Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-98 All Points Warehousing East - Stonewall - BackfileSITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package x 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final site plan approval. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning and Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. S% 1 M � x Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority x Department of Planning and Development x Inspections Department Iqx Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) x Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation x 2. One copy of the Site Plan application x 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District Request for Street Name 04 *� a nol� ll' i 0 11'18318?12-2W 0049 jo9A-1 CYIES & FtWI-�MENTS CgLL SM-4 1-IOX I 0 li'1S31b?l2-2k 11049 5392 GO IES 9- ENLARU- PITS GALL 500-421-1030 ri..�i'1:.�.. 11'1831t212-2N 0049 5391 COPIES & E.M-A%WNTS CALL SM-421-13:40 ICr . oats ,,14� ,9` 0025400 Received From ' Address Dollars $ I For ACCOUNT HOW PAID c. i d A OF . ACCC OUNT AMT PAIL BALANCE DIT BY COUNTY of I+ REDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 January 30, 2008 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. Its successors and assigns c/o Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC Attn: Carole Wells 2970 Peachtree Road, Suite 530 Atlanta, GA 30305 Chicago Title Insurance Company c/o L&B Title Company 7200 Wisconsin Avenue 8°1 Floor Bethesda, MD 20814 All Points Properties, LLC c/o Mid -Atlantic Partners 1682 East Gude Drive, Suite 201 Rockville, Maryland 20850 All Points Warehousing, LLC Attn: Joseph E. Kalbach, Managing Member 3082 Shamice Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Property Identification Number(s): 54-54A and 54-5-5A Frederick County, Virginia Zoned: M1 (Light Industrial) To Whom It May Concern: In response to the letter we received on January 9, 2008, we are providing you with a zoning certification for the above -referenced property. We have examined our records with respect to the parcel and advise you, as of this date, as follows: • The properties identified as Tax ID No. 54-5-5A and 54-5-4A, (the "Property"), is zoned M1 (Light Industrial District) and is subject to the use restrictions generally applicable to that classification, which is contained in the Frederic]( County Zoning Ordinance (the "Zoning Ordinance"). • This property has not been granted any variances, special exceptions, conditional use permits, or zoning relief of any kind. • This property is not in any special, restrictive, floodplain, floodway, or overlay district(s). 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation Chicago Title Insurance Company All Points Properties, LLC All Points Warehousing, LLC RE: Zoning Certification, PIN 54-5-5A and 54-5-4A January 30, 2008 • This Department has no record of any past or pending zoning violations having been filed, with respect to the property; and the undersigned is unaware of any violations of the applicable • portions of the Zoning Ordinance. To determine wlicther the property has any unresolved building violations and/or complaints, please contact Mr. John Trenary, Building Official, with the Frederick County Inspections Department (540)665-5650. • Currently there are three approved site plans (Site Plan 1115-82, revised #15-82, and 411-98) for the properties. • The properties are currently in compliance with the "Zoning Ordinance, with the exceptions noted below in relation to the ALTA survey. • A listing of allowable uses in the MI — Light Industrial District, is attached. Additionally, we are in receipt of Greenway Engineering's ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for All Points Warehousing, Cole Lane, dated December 19, 2007. In reviewing the survey, there appears to be a few building setback issues that affect the existing buildings. Below is an 1 overview of the issues identified by the ALTA survey, and the corresponding resolution. Resolution of the issues is overcome by one of two measures: (1) grandfathered status (legally j nonconforming) based on previously approved Site Plan 1115-82 (September 16, 1982), and its 1 revision (September 12, 1983); or (2) acquisition of a variance from Board of Zoning Appeals. The Site Plan approved September- 16, 1982 established a 37 foot building setback from the Cole Lane right-of-way. The revised Site Plan approved September 12, 1983, established the northern 1 boundary setbacks of 16 feet, and the eastern boundary setbacks of 15 feet. { 167 Cole Lane. Road setback is legally nonconforming based on Site Plan 415-82. i 185 Cole Lane. Road setback is legally nonconforming based on Site Plan 415-82. Additionally, via Zoning Administrator interpretation, it has been determined that the i encroachment is appropriate. i 193 Cole Lane. Northern and Eastern property line set is legally nonconforming based on revised Site Plan 415-82 (revised 9/12/1983). Western property line setback violation may be resolved with a Lot Consolidation or a variance obtained from the Board of Zoning Appeals. 187, 189, and 191 Cole Lane. Western property line setback violation may be resolved if a variance is obtained from the Board of Zoning Appeals Please contact this office should you have additional questions. Page 2 Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation Chicago Title Insurance Company All Points Properties, LLC All Points Warehousing, LLC RE: Zoning Certification, PIN 54-5-5A and 54-5-4A January 30, 2008 Sin 9j, Crely, Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Director �-► ALL POINTS �. �AR_OUSING C. P.O. Box 3296 • Winchester, Virginia 22604 . Office: (540) 662-2270 . Fax: (540) 662-5761 August 12, 1998 Mr. Mike Reedy Frederick County Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan 11-98 Dear Mike: Since we are not building Building #12, at this time, we will be placing a fence and trees in lieu of the building. When Building #12 is built, the fence will be removed and trees moved or new ones planted to conform to the site plan. Any questions, please call. Very CC: Construction Management Inc. ours� vewl C h COUNT' of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-S651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 June 11, 1998 Mr. Joseph E. Kalbach All Points Warehousing, L.L.C. P.O. Box 3296 Winchester, VA 22604 RE: Approval of All Points Warehousing East Site Development Plan 9011-98 Dear Mr. Kalbach: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #011-98 for the above referenced site plan on June 9, 1998. This site plan, for the construction of an additional five self -storage warehouses for a total of 23,000 square feet, meets all County requirements for development within the M1 (Light Industrial) zoning district. The development of this property also includes the provision of self storage facility screening, and a zoning district buffer adjacent to the Franklin Mobile Home Park. You have already received three copies of the approved site plan. Please keep an approved copy for their files and maintain an approved copy on the construction site. Once the site development has been completed, you should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy / Planner Il MTR/cc cc: Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor Joe C. Wilder, Engineering Technician Garland Miller, Winchester/Frederick County E.D.C. Robert Mongold, Frederick County Real Estate . Ed Dove, Dove & Associates U:IAtIKE%C0I�1 h10MS17EPLAN\ALLMAP.SPR 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 E 1. Project Title: Pq 3 4 5 Location of Property (street address) 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION All Points Warehousing Past Cole Lane 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Property Owner: All Points Warehousing LLC Address: P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone: 540-662-2270 Applicant/Agent Joseph E. Kalbach Address P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone%' 540-662-2270 Designer: Dove & Associates, Inc. Address: 3078 Shawnee Drive P.O. Box 2033, Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone: 540-667-1103 Contact: Edward W. Dove 6 A 7a 7b 1.1 Is this an original or revised site plan? Total acreage of parcel to be developed: Total acreage of parcel: Property Information: • Original Revised x_ 3.035 Acres 3.035 Acres _ Property Identification Number: 54-((5)) 5 Current Zoning: M1 Present Use: vacant Proposed Use: Mini Storage Adjoining Property Use(s) Legion Hall, Equip. sales, Mobile Home park, Res'cepce & vacant 3 Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) 55 '( A) ) h2, 32A,8, 39 & 54((5))6 Magisterial District(s) Stonewall I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of m.y�site plan. Signature: Date: / L — / / 6 7 0 • June 3, 1998 Dove & Associates Attn: Mr. Edward Dove 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Revised Site Plan Review of All Points Warehousing East Dear Mr. Dove: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/678-0682 I have reviewed the revised site plan for the project referenced above, which was received by our department on May 29, 1998. There are still a few revisions which need to be made in order to satisfy our requirements: 1. Please recalculate the existing buildings information --Building #7 should be 5,040 square feet rather than 5,760 square feet. In addition, please recalculate the gross area of buildings for the FAR calculation --the FAR should be 0.34 instead of 0.17. 