Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-05 Kernstown Commons - Commercial - Shawnee - Backfile (2)Please note The site plans associated with this file are located in fhe library. A 1k P SITE PLAN TRACKING SHEET Date: �3 File opened a� o� Reference Manual updated/number assigned -��-LOS- D-base updated File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary CLOSE OUT FILE: ts Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file 0� File stamped "approved", "denied" or "withdrawn" r l ®S Reference Manual updated D-base updated $-05 File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary W-11- Pq C -Z-f) a-H 0 (o--3 C \13e%''Common\Tracking sheets\Site Plan Tracking s%Pd Rcsised 02r07iO3 it SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST The checklist shown below specifies the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application. The Department of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). C� (1) One (1) set of approved comment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan. It is recommended that applicants contact the Department of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies are relevant to their site plan application_ A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Department of GIS (Geographic Information Services) Frederick County Sanitation Authority ✓ Frederick County Building Inspections Department / Frederick County Department of Public Works Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Health Department X Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) X City of Winchester y Town of Stephens City X Town of Middletown I_ Frederick County / Winchester Airport Authority L/" (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form. C� (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. 4 One 1 reproducible co of the Site Plan if re uimd () () eP PY ( q )• � vo DATE N O. C, 1 2 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS ILLARS FOR- -A lild oil=CASN AMT III ACCOUNT A T 7 7.,7" RALANCE MONEY 1 0U7---li E 'lnrF� L�ry le ,,, " -- BY PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY 41083811 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MIEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Nebraska, having its principal offices in the City of Middleton, Wisconsin, does make, constitute and appoint - G. TIlvIOTI iY WILKERSON, WENDY E LAHM, JENNIFER HOEI IN, DONNA K. ASFILEY, ANGELA D. RAMSEY, KAREN GRIFFIE--- WILLIAM J. QUINN, JAMES W. BLAND, JOHN D. LEAK 111, JENNIFER S. BEASLEY, SCOTT D. MATI-IERS, JOSEPI-1 E. HUNNICUTT --- its true and lawful Attorneys) -in -fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, as surety, and as its act and deed, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of ALL WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS IN AN AMOUNT: $2,500,000.00 This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPAUNY at a meeting duly called and held on the 8th day of January, 2002. "RESOLVED, that the President, and Vice -President, the Secretary or Treasurer, acting individually or otherwise, be and they hereby are granted the power and authorization to appoint by a Power of Attorney for the purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more vice-presidents, assistant secretaries and attorncy(s)-iit- fact, each appointee to have the powers and duties usual to such offices to the business of the Corporation; the signature of such officers and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed to such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking or other writing obligatory in the nature thereof to which it is attached. Any such appointment may be revoked, for cause, or without cause, by any of said officers, at any time." IN NVITNESS WIIEREOF, the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its officer undersigned and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed duly attested, this Ist day of June, 2006. Attest: PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY �.,,�; n!I:I�ipii��OUppiiiiii Alan S.Ogilvie _ SEAL A T Secretary ry Li� L F_ James J. McIntyre President STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF DANE 1 S.S.: �iicunmur.iin;m�aao., On the 1st day of June, 2006 before me personally came James J. McIntyre, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in the County of Dane, State of Wisconsin; that he is President of PLAI'TE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. KATMLEEN` qq A. t� PAULSON Kathleen A. Paulson STATE OF WISCONSIN 1 S S Notary Public, Dane Co., WI COUNTY OF DANE J CERTIFICATE My Commission Expires 10-15-2006 1, the undersigned, duly elected to the office stated below, now the incumbent in PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, authorized to make this certificate, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the Power offjjAttorney is now in force. Signed and sealed at the City of Middleton, State of Wisconsin this r2 day of f P arc co /t OL��� ` SEAL f�,t Alan S. Ogilvie Secretary THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS PRINTED ON GREEN SHADED BACKGROUND WITH A RED SERIAL NUMBER IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL 800-475-4450. PRS-POA (6-06) Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. P R+A 117 East Piccadilly Street H Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To From: Date Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: cc: Jeffrey Neal, Frederick County Fire Marshall John Whitacre, FCSA Ron Mislowsky Mav 2, 2006 Kernstown Commons — Motel Site Candice Perkins, Frederick County Planning Memorandum We have revised our parking layout to remove improvements from the Voluntary Setback Area. While waiting for VDOT to determine how much land they might need and for those improvements to begin we have proposed an emergency access drive around the back of the motel. This would be a gated, aggregate base roadway. In order for Planning to approve this new layout we will need a con-unent from you. Please call if you have questions. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 May 14, 2008 1-Iomestyle Hospitality LLC 500 Pegasus Court Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Country Inn and Suites, Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN) 75-5-2 Parcel is 5.9 +- Acres Dear Mr. Nerangis: I understand that there is interest in determining the building setback requirements as applied to the Country Inn and Suites site within the Kernstown Commons development in the event that an approximately six acre parcel is created to enable a future highway improvement. There are various issues that are considered in determining the future setbacks for the balance of land within the Country Inn and Suites parcel. In any event, it does not appear that improvements to the I-81 roadway will impact the building setback application to this site. Existing Condition The recent construction of the Country Inn and Suites on this site appears to be in conformance with the building setbacks as depicted on the approved Site Plan (410-05). Division of Land to Enable a Parcel to be Owned by the Virginia Department of Transportation In the event that a land division occurs, building setbacks will be measured from the newly created property boundary. This land division creates two 132-zoned parcels — one owned by Homestyle Hospitality LLC and the other intended for ownership by VDOT. There are no building setback requirements between these two 132-zoned parcels. I understand that the proposed boundary line will be approximately 1.5 feet from the northeast corner of the Country Inn and Suites indoor recreation area (see attached plats dated April 30, 2008). This does not appear to be an issue as the required setback of 0 feet (no setback) is satisfied. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I-Iomestyle Hospitality LLC RE: Country Inn and Suites May 14, 2008 Page 2 Future Construction of I-81 Exit 310 Interchange Improvements At such time as the planned interchange is constructed, it is anticipated that the VDOT parcel would be utilized for road right-of-way. The building setback from such a road right-of-way would be 50 feet. However, because the Country Inn and Suites is an existing building, it would be deemed legally non -conforming (i.e., grandfathered), with a 1.5 foot building setback. In the event that the Country Inn and Suites site is redeveloped, it would be appropriate to preserve the 1.5 foot building setback so long as the new site plan to accommodate the reuse of the site is approved prior to removal of the Country Inn and Suites structure. You may have the right to appeal this zoning determination within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of the Code of Virginia. This decision shall be final and unappealable if it is not appealed within thirty (30) days. Should you choose to appeal, the appeal must be filed with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) in accordance with Article XXI, Section 165- 155A(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. This provision requires the submission of an application form, written statement setting forth the decision being appealed, date of decision, the grounds for the appeal, how the appellant is an aggrieved party, any other information you may want to submit and a $300.00 filing fee, ($250.00 filing fee and a $50.00 refundable sign deposit). Once the appeal application is accepted, it will be scheduled for public hearing and decision before the BZA. If you have any questions, call me at 540-665-5651. Sincerely, heal R. C eran Zoning Administrator MRC/bad Performance Bond Frederick County, Virginia Bond Number: 41083811 Ownei-s of Property: Orange Partners LLC Property Description and Name of Project: Kernstown Commons _Landscaping & Bike Path on Route I I _ KNOW ALL MEN BY TIIBSB PRESENTS, that we, Orange Partners, LLC , as PRINCIPAL; and Platte River Insurance Company, SURETY, are obligated by this bond dated April 25, 2007 to pay Frederick County, Virginia ("County"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the sum of Seventy Eight Thousand Six hundred Eighty Eight Dollars ($78,688.00). Heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Principal and the Surety are also obligated to pay the designated sum. The Principal and Surety waive any homestead exemption related to payment of this obligation. This bond shall be in effect for a period of one (1) year from the date hereof and shall automatically renew for additional terms of six (6) months from the present or future expiration date, unless and until Orange Partners LLC shall give sixty (60) days prior written notice to the County to: "Zoning and Subdivision ,Idininisfi-atoi-, Frederick County Planning Department, suite 202, 107 noi-th Kent Street, fVinchester, J/hglnla 22601 ", by certified mail, return receipt requested, of its intent to terminate same at the expiration of the sixty (60) day period. This bond shall be terminated upon the Subdivision Administrator (or Designee) giving written release stating that Orange Partners LLC has well and truly performed and fulfilled the obligation of the agreement. The condition of the above obligation is such, that if the Principal complies with the provisions of Chapter 144, Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 165 Zoning Ordinance and/or chapter 79, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, of the Frederick County, Virginia Code related to all physical improvements that include, but are not limited to, streets, curbing, gutter, sidewalks, above ground utilities and facilities, recreational facilities, drainage systems, erosion and sediment control measures, designated open space and other required improvements located in or on Kernstown Commons the approved subdivision or site plan. If Principal fails to complete its obligation, the county shall notify the Principal and Surety. If such obligations are not completed by the Principal or Surety or their agents within fifteen (15) days after date of notification by the County, the Surety shall pay the frill amount of the bond, or such lesser amount as may be demanded by the County, to the County, within thirty (30) days of the date of the initial notification referenced above. The amount payable may include administrative or other costs. Payment by eh Surety shall not be conditional on suit by the County. The drawing will be held by the County for the sole purpose of providing for the completion and/or maintenance of the site plan and/or subdivision requirements to the satisfaction of the Subdivision Administrator or their authorized Representative. This bond shall be terminated upon the Subdivision Administrator or their authorized Representative giving written release to (Permittee or Developer) Orange Partners LLC stating that they have satisfactorily performed and fulfilled the obligations and requirements of the approved site or subdivision plan. ��J�,�c� ��_. Witness the following Signatures: PRINCIPAL: Signature: Name: /ulw-ot-n-s 'j,/l%�-k/i,,j6u) ?