HomeMy WebLinkAbout028-94 Kraft General Foods Addition - Stonewall - Backfile (2)January 3, 1994
PERMIT APPLICA 77ON
AND
BEST A VAIL4 BLE C'ONTROL
TECHINIOLOGYANALYSIS
FOR
1A."ADER'S IIAGET., BAKFRY
Geneml loads Bnkedes Conymn
220 Park Center Drive
Wirichost(ir, VA. 2:,!(503
Prepared by:
J. tvlark Kri::iriarik, PE
Tho Dennis Engineering Group, Inc:
1537 Mabi Street
Springfield, MA 01103
(4 13) 707-1 7M5
Do W ,-- � Q- C�-
L
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - AIR DIVISION
REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION
Applicant:
Registration Number:
Applicant's mailing address:
Contact
person:GARY-GERASIMOWICZ
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester, VA 22603
Telephone: (703)678-0442
Facility location (also attach map):
220. Park Center_ Drive
Winchester VA 22603
Facilit'�type, and list of activities
t_o be conducted:
Bagel Bakery (Proposed)
Beverage Manufacturing (Existing)
_ __ _ __
f— — nip notlution control permit from thi
wne applicant '� ,11 LIB "-- ..--accorda--o� a
onmental Quality..�In,-nce with § 10.1-1321.1. Title 10.1, Code o Virginia ,
Virginia Department of Envir
as amended, before such a permit application can be considered complete, the applicant must obtain a certification
from the governing body of the county, city or town in which the facility is to be located that the location and
operation of the facility are consistent with all applicable ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 (§ 15.1-427
et seq.) of Title 15.1. The undersigned requests that an authorized representative of the local governing body sign
the certification below.
Applican,Ps Date:
signatu Jan. 3, 1995
The undersigned certifies that ttCe roposed location and
operation of the facility described above are consistent with all
applicable ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 (S 15.1-427
et seq.) of Title 15.1. of the Code of Virginia (1950) as
amended.
Signature of Date:
authorized to a]_ c� S
representati;p) Z01.
Type or I
Title:
print name: Wayne Miller z-zA-
County, city Frederick County
or town: Plal-ining & Development
RtvtSM 71"
[RETURN SIGNED CERTIFICATION TO APPLICANT AND DEG REGIONAL OFFICE]
ix
FOW 7 rART I
� I
11
11
CHECK ALL FORMS THAT ARE APPLICABLE AND LIST ALL ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
PART I, FORMS
_ CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, V
REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION FORM, IX
1. DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION, XI
1 GENERAL INFORMATION, 1
1 GENERAL INFORMATION, 2
1 GENERAL INFORMATION IMILESTONESI, 3
1 FUEL BURNING, 4
1 PROCESSING, 6
INCINERATORS, 6
_ ORGANIC/PETROLEUM STORAGE TANKS, 7
ORGANIC/PETROLEUM STORAGE TANKS (CONT.), 6
LOADING RACKS, 9
2 STACK PARAMET€RS, 10 ,
1
1 APC/MONITORING111 `
�. APC/SUPPLEMENTAL`, 12
1 CRITERIA EMISSIONS, N&M, 13
1 TOXIC EMISSIONS, N&M, 14
TOXIC EMISSIONS, EXISTING, 16
1.OPERATING PERIODS, 16
Note added form sheets, if more than one.
PART 11, ADD -ON FORMS FOR STATE OPERATING PERMIT
_ FUEL -BURNING CRITERIA EMISSIONS, OPERATING 17
-TOXIC EMISSIONS, OPERATING, 19
_ CRI1 LRIA EMISSIONS, OPERATING, 19
PART Ill, ADD -ON FORMS FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT
_ EXEMPTED UNITS, 20
_ BEL rkTIONSHIP OF EMISSION UNITS/POINTS, 21
_ COMPLIANCE STATUS AND COMPLIANCE PLAN, 22
_ COMPLIANCE STATUS AND PLAN (CONTINUED), 23
PROPOSED/ALTERNATE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE, 24
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION FOR THE APPLICATION, 26
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION FOR THE APPLICATION (CONTINUED), 26
_ ALT- RNATIVE OPERATING SCENARIOS, 27
LIST Al FACHED DOCUMENTS
13— CT ANALYSIS REPORT
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION FORM
(see other side for instructions)
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments [as noted above] were
prepared under my direction or supervision'in accordance with a system designed to assure that. qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering and evaluating the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. - I 'am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and im r sonment dr knowing violations.
SIGNATURE: ���-/` ��v�---- -DATE: 1/3/95
NAME: Gaid Gerasimowicz
TITLE: Plant : Manager
COMPANY: General Foods Bakery Companies
Reference: Regulations, § 120-08-01.D4 and § 120-08-0504.G.
(703)678-0442
REV751913 7194 FOMA 7 PART 1
A
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
STACK NUMBERS
January 3, 1994
Unit #
Stack #
Process Description
1
1
Flour Storage Silo
2
2
Flour Storage Silo
3
3
Bagel Steam Cooker
4
4
Bagel Dryer Burner
4
5
Bagel Dryer Exhaust
5
6
Oven Burner
5
7
Oven Burner
5
8
Oven Burner
5
9
Oven Exhaust (Inlet Side)
5
10
Oven Exhaust (Outlet Side)
Page 1
' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Department of Environmental Quality
' Air Di�virion
f� Uzi_ ct�yw
' PERMIT APPLICATION
General information
u
11
I
n
REASON(S) FOR SUBMISSION:
❑ OPERATING PERMIT FOR PREVIOUSLY UNPERMITTED EXISTING SOURCE
❑ RENEWAL OF OPERATING PERMIT —
(CURRENT PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE:
MODIFICATION
1
❑ NEW SOURCE
THIS PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR PURSUANT TO THE
❑ FOLLOWING PROVISIONS) OF THE VIRGINIA
E)(EM.PTION REGULATIONS OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS (IF KNOWN):
SECTION 120-08-01 (STATIONARY SOURCE)
❑— SECTION 120-08-02 (PSD, MAJOR SOURCE)
OWNERSHIP SECTION 120-08-03 (NON -ATTAINMENT)
CHARGE SECTION 120-08-04 (STATE OPERATING PERMIT)
❑ _ RULE 8-5 (FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT)
REGISTRATION
UPDATE
n OTHER (SPECIFY)
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
i
COUNTY: CITY:
I
i
� PLANT ID: MAJOR SIC:
HT- ABOVE MSL (FT): UTM ZONE:
u�
UTM COORDINATES (KM):
t
I n� EAST
ElWORTHl
COMPANY AND DIVISION NAME
Lender's Bagel Bakery
General Foods Baking Companies
MAILING ADDRESS
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester, VA 22603
TELEPHONE NUMBER
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AT SITE
PROPERTY AREA AT SITE
(703)678-0442
19.9 Acres
310
EXACT SOURCE LOCATION - INCLUDE NAME OF CITY (COUNTY) AND ATTACH MAP WITH PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
220 Park Center Drive
Fredrick.County, Virginia
PERSON TO CONTACT ON AIR POLLUTION MATTERS - NAME AND TITLE
PHONE NUMBER (AND FAX NUMBER IF AVAILABLE)
J. Mark Krcmarik, PE 022591
(413) 787-1785
The Dennis Engineering Group
(413) 787-1786 (fax) -
Consulting Engineer.
REWLSM 7/"
FOiM 7 PART 1
1
' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, AIR DIVISION
GENERAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
1• Ma'iufacturP of Beverage productknownas xooiDursr
2• Manufacture of Beverage products known as Caprisun_
3: Baking of Bagels
' LIST THE STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CODE(S) FOR THE FACILITY:
F2= n207[jH 2051 Bakery 2086 Bottled and canned soft drinks E,nd carbonated waters
' PLEASE LIST ALL THE FACILITIES IN VIRGINIA UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL BY THE OWNER OF
THIS FACILITY:
TherE- Eire no other Bakeries owner cc:on1-rn11 11 C4ene:a1 Fnnr'� Bakery
' Companiesjin
Vlvgip a
-
FtE1115M' 7/94.
'
FOW 7 PART 1
2
' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, AIR DIVISION
' GENERAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
'�111._ALESTONES. This section is to be completed if the Operating Permit application includes a new emissions unitor
modification to existing operations.
MILESTONES STARTING DATE ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
i
t
New equipment installation* March 1, 1994 April- 1, 1994
Modification of existing
process or equipment
tTransfer of ownershi�i or
location �.
' Start-up dates March 1, 1994
''For new or modified installations to be constructed in phased schedule, give construction/installation
starting and completion date for each phase.
PLICABLE REQUIREMENTS - For Rule 8-5 only, list all state and federal requirements. Use separate sheets if
essary.
'UNIT
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POLLUTANT
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENTS
CITATION
VR 120- -_ or
40 CFR
'
CHECK IF EXTRA PAGES ARE ATTACHED.
i 3
Fc
OMPANYE DATE 1 / 3 / 9 5 REGISTRATION NUMBER
Lender's Bagel Bakery
FUEL -BURNING EQUIPMENT AND STATIONARY COMBUSTION ENGINES (EXCEPT INCINERATORS)
(BOILERS; TURBINES, GAS/DIESEL ENGINES, KILNS, ETC.):. r
nCheck box -if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
....................
::::ii:;a:Sii; ::i:::::>:
:.;:.;;;;>;:•;:;.:;:.::.;:;:.;
..................................
't: i3f >i ns:»::::;;::::::::;:::: •is :::::i;:;:::>:::>;::::L;:»::::>;::>::;::;::>:t•r;.
:.::.::.:.::::::.::»<>::;:>:<::<::>:::>::z:s::>::>:::;;:<:»::s»><r::>;:r•::>.>.•s>:::a:>:
:...............................................................................................................:..:...
>:::;:iiS>:25:; ? ii>:::::::: sii::i::>::>::;»:;;::::::::?•;:::::::.;>;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.::o
»•:;::>:«:>:>:>::>:<:»:z«::;<:::>:<:::»>::>:>;»>:>::�;::»:z<::»
::.:::.:::.:::.::.::. ::;.::::.:::
:>:::;::»:z:<:<:>3>:i:::�?>:<>:::zz::>�::>::»i;:::»:::�:;:»r:::z<:»:.;::�::>:>:::>
s:::i:::::»::;::i;:: ;:.:::<::<::i::::b;:.;:;::;::
..........::::
..................................f�AXIM
'0.: :.:..R'O P ....... ...: ...:.:::..::::
PR PR
UM . RATED;:O USP.UT<AP. .
�:::^��:.r�:::i::c;•.;::.: �::..>:::;;:.::::
.::...::::::::::................. ..
�`>`?"E<
..,..,..:,:::.�::::;.:
:::.:.::..:::.:::::::.;�.;;•.;::.;:<.;;:.::::::::.:::..
?y::'•:::;;;i:<:#::>:•::'";:2;;::::;:;::i.'•:2�:;:;':2F:Cs;;::�<:::>:<isi:«<::::>;:S:isii:;::::::::;:r>'<i[:i::[:;::`<::,,>::>::;:i:>`::�;>:::i:':[:>:�:<<:�:<:::>::::<:;:;:;'s.:;:::::'SS:':�::::>i::>::?>i:::>:�>::`:�::i:�::>::`::::;
•<.;:.::.: :>:>;>:<::
::::.:::�::::::.::..................MAXIMdM..RATED.INP
:>:;:i>:>:<:>;::::::«:s::;:;>:::;;:>:::>:::>:<::r»:;<::<:'s:<>:i:>::>:»:::i:>::>:::>::::>:i>i:>:.;:;::;;.;:;::;•..;:::>::;::::::::'
7...::.:•:.::.:..:................................
::::::.:::.:::::::::........:.:..:...................::..::::::.::::..:.::::::::::.:::::::..::.::>:
<i:zi:::.'::>r:::r<:::'SO
CE::TYP ....................
.
»:>:...
:SNIT .:::
..........MODEL
::.::::::::......,.....,.......................................:............:::.::::::::::.::...:...::..,.:
• :::::::::.:....:.:...........A......::::.:::.:.::::... ,.::.:::•.:::.:::..
::.........
.. M R..1F.lC.....N....................
.....:....:.....:.......................................................::::.::.:...
T .0 CI <,:F.OR.......:......TYPE.OF...............E(�
.. .....
>=�:.::.::.:::::.:::::..:::
................................................
IPM IV...:.....
:... ::::::::::::.::.:.:::.::.:::
.......................................................:..::...:..::.
:..
..>::;::;:::>.:.:::::::::::::.:;:.::.;:.::::.:::;:.:..::.;
STEAM ..........:.:.:.:.::.
.......:. ::....
;..;:.;:..>:.:::::..:::.:.:::::::.::..:..::.::;;::;::>:s::>::<:::<::::
ECHANICAL. .....
:::.:::..::.::...ELECTRICAL.:.::::::
:..........:... ...
.
:;:.>:.::;::..;:.:;.;;<.;..::..:;.;..,::.;.:.;.::;::.:
. .
..................
..NCt ...................ETHER
. ,.'FY ... .:..:...:..............
:.:.:..........................
..... ..UEL............................FUEL::::.::::...
....:�:.::::.,:,.:...:....................................:::....:.:::.:::..:,...::.:.:.:::::::::::::::::......................:
.. .:.................................
L O U HR .........
...... MIL r N.sr. / .
•...........:.:::::::::.::_::::....................
:..::.:::::::::.:::::::................
USE.COD�.A).:....::.:..
..t.............................:.:.:...:.:::::::..::::.
;.;:r::;
:::.::::.:<:.;..:.::.:.>;::.;:::.:::.:::::.::::::.
:::::;.::.:;>:,..;•:::;:.:.;•:;::;:.;::>::;:.
NORSEPOW Et.....
r:.;:.;::;:;•;:
.:. S CODE B
:::::::::::..............................
