Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006-96 Stowe-Woodward VBP Project - Back Creek - Backfile (2)�vwe,- l.A�CrJUY-AA- SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies final site plan approval. It is recommended t at app scants contact the Department of Planning an evelopment to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. pK Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Department of Planning and Development OK- 3IS h(P Inspections Department 6K - 312-1I9(0 Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) —69- 317I9(9—� Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation J� 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City V Town of Middletown - 64' 7-/,+1% 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District 9 2 15 9� ��ed� Q,o� .min D� � . ,L��Q- 3-.z�-9� � �, � � CASA 19' 1'.0 00248, ( RECEIPT Date - Received From Yr Y �? Address 2 j TLC {{ ,^"" i; Dollars $ !" For l' ( U' ACCOUNT• �� By I March 25, 1996 Stowe Woodward Company Attn: Mr. Bill Butterfield P.O. Box 356 Middletown, Virginia 22645 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX:540/678-0682 RE, Stowe Woodward Office Addition Site Development Plan Approval Dear Mr. Butterfield: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #006-96 for the Stowe Woodward Company on March 22,1996. The approved site plan calls for the construction of an office building addition that will be 2,800 square feet, the encasement of the 24 inch corrugated metal storm pipe that is located -under the propoa.-d addition, leland.cyprus plantings to enhance the screening of the -.outdoor storage area, and.all appropriate. erosion and sedimentation control measures. I have provided you with two copies of the approved site plan. This will enable you to provide an approved copy to the contractor and maintain an approved copy in your office. Please contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection once these improvements are complete. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Lo, k Evan A. Wyatt Planner It EAW Enclosure cc: Margaret B. Douglas, Back Creek District Supervisor T. Roy Jennings, Frederick County Real Estate Emily Holloway, Economic Development Commission Terry Stone, Design Concepts 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS Caller `.1- A Time Called Phone No. - / -�� ' 1 1U'T Time Requested Received By IF4%" �. Date Called t-y/% B/�) Date Requested q1 Date of Inspection � % PERMIT HOLDER NAME �•C `;"- 't �� ,_, ra RT. NO. k i Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME `�Al l 6- "• +-�.t~� DIRECTIONS �4� l^ X1T" BUILDING NO. S Zr (�r 74 /a /771l<<f7 '. PLUMBING NO. tf �-'-J C LET' ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT -- PERMIT FOR: Type of Inspection Residential Commercial Footers _ Setbacks: FR BK Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Water - _ Service Framing Sewer Rough Electric Final Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Groundworks — _ Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Other: - Time In: Temperature F, Time Out: !" ( Weather Results: Approved Comments: _ Rejected L R Final Electrical Final Mechanical Site Plan Fire Marshall _- Special/Complaint Cut in No. _ Signature �7 % /'/ Date _A) l 9, 17 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VRINIADEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIIS Caller Time Called 4'' OO P� Date Called �� ►3/ 9 (� Phone No. �iLS - �5� Time Requested hSA'P Date Requested A-SAf Received By 2yA -y677T__ Date of Inspection — - PERMIT HOLDER NAME S 40CK!i4 CPA, - RT. NO. --&- Loot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME `(A =y Pi DIRECTIONS - -1- 91 -r-n Ex' 1T' BUILDING NO. 52-7 —1(o C-0 -YWOL)G DDL.tTD,>-) PLUMBING NO. SITE 6 M i�i ELECTRICAL NO. _ 0r- T'1CuJti1 L-IP" 1 MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT --- PERMIT FOR: VFF 1 1Lt n 1T101J Type ofinp ection Residential _ Commercial -- Footers Setbacks: FIR BK L R Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final Site Plan Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint Other: Time In: in +-7 ww Temperature _ Cut in No. Time Out: ll ' t�l n� Weather _ Results: Approved J oK Timp, Q •0 Rejected Signature Date 6 1 1-7 / q DESIGN CONCEPTS Terry E. Stone, Architect Suite 6 13 South Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 TEL (540)722-7247, FAX (540)722-7248 March 28, 1996 Stowe -Woodward Research, Inc. Attn.: Bill Butterfield P.O. Box 356 Middletown, VA 22655 Dear Bill: We recently received our- Site Plan Approval for The Office Addition Project and are proceeding with the building permit process. I appreciate your help during this review process and wanted to clarify two items of discussion that arose during our review. First, the Newmans of Monte Vista are aware of the buffering requirement solution (double row of trees) arrived at during our site plan review. They are still very concerned about the horses being boarded on the