Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-96 Stimpson-Rt. 277 Oil & Lube Service - Opequon - BackfileReceivec Address, & ilt 66' ...AT OF ,OUNI APAT PAID BALANCE DUE Dat T1 'vc A ).k collars $ NT HOW PAID Y CASH By CHECK r - N40KY ORDER SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. S '' ✓/ Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Q (� I Ct b ✓ Frederick County Sanitation Authority J Department of Planning and Development J Inspections Department Y 1 Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District now a MEMO TO: File Information FROM: Jeremy F. Camp, Planner II DATE: August 8, 2002 RE: Withdrawal of Site Plan Site Plan #30-96, Stimpson/Rt. 277 Oil & Lube, is being withdrawn as a valid site plan application. A more recent site plan for a coffee kiosk was submitted & approved inplace of this site plan. JFC/ U. Ueremy�MemoslWirhdrawalofSP30-96.wpd • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/678-0682 March 5, 1997 Steve Gyurisin G.W. Clifford & Associates 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review #2 - Stimpson/Route 277 Oil & Lube Service Site Plan # 030-96 Dear Steve: I have had an opportunity to conduct a review of the above referenced plan, resubmitted to this office on March 4, 1997. Previous concerns continue to exist, as do new concerns that have materialized following your recent site plan revisions. The following comments will need to be addressed in order to proceed with site plan approval. Please provide clarification to the following items, previously addressed in a letter from this department dated July 22, 1996: 1. Item 4: "Location, height, and specifications of existing and proposed outdoor lighting fixtures." 2. Item 9 and 10: "Calculations describing the required number of parking spaces. My initial review indicated that 48 spaces were required for the site." While the Parking and Loading Requirements summary concur with the required number of parking spaces, the location of the parking spaces has not been addressed. Note: Drive-thru and stacking lanes do not count toward the parking requirement; and "Existing Parking" indicated between the gas pumps and Route 277 presently do not exist, nor is it permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Item 11: "Details of the disabled parking spaces, signage, and ramp.' The revised site plan has relocated the disabled parking spaces. But, signage and ramp details have not been provided. 4. Item 12: "Landscaping plan for the site. Should include calculations pertaining to required plantings, location for planting, and description of each plant proposed. Initial review indicates that 18 trees are required for the parking facility (5 on islands, 13 for perimeter)." 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • Page 2 Stimpson - Route 277 Review #2 Site Plan #030-96 March 5, 1997 Item 13: "Location and description of required buffers and screening. Description of proposed plantings (type, minimum caliper/heightat planting)." Item 19: "More details for the proposed landscape screening (distance between plants, plant type and number). Initial review indicates that the screen should be 225 feet long (not counting existing screen). At 225 linear feet, that requires 23 deciduous trees and 45 evergreen trees." Also, to satisfy the Full Screening requirement, a 6-foot opaque fence (typically a board -on -board fence) should be installed between the parking area and the plantings. 6. Item 17: "Dimensions for what appears to be a proposed canopy at the drive-thru". 7. Item 21: "Clarify the phasing proposed. Each phase should satisfy proposed use parking requirements." My calculations indicate that 29 parking spaces will be required upon the completion of Phase I. These 29 spaces would account for the required parking for the existing use, plus that required for the oil & lube service. Please address the following comments that have resulted from the site plan revision: 8. Installation of a sidewalk along Route 277. As mentioned in Virginia Department of Transportation correspondence, a sidewalk along Route 277 is a requirement of Frederick County. Installation of the sidewalk will be required if and when the curb and gutter on Route 277 are reconstructed or modified. The revised site plan indicated that a CG-12 curb will be installed and that curb and gutter will be replaced along this portion of Route 277. Therefore, the installation of a sidewalk will also be necessary at this time. 9. All parking bays should be provided a raised 9-foot wide landscaped island. This was previously provided on the site plan. Please include the raised islands on the most recent site plan submission. In particular, the islands should be provided: A) adjacent to the car wash facility; B) between the oil & lube office and the car wash facility, separating the parking from the oil & lube stacking lanes; C) between the loading area and the oil & lube office, at the end of the parking bay; D) along the west perimeter of the oil & lube stacking lanes; E) and at the end of the proposed parking bay adjacent to the future drive-thru addition to the existing Red Apple Country Store. Islands painted on the asphalt are not acceptable. 