:.:...........,.
.........................Ea.IpME..::..:..:.................................................,.....................:::::::.::::::.:...:..............................................
:::::.::.::::.::::::::.:.:::....:..
:...::.::... lb hr
...........{ ! ..I.........................
::.::.............
:......:.......................................:....................
4 ).:
..........
5
Oven Burners
natural
3 Units
10.5
gas
11
5
4
Dryer
3.52
natural
5
as
11
Code A - Equipment
Code A (continued)
Code B - Usage
BOILER TYPE:
1 . Pulverized Coal - Wet Bottom
2. Pulverized Coal - Dry Bottom
3. Pulverized Coal - Cyclone Furnace
4. Spreader Stoker
5. Chain or Travelling Grate Stoker
6. Underfeed Stoker
7. Hand -Fired Coal
8. Oil, Tangentially Fired
9. Oil, Horizontally Fired (except rotary cup)
10. Gas, Tangentially Fired
11. Gas, Horizontally Fired
12. Wood with Flyash Reinjection
13. Wood without Flyash Reinjection
14. Other Type Boiler
STATIONARY ENGINE TYPE:
15. Combustion Turbine
16. Internal Combustion Engine
17. Other Type Engine
OTHER COMBUSTION UNITS:
18. Oven / Kiln
19. Rotary Kiln
18. Process Furnace
99. Other
M
I . Z110LI l rfVUUGIIVII
2. Drying / Curing
3. Space Heating
4. Process Heat
5. Food Processing
6. Electrical Generation
7. Mechanical Work
99.Other
FORA 7 PART 1
C DATE _—REGISTRATION NUMBER
OMPANY ME Lender's Bacrel Bakery 1-3-95
—1 Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
PROCESSING, MANUFACTURING, SURFACE COATING AND DEGREASING OPERATIONS:
.. .. ... t ff-'FE'E' b_:-I N'P IMUM:EXPEC
.......... OCESS: OR':.OP.ER*"'A".T.I'.0.4f4..A.'.'M..E
ODEL::NUM81*1::ER]��lg:.KNOWN.;�:�:�:�.':':
.....
.................. ...
N......
OTHER S
. ..... . ....
.....
R:
.3
Cooker
Mastermatic or-
5200
5200
124,800
4
"Dryer
Eaualvalent
Winkler
5200'
5200
24,800
5
Oven
Winkler
5200
5200
124,800
See Appendix Al
Include flow diagram (process schematic) relating process steps and a narrative description including feed materials, product materials, reaction intermediates and by-products; attach
complete MSDS for raw materials used or consumed and products manufactured or handled.
Specify units for each operation in Tons, Pounds, Gallons, etc., as applicable.
PMVMM 7/a4
5
FOFVA 7 PART I
COMPANY '" E L n r %' DATE / 3/ 9 5 REGISTRATION NUMBER
❑ Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
STACK PARAMETERS AND FUEL DATA:
:;:.::;:.;.:;:.:.::.:::.::.;:.;;:.;:.:::.>
;:..
;::.;:..:;.•:::::;:.::::;:>.;;.:;.:..:
VENT/STACK.OR..EXHAUST.;DATA:.::.:.::.;...;..::.;.;...:...
;.::...:;. ;:...:...
FUELS DATA
( 1
ENT//ENTI..;;;•
.r,::•.:.,..:....•;:
..: .
....
.;::: .
.... VE T.
VENT'
............::..::.;:
:.
::...:..EXIT..:
EXIT;>;::.:
;:::::::;;:.:::.::::•
.:.;::::.:<::::.....
:.::::::MAX.:.:.•
A
::RATED:
..:.:.....:::...
—MA .. :,?'.::.:.:>:.r..::>:::'>.';;
EXPECTE, ..:.:'..EXPECTED
..:,
Hid ,ER;:':
.:..............:::...:.::.:::.�::.::...:
.
:REF...:;>::.;:::STACK.;:.
;:;.:STACK.:.>:::;:;:
..
:;::::.::..:
...STACK.;.>.;:..:;DIA::..:•
::: :::VEL:OCITY
:::::::..:...::.:.:..:...::::::.
;. .:.:..::.
:.:.::,
GAS::
:.:..:...:.:......
.:...:.......
.::::: :::::;:; :.::
:.:.. S:::';:>.
....GA .:.....
::.:..........::..HEA
<::;: YPE.OF....:..;.BURNEDI
...:.T....:
BURNED!.:L:.::.::::,
.....
-:BURNED -.;TIN:;;:
......
r.:.;MA)C.:
.:
N0._......._N
.........
:.:;.:...:::.:;...;:.;:::::.;;:•;:.;::;..,.:::;.;...;::::.;:.;:;;.;:::.;.::::;;:TEMP..:.
..:..:..:::.:.::..::.......
:::
:..::
....F
«...:.:..::
OU .....
DAY....:...._.
YEAR :.::...........
;.;::::::SP
ECIF...Y.;:<::..;;SULFUR:::::::>:::>:ASH;
:::.:::::.:..:::::::::....................
..::::::.:...........................................
.....................:.::.:::.......:.:.......::...
I
.+
a .....
:....:::.::.:.........:...:....
... teat .... ......
•:........p...................
::..::::................:..:::.::..::::.:.::...
::
f m .....
;:.::.;:;:.;:.;:<..;::.::.>::.:
.::...:..::....:.:.::::
:...::.:...............
acfm.::....:.::...
..
.::;.«:.:::.;.;;:.:::•::::.::::::.::•::...:::::.:::::..:
S Cl Y:.
(.. P E.. F....
SPECIF..Y.........
...(... ............
.:.::.::::::::.:.:,.:.
(:..
:.•I
.0 ITS ..:.....
......
:�::..:::.:::::::........
...... ..........
. .:......
:...:::..::::.:::::.......:.::::.:.:....::.:....
........ ..
......:.................................
.:......:..::.:.::::.:.::::.:...:.
...:....................:...:....:::...:
::..:.:.:�:...:.:..:.::.....UNITSI...;.:
; ..;UNITS)......
.::. I...:..::..:.......:...:::.:....:..:.::.:::.:.............:........
.
3
3
1
32
10
1910
1500
180
EXHAUST
ONLY NC
FUEL
4
4
1
38 ::
0.83
1412
770
350
AT
GAS
3.5
87.5
27,300
1050
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
BTU/CF
4
5
1
32
1.0
1273
1000
AMB
EXHAUST
ONLY:;
NO FUEL
5
6
1
38
1.14
754
770
350
AT
GAS
3.5
87.5
27,300
1050
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
3.5
87.5
27,300
1050
5
7
1
38
1.14
754
770
350
AT
GAS
MBTU/H
MBTU7H
MBTU/H
MBTU/CF
3.5
87.5
27,300
1050
5
8
1
38
1.14
754
770
350
AT
GAS
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
MBTU/H
MBTU/CF
Ground Elevation = 690.00
Code K -Vent/Stack Configuration Building Roof = 715.00
1. Unobstructed vertical discharge
2. Obstructed vertical discharge (e.g., raincap)
3. Horizontal or downward discharge (e.g., T-stack)
99. Other (specify)
• Above Ground Level.
•• Identify All Types of Fuels (Including Auxiliary Fuels, In -Process Fuels) and Corresponding Data.
••• Use Tons for Solid Fuels, Thousands of Gallons for. Liquids, and Millions of Cubic Feet for Gaseous Fuels.
RanaM 7194 10 F'OMA 7 PART I
r r r it r r r. r r r r r r r ■r r r r r
COMPANY lull DATE REGISTRATION NUMBER �J
Lender' 1/3/95
,_•,,.Check •box. if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
STACKIPARAMETERS "AND FUEL DATA: ;
UEL DATA'::i...
1....:.:..:..:::.::..............
::: EXPECTED`::
5,...
9
1
32
1.14
.3429°:.
3500
350
EXHAUST
ONLY:
NO
FUEL
5
10
1
32
1.14
3429
3500'
350
EXHAUST
ON
Y':
NO
FIJEL
r-
Code K - Vent/Stack Configuration
1. Unobstructed vertical discharge
2. Obstructed vertical discharge (e.g., raincap)
3. Horizontal or downward discharge (e.g., T-stack)
99. Other (specify)
• Above Ground Level.
•• Identify All Types of Fuels (Including Auxiliary Fuels, In -Process Fuels) and Corresponding Data.
•"` Use Tons for Solid Fuels, Thousands of Gallons for Liquids, and Millions of Cubic Feet for Gaseous Fuels.
ReWTM 7/M 10- 2
FofrA 7 PART 1
REGISTRATION NUMBER
COMPANY Lender's Bagel Bakery
❑ Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT:
Code L - AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT TYPE
1. Settling Chamber
2. Cyclone
3. Multicyclone
4. Cyclone scrubber
5. Orifice scrubber
6. Mechanical scrubber
7. Venturi scrubber
(a) fixed throat
(b) variable throat
8. Mist eliminator
9. Electrostatic Precipitator
(a) hot side
(b) cold side
(c) high voltage
(d) low voltage
(a) single stage
(f) two stage
(g) other (specify)
10. Filter
(a) baghouse
(b) other (specify)
11 . Catalytic Afterburner
12. Direct Flame Afterburner
13. ABSORBER
(a) packed tower
(b) spray tower
(c) tray tower
(d) venturi
(e) other (specify)
14. ABSORBER
(a) activated carbon
(b) molecular sieve
(c) activated alumina
(d)silica gel
(a) other (specify) _
15. Condenser (specify)
99. Other (specify)
POMA 7 PART I
RE1IfE» 7194
COMPANY ( E T,Pnr1Pr S Raat-1 Rakery DATE 1-3-95 REGISTRATION NUMBER
❑ Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
AIR PnI 111TrnN cnNTRni FnIIIPMFNT - gtlPPLFMFNTAL INFORMATION -
GE RE N :..:
;::>::
.....:..... ..
ERA ION
T
U ::::*
PRESS
:::::::..:...::::»>:>:<•;::
:.: •..
:.:................ :::.
...
T:YP.E..
FLOW:..:
LIQUID...:...
::..:::::: :..:::
MEDIUM.:....
:::CLEANING`.-
G::
;.:
;:: U BER::.::;::
::.�....::::_:
NUMBER;,:.:
>;;:;::;:::.::::;c:.:::::.:.:....:
O .:::.;:.,:...;.
F
,;;>..:;;..;:.
,AIR ;TO::.
CLOTH.:::..
..
.:::.;.:;:::•;.;:.:...
.•::.:.......
.. .
METHOD
CHAMBER:.'.
: RETENTION :
RE'DR OP
ii::.
.:;VENT::.;;.:.:•::.:.:.
..:.:..�:.::.:.
::::
<....
.;::..;:::.RATE:::;;.;:.
;:;::.;:.:::.;.;.:::><.;
;
: ;.METHOD.;: ,
<
.::::::::.:OF:•.;:.::.;
.:::. .:.:.:::.:....
.:: SECTIONS.:...:.RATIO::..:..
MATERIALY..
INLET;
C .CLE....
TEMP. I,F)
f.::;.�.;:..;
z:.......
::.REF..:::
..........
:.:::.(USE
•:: STACK::.::::
.....................
.:.:..:.:........
:•:.::.:....:I9
'ODE:::*
.CODE
m).:::;;>::;:
.........(
........................:
..::;::>::>::::;>::::>
>:::...:.,,;::;:.;:.:.;:•:::::.:<.;::;
Codes:.:
:..
::::..:...:: .:....::.::::
:.:s:::.>:>:::> :: ;;;:>:>:::::;::>:.
:..:....::::.FIELDS::.::..:.:..:::.:.::::::::..:::.::::..
::.:.:..:...
:•::::::::::::::••:::::...::.::::::::::.:::::,�
•::.�
..:... .......
•:::.::.:
...........................:odes:..;:
..
::::.:::::::...:•.:;
::.:.: ;:::.:::.
.................:.:......
......::.::::
> r
:.:.:::::::.:::....:.
..TEMP.:.:::.....
e::.....:.:.:..:.::::::::.::::.:::
I F)....
::TIME::.
•:. (Codes.:.::.:
..l �>•:::>:»
<.;:.;:.::..;.:.::
::.::::.:::.::.;:.;;::.::
,.;:.;:::.:.;:: <.: •::..;.
:.: ::
Codee .4 5 .:
...:.:...:,.:: �:: �:::..::
... ....
1. ,.13 1 h ...
( d ..
Cotlea:::....:.
.......::::.::..::::::.:.::..::::::::.:.::::::::.:::::::.....
Cpde:...
(Code 101
...... •::::::.sec
:;::;:•
{.....1.:::.::....
;::::..;:.:::.;:.,<:<'r:;:::::,;;,;;.,:..:.:>
.....
1.. 12 :: .:.:.:1.1.121_.:.:::.:::::.::
<::<......
:..................................:...:..:...:....7.
:.::::::::.
,:..:::.:::::.:::::.::..................:.........;::.:.:..:..:::::..:.......:.................................................................
i, ,1. l..:..::....:..........
.
.::..::...:::.....
:... Code.....
1..... .
Polyest
r.
Gravit
1
1
10A
N/A
N/A
None
N/A
N/A
1 3
IN.on.wovellAMB
Clean
AMB
N/A
6" WC
I
Polyester
Gravity
2
2
10A
N/A
N/A
None
A
A
"
Code L - AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT TYPE
1. Settling Chamber
2. Cyclone
3. Multicyclone
4. Cyclone scrubber
5. Orifice scrubber
6. Mechanical scrubber
7. Venturi scrubber
(a) fixed throat
(b) variable throat
8. Mist eliminator
9. Electrostatic Precipitator
(a) hot side
(b) cold side
(c) high voltage
(d) low voltage
(a) single stage
(f) two stage
(g) other (specify)
10. Filter
(a) baghouse
(b) other (specify)
11. Catalytic Afterburner
12. Direct Flame Afterburner
* 6" Maximum - DP Cell override for cleaning
ntVna» 71W4 12
13. ABSORBER
(a) packed tower
(b) spray tower
(c) tray tower
(d) venturi
(e) other (specify)
14. ADSORBER
(a) Activated carbon
(b) Molecular sieve
(c) Activated alumina
(d) Silica gel
(a) other (specify)
15. Condenser (specify)
99. Other (specify)
' Steam stripping, hot air, etc.
