The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About49-03 Monoflo, Inc. Revision of SP 02-99 - Industrial - Manufacturing - Stonewall - Backfile (2)CASH11- `v3 003537' RECEIPT Received From �/ ' (�� g Address v `r �--�/` �CMQ. W �1�- V A ZZ a> F ar g CX1 O `( � U AMT. OF , t tL ACCOUNT �V CASH (Wp� (W(� AMT PAID CH / BADU CF1' MONEYEDITCCARD I. I By 1. SITE PLAN TRACKING SHEET Date: Lv� / D 3 File opened / 03 Reference Manual updated/number assigned j/ I LO3 D-base updated File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary d a-1 CLOSE OUT FILE: O( Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" ofL Reference Manual updated p D-base updated y�" I File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary )22i�-� U \Carol\Common\Tracking shcctslSile Plan Tracking wpd Rcmi d 02/07103 SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST The checklist shown below specifies the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application. The Department of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). (1) One (1) set of approved comment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application. A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: Frederick County Department of Planning &Development Department of GIS (Geographic Information Services) Frederick County Sanitation Authority ✓ Frederick County Building Inspections Department t/Frederick County Department of Public Works Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Health Department Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) City of Winchester Town of Stephens City _Town of Middletown Frederick County / Winchester Airport Authority (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form. (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. / 4 One 1 reproducible co of the Site Plan if required). O O P PY (• q )• RIE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 February 24, 2004 Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E. Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Administrative Approval of Site Plan #49-03, Monollo, Inc. (revision of S.P. #02-99) Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 54-A-97B Dear Mark: The above referenced site plan was approved by staff on February 24, 2004. There are three phases of the approved site plan. Phase one is approved for the construction of a 52,000 square foot warehouse building. Phase two is approved for the construction of a 9,100 square foot manufacturing building addition. Phase three consists of adding additional parking in the front parking area. Landscaping, fire lanes, handicap access, fire hydrants, curb and gutter, asphalt paving, and a category C zoning buffer, are required for this development as shown on the approved site plan. I am providing you with several copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ;e�remy F. Camp, Planner II JFC/bad 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Mr. Mark Smith, P.E. Approval of S.P. #49-03 February 24, 2004 Attachments cc: Mo da Tyler, Stonewall District Supervisor / Light, Stonewall District Planning Commissioner /J�ipe Anderson, Real Estate ',atnck Barker, Economic Development Commission Rader Investment Group (owner) em: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Stonewall District Planning Commissioner (Chairman) is eiN GREENWAY ENGINEERING 1*407 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 vun.lcd in 1971 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Monotlo File No: 2241 Date February 23, 2004 To: Frederick County Planning From: Austin Spitler/jw Attn: Jeremy Camp GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Copied Fax: 540-722-9528 ❑ Urgent ❑ For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Jeremy, Attached are 8 copies of the revised site planer Planning comments along, with 1 set of agency comments. Thank you for your assistance. Call with any concerns. Greenway Engineering Telephone 540-6624185 FAX 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 IIand deliver to: 107 North Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester. Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Monoflo Building Addition Location of property: 882 Baker Lane, Winchester Inspections Department's Comments: Comm lyr e,11`s 1 ✓'C'_ Instwctituts l)epartntcnt usr only T� Datc reccived )late rcvisio:r rccciccd 1)xic ;tpittuvrd luionl�lcte � tncutT�i7 ctc � Datc roie"ved Sigilature acid Datc Sigliatare attd DItc (revisit l)atr nwicA-ail - ' 1 ..... ...... ... 3� p� 15 Addition and new building shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Sections 306, Use Group F (Factory and Industrial) of the International Building Code/2000. Other Code that applies is CABO Al 17.1-98 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities. Please note section 3408.6 IBC for accessibility requirement for additions and alterations (ADA 20% rule for updates to the existing structure ). New warehouse shall be HC accessible and all egress doors shall be accessible to a min. landing for area of refuge on the exterior. No parking space shown at the building at this time or accessible route. The sewer line shown between buildings shall not be below a 45 degree from the bearing plain of the structures footing HC parking appears to be in compliance however please note that