/j (please print) Title: m 6),-► 06)( SURETY: (please print) Title: Attorney -in -Fact & Virginia Agent Fo cus CONSTRUCTION November 3, 2006 Orange Partners Lisa Limoges 500 Pegasus Ct. Winchester, VA 9 N. Loudoun St Suite 201 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone: 703-948-0500 Fax: 540-545-8056 Project: Rt 11 Improvements @ Kernstown Commons, Winchester, VA Re: Bike Trail Credit Dear Mrs. Limoges, This letter is to serve as notification to you of the value of the bike trail as indicated on the approved Rt. 11 Improvements drawings as designed by PHR&A dated 3/17/06. The total cost for the bike trail, including excavation, 6" of stone base, and 2" of asphalt is $26,516 (Twenty six thousand five hundred sixteen). Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 571-233-5929. Thank you, Aaron Aulabaugh Senior Project Manager LOFocused on Excellence" �■� Aug 17 06 02:08p PHRR WINCHESTER 540-665-0493 p.1 ■ ;■ Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners, Landscape Architects. l - R /� 117 East Piccad Ily Street 1_1 � f � Winchester, VrC- nia 22601 T 5,10.667.2139 P 540.665,0493 Fax Transmittal To: Ca: idire Perkins Organization/Company: Fre:lerick Counry Plarm'MR Fax Number: 665,6395 From: Rot 1 Mislowsk Date: !�-Ul.usL 17, 2006 Project Name/Subject; Ket nstown Commons CC: Total Pages including cover: 2 A hard copy of this fax ❑ will Z will not be mailed to you. Comments: Fire Marshall approval of revised mot :l plan. AUG 1 7 2006 NOTE: This message is uiicnded for the use of the addressee and may contain infonriation that is privileged and confidential. if you are not the intended recipient, you ; rc hereby notified that any dissemination of this co,nmunicatton is stricdy prohibited. if YOU receive this facsimile in error, ple ase notify its immediately at the number above. Thank you, Aug 17 06 02:08p PHRFI WINCHESTER 540-665-0493 p.2 4�G •tr . 'O Control number MDt'04-001.6RR Project Name Kemstown Commons Address 117 E. Piccadilly SI. Type Application Master Development -Resubmit Current Zoning B2 Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Adequate Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments )alc mcoived Date feviewed Date Revised 8/2/2006 8/14/2006 Applicant Patton Hams Rust 8 Associates City State Zip Applicant Phone Wnchoster VA 22601 S40,067.2139 ax ID Number Fire District Rescue District '5-A-10 11 11 Election Dlstriet Recommendations Shawnee Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System Yes No Reallirements Hydrant Location Fire Lane Required Adequate Yes Roadway/Aisleway Width Special Hazards Adequate No Emergency Vehicle Access Comments I f'l: �If:��9' fU'.,� ... �1�:'ll'I: �' n• �_. I' .:I r�ir.l'. ;i Access Comments Additional Comments 11:-: 2plii t)vi Ci .is su, Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes Jeffrey S. Neal Title A PROpt� VEi? _ FIRE MARSHAL, �'RIEDEMU< COUNTY Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. R+A 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 PH T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: Candice Perkins Organization/Company: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: Frederick County Planning Ron N islowsky Apra 24, 2006 Kernstown Commons Memorandum I've attached a revised parking lot plan for the motel site. As we discussed a few days ago, we have located all of the parking outside the voluntary setback area. We are fuializing the storm sewer and landscaping revision now, but I wanted to try and obtain any comments you night have on this new arrangement at this time. Please call if you have questions. APR 2 6 2006 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, Landscape Architects PH i Last Piccadilly a 226, Suite 200 T Winchester, Virginia 22G01 'I' S40.GG7.2139 P 540.665.0493 To: Organ(zation/Company: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: cc: Candice Mills I•redcrick County planning nn Ron Nfislowsky, August 2, 2005 Kernstown Commons AUG 2 2005 Memorandum The recent approval for the Kernstown Commons project included a reference to a 65 room motel. I'his motel size is actually 81 rooms. 'I'his was a typographic error on sheet 2. The parking provided in Phase One does satisfy the requirement for an 81 room facility. I've enclosed a copy of revised sheet 2. Please let me know if you have questions. FREDERICK COUN SANITATIO AUTHORITY P.O. Box 1877 Winchester. VA 22604-8377 ROBERT P. JIOWEAZY. C.P.A.. Clulirman � �C 2 9 2006 Wellington H. Jones, P.G. En in - v'-Dire ' a JOIf\ S1-F.1 F.NS. Vice-chairman RICHARD A. RUCKMAN. P.h:., tine -treasurer J. S A\LEN' CROCEa CI' DARWIN S. IIRADEIN Ms. Lisa Limoges Orange Partners, LLC 500 Pegasus Court Winchester VA 22602 REFERENCE SUBJECT: Dear ivfs. Limoges: December 28, 2006 Kernstown Commons Bill of Sale A copy of the recorded Bill of Sale for the above -noted project is enclosed. • 1 Ph. - 1540) 868- 1 n6 1 -_f Fas - (5401 868.1-1--') The Authority now owns the newly installed water and sewer facilities and appurtenances. Your one-year warranty period began on the date we signed the document. Respectfully, ZJohn G. Whitacre Senior Engineer /ths Enclosure cf: Frederick County Zoning Administrator WATER AT YOUR SERVICE J3 � K-1 1 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE GREGORYA. WHIRLEY EDINBURG, VA 22824 ACTING COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER November 3, 2005 Ms. Lori Adams C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Kernstown Commons Route 11, Valley Pike Frederick County Dear Lori: A VDOT review has been completed on the final plat dated October 17, 2005 for the referenced project. The plat appears to reflect the information shown on the approved project plans and is therefore approved by this letter. The application for subdivision of this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 11, Valley Pike, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans for review. Entrances will have to be constructed to VDOT standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property. We are returning six (6) signed copies of the plat to your office, one copy is being retained for our work file. Please provide one copy of the plat of dedication fully signed and recorded at the appropriate County Clerk's Office prior to the issuance of any land use perinit froin VDOT. If there are any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely a&v /1 3 Barry J. Sweitzer, Trans. Roadway Engineer For: Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer BJS/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. Robert Hawkin , r. Mark Cheran ' giniaDOT.org E KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 0- .-tC/ Im C� r 0 Cft-NT1Y,j14f jCj"2J)I$RICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 July 29, 2005 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Approval of Site Plan 910-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Ron: The Frederick County Department of Planning and Development administratively approved the above - referenced site plan on July 29, 2005. The site plan is approved for the construction of a 6,183sf Outback Steakhouse and a 65 room Country Inn and Suites located on the development known as Kernstown Commons. The site is located on Valley Pike (Route 1 1) and will be accessed off of the southern most commercial entrance into the development. This site plan also contains second commercial entrance located at the northern portion of the property. This northern entrance can only be created if a limited access break is granted for the site by the Commonwealth Transportation Board.. Some of the required site improvements include the following: Phase I Improvements • Southern full commercial entrance with a main travel isle to access the Outback and Hotel sites. • A five foot sidewalk along the main driving lane and northern entrance. Outback Steakhouse • Construction of a parking lot with a minimum of 62 spaces (five handicap spaces), including curb and gutter, landscaping, striping, and handicap access. • A sidewalk around the building • Dumpster Pad with a six foot opaque screen Country Irul and Suites • Construction of a parking lot with 107 spaces (five handicap spaces), including curb and gutter, landscaping, striping, and handicap access. As noted on the site plan some of these spaces are located within the limits of use and all required spaces (65) must be on the lot or adequately accommodated elsewhere on the property possibly through shared parking. • A sidewalk around the building. • An outdoor fountain feature. • Dumpster Pad with a six foot opaque screen 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Whichester, Virginia 22601-5000 K ,r Mr. Ron Mislowsky Re: Approval of Kernstown Commons July 29, 2005 Page 2 All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with four (4) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II Attachment CEP/bad Orange Partners, LLC, 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 Jane Anderson, Real Estate Patrick Barker, Economic Development Commission Gene Fisher, Shawnee District Supervisor Paige Manuel, Robert Morris, Shawnee District Planning Commissioner Jolul R. Riley, County Administrator • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 . Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Telephone: 540/665-5651 FAX:540/665-6395 FAX TRANSMISSION To: -e-Y-O-x)�C; s ForeTLYRIENIM FAX #: (o b i 'I R a9 Remarks: Date: 1 12 Q S Number of 4es (including cover sheet) _ From the desk of: _e o-cd i �Q_ lQ-v }{; ns P, 1 x ImWate TX Result Report ( Jul, 29, ' 05 3:38PM) x x x Fax Header) File Date Time Destination Mode TXtime Page Result User Name No. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jul.29. 3:37PM 540 667 4929 G3TES 0'36" P. 3 OK 1813 Batch M Memory L Send later Q Forwarding E ECM S Standard D Detail F Fine Reduction x LAN —Fax + Delivery O RX Notice Req. A RX Notice gflbert w. chfford Associates a division of Patton Harris Rust & Associates,pc Engineers, Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. R+A 117East Piccadily Street,Suite200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 PHT 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: Organization/Company: Address: Candace Perkins Frederick County Planning 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 I-7 u JUL 2 9 ?0 Transmittal Telephone Number: Date: July 29, 2005 From: Ron Mislowsky, P.E. Project Name]Subject: Kernstown Commons Via: Internal Project File #: Quantity File # Date Description Transmitted ❑ Herewith g Construction Drawings for approval ❑ Under separate cover Notes: Received by: Date: Material ❑ Originals ❑ Photocopies ❑ Diskette ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ❑ Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia Purpose ❑ Your Use ❑ Your Files ❑ Approval ❑ Please Return: Corrected Prints ❑ Please Submit: Revised Prints Jul 28 05 02:20p PHRR WINCHESTER gilbert w, clifford & associates a dhrlslon of Patton H arris Rust d Assoclates,pc Engine. Sure yom Planners. Landscape Architects. PRW117nc;haBUstPerl,ccadl inlStreet,SuHe200 H /\l T540.667. Virglnla 22601 T 540.667.T139 F 540.665.0493 To: Candice Mills Organization/Company: Fax Number: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: I Frederick County Planning 665-6395 Ron Mislowsky, P.E. 7/28/05 540-GGS-0493 0 Kernstown Commons — FCSA .Approval Letter p.I Fax Transmittal ntemal Project rile Number: Total Pages including cover: 2 A hard copy of this fax ❑ will E will not be mailed to you. Comments: NOTE: This message is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is stricdy prohibited. If Jul 28 05 02:20p PHRA WINCHESTER 07/28/2005 11:17 5400061 f giIbert W. Clifford & associates P-11on H+rrls It", a 4230clates,PC Engineer., Survr� Plonrnva, Lcndncop■ ArCh;tCGle. 