POWA 7 PART I
COMPANY070�;�Lender ' S Bagel Bakery DATE 1 / 3 / 9 5 REGISTRATION NUMBER
Check box if this page shows alternative operating'scenario(s).
El
CRITERIA PN I IMANT FMIRSIONS INFW AND MODIFIED SOURCESL-
1 1
2 2
3 1 3 1 SEt B CT RE O T
4 14,5
5 6,7,8
5 9,10
Code M Emission Estimate Method (provide detailed calculations including assumed control efficiency of control equipment, if applicable)
1. Stack Test (include a copy)
2. Material Balance (include calculations)
3. Emission Factor (identify)
99. Other (describe)
• TSP, PM,,, V�OCs should also be split up by component and reported under TOXIC POLLUTANTS.
REMED 7/94
13
FOFFA 7 PART I
..L
FC
OMPANY _ _i IE 1 —T—DATE REGISTRATION NUMBER
Lender's Bagel Bakery1 3 95
❑ Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
Trvvin nn1111TAkfT CDMUI DDnDnCCr% CAMI ITV InAw and mnrlifinri anrlrnna -
0
........wee
C.0
VTRQLLED.
5 9 3.8 14.85 N/A N/A I 99
s l 10 1 3.81 14.851 N/A I N/A I I I I I I I I I 99
tal I 7.61 29.7
Code M Emission Estimate Method (provide detailed calculations including assumed control efficiency of control equipment, if applicable)
1. Stack Test (include a copy)
2. Material Balance (include calculations)
3. Emission Factor (identify)
99. other (describe) American institute of Baking Formula — see Report
Toxic -Pollutant means any air pollutant for which no ambient air quality standard has been established. Particulate matter and volatile organic compounds are not toxic pollutants as generic classes
of substances, but individual substances within these classes may be non -criteria toxic pollutants because their toxic properties or because a TLV (tm) has been established. See toxic pollutant
listing in the front of this application. Specify which pollutants are also reported as TSP, PM10, or VOCs.
14
FOffA 7 PAFrr i
i/M M M M M M M M M M M
C0MPA - ELender's Bagel Bakery
❑ Check box if this page shows alternative operating scenario(s).
OPERATING PERIODS:
DATE 1 / 3 / 9 5 REGISTRATION NUMBER
..
::<'>.'•<:>:;>:.;:::>::.;;;;>
::::..:::::::::.::.:,.::.:::::::::.::::.:::::.:.::;::::..:::::.::.;::::...:....................
<:>:<:::5::::::>i::::»::r�:<::�>E:>:::'•::::»:<::::::2:?::><:><:::�:;;.;::�:£':�i:;:;:::;>::>:;::::;<z;:;<:>:;>:;�;�::>:
CEN:7'AIVNUA :..
L USE' ::
.:..................._..:.. lTH�tOUG ::> >: EA50N...........................................
>:::::;>::::::;,�>:;>:;»::;:::;::>:::;<;:::::::>:::<�:>:>
hto.RN1AL:::p.)oC>_sS ;;.;
...... Q P.MEk7:::OPER >::::.
71± Ui .
:>;:.;�:::;�:;>:>;:::�:::;;<::;::;�>;::>:>i;::;i:;:::;�:;>::;i:::>:;:;:>;;::>:>::;;:::;;::;�:;:::is::»;::>::i;::;;:<::i::i;::>::>.
:,;:>:;: MAXI UM. E U .
M Q IPMENT/P OCEsS:. PRATING...
....:. ..... .......::::::.:::::...........:::::::.�:::::...........:::::::.:::...:..........:.:.:::::::::............:.
.
...........
;:;,:..:,r:i::::;:::::isz:;:::;::::i�;:.;:;::[::i:;::::;�
H........
J ::::.:....::::
.................
::::::....•
.:.:�::::::.......
.:.::::::::......::::..:..:..:.:...::.::.:::::.::::::::::..::..:::..:.:.::::::..:.........
MA.Y..:::.............
..............AUG
5:.;>;;:.>:::.:.:
..:................
....:..................
WEE .............::::::................:::.:.
K............
...........
:.::.:::.:............::::::::::.::.:..................:::::...:::................:.:PER...
........YEA:::::>:.;:.;:�;;:<:::.:.;:.;:.;:.;:.
RS. PER..
:.
........ • ..::::.::
......:
....::::.:...:.
3
25%
25%
25%
25%
24
13/2wks
50
24
130/2wks
50
5
6
AX.IMUNI .FACI[ITY;OPERATING :SCHEDULE '.,..:.._
HOURS PER DAY
24
DAYS PER WEEK
7
WEEKS PER YEAR
50
Rana® 7194 16
FOfrN 7 PART 1
January 3, 1994
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOL O G Y
ANALYSIS
LENDER'S BAGEL BAKERY
General Foods Bakeries Company
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester, VA 22603
Prepared by:
J. Mark Krcmarik, PE
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc
1537 Main Street
Springfield, MA 01103
(413)787-1785
'
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3 1994
'
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
ABBREVIATIONS
'
BTU/H
BTU's per hour
'
CFH
CFM
Cubic feet per hour
Cubic feet
per minute
CF
Cubic feet
'
FPM
Feet per minute
FT
Feet
GR/CF
Grains per cubic foot
'
HPY
Hours per year
PCF
Pounds per cubic foot
PPH
Pounds per hour
'
PPY
Pounds per year
P/M
Pounds per minute
'
ppm
Parts per million
SF
Square Feet
'
TPY
TPH
Tons per year
Tons per hour
1
'
Page 1
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3, 1994
Page I
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Facility and Process Description
2.0 Regulatory Requirements
3.0 Plant Operating Data
4.0 Flour Silos
5.0 Burners - Gaseous Fuel
6.0 Ethanol Emissions
7.0 Alternative Control Technologies
8.0 Cost/Operating Analysis
9.0 Conclusions
APPEN7DICES
A 1, Process Flow Diagram
A2. Flour Transfer Flow Diagram
B. Flour Emission Calculations
C. Flour Particle Analyses
D. Burner Emissions Calculations
E. Vendor Cost Data - Catalytic Oxidizers
F. BACT Detailed Cost Analysis
G. Roof Plan
H. Site Plan
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3, 1994
Page 2
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
1.0 Facility and Process Description
The facility is located in Frederick County just to the north of the City of Winchester. The
facility was constructed in 1990 and added to in 1993. The facility currently houses a beverage
process that produces bottled drinks. The current facility does not produce any regulated
emissions and consequently does not have any existing air emission permits. The existing
facility occupies approximately 200,000 square feet.
The proposed project will add a bagel production area in the existing building and will include
the construction of a holding freezer, shipping/receiving dock, refrigeration engine room and a
spiral freezer. The bagel facility will be a separate operating unit from the beverage unit in both
production and economic considerations. The bagel arga will occupy 63,000 square feet of
existing building a and 20,330 square feet of constructed space.
The proposed process area and the equipment is very specific to bagels and consequently will not
be capable of producing other products. A flow diagram is included in Appendix A. The
process ingredients are primarily flour and water plus minor amounts of flavorings such as
raisins, onions, etc.
The projected process emissions are:
Particulates from the Flour Silo - See Section 4.0
.2 Combustion By -Products from Baking Oven and Dryer- See Section 5.0
VOC emissions from Baking Oven - See Section 6.0
2.0 Regulatory Requirements
The facility lies in the Virginia Air Quality Region II and is administered from the Regional
Department of Environmental Quality office in Springfield, Virginia. All permitting will be
directed through the Region 7 office in Springfield. AQR II is considered to be an attainment
area for VOC emissions.
The bagel facility is regulated by the Commonwealth of Virginia via the REGULATIONS FOR
THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION, more specifically Part V Section
120-05-0401 (Rule 5-4). This regulation provides the standards of performance for stationary
new and modified air emission sources. This section provides for Best Available Control
Technology to be applied to all emissions except as exempted in Appendix R.
This Report is submitted as means to document compliance with the BACT for the emissions
and those which are exempted.
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
January 3, 1994
Page 3
The ethanol emissions will also be subject to the toxic emission rule (Rule 5-5) as ethanol is
included on the US EPA list of 189 hazardous materials. The limits are the lesser of either the
stated limits of 100 TPY/22.8 PPII or the calculated limits based on the TLV-STEL. The
calculated values are 94,000 micrograms per cubic meter as the maximum hour or the annual
average of 3,760 micrograms per cubic meter.
3.0 Plant Data
3.1 Operating Data
The bagel facility will operate as follows:
50 weeks per year
24 hours per day for 13 days followed by I day for sanitation
The operation is 7800 hours per year
Production design is for 5,200 doz/hr bagels at 90% plant efficiency = 4,680 doz/1Ir
Employees: 310
3.2 Raw Ingredients
The main bagel ingredients are flour, water, and yeast. The yeast is necessary to cause the dough
to rise. The other flavor ingredients include: egg, onion, raisins, salt, garlic, etc. All ingredients
and cleaning materials are listed by FDA as "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS).
4.0 Flour Silos/Transfer
The facility will have two flour silos with a flour transfer system to the production area. The
system is shown in the process flow diagram in Appendix A. The flour system will have two
points of emission which are at the top of the silos which is 76 feet above the ground. The
calculations in APPENDIX B are based on one silo filling and the other silo feeding production.
The divert valves at the top of the silos are controlled to prevent the silos from filling and
running in parallel.
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc Springfield, MA 01103
L
k
k
L
I
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Wincliester, VA
January 3, 1994
Page 4
The PM 10 emissions considered exempt per Appendix R Part V as the total potential emission is
less than 10 tons per year. Particulate data from the flour vendors is provided in Appendix C that
indicate that less than 10% of the flour is below 10 micron. The TSP emissions are not
exempted as the total potential exceeds 15 TPY. Based on the potential TSP of the air exhaust
from the silo/transfer system is being provided. This will limit the emissions to less than 0.03
tons per year.
5.0 Burners - Gaseous Fuels
5.1 Dryer
The bagel dryer is 8 feet long by 12 feet wide and is an indirect fired system. The dryer is
operated at a temperature of 200 to 300 degrees F and is used to remove surface moisture from
the bagels prior to the oven. This arrangement dries the bagel surface to keep the bagel from
sticking to the oven conveyor belt. The dryer operating temperature and the detention time in the
dryer are not adequate to cook the bagels.
The dryer burners are connected to a common flue. The dryer has a total heat input capacity of
3.5 MBTU/H and will operate between 60 to 75% of capacity depending on other operating
conditions.
5.2 Baking Oven
The baking oven is 196 feet long by 12 feet wide. The oven is an indirect fire design using three
natural gas burners with an exhaust flue for each burner. The oven operates at nominal baking
temperature of 350 to 500 degrees F. The burners will take room air for combustion.
The oven burners are Model 435 as manufactured by Maxon. The burners are rated at 3.5
million BTU/Hr each with a total burner capacity of 10.5 million BTU/Hr and can burn gaseous
fuel only.
The burner emissions calculations for the burner by-products of combustion are included as
APPENDIX D and based on the EPA AP-42 emission factors for a gaseous fuel burner. These
are very conservative for this operation. Burner permit limits are requested based on the EPA
values to insure that further stack testing will be waived.
As the total input capacity is less than 50 million BTU/Hr as a gaseous fuel, the burners are
exempted per Appendix R Part II A.4. The calculations demonstrate compliance with other
exemptions in Appendix R.
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc
Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3, 1994
' Page 5
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
' 6.0 Ethanol Emissions
As shown on the process flow diagram, the yeast, water and flour are added to a mixer where the
' dough is produced. The mixture undergoes a metabolic fermentation process where the yeast
produces ethanol as a by-product that is held in the dough as a liquid. The ethanol is not
vaporized until a baking temperature is reached in the oven.
Prior to the oven, the dough goes through several stages which takes a maximum of 1.013 hours
as shown on the flow diagram in APPENDIX A. The function of the various stages are:
1. Dough is first formed in to dough balls of the appropriate weight,
2. The first proofer provides time for the dough to "relax",
3. The dough ball is formed into a bagel shape,
4. The final proofer allows for further "rise",
5. The cooker seals the dough into the bagel shape and provides the shiny outer shell
6. The dryer removes excess surface moisture.
During the above processes only minor amounts of ethanol are released to the atmosphere as
the dough has a relatively small surface area during the processing for the ethanol to escape.
Also, the cooker seals the dough surface to minimize the ethanol escape through the surface.
The American Baking Institute has indicated that the ethanol, is not released until the yeast is
killed. This further attested in a report titled "Technical Assessment Report for Regulation 8
Rule 42 - Organic Compounds - Large Commercial Bakeries" dated July 27, 1989 and prepared
by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in San Francisco, California. This report
indicates that over 90% of the ethanol is released during the baking and concludes that the
emissions prior to baking are not to be considered in the control schemes. The release of ethanol
has been quantified to less than 0.4 tons per year in the proofer area in a RACT analysis for a
commercial bakery in the Richmond Nonattainment Area.
The ethanol emission calculations are based on the American Baking Institute formula for
ethanol which is based on the percent yeast and the fermentation time. The formula is:
Ethanol (pounds per ton of dough) = (0.44585 * % sponge yeast * fermentation time) + 0.40425
The proposed maximum values for this operation are:
Percent sponge yeast = 2.3%
Fermentation Time = 1.013 hours
The calculation is as follows:
Ethanol (pounds per ton of dough) = (0.44585 * 2.3 * 1.013) + 0.40425 = 1.44 pounds per ton.