2. Denote the surface treatment for this site. The Zoning Ordinance states that all parking areas, travel aisles and maneuvering areas associated with the self-service storage facility operations shall be paved with asphalt, concrete or similar material to provide a durable hard surface. Please revise your site plan to address these comments, as well as the comments provided by the required review agencies. Once all comments have been addressed, please resubmit one copy of the revised site plan along with all approved review agency comment sheets. If the revised site plan satisfies all review agency comments, we will request five copies and recommend the site plan for approval. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jeffrey C. Everett Planner I Attachment U:VEFRCOMMON\SITE. RE V\ALPOINn. W PD "�. ' ''' ��� ra\\\\eye `�; '•, rkw 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • E Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Joseph E. Kalback Address: All Points Warehousing LLC P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Phone Number: 540-662-2270 Name of development and/or description of the request: All Points Warehousing East Location of property: 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Inspections Department's Comments: cornents areon the back of this form. 17 0 • Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building and Section 311, Use Group S (Storage) of the BOCA National Building Code/1996. Other Codes that Apply are CABO A 117.1-92 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities. All structures placed on fill material shall comply with Chapter 17 BOCA Special Inspections. Compaction reports shall be.sukrnitted at the time of permit application HC parking area shall have a 8' striped unloading area (Van Accessible). COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No.SP98-0014 Date Received 2-18-98 Date Reviewed 6-5-98 Applicant Dove & Associates Plan Rev. Date: Address 3078 Shawnee Dr Winchester, VA Project Name All Points Warehousing LLC Type of ApplicationSIte Plan 1st Due Fire Co. 18 1st Due Rescue Co. 18 Tax I.D. No. 55-5-5 RECOMMENDATIONS Plione No.540-662-2270 Current Zoning M-1 Election DistrictShawnee Automatic Sprinkler System Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required Yes No XX Comments Emergency access must be maintained during construction. Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted Yes No XX Comments Hydrant Locations Adequate Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Location Adequate Inadequate Not Identified Additional Comments Attached? Yes No XX Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No Signature Title ��/ E • Mr. Edward W. Dove; L.S. Dove & Associates 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 June 4, 1998 RE: All Points Warehousing East - Site Plan Comments Lot 5 - Ash Hollow Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Dove: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the revised site plan dated May 25, 1998, received on June 4, 1998, you have addressed all of our previous comments. - Therefore, we recommend approval of the site plan. We request that you submit an additional copy of the revised site plan to be stamped, approved and returned to you for your records. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, e.� Lau Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Public Works cc: Frederick County Planning Department file 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 DK 9, C 6 PG 12 4 1 The attached plat, and courses and distance description, made 1py ,DCJyr �� UOQltmA Certified Land Surveyor,/�u,(0� ((��,,�� Virginia, dated 15-" ��- / 19 of the lands of situate in District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being the same land acquired by the said A I by deed dated 7 - g;z -9 7 19 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick lBr6 y /02/ County, Virginia, in Deed Book No. 8-$3 , Page /7.//O , is hereby confirmed and submitted for record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office. Given under our hands this STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK, TO -WIT: I h! day (SEAL) (SEAL) Owh( , a Notary Publi for said County of Frederick, in the State of Virginia, do hereby certify that 00gD�-) (�. whose names are signed to the foregoing Certificate of Confirmatic 1 by Owners, and Plat, bearing date of tCJ he 2�day of /Y(,q , 191)-P , have acknowledged the same before me in my county afore- said. My commission expires Oelellj",e Given under my hand this �_Aday of (All& Notary runiic , 19 ,/ U U 8I -N- r BERRYVILLE PIKE � 656 S1 T 659 P41 cE r VICINITY MAP SCALE. 1 " = 2, 000' L O T CONSOLIDA TION LOTS 4&5 ASH HOLLOW DEED BOOK 565 PAGE 774 STONEWALL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, 14RClNIA APPROVED ----------------- G 3 SUMWSION ADMINISTRATOR 1� DA 7E NOTES.• 1) THE PROPERTY DELINEA TED ON THIS PLA T IS LOCA 7ED ON TAX ASSESSMENT MAP t 55 ((5)) L07S 4 do 5 AND IS ZONED MI. 2) CURRENT OWNER: ALL POINTS WAREHOUSING L.L.C. LOT 4 — D& 275 PG: 151.3' (CITY) L0T 4 — DR:. 859 PG: 1021 • (COUNTY) LOT 5 — DB.• ,88J PG.'. 1740 (COUNTY) J) THIS PLA T WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS' GWL Y AND IS NOT THE RESULT OF A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY THIS FIRM. OWNER'S CONSENT THIS PLAT OF CONSOLIDA770N TO CODmm' L075 4. AND 5 IN70 ONE PARCEL IS MADE W17H,7hF fULL D,&SIRE,/1ND CAN,fiENT OF 7HE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS. rr DA 7E PAGE 1 ' OF 2 THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TI1LE REPORT DATE} APRIL JO, 4998 SCALE.' 1" �100' AND DOES -NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. TH ply, ENGINEERS Gl PLANNERSx SURVEYORS U` k EDWARD W. DOVE f�'M78`SHAWNEE- DRIVE CERT. NO. rBOX!%2033 54-17-3(A) 964 .WINCHESTER,",VIRGINIA 22601 (703)667-1103 0 • - 9j I GRAPHIC SCALE Gi\ U �,� t•} 100 0 50 100 200 SCALE- 1 Inch = 100 feet 3 \ 75 , {�• A- •• .... �j \ \t.^.Y •�v /.�° ;i;,.i .•:x••} •r�" � \ � •fir\ ftj.•�::. 50 \ \ ,1p'E 566.33 �6 212' w o 9"E PROPOSED 10' N ::... .•..' X's 'Q STORM DRAINAGE 1.,. { ;% �•, �_kp a6'o9;,- �`,/� EASEMENT20.00, \ \ LOT 5A 14. 45' N \ N 202,241 SO. FT. \ 1 \ �\ * 4.6428 ACRES N_\ 10 \\ \\ \ ►�v \\ EX. 50WRJ \ \; \ ESMT. \ \ WA S27'fD:i9"W � \` \ `\ �! I 17.10' 15607204E ---� 7�75 , PROPOSED N1774 38"W 56ik10 68 �U STORM DRAINAGE ��0. 00 N 39.9B' EASEMENT N63'14 59 W EX. SEWFR A 4 0.41 N56 50 56 "'W 152.69' R=50.00 N,. •� �: ,� .,,� ,::;: L=104.11' COLE LANE , RTE. (60' R/W) N4725 19 W 762 V 36.46.46' t t: LOT CONSOLIDA T/ON of - LOTS, 4 & 5 ASH -HOLLOW /NQU•,STRIAL .. PARK DEEP .Q00/(,;49, PAGE 289 STONEWALL DISTRICT j"REDER/CK COON TY, WI VGINIA , NOTES' 1. TAX ASSESSMENT MAP NO. 55 ((5)) LOTS 4 & 5 / 2. CURRENT INSTRUMENT IN CHAIN OF TITLE IS LOT 4 - DR: 275 PG: 151J (CITY) LOT 4 - DB: 859 PG: 1021 (COUNTY) LOT 5 - DB: 883 PG: 1740 (COUNTY) PAGE 2 OF 2 THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT DATE.' APRIL 30, 1998 SCALE: 1 " = 100' AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. OWNED• JOSEPH E. KALBACK JOB / C.• �SDSKPROJ�ASH_HLO-REV�PLAT D FLOOD NOTE -ZONE: C COMMUNI TY NO: 510063 PANEL: 0115 B DA TE.• 7-17-78 r QARCHITECTSD= ENGINEERS UPLANNERSEASSOCIATES SURVE>'ORS 53078 SHAWNEE DRIVE P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (540) 667-1 103 COMMoNWALIe OF VI#G!¥IA 0 ,eg2k RECEIPT. RD9!G gR21C 2 RS E3EI >§ g&k"3', m § -- C E. ; PAYMENT wq#R5 A2 aE 6 !G! K. §a!k2; B G# N 9a E }a # Ka !y% ' %ALL. r . e w• &7 7 DEE %G#3s mmz . 9222 a !R n9 R»K9k; w A ; MAID .# - 2 \a NO CODE R2gSlH ! "^ - h.& 145 FUND ," ; y �. 2 i - Saf ; I ak« &2; e,& Ja« aT! .