The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About036-98 Zeigler Mechanical - Stonewall - BackfileSITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information. -that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must -be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Department of Planning and Development Inspections Department Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District ani ��rnGYtfif ��C �r�2t � cPM . c % _ Receipt Date __ RECEIVED FROM e FOR T OFORA FROI�t_.` e-. `ec�, Cam\ ACCOUNT O C83h PAYMENT, O Ch@Ck BALANCE DUE O moery ord No. 145803 s u4 t4 4u _ DOLLARS TO 1.b6cu 10' BY TC 1182 COMMONWEALTH of VIR QINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 January 22, 1999 Mr. Pete Lebel C/O Lantz Construction Co. 600 Airport Road Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Mr. Lebel: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)984-5600 FAX(540)984-5607 Ref: Zeigler Mechanical Routes 11 & 668 Frederick County Enclosed is your approved Land Use Permit #855-04689 to cover the construction and maintenance of two commercial entrances at the referenced location. Please ensure a copy of the approved permit assembly is kept at the job site whenever working within the Routes 11 & 668 rights -of -way. I would also like to remind you of the need to erect and maintain proper traffic control in accordance with our Virginia Work Area Protection Manual Please give Mr. Dave Heironimus a call at (540) 722-3460 at least 48 hours in advance of the start of construction to arrange for any necessary inspections. If you have any questions concerning the permit requirements or during construction, please give me a call. / Sincerely, .,!I urtis J. Roy Hwy. Permits & Subd. Specialist Sr. CJR/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. Kelly Downs (w/ copy of permit) RECEIVED Mr. Dave Heirommus Mr. Bob Hawkins Mi. _K` _risT__ _ ierney__, _ JAN 2 6 1999 DEPT, OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING • 1 lx�: }ti. • COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 January 20, 1999 Mr. Michael M. Artz C/O Ebert & Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601-4740 Dear Mike: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)984.5600 FAX (540)984.5607 Ref: Zeigler Mechanical (Plat) RDJAM Limited Partnership Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike) Route 668 (Branson Spring Road) Frederick County We have reviewed the plat dated October 26, 1998 for the referenced project. The plat appears to be satisfactory to the site plan needs and is approved by this letter. Enclosed please find the signed plat. Once available, please provide VDOT with a copy of the plat with signatures of all parties for our records and recordation. The dedication should be to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerel , r G / Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer RECEIVED JAN 2 5 1999 DEPT. OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING • I CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Pete Lebel Lantz Constriction Company, Inc. 600 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Notice To Comply - Erosion and Sediment Control Ziegler Site - Route 11 North Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Lebel: COUNTY of I+;1gED>1 RICI, Department of Public Works October 22, 1998 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0632 On Wednesday, October 21, 1998, we viewed at the subject site that the stormwater pond had not been constructed. It appeared that some fill had been placed within the area of the pond, but no structure or compacted berms have been constructed. As stated in the approved plans, the construction of the stormwater pond needs to be a first step in the site grading operation. The pond needs to be constructed to contain additional stormwater that is generated on -site, as well as to contain sediment. Once the pond is constructed in accordance with the approved plans, the berms shall be stabilized with permanent vegetation. I will re -inspect the site on Friday, October 31, 1998 to ensure that progress is being made to correct this violation. If progress is not being made, further measures will be taken to ensure compliance, such as a stop work order for the entire site. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. cc: file Sinc rely, e C. Wilder Engineering Technician Public Works 107 North Dent Street a Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 August 18, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. Ebert & Associates 35 Nest Boscowen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-4740 RE: LZiegler Mechanical. - Site Plan Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear Robert: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the revised site plan dated July 30, 1998, we offer the following comments: 1. There is a discrepancy on the site plan with regards to the size of the outlet pipe for the stormwater detention pond. Sheet 1 of 6 indicates the size of the pipe as an eight (8) inch CivFP and Sheet 4 of 6 indicates the size as a 12 inch C1VIP. The stormwater management calculations indicated the outlet size as an eight (8) inch Ci%9P. Clarify this discrepancy. 2. As we discussed, the french drain detail should be completely back -filled with #57 stone, not 21 A. 3. The construction entrance will be required to have a washrack installed per the detail shown on sheet 6 of 6. 4. A footing foundation1building permit will not be issued for this project until we receive the Health Department's approval of the septic system. However, since these comments are minor in nature, we recommend approval of the subject site plan and the erosion and sediment control plan. We request a copy of the final approved site plan for our file. We recommend that copies of the final plan are forwarded to Lantz Construction Company of Winchester so that all erosion and sediment control measures can be properly installed. 107 North Dent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 A6 Zeigler iVleclianical Page 2 August 18, 1998 We have issued a land disturbance permit based on the fact that all of our comments will be addressed. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Department of Public Works JCW/kch cc: IVlike Ruddy, Frederick Cunty Planning Department C Pete Lebel, Lantz COnstrllcliOn file -O- 96 COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 August 18, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. 