11
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc
Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
January 3, 1994
Page 6
The annual ethanol emissions will vary based on the oven throughput and the percent sponge
yeast as the fermentation time is fixed. The 2.3% sponge yeast is an average measure taken over
the current products. The ethanol calculations thus include the average ethanol load at the
maximum throughput which will provide a conservative value for the annual tons of ethanol
produced. The annual ethanol emission is:
Bagel Dough Weight = 3.0 Oz 0.1875 lbs/bagel
Production Rate = 4,680 doz per hour
Dough Rate = 4680 DPI -I* 12/doz*0.1875 lbs ea* 0.0005 T/lbs
5.26 TPII
Annual Production = 7,800 hours
Annual Wet Dough = 7800*5.26 = 41,067 TPY of dough
Annual Ethanol Emission = 41067 TPY * 1.44 Ibs E /T * 0.0005 T/Ibs
29.5 TPY Ethanol
The proofers, cooker and dryer are thus considered to be exempt from the BACT analysis as the
incremental cost to capture and control these emissions would increase the oxidizer size by a
factor of three for only a minor amount of ethanol controlled i.e. a cost exceeding $6,000 per ton.
7.0 Alternative Control Technologies
The following control technologies have been considered as potential control technologies for
the ethanol emissions. Thermal catalytic oxidizers have been shown by different sources to be
the most cost efficient and useful in a commercial bakery including the two references in Section
6. These have been used by the General Foods Bakery Companies in larger bakeries for ethanol
control.
7.1 Thermal Catalytic Oxidizers
These are the most common VOC control device in the baking industry. The energy
consumption is reasonable with respect to other technologies, however, they are prone to fouling
of the catalyst bed by particulates and may require periodic cleaning or replacement.
7.2 Thermal Oxidizers
This unit is a simple combustion unit that suffers from high (per ton of VOC) fuel costs. The
ease of operation does not offset the fuel inefficiency.
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3, 1994
Page 7
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
7.3 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers
These units are an improvement on thermal oxidizers but are not as efficient as the catalytic
units. The ceramic bed is heavy and fragile and can make siting and structural considerations
more difficult.
7.4 Carbon Absorption
This technology is not viable due the large surface area of carbon needed and the final disposal
of the spent carbon is often a more serious problem then the VOC.
7.5 Wet Scrubbers
The wet scrubbers are used for highly concentrated VOC emissions. However, they create a
secondary waste flow that must be treated as well. Secondary treatment is not feasible due to the
dilute nature of the VOC.
7.6 Condensation
This technology is viable only for concentrated air streams. The costs are prohibitive except for
high cost VOC or concentrated streams.
7.8 Biofiltration
Biofiltration is a new technology for the removal of VOC and is feasible for cool air streams.
The costs to reduce the air temperature to avoid killing the microbes is detrimental to its use in
bakeries.
7.9 Product Reformulation
Product reformulation has not proven to be effective in the baking industry as the reformulations
are often not acceptable to the consumers. Also, the relatively low yeast content in the bagel
dough is not conducive to this reduction method.
8.0 Cost/Operating Analysis
The use of a thermal catalytic oxidizer was investigated for the destruction of the ethanol from
the oven exhaust stacks. The analysis assumes that both stacks are served by a common oxidizer
that would treat 30 TPY of ethanol at 7000 ACFM. The oxidizer would be mounted on a
concrete slab at ground level that would have a 60 feet tall stack. The detailed costs are shown in
APPENDIX F.
Tlie Dennis Engineering Group, Inc Springfield, MA 01103
BACT ANALYSIS REPORT January 3, 1994
' Page 8
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
ANNUAL COSTS
Capital at 10% for 10 yrs, $310,800 $50,581
Gas at 700 efli at $0.52/therm
$29,812
Power at 55 I-IP at $0.09/KW-I-Ir
$28,958
Operating/Maintenance Labor
$35,000
Catalyst Replacement
$2,000
'
Replacement parts at 3% of Capital
$5,214
1 TOTAL ANNUAL COST $151,564
TOTAL ANNUAL EMISSIONS 30 TPY
' COST OF EMISSION REDUCTION $5,052 PER TON
9.0 Conclusions
' The flour silo emissions for PM 10 emissions are below a total potential of 10 per year and are
consequently exempt from the permit. The total poetential for TSP, however, exceeds 15 TPY
which will requires control. A filtration system is proposed to be installed on the exhaust stack
tfrom the silos.
The gaseous fuel burners for the operation total less than 50 million BTU/Hr which are exempted
' from permit requirements. However, limits on the by product of combustion are requested in the
permit.
The analysis indicates that the ethanol emissions are recoverable from two exhaust stacks from
the oven with a total potential to emit of 29.7 tons per year. These emissions would be reduced
by 90 to 95% using a thermal catalytic oxidizer. The ethanol emissions from the pre -oven dough
' processes are not considered significant and below the exemption levels. I-Iowver, the cost to
reduce the ethanol emissions is not economically feasible based on a criteria of $3000 per ton per
year.
' The concludion of the analysis is that the BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY for
this process is NO CONTROL based on the current ethanol emissions and gaseous fuel ratings..
END OF BACT ANALYSIS
L
I
The Dennis Engineering Group, Inc
Springfield, MA 01103
APPENDIX A -I
a t a I 7 I a I a
c
`I IA
31 IB
STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK
j3 f4 15 #6 /7 #9 110 18
U
Z
O Z
D
YEAST SLURRY DOUGH DOUGH DMONG h Jill
FlRST PROOFING BAGEL FORMING FlNAL PROOFlNC
ONION SLURRY WDDERS ROUND IpULDM
LIQUD SUGAR
MINOR NGRED.
MIH
mU
FLOW CHART E
BAGEL PRODUCTION
THE DRW GROUP, INC.
F F
. cvle>Sruaox �uluG;o�er
PROC
Q WWCHESTER PLANT ENGINIMING Q °"� '� GF BAKERY COMPANIES FLOW DMRAM
vZ"X�. 1r0UD3 • II.iI
WINCHESTERRGINIA FLOUR/MIXER AREA
w a., vis Rnido w . VA-
..1[ �iiiiIasfm.IdI IEYIfIOi WV*C 1l W 22003 lm4qI or q
l� tsa wa s x RmwT ff MVT 9-oyas ►oaoa . WK i MO... IN W�s� : p�s�n �. or wr K M M IK ...r a woo OU a a pW rs = Mp= .� ti. ww m r IT m wocwx .0 soar ram awoaxi- w .ne.m. oar 9 4 —019 B 901 Y�
� I
� I
j
F-
L
�u
L
I APPENDIX A-2
BI
F
T
a-
A_
2 ' 3 ' 4 1 S 1 c I 7 1 a I 0
RETURN FLOW
IA
�913
�IH
-E
a
THE DRH GROUP. INC. g
F KAMMcmtrrzuc�„F
r WNW VOL 443-757—VM d
v WINCEESTER PLANT ENGMERING �` 01iL a0� GF BAKERY COMPANIES FLOW DIAGRAM
GEWMn FOODS II5L „ � K WINCHESTER• VIRGINIA FLOUR/MIXER AREA
a� tfYItIQt91 mfw w I 'kN0*5iER, VA. 22003 at e��oao or
nn t ww s x �nr f IOHlr anar r000a x xr i anw. tt swr� eaeaa� s x aar rar a. a x aaes� aer x tr ��� a eau a Fa aer sue a� sr >rr we eao Ir r. nvaoau FWWOEL I CO or 9=X T= RMNUM C 9 4 — 019 B 902
?
APPENDIX B
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
FLOUR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
1.0 Process Operating Conditions
Operating Cycle =
Operating Weeks
January 3, 1994
Proj. No. 1114
by JMK
13 days out of 1 (One day per cycle for sanitation)
50 Weeks/year
Operating Days = 325 Days per year
Annual operation = 7,800 I-IPY
Plant Efficiency = 90%
2.0 Floui• Handling System
2.1 Truck Unloading
Flour Consumption = 9,600 PPHH
A truck is unloaded in approximately one hour
Flour Delivery = 50,000 PPH
Operation per year = 1,498 HPY
Only One truck to unload at a time
Delivery Flow Rate = 650 CFM
74,880,000 PPY
25 TPH
Page 1
APPENDIX B January 3, 1994
Proj. No. 1114
Lender's Bagel Bakery by JMK
Winchester, VA
FLOUR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
2.2 Return From Process
Return Rate = 24000 PPI-I 12 TPH
Return Flow Rate =
700 CFM
Opertion per year = 780 I-IPY
Operates only 10% of the time during processing
2.3 Dehumidifier
Flow Rate =
600 CFM
This does not contribute to the flour load and operates separately
from both the truck unloading and return flow; this does not
contribute to the flour load to the filters.
2.4 Fluidizing Air
Flow Rate = 220 CFM
Opertion per year = 780 I-IPY
Operates with Process and Return Flow
Page 2
i
1
APPENDIX B January 3, 1994
Proj. No. 1114
by JMK
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
'
FLOUR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
3.0 Operating Conditions
'
3.1 Operating Condition 1 - Flour Delivery
This condition is normal during unloading and occurs 90% of the time
'
Flow Rate = 650 CFM
'
Use EPA load factor of 1.5 lbs of Flour in head space per Ton
'
Flour Load in head space = 37.5 PPH Flour as Potential Emissions
25.272 TPY
Removal Efficiency = 99.90% at 10 micron
'
Emissions from Filters = 0.0375 PPI-I
0.0253 TPY
'
Removal in Penthouse = 99.00%
'
Emissions from Penthouse = 0.000375 PPI-I
0.0003 TPY
3.2 Operating Condition 2 Return from Process & Fluidizing
This condition occurs only 10% of the time during Flour Unloading
'
Flow Rate = 920 CFM
'
Use EPA load factor of 1.5 lbs of Flour in head space per Ton
Flour Load in head space = 55.5 PPI-I Flour as Potential Emissions
4.1558 TPY
1
Removal Efficiency = 99.90% at 10 micron
Emissions from Filters = 0.0555 PPH
0.0042 TPY
'
Page 3
APPENDIX B
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Winchester, VA
FLOUR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
Removal in Penthouse = 99.00%
Emissions from Penthouse = 0.000555 PPI-I
January 3, 1994
Proj. No. 1114
by JMK
3.3 Operating Condition 3 - Dehumidifier Only - No Emission
This occurs 90% of the time when the trucks are not unloading
No Emission = 5,522 HPY
4.0 Filtration System Design
Cotton flannel bags with gravity clean at no flow conditions
0.0000 TPY
Removal efficiency = 99% at 10 micron
Maximum Air to Cloth Ratio 4 CFM/SF (from Industrial Ventilation Handbook)
Maximum Flow = 920 CFM
Bag Area Required = 230 SF
Bag Surface Area = 37 SF
Bags Required = 6
Bags Provided = G
Page 4
APPENDIX B
January 3, 1994
'
Proj. No. 1114
by JMK
Lender's Bagel Bakery
Wincliester, VA
'
FLOUR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
5.0 Louver Design
rMaximum
Flow =
920 CFM
'
Maximum Velocity =
50 FPM
Area Required =
18.4 SF
6.0 Summaiy
29.4 TPY
Total Potential Pat•ticulates
'
Testing indicates Flour is less
than 10% PM10
'
Potential PM10 Emissions =
2.9 TPY
Total Emissions =
0.0003 TPY
'
CFM
Maximum Flow =
920
'
Maximum Load =
0.000555 PPI-I
0.0333 P/M
'
Maximum Concentration =
3.62E-05 PCF
0.253369565 GR/CF
If Dilution by plume =
0.001
'
Ambient Air Concentration =
0.0003 GR/CF
'
Allowable Concentration =
0.022 GR/CF
1
'
Page 5
H
H
u
APPENDIX C
d
I
10:57 AM
*CFM SPRINGFIELD
P 0 1
CARGILL,'
FLOUR AHUING DIVISION
DATE:
TIME SENT:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 14
TO:
COMPANY:
TELEPHONE # TO CONFIRM:
FROM: Cargill Flour Milling
SENDER:,,k
OUR FAX# IS
J217_788_1230
NOTES: 1 4 11� Py"'n'nr-, ��— ' 1 ?P` 1Q/ r/Q
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE PROPER NUMBER OF PAGES PLEASE CALL BACK.
Cargill Flour Milling
1525 East Phillips
Springfield, Illinois 62702
-1 .. ., ..... v,�►-
RANGE (MICRONS)
vn , •-non,
RUN 1
-!►. vveb
RUN 2
wfy1L- ov
AVERAGE
498-704
010
0.0
0.0
362.498
0.0
0,0
0.0
249-352
0.0
0.0
0,0
178.248
6.2
6.0
0.1
124.175
13,5
13.6
13.5
88.0-124
18.8
18.9
18,6
62.2-88.0
20.0
19.8
19.9
44.0-62.2
14.5
14.4
14,4
31.1-44.0
8.8
8.6
8.6
22,0-31.1
8,8
618
6.8
15.6-22.0
5.7
5.7
5.7
11.0-15.6
2.e
2.6
2.6
7,78-11.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.50.7.78
110
1,1
1.0
3.89.5,60
0.3
0,3
0.3
2.76-3.8C
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.94.2.75
0.6
0,0
016
1.3$-1,94
0,0
0,0
0,0
0.97-1.38
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,69.0.97
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
36.0
30.0
26.0
20.0
16.0
x
�u 10.0
0 5,0
0.0
ou1v11xjmrSJ
uM A
RUN 1
RUN 2
AVERAGE
10%
19.9
1919
19.9
50%
72.9
72,9
72.9
90%
161.4
160.9
161.1
MV
81.3
81,2
$1.2
08
0.157
0.158
0.158
MICROTRAC DIFFERENTIAL VOLUME GRAPH
0,97 1.94 3.89 7.78 15.8 31.1 62.2 124 248 498
PARTICLE DIAMETER AT UPPER CHANNEL EDGE (MICRONS)
' 1 1. 29. 94 10 : 57
to NY 40I80 96 '6d 'I I
AM *CFM SPRINGFIELD
P 0 2
11
I I
I I
u
11
MICROTRAC PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS REPORT
REQUESTOR;
MEDALLION
CUSTOMER SID;
#2
DESCRIPTION;
WHEAT FLOUR
BID:
04020095
DATE;
NOVEMBER
26, 1994
CHANNEL SIZE
DIFFERENTIAL
VOLUMI!