the side walk on the accessible route shall slope at less than P in 20' at elevation changes or shall be designed and permitted as a ramp per CABO A117.1-98. Design Professional lie. in VA shall seal the structural plans submitted for permit application and special inspection requirements of Chapter 17 of IBC shall apply to this type of structure. (soils, concrete, steel ect.) Ruckman Engineering January 22, 2004 Mr. Kevin Kenney Construction Management, Inc. 360-2 McGhee Road Winchester, Virginia 22603 RE: Relocation of Sanitary Sewer Line Monoflo Warehouse Building 886 Baker Lane Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Kenney, This letter is to confirm that Ruckman Engineering has checked the proposed warehouse footing elevations relative to the relocated sanitary sewer line along the west side of the building. According to the site plan prepared by Greenway Engineering, the finished floor elevation of the warehouse will be 681.00'. This places the bottom of the concrete footings at elevation 678.00'. On the Greenway site plan, the relocated sewer is I I' to 12' from the face of the building. This places the outer edge of the west side footings 10' to 1 I' east of the sanitary sewer line. The deepest portion of the sanitary sewer, which is adjacent to the new warehouse building, is at proposed manhole #2. The invert out elevation at manhole #2 is 669.1'. This is roughly 9' below the bottom of the footings at the left front corner of the building. In summary, these elevations place the sewer line outside the 45 degree line extending downward from the edge of the building foundation. However, the proposed manhole #2 slightly encroaches inside the 45 degree line. As a result, footing "E" at the left front corner should be roughly 2' deeper to account for the overdig area around the new manhole. The footing could be poured 3' thick, instead of the 12" thickness shown on the approved drawings, or the pier could be made 4' tall instead of the 2' tall pier shown on the approved drawings. No other modifications need to be made to the foundation system because of the relocated sewer line. I hope the information provided meets your needs at this time. If I can be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to call... Sinc Richard A. Ruckman, P.E. 22-B Ricketts Drive * Winchester, NA 22601 * (540) 678-1216 * Fax (540) 678-1217 0 0 I Mr. Austin Spitler Grecnway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Site Plan Comments - Monoflo Frederick County, Virginia Dear Austin: January 15, 2004 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 Upon review of the revised site plan dated December 1,5 2003, it appears that all of our previous comments have been addressed. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject site plan. Sincerely, J�/;e n �6 , 16Y— oe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/rls cc: Frederick County Planning and Development file AA revi I 10 110 fl 0 co nim-P d 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Ll Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authoritv Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer Director P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, VA (540) 868-1061 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway En ing eering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540,) 662-4185 A (/ jTi11 Name of development and/or description of the request: Monoflo Location of property: 882 Baker Lane Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: y l t�1 . � r /> Sanitation Authoritv use only Date received Incomplete Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revis Date revision received - _ Date approved Incomplete Date reviewed 17 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • Request for Street Name Comments Site Plan Review Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Attn: Marcus Lemasters, Mapping and Graphics Manager 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5651 The Mapping & Graphics manager will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County street name system. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will prevent duplicate street names form being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 2260/fi Phone Number (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Location of property: 882 Baker Lane Mapping and Graphics Manager Comments: Communication Center Supervisor's Comments: Monoflo ' ;_ Uatc received Date rc%i,�ion rcccivcd _ T bite approval Incomplete Inconylctc Date reviewed Date reviewed Signature and I)atc Signature and Date (revision) 13 . t DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDERICI{ COUNTY, VIRGINIA STREET NAME COMMENTS DATE: December 18, 2003 STAFF MEMBER: Marcus Lemaster , trector SITE PLAN: Revised Site Plan - Phases I & II for Monoflo, Inc. -'COMMENTS: The Frederick County Department of GIS has reviewed. the Revised Site Plan - Phases I & II foi Monoflo, Inc., and has made the following determinations: 1. No road name will be required Cor these additional structures. Numbered structures will not etceed'the nunber required to install a new road name. 2. New structure numbers have been assigned to the additional buildings. These ininibers are annotated on the enclosed plan. Frederick County Dept of GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5651 • Request For Site Plan Comments Cite of Winchester Mail to: Winchester Planning Department Attn: Planning Director 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540)667-1815 Hand delk er to: 15 North Cameron Street Rouss City Hall Winchester, VA (540) 667-1815 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway En,C ineerinK Address: 151 Windy Ilill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Monoflo Location of property: 882 Baker Lane City of Winchester's Comments: �jc/►�1�ile V CO'y'y Wincimster 11minim! Oct,artment ttw onto Date rcecivcd Date revision rcccibcd Date ,fjvi7rovcri lttcornhletc Rick -Ini)ICic il;,t.