500 Mussleman Road Falmouth, VA 22405 Dear Robert: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)984-5600 FAX(540)984-5607 Ref:FZeigler. Mechanical Routes 11 /668 Frederick County We have received your revised site plan dated August 14, 1998 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. Copies of any/all drainage easements and right-of-way dedications required to implement this project should be provided to VDOT for review prior to issuance of any land use permit(s). The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 11/668 rights -of -way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. Please provide seven signed sets of approved construction plans for VDOT distribution. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. BJS/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. Dave Heirommus Mr. Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely, . Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer .:y WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Re uest for Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, VA (540) 722-3460 Plea out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan with traffice generation data and drainage calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: 2EI,/- LE2 ME�cld. Address: is� Co�� LANE Phone Number: ( 7 4" I �, (--7 r Name of development and/or description of the request: 2 C 1 �- L- C1L NF_ � 2T lv�d Location of property: R o p. Virginia Department of Transportation's comments: 1998See attached letter from Mr. Barr Sweitzer to �Ir. Robert Pease dated Au us Page 1 of 2 From: Sweitzer, Barry <BSWEITZER@vdot.state. va.us> To: Robert P. Pease (E-mail) <hawkinssurvey@erols.com> Cc: Heironimus, David<Heironimus_D@vdot.state. va.us>; Frederick County Planning Department (E-mail) <fcplan@shentel.net> Date: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 2.44 PM Subject: Zeigler Mechanical (Routes-11 /668, Frederick County) Attention: Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. We have reviewed the revised plans dated July 30, 1998 for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows and as shown in red on the plans being forwarded to you via U.S. Mail. Sheet 1 of 6 1. The AADT should be shown on each VDOT roadway on the plans. 2. The ITE volumes found in the current 6th Edition (1998) appear to be approximately 54% greater than those posted from the 1978 data. The greater volumes in this site do not affect the turn taper shown on the plan. However, care should be used in research to provide current ITE data and updated by acceptable percentages of increase/decrease or provide an on the site (use experience) volume count. 3. The dimension of entrance at the end of the radii as shown on the site plan should be 34' rather than the 30' proposed. Please review Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. Entrances to roadways with shoulders (basically rural in nature) that the minimum 30' maximum 50' widths shown are pavement widths. In the other condition (basically urban in nature) with curb and gutter, the widths shown are drawn to back of curb and gutter to include radii dimensions. Please be governed accordingly. 4. The VDOT standard type of entrance for this site condition is Standard CG-11 and should be used on the plan entrances for identification. 5. A note should be posted on the plan which absolves VDOT of any liability for and/or any responsibility for maintenance of the stormwater management pond. Please be aware this particular pond approaches depth for consideration of a safety device being installed, i.e. guardrail, earth berm, etc. 6. Since the speed limits are posted and Route 11 is 45 mph and Route 668 is unposted (which means either 55 mph or maximum safe driving speed), CG-7 is needed rather than the proposed CG-6 where curb and gutter falls within the VDOT right-of-way. 8/12/98 Page 2 of 2 When all the above comments have been addressed, please send one copy of the revised plan for review. If the plan can be approved, we will request additional plans needed at that time. Should you have any questions, please do not hestiate to call. Barry J. Sweitzer Roadway Engineer for Steve Melnikoff, Transportation Engineer * (540) 984-5631 <maiIto: Bsweitzer@vdot.state. va.us> Bsweitzer@vdot.state.va.us 8/12/98 F� L V, CM P W COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 September 29, 1998 Mr. Jim Douglas Zeigler Mechanical 156 Cole Lane Winchester, VA 22604 RE: Approval of Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan #036-98 Dear Mr. Douglas: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved the above referenced site plan, 9036-98, on September 21, 1998. This site plan, for the construction of a 22,870-square-foot facility in which your office, manufacturing and storage operation will be located, meets all County requirements for development within the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District. The site plan also calls for the provision of 64 parking spaces and parking lot landscaping. In addition, the provision the C-category buffer with landscape screen adjacent to the Route 11 right-of-way is consistent with the approved Master Development Plan for this property, MDP#001-98. As you are aware, all site improvements must be completed prior to any Certificate of Occupancy being issued for this facility. In particular, please ensure that any improvements associated with the water supply receive the approval of the Office of Water Programs. I previously provided you with two copies of the approved site plan. Please keep an approved copy for your files and maintain an approved copy on the construction site. Once the site development has been completed, you should contact this office to schedule a final site inspection. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely; / �cC Michael T. Ruddy Planner H MTR/cc cc: Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor Joe Wilder, Public Works Jane Anderson, Real Estate Garland Miller, EDC Karl Evans, Health Department Robert Pease, Ebert & Associates U.Ui i},clC o mm o n\S rrE P LakNV-E I GA P P. S P R 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r, • COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRC NIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 June 22,1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. C/O Ebert & Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601-4740 Dear Robert: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 Ref: Zeigler Mechanical Routes 11 / 668 Frederick County We have reviewed the preliminary plan dated June 10, 1998 for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows and as shown in red on the enclosed plan sheet: Plan Sheet 1 of 5 1. The tapers at the Route 11 entrance should be full 12' wide from Route 11 normal edge of pavement to the lip of curb & gutter with a 36' length of tapers (3xW). On Route 668 tapers should be 10' wide from edge of pavement to lip of gutter with 30' tapers. 