Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
025-97 SEO Property - Shawnee - Backfile
iJ 0 CASH RECEIPT Date \ Received From LA Address 1 For AMr OF ACCOUNT CASH AMl PAID CHECK BALAN(A MONEY DUE ORDER By •� ,g-0025156 I � Do,llars $ l SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. r ` /'-' )9 % L Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) /Frederick County Sanitabon Authority Department of Planning and Development L��9F ✓ I pections Department F derick County Engineer (Public Works) FLl►�Iq4' - Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) _��-flep3Rment City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District Request for Street Name 8 • 0 The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N ./ 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. �L 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. / 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect.s��l _y 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. AIA 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator' for the approval signature and date of approval. 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) _Vol" 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right- of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 11 General Site (con't) Y N ✓ 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. t 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. Srlc�l� � NA/ 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. ✓ 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. AA 22. Location and area of common open space. 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. ✓ 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Buildinglnformation Y N 27. The height of all buildings and structures. 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. ✓ 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N ✓ 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. ✓ 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. N 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. arkin Y il OM Natural Features Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading ellspaces. --� 41. oration and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. Landscaping Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. TYPE�DvAJ�'' nr,�� cAc��E� 47. Location of require buffers and scCeening with cross sections or ~~ profiles. N1SC� pC 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. 12 7 �Z3-g7 ��7firvzl 3-2- 9 Y" FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 \,larch 5. 2003 Nis. Eun Sook Seo 2986 Second Street 'd%inchester. Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan Expiration - Site Plan #025-97, Seo Property 1930 Front Royal Pike - Property Identification Number (PIN)# 76-2-A Dear Mr. Seo: --he Frederick County Department of Planning and Development administratively approved site plan 025-97 on March 2. 1998. In accordance with Section 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and Section 165-145G of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, approval of a site plan shall expire within five years of the approval date unless building permits have been obtained for construction. No building permits have been obtained for construction of improvements shown on the site plan as c f March 5. 2003. therefore, Site Plan #025-97 has expired. A new site plan. application, and fee must be submitted and approved prior to any construction activity on the property. Please call me at 540-665-5651, if you have any questions. S incerely. Patrick Davenport, CZA Zoning & Subdivision Administrator R AR/PTD/kac I 1 Rebccca Sne Plans Eepirauons SECkcpiratinn wpd 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 r FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 March 3, 1998 Eun Sook Seo 2968 Second Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan Approval - Seo Property Site Plan #025-97 Zoned: B1 Dear Ms. Seo: This letter is to inform you that Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved site plan #025-97 on March 2, 1998. This site plan consists of a 1,910 square foot building to be used for an apparel store (SIC 56). In addition to the building, there will be 17 parking spaces within an asphalt surface and curb parking lot. Landscaping will be installed around the perimeter of the parking lots, and to buffer this site from the adjoining properties. The buffer/screening landscaping will comply with buffer and screening requirements of the zoning ordinance. Attached are two copies of the approved plan. This will enable you to provide your contractor with an approved copy, and maintain a copy for your records. Please have the contractor contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection once all improvements are complete. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Si cerely, ric . Law nc Zoning Administrator ERL\bah U:IRIC•COMMON.SITEPLA.`VSEO. APR Enclosure cc: Carl Rinker, PHR&A Jerry Copp, Virginia Department of Transportation Real Estate Office, Commissioner of Revenue Public Works Department bc: John R. Riley, Jr., Jim Longerbeam & W. Harrington Smith, Jr. 107 North Bent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 116 North Main Street, PO Boot 46, Bndgemter,e 22812 Tel: 540 828-2616 Fax 540 828.6437 Patton Hams Rust & Associates, pc IY County of Frederick Planning and Community Dcvclopmcnt 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. Eric Lawrence :\TTi7 noti Rl: Seo Site Plan TRANSMITTAL January 6, 1998 DATE. 9778-10 ElUr / UPS Next Day Air VIA D. Walsh/krf HY QUM%;IM- HIF NO. DATE DF.SMPnON TRANSWrIED ® Herewith 5 Copies of Site Plan ❑ Under Separate Cover RECEIVED BY DATE MATT-IUAL ❑ Originals ❑ Photocopies ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ® Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia ❑ Disk(s) i i ' RPOSE ® Approval O Your Use ❑ Your Files ❑ Please Return ❑ Please Submit W� <Q J�� c -) o NS �� I R A : o cI I tilgb COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works January 9, 1998 Mr. George I. Staber, Jr., P.E. Patton, Harris, Rust and Associates, P.C. 116 North Main Street Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 Re: Site Plan Comments - Seo Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Staber: 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the revised site plan dated December 13, 1997, you have addressed all our previous comments. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject site plan. As a matter of information, a land disturbance permit will have to be issued by this office prior to initiating site work. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, oe C. Wilder Engineering Technician cc: Eric Lawrence, Frederick County Planning Department file 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Atten: Building Official P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 (703) 665 - 5650 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (703) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one copy of your site plan with this sheet. Applicant's name: F,,X/ ' •,- Sao Address: -7 1AJ1nl�i-1�C1i=/� Phone number: Name of development and/or description of the request:C �PnC4 �t • Location of development.- Inspections Department's Comments: Cou rents are on the back of this form. Inspections Dept. use only Date re-ceived Incomplete Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (re, Date revision received Incomplete Date approved 0 9 The H.0 parking and access to the existing M,(Merchantile) structure appears to be in compliance with the CABO A117.1-92 standard for Accessible and Useable Buildings and Facilities. Please submit detail ramp plans at the time of permit application for the ramp. Note: the van accessible striped unloading area shall be a min. 96" in accordance with section A4.6.4 of the CABO A117.1.,the plan shows 7' area. • • COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No.SP98-0006 Applicant EUN SOOK SEO Date Received I � 11-98 Address 2968 SECOND ST. WINCHESTER, VA FE61998 RECE�v ED F' DEFT. OF p�1NNIN� Date Reviewed Plan 9ev. Date: Project Name CLOTHING STORE Type of ApplicationSITE PLAN 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. Tax I.D. No. 76-2-A RECOMMENDATI Automatic Sprinkler System Residenti Automatic Fire Alarm System Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate XX Inadequat, Fire Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Twenty foot fire lane required Phone No. 540-667-6867 Current ZoninJ3-1 I I Election District SHAWNEE Sprinkler System Not Identified for emergency vehicle access Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Special Hazards Noted Yes No X Comments Hydrant Locations Adequate XX Siamese Location Adequate Additional Comments Attached? Plan Approval Recommended? Y4 Signatu Not Identified Inadequate Not Identified Inadequate Not Identified Yes No XX Title x 116 North Main Street, PO Banc 46, Bndgewater, Onia 22812 • Tel: 540 828-2616 Fax W 8284437 ��j � � L Patton Hams Rust & Associates, pc 1 �� J4 p o4 -Ir) Frederick County Planning RE Seo Property 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. Eric Lawrence ATT ON TRANSMITTAL December 15, 1997 DATE: 9778-10 FLEE M Hand z �c C Q. Royer/krf BY QUANTITY 1 •l l J : No i DATE DESCRIPTION TRANS ED ® Herewith 2 9778-10 12/15/97 Revised Site Plan ❑ Under Separate Cover MATERIAL ❑ Originals O Photocopies ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar 10 Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia ❑ Disk(s) PURPOSE ® Approval ❑ Your Use ❑ Your Files ❑ Please Retum NOTES ❑ Please Submit PHRAA RECEIVED BY DATE Is 116 North Main Street PO Box 46, Brier, Virginia 22812 Tel 540 828 2616 Fax 540 82B 6437 • IRattoll llarri., lust & 1ss(wiate". pc December 15, 1997 Mr. Eric R. Lawrence Planner II County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: SEO PROPERTY SITE PLAN #025-97 PHR&A #9778-10 Dear Mr. Lawrence: In response to your comment letter dated November 13, 1997, and your Fax sent on December 11, 1997, PHR&A has revised the Site Plan, Landscaping Plan and corresponding details. Accordingly, the plans have been revised as follows: Notes added to SITE PLAN NOTES Sheet 1 of 3: The following revisions correspond with comment letter November 13, 1997, Comments: 5, 6, 7, 8 A. "No proposed signs and outdoor lighting tire proposed with this phol". Also, the existing lighting fixtures located on the structure were noted on the plan. B. "No outdoor trash receptacles or outdoor storage areav are proposed with this plan. " 2. Notes added to ZONING NOTES sheet 1 of 3: The following revisions correspond with comment letter November 13, 1997, Comments: 9, 10, Sheet 1 of 2, A, B, C, F A. The proposed use was added: Apparel and Accessory (SCI #56) B. The zoning was changed to B 1 classification. C. Maximum height was noted: 35' D. The required number of parking spaces was noted Pf fR`AJ& Corporate Offices Chantilly, Virginia Virginia Offices Bridgewater Leesburg Virginia Beach Winchester Woodbridge laboratory Chantilly Engineers Surveyors Planners & landscape Architects Mr. Eric R. Lawrence December 15, 1997 Page 2 • • E. The provided number of parking spaces was noted. F. Parking surface note was revised to refer to the pavement section detail located on Sheet 3 of 3. 