10. Provide a detail of the proposed surface treatment. • Page 3 Stimpson - Route 277 Review #2 Site Plan #030-96 March 5, 1997 11. Address the technique that will be exercised to allow stormwater to flow from the proposed asphalt surfaces. In particular, it appears that the flow will be towards the car wash facility. How is the stormwater to flow beyond the curb and gutter? 12. Provide a statement indicating that all utilities (electric and telephone) will be buried underground. 13. Provide a statement similar to "This site plan shall expire 5 years from date of approval". Enclose you will find a copy of the site plan that I have red -inked. Please address the comments of both this letter and those found on the red -inked site plan. Please revise your site plan to address these comments, and the comments provided to you by the review agencies. My files indicate that the Inspections Department has not approved the site plan. You will also need to provide this office with an approved comment sheets from all required review agencies. Once all agency comments have been addressed, please resubmit one copy of the revised site plan to this department for final review. If the site plan satisfies all agency comments, the Planning Department included, we will request five copies of the final site plan and recommend the site plan for approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincer y, Eric Planner II Enclosure cc: Mr. Harry Stimpson Mr. Pete Lebel, H & W Construction (() PRI JI-,A1ED METAL PIPE FIRE HYDRANT INVERT METAL LIGHT POLE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ROUTE SIGN SANITARY MANHOLE SPEED LIMIT SIGN TELEPHONE RISER BOX WOOD POWER POLE IRON ROD FOUND IRON ROD SET METAL SIGN POST TELEPHONE CONTROL BOX WATER VALVE GUY ANCHOR V A I 'h^ t,oundory and topographic information shown is .1o"O'd �:,n an actual field survey competed March ,L April 5, 1996 by Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.0 OUTE 277 FA_I__J POSTED 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT '� EPLACE AN' CURB & GUT /fr you And NIp�IFK.�� STA 42 6t,n I-,)'TNf-.i �\ SDEt-IALk. %+SMEET, REOF POST - . 74J.66 — - _ 155 CMP _ STOP _--__ INV. (739.90) INV( - IS3 •Hqf. / Gas Pur R Vprti._ol elevations for this topographic survey ore based on U,4bUT-/737. k GS datum N /F SCULLY, LTD. 85-A-148 DB 575 PG 540 ZONED: B-1 USE: COMMERCIAL INV. (738. 65) C`- tS �� QA�,1J{iI 1 107 UNDEVELOPED / V E X. C O M t f• t l E XIS TING RED APPLE COI.'N TR 1 S F.F.= 742.44 Psm t. F.F. - 732. 93 3000 sq ff \N1 � 1F1,�Q kLL 161�0 PLAC • s p � 4'- e3c) - 2(0 COMMONWL✓ LTII of VIRQII\, I: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 1a031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COVMISSIONCH P O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 May 15, 1997 Mr. Harry S. Stimpson, III Route l Box 173-C Boyce, VA 22620 Dear Mr. Stimpson: JERRY A. COPP RESIOCN, E:+G1NfER TELE ,5401 384 `.600 rAx Is::1384 5607 Ref: Red Apple Deli l'Zoutes 277 & 1085 Frederick County At our April 24, 1997 meeting you posed two questions concerning the possible signalization of the referenced intersection. The first was concerning cost and what your share (50%) would be under a signalization agreement. The total cost would be approximately $90,000.00. Therefore, your share would be $45,000.00. Secondly, you were concerned with stacking right and left turning vehicles on Route 1085 would block patrons trying to enter your property through the Route 1085 entrance. While this is certainly a valid concern, this issue can only be addressed when the signal plans are developed. If at all possible, the stop bars can be adjusted to fit field conditions. However, we cannot guarantee at this early stage that this could be done to completely satisfy your concerns. I would like to point out though if signalization at this location becomes a reality we would not want your patrons blocking south bound Route 1085 motorists. All factors will need to be considered in our final design. If you have any further questions regarding the signal or agreement process, please let me know. RBC/ rf xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely, Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor 9 e ^® MAY 19V RECEIVED DEPT. OF PLANNINn i� I�_6 k0,PMEf4g mad WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING �J 1 J gilbert w. cliff ord & associates, inc. INCORPORATED 1972 Engineers Land Planners Surveyors Water Quality Analyses Corporate Office: 150C Olde Greenwich Drive • P. 0. Box 781 Fredericksburg, VA 22401 • (540) 898-21 15 Winchester Office: 200 North Cameron Street • Winchester, VA 22601 • (540) 667-2139 5 March 1997 Mr. Eric Lawrence Frederick County Planning 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan #030-96 Stimpson - Rt. 277 - Red Apple Store Dear Eric: We have revised the enclosed plan to reflect your and other agency comments. Please indicate your final comments for approval. All review agency approvals are enclosed for your reference. Sincerely, gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. Step cc Gyurisin re Mr. Harry Stimpson, Owner Mr. Pete Lebel, H&W Construction 41- R P481997 OF a AND ftmv - ING BOARD OF DIRECTORS OC )�E Thomas J. O'Toole, P. E. Charles E. Maddox, Jr. P. E. Earl R. Sutherland, P. E. P. Duane Brown, C. L. S. William L. Wright, Laboratory Director t '► COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 FAY: 540/ 678-0682 July 22, 1996 Steve Gyurisin G.W. Clifford & Associates 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review - Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan 9030-96 Dear Steve: I have reviewed the above referenced site plan, submitted to this office on July 3, 1996. The following comments will need to be address in order to proceed with the site plan review process. Please provide: 1. Name, address, and phone number of the developer. 