Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
14-10 Rt. 50 Assisted Living - Assisted Living - Back Creek - Backfile
Comment Sheets: GIS Sanitation Authority Inspections Public Works Parks & Rec Health Dept. SITE PLAN TRACKING SHEET VDOT Winchester _ Stephens City Middletown _ Airport Fire One copy of Site Plan application form Payment of site plan review fee t� One reproducible copy of Site Plan OPEN FILE: 3 0 File Opened 81 /10 Reference Manual updated/number assigned Xo D-base updated D Application Action Summary updated CLOSE FILE: 4 //U Approved (or denied) letter mailed to applicant/copy to file and cc's A File stamped "approved", "denied" or "�� ithd r.m n" A//0 Reference Manual updated Iq Xo D-base updated 10 3SW Application Action Summary updated S SID# iy3a %����l'sb CHARGE CARD FORM Name W . Q-cj d Vi -:�( Phone 9 ) 9 -) y 0 (P (� U Company Name Address ? () 1 J 0 k �� City, State, Zip Code ri 5 0 a Card Type �% S0. ( 5) Exp. Date Card i, - Signaturck JU A Dat� 3//c) I., Please Accept payment for the following fee(s) by credit card as noted below: (d) Item Budget Amount Code Booklets & Maps PCOI $ Description Proffers %odside Estates II IOBH $ Saratoga Meadows IOBQ $ Valley Mill Estates 10CC $ Briarwood Estates II - IX IOCN $ Sign Deposit 1095 $ Applications s; P �,� i S K1SS;s� d ZASP $ Soo_ 00 SVfrn9 n IDO( A Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance PCO2 $ Sale of Amendments (Zoning/Subdivision ord.) PCO2 $ Sale of GIS Material 10 DL $ Subtotal $ % card user fee + Total a.:\cbarsecardror.wpa $ 5 ((a 5 0C.3 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 September 7, 2010 Mr. Eric S. Meske, P.E. Bowman COnSUltmg Group Ltd. 124 East Cork Street Winchcster, Virginia 22601 RE: Approval of Site Plan #66-08; Route 50 Assisted Living Facility Property Identification Number (PIN): 53-A-82 Dear Eric: The above -referenced site plan was approved on September 7, 2010. The site plan is approved for revisions to Site Plan 466-08, which was approved for the construction of a new assisted living facility located on Northwestern Pike (Route 50W) and Ward Avenue (ROUtC 1317) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Revisions include: shifting the dumpster area, revised drop off area for Building 2, sidewalk modifications, revised landscaping, addition of signage, and gazebo additions. All requirements of the Frederick COUnty Zonrrlg Ordirimicc have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with three (3) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate represcntative(s). Furthermore, advise the owners) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner Attachments CEP/bad cc: .lane Anderson, Real Estate Gary Lofton, Back Creel: District Supervisor Greg Unger and Kevin Crosen, Back Creek District Planning Commissioners Commissioner of Revenue 1-111 Hunt Corporation, 117 Edinburgh South, Suite 100, Cary, NC 27511 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning,and Development Use only.. Date: application received: U /4O. Application #k Fees received: t'� Initials: 1. Project Title: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility 2. Location of Property 2093 Northwestern Pike (street address) Winchester, VA 22603 Spring Arbor of Winchester LTD PR 3. Property Owner: Address: 800 Hethwood Blvd Blacksburg, VA 24060 Telephone: 540-552-3515 Spring Arbor of Winchester LTD PR 4. Applicant/Agent Address 800 Hethwood Blvd Blacksburg, VA 24060 Telephone: 54 0 - 552 - 3 515 5. Designer: Bowman Consulting Group 101 South St. SE Address: Leesburg, VA 20175 Telephone: 703-443-2400 Contact: Eric Meske 6 6a. Is this a standard or 'minor' site plan? Standard X Minor 6b. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original Revised X 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 10.23 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 10.23 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: 53-A-82 b) Current Zoning: B2 c) Present Use: Vacant d) Proposed Use: Assisted Living Facility e) Adjoining Property Use(s) Residential and Commericial f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) See Below g) Magisterial District(s) Back Creek I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. ; Signature: Date: 7 0 Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street North Building, 2"d Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review, Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: HHHunt Corporation Address: 117 Edinburgh South, Suite 100 Cary, NC 27511 Phone Number: (919)-461-0587 Name of development and/or description of the request: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility request is to add two assisted living facilities with parking and necessary infrastructure. Location of property: South of Route 50- Northwestern Pike, West of United Bank, North of Allegheny Power substation, East of Stonewall Drive - Route 858. Planning and Development's Comments: PTanning.and Development use only, Date i•eccived._ pate revision iecewed - Date approved Tnconiplete Incomplete , Date reviewed Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date,(revision) 15 Request for Street N-ctme CoInnIenis Site flan Review Frederick County InfoPmation Teclulologies, GIS Divisioix Attu: GIS Manager 107 North lent Street lAlinchcstec' VA 22601 540-665-5614 The GIS staff will x•evie"T the proposed street names fol' this project to e3lsure that their acceptability into the Frederick Cotulty street name system. li'leaso attach oeze copy of the pl,,tn indicating proposed Street names. Applicant's Name:Gtl'i Address: 6 i f Phone: Na111e of development and / or description of request: _eude- 66 C Jf A, 4-v Ibw<-1�Al Onit .lnnxA onr Date received (�f �(�,� Date revision rec©ived Incomplete? (' j� Incomplete? Date first reviewed .Reviewed and signed by �� p Date revision reviewed Reviewer) and signed by Z'cl 69Iz2ZLot-s ooid azeaRauno-1 �to2 �atoo,a-a Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department _Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 North Building, 21 Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet, Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: Name of evelopment and/or description of the request: Inspect' ,ns Repartment's Comments: _�on�r- q , Ins ec>0'ps'.i3ePt; use ori.l Da e' 'r-6 ivgd DV-revisiqu received bate approved 1G '(�� :..: . Incompic�c' co plete Date re�iewea �„c 1���21U Signature and Date o � �' : Signattira and Date (revisi )0, Z0 39VC1 Z6908L90bS 6i 69 600Z/91/90 0 0 Building shall comply with 2006 Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC), Section 308 I -Institutional — Assisted Living facility of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) and. Building shall also comply with 2003 ANSI A117.1-03 for Accessible And Usable Buildings and Facilites. Plans submitted for building permits shall be sealed by Virginia Registered Design Professional. Site plan indicates two separate buildings. Both are I -Institutional Use Groups. Buildings shall comply with height and area of T503 IBC with applicable increases. Buildings shall be sprinkled as required. Site plan indicates sprinkler. Both buildings shall meet height and area for all due to <60' separation distance. Building is not located within 100 year floodplain. All required egress shall be accessible. Building appears to meet ANSI with exiting. Handicap parking provided as required and is dispersed among parking areas. HC parking shall not exceed 2% slope. HC signage shall be provided as required by the USBC Section 1106.8. Walkways shall not exceed 2% slope. Walkways exceeding 2% slope shall be designed as handicap ramps. Handicap ramps shall be designed per ANSI A117.1-03 Maximum slope 1:12, max distance between landings is 30'. Grease traps located outside the building should be noted on site plan Building permit is required for signs and maintenance building shown on plan. Special inspection requirements of Chapter 17 of the IBC shall apply to this type of structure. (soils, concrete, steel, etc.) 6/15/09 Handicap parking shall be placed on the closet route to the entrance. Where multiple entrances exist, parking shall be dispersed among all entrances. 9/3/10 Outdoor structures in close proximity of main structure shall be fully sprinklered or shall comply with NFPA 13 Section 8.15.7 (noncombustible/fire retardant materials). Monumental signage is required to have a building permit. • Bowman C O N S U L T I N G 101 South Street, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 Phone (703) 443-2400 Fax (703)443-2425 www.bowmanconsulting.com To: Frederick County Planning Department 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Candice Perkins LET -MR OF TRANSMITTAL Date: 9/7/2010 Project Name: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility Project No: 5132-01-00S Re: Signature Sets Via: Hand Delivery We are forwarding: Plans QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 5 Sets of Site Plan for Signature Sets COMMENTS 7 2010 Urgency: Regular Transmitted by: BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. Eric S. Meske, P.E. Reup,cm Copy Confirmation of Receipt Required: No Fecd by: nature) nt Name) (Date) 9 7,26W • Bowman C d N 5 U L T I N G 101 South Street, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 Phone (703) 443-2400 Fax (703)443-2425 www.bowmanconsulting.com To: Frederick County Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, North Bldg 2nd FI Winchester, VA Attn: Ms. Candice Perkins • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: September 2, 2010 Project Name: Rte. 50 Assisted Living Project No: 5132-01-005 Re: Site Plan Revision Via: Hand Delivery We are forwarding: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 2 Copies of Revised Site Plan Request for Site Plan Comments Comment Response Letter to Candice Perkins Copy of GIS Department Approval Letter COMMENTS Urgency: Regular Transmitted by: BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. Eric S. Meske, P.E., CFM, Project Manager &nde, Copy Confirmation of Receipt Required: no Received by: (Print Name) (Date) 7/[ 112010 • Bowman C o GPI, 5 U LT � HI 6 September 2, 2010 Ms. Candice Perkins, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility (Spring Arbor) SI' #14-10 BCG Project 85132-01-005 Dear Ms. Perkins: We have received your comments dated August 16, 2010 and offer the following in response. 1. "Proposed Changes. The coversheet slows that only sheets 1, G, 8, 24 and 25 are being modified, however there are chmiges also shown on sheets 4, 5, 7, and 26. The revised coversheet shows changes 118-11 which were not part of the approved site plan which shows revisions 111-7. Indicate if the revisions completed after the approval date (tidy 2, 2009) have been reviewed and approved 4y all applicable Comity agencies. " Response: We will be resubmitting to Inspections, Fire Marshall, FSCA, I-[ealth Department, and Public Works along with this submission. We will forward approval letters From all agencies as we receive them. 2. "Landscapinq Note. On sheet 24, revise note #1 to change tiS165-36B to §165-203.01B. " Response: Note # I on Shect 24 has been revised. 3. "Af,ency Approvals. Agency approval sheets are required from the Frederick County Inspections Departil7ew aid the Frederick colony Fire Harshal. Agency approvals for the revisions prepared after the approval date need to be provided as well. " Response: We will be resubmitting to Inspections, Fire Marshall, FSCA, Health Department, and Public Works along with this submission. We will forward approval letters from all agencies as we receive them. Should YOU have any further questions please feel free to contact nle at the office. Sincerely, BOWMAN CONSUL/TING G OUP Eric S. Meske, P.G., CFM Project Manager Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. 