3. The existing deck and shed west of the existing one story building were noted (`Tloi to be Tlsed " (Comments: 9, 10, Sheet 1 of 2; B, F) 4. A landscaping plan has been provided. This plan also includes cross section profiles. (Comments: 18, 19, Sheet I of 2; 1, 3, D, E) Please note this plan complies with the fax sent to PI-IR&A on 12/12/97 by Mr. Lawrence (Frederick County Planning) for the location, type and caliper of plantings. 5. The parking lot curb was revised to a rolled asphalt curb as requested by Mr. Powers (Client). (Comment; 4) 6. The entire building footage was used to calculate the parking requirements. (Comment; F) Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Cordially, PATTON HARRIS RUST AND ASSOCIATES A Professional Corporation /)J� John �. Hash Senior Project Manager ENCL: JDH/QLR;krf: g- i,i P1`1A.L Au"d Quentin 7 L. Royer Designer 0 COMMONWEALTH of VIRQI IA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 December 17, 1997 'Sot 1�® N6 8 L g JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-5600 FAX(540)984-5607 Mr. Quentin Royer Ref: SEO Property C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, p.c. Route 522 P. O. Box 45 Frederick County Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear Quentin: We have received your revised site plan dated December 13, 1997 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. The appropriate land use permits may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 522 right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJ S/rf xc: Mr. R. B. Childress Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely, Bar J! Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For- Robert B. Childress Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING "R COMMONWEALTH of VlRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 1,1031 OLD VALLEY PIKE CO,MWISSIONER P O- BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 July 23,1997 Mr. John D. Hash, Sr. Project Manager Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc P. O. Box 46 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear john: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984.5600 FAX (540) 984.5607 Ref: Seo Property PHR & A #9778-10 Route 522 South Frederick County I have received your July 16, 1997 letter concerning the conveyance of right-of-way at the referenced location. I have forwarded your letter and survey plat to our District Right -of -Way Manger, Mr. Bob Ryder, in Staunton for review. Once I receive any comments I will forward them onto you. In the meantime if you have any questions, please let me know. RBC/ rf xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely, Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING • COMMONWEALTH of `V IRGINIA RANDOLPH L. GORDON, M.D., M.P.H. Department of Health ROCKBRIDGE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER COMMISSIONER Office of Water Programs 131 WALKER STREET LEXINGTON, VIRGINIA 24450-2431 Environmental Engineering Field Office PHONE: (540) 463-7136 FAX: (540) 463-3892 1 October 1997 SUBJECT: Frederick County Sewerage - NPDES Permits (Eun Sook Seo Property) Mr. Eun Sook Seo 2968 Second Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr, Seo: Plans and specifications for the installation of a wastewater treatment system to serve the Eun Sook Seo property in Frederick County, as prepared by Bushman Engineering, P.C., Toms Brook, Virginia, have been reviewed by this office. The plans Include Sheets 1 of 2 through 2 of 2 titled "Seo Property, Sand Filtration System, Frederick County, Virginia", and dated September 1997. The specifications are contained on the plan sheets. The project consists of the installation of a 300 gallon per day septic tank -sand filter system consisting of a septic tank, 13 gpm recirculation pump station, two 40 square foot sand filters, and chlorination, dechlorination, and post -aeration facilities. Discharge from the project will be to Opequon Creek, Potomac River Subbasin, Potomac River Basin. Based upon our review, the subject plans and specifications provide sufficient Information for the proper Installation of the proposed units. These plans and specifications are acceptable to this Department with the condition that a copy of the maintenance contract with a person/firm capable of performing the required maintenance be provided prior to the Issuance of the certificate to operate. The maintenance contract must provide, as a minimum, the conducting of effluent testing, complete repair of the treatment system within a specified time period following notification of needed repair, and remain effective for at least 24 months with provisions to renew through the duration of the NPDES General Permit. The contract must be kept In force at all times and renewed upon expiration. The attached information provides more details on the above -mentioned condition. This document constitutes your Certificate to Construct under the general permit that has been Issued. Upon completion of this project, you are required to submit a Statement of Completion (see Enclosure 1) as prepared by the installation contractor and obtain a Certificate to Operate prior to placing the system into operation. This certificate does not relieve you of the responsibility of operating the facility In a consistent manner to meet the facility performance requirements, or the responsibility for the correction of design and/or operation deficiencies, nor does this certificate relieve you from meeting all other laws and regulations as may be applicable. 0 0 Mr. Eun Sook Seo 2 1 October 1997 SUBJECT: Frederick County Sewerage - NPDES Permits (Eun Sook Seo Property) If you should have any questions, please contact Harold T. Eberly, District Engineer, In this office at 540/463-7136. Very truly yours, r Ronald E. Conner, P.E. Engineering Field Director HTE/bt/97100101.doc cc Bushman Engineering, P.C. - Attn: David L. Bushman Frederick County Health Department VDH - Richmond Central ourib wuI= f-AI :IpA.N DATE _J' b TIME P. K PHONE CALL f=0H _ OATE TIME�t__ "M. N/j . ONED FAX `8 URNED PHONE ❑ M013t E r VR CALL AREA UUE NUMUE" ECTEMESSAGESE CALL L CALL I GAIN ME TO E YOU NTS TO E YOU SIGNED URM 4003 0 • 1 SEO Property Site Plan #025-97 Site Plan Actions July 23, 1997 Application package submitted to Frederick County. Application stated that a "video store" is the proposed use. Application stated that the site was zoned "B 1 ". Staff initiated first review of preliminary site plan. August 12, 1997 Planning staff completed preliminary site plan review #1. The review identified 28 specific items that are required to be shown on the site plan. Letter mailed to the applicant's engineer, Dave Walsh of PHR&A. Red - lined site plan included in mailing to further identify necessary site plan information. August 18, 1997 (Approximate date of conversation). Dave Walsh of PHR&A contacts this office to confirm receipt of letter. During this conversation, staff and Mr. Walsh agreed as to how the identified comments of August 12th letter will be addressed, August 22, 1997 Engineer faxed a revised parking lot layout and landscape plan to the Planning Department for comment. Telephone conversation between Staff and Engineer followed fax receipt. September 19, 1997 Staff receives letter dated September 17, 1997, from Mark Petrovich, Attorney for the applicant. Letter questions the staff review letter dated August 12, 1997. In particular, Mr. Petrovich questions the number of comments generated by the staff review. October 1, 1997 Staff replies to Mr. Petrovich's letter, reaffirming that each staff comment is necessary and is required of site plans submitted to Frederick County. Offers to meet with Mr. Petrovich and Mr. Walsh, PHR&A, to further discuss concerns. October 29, 1997 Staff receives revised site plan (submission #2) and DEQ permit information. DEQ information is not a permit for operation, but states that N this site qualifies for coverage under the General Permit for Small Sewage Discharges. Property owner is required to obtain authorization from the Virginia Department of Health for the construction and operation of the sewage treatment facility. November 13, 1997 Staff reviews site plan submission #2. This review identifies numerous items from review letter #1, dated August 12, 1997, that have not been addressed. Further concerns are identified that have resulted from the applicant's revisions. These new concerns include: Property Zoning. Previously the preliminary site plan indicated that the site was Zoned B 1. Preliminary site plan submission #2 indicates that the property is zoned B2. Staff has researched the zoning for this site; official zoning is B 1. Proposed Use. Previously the preliminary site plan indicated that the proposed use would be "Video Store". Preliminary site plan submission #2 indicates that the proposed use is "Seniors Consignment Store." Staff requests that a "Seniors Consignment Store" be defined so that staff may confirm that such a use is permitted in the B 1 zoning district. Landscape Plan. The landscaping plan has been modified; does not comply with ordinance requirements. This site is required to provide parking lot landscaping, and buffer and screening to protect adjoining residential properties. The submitted site plan does not comply with either of these landscape requirements. December 5, 1997 Engineer faxed a revised landscape plan to the Planning Department for comment. December 10, 1997 Telephone conversation between Staff and Engineer. Staff stated that the landscape plan does not comply with the landscape buffer and screening requirements. Staff inquired into what use is actually proposed for this site; engineer stated "clothing sales". (Note: The proposed use has been changed for the third time.) Staff mails letter and diagram to PHR&A illustrating the necessary landscape buffer and screening requirements. U:\L• RIC\COI`4\40N\SI'I'GPLAMSGO-I-IIS'I'.WPD %S I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 December 10, 1997 Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C. Attn.: David Walsh 116 North Main Street Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review #3 - Seo Property Site Plan #025-97 Dear Dave: On December 5, 1997, I received a fax from Quentin Royer of the PHR&A -Bridgewater Office. This fax was in reference to the proposed landscape plan for this site. I spoke with you via telephone on December 10, 1997, and further discussed the landscape requirements. The landscape plan that I received identified the location of the required landscape buffers but this plan did not contain an adequate number and type of plantings to comply with zoning ordinance requirements. The Zoning Ordinance's buffer and screening section requires that screening and distance buffers be utilized to reduce the impact a proposed use may have on the surrounding properties. This site will be required to implement a Category `B" buffer to protect the adjoining properties. The submitted site plan indicates your intent to utilize a Full Screen and a Landscape Screen that will comply with the Category `B" requirements. Please revise the landscape plan to comply with the buffer and screening requirements. The following has been excerpted from the ordinance, and should be of use in designing the landscape plan. 0 A Landscape Screen consists of a totally landscaped easement at least ten (10) feet in depth. Within this easement, there shall be a minimum density of three (3) plants per ten (10) linear 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 n Page 2 Walsh, David RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review #3 - Seo Property Site Plan #025-97 December 10, 1997 feet, and they shall be at least four (4) feet in height at planting. There shall be at least 3 species of plants, with the majority being evergreen and at least 1/3 being deciduous. ❑ A Full Screen includes all the elements of a landscape screen and also includes a six-foot high, opaque hedge, fence, wall, mound, or berm. Enclosed is a sketch of an acceptable landscape plan that addresses both parking and the buffer and screening requirements. Please revise the landscape plan to include the necessary elements required by the buffer and screening section of the zoning ordinance. I may be contacted with any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, r Eric R. Lawrence Planner II Enclosure ERL/bah U:\ERIC\CONINION\SITEPLAN\.SE04.REV Aft mr O � � �cl II O W O O O O O O C r per, O I -In r-J !',ri �i � i", %.