property and have stated they will pursue a stop -work order if any damage to the fence occurs during construction. I will forward a copy of this letter- to Howard Shockey & Sons, Inc. and convey the mood and disposition of your neighbors to Larry Dubyk. The other item of discussion concerned the office addition being constructed over the existing sanitary sewer line and easement. The concern is the restriction of excavation to repair or maintenance this line. The Town of Middletown (who own and operate this line) was provided plans during the review process and had no comment. I do not recommend we relocate this line at this point for three reasons. First, the cost to relocate this line is equally expensive whether we do it now or later and I understand your desire to maintain minimal cost at this time. Secondly, the short-term potential for having a problem is unlikely due to the depth of the line. Third, the long-term potential for having a maintenance problem is unlikely due to and the location of existing manholes on either side of the office. These manholes provide good access for clearing or cleaning this sewer line. Again, I appreciate your help during the site plan approval process and look forward to the construction of the office addition. Please call if your have any questions. Sincerely Yours, Terry E. Stone Project Architect cc: Evan Wyatt, Frederick County Planning Department John Trenary, Frederick County Inspections Department Larry Dubyk, Howard Shockey & Sons, Inc. 3. Property Owner: 75700/6 - Woo.i�wAIZ-D Co. Soc77 H Address: 0. S , RO IJTE I f MIDDL_ETayvt-�. VA C-/o Mom. g1Lc- >U-ITE01—fFIELP Telephone: (5+0) B 6 9 4. Applicant/Agent 14c) Wra2 D JNo cKE Y Joi.� s , tic . Address MA2T1 �5SU2G, T I KE 1n%In�Gl�ESTE� VA Zz601 FRoJEGT MG2t LA 2Y IJBYI< Telephone: (, 6 -:-� - -:� 7 00 5. Designer: —7—a2P—Y S7-a,JC Ae-CI4 I-TEc--r Address: /3 S , Lou no v tJ 'f I�JIr,�GNEsTE� VA Zzlool Telephone: Contact: �6ae2y STon�E SITE PLAN) PK r✓ PA FL E 7� B Y : &1-v�-t� T E j ST,�12 Gi 1 ►J E E 1 ►G 12AGir �A22� ►-� D P. E . Zl0 At -PI nJE � M�faDow �'z7. �51jo��O�Z-1�'tz VJ10C,HE5TE2L VA ZZlPa2 • 6. Is this an onginal or revised site plan? 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: b) Current Zoning: Original Revised X Za00 5• F. O. Or"+ AGES / Z 00O AC_ KE s JmwE- WC:5C>nwA2E_� D S • 453 - P. lam} o Pry# 9/-A- ZS M - 1 c) Present Use: 1 ►J P (J s T'2 i ^ L- d) Proposed Use: 1 r.� C> v s r 2 1 A L_ e) Adjoining Property Use(s) U---FO i A c- ', - VAC -A f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s)9r-A-LBA 91-A-LB1B, 90-4-SaB� 90-4-5gc. g) Magisterial District(s) PE uo r-1 QI C �C G I have read the material included in this package and understand what is req red by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: 0 Date: Z- —94 \ ! i C" FFQ j °96 s> r oE�CEf VLr r. F 7 el Uf�E P4%Vr ���. 0 Request For Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation Local VDOT OfficE Atten: Resident Engineer 1550 Commerce S P.O. Box 278 Winchester, VA Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (540) 722-3460 (540) 984-5600 RECEIVED C.D( 1,JRG RESiDEN ❑�kj)] c;.] .)Ac h t! tira G7 I<31i n KOC [� NC,Z cojfts to Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the VDOT with their review. Please attach four copies of your site plan with this sheet. Applicant's name: 140WAZD SHOO -Ey ZFC Sd-Js (r,ic. Address: ► V lA,-z.7'i �JS'so X G Ffc.E , was -re,<-- vA zz 6 0 ( Phone number: `7C� Q2y 5-ronJE ATrN LAKRY RUBY lam. Name of development and/or description of the request: "5TowE-- WO n_r> ,3Ar,-'1> Location of development: U - S . T�o UTE I l - ' u-T N of M i Dp -ro W r-] Virginia Department of Transportation's Comments: No objection to this site plan. Present- entrances) is adequate for proposed improvements. Should business ever expana in the future, en rance s may nPPd to hP iinaaded. xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff • w? February 15, 1996 Terry Stone, Architect 13 South Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22603 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 RE: Preliminary Review of Stowe Woodward Office Addition Site Development Plan Dear Terry: I have had the opportunity to review the above referenced site plan received by our department on February 9, 1996. The following comments need to be addressed during the revision of this site plan: 1) Please provide the name, address and telephone number for the owner and the developer. 2) Please relocate the revision block as indicated on the marked -up plan. 3) Please include the road name (Valley Pike) on the Vicinity Map. 4) Please revise the Magisterial District to Back Creek. 5) My review of the adjoining property information is not consistent with your information. Please review the information on the marked -up plan and verify these discrepancies. Please also provide adjoining property information across Valley Pike. 6) Please provide the location and dimension of all required setback yard areas. 