2. Zoning of the adjoining properties. 3. Location of all proposed and existing signs. This would include proposed traffic flow/directional signs. 4. Location, height, and specifications of existing and proposed outdoor lighting fixtures. 5. Location of additional outdoor trash receptacles and enclosures. Is the existing facility adequate to handle the proposed oil & lube and carwash? 6. Use of all buildings. 7. Posted speed limits of adjacent roads. 8. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrances. Satisfy entrance distance requirements. 9. Calculations describing the required number of parking spaces. My initial review indicated that 48 spaces were required for the site. 10. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces. Parking spaces should satisfy the 180 square foot requirement. The proposed loading space does not satisfy dimensional requirements. The proposed loading space should sit atop a concrete slab. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan #030-96 July 22, 1996 11. Details of the disabled parking spaces, signage, and ramp. 12. Landscape plan for the site. Should include calculations pertaining to required plantings, location for plantings, and description of each plant proposed. Initial review indicates that 18 trees are required for the parking facility (5 on islands, 13 for perimeter). 13. Location and description of required buffers and screening. Description of proposed plantings (type, minimum caliper/height at planting). 14. Curb and gutter along the perimeter of all paved surfaces. CG-6 is standard. 15. Minimum stacking requirements for the oil and lube, and the drive-thru. Minimum stacking for the oil and lube is 40 feet (2 cars). And for the drive-thru, 100 feet (5 cars). 16. Minimum drive lanes of 12 feet. This is most applicable along the southern and western edges of the proposed facility. 17. Dimensions for what appears to be a proposed canopy at the drive-thru. 18. More information concerning the proposed car wash. As presented, there is no vehicular access or utilities for this use. Either provide the essential information or remove the use from the site plan. 19. More details for the proposed landscape screening (distance between plants, plant type and number). Initial review indicates that the screen should be 225 feet long (not counting existing screen). At 225, that requires 23 deciduous trees and 45 evergreens. Also state that deciduous trees should contain minimum calipers of 2.5 inches at planting. Four -foot heights for evergreens. 20. Dimensions of proposed sidewalks (widths and depths). 21. Clarify the phasing proposed. Each phase should satisfy proposed use parking requirements. 22. Pavement stripping and directional arrows to provide safe traffic flow. Enclose you will find a copy of the site plan that I have red -inked. Please address the comments of both this letter and those found on the red -inked site plan. Please revise your site plan to address these comments, and the comments provided to you by the review agencies. The agencies reviewing this plan should include: the Planning Department, Virginia Department of Transportation, Sanitation Authority, Inspections Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Marshall. You will also need to provide this office with an approved comment sheets from all required review agencies. Once all agency comments have been addressed, please resubmit one copy of Page 3 Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan #030-96 July 22, 1996 the revised site plan to this department for final review. If the site plan satisfies all agency comments, we will request five copies of the final site plan and recommend the site plan for approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Eric R. Lawrence Planner I ,4i COMJMONWE: iLTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COVYISS1O%ER P O BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824.0278 February 25, 1997 'Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., V.P. G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Chuck: JERRY A. COPP RES-DENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984 5600 FAX 15401 984 5607 Ref: Stimpson Property Routes 277 & 1085 Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of your revised plans dated October 15, 1997 for the referenced project. T_he plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer accordingly. I offer the following comments: • A preconstruction conference be held by you and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various county agencies and VDOT shall be conducted prior to initiation of work. • Materials used and method of construction shall apply to current observed VDOT Road & Bridge Specifications applicable during construction of this development. • Our review and comments are general in nature. Should conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Department. • The contractor shall notify VDOT when work is to begin or cease for any undetermined length of time. VDOT will also require 48 hours notice for inspections. • The appropriate land use permits shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way. The permits will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary and expenses of a State assigned Inspector. • The intersection of Route 277 & 1085 will need to be striped to provide a left turn lane. You have been provided a copy of the plans showing the suggested method of pavement marking. Our District Paint Crew can perform this work on an account receivable basis after the entrance improvement � have ; b".:, ,'- completed. I-, c%C � WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr. • • Ref: Stimpson Property February 25, 1997 Page 2 • Although signalization of the intersection of Route 277 & 1085 is not warranted at this time, the additional traffic generated by this project may justify signalization in the future. Therefore, the developer will be required to enter into a signalization agreement with the Department for a period of five years to cover 50% of the design and installation costs of a signal if warranted within the prescribed time period. This matter needs to be addressed prior to the issuance of VDOT permits to perform work on the project. • Since Route 277 is classified as a major collector facility, Frederick County may require the installation of sidewalk along Route 277 frontage. If so, the existing entrance on Route 277 will need to be upgraded to include handicap ramps. Additionallv, the curb & gutter may need to be extended eastward to the property line. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Barry . Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor BJS/ rf xc: Mr. R. B. Childress Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris Tierney r_ MAR 1997 RPTCEIVE� �, OF PLMNIN • u COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No.0814960278 Date ReceiN'ed 073196 Applicant G.W. Clifford and Associates Address 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 Date Reviewe 081496 Project Name Red Apple Country Store Phone No.540-667-2139 Type of ApplicationSite Plan Current Zoning B-2 1st Due Fire Co. 1 1 1st Due Rescue Co. 11 I'lection DistrictOpequon Tax I.D. No. 85-3-1 RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler SystemXX Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm Systen X Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Posted fire lanes required at all hydrant locations. Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted Yes XX No Comments Storage of lubricants and oils must be in compliance with applicable sections of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Hydrant Locations Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Location Adequate Inadequate Not Identified XX Additional Comments Attached? Yes No XX Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No Signature ,,,, .. Title L,.� �� AMa �,� �t�nrNlryG COUNTY of FREI)EIZ1('K Department of Public %%orks 5411/665-5651 February 18, 1997 FAX: 540/678-0682 Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Red Apple Deli Frederick County, Virginia Dear Steve: In response to Ron Mislowsky's letter dated October 3, 1996, the county treasurer has devised a procedure by which Frederick County can accept a contribution related to future stormwater improvements. Basically, Ron's letter recommended that the developer contribute $2,000 to a fund established to provide improvements to the downstream channel. This contribution would be made in lieu of providing on -site detention. The treasurer has indicated that Frederick County has the authority to accept this contribution and has taken the necessary steps to establish a separate account. To avoid confusion, we recommend that the check be made payable to the Treasurer, Frederick County, and routed through the Public Works Department. In that manner, we can attach an explanation with the check to ensure that it is credited to the appropriate account. Please let me know if the developer still intends to make this contribution. Sincerely, 4 Harvey E� S rawsnyder, Jr., E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Frederick County Treasurer Finance Department file 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MEMMMMIUMMU Mawer, nitation A Mail to Hand Deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 199 Front Royal Pike P.O. Box 618 Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 665-5690 (540) 665-5690 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach lwQ copies of your site plan