�, fly 'arY�,���1i'�iLi:�: s' � (��(�, � •, ���� �� ` j 0 • t4t 64 G warn s C (lZ vtil— ..j Cfxr"V-ti 0 P 14 2 �� 5 18 7z-4 9 g 19 48 arkins Mills 79 20 9 9 PA . 2 g3B g� 93 239 - 333 y, 2377 364 90p, g6A West Parkins Mi Rood Rt. g7D 130 A A 97C 13 97 97B g7 A Greek 6 4 Page Cou't 5 C g 8 er -� i' A-2 B-2 B� - 530 000 �09-79) \, (004-76) � .,Q \ n � FEET ,(QJ� 645 7 - � � Tom--� .. •l " \ L 7 x736 : ° —4333 '693 l4_2 Y $Mills .� 9 ee f 4332 `�- ° 1� • ' 3c° � �� vas �� ar� �1 oo i/�yfo r �.� � — / \ -i r� Opp i0 lisesdanis ' • i 65b" S aAlseen 0 4331 734 N 11 !3 All O _ _ _ .>< _ ' n ° " 'ems"• Zo o is \ k.7 636a a , lisle Pit08 r 'i���' L/,Oo 430 51 95 f Q,� Armel '0'�v . 4329 /1'( ° • �e J l �; Run �- 72 —2 1-79) Z. • 677� O ✓ 1 ,� 700 � g • � - ; r. ° 4' a �O �� ► _ JS C� o g 4328 lw CJ E § 165-35 FREDERICK COUNTY CODE § 165-37 the emissions of smoke, particulate matter, odors and other gaseous pollutants. G. Water pollution. No use shall be allowed which does not conform with the regulations of the Virginia State Water Control Board and the Virginia Department of Health concerning the discharge of liquid, toxic or other wastes into surface waters or the soil. H. Noise. In the M 1 Light Industrial or M2 Industrial General Zoning District, sound levels at the perimeter boundary of a development shall not exceed seventy-five (75) dba (A scale). § 165-36. Landscaping. A. All portions of developments requiring site plan approval shall be appropriately landscaped to enhance the appearance, character and value of development in the county. Landscaping shall be provided to reduce the visibility of paved areas from surrounding properties, to minimize noise and glare, to provide shade and to improve the general appearance of the lot to be developed. B. In any development requiring site plan approval, any part of a lot not used for buildings, structures, parking. loading, driveways or walkways shall contain a ground cover including grass, trees, flowers, shrubs or other landscaping materials which shall be maintained in a healthy condition. § 165-37. Buffer and screening requirements. [Amended 6-13-1990] It is the intent of the regulations of this section to encourage proper design of a site in order to protect adjacent existing uses and to protect proposed uses within the site. Certain types of uses must be buffered from other types in order to ensure a desirable living environment. Additionally, appropriate distances must be maintained between commercial, industrial and residential uses and roads. A. Distance buffers. Distance buffers are based on the nature of an activity and its proximity to an activity of a different nature. They are linear distances measured from property lines inward. Part of the buffer must 16558 • • L _ ,Z1la/�� "Vvl v-" toe ,13r i w aAn ►vi rry e �o IM1 c uvu va rP�vlG2 u . cl—v • 0 § 165-37 ZONING § 165-37 be inactive and part may be active. The inactive portion begins at the adjoining property line, as shown in the example diagrams.' (1) Inactive distance buffer. This portion of a buffer area permits no activity except the necessary utility functions provided by transmission lines, underground conduits, etc. (2) Active distance buffer. This portion of a buffer area may not be encroached by a building or other principal structure or activity. However, accessory activities, such as parking, are permitted in this area. Active buffers shall not contain road rights -of -way. Adjacent structures shall be considered structures on the same or abutting properties or structures in the same general vicinity. (3) Wherever proposed developments are adjacent to or within one thousand (1,000) feet of the boundaries of existing uses, the Planning Commission may require increased or additional distance buffers to separate different uses to achieve the intentions of this section. B. Screening. Screening is designed to work with distance buffers to lessen the impact of noise or visual interaction between adjacent activities. There are two (2) levels of screening: landscape screening and full screening. The higher the level of screening provided, the lower the level of distance buffer required. The example diagrams show how this works.2 (1) Landscape screening. A landscape screen consists of a totally landscaped easement at least ten (10) feet in depth. Within the easement, there shall be a minimum landscaping density of three (3) plants per ten (10) linear feet, and they shall be at least four (4) feet in height at planting and intended to reach a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. There shall be at least three (3) species of plants, with the majority being evergreens and at least one- third (W) being deciduous. Where natural barriers, topography or other features achieve the functions of the landscape screen, the requirement may be waived by the Planning Commission. (2) Full screen. A full screen provides all the elements of a landscape screen and also includes a six -foot -high, opaque hedge, fence, ' Editor's Note: The diagrams detailing example buffers and screening are included at the end of this chapter. Z Editor's Note: The diagrams detailing example buffers and screening are included at the end of this chapter. 16559 6-25-94 • i § 165-37 FREDERICK COUNTY CODE § 165-37 wall, mound or berm. A woodland strip of fifty (50) feet may be allowed as a full screen. As with landscape screens, if natural barriers, topography or other features achieve the functions of the full screen, the requirement may be waived by the Planning Commission, and the requirement may be changed to maintain highway sight distances. (3) Wherever proposed developments are adjacent to existing uses, the Planning Commission may require additional landscaping or landscaped easements to separate different uses and to achieve the intentions of this section. C. (Amended 5-11-19941 Residential separation buffers. Perimeter and interior residential separation buffers shall be established to adequately buffer single-family detached traditional and cluster dwellings from other housing types. The function of the perimeter separation buffer shall be to adequately separate different housing types within adjoining developments, while the interior separation buffer shall adequately separate different housing types within mixed - use developments. The requirements for perimeter and interior residential separation buffers are as follows: (1) Perimeter single-family separation buffers. (a) Wherever possible and practical, single-family detached traditional and cluster structures shall not be placed adjacent to other types of residential lots or structures. If other types of residential structures must be placed adjacent to single- family detached traditional and cluster dwellings, the following buffers are required: Distance Buffer Required Inactive Active Screening (Minimum) (Maximum) Total Provided (feet) (feet) (feet) Full screen 75 25 100 Landscape screen 150 50 200 No screen 350 50 400 (b) Buffers shall be placed between the lot line of the lot containing the single-family detached traditional and cluster structures or lots designated by an approved master 16560 6-25-94 r 0 November 13, 1997 Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C. Attn.: David Walsh 116 North Main Street Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review #2 - Seo Property Site Plan #025-97 Dear Dave: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development S40/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 I have reviewed the above referenced site plan received by this office on October 29, 1997. The following comments were included in my review letter dated August 12, 1997, and continue to need to be addressed in order to proceed with approval of this site plan. Each item should be addressed; if you believe the item does not pertain to this site, please state so on the site plan. Please provide: 5) The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 6) Location, height, specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 7) Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 8) Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure(fencing, etc) required to enclosed receptacles. A concrete pad should also be provided within the enclosure. 9) The height of all buildings and structures. 10) The proposed use of each building, structure, and area. [...It is my understanding that a deck exists on the rear of the building. Please identify this feature... ] 18) Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. Information such as type, quantity, minimum caliper/height should be included. 19) Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections of profiles. 20) Update the `Revisions' box with each review agency's revisions dates and the date of approval. State which agency's comments have been addressed. Sheet 1 of 2 1) Illustrations of how/where required screening and buffer will be installed. This is typically accomplished by including a detailed landscape plan. The areas requiring a `Full Screen' will need to include a 6-foot opaque element (fence or berm). 107 North Kent Street • Winchester. Virginin 22601-5000 E r� L Seo Property Preliminary Site Plan Review #2 Page 2 November 13, 1997 3) Illustrate the location, plant type, size, quantity necessary to satisfy parking lot landscape requirement, and to screen headlamps from adjoining properties. 