• r.+\'t. it:.•It flat.• r.vi.•\tr,•t Signature and Datc Signature and Date (revision 1 22 Request For Site Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 2275 Northwestern Pike Winchester, VA 22603 (540) 535-1828 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach five (5) copies of the site plan with traffic generation data and drainage calculations with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540) 662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Mon_oflo Building Addtion Location of property: 882 Baker Iane, Winchester Virginia Department of Transoration Comments: The application for site plan for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 1200, Baker Lane. the VDOT facility which would provide access tot e property. any work is performed on the S!«+e'q rig ►! of way, a End asoPNR:Piit=:,;" Aeed }e lie pp]4gil for -ind icciied to rnvrr cgid work. The permit is issued by this office and requires a fee and surety bond coverage. See attached letter from VDOT to Greenway Engineering dated November 24, 2003. 1`IAM use only Date r=6N-c.l 1acumplete Date revirw< Signature and 1.1ate si�;natzure ;ind Dav (revision Date revi:iust received 0 "5 i 14�tmpleac -1'?aitr't�irwrti � ��jf(j Darr appro%t°dl l {a-3 Is Co '-�i,11 LTI I of VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY Philip A. Shucet 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER EDINBURG, VA 22824 November 24, 2003 Mr. Austin Spitler C/O Greemvay Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Ref: Monoflo, Inc. Route 1200, Baker Lane Frederick County Dear Austin: JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TEL (540) 984-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 We have received your revised site plan dated November 10, 2003 for the referenced project. It appears all of our earlier review comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Please advise the owner of our approval. Also please provide six (6) sets of approved construction plans with signed seal for VDOT distribution. All standard VDOT items called for on the plan sheets should be those current on the date of installation on the project. The appropriate land use permit may now be applied for to cover work within the Route 1200, Baker Lane right-of-way. The permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage, and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector. A copy of any/all recorded plats of dedication for drainage easements or additional right-of-way required for implementation of this proposed project should be provided to VDOT prior to issuance of any land use permits. Dedication should be made to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Once satisfactory application has been made, a permit will normally take approximately thirty days to process and issue. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. Sincere axw Barry J. Sweitzer, Trans. Roadway Engineer l For: Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer ' !! BJS/rf 1 Enclosure xc: Mr. Dave Heironimus Mr. Jeremy Camp VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Request For Site Plan Comments Winchester Regional Airport Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA 22602 (540)662-2422 Fax — (540) 722-9335 Hand deliver to: 491 Airport Road (Route 645, off of Route 522 South) (540) 662-2422 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540.)662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Monoflo Building Addition Location of property: 882 Baker Lane, Winchester Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: !Vinchester Recionarl Airw)rt nSc un[v late rcccivud Date rtnisiton recuiv,cd i_late appro%vd Iucnniplvtr Date r, NNiewed late re iru,rd Signature and hate I Signatur,� and gate (revision) • ��` WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT �� 491 AIRPORT ROAD SEWW. nE TOP ^'�''^ WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 q��l (540) 662 2422 December 1, 2003 Austin Spitler Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Site Plan Comments Monoflo Building Addition Stonewall Magisterial District Dear Mr. Spitler: The above referenced site plan has been reviewed and it appears that it should not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport since the site falls just outside of the airport's Part 77 surfaces. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director • Request For Site Plan Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal 107 North Kent Street Attn: Fire Marshal First Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-6350 Winchester, VA (540) 665-6350 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540)662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: Monoflo Building Addition Location of property: 882 Baker Lane, Winchester Fire Marshal's Continents: Hire and Rescue Dew. use only' Date rccci%ccl Incomplete _ Date rvvje red Signature and Datc Signature and Date f Date reoisiim mxivcd _ Incompictc Datc revicwccd Date approved 11- �-1 l..., /tc$ C, o q c M �_ x K H M � rtaaixtn Control number SP03-0057 Project Name Monoflo Warehouse Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Type Application Site Plan Current Zoning M-1 Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Adequate Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments • • Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Date Revised 11 / 19/2003 11 /21 /2003 Applicant Greenway Engineering City State Zip Applicant Phone Winchester VA 22602 540-662A185 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District 54-A-97B 18 18 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Requirements Hydrant Location Adequate Roadway/Aisleway Width Adequate Election District Stonewall Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature,by;,� Yes Timothy L. Welsh �tN r hOV M Title LA • January 30, 2004 Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E. Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 � R RIF mpy C RICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 Re: 2nd Review of Site Plan 449-03, Monoflo, Inc. (revision of S.P. #02-99) Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 54-A-97B Dear Mark: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan, which was a revision of the site plan submitted last November, to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval is denied until the following issues are appropriately addressed, as well as all issues of the other review agencies. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. All except comment number 8 were included in staff s first review letter, dated December 10, 2003. Review Comments: 1) Parking Location/Access. Please provide a handicap accessible sidewalk from the existing parking lot to the Phase 1 warehouse building. 2) Truck Access To Loading Areas. The travel aisle to the loading areas appears to be awkward at best. Please provide supportive information to staff which clarifies that the turning radii and general access to the loading area is appropriate. 3) Outdoor Storage. Please provide a note on the site plan which requires the existing outdoor storage to be completely removed from the site or relocated inside of the Phase I warehouse building within 30 days of occupancy. This note should be located on the cover sheet, the Phase 1 site plan and the overall site plan to ensure that this issue is not overlooked. 4) Lighting. Please show all proposed lighting and demonstrate how this lighting will be shielded and directed away from adjoining properties to ensure that light pollution is minimized to the utmost extent. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Review Comments for Site Plan #50-03 Mr. Mark Smith January 30, 2004 5) Landscaping Calculations. Please include the entire site, not just the proposed expansions, into the landscaping calculations. Required landscaping shall be provided as necessary to meet the total required landscaping for the entire site. 6) Curb & Gutter. Please provide curb & gutter along the right hand side of the proposed ramp of the existing warehouse building, as illustrated on the proposed site plan. 7) Interior Landscaped Area Of Parking Lots. Please ensure that at least five per cent of the interior of the parking areas is landscaped. This information should be provided as part of the landscaping calculations of the site plan. 8) Relocated Trees for Phase 3. Please explain why there are 12 proposed relocated trees for the Phase 3 front parking lot expansion, but only eight trees shown to be removed. Are these four additional trees proposed new shade trees? After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for final administrative approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick CountylrtspectionsDepartment, theFrederickCountyDepartinent of Public Works (County Engineer), the City of Winchester, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Airport Authority, the Frederick County Department of GIS, and the Virginia Departrent of Transportation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Jeremy F. Camp, Planner II JFC/bad • It\ GREENWAY ENGINEERING `%47 151 Windy Ilill Lane rouruki in 19.1 Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Monollo File No: 2241 Date January 15, 2004 To: FC Planning Attn: Jeremy Camp Copied ❑ Urgent ❑ For Your Review Fro ni: Austin Spiticridlm GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message: Jerem Attached is the following for the above project: -2 copies of the revised site plan per Planning comments -Comment response letter Thank you for your assistance. Call with any concerns. Greenway Engineering Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy I lill lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Pounded in 1971 January 15, 2004 Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Jeremy Camp Re: Monoflo Comments Dear Mr. Camp We are in receipt of the comments from Frederick County Planning Department and offer the following responses. Our