101 South Street SE o Leesburg,VA 20175 Phone: 703.443.2400 o Fax: 703.443.2425 o www.bowmanconsulting.com A 0 0 Ace Tree Movers, Inc. *21201 Zion Road * Brookeville, Maryland 20833* i 301-519-0008 * 800-258-4-ACC * Fax 301-216-0099 www.acetreen�overs.com * sales(r),acetreeInovers.coill September 1, 2010 Planting and Zoning Re: Spring Arbor of Winchester I- H Hunt Inc. Dear Mrs. Candice Perkins, We are writing this letter in careful consideration in changes to species to be planted at the Spring Arbor of Winchester site, located at 106 Ward Avenue, Winchester, VA. Provided below are the details of our intentions. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping: Deleted (8) Tilia cordata 2" caliper and (4) Zelkova serrata 2" caliper and substituting (12) 5" caliper Zelkova serrata. Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping: Canopy Trees: Reducing the number of Acer rubrum `October Glory 2" caliper from (6) trees to (4) trees @ 2" caliper and upsizing the (2) remaining trees from 2" caliper to 5" caliper. Keeping the (4) Quercus palustris @ 2" caliper. Deleting the (11) Tilia cordata 2" caliper and the (7) Zelkova serrata 2" caliper and substituting (18) Zelkova serrata 5" caliper. Ornamental Trees: Keeping the (22) Prunus x yedoensis 2" caliper, and substituting the Amelanchier, Cercis candesis, Crataegas plaenopyrum, and magnolia stellata, with (3) different varieties of Flowering Crab apples. The crab apples have a better flower display; will be pink, white, and rose colored. They have some winter characteristics enjoyable to the eye such as long lasting fruit, and handsome exfoliating bark, which the other ornamentals we are deleting do not have. The fruit is eaten by the birds during the winter, an added benefit to the elderly residence to enjoy. Ace Tree Movers Page 3 9/1/10 Evergreen Trees: The plan calls for (10) Arborvitae to be planted in a narrow space of about 5' wide. Unfortunately a gas line runs in the center of the planting area prohibiting any tree planting. We would like to incorporate these (10) trees into the burm buffer planting. Shrubs: There are 103 shrubs in this area. Substituting Nellie Stevens Holly, Euoymus, and Viburnum rhytidophilloides versus the Ilex glabra, Ilex cornuta, and Ilex Dr. Kassab, as they will accept the heat from the parking lot better, and more capable of withstanding salt from snow and ice treatments. Zoning District Buffer Landscaping: Canopy Trees: Substituting (41) 2" caliper Acer rubrum, already up graded to (11) 5" caliper Acer rubrum, keeping the Platanus x acerfolia @ 2" caliper and reducing the number of Quercus palustris to (6). Ornamental Trees: Deleting the Amelanchier arborea and Cercis candensis and substituting with Flowering Crab Apple and Flowering Pear. Evergreen Trees: We already graded to (22) 8'-10' tall Thuja plicata and (16) Clyptomeria japonica. Deleting the Juniperus virginiana, Cupressocyparis leylandii, and Thuja occidentalis ,and substituting with Picea abies and Pines strobes. The Picea abies have more of a stately look, and have fewer pest problems than ones we are deleting. Also, the ones we are deleting grow very dense and require a lot of air circulation, which they will not get due to the number of plants within the planting area. This lack of air circulation will cause death of plants and become a home to insect infestations which will affect other trees on the site. The Pinus strobes grow more openly, and do not require the same amount of air circulation and over the long term will perform better. Shrubs: Doing away with all of the Hollies except the Ilex Nellie Stevens Holly and substituting Euonoymus, Forsyhtia, and Viburnum. These species will not only look more natural but will also perform better under tightly planted conditions. Road Efficiency Buffer: Canopy Trees: Substituted (8) Nyssa slyvatica and (3) Acer rubrum October Glory 5" caliper in lieu of (11) Acer fremanii 2" caliper. Substituting (2) Prunus yedoensis for (2) Cercis candensis. • Ace Tree Movers Page 4 9/1/10 Substituting (14) Viburnum and (10) Cuonymus for (14) Ilex verticillata, and (10) Fothergilla gardenli. We greatly appreciate your acceptance of all substitutions. Our goal is to have a site that is not only pleasing to the eye, but also maximizes short term and long term survivability. Sineerel , ike Cunningham President 1pme Spring. inc ester 6C N Plant Schedule Key Qty Botonical Name Common Name Size Interior Parking Lot Landscaping Canopy Trees Z 12 Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova 5" caliper Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping Canoov Trees Ar 4 Acer rubrum Red Maple 2" caliper Ar 2 Acer rubrum Red Maple 5" caliper Qp 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2" caliper Zs 18 Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova 1 5" caliper Ornamental Trees Ma 36 Matus Flowering Crab Apple 2" caliper Py 22 Prunus yedoensis Yoshino Cherry 2" caliper Ps 6 Prunus serrulata Kwanzan Cherry 5" caliper Shrubs In 34 Ilex Nellie Stevens Nellie Stevens Holly 26"-30" tall Ea 42 Euoymus alatus Winged Euonymus 26"-30" tall Vr 27 Viburnum rhytidophlloides Allegany Viburnum 26"-30" tall Zoning District Butter Landscaping Canoov Trees Ar 41 Acer rubrum Red Maple 2" caliper Ar 11 Acer rubrum Red Maple 5" caliper Lp 20 Platanus x acerfolia London Planetree 2" caliper Qp 6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2" caliper Ornamental Trees Pc 25 Pyrus calleryana Aristocrat Pear 2" caliper Ma 69 Malus I Flowering Crab Apple 2" caliper Everereen Trees Tp 22 Thuja plicata Green Giant Arborvitae 8'-10' tall Cl 16 Cryptomeria japonica Japanese Cedar 8'-10' tall Pa 191 Picea Abies Norway Spruce 4' tall Ps 121 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 4' tall Shrubs Ea 85 Euoymus alatus Winged Euonymus 26"-30" tall Fi 91 Forsythia intermedia Forsythia 26"-30" tall In 85 Ilex Nellie Stevens Nellie Stevens Holly 26"-30" tall Vr 29 Viburnum rhytidophlloides Allegany Viburnum 26"-30" tall Road Efficency Buffer Landscaping Canopy Trees Ns 8 Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 5" caliper Ar 3 Acer rubrum October Glory Red Maple 5" caliper Ornamental Trees P 2 Prunus yedoensis Yoshino Cherry 2" caliper Shrubs Vr 14 Viburnum rhytidophlloides Allegany Viburnum 26"-30" tall Ea 10 Euoymus alatus Winged Euonymus 26"-30" tall 9` ,YL • N:O6- r4(&NT1-j U Spring Arbor of Winchester Key Quantity Bontanical Name Common Name Size INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING CANOPY TREES Tc 8 Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' Greenspire Littlelaf Linden 2" caliper Zs 4 Zelkova serrata 'Green Vase' Green Vase Japanese Zelkova 2" caliper PLKIML I LK PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING CANOPY TREES Ar 6 Acer rubrum 'October Glory' October Glory Red Maple 2" caliper Qp 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2" caliper Tc 11 Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' Greenspire Littlelaf Linden 2" caliper Zs 7 Zelkova serrata 'Green Vase' Green Vase Japanese Zelkova 2" caliper I•L•�.