°4
SUMM6RY-26TA
RANGE (MICRONS)
RUN!
RUN 2 AVERAGE
RUN 1
RUN 2
AVERAGE
496-704
0.0
0.0
T,0
10%
%B
19.5
915
352.498
0.0
0.0
010
60%
72.9
72.0
_... 72.8
240-362
0.0
0.0
0.0
90%
161.7
150.6
16111
178.24a
4.3
4,0
4.2
124.175
12.1
12,2
12.1
MV
78.5
78,1
78.3
88.0.124
21.7
21.9
21.5
C8
0,1a2
0.163
0.153
02.2-88,0
20,3
19.9
20.1
44.0.62.2
13,3
13.8
13.4
31.1.44.0
9.3
913
0.3
22.0-31.1
8.9
6.8
8,a
15.8.22.0
8.8
616
6.8
11.0.16.6
2.3
2.6
2.8
7,78.11.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
S.BN7.78
1,1
1.1
1.1
3.a9.6.60
0.3
0.3
0,3
2.75.3.89
0.8
o.s
o.s
1,94.2.76
0.8
0.6
0.0
1.39-1.94
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.97.1.35
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.89.0,97
0.0
0.0
0.0
• '40,0
38.0
30.0
= 25.0
20,0
1 �.0
x 10.0
S.0
0.0
MICROTRAC DIFFERENTIAL VOLUME GRAPH
0.97 1,94 3,69 7.78 15.6 31.1 62.2 124 248 498
PARTICLE DIAMETER AT UPPER CHANNEL. EDGE (MICRONS)
1 1. 29.. 94
10:57 AM *CFM SPRINGFIELD
P 0 3
I I
I I
t]
I I
I I
I I
MICROTRAC PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS REPORT
REQUESTOR:
MEDALLION
CUSTOMER BID:
#3
DESCRIPTION:
WHEAT FLOUR
SI0:
94020695
NOVEMBER 28, 1994
DATE:
CHANNEL SIZE
RANGE MICRONS
I
RUN 1
RUN 2 AVERAGE
RUN 1
RUN 2
1
AVERAGE
11a,2
498.704
0.0
0.0
0 0
103� 19,
60°� 72.1
72,1
72.1
362.498
0.0
Q•0
0.0
90% 153,2
152.7
162.9
249.352
175.245
0.0
4.0
010
4.0
4.0
MV 78,4
7813
124-176
13.5
13.3
13.4
20.1
C8 0.105
866
0.186
58.0-124
20.8
i 9.3
20.7
19,4
19.4
$2.2.85.0
44.0-82.2
13.8
13.7
13,7
31.1.44.0
9.2
9.2
9.2
7.0
22.0-31.1
7,0
7,1
6.0
16.0.22.0
6,0
6.0
11.0.19.8
2.7
2.7
2,7
7,78.11.0
1.1
5,50.7.78
1,1
0.3
3,89.5.60
013
0,4
0.8
2,76.3,09
0.8
0.8
0.8
1 ,94.2.75
0.8
0.8
0,0
1.38.1.94
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,97.1.35
0.0
0.0
0.0
n ae_n al
0.0
0.0
MICROTRAC DIFFERENTIAL VOLUME GRAPH
40.0
38,0
solo
= 25.0
20.0
15,0
10.0
5.0
y
0,0 -
0.97 1.94 3.89 7.78 1818 31.1 82.2 124 248 498
PARTICLE DIAMETER AT UPPER CHANNEL EDGE (MICRONS)
I I
01 MTMl7 PtPC 7TC MVM C7-1T1.1 -*4)4 JAI I.1WaA!MT "C. G7 /nki
11-ZY-H UI;U4Fl,1 FRUTA *PILLSBURY Q, A.
Fui
`I'H15 IS A FACSIMILE FROM:
BUFYALO Q.A. DEPARTMENT
AOM MILLING COMPANY
250 GANSON STREET, P.O. DOx 487
DUFFAIA, NEW YORK 14210.04A7
OADM
TO: O A AP--K r
LOCATION: _ p
PHONE:
DATE: � t 2-T -
NUMBER OF PAGES INC. COVER
BUggpj,0 Q.A. DEPT. PHONE
`
(716)
849-7343
FAX
(71G)
849-7342
l l-Zy-y4 UI:U4F14 FRU1,1 iTILLS BURY Q. A. X
t•Ud Mat, t. - L t vo-06-II
F U'Z
MICROTRAC PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS REPORT
RL'QUC8TOR:
MEDALLION
CUSTOMER SID.'
11/15/94, BUFFALO FLOUR, R-52
DESCRIPTION:
WHEAT FLOUR
VD:
94020419
DATE;
NOVEMBER 28, 1994
UMMARY
A
OHANNEL 812E
RANGE MICRONS
DIPFI=RENT1AL
RUN 1
VOLU.M
RUN 2 AVERAGE
RUN 1
RUN Z AVERAGE
498-
O.o
0.0
10% 19.1
19.1
19.1
89.4
362.498
0.0
0.0
010
0.0
60% 60.4
00% 141.0
60A
142.7
141.8
249.362
010
0,0
178.248
124.175
1.3
1Z.8
1.8
12.7
1.8
1V
MV 73.9
74.3
7a.1
65.a124
Z1.4
20.7
21.1
co 0,170
o.171
D.171
62.2.88.0
20A
20.5
20.3
44.0.82.2
18.3
15.3
16.3
31.1.44.0
9.4
913
9.4
22.0.31.1
710
7.1
7.1
15.5-22.0
8.0
6.9
B.0
11.0.16.E
2.0
2.0
2.8
7170.1110
1.1
1.1
1.1
6,90-7.78
1.2
1.2
1.2
3.99.5.50
0.3
0.3
013
2.T5.3.69
0.8
019
0.0
1.94-2.75
0.7
0.7
0.7
1,38.1.94
0.0
D.0
0.0
0.97-1.38
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.89-0.97
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
=
2510
20.0
15.0
W
10.0
5.0
DA -
0.97
wt-on,man 1711~RERENTIAL VALUMP GRAPH
1.94 3.89 7.78 15.8 31.1 tiZ.Z 144 4w
PARTICLE DIAMETER AT UPPER CHANNEL EPOS (MICRONS)
F. I cq 0107 07q 219 ud 5.1-I1W Itki 13J WdZ7160 76, 62 /10N
p
APPIJNDIX D
F
L
APPENDDC D January 3, 1994
Proj. No. 1114
Lender's Bagel Bakery by JMK
Winchester, VA
BURNER EiIISSIONS CALCULATIONS
1.0 Process Operating Conditions
Operating Cycle -
13 days out o (One day per cycle fur sanitation)
Operating Weeks
50 Weeks/yea
Operating Days -
325 Days per year
Annual operation -
7,800 hrs/yr
Plant Efficiency -
90%
2.0 Burner Emissions
Emissions Based on the follo�.ing combustion by-products
Based on US EPA AP-42
Particulates:
2.5 lbs per million CF of Gas
S02
0.6 lbs per million CF of Gas
NOx
100.0 lbs per million CF of Gas
CO
20.0 lbs per million CF of Gas
VOC (nonmethane)
5.3 lbs per million CF of Gas
VOC (methane)
2.7 lbs per million CF of Gas
E,'vMSSIONS
Unit
Stack
Heat Input
Particulate Particulate
S02
S02
NOx
NOx
CO
CO
VOC(n)
VOC(n)
VOC(m)
VOC(m)
is
9
TPH)
(TPY)
(PPH)
(TPY)
(PPH)
(TPY)
(PPH)
(rPY)
(PPH)
MY)
(PPH)
(TPY)
4
4 Burner
3,500,000 BTU/Hr 3,333 CFH
0.0083
0.0325
0.0020
0.0078
0.3333
1.3000
0.0667
0.2600
0.0177
0.0639
0.0090
0.0351
5
6 Burner
3,500,000 BTU/Hr 3.333 CFH
0.0033
0.0325
0.0020
0.0073
0.3333
1.3000
0.0667
0.2600
0.0177
0.0689
0.0090
0.0351
5
7 Burner
3,500,000 BTU/Hr 3,333 CFH
0.0033
0.0325
0.0020
0.0078
0.3333
1.3000
0.0667
0.2600
0.0177
0.0689
0.0090
0.0351
5
8 Burner
3.500,000 BTU/Hr 3,333 CFH
0.0033
0.0325
0.0020
0.0078
0.3333
13000
0.0667
0.2600
0.0177
0.0689
0.0090
0.0351
Page 1
F
C
L
f
L
APPENDIX E
Research -Cottrell
REECO
December 19, 1994
Mr. Mark Krcmarik
The Dennis Group
1537 Main St., Suite 205
Springfield, MA 01103
FAX (413) 787-1786
Reference: Catalytic Oxidizer for Lenders Bagel Plant
Proposal No. P-40-5999-017
Dear Mr. Krcmarik:
In response to your request, we are pleased to present this budgetary quotation for a
Catalytic Oxidization System.
This proposal is based on the following design criteria:
Process: Bagel Oven
Volume: 7,000 SCFM
Temperature: 300 °F
VOC: Ethanol
Loading (Max.): 0.132 lb./min.
VOC HHV: 12,800 BTU/LB.
Cycle: 13 days, 24 hrs./day
every two weeks
REECO - Regenerative Environmental Equipment Co., Inc.
U.S. Highway 22 West and Station Road, Branchburg, NJ 08876
Mailing Address: PO Box 1500, Somerville, NJ 08876-1251
908-685-4000 FAX 908-685-4074
Recycled Paper
Affiliates of Air & Water IT
Technologies Corporation
11
The Dennis Group
Springfield, MA
CATALYTIC OXIDIZER
General Description:
Proposal No. P-40-5999-017
December 19, 1994
Catalytic oxidation is an economical choice because a catalyst accelerates the rate of chemical
reaction without being consumed. The catalyst causes VOC destruction to occur quicker and
at temperatures 50 % lower than in a thennal incinerator.
The lower operating temperatures of our catalysts enable a more compact design, less
insulation, lower weight, less expensive alloy steel construction and, therefore, lower capital
cost. Even greater savings are achieved by introducing a heat exchanger to capture and use
the energy in the catalytic effluent.
The Catalytic oxidation system consists of four primary components. A catalyst bed, preheat
heat exchanger, exhaust fan and burner with combustion chamber.
I I
Catalyst:
ire
I I
I I
I I
r
7
This is the heart of the system and is a platinum catalyst on a ceramic honeycomb substrate
which is the key to reduced capital cost and lower operating cost of the entire system.
Provided chlorinated solvents (and other halogens), sulphides and heavy metals such as lead,
mercury or zinc and no greater than 0 2 % silicones are kept out of the effluent stream, the
expected catalyst like is at least five years.
Solvent vapor laden air enters the heat exchanger where the temperature is increased from
ambient to about 600°F before passing to the burner chamber and then into the catalyst bed.
The catalytic reaction then oxidizes the hydrocarbons in the air and produces additional
temperature rise. The exhaust from the catalyst bed at 715 °F then enters the heat exchanger
where it is cooled to 445 °F before exhausted to atmosphere.
When the exhaust from the catalyst bed is of sufficient temperature to preheat the VOC air,
the gas burner shuts down and the catalytic process continues in the self-sustaining mode.
Reactor:
The reactor vessel holding the catalyst bed is constructed of stainless steel surrounded by
insulation with stainless steel cladding. The thickness of the reactor skin is dependent on the
reactor size, as are inlet and outlet duct sizes. The reactor is designed in a modular
configuration so that burner and preheat heat exchanger sections can be bolted on the main
reactor. Unit skin temperature will range from 100°F to 130°F depending upon ambient
temperature and solvent loading.
The Dennis Group
Springfield, MA
Fan:
Proposal No. P-40-5999-017
December 19, 1994
The incinerator is equipped with a fan capable of delivering the required CFM. The unit is
complete with a motor, and a unitary base. Also included with the fan is a controller to
automatically adjust airflow in response to variations in process flow. This substantially
lowers operating costs when exhaust points are shut down.
Controls and Safeties:
The control systems are designed to provide safe and economic operations of the incineration
system. Included in the control package is:
- Burner system temperature control
- High and low temperature alarm
- Airflow switch
- F1\4/IRI gas train controls
- Automatic system shut down and alarm should bed temperature drop below
incineration temperature while system is in incinerate mode.
Burner and Combustion Chamber:
The combustion chamber is located upstream from the catalyst bed. Burners are equipped
with regulating valves and controls meeting FM and IRI requirements. The system has
multiple thermocouples mounted throughout the bed to monitor and control. The burner size
is based on the reactor size and air flow.
Heat Exchanger:
The primary heat exchanger is an air to air 65 % efficient plate type unit. It is designed for
1000°F hot side inlet and 70°F cold side inlet at maximum flow. This unit eliminates the
potential for cross contamination through leakage and reduces maintenance requirements
caused by coating and corrosion.
Other Hardware Includes:
(a) Gas train valving, regulators, high and low pressure switches, modulators.
(b) System control panel with IRI approved burner controls.
(c) for periodic inspection and maintenance of the system, access doors are provided at
the burner chamber and the catalyst bed.