responses are in order of Planning's comments. Continents from hrederick County Planning Department Response 1: Parking Calculations Previous approved site plan showed proposed use as office and manufacturing. Current Ilse Is office, manufacturing, and warehouse as shown on revised site plan. No office proposed for Phase I Warehouse Building. Response 2: Parking IA)cation/Access Proposed 1 or 2 employees for Phase I Warehouse, which will be working between Phase 1 Warehouse and existing warehouse. Most employees will be employed in existing warehouse and will be parking in existing, parking lot. Response 4: Outdoor Storage lixisting storage to be relocated to Phase 1 Warehouse once completed. Response 6: Landscaping Calculations Landscaping provided for Phase 1 only. Landscaping for remaincler of site was provided for on previously approved site plan. Response 14: E'lectric Connections Location of electric connections unknown at this time. Iacctric will be placed underground. Response 17: Proposed Ramp Ramp used for forklifts only between Phase I Warehouse and existing warehouse. Please contact us at your convenience if you have any questions or to schedule a meeting if any of the comments need further discussion. 'Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, Greenway Engineering - //A� ustin Spitler Engineers Surveyors Pile #2241/AS/dim Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 5,10-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com • • o 0 COUN R o K Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 December 10, 2003 Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E. Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Review of Site Plan #49-03, Nlonoflo, Inc. (revision of S.P. #02-99) Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 54-A-97B Dear Mark: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted until the following issues are appropriately addressed, as well as all issues of the other review agencies. Please review Staff s comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Parking Calculations. The parking calculations of the proposed site plan are significantly different to the currently approved parking calculations of S.P. #02-99. The key difference appears to be that instead of the entire site being classified as a manufacturing use, the proposed plan breaks down the parking calculations into three categories: office use, warehouse use, and manufacturing use. Please provide an outline around these individual and total parking calculations to more clearly show how parking calculations were determined. Please also show all areas of office use on the site plan. Is there any office use proposed for the new warehouse building (Phase 1)? If so, please show this area and modify the parking calculations as necessary. 2) Parking Location/Access. Please provide appropriate access to the required parking for the proposed warehouse building (Phase 1). As currently shown, no parking is provided directly adjacent to the building and no sidewalks are offered for pedestrian access. Also, at least one handicap space will need to be provided for this building, based on the eight required parking spaces. Staff recommends that at least eight parking spaces be provided adjacent to the new warehouse building. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • Page 2 Review Comments For S.P. #50-03 Mr. Mark Smith December 10, 2003 3) Truck Access To Loading Areas. The travel aisle to the loading areas appears to be awkward at best. Please provide supportive information to staff which clarifies that the turning radii and general access to the loading area is appropriate. A sketch of a possible alternative plan is provided on the attached site plan. This alternative plan would eliminate ten parking spaces, bringing the total number of spaces to the minimum required. 4) Outdoor Storage. The statement that all outdoor storage will meet County requirements is inappropriate, because the existing outdoor storage currently does not meet County requirements because it is not fully screened. Please show the location of all proposed outdoor storage and demonstrate how these materials will be fully screened from adjoining properties. If no outdoor storage is proposed, then please provide a statement to that effect along with a statement that all existing outdoor storage will be removed prior to the issuance of any future occupancy permits. 5) Lighting. Please show all proposed lighting and demonstrate how this lighting will be shielded and directed away from adjoining properties to ensure that light pollution is minimized to the utmost extent. 6) Landscaping Calculations. Please include the entire site, not just the proposed expansions, into the landscaping calculations. Required landscaping shall be provided as necessary to meet the total required landscaping for the entire site. 7) Dumpster. What will be happening to the existing dumpster? How will trash collection be managed on this property? Please address these questions. 