` IAhIF, I J.L Aa 3 Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry 2" caliper Cc 5 Cercis candensis'Forest Pansy' Forest Pansy Redbud 2" caliper Cp 11 Crataegas Plaenopyrum Washington Hawthorne 2" caliper Ms 24 Magnolia Stellata Star Magnolia 2" caliper Py 21 Prunus x yedoensis Yoshino Cherry 2" caliper EVERGREEN TREES �L To 10 Thuja occidentalis'Smaragad' I Emerald Green Arborvitae 4' ht. SHRUBS Ig 7 Ilex glabra InkberryHolly 24"-30" tall Ic 30 Ilex cornuta 'Dwarf Burford' Dwarf Burford Chinese Holly 24"-30" tall Ik 27 Ilex x Dr. Kassab Dr. Kassab Holly 24"-30" tall Ea 12 Euonymus Alatus Winged Euonymus 24"-30" tall Vr 27 Viburnum rhytidophllodes Allegany Viburnum 24"-30" tall LONING DISTRICT BUFFER LANDSCAPING CANOPY TRFFS Ar 9 Acer rubrum 'October Glory' October Glory Red Maple 2" caliper Ns 13 Nyssa Slyvatica Blackgum 2" caliper Lp 22 Platanus x acerfolia London Planetree 2" caliper Qp 1 27 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2" caliper Zs 1 7 Zelkova serrata 'Green Vase' Green Vase Japanese Zelkova 2" caliper AMMA A120rr•Iir. NW1 Aa 50 Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry 2" caliper Cc 44 Cercis candensis'Forest Pansy' Forest Pansy Redbud 2" caliper FVFRUiRFFN TRFF% �m EZ■ ME ME 0E Ig 10 Ic Ik In it ,:. • Spring Arbor of Winchester • CANOPY TREES Af1 11 Acer Freemanii 'Jefferesred' Autum Blaze Maple 2" cali ORNAMENTAL TREES Cc 2 Cercis candensis'Forest Pansy' I Forest Pansy Redbud 2" caliper SHRUBS Iv I Ilex verticillata Winterberry Holly 24"-30" tall Fg 1 10 Fothergillia gardenli Dwarf Fothergilla 24"-30" tall • -4� GeoForestry, Inc. / Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting Via Email and First Class Mail Eric R. Lawrence Planning Director Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22030 www.GeoForestry.com office: 703-251-0402 fax: 703-251-0413 July 26, 2010 Re: Request for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design Dear Eric: We appreciate your meeting with us the other day regarding the Roadside Efficiency Buffer. I thought that our meeting was insightful and beneficial in understanding the code requirements and provisions. On behalf of our client, HHHunt Corporation, we request that the Frederick County Planning Commission approve an alternative landscape design for the Route 50 Assisted Living Facility/Spring Arbor site located in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Citing Zoning Ordinance Sec 165- 203.02.E(3). "The Planning Commission may allow for alternative designs which meet the intent of the section in the event of topography or sight distance constraints." We request that an alternative design be approved in lieu of the required planting of a double row of evergreens for the Road Efficiency Buffer. The site is located along Route 50 near the entrance to the western side of the City of Winchester. The B-2 business district has a mix of retail, banks and hotels in this area. Stoplights, traffic controls and connecting walking paths are now in place, signaling a transition from the more rural divided highway character of the roadway further west. The building on the subject site is set back approximately 220-250 feet from the roadway. The closest parking is located 130 feet from the roadway. The 27.5 foot tall building is sited approximately 15 feet above the roadway with a stepped tiered landscape including walkway, berm, storm water pond and parking lot landscaping extending between the building to the roadway edge. The combination of the topography, landscaping and total distance will soften the impact of the building to the road and adjacent parcels. A review of the landscape buffers installed on the adjacent developed parcels in this B-2 District reveals aesthetically pleasing landscapes planted with a mixture of planting materials that provides visual interest in both texture and height. The subject site will have a walking path within the Road Efficiency Buffer connecting to the walkways of the adjacent parcels as well. We propose to landscape the area with the proffered planting material, which consists of a mixture of canopy trees, small to midsize trees and shrubs similar to the plantings found in the surrounding developed parcels. niversity Drive, 0 Fairfax,VA SuiteIne 403Uwww.GeoForestr .com office: 703-251-0402 Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting fax: 703-251-0413 Planting all of the required material within the narrow swath along the roadway would create a densely packed planting that would inhibit the growth and long term viability of the planting material. The required single row of evergreens "to grow to a minimum of 20ft tall" would effectively create a solid green wall that would not be aesthetically pleasing or in keeping with the landscaping installed on the surrounding developed parcels. The placement of large evergreens would also be inappropriate for this site as they could pose the risk of interference with the existing overhead electric primaries. The proffered shrub plantings and a few small ornamental trees appropriate for placement beneath the existing overhead utility lines are proposed to be relocated and interspersed along the path in a similar fashion to the surrounding parcels. Relocating the shrub and small ornamental trees to the area around the walking path is intended to alleviate the stress caused by dense planting. The plantings