The Dennis Group
Springfield, MA
Installation and Startup:
Proposal No. P-40-5999-017
December 19, 1994
The system is delivered in prefabricated modules. All units are shop assembled and tested
prior to shipment to assure a minimum start-up period. Some field welding, wiring, and
piping is required at installation. Two days start-up assistance excluding expenses are a part
of the work.
Energy Consumption Estimate:
Fuel Cost
Power Cost
Design Data:
Model
Process Volume
Process Temperature
Process Pressure
Stack
Performance
$3.14/lir. @ $0.45/therm
$3.22/hr @ $0.09/kw
M5X
7,000 ACFM
300OF
-3 in. W.C.
50 feet
Destructions Efficiency > 90 %
NO, produced by Unit < 10 ppm
NOTE: NO, in Virginia is not known to be a serious concern.
Warranty:
The catalytic oxidation system is warranted to bring stack emissions into compliance with
Federal and State regulations. The catalyst is warranted for one year as are defects in
workmanship and materials.
Base Equipment
To process bake oven effluent of 7,000 ACFM, the destruction efficiency will exceed 90%.
A model M5X with 50 BP fan will be furnished on a turn key basis including start-up
assistance and freight, FOB fabrication shop for ..................... $22300.
All prices are budgetary and are based on REECO standard terms and conditions.
The Dennis Group Proposal No. P-40-5999-017
Springfield, MA December 19, 1994
Other options are available to accommodate specific needs. We will be pleased to discuss
these with you are your convenience.
We will also be pleased to submit a formal proposal for either UNITHBRM or Catalytic
system based on more detailed site requirements. Please let me know whenever we can be
of further service.
Ve tru yours
Rich Grazanka
Product Sales Manager
RG/jcp
cc: Alan Silver
. 1abra or Cleo A 'Silstems Inc
I' 11G1. 1 7 J•Y 1"1 • •'TG wLJ 11-1 I LJI,.. rll\Lill ll lJ
A: Whi
F
10 East V110-,i 5t,
;Millburn, NJ 07041 i.
Tel. (201)°379-4'
1100
Fax. (201):379-7j�201rP
December 1.5, 1994
The
nnis ;i Group
1537
ain Street
Suit
S�rii?
205
q�f iel� MA 03.163
Attn i
Mr. Mark Krcmarik Fax (413) :787 -17:86
Ejubj'at:
udgetary Control System
Kt7cmarik:
Dear
Mr.
We arg pleased to provide the following budgetary
Proposa-1 �or
,V.o.(.
conrot 1 including:
i* 4300 SCFM Econ-Abator
7o% Heat Recovery
system exh4ust fan and motor
The'
bove system is based on the following preliminary data�i i!
Flow 7000 ACFM. .(4,313 SCFM.)
Tempqrature 4 0 O'F
Solvqnt Load 7.9#/hr Ethahol
Budg.
tary ?Price
:Ur,
One (1) 4300 sCtM Econ-Abator with.70% Edat recovery
an4
fr6iglit ""I; $V
exfan and motor, F.O.B. our factory,
0 op
alloT4ed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
Rech Sy
MS Amcec ARI Technologies Huntington Energy System
'Westates:Catbon
PRIMED ON RECVdUD OPER
rj
` I have enclosed general specifications for a typi;cal:;E
Abat r. I trust ;this information will :assist you'. in':.
evaT atiorfs'.
Very truly; your '
eA(�s1 h1 O
Rodney L. i Peington; P �.
Regional Sales/Market>,iig riiA,
WCAS
10 East Willow Street
1
Millburn,; NJ 07041
Phone (201:,) 3'79�-4100
Fax (201) 379-7220
s
RLP/ ;
! Cc: Howand Case ;
1
i l
i
i
� I
f
I
r i
, S
r i ,
i
rt -
rl•
x
i
i
i
• i
Y�4
,�
i
-I
,
i ,
w L:. o i n i La z) t- ri o, rjui ( i 'i i
posalfot STANLEY-VIDAfAR
I',- r' AW AIR SYSTEMS INC.
Wh
eelabrator clean A�I
Bj VYIIZP�TDAAJVA
A OVF VIEW
rei"20 years
Thic Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems ARI Econ-Abator process represents ogre y.,
'fixed bed of ineXped
'ih a
of jexperience in catalytic oxidation technology. By U§ . g ive. non-
noblent thermaliy. stable support, the 'Wh j�labrator
metal catalyst on an abrasion resistant
come th�I'state�ofthe-art catal:idation
Clban Air Systems ARI Econ-Abator has be catalytic
sycomih
tein ovraisedthe objections- typically raised concerning 4taly§ y,
�
reliability, flexibility and cost.
The Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems ARI Econ-Abatdr can tolerate chloridds, sox
and many other gas contaminants which are often a problem to other catAl�st'.'s.vs[ems.
:
A ;variety of catalyst formulations and configurationsoptinlize. catalystper-fo'ce with
mtchanical design in each application.
Tile Wbeelabratoi Clean Air Systems ARI Econ-Aba'tor proven fixe*d catalyst system
promotes high petformance over a wide range of operating conditions.
N!
Adlech St'.Ktc-ms
....... ... ..... ...
PR CE55 LAN
CFM'
... . ......
-7000 ACFM
Gk -7, c?. 16/hr VOC
wc Si' r7
rJD
c x - L-1 A —US—T
SUM
AC' FM 150 OF
. FUCL
SCFI-A
0,7
Pa
PROCESS FLOW SCHEME - YvI 709'o Heof Exc-hem9e-r-
ECON—AT3AT0R'9 CATM,rric OXIDATION SYSTEM
FIGURE I
rryr,tpslKH
Pl,orw,ej No,
J'StelI6 lk.
- - --------- --
SC/ -
FM SCFM
—13Ljpr4l=
co
— ---------------------------- f
uml r, 1.0 5
EA 7-
------------
To-TA L
0.
,�
CF�=
:� _ :.
u
F-
CE
U)
CD.,
4�4
I I
u
� APPENDIX F
0
o-
0�
v
c•I II e I ion l-�--�---I--To
o f i i �e i ii i i i i i i I°
{WR��
II I I I 1 1 I 1
I I ®I Ico II� I� I NI
.a n� II � II a � II II II Q I. . 11. � i ..a' II a . L°i ..I � .I•w 1 a I
STACK #1 :8
STACK 12
ratiomulm
SLOPE
THE DEWS GROUP, INC.
PLANNING • ENGINEERING
CONSIRUCTiON MANAGEMENT
1537 W STREET TEL 413-737-17M
Q
`vINCHESTER PLANT ENGINEERING
4
x^�
onTEI
OA
GENERAL FOODS USA
DRANN DY
APPROVED BY
REVISIONS ;.'
,",.'
�':
; `
-T�
REVISIONS ��' iI- n.
GENERAL
Fu1,
WINCHESTER. VA. 22603 ��-
crNERAL
fOOD'
,,,p DY
,�� BY
THIS DRARIN. IS TIE FROPERTT OF KRAFT' GENERAL FOODS
AND
MIST
BE RETLRMCD.
I< INFOIR> IJON HET�CON IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY NOT DE USED NO TIE
DRAXIN: PAT NOT
BE REi1.`OOl10ED
USA
a¢o<m Nr
MPROV[D pY
IN NIG.E DR IN PART FOR ANY PURPOSE OTIfR TiM THAT FOR WHICH 11 HAS SPECIFIMLY
FUh:19ET1.
00 NOT SCALE THIS ORC.H R:C-USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
0
c
D
E
M
7
APPENDIX G
11
Y i
MOFFET
ZONED B-2 MOORf� •� PAPAMICHAEY ` ZUCICERLIMI
EXISTING CULVERT
ZONED B-3 ZONED B-3 ZONED 11-1
R R.R.
ROAD STA. I�
R=1616.93' A=257.81 W
h•. .``i iI j � (Ji r. 1,r a _ f; �.�:z�``� If' 1 I _
I _
-
''iil
! it ii• .
I,,F; r'.i �.�``- •�, �-�..� CHLLER PAD -- •......---- RESIN &LO PAD //
,.
.,f: � ��� • 8: FRUCTT)SE TiW16
,: 11
.1
( ------------ .....---------- _ __ - - _ --
- -- -- --
r
1
i`
1C,r
,
r
I
i_ Y I
1
_ 1
0 PAD PROPOSED SILO � =��� PROPOSED MP HOUSE
I I 875 SF I �) 495 SF
FIN FIR MOO FIN FLR 690.00
1 EWE - 76&00 E _ 1
SEE PLAN SHEET Z003 t EAVE - 702 00
( ? Z004 FOR ENI. RGED PUN 1
r` I
1 � 1
\\ .
it
t
Z--
ZD03 SEE PLAN SHEET
O
i
I -
� FOR ENLARGED PLAN - `
EXISTING BUILDING ii 1
r ,',,'l+. I' i I EXISTifIG BUILDING z00 00o SF `� $I PROJECT LO C U S
I N i' i ti�l EXHAUST STACKS FINISH FLOOR MOD I 9 I
;1 n SCALE: 1• - 2000'
SEE ROOF. p EAVE HEIGHT 716.58 I' I :I
--- -.-._-___ I: WINCHESTER QUAD L15CS 7 V SERIES
1• \ I FOR GREATER OETNL SITE AREA - 19M ACRES _,--- I':I !' DATED 1967
SITE ZONED M-1 N - NI i
I :�`'; _ I III IN � 4�� ��•I � �---�, -- - f��(��( IIIII 1 l'
ZONFS� M-1 �',t ' ,? I I , Ii CREIN BAY PACKAGING
VACANT
`i ` �( ':III ' ' •i!� ZOIIED hi
1 i,\i. I.iI I SEE PLAN SHt�f Z002 H
:: __ ti; vljjf ;! i` FDR ENUViGED PIAN l I 1
H
Ex. Kwnlcw PARKING SPACES I NOTES:
,II'!•��..' - ` �. . :!^'•. 1 1. FAR WIN PAOPOSM BUILDINGS - 0.2M .
:i- .l -
_. _. -�`;= •,,,i � - .. .. _ 1 .. PROPOSED E>YAltSFON DOES lIOT RFI�UNE ADDITIONAL EMPIDYEE PARKING.
THE AD MOMS ARE STORAGE OR �I, ':f„ I, •� SPACES Ti•M7 Do rear REQUIRE
H — —(-- I1; ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES. THE SITE PAS 207 EXISTING SPACES OF WHICH
4z2oo• ExisnNc I (: � i SEVEN ARE wAo+rw SPACES.
": 3. DETENTION POND
^ tiElOCTID N ETriNL VOLUME TO DQSiIiC
EaSINC DR0MGE AREA - 22.425 SF
Psaor� D WOZE AM to tao SF
4. THE PROJECT INS N THE STOfEAALL MAGISTERIAL DISTiWr
I• tine^,''li i i 1 , 1 ��; I!i. of
s. nE PRaPERTY UTILITY AM DauNACE EA55EHtxts ARE uNCI�Ncm FROM
1 1 THE PREVIOlJSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN.
�_ - - - �
GROUP.INC
• � c__.__._ =____ �--_ �-:: �---:--•------_ ._::. MiCEiESTIIt. VIM 22E�03 STREET
PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION , , - T__-: __-_.r.._—.._.._._____W ;ilil � NCFHaO. w 01103
ft �j �='-"- ti STORAGE FREEZER 10,944 SF 72aJ3 ERNE I ,./ i� �..•-.---.•�....__-'-__-.__.-.__• .^--__
1, t LOADING DOCK Z716 SF 713M EAve
Jf Tit SPIRAL FREEZER k 0IOW ROOM 2A98 SF/FLR 723_a3 SAVE
1--------------------
1 _1 l �' `I —,—< ';� _ _= =:;_ - _ PLAT
1
I _ I noaTH
1 _ Z
OL
_ I• _ 9
R DO•
-81.68 s-
— — — — 00' R/lr. 24' PAVEWERT. a' SHOULDERFORT
... _- . .. _.. ... '. . �.._ - PARK AS90CNilON - .. ZONED ODL� APPfvSED � zTDlwc AK>twas wOOR THE DRM GROUP. INC.
' r-- zoo M-,
r PLANNING • ENGWEEENG
CONSTRUCTION WAGEYENT
SIDED lmT weI STREET TEL 413-7m-17=
S1itRiT1FY.D IIA 01103
--1 G WINCHESTER PLANT ENGINEERING � z� F _gyp DATE DATE GF BAKERY COMPANIES CIVILOVERsrrE PLAN
RnWH DT Gcc D/T7 nmRovED ar WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
GENERAL GENERAL FOODS USA GENERAL cAD 0Y' a.c ,rc nPPRGVCD BT
REVISIONS ;, �`,'hD WINCHESTER, VA. 22603 USA Daum Dr N m/n/ APPROVED BY g
REVISIONS an I00tY'
I ICNXT;IHT DNS DRAMINC IS TIE FROPERIT OF KRAF7 GENERAL FOODS MD MUST BE RETURNED. THE INFORMATION HEREON IS CONFIDENTIAL MO HAY NOT OC USED NA TIE DRAWING MAY NOT DE R[JTCD)CED IN N10LE OR 114 PART FOR A!T FURPOSC OVER THAN THAT FOR HHID1 11 N1S SPECIFICALLY FURNISHED. 00 NOT SCALE THIS DRAHINC-USE DIHENS10N5 ONLY 9 4-019 B Z001
* STAFF SITE PLAN CHECKLIST *
This application is not complete if the following are not included:
1. One set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked
copies
of the plan;
11 i
VDOT
City of Winchester
Sanitation Authority
Town of Stephens City
Inspections Dept.
_ Town of Middletown
-
Fire Marshal
- Health Dept.
— --•
Bounty �ngineer
_ Parks & Recreation
-
Airport Authority
Soil & Water Conservation Dist.
2. One copy of the Site Plan application.
t ri !�. Five copies of the Site Plan.
4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required).
5. One 35mm. slide of the Site Plan (if required).
TRACKING
Date
lApplication received.
l !'I All necessary agency comments received.
`1 Fee Paid (amount SOd ).
/Q-jcj-'J4 Site Plan to Planning Commission via bi-monthly.
Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required).
Revisions received (if required).
I I 1�) Date of approval.
Info added to as retie. c{ L,
RECEIPT
It_ 024C--73
AMOUNT DUE
AMOUNT PAID
I
I
BALANCE DUE
PAID BY
CASy
Q✓CN . iI I I
'
OTHER
FREDERICK COUNTY DEPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
P.O. BOX 601, 9 NCRTIi LOUDON ST.
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601
DATE LAC -I
RECEIVED FROM
ADDRESS I ✓� 1 I " lY��-�-1 T�7).�
THE SUM OF ._' .( I � )Cl,LcL jlt �C4-./L�_�_ � , DOLLARS
FOR �� /��L1.'��. .'�_. L l I-t_ -. �\C_ �_.
w
PHONE CALL
FOR DATE TIME' C Z F. I
h
i
SIGNED ro1,s U r-olann .uu +
]F ('OC S
PHONED
SHONE �! J t 5
RETURNED
YOUR CALL
AR ODL NUI,QI3�:jR EXTGN ON
�,.,
Vl E S S A G E �--�.-JLJ� l -
PLEASE CALL
n
WILL CALL
AGAIN
CAME TO
SEE YOU
WANTS TO
S
SEE YOU
-C CL
C1 �rn F'�'�� ���) 'r=z�,� •-1_. �� F�a,1 )
P-f-mo,4k y f t A '110, L.V/) pt "Irfl-2
Fl, I �(_
--- TI-IE DENNIS GROUP, INC. - - - - - - - -- - _
P[IA'.A/.A't,./AL/AIllZl Al, .l nA11/tltlluA t/1AIt,/W/A1
CARL J. GOLINSKI u
1391 �Ivta Siiii.i.i I36 Stn iu ALvix Sii<ii i
413.757. 17s5 . FAX 413.757- 1780 . I-r\X 8'01-531•S586 - R.W. (Dick) Hilenski
Senior Project Manager
--- Corporate Engineering - Project Management — ---- --- --- - - — -- - -- - -
KRA�T� Kraft Foods-
220 Park Center Drtve, Winchester, VA 22603
Phone 540.678.5379 Fax 540.678.0241
E-mail: dhilenski(wkraft.com - — — - - - - - - —
Jacqueline Armstead
RTD Site Manager
Kraft Foods - - - - - - -
220 Park Center Drive, Nhnche,ter. VA 2603
Phone 540678.8177 Fax 540.678.0235 - - -- -- -- _ -- -- _-----_-- _--- -- --
DESIGN CONCEPTS
Terry E. Stone, Architect
April 24, 1996
Frederick County Planning Department
Attention: Evan Wyatt
Planner II
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Evan:
KRAFT FOODS
Chiller Pad Expansion
,r APR 1996
P+
11VV,D
)EPL Of- PLANNING
f tjM DEVELOPMENT,
101,
The attached sketch illustrates the scope and extend of the Chiller Pad extension. A copy of
this sketch was faxed to Doug Karacofe, Fire Marshall and his approval was verbally given to
myself over the telephone on Tuesday April 23. Doug informed me that he would call
yourself and forward a letter to confirm his approval.
Per our telephone conversation this morning I am forwarding this letter. At the bottom I have
provided a signature block for Wayne Miller- to sign and I understand this will be attached to
the latest approved site plan for this facility.
I truly appreciate your timely assistance with this project. Please call if you have any
questions.
Sincerely Yours,
�J4�-
Terry E. Stone, AIA
Project Architect
/ % <o
Zoning Administra r ate
MOORES
ZONED B-3
f
\� `, PALL
PEA-OCATE Ex-r'G.
` 'IF-W P,r7/.11.1in1G WALL , DVE'• FRUCTOSE TANKS
rlEw sTJ?vcTI�PaL CHILLER PAD
t I..., RESIN SILO PAD
SLAB CN GR,A1)E .
.�
18 ro E F,nSG
SILO
876 SF
FIN FLR = 690.E
SAVE = 766.0(
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING 200,000 SF
FINISH FLOOR 690.00
SAVE HEIGHT 716.68
SITE AREA = 19.96 ACRES
SITE ZONED M-1
From: Frederick County Fire and Rescue Fire Marshal's 0I7Ice0406784739 Voice: 640-665$360 To: Evan Wyatt, Planner at: Plareept.
Pape 2 of2 Wednesday. May 01,1996 10:43:16 A
May 1, 1996
To: Evan Wyatt, Planner
From: Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal
Ref. Kraft Foods
I've looked at the proposed change to the existing Site Plan at Kraft Foods. This change
involves relocating a fire hydrant, in the area of a proposed silo pad. This move will have
no adverse impact on our firefighting capabilities, and since this is a private fire main, no
approval of the FCSA is needed. By way of this memo, I am recommending approval of
the proposed hydrant relocation.
Should you have any questions, or need anything further, please let me know.
Faxed via motem
saved to disk
5/1/96
\( ► t )h 1. 5 r 1 r E c 1 722 7248
r)FSIC, %�v' CONCEPTS
FAX
1 errti F-. 4tone, Arc hItt"c t
'
K
• 1248 P.U2
•
•
January 18, 1995
Mr. Dick Hilenski
Kraft -General Foods
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22603
RE: Proposed Plant Expansion
Kraft General Foods Addition
Site Plan #028-94
Dear Dick:
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX -703/678-0682
This letter is to inform you that the Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved
site plan #028-94 for an addition to Kraft General Foods on January 17, 1995. This site plan involves
the construction of an addition to the existing structure for the production of Lender's Bagels. This
addition includes a 10,944 square -foot storage freezer, 496 square -foot fire pump house, and 876
square -foot silo pad.
Attached are two copies of the approved plan. This will enable you to provide a copy to the
contractor and maintain a copy for your records. Please have the contractor contact this office to
schedule an on -site inspection once all improvements are complete.
Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
Eric R. Lawrence
Planner I
ERL/laf
Enclosure
cc: Charles W. Orndoff Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor
J. Mark Krcmarik, PE, The Dennis Group, Inc.
T. Roy Jennings, Frederick County Real Estate
107 North Kent Street P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRC&A •
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTION
Caller Time Called TP `i Date Called
Phone No. 6!05 Time Requested ASfrP Date Requested A_ A-f
Received By ��Pr� �`� yfT�_ Date of Inspection 6,
PERMIT HOLDER NAME C��
RT. NO. Lot No. _ SEC. No. SUBDIVISION - _nLLJy� �Nit0*%77Z►IV(- rpll?-t`�
STREET NAME _I717
�v
DIRECTIONS -ro PfI-fz C�r_;Z"Lr_ )R��t.
LJ_) CA -T-U T-) ot 1 ��� Ac2oss
M Pfi C iLR'C: I rJ Lnr-
BUILDING NO. S [ " ` -S
PLUMBING NO
ELECTRICAL NO
MECHANICAL NO.
SIGN NO.
DISTRICT
PERMIT FOR: K,ZRFi'
Type of Inspection
Residential
Footers _
Slab
Water
Sewer
Rough Plumbing
Groundworks
Setbacks: FIR
Draintile
Service
Rough Electric
Rough Mechanical
Gas Piping/Test
Commercial ►/
BK L R
Gas Fire -up
Framing
Final _
Final Building
Final Plumbing
Other:
Time In: __ Temperature ^ _ Cut in No.
Time Out: _ Weather SU►-��y
Results: Approved J Rejected
Comments:
Signature _ --
r
Final Electrical
Final Mechanical
Site Plan
Fire Marshall
Special/Complaint
Date 6II.1 /j�'
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIONIA
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
Caller (,-? [- -'✓r Time Called
Phone No. / Time Requested
Received By e r' ! 4/��'� f , (C 4-
0
Date Called 'Y/' C/
Date Requested
Date of Inspection
PERMIT HOLDER NAME"
RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION
STREET NAME
DIRECTIONS ���'^ -"� Jll(f/7 -A/ BUILDING NO. _
1" 'A L PLUMBING NO.
PERMIT FOR:
Type of Inspection
Residential
Footers _
Slab
Water
Sewer
Rough Plumbing
Groundworks
Other:
Time In: X
Time Out: __-
ELECTRICAL NO.
MECHANICAL NO.
SIGN NO.
DISTRICT 1 4 _
Commercial
Setbacks: FR
BK L_
__ R _ -__
Draintile
Gas Fire -up
Final Electrical
Service
Framing
Final Mechanical
Rough Electric
Final
Site Plan
Rough Mechanical
Final Building
Fire Marshall
Gas Piping/Test
Final Plumbing
Special/Complaint
Temperature
Weather _
Cut in No. _
Results: Approved /Li»r. -=� / af, %' Rejected
Comments: _ - R �L l C ALL- ' / / - -9,Af--/ S
Signature
Date
y4-S
• ��
SITE PLAN APPLICATION CY)
c� DEP'i, Of PEANtJING
{AND cDEVELUPt,1EN
C
Complete the following application: `9�S ,��>i
DATE qPpt 21 1 q q 4 APPLICATION #
1. Development Fort Collier Industrial Park
2. Location of Property: 220 Park Center Drive
(by street name) Winchester VA 22603
3. Property Owner: Kraft General Foods
Address: 220 Park Center Drive
• Telephone:
(703) 678-0442
4. Applicant/Agent:
Kraft General Foods
Address:
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester VA 22603
Telephone:
(703) 678-0442
5. Designer:
The Dennis Engineering Group Inc
Address:
1537 Main Street
Sprinqfield MA 01103
Telephone: (413) 787-1785
Contact: J. Mark Krcmarik
• 6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan?
Original Revised x
-5-
•
•
7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 5.02 Ac/19.96 Ac
8. Property Information:
a) Property ID #:
b) Current Zoning: Zone M-1
c) Present Use• Beverage Manufacturing
d) Proposed Use• Present Plus Bagel Manufacturing
e) Adjoining Property Zoning: Same
f) Adjoining Property Use: Industrial
g) Magisterial District:
I have read the material included in this package and understand
what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I
also understand that all required material will be complete prior
to the submission of my site plan.
� 1
signature:
Date:
APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST
Your site plan should include the following:
Administrative Information
Y N
1. Name of proposed development.
X 2. Name and address of owner.
A 3. Name and address of developer.
X 4. Name, address and phone number of designer.
0 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer or architect.
X 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions.
7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as
a result of a conditional use permit or conditional
zoning approval.
X 8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning
Administrator" for the approval signature and date of
approval.
General Site Information
Y N
X 9. Location map (scale 1:2000)
X 10. Magisterial District of site
X 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50)
X 12. North Arrow
X 13. Zoning of site
X 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties
Lots/Uses/Buildings and Structures
Y N
X - 15. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels
X 16. Acreage of all' lots included in the plan
X 17. The location and dimensions of all required
setbacks and yard areas
X 18. Location of all buildings, structures and uses
X 19. The proposed use of each building, structure and
area
N/A 20. The location and type of all dwelling units
X 21. Ground floor area and total floor area of all
buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and
industrial zoning district
X 22. The height of all buildings and structures
N/A 23. The location and dimensions of all signs
-7-
9 .
Lots/Uses/Buildings and Structures (con't)
Y N
X 24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures
N/A 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas
N/A 26. Location and area of common open space
N/A 27. Location and description of all recreation
facilities
X 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways
X 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles
Roads
Y N
X 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on
and adjoining the site
N/A 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and
adjoining the site
N/A 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement and
construction of planned roads
X 33. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances
from public right-of-ways
Utilities
Y N
X 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and
water lines with the size of lines, mains and laterals
X 35. Location and width of all easements, including
access, utility and drainage easements
X 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants
and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire
Code requirements
Parking
Y N
37. Calculations describing the required number of
parking and loading spaces
X_ 38. Location and dimensions of all -parking and loading
spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other
features to be used
X 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces
Natural Features
Y N
X 40. Existing and finished contour lines
X 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains
wetland, sinkholes and other environmental features
X 42. Location of streams and drainage ways
Landscaping
Y N
N/A 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of
plants to be used
N/A 44. Location of required buffers and screening with
cross sections or profiles.
Erosion and Sediment Control
Y N
45. A stormwater management plan with run off
calculations and location and description of facilities
to be used
{; 1 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with
location, types and examples of provisions to be used
•
i
[,A'1I0 R GEHR
November 8, 1994
Mr. Gary Gerasimowicz, Facility Manav r
Kraft General Foods
220 Park Central Drive
Winchester, VA 22603
Dear Mr. Gerasimowicz:
6USHrnniN
/ 5 7
Ref: Kral General Foods Addition
Route 1320
Frederick County
Thant: you for your letter of October 27, 1994 and revised site plans for the referenced project. The revised
plans and your commitments address all of our concerns expressed to Mr. Krcmarik at our recent meeting.
This letter will serve as your permit to install and maintain the entrance to the 20' wide fire access drive as
required by the County Fire Marshall. Tile following provisions will be required:
• Work area protection signage in accordance with the attached kill be required while working within th': right-of-way.
• All work on the right-of-way is to be confined to the ultrance location only.
• A minimum of G" of VD01 # 1 aggregate 20' in width is to he placed From the edge of tlic shoulder to the right-of-way line.
• Positive drainage is to be maintained within the right-of-way.
• Provisions will be made to prevent the cant-ing of thud onto the roadway.
• /env distiu-bed a mLs on the ngit-of-way or damagc-s to the pavement or shoulder adjacent to this entrance \\ ill be repaired by you
to our satisfaction.