with this sheet. Applicant's name: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. Address: 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Va. 22601 Phone number: 667-2139 7/30/96 Name of development and/or description of the request: Oil & Lube service addition - Stimpson/Rt 277 - Red Apple Country Store Location of development: South side of Route 277 at Stickley Drive - behind the Red Apple Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: oy6o anitation Authority use only ate received Date revision received ncomplete Incomplete )ate reviewed Date re iev signature and Date ' ignature and Date`(revision) Date approved �. A UT DEPT �D pOF P( l,V0v;,;G c-'F' Q4 r Request for Site Plan Comments JUL Frederick County Inspections Department FREDERICK CO. EERIN & INSPECTIONS Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540)665-5650 Hand Deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one copy of your site plan with this sheet. Applicant's name: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates. Inc. Address: 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Va. 22601 Phone number: 667-2139 7/30/96 Name of development and/or description of the request: addition - Stimoson/Rt. 277 - Red Armle Country Store rvice Location of development: South side of Route 277 at Stickley Drive - behind the Red Apple Inspection Department's Comments: Building shall comply with Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 311, Use Group S (Storage) of the BOCA National R11j1cjjW CYx3P/1993 her .odes hat a"l_y are t-it-le 24 of Disability by Public Acconvodations and in Commercial Facilities. Question, 1) Oil, gas Inspections Dept. use only Date received Date revision received Date approved Incomplete Incomplete j Date reviewed Date reviey,,ed Signature and and Date � ... r�,.:.:� -z� r Signature and Date (revision) t- LO C r (ba please)I or clean up process. Question, 2) Location of waste oil storage on site ADA Parking and Access to the building is not indicated on plans. :?o • I tf.0 ly `` I (' I i COMMONLY ALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER P 0. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824.0278 February 25,1997 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., V.P. G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Chuck: JERRY A. COPP RESAENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-56W FAX (540) 984-5607 Ref: Stimpson Property Routes 277 & 1085 Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of your revised plans dated October 15, 1997 for the referenced project. The plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer accordingly. I offer the following comments: • A preconstruction conference be held by you and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various county agencies and VDOT shall be conducted prior to initiation of work. • Materials used and method of construction shall apply to current observed VDOT Road & Bridge Specifications applicable during construction of this development. • Our review and comments are general in nature. Should conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such iiWasures shall lie completed to the satisfaction of the Department. • The contractor shall notify VDOT when work is to begin or cease for any undetermined length of time. VDOT will also require 48 hours notice for inspections. • The appropriate land use permits shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way. The permits will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary and expenses of a State assigned Inspector. • The intersection of Route 277 & 1085 will need to be striped to provide a left turn lane. You have been provided a copy of the plans showing the suggested method of pavement marking. Our District Paint Crew can perform this work on an account receivable basis after the entrance improvements have been completed. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Mr. C. E. Max, Jr. Ref: Stimpson Property February 25, 1997 Page 2 • Although signalization of the intersection of Route 277 & 1085 is not warranted at this time, the additional traffic generated by this project may justify signalization in the future. Therefore, the developer will be required to enter into a signalization agreement with the Department for a period of five years to cover 50% of the design and installation costs of a signal if warranted within the prescribed time period. This matter needs to be addressed prior to the issuance of VDOT permits to perform work on the project. • Since Route 277 is classified as a major collector facility, Frederick County may require the installation of sidewalk along Route 277 frontage. If so, the existing entrance on Route 277 will need to be upgraded to include handicap ramps. Additionaiiy, the curb & gutter may need to be extended eastward to the property line. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Barry . Sweitzer c Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor BJS/ rf Xc: iv . A. D. C liildress Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Kris. Tierney u • Ic I DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA Mr. Harry Stimpson 152 Fairfax Pike Stephens City, VA 22655 Dear Mr. Stimpson: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY 1.1031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 December 11, 1996 JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGUNEER TELE (54, 9945600 FAX (540) 984 5607 Ref: Red Apple Country Store & QuickLube Routes 277 & 1085 Frederick County I have received your November 5, 1996 letter concerning the referenced project. I did receive revised site plans for the project. Unfortunately, all of our technical review comments were not addressed. I returned them to Mr. Chuck Maddox on November 22, 1996 for correction. As for the traffic signalization agreement issue, I would appreciate meeting with you at your convenience to discuss our position on this matter. I look forward to talking with you soon. RBC/ rf xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. Steve Gyurisin Mr. Kris Tierney Sincerely, 6:?4� 4. 64-1d"04--- Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor WE KEEP VIRGINIA PROVING 152 Fairfax Pike phens City, Virginia 22655 r November 5, 1996 Mr. Robert Childress Virginia Department of Transportation P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 RE: Stimpson/Route 277 Red Apple Country Store Quick Lube and Oil Service Addition Dear Bob: Approximately two weeks ago revised plans, as per your letter of September 12, 1996, were resubmitted to your attention for review and approval. All of your comments are reflected on the revised plans. Your expeditious review and approval of the resubmitted plans is welcomed since we have started site construction work and winter weather is closing in. All recommended review changes have been incorporated in the new plans to meet or exceed your comments. Comment item number "4" indicates that the developer will be required to enter into a signalization agreement for five years and 50% of the design and installation costs if warranted. It is my opinion that this requirement is excessive both in terms of cost and traffic control for the scope of the proposed project. We are adding, at this time, only a quick lube and oil change service to our existing store. Requiring a traffic signal agreement at this time and at this location for a quick lube/oil change business severely impacts the economic viability of my project. I would request that you reconsider your comment for a traffic signal agreement in conjunction with our latest plan revisions for the Red Apple Country Store, understanding fully that I oppose such an agreement. I would respectfully ask that you delete the requirement for a traffic signal agreement. Sincerely, Harry Stimpson - , cc: Mr. Bob Sager Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E. ' Mr. Steve Gyurisin i i • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5651 September 18, 1996 FAY: 540/678-0682 Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Oil and Lube Service Addition Stimpson/Route 277 East Red Apple Country Store Frederick County, Virginia Dear Steve: We have completed our review of the subject site and only have one major concern: stormwater management. We have approved previous expansions related to the Red Apple Country Store contingent upon the installation of stormwater management concurrent with any additional development. This requirement was documented in previous review comments for the parking expansion. Consequently, we will require on -site stormwater detention designed to accommodate previous construction. As an alternative, we would consider the developer's offer to improve the downstream channel from the Red Apple Country Store to the Stephens Ridge subdivision. We cannot grant our approval of the proposed site plan until one of the above alternatives is implemented. The existing drainage ditch should be highlighted on the site plan to ensure that the proposed fill does not adversely encroach on the drainage easement. I am available to discuss the stormwater management issue if you should so desire. Sincerely, v Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works 107 North Dent Street • Winchester. Virginia 22601-5000 ��,711a,� �f+ I � r COMMONWEALTH of `vIRG INIIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 September 12, 1996 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., V.P. G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Chuck: ex(L s� WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN, P.E. RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-5600 FAX (540) 984.5607 Ref: Stimpson Property Routes 277 & 1085 Frederick County As requested, we have reviewed the above referenced project's site plan dated April 9, 1996. Our comments may be found on the enclosed plans marked in red and as follows: 1. The two proposed entrances on Route 1085 will need to be designed to a minimum 30' width from face to face of gutter pan. Also the radii length should be specified. 2. The proposed curb & gutter along Route 1085 will need to be installed 20' from the center of the existing right-of-way to face of curb to allow for an ultimate 36' wide pavement width. Additionally, the existing curb & gutter may have to be adjusted to meet this offset requirement. 3. The intersection of Route 277 & 1085 will need to be striped to provide a left turn lane. We have also enclosed a copy of the plans showing the suggested method of pavement marking. Our District Paint Crew can perform this work on an account receivable basis after the entrance improvements have been completed. 4. Although signalization of the intersection of Route 277 & 1085 is not warranted at this time, the additional traffic generated by this project may justify signalization in the future. Therefore, the developer will be required to enter into a signalization agreement with the Department for a period of five years to cover 50% of the design and installation costs of a signal if warranted within the prescribed time period. 5. A standard CG-12 handicap ramp will need to be installed at the intersection of Routes 277 and 1085. Since Route 277 is classified as a major collector, Frederick County may require the installation of sidewalk along the Route 277 frontage. If so, the existing entrance on Route 277 will need to be upgraded to include handicap ramps. Additionally, the curb & gutter may need to be extended eastward to the property line. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Mr. C. E. Maddi0r. Ref: Stimpson Property August 12, 1996 Page 2 6. Presently drainage sheet flows across the Route 277/1085 intersection onto the property. As designed, the entrance pavement will maintain the sheet flow. You may want to consider a structure within the Route 1085 right-of-way and pipe to Structure No. 2 to eliminate the sheet flow. Additional detail including contours and top of curb elevations will need to be provided. 7. Other miscellaneous comments as marked will need to be addressed. Please revise and resubmit four copies for final approval. Should any changes be deemed necessary, please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, C�j Robert B. Childress Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor RBC/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. S. A. Melnikoff Mr. H. E. Strawsnyder Mr—ICTis _Tierney: COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No.0814960278 Date Received 073196 Date Reviewed 081496 Applicant G.W. Clifford and Associates Address 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name Red Apple Country Store Phone No.540-667-2139 Type of ApplicationSite Plan Current Zoning B-2 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 1 1 Election DistrictOpequon Tax I.D. No. 85-3-1 RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler SystemXX Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm SystenKX Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Firc Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Posted fire lanes required at all hydrant locations. Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted Yes XX No Comments Storage of lubricants and oils must be in compliance with applicable sections of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Hydrant Locations Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Location Adequate Inadequate Not Identified XX Additional Comments Attached? Yes No XX AUG 1996 OF V FA Mp fM� Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No Signature - -r Title Z COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 July 22, 1996 Steve Gyurisin G.W. Clifford & Associates 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review - Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan #030-96 Dear Steve: I have reviewed the above referenced site plan, submitted to this office on July 3, 1996. The following comments will need to be address in order to proceed with the site plan review process. Please provide: l . Name, address, and phone number of the developer. 2. Zoning of the adjoining properties. 3. Location of all proposed and existing signs. This would include proposed traffic flow/directional signs. 4. Location, height, and specifications of existing and proposed outdoor lighting fixtures. 5. Location of additional outdoor trash receptacles and enclosures. Is the existing facility adequate to handle the proposed oil & lube and carwash? 6. Use of all buildings. 7. Posted speed limits of adjacent roads. 8. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrances. Satisfy entrance distance requirements. 9. Calculations describing the required number of parking spaces. My initial review indicated that 48 spaces were required for the site. 10. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces. Parking spaces should satisfy the 180 square foot requirement. The proposed loading space does not satisfy dimensional requirements. The proposed loading space should sit atop a concrete slab. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • • Page 2 Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan #030-96 July 22, 1996 11. Details of the disabled parking spaces, signage, and ramp. 12. Landscape plan for the site. Should include calculations pertaining to required plantings, location for plantings, and description of each plant proposed. Initial review indicates that 18 trees are required for the parking facility (5 on islands, 13 for perimeter). 