Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout55-07 Rutherford Crossing - Commercial Subdivision - Stonewall - BackfileDATE _ _ - NO. -+ 2 2 9 RECEIVED FROM _ ADDRESS DOLLARS JFOR RENT J FOR oil AMT OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT PAID CHECK FaAi AN('F MONEv ' ORDER f : , w SITE PLAN TRACKING SHEET Date: V—/lAo File opened Reference Manual updated/number assigned o D-base updated i l8 b� File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary PA� CLOSE OUT FILE: f (0 Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" LLI�LOJ Reference Manual updated IL47 0� D-base updated jj_ o ,07 File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary UABc \Comrnon%Trecl:ing sheetslSirf Plan Tracking wpd Rc,ised 02/07/03 A SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST The checklist shown below 9peci5es the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application. The Department of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). (1) One (1) set of approved comment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan_ It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies' are relevant to their site plan application_ A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development X - Department of GIS (Geographic Information Services) V Frederick County Sanitation Authority ✓ Frederick County Building Inspections Department —� Frederick County Department of Public Works Frederick County Fire Marshal X Frederick County Health Department X Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation �— Virginia Depaii ent of Transportation (VDOT) _ City of VTmDhester X Town of Stephens City x Town of Middletown -�i — Frederick County / Winchester AirportAuthority (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form.. (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. -� (4) One (1) reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required). M REWd COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 November 2, 2007 Mr. Marty Smith Bury + Partners 3810 Concord Parkway, Suite 1000 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 Re: Approval of Site Plan #55-07; Rutherford Crossing Revisions Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 43-A-99, 43-A-100 Dear Marty: The Frederick County Department of Planning and Development administratively approved the above - referenced site plan on October 26, 2007. The site plan is for approved revisions to the previously approved Rutherford Crossing Site Plan (SP# 13-07). This commercial center is located off of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with five (5) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Senior Planner CEP/bad Attachment cc: Charles DeHaven Jr., Stonewall District Supervisor John Light and Gary Oates, Stonewall District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Patrick Barker, EDC Commissioner of Revenue Rutherford Farm, LLC, 112 N. Cameron St., Winchester, VA 22601 Jack Waghorn, NV Retail, 8230 Leesburg Pike, Ste. 500, Vienna, VA 22182 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mai o: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 North Building, 2n° Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: SUR.Y + PA, t--rr1EF_S Clo Anh�ry Address: 3E10 6waehe Aga YjAY . SO/Tf 1 Qoo CNaN7i4i,Y-✓A 201.1 Phone Number: e 7aa1 `i 6 a- 4 a 9 o Name of development and/or description of the request' RyYt4 RFQRp CS0S5,1 N(;-- Location of property: -rAx' p,4s e_E L Y3 -A - lyo Inspections Department's Comments: 1 XMI'a 2. , Inspoctious -Dept. use -only Date t�oaei�o¢ inoottlpletc pate reviewed SigpaWa and D to Moat= and D,3te (re Date revision received Date approved Incomplete n. �zelcrrr '1t ��.-afl //�0�.1�c •�115 16 I0 3E)Vd SNOIlO3dSNI 0618ZZLOOS 60:EL L00Z/EZ/80 Ff00:LIFE SAFETY • 003/2007 09 22 #359 P-001/001 Control number SP07-0025RR Project Name Rutherford Crossing Address 3810 Concorde Parkway Suite 1000 Type Application Site Plan Resubmit Current Zoning B Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation rredurick County Firs: and Rescuc Deparft,ient Office of the Fire Mamhal P Plan'Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Date Revised 9/13/2007 9/' 3/2007 Applicant Bury & Partners, Inc City State Zip App4cant Phone Chantilly VA 20151 703-96B-9090 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue Desirict 43-A-100 13 13 Election District Recommendations Stonewall Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System Yes No Requirements Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location Fire Lane Required Adequate Adequate Yes Siamese Location Roadway/Aisleway Width Special Hazards Adequate Adequate No Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Plans approved as submitted Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By signature Yes J. Neal — FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY SITE PLAN REVIEW COMAENTS RECEIVED SEP 1 3 2M7 PO Box 1877, Winchester, VA 22604 315 Tasker Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 540.868.1061 Voice 540.868.1429 Fax Project �11 T� R/ I� C RIO Applicant REVIEW STATUS 103 5154fFT5 review number pp� /? Y/ s/ON correct & resubmit approved as noted number of items to be corrected approved DRAWINGS y send me by_ 9? L print of sheets �b 3 SS �� 73 7y �0/ 2. two CDs: each disc shall contain the following plan sheets 54/me a. One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in PDF format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and be in landscape orientation. Each file shall be titled with the project name and appropriate sheet number. b. One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in DWG format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and each file shall be titled with the project name and appropriate sheet number. Each sheet shall (1) be in landscape orientation, (2) be without a border, (3) be in state plane coordinate system NAD 83, and (4) be compatible with AutoCAD 2006. c. Each of the two CDs shall be labeled with its format and project name, and placed in its own CD sleeve. EASEMENTS /ViL'F �YFw �/ S,F-HENTf N I need a copy of the recorded onsite water and / or sewer easement(s). ©/ N I need a copy of the recorded offsite water and / or sewer easement(s). I need a copy of the recorded deed(s) of easement before service will be authorized. OTHER Y A0 This project also requires DEQ - Valley Region approval. 