117 East PlccaalPy &Ireol, surle 200 L T + wlnchesler, V119nlB 22801 1I�11 T S40.88721N F 510885.019) To; 0 rgan Ization/company: Address Telephone Plumber: John Whiracre F(TiA P.O. Box 1877 - Winchester VA 22604 Date:.. July 21, zoos . . 540-GG5-0493 FCSA 0 PAGE 0] Transmittal From: Ron 3&lowsky Project Name/Subject; `Kcrnstown Commons Via; Internal Project Flle 0: Quantity File # Date Description Transmitted 2 Revised Pluu ® Herewith — �— ❑ Under $Operate cover Material —L_ i V ❑ Photocopies �Q ❑ 1'SiskaHa _ ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ MYlar ❑ ()slid Prints s / CP - � ��/y�� ❑ Invoice sepia Purpose —_ j ! //7'4 F / �f�' �./ ❑ Your Use ❑ Your Files Notes: ® Approval /"44 ❑ Please Return: /Li,� ,A 3'/S��r�' TS' % {' i ConauadPMmf Y. �.qrl �" J ❑ Pltsee Submit; Z � ?T26�SQ C Uto y 4 ,--t' �5.crP Received by: Date: �YQ o wyc= s�iio of �l�.y sT r o s.t 7',F — /�ic'�ori '4 f IC7,Z�,1s ",6- .18Jo,5- p.2 Patton Harriso"'t & Associates,pc • July 21, 2005 Candice 1:. Perkins Frederick County Planning 107 North Kent Street Winchcstcr, VA 22601 RE: Review Comments for Site Plan #10-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Candice, �/� We have addressed the comments dated July 5"', 2005 and offer the following PHR- O responses: Comment 1. Limits Of Use Plat . T11C limits of use needs to be recorded before c the site plan can be approved as stated in the "Limits of Use Designation". Response 1. We've attached a copy of the recorded plat here for your records Comment 2. Drlying Lanes: I hC Cllr►ent conflgtlrat►on to access the Phase I businesses appears to be confusing. Tbc main driving lints in this location whicli arc shown in Phase II need to be constructed in Phase I as I have shown on the plan to provide for better flow on the site. Response 2. The plans have been revised to include the main driving lane (shown in Phase II) within the phase I construction. {See Sheets 4 & 5) Comment 3. Phase I Parking Requirements. The lots shown in Phase I parking requirements arc wrong, please revise to show the correct lot numbers. . Response 3. The lot numbers have been revised to reflect the correct y information. (See Sheet 2) . Comment 4. Bike Path and Sidewalks. Provide a statement that the bike path will be asphalt and extend the hotel sidewallc to the future lot- I as I have shown on the plan. Response 4. The bike path call out now reads "Future 10' asphalt bike 0, path". Also, the plan not reflects a future 5' sidewalk along lot 1 and a proposed 5' sidewalk tying into it from Lot 2. A crosswalk and additional sidewalk has been added leading up to the proposed Country Inn Hotel. {See sheet 41 0 Comment 5. Hotel Location. The back harking areas and the fire lanes for the hotel area located within the limits Of use. In your correspondence you stated that the 1uilding Code does not require access to all sides of the building. Please check with the lire Marshall to sec if they are also satisfied with having access to only tlhree sides of the structure. Response 5. I have met with the Fire Marshall to go over the Voluntary Building Restriction line and the possibility that VDOT could in fact take up to that limit should the future 1-81 improvements necessitate that much land. Mr. Welsh understood the access implications and had no objection to the layout as shown. I assured Mr. Welsh, as we have the County, that should this "taking" occur, a revised plan would be necessary to reconfigure the parking that would remain. PR-A We trust the above responses address all Of your comments and concerns. Should you have any gL1CStioiis regarding these responses, hlcase feel free to call. Regards, PATTON HARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES, pc d A. 1\',lislowsky, �Vll, 0 gilbert w. chfford & associates a dyislon of Patton Harris [lust & Associates,pc Engineers Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects, PR117 East Piccadily Street, Srite 200 H Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: Lloyd Ingram, VDOT Joe AVilder, Public Works John Whitacre, FCSA Tim Welsh, Fire and Rescue John Trenary, Inspections March Cheran, Planning From: Ron Mis Date: February 17, 2005 Project Name/Subject: Kernstown Commons PHR+A Project file Number: cc: Nick Nerangis Richie Pifer Memorandum On behalf of Orange Partners, we are pleased to submit, for site plan approval, plans for the development of 2 sites on approximately 31 acres in Kernstown. An 84 room motel and 2800 seat theater complex, along with associated roadway and ui'liity extensions and site preliminary grading are proposed. The development of the remaining 6 out lots will require separate site plan applications for each proposed use. This is similar to the procedure just finalized for the Sherando Towne Center. Once this site plan has been reviewed and comments addresses, final subdivision plats will be submitted for administrative approval. The site is served by FCSA water and sewer. The water is extended from across Route 11 through the former "Outback Steakhouse site" to Kernstown Commons. The site drains to a new wet well mounted pump station which discharges through a 4" force main along Route 11 to a manhole at the Prosperity Industrial Park. The site drains to an existing storm conveyance channel constructed by VDOT during the Route 37 construction. This flow will be diverted around the motel site. The site drains to a new detention pond sized to limit discharge to the Interstate right-of-way to 10 year predevelopment levels. The updated erosion control measures are specified on the plans. A Land Disturbance Permit has been issued for the property. Major improvements to the Route 11 right-of-way are proposed. A widening to meet the requirements of the TIA are specified. Please note, these plans anticipate that the limited access break request will be approved by VDOT. Should that break not be approved the northern site access shown will be removed prior to final site plan approval. All dry utilities will be extended from the Route 11 right-of-way. Preliminary, routings through the site area shown. Appropriate copies of the plans and stormwater calculations are enclosed here for your review. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 0 Request for Site Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. 107 N. Kent St. Attn: Building Official Fourth Floor 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Address: c/o Ronald A. Mislowsky 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Name of development and/or description of the request: Kernstown Commons Location of property: West of I-81. east of US Route 11 and immediately south of VA Route 37 Inspections Development's Comments: C o S D- ni5 For i. _ Inspection Dept. use only Date received Incomplete Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) Date revision received Incomplete D.gtP re.viewed Date approved OS — Control number SP05-0009R Project Name Kernstown Commons Address 117 E.Piccadilly Street Type Application Site Plan Current Zoning B2 Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Adequate Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Dale Revised 5/12/2005 5/17/2005 5/5/2005 Applicant P.H.R. & A. City State Zip Applicant Phone Winchester VA 22601 540-667-2139 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District 75-A-10 11 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Req,uiE°ernaEi "-Ls Hydrant Location Adequate Roadway/Aisleway Width Adequate Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Additional Comments Fire lane markings and signage required at all fire hydrants, fire department connections, and all normal and emergency access points to the structure(s). Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes Timothy L. Welsh � /�,��� n� Title —`" U- 1. 1f�tel-1 i P, (DYE - FI.1 "IE NI- li Ul!CMCI MPI Fi 1�� G5*15490 • RECORDATION OF PLAT The attached Plat Showing Voluntary Limits of Use Per Limited Access Area of I-81, and courses and distance description made by Cory M. Haynes, Land Surveyor, Winchester, Virginia, dated July 13, 2005, of the lands of ORANGE PARTNERS. LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being the same land acquired by the said ORANGE PARTNERS, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company, by deed dated 3-- -Y) e- 1 I Z o v l and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. OLloul(.)tl� is hereby confirmed and submitted of (record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office. The attached plat places of record the Voluntary Limits of Use Per Limited Access Area of I-81 of the land of ORANGE PARTNERS, LLC, as set forth in particular on the attached plat. Dated this day of v7d )2005. ARRISON & JOHNSTON.PLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA ORANGE PARTNERS, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company Bye.. (SEAL) anager/Member STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE, CITY OF WINCHESTER, To -wit; The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this day of /, 2003, by ° r ',s , as Manager/M ber of ORANGE P RTNERS L.L.C., Virginia Limited Liability Company, on behalf of said Company. My commission expires .3 24"-Jt, Wary Public ARRISON & JOHNSTORPLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1,000' OWNER'S CONSENT: Limits of Use designation (adjacent to the 1-81 and Route 37 interchange area) Parking and other accessory uses shall be permitted in the area located northeast of the limits —of —use building restriction line pursuant to applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, as discussed below. Prior to construction of parking or any other accessory uses within the Limits —of —Use area, the applicant must demonstrate that the Zoning Ordinance required parking could adequately be accommodated elsewhere on the Kernstown Commons MDP property. Execution of a shared parking agreement, per the Zoning Ordinance, may be utilized to satisfy the zoning ordinance parking requirements. In the event that VDOT determines that all or a portion of said area is required for public road improvements and thus initiates the process of acquiring the necessary right—of—way, the property owner sholl be responsible for relocating any parking or other accessory use installed within the designated 'limits —of —use' area. The relocation of such uses shall occur at the owner's expense. Any costs associated with design and reconstruction of the limits —of —use area for the purposes of public road improvements, to include removal of existing accessory uses, shall be the responsibility of VDOT. -7/1 s/OS (DATE) NOTARY PgBLIC. . STATE OF // -P` -� CITY/ OUNTY - THE FOREGOING INSTRUMY4NT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON l S ZOOS BY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (NO ARY P BLIC) (DATE) p,Z,TH 0 v CORY M. HAYNES No. 2539 7� 131oS PLAT SHOWING: VOLUNTARY LIMITS OF USE PER LIMITED ACCESS AREA OF 1-81 PROPERTY OF ORANGE PARTNERS, L_C SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: JULY 13, 2005 PATTON HARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CONSULTING ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING 117 E. PICCADILLY STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (540) 667-2139 SHEET 1 OF 2 rn 3 N N U U U a E _.1 O <r 00 N Ld Y_ Ld Lli I � LLI of F-- ui w r` 0 q- °' N ZI ROUTE 37 C' R/W VARIES _ S57'34'12_E 71- 194.28' \ (TIE) 7 rn _ 830.79' TOTAL 9s 6'S o D or o�mD cn 7 ; Iw \moo c,+ r'• cn o S \, N \rrl 75—((A))-10 ORANGE PARTNERS, LLC INSTR. #040010118 N52 18'18F 47 "W 984. ' " (TO'TgL�-�_ I 75—((�)-11C DEALERS�H p AUTO gNAGEMENT'C/NC. AND INS7; #04001609 �MPgN y, CURVE TABLE 7.30' (TIE) L. L. C. DPW rri� (nm CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT BEARING CHORD Cl 42'05'36" 614.63' 451.55' 236.51' S23'44'28"E 441.46' C2 36'02'27" 85 7' 539.88' 279.21' S10'04'49"W 5 1.03' C3 03'48'35" 1829.86' 121.67' 60.86' S25'12'07"W 1 1.65' �i,LTH OF O v CORY Y. HAYNES >' No. 2539 '7 ! 