Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout057-98 Kim Henry Property - Mini-Warehouse - Stonewall - BackfileIP SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information ..that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must.be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Department of Planning and Development Inspections Department Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approva 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District I "O� WITHDRAWN �- `i- 02, CASH • RECEIPT = ..W. FA • D. � �, • � I� I � i fir ., ,may ACCOUNT HOW PAID PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS tel.: (540)662-5792 302 South Braddock Street - Suite 200 fax.: (540)662-5793 Winchester, VA 22601 email: paintlew@earthlink.net Ms. Rebecca Ragsdale Frederick County Planning Dept. 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Kim Henry Property-Siteplan Rebecca, Please find the revised and most current sets of the proposed siteplan for the Kim Henry property: 54-A-97L. Also included with the siteplan sets are the approval letters from the appropriate review agencies. I am requesting that the existing siteplan referenced as SP-057-98 (Kim Henry Property Mini -Warehouses) be withdrawn. Please contact either John Lewis or myself with any questions or comments you may have. Thank you very much for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Sara B. Saunno Project Designer AUG 0 7 2002 DEPT. OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT; page 1 PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 4;—"RX t 0 d7/2- 4!3�e7g SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. Department of Transportation (VDOT) : --)!C County Health Department _::x/Vlrgin,ia Frederick County Sanitation Authority of Planning and Development _ City of Winchester _,Department _� Town of Stephens C.ty Inspections Department / Town of Middletown ,�FredenckCounty Engineer (Public Works) Airport Airt Authority Fredenck County Fire Marshal Sod & Water Conservation Distract _ Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) 8 r� U Site Plan Information Checklist The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development. ._—. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. ✓ 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled 'Approved by the Zoning Administrator• for the approval signature and date of approval. - 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 13. N a rth A rrow 14. Zoning of site 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16, Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. E Y, r • • General Site (con't) Y/ N ..L. 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. --_— The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard are a s . / S 1 t— -.- n.� .,t c —._ _ ✓ 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. 22. Location and area of common open space. 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information Y N 27. The height of all buildings and structures. 29. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with PAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y / N 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Pasted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. J 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 0 • • 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the Proposed or existing entrance. 38. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. t 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking Y N , 2 r' c tvu��ri.d �r,�v rvl.c.aGc-vu.t� ( Calculations describing the requvr ired number of parking and loading spaces. �2ti �l G CIO1it ('� I 4� Loca ' n and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, J3enx)t-c — 7' T3 la 13 Z driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N �J 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44A-rdZl k.A ( /44.) Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. �',a, c.001'r-i 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. t ,�,�� b2 II 0 • Landscaping Y N 48. 6) Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48. 11 49 Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. -ttm 101�✓ vcj,— o1 �vc crvn P (= wUw(- rG% hwr vt ve. w^ Cc,� w e, . V A stormwater management plan with run tPC3Iculbtlons arty! &-C� location and description of facilities to be used. cPvLkA"c.4-- Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the, AICA.� location and methods to be used to minimize erosion andaha.