# cgk/ Q9A RR«AG met. v COMMONWEALTH of 'VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY JERRYA. COPP COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE RESIDENT ENGINEER P.O. BOX 278 TELE (540) sea-56M EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 FAx154019e4-%07 May 7,1998 Mr. Edward W. Dove, P.E., L.S. C/O Dove & Associates P. O. Box 2033 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Dove: Ref: All Points Warehousing East Route 672 (Cole Lane) Frederick County We have received your revised site plan dated April 30, 1998 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. VDOT approval is primarily based on the low volume dead end condition at the proposed site. Please provide three additional sets of the plans for VDOT use. The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 672 right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/ rf Enclosure xc: F.C. P&S Specialist Mr. Kris Tierney Sincere y, Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Request for Site Plan Comments Virainia Department of Transportation Mail to: Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 1550 Commerce Street P.O. Box 278 Winchester, VA Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 722-3460 (540) 984-5600 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan with traffice generation data and drainage calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Joseph E. Kalback Address: P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Phone Number: 540-662-2270 Name of development and/or description of the request: All Points Warehousing East Location of property: 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: see attached letter from VDOT to Mr. Edward W. Dove of Dove & Associates dated May 7, 1998. • �'Qihl • a � v COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 May 7,1998 Mr. Edward W. Dove, P.E., L.S. C/O Dove & Associates P. O. Box 2033 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Dove: JERRYA. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) BM-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 Ref: All Points Warehousing East Route 672 (Cole Lane) Frederick County We have received your revised site plan dated April 30, 1998 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. VDOT approval is primarily based on the low volume dead end condition at the proposed site. Please provide three additional sets of the plans for VOOT use. The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 672 right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/ rf Enclosure xc: F.0 T&S_Specialist Y—Mr—Krissierne Sincere y, G✓Uu,� Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Request for Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, VA (540) 722-3460 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan wiih traf ice generation data and drainage -calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Joseph E. Kalback Address: P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Phone Number: 540-662-2270 Name of development and/or description of the request: All Points Warehousing East Location of property: 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: see attached letter from VDOT to Mr. Edward W. Dove of Dove & Associates dated May 7, 1998. l.� COMMONWEALTH ®f V IRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY COMMISSIONER 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 May 7,1998 Mr. Edward W. Dove, P.E., L.S. C/O Dove & Associates P. O. Box 2033 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Dove: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)984-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 Ref: All Points Warehousing East Route 672 (Cole Lane) Frederick County We have received your revised site plan dated April 30, 1998 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. VDOT approval is primarily based on the low volume dead end condition at the proposed site. Please provide three additional sets of the plans for VDOT use. The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 672 right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. BJS/rf Enclosure xc: F.C. P&S Specialist Mr. Kris Tierney Sincereyy, Barry J. Sweitzer Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Steven A. Melnikoff Transportation Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING • • Request for Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, VA (540) 722-3460 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan with traffice generation data and drainage calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: _Joseph E. Kalback Address: P.O. Box 3298, Winchester, VA 22604 Phone Number: 540-662-2270 Name of development and/or description of the request: All Points Warehcusiny- East Location of property: 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: See attached letter from VDOT to Mr. Edward W. Dove of Dove & Associates dated May 7. 1998. v-DOT use only Date received a! 2 0.1 q Incomplete Date mriewed �E Signature and Date _ Signature and Date (revision) 514ligb Date revision received _ Date approved 5h 19 8 Incomplete Date rmicwcd J� l� Transportation Engineer 05/07/98 Im X 1 9 0 & ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22E0: -03) 667 1103 • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS _ 3111 April 28, 1998 Jeffrey C. Everett, Planner I� County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development c' �9 _ �0 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Re: All Points Warehousing East Site Plan Dear Mr. Everett: We have completed addressing your comments of March 2, 1998 and are herewith resubmitting the plan for your review. Where have been some major changes to the plan since the first submission. They are as follows: 1. Buildings #8,9,10 & l 1 have been shortened by twenty feet and building #12 has been moved to the west by twenty feet. This results in considerably less disturbance of the existing woodlands and steep slopes. 2. Building #12 has been shortened by seventy feet. This has resulted in meeting the 100' buffer of RP zoned land on parcel 39. J 3. We have secured a photo taken in 1993 which shows the site fairly devoid of trees. ,after review of the photo with Eric Lawrence, Eric has agreed that a large portion of the E� ,c property is not classified as woodlands. In addition, he has agreed to a double row of l,A o\t evergreens and the existing woodlands in the stream valley to fulfill the category C. full 5 screen requirement between this site and the adjacent parcels zoned Mll-1 and RP. Your comments of your letter of March 2, 1998 are addressed as follows: Comment: You have indicated that you wish to apply for a variance for a front setback. reduction. You will need to make application for this and reference the variance application number on the site plan. The site plan will not be given final approval until a decision has been reached by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZ.A). • • Dove & Associates, Inc. Page) Jeffrey C. Everett, Planner I April 28, 1998 All Points Warehousing East Response: Due to time restraints for getting the Plan approved, we have reduced building size and are not considering a variance as a part of the site plan review, at this time. 2. Comment: Copy of the lease agreement which describes the requirements of Section 165- 44G. This shall be approved in conjunction with the site plan. Response: A copy of the lease agreement is shown on sheet 4. 3. Comment: You have indicated that you wish to vacate the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5. A boundary line adjustment/lot consolidation will need to be approved before final site plan approval will be given. Since you are consolidation Lot 5 with Lot 4, you will need to show pertinent details on Lot 4 such as boundaries, location of parking spaces, and location, dimensions, and uses of all structures. Response: A copy of the approved site plan for lot 4 is included as sheet 8. 4. Comment: Copy of the approved subdivision plat (there seems to be discrepancies between the site plan and our zoning maps in regard to the property owners and zoning of the parcels which are contiguous to the subject parcel). Response: We are enlarging a copy of the recorded subdivision plat. 5. Comment: Location, height, and dimensions of all signs. Response: A note stating "No additional signs are to be constructed" has been shown on. sheet 1. 6. Comment: Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. Please provide a detail that shows what the lights will look like. Response: Lights are to be attached to the buildings as shown and a detail is shown on sheet 2. 7. Comment: Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. If no outdoor storage is proposed, please provide a statement to this effect. Response: A note stating "No outdoor storage is proposed for this lot" has been shown on sheet 1. • 0 Dove & Associates, Inc. Page 3 Jeffrey C. Everett, Planner I April 28. 19Q8 All Points Warehousing East 8. Comment: Location of Outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions Of Structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Board on board fencing can be utilized for this purpose (please provide a detail showing this). Response: A note stating "No outdoor trash receptacles for this lot" has been shown On sheet 1. 