4) The parking lot should be provided with curb and gutter. Please illustrate type and specify location. The following are concerns that have been generated and identified as a result of revision #1: A. The zoning for this property is B 1 (Neighborhood Business). This was properly labeled as B 1 on the July 23, 1997 submission. The most recent submission indicates that the property is zoned B2. If it is your intention to utilize B2, a rezoning of this property must be granted by the Board of Supervisors. Please let me know if you intend to submit a rezoning application to the County. If this is your intention, this site plan will not be approved until the appropriate zoning district is granted. B. The "Proposed Use" on this site plan has been changed. In the July 23, 1997 submission, the proposed use was for a Video Store, a permitted use in the B 1 District. The "Proposed Use" on the October 29, 1997 submission has been changed to a "Seniors Consignment Store." Before we are able to determine if this use is permitted in the B 1 District, we need to obtain a better understanding as to what exactly is involved in such a use. I would ask that you provide a statement explaining the proposed use so that it may be classified within the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code system. C. All parking areas are to be treated with a bituminous concrete surface. Please modify the pavement type under the "Zoning Notes" heading. D. A landscape plan satisfying the ordinance requirements for parking lots, and buffer and screening is necessary. Such a plan should include: tree calculations (how many are required); how many are provided; the size of the provided trees and bushes; and the location each is to be planted. My initial calculations for parking lot landscaping indicate that 10 shade trees and 56 evergreen bushes are required around the parking lot perimeter. Plant sizes are: 2 inch calipers for deciduous trees, 4-6 foot high evergreen trees, and 36-inch heigh evergreen bushes, all measured at time of planting. Because of the amount of information to be included on the landscape plan, it should be provided on a separate sheet. E. Details of the proposed buffer and screening requirements. The plan ("Landscaper Buffer Schematic") indicates that a buffer type "B" is required, and will be provided in the form of a Full Screen and a Landscape Screen. Please provide the location and • Seo Property Preliminary Site Plan Review #2 Page 3 November 13, 1997 details of this buffer. Details of the board -on -board fence should also be included on this plan. All fence requirements and plantings should be placed to utilize the benefits of the topography; don't place these screening elements at the property's low points. Enclosed are the planting requirements for buffers and screening. F. What is the size of the building? The information included in the "Zoning Notes" section states the building is 1,334 square feet. The trip generation figure states that the building is 2,000 square feet. Please correct as necessary. Please revise your site plan to address the above comments and the comments provided to you by the review agencies. You will also need to provide this office with the approved comment sheets from all required review agencies. The required review agencies include: Virginia Department of Transportation, Inspections Department, County Engineer, Fire Marshal, County Health Department, Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Planning Department. Once all comments have been addressed, please resubmit two copies of the revised site plan to this department for final review. If the revised site plan satisfies all agency comments, we will request five copies of the final site plan and recommend this revised site plan for approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, r Eric R. Lawrence Planner I1 ERL/cc Attachment U \ERIO.CO\I\ION\SrrEPLAN�SEOJ REV ' S7OR" WA 71 R 1 1 UEIE-N17ON /JAV/y _� A I , ' Pons r Af RA mrw !A VAt ! .{. I � ? �• �{') •D�LY•IIt.A1'/Nr17I!fw J,, ,, ,,, I, 1 -` a a - cavrACr 7ANh , 1 r nl ,• 1 14. _ .. 4 UWI CRINA IOle 1 n yiNl; .17 £6N- CfEEAWQ 00 r- R ;/ o :�'J4 s; I _lam `-.v�sPbr 1. b z 1 1 , q �1.. ,pb J /iOno 57ORr SLOG :no C • 7; r ` ' -- !` L - — ? ' S Woof ,00 �' - - - --- -- • ' wor ('c-12 t _ 1 X. GRA VE• L o o r 11 _ ` VALL HE 170-0`0 WO 0000 �'"GYi-7 000 07 A t L; I RE71/O-._ . EX. FWK 55 MPH SPE i l�) / ._--- s�c>SIGN- -- --- - _ T DO yYAL ME �Pos 7E v � ALL B REZOCATED " 522 ALL S17E- LIG1417NG SHALL HE D/RECIED DOWMAR05 r D/S r I oho, / ANU A WAY FROM AOJaM/NG LAND. �1jty�/Jb lei (/1�hJ%fir f -//-..qi lCpS T 10 Cgx, par. \ 1 r f r.`- l `h�` / r z 1 r t i! 7R/P GENERA 776W (US/NI £X. CURB • anT LEAST Cj(o E VEn[-FEFA FS ` LAND USE.- SUOPP/NG Cf (r D/R. SIGN GROSS LEASABLE SPACY- COMMONWEALTH of VIRQ INIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824.0278 October 30,1997 Mr. George I. Staber, Jr., P.E. C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, Inc. P. O. Box 46 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear George: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-5600 FAX (540)984.5607 Ref: SEO Property Route 522 Frederick County We have reviewed the revised site plan dated October 29, 1997 for the referenced project. We have the following comments as shown in red on the plan: • A Standard Type CG-11 entrance note should be added in the entrance area. The 12' wide pavement addition should be from existing edge of pavement to the first edge of gutter. When you have addressed the above comments, please resubmit five copies of revised plans for review and approval. If you have any questions, please call. BJS/ rf Enclosure xc: Mr. R. B. Childress Mr. S. A. Melnikoff _Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Robert B. Childress Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 116 North Main Street, PO Box 46, Bricipmter, VVig 22812 • TeL 540 828.2616 Fax 540 828-6437 Patton Hams Rust & Associates, pc -R) Frederick County Planning RE Seo Property 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. Eric Lawrence ArraMON TRANSMITTAL October 29, 1997 FAT 9778-10 IIIJ: A Hand VIA D. Walsh/krf IN VV4 Qt'ANUn' FILE NO. DXrL DESCRIPTION TRANSMrM-,D ® Herewith 1 Revised Site Plan ❑ Under Separate Cover 1 DEO Permit MATFRIAL ❑ Originals ® Photocopies ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ® Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia ❑ Disk(s) P1 JRPOSE ® Approval ❑ Your Usc ❑ Your Files ❑ Please Return ❑ Please Submit UCEIVFD BY DATF 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6867 • PURPLES DISCOUNTERS • Ownp Ar14 Go.9.ar COMMONWEALTH of VIRC41NIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL. QUAIJTY Valley Regional Office "Nor— D-4130P Strwer wddrrrf: 4411 Early Road, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 3wamy of Nemw R4VOWM MallimS&"mi; Po Box 1129, Harrisonburg, Virginia 72A01-1129 Ttlepho" (S40) 574-7800 Fax (540) 57&7879 brevJ/..., -. deq.aaes.va-vs July 21, 1997 Mr- Eun Sook Seo 2968 Second Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Purples VPDES General Permit No. VAG401815 Dear Mr. Seo: TLomu L Hopwas Director R. Bradky Che ruing, P E VaLpty Rcponal Du«tor We have reviewed the permit application referenced on the attached Facility Information Form and determined that it qualifies for coverage under the General Permit for Small Sewage Discharges. If our determi- nation of the applicable Part I.A. page is incorrect, please let me know. Please submit a revised Registration Statement to this office if any of the information on your original "submittal changes or is found to be incorrect. For a property transfer, please submit a completed copy of the enclosed Transfer of Ownership form at least 30 days prior to the transfer. Coverage under the General Permit does not relieve you of your responsibility to obtain authorization from the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) for the construction and operation of the sewage treatment facilities_ For this facility, the appropriate VDH office is Office of Water Programs, Rockbridge Square Shopping Center, 131 Walker Street, Lexington, Virginia 24450 (phone: 540-463-7136). Sincerely, B. Keith Fowler Regulatory Services Engineer Enclosure CC: VDH-Lexington Correspondence File r, RFccr�� W., An Agency of the Natural Resources Secretariat �r vi El 21 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6867 • PURPLES DISCOUNTERS 0 PAGE 03 VPDES General .Permit No. VAG401815 Tax Map ID # 76-2-A County Health Department ID # 97018080 Property: Prvt - Purples Owner: Eun Sook Seo Telephone: (540) 667-6867 Mailing Address: 2968 Second Street Winchester, VA 22601 Property Location: U.S. 522 x Rt. 644, Parkins Mille County: 069 Application Complete: 19970718 Approved for GP Coverage: 19970721 Receiving Stream: opequon Creek classification: A A = Stream 7Q10 > 0.200 MGD B = Stream 7Q10 < 0.200 MGD C Stream is dry for < 500 feet before reaching a permanent stream. D = Stream is dry for > 500 feet from the discharge point. This facility is subject to the effluent limitations specified in Part I.A., Page 2 of 3. (Disregard other Part I.A. page.) Part I.A.1 (PAGE 1) = Effluent dechlorination and post -aeration ARE REQUIRED. Part I.A.2 (PAGE 2) - Effluent dechlorination and post -aeration ARE NOT required. 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6B67 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS • PAGE 04 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY General Permit No.: VAG401815 Effective Date: August 1, 1996 Expiration Date: August 1, 2001 GENERAL PERMIT FOR DOMESTIC SEWAGE DISCHARGES LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1,000 GALLONS PER DAY AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, owners of domestic sewage discharges with a design flow of less than or equal to 1,000 gallons per day on a monthly average are authorized to discharge to surface waters within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Virginia, except those specifically named in Board Regulations or Policies which prohibit such discharges. The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with this cover page, Part I - Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements, Part II - Monitoring and Reporting Requirements, and Part III - Management Requirements, as set forth herein. ;r U L L n e ,J D D n n J J L e D L Pornit No. VAGfO Part I Pape 1 01 I A. MT LIMITATIONS AND IIANITIORING REQUIREMENIS T. During the period beginning with the permit's effectivt data and bating until the permit's expirstlon dais, the parmittee Azad to schorge from outfolt serial number 001 to receiving waters where either: a) the 7010 flow is zero and the discharge t less than S00 before it reaches receiving waters with 7Q10 flow greater then zero; or b) the 7410 flaw Is greater than zero than 0.2 M D. Such rgas shall be limited and monitored by the permittet so specified below: (MVEN1 C UST OISCHAROE LIMITATIONS MAU I T NO ft. f R N N Instantaneous Instantaneous Minimm Nuissal nc 5#Vlt Tt9e F(oM (140)MA ML 1/year Estimate • gODS MA 30 ng/l 1/ysar Grob Totet Suspended Solids MA 30 vq/( 1/year Grob Total Residual Chlorine** After contact tank l Y 1/yetr Grab Final effluent NA -detectable llyear Grob Fecal Coliform lacteris•aa NA 200/100 nt 1/year Grab pM (standard units) 6.0 9.0 1/year Grab Oissolved Oxygen 1/year Grab NL s go Limitation, alonitoring ed NA ■ Not ApptiCabGe • The design flow of thi otment facility is loss than or equal to 1,000 go per day •` Applies only wh ine is used for disinfection. • Applies on( methods other than chlorine are used for disinfection. Continuous di tion capability shall be protiided In order to maintain effluent limit. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible 2. Schedule of Compliance This compliance schedule shall be allowed only for treatment works that were existing on the effective due of this general permit. Treatment works constructed after the permit effective date are expected to comply with the 5mirations and conditions of the general permit from the date of coverage. The perminee shall install equipment or unit processes or make other physical modifications to the treatment works that are necessary to achieve compliance with the limitations and cooditions of this permit within I80 days of the dau of coverage under the permit. The modifications shall nor be initiated until written authorization is first provide, by the Department of Health or the Department of EnvirotunenW Quality. The permitter shall submit to the Department of Environmental Quality Regioaal Office a written notice certifying completion of any necessary modifications on or before the 180 day compliance deadline. If the permittee is unable to meet the deadline, a written notice shalt be submitued which shall include the cause of the delay, any remedial actions taken, and the projected date for compliance. Sawling and Analysis Methods 1. Samples and measurements taken as required by this permit shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored activity. 2. Unless otherwise specified in the permit all simple preservation methods, maximum holding times and analysis methods for pollutants shall comply with requirements set forth in Guidelines Establishins TesttProcedures for the Analysis of pollutants Under the Cleam Water Act as published in the Federal Register (40 CFR 136). 3. The sampling and analysis program to demonstrate compliance with the permit shall at a minimum, conform to Part I of this Permit. 4. The permittee shall periodically calibrate and petfotza maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at intervals that will insure accuracy of measurements. For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the permittee shall record the following information: The dale, exact place and time of sampling or The pefson(s) who performed the sampling or The persoo(s) who performed each analysis; The analytical techniques or methods used; and Permit No. VAG40 Part III Page 2of7 C. Adverse Impact The permittcc shall take all feasible steps to minimize any adverse impact to State waters resulting from noncompliance with any Limitation(s) and/or conditions specified in this permit, and shall perform and report such accelerated or additional monitoring as is necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying limitations) and/or conditions. D. Duty to Halt. Reduce Activity or to Miti2at I. It shall not be a defense for L perminee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. 2. The perminee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize, correct or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment E. Structural Stability The structural stability of any of the units or parts of the treatment works herein permitted is the sole responsibility of the permittee and the failure of such structural units or parts shall not relieve the permittee of the responsibility of complying with all terms and conditions of this permit. F. 13ypassirie Any bypass ("Bypass - mans intentional diversion of waste streams from any portoon of a treatment works") of the treatment works herein permitted is prohibited. G. Compliance With State and Federal Law Compliance with this permit during its term constitutes compliance with the State Water Control Law and the Clean Water Act. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action under, or relieve the parnittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any other State law or regulation or under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Clean Water Act. Permit No. VAG40 Pan Ill Page 3 of 7 H. 1roperty Rights The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal properly, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any in- fringerment of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. Severabilicy The provisions of this permit are severable. • Duty To Reregister If the permittee. wishes to be eligible to discharge under a general permit after the expiration due of this permit, the patnittee must submit a new registration statement at least 60 days prior to the expiration date of this permit. K. Right of Entry The permittee shall allow authorized state and federal represottatives, upon the presentation of credentials: 1. To enter upon the permittee's. premises on which the. establishment, treatment works or discharge(s) is located or in which any records are required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; 2. To have access to inspect and copy at reasonable times any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; 3. To inspect at rusonable times any monitoring equipment or monitoring method required in this permit; 4. To sample at reasonable times any waste strvw discharge, process stream, raw material or by-product; and S. To inspect at reasonable times any collection, treatment or discharge facilities required under this permit. Permit No. VAG40 Part III Page 4 of 7 For purposes of this section, the time for inspection shall be deemed reasonable during regular business hours, and whenever the facility is discharging. Nothing contained herein shall make an inspection time unreasonable during an emergency. L. Transferability of Permits This permit may be transferred to another person by a permittee if: 1. The current owner notifies the Department of Environmental Quality Regional Office 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of the title to the treatment works or property; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and proposed new owner containing a specific date of transfer of permit responsibilin•, coverage and liability between them; and 3. The Department does not within the 30-day time period notify the existing owner and the proposed owner of the State Water Control Board's intent to modify or revoke and reissue the permit. Such a transferred permit shall, as of the date of the transfer, be as fully effective as if it had been issued directly to the new pertnittee. M. Continuation of Expired General Permits An expired general permit continues in force and effect until a new general permit is issued. Only those treatment works authorized to discharge under the expiring -eeneral permit arc covered by the continued permit. N. Public Access to Information All information pertaining to permit processing or in reference to any source of discharge o:f any pollutant, shall be available to the public. O. Permit Modification The permit may be modified when any of the following developments occur. Permit No. VAG40 Part III Page S of 7 1. When a change is made in the promulgated standards or regulations on which the permit was based; 2. When an effluent standard or prohibition for a toxic pollutant must be incorporated in the permit in accordance with provisions of Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act; or 3. When the level of discharge of a pollutant not limited in the permit exceeds applicable Water Quality Standards or Water Quality Criteria, or the level which can be achieved by technology -based treatment requirements appropriate to the pertnittec. P. Permit Termination After public notice and opportunity for a public hearing, the general permit may be terminated for cause. Q. When an Individual Permit May Be Required The Department may require any owner authorized to discharge under this permit to apply for and obtain an individual permit. Cases where an individual permit may be required include, but art; not limited to, the following: 1. The discharger(s) is a significant contributor of pollution. 2. Conditions at the operating facility change altering the • constituents and/or chamcteristics of the discharge such that the discharge no longer qualifies for a General Permit. 3. The discharge violates the terms or conditions of this permit. 4. A change has occurred in the availability oi'demonstrated technology or practices for the control or abatement of pollutants applicable to the point source. S. Effluent limitation guidelines are promulgated for the point sources covered by this permit. m to m Z. m m (P m 00 m m M 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6867 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAUL 09 • • AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO A PROPERTY TRANSFER, please submit a completed copy of this form to your local health department and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional office, P. o. Box 1129, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22001. VPDES GENERAL PERMIT VAG40 TREATED DOMESTIC SEWAGE DISCHARGE s1000 GALLONS PER DAY We, the undersigned, do hereby agree to the transfer of coverage, responsibility, and liability under the VPDES General Permit identified above, to be effective as of (date) County Name Health Dept. ID # Tax Map # Current (Previous) Owner(a) Printed Name: Address: Telephone #: ( Signature:_ Date: Neat owner(o) Printed Name; Address: Telephone #: ( Signature: Date: Printed Name: Address: Telephone #: ( ) Signature: Date: Printed Name: Address: Telephone #: ( ) Signature: Date. 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6867 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAGE 11 4 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RANOOLPH L. GORDON, M.O., M.P.H. Department of Health ROCKORIDGE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER COMMJS6tONER Office of Water Programs 131 WALKER STREET LEXINGTON, VIRGINIA 24460-4A3i Environmental Engineering Field Office PHONE (yip) 403--M36 FAX: (5W) 463-M 1 October{ 1997 SUBJECT: Frederick County Sewerage - NPOES Permits (Eun Sook Seo Property) Mr. Eun Sook Sec 2968 Second Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Seo: Plans and specifications for the installation of a wastewater treatment system to serve the Eun Sook Seo property In Frederick County, as prepared by Bushman Engineering, P.C., Toms Brook, Virginia, have been reviewed by this office. The plants Include Sheets 1 of 2 through 2 of 2 tided 'Seo Property, Sand Filtration System, Frederick County, Vlrglnla', and dated September 1997. The spedRcatlons are contained an the plan sheets. The project consists of the Installation of a 300 gallon per day septic tank -sand filter system consisting of a septic tank, 13 gpm recirculation pump station, two 40 square foot sand filters, and chlorination, dec hlorination, and post -aeration facilities. Discharge from the project will be to Opequon Creek, Potomac River Subbasin, Potomac River Basin. Based upon our review, the subject plans and specificatlons provide sufficient information for the proper Installation of the proposed units. These plans and specifications are acceptable to this Department with the condition that a copy of the maintenance contract with a person/firm capable of perfbrming the required maintenance be provided prior to the issuance of the certificate to operate. The maintenance contract must provide, as a minimum, the conducting of effluent testing, complete repair of the treatment system within a specified time period following notification of needed repair, and remain effective for at least 24 months with provisions to renew through the duration of the NPOES General Permit. The contract must be kept In force at all times and renewed upon