+f• sedimentation during development. %t- 1�Gn„d ►� t� � � �✓� ✓vt, of � � 12 Z. 0.,4" d ✓-> ( —Cx PU'D W4-"� " V�>P COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 October 8, 1998 Mr. John Lewis Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Kim Henry Property Mini Warehouse Site Development Plan 4057-98 Dear John: I have had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plan. The following comments are offered and should be addressed during the revision of this site plan. I have also marked the enclosed plan for your use. ✓ 1) Please show the required 15' rear setback and adjust the site data accordingly ,tea µ r l v/2) Please adjust the parking calculations. Two spaces are required for the residence and the storage parking should be rounded up to the required 12 parking spaces. You may wish to accommodate the additional parking space between buildings B 1 and B2 in a similar fashion to the parking between buildings B2 and D. 6-" /3) Please ensure that the existing vegetation located on the steep slopes, and the vegetation adjacent to the stream, is not disturbed. This should be made clear on the plan. In addition, construction notes 13 and 15 should be revised accordingly. This is necessary to ensure the stabilization of the slopes and to incorporate this vegetation into the buffering of the residential properties. ✓ ✓4) The screening within the buffer adjacent to the residential properties, as proposed on the plan, would be ineffective and would most likely not survive without the importation of a considerable amount of top soil. Staff would be amenable to modifying the screening within this required buffer. In conjunction with maintaining the existing vegetation on the steep slopes adjacent to this property line, evergreen plantings along the top of the hill would effectively screen the development from the residential properties. 7at3 APT55 ," The area in which these plantings would be effective is within the Huntington Meadows townhouse development open space. Obviously, approval of the plantings in this location would have to come from the Huntington Meadows Homeowners Association. Through Mr. Jim Vickers, staff has contacted Jackie Lewis, President of the HOA. It would appear as though the HOA may be amenable to the plantings, or another alternative, within their Open Space. Please contact Ms. Lewis to coordinate gaining the HOA's approval. It is my 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 January 25, 1999 Mr. Ralph Beeman C/O Greenway, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Ralph: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)984.5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 Ref: Kimberly Henry Subdivision (Plat) Route 657 (Senseny Road) Frederick County A VDOT review of the referenced subdivision plat dated January 5, 1999 has been completed. The plat appears to be satisfactory and is approved by this letter. Enclosed please find the signed plats. Once available, please provide a copy of the signed recordation plats for our records. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely`7 , Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer RECEIVED JAN 2 6 1999 DEPT, OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING COUNTY of FREDERICK November 20, 1998 Mr. John Lewis, PE Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX:540/678-0682 We have received and reviewed the stormwater management report for the subject project. This document fulfilled our requirement for the site design. Therefore, we grant our approval for the subject site plan. HES/rls CC' Frederick County Planning Department/ file A\lienrypropIcom com Sincerely, t �9f,, Harvey E. Str, snyder, Jr., P.E. /lz� Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FRFDFRIC>K Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 November 17, 1998 Mr. John Lewis Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Bo's at Kernstown Site Development Plan #052-98 Henry Site Development Plan #057-98 Rite Aid Parking Addition Site Development Plan #068-98 Dear John: I have had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plans. The status of each is described in the following summary. Please make any necessary revisions and resubmit five copies for final approval. Bo's at Kernstown Site Development Plan #052-98 1) Please provide the correct the property owner information for the parcels across the Route 11 right- of-way. 2) The loading space is required to be twelve (12) feet wide and forty-five (45) feet long. Please revise the size of the loading space. You may wish to revise the location of the loading space to avoid a circulation conflict on -site. 3) An updated approval of the design changes recommended by the Frederick County Planning Commission must be obtained from VDOT prior to final approval of this site plan. Henry Site Development Plan #057-98 1) Please provide copies of the final approval from VDOT and the Department of Public Works. Rite Aid Parking Addition Site Development Plan #068-98 1) Please provide five copies for final approval. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner II U:\\1IF:R3kCO\LNION'%SITEPLA14\PLG WISSP.SPR 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Tel.: (540) 662-5792 302 South Braddock Street, Suite 200 Fax.: (540) 662-5793 Winchester. VA 22601 November 19, 1998 Mr. Mike Ruddy Frederick County Planning Dept. 