7) Please provide the height and dimension for the existing sign located near Interstate 81. 8) Please provide specifications for the outdoor lighting fixtures. 9) Please identify the outdoor storage area along the Newman tract and provide a description and detail for the 6 foot high opaque screen that is required in this area. 10) Please provide the location of any existing or proposed outdoor dumpster area. 11) Please provide the height for all portions of the Stowe Woodward facility. 12) Please provide the use for all portions of the Stowe Woodward facility. 13) Please provide the name (Valley Pike) to identify U.S. Route 11 and provide the posted speed limit along this segment. 14) Please provide calculations that describe the required number of loading spaces. 15) Please provide the dimensions for all parking and loading spaces. 16) A detailed review of this plan has indicated that buffers are not required between the Stowe Woodward tract and adjoining properties based on the existing zoning classification of all properties. However, the outdoor storage area specified under #9 will need to be screened. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 U L_ J Page -2- Stone Letter February 15, 1996 17) - The Building Official has indicated that the location of the sewer and the sewer easement must be permitted by the Town of Middletown prior to approval of the site plan. Please provide a statement on the final site plan which explains how this will be accomplished. Please revise your site plan to reflect the comments specified in this letter and resubmit one copy for my review. Once I have verified this information, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and five copies of the final site plan for approval. These comment sheets include the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Building Official, the Fire Marshal, the County Engineer and the Town of Middletown. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, 6j'I �. Evan A. Wyatt 44 Planner II EAW enclosure cc: Tracy A. Farrand, P.E. 0 11 Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: UC1"A 2 D S N o C K- e y Address: _ l v 1 AG7-T I n/5 $ USG 1 rcE wI �C.�1 E STE GL� VA zz6 O TErtQ�/ SToJE Phone Number: A-rr rJ C_A22Y Du by K- Name of development and/or description of the request: SroWF -W 00-p ViAOF, r—> Location of property: U - S. 20 U-re It ovTl-r of DD �.E�restJ Planning and Development's Comment 4. Ct Z�51.)&. V ak - d'h Planning and De lopment use only Date received TL' Incomplete Date reviewed ZJ /4140 so Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision)_ O P-1s.,a- -4.. Date revision received Incomplete Date reviewed . .�...i a 0.4 d-.o 3/Zo/R1. Date approved 3 W9( 0 3/Zo/q(q L FEB 1996 A DEPT OF �Do cn D DEYEIppMEN cam • Srow � 0000 w w+-o S • P. 194 IzzVI0.1 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The checklist below indicates all the information that needs to be submitted as part of the site plan application. All required information must be submitted prior to the final approval of any site plan. The Department of Planning and Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete. If any portion is not included or complete, the site plan application will not be accepted and returned to the applicant(s). Site Plan Package 1. One set of approved comment sheets are required from the following review agencies prior to final sitsan approval. it is recommended that applicants contact the Departmentor Planning a a uevelopment to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. ' Virginia Department of Transportation (VDCT) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Department of Planning and Development Inspections Department Frederick County Engineer (Public Works) Frederick County Fire Marshal Department of Parks and Recreation 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 3. Five Copies of the Final Site Plan for approval 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) County Health Department City of Winchester Town of Stephens City V/ Town of Middletown Airport Authority Soil & Water Conservation District 8 Site Plan Information Checklist The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development. 2�. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 3O. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer. 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. 0 Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. MIA 9. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) General Site Information Y N ® Location map (scale 1:2000) �_ 11 Magisterial District _/ 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1.50) 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site _ 05- se zoning, and Property Identification Number P�IN#� of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. r. 9 u • General Site (con't) Y N 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. (5 The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. Piz9 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. _ 4 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestnan ways. TiA 22. Location and area of common open space. ✓ 0 The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. ©4 Location, height, and specification of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25 Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. ARCA To 0C ) �L 0 ENcLo$ED 8Y G ' r+IGN 40AAtb 94r#. 