2. Erosion control stone should be placed as needed at end of curb & gutter. 3. Standard VDOT RM-1 right-of-way monuments should be placed as shown by a certified land surveyor with State of Virginia registry. 4. Drainage flow arrows should be shown as indicated. 5. VDOT standard CG-12 curb ramps should be provided, placed as directed by VDOT Engineer/Inspector. 6. Typical sections should be prepared to show roadway width and pavement structure at pave tapers at Route 11 and Route 668: • Pavement Structure - Route 11: 1.5" SM-2A, 4" BM-2, 8" 21-B Aggregate Pavement Structure - Route 668: 1.5" SM-2A, Prime Coat, 8" 21-B Aggregate 7- The sight distance should be secured at each entrance. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING _..::� Mr. Robert Pease ReF Zeigler Mechanical June 22,1998 Paee #2 8. Trip generation should be shown for each entrance. 9. VDOT General Notes number 1 through 8 (copy attached) should be shown on the plan. All miscellaneous notes shown in red should be addressed. When all the above comments have been addressed, please provide five sets of revised plans for review. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, i Gr/Uzti Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer BJS/ rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Kris Tierney %:A� �+%£7a�S1 %r�iji �.lyg T'� "'��=.�?,. :-_S e' ;,. l .r• '; !Y,' -, •.�.�,, :ems _ �� - - ;�, .ti., V-.��,� � T�� a2,:� V � - �Er _s:.i:z- -' -� _.:.`c_�::'.�'.:•- �±14- yr .i.....i; it'i.. `_`..�.::k:%;r. �� It:,�+•L� �i- . �Y^.T r...:.�_� :�-rr—'.-� �- e•Y.=•'' - _ . -� ,i;-�:a��p .. rr�. ncr.:-�ar_ao 1:"< �_, jra.-.:•, •-,R-?or. r•i.:}ai v: Gf z•-;ice. zr,ac-_-c� .. "�!. ;.. •Y `sic -'r: =, �:: 'O� _—_ _•.---._ June 29, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease Ebert and Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601-4740 _-------"_.- - - COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/ 678-0682 RE: Review of Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Pease: I had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plan submitted to our department on June 10. 1998. The following comments, in addition to those marked on the plan, should be addressed during the revision of this site plan. I . Please distinguish this as being proposed lot one, as the subdivision has not occurred at this time, 2. Please include the address and phone number of the owner. 3. Please label the use, zoning, and property identification number (PIN) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. Show the adjoining properties as if there were no subdivision of the 25.18 acres. 4. Please label all setbacks on the plan. 5. Please indicate that the sidewalk is raised above the parking surface on the plan. This is to ensure that the six-inch curb requirements are achieved. 6• Include the location, height, and specifications of all proposed outdoor lighting on the plan. 7• Please provide the posted speed limit for Martinsburg Pike (Route 1 1) and Branson Spring Road (Route 668), 8.. Please in.dude a detail displaying the required enclosure (opaque fencing) around•.the.propose — ' ---- — r would recommend::a. 6: high board :on.board woodenatockade-enclosure. - , - `d - ^du 'al=classification '.�ode'�is'associ"ated.�_with-each.�use In = pe�fX,v�i at�SiG°(Standar ) .n strj - _ _ _ . ... _ --proposedi d-buifdgin - .:... . - - - ,_�-'i'-_ _ __ -- -- 4: rs. •��>�:e,. s, S7 Y,r."i'•:7:3�'•:7�c i�7 :n"C -__ _ _ -_ _ _ �.t = - Fiei ofalFbuildin in fect;: and ilfustrate'if-the'warehodse-'&ed'will be- higher f t.. _�1 ttie _ _ ease - r . _ �.n.,i.-.o• _ .a.�.-L�..rr.r---T;.�._- .. s--_ �.i..; -u"1�, =�...♦ J.. i1�:'Tl.+:�iC..;...rrsi:.'-':�:..-.--�..r_{ �.. .;fF,..,h: _ —_ �,. .--...-- -—T--�4_.' - :.---ate.--r- - - - �^r..-.'-'�` r'�:.:6:.,.......,v,'..i , '�:..�;.•�.... . . _ _ _ ___ _ _,rye +!kY�2t:• -s,� •�1+ •,.4•i..,.•r.-�_- -_ _ C�,, �j'•.- �v ^: �J:..Rn 'e-.�s., w� .X;� �/'J ��,`:T ,� _t �,.� :,,Y..� E•,.. �•;,,.:rrn�•Isa• �`Ei� •`✓. I ]r='r._fx': _�J.- .:n:: V, rj .h a.l:- J.4.V.�Nj�K, ,i.•i•; y:5lr .�iE 'T,iY Y' i,)'- ♦ � �'. fi•i.��'. '•r :;f ! 1 ",.•' t��t �`a::^ , �i,.-�5-sit_..�r, ..�'��.,tt'(•t ,;rt�� . .t•�•1'= .',i ^9,, 4i fi:;�;.,. ,• �•rr'•J � n•..�'l:•:1�vcr-lyyL �. -�^. ? •. i^.i.5_� .Jr;.r�' �•:S �, "�':r", , :P� . }� t�. _f`a rr �, '••i.F l,, i"�: ;•y'^� (, .:.5�,:r�7;�.;':: .;':r'-v;, _ Y�4......., �..1.''ni`:_..,_.. .`,;%i� i .�!1�L,1L17�•Nnr4FirTtc�n+' rpiniai2260I �4:,�'f.'�':,'sllri'ct�:._tti��.. Zr .%•. _•st..}.z1 ,_ ->.;: ::::.:r':?;a: _ _+., _ zt:f�'n :-i=ra ;:-- - _ -- ., - _ r_; -,r.'::::r. .ti`.:ti>s."'o'.r4'.t. :i rr. r' .: '� _-__ mil-.•. _- ..yf�b.^.: 1A'f^'"--ir in..� Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan - - Page 2 - June 29, 1998 than the office section. 1 1. Please include ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with the FAR calculations. 12. Driveways accesing parking lots must be 24 feet in width. The driveway connecting the eastern parkinVoading lot should be 24 feet. The driveway connecting the eastern parking/loading lot to the northern parking lot should also be 24 feet. The entrance from Route I I should be 24 feet wide. The access from Route 668 to the southern parking lot should also be 24 feet. Please refer to the red marking on the plan for a visual explanation. 13. Although there are more than enough parking spaces provided, your parking calculations are not accurate. The plan states that there will be 9,600 square feet of office. The parking tabulation states that there is only 7,500 square feet of office space. Please correct the parking calculations accordingly. 14. Please provide a detail for the proposed six-inch curb and gutter. 15. Curb and gutter must surround all parking areas. The southern edge of the southern parking lot should be revised. This area must also have six-inch curb and gutter. 