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Ruddy: For your review please find enclosed, comments from V.D.O.T. re: The Kim Henry Property Mini -Warehouse Project. Please contact this office if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Monica Butts Office Assistant Enclosure P i,C I ;�, t=� t Lill- �t 000[FDV p COMMONWEALTH[ of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY JERRYA.COPP DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE RESIDENT ENGINEER COMMISSIONER P.O. BOX 278 TELE(540)964.5600 EDINBURG, VA 22024-0270 FAx(540) 984.5607 August 26, 1998 Mr. John C. Lewis, P.E. Ref: Henry Property — Mini Warehouse Project C/O Painter -Lewis, PLC Route 1322 (Fort Collier Road) 302 South Braddock Street, Suite 200 Frederick County Winchester, VA 22601 Dear John: We have received your revised site plan dated Aug _Ist 21, 1998 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. A copy of any/all drainage easement plat(s) required to implement this plan should be provided to VDOT prior to issuance of any land use permit. The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 1322 right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee,, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. When applying for this land use permit, please provide two sets of approved construction plans along with the permit application. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. BJS/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. Dave Helronlmus Mr. Kris Tierney Since lyfi Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Request for Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to• Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, VA (540) 722-3460 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan with traffice generation data and drainage calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: Name of development and/or description of the request: Ate \,J Rr, Location of property: Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: See attached letter from VDOT to Nr. John Lewis dated 0 0 Kim Henry Property Site Plan Review Page 2 October 8, 1998 understanding that they will be having a HOA meeting on October 13, 1998. The modification of the screening would benefit both the homeowners and your client. The development would be effectively screened from the homeowners' residences, and your client may realize savings through a reduction in the number of initial plantings and the number of plantings replacing dead trees. ZPlease provide the required `B" category zoning district buffer along the front of the property being developed. This buffer is depicted on the approved Master Development Plan for this property, the Henry Business Park. The distance of the Fort Collier Road right-of-way may be included within the buffer distance. -A 5 MS, -PIA4. 6) The Master Development Plan for this property, the Henry Business Park, reserves the majority of the property you are proposing to develop for stormwater management purposes. The elimination of this regional facility will have a significant impact on the stormwater management for the remainder of the Henry Business Park. Prior to any additional development within the park, a revised Master Development Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, Frederick County. This revised Master Development Plan should address the stormwater management issue. Please ensure that Mr. Henry is aware of this requirement. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will then need five copies of the final site plan for approval. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner II MTR/cc Enclosures UANUke\Common\Sf1EP LANU I P.N RYSTO.SPR J I COUNTY of >F'RiEDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 October 8, 1998 Mr. John Lewis Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Kim Henry Property Mini Warehouse Site Development Plan H057-98 Dear John: I have had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plan. The following comments are offered and should be addressed during the revision of this site plan. I have also marked the enclosed plan for your use. 1) Please show the required 15' rear setback and adjust the site data accordingly. 2) Please adjust the parking calculations. Two spaces are required for the residence and the storage parking should be rounded up to the required 12 parking spaces. You may wish to accommodate the additional parking space between buildings B 1 and B2 in a similar fashion to the parking between buildings B2 and D. 3) Please ensure that the existing vegetation located on the steep slopes, and the vegetation adjacent to the stream, is not disturbed. This should be made clear on the plan. In addition, construction notes 13 and 15 should be revised accordingly. This is necessary to ensure the stabilization of the slopes and to incorporate this vegetation into the buffering of the residential properties. 