4411 Early Road P.O. Box 3000, Harrisonburg, VA 22801 (540-574-7814) Y ,V This project also requires VDH — Lexington Office approval. 131 Walker St., Lexington, VA 24450 (540-463-7136) Date: John G. Whitacre - Senior Engineer At:G 07 Rutherford Crossing - VDO•T Conditional Approval Page 1 of 3 Candice Perkins From: Smith, Marty [msmith@burypartners.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:39 AM To: Candice Perkins Subject: FW: Rutherford Crossing - VDOT Conditional Approval Candice — For your information, I have attached the latest approval email from VDOT on the Rutherford Crossing site plans. I will be adding the requested detail to the plans on the set that will be submitted to you for signature. I expect to have those sets to you tomorrow. We are also working on the revised plat and my survey department is working to coordinate with Mark on that. Thanks. MARTY SMITH Bury + Partners ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS From: Smith, Matthew, P.E. [mailto:Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:07 AM To: Smith, Marty Cc: rbrana@nvretail.com; Baluch, Stephen; Ingram, Lloyd; Smith, Matthew, P.E. Subject: Rutherford Crossing - VDOT Conditional Approval This is to acknowledge receipt of the latest revised site plan sheets for the Rutherford Crossing Project, as received by this office on September 27, 2007. The revisions appear satisfactory and are approved, subject to the addressing of the following comment. Add current VDOT Standard PB-1 detail to the plans. Add a note stating that storm culverts within public right-of-way are to be installed in accordance VDOT Standard PB-1 Detail. Please provide 4 complete sets of approved construction plans with signed and dated sea[ for VDOT distribution. I offer the following comments: • A preconstruction conference be held by the engineer and/or developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies and VDOT prior to initiation of work. Materials used and method of construction shall apply to current observed VDOT Road & Bridge Specifications applicable during construction of this development. 10/26/2007 Rutherford Crossing - VD01' Conditional Approval Page 2 of 3 Our review and comments are general in nature. Should conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Department prior to inclusion into the Secondary Road System. . Attached is a copy of the minimum requirements and information needed prior to acceptance of subdivision streets into the Secondary System. This is the responsibility of the developer. • All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. • The contractor shall notify VDOT when work is to begin or cease for any undetermined length of time. VDOT will also require 48 hours notice for inspections. • The appropriate land use permits shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. • Any entrances constructed from the referenced streets) shall meet VDOT minimum standards. This is the developer's responsibility. . Any signs to be installed will be in accordance with attachments. . I suggest any utilities and/or storm sewer placed within the proposed right-of-way be backfilled completely with C.R. Type 21-13 Stone. This will greatly reduce the possibility of any pavement settlement. . An agreement between VDOT and Frederick County to absolve the Department of any maintenance or liability of the detention basin will be required. This is the developer's responsibility. The executed agreement is needed before the street (s) is eligible for acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System. A copy of any/all recorded plats of dedication for drainage easements or additional right-of-way required for implementation of this proposed project should be provided to VDOT prior to issuance of any land use permit. Dedication should be made to the Commonwealth of Virginia. 10/26/2007 Rutherford Crossing - VDO� onditional Approval 0 Page 3 of 3 • A copy of any/all RECORDED PLATS of dedication to public use (the County of Frederick County) for drainage easements or additional right-of-way required for implementation of this proposed project should be provided for VDOT review prior to issuance of any land use permit. Should you need additional information, do not hesitate to call. «SC N_20071004090600_001. pdf>> Matthew B. Smith, P.C. Residency Staff Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22524 Phone # (540) 984-5615 Fax # (540) 981-5607 10/26/2007 Rutherford Crossing (Internal Roads) - VDOT Plan Approval - Route 11, Frederick County Page 1 of 2 0 is Candice Perkins From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:51 PM To: msmith@burypartners.com Cc: cperkins@co.frederick.va.us; Ingram, Lloyd; Copp, Jerry; Alexander, Scott; Eric Lawrence Subject: Rutherford Crossing (Internal Roads) - VDOT Plan Approval - Route 11, Frederick County Ma rty, This is to acknowledge receipt of your revised plans dated June 1, 2007 for the referenced project. The plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer accordingly. Please provide six (6) sets of approved construction plans with signed seal for VDOT distribution. I offer the following comments: . A preconstruction conference be held by the engineer and/or developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies and VDOT prior to initiation of work. • Materials used and method of construction shall apply to current observed VDOT Road & Bridge Specifications applicable during construction of this development. . Our review and comments are general in nature. Should conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Department prior to inclusion into the Secondary Road System. . Attached is a copy of the minimum requirements and information needed prior to acceptance of subdivision streets into the Secondary System. This is the responsibility of the developer. . All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. . The contractor shall notify VDOT when work is to begin or cease for any undetermined length of time. VDOT will also require 48 hours notice for inspections. . The appropriate land use permits shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. . Any entrances constructed from the referenced street(s) shall meet VDOT minimum standards. This is the developer's responsibility. 10/26/2007 Rutherford Crossing (Internal - VDOT Plan Approval - Rou1 1, Frederick County Page 2 of 2 • Any signs to be installed will be in accordance with attachments. • I suggest any utilities and/or storm sewer placed within the proposed right-of-way be backfilled completely with C.R. Type 21-B Stone. This will greatly reduce the possibility of any pavement settlement. • An agreement between VDOT and NV Retail to absolve the Department of any maintenance or liability of the detention basin will be required. This is the developer's responsibility. The executed agreement is needed before the street(s) is eligible for acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System. • A copy of any/all recorded plats of dedication for drainage easements or additional right- of-way required for implementation of this proposed project should be provided to VDOT prior to issuance of any land use permit. Dedication should be made to the Commonwealth of Virginia. • A copy of any/all RECORDED PLATS of dedication to public use (the County of Frederick County) for drainage easements or additional right-of-way required for implementation of this proposed project should be provided for VDOT review prior to issuance of any land use permit. Should you need additional information, do not hesitate to call. Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer Viiginia Department of Transportation Edinburg Residency — Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 Phone #(540) 984-5611 Fax #(540) 984-5607 10/26/2007 Bury - Partners F N G i N E E R i N G S O t U T i O N S September 27, 2007 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester. VA 22601-50W Attn: Candice E. Perkins RE: Second Review Comments for SPli55-07; Rutherford Crossing Revisions, Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 43-A-99, 43-A-100 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS DATED 9-27-2007 Comment 11 Building 5D. Provide sidewalks as indicated on sheet 9 around building 5D. Response: Sidewalks have been provided. See sheet 9. Comment 2) Directional Arrows. Provide directional arrows throughout all the parking lots as indicated on sheets 9-10. Response: Additional directional arrows have been added as indicated. See sheets 9 and 10. Comment 3) Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks as indicated on sheet 9. Response: Crosswalks have been added. See sheet 9. Comment 4) Island. Revise the island as indicated on sheet 11. Response: A drainage inlet is located in the middle of the indicated island. The curb line indicates the curb channel directing runoff to the inlet. No revision has been made. BURY+ PARTNER S-VIRGINIA, INC 381 G Concorde Parkway, Suite 1000 Chantilly Virginia 20151 1703) 968-9090 (703) 968 4866 Austin - Dallas - Houston - Son Antonio - Tempie Texas Fairfax - Warrenton - Williamsburg. Virginia www buryportners com �.� �, __,_ �� �,, � �� ��,,� Ms. Candice E. Perkins B Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Development T s Rutherford Crossing Site Plan #05 -07 September 27, 2007 Paoe 2 of 3 Cr Comment 5) Historic Area. Indicate why the historical area has been revised since the last subIllission. Response: Upon fitrther review of the grades in the historical area, the path location was revised to accommodate handicapped access from the parking area designated for the handicapped parking. The grades were too steep to come directly froth the parking lot, as previously shown. A path has been added from the parking area to the trail along Route 11 to allow access to the relocated path in the historic area. Comment 6) Handicap Ramps. There are handicap ramps shown at some of the larger buildings (2A, SB, 5A). The sidewalks in front of the buildings can be depressed concrete if desired to avoid the transition. Response: The sidewalks are not depressed and require the ramps. Comment 7) Lowe's Parking. The parking area beside the LoNve's garden area has been revised since the last submission to remove the curb and gutter and sidewalks. Revise the plan to show the previous layout. Response: The parking area has been revised to show the previous layout. Comment 8) Loading Spaces. There are loading spaces behind the Lowe's building for pallet trailers and used appliances; ensure that the storage of these materials will not occur behind the building. Response: We have indicated areas inhere, according to Lolve's, they load the noted items on to trailers. 