• /ail work is to be compdctrd in accordance with the cunent Virginia Erosion S, .Sediment Controlllur,,ihook.
The Department of Transportation will not be held liable for suit should such result from, this operation nor
is it granting permission to grade on the property of others or distUrb Underground utility lines. If the
Department observes the entrance being used in the future for any reason other than its intended use, this
permit may be revoked and the entrance removed by you to our satisfaction.
If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please let me know.
Sincerely,
1V. 1-1. Bushman, Trans. Resident Eng.
By: R. B. Childress, Trans. Permits R Subd. Spec. Supv.
RBC/rf
Enclosures
xe: Mr. S. A. Mcinikoti; Mr. R. D. 1•tawkir.s, N'ir. R. W'. Watkins, Mr. Doug Karicof, , Mr. Kevin Fireball'Ol
Tt ANV 7A':(`.%.. 'F ?1ST if NItI:I',
-r1. U)
-� rs A
CO.M-.ATOM/l/ '.ALTE of .v1RC.I.OIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE
DAVID R. GEHR
P.O. BOX 278 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN, P.E.
120%1MISSIONER EDINBURG, 22824-0278 PESIDENT ENGINEER
TELE(703)984.5600
November 28, 1994 F:.X(703) 984.5607
Mr. Kevin R. Firebaugh, Project Manager Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park
Perry Engineering Company, Inc. Kraft General Foods
1945 Millwood Pike Route 1320
Winchester, VA 22602 Frederick County
Dear Kevin:
As requested in your letter of November 18, 1994 this office grants permission to
install a temporary construction entrance at the referenced location. This letter
is to be considered your permit to do so. The following provisions will be required:
• Work area protection signage in accordance with the attached will be required
while working on the right-of-way.
• All work on the right-of-way is to be confined to the temporary entrance location
only.
• A minimum 6" depth of VDOT #1 (2-3" stone) course aggregate by 30' in width will
be required. It is to be placed from the edge of pavement and extended back onto
private property far enough to prevent the carrying of mud onto the roadway.
• Positive drainage is to be maintained within the right-of-way at all times.
• Any disturbed areas of the right-of-way or damages to the pavement structure
adjacent to this entrance will be repaired by you to our satisfaction.
• This permit is being issued for 180 days.
• All work is to be completed in accordance with the enclosed Virginia Erosion &
Sediment Control Handbook, Specification 3.02.
The Department of Transportation will not be held liable for suit should such result
from this operation nor is it granting permission to grade on the property of others
or disturb underground utility lines. If the above listed items are not followed this
permit may be revoked.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
William H. Bushman
Trans. Resident Engineer
✓� By: Steve A. Melniko f
Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Sr.
SAM/rf
Enclosures
xc: Mr. R. B. Childress, Mr. R. D. Hawkins, Mr. R. W. Watkins
L-J
u
January 13, 1995
On this date, Mr. Strawsnyder, County Engineer,
verbal approval for the Kraft General Foods Addition
facilities for Lenders Bagels. Mr. Strawsnyder sta
accommodated in the regional stormwater facility.
January 13, 1995
12:55 P.M.
Friday
provided the Planning Department with a
. This addition will contain freezer/storage
ted that stormwater management had been
COUNTY OF FREDER I CK , V I RG I N I A
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS
C' DEPT. OF PLANNING
�00 AND DEVELOPMENT
I
Control No. 0923941676 Data Received 092394 Date Reviewed
Applicant Name Kraft General Foods
Address 220 Park' Center Drive
Winchester, VA 22603
Project Name Kraft General Foods
Phone No. 703-678-0442
Type o-1 AppI icat ion S/r, f LA.c/ Current Zoning /I%�
1st Due Fire Co. 1st Due Rescue Co. /3
Election District Z
RECOMMENDATIONS
Automatic Sprinkler System k Residential Spri,akler System
Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other
Emergency Vehicle Access;
Adequate �r Inadequate
Not Identified
Fire Lanes Required; Yes �_ No
Comments: Wf, ew SiTc fl'L�1� 0FI7,-z;, yZe/w
Roadway/Aisleway Widths;
Adequate X Inadequate
Special Hazards Noted; Yes -
Comments:
Not Identified
No X
- Centinued -
} } 1, ` •
tq
t1
Hydrant Lo"cation=_;
Adequate ` X Inadequate
5iam'ese Connection Location;
Approved X Not Approved
is
Not Identified
Not IdentiFied
Additional Comments: /yam
/.t/ 14�y�=�%l/l� lJ/�1l�F�L /L/EET7c/G�
f%/J
ell
Re nw Time
Dougl s A. hiracofe
Fire Marshal
.FCSA
0
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Attn: Engineer Director
199 Front Royal Pike
P.O. Box 618
Winchester, Virginia 22604
(703) 665-5690
The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is locat,
South, one tenth of a mile from the U.S. 50 North in
you prefer to hand deliver this review.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Kraft General Fonds 92.0 PArk—(enter Drix,,,@
Winchester VA 22603 (703) 678-0442
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Review of proposed expansion of existing facility
Fire Mains, Hydrants, Fire Pump House -No changes to domestic Water
System
Location:
Fire Pump House in NE corner; other changes in SW corner
Sanitation Authority Comments:
/ 5T REV/,E W - VF0 410 TF4 - l / J',�
� P�y,4
Sanitation Authoiit `Signature & Date:
(NOTICE TO SANITATION AUTHORITY * RN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.)
7
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your application form, location map, and
all other pertinent information.
— N/.— J )tic
•
THE DENNI S GROUP, INC.
IRCi //()'. t),i'..;r;i-'.Ii .,
Y
�� of
January 10, 1995
Mr. Erik Lawrence
Frederick County
Department of Planning and Development
9 North Loudon Street
Winchester, VA 22601
RE: Proposed Plant Expansion
Kraft Foods
220 Park Center Drive
Winchester, VA
Mr. Lawrence:
Enclosed please find five sets of final site plans for the referenced project. These plans are
intended for use in the construction of the project and have been revised per your review
comments. The plans have been signed and sealed with the Virginia Professional Engineers seal
per your only request.
Would please give me a call if there are any further issues on the project. We will be pleased to
pick up a set of approved plans when you have completed your review.
Thank you for your time and effort in this matter.
Respectfully,
The Dennis gineering Group, Inc.
J."Mark Krcmarik, PE
Project Engineer
cc Carl Golinski
,01
SPI-oZB-94
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA
FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT
9 N. Loudoun Street, 2nd Floor
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Thomas W. Owens
Director
July 29, 1994
J. Mark Krcmarik, P.E.
c/o The Dennis Group, Inc.
1537 Main Street, Suite 205
Springfield, MA 01103
Dear Mr. Krcmarik,
Douglas A. Kiracofe
Fire Marshal
This is to follow up on our meeting at the Kraft Foods site
on Tuesday, July 26, 1994.
To highlight the site considerations we discussed...
1. No additional hydrant will be required on the west side
of the site, adjacent to the proposed silos.
2. The hydrant on the northeast corner of the site will be
relocated away from the building footprint along either
the fire lane or along West Brooke Road.
3. An emergency fire lane, 20 ft. in width, will be added
around the south side of the proposed freezer. This
can be secured with bollards and chain. This fire lane
must allow access to within 200 ft. of the exit on the
south side of the existing building.
4. OS & Y valves will be permitted on the inside risers
as control valves instead of wall indicator valves.
5. The new freezer, equipment room and loading dock will
become separate fire alarm zones when built.
6. Additional Fire Dept. siamese connection may not be
added on the northeast section of the fire main loop as
the existing siamese charges the entire loop from a
source isolated by the dual check valve.
I'm in hopes that this will streamline the process for you
when you are ready to submit your plans for site plan approval.
DIRECTOR - (703) 665-5618 FIRE MARSHAL - (703) 665-6350 FAX - (703) 678-0682
The Fire and Rescue Dept. will require two (2) copies of the
amended site plan for review. Other agencies which must receive
plans for review are listed in the enclosed Site Plan Application
Package.
At your convenience please contact Mr. Evan Wyatt with the
Frederick County Planning Dept. as your first step through our
review process.
This will save valuable time in the future as your project
begins.
If I can assist you further in any manner, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Douglas A. Kiracofe
Fire Marshal
DAK:cra
cc: Evan Wyatt, Planner II
File
0
0
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick County Inspections Department
Attn: Building Official
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5650
The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 North
Loudoun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you
prefer to hand deliver this review.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Kraft General Foods, 220 Park Center Drive
Winchester VA 22603 (703) 678-0442
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Review of site plans for proposed expansion of existing facility
Location:
Plant expansion to include: Storage Freezer, Loading Dock, Z Story
Engine Room/Spiral Freezer, (2) 12 Ft Flour Silos and Fire Pump House.
Inspection Department Comments: Building shall comply with Virginia Uniform
Statewide Building Code and Section 311, Use Group S (Storage) of the BOCA National
Building Code/1993. Other codes that apply are title 24 Code of Federal Regulation,
Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and
in Commercial Facilities. Separate building permit is required forPump house and
shall comply with Section 312, Use Group U (Utility). A/E seal required on structural
drawings. NOTE: Table 307.8(1) for Exempt Amounts of Hazardous Materials and
Combustible Dust.
Code Administrator Signature & Date; -a3
(NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT. *PLEASE R'PTURN THIS FORM TO APP CAN . )
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
-14-
kso ? 1
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
CITY OF WINCHESTER
ATTN: Planning Director
15 North Cameron St.
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 667-1815
The City of Winchester Planning Dept. is located in Rouss City Hall
at 15 North Cameron St. in Winchester, if you prefer to hand
deliver this form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
Kraft General Foods 220 Park Center Drive
Winchester VA22603 (703) 678-0442
Name of development and/or description of the request:
Review of proposed revisions to site to facilitate expansion
of building.
Location:
Work is general in SW Corner of site; (2) Silos in NW Corner
and Fire Pump House in NE Corner.
C ' try of Winchester Comments: �l
; / 6
Director Signature and Date: c 3v
(NOTICE TO DIRECTOR * PLEAS THISJ FORTt TO THE APPLI ANT )
NOTICE TO APPLICANT, )
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please
--.J also attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
-16-
0
0
• 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 5.02 Ac/19.96 Ac
8. Property Information:
a) Property ID # : A54 - A - 3(rH
b) Current Zoning: Zone M-1
c) Present Use: Beverage Manufacturing
d) Proposed Use: Present Plus Bagel Manufacturing
e) Adjoining Property Zoning: Same
f) Adjoining Property Use: Industrial
g) Magisterial District: STONE-_WN-�-
I have read the material included in this package and understand
what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I
also understand that all required material will be complete prior
to the submissi..o j fi my site plan.
signature:
Date:
0
0
i COUNTY of FREDERICK
Deparunent of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
"Fax 703 / 678-0682
September 30, 1994
Mr. J. Mark Krcmarik
The Dennis Engineering Group Inc
1537 Main Street
Springfield, MA 01103
RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review of Kraft General Foods Addition
Dear Mark:
yg gk v'
Cyj
v
DEi' Goe
'F�F�QPb�E,frQq
I have had an opportunity to review the above referenced site plan. The following comments
need to be addressed prior to final approval of this site plan:
1) Please provide your Commonwealth of Virginia professional engineer's seal with your
signature on the final site plan copies.
2) Please provide a scale with the location map in the upper right corner (scale 1:2000).
3) Please provide the Magisterial District for this site (Stonewall Magisterial District).
4) Please provide the use for each parcel that adjoins this site.
5) Please provide the plan for the "Proposed Silo Pad" (Drawing Z005).
6) Please provide the height of all buildings and structures.
7) Please provide the location and width of all utility and drainage easements that are
located on this site.
8) Please provide the calculations describing the required number of parking and loading
spaces. If the proposed expansion does not require additional employe:; parking, please
state that 208 parking spaces are provided. Please provide calculations pertaining to
required parking and loading clock spaces.
If you intend to exercise the exemption clause, Section 54.1-401(3) specified in the Code of
Vir inia, while waiting for the certificate approval, please state your intention on the final site
plan copies. Please be reminded that the exemption shall continue until the Board for Architects,
Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Landscape Architects either grants or denies the
licensure.
9 Norih Loudoun Street
Winchester, VA 22601
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22604
Page 2
Mr. Krcmarik
September 30, 1994
Please provide our department with the site plan review fee, the site plan application page, and
all review agency comments. Once our department receives this information, a file will be
created and this plan will be placed on the Planning Commission's Bimonthly Report. Our
department will proceed with administrative approval of this site plan once all review agencies
and the Planning Commission are satisfied.
Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
Eric R. Lawrence
Planner I
ERL/dc
THE DENNIS GRoJO INC .
0
Simj.x of:
Planning • Engineering • Construction Management
• I'ROJECT NUMBER:
TITLE:
SU BJ EC'r: _
oG T ) 3 VvL- 9/ / � q 9-
b E <J A „) (A) Y /A IT
(�2h�GJ2LC (( C,)JNT�K ?Gnw.✓".vr)
/4 Pt7216 KIZC
DV--,vA-AS r'zO jf,
ZZO /U iC rz__� %i2i ✓�
r ^1 L L C-5 "i rlR V
IZ .v I-5 r126 —1
-L) G o -c m (z ,u r s / Cw p/ n! r
3) Go - f, C C- /l PI- - / C /A i / 6 A\)
% !1 (/ B iU
�U �)
5%/o,v S
DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
CHECKED BY:
19�.
' OCT 1994
DEPT. OF PLA14N(NG <�i1
l AND DEVELOKIENT
y c H c-c_ L,-- ,c_ (� r /o C)
�> zz 0,S /, i� �C it �j 5 j 12 /7 /U-S
1537 MAIN STREET SUITE 205 SI'RINGFIELD, MA 01103 PRONE: (413) 787-1785 FAX: (413) 787-1786