4L Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Buildina Information Y N ,i 0 The height of all buildings and structures. 28 Location of all buildings, structures and uses. �L 0 The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industnal zoning districts. Y N 31 Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. _� 3© Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. '0 M EXIIMP446 ENTRA*kE TO BE REvldxjcb t M'PkaVr-Z By V OdT- 10 • • Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37 Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. U"b" P"Pasa'It's Ou%LbI#3fi ®8 Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. UN b M P"POtED OU' `b' N CG 0 Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. To 6 C Ar"P- /ED gy In 2E 04A" >►4 — Parking Y N r0 Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. 41 Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. u 42 Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features. MA 45. Location of streams and drainage ways 0 0 Landscaping Y N NIA 46. Landscaping plan descnbing location and types of plants to be used. 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 0 E48 A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49 Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan descnbing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. -M BE gQp�CD ay r] 10 Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. 107 N. Kent Street Attn: Building Official Fourth Floor P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 665-5650 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: [4o WA t. p SN o C-r—E y ,tj s Address: 'F,:'KE W trJGl-lEs-TER. , VA ZZ60 t Phone Number. Z16 7 - 7700 A --TT t-) LA (z 4e—,y u6Y l� —%EK2Y SToJE Name of development and/or description of the request: t7 t,jA 2 D Location of property: It. o c)"rc o F M D DBE -r p v-) P-) Inspections Department's Comments: C1c)jm)1L n1-s nrp nn Hie hack of r-h i G sheer. Inspections Department's Comments: Building shall comply with Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 306, Use Group F (factory) of the BOCA National Building Code/1993. Other codes that apply are title 24 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial facilities. (Rate exterior wall under 50'/Section 507) ADA 20% rule applies for additions and renovations. Question on sewer easement under existing and new addition. fJ�l{�=, 1, �.,,��l�fjD t1f.l�ELnPtfEfdl] ��� a •,���' c �u�L E �CTIONS .Fn w FEB 0 8 1996 0 C, Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Engineering Department Mail to: Frederick County Engineering Dept. Attn: Director of Engineering P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 665-5643 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5643 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name Address: t-i0OVA 6zp SWoclCEy �o�S M A ZT f N S 13 U(Z6 'T WI rJGNES-r-E.2 . VGA Phone Number: Coco-7- T�Io o H-n'a r Name of development and/or description of the request: 2v �UbY K. /�Q2Y JTcs7J� WE- WOo I7 �A2.?> COUNTY OF FREDERICIC, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSIIAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No.0307963114 Date Received 020396 Date Reviewed 030796 Applicant Howard Shockey and Sons Address Martinsburg Pike Winchester, Virginia 22603 Project Name Stowe -Woodward Addition Phone No. 540-667-7700 Type of Application Site Plan Current Zoning M-1 1st Due Fire Co. 12 1st Due Rescue Co. 12 Election DistrictOpequon Tax I.D. No. 91-A-28 RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System XX Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm SystemXX Other REQUIREMENTS Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Inadequate XX Not Identified Fire Lanes Required Yes XX No Comments Posted Fire Lane leading to hydrant on north side of structure must be maintained at all times. Roadway/Aisleway Widths Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Special hazards Noted Yes No XX Comments IIydrant Locations Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Location Adequate XX Inadequate Not Identified Additional Comments Attached? Yes No XX Plan Approval Recommended? Yes XX No ��-" Signatlll �� _ �G "I'itic or PLnNNwa, f1EVELOPMENi �� • 0 Request For Site Plan Comments Town of Middletown Mail to: Hand deliver to: Town of Middletown 7875 Church Street Attn: Town Manager Middletown Town Hall P.O. Box 96 Middletown, VA Middletown, VA 22645 (540) 869-2226 (540) 869-2226 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: No wA2 D 7 /14C)CKE y � J�o,.