1 do not have airy additional information about the operational practices of Lowe's at this time. Comment 9) Milton Ray Drive. The cul-de-sac for Milton Ray Drive near the railroad does not extend to the edge of the property/railroad easement. If the intent is not to build the road to the limits of the railroad, then an easement needs to be shown so the adjacent property can connect into this road when it develops. Response: Milton Ray Drive right of way is showt1 on the plan extenditrg to the railroad property SO that fitnure extension can occur. No easement is needed. The cul-de-sac is a temporary turn -around required by VDOT since it is not known when the extension of Milton RaY Drive will occur. �� r • Ms. Candice E. Perkins Bury Pa � i f ie r s Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Development Rutherford Crossing Site Plan #/05 -07 September 27, 2007 Page 3 of 3 Coniment 10) Landscaping. Provide tI-ees within the landscaped Islands as indicated oII sheet 92. Response: Trees have been added as requested ivhere I#1ey would not inteifiere with utilities or sight lighting. I hope you find our responses satisfactory to the comments and concerns of staff. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 703-968-9090. Thank you again for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Bur U Partners — Virginia, Inc. ILA Martin F. Smlth Jr. E. Associate/Project Manager Cc: Jack VAIaghorn, NVRetail Rod Brana, NVRetail Tom Plckering, P.E. MFS/omw Enclosures r� u PP Bury Partners E N G IN E E R ING SOL U T I ON S Letter of Transmittal Bury+Partners, Inc. 3810 Concorde Parkway Suite #1000 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 703-968-9090 703-968-4866 Fax To: Candice Perkins Prr Yeti No.: 20225-02 Cavany: Frederick County Department of Planning Date: 09-27-2007 Address: 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 cc: File Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rutherford Crossing Site Plan O First O Overnight/Express O Client Pick -Up O Courier Pickup & 0 Other Cbss/Regular Mail Shipping Delivery Quantity• Description of Item(s) 1 copies Rutherford Crossing site Plan - Revised plan sheets 1, 2, 9-13, 92- 99 1 copy Comments - Response letter _des_ II nL � CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: 7his transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. /f you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the enclosed item to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this item or any of its cutachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this item in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity. r Bury+Partners, Inc. B' l 3810 Concorde Parkway Ury -Partners Suite # 1000 ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Chantilly, Virginia20151 703-968-9090 703-%84866 Fax Letter of Transmittal To: Candice Perkins Project No.: 20225-02 Comtxvn: Frederick County Department of Planning Dare: 10-15-2007 Address: 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 cc: File Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rutherford Crossing Site Plan ❑ First ❑ Overnight/Express ❑ Client Pick -Up ❑ Courier Pickup & 0 Other Class/Regular Mail Shipping Delivery ouvuin, Description of Item(s) 7 e s Rutherford Crossing Site plans _des_ Oct 5 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This transmittal mar• contain privileged and confidential information and is intended solel' for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the enclosed item to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this item or any of its attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this item in error, please imme&ately notify the sending individual or entity. U • Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 September 24, 2007 Mr. Marty Smith Bury + Partners 3810 Concord Parkway, Suite 1000 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 Re: Second Review Comments for SP#55-07; Rutherford Crossing Revisions Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 43-A-99, 43-A-100 Dear Marty: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be <oranted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staff s comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Building 5D. Provide sidewalks as indicated on sheet 9 around building 5D. 2) Directional Arrows. Provide directional arrows throughout all the parking lots as indicated on sheets 9-10. 3) Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks as indicated on sheet 9. 4) Island. Revise the island as indicated on sheet 11. 5) Historic Area. Indicate why the historical area has been revised since the last submission. 6) Handicap Ramps. There are handicap ramps shown at some of the larger buildings (IA, 513, 5A). The sidewalks in front of the buildings can be depressed concrete if desired to avoid the transition. 7) Lowe's Parking. The parking area beside the Lowe's garden area has been revised since the last submission to remove the curb and gutter and sidewalks. Revise the plan to show the previous layout. 8) Loading Spaces. There are loading spaces behind the Lowe's building for pallet trailers and used appliances; ensure that the storage of these materials will not occur behind the building. 