expiration. The attached information provides more details on the above -mentioned condition. This document constitutes your Certificate to Construct under the general permit that has been Issued. Upon completion of this project, you are required to submit a Statement of Completion (see Enclosure 1) as prepared by the Installation contractor and obtain a Certificate to Operate prior to placing the system into operation. This certlRcate does not relieve you of the responsiblilty of operating the facility In a consistent manner to meet the factifty performance requirements, or the responsibility for the correction of design and/or operation deficiencies, nor does this certificate relieve you from meeting all other laws and regulations as may be applicable.L`�6������® 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6B67 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAGE 12 Mr. Eun Sook Seo 2 1 October 1997 SUBJECT: Frederick County Sewerage - NPDES Permits (Eun Sook Seo Property) If you should have any questions, please contact Harold T. Eberiy, District Engineer, in this office at 540/463-7136. Very truly yours, �,. Ronald E. Conner, P.E. Engineering Field Dlrector HlVbt/97100101.doc cc Bushman Engineering, P.C. - Attn: David L Bushman Frederick County Health Department VDH - Rk3rmond Central 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6667 0 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS • PAGE 13 Completion Statement Commonwealth of Vkglnla Department of Health Health Department Identification Number: Name of Company/Corporation/Individual Adds Telephone Owners Name Owner's Address Location of Installation: Lot Block Section Subdivision Other I hereby certify that the discharging system has been Installed In accordance with the Certificate to Constnxt Isw (date) and is in compliance with the conditlons of the Certificate to Construct. Date Enclosure 1 Signature and Title 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6867 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAGE 14 Alternative Discharging Regulations Effective July 30, IM Page 44 Article 4. Monitoring and Maintenance Requirements § 3.11 Monitoring A. General. Discharging systems that discharge improperly treated effluent can endanger public health and threaten environmental resources. All discharging systems shall be routinely inspected and the effluent sampled to determine compliance with the effluent limitations set forth by the State Water Control Board in the General Permit All testing requirements contained in these regulations are the responsibility of the system owner to have collected, analyzed, and reported to the Department. B. Types of testing. There are two types of testing recognized by these regulations: Formal compliance testing and informal testing. Formal testing is conducted to determine either compliance or non-compliance with these regulations. Informal testing is conducted to determine compliance with these regulations and to determine when additional formal compliance testing is necessary. Informal _tes mg may support but. shall not be. the -soh basis for suspending an operation permit pursuant to § Z23 or to suspend or revoke the approval of the system pursuant to § 128 of these regulations. 1. Formal compliance testing. Effluent from all discharging systems shall be tested for the following parameters at a frequency specified in Table 3.4. Five day biochemical oxygen demand (BODE, total suspended solids, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved oxygen and total chlorine residual (measured at the outfall and in the chlorine contact chamber if dechlorination is required). The tests shall be analyzed by a laboratory certified by the E.P.A. or the SWCB to =duct self monitoring analysis to determine compliance limits for VPDES permit discharge limits. Samples shall be collected, stored, transported and analyzed in acoordance with requirements set forth in Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act as published in 40 CFR Part 136 (July 1, 1991). Z. Informal tcadn, The following tests will be conducted on the effluent, except as noted, at a frequency spedfied In Table 3.4; 30 minute settleable solids (conducted on the mixed liquor suspended solids), odor, color, pH, and chlorine (after the chlorine contact chamber). In addition, systems requiring effluent dechlorination shall be tested for dechlorination at the point of discharge. These tests shall be run in the field during routine monitoring Inspections. The criteria for satisfactory informal testing are contained in Table 3.3. 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6B67 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAGE 15 Alternative Discharging Regulations Effective )uly 30, 1992 Table 3.4 Page 46 Frequency of Mandatory Testing Beginning Six Months After System Start-up System Approval Formal Testing Informal Testing Experimental' Quarterly= Monthly Preliminary Semi -Annually= Quarterly General Annually= Semi - Annually 'Testing on systems with experimental approval shall b. a in 3 months after installation and continue for 12 or more consecutive months- The initial sample testing at 3 months shall be formal testing and the formal testing shall continue quarterly from that time forward. = Also see § 3.11.D.1 between 45 and 90 days after the original samples were collected and the results reported to the local health department. This follow-up formal compliance testing shall constitute a subsequent consecutive quarter for the purposes of determining compliance with § 2.28.B and Z28.D. Z Anytime an informal test reveals an apparent problem, additional formal or informal testing may be conducted to xevigw the effectiveness Of any repairs or adjustments. 3. Anytime the results of two consecutive formal compliance.tests as specified in 3.11.13.1 result in a violation of the effluent limitations of the General Permit, informal testing shall revert to monthly frequency until sadsfsctory results are Obtained for six consecutive months. Nothing in this section shall preclude requiring the collection of samples for formal compliance testing as described in §§ 3.11.3.1 and 3.11.C1 to determine compliance with the effluent limitations set forth in the General Permit. E. Responsibility for teatLg. The owner of each system is responsible for ensuring that the collection, analysis, and reporting of all effluent sample tests are completed in a timely fashion and in accordance with §§ 3.11 and 3.13. In 10/27/1997 09:50 540-667-6667 PURPLES DISCOUNTERS PAGE 1b Alternative Discharging Regulations Effective July 3o, 1992 Page 48 C. Elements of a maintenance contract. At a minimum each maintenance contract shall provide for the following: I. Performance of all testing required in § 3.11.13 of these regulations, unless the owner maintains a separate monitoring contract in accordance with § 3.111. 2. Full and complete repairs to the system within 48 hours of notification that repairs are needed. Any deductible provision in a maintenance agreement shall not exceed $500 in any given year for repairs (including parts and labor). 3. Twenty-four months of consecutive coverage shall be the minimum time period a maintenance contract may be valid. D. Public utility. In localities where a public service authority, sanitary district, or other public utility exists which monitors and/or maintains the systems permitted under these regulations, the requirements for the monitoring and/or maintenance contract may be waived by the Division provided the owner of the system subscribes to the service and the utility meets the minimum elements described in §§ 3.11 and 3.11 E. Quahflcationar to perform maintenance.. In order to competerrHy-evaluate system performance, collect and Interpret sample results, as well as repair and maintain discharging systems, an individual must be knowledgeable in sewage treatment processes. Therefore, after July 1, 1994 all individuals who perform maintenance on discharging systems pursuant to § 3.1Z are required to hold a valid Class IV wastewater works operator license issued by the Board For Waterworks and Wastewater Works Operators. Until July 1, 1994, individuals that can demonstrate two years of practical experience with discharging systems, with flows under 1,000 GPD, may conduct maintenance on all systems. S 3.13 Information to be reported. A. Who is t*gxmsibls for reporting. All owners issued an operation permit for a discharging system are responsible for reporting the results of all mandated testing to the Department: B. What must be reported. All formal compliance testing, informal testing, repairs, modifications, alterations, expansions and routine maintenance must be reported_ C When reports an due. All reports and test results must be submitted within, 15 working days of the sample collection. 0 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/678-0682 October 1, 1997 Mark Petrovich 8996 Burke Lake Road, 9200 Burke, Virginia 22015-1607 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review - Seo Property; Site Plan -9025-97 Dear Mr. Petrovich: I recently received your letter concerning the site plan for the Seo Property. In this letter, you expressed an interest in gaining site plan approval for the site; I too am interested in obtaining site plan approval. The challenge before us is the completion of a design and preliminary site plan which addresses the requirements outlined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and those comments of the review agencies. Once approval is gained from the review agencies, we will be able to proceed with administrative site plan approval by the Frederick County Zoning Administrator. Your letter questions a number of the comments generated during my review of the submitted preliminary site plan. I have reviewed the list of items that you believe to be either already included on the submitted site plan, or irrelevant to this site. I firmly believe that each is clearly a requirement that has yet to be, and should be, addressed on this preliminary site plan. In previous discussions with your client's engineer, Mr. Dave Walsh of PHR&A, we reviewed the comments and agreed as to how each would be addressed. I am available to meet with you to further discuss the site plan requirements. In order to more clearly understand Frederick County's site plan requirements and review process, I would suggest that Mr. Walsh be included in the discussion. Please contact me should you be interested in arranging such a meeting. Sincerely, Eric R. Lawrence Planner II ERL/bah cc: Dave Walsh, PHR&:A bc: John R. Riley, Jr., W. Harrington Smith, u:IEtttcco�nioN sr«]'L.