� s / N (-- . Address: PIKE: W/n1G}IESTE2 VA ZZ6C) I -7"E2�Y STo�JE Phone Number: 7 ,-i-LAQ2 y lDuc3Y E< Name of development and/or description of the request: STo WE. - Woo r>WA 2 c> Location of property: U . S . /zo uTE 11 - So u-r H of H 1 n v LG -ro w ,--� Town of Middletown Comments: F0,0� �., t)"'VrWP,IIEN1 DESIGN CONCEPTS Terry E. Stone, Architect 1�sG Suite 6 13 South Loudoun Street �r DEPtr tl;= pr_hNf�lflg \v/ ANO €3EVELOp,11Epd1; Winchester, Virginia 22601 "c, TEL (703)722-7247, FAX (703)722-7248 `��'91'00% February 7, 1996 Frederick County Planning Department Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Evan: We recently met to review the existing Approved Site Plan for Stowe -Woodward, Inc. and to discuss plans for a small office addition. During this meeting we decided a site visit would be appropriate to assure post -construction accuracy, assess ADA compliance, and assess possible buffering requirements that may apply. During our site visit you requested that I inquire about the existing zoning and current uses of the adjoining property, Monte Vista, to aid yourself in establishing any buffering requirements. Current deed research indicates that both properties are zoned M-1. I telephoned Mr. Eugene Newman to inquire about uses and learned that his daughter, Dr. Lee Newman operates a veterinarian office and permanently resides at the location. There is a stable on the property for boarding horses. During the phone conversation I scheduled a visit to the property to fully explain the scope and location of the office addition. The following is a brief synopsis of that visit and discussions. I visited with Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Newman and Dr. Lee Newman on the afternoon of Tuesday, February 6 to discuss the proposed addition. I explained that you had requested the inquiry and that Stowe -Woodward was not aware of your request nor with my meeting with them that day. It was noted that I did not have any authority regarding the Fred. Co. Ordinance requirements nor any authority to represent Stowe -Woodward, Inc. The Newmans stated they have been peaceful neighbors with Stowe -Woodward since its initial construction. The only complaint ever communicated involved the plant addition about 6 years ago. The excess soil after excavation was temporarily stock -piled on the site creating an erosion control and visual concern for the Newmans. This earth pile was eventually removed from the site. Most importantly the Newmans were concerned that the historic integrity of Monte Vista be maintained. They noted their recent historic designation from Frederick County, their affiliation with the Cedar Creek Battlefield, and their historic designation on the National Register. The Newmans generally did not object to the finished office addition. The Newmans did not feel that the office addition would be visible from the house due to the location of the grain barn and the existing topography. The Newmans stated their greatest concern was due to the noise, dust, and security issues during the actual construction period. Dr. Newman has several mares due to give birth this spring. She stated these folds are very valuable and her concern was the noise disturbance of the mares before birth and the colts after birth. She was also concerned that the existing fence might be temporarily damaged and allow her horses to escape. She also stated that wind-blown dust associated with the construction process was a concern. The Newmans stated their desire was to have a permanent 6' high solid board fence constructed along the property line to aid with dust control, noise control, and visual surveillance. They stated they would like this fence constructed before any construction begins to sheild the horses from any disturbance. The Newmans also requested assurances that no excavation stock -piles are allowed after construction is completed. The Newmans felt the best method to resolve everyone's concerns was to schedule a meeting with Stowe -Woodward, Frederick County Planning Department, and themselves present. I suggested that if this meeting was agreeable to all parties that it would be most appropriately held at Stowe -Woodward so the actual addition location could be visited and discussed. The Newmans stated they would be out of town beginning Feb. 22 for two weeks and would like to have these issues resolved before they leave. I request your review of this letter and inform all parties of your interpretations or decisions. I would ask that you organize any further- meetings and I offer my attendance if desired. I asked the Newmans to inform yourself directly or myself if they feel I have misinterpreted or misrepresented their concerns or discussions. Please call if your have any questions. Sincerely Yours, Terry E. Stone Project Architect cc: Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Newman and Dr. Lee Newman, Monte Vista Larry Dubyk, Howard Shockey & Sons, Inc. Bill Butterfield, Stowe -Woodward, Inc.