16. The five-foot curb cut which appears on the drawing near the Section "B" and Section "A" divide line is not allowed. This area must also have a continuous six-inch curb and gutter section., 17. Please show the dimensions of the handicap parking spaces. 18. According to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, a three -foot -high evergreen hedge, fence, berm or wall shall be provided as necessary to prevent headlights from shining on public rights -of - way and adjoining properties. The southern parking lot would require this so that the headlights do not shine on Route 668. This requirement is unnecessary along Route 1 1, as the zoning buffer achieves this function. 19. Please show the calculations for the perimeter of the parking lots. 20, Please identify what buffer screening you are proposing to implement to achieve the required "C" category zoning buffer along Route 1 1. Currently the category "C" requirements are not met. 21. Please show the location and a detail for any proposed outdoor lighting. If there will be no outdoor lighting, then please indicate this on the plan. 22. The location and nature of all facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements shall be approved by the Fire Marshal._= - - -- --- .. - •• _ - -_ -- 23. The stormwater management plan, and the soi(erosion and 'sedirrientat�on'coiitrol plan; shall be _. -_..-......-._-.-.r._-.. .. .._..._ -. r. .. ...: T. �_• .:-. .._ ..-_.._•C=.�-'a t�i•1TJdiX%i'�[:a ._. �zZ.irµ r....L...� _... ..._ �t.__v�._J..c__-.-L.1_.-.r __.Wf-_...-J-'_•_� ...t..-✓l:_r-.•-_.....s•?.. s' Y i:c r s.'3,4.^tom r-�il.�jtr•:�-u'`:_�.�.:_.: . _' _ -- - --. —... . _ — bythe. Departmen - - - — _.__ .._____�_•-:Please revise r;srte, Ian to speafied in this letterarid resubmit one copy for my ;;r ; ...:."" - .;::�::• r ii<ca .�:}•-rt.4r_.i'?-.r^r,:, :.P �l. �*t-.a �;,o _ _ ., _ - -,s.%.cc.a.i.taov%n'er:x?t4'i�kic+uF"ir:c'-`-�.Fs.`^i"•„'c�-jssz.+v�..trrr_�_�#T•� �3•ti'�j3. �I '• ._'r;Sfi- :G,�lf` '�.... ya � y\., !:"-l'�'_ -. - •<L, - - •"r,�. - - - roc:... y_}^- -_- v.e�. c'}_.rv.-.��}'��,.:.?+t��,-:,?•''cir�,-)�"�.(. R'!t� `,: ,Y -_-ti_-: �'•'=i.''�.-.' ; - _ - - _ �-i.__ - _ � ;_^ ��v` �-.•=�t,'�N ,i'1��1 •('.� M:t.+'aYr��-�••':iL..�.'-ka•�.s a,r ^J•.. __ - - - - __ _ >: N ..1 _ M ..++:Ri.Y"i�br. ;. �.'r1. ••r:� - -.:�. yN �,y �r� 1. ,'T7.S �c7.- _ ._fT SJ4 /}1 _I/.ils .— ... �::wL.•�::."r"=:��i%?^j:-•^^- �-i- �i..-7�•.-'.�, it^rt� :.�-sr ...r t•Cir✓?•-t5:�1i c�•[� � :�!is y_-.,y..::n�t _ •,+wyz,.2.4>.,%.�:1it ;�':.ry:�..y...-y�..F�)'..,•4'..i�fC`;t�:,...�,YL:'/.4.,��i.'»YfJ 7;4•.<.y .r.r+'-�:�.r..� .. _, .;w` .. ...._.__-•.____•__......��..._.,,._..:1.-.....a}Jr1::�".:::.':..,�.,t..•r�:etr'-.:�ae.zi:�•.rir':%-irt�ri '.a•,a:'•L`<<. �:u ._., .Y» _,lv- _. _.._ ._. ,.. .:�i� ..,_. ...._... r `;=;� `-a}}gs ;4r,'r'1%. a °}- ,^ ri.• ri'i:i.'._ r t . trr vr..rr.'::+:r}',."tT --177 Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan -..- _ _.Page 3 June 29, 1998 review, Once I have verified the information contained on the revised site plan, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets along with five copies of the final site plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Health Department, the State Office of Water Programs, the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Engineer and the Frederick County Fire Marshal. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Bradley /.Curne Planner I BJC/cc cc: Zeigler Mechanical, 156 Cole Lane, Winchester, Virginia, 22604 - --.+`i..::. '--.a:n.. .;,r •_,<�.a• . f -•fir - ��= ,:ems .-->..-__ - •.t ... ... _.,._ _ - _J. _.S :.i i :1' - - .. f.• ..: .. .J...� '11�:1a - - - �t=�—. ...Y.h:. 1 ..,_..L,•.�..iGw�.r��.�i�t�c..t_•:�:.a.t.J :;:.c:. ...-Y u.+— �f P..,::-t..;�� '^T'Y,•.—.r-.r�;... e+". _ _ �f '- ^•IZ-5 — !'_t'•'.'T;?^^`•• 'vim'.-; .-rlr.?=i:. :�.-.'u: ..--;„...- -..�-1 t•.-.�_-.. �..�r-,.r•r_+±r-+.=•^.•'^°".i" - ..�•�.:.:_�-."-�� - �.:•d:r—:,t �.ey _ .r-_r ti]�t'f z i�: , . F!=i:'�::,�,.`-.., sRJ!-i]RMS'L!,�R- '-•...:.-z.. UXBRAUCOMMOMS - ---�- - __-- - -- - - -•-mot.,: - - - --_--- - -- -�.•l . _. _.-.. _fir. .._ - - _ _ .. .. ... - - - - -- ._ - yf ,. :J] +w+r+i'4 r:n.•tu:��r+.�•�+�'r'._:. "."�'•-T -••L ��,,y 1] y}S:L. i•�Y+. t.h ___ ' i '<.:.',+1n' .::,6,'�•�y "� .....:L yi.:; 1-i ...-•:^.^�•: J.. .,t .,(; c.l':r•c:�., •r.f :Y ,,Y i,.+:J. SJc.1.( ,,tit .: t` -f... . - o,y,r: :L-, .'� ri-:� .r. � :. �.: ":`I,+:F .;r•<<+n .r J �� ,1. :Y:f.,. ... y� F,:. - - -•.e'.a. Nam- :+a1'- :'3�.N,)..-y'.: =rM .;?i!:r:`.-ti' + ..!1. _�.Y'?'•F"`. }.,. �"j; Jh'• .ti:•tf ;^}; .t �;'l�M1 f. T�'r•.... � ,1�};y -!'-`, t.,� a^.c .,J.. .F„hr-f}i s�'�t,`'D, �' -•J, �..(,•< - t i.t:l,4 r_• f�``1'(::.:E'7`>; .r. �-•).. -cJ _,l� ,:� S.^ Jtrt•� :i' i.)... ';�aa-,.y_ :. is .�.]�'• _ .. 4 < �.. ..t'. a. .. ..1. - . _ f 1'r'. n t � .'1 •;, +'d ��..,i.' �!..-i : "c•-1 •�-.. ... /.. ..�. �-d',r.... ... .. .. -.. .. t Yi_ - - . •��__..._�e.f.`.;:....,._.bl...-.,.. ..�..... .`,;1... ,•.-.f-�t:J.•1�:��:•..v.%_i_-. tc:i_ ):::ice rr„-^'a.-.; . _.. _,'J _ s_`r'L:=;tr.sati._d.:_r1.t..4a�:v.:':�:�i:.a'.e_;!-'f��i:�sS?�=::__�-v?.� •,;a-;:.Y�^:__- - , I ec.,O�. \cA �11 June 30, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. Ebert & Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-4740 RE: Zeigler Mechanical - Site Plan Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Pease: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: 1. The stormwater calculations do not indicate the post -developed storm flows. Provide a summary of the analysis comparing the post -developed storm flows to the pre -developed storm flows. The stormwater management pond shall be designed to release a ten-year post -developed storm at a two-year pre -developed rate. Also, include a discussion of the 100-year storm flows and the anticipated backwater conditions created by a 100-year storm. Place a note on the plan indicating that the entrance road off of Route 688 will be over -topped by a 100-year storm. 2. The stormwater pond needs to be designed as a sediment basin in accordance with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Manual, Section 3.14. Provide complete details of the berm and elevations as necessary for the construction of the pond and riser sections. 