips. Land Use ITE Code Units Weekday Daily Pass-bys (76% AM, 75% PM/SAT) Pass-bys (76% AM, 75% PM/SAT) Units Weekday Daily 223 20,000 19,000 20,000 21,000 21,000 20,000 21,000 17,000 19,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 980 1,100 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021AADT (vpd)Historical VDOT AADT1 US 50 (Northwestern Turnpike)Route 803 (Round Hill Road) 1 https://www.virginiadot.org/info/ct-TrafficCounts.asp 224 Appendix B All Turning Movement Count Data Sheets 225 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd AM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 7 0 19 0 26 1 40 12 0 53 8 1 0 0 9 0 188 4 0 192 280 06:15 AM 4 1 22 0 27 0 48 12 0 60 4 0 1 0 5 0 319 12 0 331 423 06:30 AM 12 2 29 0 43 2 64 22 0 88 7 0 0 0 7 0 317 11 0 328 466 06:45 AM 10 3 20 0 33 2 50 17 0 69 10 1 2 0 13 2 302 17 0 321 436 Total 33 6 90 0 129 5 202 63 0 270 29 2 3 0 34 2 1126 44 0 1172 1605 07:00 AM 9 0 41 0 50 2 63 9 0 74 18 2 1 0 21 0 269 14 0 283 428 07:15 AM 13 1 34 0 48 3 89 6 0 98 20 0 0 0 20 0 338 16 0 354 520 07:30 AM 9 2 43 0 54 3 84 11 0 98 19 1 4 0 24 2 328 17 0 347 523 07:45 AM 15 1 38 0 54 2 112 7 0 121 16 0 0 0 16 1 297 20 0 318 509 Total 46 4 156 0 206 10 348 33 0 391 73 3 5 0 81 3 1232 67 0 1302 1980 08:00 AM 10 0 46 0 56 6 79 10 0 95 11 0 0 0 11 2 232 19 0 253 415 08:15 AM 5 3 41 0 49 6 104 13 0 123 13 3 0 0 16 0 192 12 0 204 392 08:30 AM 10 0 48 0 58 4 93 10 0 107 18 1 0 0 19 0 199 16 0 215 399 08:45 AM 16 0 47 0 63 9 83 8 0 100 16 1 0 0 17 0 191 19 0 210 390 Total 41 3 182 0 226 25 359 41 0 425 58 5 0 0 63 2 814 66 0 882 1596 Grand Total 120 13 428 0 561 40 909 137 0 1086 160 10 8 0 178 7 3172 177 0 3356 5181 Apprch %21.4 2.3 76.3 0 3.7 83.7 12.6 0 89.9 5.6 4.5 0 0.2 94.5 5.3 0 Total %2.3 0.3 8.3 0 10.8 0.8 17.5 2.6 0 21 3.1 0.2 0.2 0 3.4 0.1 61.2 3.4 0 64.8 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 9 0 41 0 50 2 63 9 0 74 18 2 1 0 21 0 269 14 0 283 428 07:15 AM 13 1 34 0 48 3 89 6 0 98 20 0 0 0 20 0 338 16 0 354 520 07:30 AM 9 2 43 0 54 3 84 11 0 98 19 1 4 0 24 2 328 17 0 347 523 07:45 AM 15 1 38 0 54 2 112 7 0 121 16 0 0 0 16 1 297 20 0 318 509 Total Volume 46 4 156 0 206 10 348 33 0 391 73 3 5 0 81 3 1232 67 0 1302 1980 % App. Total 22.3 1.9 75.7 0 2.6 89 8.4 0 90.1 3.7 6.2 0 0.2 94.6 5.1 0 PHF .767 .500 .907 .000 .954 .833 .777 .750 .000 .808 .913 .375 .313 .000 .844 .375 .911 .838 .000 .919 .946 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 226 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd AM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Trucks Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 13 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 13 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 14 06:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 2 0 5 0 4 0 0 4 15 Total 0 0 3 0 3 0 20 3 0 23 3 0 2 0 5 0 24 0 0 24 55 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 12 11 0 3 0 14 0 10 0 0 10 36 07:15 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 9 0 1 0 10 0 8 0 0 8 27 07:30 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 7 2 0 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 19 07:45 AM 0 0 3 0 3 2 11 4 0 17 4 0 1 0 5 0 8 0 0 8 33 Total 0 0 8 0 8 2 33 10 0 45 26 0 5 0 31 0 31 0 0 31 115 08:00 AM 2 0 2 0 4 1 11 5 0 17 5 0 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 6 32 08:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 10 0 0 11 5 0 0 0 5 0 7 1 0 8 26 08:30 AM 2 0 3 0 5 0 11 2 0 13 5 0 1 0 6 1 11 0 0 12 36 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 15 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 19 Total 6 0 5 0 11 2 42 12 0 56 16 0 1 0 17 3 25 1 0 29 113 Grand Total 6 0 16 0 22 4 95 25 0 124 45 0 8 0 53 3 80 1 0 84 283 Apprch %27.3 0 72.7 0 3.2 76.6 20.2 0 84.9 0 15.1 0 3.6 95.2 1.2 0 Total %2.1 0 5.7 0 7.8 1.4 33.6 8.8 0 43.8 15.9 0 2.8 0 18.7 1.1 28.3 0.4 0 29.7 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 3 0 3 2 11 4 0 17 4 0 1 0 5 0 8 0 0 8 33 08:00 AM 2 0 2 0 4 1 11 5 0 17 5 0 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 6 32 08:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 10 0 0 11 5 0 0 0 5 0 7 1 0 8 26 08:30 AM 2 0 3 0 5 0 11 2 0 13 5 0 1 0 6 1 11 0 0 12 36 Total Volume 6 0 8 0 14 4 43 11 0 58 19 0 2 0 21 3 30 1 0 34 127 % App. Total 42.9 0 57.1 0 6.9 74.1 19 0 90.5 0 9.5 0 8.8 88.2 2.9 0 PHF .750 .000 .667 .000 .700 .500 .977 .550 .000 .853 .950 .000 .500 .000 .875 .375 .682 .250 .000 .708 .882 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 227 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd AM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bicycles on Crosswalk Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 AM 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 228 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd AM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Pedestrians Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 AM 06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 229 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd AM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Combined Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 7 0 20 0 27 1 45 13 0 59 8 1 0 0 9 0 194 4 0 198 293 06:15 AM 4 1 22 0 27 0 55 12 0 67 4 0 1 0 5 0 325 12 0 337 436 06:30 AM 12 2 29 0 43 2 68 24 0 94 7 0 0 0 7 0 325 11 0 336 480 06:45 AM 10 3 22 0 35 2 54 17 0 73 13 1 4 0 18 2 306 17 0 325 451 Total 33 6 93 0 132 5 222 66 0 293 32 2 5 0 39 2 1150 44 0 1196 1660 07:00 AM 9 0 41 0 50 2 71 13 0 86 29 2 4 0 35 0 279 14 0 293 464 07:15 AM 13 1 36 0 50 3 96 6 0 105 29 0 1 0 30 0 346 16 0 362 547 07:30 AM 9 2 46 0 57 3 91 13 0 107 21 1 4 0 26 2 333 17 0 352 542 07:45 AM 15 1 41 0 57 4 123 11 0 138 20 0 1 0 21 1 305 20 0 326 542 Total 46 4 164 0 214 12 381 43 0 436 99 3 10 0 112 3 1263 67 0 1333 2095 08:00 AM 12 0 48 0 60 7 90 15 0 112 16 0 0 0 16 4 236 19 0 259 447 08:15 AM 7 3 41 0 51 7 114 13 0 134 18 3 0 0 21 0 199 13 0 212 418 08:30 AM 12 0 51 0 63 4 104 12 0 120 23 1 1 0 25 1 210 16 0 227 435 08:45 AM 16 0 47 0 63 9 93 13 0 115 17 1 0 0 18 0 194 19 0 213 409 Total 47 3 187 0 237 27 401 53 0 481 74 5 1 0 80 5 839 67 0 911 1709 Grand Total 126 13 444 0 583 44 1004 162 0 1210 205 10 16 0 231 10 3252 178 0 3440 5464 Apprch %21.6 2.2 76.2 0 3.6 83 13.4 0 88.7 4.3 6.9 0 0.3 94.5 5.2 0 Total %2.3 0.2 8.1 0 10.7 0.8 18.4 3 0 22.1 3.8 0.2 0.3 0 4.2 0.2 59.5 3.3 0 63 