9) Milton Ray Drive. The cul-de-sac for Milton Ray Drive near the railroad does not extend to the edge of the property/railroad easement. If the intent is not to build the road to the limits of the railroad, then an easement needs to be shown so the adjacent property can connect into this road when it develops. 10) Landscaping. Provide trees within the landscaped islands as indicated on sheet 92. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Mr. Marty Smith Bury _ Partners RE: Site Plan rt05-07 September 24, 2007 Page 2 f� 0 After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least hive copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick Counly Sanitation Authority, the Health Department, Frederick County GLS Department, and the Virginia Department of Tra17sportaIiO?7. Sincere, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Rutherford Farm, LLC, 112 N. Cameron St., Winchester, VA 22601 Jack Waghorn, NV Retail, 8230 Leesburg Pikc, Ste. 500, Vienna, VA 22182 CEP/bad Enclosure • • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick Countv Public Works Department 5 Mail to: Frederick County Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5643 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 North Building, 2nd Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5643 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicants Name: Rutherford Farm LLC, C/O Rod Brana 8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500 Address: Vienna, VA 22182 Phone Number: _703-448-4300 Name of development and/or description of the request: Resubmission of previously approved Rutherford Crossing Site Plans — Location of property: Tax Parcel 43-A-100 Public-.. q. v i Public NVorks Department Use Only Date received Date revision received Date approved %/d 7 Incomplete Incomplete Date reviewed A14 7 Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) JUL 1 2007 FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC WORK & INSPECTIONS Bury - Partners NGINE E RING SOLUTIONS August 31. 2007 Ms. Candice Perkins, AICP Senior Planner County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street. Suite 202 Winchester, Va. 22601 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS COMMENTS DATED 08/08/07 Plan Name: Rutherford Crossing Site Plan Revisions Frederick County Plan No: SP 55-07 Bury+Partners No: 20225-02 Dear Ms. Perkins: SEP 5 2CGl We are pleased to submit the above referenced plan for its final review. Please find attached 2 copies of the revised final plan. The following is our response to the V review comments. Comment 1: Dumpsters: Provide a dumpster detail in the site plan. Response 1: Please see sheet 5, the requested dumpster enclosure details have been added to this drawing. Comment 2: Building 5C: Check the parking numbers provided. Loading spaces can't be within the driving lane: label the drive thru and width, show any canopies and proposed signs. Response 2: Please see sheet 2, the parking table has been updated to reflect the parking available to this building pad. In addition, please see sheet 9; the loading space is no longer being utilized as a travelway, the drive thru lane has been labeled and dimensioned and the location for the menu board has been added. There is no canopy planned for the drive thru of this building. W ky+PARTNERSVIRGINIA, INC Ausr,n • vanas • Housron • San A-c)- > • ?errple Teas Fciifox • Warrenton V rgm,a • Page 2 of 3 MP ��� �� i.e i Comment 3: Building, 5D: The driving lane with the loaditig space needs to be one-lvav (ensure at least 1 .feet clearance); check parking numbers provided. Response 3: Please refer to sheet 9, the loading space has been relocated so that it is no longer in a travel way. In addition, please refer to sheet 2; the parking available for this building pad has been updated, as requested. Comment 4: Buildmg 6A: Provide sidewalk that is sholvii mi the approved plait acid shade all sidewalks. Label acid show ividths of the drive thru and bypass lane. Show any canopies mid signs. Response 4: Please refer to sheet 9, the sidewalk that had been shown on the approved plan has been added, as requested. In addition, the drive thru and bypass lanes have been labeled and dimensioned, as requested. Also the location of the drive thru menu board has been added. 'There is no canopy planned for the drive thru of this building at this time. Comment 5: Buildings 5A and SB: Show the concrete area m front of the building, revise the curb and gutter beliind building 5B as indicated, provide 6 inch curb around tuif area and ensure that dumpsters cis provided caii be accessed With location of tuff area. Response 5: Please refer to sheet 10, the concrete Nvallis along the front and sides of these building pads have been added to the plans, as requested. In addition, please note that Nve have determined that the turf area will be to restrictive to the movement of truck traffic in the real- of the building. As such, it has been eliminated froin the plan. Comment 6: Building 3B: Building 3B deeds a dumpster. Response 6: Please refer to sheet 12, a dumpster pad has been provided for this building, as requested. Comment 7: Building 3A: The turf area behind building 3A needs a six inch curb around it. Response 7: Please see sheet 13, the curbing has been added as requested. 'Bury- -Mers -: r -! E E 6: r, j (= S C, u' O r'] S -Pat 0 0 Pa2c 3 of 3 I hope you find our responses and plan revisions satisfactory to the comments and concerns of staff. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 703-968-9090. Thank you again for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Bury+Partners - Virginia, Inc. I�L� Darin J. Mullen Associate/Project Manager 9-,XULERICK Department of Manning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 8, 2007 Mr. Marty Smith Bury + Partners 3810 Concord Parkway, Suite 1000 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 Re: Review Comments for SP##55-07; Rutherford Crossing Revisions Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 43-A-99, 43-A-100 Dear Marty: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this leper, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staff s comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments- 1) Dumpsters. Provide a dumpster detail in the site plan. 2) Building 5C. Check the parking numbers provided. Loading spaces can't be within the driving lane; label the drive thru and width, show any canopies and proposed signs. 3) Building 51). The driving lane with the loading space needs to be one-way (ensure at least 12 feet clearance); check parking numbers provided. 4) Building 6A. Provide the sidewalk that is shown on the approved plan and shade all sidewalks. Label and show the widths of the drive thru and bypass lane. Show any canopies and signs. 5) Buildings _SA and 513. Show the concrete area in front of the building, revise the curb and gutter behind building 5B as indicated, provide a six inch curb around the turf area and ensure that dumpsters as provided can be accessed with the location of the turf area. 6) Building 313. Building 3B needs a dumpster. 7) Building 3A. The turf area behind building 3A needs a six inch curb around it. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. 1 will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Department of Public Works (County Engineer), the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Health Department, Frederick County GIS Department, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Rutherford Farm, LLC, 112 N. Cameron St., Winchester, VA 22601 Jack Waghom, NV Retail, 8230 Leesburg Pike, Ste. 500, Vienna, VA 22182 CEP/bad Enclosure 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Rutherford Crossing, Frederick Count), • Page I of 3 Candice Perkins From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 8:01 AM To: msmith@burypartners.com Cc: Baluch, Stephen; Smith, Matthew, P.E.; cperkins@co.frederick.va.us; rbrana@nvretail.com; adean@perryeng.com; Davis, John; Hoffman, Gregory; jwilder@co.frederick.va.us; Ingram, Lloyd Subject: Rutherford Crossing, Frederick County Marty, We have received additional comments from the VDOT Staunton District Office on the plans for the subject development. We are providing those comments along with our comments on the latest revision (7112107) of the Rutherford Crossing site plans. Several comments relate to the Route 11 improvements as summarized below. Modifications of the previously approved Route 11 improvement plans will need to be submitted to address these issues, prior to the continuation of work on the Route 11 improvements. Edinburg Residency Review — Rutherford Crossing (with latest revisions 7112107) I. Provide centerline horizontal alignment data for proposed VDOT roads. 2. Provide dimension on cul-de-sacs and all curb radii for proposed VDOT roads. 3. Provide designed outfall channels with supporting calculations from structures 79 & 149 to tie into the proposed concrete drainage channel. Extend drainage easements as well. 4. The cross slopes shown on sheet 69 in the inlet computations for Structures 104 & 106 are wrong. Revise to calculations to show a normal 0.0208 cross slope. Revise inlet sizes as necessary. 5. Sheet 69 runoff coefficient for structure 106 seems too low, as most of the drainage area is impervious. Revise accordingly. 6. Specify type and dimensions for FEMA entrance off Market Street cul-de-sac. 7. Sheets 45 & 46 show storm culverts crossings in centerline profiles for proposed VDOT roads. 8. We have sent the revised plans to the VDOT District Office, Bridge Section, as required for review of major structures (i.e., storm pipes with equivalent diameters 48" or larger) which cross VDOT right-of-way. We will provide any comments on that review when we receive them. Staunton District Review — Rutherford Crossing (previous plans with latest revisions dated 2112107) 9. Bury + Partners need to submit signing plans for the VDOT roads within the development site. 10. Bury + Partners need to submit pavement marking plans with the correct line styles and need to label each type of pavement marking. Use Type B Class I 7/20/2007 Rutherford Crossing, Frederick County • Page 2 of 3 (thermoplastic) for the markings and pavement messages, except lane lines which can use Type A (paint). Plans as submitted do not have the necessary information to provide review comments. 11. When using dual lefts at Merchant and Market intersection, the receiving lanes should be 15 ft. in width and transition to typical lane widths using an 11:1 transition as described in Appendix C of VDOT's Road Design Manual (Page C-20, Figure C-1-2). 12. More right-of-way at the intersection of Market Street and Merchant Street will likely be needed for the construction of the traffic signal. 13. Verify all the entrances have appropriate and adequate sight distance once the landscaping has matured. A planting agreement with VDOT will be required so that if any plantings are deemed a potential sight distance hazard, they may be removed. 14. At the cross over on Merchant Street, is traffic going to be able to travel across Merchant St. from the drive between building 6A and 6C to the drive for building 1? If the intent is to prevent traffic from crossing Merchant St., revise signs and markings accordingly. 