13 / oS 200 100 0 100 200 <4v SURO�4 1"=200' PLAT SHOWING: VOLUNTARY OMITS OF USE PER LIMITED ACCESS AREA OF 1-81 PROPERTY OF ORANGE PARTNERS, LLC SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: JULY 13, 2005 r PATTON HARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CONSULTING ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING 117 E. PICCADILLY STREET, WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 (540) 667-2139 SHEET 2 OF 2 0 200211 Ronald A. Mislowsky 0 • From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:34 PM To: 'Ron.Mislowsky@phra.com' Cc: Eric Lawrence (E-mail); Copp, Jerry; Alexander, Scott; Ingram, Lloyd Subject: Kernstown Commons Ron, We have reviewed the latest submittal for your proposed entrance at Kernstown Commons. We feel we can approve this proposal contingent upon the agreement the development will be limited to 70% of the build aut. Any additional expansion beyond the 70% will require a new -HA to identify improvements of ingress/egress to mitigate the additional traffic load. While not detailed on this last submittal, the developer will be responsible for signals at the entrance as well as Lhe intersection of Route 11 and the Route 37 South off ramp. All turn lanes and tapers shown on the Submittal for construction will be the responsibility of the developers. Dther minor requirements can be satisfied during the detailed site plan review. Lloyd A. Ingram transportation Engineer VDOT Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike dinburg, VA 22824 -540) 984-5611 '540) 984-5607 (fax) 5/20/2005 10 0 s� •0 �> COUNTY of FREDERICK July 7, 2005 Mr. Ronald A. Mislowsky, Jr., P.E. Vice President Patton Harris Rust & Associates, p.c. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan Comments - Kernstown Commons Frederick County, Virginia Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 Dear Ron: Upon review of the revised site plan dated June 27, 2005, all of our previous comments have been addressed. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject site plan. Please provide a copy of the geotechnical engineering report for our files. We do not have a copy of this report on file. Sincerely, QC)e- C. , Joe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/rls cc: Planning and Development file A:Uccrnstomicofill, ionsrevcom.repd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 i I July 5, 2005 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 COU o ITZLT�ER>(CK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #10-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Ron: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments 1) Limits Of Use Plat. The limits of use needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved as stated in the "Limits of Use Designation". 2) Driving Lanes. The current configuration to access the Phase I businesses appears to be confusing. The main driving lanes in this location which are shown in Phase II need to be constructed in Phase I as I have shown on the plan to provide for better flow on the site. 3) Phase I Parking Requirements. The lots shown in the Phase I parking requirements are wrong, please revise to show the correct lot numbers. 4) Bike Path and Sidewalks. Provide a statement that the bike path will be asphalt and extend the hotel sidewalk to the future lot l as I have shown on the plan. 5) Hotel Location. The back parking areas and the fire lanes for the hotel area located within the limits of use. In your correspondence you stated that the Building Code does not require access to all sides of the building. Please check with the hire Marshal to see if they are also satisfied Nvith having access to only three sides of the structure. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Re: Review Comments, Kernstown Commons July 5, 2005 Page 2 After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia De/marlment of Ti•ansj)orlalion, the Frederick Couni)) Engineer, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Fu•eclerick County Heallh De]mn-tment, and the Frederick Count}) Ah-I)ort Authority. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II Attachment CEP/dlw cc: Orange Partners, LLC, 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 P a t f o n Harris R& Associates,pc 0 June 28, 2005 Candice IM. Perkins Frederick County Planning 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 J U N 2 9 2005 RE: Review Comments for Site Plan #10-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Candice, We have addressed the comments dated June 16, 2005 and offer the following responses: Comment 1. Contact Information. The contact information on tine cover sheet for the Planning Department is incorrect; 11/Is. 13d(ly does not work c on site plans. The person of contact for the Planning Department should state "Planner II". OF Response 1. The contact information has been revised and now reads "Planner II" for point of contact. f Sheet 1 } Comment 2. Route 11 Landscaped Medians. The road layout shown on the plan does not reflect raised, landscaped medians on Route 11 as discussed at the MDP level. Response 2. Tine plans now show future raised medians for Route 11. Plcasc note that the Route 11 improvements shown on this plan are for informational purposes only. A site plan for the proposed Improvements along Route 11 including landscaping, hiker/biker trail and associated details will be submitted separately. r,...., OFF,.i5 Comment 3. Project Information. On sheet 2 of 30 under project information, include the information for the Outback. Response 3. The project information for the Outback Steakhouse has been included. (Sheet 2) errs• ,�:�.�::. O:: Comment 4. Site Notes. On Sheet 2 of 30 under site notes, note number five needs to include that any signagc along Route 11 must be a monument -style sign. I Response 4. Note I1LI1nl)Ci" fiVC now reads that all signagc along Route 11 must be a monument -style sign. f Shect 2) Comment 5. Parking Requirements. On Sheet 2 of 30 under parking requirements, the "Theater requires 679 seats but only 676 spaces are being provided. Revise the parking calculations to meet the I7T1111iTTUm. Response 5. The parking calculations have been revised to show adequate parking for Phase I per Frederick County requirements. Phase I is for the development of the Country Inn & Suites and Outback Steakhouse. {Sheet 2) Comment 6. Entrance Detail. On Shect 4 of 30, the entrance detail that is shown in case the limited access break is not granted contains a note that states "both the entrances...". There is only one entrance located PR 1 /�, within the limited access area and the note needs to be revised. Response 6. The entrance detail has been revised and the note now refers to only one entrance. {Sheet �l} Comment 7. Bike Path and Sidewalks. Per the NIDP, a bike path is required along Route 11 as well as sidewalks along both sides of all proposed streets within the development. Response 7. The plans now show the future bile path along Route 11, which will be designed with Route 11 Improvements Plan and will be submitted separately. {All plan view sheets} Comment 8. Sigiialization. Show the traffic signal on the southern entrance. Response 8. The traffic signal has been added to the southern entrance. {Sheet 51 Comment 9. Comments 9-11. Pursuant to the agreements pertaining to the limits of use and the commitments made on the Nlaster Development Plan, particular attention should be made to comments 9-11 Response 9. The NfDP has been revisited and comments 10 & 11 have been addressed. Comment 10. Theater and Hotel Locations. The back parking areas and the fire lanes for the theater and hotel area located within the limits of use. The buildings should be moved forward to ensure that at least the fire lanes to access the rear of the structures arc retained. Response 10. We have discussed this issue with the Building Inspector. "The Building Code does not require access to all sides of the building. • However, the design of the structure will be impacted by the accessibility and setbacks provided. Comment 11. Parking in Limits of Use. The parking area,,; that are currently within the limits of use on the site need to be extra/in addition to the required amount. The required number of parking spaces needs to be delineated in another location on the site to ensure that if the spaces within the limits of use are taken out that the site will still have adequate parking. Response 11. The plan now delineates the future parking limits that will be established in the event that MOT would acquire the Limits of Use Area. The provided parking spaces shown on the parking tabulations does not tale into account the parking spaces within the Limits of RA Use Area. {Sheet 2, 4 & 51 PH Comment 12. Limits of Use Statement. The statement that will be placed on the NIDP about the limits of use also needs to be placed on the site plan. Response 12. The limits of use statement that is shown on the NIDP is now shown on the site plan. {Sheet 2} Comment 13. Interstate Overlay Signs. This site is allowed to have one interstate overlay sign, the location and height of this need to be shown on the site plain. Response 13. The interstate overlay sign has been located on the site plan along with the height. {Sheet 5} Landscaping Plan Comment 14. Hedge Rows. On Sheet 30, the planting size for the hedges must be a minimum of 36" in height at time of planting, provide this size requirement in the plant schedule. Response 14. The plant schedule now reflects a hedge row at a ►ninimum of 36" in height. f Sheet 30) Comment 15. Lot 2 Landscaping Calculations. On Sheet 30, the calculations for lot 2 show 34 required trees and 33 provided; revise to show 34 provided. Also, a hedgerow needs to be provided along the parking area facing lot 1. Response 15. 'There are now 34 perimeter shade trees provided on the plan for Lot 2 and a hedgerow has been added along the edge of the parking lot • facing Lot 1. 'I'll's row of planting on Lot I will be installed with this plan, but not counted towards the planting provided in Lot 2. (Sheet 28, & 30) Comment 16. Perimeter Parking Calculations. On Sheet 30 under site totals it states that there is 849,856sf of interior parking surface. Interior parking surface is the parking lot and would be impervious surface. The impervious area for the three lots ulicler "Interior/Exterior Parking Lot Landscape" has a combined total of 390,771sf of impervious surface; please clarify why these two totals do not match. Response 16. The total interior parking surface of 8,19,856 SIB includes lots 1-8. The impervious surface of 390,771 S17 only includes lots 2, 3, & 8. P p /A {Sheet 301 Comment 17. Landscaping Substitutions. On Sheet 30, provide a note 20 that sates landscaping substitutions must he approved in writing by the lircdcrick County Planning Department. Response 17. Note 20 has been added to the plan. {Sheet 30) Comment 18. Other Lot Landscaphi . On Sheet 28 and 29, remove the landscaping from the lot that appears to be the future iiMcDonalds. Response 18. The landscaping for the future 1\'lcDonald's has been removed from the plan. {Sheet 28 & 291 I've attached approvals from the lire iMarshall and Building Inspector along with the Power of Attorney. We trust the above responses address all of your comments and concerns. Should you have any questions concerning these responses, please feel free to call. 1Zegards, PATTON HARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES, pc Wald A. fMislowvsky, P.L?., NT cc: Nick Nerangis 4!ay. 6 2005 9:09AM NERI�NGIS MANAGEMENT CORP No.1868 P. I J UN 2 9 2005 Spedal LWted Power of Attorney County of Frederic14 Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www co frederjck V#-ne DePrtMet of Mlxain & i>-vC1apsn;a4-, County of Fliertck, Vkjln1*, 107 MarthX"t Street Vftf$eeter, Virg ntn 2201 Mae 54"65-S-i31 Nedi fle 540-6"95 KnowAll Men-By.Thost Present: Thal-1(We) (Name) Nick- Neran s Nick NeKangisjr., Steve Ncraneis & Licn Umoges (Phone) 540-667-1322 (Address) 500 Pep*Y.LwC4Durt, Winchester VA-22602 the mner(s) of all those tracts -or -parcels of -land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Otiioe of thc.CiluuA Coiut of the Couul ofFmdericl(, Virginia, by Instrument # 040010118 and is described as Parcel:10 Lot: Block: A Section`. 75 Subdivision-, do hereby make, constitute and appoint: — (Name)Charles E dox PHR+ (Phone)54"67-2139 (Address) 117E iccadjlIYS1metWinQhcsWVA22601 To act as my true and-lawful-attomey-in-factfor and•in my (our) name, place, end stead witlt full power and authority I (we) would --haw if aetiug pormeae3Fj•to-file-pLuming applications for my (our) above described Property, including — ing (including proffers) Coati ral-Use Permits MaU-De"pmeai Plan(Ptclirminary and Final) _ Subdivision — 2 Site plan My attorney -in -fact shall have the author4y-te`til9crproii'ered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except 2s follows: --- This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modit'ted- In witness thereof, --I (we)-Irsve-hmto set my (oor�-hand and seal thus _ day of� 200� „// . � A -I?-- /f State of Virginia, City/County of ++ =I � 1 tt� To -wit= I, ti �1 I t • a -Notary Public iII--and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s).who-signed-to thc-foregoing instrument personally appeared befare me and has acknowledged the same beforr_mur:tkc}urisdiciion aforesaid this __�f�day of i� Id, 200 Notary Public -- — MY Cortnztissisti�zpirci;: J Control number SP05-0009R Project Name Kernstown Commons Address 117 E.Piccadilly Street Type Application Site Plan Current Zoning B2 Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Adequate Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments • • Frederick County Fire and Rescue . Department llll� ? 9 2�Ori Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received 5/12/2005 City Winchester Tax ID Number 75-A-10 Date reviewed 5/17/2005 Applicant P.H.R. & A. State Zip VA 22601 Fire District 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Requirements Hydrant Location Adequate Roadway/Aisleway Width Adequate Date Revised 5/5/2005 Applicant Phone 540-667-2139 Rescue District 11 Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Additional Comments Fire lane marldnas and signage required at all fire hydrants, lire department connections, and all normal and emergency access points to the structure(s). Plan Approval Recommended Pp Reviewed By Signature Yes Timothy L. Welsh Title III �I '►�4i1/���1= �(vl;,(`�5 C t 'G=�>>C: [ 3�CIPD OD ! IT, 0 Recluest for Site Plan Comments • Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent St. Fourth Floor Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Please, fill Q-t the ;nf nx=aj;nP ar nccligntelkz as possible, in nrder tnq-,-qiqt the ggcmr.�4 with their review Please attach one (1) copy of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: c/o Ronald A. Mislowsky 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Name of development and/or description of the request: Kernstown Commons Location of property: West of I-81, east of US Route 11 and immediately south of VA Route 37 Inspections Development's Comments: Inspection1Dept. use only' Date received Incomplete Date reviewed _ Date revision received Incomplete t�atr rr�� ic��rc�cj Signature and Date Sii:nature and Date -(revision) Date approved I 6 c gilbei-t w. Clifford & associates a division of Patton Harris Rust & Associates,pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 P R+A Winchester, Virginia22601HT 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 • 5NUI1O3dsNl l i l La l ui�no� I To: John Trenaiy, i Organization/Company: Frederick Coi-mty Inspections i Address: 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone Number: Date: May 11, 2005 From: Ron MisloNvsk), Project Name/Subject: Kernstown Conunons Via: Internal Project File #: Quantity File # Date Description Transmitted ® Herewith 1 Revised Plans ❑ Under separate cover Material ❑ Originals ❑ Photocopies ❑ Diskette ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ❑ Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia Purpose ❑ Your Use ❑ Your Files Notes: ® Approval ❑ Please Return: Corrected Prints ❑ Please Submit: Revised Prints Received by: Date: • Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 June 16, 2005 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #10-05; Kerustown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Ron: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments 1) Contact Information. The contact information on the cover sheet for the Planning Department is incorrect; Ms. Eddy does not work on site plans. The person of contact for the Planning Department should state "Planner II". 2) Route 11 Landscaped IVIedians. The road layout shown on the plan does not reflect raised, landscaped medians on Route 1 1 as discussed at the MDP level. 3) Protect Information. On Sheet 2 of 30 under project information, include the information for the Outback. 4) Site Notes. On Sheet 2 of 30 under site notes, note number five needs to include that any signage along Route 1 l must be a monument -style sign. 5) Parking Requirements. On Sheet 2 of 30 under parking requirements, the Theater requires 679 seats but only 676 spaces are being provided. Revise the parking calculations to meet the minimum. 6) Entrance Detail. On Sheet 4 of 30, the entrance detail that is shown in case the limited access break is not granted contains a note that states "both the entrances...". There is only one entrance located within the limited access area and the note needs to be revised. 7) Bike Path and Sidewalks. Per the MDP, a bike path is required along Route 1 l as well as sidewalks along both sides of all proposed streets within the development. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Re: Review Comments, Kernstown Commons June 16, 2005 Page 2 8) Sif�nalization. Show the traffic signal on the southern entrance. 9) Comments 9-11: Pursuant to the agreements pertaining to the limits of use and the commitments made on the Master Development Plan, particular attention should be made to comments 9-1 1. 10) Theater and Hotel Locations. The back parking areas and the Fire lanes for the theater and hotel area located within the limits of use. The buildings should be moved forward to ensure that at least the fire lanes to access the rear of the structures are retained 11) Parking, in Limits of Use. The parking areas that are currently within the limits of use on the site need to be extra/in addition to the required amount. The required number of parking spaces need to be delineated I in another location on the site to ensure that if the spaces within the limits of use are taken out that the site will still have adequate parking. 12) Limits of Use Statement. The statement that will be placed on the MDP about the limits of use also needs to be placed on the site plan. 13) Interstate Overlay Sims. This site is allowed to have one interstate overlay sign, the location and height of this sign need to be shown on the site plan. Landscaping Plan 14) Hedge Rows. On Shcet 30, the planting size for the hedges must be a minimum of36" in height at time of planting, provide this size requirement in the plant schedule. 15) Lot 2 Landscaping Calculations. On Sheet 30, the calculations for lot 2 show 34 required trees and 33 provided; revise to show 34 provided. Also, a hedge row needs to be provided along the parking area facing lot 1. 16) Perimeter Parking Calculations. On Shect 30 under site totals it states that there is 849,856sfof interior parking surface. Interior parking surface is the parking lot and would be impervious surface. The impervious area for the three lots under "Interior/Exterior Parking Lot Landscape" has a combined total o of 390,771 sf of impervious surface; please clarify why these two totals do not match. 17) Landscaping Substitutions. On Sheet 30, provide a note 20 that states landscaping substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick Count}' Planning Department. 18) Othei• Lot Landscaping. On Sheets 28 and 29, remove the landscaping from the lot that appears to be the future McDonalds. M Mr. Ron Mislowsky Re: Review Continents, Kernstown Commons June 16, 2005 Page 3 After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Insimctions Department, the Frederick County Engineer, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County health Department, and the Frederick County Aiihort Authority. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Ooil,a Candice C. Mills Planner II Attachment CEM/bad cc: Orange Partners, LLC, 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 0 9NN'. Clifford & associates 0 I —+ ci is ion of Patton I -lams Rust Z Associutes• fix: j' JUN 14 2005 L! :I l lI 0..I_Ii ' rs Sul�nv)ca e nrr hlr�t 1,, II, f , P! - - 11Fia�-1, 2005 Candice Perkins Frederick County Planning 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 M AY 1 2 2005 I �.T RE: Review Comment for Site Plan #10-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Mrs. Perkins, We have addressed the comments dated March 31", 2005 and offer the following Presponses: Review Comments: Comment 1. Application. The site plan application submitted has not been v.:aln;. OFFICES signed. Response 1. Please find enclosed a signed site plan application. Comment 2. Special Limited Power of Attorney Form. Please have the property owner sign the attached Special Limited Power of Attorney Form prior to further review or approval. This form should be notarized and completed to grant the applicant (you) with authorization to represent them for this site plan. Response 2. Please find attached a Power of Attorney Form sigi ed by the owner. u,A-Q.-.l,o OFFICES Comment 3. Developer. On the cover sheet, the developer needs to be identified. Response 3. The Owner, Applicant and Developer are the same. We have revised the Cover sheet to show the Developer information. WES, VISGINIA Comment 4. Vicinity Map. The scale of the vicinity map needs to be increased OFFICE to 1":2000'. Response 4. The vicinity map has been revised to a scale of 1":2000' T vC7 2139 cas 01!"3 Comment 5. Signature Line. Provide a signature line on the cover sheet for the 7 � ''"` `""' Zoning Administrator and a statement that his signature is only valid ` for five years. Z .) Response 5. The signature line for the Zoning Administrator and a statement that the signature is only valid for five years has been added on Sheet 1. Comment 6. Contact Information. The contact information on the cover sheet for the Planning Department is incorrect. Response 6. The Point of Contact for the County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development has been revised on Sheet 1. Comment 7. Adjoining Properties Information. On Sheet 3 of 30, provide the information for the Miller Honda Property. Response 7. Adjoining property information for the Miller Honda property has P-A been added on Sheet 3. W" Comment 8. Overall Plan Scale. The overall plan on sheet 3 states that it has a scale of 1:50; this is incorrect. Response 8. The scale of the Overall Plan has been corrected to read 1"=100' {Sheet 31. Comment 9. Future Gas Station. The gas station shown on the corner of Route 11 and Route 37 should not show a building on it. Since none of the parking areas are shown, remove the structure and label the site a future development. Response 9. Lot 1 has been labeled as future development and the building layout that was previously shown has been removed. {Sheet 31 Comment 10. Other Uses. The buildings (as stated in comment 9) are shown with their respective parking lots; however, they do not include any other improvements. It should be appropriate to provide a statement on the plan that each of these lots will be site planned separately. Response 10. A note has been added stating that "This site plan is for the development of Theater, Hotel and Outback Steak House and all other structures will require a separate site plan showing parking, landscaping, side walk and other requirements which meet the Frederick County standards". (See Sheet 21 Comment 11. Limits of Use. Show the limits of use for the portion of the property along Route 37 and Interstate I-81 as depicted on the MDP. Response 11. The Voluntary Limits of Use line as shown on the MDP for the portion of the property along Route 37 and Interstate I-81 has been included in the plans. {See Sheets 3, 4 & 51 Comment 12. Limited Access Break Entrances. All of the proposed entrances are shown on this site plan. Provide a statement on the two entrances located within the limited access break, that they are contingent upon approval. Also provide a logical pavement edge for the parking areas and driving lanes if these entrances are not granted. Response 12. A detail has been on Sheet 4 which shows the alternate site layout should the limited access break entrance not be granted. We have also added a note which states that the entrances onto Route 11 are PRA contingent upon approval. f See Sheet 41 Comment 13. Width of Travel Aisles & Sidewalks. The main travel isles for this site need to be at least 24' wide. While some of the travel isles are 24' many that contain parking spaces arc reduced to 20'. There needs to be an appropriate internal road system that serves these properties that is 24' wide. It would be helpful to shade the main private road that will circulate through this development. Sidewalks with appropriate "brick" crosswalks should be provided throughout this development especially along the main travel aisles of the development to promote pedestrian access between uses. Response 13. The parking lot layout has been adjusted to provide a main travel isle with a minimum width of 24'. The path of die main travel isle has been shaded on die Overall Plan. f See sheets 3, 4 & 51 Comment 14. Disturbed Area. Please clarify why the disturbed area is almost four acres more than the site area. Response 14. Apart from the site area, the total area of disturbance includes approximately 1,500 linear feet of frontage and road improvements to Route 11. The width of the improvements along Route 11 is approximately 120', which accounts for the 4 acre difference in Site area and disturbed area. Comment 15. Building Restriction Lines, The BRL's need to be shown for Route 37 and I-81. Response 15. The required 50' Building setback lines for Route 37 and I-81 has been added on Sheets 4 & 5. Comment 16. Curb. On the site plan, label the type of curb being used (CG-6). Response 16. The type of curbs being used are now labeled on Sheets 4 & 5 Comment 17. Box Features. On the site plan there arc features that are shown as bold boxes; however, these boxes are not shown in the legend. On the site plan or the legend, label what these boxes arc intended to be. Response 17. The box features referenced were preliminary transformer pad locations. To eliminate any confusion we have removed the locations from this Site Plan. The final locations of transformer pads will be included with the individual site plans for the respective buildings. R-A Comment 18. Route 11 and Entrance Configuration. Once approved by PH VDOT, the Valley Pike improvements need to be shown and the entrance configurations and lanes coming off of Route 11 need to be depicted on site plan. Response 18. We have taken note of the above comment and will provide the Valley Pike improvements and entrance configurations on the plan. Lot 2 — Country Inn Comment 19. VDOT Easement. The Country Inn is shown over top of VDOT's permanent construction and maintenance casement. Please provide verification from VDOT that they are amenable to the hotel being place over their casement. Response 19. With the revisions to the Storm Drainage System we have shown the VDOT Permanent Construction and Maintenance easement to be vacated. We have provided a storm drainage casement from the existing culverts under Route 11 to the proposed 12'x6' Box Culvert and the Stormwater Management Pond. {See Sheet 13} Comment 20. Loading Spaces. This hotel does not have any loading spaces. The total floor area of the hotel is 40,650 square feet and, therefore, requires two loading spaces. Response 20. The two (2) required loading spaces of dimensions 12' x 45' have been added for the hotel. {See Sheet 41 Comment 21. Dumpster Screening. The duinpster is required to be screened by landscaping or a six foot high opaque board -on -board fence; specify which is being used. • • Response 21. Dumpster locations at Hotel and Outback Steak House and trash compactor location at dhe Theater will be screened by opaque board - on -board fence. It is labeled on the plans and details of the fence have been added on the detail sheet. {See Sheets 4 and 111 Comment 22. Other Uses. The hotel is being parked for only 65 rooms. Please state if this hotel is going to have any meeting rooms or other uses. Response 22. There are no meeting rooms or restaurants proposed to be within this hotel. We have added a note regarding this on Sheet 2 under the Project Summary. Comment 23. Gross Floor Area. Under the project summary on Sheet 2, it is PW� unclear why the gross floor area of die hotel is less than the total floor area. Response 23. The gross floor area shown is the area per floor. The gross floor area for each floor is 13,550 s.f. and the total floor area for the hotel is 40, 650 s.f. which is three times 13,550 s.f. Comment 24. Circular Feature. There is a circular feature shown in the front yard in of the inn. Label what this feature is going to be. Response 24. The circular feature shown in front of the Inn has been labeled. This feature is a fountain surrounded by a landscaped courtyard area. {See Sheet 41 Lot 3 — R/C Theater Comment 25. Theater Height. The maximum height in the B2 zoning district, unless an exception is specified, is 35'. Theaters do not have an exception to die maximum height requirement and, therefore, must meet the 35' height requirement or request an amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow theaters to extend beyond the specified height requirements. Response 25. The 54' height was a miscalculation on the previous note sheet. The maximum building height is 35'-4" and the maximum building height allowable is 35' in the B-2 Zoning District. The additional 4" is due to the parapet wall and will be un-occupied. {See Sheet 21 Comment 26. DumFster Screening. Only one dumpster is being provided for a 2,417 seat theater. Additional dumpsters should be provided to accommodate d-ie site. Also, the dumpster is required to be screened by landscaping or a six foot high opaque board -on -board fence. Specify which is being. Response 26. The trash receptacle shown is a trash compactor and has sufficient capacity for the theater facility. The location has been moved to allow for easier pickup. This will be screened by opaque board -on- board fence. It is labeled on the plans and details of the fence have been added on the detail sheet. {See Sheets 4 and 111 Comment 27. Parking Areas in Front of Theater. The parking areas at the front of the theater are angled for one-way parking. This portion of the travel aisle should be increased to make the parking areas on both sides of the private road accessible to vehicle traffic coming from PHRA both ways. Response 27. The travel aisle in front of the theater has been adjusted to provide 24' drive aisles for ease of vehicle movements. The handicap parking in front of the theater has also been revised to 90' angle for parking to be accessible from both ways. {See Sheet 4} Comment 28. Parking Lot Islands. The parking lots for the theater are very large. For aesthetics it would be better to provide landscaped as pointed out on the plan to break up these areas. Response 28. Additional landscaping islands have been provided in the theater parking area. {See Sheets 4,5, 28 & 29) Comment 29. Landscaped Areas. The entire area around the theater structure is labeled as being concrete walkways; however on the landscaping plan there areas shown with trees. Please specify where the concrete areas stop and the landscaping begin. Response 29. Any landscaping within the concrete area will be located within a tree well with a tree grate. Comment 30. Brick Walkways. The pictures circulated of the development show brick walkways in front of the theater as well as two that extend across the street to the grass area. If this is still the intent of the development to include these features, show the diameters of the brick walk areas and label them. Response 30. The brick walkways and crosswalks have been added to the plan view. {See Sheets 6 & 7} Landscaping Plan Comment 31. Shade Tree Requirements. The sections labeled shade tree rcquircmerts need to be changed to interior parking rcquircments. Response 31. The plat has been amended to reflect the interior parking requirements. Comment 32. Hedge Rows. On Sheet 30, the type of evergreens being used for the hedgerows and the number of shrubs required needs to be specified. Response 32. Shrubs have been added to the plat as well as reflected in the tabulation. PH Comment 33. Lot 2 Landscaping Calculations. On Sheet 30, the calculations for lot 2 show a required 11 trees for the interior parking and 34 required perimeter trees. It is listed that 57 interior trees are being provided; however, a combined total of the perimeter and interior landscaping trees will be 57. Please clarify to show how many Of each type arc being provided. Response 33. The calculations have been amended on Sheet 30. Comment 34. Lot 3 Landscaping Calculations. On Slicet 30, the calculations for lot 3 show a required 70 trees for the interior parking and 90 required perimeter trees. This adds up to a minimum of 160 trees for the interior and perimeter parking. It is listed that 102 interior trees and 102 perimeter trees are being provided; this would add up to 205 trees. It appears that this number is intended to be a combined total; however it is less than the required. Also, under the plant schedule only 159 trees are provided. Please revise these figures to be constant. Response 34. TIIC calculations have been amended on Sheet 30. Comment 35. Landscaping Maiintenance. On Shect 30, provide a statement that all landscaping will conform to 165-36B of the Frederick County Ordinance. Response 35. A note has been added to Sheet- 30 to reflect that landscaping will conform to 165-3613 of the lrederick County Ordinance. C� Comment 36. Screening from I-81. Areas of evergreen trees should be used along the back portion of die site to screen the development from the interstate. Response 36. Evergreen trees were used along die portion of d1c site that fronts Interstate 81. It should be noted that due to space limitations dzese evergreen trees have been included as part of the canopy tree requirements. We trust dhe above responses address all of your comments and concerns. Should you have any questions concerning diese responses, please feel free to call. /� Regards, P R- � PATTON HARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES, pc ejonald A. Mislowsky, I .E., VP i Special Limited Power of Attor ley County of Frederick, Virginist� Frederick Planning Web Site: www.coSredenck.iiii- Department of Planning do Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) Nick Nerangis, Nick Nerangis, Jr., Steve Nerangis & Lisa Limoges (Phone) 540-667-1322 (Address) 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (its), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument # 040010118 and is described as Parcel:10 Lot: Block: A Section: 75 Subdivision: _ do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name)Charles E. Maddox. PHR+A (Phone)540-667-2139 (Address) 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Winchester, VA 22601 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including Rezoning (including proffers) _ Conditional Use Permits Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) _ Subdivision X Site Plan My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this LQ day of0-MA 200_1�) State of Virginia, City/County of y 1��(. �,� t —To-wit: ( e7, � l�-�i I I a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this day of ij(, 200 (��ALU______My Commission Expircs:ot i niJ Notary Public a • d EEt1O_S99_Oi1S NDISAHON I M d2IHd e0E : LO SO SO ReW • 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development Use only. Date application received Application # Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return. j MAY 1 2 2005 1. Project Title: Kernstown Commons 2. Location of Property: West of I-81, east side of US Route 11 and (Address): immediately south of VA Route 37 3. Property Owner: Orange Partners, LLC Address: 500 Pegasus Court Winchester, VA 22602 Telephone: 540-667-1322 4. Applicant/Agent: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 5. Designer: Patton Harris RLISt & Associates, pc Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Contact: Ron Mislowsky Minor 6a. Is this a standard o i-ninor' site plan? StandarpoX 6b. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original X Revised 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 31.5327 ac 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 31.5327 ac 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: 75-A-10 b) Current Zoning B-2 c) Present Use: Vacant d) Proposed Use: Commercial e) Adjoining Property Use(s) Vacant & commercial 0 Adjoining Property Identification Number (s) 75-A-213, 3, 5, 10A, 11C, 75A-6-B-41B g) Magisterial District (s) Shawnee I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature At7 v _ Date `� �� COUN of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 May 24, 2005 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rejection of Revised Site Plan 00-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Ron: The revised site plan for Kernstown Commons is being rejected at this time. The Master Development that was reviewed by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors on March 23, 2005 contained only a stormwater management pond within the Limits of Use on the property. On the initial site development plan, received on February 22, 2005 that was submitted for Kernstown Commons, the Limits of Use for the site was not depicted and I asked for the line to be shown. The revised plan received on May 12, 2005 does have the Limits of Use shown; however, a large portion of the required parking for the Theater and the Hotel are located within the Limits of Use area. As such, the revised site development plan is being rejected and returned to you. This plan needs to be revised to remove everything but the stormwater pond from the Limits of Use. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II Attachment CEP/dlw cc: Orange Partners, LLC, 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 Eric Lawrence, Planning Director 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 [Fwd: Kernstown Commons] Subject: [Fwd: Kernstown Commons] From: Eric Lawrence <elawrenc@co.frederick.va.us> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:32:51 -0400 To: Candice Perkins <cperkins@co.frederick.va.us> Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Director Department of Planning and Development County of Frederick 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 540.665.5651 540.665.6395 fax elawrenc@co.frederick.va.us www.co.frederick.va.us Subject: Kernstown Commons From: "Ingram, Lloyd"<Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT. Virginia. gov> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:17:04 -0400 To: "'Cluistopher.Mohn@phra.com"' <Cliristopher.Mohn@plira.coni> CC: "Ingram, Lloyd" <Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov>, "Eric Lawrence (E-mail)" <elawrene@co.frederick.va.us> «... OLE_Obj... >> «... OLE_Obj... >> DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 April 21, 2005 The application for site plan for this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 11, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. We have the following comments: • The proposed entrance and Route 11 configuration will not meet the traffic volumes identified in the development's TIA. • Please resubmit once the Route 11 lane configuration has been corrected. 1 of 2 5/4/2005 8:18 Alva [Fwd: Kernstown commons] • Please note that the two proposed north entrances required limited access break approval and should be noted as such or removed from the site plan. If any work is performed on the State's right-of-way, a land use permit will need to be applied for and issued to cover said work. The permit is issued by this office and requires a fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540)984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) Content -Type: message/rfc822 Kernstown Commons.eml Content -Encoding: 7bit 2 of 2 5/4/2005 8:18 AM is J' � • ♦GG �4 � �7�, COUNTY of FREDERICK -- Department of Public Works �— 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 March 14, 2005 Mr. Ronald A. Mislowsky, Jr., P.E. Vice President Patton Harris Rust & Associates, p.c. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan Comments - Kernstown Commons Frederick County, Virginia Dear Ron: Upon review of the subject site plan, we offer the following comments: 1) Provide a copy of the geotechnical engineering report for the proposed site work. Also, the report should include a slope stability analysis of the stormwater pond embankment since a 2:1 slope has been proposed. 2) Provide a copy of the retaining wall design as well as top of wall spot elevations for the proposed retaining wall. 3) It will be necessary to address permanent maintenance of the steep slopes reflected in this site plan. Mowing 2:1 slopes is difficult at best, therefore, provide recommendations the type of permanent stabilization to be utilized onsite. 4) The existing sediment basin located along the eastern portion of the site shall be filled in during completion of the parking lot. Also, it appears that area located along the northern portion of the site will drain to the new stormwater pond. Consequently, it will be necessary to submit an intermediate erosion and sediment (E&S) control plan detailing the methods of protection to be utilized during the conversion of the sediment basin to a stormwater pond. Because the majority of the Phase I E&S control will be removed during site grading, it will be necessary to provide perimeter E&S control in addition to the inlet protection proposed for the site. Provide a detail of the E&S control protection to be utilized within the stormwater pond. Currently, none has been proposed. The stormwater pond E&S control is necessary to ensure that sediment will not drain through and deposit into the existing I-81 drainage network. 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Kernstown Commons Site Plan Comments Page 2 March 14, 2005 5) The plan does not indicatc whether or not a street name sign will be required. If the main entrance road will be named, provide the Frederick County street name sign detail on the plan as well as the proposed road name. Two 6" x 9" signs shall be required (one in northbound lane and one in sorthbound lane) if a road name is proposed. 6) The slope in the proposed stormwater pond is less than 2 percent. This slope will create a problem with standing water in the bottom of the pond. Therefore, a french drain, concrete trickle drain or other drainage method shall be provided to allow the bottom of the pond to drain properly. Once these comments have been addressed, submit one set of the plan for further review. Sincerely, Joe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/rls cc: Planning and Development file A:U<rrus(owl IcoinmoIIsvom.1cpd c- j Kernsto,wn Commons Subject: Kernstolwm Commons From: "Christopher M. Mohn" <Chris.Mohn@phra.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:31:55 -0500 To: <cperkins@co.frederick.va.us> CC: "Chuck Maddox" <cmaddox@shentel.net>, "Chuck Maddox" <cmaddox@shentel.net>, <T'om.Price@phra.com> Hi Candice! If possible, I would appreciate a copy of the ten "unresolved" items involving the Kernstown Commons MDP that you referenced during the PC meeting. I would note that these additional issues were not shared during our 10 AM meeting on 3/2 concerning this MDP, which was also attended by Mike Ruddy. I've reviewed the submitted plan against Jeremy's comments (dated June 28, 2004), and every item involving a substantive ordinance issue has been addressed. The water line connection to Miller will be deleted, and the note concerning interstate overlay signage will also be modified to clarify that only one such sign is permitted. Beyond these two items, clarification regarding staff concerns is needed so that appropriate changes can be made for BOS review (with the exception of policy issues, which we understand). Your help is most appreciated! Best, Chris Christopher M. Mohn, AICP Director of Planning Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 P 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 Email Christopher. MohnCcD_phra.com www.phra.com I of 1 3/4/2005 8:24 AM r: • March 31, 2005 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 1 17 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Whichester, Virginia 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan P10-05; Kernstown Commons Property Identification Number (PIN): 75-A-10 Dear Ron: r-t .. E,.: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Application. The site plan application submitted has not been signed. 2) Special Limited Power of Attorney Form. Please have the property owner sign the attached Special Limited Power of Attorney Form prior to further review or approval. This form should be notarized and completed to grant the applicant ()'ou) with authorization to represent them for this site plan. 3) Developer. On the cover sheet, the developer needs to be identified. 4) Vicinity Map. The scale of the vicinity map needs to be increased to 1:2000'. 5) Signature Line. Provicle a signature line on the cover sheet for the Zoning Admin istrator and a statement that his signature is only valid for five years. 6) Contact Information. The contact information on the cover sheet for the Planning Department is incorrect. 7) Adjoining Properties Information. On Sheet 3 of 30, provide the information for the Miller Honda Property. 8) Overall Plan Scale. The overall plan on sheet 3 states that it has a scale of 1:50; this is incorrect. 9) Future Gas Station. The gas station shown on the corner of Route 1 1 and Route 37 should not show a building on it. Since none of the parking areas are shown, remove the structure and label the site as future development. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • Page 2 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Review Comments for S.P. 910-05 March 31, 2005 10) Other Uses. The buildings (as stated in comment 9) are shown Nvith their respective parking lots; however, they do not include any other improvements. It would be appropriate to provide a statement on the plan that each of these lots will be site planned separately. 11) Limits of Use. Show the limits of use for the portion of the property along Route 37 and Interstate 1-81 as depicted on the MDP. 12) Limited Access Break Entrances. All of the proposed entrances are shown on this site plan. Provide a statement on the two entrances located within the limited access break, that they are contingent upon approval. Also provide a logical pavement edge for the parking areas and driving lanes ifthese entrances are not granted. 13) Width of Travel Aisles & Sidewalks. The main travel isles for this site need to be at lease 24' wide. While some of the travel isles are 24' many that contain parking spaces are reduced to 20'. There needs to be an appropriate internal road system that serves these properties that is 24' wide. It would be helpful to shade the main private road that will circulate through this development. Sidewalks with appropriate "brick" crosswalks should be provided throughout this development especially along the main travel aisles of the development to promote pedestrian access between uses. 14) Disturbed Area. Please clarify why the disturbed area is almost four acres more than the site area. 15) Buildina, Restriction Lines. The BRL's need to be shown for Route 37 and I-81. 16) Curb. On the site plan, label the type of curb being used (CG-6). 17) Box Features. On the site plan there are features that are shown as bold boxes; however, these boxes are not shown in the legend. On the site plan or the legend, label what these boxes are intended to be. 18) Route 11 and Entrance Configuration. Once approved by VDOT, the Valley Pike improvements need to be shown and the entrance configurations and lanes coming off of Route 1 1 need to be depicted on site plan. Lot 2 — Count►-y Inn 19) VDOT Easement. The CounUy Inn is shown over top of VDOT's permanent construction and maintenance easement. Please provide verification from VDOT that they are amenable to the hotel being placed over their easement. 20) Loading Spaces. This hotel does not have any loading spaces. The total floor area of the hotel is 40,650 square feet and, therefore, requires two loading spaces. 21) Dumpster Screening. The dumpster is required to be screened by landscaping or a six foot high opaque Page 3 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Review Comments for S.P. #10-05 March 31, 2005 board -on- board fence; specify which is being used. 22) Other Uses. The hotel is being parked for only 65 rooms. Please state if this hotel is going to have any meeting rooms or other uses. 23) Gross Floor Area. Under the project summary on Sheet 2, it is unclear why the gross floor area of the hotel is less than the total floor area. 24) Circular Feature. There is a circular feature shown in the front yard of the inn. Label what this feature is going to be. Lot 3 — RIC Theater 25) Theater Height. The maximtm height in the B2 zoning district, unless an exception is specified, is 35'. Theaters do not have an exception to the maximum height requirement and, therefore, must meet the 35' height requirement or request an amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow theaters to extend beyond the specified height requirement. 26) Dumpster Screening. Only one dumpster is being provided for a 2,417 seat theater. Additional dumpsters should be provided to accommodate the site. Also, the dumpster is required to be screened by landscaping or a six foot high opaque board -on -board fence. Specify which is being. 27) Parking Areas in Front of Theater. The parking areas at the front of the theater are angled for one-way parking. This portion of the travel aisle should be increased to make the parking areas on both sides of the private road accessible to vehicle traffic coming from both ways. 28) Parking Lot Islands. The parking lots for the theater are very large. For aesthetics it would be better to provide landscaped islands as pointed out on the plan to break up these areas. 29) Landscaped Areas. The entire area around the theater structure is labeled as being concrete walkways; however on the landscaping plan there area areas shown with trees. Please specify where the concrete areas stop and the landscaping begins. 30) Brick Walkways. The pictures circulated of the development show brick walkways in front of the theater as well as two that extend across the street to the grass area. if this is still the intent of the development to include these features, show the diameters of the brick walk areas and label them. Landscaping Plan 31) Shade Tree Requirements. The sections labeled shade tree requirements need to be changed to interior parking requirements. r Page 4 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Review Comments for S.P. 410-05 March 31, 2005 32) Hedge Rows. On Sheet 30, the type of evergreens being used for the hedge rows and the number of Shrubs required needs to be specified. 33) Lot 2 Landscaping Calculations. On Sheet 30, the calculations for lot 2 show a required 1 i trees for the interior parking and 34 required perimeter trees. It is listed that 57 interior trees are being provided; however, a combined total of the perimeter and interior landscaping trees will be 57. Please clarify to show how many of each type are being provided. 34) Lot 3 Landscaping Calculations. On Sheet 30, the calculations for lot 3 show a required 70 trees for the interior parking and 90 required perimeter trees. This adds up to a minimum of 160 trees for the interior and perimeter parking. It is listed that 102 interior trees and 102 perimeter trees are being provided; this would add up to 205 trees. It appears that this number is intended to be a combined total; however it is less than the required. Also, under the plant schedule only 159 trees are provided. Please revise these figures to be constant. 35) Landscaping Maintenance. On Sheet 30, provide a statement that all landscaping will conform with § 165-36B of the Frederick County Ordinance. 36) Screening from I-81. Areas of evergreen trees should be used along the back portion of the site to screen the development from the interstate. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that i may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Ins])ections Depcn-tment, the Frederick County Engineer, the Frederick Count, Fire Marshal, the Freclerick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Health Department, and the Frederick County Ah-poi-t Authority. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Sincerely, Candice E. Mills Planner II Attachment CEM/bad cc: Orange Partners, LLC, 500 Pegasus Court, Winchester, VA 22602 gilbert w. clifford &&sociates a division of Patton H arris Rust a Associates,pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 'T{ A 117 East Piccadilly Street, Sute 200 PH 1 ` Winchester, Virginia22601 T 540 667.2139 F 540 665 0493 Transmittal t J i To: Mr. Mark Cher -an Organization/Company: Frederick County Subdivision Administrator Address: Telephone Number: Date: From: Project Name/Subject: Via: 3/16/05 Randy Stowers Kemstown Commons Internal Project File #: Quantity File # Date Description Transmitted z Herewith 3/ 16/05 Final Plats-Kemstown Commons El Under separate cover Material ❑ Originals ❑ Photocopies ❑ Diskette ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ❑ Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia Purpose ® Your Use ❑ Your Files Notes: ie Approval V Submittal -Please review and advise. Thank you. ❑ Please Return: LAh/ N� / Sim.✓ c�c' /,>.P�y�' Z'` ©v/ %r�vEtJ Corrected Prints ✓e/6 Si.�'i��S �a .�.� ,�c•�a,� S / A.) Ark C ,-- /_)•,T ❑ Please Submit: Revised Prints Received by: Date: �he� Site Plan Information Checklist The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1. 2. ✓ 4. 5. 6. 7. 9 General Site Information Y N Name of proposed development. Name, address, and phone number of owner. Name, address, and phone number of developer. s Name, address, and phone number of designer. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) ✓ 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site 15 Use, zoning, and Property Identification Number (PIN#) of all adjoining properties. This includes properties located across right- 0 of -ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. General Site (con't) Y N 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. 19. The location and type of all dwelling units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. — �t;ncc ,6 N 1 A 22. Location and area of common open space. 2 . a The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. t� 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. 6noo-O Kckve- mcyc `JI'Y"'n � C, S K Building Information Y N 7. The height of all buildings and structures. 8. Location of all buildings, structures and uses.- n e6c\ A-D �9 The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 1 liYccn ,no+ c ppYD v�e c,'� 10 • • 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utilities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. / 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. V 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parkin Y N 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. c-) o)a o� C ��S-c n oI ;n lip QvaQ Location and dimensions of all parking and loading pa 41. cks, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42 Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and t Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 04. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, / sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. . . .49 Landscaping Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and / location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. 12 • SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Deve op;a se only. Date application received a Application # /0 bs Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return. 1. Project Title: Kernstown Commons 2. Location of Property: West of I-81, east side of US Route 11 and (Address): immediately south of VA Route 37 3. Property Owner: Orange Partners, LLC Address: 500 Pegasus Court Winchester, VA 22602 Telephone: 540-667-1322 4. Applicant/Agent: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 5. Designer: Patton Hams Rust & Associates, pc Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Contact: Ron Mislowsky • 6a. Is this a standard or `minor' site plan? 6b. Is this an original or revised site plan? 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: b) Current Zoning c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: e) Adjoining Property Use(s) f) Adjoining Property Identification Number (s) g) Magisterial District (s) • Standard X Original X 31.5327 ac Minor Revised 31.5327 ac 75-A-10 B-2 Vacant Commercial Vacant & commercial 75-A-2E, 3, 5, 10A, 11 C, 75A-6-B-41 B Shawnee I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature Date Pi Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of Planning and Development 107 N. Kent St. PAP'... Attn: County Planner Fourth Floor 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Address: c/o Ronald A. Mislowsky 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Name of development and/or description of the request: Kernstown Commons Location of property: West of I-81, east of US Route 11 and immediately south of VA Route 37 Planning and Development's Comments: Planning and Development use only Date received Date revision received Incomplete Incomplete Date reviewed Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) Date approved gilbert w. clifford & associates a dMsion of Patton Harris Rust b Associates,pc Engineerm Surveyor-s. Planners. Landscape Architects. RT A117 East Piccaddy Street, Sdte 2W Winchester, Virgins 22601 PH 540667 2139 F 540.665.0493 To: I1oyd Ingram, VDOT Joe Wilder, Public Works John Whitacre, FCSA Tim Welsh, Fire and Rescue John Trenary, Inspections March Cheran, Planning From: Ron Mislowsky Date: February 17, 2005 Project Name/Subject: Kernstown Commons PHR+A Project file Number: cc: Nick Nerangis Richie Pifer Memorandum On behalf of Orange Partners, we are pleased to submit, for site plan approval, plans for the development of 2 sites on approximately 31 acres in Kernstown. An 84 room motel and 2800 seat theater complex, along with associated roadway and utility extensions and site preliminary grading are proposed. The development of the remaining 6 out lots will require separate site plan applications for each proposed use. This is similar to the procedure just finalized for the Sherando Towne Center. Once this site plan has been reviewed and comments addresses, final subdivision plats will be submitted for administrative approval. The site is served by FCSA water and sewer. The water is extended from across Route 11 through the former "Outback Steakhouse site" to Kernstown Commons. The site drains to a new wet well mounted pump station which discharges through a 4" force main along Route 11 to a manhole at the Prosperity Industrial Park. The site drains to an existing storm conveyance channel constructed by VDOT during the Route 37 construction. This flow will be diverted around the motel site. The site drains to a new detention pond sized to limit discharge to the Interstate right-of-way to 10 year predevelopment levels. The updated erosion control measures are specified on the plans. A Land Disturbance Permit has been issued for the property. Major improvements to the Route 11 right-of-way are proposed. A widening to meet the requirements of the TIA are specified. Please note, these plans anticipate that the limited access break request will be approved by VDOT. Should that break not be approved the northern site access shown will be removed prior to final site plan approval. All dry utilities will be extended from the Route 11 right-of-way. Preliminary routings through the site area shown. Appropriate copies of the plans and stormwater calculations are enclosed here for your review. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Document Approval Form FF7 2 J PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCU?vIENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TB4E OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROP7DE COMMENTS AS TO WHA T YOU WOULD LIKE TO HA VE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TEViE Candice David Mark Susan Eric COMMENTS: ZZ/0 Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): 0 0 ®� vo m «+ C « '� �, o c� ' v i v o �E �;Z o�C14 �; o 'v c U s � U t V O �aC3`rt, RECEIVED F�jRom<n ADDRESS DATE ' a 0 S (� WVn NO. 8132 RSS SI!53 � .LL ze la- --- ACCOUNT I CASH AMT PAID 3 CHECK - ^� BALANCE I OMONEY ROER I BY-1