3. Sheet 1 of 5 The site plan indicates placing a drainage channel around the site to convey stormwater that drains under Route 11 through an existing 12 inch CMP. Also, provide calculations for the design of the drainage ditches. The detail for the six _ (6) foot wide ditch section indicates a slope of 0.50 percent. We do not _...._recommend placing a grass -lined ditch with"a slope of less than one 1percent :� Tdue.t6'inadequate drainage flow: -We recommerid`usirig: apaved dltchio p `T acin _nduit�Ano_ther o tion:wouldbeao.install afrench T' - :__:_ - -- rmwater m i clo sed co �.-., - - sn'•�`1rY: i^Xfeyt4Gi1F:::-r✓. i .l ..:YrA....r`..._� .{�_.._...r �-•rre:-+.•.r_..-_-�.�.,:: c:..'_::.ti_-_`.:,.:._._-r _ -''--�____-..r.�----•`T`-'T-.:.•'f,.:->-r-"^!-�- ..-..x;.:.�..�rr.'rr«rii=+ss. a:f._..-..:. - -_ _ __-- __ _ - -_ ...._. .....:...._—..- .__. ...... .. 16ng lyre bottom 6f-the ditch to removespanding wafer-. - - - - _ ,.t z Y� K:.�I N.1.4L:�:%/-..1'::� - �T.l-•:-•Y._." S'pT•.� --., ..•"Y'.!!tC .�':^.,_.. YT.'7/'-'.T:h,^'.^�H;-t'�.-_.. ...,,.. ._.. .. _. ::�� -y •i�.��1�:t&c�,,,.-�r--rt`:�' t.11:',.{_:�V.:�..=�.s. tip,;.:; :r'TT-.f�'a• �.',: �l'S.Y.-ti _tom-�.._+:::i - - - - - :rr tc.c•� - - ��i:.:- s - - ,_%.c _.F � •--<t ... '..a:i u.i-'c.t:.ra---.CiM>- a-+� •-ci-.•-.. -- - _--- - - - - - -- - - - - ----..-..-.--.-- ...fie ::1�'•' .1: .. ��Z, ---- ___ ___; __ _._ .Zeigler Mechanical - • -:.- _ . . Page 2 June 30, 1998 4. Sheet 2 of 5 The proposed sewer system design requires health department approval prior to site plan approval or obtaining a land disturbance permit. 5. Sheet 4 of 5 Place the area of culvert number three within a dedicated drainage easement and provide an adequate channel analysis. 6. The proposed curb stops along the south side of the parking lot are not allowed under the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. You need to place curbing along this area with curb cuts to allow the stormwater to drain into the pond. Each curb cut needs to have outlet protection as specified within the erosion and sediment control handbook. 7. As stated in our master development plan comments dated March 13, 1998, you need to provide a complete erosion and sediment control narrative which shall include a construction phasing schedule, permanent seeding schedule, etc. The first step in site grading shall be the installation of the construction entrance with washrack, silt fence, sediment basin and a drainage channel. Also, provide details of all of the erosion and sediment control measures that will be used on -site. We do not recommend silt fence inlet protection for the existing 18 inch CMP located under Route 668. 8. Please verify the adequacy of the 18 inch CMP culvert under Route 668 to ensure that there will not be an increase in run-off draining to the culvert. 9. Place a note on the site plan indicating that issuance of a land disturbance permit will be required prior to initiation of any site grading operations. 10. Place a silt fence in the area indicated on the site plan. Provide outlet protection for the proposed 12 inch CMP outlet structure. �__ .-----:-= As stated in our previous comments, prior to issuance of a.land disturbance permit, our ---6f£ice will need a copy -of the 'signed drainage easement agreement across the downstream ; - Iielnw'the discharge point of the storrrmwater management' popropnd_ --- - --' t - f :::':—'.' .J. ~'"x�4 ,.>N,` ..,. . .+.c•r�'�..,.. ...E-,..r'. - -- .. c ... r -,J,= ' `T two ? �~co Lies 6f the- site lan _ - =� :Once'these- comments have been addressed, Iease submit p f _ — - ---- - - - ---- p -- - - - - L�- p .......... .•,�;...._,u... .r+:.-�,'�f't'^.�rf'� _c,_r.;.' ,Vf.'.: 'i'4. ir=i'.'.::'.•'- ..t%:.—,._�.. �'t..-. 7� - �+�`-:-�..a2�•—".�. t�^�u "��:,,, +'i'.Ki;ir j, -i' :}••:.. .,.x..�.: '•i�� _`_-_ _._'4.'.—._`_`r_._c... ._.... _ .,.. '.�-,ca. ...v -. '3<z... ... ... _ i';, : .- _. .. �.. _ ,.. _ _, .... _... _...... _.�__ _ .•.. ..f:h_ t'r='7...;:5 �. ,.. a ...: ... _.. _.+ ...,. .. �. :.y��z�..�: T7:.zi�.x:.�,. '7T rY,,=-_r `T-ti=:i•`- - ----- -- r:T -. r, s... :'. -•Ja:i: `r_'".._ �... Zeigler Mechanical _. . - Page 3 June 30, 1998 for review and final approval. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, o._ e . Lai. OLI, Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Department of Public Works cc: Mike Ruddy, Frederick County Planning Department file :,.�. -zir: :arc._ ._�^:r .gin ., �*:•� ZIZ _ _ _ 'iS�_�-•••_�1s.`3+is...-_..-^c.=.s:c_^ L•c`1^' �_-�+ __ - iY_ .F:�---'°" •:Yr t:.J .�:� �' .Y' fir 'C..=.....(.n'.e^' :.t.-. 1.4:.., _ :r �.L...n.1.4: _t�.: 6"a�" e1T - fir. Y•n,, lit:-.;�.�s... -.�.. a.- , �-�._. s.-.r ! 1,�iH 1:. .1 .. .. _: r'�. ., �i r.:S•'i .. __. =..r .. _ �1,>.. - " _ -�-_.. _.. .,,.._....._ .� . .. .,:-t••..:•a'. , N'; ,..s J Yam, . H. Aubrey Hawkins Associates, Ltd. LAND SURVEYING LAND PLANNING DEVELOPMENT August 4, 1998 County of Frederick 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA. 22601-5000 RE: Zeigler Mechanical / Site Plan Dear Sirs, The purpose of this letter is to review how various agency comments were addressed during the first revision to the above referenced site plan. Department of Planning and Development 1. Lot designation has been changed to "Proposed Lot One." 2. The owner's name and address has been added. 3. The adjacent property information has been added. 4. The setbacks are labeled. 500 Mussleman Road Falmouth, Virginia 22405 Phone: (540) 371-0268 Fax: (540) 371-3479 Toll Free: 1-800-562-4083 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-4740 Phone: (540) 667-3233 Fax: (540) 667-9188 Toll Free: 1-800-755-7320 5. A note has been added to assure compliance. 6. The lighting information has been added. 7. The speed limit information has been added. 8. A fence enclosure has been added to the dumpster pad area. 9. The SIC codes have been added, as requested. 10. The height of the building has been added, as well as additional "FF" call - outs. 11. This information has been added. 12. The parking geometry has been revised, as requested. 13. The parking calculations have been corrected, as requested. 14. A curb and gutter detail has been added. 15. The wheel stops have been removed and replaced with CG-6, with curb cuts. 16. In a conversation with Public Works, it was stated that curb cuts would be allowed to address storm drainage. In a later conversation with Bradley Currie, he stated that he was agreeable to that. 17. The HDCP spaces have been dimensioned. IS. A 3' fence has been added to this area of the parking lot. 19. The perimeter calculations have been added to the landscape plans. 