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 9 0 41 0 50 2 71 13 0 86 29 2 4 0 35 0 279 14 0 293 464 07:15 AM 13 1 36 0 50 3 96 6 0 105 29 0 1 0 30 0 346 16 0 362 547 07:30 AM 9 2 46 0 57 3 91 13 0 107 21 1 4 0 26 2 333 17 0 352 542 07:45 AM 15 1 41 0 57 4 123 11 0 138 20 0 1 0 21 1 305 20 0 326 542 Total Volume 46 4 164 0 214 12 381 43 0 436 99 3 10 0 112 3 1263 67 0 1333 2095 % App. Total 21.5 1.9 76.6 0 2.8 87.4 9.9 0 88.4 2.7 8.9 0 0.2 94.7 5 0 PHF .767 .500 .891 .000 .939 .750 .774 .827 .000 .790 .853 .375 .625 .000 .800 .375 .913 .838 .000 .921 .957 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 230 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd MID Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 30 0 71 0 101 17 103 10 0 130 6 1 0 0 7 1 148 15 0 164 402 11:15 AM 31 1 77 0 109 9 128 10 0 147 11 2 0 0 13 2 137 15 0 154 423 11:30 AM 20 2 74 0 96 10 98 11 0 119 8 1 1 0 10 1 125 21 0 147 372 11:45 AM 33 2 71 0 106 17 140 9 0 166 17 0 1 0 18 2 134 19 0 155 445 Total 114 5 293 0 412 53 469 40 0 562 42 4 2 0 48 6 544 70 0 620 1642 12:00 PM 34 1 72 0 107 14 100 9 0 123 14 3 0 0 17 2 130 22 0 154 401 12:15 PM 38 2 72 0 112 13 136 12 0 161 16 3 0 0 19 0 110 28 0 138 430 12:30 PM 51 5 63 0 119 14 106 14 0 134 10 0 0 0 10 0 98 21 0 119 382 12:45 PM 47 0 83 0 130 8 127 4 0 139 6 0 0 0 6 0 123 14 0 137 412 Total 170 8 290 0 468 49 469 39 0 557 46 6 0 0 52 2 461 85 0 548 1625 Grand Total 284 13 583 0 880 102 938 79 0 1119 88 10 2 0 100 8 1005 155 0 1168 3267 Apprch %32.3 1.5 66.2 0 9.1 83.8 7.1 0 88 10 2 0 0.7 86 13.3 0 Total %8.7 0.4 17.8 0 26.9 3.1 28.7 2.4 0 34.3 2.7 0.3 0.1 0 3.1 0.2 30.8 4.7 0 35.8 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 33 2 71 0 106 17 140 9 0 166 17 0 1 0 18 2 134 19 0 155 445 12:00 PM 34 1 72 0 107 14 100 9 0 123 14 3 0 0 17 2 130 22 0 154 401 12:15 PM 38 2 72 0 112 13 136 12 0 161 16 3 0 0 19 0 110 28 0 138 430 12:30 PM 51 5 63 0 119 14 106 14 0 134 10 0 0 0 10 0 98 21 0 119 382 Total Volume 156 10 278 0 444 58 482 44 0 584 57 6 1 0 64 4 472 90 0 566 1658 % App. Total 35.1 2.3 62.6 0 9.9 82.5 7.5 0 89.1 9.4 1.6 0 0.7 83.4 15.9 0 PHF .765 .500 .965 .000 .933 .853 .861 .786 .000 .880 .838 .500 .250 .000 .842 .500 .881 .804 .000 .913 .931 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 231 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd MID Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Trucks Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 6 3 0 9 3 0 2 0 5 0 10 0 0 10 26 11:15 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 3 0 1 0 4 1 8 0 0 9 25 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 10 3 0 0 0 3 0 12 1 0 13 26 11:45 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 8 5 0 13 6 0 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 28 Total 1 1 4 0 6 0 28 14 0 42 15 0 3 0 18 1 37 1 0 39 105 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 13 2 0 2 0 4 0 10 0 0 10 27 12:15 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 6 2 0 8 4 0 1 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 22 12:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 3 0 13 4 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 7 25 12:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 0 12 3 0 0 0 3 1 12 0 0 13 29 Total 1 0 3 0 4 1 36 9 0 46 13 0 3 0 16 1 36 0 0 37 103 Grand Total 2 1 7 0 10 1 64 23 0 88 28 0 6 0 34 2 73 1 0 76 208 Apprch %20 10 70 0 1.1 72.7 26.1 0 82.4 0 17.6 0 2.6 96.1 1.3 0 Total %1 0.5 3.4 0 4.8 0.5 30.8 11.1 0 42.3 13.5 0 2.9 0 16.3 1 35.1 0.5 0 36.5 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:15 AM 11:15 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 3 0 1 0 4 1 8 0 0 9 25 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 10 3 0 0 0 3 0 12 1 0 13 26 11:45 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 8 5 0 13 6 0 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 28 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 13 2 0 2 0 4 0 10 0 0 10 27 Total Volume 1 1 2 0 4 0 31 15 0 46 14 0 3 0 17 1 37 1 0 39 106 % App. Total 25 25 50 0 0 67.4 32.6 0 82.4 0 17.6 0 2.6 94.9 2.6 0 PHF .250 .250 .500 .000 .500 .000 .861 .750 .000 .885 .583 .000 .375 .000 .708 .250 .771 .250 .000 .750 .946 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 232 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd MID Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bicycles on Crosswalk Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 233 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd MID Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Pedestrians Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 234 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd MID Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Combined Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 30 0 73 0 103 17 109 13 0 139 9 1 2 0 12 1 158 15 0 174 428 11:15 AM 31 2 78 0 111 9 136 12 0 157 14 2 1 0 17 3 145 15 0 163 448 11:30 AM 20 2 74 0 96 10 104 15 0 129 11 1 1 0 13 1 137 22 0 160 398 11:45 AM 34 2 72 0 108 17 148 14 0 179 23 0 1 0 24 2 141 19 0 162 473 Total 115 6 297 0 418 53 497 54 0 604 57 4 5 0 66 7 581 71 0 659 1747 12:00 PM 34 1 72 0 107 14 109 13 0 136 16 3 2 0 21 2 140 22 0 164 428 12:15 PM 38 2 74 0 114 13 142 14 0 169 20 3 1 0 24 0 117 28 0 145 452 12:30 PM 51 5 64 0 120 14 116 17 0 147 14 0 0 0 14 0 105 21 0 126 407 12:45 PM 48 0 83 0 131 9 138 4 0 151 9 0 0 0 9 1 135 14 0 150 441 Total 171 8 293 0 472 50 505 48 0 603 59 6 3 0 68 3 497 85 0 585 1728 Grand Total 286 14 590 0 890 103 1002 102 0 1207 116 10 8 0 134 10 1078 156 0 1244 3475 Apprch %32.1 1.6 66.3 0 8.5 83 8.5 0 86.6 7.5 6 0 0.8 86.7 12.5 0 Total %8.2 0.4 17 0 25.6 3 28.8 2.9 0 34.7 3.3 0.3 0.2 0 3.9 0.3 31 4.5 0 35.8 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 34 2 72 0 108 17 148 14 0 179 23 0 1 0 24 2 141 19 0 162 473 12:00 PM 34 1 72 0 107 14 109 13 0 136 16 3 2 0 21 2 140 22 0 164 428 12:15 PM 38 2 74 0 114 13 142 14 0 169 20 3 1 0 24 0 117 28 0 145 452 12:30 PM 51 5 64 0 120 14 116 17 0 147 14 0 0 0 14 0 105 21 0 126 407 Total Volume 157 10 282 0 449 58 515 58 0 631 73 6 4 0 83 4 503 90 0 597 1760 % App. Total 35 2.2 62.8 0 9.2 81.6 9.2 0 88 7.2 4.8 0 0.7 84.3 15.1 0 PHF .770 .500 .953 .000 .935 .853 .870 .853 .000 .881 .793 .500 .500 .000 .865 .500 .892 .804 .000 .910 .930 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 235 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd PM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 