\\ st-:o2.iu:%• County Administrator Jr., BOS Shawnee District 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 IAA 01I FICI:'S MARTIN, ARIF & PETROVICH CHARLES R. MARTIN* A Panm-r%hip of Professional Corporations MICHAEL S. ARIF$ 8996 Burke Lake Road #200 MARK 1. PETROVICH • Burke, Virginia 22015-1607 (703)323-1200 DECLAN LEONARD *ALSO ADMITTED IN WASHINGTON DC. Fax# (703) 978-1040 September 17, 1997 Mr. Eric Lawrence County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Dear Mr. Lawrence: J' o C:rjrj ( & OFCDLJNSEb- ,� W THOMA3*VALS A O AVG IInIC(�.Vi +ALSO ADMITTED IN PENNSYLVANIA Re: Preliminary Site Plan - Seo Property, Site Plan #025-97 Please be advised that this firm has been retained to represent the interests of the above referenced owner regarding obtaining approval of the above site plan. Let me first emphasize that this letter is not written in an adversarial posture. The purpose of this correspondence is simply to facilitate the approval of our client's plan. With regard to the site plan referenced above, we have reviewed the proposed plan, met with our client and discussed the matter with the engineering firm our client has hired. Initially, I would like to address the correspondence, dated August 12, 1997, you sent to Harris, Rust & Associates (a copy is attached hereto). Before explaining our position concerning each of the 28 items you listed, there were some items which we did not quite understand and therefore we question their validity. I first call your attention to items 1,4,10,11,12 and 13 on page one of your correspondence, and items 16 and 20 on page two. The information in each one of these items has already been provided on the drawings your office reviewed. If your office cannot locate where on the drawings these items are addressed, Harris, Rust & Associates would be willing to point out their location to the individual in your office who committed this oversight. As long as we can agree that these items need not be further addressed, we would not need to provide our client with an explanation as to why the department was requiring him to address eight items which have already been provided in the drawings. I next point out item 9 on page one and item 2 on page two. Item 9 refers to the height of all buildings and structures. As you are aware, there is already in existence a structure which is in the range of 10 to 15 feet in height. As you are also aware, the maximum allowable height is 35 .r feet. I am having trouble ascertaining the legitimate purpose of having an engineering firm measure the height of a building which is obviously at least 20 feet below the maximum allowed. Item 2 (on page two) refers to a guard rail for my client's proposed parking lot. This is an unusual request and does not seem to be required in other similarly constructed parking lots. Having addressed those items in more detail, the following are my clients responses to the items mentioned in your correspondence: - items 2 and 3 on page one, and items 15,17,18,19,1,3,4,5,6,7 & 8 on page two will be provided to your office-, - items 1,4,10,11,12 and 13 on page one, and items 16 and 20 on page two have already been provided to your office; - items 6,7,8 & 14 on page one are not applicable to this plan (due to the fact the physical structures referenced rn those items will not be used); - item 9 on page one is not required; - item 2 on page two; my client is willing to construct a guard rail along the sharpest curved area of the parking aisle. Please advise me if these responses would be enough to satisfy your office's requirements for my client to obtain approval of the plan. If more communication is necessary and it becomes difficult via letters or phone conversation, our firm would be agreeable to meeting with you in person. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future and obtaining approval on behalf of my client. MJP/m cc: Brent Powers Dave Walsh John Riley Very truly yours Mark Petrovich CHARLES R. MARTIN* MICHAEL S. ARIF• MARK J. PETROVICH DECLAN LEONARD *ALSO ADW= IN WASHINGTON DC Mr. Eric Lawrence LAW OFFICES MARTIN, ARIF & PETROVICH L A Partnership of Professional Corporations OF COUNSEL - "• 89% Burke Lake Road #200 Burke, Virginia 22015-1607 THOMASB. WALSH* - (703)323-1200 Fax# (703) 978-1040 ALSO ADMITTED IN PENNSYLVANIA September 17, 1997 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Re: Preliminary Site Plan - Seo Property, Site Plan #025-97 Dear Mr. Lawrence: Please be advised that this firm has been retained to represent the interests of the above referenced owner regarding obtaining approval of the above site plan. Let me first emphasize that this letter is not written in an adversarial posture. The purpose of this correspondence is simply to facilitate the approval of our client's plan. With regard to the site plan referenced above, we have reviewed the proposed plan, met with our client and discussed the matter with the engineering firm our client has hired. Initially, 1 would like to address the correspondence, dated August 12, 1997, you sent to Harris, Rust & Associates (a copy is attached hereto). Before explaining our position concerning each of the 28 items you listed, there were some items which we did not quite understand and therefore we question their validity. I first call your attention to items 1,4,10,11,12 and 13 on page one of your correspondence, and items 16 and 20 on page two. The information in each one of these items has already been provided on the drawings your office reviewed. If your office cannot locate where on the drawings these items are addressed, Harris, Rust & Associates would be willing to point out their location to the individual in your office who committed this oversight. As long as we can agree that these items need not be further addressed, we would not need to provide our client with an explanation as to why the department was requiring him to address eight items which have already been provided in the drawings. I next point out item 9 on page one and item 2 on page two. Item 9 refers to the height of all buildings and structures. As you are aware, there is already in existence a structure which is in the range of 10 to 15 feet in height. As you are also aware, the maximum allowable height is 35 � • i feet. I am having trouble ascertaining the legitimate purpose of having an engineering firm measure the height of a building which is obviously at least 20 feet below the maximum allowed. Item 2 (on page two) refers to a guard rail for my client's proposed parking lot. This is an unusual request and does not seem to be required in other similarly constructed parking lots. Having addressed those items in more detail, the following are my clients responses to the items mentioned in your correspondence: - items 2 and 3 on page one, and items 15,17,18,19,1,3,4,5,6,7 & 8 on page two will be provided to your office; - items 1,4,10,11,12 and 13 on page one, and items 16 and 20 on page two have already been provided to your office; - items 6,7,8 & 14 on page one are not applicable to this plan (due to the fact the physical stn:ctures referenced in those items will not be used); - item 9 on page one is not required; - item 2 on page two; my client is willing to construct a guard rail along the sharpest curved area of the parking aisle. Please advise me if these responses would be enough to satisfy your office's requirements for my client to obtain approval of the plan. If more communication is necessary and it becomes difficult via letters or phone conversation, our firm would be agreeable to meeting with you in person. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future and obtaining approval on behalf of my client. Very truly yours Mark Petrovich MJP/m cc: Brent Powers Dave Walsh John Riley S�'�n► i SeEaL t4a"r s 1&4"/MTV SEAL EIf"457 Cs -,-us �PK ) i 67— p1o,r P neJ % A E' (O • pS i� of 'Dvi c.�.��c.� = yr. ✓�r�� f�—�.. ��Efl �coe-^ •7a ��-r-�,. �....1 C— �p,.. rv.lC. �Lo+4b. • Cam) l�Er,, T - d3� l3�T L.t11-47- � S ,pc� o n L F•4/Z � l3� v-rtc,�rir� —7 �•w��-�-TEc c� f�„•--, w-•�� CTs ptua/L� b4.•.A6LJ (Z.srv,,.s.as�K ! G r Pic,C �(r • AAr� 1� I �V C-4-lw- ZS#v C (>;.- -tt- RTir/ e- --,:? I.%tpwj oDdi�o + ct r P�ai./ �Z o� c.�� �� = c�d�.•A M -9 D r ScJ1sO-d f3 � Pao �� � 4 % F..f -rr-�i. L•i %b G.j AI"�v� �- tea- s �-� � � � 0 9 LlG- 1-1TS H TS� S7'c✓-zAG-F. "� S i /�7 �� 1JdT .�c�✓,Jf�� 14- (ZE COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 August 24, 1997 Mr. George I. Staber, Jr., P.E. Patton, Harris, Rust and Associates, P.C. 116 North Main Street Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 RE: Site Plan Comments - SEO Property Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Staber: Based on our review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: Sheet 1 of 2 Submission of a copy of the discharge permit for the on -site treatment plant issued by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to this office will be required before final approval of the site plan will be granted. 2. It will be necessary to submit a copy of the Virginia Department of Transportation Right -of -Way agreement to this office before gaining final approval of the site plan. Evaluate the impact of the existing bridge opening at Route 522 to determine whether backwater from a 100 year and 10 year storm will inundate the stormwater pond and the septic system. The existing bridge opening represents the controlling restriction for the flow on the Opequon Creek. 4. Verify the stability of the proposed two (2) horizontal to one (1) vertical fill slopes. In addition, indicate the proposed method of stabilizing these slopes in relation to erosion and the potential effect of backwater from the Route 522 bridge abutment. Provide stormwater calculations for the proposed stormwater/sediment basin. The stormwater pond should be designed to release ten-year post - developed storm flows at a two-year pre -developed rate. In addition, the 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 proposed eight (8) inch PVC outlet pipe is highly susceptible to clogging. We recommend revising the design to reflect the use of a different inlet structure to prevent the occurrence of clogging. Also, it will be necessary to provide a detail and cross-section of the stormwater pond. 6. Indicate the finished floor elevation for the existing structure. 7. Revise the site plan to reflect the location of the construction entrance. In addition, it will be necessary to include an erosion and sediment control narrative for the subject site. Sheet 2 of 2 Revise the site plan to include a note indicating that a land disturbance permit will be required by the Frederick County Public Works Department prior to initiating any site work. 9. It will be necessary to submit Engineered compaction reports for the parking area as well as the entrance road for review by this office prior to the final site plan approval. Once these comments have been addressed, it will be necessary to submit two (2) copies of the site plan for further review. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1� �' 30�:Z_� Harvey E�Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: John S. Trenary, Building Official, C.P.C.A. Frederick County Planning Department Bob Childress, Virginia Department of Transportation file Ll 11 .Y. � 7 k I1 , LLI � Y E F � F f f � 4 iE �E iE �iF -lE jE dE iE iE * 57ERN AN, lE' P/N£ 0 0 _ _ 90 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 August 12, 1997 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Attn.: Carl Rinker 119 Creekside Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review - Seo Property Site Plan #025-97 Dear Carl: I have reviewed the above referenced site plan received by this office July 23, 1997. The following comments will need to be addressed in order to proceed with approval of this site plan. Please provide: 1) Signed and dated seal of engineer. 2) Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways and streams. 3) Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 4) The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. The location of such setbacks should be illustrated on the plan. 5) The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 6) Location, height, specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 7) Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 8) Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure(fencing, etc) required to enclosed receptacles. A concrete pad should also be provided within the enclosure. 9) The height of all buildings and structures. 10) The proposed use of each building, structure, and area. 11) Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial zoning districts. 12) Location and dimension of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 13) Location of all utilities, including water lines with size of lines, mains, and laterals. 14) Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 107 North Kent Strut • Whichester, Viroinin 22601-5000 Seo Property Preliminary Site Plan Review Page 2 August 12, 1997 15) Calculations describing the required number of loading spaces. Location and dimensions of required loading spaces. 16) Location and dimensions of all parking spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 17) Location of steep slopes, woodlands, flood plains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. 18) Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. Information such as type, quantity, minimum caliper/height should be included. 19) Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections of profiles. 20) Update the `Revisions' box with each review agency's revisions dates and the date of approval. Sheet 1 of 2 1) Illustrations of how/where required screening and buffer will be installed. This is typically accomplished by including a detailed landscape plan. The areas requiring a `Full Screen' will need to include a 6-foot opaque element (fence or berm). 2) A guardrail along the western perimeter of parking aisle. 3) Illustrate the location, plant type, size, quantity necessary to satisfy parking lot landscape requirement, and to screen headlamps from adjoining properties. 4) The parking lot should be provided with curb and gutter. Please illustrate type and specify location. 5) Parking lot layout: As proposed, it appears to be difficult for a vehicle to back -out of the ADA parking space. The parking lot should allow for the vehicle to back-up and maneuver from the space. An expansion of the lot near the proposed ADA ramp may enable this vehicle maneuvering. 6) A statement that reads "This site plan shall be valid for a period of 5 years from date of approval". This statement should be placed near the Zoning Administrator approval block. 7) Building Setbacks: correct the setbacks. The required side and rear setbacks for B 1 District sites is 0 feet. 8) Details pertaining to the accessible parking space and ramp to building (dimensions, signage, ramp materials, etc.). Please revise your site plan to address the above comments, those on the red -lined plan, and the comments provided to you by the review agencies. You will also need to provide this office with the approved comment sheets from all required review agencies. The required review agencies include: Virginia Department of Transportation, Inspections Seo Property Preliminary Site Plan Review Page 3 August 12, 1997 Department, County Engineer, Fire Marshal, County Health Department, Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Planning Department. Once all comments have been addressed, please resubmit one copy of the revised site plan to this department for final review. If the revised site plan satisfies all agency comments, we will request five copies of the final site plan and recommend this revised site plan for approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, 1 Eric R. Lawrence Planner II ERLlbah Attachment UAERIOCONIN1ONMSITEPLA,NNSEO.REV V. 6' � IN OUI- 69.UV le i I L' ll'�ll S70RMWA IETP t \ / DE7EN770N BASYy--RA IICJrV /ANK OfICHL ORINA 77QN TANA CoN rA c r YA/yKs (_i) \ 75 (2)- B /- rM ZONING: RA ORI71--- 14 Sf_ P77C TANK WI 77 / USE. RESIDE. N 17 1 REC/RCUL A 7WG PUMR► ' HOUSING f76 VDO7' EWII-2 -- - --r 5 t 7FR 17- ly 97 00 o t r , ;, IZ74? Y SLOG - o q — 99.4 1 • , O O Wig TLR ,uf 71-000 -';- o loo a 4 Ex, cowc. srooP 0 - _ - - -- wp r Gc— 12 i 4 X GRA l f L K 1 SHALL BE REM0 VEO °0°00 GAG-7 f j / 0009 ° D PE#- 000 _ 000 ,_ J- - BEGIN 7APf-R B TO REVOV£ ---- —150 TAPER 2 z EX. GUARDRAIL y MPH SPEED) 55 s2� Sic EX. SOEJ PIKE (POS 7F D SIGN— --- - - - - - ROE 522 �T ROYAL ALL R£LOCA7ED ALL SITE LIGHTING S/�ALL BE D/RECIED DOH1VWitRQS BS' Sy T D/ST 70IB0, AND AWA Y FROM AD-AOIN/NG LAND. 7R/P GENERA 77UN USING LAND USE-.SNOPP/NG CEPY DIR. SIGN CURB GROSS LEASABLE SPACE.- i- COMMONWEALTH of V1RQINI A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 1,1031 OLD VALLEY PIKE JERRY A. COPP COMMISSIONER P O BOX 278 RESIDENf ENGINEER EDINBURG, VA 22824.0278 TELE (540) 984,5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 July 31, 1997 Mr. George I. Staber, P.E. Ref: SEO Property C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates Route 522 P. O. Box 46 Frederick County Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear George: We have received your preliminary site plan dated July 3, 1997 (received on July 23, 1997) for the reference project. A review has been completed and we have the following comments as shown in red on the plans. 1. A section of radial guardrail to match the existing guardrail should be provided on the south side of the proposed entrance, adequate shoulder should also be provided to support the guardrail. 2. The geometry of the Route 644 intersection should be shown in more detail, e.g. additional elevations extended eastward to show sight distance entering Route 522 from the proposed site entrance going north, the pavement radii and edges of Route 522 pavement including left turn lane to crossover and right turn lane to Route 644. (A copy of the Route 522 plan is attached.) 3. A typical section should be provided to illustrate the 12' additional pavement at the proposed entrance end of the deceleration taper as well as the shoulder and roadway ditch along the 150' taper. The taper pavement structure should be 8" of 21-B Aggregate, 3" BM-2, and 1 '/z" SM-2A. This pavement structure should also be used on the section of proposed site entrance within VDOT right-of-way. Shoulder should be 6 '/z" of 21-B Aggregate. 4. The proposed CG-11 entrance should have 40' wide pavement, 25' radius face of curb on the north and south side. Tapers should be 150' long and 12' wide on the north side and 36' long and 12' wide on the south side. The CG-7 could be ended at the right-of-way line on both sides. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Mr. George I. Staber Ref: SEO Property July 31, 1997 Paqe #2 5. The 60' of 15" R.C.P. could be deleted with the DI-1 receiving the waters on the north side and carrying them to the detention pond. It appears the remaining surfaces could sheet flow to and over the fill embankments. Riprap should be provided as shown on the south side to avoid potential erosion of VDOT fill slope. 6. The sight distance north and south entering Route 522 from the proposed site entrance should be confirmed and shown on the plan. 7. A detailed drawing of the CG-7 should be provided. 8. All miscellaneous notes shown on the plan sheets should be addressed. Any changes in design items should meet or exceed standards. Once you have addressed all the above comments, please submit five sets of plans for review and approval. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Baf JJ.Sweitz Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor BJS/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. R. B. Childress - �i��;:j Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris Tierney ��°� �� to, `. SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development Use only. ©ate application received Application # _ Complete. Date of acceptance _ Incomplete. Date of return. 1. Project Title: 2. Location of Property (street address) 3 4 5 Property Owner: Address: Telephone: Applicant/Agent Address Telephone: Designer: Address: Telephone: Contact: ed i SAy - 7'L'L721 —T z3�- 472� R SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final apprcval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. ff any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be ac ;epted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Department of Planning and Development Inspections Department Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Heath Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Yicdletown Airport Au-tonty Soil & Wa-er Conservation District Request `or Street Namae R. • • 6. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original il� Revised 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 8. Property Information a) Property Identification Number: I it'll— 16— .- i b) Current Zoning: I c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: r' e) Adjoining Property Use(s) f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s)�-16 Varce�S - V7 \8 0� g) Magisterial District(s) J , A,A10'.Q� I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the _ Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature ��_.i"— Date 7 — L Z — /9 9 ", The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N i 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. �. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. V 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District r✓ 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) ✓ 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 9 E • z General Site (con't Y N 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. v� 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. .� 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. / 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. LNI alal 22. Location and area of common open space. 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information Y N 27. The height of all buildings and structures. 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. �A 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. ✓ 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 10 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. �; 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other T facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking Y N 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. f 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. Lan dsca in Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver t Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Stre Attn: County Planner Fourth Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 (540) 665-5651 C Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: 7 22- A-7 2 J Name of development and/or description of the request: ErST4Q��r�v Location of property: Planning and Development's Comments. - Planning and Development use only Date received Datc revision received Date approved — Incomplete Incomplete Date r im7 ed Date rcvie«,ed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) 16