13. Location and description of required buffers and screening. Description of proposed plantings (type, minimum caliper/height at planting). 14. Curb and gutter along the perimeter of all paved surfaces. CG-6 is standard. 15. Minimum stacking requirements for the oil and tube, and the drive-thru. Minimum stacking for the oil and tube is 40 feet (2 cars). And for the drive-thru, 100 feet (5 cars). 16. Minimum drive lanes of 12 feet. This is most applicable along the southern and western edges of the proposed facility. 17. Dimensions for what appears to be a proposed canopy at the drive-tluu. 18. More information concerning the proposed car wash. As presented, there is no vehicular access or utilities for this use. Either provide the essential information or remove the use from the site plan. 19. More details for the proposed landscape screening (distance between plants, plant type and number). Initial review indicates that the screen should be 225 feet long (not counting existing screen). At 225, that requires 23 deciduous trees and 45 evergreens. Also state that deciduous trees should contain minimum calipers of 2.5 inches at planting. Four -foot heights for evergreens. 20. Dimensions of proposed sidewalks (widths and depths). 21. Clarify the phasing proposed. Each phase should satisfy proposed use parking requirements. 22. Pavement stripping and directional arrows to provide safe traffic flow. Enclose you will find a copy of the site plan that I have red -inked. Please address the comments of both this letter and those found on the red -inked site plan. Please revise your site plan to address these comments, and the comments provided to you by the review agencies. The agencies reviewing this plan should include: the Planning Department, Virginia Department of Transportation, Sanitation Authority, Inspections Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Marshall. You will also need to provide this office with an approved comment sheets from all required review agencies. Once all agency comments have been addressed, please resubmit one copy of Page 3 Stimpson - Route 277 Site Plan 4030-96 July 22, 1996 the revised site plan to this department for final review. If the site plan satisfies all agency comments, we will request five copies of the final site plan and recommend the site plan for approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Eric R. Lawrence Planner I RTC 2_r?9 Site Plan Information Checklist The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. N' 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. Qk/4 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the vanance application number.) General Site Information Y N 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundanes for all lots and parcels. 9 General Site (con't) N N^ NA NA / Building Information Y N Roads Y N 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. 22. Location and area of common ope_ nos ice. gDWugTF 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. p�r,ovot' F.D 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. ffX11rJ-,J4 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. tS I 'r AREA UATIL 27. The height of all buildings and structures. 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 10 1 • • 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 0 J S'T t �K L �( 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking Y N 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. up>prC Moult-t 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. '>R—Sc'— PTz>--.J CDf` S PQc_w ' S t f+ i A -A � O Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. Landscaping Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be W used. H F-it, 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. Z- 01..e 12 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development Use only. Date application received Application to _ Complete. Date of acceptance _ Incomplete. Date of return. 1. Project Title: o bIL+-WB� 6�LCE- 2. Location of Property (street address) 3. Property Owner: Address: 21 M: 13 3 - G Lv�� IVA 2�, Telephone: " n ?jo2L] I 4. Applicant/Agent Address Telephone: 5. Designer- Address: Telephone: Contact: JE A Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: I V / N. r\Cf Il Jlf CCl Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: 61 W . C-LA e-Tep * ltEice_. INc, Address: Zoo Iv • CAM:G�) c5 Phone Number: 5� - Name of development and/or Ar- TN T71 w \ — ::-,,n vv oqption of property: pi do o the re uest: C_ L D l 1 -7-7 -7 _ _&4� Planning and Development's Comments: Planning and Development use only Date received Date revision received Incomplete Incomplete Date reviewed Date rcviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) ;�77 AT LlYllm Dater � red .z^_ t 6. Is this an original or revised site plan? 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: e) Adjoining Property Use(s) f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) g) Magisterial District(s) Original Revised /` z. !7 z .,:::�]-7 E� - ( 3� BONN i s'� +� .� ►I + + I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: "A Date: ' t_z