55 2 76 0 133 11 257 21 0 289 19 0 2 0 21 5 132 24 0 161 604 03:15 PM 43 1 60 0 104 10 222 19 0 251 21 0 3 0 24 0 143 14 0 157 536 03:30 PM 62 2 70 0 134 12 247 17 0 276 22 5 0 0 27 1 128 18 0 147 584 03:45 PM 58 0 66 0 124 7 289 16 0 312 17 1 2 0 20 0 127 14 0 141 597 Total 218 5 272 0 495 40 1015 73 0 1128 79 6 7 0 92 6 530 70 0 606 2321 04:00 PM 58 6 71 0 135 15 259 16 0 290 15 2 2 0 19 1 132 14 0 147 591 04:15 PM 60 3 70 0 133 4 294 12 0 310 13 1 0 0 14 3 144 20 0 167 624 04:30 PM 60 2 67 0 129 7 263 11 0 281 14 4 2 0 20 2 116 23 0 141 571 04:45 PM 59 3 59 0 121 8 291 22 0 321 12 0 0 0 12 1 145 22 0 168 622 Total 237 14 267 0 518 34 1107 61 0 1202 54 7 4 0 65 7 537 79 0 623 2408 05:00 PM 62 1 66 0 129 11 296 16 0 323 12 5 2 0 19 1 125 16 0 142 613 05:15 PM 66 4 68 0 138 12 308 18 0 338 12 3 0 0 15 0 147 15 0 162 653 05:30 PM 56 4 54 0 114 9 284 14 0 307 10 2 1 0 13 1 137 9 0 147 581 05:45 PM 46 4 48 0 98 12 249 21 0 282 7 2 0 0 9 0 88 19 0 107 496 Total 230 13 236 0 479 44 1137 69 0 1250 41 12 3 0 56 2 497 59 0 558 2343 Grand Total 685 32 775 0 1492 118 3259 203 0 3580 174 25 14 0 213 15 1564 208 0 1787 7072 Apprch %45.9 2.1 51.9 0 3.3 91 5.7 0 81.7 11.7 6.6 0 0.8 87.5 11.6 0 Total %9.7 0.5 11 0 21.1 1.7 46.1 2.9 0 50.6 2.5 0.4 0.2 0 3 0.2 22.1 2.9 0 25.3 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 59 3 59 0 121 8 291 22 0 321 12 0 0 0 12 1 145 22 0 168 622 05:00 PM 62 1 66 0 129 11 296 16 0 323 12 5 2 0 19 1 125 16 0 142 613 05:15 PM 66 4 68 0 138 12 308 18 0 338 12 3 0 0 15 0 147 15 0 162 653 05:30 PM 56 4 54 0 114 9 284 14 0 307 10 2 1 0 13 1 137 9 0 147 581 Total Volume 243 12 247 0 502 40 1179 70 0 1289 46 10 3 0 59 3 554 62 0 619 2469 % App. Total 48.4 2.4 49.2 0 3.1 91.5 5.4 0 78 16.9 5.1 0 0.5 89.5 10 0 PHF .920 .750 .908 .000 .909 .833 .957 .795 .000 .953 .958 .500 .375 .000 .776 .750 .942 .705 .000 .921 .945 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 236 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd PM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Trucks Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 12 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 20 03:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 9 23 03:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 1 0 7 3 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 16 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 11 1 0 12 19 Total 0 0 3 0 3 2 30 8 0 40 5 0 0 0 5 0 28 2 0 30 78 04:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 11 04:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 0 5 13 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 6 15 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 11 Total 3 0 0 0 3 1 24 1 0 26 2 0 1 0 3 1 17 0 0 18 50 05:00 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 16 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 7 05:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 10 05:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 9 Total 3 0 1 0 4 1 14 2 0 17 1 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 20 42 Grand Total 6 0 4 0 10 4 68 11 0 83 8 0 1 0 9 1 65 2 0 68 170 Apprch %60 0 40 0 4.8 81.9 13.3 0 88.9 0 11.1 0 1.5 95.6 2.9 0 Total %3.5 0 2.4 0 5.9 2.4 40 6.5 0 48.8 4.7 0 0.6 0 5.3 0.6 38.2 1.2 0 40 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM 03:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 12 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 20 03:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 10 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 9 23 03:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 1 0 7 3 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 16 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 11 1 0 12 19 Total Volume 0 0 3 0 3 2 30 8 0 40 5 0 0 0 5 0 28 2 0 30 78 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 5 75 20 0 100 0 0 0 0 93.3 6.7 0 PHF .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .500 .625 .667 .000 .667 .417 .000 .000 .000 .417 .000 .636 .500 .000 .625 .848 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 237 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd PM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bicycles on Crosswalk Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 238 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd PM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Pedestrians Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 239 File Name : 3-US 50 & Retail Blvd PM Site Code : Start Date : 11/9/2022 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Combined Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 55 2 77 0 134 12 269 23 0 304 19 0 2 0 21 5 136 24 0 165 624 03:15 PM 43 1 61 0 105 10 232 22 0 264 21 0 3 0 24 0 151 15 0 166 559 03:30 PM 62 2 71 0 135 12 253 18 0 283 25 5 0 0 30 1 133 18 0 152 600 03:45 PM 58 0 66 0 124 8 291 18 0 317 19 1 2 0 22 0 138 15 0 153 616 Total 218 5 275 0 498 42 1045 81 0 1168 84 6 7 0 97 6 558 72 0 636 2399 04:00 PM 59 6 71 0 136 16 264 17 0 297 15 2 2 0 19 1 135 14 0 150 602 04:15 PM 61 3 70 0 134 4 300 12 0 316 13 1 1 0 15 4 148 20 0 172 637 04:30 PM 61 2 67 0 130 7 270 11 0 288 15 4 2 1 22 2 122 23 0 147 587 04:45 PM 59 3 59 0 121 8 297 22 0 327 13 0 0 0 13 1 149 22 0 172 633 Total 240 14 267 0 521 35 1131 62 0 1228 56 7 5 1 69 8 554 79 0 641 2459 05:00 PM 64 1 66 0 131 12 300 17 0 329 13 5 2 0 20 1 132 16 0 149 629 05:15 PM 66 4 68 0 138 12 312 18 0 342 12 3 0 0 15 0 150 15 0 165 660 05:30 PM 56 4 55 0 115 9 288 14 0 311 10 2 1 0 13 1 142 9 0 152 591 05:45 PM 47 4 48 0 99 12 251 22 0 285 7 2 0 0 9 0 93 19 0 112 505 Total 233 13 237 0 483 45 1151 71 0 1267 42 12 3 0 57 2 517 59 0 578 2385 Grand Total 691 32 779 0 1502 122 3327 214 0 3663 182 25 15 1 223 16 1629 210 0 1855 7243 Apprch %46 2.1 51.9 0 3.3 90.8 5.8 0 81.6 11.2 6.7 0.4 0.9 87.8 11.3 0 Total %9.5 0.4 10.8 0 20.7 1.7 45.9 3 0 50.6 2.5 0.3 0.2 0 3.1 0.2 22.5 2.9 0 25.6 Retail Blvd Southbound US 50 Westbound Retail Blvd Northbound US 50 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 59 3 59 0 121 8 297 22 0 327 13 0 0 0 13 1 149 22 0 172 633 05:00 PM 64 1 66 0 131 12 300 17 0 329 13 5 2 0 20 1 132 16 0 149 629 05:15 PM 66 4 68 0 138 12 312 18 0 342 12 3 0 0 15 0 150 15 0 165 660 05:30 PM 56 4 55 0 115 9 288 14 0 311 10 2 1 0 13 1 142 9 0 152 591 Total Volume 245 12 248 0 505 41 1197 71 0 1309 48 10 3 0 61 3 573 62 0 638 2513 % App. Total 48.5 2.4 49.1 0 3.1 91.4 5.4 0 78.7 16.4 4.9 0 0.5 89.8 9.7 0 PHF .928 .750 .912 .000 .915 .854 .959 .807 .000 .957 .923 .500 .375 .000 .763 .750 .955 .705 .000 .927 .952 Peggy Malone and Associates 904-992-8072 240 Appendix C Year 2023 Existing Conditions Level-of-Service Worksheets 241 Queues Existing AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Existing AM Existing AM 4:12 pm 01/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 1301 7 49 432 18 7 92 182 4 52 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.66 0.01 0.52 0.24 0.02 0.11 0.30 0.66 0.03 0.14 Control Delay 71.2 21.6 0.0 57.4 9.6 0.1 56.7 2.6 62.7 47.0 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.2 21.6 0.0 57.4 9.6 0.1 56.7 2.6 62.7 47.0 0.