15. Based on the typical sections on sheet 3, all of the roads inside the shopping center have a design speed of 30 mph. Verify the sight distance is adequate based on the plans and profiles in conjunction with the proposed design speed. Staunton District Review — Route 11 Improvements 16. On sheet 11 of 102 in the Rutherford Crossing plans, the northernmost entrance on Rte. 11 should be designed as a right in / right out with no crossover, per the note shown on the plan sheet. 17. There should not be a continuous right turn lane on southbound Route 11. We believe in previous meetings it was agreed that south of the right-in/right out entrance at Market Street, there would be a gap of 50 to 100 feet in the right turn lane, prior to the taper for the right turn lane for the I-81 NB ramp. 18. At Merchant Street, the Route 11 SB right turn lane should be right -turn only into Merchant Street. Right -turn out traffic from Merchant St. will need to be directed into the through lanes by the use of either flexible delineators or a painted "bulb -out" to prevent the turn lane from being used as an acceleration lane. 19. The Merchant St. intersection at Route 11, as shown on the Rutherford Crossing plans is not consistent with that shown on the Route 11 improvement plans. The Route 11 plans need to be updated to the latest proposed design for the site development, including intersection configuration, curb and gutter, storm drainage, roadside trail, etc. 20. When using dual left lanes, the receiving lanes need to be 15 ft. in width and transition to typical lane widths using an 11:1 transition as described in Appendix C of 7/20/2007 Rutherford Crossing, Frederick County • Page 3 of 3 VDOT's Road Design Manual (Page C-20, Figure C-1-2). This applies to the NB Route 11 lanes and the westbound lanes of Merchant St. at the intersection of Route 11 with Merchant Street. 21. The Merchant St. intersection with Route 11 will need to be signalized when open to traffic. Signal plans should be submitted to VDOT for approval. The Route 11 signs and markings plan needs to be updated to reflect the signalized intersection. 22. More right-of-way may be needed at the intersection of Route 11 and Merchant Street for the construction of the traffic signal. Any additional ROW needed to accommodate the signal pole and electrical cabinets will need to be dedicated to VDOT. 23. The signal plans will need to verify sufficient vertical clearance for the traffic signals relative to the overhead utilities. 24. The service entrance from Route 11 to Building 1, needs to be designed to discourage use by general traffic as a short-cut to Market St. 25. The double left -turn lanes from Route 11 SB to the Future Road opposite Merchant St. have been proffered for construction as part of the Route 11 improvements. The Route 11 plans need to be revised to include these left -turn lanes. This revision needs to be coordinated with the developer/owner east of Route 11. 26. Verify the transition on Rte. 11 at the north end of the development is appropriate for the existing speed and width of transition specified. 27. The Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) plans and the Sequence of Construction will need to be updated for the Route 11 improvements based on the revisions to the construction plans and the latest changes to the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual, Rev. May 2005. 28.On sheet 18 of the Route 11 Improvement Plans, the VDOT standard detail sheets need to be updated to the latest versions provided on the VDOT web site (http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/road-and_bridge_standards.asp.) Should you need additional information, do not hesitate to call me, or Mr. Stephen Baluch in the Winchester Office at 540-535-1829. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT N Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) 7/20/2007 • 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development Use only. Date application received: 3 Application # 5SO 2 f6 C °� Fees received: S �, Initials: 1. Project Title: 2. Location of Property (street address) 3. Property Owner: Address: Telephone: 4. Applicant/Agent Address Telephone: 5. Designer: Address: Telephone: Contact: Rutherford Crossing Martinsburg Pike Rutherford Farm, LLC 8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500 Vienna, VA 22182 703-448-4300 Rod Brana Rutherford Farm, LLC 8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500 Vienna, VA 22182 703-448-4300 Bury+Partners 3810 Concorde Pkwy, Suite 1000 Chantilly, Va 20151 703-968-9090 Martin Smith ll rel 6a. Is this a standard or 'minor' site plan? Standard _ 6b. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original _ 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: _ 58.983 Acre 7b. Total acreage of parcel: _ 58.983 Acre 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: _Tax Parcel43-A-goo b) Current Zoning: _ B-2 c) Present Use: _ vacant d) Proposed Use: _ Commercial Subdivision e) Adjoining Property Use(s) _ vacant f) Adjoining Property Identification Number(s) _ 43-A-111 g) Magisterial District(s) _ Stonewall Minor Revised X I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Date: 1- I !; - '% • • Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street North Building, 2nd Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Rutherford Farm LLc, C/O Rod Brana 8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500 Address: Vienna, VA 22182 Phone Number: 703-448-4300 Name of development