would also create a perceived buffer from the street and result in a safer more welcoming environment for pedestrians. The intent of this alternative landscape design is to provide for an effective and aesthetically pleasing landscape buffer within this B-2 Zoning District. While an unbroken wall of evergreens may be appropriate for a site located along a divided limited access highway such as Interstate 81 or Route 37, this particular site is in an area where businesses and pedestrians are to be considered. As the County's Business District, it is appropriate to provide for landscaping that is in conformance with the types of uses and end users contemplated by the B-2 district regulations. The submitted plan also depicts a reduced number of trees along the rear portion of the property in Enhanced Category "B" Buffer. The large berm that is located along the rear property line provides a more than sufficient screen between the adjacent properties. The plan as presented includes many specimen trees that have been upsized from what is typically required. Many eight to ten foot screening evergreens and five inch caliper shade trees are to be planted on site. Thank you for your consideration of this request, and please inform us when this matter is scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely yours, Geoforestry, Inc Samuel W. Doan if / 1'1..�/i,;.:.Q �� ;� •I L—:I :l .� �1�' �;� �� � ,1 _ tea,.,..:.,�,.............. a / I 74 i�• �li �„ ���/; / ,�', ( J I l / ,\ o•�.fi'.r:,""J1i \ p /,9/ p 1 _"_•'M.."_-_.•�av Cb '11 ��-� � n, _�`�I.�l t , (moo /��'{r� /,�K;�,..��:; Y ` �•.� _. , .,,,,.� M.,.n.,....,...�..M.�.„ ...t- \..r i .� / , %' �..a�;j�`�}'_C ••- /T"C S b \ _ \ I n •....,...a o- ,....- n�a> ..� ,... , .o,.. ..,. :J rii / - .;Sri � FC, �+..'�... _ r7✓; vJ f�.a `.y � k, . � .� / `;/� 7 (�-'' / �.., i''r. n. coo L^n �'io.�n t \ � — � �... ai •...,a �y I LIL !�1�: n;• R ''r /I a o(ia :ri. �J., ({I( LEGEND o - LI— \ ° '— x� / < / 1 \ alp. O �• \ / GRCHIC SCAN: \ Plan View R/W 100' Road Efficiency Buffer Rouse 50 WBL Median Route 50 - EBL R/vV so 1-1— So Mtne Parking Lot Open Space swm .-1 YOki., • _ Witty -�17 rel +50 ,-, r1 +50 +50 300 Assisted Living Facility Bowman Roa I Bti f/c,r l:xl ) C 0 M S V L 7 1 M 5 iwl 4 Alkli i A 1-: Eric Lawrence From: Eric Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:54 PM To: 'sdoan@geoforestry.com' Cc: Eric Meske Subject: Spring Arbor landscape alternative request Hi Sam and Eric. In following up on your email regarding the request for alternative landscape design along the Spring Arbor road frontage, I noted that my department did not receive a formal submission of the request as I'd understood would be coming to us. So I offer to questions: Are you still interested in this request for an alternative landscape design along Route 50? And if so, please forward the signed/executed request to my department for processing. In terms of scheduling the request for review/consideration by the Planning Commission, it looks like the next Planning Commission meeting with be on July 21, 2010. (the PC meetings for June 161h and July 71h have been canceled). I presume you will be available to represent the request at the July 21" meeting? The PC will have agenda items for their July 21't meeting, and I'd like to add your request to that agenda. It should be noted the ordinance required buffer is actually a double row of evergreens, rather than the single row you reference in your email correspondence. You may want to clarify if you are seeking to reduce the buffer to a single row of evergreen trees, or to eliminate the evergreen trees entirely. Please advise of the status of this request, when I should expect to receive the signed request, and if placement on the July 2151 PC agenda works for your schedules. Thank you. -Eric Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Director, Department of Planning and Development Frederick County 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 540-665-6395 (fax) elawrenc(c�co frederick.va.us www.FrederickCountvVa.qov/Planninq www.FrederickCountyVa.gov • ✓—L ®P� "I�- Get Eric Lawrence From: Eric Lawrence Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:40 PM To: 'sdoan@geoforestry.com' Cc: Eric Meske Subject: RE: Rt. 50 Assisted Living Facility Request for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design Hi Sam The Planning Commission is not meeting on June 16"'; so the next available agenda is their July 2"d meeting. I would note that I've yet to receive the (lard copies of this request, but once received, I will schedule the item for the next available Planning Commission meeting. -Eric From: Sam Doan [mailto:sdoan@geoforestry.com] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:27 PM To: Eric Lawrence Cc: Eric Meske Subject: Rt. 50 Assisted Living Facility Request for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design Dear Mr. Lawrence, Attached you Neill find the the submission for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design for the Rt. 50 Assisted Living Facility. Hard copies of the attached letter and associated exhibits are being sent to your attention as well. Thank you for meeting with us regarding this project. Please let us ]snow if this matter can be included on the docket for the upcoming June 16th Planning Commission meeting. Sam Doan GeoForestry, Inc. Forestry, Arboriculture & Natural Resource Consulting 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax, Va. 22030 (703) 251-0402 office (703) 251-0413 fax (703) 505-3422 cell sdoan a,geoforestry.com «,NyNy. L,CofOrestrV. con1 0 • GeoForestry, Inc. Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting Samuel W. Doan 703 251-0402 sdoan (TReoforestmeom I'm (703) 25 1-04 13 Via Email and Fit-st Class Mail Eric R. Lawrence Planning Director Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22030 www.GeoForestry.com office: 703-251-0402 fax: 703-251-0413 May 20, 2010 Re: Request for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design Dear Eric: We appreciate your meeting with us the other day regarding the Roadside Efficiency Buffer. I thought that our meeting was insightful and beneficial in understanding the code requirements and provisions. On behalf of our client, I-II-II-lunt Corporation, we request that the Frederick County Planning Commission approve an alternative landscape design for the Route 50 Assisted Living Facility/Spring Arbor site located in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Citing Zoning Ordinance Sec 165- 203.02.E(3). "The Planning Commission may allow for alternative designs which meet the intent of the section in the event of topography or sight distance constraints." We request that an alternative design be approved in lieu of the required planting of a single row of evergreens for the Road Efficiency Buffer. The site is located along Route 50 near the entrance to the western side of the Town of Winchester. The B-2 business district has a mix of retail, banks and hotels in this area. Stoplights, traffic controls and connecting walking paths are now in place, signaling a transition from the more rural divided highway character of the roadway further west. The building on the subject site is set back approximately 220-250 feet from the roadway. The closest parking is located 130 feet from the roadway. The 27.5 foot tall building is sited approximately 15 feet above the roadway with a stepped tiered landscape including walkway, berm, storm water pond and parking lot landscaping extending between the building to the roadway edge. The combination of the topography, landscaping and total distance will soften the impact of the building to the road and adjacent parcels. A review of the landscape buffers installed on the adjacent parcels in this B-2 District reveals aesthetically pleasing landscapes planted with a mixture of planting materials that provides visual interest in both texture and height. The subject site will have a walking path within the Road Efficiency Buffer connecting to the walkways of the adjacent parcels as well. We propose to landscape the area with the proffered planting material, 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 GeoForestry, Inc. Fairfax, VA y.com www.GeoForestr com office: 703-251-0402 Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting fax: 703-251-0413 which consists of a mixture of canopy trees, small to midsize trees and shrubs similar to the plantings found in the surrounding developed parcels. Planting all of the required material within the narrow swath along the roadway would create a densely packed planting that would inhibit the growth and long term viability of the planting material. The required single row of evergreens "to grow to a minimum of 20ft tall" would effectively create a solid green wall that would not be aesthetically pleasing or in keeping with the landscaping installed on the surrounding developed parcels. The placement of large evergreens would also be inappropriate for this site as they could pose the risk of interference with the existing overhead electric primaries. The proffered shrub plantings appropriate for placement beneath the existing overhead utility lines are proposed to be relocated and interspersed along the path in a similar fashion to the surrounding parcels. Relocating the shrubs to the area around the walking path is intended to alleviate the stress caused by dense planting. The plantings would also create a perceived buffer from the street and result in a safer more welcoming environment for pedestrians. The intent of this alternative landscape design is to provide for an effective and aesthetically pleasing landscape buffer within this B-2 Zoning District. While an unbroken wall of evergreens may be appropriate for a site located along a divided limited access highway such as Interstate 81 or Route 37, this particular site is in an area where businesses and pedestrians are to be considered. As the County's Business District, it is appropriate to provide for landscaping that is in conformance with the types of uses and end users contemplated by the B-2 district regulations. Thank y schedule Perspective View 100' Road Efficiency Buffer Route 50 - EBL R/W 50'Inactive 50'Active Parking Lotn SwM Facility 0k 0 100 +50 200 +50 Plan View W Route 50 - WBL Median Route 50 - EBL 1 0 +50 BOW171M C O N S V l I I Cr 100' Road Efficiency Buffer R� 50'trl.1— 50 Act.- SWM F—My Ja '"' • v r �* Perspective View Parking Lot Assisted Living Open Space Facility 100 +50 200 +50 300 Road Rufjer F_.ic F*�x 1 �^ Ntrl lie tlie ,: x r lkm r � t �1® • .1 = fir' �,, � •"-"tom ""�"'�i • , J, � ".� "ij *r�. s ROL) TE 5 - 1Q����NC.E�EFFICIENCY �Pf �ID �w_ evrrw rKo r>i.[ n.,rrta o-siw^¢ . ,w> v l`• • ?, '" '� aL Sa3m - 340 • : - II [.I EE+ mitts I r` •` � T'v _— . . • ,CRhTI(u� • w [ ¢� IX 'nL eLC� IO ��KS,•C."<.ur RLt'. U.VS+,✓[ .1 CCCS w•3i w•M '7t• T„Y [:: K.C.O'u-uS " ,>a•a.u(Y:ti x. ,v Z � _ • ` (vim x >,-� (Il. ' /l f- Sr'Y�� .` ".tt. I , _ � ._ RTE. 359 n`N CiP -LI • R n LaU=FER I(Kvr11r� 4+IS - J i+ram^ r( THPUV[n lu A(, U� 9x'u/9liP PLUPF rING SCIFACATIOV9/ LEGEND -- � II PC5i9DUv'7� ,.mv ORri �- cSTERN PIKE Wi T) _—_-'•_ CASi90UnD v:sw ,vv.. urxv., wav +n .v ra>c.-. M I (- "! ' asc o m um... ,a nv ..y, n •' c.r-v �v<,ra ,.` -'1`"'}� > wr�taa.n..a•.ww.A wxni ..orw.+ac,.we.-ice/ - 4• �..,at m. ra �K - %J�Ajpo • ,+. ,a n,..,w,.wnran .rr, __ � _r-- ;f�•'l ;'�' P�Riw�r.E_R_Y.hR;cinv�.ArwCSCn"��'C,.,t,,.>.,.n.,.....ncr�,......._..q�o....� .. - _ /Y. 1.Y�r .� _ � w;WHP2 , :M K+ 2W0 - 0� �vv>� ♦ ,r[x. hJ� ••.f I 103 �.]// / Y.i V +Wr (�..[;.;tW l(n [v,> ehw. IYTAS ,a w.um. n nu.n> u•. vs•tr,wi �.I -MR sore[ l FG 4D �` \ � I - •�+ • '•+ •N i Ru PARKIN(: L ANpS_CAPItJG �, � Iona •r -u, . �u r[.rn.. "� tom' f��f�'�>- , il-�\��,-_ �- a. � ;.c �,. K't".cn :".".>, o..:.......�,.� u.� n•�• ; GRAPHIC SCAI.F. 'µ( n0•� �> [ E9jj/� �24a32 • 0 ?GeoForestry, Inc. Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting Samuel W. Doan 703 251-0402 sdoan (i 2eofores(nwom Fax (703) 251-0413 Via Email and First Class Mail Eric R. Lawrence Planning Director Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax,VA 22030 www.GeoForestry.com office: 703-251-0402 fax: 703-251-0413 July 9, 2010 Re: Request for Planning Commission Approval of Alternative Landscape Design Dear Eric: We appreciate your meeting with us the other day regarding the Roadside Efficiency Buffer. I thought that our meeting was insightful and beneficial in understanding the code requirements and provisions. On behalf of our client, 1-1I-I1-Iunt Corporation, we request that the Frederick County Planning Commission approve an alternative landscape design for the Route 50 Assisted Living Facility/Spring Arbor site located in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Citing Zoning Ordinance Sec 165- 203.02.E(3). "The Planning Commission may allow for alternative designs which meet the intent of the section in the event of topography or sight distance constraints." We request that an alternative design be approved in lieu of the required planting of a double row of evergreens for the Road Efficiency Buffer. The site is located along Route 50 near the entrance to the western side of the City of Winchester. The B-2 business district has a mix of retail, banks and hotels in this area. Stoplights, traffic controls and connecting walking paths are now in place, signaling a transition from the more rural divided highway character of the roadway further west. The building on the subject site is set back approximately 220-250 feet from the roadway. The closest parking is located 130 feet from the roadway. "hhe 27.5 foot tall building is sited approximately 15 feet above the roadway with a stepped tiered landscape including walkway, berm, storm water pond and parking lot landscaping extending between the building to the roadway edge. The combination of the topography, landscaping and total distance will soften the impact of the building to the road and adjacent parcels. A review of the landscape buffers installed on the adjacent developed parcels in this B-2 District reveals aesthetically pleasing landscapes planted with a mixture of planting materials that provides visual interest in both texture and height. The subject site will have a walking path within the Road Efficiency Buffer connecting to the walkways of the adjacent parcels as well. We propose to landscape the area with the proffered planting 4031 University Drive, Suite 200 GeoForestry, Inc. Fairfax,VA y.com www.GeoForestr com office: 703-251-0402 Forestry, Arboriculture, and Natural Resource Consulting fax: 703-251-0413 material, which consists Of a mixture of canopy trees, small to midsize trees and shrubs similar to the plantings found in the surrounding developed parcels. Planting all of the required material within the narrow swath along the roadway would create a densely packed planting that would inhibit the growth and long term viability Of the planting material. The required single row Of evergreens "to grow to a Mill1mUm Of 20ft tall" would effectively create a solid green wall that would not be aesthetically pleasing or in keeping with the landscaping installed on the surrounding developed parcels. The placement of large evergreens would also be inappropriate for this site as they could pose the risk of interference with the existing overhead electric primaries. The proffered shrub plantings and a few small ornamental trees appropriate for placement beneath the existing overhead utility lines are proposed to be relocated and interspersed along the path in a similar fashion to the surrounding parcels. Relocating the shrub and small ornamental trees to the area around the walking path is intended to alleviate the stress caused by dense planting. The plantings would also create a perceived buffer from the street and result in a safer more welcoming environment for pedestrians. The intent of this alternative landscape design is to provide for an effective and aesthetically pleasing landscape buffer within this B-2 Zoning District. While an unbroken wall of evergreens may be appropriate for a site located along a divided limited access highway such as Interstate 81 or Route 37, this particular site is in an area where businesses and pedestrians are to be considered. As the County's Business District, it is appropriate to provide for landscaping that is in conformance with the types Of uses and end users contemplated by the B-2 district regulations. Thank you for your consideration of this request, and please inform us when this matter is scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely yours, Geoforestry, Inc. SamUel W. Doan Perspective View Assisted Living Parking Lot Open Space Facility Plan View RaV R/W 100' Road Efficiency Buffer Route 50 WBL Median Route 50 EBL sO SO A I- swm f.uhy • 0 +50 100 +50 200 +50 300 Bowman l Road Bu_ f fir EY/ bit C O N S U L T I N G .. U*., - 00 y • 4 lam Allll' a h ..'J6 IIIN ill w- t4, r .M. r i v.».....:.:..r ..r•.e�::-.m <w-c�-...:..:�. ssvv,.x-wig_..,: +.� ... _.... �h J•M',tk,�' � A. f #�+� ,?:& �'�'%'��: sN- i° i.f ,�".!i ,.2' '4f 1>'.., t. w ,.Y� 4 uw�4 r t Y ,�. - •�' N ZS � ' ... �'� - s it-. „� ..eatrer m rA �a % 4, vi }t: APR!,,, r� • I--- Plan View i Perspective View R/W 100' Road Efficiency Buffer Assisted Living Route 50 - WBL Median Route 50 - EBL R/W so In.tt- so kfi- Parking Lot Open Space Facility 4 ►� swM Fx,hy • _NIIIIIIIII_ 0 100 +50 200 +50 300 Bowman ! Road Bu f, !:x I bit C O N% U I I ING BULEER Y M .4- -.4 14 -,n T 858 ENHANCED , �LR t 4�_ 5 '( 11 - 7i _._ 4ORT IKE- ............ COU _—Jul fill 01, El )i / V) z < a- uj �7 V) z 0 t P= z <= < < 0 uj [If Z 0 5: Vi� < L) W Ln z v) E < z F_ LLI < V,- a < 0 11 'F LO m t LJ _rv 1 EGEND (77 AqK:NG LANRSCAZ['rjG/.