8) Curb & Gutter. Please provide curb & gutter at the orange highlighted locations shown on the attached site plan. 9) Existing Silos. Please show all of the existing silos on the site plan. 10) Zoning Buffer. Please change the size of all trees to six feet at planting to ensure that the required landscape screen height is achieved prior to the use of the Phase 1 warehouse building. Please also provide the species of trees that will be used for this screen and the total number of trees as well. Remember that at least one third of these trees must be deciduous (two inch caliper), but the majority of trees must be evergreen (six feet tall). Staff also requires that the location of the proposed berm and trees be clearly shown on the site plan. Based on the provided plan, it appears that the berm and trees are only being provided for a portion of the property line. Please change this to ensure that the berm and trees are provided for the entire property line (449.1 V long). 11) Phasing Of Parking Lot Modification. Please provide a statement to the effect that the proposed modifications to the existing parking lot will occur during Phase 1. Page 3 Review Conunents for Site Plan #50-03 Mr. Mark Smith December 10, 2003 12) Gap Between Buildings. Please explain the intended use of the area between the proposed manufacturing building addition and the existing metal building. This is the areas labeled as existing concrete pad and the 15 feet wide space in front of the wall where the three dock doors will be abandoned. 13) Fire Lanes and Signs. Please ensure that all improvements required to meet fire code, including fire lanes and signs, are shown on the site plan. 14) Electric Connections. Please show how the proposed warehouse building and manufacturing addition building will be comiected to electric. As noted, all utilities shall be located underground. 15) Interior Landscaped Area Of Parking Lots. Please ensure that at least five per cent of the interior of the parking areas is landscaped. This information should be provided as part of the landscaping calculations of the site plan. 16) Zoning Administrator Approval Statement. Please provide a statement beside the Zoning Administrator Approval Box to the effect that approval of this site plan is only valid for five years from the date of Zoning Administrator approval. 17) Proposed Ramp. The proposed ramp/loading space does not appear to be accessible based on the layout of the proposed parking spaces. How will a tractor trailer or other truck enter this area? After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for final administrative approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Department of Public Works (County Engineef), the City of Winchester, the Frederick County Fife Marshal, the Frederick CozrntySmtitationAuthority, the Frederick CountyAhporlAuthority, the Frederick CountyDepartinent of GIS, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Jeremy F. Camp - Planner II JFC/bad Attaclurient: Page 2 of 7 SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1. Project Title: 2. Location of Property (street address) 3. Property Owner: Address: Telephone 4. Applicant/Agent Address Telephone S. Designer: Address: Telephone: Contact: Monoflo. Inc 882 Baker Lane Winchester, VA 22603 Helmut and Gisela M. Rader 882 Baker Lane Winchester, VA 22603 540-665-1691 Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 540-662-4185 Greenway Engineering Same Same Austin Spitler Rr-CE ,/ -ID NOV 1 9 2003 V REDERCK G0UW Y ENT PIANNINO & DE 9 r-I U 6. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original ❑ Revised X 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 3.9 acres 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 10.33 acres 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: b) Current "Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: e) Adjoining Property Usc(s) i) Adjohiing Property Identification Number(s) g) Magisterial Districts) 54-A-97C and B M-1 Industrial/Manufacturing Industrial/Manufacturing Industrial, Residential 54-7-1 3,4,5I3 6A, 54-A-97A, .54.1-1-1, 2 Stonewall I have read the material included hi this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature:4&� Date: VA Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: 107 North Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway En ing, eering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone Number: (540)662-4185 Name of development and/or description of the request: MonoIIo Building Addition Location of property: 882 Baker Lane, Winchester Planning and Development's Comments: Plann€ne and Ih'N'rlopment list onk Datc received !laic revision recciicd Date approved Incomplete €nconnpletr 1 aic rcvie%ed Datc revioxed Signatnrc and €)atc Si n3aturc and Datc 0 • GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lanc Winchester, Virginia 22602 Founded in 19:i T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Monoflo File No.: 2241 Date: November 19, 2003 To: FC Planning Attn: Jeremy Camp From: Austin Spitler/dlm GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Copied: Remarks: [7' Urgent r. For Your Review I.: As You Requested r, Please Comment Message: Jeremy, Attached is the following for the above project for your preliminary review: -2 copies of the site plan -Site Plan Application -Application fee check for $1,766.50 -FC Planning comment sheet Once we have received all Agencies review comment sheets, we will submit to your office. Thank you for your assistance. Call with any concerns. RECEIVED Nov 1 9 2003 Engineers Surveyo Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 greenway@visuaUink.com