9. Comment: Posted speed limit on Cole Lane. Response: A note stating "No speed limit posted" has been shown on sheet 2. Speed lirni. should be 25 mph. 10. Comment: If no new water and sewer hook-ups will be made on this site, please provide a statement that reflects this. Response: A note stating "No new water or sewer will be made on this site" has been shown on sheet 1. 11. Comment: Since this is an industrial site, it must meet all necessary parking lot requirements in regard to surface materials, space demarcation, curbs and gutters, raised islands, setbacks, handicapped spaces, entrance requirements, aisle requirements, and landscaping. Response: A note stating "Required parking is provided adjacent to existing and proposed buildings, no parking lot is proposed" has been shown on shcel. 1. 12. Comment: If steep slopes are present, please identify where they are. In addition, please clearly delineate the boundaries of the stream and the woodlands that are present on this site. Please keep in mind that a steep slope disturbance of 25 percent is allowed on the site --you have indicated a steep slope disturbance of 28 percent. If no flood plains, wetlands, sink holes or other environmental features exist on this site, please provide a statement to this effect. Response: Steep slope and Woodlands have been identified and shown and notes 14 and 15 have been revised and a note stating "no flood plains, wetlands, sink holes or other environmental features exist on this site" has been shown On sheet 1. 13. Comment: You need to specify the type Of trees that are to be used in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements for self-service storage facilities. In addition, you need to provide a statement concerning the minimum height at time of planting. Dove & Associates, Inc. Pace 4 Jeffrey C. Everett, Planner I April 28, 1998 All Points Warehousing Cast Response: The type of trees and the height has been shown on sheet 2. 14. Comment: A Category C buffer is needed adjacent to PIN 55-A-38. The woodlands will not be allowed as a full screen. Response: A Category C buffer has been shown adjacent of PIN 55-A-38 as indicated in item 3 of opening paragraph. 15. Comment: A Category C buffer is needed adjacent to PIN 55-A-39. The woodlands will not be allowed as a full screen. Response: A Category C buffer has been shown adjacent of PIN 55-A-39 as indicated in item 3 of opening paragraph. I believe this addresses all the comments. Please call me if I can provide further information. Very truly yours, Dov- Y--��ociatcs, Inc. C Edward W. Dove, P.C., L.S. President file:d I a\mise\allpte2. ' • C l�o� COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/ 665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 March 6, 1998 Mr. Edward W. Dove, L.S. Dove & Associates 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: All Points Warehousing East - Site Plan Comments Lot 5 - Ash Hollow Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Dove: Upon review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: Sheet 1 of 6 1. Note 15 describing the maximum woodland disturbed area indicates that 11 percent will be disturbed by this development. However, after viewing the site, it appears that most of the site is covered by woodland areas. Clearly indicate the total area of woodlands on the site plan and how much will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance - Section 165-31 indicates that only 25 percent of woodlands can be disturbed on a site. (see attachment 1) 2, Note 14 indicates that 28 perc.,nt of steep slopes will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance 165.31 indicates that only 25 percent of steep slopes can be disturbed. You will need to reduce the amount of steep slopes disturbed or obtain approval from the board of supervisors as outlined in the ordinance. (see attachment 1) 3. Sheet 3 of 6 The stormwater detention pond as well as all stormwater culverts and structures need to be located within a dedicated drainage easement. f 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r' All Points Warehousing East Page 2 March 6, 1998 4. Provide a detail of the required inlet protection for all stormwater structures in accordance with standard 3.07 and 3.08 of the. erosion and sediment control handbook. 5. Provide a detail of the required construction entrance with a washrack in accordance with standard 3.02 of the erosion and sediment control handbook. 6. Provide a detail and sizing of all culvert outlet protection in accordance with standard 3.18 of the erosion and sediment handbook. 7. We do not recommend the use of a sediment trap at the outlet of the stormwater pond. We recommend designing the stormwater pond as a sediment basin in accordance with standard 3.14 of the erosion and sediment handbook. Provide all design calculations and provide a detail of the proposed structure. Also, place a note indicating that the construction of the sediment basin shall be the first step in the construction sequence. 8. Provide adequate slope protection at the outfall of the proposed 24 inch RCP culvert to ensure that no erosion will occur on the slope or within the main drainage swale downstream of the discharge point. Add comment about slope stability for 2:1 and diverting stormwater away from property boundary at outfall. Also, relocate discharge point to prevent point source flows at property boundary. 9. Sheet 4 of 6 You need to include a complete erosion and sediment narrative which includes the phasing of construction, seeding requirements, etc. as shown on attachment 2. Also, include details of all specified erosion and sediment control measures. 10. Note two indicates that a structural engineer will need to design the outlet structures of the stormwater pond. These calculations will need to be submitted to this office for review prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit. 11. Sheet 5 of 6 Place a note on the site plan indicating that issuance of a land disturbance permit will be required by this office prior to any site grading operations. 12. Recommend using a grass -lined channel in lieu of the rip -rap lining for the crest of the emergency spillway. The rip -rap will change the characteristics of the emergency spillway flow. Adequate slope protection is still required on the A❑ Points Warehousing East Page 3 March 6, 1998 downstream slope. 13. The pre -developed run-off coefficient of 0.5 is not representative of the onsite Martinsburg Shales. The "C" value for woodland areas in these shale conditions should be on the order of .30 0.35. The stormwater calculations and the sizing of the stormwater pond shall be revised to reflect this change. Resubmit the revised design calculations for our review. Once these comments have been addressed, resubmit two (2) copies of the site plan for further review. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Public Works cc: Jeff Everett, Frederick County Planning Department file N DOVE' &ASSOCIATES • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS April 28, 1998 P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 l%03) 667-1103 Joe C. Wilder, Engineering Technician County of Frederick Department of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Re: All Points Warehousing East Site Plan Dear Mr. Wilder: We have completed addressing your comments of March 6, 1998 and are herewith resubmitting the plan for your review. There have been some major changes to the plan since the first submission. They are as follows: l . Buildings #8,9,10 & 11 have been shortened by twenty feet and building 412 has been moved to the west by twenty feet. This results in considerably less disturbance of the existing woodlands and steep slopes. 2. Building #12 has been shortened by seventy feet. This has resulted in meeting the 100' buffer of RP zoned land on parcel 39. 3. We have secured a photo taken in 1993 which shows the site fairly devoid of trees. After review of the photo with Eric Lawrence, Eric has agreed that a large portion of the property is not classified as woodlands. In addition, he has agreed to a double row of evergreens and the existing woodlands in the stream valley to fulfill the category C, full screen requirement between this site and the adjacent parcels zoned MH-1 and RP. Your comments of your letter of March 6, 1998 are addressed as follows: Sheet 1 of 6 Comment: Note 15 describing the maximum woodland disturbed area indicates that 11 percent will be disturbed by this development. However, after viewing the site, it appears that most of the site is covered by woodland areas. Clearly indicate the total area of woodlands on the site plan and how much will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance - Section 165-31 indicates that only 25 percent of woodlands can be disturbed on a site. Dove & Associates, Inc. Page 2 Joe C. Wilder, County of Frederick April 28, 1998 All Points Warehousing East Response: Woodlands areas have been identified and Note 15 has been changed to 20.2 percent to match area designated. 