- -j I 77- GRAPHIC SCALE ---------- 0 Candice Perkins From: Eric Lawrence Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:18 PM To: Eric Lawrence; Candice Perkins Subject: HHHunt site plan For File Representative from HHHunt design team met with planning department staff today to discuss modifications to: (1) road efficiency buffer/landscaping, (2) relocating dumpster, and (3) creation of a resident drop-off canopy at the facility's SE corner. Those in attendance were Eric Lawrence, Eric Meske, Ron Peterman, and Sam Doan. (1) The representatives desired a reduction in the landscaping along the Route 50 frontage. Current plan provides a full Distance Road Efficiency Buffer and the proffered enhanced landscaping. Initially sought was an ordinance amendment to enable a PC granted modification to the REB. After extensive discussions about their request, the enhanced landscaping to be provided, and the post -construction resulting topography, it was believed that they could request of 165-203.02.E(3) — PC waiver if topography warrants modifications. Post -construction topography results in a 10ft differential from road ROW to building pad grade, and structure setback exceeds 200 ft. Any modification requests should be supported with illustrative depicting planned landscaping if modification to evergreen tree plantings is granted. (2) The representatives indicated an interest in relocating the dumpster pad/enclosures approximately 50 ft. New site warrants a slight deviation to the sidewalk system and shrubs. Would require site plan modification (3) The representatives sought the ability to create a covered resident drop-off at the SE corner of facility. Appears to be enabled with a site pan modification. Design team will seek modification from REB enabled by 165-203.02.E(3). Once completed (granted or denied), a site plan modification will be submitted to address these issues. It was also noted by Mr. Meske that Candice had previously permitted deviations to the various landscape screens around the site's perimeter. Total plantings would not be reduced, but location deviations were permitted. Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Director, Department of Planning and Development Frederick County 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 540-665-6395 (fax) elawrenc(@co.frederick.va.us www.FrederickCountyVa.gov/Planning www.FrederickCountyVa.gov • C� Bowman C 0 RI S U L u 0 fib' July 8, 2010 Ms. Candice E. Perkins, AICP Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility — STPL #66-08 Revisiou BCG Project #5132-01-005 Dear Ms. Perkins: I JUL 9 2010 1` I am providing this letter to explain the revisions made to the Route 50 Assisted Living Facility Site Plan approved July 2, 2009. The attached submission includes all of the minor revisions that have been made to date during construction for your records. The main revision that we arc submitting for your review is denoted as revision 12 dated July 9, 2010. Below is a summary of each revision that has been made along with the corresponding Sheet #. Sheets 6 and 8: Per client request, the dumpster pad was shifted west closer to the breezeway between the two buildings. In addition, the sidewalks around the dumpster area have been revised along with the location where it passes thru the breezeway. The access between Building I and Building 2 is now being shown in the Architectural plans and this grading has been removed from the site plan. Also, per client request the drop off area to Building 2 at the southeast corner has been modified to go underneath of the overhang instead of adjacent to it as previously proposed. No easements or utilities were revised in either of these revisions, just curb and gutter, pavement, and sidewalks. Sheets 24 and 25: The landscaping has been revised per discussions with the County to show an evergreen hedge along the southwest portion of the site to remove the need for the fence. Also some of the plantings in the zoning district buffer have been removed along the property line that parallels Ward Avenue, as previously discussed. These plantings along with the majority of the "enhanced" portions of the plantings for the zoning district buffer have been located at the rear of the property. I wish to note that my client will be presenting a revised buffer planting for several portions of the project to the Planning Commission for their review at a later date. A subsequent plan revision will be provided to you at that time should their proposal be found acceptable. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information on the plan revision provided to you as attached. Sincerely, BOWMAN CO LTING�GROUP Eric S. Meske, P.E., C F M Project Manager cc: Bo Cook, 1-1I-11-lunt Corporation Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. 101 South Street SE - Leesburg,VA 20175 Phone: 703.443.2400 o Fax: 703.443.2425 - www.bowmanconsulting.com 0 Bowman C O N S U L T I N G 101 South Street, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 Phone (703) 443-2400 Fax (703)443-2425 www.bowmanconsulting.com To: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Mc. Candice E. Perkins, AICP LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: 7/28/ 10 Project Name: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility Project No: 5132-01-005 Re: STPL #66-08 Revision Via: Hand -Delivery We are forwarding: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 2 Copies of Revised Plan Sets • ►l ►I o \_ Regular Transmitted by: BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. Eric S. Meske, PE, CFM, Project Manager Binder Copy Confirmation of Receipt Required: No 0 Bowman C O N S U L T I N G 101 South Street, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 Phone (703) 443-2400 Fax (703)443-2425 www.bowmanconsulting.com To: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Ms. Candice E. Perkins, AICP LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: July 8, 2010 Project Name: Route 50 Assisted Living Facility Project No: 5132-01-005 Re: STPL #66-08 Revision Via: Hand Delivery We are forwarding: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 2 Copies of Revised Plan Sets I Revision Narrative to Candice Perkins COMMENTS cc: Bo Cook, HHHunt Bond McCamy, JDavis Architects Kyle Luttrell, Howard Shockey & Sons A Transmitted by: BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. Eric S. Meske, P.E., CFM, Project Manager Confirmation of Receipt Required: Received by: -i (Signature) i U U L 9 2010 (Print Name) (Date)