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 357 0 38 51 0 5 0 68 3 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 104 494 0 72 70 0 21 0 104 14 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 250 Base Capacity (vph) 163 1968 793 130 1834 854 96 326 306 176 377 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.66 0.01 0.38 0.24 0.02 0.07 0.28 0.59 0.02 0.14 Intersection Summary 242 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Existing AM Existing AM 4:12 pm 01/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 72 1236 7 47 410 17 6 1 87 173 4 49 Future Volume (vph) 72 1236 7 47 410 17 6 1 87 173 4 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 1301 7 49 432 18 6 1 92 182 4 52 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 88 0 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 1301 4 49 432 10 0 7 4 182 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 29% 24% 9% 18% 33% 0% 23% 6% 0% 4% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 62.3 62.3 6.5 62.2 62.2 5.1 5.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 Effective Green, g (s) 7.0 62.3 62.3 6.5 62.2 62.2 5.1 5.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 109 1917 678 82 1791 740 62 58 275 158 129 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.37 c0.03 0.13 c0.00 c0.06 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.68 0.01 0.60 0.24 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.66 0.03 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 19.1 12.1 53.0 13.9 12.2 52.8 52.7 51.1 48.4 48.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.5 2.0 0.0 7.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 4.6 0.0 0.0 Delay (s) 67.5 21.1 12.1 46.8 9.2 12.2 53.1 52.9 55.7 48.4 48.5 Level of Service E C B D A B D D E D D Approach Delay (s) 23.6 13.0 52.9 54.0 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 243 HCM 6th TWSC Existing AM 2: Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr 06/26/2023 Existing AM Existing AM 4:12 pm 01/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 1 29 61 1 103 Future Vol, veh/h 123 1 29 61 1 103 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 - - 190 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 134 1 32 66 1 112 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 123 49 0 0 98 0 Stage 1 65 - - - - - Stage 2 58 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 859 1009 - - 1493 - Stage 1 950 - - - - - Stage 2 958 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 858 1009 - - 1493 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 858 - - - - - Stage 1 950 - - - - - Stage 2 957 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 858 1009 1493 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.156 0.001 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 10 8.6 7.4 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0 0 - 244 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 3: US-50 06/26/2023 Existing AM Existing AM 4:12 pm 01/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1315 465 0 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 1315 465 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 1429 505 0 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 vC, conflicting volume 505 1220 168 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 505 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 714 vCu, unblocked vol 439 1165 96 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1099 316 926 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 714 714 202 202 101 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.12 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 245 Queues Existing PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Existing PM Existing PM 9:20 am 02/15/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 617 8 67 1217 38 12 63 297 15 250 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.31 0.01 0.58 0.62 0.04 0.16 0.21 0.76 0.07 0.62 Control Delay 73.9 16.9 0.0 68.4 13.2 0.1 60.2 1.6 64.1 46.7 13.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 73.9 16.9 0.0 68.4 13.2 0.1 60.2 1.6 64.1 46.7 13.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 63 142 0 53 291 0 9 0 116 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 114 206 0 92 389 1 30 0 159 31 76 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 250 Base Capacity (vph) 179 1970 878 148 1973 965 85 309 496 269 441 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.31 0.01 0.45 0.62 0.04 0.14 0.20 0.60 0.06 0.57 Intersection Summary 246 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Existing PM Existing PM 9:20 am 02/15/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 79 592 8 64 1168 36 5 7 60 285 14 240 Future Volume (vph) 79 592 8 64 1168 36 5 7 60 285 14 240 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 82 617 8 67 1217 38 5 7 62 297 15 250 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 18 0 0 61 0 0 222 Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 617 4 67 1217 20 0 12 2 297 15 28 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 13% 2% 2% 3% 20% 0% 4% 0% 0% 1% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.8 64.0 64.0 6.8 63.4 63.4 4.2 4.2 13.5 13.5 13.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 64.0 64.0 6.8 63.4 63.4 4.2 4.2 13.5 13.5 13.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 117 1869 746 100 1869 828 60 54 393 213 179 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.18 0.04 c0.34 c0.01 c0.08 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.33 0.01 0.67 0.65 0.02 0.20 0.04 0.76 0.07 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 55.0 15.9 13.1 55.5 20.3 13.5 56.3 56.0 51.7 47.6 48.