4) The screening within the buffer adjacent to the residential properties, as proposed on the plan, would be ineffective and would most likely not survive without the importation of a considerable amount of top soil. Staff would be amenable to modifying the screening within this required buffer. In conjunction with maintaining the existing vegetation on the steep slopes adjacent to this property line, evergreen plantings along the top of the hill would effectively screen the development from the residential properties. The area in which these plantings would be effective is within the Huntington Meadows townhouse development open space. Obviously, approval of the plantings in this location would have to come from the Huntington Meadows Homeowners Association. Through Mr. Jim Vickers, staff has contacted Jackie Lewis, President of the HOA. It would appear as though the HOA may be amenable to the plantings, or another alternative, within their Open Space. Please contact Ms. Lewis to coordinate gaining the HOA's approval. It is my 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Kim Henry Property Site Plan Review Page 2 October 8, 1998 understanding that they will be having a HOA meeting on October 13, 1998. The modification of the screening would benefit both the homeowners and your client. The development would be effectively screened from the homeowners' residences, and your client may realize savings through a reduction in the number of initial plantings and the number of plantings replacing dead trees. 5) Please provide the required "B" category zoning district buffer along the front of the property being developed. This buffer is depicted on the approved Master Development Plan for this property, the Henry Business Park. The distance of the Fort Collier Road right-of-way may be included within the buffer distance. 6) The Master Development Plan for this property, the Henry Business Park, reserves the majority of the property you are proposing to develop for stormwater management purposes. The elimination of this regional facility will have a significant impact on the stormwater management for the remainder of the Henry Business Park. Prior to any additional development within the park, a revised Master Development Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, Frederick County. This revised Master Development Plan should address the stormwater management issue. Please ensure that Mr. Henry is aware of this requirement. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will then need five copies of the final site plan for approval. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Planner II MTR/cc Enclosures U:Wikc\Common\SrrEPL kN\HENRYSM.SPR 0 • Mr. John Lewis, PE Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 September 25, 1998 We have received your revised site plan dated August 21, 1998:' Prior to granting our final approval, please provide us with a revised copy of the stormwater analysis. In particular, we would like the opportunity to review the impact of the 100-year flood on the proposed site development. In our review of your latest submission, we observed that you have chosen to ignore our previous comment related to the landscaping buffer. We have referred this issue to our planning department for their resolution. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above comments. HES/rls cc: Frederick County Planning Department file AM icnr5Troplcom.com Sincerely, 41 �. Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 4k I July 9, 1993 Mr. John Lewis, PE Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: -Mint-Warehouse Project - Hrenry Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 We have completed our review cf the site plan for the Henry Mini Warehouse Project and offer the following comments: 1. Stormwater 1anagement: We concur with your approach to storm management for the subject site development. However, your analysis needs to be expanded to include the following: a. Compare the pre and post development hydrographs for the site with the total drainage basin hydrograph to demonstrate that on -site detention is not warranted. b. Evaluate the impact of the site grading (fill) on the 100 year flood elevation. The impact study of this grading should be expanded to include adjacent sites upstream of the subject property. C. Evaluate the box culvert located immediately downstream of the site to determine its impact on the proposed site development during the 100 year storm event. The table included in your current analysis should be revised to reflect the results of the above evaluations: 2. Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to General Note Number 11. The proposed site does contain wetlands. The actual extent should be determined in the field and delineated on the plan. Ron Stouffer of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers located in Dumfries, Virginia should be contacted if the wetland area exceeds one-third of an acre. His number 107 North lent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I V Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Page 2 July 9, 1998 is 703-221-6967. 3. Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to General Note Number 12. This note should be revised to reflect the results of our comment number one. 4. Sheet 3 of 5 Based on the proposed grades, it is anticipated that both rock excavations and compacted fills will be required to achieve the design floor elevations. Consequently, a geotechnical report verifying the adequacy of the bearing conditions will be required before we will issue building permits. A geotechnical investigation may also prove invaluable in the vicinity of Building "I" and "H" to determine the extent of existing rubble fill. 5. Sheet 4 of 5 Extensive blasting will be required to achieve the landscaping buffer paralleling Huntington Nleadows. It will also be necessary to import topsoil to promote vegetative growth in this area. Previous mining operations have removed all topsoil and a majority of the over burden residual soils. Only a slightly weathered rock surface remains. Another screening alternative should be considered in light of these conditions. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, Harvey E. Strawsn der Jr. P.E. Y Director of Public Works HES/rab / cc: Frederick County Planning Department file 1 2 3. 4 • SITE PLAN APPLICATION \\J� '0 n Project Title: vv� ', vJ Location of Property bX (street address),-� Property Owner: /A s . \41, lam- Address: `s/.I�a1 ^\^ � cvc Telephone: Applicant/Agent �✓i�tl�C� -w�� 1�4-t� Address c�S�l-l`Cv 2�`D Telephone: ` ( o 5. Designer: Address: Telephone: Contact: CR�r,�t'�cGC —� Lw.S'� • -• C-- ' 0 6. Is this an original or revised site plan? 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: e) Adjoining Property Use(s) f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) g) Magisterial District(s) Original ✓ Revised y acres 7.'7 y - i3 3 Vacs "\4 W(vekntIA0 Tn \ V <W')r On—gle-y" VCiCCti/ ; If ck;,1 14rMi/�n� �yl--Z r�4-11-9�C 5y-A-ci7r� Mc,g,sl¢r,n 1 1i5kyv ck- (if Frederic k J� I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Date: Z( 7 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. SP98-0044R Date Received 8-22-98 Date Reviewed 8-24-98 Applicant Painter- Lewis, P.L.C. Plan Rev. Date: Address 302 South Braddock Street Suite 200 Winchester, Va. 22601 Project Name henry Property Mini -warehouse Plione No. 540-662-5792 Type of Application Site Plan Revision Current Zoning B-3 1st Due Fire Co. 18 1st Due Rescue Co. 18 Election District Stonewall Tax I.D. No. 54-((A))-97L RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler SystemXX Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alai -in SystemXX Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted Yes No XX Comments Hydrant Locations Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Location Adequate Inadequate Not Identified XX Additional Comments Attached? Yes No XX Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No Title Signature o 0 July 9, 1998 Mr. John Lewis, PE Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Frederick County, Vlrgnlla Dear John: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 We have completed our revie%v of the site plan for the Henry ;\.Mini Warehouse Project and of%r the following continents: 1. StorniNvater Management: We concur with your approach to stor►n nlanagenlent for the subject site development. However, your analysis needs to be expanded to include the following: a. Compare the pre and post development hydrographs for the site with the total drainage basin hydrograph to demonstrate that on -site detention is not warranted. b. Evaluate the impact of the site grading (fill) on the 100 year flood elevation. The impact study of this grading should be expanded to include adjacent sites upstream of the subject property. C. Evaluate the box culvert located immediately downstream of the site to determine its impact on the proposed site (levelopnlent during the 100 year storm event. The table included in your current analysis should be revised to reflect the results of the above evaluations: 2. Sheet 2 of' 5 Refer to General Note Number 11. The proposed site does contain wetlands. The actual extent should be determined in the field and delineated on the plan. Ron Stouter of the U. S. Arnly Corps of Engineers located in Dumfries, Virginia should be contacted if the wetland area exceeds one-third of an acre. His number 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Page 2 July 9, 1998 is 703-221-6967. 3. Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to General Note Number 12. This note should be revised to reflect the results of our comment number one. 4. Sheet 3 of 5 Based on the proposed grades, it is anticipated that both rock excavations and compacted tills will be required to achieve the design floor elevations. Consequently, a geotechnical report verifying the adequacy of the bearing conditions will be required before we will issue building permits. A geotechnical investigation may also prove invaluable in the vicinity of Building "I" and "IT' to determine the extent of existing rubble fill. 5. Sheet 4 of 5 Extensive blasting will be required to achieve the landscaping buffer paralleling Huntington Meadows. It will also be necessary to import topsoil to promote vegetative growth in this area. Previous mining operations have removed all topsoil and a majority of the over burden residual soils. Only a slightly weathered rock surface remains. Another screening alternative should be considered in light of these conditions. Please contact nle if you have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, ICU- Q19 Harvey E. StrawsnY der Jr. P.E. AtliDirector of Public Works HES/rab cc: Frederick County Planning Deparhnent file • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. 