2. Comment: Note 14 indicates that 28 percent of steep slopes will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance 165.31 indicates that only 25 percent of steep slopes can be disturbed. You will need to reduce the amount of steep slopes disturbed or obtain approval from the board of supervisors as outlined in the ordinance. Response: Steep slopes have been identified and Note 14 has been changed to 24.9 percent to match area designated. Sheet 3 of 6 3. Comment: The storm water detention pond as well as all storm water culverts and structures need to be located within a dedicated drainage easement. Response: The storm water detention pond and the storm water drainage system have been located in an easement. The easement plat and consolidation plat is attached. 4. Comment: Provide a detail of the required inlet protection for all storm water structures in accordance with standard 2.07 and 3.08 of the erosion and sediment control handbook. Response: Inlet protection and the detail have been provided on sheet 4. 5. Comment: Provide a detail of the required construction entrance with a washrack in accordance with standard 3.02 of the erosion and sediment control handbook. Response: A detail of the construction entrance has been shown on sheet 4. 6. Comment: Provide a detail and sizing of all culvert outlet protection in accordance with standard 3.18 of the erosion and sediment handbook. Response: A detail and sizing of culvert outlet protection has been provided on sheet 4 7. Comment: We do not recommend the use of a sediment trap at the outlet of the storm water pond. We recommend designing the storm water pond as a sediment basin in accordance with standard 3..14 of the erosion and sediment handbook. Dove & Associates, Inc. Page 3 Joe C. Wilder, County of Frederick April 28, 1998 All Points Warehousing East Provide all design calculations and provide a detail of the proposed structure. Also, place a note indicating that the construction of the sediment basin shall be the first step in the construction sequence. Response: An erosion and sediment control narrative has been provided. This calls for the construction of the storm water pond as a sediment basin and to be in the second step. I feel the first step should be accomplished prior to starting the pond. The pond will be constructed before any of the construction activities. See the narrative on sheet 4. Comment: Provide adequate slope protection at the outfall of the proposed 24 inch RCP culvert to ensure that no erosion will occur on the slope or within the main drainage swale downstream of the discharge point. Add comment about slope; stability for 2:1 and diverting storm water away from property boundary at outfall. Also, relocate discharge point to prevent point source flows at property boundary. Response: Slope protection at the outfall of the proposed 24 inch RCP has been provided and the point of discharge has been relocated. Sheet 4 of 6 9. Comment: You need to include a complete erosion and sediment narrative which includes the phasing of construction, seeding requirements, etc. as shown on attachment 2. Also, include details of all specified erosion and sediment control measures. Response: A complete erosion and sediment narrative and detail have bee provided. 10. Comment: Note two indicates that a structural engineer will need to design the outlet structures of the storm water pond. These calculations will need to be submitted to this office for review prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit. Response: A Note to this effect has been added. Sheet 5 of 6 11. Comment: Place a note on the site plan indicating that issuance of a land disturbance permit will be required by this office prior to any site grading operations. Dove & Associates, Inc. Page 4 Joe C. Wilder, County of Frederick April 28, 19:S All Points Warehousing East Response: A Note to this effect has been added. 12. Comment: Recommend using a grass -lined channel in lieu of the rip -rap lining for the crest of the emergency spillway. The rip -rap will change the characteristics of the emergency spillway flow. Adequate slope protection is required on the downstream slope. Response: We have kept the rip -rap lining for the cr:,st of the emergency spillway. live feel a grass lined channel is to apt to erode. I called to discuss this prior to resubmitting , but was unable to get you. Please call to discuss, if you f--et it necessary. 13. Comment: The pre -developed run-off coefficient of 0.5 is not representative of the onsite Martinsburg Shales. The "C" value for woodland areas in these shale conditions should be on the order of .30 0 3.5. The storm water calculations and the sizing of the storm water pond shall be revised to reflect this change. Resubmit the revised design calculations for our review. Response: We feel the pre -developed run-off coefficient of 0.5 is representative considering that 52 percent of the site is comprised of steep slopes varying from 15 percent to 35 percent. In addition to this, if you will recall from our site visit together, another 15 percent of the pre -developed site has been disturbed to an exposed shale. Further, the remainder of the site has been determined to not be Woodlands. I called to discuss this but was unable to get you. Please call to discuss, if you feel it necessary. I believe this addresses all the comments. Please call me if I can provide further information. Very truly yours, Do so fates, Inc. l Edward W. Dove, P.E., L.S. President filed 1 a\misc\aIIpte. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER Mr. Edward W. Dove, C.L.S. C/O Dove & Associates 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Dove: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 March 2,1998 Ref: JERRYA.COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(540)9845800 FAX(540)984-%07 All Points Warehousing East Route 672 (Cole Lane) Frederick County We have reviewed the site plan dated February 16,1998 for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows and as shown in red on the enclosed plan sheet. 1. The existing entrance is deficient in the taper offset based on current VDOT standard. The minimum offset allowed is 10'. The entrance could be relocated as shown and brought up to current standard. 2. With the tree planting buffer zone shown on the plan around the north side of the cul-de-sac, the drainage from Route 672 should be redirected as shown by directional flow arrows. All miscellaneous comments shown in red should be addressed. When all the above comments have been addressed, please submit five copies of the revised plans for review. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. SincerelyaRoadway G✓1� Barry J. Sweitzer, Trans. eer For: Steven A. Melnikoff, Transportation Engineer BJS/ rf Enclosure xc: P & S Specialist - Frederick County Mr. Kris Tierney 0 i DOVx & ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 667-1103 • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS -PLANNERS -SURVEYORS April 28, 1998 Barry J. Sweitzer, Trans. Roadway Engineer Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation Edinburg Residency 14031 Old Valley Pike P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 RE: All Points Warehousing East Site Plan Dear Mr. Sweitzer: We have completed addressing the comments from the first submission of the above referenced site plan. The owner has indicated that he could not move the entrance to the location you had indicated for security reasons. Since we are not doing any construction within the VDOT right-of-way and th,-, existing driveway entrance was approved with the site plan for the existing facility, we have proposed to utilize this existing driveway. We understand that it would be better to rebuild that entrance to current standards, however this is not possible because of grading. The drainage on the approved street plan calls for the drainage to circle the cul-de-sac and follow the drainage easement along the lot line of Lot 6 and 7. I have enclosed a copy of this easement for your review. I appreciate your time and effort in reviewing this plan. Very truly yours, Dove & Associates, Inc. Edward W. Dove, P.E., L.S. President file:da 1 Vnisc\a11pte3 .. ._ -.. . - -: 1'1i_ ♦.: •'X•.C!%..('��. �^'1!4:,1� •.V.Y"1YiY9'!•\: ?ry�ln(P•��.•--....—. ....r.y -.•. . • s rti•. r.e�r... A } 1.Acres Loh 1 /�/ 1\ 1,Y• \ •5"Jrl Aau RH•/ 1 �' / � �+ s • '��,� bi r 1 • � 50.06I Aaa ToMArN [•o• // ` 1•i � : ' A, tell 1, V'k, or t f r {•d . , e... �• l.OJl Arsw LOT I r • • .v'lw�rwrn+ ' �• w f - /.2/JAcm �ss•./� i l.905 AM►• �# rut.Nry.rar :• IL t CV . - . !t' +��♦�r • Ir�N�u� r (f�l �i, au•ual.r --t—+�j�� A. S i LOT /O • d ar'a�tlaCli O lef... 4 /!