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.3 0.5 0.0 12.1 1.7 0.1 0.6 0.1 7.2 0.1 0.1 Delay (s) 69.3 16.3 13.1 63.2 13.0 13.6 56.9 56.1 58.8 47.7 48.3 Level of Service E B B E B B E E E D D Approach Delay (s) 22.4 15.6 56.2 53.8 Approach LOS C B E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 26.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 247 HCM 6th TWSC Existing PM 2: Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr 06/26/2023 Existing PM Existing PM 9:20 am 02/15/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 218 1 52 70 1 321 Future Vol, veh/h 218 1 52 70 1 321 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 - - 190 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 237 1 57 76 1 349 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 272 67 0 0 133 0 Stage 1 95 - - - - - Stage 2 177 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 695 983 - - 1449 - Stage 1 918 - - - - - Stage 2 836 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 694 983 - - 1449 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 694 - - - - - Stage 1 918 - - - - - Stage 2 835 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.9 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 694 983 1449 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.341 0.001 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.9 8.7 7.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.5 0 0 - 248 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM 3: US-50 06/26/2023 Existing PM Existing PM 9:20 am 02/15/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 679 1413 0 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 679 1413 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 738 1536 0 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.80 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 1536 1905 512 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1536 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 369 vCu, unblocked vol 786 1248 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 661 251 865 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 369 369 614 614 307 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.22 0.36 0.36 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 249 Appendix D Winchester Shops Development Site Plan 250 ±3,900SF ±4,062SF60 '62.5'65 24'25'24'24'24' 24' 3,200SF 2,400SF 24'251 Appendix E Year 2024 Background Traffic Level-of-Service Worksheets 252 Queues Background AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Background AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 1321 7 49 442 18 7 93 189 4 54 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.67 0.01 0.53 0.24 0.02 0.11 0.31 0.67 0.02 0.15 Control Delay 72.2 22.0 0.0 58.1 9.9 0.1 56.7 2.6 63.0 47.0 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 72.2 22.0 0.0 58.1 9.9 0.1 56.7 2.6 63.0 47.0 0.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 58 368 0 37 52 0 5 0 71 3 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 504 0 73 72 0 21 0 107 14 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 250 Base Capacity (vph) 163 1962 791 130 1824 851 96 326 308 177 377 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.67 0.01 0.38 0.24 0.02 0.07 0.29 0.61 0.02 0.14 Intersection Summary 253 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Background AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Background AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 76 1255 7 47 420 17 6 1 88 180 4 51 Future Volume (vph) 76 1255 7 47 420 17 6 1 88 180 4 51 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 80 1321 7 49 442 18 6 1 93 189 4 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 89 0 0 49 Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 1321 4 49 442 10 0 7 4 189 4 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 29% 24% 9% 18% 33% 0% 23% 6% 0% 4% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 62.2 62.2 6.4 61.8 61.8 5.1 5.1 9.8 9.8 9.8 Effective Green, g (s) 7.2 62.2 62.2 6.4 61.8 61.8 5.1 5.1 9.8 9.8 9.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 113 1914 677 81 1779 735 62 58 281 161 132 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.37 c0.03 0.13 c0.00 c0.06 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.69 0.01 0.60 0.25 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.67 0.02 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 52.9 19.3 12.2 53.1 14.2 12.4 52.8 52.7 51.0 48.2 48.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.2 2.1 0.0 8.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 Delay (s) 68.1 21.4 12.2 48.2 9.5 12.4 53.1 52.9 56.0 48.2 48.3 Level of Service E C B D A B D D E D D Approach Delay (s) 24.0 13.3 52.9 54.2 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 26.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 254 HCM 6th TWSC Background AM 2: Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr 06/26/2023 Background AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 1 30 64 1 104 Future Vol, veh/h 131 1 30 64 1 104 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 - - 190 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 142 1 33 70 1 113 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 127 52 0 0 103 0 Stage 1 68 - - - - - Stage 2 59 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 854 1005 - - 1487 - Stage 1 947 - - - - - Stage 2 956 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 853 1005 - - 1487 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 853 - - - - - Stage 1 947 - - - - - Stage 2 955 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 853 1005 1487 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.167 0.001 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 10.1 8.6 7.4 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0 0 - 255 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Background AM 3: US-50 06/26/2023 Background AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1338 477 0 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 1338 477 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 1454 518 0 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98 vC, conflicting volume 518 1245 173 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 518 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 727 vCu, unblocked vol 441 1182 89 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1094 311 933 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 727 727 207 207 104 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.43 0.43 0.12 0.12 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 256 Queues Background PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Background PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 633 8 68 1240 38 12 64 316 15 256 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.32 0.01 0.59 0.66 0.04 0.16 0.21 0.78 0.07 0.62 Control Delay 76.1 17.3 0.0 69.2 16.5 0.1 60.2 1.6 65.0 46.4 12.