107 N. Kent Street Attn: Building Official Fourth Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Address:AA cn.r»11 Phone Number: ya 1,4a - 5 79 -a- Name of development and/or description of the request: y Location of property: Comments are on the back of this form. Inspections Department's Comments: t=REDERtCK CO. .;iNEE?IIVG � If�ISPECl"i� 0 0 Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Sections 304, (Business) 310, (Residential) and 311 (Storage) of The BOCA National Building Code/1996. Othe Codes that apply are CABO A117.1-92 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities. Note: section 705.2 BOCA Fireresistance Ratings of Exterior Wall less then 30', Section 503 Height and Area Limitation, and section'904.7 area limits with out fireprotection system. HC parking and building access appears to be in compliance. • • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 315 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Director Stephens City, VA P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1061 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 868-1061 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Ck"xN���R>� Address: -,), Phone Number: Name of development and/or description of\the request: \ �`P �'1C` �./ �C'Sl �•s �e-�/ / " \�e� 1 � V�.l (� C'r V� 1'�� 1 �� N �C i � � � c ;�" �� Location of property: ; - �. �� .���-..�c�1 hF '\�n��_P \_ .,�,� Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: /,: �T f�k 54"F,,�EAI �� D/- -r . 5- ta,~ �p�. I F.12' Dip (1 ACH `— — s1D£ of s cn P02.537 1 �ad1 July 9, 1998 Mr. John Lewis, PE Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 302 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Mini Warehouse Project - Henry Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 673-0682 We have completed our review of the site plan for the Henry 1�14ini Warehouse Project and offer the following comments: 1. Stor►nwater 11'lanagenient: We concur with your approach to storm management for the subject site development. However, your analysis needs to be expanded to include the following: a. Compare the pre and post development hydrographs for the site with the total drainage basin hydrograph to demonstrate that on -site detention is not warranted. b. Evaluate the impact of the site grading (fill) on the 100 year flood elevation. The impact study of this grading should be expanded to include adjacent sites upstream of the subject property. C. Evaluate the box culvert located immediately downstream of the site to determine its impact on the proposed site development during the 100 year storm event. The table included in your current analysis should be revised to reflect the results of the above evaluations: 2. Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to General Note Number 11. The proposed site does contain wetlands. The actual extent should be determined in the field and delineated on the plan. Ron Stouffer of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers located in Dumfries, Virginia should be contacted if the wetland area exceeds one-third of an acre. His number 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I 1. r' Mini Wareliouse Project - Henry Property Page 2 July 9, 1998 is 703-221-6967. 3. Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to General Note Number 12. This note should be revised to reflect the results of our comment number one. 4. Sheet 3 of 5 Based on the proposed grades, it is anticipated that both rock excavations and compacted fills will be required to achieve the design floor elevations. Consequently, a geotechnical report verifying the adequacy of the bearing conditions will be required before we will issue building permits. A geotechnical investigation may also prove invaluable in the vicinity of Building "I" and "H' to determine the extent of existing rubble fill. 5. Sheet 4 of 5 Extensive blasting will be required to achieve the landscaping buffer paralleling Huntington Meadows. It will also be necessary to import topsoil to promote vegetative growth in this area. Previous mining operations have removed all topsoil and a majority of the over burden residual soils. Only a slightly weathered rock surface remains. Another screening alternative should be considered in light of these conditions. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, 1 r Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. A0 Director of Public Works HES/rab cc: Frederick County Planning Department file County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Fax: (540) 678-0682 E-mail: fcplan@shentel.net FAX COVER SHEET To: ;5iM V I C K E?.S From: MIKE IZtA D D Y Company: Fax: 662 sgzs Date: 912.$I q g Phone: # of pages (including cover): 3 Subject: RELOC A-rlOw Or SGREENIN 9. Message: I ly p Olt, CIF 1p, A 00' Cw SF 000(-)00(:)f-)Wk )000000000 BUILDING 82 4SOO 'F L i I I I I I i i ►-_ I l_-� -' ��-W u 11 �I ► _ P A i 4 Of", r; 0 r.3_—r--t"—'f —}n,-•'-----� -tee. .ow •�-�.__ ��,�ri- --"`+.----- .c. ,. t,. All yr' I I Ja ', Jr , \ \� �• .. I � - —_ - - - - - t . � � � I .�s oo r zo �Nlo-urt�� �� -�-•- ,.��� �3,� J'•. • � � \ '�'• ' ;r � � '"'1 ' `, ' !s ozs b l e JNIU�I(1t1 � :� V I IT PqJlk o� •\ � 1 �v. � ��) � � �• !PPP / � is is ,�, y 1�� \`C�`.�' t + • �.. , `� t~%. � .•� 3 9(JKl H118 �`d. __...._,-�yk�c"' O.1\'.�'�\ J``�'1';.\\�\� � :(.t, /I � � .'s_ /