20. It has been determined that the 150' inactive buffer requirement set backs have been met. 21. The lighting locations have been shown on the plan. 22. This comment is acknowledged. VD T 23. This comment is acknowledged. 1. The pavement topers have been revised. 2. Erosion control has been added. 3. The highway monumentation has been added, as requested. 4. Flow arrows have been added. 5. HDCP ramps have been added, as requested. 6. The pavement sections have been revised for Route 11 and Route 668. 7. The sight distance is available at both entrances, as now indicated by note. 8. Trip generations figures have been added. 9. The standard VDOT notes have been added to the plan. Deparhnent of Public Works 1. The SWIV1 calculations have been revised to the proper post -developed release rate. The 100-year storm has been routed, as well as the requested note added. 2. The temporary sediment basin design has been included with this submission. 3. The design of the 0.50% slope ditch has been augmented to include a gravel trench. 4. The requirement for Health Department approval is hereby acknowledged. 5. The easement and channel analysis has been added. • • 6. The curbing has been added to the southerly parking lot, as requested. 7. The siltation -erosion control narrative has been added. 8. A note has been added to the plan addressing the existing 18" CMP under Route 668. 9. This note has been added. 10. The silt fence and inlet protection has been added. Please call at your earliest convenience if there are any questions with reference to these matters. Yours very truly, Robert Pease • 0 1 2 3. 4 5 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Project Title: Z_' LQ- Z I -A rA Location of Property --A E c:o n_ ,-D L 2 1 J T K o (street address) A Q L G Property Owner: Address: �iSC; C G�� --�� W i .y c H E S 7 LVI-- 6. 'Z z. :v o4 Telephone: �54 c J L, 6--7 4)-1 Applicant/Agent Address (A M E k S I,7 M Telephone: Designer: Address: 3S �� • ��s c Ar� S-r WC C 1 V �� C cS- 4• 2- Z- c� U 1 Telephone: ` 6Uo) 2- Au Contact: 'FI--- G 6. 7a. 7b. 8. a) b) c) d) e) f) g) • Is this an original or revised site plan? Total acreage of parcel to be developed Total acreage of parcel: Property Information: Property Identification Number: Current Zoning: Present Use: Proposed Use: Adjoining Property Use(s) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) Magisterial District(s) • Original J Revised " b CDC SAr�� P-A VAC- A �7 N1AKi, NG(7 \. ( Go HI- 3'3"A--1 Ll- I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the _ Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to t submission of my site plan. Signature: Date: • • SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. ✓ Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority ✓ Department of Planning and Development Inspections Department Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District Request for Street Name The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. ✓ 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. J 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. ord PLAT 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. N I A 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. / 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. NIA 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) ✓ 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site ✓ 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. z General Site (con't Y N ✓ 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. N I/� 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. ,v �A 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. �+ 22. Location and area of common open space. 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. ki 1A 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. dimensions 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information Y N ✓ 27. The height of all buildings and structures. ✓ 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. ✓ 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. ✓ 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N/ r�! 1 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. t4 /A 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. ✓ 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements, r4/A 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parkin Y N 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. ✓ 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N / 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. Landscaping Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N J 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. J 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. 12 0 • Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street Attn: County Planner Fourth Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: c%6;- LEJZ- M�-= ,( Address: i s(O C v 1- L L A a L Phone Number: Name of development and/or description of the request: .7 r k 6-L-�� P Location of property: f-: C (?- Planning and Development's Comments: 16 eNN COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �= DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY JERRYA. COPP COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE RESIDENT ENGINEER P.O. BOX 278 TELE (540) 9B4-5600 ED I N B U R G, VA 22824-0278 FAX (540) 984.5607 June 22,1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. Ref: Zeigler Mechanical C/O Ebert & Associates Routes 11/668 35 West Boscawen Street Frederick County Winchester, VA 22601-4740 Dear Robert: We have reviewed the preliminary plan dated June 10, 1998 for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows and as shown in red on the enclosed plan sheet: Plan Sheet 1 of 5 1. The tapers at the Route 11 entrance should be full 12' wide from Route 11 normal edge of pavement to the lip of curb & gutter with a 36' length of tapers (3xW). On Route 668 tapers should be 10' wide from edge of pavement to lip of gutter with 30' tapers. 2. Erosion control stone should be placed as needed at end of curb & gutter. 3. Standard VDOT RM-1 right-of-way monuments should be placed as shown by a certified land surveyor with State of Virginia registry. 4. Drainage flow arrows should be shown as indicated. 5. VDOT standard CG-12 curb ramps should be provided, placed as directed by VDOT Engineer/ Inspector. 