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.1 17.3 0.0 69.2 16.5 0.1 60.2 1.6 65.0 46.4 12.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 148 0 54 300 0 9 0 124 11 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 121 212 0 95 412 1 30 0 169 31 77 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 250 Base Capacity (vph) 178 1956 873 148 1878 929 85 309 496 269 446 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.32 0.01 0.46 0.66 0.04 0.14 0.21 0.64 0.06 0.57 Intersection Summary 257 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Background PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 06/26/2023 Background PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 84 608 8 65 1190 36 5 7 61 303 14 246 Future Volume (vph) 84 608 8 65 1190 36 5 7 61 303 14 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 88 633 8 68 1240 38 5 7 64 316 15 256 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 19 0 0 62 0 0 226 Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 633 4 68 1240 19 0 12 2 316 15 30 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 13% 2% 2% 3% 20% 0% 4% 0% 0% 1% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 63.6 63.6 6.8 60.3 60.3 4.2 4.2 13.9 13.9 13.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 63.6 63.6 6.8 60.3 60.3 4.2 4.2 13.9 13.9 13.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.53 0.53 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 1857 741 100 1778 787 60 54 405 220 185 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.18 0.04 c0.35 c0.01 c0.09 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.34 0.01 0.68 0.70 0.02 0.20 0.04 0.78 0.07 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 52.5 16.2 13.3 55.5 22.9 15.0 56.3 56.0 51.6 47.3 47.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 0.5 0.0 13.2 2.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 8.7 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 55.2 16.7 13.3 64.7 17.1 15.1 56.9 56.1 60.3 47.3 47.9 Level of Service E B B E B B E E E D D Approach Delay (s) 21.3 19.4 56.2 54.6 Approach LOS C B E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 258 HCM 6th TWSC Background PM 2: Retail Blvd & Crock Wells Mill Dr 06/26/2023 Background PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 235 1 52 75 1 328 Future Vol, veh/h 235 1 52 75 1 328 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 - - 190 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 255 1 57 82 1 357 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 279 70 0 0 139 0 Stage 1 98 - - - - - Stage 2 181 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 688 978 - - 1442 - Stage 1 915 - - - - - Stage 2 832 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 687 978 - - 1442 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 687 - - - - - Stage 1 915 - - - - - Stage 2 831 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 687 978 1442 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.372 0.001 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.3 8.7 7.5 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.7 0 0 - 259 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Background PM 3: US-50 06/26/2023 Background PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 700 1441 0 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 700 1441 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 761 1566 0 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.78 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 1566 1946 522 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1566 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 380 vCu, unblocked vol 723 1213 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 680 259 842 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 380 380 626 626 313 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.22 0.37 0.37 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 260 Appendix F Year 2024 Total Traffic Level-of- Service Worksheets 261 Queues Total AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 07/17/2023 Total AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 1295 7 49 484 29 7 93 269 4 237 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.70 0.01 0.52 0.30 0.04 0.11 0.31 0.72 0.02 0.59 Control Delay 76.7 24.3 0.0 59.0 13.6 0.1 56.7 2.6 60.7 45.2 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.7 24.3 0.0 59.0 13.6 0.1 56.7 2.6 60.7 45.2 10.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 388 0 38 61 0 5 0 99 3 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #183 491 0 74 82 0 21 0 #160 14 60 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 275 Base Capacity (vph) 177 1867 764 131 1641 787 96 326 375 215 404 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.69 0.01 0.37 0.29 0.04 0.07 0.29 0.72 0.02 0.59 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 262 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Total AM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 07/17/2023 Total AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 115 1230 7 47 460 28 6 1 88 256 4 225 Future Volume (vph) 115 1230 7 47 460 28 6 1 88 256 4 225 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3539 1252 1456 3312 1369 1420 1313 3303 1900 1553 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 121 1295 7 49 484 29 6 1 93 269 4 237 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 15 0 0 89 0 0 210 Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 1295 4 49 484 14 0 7 4 269 4 27 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 29% 24% 9% 18% 33% 0% 23% 6% 0% 4% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 58.8 58.8 6.5 55.3 55.3 5.1 5.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 58.8 58.8 6.5 55.3 55.3 5.1 5.