/ LOT !i,� tilrl • 4.911 Aar+ I / • , , ' ` -6 LOl t / . I �� '? •�'r LOT I LOT 11 l.Jtt Aww 1%6 , . Ir �l�al • r r � ` �. aR H/ �} fYtlltf , +' �� � —u:�__ iff me i �Tlv Iti •rr•u ai'i iIRIr' AMA" jV4fr)Cff O K got .b.w 1 ,��' y op y • i'R s. f J- .... • wr4 dr Is(.KfRwf • A+rrrmf p„ ,MC• R0. IP/ we - - .. .,rcwrarfs rrswrr . r� O s Cr: � - •'.•f Rio. Y .rii .)-i �f�-jC • • :; c 1:E2 PLAT ASH HOLLOW /NOUSMAL PARK STONEWALL '01srf/CT FREOEAJCX C011Nrr 10 APRK /frI • CURVE TABLE 1 _ Curve ho. R ARC DELTA TAN CHORD CHORD BEARING 2 150.00' 165.15' 63'04'53' i2.07' 156.93' S 25.18'27' E 3 50.00' •104.10' 119.17'41' 115.33' 86.29' S 50019'S4' E• 4 SO.00' 84.20' 96.29'24' !►6.01' 74.60' S S7.33'38W { S So.00' 61.50' 70.23.32' 35.32' 57.70' N 38.5/'24' M a . i 6 210.00' 1211.15' - 33003'18' 62.31' 119.43' N 40.19'17' W �( • 7 210.00 110.06 30 41 4 56.32 108.80 N 08 46 48 W `, • . _i - • � �(((l' ..ram C) •:-. • PLAT • ==:' ASH HOLLOW INDUSTRIAL PARK Stonewall District. Frederick County •s t Virginia § �•� 10 April 1978 • Revised 27 April 1978 -3=5.+•K' - � .. - ��' .y`= •J: •• �nCT.� �1...-T�i�fK•!V �,.p4�: i��•./. •' .•.'.�: V -1 •,; 1 ;•',;�.' `4.'�,••-.=-t''rtS'-s': - - �y - Y ~-V �!X•1nLt.�.L.i...� . . L...ar...'L.�.:: �•.:.C. -S� �r>,•f "�c. - :f :T .:�};n,•V am •,/�!:•- � �+,;•4. :_� ter_ - _ - •�.aCA�'�•�1r-�.i�-?i��!"e'�r��!f+'�wy�•�iAr�4�i..i7�+��•-37�-•" �..i:al.v v S' � � 4:�.� ��Y _ - _ BK859PG 1022 BK 2 7 5 PG 15 4 I L-o(T a 1 sS- ((A))- 3Z 1 10. 017 A6. AMe1�Ic�N I CGIoN ING. 1 JU r aAPLWYL-a MP C - 47z. 41' ANAC�l1"foN t� ►f•�. 1�:c. A Ju '!o' INQI�7s • L6!•a75 eAf�M6NT AEG • I&S. is' ,) lil ►.4SS ;AGP'-> 5.. _ 1_'� 1407Ac.Ra=5 N Ct 0, 703,, 1-6. 9V 1 O D. e. 7 A%, P6.9O 1 �s�wfF Z II�M�T. Ids M-IfAM T. "'Al G �4• ((f))t Tr k, 10� co Le �� s• 2 � � aa..ol,Ri.iDt1► i ��J tNflMIMT {1j,., �6AT 4M/t•M/INt! Ml�D tiA'st1MRNT1 L-OTO *-AND .*A- ���` :ASH Hit-�.oW 1Nr?tJ'sTl!!�l�►.L �'�41�K. `gTWWOVN►L.t•, tx*TPW-T - FvLeOeP 4r-K 6odATY. VirbtNtA. "..,. OM : MAY s P"t. GREENWAY, INC. K&as L&-Pmdb 3L4WEYM - DE1 SMNM-_PLANNM s/.n"" 40 E- =;>i11M t I March 2, 1998 Dove & Associates Attn: Mr. Edward Dove 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, VA 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAY: 540/ 678-0682 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Review of All Points Warehousing East Dear Mr. Dove: I have reviewed the site plan referenced above. Please provide the following information on a revised copy: Jl . You have indicated that you wish to apply for a variance for a front setback reduction. You will need to make application for this and reference the variance application number on the site plan. The site plan will not be given final approval until a decision has been reached by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). t /2. Copy of the lease agreement which describes the requirements of Section 165-44 G. This shall be approved in conjunction with the site plan. J3. You have indicated that you wish to vacate the lot line between Lot 4 and Lot 5. A boundary he adjustment/lot consolidation will need to be approved before final site plan approval will be given. Since you are consolidating Lot 5 with Lot 4, you will need to show pertinent details on Lot 4 such as its boundaries, location of parking spaces, and location, dimensions, and uses of all structures. 4. Copy of the approved subdivision plat (there seems to be discrepancies between the site plan and our zoning maps in regard to the property owners and zoning of the parcels which are contiguous to the subject parcel). J 5. Location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 107 North Dent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0- ,. Page 2 All Points Warehousing East Site Plan Review March 2, 1998 ✓ 6. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. Please provide a detail that shows what the lights will look like. 7. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. If no outdoor storage is proposed, please provide a statement to this effect. 8. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Board on board fencing can be utilized for this purpose (please provide a detail showing this). 9. Posted speed limit on Cole Lane. �, . s = • f 10. If no new water and sewer hook-ups will be made on this site, please provide a statement that reflects this. 11. Since this is an industrial site, it must meet all necessary parking lot requirements in regard to surface materials, space demarcation, curbs and gutters, raised islands, setbacks, handicapped spaces, entrance requirements, aisle requirements, and landscaping. 12. If steep slopes are present, please identify where they are. In addition, please clearly delineate the boundaries of the stream and the woodlands that are present on this site. Please keep in mind that a steep slope disturbance of 25% is allowed on the site --you have indicated a steep slope disturbance of 28%. If no floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes or other environmental features exist on this site, please provide a statement to this effect. 13. You need to specify the type of trees that are to be used in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements for self-service storage facilities. In addition, you need to provide a statement concerning the minimum height at time of planting. 14. A Category C buffer is needed adjacent to PIN 55-A-38. The woodlands will not be allowed as a full screen. 15. A Category C buffer is needed adjacent to PIN 55-A-39. The woodlands will not be allowed as a full screen. r • • Page 3 All Points Warehousing East Site Plan Review March 2, 1998 Please revise your site plan to address these comments, as well as the comments provided by the required review agencies. Once the revised site plan is satisfactory, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and five copies of the final site plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, r� Jeffrey C. Everett Planner I JCE/bah U:UEMCOMMON\SITE.REV\ALLPOINT. WPD 't BK859PG 1022 BK 275 PG1514- 1 rsS- ((A))- 32 1 l0.0-17 AG. AM&P-leAN 1-a(;4cN ING. 1 0.6.71j 3, D.b. 2)c, PG. S74 � I IG. 71 4ARLYt.G e• - 47z. 41' AN�FSoN z79. vb' --;Li 7-- 7&- ae. WA5. M.. N 30'�NGrf7i- e-r-"v 5 12.2.�. J SA1fMtHT ` � � s I Z �vrus• Iri+.c�o' � .. Alti • 16-%. If.' ; I 1.455, AGP-r--S NI 1-&07AGRE9 N U Ct0.7f3!, Fr- .771 0 P.0.7A►, P6.%71 o spp" sAr+. 40WfF Z �1 • � M' T. N1c•c IO'YANITAPY tG >6 K. di .pAy co►� ,1 ) ly/ I -a- Op"T 4HOWIMd ""404WO MA78MCH" LoTO 4 AND 4A ASH HmLLoW INDUSTM4AL.- PPAPO-K lfrWWltva &." brsTr+e.T - rPtOer+c r� cai1STY. ViPbINfA "• —1 1 OEM I MAY a, 1."C. GREENWAY, INC. $� K flnof EdwA L-s- - Prubbd SURYEYM - OESO" - PLANNM 110 DIWrAL - AWICULTURAL - COMUML, NOWTIft- C"IATI I: C4 C.6. col, M. IDI1 sm. a-' sS WOw. AHV otin+AAa fA1G►AUNT "E Sg6� 0� `\\\ '32,27"E 75/' \ ; 95.2 248-5/' \\\ \\ o p " PROPOSED 10' SIORY DRAINAGE a6.09 /��\ EASEmmr\\ tE 20.00, 14.45 202,241 SO. FT. \ ` 4.6428 ACRES N.\ 10 I r \A� _ Ns EXETfER I2 S2740J9'W, \\ \ 1 L+ f7. f0' L.1 I S_6072'04 f Lc":, V I � -'1 l rta, LA 58*.io8 Qp PROPOSED ou N1724 38 W 16 ST" DRAINAGE SE X. i4£R �A4` 39.9 E8� EASEMENT --�T'1/231 3� 1104 N56 50 COLE LANE , FRTE: (60' RIW) 152.69' R=50.00' L=104.11 ' 762 N8o N4725'19'W 36.4s' L 0 T CONSOLIDA TION OF LOTS 4&5 ASH HOLLOW INDUS TRIAL PARK DEED BOOK 495 PAGE 289 STONEWALL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, ORGINIA NOTES.' 1. TAX ASSESSMENT MAP NO. 55 ((5)) PARCELS 4 & 5 2. CURRENT INSTRUMENT IN CHAIN OF TIRE IS DEED BOOK 859 PAGE 1018 (PARCEL 4) DEED BOOK 883 PAGE 1740 (PARCEL 5) THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT I DATE- APRIL 30, 1998 AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. OWNER.• JO.SEPH E. KALBACK JOB / C.• \SDSKPROJ\ASH--HLO—REV\PLAT FLOOD NOTE — ZONE: C COMMUNITY NO: 51006J PANEL: 0115 B DA TE.• 7-17-78 ARCHITECTS Dm ENGINEERS PLANNERS & ASSOCIATES SURVEYORS 3078 SHAWNEE DRIVE P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (540)667-1103 N63 ,574 9"w i SCALE: IN = 100' g'N of y O 0 U EDWARD W. DOVE CERT. NO. I 54-17-3(A) 964 J SUR A I I Po-% ,- 5 The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. _MIt • 15 M. Y N ✓ 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. ✓ 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. ✓ 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval �efere�ncehe variant J applica�number General Site Information Lops °F I �' s`' A c Sc,.� ��►.�9-s Y N f ° ✓ 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) ✓ 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1.50) ✓ 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site �0.5 K. &D�V'c I+ X 15 Use. zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 4 C General Site (con't x 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. =1_A 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. !1A 22. Location and area of common open space. 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 51ea-+_.,mot 26 Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information ' Is o, lam{- Y N -W'—sok(4 ,1—) .,.