6. Typical sections should be prepared to show roadway width and pavement structure at pave tapers at Route 11 and Route 668: • Pavement Structure - Route 11: 1.5" SM-2A, 4" BM-2, 8" 21-B Aggregate • Pavement Structure - Route 668: 1.5" SM-2A, Prime Coat, 8" 21-B Aggregate 7. The sight distance should be secured at each entrance. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Mr. Robert Pease Ref: Zeigler Mechanical June 22,1998 Page #2 8. Trip generation should be shown for each entrance. 9. VDOT General Notes number 1 through 8 (copy attached) should be shown on the plan. All miscellaneous notes shown in red should be addressed. When all the above comments have been addressed, please provide five sets of revised plans for review. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer BJS/ rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Kris Tierney __ • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 June 30, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease, P.E. Ebert & Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-4740 RE: Zeigler Mechanical - Site Plan Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Pease: Upon review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: 1. The stormwater calculations do not indicate the post -developed storm flows. Provide a summary of the analysis comparing the post -developed storm flows to the pre -developed storm flows. The stormwater management pond shall be designed to release a ten-year post -developed storm at a two-year pre -developed rate. Also, include a discussion of the 100-year storm flows and the anticipated backwater conditions created by a 100-year storm. Place a note on the plan indicating that the entrance road off of Route 688 will be over -topped by a 100-year storm. 2. The stormwater pond needs to be designed as a sediment basin in accordance with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Nlanual, Section 3.14. Provide complete details of the berm and elevations as necessary for the construction of the pond and riser sections. 3. Sheet 1 of 5 The site plan indicates placing a drainage channel around the site to convey stormwater that drains under Route 1 1 through an existing 12 inch CNIP. Also, provide calculations for the design of the drainage ditches. The detail for the six (6) foot wide ditch section indicates a slope of 0.50 percent. We do not recommend placing a grass -lined ditch with a slope of less than one (1) percent due to inadequate drainage flow. We recommend using a paved ditch or placing the stormwater in a closed conduit. Another option would be to install a french drain along the bottom of the ditch to remove standing water. 107 North Kent Street a Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Zeigler Mechanical Page 2 June 30, 1998 4. Sheet 2 of 5 The proposed sewer system design requires health department approval prior to site plan approval or obtaining a land disturbance permit. 5. Sheet 4 of 5 Place the area of culvert number three within a dedicated drainage easement and provide an adequate channel analysis. 6. The proposed curb stops along the south side of the parking lot are not allowed under the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. You need to place curbing along this area with curb cuts to allow the stormwater to drain into the pond. Each curb cut needs to have outlet protection as specified within the erosion and sediment control handbook. 7. As stated in our master development plan comments dated March 13, 1998, you need to provide a complete erosion and sediment control narrative which shall include a construction phasing schedule, permanent seeding schedule, etc. The first step in site grading shall be the installation of the construction entrance with washrack, silt fence, sediment basin and a drainage channel. Also, provide details of all of the erosion and sediment control measures that will be used on -site. We do not recommend silt fence inlet protection for the existing 18 inch CMP located under Route 668. 8. Please verify the adequacy of the 18 inch CMP culvert under Route 668 to ensure that there will not be an increase in run-off draining to the culvert. 9. Place a note on the site plan indicating that issuance of a land disturbance permit will be required prior to initiation of any site grading operations. 10. Place a silt fence in the area indicated on the site plan. Provide outlet protection for the proposed 12 inch CNII' outlet structure. As stated in our previous comments, prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit, our office will need a copy of the signed drainage easement agreement across the downstream property below the discharge point of the stormwater management pond. Once these comments have been addressed, please submit two (2) copies of the site plan • Zeigler Mechanical Page 3 June 30, 1998 for review and final approval. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, q0'�- e. W-j Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Department of Public Works cc: Mike Ruddy, Frederick County Planning Department file NIA N/A Zee I�r ��nica 668 ii The following information must be includedoryour site plan. If your site plan is incomplete ete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N WA General Site Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development. ' / Name. address, and phone number of owner. I J,**71 no Olcysresr 3. Name. address, and phone number of developer )oh~ # 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number ) 10 11. 12. 13 1 15. 16. '0 Location map (scale 1:2000) Magisterial District RA to& Cosa Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) North Arrow 7 i Zoning of site Use. zoning, and Property Identificat;on Number ;PIN#r) of all adjoining properties This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. a IK 34 A 8 General Site (con't) Y N ✓ Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 8 The location and dimensions of all required setbacks a d yard areas. 1Vor&wn tick V-&41 Q* vrn Side st8vct —/ rear. N� 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. AI/A 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. // 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. NIA 22. Location and area of common open space. ✓ 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. kV Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. N/A 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. f9Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of �l// structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information {� Y N W�1" ' 0 0 The height of all buildings and structures. 