and/or description of the request: Resubmission of previously approved Rutherford Crossing Site Plans Location of property: Tax Parcel 43-A-100 Planning and Development's Comments: PlaIlIllng a11(I DewlopIllellt Ilse only Date received Date revision received Date approved Incomplete Incomplete Date reviewed Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) 15 • • Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE SAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TmiE OF YOUR APPROVAL. .IFTHTSDOCDMENTDOESNOTMEETYOURAPPROVALPLEASE PR0VIDE CO YEA7S,gS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LTBE TO .HAVE COMPLETED. INITL4LS DATE & TTME Candice f —4`' L �� _ Bernie Mark Susan Eric Kevin John Lauren COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd FREDERICK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MASTER Site Inspection Form OGNERAL INFORtdAtCION Permit Holder Name f Prro'perty Identification Number (PIN) O Site Plan or Subdii§ssio� P�1an plumber I.ocat.ion Building Permit Number/'^ (-0 ntact Information INSPECTION OF ROADS, DRIVEWAYS TRAVEL A LES & Traffic Signs (Chet); when completed - note all incomplete work): Sidewalks & Lighting Street Striping Dimensions Surface Material Overall Layout Cenunents Inspector Date Verified Incomplete Inspector �._ Date Verified Complete �H ' �ZJ INSPECTION of PARKINt3, NANEUVERINO AREAS & LOADIMO AREAS (Check when completed - note all incomplete work): Number of Spaces Sidewalks & Lighting V Striping Dof Spaces Dimension Surface Material Overall Layout Comments _ Inspector Inspector Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete >��_ V INSPECTION OF LA14DSCAPIRO IMPROVEMENTS (Check ;:hen completed - note all incomplete work): �Iumber of Trees Size of Plants Sze Number of. Shrubs Species of Plants soil Stabilization Seeding Screens Overall. Layout Comments Inspector Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ '% I Inspector << �} INSPECTION OF OTHER I14PROVE1,1E14T8 (Check when completed - note all incomplete work) : Setbacks Recreational Facilities Proffered Conditions Preservation Areas Signs Curb & Gutter Comments Inspector �n Date Verified Incomplete Date Verified Complete _ Inspector R; nnature Date oaf Approval Is site approval contingent on a monetary guarantee? Yes* No Bond Number (-if yes, all site improvements noted on this form must be complete prior to the release of a monetary guarantee. in addition, all relevant review agencies sha11 provide final site approval. A checklist of these agencies is provided beio:: for documentation purposes.) Fire Marshal Building Inspections Public Works Parks & Recreation Virginia Department of Transportation Sanitation Authority City of Winchester Other ( ) (Please date 6 initial when all site Work is complete ( all relevant review agencies have approved) Date Monetary Guarantee Released Initials I iere on the old Swift Run Gap Road on the eve- ning of October 3, 1864, Union Lt. John Rodgers Meigs was killed in a fight with three Confeder- ate scouts guided by local resident Pvt. Benjamin F. "Frank" Shaver, 1st Virginia Cavalry. Meigs, of Gen. Philip H. Sheridan's staff, and two orderlies encountered the Confederates, who had entered Union lines that morning to observe the disposi- tions of Sheridan's army camped around Har- Benjamin F. -Frank" Shaver remained vigilant for years after the war because Gen. Meigs had pad a price on the " bushwhackrrb" head. C,-l-, Jd­ 1. 11-1-de risonburg. A firelight „ it,'.,r,,,: t;,.K, . ,11;. , ensued and Meigs scouts had worn "rubber raincoats" over their wounded a scout, but uniforms.) Sheridan retaliated, ordering that the others returned buildings over a large area, including the town of fire and killed Meigs. Dayton, be burned to the ground. He soon rescind - His body was recov- ed the order concerning Dayton, but thirty other ered the next morning. dwellings were destroyed in what came to be One of the orderlies known as the "Burnt District." Sheridan justified reported to Sheridan his actions by asserting, "Since I came into the that civilian "bush- Valley, from Harpers Ferry up to Harrisonburg, whackers" had mur- every train, every small party, and every straggler dered Meigs. (Because has been bushwhacked by people." In this case of a drizzling rain, the he was wrong, and innocent people paid the price. John Rogers Meigs as a cadet tourlcer Ltbrnn of Congrres VIliiN1A 1]111AAR TRAILS .Cn4 John Rodgers Meigs was a mem her of a distinguished family, the cldesl sun of Montgomery C. Wilts, quartermaster general of the U.S. Army. Young Wigs grad waled first in the West Point ,-lass of 1863 and became a high ly regarded staff engineer before joining Sheridan. After his death, he reeeived posthumous promotion to the rank of major, and his body was transported to Mrs. Robert E. l.ee's Arlington House. then under Gen. Wigs's jurisdiction. The general buried his son in Plot 1. Gr"e 1, in Mrs. Lee's rose garden. This site is one of many in the Shenandoah Valley interpreted largely because of the efforts of John L. lieatwole, a renowned Valley historian, woodcarver, sculptor, and folklorist. His two books (Shenan- doah Ybieec kblklore, 1,grrads and 71vdi- lions of the Ybllry and The Burning: Sheridan i Drtostu/ion of the Shenandoah Ybtlgl, his contributions to the Virginia Civil War'lrails program, and his work on the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Commission have brought the stories of this region to life for Valley residents and visitors alike. John L. heat-1 Please note: The site plans associated with this file are located in the file room.