�-U Lod- 3 C sl,�us, • � 27. The height of all buildings and structures. 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. a. The proposed use of each building, structure and:districts. )C 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildinwith FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning ,� Cor s.l, I@.4-' L- )Roads Y Z31. N Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site Nh 32 Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33 Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. • • ±6�A 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the 36. proposed or existing entrance. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities ..f 'w' Y N ..-k '.A� �fgk,,,,r , \ t ►1 ,WIII� 1'- ,,, 0, bi d"' 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking P Y N / 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, C w�-b it ��,,a,►�r �•s�►� driveways, parking aisles. curbing and other features to be used. islililloOK,42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N ✓ 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands. floodplains. wetlands. sinkholes, and other environmental features. "�o••a C 45. axts'� Location of streams and drainage ways. let WPLetl PI I We 46 47 Erosion and Sediment Control Y N \f-swV`4" SA' Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. At Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. S\.o ao�I�s .,,t k� �oe�l� t�,f� •k -E'a b,�f-� �-- ►� �w,�-r. ,� S b r.�f' � ...�,� {- .�- n le P I ....., f ` L •✓� S �w11-•-.,... �-- .. � �e.� II 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and % sedimentation during development. 4 ", 127 6 575 032 27 28.492 Acres Lots 95. 1.572 Acres Rood 30.064 Acres Total Area vA 50800 %-A 60L, 56 9 Diws'o' L LOT 2 5 66 0 33 / "_ o �, .\ \ 23 LOT 5 It 'A 'no' 3 5 ate -Z- on to 923 Acre .035 Acre-, M S, S1 Ape Inter069" LOT 41 LOT 4 /0' Se;I,,er E. SeM 0 1.215 Acres 2.683 Acres 19.8-468 Pg. 565 5A 11 159- 206. 1!5.79 5152 A\ 75 :> 224-'0' 5 6" W A, N 710 L8 4) 1.96 d -7 — v 6-TO14 59 g 7 7' -T68.97' 0.00, /0 .A, - '56" W 5800 34 tp I S56050'.56"E 2 3 71008 4� 145-12 C) \� .I \ 72 LOT /0 A, /0 Sewet Eosemenf 4.293 Acres T I N 0 D.B.468_---- LOT 9 Pg. 564 4.955 Acres 'L'o t LOT 6 ) LOT 8 LOT 7 \4)3.342 Acres J. 03 0 Acres 2.820 Acre -V S PCs/ Ln 46 5114 �/O'Se,& Easement 453-34' D. B. 45S Pg. 762, 763 yy' A' 53 o o W 78, 15.?. Jo' 370. 00' k 366.76' 747 /ZLj' F&pce V56'47'-T7"W 889.06' LEGEND 0 / P. (Except as noted) 0 V. D. H. Mo.~nl 9 /. P. 5,1 0 Point GREENWAY ENGINEERING 8 SURVEYING CO., INC. P.O. SOX 666 WINCHESrER, VIRGINIA PLAr ASH HOLLOW INDUSTRIAL PARK STONEWALL DISrRICr, FREDERICK COUNTY 0 Revised 27 April 1978 VIRGINIA /0 APRIL 1978 • CURVE TABLE 1 Curve No. R ARC DELTA TAN CHORD CHORD BEARING 2 150.00, 165.15' 63.04'58' i2.07' IS6.93' S 25.18'27' E 3 50.00' 104.10' 119'17'41' 115.3g' 86.29' S 50.19'54' E- 4 50.00' 94.20' 96•29'23' 56.01' 74.60' S S7'33'33' W J k • 5 50.00, 61.50' 70.23'32' 35.32' 57.70' N 38'5/124' w 6 210.00' 121.15' 33003'18' 62.31' 119.43' N 40019'17' t Y 7 210.00' 1i0.06' 30001'40' 56.32' 108.80' N 08*46'4S W �Y i i o • =;"' PUT ASH HOLLOW INDUSTRIAL PARK ;: Stonewall District. Frederick County •� Virginia U•a 10 April 1978 ' 1 •' Revised 27 April 1978 ��'-•- ��ti _ • . . ;;' _ _lam;•- :�. �y_ :;_ �. rwwnr=..jKL;-r<:.^ �-'iyr r.. . ,� :r {34� ICJ kL-: �< `_ ^; y : - - -< <- ''dh�1J .. i..�5 4 •`.:';••:•. •w'ti.u...t a... _._, _�, .-•.--.. ',.:L._•.� •'` •.'..j.'..7•_r.• „`. 5.::�.'C�. ..._4 "• _.....__ ... _. .-. t7. .,t•�, .: '\.Y; .� ;I'./y..1•Z~./�' �..'•.L�...'�` Yy-.�;.,,t�,..� k!hI./ �t .—/ •//.` L ...,d'r� � '_.r.•�t r.. _�� .:_Jri�: � ;. ••`i:�^,� Y/: �w�,�'_ Y.�,�..r!,.,,�!'�`�'�c�r�l�►rr�"�+�[:�•-�`•�.s;_f-.�..,`.�:Cir✓nJr.;.w�-r'-:'�=�� rr '�; _ i' M A 10.491 Acrosp Lot* OC- 1.57Z Acyos 50.064 ACr" IoWAFM Is T *04. to "A �qr i I. SZ5 Acme Lor 0 J.0j rs Aw Lor 4 4685 ACrn 215 .16 10 ao Cat—i—+jr LOT io 4.Z95 Acros• Lor I 4.955 Acow Lor 9 Lor 0 LOT J.J42 AwW jr, - - - A.-P 5.050 Aaw. "Zo Aaw % It ,— AI AA *m 4sxse I I I'll , roy."r Z' ".Pe I 'fay.*e Craw AVZAA" i"Mff • 1.4 S. Ot dL fox IfY V,,rcwrjrrp vwtm^A bu, -, �fr n ASH HOLLOW INDUSTRIAL PARK sroN--wALL pisrRicr, rREarmcx co4vAf7r 10 APML NE 586� 0� E \ 75 3 95 2� 7 \ ; - z \ �` rn \ 0 o �E / PROPOSED 10' k.; o 10 \ sTwu DRAINAGE �\�_ 6'Q9 /Sq,/ice/ \\ EASEMENT 20.00, LOT 5A \, % 14.45' N \N 202,241 SO. FT. \\ ` 4.6428 ACRES N 0 � Ip ,\ I I� Cr► la \ EX. SE14fR ESMi N56 50 ;56 NW 152,. 69' COLE LANE — RTE. 762 (60' R/W) \ \\\` EX. SEff£R\ \ S2740 39 "W 17.10' 5_6072 04 E 7575' / / Sg /�Di Op' / PROPOSED / � \ u / _riyd. 00 , N Ql/ N1774 j W // 166• STORY DRAINAGE �N63'1459 W J9.98' / / EASEMENT / 1 104 R :� ' � =50.00' 8 0 • L=104.11 ' N4725'19'W J6.46' L 0 T CONSOLIDA TION OF LOTS 4&5 ASH HOLLOW INDUS TRIAL PARK DEED BOOK 495 PAGE 289 STONEWALL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY 14RCINIA NO7ES.• 1. TAX ASSESSMENT MAP NO. 55 ((5)) PARCELS 4 & 5 2. CURRENT INSTRUMENT /N CHA/N OF TI RE IS DEED BOOK 859 PAGE 1018 (PARCEL 4) DEED BOOK 883 PAGE 1740 (PARCEL 5) THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT I DA 7E• APRIL 30, 1998 AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. OWNER.• JOSEPH E. KALBACK JOB / C.• \SDSKPROJ�ASH-HLO-REV\PLAT FLOOD N07E - ZONE: C COMMUNITY NO. Dm & ASSOCIATES 510063 PANEL: 0115 B DATE.- 7-17-78 ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 3078 SHAWNEE DRIVE P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (540)667-1 103 SCALE: 1 N = 100' OF D o O0 U EDWARD W. DOVE CERT. NO. 54-17-3(A) 964 su v;; G W CLIFFORD & ASSOC PAGE 0'2 r `Do 520 °9 l 1 r 08 785 Pa. 536 r I f 6'09'21 Aah H nlln� qp tes ommon Area Maiden Reaf EOetote Corporation Ex. Us**, Open Spo Ex. Zoning: RP Ex !'se: VQ,:,, 45.50' N 1 B'28'09`E 189.97' 21'S,5'34'E i _- t�Ei 110.00' ,;dr.t I �t.n0•. aD uG o iia, � I N c OH I'? 1 f q. .5n= I / it; M,jrk fiur_.at. _ I b O0 C w rn N 4 f+. '"t%ninri F- 14 I / ern W r w me " ' ° ' a` N19' " 47'48'E c� ty{Crthr = (;tlrncr fr a5 --{ 4fi ' SEWER FSMTS. 1 E - . g. 839 �a61 17 �o i N ``. . I tp V Ems.. �,•�. , Obi EX. 1C' � :::.•t 1 \ \_ N�.Ef•: _sraT:-�� ', `, Lot; �6`'•. `. Ue 164 Pei., 8.39 'Lot -47 :Ili : V'i 'i •'� �� rp Y F.rr • r -, .11i! -�....rn Lot '48 { SFF :sHFF T o �r / 280.73' Sit507'05 W 13oen _race Mil �al{ey Ject,on 3507.22' ' � t_ot �•7=r`t-t� ``-'' an lots ore aingfe f0mily detached - cluster. 01 �': �• ;OLT ana -'-Pen _pare are noiect to a 20' Slope do Drainage Easement aionq nra;mz a Ec.ement .long cll orcper.,, r / y r996 i SCALE . 1 = t 00' 1 FILE#- '5n_3p,a .�I,N. gilbart w clifford & osaociates• inc. ENGINEERS - LAND PLANNERS - SURVEYORS �—_ "O—r, Oil& Ia<eanw�cn Or++e 200 P4" Cweron Sheet b-reowlCMsOurg, Srgm.o Mn Yrpn,o 22601 { "4+71 a9R-2115 ,u u;, 2(K1 (540) 667-2739 LNow i+. r I SEC CG ' %g;� ! I ' � r C' t - � � '�' ,I � {r• .•' vy'�� t' ! %- �• - T �� -�• ,F '1• �1 1 �`:1 a':�.t•.w �i'yfi� ����. C�} �l' • r f a � Ala f �✓ i f , _ ?` � ��-�yY'� '•�,��!.' G - _` r , `• -���?. 'l4• i '�` •'il�r`',-'�'-`i� i J ,�64 '{�' � •� • '. Ott •',... `e� �'. 1 t..,,i5/jv� L:it�' '}r•:I K� •'rY5•t,L I . y,I.� n _ �• E _'•���!�,f-F�'1',.. 4SS�i`,', . �':ryF�BS'�� - - �y };�,r�,,�t / ��. (o CR E :• 9tr`-.r't` `;' ;^'-E}i'!i� �. 4 ��' 're: '^'L�T� / \ ` D �•ir ij'��"f'� :.G+!- S �•� l s?v 60 IZO St Wee i' �,:r'; . w .wit+•, i' �,,.,� y �'r".r �. toso -Y� cb 11 .i, Mir •I�: `�. �'11 �/'� � j�' / ...\ t � '\. to 4 ti�'•� .!-i�i:!'°�'r i t ti Ice It �t �o �•y r/ASP„btu �1��� _.)-,: ��� At !r C,vf �o ,' v�. i•' �i \�``. �cw w i1. ^•( - ..,t :%t'i''�i�,':'1/�•.:r AS41 Rgi:/6� !t sOfC'� �� �`. 4'r . �. •..� t ��1 w °; ..• .r,L.c. u�[worenou lWF�COMMENDA S �1� �lol� ��wwat ao.� � �<< a\ /y ate• • Mr. Edward W. Dove, L.S. Dove & Associates 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 March 6, 1998 RE: All Points Warehousing East - Site Plan Comments Lot 5 - Ash Hollow Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Dove: u COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 Upon review of the subject .site plan, we offer - the following comments: Sheet 1 of 6 1. Note 15 describing the maximum woodland disturbed area indicates that 11 percent will be disturbed by this development. However, after viewing the site, it appears that most of the site is covered by woodland areas. Clearly indicate the total area of woodlands on the site plan and how much will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance - Section 165-31 indicates that only 25 percent of woodlands can be disturbed on a site. (see attachment 1) 2. Note 14 indicates that 28 percent of steep slopes will be disturbed by this development. The zoning ordinance 165.31 indicates that only 25 percent of steep slopes can be disturbed. You will need to reduce the amount of steep slopes disturbed or obtain approval from the board of supervisors as outlined in the ordinance. (see attachment 1) 3. Sheet 3 of 6 The stormwater detention pond as well as all stormwater culverts and structures need to be located within a dedicated drainage easement. 