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.51 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 1809 640 82 1592 658 62 58 376 216 176 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.37 c0.03 0.15 c0.00 c0.08 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.72 0.01 0.60 0.30 0.02 0.11 0.07 0.72 0.02 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 21.7 13.8 53.0 18.1 15.7 52.8 52.7 49.2 45.2 45.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 2.5 0.0 7.5 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.2 5.3 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 65.7 24.1 13.8 48.7 13.1 15.7 53.1 52.9 54.5 45.3 46.1 Level of Service E C B D B B D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 27.6 16.4 52.9 50.5 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 263 HCM 6th TWSC Total AM 2: Retail Blvd & Driveway 1/Crock Wells Mill Dr 07/17/2023 Total AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 10 250 131 10 1 50 30 64 1 104 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 10 250 131 10 1 50 30 64 1 104 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 160 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 11 272 142 11 1 54 33 70 1 113 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 251 332 62 240 302 52 124 0 0 103 0 0 Stage 1 121 121 - 176 176 - - - - - - - Stage 2 130 211 - 64 126 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 682 586 990 694 610 1005 1461 - - 1487 - - Stage 1 870 795 - 809 752 - - - - - - - Stage 2 860 726 - 939 791 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 651 562 990 481 585 1005 1461 - - 1487 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 651 562 - 481 585 - - - - - - - Stage 1 835 794 - 777 722 - - - - - - - Stage 2 812 697 - 671 790 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 15.2 2.6 0.1 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1461 - - 945 481 608 1487 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - - 0.311 0.296 0.02 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - 10.5 15.6 11 7.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - B C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.3 1.2 0.1 0 - - 264 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Total AM 3: US-50 & Driveway 2 07/17/2023 Total AM 3:31 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1352 491 200 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 1352 491 200 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 1470 534 217 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 vC, conflicting volume 751 1378 286 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 642 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 735 vCu, unblocked vol 606 1257 124 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 932 293 870 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 735 735 214 214 324 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 217 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.43 0.43 0.13 0.13 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 265 Queues Total PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 07/17/2023 Total PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 611 8 68 1276 48 12 64 384 15 413 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.32 0.01 0.59 0.72 0.05 0.16 0.21 0.84 0.06 0.86 Control Delay 80.3 18.1 0.0 71.3 21.1 0.2 60.2 1.6 67.1 45.3 32.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 80.3 18.1 0.0 71.3 21.1 0.2 60.2 1.6 67.1 45.3 32.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 94 151 0 55 368 0 9 0 148 10 76 Queue Length 95th (ft) #180 204 0 95 451 3 30 0 #209 31 #248 Internal Link Dist (ft) 408 939 1474 367 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 280 1000 250 300 275 Base Capacity (vph) 184 1902 855 148 1775 889 85 309 501 272 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.32 0.01 0.46 0.72 0.05 0.14 0.21 0.77 0.06 0.84 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 266 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Total PM 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 07/17/2023 Total PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 118 587 8 65 1225 46 5 7 61 369 14 396 Future Volume (vph) 118 587 8 65 1225 46 5 7 61 369 14 396 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1805 3505 1399 1770 3539 1568 1718 1553 3502 1900 1599 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 123 611 8 68 1276 48 5 7 64 384 15 412 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 25 0 0 62 0 0 268 Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 611 4 68 1276 23 0 12 2 384 15 145 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 3% 13% 2% 2% 3% 20% 0% 4% 0% 0% 1% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.4 61.7 61.7 6.8 56.5 56.5 4.2 4.2 15.8 15.8 15.8 Effective Green, g (s) 12.4 61.7 61.7 6.8 56.5 56.5 4.2 4.2 15.8 15.8 15.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 7.6 5.4 5.4 7.9 5.3 5.3 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 1802 719 100 1666 738 60 54 461 250 210 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.17 0.04 c0.36 c0.01 c0.11 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.34 0.01 0.68 0.77 0.03 0.20 0.04 0.83 0.06 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 51.8 17.2 14.2 55.5 26.3 17.0 56.3 56.0 50.8 45.6 49.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.7 0.5 0.0 13.3 3.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 11.7 0.0 7.3 Delay (s) 58.4 17.7 14.2 66.7 22.3 17.1 56.9 56.1 62.5 45.6 57.0 Level of Service E B B E C B E E E D E Approach Delay (s) 24.4 24.3 56.2 59.4 Approach LOS C C E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 267 HCM 6th TWSC Total PM 2: Retail Blvd & Driveway 1/Crock Wells Mill Dr 07/17/2023 Total PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 11.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 8 216 235 9 1 44 52 75 1 328 9 Future Vol, veh/h 9 8 216 235 9 1 44 52 75 1 328 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 160 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 9 235 255 10 1 48 57 82 1 357 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 494 599 184 379 563 70 367 0 0 139 0 0 Stage 1 364 364 - 194 194 - - - - - - - Stage 2 130 235 - 185 369 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 458 414 827 553 434 978 1188 - - 1442 - - Stage 1 627 622 - 789 739 - - - - - - - Stage 2 860 709 - 799 619 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 434 395 827 376 414 978 1188 - - 1442 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 434 395 - 376 414 - - - - - - - Stage 1 599 621 - 754 706 - - - - - - - Stage 2 810 678 - 564 618 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 31.8 2.1 0 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1188 - - 771 376 439 1442 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - - 0.328 0.679 0.025 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0.1 - 11.9 32.6 13.4 7.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - B D B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.4 4.8 0.1 0 - - 268 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Total PM 3: US-50 & Driveway 2 07/17/2023 Total PM 3:52 pm 06/13/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 713 1454 172 0 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 713 1454 172 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 775 1580 187 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) 488 pX, platoon unblocked 0.75 0.75 0.75 vC, conflicting volume 1767 2061 620 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1674 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 388 vCu, unblocked vol 839 1233 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s)5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 591 251 810 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 Volume Total 388 388 632 632 503 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 187 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 269 Queuing and Blocking Report Total AM SimTraffic Reports 07/19/2023 Total AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 271 375 388 154 136 182 222 60 54 147 182 213 Average Queue (ft) 101 204 234 9 42 74 106 12 6 53 87 115 95th Queue (ft) 211 342 367 76 98 146 185 42 32 109 158 188 Link Distance (ft) 374 374 871 871 871 871 1473 300 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 7 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 280 250 300 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 0 Intersection: 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 Movement SB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 34 135 Average Queue (ft) 4 61 95th Queue (ft) 21 98 Link Distance (ft) 300 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 270 Queuing and Blocking Report Total PM SimTraffic Reports 07/19/2023 Total PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 169 194 235 58 123 415 445 52 60 74 230 251 Average Queue (ft) 83 95 115 4 50 237 259 15 12 28 115 145 95th Queue (ft) 143 173 201 35 100 371 396 41 40 56 190 219 Link Distance (ft) 374 374 871 871 871 871 1473 300 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 280 250 300 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 1: Round Hill Rd/Retail Blvd & US-50 Movement SB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 212 272 Average Queue (ft) 21 160 95th Queue (ft) 104 264 Link Distance (ft) 300 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 271 272 From:Rod Williams To:Ronald A. Mislowsky Cc:Wyatt Pearson; John Bishop; Tyler Klein Subject:Rezoning Application - Round Hill Crossing Phase 2 - Tax Parcel 52-A-B (the "Property") Date:Sunday, October 29, 2023 3:59:53 PM Dear Ron: You have submitted to Frederick County for review a proposed profferstatement amendment (the “Proffer Statement Amendment”) for the proposed proffercondition rezoning of the Property, 28.17± acres in the Gainesboro MagisterialDistrict, zoned in the B2 (General Business) Zoning District. I have now reviewed theProffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a form tomeet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code ofVirginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the followingcomments: Item 6 of the Application does call for identification of persons holding interestsin the entities owning the property (but only their names and not their respectiveownership shares). The draft shows a response of “N/A”. As written, the heading of the Proffer Statement Amendment refers to the 2016rezoning, but the relevant text relates to the 2003 rezoning. The best practicemay be to reference both the 2003 and 2016 proffer statements in the headinginformation. Thus, perhaps the title should be: “Proffer Statement Amendment /Rezoning #s 03-03 and 08-16 / Round Hill Crossing Phase 2”. Likewise, for the“Original Date of Proffers”, it might work best if that item just identified the finaladopted versions for both previous proffer statements, such as by indicating:“Rezoning # 03-03 – June 20, 2003 // Rezoning # 08-16 – October 3, 2016”. The magisterial district for the rezoning is Gainesboro and not Back Creek. Thearea of the Property has not been moved to a different district. Because the language of the Proffer Statement Amendment refers to the GDPand to an attached exhibit, addition of the following clarifying language may beappropriate, after the language at the bottom of page 1: “Other than with respectto designating entrance connections to U.S. Route 50, neither this profferstatement amendment nor its attached exhibit in any way otherwise modifiesany GDP or MDP previously approved for the property.” I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers aresuitable and appropriate for this specific development, as my understanding is thatreview will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sincerely yours,Rod 273 274 275 276 277 278 N/A Silver Lake, LLC Winchester Warehousing, Inc 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 11/17/23, 10:33 AM Untitled Page https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 1/1 Frederick Home Frederick County Virginia LIFE AT THE TOP Pay/Lookup Taxes Pay Real Estate Tax Bills Map Number: 52 A B View Map Name:WINCHESTER WAREHOUSING INC. Select Account#Dept#Ticket#Seq#Due Date Detailed Information (Click Below) Amount Due ViewBill View Back of Bill 8014308 RE2023 45692 2 12/5/2023 2023 REAL ESTATE $25.24 Total Due: $25.24 Enter Amount to Pay: 25.24 Return to Search Pay another Bill Proceed to Shopping Cart Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Pay FOIA Charges Other Payments ShoppingCart(0)Pin Options Change Email 301 Planning Commission Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: January 3, 2024 Agenda Section: Other Title: Current Planning Applications Attachments: 302