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 9 The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 001 is rA 0 Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32 Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the T site. Ir 33 Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. NWJ 4,� ,gyp /pqAIS 401ve ti' �e Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities. including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking Y N Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. #ts CW 4 tcKx 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces. driveways. parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. nlrrlemsibnS A01 Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. ✓ 44. Location of steep slopes. woodlands. flood.clains. wetlands. sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. NSA i RN d Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48 49 104Fe sate &A oM 27. /1 K coned. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. c ��ca�� P*rki1df peelantl , Location of required buff s and screening with cross sections or profiles.p"-Vt,j to Ime Sa,Y1Q po o/ v"ee / j a t At cm/i ern P ur, �e/ W ��, !fie //i � wA ch1he as Pc,y is rcx, A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. Wlw / i � N t4se IiAt 7 MIIAe SwAer►, 10 • � � lJ �_� L� l'_J lJ �� COUNTY of F REDE ICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 June 29, 1998 Mr. Robert P. Pease Ebert and Associates 35 West Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601-4740 RE: Review of Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan Dear Mr. Pease: I had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plan submitted to our department on June 10, 1998. The following comments, in addition to those marked on the plan, should be addressed during the revision of this site plate. Please distinguish this as being proposed lot one, as the subdivision has not occurred at this time. 2. Please include the address and phone number of the owner. 3. Please label the use, zoning, and property identification number (PIN) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. Show the adjoining properties as if there were no subdivision of the 25.18 acres. 4. Please label all setbacks on the plan. 5. Please indicate that the sidewalk is raised above the parking surface on the plan. This is to ensure that the six-inch curb requirements are achieved. 6. Include the location, height, and specifications of all proposed outdoor lighting on the plan. 7. Please provide the posted speed limit for Martinsburg Pike (Route 1 1) and Branson Spring Road (Route 668). 8. Please include a detail displaying the required enclosure (opaque fencing) around the proposed dumpster pad. Staff would recommend a 6' high board on board wooden stockade enclosure. 9. Specify what SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code is associated with each use in the proposed building. 10. Please specify the height of all buildings in feet, and illustrate if the warehouse area will be higher 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan Page 2 June 29, 1998 than the office section, 1 1. Please include ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with the FAR calculations. 12. Driveways accesing parking lots must be 24 feet in width. The driveway connecting the eastern parking/loading lot should be 24 feet. The driveway connecting the eastern parking/loading lot to the northern parking lot should also be 24 feet. The entrance from Route I I should be 24 feet wide. The access from Route 668 to the southern parking lot should also be 24 feet. Please refer to the red marking on the plan for a visual explanation. 13. Although there are more than enough parking spaces provided, your parking calculations are not accurate. The plan states that there will be 9,600 square feet of office. The parking tabulation states that there is only 7,500 square feet of office space, Please correct the parking calculations accordingly. 14. Please provide a detail for the proposed six-inch curb and gutter. 15. Curb and gutter must surround all parking areas. The southern edge of the southern parking lot should be revised. This area must also have six-inch curb and gutter. 16. The five-foot curb cut which appears on the drawing near the Section "B" and Section "A" divide line is not allowed. This area must also have a continuous six-inch curb and gutter section. 17. Please show the dimensions of the handicap parking spaces. 18. According to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, a three -foot -high evergreen hedge, fence, berm or wall shall be provided as necessary to prevent headlights from shining on public rights -of - way and adjoining properties. The southern parking lot would require this so that the headlights do not shine on Route 668. This requirement is unnecessary along Route 1 1, as the zoning buffer achieves this function. 19. Please show the calculations for the perimeter of the parking lots. 20, Please identify what buffer screening you are proposing to implement to achieve the required "C" category zoning buffer along Route 11. Currently the category "C" requirements are not met. 21. Please show the location and a detail for any proposed outdoor lighting. If there will be no outdoor lighting, then please indicate this on the plan. 22. The location and nature of all facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements shall be approved by the Fire Marshal. 23. The stormwater management plan, and the soil erosion and sedimentation control plan, shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. Please revise your site plan to reflect the comments specified in this letter and resubmit one copy for my 0 • Zeigler Mechanical Site Development Plan Page 3 June 29, 1998 review. Once I have verified the information contained on the revised site plan, 1 will need all approved review agency comment sheets along with five copies of the final site plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Health Department, the State Office of Water Programs, the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Engineer and the Frederick County Fire Marshal. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, G Bradley . Currie Planner I BJ C/cc cc: Zeigler Mechanical, 156 Cole Lane, Winchester, Virginia, 22604 U.\BRAD\C0MM0MSITEPL-1\ZEIGLERWPD