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 w • 0 All Points Warehousing East Page 2 March 6, 1998 4. Provide a detail of the required inlet protection for all stormwater structures in accordance with standard 3.07 and 3.08 of the erosion and sediment control handbook. 5. Provide a detail of the required construction entrance with a washrack in accordance with standard 3.02 of the erosion and sediment control handbook. 6. Provide a detail and sizing of all culvert outlet protection in accordance with standard 3.18 of the erosion and sediment handbook. 7. We do not recommend the use of a sediment trap at the outlet of the stormwater pond. We recommend designing the stormwater pond as a sediment basin in accordance with standard 3.14 of the erosion and sediment handbook. Provide all design calculations and provide a detail of the proposed structure. Also, place a note indicating that the construction of the sediment basin shall be the first step in the construction sequence. 8. Provide adequate slope protection at the outfall of the proposed 24 inch RCP culvert to ensure that no erosion will occur on the slope or within the main drainage swale downstream of the discharge point. Add comment about slope .stability for 2:1 and diverting stormwater away from property boundary at outfall. Also, relocate discharge point to prevent point source flows at property boundary. 9. Sheet 4 of 6 You need to include a complete erosion and sediment narrative which includes the phasing of construction, seeding requirements, etc. as shown on attachment 2. Also, include details of all specified erosion and sediment control measures. 10. Note two indicates that a structural engineer will need to design the outlet structures of the stormwater pond. These calculations will need to be submitted to this office for review prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit. 11. Sheet 5 of 6 Place a note on the site plan indicating that issuance of a land disturbance permit will be required by this office prior to any site grading operations. 12. Recommend using a grass -lined channel in lieu of the rip -rap lining for the crest of the emergency spillway. The rip -rap will change the characteristics of the emergency spillway flow. Adequate slope protection is still required on the 0 • All Points Warehousing East Page 3 March 6, 1998 downstream slope. 13. The pre -developed run-off coefficient of 0.5 is not representative of the onsite Martinsburg Shales. The "C" value for woodland areas in these shale conditions should be on the order of .30 0.35. The stormwater calculations and the sizing of the stormwater pond shall be revised to reflect this change. Resubmit the revised design calculations for our review. Once these comments have been addressed, resubmit two (2) copies of the site plan for further review. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Joe C. Wilder Engineering Technician Public Works cc: Jeff Everett, Frederick County Planning Department file �"`{-�-*..�,, ,,,, ;;'� � .'� T��-,i� c .) c� t, I� a I � cam. J a �•_ Tr�e.,�. FY. � l-wwrw�- . or-i �;Y"Y lJt..' `.- S O_ S C � v-i J • t,` G i f c .� W` i Q�...T - C � r `. � h.. � .r�.� V'� 9 w`fi V / j C-4 AA- `�� G1.-.v r 1 �. b",M�+ � t� V....`.'�� `�.n.T"T Q_-.� - \—� i � S n.. �.. .�M< S � 1-C v � S � �' we .. �4✓ i.,�tc•r 4 ; K �-� of ; .L 1 a..-? S �..er-t. J`Q-rvI ww t fo v7 L1.--- `tom... s :., b �^^� --r Li r+�f`-' 4s. 31`+O 44t• �k �ro�,aLl,l d-rJ,..1, a s d iil Cy lA- i,,.,i.e. y44° c +o �/ ► u.-�>` E-, C 1-� 5 1) ra�t..t Sq .,-o-,.-a, �,� ` i'•`�t �- u � S Cam- S �-1 11 �o .4- �... , a,t/� - ¢.,... � 1{� ��Jfu � �� S � �i � � �� ' J �, ` }'L.. ; Uw 1 c 1 r y' tc u l c. l • i" �^ s l� �^ c i n Y� .� o . IJF�p„s / ' •+ca 1< F �l�t. -• i +.� .a-LI Kr D,.,rl�.w� 6.K+a-S' �+<..v-tA o-.. y li j� a-,.�' �w..-..tn.�v .ate �..� cam•. � .. S S (-.r�(. � �a.c '. �-v-c.Il/ wi�'1` G-L p L_..4 i' cs - U-&T+-iJ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI 4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION s ��99 DAVID R. GEHR EDINBURG RESIDENCY 74031 OLD VALLEY PIKE ss ERRYA COPP, COMMISSIONER d.^ �,�� N P.O. BOX 278 RESIDENT ENGINEER (f� TELE(5d0)984�5600 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 �� ' `•L40)9e4-5so7 March 2,1998 Mr. Edward W. Dove, C.L.S. C/O Dove & Associates 3078 Shawnee Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Dove: Ref: All Points Warehousing East Route 672 (Cole Lane) Frederick County We have reviewed the site plan dated February 16, 1998 for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows and as shown in red on the enclosed plan sheet. 1. The existing entrance is deficient in the taper offset based on current VDOT standard. The minimum offset allowed is 10'. The entrance could be relocated as shown and brought up to current standard. 2. With the tree planting buffer zone shown on the plan around the north side of the cul-de-sac, the drainage from Route 672 should be redirected as shown by directional flow arrows. All miscellaneous comments shown in red should be addressed. When all the above comments have been addressed, please submit five copies of the revised plans for review. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. SincerelyaRoadway G✓� Barry J. Sweitzer, Trans. eer For: Steven A. Melnikoff, Transportation Engineer BJS/ rf Enclosure xc: P & S Specialist - Frederick County Mr. Kris Tierney WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING i • The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development _g_ 2. Name, address, and phone number of owner. x 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. X 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. X 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. X 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. X 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. X 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator' for the approval signature and date of approval. X 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N X 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) X 1.1. Magisterial District X 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) X 13. North Arrow X 14. Zoning of site x 15. Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. x 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 9 • General Site (con't Y N X 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. X 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. X 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. X 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. X 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. X 22. Location and area of common open space. X 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. X 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. X 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. X 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Building Information Y N X 27. The height of all buildings and structures. X 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. X 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. X 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N X 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. X 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. X 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. X 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. g 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. g 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N X 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. x 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. g 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parking Y N g 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. g 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. g 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N X_ 43. Existing and finished contour lines. X 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. g 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. • • x 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. x 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N x 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. x 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. 12 Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street Attn: County Planner Fourth Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Joseph E. Kalback Address: All Points Warehousing LLC P.O. Box 3298, Winchester VA 22604 Phone Number: 540-662-2270 Name of development and/or description of the request: All Points Warehousing East Location of property: 209 Cole Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 Planning and Development's Comments: